Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: A structural review
on the negative Poissons ratio
Yunan Prawoto
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 December 2011
Received in revised form 7 February 2012
Accepted 7 February 2012
Available online 8 March 2012
Keywords:
Poissons ratio
Auxetic materials
Periodic microstructure
Disordered microstructure
Homogenization
a b s t r a c t
This paper summarizes research work related to materials with zero, or negative Poissons ratio, materials which are also referred to as auxetic materials. This review puts an emphasis on computations and
aspects of their mechanics. It also considers diverse examples: from large structural, to biomedical applications. It is concluded that auxetic materials are technologically and theoretically important. While the
development of the research has been dominated by periodic/ordered microstructures, the author predicts that future research will be in the direction of disordered microstructures utilizing the homogenization method.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Although normal materials contract when they are stretched,
auxetic materials are opposite: they expand laterally when stretched
longitudinally. In a book published in 1944, Love described a material with negative Poissons ratio [1]. According to the knowledge of
the author, that is the rst engineering mechanics fact nding
recorded, although materials with either negative or zero Poissons
ratio may have been known to exist more than a 100 years ago.
The next documented evidence of an auxetic material was found
38 years after that, in 1982 by Gibson [2,3]. He realized the auxetic
effect in the form of the two-dimensional silicone rubber or aluminum honeycombs deforming by exure of the ribs.
The intentional development of the concept was rst published in Science magazine in 1987 by Lakes 5 years after Gibsons
nding [4,5]. In his publication, Lakes did not use the term auxetic to refer to these materials. This terminology came 4 years
later, in 1991. The word is derived from the word atvgsijo1
(read: auxetikos), which means that which tends to increase
and which has its roots in the word atvg1i1 (read: auxesis),
which is the noun form of increase. This terminology was
coined by Evans et al., when they rst fabricated the microphorous polyethylene with negative Poissons ratio [68]. The concept
development and subsequently the fabrication of this prototype
provided the momentum for the modern day auxetic material,
which is the object of this review.
Tel.: +60 167 279048; fax: +60 755 66159.
E-mail address: yunan.prawoto@gmail.com
0927-0256/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012
141
The aim of this short review is to give some bases for the understanding of the mechanics of auxetic materials, and report on the
research works over the past two decades, especially their
mechanical and computational aspects. It hopes to stimulate more
research works on this subject matter.
2. Poissons ratio in the mechanics of materials
Poissons Ratio is so named because it was invented by Simeon
Dennis Poisson (21 June 178725 April 1840) [14], a mathematical
genius who was born in Pithiviers, France. It is dened as the ratio
of transverse contraction strain to longitudinal extension strain
with respect to the direction of stretching force applied. Tensile
deformation is considered positive and compressive deformation
is considered negative. The denition of Poissons ratio contains a
minus sign, so that normal materials have a positive ratio. It is usually represented by the lower case Greek nu, m.
Almost all common engineering materials have positive Poissons ratio, having a gure of close to 0.3 for most materials and
slightly less than 0.5 for rubbery materials [12,15]. It is logical to
think that Poissons ratio is typically positive. This agrees with
the microstructural point of view, whereby the reason for the usual
positive Poissons ratio is that inter-atomic bonds realign with
deformation. In order to do that, the system tends to maintain its
density, resulting in contraction in the lateral direction. The correlation between the Poissons ratio and the atomic packing density
is known: for materials that are atomically dense, such as gold,
typically their Poissons ratio ? isotropic upper limit, which is
0.5, while crystalline metals that are atomically less densely
packed, such as steels, have their Poissons ratio 0.3. Naturally,
to compare common crystal structures, face centered cubic, hexagonal closed packed, body centered cubic, and cubic diamond, their
Poissons ratios would be in sequence: mfcc,hcp P mbcc P mcd [16]. The
same reason and mechanism make the typical value of Poissons
ratio for ceramics, glass, and semi-conductors become 0.250.42
[1720].
Most engineering materials have a higher shear modulus G
than their bulk modulus K. By changing the microstructure of a
material in such a way that the Poissons ratio m is lower, the values of K and G can be altered if E is kept constant. Naturally,
decreasing the value of m to zero or below would result in a high
shear modulus G relative to the bulk modulus K that can be
obtained.
