Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Elle a toujours fire allure, la vieille dame malgr tout ce qu'on lui fait subir. Avec la mer
qui lui lche les pieds et les montagnes qui veillent sur elle, comment ne pas l'aimer quand
elle vous a vu naitre et grandir. Je suis extrmement fire d'tre portlouisienne.
(Anonymous, Map My Port-Louis, September 2016)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3
Background ............................................................................................................................ 3
Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 3
Description of the tool ........................................................................................................... 4
The Map My Port-Louis survey ......................................................................................... 4
FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 5
General Findings .................................................................................................................... 5
Other General Findings .......................................................................................................... 7
Mobility ................................................................................................................................. 8
Bus stations .......................................................................................................................... 12
Arts, Heritage and Culture ................................................................................................... 13
Like and dislikes .................................................................................................................. 16
Security ................................................................................................................................ 20
Quality of Urban Life........................................................................................................... 22
Residential and housing ....................................................................................................... 24
Commerce & Business......................................................................................................... 27
The future of Port-Louis ...................................................................................................... 29
SAMPLE POPULATION PROFILE ...................................................................................... 30
CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 32
ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................... 33
INTRODUCTION
The survey entitled Map My Port-Louis serves the purpose of participatory urbanism in the
context of the Port-Louis capital city. Participatory Urbanism (PU) is about how ordinary
people make sense of places and spaces. It is based on the idea of creating socio-political
agency with an underlying action that involves revising or reinterpreting existing
infrastructure. In the Mauritian context, there has been no previous large-scale initiative to
deploy such a method in the field of urban development or regeneration.
Background
The urban regeneration of the capital city has been declared to be a government priority in
the last budget program of 2016. The regeneration is understood to be focused on the larger
central business district of Port Louis from Champ de Mars to the sea and from Reine de la
Paix to Plaine-Verte. Different projects converge towards the same goal of regenerating the
capital through economic and social initiatives (funded by both the public and private sectors)
but none include an open citizenship participation in the process of planning and
implementing projects. The Map My Port-Louis report fills this gap in order to provide
baseline data on how the citizens perceive the capital to be and to change over the upcoming
years.
Goals and Objectives
The overarching goal is to use citizens insights to inform policy makers, stakeholders and
project developers involved in strategic urban projects of Port-Louis. The crowdsourcing of
insights is done by using interactive maps and questions online. In turn, this creates an
anthropologically rich database that is generated by the local population. The realistic
participation of the public results in an invaluable human and social capital. The findings are
of qualitative, quantitative and geographic nature, and are crucial in rethinking the urban
framework and future of the city. The steps and objectives of the study were as follows:
STEPS
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
OBJECTIVE
TIMEFRAME
Identify existing programs, relevant
1 June to 30 June
stakeholders and identified issues in the
capital
Create, Design and Format the survey
questionnaire
Face-to-face field data collection
completed by Syntheses Mauritius in
Port Louis
Build a strong communication strategy
and campaign
Online data collection further to
promotion of citizen participation
online & engagement from all target
groups
1 July to 8 August
8 August to 16 September
5 September to 10 September
19 September to 31 October
FINDINGS
The findings of Map My Port-Louis involve:
Total number of respondents: 2642
Total number of visitors (Including those who did not answer anything): 5573
Total number of map responses (Geographical data): 17338
The findings are classified following the themes below:
Mobility
Arts and
Culture
Security
Residential
and Housing
Commerce &
Business
Quality of life
Type of
transport
system to
prioritize
Preferred
spots for arts
& culture
Less secure
areas
Type of
housing
preferred
Commercial
axis
Green space
areas
Essential
business
matters to
people
Public utilities
Pedestrianizing
Best transit
methods
Favorite
buildings
Disaster relief
and Accidents
Places that
people like
and dislike
Willingness to
move to PL
Pollution &
littering
Unwillingness
to leave PL
Parking spots
Culture & life
Use of bus
stations
General Findings
Citizens general opinion and feeling about the capital is crucial to understand their level of
engagement in the status of affairs of Port-Louis. It was found that the population views are
quite unanimous, with a major 75% of the population that are proud of the capital and 3%
that are indifferent.
Are you proud of your capital city?
