Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF ENLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
TARIK SULI
~0~
SARAJEVO, 2016
~1~
ABSTRACT
Discussion methods are one of the most valuable tools in the teachers repertory. Often
teachers in big classes think that they must lecture because they believe discussion is not
possible. In fact, discussion techniques can be used in classes of all sizes. In order to help
students learn and think, teachers will need to find out what is in their heads. Discussion is
one of the ways of doing so. While trying to increase participation the teacher can encounter
problems of students passivity and inactivity. The aim of this essay is to research the
educational approach of how to make students participate in a discussion, firstly by
exploring the barriers and problems a student may be facing with. We then shift our focus to a
range of techniques which can be helpful to the instructor while trying to include
nonparticipants into the discussion. Even though the path of teaching by discussion may be
regarded as hard, it is likely to be more satisfying for both students and teachers.
Keywords: discussion, participate, barrier, nonparticipants, technique, buzz groups, innercircle technique(fishbowl)
~2~
INTRODUCTION
BARRIERS TO DISCUSSION
~3~
One of the most important matters of discussion leaders is to be able to assess the
groups progress and to be aware of roadblocks or problems that are hindering learning. This
skill depends on attention to cues such as inattention, aggression, or diversionary questions.
Some of the reasons why students dont participate in discussions are (Svinicki & McKeachie,
2011):
1.
2.
3.
4.
weighed
5. Sensing that the job is to find the answer the instructor wants, rather than to explore
and evaluate possibilities
A primary barrier to discussion is the students belief that they are not learning.
Occasional summaries during the hour not only help students graph their progress but also
help smooth out communication problems. A summary doesnt need to be a statement of
conclusions. In many cases the most effective summary is a restatement of the problem in
terms of the matters resolved and those staying. Maintaining a visible record on the
chalkboard of ideas, questions, data, or points to explore helps maintain focus and grant a
sense of forward motion (Barkley, 2010). Asking the students to summarize progress and what
now needs to be done helps them in learning.
Another common barrier to good discussion is the instructors tendency to tell students
the answer before the students have developed an answer or meaning for themselves. The
instructor should always leave enough time for students to think before giving out the answer.
Of course, teachers can sometimes save time by tying things together or stating a
generalization that is emerging. But all too often they do this before the students are ready for
it.
When you oppose a students opinion, you should be careful not to overwhelm the
student with the force of the criticism. Your objective is to initiate a discussion, not stifle it
(Svinicki & McKeachie, 2011). Give students an opportunity to respond to criticisms,
examining the point of sight that was matched. Above all, avoid personal criticism of students
(Davis, 1993).
And possibly the most common barrier is our own discomfort. We are not dispensing
knowledge and we are not in control of it. It is very easy to slip back into our old methods of
teaching (Svinicki & McKeachie, 2011).
~4~
In most classes there are always some students who talk too much, and others who
never volunteer. What can the teacher do?
Unluckily, most scholars are used to being passive recipients in class. Some of your
scholars may come from cultures whose norms discourage speaking in the classroom
(Svinicki & McKeachie, 2011). To assist students become participants, try to create an
anticipation of participation in the discussion section. You can start to do this in the first
meeting of the course by defining the functions of various aspects of the course and
explaining why discussion is valuable. In addition to this initial structuring, however, you
must continually work to increase the students awareness of the values of participation.
Participation is not an end in itself. For many purposes widespread participation may be of
great importance; for others it may be detrimental. But you want to create an atmosphere in
which an important contribution is not lost because the person with the necessary idea did not
feel confident enough to express it (Barkley, 2010).
What keeps a student from talking? There are many reasons - boredom, lack of
knowledge, habits of passivity, cultural norms, but most common is the fear of being
embarrassed. When one is surrounded by strangers, when one does not know how judgmental
these strangers may be, when one is afraid of the instructors response, the safest thing to do is
to stay quiet.
What can reduce this fear?
Getting familiarized is one way to help. Once students know that they are among
friends, they can risk expressing themselves (Davis, 1993). If they know that at least
~5~
Even applying all of these techniques will still not make every student an active, verbal
participant. Two group techniques can help us with that:
Buzz Groups
Buzz groups are a cooperative learning technique consisting in the formation of small
discussion groups with the aim of developing a specific task (generating ides, problem solving
etc.). Buzz groups allow covering the discussion about different views referred to the same
study themes, maximizing the possibilities of division of the members of the group. Later the
initial introduction of the project to be evolved, big groups are split into smaller groups,
among three and six students. Each group selects a spokesperson to inform the rest of the
groups about the results of the discussion of their group (Boudreau, 2015).
The inner circle is another technique which is using the classroom design as the tool. It is
basically saying that at the next class meeting you are going to have a class within a class,
with some of the students (6 to 15) acting as the discussion group and the others as observers.
If the classroom has movable chairs, you can then arrange the seating in the form of
concentric circles (Svinicki & McKeachie, 2011). You will see that students who are normally
silent will talk more because they feel the increased sense of responsibility as members of the
inner circle.
CONCLUSION
Teaching by discussion differs from lecturing because you never know what is going
to happen. Sometimes this can be anxiety-producing, at times frustrating, but more often
exhilarating. It provides constant challenges and opportunities for both the instructor and the
~6~
students to learn and grow. When you can listen for several minutes without intervening, you
will have succeeded.
REFERENCES
Svinicki, M. & McKeachie, W.J. (2011). Facilitating Discussion: Posing Problems, Listening,
Questioning. In McKeachie's Teaching Tips (pp. 44-47). Belmont, CA, USA: Wadswort.
Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dees, J. (2010, March 28). How to Get Students to Participate in Class Discussions. Retrieved
May 09, 2016, from http://www.thereligionteacher.com/how-to-get-students-to-participate-inclass-discussions/
Barkley, E.F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boudreau, D. (2015.). How Do I Use Buzz Groups in Training? Retrieved May 10, 2016,
from http://thetrainingworld.com/articles/buzz.htm
~7~