Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Right to Wind Up
ARTICLE 1836. Unless otherwise agreed, the partners who have not
wrongfully dissolved the
partnership or the legal representative of the last surviving
partner, not insolvent, has the right to wind up the partnership
affairs, provided, however, that any partner, his legal
representative or his assignee, upon cause shown may obtain
winding up by the court.
Extrajudicially
o By the partners who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership
o Or by the legal representative of the last surviving partner (when all
the partners are already dead), provided the last survivor was not
insolvent.
o NOTE: where the managing partners of the partnership has the
necessary authority to liquidate its affairs under its article of copartnership, he may sell the partnership properties even AFTER the life
of the partnership has already expired since he as manager, is
empowered to wind up the business affairs of the partnership.
Judicially
o Under the control and direction of the court, upon proper cause that is
shown to the court.
o NOTE: here the person to wind up must be appointed by the court. And
said appointee should not be the legal representative of a deceased
partner but should be instead a surviving partner.
Profits
Profits are supposed to accrue only during the existence of the partnership
before dissolution. Of course, profits that will actually enter the firm after
dissolution as a consequence of transactions already made before
dissolution are included because they are considered as profits existing AT
THE TIME OF DISSOLUTION.
Any other income earned after the time, like interest or dividends on stock
owned by the partners or partnership at the time of dissolution should not
be distributed as profits (hence, the agreement here as to the distribution of
profits will not govern), but as merely additional income to the capital (to
be distributed under the rules on co-ownership, that is, to be dividend in
proportion to the amount of capital given)
NOTE: said capital given is computed as to the time of dissolution, that is,
after profits and losses have already been computed
NOTE: indeed said income is not considered as profits for after dissolution,
the firm has ceased to continue the business of the partners together.
o When he acts in behalf and in the name of the partnership.
Settlement of Accounts
ARTICLE 1839. In settling accounts between the partners after
dissolution, the following rules shall
be observed, subject to any agreement to the contrary:
The contributions of the partners, which are made to pay off the partnership
liabilities.
Second give to partners who are also creditors (they should be placed in a
subordinate position to outside creditors for otherwise they may prefer their
own interests)
o NOTE: example of credits owing to partners which are neither capital
nor profits, are those for reimbursement of business expenses.
New Contributions
If the partnership assets are insufficient, the other partners must contribute
more money or property. Who can enforce these contributions?
o In general, any assignee for the benefit of the creditor; or any person
appointed by the court (like a receiver).
Suppose both the partnership property and the individual properties of the
partners are in the possession of the court for distribution, who should be
preferred?
o It Depends
SISON v McQUAID
94 Phil 201.
VILLAREAL v RAMIREZ
GR No. 144214, 14 July 2003
Rights of Creditors
After all, the partnership is a juridical person with whom the creditors have
contracted. Moreover, the assets of the partnership must first be exhausted
Reason Why Individual Creditors May Still Attach the Partners Share
After all, the remainder (after paying partnership obligations) really belongs
to the partners
NOTE: the purchaser at the public sale does not necessarily become a
partner
If a partner sells his share to a third party, but the firm itself remains
solvent, creditors of the partnership cannot assail the validity of the sale by
alleging that it is made in fraud of them, since they have not really been
prejudiced.
Note that innocent partners have better rights than guilty partners and that
the latter are required to indemnify for the damages caused.
Note also that the innocent partners may continue the business (but this
time, ther eis really a new partnership)
They can even use the same firm name if they wish to; moreover, they can
ask new members to join, BUT always the right granted to the guilty
partners are safeguarded by:
o A BOND approved by the court
o A PAYMENT of his interest at the time of dissolution minus damages
(moreover, the guilty partner who is excluded will be indemnified
against all PRESENT or FUTURE partnership liabilities. This is because
he is no longer a partner.
NOTE: The right given to each partner, where no agreement to the contrary
has been made to have his share of the surplus paid to him in CASH makes
certain an existing uncertainty. At present it is not certain whether a partner
remaining after third persons have been paid.
NOTE: The deprivation of his share in the goodwill is not unconstitutional and
cannot be considered as unlawful taking of property without due process of
law
Division of Losses
LICHUACO v LICHUACO
33 Phil 350
VII.