Yes, definitely
Yes, quite
No, not really
No, not at all
I am indifferent
%
50
25
17
5
3
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
It was equally important to level their opinion about the sthetics of the capital and more
than 2000 people validated that, in general, they find Port-Louis to be a beautiful city versus
507 individuals that considered the contrary.
Do you think that Port Louis is a beautiful city?
Yes, definitely
45
Yes, quite
35
16
3
Do you think that Port Louis is a beautiful city?
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Life conditions
Commercial & Business
Security
Cleanliness
Cultural entertainment and nightlife
Quality of the urban structure
Implication of the population in organizing and managing the city
The relationship between citizens of Port Louis
I think that:
The relationship between citizens
Implication of the population in
Quality of the urban structure
Has improved more or less
Cleanliness
Security
Commercial & Business
Life conditions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Has degraded
Security
Cleanliness
Has degraded
Implication of population in organizing and
managing the city
As a result, main areas considered as degraded by the population and are worth focusing on
primarily are the security and cleanliness of the capital as well as the implication of the
population in the managing the city.
Mobility
Results point toward decreasing vehicles and improving pedestrian options:
Public transportation is a priority for most informants with peak results below:
71 80
61 70
51 60
41 50
31 40
21 30
11 20
1 10
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
600
By order of preference:
On foot
33%
Metro-leger
26%
15%
Bicycle
9%
7%
Taxi-boat
5%
Car-sharing
3%
It is important to note that the bus option here was not proposed, which may explain the high
motivation rate towards the metro-leger. This finding is consistent with the previous one on
the need to improve public transportation rather than private solutions.
Lets zoom in on the very high demand for a parking spot in Champs de Mars:
Profession related
Gender-related
Residential-related
10
>50% of the
respondents tagged
here
11
Bus stations
The main findings around the bus stations are relevant to access, activity and security.
Access to and from Victoria Station:
How would you prefer to cross from Victoria Station to Caudan
Waterfront?
Zebra crossing
Underground
Overhead
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
%
55
27
18
*There is a very high prevalence of women informants that have opted for the zebra crossing
option.
Commercial activity at Victoria Station and Immigration square is encouraged by 56% of
informants choosing the centralisation of hawkers here.
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
10%
16%
17%
200
100
56%
0
Do not Agree
Agree a little
Agree moderately
Agree fully
12
Aapravasi Ghat
Theatre
Museum
Caudan
Theatre
Citadelle
Champ de Mars
13
Theatre
Photography
Museum
Areas vary significantly except for the top three favourites around:
o Aapravasi Ghat
o Museum
o Theatre
There are less tags for informants earning Rs.5000 versus Rs.20000 which may
suggest that they intentionally omitted to respond or may not have reached this far in
the questionnaire. The latter option is less plausible as follow-up responses are
available for this group.
14
No tags on Champs
de Mars (cut-off)
Very low interest for
Caudan
Higher interest for
the Central Market
Line Barracks is
considered as a
general place for
arts, culture &
heritage
Extremely high
interest for Caudan
Champs de Mars is
tagged repetitively
China Towns area is
acknowledged here.
2.
8.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
4.
3.
7.
Jummah Mosque
Caudan Waterfront
Municipality Building
Theatre
Citadelle
Main Cathedral
Line Barracks
Place dArmes avenue
5.
6.
3.
Findings show that less of 5 informants have spotted the following heritage sites:
- Old granary
- Bazar central
- Aapravasi Ghat
- Fort George
15
Stratify places that people like places by order of activities and in priority
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The place that people liked based on their preference for a range of activities
Caudan
16
The variety of most disliked places (green) over liked places (turquoise)
Female Informants
Male Informants
17
Differentiated disliked
areas
Female
Victoria Bus station
Independence square
Jardin La Compagnie
Central market
Male
1.
2.
3.
4.
La Citadelle
Champs de Mars
Plaine Verte
Camp Yoloff
1. Shopping areas:
Caudan, Royal St,
John Kennedy St
2. Line Barracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
18
4.
3.
I think that
cleanliness
Has improved
Has degraded
more or less
more or less
Has not changed
29%
54%
17%
Cleanliness
Has not changed
Has degraded more or less
Has improved more or less
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
19
Security
The major finding lies in 57% of the population that considers security to have decreased
in the capital
I think that
security
Has improved
more or less
27%
Has degraded
more or less
57%
Security
Has not changed
Has degraded more or less
Has improved more or less
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Below are major findings on the areas where people feel insecure
20
Insecurity areas are mainly tagged at the Caudan Waterfront, along the M1 access.
