Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
org/papers
Title:
Authors:
Subjects:
Architectural/Design
Faade Design
Structural Engineering
Keywords:
Faade
Structural Engineering
Structure
Publication Date:
2015
Original Publication:
Paper Type:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Elena Mele; Giovanni Maria Montuori; Gianpaolo Perrella;
Vincenzo Della Vista
This paper provides a first insight on tube configurations based on non conventional structural
patterns geometries for tall buildings. The idea is to investigate the mechanical properties of
non conventional structural pattern both regular (Hexagrid) and irregular (inspired by the
Voronoi tessellation) to assess their applicability in tall buildings, and to compare their potential
efficiency to more popular systems. A general homogenization approach has been established
for dealing with any structural patterns and a methodology for characterizing the structural
patterns from the mechanical point of view has been developed. Through a statistical approach,
the same procedure has been adapted for the analysis of irregular structures based on the
Voronoi diagram. Then on the basis of a simple stiffness criterion, a design procedure has been
proposed and applied to a tall building case study, and several structural solutions have been
designed and assessed by varying the geometrical parameters of the patterns
Keywords: Hexagrid; Irregular Structures; Structural Engineering; Structure
qH4 qH2
. (1)
+
= shear factor.
A stiffness based criterion for preliminary sizing the cross section (area and inertia) of
the equivalent beam consists in setting a maximum value for the top displacement, e.g.
=
max H=
/ 500 tot
(2)
The ideal cross section for a cantilever beam is a hollow section; structural configurations for tall
buildings best reflecting this optimum section shape of the equivalent giant beam are the ones
employing the tube concept: the four building facades act as two flanges and two webs of the
hollow cross section, the formers mainly resisting bending moment through axial tension and
compression, the latters providing shear resistance.
It should be pointed out that the building facades are made of a grid of structural members
instead of solid panels, and the shear-resisting mechanism of the faade grid strongly affects
the tube efficiency. In this perspective, diagrid structures - the latest mutation of tube structures
- show an extraordinary efficiency, related to the adopted geometrical pattern: thanks to the
triangle tessellation of the faades, internal axial forces are largely prevalent in the structural
members, thus shear lag effects and racking deformations are minimized [Mele et al. 2014]. Being
also adaptable to whatever surface, diagrid is becoming the most used structural solution for tall
buildings of complex form [Montuori et al., 2013, 2014 a, 2014b].
However, alternative, non conventional, geometrical patterns are worth of consideration for their
structural and aesthetical qualities. Natural patterns, i.e. geometrical patterns observable in nature
which reflect the unquestionable laws of economy and efficiency, can be a fruitful and almost
endless source of inspirations for efficient man-made structures, at all scale levels (from the very
are both regular and non-regular (Voronoilike) patterns: the former are patterns made
by uniform tessellation of hexagonal cells,
appointed as hexagrids, while the latters,
the non regular patterns, are either fully
based on Voronoi diagrams, or mixed regular
(hexagrids) and irregular (Voronoi) patterns.
tot =structures
bending + shear =
products at the mega level, namely
8 EI grid 2 GA grid
for high-rise and long-span buildings, thus
providing a radically new repertoire of forms
(3)
and systems for challenging architectures.
This type of approach is proposed by [Kwan,
As a first step of the research undertaken
1994], with a methodology for dealing with
by the authors, hexagon-based patterns are
frame tube panels as equivalent orthotropic
currently being examined as tube structural
membranes, so that the framed tube could be
grids for tall buildings. Objects of the study
analyzed as a continuous structure.
( )
( )
( )
Figure 1. Voronoi elevation patterns for tall buildings: (a) Use Arrangement Christian Hahn eVolo 2010 Skyscraper
competition entry [eVolo, 2010]; (b) SOM competition entry for a tower in Tianjin, China [Beghini et al., 2014]; (c) LAVA
Bionic Tower [LAVA, 2007] (Source: University of Naples, Ferderico II)
( )
(x , x )
s
1
s
2
i [0,2
0, 2 ]
Figure 5. Axial tests a) along x1; b) along x2; c) Shear test (Source: University of Naples, Ferderico II)
E*i,V
E
*
i,h
, where,
E*i,h
Figure 7. Hexagrid under axial test along x1 a) Deformed configuration; b)Definition of the RVE (Source: University of
Naples, Ferderico II)
Figure 8. Hexagrid under axial test along x2 a) Deformed configuration; b)Definition of the RVE (Source: University of
Naples, Ferderico II)
Figure 9. Hexagrid under shear test a) Deformed configuration; b)Definition of the RVE (Source: University of Naples,
Ferderico II)
and,
E*2,V,i, G*12,V,i)
, a , i , i
1
1
=
; p
n ( E 2,i ) n
1
p (G12,i ) = where is the total
n
analysis is
;
p (E1,i ) =
i =1
n
Figure 11. Boundary conditions and external forces adopted in the FE models of the Voronoi
specimens (Source: University of Naples, Ferderico II)
= 0, 0.1, 0.2,
0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9,
1) and for each value of j; globally 3960
numerical test have been performed.
