Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Terrorism in Pakistan

the purpose of study:

the purpose of reschers is


about the terrorism in pakistan.
problem statement:
pakistan.
scope of study:

how to control the terrorism in

our scope of study is to know about


the reson behind that why people become terrorist.
relevance of study:
we conduct the literature survey
and collect the relivent data about problem.
literature survey:
to find the solution of problum we
will research on publish and un-publish data.we will
use primary and secondary source.this information
will be relevant to the problem.
identifying the relevant source
extract relevant information
writing up the literature survey
methodology .
we will conduct the intrwe through
quenearre..............
papulation:
data collection:

we will conduct `the data from primary


and secondry. in primary source we will conduct data
from intrwew
time frame:
the time frame nessasry for completion
of this resurch is appox. 2 month. during these 2
months , resurch report will be provided on progress
being made.

Introduction
No one can forget the disaster happened
last September 11 of 2001. The city was
terrorized by the people who are not afraid in
their suicidal actions and their pleasure to kill.
And what purpose? Maybe someone
answered this tricky question, but in a place
where the democracy and equality prevails, the
idea of terrorism and their ideologies are not
welcome.
Terrorism
Many actions against the terrorism is
already place in priority and shorthand phrase
war on terrorism is the word that can
describe the United States response to the
terrorist attacks. The war they proposed is just
like the previous wars can be won by simply
killing all their enemies and probably the
potential enemies. But still, this war is a
different kind of war; the enemies are
immeasurable, meaning nobody knows the real
enemy in the line of the suspects. And there
are chances that the military force is
outnumbered. Therefore, the word strategic
approach is the main requirement to manage
the catastrophe (Pea, 2004).
There are many reports about the alliances
and partnerships of the Al Qaeda with the
indigenous Pakistani terrorist groups that

implicated both attacks on the West and


somewhere in India. Still, many advocates and
concern groups against the terrorism have
grown hopes saying that the success in the
struggle against the global terrorism will likely
be decided.
On
the
other
hand,
the
Pakistan
government is part of setting an end on the
terrorism and like what is expected, many
raised their questions about the governments
determination, sincerity and effectiveness of
their efforts. As widely known, Pakistan
became the center of terrorism issues and
doubts are hauled by the Western experts.
Those doubts are mixed with concerns about
the implications of maintaining the present
policies implemented by the U.S. and the
efficacy of their latest strategy.
The implemented latest strategy came
from Islamabad which appears to seek
reconciliation with the pro-Taliban militants. If
the people really want to end the war then,
there should be no doubts in the anti-terrorism
policies and the so-called war on terrorism
should be emphasized through uplifting the
socioeconomic and resolution of outstanding
disputes in Muslim world (Kronstadt, 2007).
Even the election process on the Pakistan is
under the crisis in which relatively caused by
the terrorist attacks. The issues about the selfinterest of the politicians are considered as
another symptom of the birth of the terrorism

(Ansari and Moten, 2003; Haggani, 2006).


The Consequences of the Action
There are measured consequences in the
campaign of against the war. First, usually the
captured terrorists or terrorist suspects are not
all member of Al Qaeda in which there is no
hard evidence if they are related to the group
in some ways. In this situation, the people will
transfer in the United States. Second, it will
force the senior Al Qaeda operatives to leave
simply by no means. The less ideologically
congenial surroundings and the need of the
terrorists to the communication increase the
chances of susceptibility to detection and
arrest. And thirdly, the dramatic irruption of the
Pakistani estate and their connection to the Al
Qaeda emphasizes the issue of doubt on their
sincerity. Other that that, the population is
violently pro-Taliban, and the presence of the
Pakistan Army is thin, has inadvertently made
the task be more difficult (Kronstadt, 2007;
Tellis, 2008). A strategy for the war on
terrorism must consist of three elements:
homeland security, dismantling Al Qaeda
forces, and a foreign policy that does not
needlessly create new terrorists (Pea, 2004).
Is There a Failure?
Is there a present failure on the ways of the
Pakistan in battle against the terrorism? There
are many requirements that the Pakistan
government should consider before bringing

the democracy in their nation. For the other


countries, sovereignty can help them achieve
the stability, strength and power not because
of the contributions of few individuals but
because of the strong institution, stable
systems, and well-rooted traditions all are
part of the evolution. It may be part of the
political process and democracy in Pakistan
had failed and will fail again if they did not
bring the stability to the country. However, the
answer is not in giving up on the democracy or
democratic process but to adhere it seriously
and closely (Haggani, 2006).
Conclusion
There is still hope for Pakistan. There are
still other strategies and approaches available
for the country to be introduced as a country
that breathes peace. The terrorism of their past
will hunt them down if they continued their
practice. The efforts to set the war on the
terrorism should be entitled with full focus and
sincerity, if the rulers really want to promote
the terrorism-free land.
References:
Ansari, Z., & Moten, A., 2003. From Crisis to
Crisis: Musharrafs Personal Rule and the
2002 Elections in Pakistan. The Muslim
World, Vol. 93, No. 4.
Haggani, I., 2006. Failure of Democracy in
Pakistan?. The Muslim World, Vol. 96, No. 2.

Kronstadt, K., 2007. Pakistan and Terrorism: A


Summary. CRS
Report
for
Congress.
[Online]
Available
at: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organiza
tion/82600.pdf. [Accessed 15 Jan 2010].
Pea, C., 2004. Strategy for the War on
Terrorism. CATO Policy Report, Vol. 26, No.
4.
[Online]
Available
at: http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/
v26n4/cpr-26n4-1.pdf. [Accessed 15 Jan
2010].
Tellis, A., 2008. Pakistan and the War on Terror
Conflicted
Goals,
Compromised
Performance. Carnegie
Endowment
for
International
Peace [Online]
Available
at:http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files
/tellis_pakistan_final.pdf. [Accessed 15 Jan
2010].

Вам также может понравиться