Limited Partnership
Signing under oath of the required certificate (with all the enumerated
items; and
Filing for the record of the certificate in the office of the SEC
If the proposed limited partnership has not conformed substantially with the
requirements of this article, as when the name of not one of the general
partners appear in the firm name, it is not considered a limited partnership
but a general partnership.
The law says the contribution of each limited partner must be stated.
Therefore if the aggregate sum given by two or more limited partners is
given, the law has not been complied with.
the law requires the firm name to have the word Limited
if this provision is violated, the name cannot be considered the firm name of
a limited partnership
The ff acts do not constitute taking part in the control of the business
o Mere dealing with a customer
o Mere consultation on one occasion with the general partners
The ff have been held to constitute taking part in the control of the
business
o Selection of who will be the managing partners
o Supervision over a superintendent of the business of the firm
Participation in the control of the business makes the limited partner liable
as a general partner without however getting the latters rights
Note that even after a limited partnership has already been formed, the firm
may still admit new limited partners, provided there is a proper amendment
to the certificate
Note that as a rule, in the instances enumerated, the general partners must
still get the written CONSENT or RATIFICATION of ALL the limited partners
Reason: in a sense the acts are acts of strict dominion or ownership, and are
not generally essential for the routine or ordinary conduct of the firms
business
A limited partner necessarily has lesser rights than a general partner. There
rights are enumerated in the article
Note however that among other things he also has the right to have
dissolution and winding up by decree of the court
The person referred to under Art 1848 cannot take advantage, naturally, of
Art 1852.
Note that a person may be a general and a limited partner at the same time,
provided same is stated in the certificate.
Rights
Right of Limited Partner to Lend Money and Transact Other Business with
the Firm
Note that 3rd parties are always given preferential rights insofar as the firms
assets are concerned
Note also that while the limited partner, in the case of a claim referred to in
the article, is prohibited to receive or hold as COLLATERAL SECURITY any
partnership property, still he if not prohibited to purchase partnership
assets which are used to satisfy partnership obligations towards third
parties.
Note that preference can be given to some limited partners over the other
limited partners
1st paragraph deals with CONDITIONS that must exist before contributions
(or part thereof) by a limited partner can be returned to him
2nd paragraph deals with the TIME when such contributions can be returned,
provided that the conditions are complied with.
If 1st paragraph is violated, previous creditors can sue, but they must allege
and prove the non-existence of the CONDITIONS. Among these in the same
category as previous creditor is the assignee in insolvency of a bankrupt
limited partnership.
Future creditors cannot make use of the principle enunciated in the abovecited case in view of the recorded amended certificate, except of course if
the money had been wrongfully returned to the limited partner.
Does the assignee of the interest of the limited partner become necessarily
a substitute partner?
o No.
he is a person admitted to all the rights of a limited partner who has died or
has assigned his interest in a partnership.
DRICI
o D death
o R retirement
o I insolvency
o C civil interdiction
o I insanity of a GENERAL partner
Cancellation
When the partnership is dissolved, or when all the limited partners cease to
be limited partners, the certificate shall be cancelled, not merely amended.
This is obvious for if there be no more limited partners, the limited
partnership cannot exist as such. The writing to cancel a certificate shall be
signed by all members.
NAJIM v DE MESA
TRUST
I.
DEFINITION
ARTICLE 1442. The principles of the general law of trusts, insofar as they
are not in conflict with this Code, the Code of Commerce, the Rules of
Court and special laws are hereby adopted
This Article incorporates a large part of the American law on trusts, and
thereby the Philippine Legal System will be amplified and will be rendered
more suited to a just and equitable solution of many questions.
Anglo-American Precedents
II.
As the law of trust has been much more frequently applied in the UA and in
England than it has in Spain, such may be drawn freely upon AngloAmerican precedents. This is particularly so, because Anglo-American trusts
are derived from Roman and Civil Law nations.
PARTIES
ARTICLE 1440. A person who established a trust is called the trustor; one
in whom confidence is reposed as regards the property for the benefit of
another person is known as the trustee; and the person for whose
benefit the trust has been created is referred to as the beneficiary.
Trustor
Trustee
Beneficiar
y
The person for whose benefit the trust has been created (Cestui
que trust)
Elements of a Trust
SALAO v SALAO
70 SCRA 168
ROA, JR v CA
123 SCRA 3