Figure 13. Voronoi building, plan and elevation (Source: University of Naples, Ferderico II)
qH4
The building
q model
H utilised for theH
+
= by
tot = bending + shear =
*
is characterized
8 E1,* H E1, A I design
2 Gapplications
500
12, H G12, A A
=stories,
+
+
=
=
+
+
90
=
bending
nding
shear
shear
**
**
351 m,
interstory height 3.9 m,
88 E
E
E1,EA1, A I I 22 G
G
A
500
500
1, H
12,12,
1, H
G12,
H H
G12,
A A A
4
qH
qH
H
=
+
*
E E1, A I 2 G12,H G12, A A
500
H2
*
1, H
H
G12, A A (4)
500
=
Figure 14. Displacement and Interstory drift under horizontal load of the Voronoi building (Source: University of
Naples, Ferderico II)
Figure 15. Possible improvements of Voronoi structures (Source: University of Naples, Ferderico II)
References:
Ashby M.F. 2006. The properties of foams and lattices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 15-30.
Aurenhammer F. 1991. Voronoi Diagrams A Survey of a Fundamental Geometric Data Structure. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). Vol.23,
Issue 3, 345-405.
Aurenhammer F., Klein R. (2000). Voronoi diagrams. Handbook of computational geometry, 5, 201-290.
Baker W.F. 2013. Structural possibilities. In: The Tall Buildings Reference Book, Eds.: Parker D. and Wood A., Routledge.
Beghini L.L., Beghini A., Katz N., Baker W.F., Paulino G.H. 2014. Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology
optimization. Engineering Structures 59. 716726.
Burry, Jane and Burry, Mark. (2010): The New Mathematics of Architecture. New York: Thames & Hudson
CSI SAP2000 - Computers and Structures, 2000
deMeijer J.H.M. 2012. Lateral stiffness of hexagrid structures. Masters thesis.Eindhoven University of Technology Department of the Built
Environment Structural Design
eVolo. 2010. A City Within a Skyscraper for Battery Park. http://www.evolo.us/architecture/a-city-within-a-skyscraper-for-battery-park/. Use
Arrangement Christian Hahn eVolo 2010 Skyscraper Competition entry.
Fraldi M., Cowin. 2004. Inhomogeneous elastostatic problem solutions constructed from stress-associated homogeneous solutions, J.
Mech. Phys. Solids, 52.
Fu, X.Y., Gao Y., Zhou Y., Yang X. 2012. Structural Design of Sino Steel International Plaza. CTBUH 2012 9thWorld Congress, Shanghai.
Gibson J., Ashby M.F. 1988. Cellular Solids: structure and properties, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46-1988.
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. 1997 Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K
Hohe J., Beckman C. 2012. Mech. Mat. 49 (2012), pp 13-29.
Kwan A.K. H. 1994. Simple method for approximate analysis of framed tube structures. J. of Structural Engineering, Vol. 120, No.4.
LAVA. Bionic Tower. http://www.l-a-v-a.net/projects/bionic-tower/
Li, K., Gao, X.-L., Roy, A., 2003. Micromechanics model for three-dimensional open-cell foams using a etrakaidecahedral unit cell and
Castiglianos second theorem. Composite Science and Technology 63, 1769 1781.
Li K., Gao X.-L., Subhash G., 2005 Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional
cellular solids, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Volume 42, Issues 56, March 2005, Pages 1777-1795, ISSN 0020-7683
Mele E., Toreno M., Brandonisio G., De Luca A. 2014. Diagrid structures for tall buildings: case studies and design considerations. Struct.
Design Tall Spec. Build. 23, 124145.
Montuori G. M., Mele E., Brandonisio G., De Luca A. 2013. Design criteria for diagrid tall buildings: Stiffness versus strength. Struct. Design Tall
Spec. Build. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tal). DOI: 10.1002/tal.1144
Montuori G. M., Mele E., Brandonisio G., De Luca A. 2014, a. Geometrical patterns for diagrid buildings: Exploring alternative design
strategies from the structural point of view. Engineering Structures 71, 112127
Montuori G. M., Mele E., Brandonisio G., De Luca A. 2014, b. Secondary bracing systems for diagrid structures in tall buildings. Engineering
Structures 75, 477488.
Montuori, G. M., Fadda, M., Perrella, G., and Mele, E. (2015), Hexagrid hexagonal tube structures for tall buildings: patterns, modeling, and
design. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build., doi: 10.1002/tal.1218.
Nemat-Nasser S., Hori M.1999. Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials,2ndEdition, North-Holland.
Silva M.J., Gibson L.J. and Hayes W.C. (1995) The effects of non-periodic microstructure on the elastic proprieties of two-dimensional
cellular solids. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 37, 1161-77