Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
481
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
1/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
2/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
Phil. 995, 1006 436 SCRA 317, 323 (2004) [Per J. Callejo, Sr., Second
Division].
483
3/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
[2]Guevarra v. Spouses Bautista, 593 Phil. 20, 26 572 SCRA 375, 381
Quezon City.
484
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
4/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
_______________
[8] Rollo, pp. 5862.
[9] Id., at pp. 6567.
[10] Id., at p. 77.
[11] Id., at pp. 6870.
485
5/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
486
487
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
6/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
Second Division].
[24] Rollo, p. 23.
[25] Id., at pp. 100111.
488
7/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
8/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
March 5, 1993, 219 SCRA 561, 567568 [Per J. Feliciano, Third Division],
citing Turqueza v. Hernando, 186 Phil. 333 97 SCRA 483 (1980) [Per J.
Teehankee, First Division].
[28] G.R. No. 90349, March 5, 1993, 219 SCRA 561 [Per J. Feliciano,
Third Division].
490
9/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
491
10/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
_______________
[30] 557 Phil. 241 530 SCRA 468 (2007) [Per J. Garcia, First Division].
[31] Id., at p. 248 p. 475.
492
15, 2010, 610 SCRA 134, 149 [Per J. Peralta, Third Division].
493
11/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
Phil. 995, 1006 436 SCRA 317, 323 (2004) [Per J. Callejo, Sr., Second
Division].
494
12/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
495
III
The Court of Appeals correctly denied
the petition for certiorari for petition
ers failure to file a motion for recon
sideration of the order denying the
petition for relief from judgment
In its resolution dated July 27, 2011, the Court of
Appeals denied petitioners petition for certiorari for failure
to file a motion for reconsideration of the order denying the
petition for relief from judgment. We agree with the
appellate court.
Section 1, Rule 65 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
requires that no appeal or any plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law is available to a party
before a petition for certiorari is filed. This section
provides:
Section 1. Petition for certiorari.
When any tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial or quasi
judicial functions has acted without or in excess of its or his
jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack
or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain,
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
13/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
Division].
496
14/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
[46] Id.
[47] Bentulan v. BentulanMercado, 487 Phil. 364, 376 446 SCRA 150,
Division].
[49] Id., at p. 576 p. 647.
497
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
15/16
10/8/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME725
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000157a466da249a36fe96003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
16/16