Other areas to consider for security measures (red circles from left to right)
o Victoria Station
o Jardin de la Compagnie
o Independence square
o Citadelle
21
Priority
Secondary
Useless
The need for green spaces is considered as a priority by 67% of the sample
population.
High
Priority
67%
Priority
18%
Secondary Useless
3%
3%
22
23
%
7
15
31
47
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
New condominiums
40
Reconverted lofts
41
Existing housing
19
200
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
24
Yes
75
No
Unsure
9
16
No
Yes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
80% of residents of PL do not want to leave their neighborhoods nor change housing
Only 6% would stay in PL and consider changing housing
Only 8% would like to change cities
80%
6%
6%
Change cities
8%
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
25
900
High Priority
Priority
Secondary
Useless
14%
8%
18%
16%
45%
40%
19%
18%
9%
14%
Priority
Important but
not priority
Secondary
Useless
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
High
Priority
Priority
High
Priority
26
T
h
T
h
T
h
T
h
27
When asked about the status of commercial and business avenue, 60% of the sample state
that it has improved, 30% degraded, and 10% state that it has not changed.
28
Healthy city
Cultural
city
Safe city
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Childfriendly city
Green city
Healthy city: walk-able transits and open spaces for outdoor sports
Child-friendly city: play spaces and fun zones for children
Green city: Parks and more trees along highways and main public spaces
Safe city: More security, less poverty and less illegal activities
Cultural city: More shows, more museums, more heritage-sensitive activities
29
%
51
Female
Other
47
2
My age:
12-15
16-18
%
9
11
19-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-49
50-59
60 years and above
12
13
11
10
12
13
9
Other
Female
Male
0
200
400
600
800
My age:
60 years and above
40-49
30-34
19-24
12-15
0
50
100
150
200
30
%
23
20
20
3
3
24
1
5
My personal income
bracket
Rs 5000 or less
Rs 5001 - Rs 10000
Rs 10001 - Rs 15000
18
17
13
Rs 15001 - Rs 20000
Rs 20001 - Rs 25000
Rs 25001 - Rs 30000
Rs 30001 - Rs 35000
Rs 35001 - Rs 40000
Rs 40001 - Rs 50000
Rs 50001- Rs 60000
Above Rs 60000
10
6
6
6
5
4
3
11
%
45
3
16
previous home
7
18
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
200
400
600
800 1000
31
CONCLUSION
This study has been conducted to inform policy-makers, stakeholders, project developers and
heritage organizations on citizens insight of Port-Louis. The two phases (field and online) of
the project was crucial to achieve critical mass and sample representativity.
The findings reflect different aspects of human condition and quality of life in the urban
context of Mauritius. They are declined in 6 main sections namely: mobility, arts and culture,
security, residential and housing, commerce and business, and quality of life.
The study was conducted by Landscope (Mauritius) Ltd. in collaboration with Syntheses
Mauritius Ltd. Landscope (Mauritius) Ltd. also acknowledges the precious assistance of
different stakeholders including government bodies, private institutions, non-governmental
organisations, citizen alliances as well as all the informants who participated actively in the
survey.
Disclosure Note:
This document and the data it withholds is under the ownership of Landscope (Mauritius)
Ltd. It has been completed by Meelan Thondoo (Social Analyst) and is not to be used for
open circulation. This document does not contain any qualitative analysis nor discussion on
the findings.
La Tour Koenig, the 14th of December 2016
32
ANNEXES
Table 1: Field study locations and fieldworkers rooster
Les Salines
Trou Fanfaron
Cassis
Champ Chapelon
Tranquebar
Saint Francois
Valle des Prtres
Cit Vallijee
Valle Pitot
La Tour Koenig
Roches Bois
Bell Village
Cit Sainte Croix
G.R.N.W
Plaine Verte
Cit la Cure
Camp Yoloff
Port-Louis (Proper)
Cit Martial
Cit La Briquetterie
Terrasson
La Butte
Borstal
Field Period
8th-19th of August
10
th
th
29 -17 of September
5-6
No. of participants
2000
1642
1500
1281
1000
1033
500
0
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
33
34