From the continuum mechanics point of view, most materials
resist a change in volume as determined by the bulk modulus K
more than they resist a change in shape, as determined by the
shear modulus G. Meanwhile, the relation between E, G, and K is
as follows [21,19]:
E
2 1 m
E
3 1 2m
Fig. 1. Graphical
h
i description of the relation between the Poissons ratio and the
1m
value of 12
m for conventional structural materials.
This restricts a conventional structural material to have its Poissons ratio to be m P 1/8. For a Poissons ratio to be m 6 0, the value
of the bulk modulus must be much less than the shear modulus,
K G. Meanwhile, Eq. (3) can also be expressed as:
2G 1 m K 1 2m
or
3K 2G
2G 6K
Eq. (6) is graphically depicted in Fig. 2. The gure also shows the
contour line of m = 0. While classical mechanics treats Poissons ratio as a static component, a dynamic approach is also available. Another point of view for expressing Poissons ratio is by the speeds of
sound [19]:
1
2
2
Vt
V
md l 2
Vt
Vl
1
7
1
and
1 m
3K
1 2m
2G
1 m
3
P
1 2m
2
Fig. 2. Graphical description of the relation between the Poissons ratio and the
value of K and G.
142
the shear wave velocity, a VVRt , depends only on the value of Poissons ratio of the medium, and it can be found as the admissible, real
and positive root of the following equation [22]:
a6 8a4 8
2 md 2
8
a
0
1 md
1 md
Fig. 3. Denition of the elastic moduli and Poissons ratio in isotropic and orthotropic materials [23].
143
Fig. 7. The basic unit cell for re-entrant geometry analyzed by Lira et al. [50].
and
h
E1 j
Fig. 4. Examples of several auxetic structures extracted from several publications
[4045].
10
m12
Fig. 6. The basic hexagonal unit cell used to describe some re-entrant geometry
[2,116].
sin h
b cos3 h
l
11
m12
sin h hl sin h
cos2 h
144
Fig. 9. Example of polyurethane foams (left: conventional and right: auxetic) [43].
exible spacer groups along the chain lengths. The exible spacer
groups are attached to the ends of some of the rigid rods connected
terminally or laterally. In the relaxed state, all the rigid rods are
oriented along the chain directions. Auxetic behavior occurs when
there is a rotation of the laterally attached rods upon stretching of
the foam. This agrees with the basic concept highlighted by He
et al. [53]. Interestingly, this type of foam can be produced easily
in any laboratory from commercially available conventional foams
through a process involving volumetric compression, heating it beyond its softening temperature, and then cooling it while under
compression [43], also see the Appendix for the technique formulated by Lakes back in 1984 [4]. Analytical and computational approaches to this type of structure are difcult to nd if available at
all.
Fig. 10. Basic model of the unit cell for chiral structure analysis used by Prall and
Lakes [54].
TL
6Es I
13
Es t 3 d
/
2L
14
or
e r sin /
Another pioneer in this structure is Wojciechowski, who published his rst research on this subject back in 1987 [55]. He and
his group have been very actively researching this material even
until today [5667]. They have been followed by other researchers
such as Ishibashi and Iwata [68], Bornengo et al. [69], Spadoni et al.
[70], Vasiliev [71], Grima [72], and Milton [73].
The chiral based structure has developed into various shapes
from around 2005. Grima et al. published their research on auxetic
e1 r/ cos h
12
e2 r/ sin h
in which, for small deection, r sin/ r/ and h = 30o. By using the
elementary beam theory, if the thickness is t, the deection eventually becomes:
1 3
where I 12
t d. The strains, therefore, become:
r
R
r
/
R
e1 /
e2
15
e2
e1
e
m21 1
e2
m12
16
145
the Youngs modulus E are independent of the direction of the loading. Furthermore, they developed star-shaped structures from general isosceles triangles, see Fig. 13. For their systems, Poissons
ratios for loading in the Ox1 or Ox2 are:
m21 m1
12
b cos a 2h acos 2h
tan 2a 2h bsin a 2h a sin
h
2
18
This equation shows that one can adjust the Poissons ratio by
adjusting the values of both a and h. Eq. (18) can be easily derived
from the trigonometric relation of:
b
2a
h
h
2a sin
X 1 2b sin a
2
2
a cos1
19
20
and
h
X 2 2a cos a
2
21
and
mij
dej
dei
22
p
4 3K h
a2 1 cos p3 h
17
Qg
1 1 X
C cg C cg T
2
23
cg cg
p
where C cg
ij r i Rj and is the 2 rotation matrix in the plane (the
Levi- Civita matrix) and CT is the transpose of C. Eventually, the total
strain can be written as:
g
g
g
g
ecg
ij Eijkl rkl Q ijkl hkl r
24
where the rst term Egijkl rgkl is the expansion strain and the second
term Q gijkl hkl rg is the strain due to rotation [79]. Subsequently,
Poissons ratio can be calculated conveniently.
