Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
to practice their grammar using free website and self-study book continued by completing
questionnaire. The resource materials were taken from two representative grammar practice
websites and two self-study resource books. In the final phase the authors used semi structured
interviews that interviewed four selected participants. After recording the interview, the author
transcribed it.
Jarvis and Szymcyk (2010) said that in this study, there were 38 participants had been
selected from non-native speakers of English at British University that had registered on a presessional EAP (English for Academic Purpose). The English level of the participants were
measured by placement test. Therefore, in the second phase, the authors selected 13 participants
who had a willingness and were available in a time to have website grammar practice. In the
final phase, four participants were chosen to have the interview.
Based on the result of the study, the participants thought that learning grammar was
necessary. Furthermore, thirty of them said that they practiced their grammar independently. This
result provided confirmatory evidence that students do independent learning outside the
classroom for learning grammar as an important aspect. In the term of their preferences using
website or paper-based material, the authors put forward the view that the students preferred to
use self-study resource book on learning grammar. According to the data that presented in the
chart, Jarvis and Szymczyk (2010) stated that in comparison with website, the self-study books
were viewed more positively (p. 37). Thus, based on the interview result, the authors found
tendency of the participants to use self-study books even though it seemed systematic and
sometimes bored because the books are always available in anytime. On the basis of the evidence
currently available, it seems fair to suggest that students are still prefer to use paper-based
material for learning grammar independently rather than website based material. However,
participants response to website-based material was not completely negative but seemed to have
more disadvantages.
Above all, the writer found the article quite interesting. The authors presented arguments
of the study in chronological order. Research on the students view on learning grammar with
website and paper based material does not support the view that computer-assited language
learning (CALL) is an ideal primary material based on the students need. Yet not everyone
agrees that computer provides all materials that is needed. Computer has a role for independent
learning, but it cannot replace the role of paper-based resources book. To conclude, this study has
a great importance to the English teachers especially when they want to teach grammar. The
teachers should suggest the students to do independent learning cosistently in order to develop
their grammar comprehension. Then, the teachers should consider comprehensively to use
website-based or book-based as their primary resources based on students need. It also better to
suggest them to choose appropriate resources whether in websites or in self-study books so that
the students can easily find the resources.
Reference:
Jarvis, H and Szymczyk, M. (2010). Students View on Learning Grammar with Web- and BookBased Material. ELT Journal Volume 64/1 January 2010, 1-14.