Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
In developing the constitutive model for steel fibre reinforced concrete, insight of fibre behaviour during the
pullout is vital. In a freely and randomly orientated multi-fibre composite, not all fibres are aligned in the direction
of the applied load; instead, fibres lie at various angles to the loading direction. This paper reports on the results
of X-ray imaging of steel fibre reinforced concrete in tension. In this study, uniaxial tension tests with multi-fibres
randomly distributed and oriented in dog bone shaped specimens were conducted. It is observed that crack paths
find ways of minimum resistance, through a section with poor fibre dispersion and divert around fibre ends, where
possible. In large scale structural members where crack locations are not fixed by either geometry or load state,
variability in fibre dispersion and fibre-matrix interaction should be considered at the model level, rather than
incorporated in materials or member safety factors.
Keywords: Steel Fibre, Tension, Dispersion, Distribution, X-Ray, Fibre-Matrix Interaction
agents [12] and fibre type and fibre orientation [2, 13].
In spite of a belief sometimes expressed [2] that no
correlation exists between the behaviour of a single
fibre pullout test and the behaviour of bulk fibres in a
real composite matrix, the effectiveness of a fibres as
a medium of stress transfer is often assessed using
fibre pullout tests where slip between the fibres and
the matrix is monitored as a function of the applied
load.
INTRODUCTION
In the early 1960's, pioneering research into fibre
reinforced concrete was undertaken by Romualdi and
Batson [1] where it was demonstrated that the tensile
strength and crack resistance of concrete can be
improved by providing suitably arranged, closely
spaced, wire reinforcement. After 50 years of
research in the development and placement of fibres
in reinforced concrete, the concept has matured to the
stage where it is finding increasing use in practice.
The materials used for fibres have also seen
significant advancements including stainless steels
and complex polymers. As early as 1994, Banthia and
Trottier [2] recorded that fibres are used as a form of
shear reinforcement in reinforced concrete (RC)
structural elements, for blast resistance in structures,
as shotcrete in tunnel linings, for use in slope
stabilisation works and to limit early age shrinkage
cracking in large concrete pavements.
By adding fibres to a concrete mix the objective is
to bridge discrete cracks providing for some control
to the fracture process and increase the fracture
energy. Since the early work, the pullout mechanism
of discontinuous fibres embedded in a variety of
cementitious materials has been studied by a number
of researchers [3-7].
The current understanding of the behaviour of
fibre-matrix interfacial mechanics is based on a
number of pullout studies using single or multiple
fibres where steel fibres are embedded within a
cementitious matrix. The experimental parameters
investigated include the rate of loading [8-9], curing
and environmental temperatures [2, 10], the quantity
and quality of the matrix [11], addition of adhesive
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
The study consists of nineteen 30 mm thick dogbone shaped specimens with randomly distributed
25 mm long by 0.3 mm diameter end hooked fibres
with nominal yield strength of 2300 MPa and volume
of between 0.5% and 2% were cast and eleven
specimens were X-ray imaged prior to tensile testing.
The mortar mix used in the specimens was
composed of kiln dried Sydney sand and general
purpose Portland cement mixed with a sand and
cement ratio of 3:1 and water-cement ratio of 0.4. No
other additives were added in the mix design.
The testing arrangement is shown in Fig. 1. The
displacements in the direction of movement of the
loading jacks were measured using two linear
variable differential transducers (LVDTs), one placed
on each side of the specimen to allow for the X-ray
film to be attached. The displacement plotted is taken
as the average of the LVDT readings. Loading was
conducted using displacement control at a rate of
0.12 mm per minute up to the crack opening
displacement of 2 mm. The rate was then increased to
a minimum of 0.1 mm per minute, with further rate
increases introduced as necessary during the test.
1
presented in Fig 5.
3.0
200
Epoxy
0.5%
2.0
1.5
2.5
35
3.0
UT-Hom-0.5% (3)
UT-Hom-1.0% (2)
UT-Hom-1.5% (3)
UT-Hom-2.0% (3)
2.5
2.0
1.5%
1.5
0.5%
1.0
1.0%
0.5
2.0%
0.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Crack Opening Displacement (mm)
2.0
1.0%
0.5
1.5%
R1
45
2.0%
0.0
0.00
chemical
anchors
1.25
2.50
3.75
5.00
6.25
7.50
35
LVDT
Epoxy
P
200
Fig. 1
Fig. 3
(a)
(b)
Figure 4: Digital X-ray image along the crack path:
(a) before the image analysis and (b) after the
image analysis.
