Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TUGUEGARAO CITY
59
CHAPTER 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
This chapter present the results of the findings of the
study including the interpretation and analysis of data.
1. Profile of Respondents
1.1. Age
Table 2a
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents
Relative to Age
Age
16
17
18
19
20
21 above
Total
Mean Age=18.45
Table
above
Frequency
17
25
85
37
9
32
205
shows
the
frequency
Percentage
8.30
12.20
41.50
18.00
4.40
15.60
100.00
and
percentage
60
1.2. Gender
Table 2b
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Relative to Gender
Gender
Male
Female
Total
The
Frequency
43
162
205
above
distribution
table
of
shows
the
respondents
Percentage
21.00
79.00
100.00
frequency
relative
to
and
percentage
gender,
it
is
It
implies
that
there
are
more
female
above
Frequency
197
8
205
table
shows
the
frequency
Percentage
96.10
3.90
100.00
and
percentage
civil
status,
out
of
205
respondents,
197
or
96.1
61
implies that there are more single students than the married
one.
1.4. Parents Highest Educational Attainment
1.4.1. Father
Table 2d
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Relative to Highest Educational Attainment of Father
Parents Highest
Educational
Attainment
Unschooled
Elementary Level
High school Level
College Level
Total
It
is
revealed
above
Frequency
Percentage
4
39
95
67
205
2.00
19.00
46.30
32.70
100.00
that
or
2.0
percent
are
college
level.
It
implies
that
majority
of
the
1.4.2. Mother
Table 2e
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents
Relative to Highest Educational Attainment of Mother
Parents Highest
Educational
Attainment
Unschooled
Frequency
3
Percentage
1.50
Elementary Level
High school Level
College Level
Total
It
is
revealed
62
45
87
70
205
above
that
22.00
42.40
34.10
100.00
3
or
1.5
percent
are
college
level.
It
implies
that
majority
of
the
the
father
63
Frequency
144
10
25
6
15
1
2
1
1
205
Percentage
70.20
4.90
12.20
2.90
7.30
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
100.00
percent
work
as
collector
and
or
.5
work
as
saleslady.
This implies that most of the mothers occupations of
the respondents are housekeeper due to the effect of their
educational
qualification
that
they
school level.
1.6 Ethnic Affiliation
Table 2g
are
only
reach
high
64
Frequency
98
13
63
22
5
3
1
205
Percentage
47.80
6.30
30.70
10.70
2.40
1.50
0.50
100.00
Mean
2.36
2.36
2.18
2.19
2.46
2.37
2.25
2.28
2.33
DS
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Always
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
printed materials.
10. Set aside a certain time for study each day.
Category Mean
With
the
result
of
the
65
2.30
Sometimes
Sometimes
2.31
data
gathered
from
the
factor
is
not
always
being
practiced
by
the
which
is
2.31
manifested
that
personal
factors
Mean
2.40
2.45
2.05
DS
Always
Always
Sometimes
66
2.18
2.34
2.45
2.68
2.36
1.92
1.91
2.27
Sometimes
Sometimes
Always
Always
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Mean
DS
Sometimes
2.30
2.35
Sometimes
2.17
Sometimes
2.35
Sometimes
2.31
Sometimes
2.34
Sometimes
Sometimes
2.35
social/environmental
the
factor
Always
2.47
Always
2.63
Sometimes
2.30
Category Mean
Overall,
67
2.36
extent
in
the
of
Sometimes
influence
study
practices
of
as
Mean
2.32
DS
Sometimes
68
Always
2.66
Sometimes
2.34
Always
2.60
2.62
Always
Always
2.60
Always
2.50
2.39
2.55
Sometimes
Always
Sometimes
2.25
2.48
Always
the
students
to
give
their
opinion
in
class
Mean
2.48
DS
Always
69
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
2.00
1.85
2.27
2.28
2.09
1.95
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
2.39
2.27
Sometimes
Sometimes
1.89
2.15
Sometimes
is
always.
2.48
among
The
overall
the
ten
weighted
items
mean
and
of
interpreted
as
the
of
extent
social
media
factor
sometimes
influence
the
study
Mean
DI
70
Personal Factor
Home Factor
School/Environmental Factor
Teacher factors
Social Media Factor
Based
from
respondents
on
2.31
2.27
2.36
2.48
2.15
the
summary
various
school/environment
and
table
factors,
social
on
the
the
media
Sometimes
Sometimes
Sometimes
Always
Sometimes
assessment
personal,
factors
of
home,
sometimes
Frequency
0
0
8
27
67
87
12
4
205
Percentage
0.00
0.00
3.90
13.20
32.70
42.40
5.90
2.00
100.00
71
Table 5
Correlation between the Study Practices of the
Respondents and their Academic Performance
Personal Factor
Home Factor
School Factor
Teacher Factor
Social Media Factor
Study Habits
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Table
practices
5.0
of
shows
the
the
72
correlation
respondents
and
between
their
mean
the
study
academic
Age
Gender
Civil Status
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Personal
Factor
.04
.217
205
.04
.906
205
-.11
.463
205
.03
.981
Home
Factor
.03
.001
205
.04
.760
205
-.18
.986
205
.01
.460
School
Factor
.02
.061
205
.26
.955
205
-.11
.754
205
.13
.691
Teacher
Factor
.04
.023
205
-.04
.265
205
.02
.781
205
-.09
.705
Social
Media
Factor
-.03
.029
205
.03.072
205
-.055
.436
205
.014
.292
Parents Highest
educational
Parents Highest
Educational
Attainment Mother
Parent's Occupation
Father
Parent's Occupation
Mother
Ethnic Affiliation
73
205
205
205
205
205
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.03
.407
205
-.09
.305
205
-.14
.380
205
-.11
.881
205
.01
.151
205
-.09
.946
205
-.09
.867
205
-.09
.787
205
.13
.101
205
-.26
.505
205
.-.27
.239
205
-.17
.910
205
-.08
.799
205
-.01
.970
205
.01
.833
205
.01
.362
205
.12
.076
205
-.09
.525
205
-.14
.692
205
-.15
.804
205
status,
parents
occupation,
and
ethnic
study
practices,
thus
the
acceptance
of
the
null
educational
attainment
is
significant
to
74
should
learn
how
to
manage
their
time
in
like
library
work,
research
etc.,
for
them
to
75