For a sample of statistical significance, the median
value of Ffd for samples taken within one dog-bone
specimen represents the average fibre volume
fraction, f. This data is plotted in Figure 6 for the
dog-bone shaped specimens for the different, known,
fibre volumetric ratios (f from 0.5% to 2.0%). With
the relationship Ffd and f established, for the given
fibre type and specimen thickness, (Fig. 6), the
volume fraction as a function of Ffd is determined as:
= (126 136 )
35
(1)
f = 0.005
30
0.025
20
0.020
15
10
0.015
5
0
0.000
0.010
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
Variation of f
0.005
(a)
Relative Frequency (%)
20
f = 0.010
0.000
0.0
15
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.006
0.009
0.012
0.015
0.018
0.021
Variation of f
(b)
20
0.1
10
0
0.003
f = 0.015
15
10
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
0.020
0.024
0.028
Variation of f
(c)
15
fd
Mean Fibre Dispersion Factor, Eq. (1) f
126 136 F fd
th
90 percentile characteristic value
th
75 percentile characteristic value
25
f = 0.020
10
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Variation of f
0.030
0.035
(d)
Figure 5: Distribution of fibres for fibre volume
percentage (f) of 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2.
With the fitting Eq. (1) established, variations in the
fibre volume fraction within one specimen can then
be determined. Note that the best predictions from Eq.
1 are when the results are interpolated, that is between
fibre volume fractions of between 0.005 and 0.02
3
concrete.
The pullout load, Pf, of an individual fibre can be
determined from
Pf b la d f
(2)
P b d f
(a)
la
i 1
(b)
Pc k0 fct bD
(d)
Figure 8: Fracture plane of dog-boned shaped
specimens for fibre volume concentration of
(a) 0.5%, (b) 1.0%, (c) 1.5% and (d) 2.0%
Fully and/or Partially Deformed
End-Hooked Fibres (%)
b d f
End-Hooked Fibres
lf = 25 mm
df = 0.3 mm
50
fy = 2300 MPa
Cement Mortar
fcm.ave = 41 MPa
40
(4)
(c)
60
(3)
la k0 fct Db
(5)
i 1
30
20
la.ave
10
lf
4
(6)
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Fibre Volume Concentration (%)
2.0
(7)
2 i 1 A fi 2 A f
Substituting Eqs. (6) and (7) into Eq. (5) gives the
fct
b f f
2k0
REFERENCES
[1] Romualdi JP and Batson GB, Behaviour of
reinforced concrete beams with closely spaced
reinforcement, ACI Journal, Vol. 60, June 1963,
pp. 775-789.
[2] Banthia N and Trottier JF, Concrete reinforced
with deformed steel fibres, Part I: Bond-slip
mechanisms, ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 91,
Sep. 1994, pp. 435-446.
[3] Gray RJ, Analysis of effect of embedded fibre
length on fibre debonding and pull-out from an
elastic matrix. Part 2 - application to steel fibrecementitious matrix composite system, Journal
of Materials Science, Vol. 19, May 1984, pp.
1680-1691.
[4] Gopalaratnam VS and Shah SP, Tensile failure
of steel fibre-reinforced mortar, Journal of
Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 113, Jan. 1987, pp.
635-652.
[5] Mandel JA, Wei S and Said S, Studies of the
properties of the fibre-matrix interfaced in steel
fibre reinforced mortar, ACI Materials Journal,
Vol. 84, Mar. 1987, pp. 101-109.
[6] Namur GG and Naaman AE, A bond stress
model for fiber reinforced concrete based on
bond stress slip relationship, ACI Materials
Journal, Vol. 86, Jan. 1989, pp. 45-57.
[7] Wang Y, Li CV and Backer S, Experimental
determination of tensile behavior of fiber
reinforced concrete, ACI Materials Journal,
Vol. 87, Sep. 1990, pp. 461-468.
[8] Hughes BP and Fattuhi NI, Fiber bond strength
in cement and concrete, Magazine of Concrete
Research, Vol. 27, Sep. 1975, pp. 161-166.
[9] Banthia N and Trottier JF, Deformed steel fibercementitious matrix bond under impact, Cement
and Concrete Research, Vol. 21, Jan. 1991, pp.
158-168.
[10] Banthia N and Trottier JF, Effects of curing
temperature and early freezing on the pullout
behaviour of steel fibres, Cement and Concrete
Research, Vol. 19, May 1989, pp. 400-410.
[11] Gray RJ and Johnston CD, Effect of matrix
composition on fibre/matrix interfacial bond
shear strength in fibre-reinforced mortar,
Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 14, Mar.
1984, pp. 285-296.
[12] Guerrero P and Namman AE, Effect of mortar
fineness and adhesive agents on pullout response
of steel fibres, ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 97,
Jan. 2000, pp. 12-20.
[13] Naaman AE and Shah SP, Pullout mechanism
in steel fibre-reinforced concrete, ASCE Journal
of the Structural Division, Vol. 102, Iss. 8, 1976,
pp. 1537-1548.
[14] Htut TNS, Fracture Processes in Steel Fibre
Reinforced Concrete, PhD Thesis, School of
(8)
f .optimum
2k0 fct
b f
(9)
Pf .max
d f la
(10)