146
Fig. 12. Example of star-shaped auxetic structure. Stretching of these systems result in an increase in the angle h between the triangles which results in a more open
structure. Note that if these systems are viewed from the perspective of the empty spaces (unshaded) between the triangles (shaded), then these systems can be described
either in terms of their star shaped perforations, or triangular shaped perforations in the special case when the angles between the triangles is 60 (the middle structure) [77].
Fig. 13. A more general connected triangles system constructed out of isosceles
triangles rather than equilateral triangles [77].
Fig. 14. auxetons made of three-contact building blocks used by Blumenfeld. Each
auxeton can expand and rotate when forces are applied to its ends [79].
147
Table 1
Summary of the applications of the auxetic materials (in alphabetical order) [81,11,82,83,13,84,29].
Field
Aerospace
Automotive
Biomedical
Vanes for gas turbine engine, thermal protection, aircraft nose-cones, wing panel, sounds and vibration absorber, rivet
Bumper, cushion, thermal protection, sounds and vibration absorber parts that need shear resistant, fastener
Bandage, wound pressure pad, dental oss, articial blood vessel (the wall thickness increases when a pulse of blood ows through
it), articial skin, drug release unit, ligament anchors. Surgical implants (similar to that of bone characteristics)
Fiber reinforcement (because it reduce the cracking between ber and matrix)
Helmet, bullet proof vest, knee pad, gloce, protective gear (better impact property)
Composite
Military
(defence)
Sensors/
actuators
Textile
Industry
Hydrophone, piezoelectric devices, various sensors (the low bulk modulus makes them more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure)
Fibers, functional fabric, color-change straps or fabrics, threads
Referring to Eq. (1), one can immediately obtain the higher resistance to shear strain, G, caused by twisting or tearing forces
[88,21,19]. Practically, the material would become highly compressible but difcult to shear; low E, high G.
Choi was among the rst to explicitly calculate the elastic modulus of an auxetic material. He used the model of the re-entrant
foam as shown in Fig. 16 [89]. Starting from the simple principle
of Egli [90], he used the relationship
n between the density ratio
and Youngs modulus ratio, EEs / qq , where the subcript (s) is
s
the solid, and the superscript () means the cellular. With some
mathematical manipulations, he was able to use it via the volume
change ratio.
Meanwhile, the Castigliano principle was also used:
dp
n
@U X
@P
i
Z
z
M i @M i
dz
EI @P
25
2
Ec
q
0:88 c
Es
qs
26
For the re-entrant foam in the same gure, the value becomes
[89]:
2
Er
Hu
1
qc
p
0:05
Ju 1 sin 2 u qs
Ec
27
where H(u), J(u) are geometrical functions of the particular re-entrant form.
6.1.2. Material hardness
The traditional hardness test is based on the resistance to
indentation. The following equation describes their relation:
E
H
1 m2
c
28
where c is a constant to which the load is applied. For uniform pressure, c is 1. When a non-auxetic material is subjected to hardness
testing, the force compresses the material, and the material compensates by spreading in the directions perpendicular to and away
from the direction of the impact. However, when the hardness
indentor is applied to an auxetic material, the auxetic material will
contract laterally. The material ows into (compresses towards) the
vicinity of the impact, as shown in Figure 17. This creates an area of
denser material, which is more resistant to indentation. Therefore,
the hardness of an auxetic material is higher. Fig. 17 shows the
graphical depiction of this mechanism [10,47]. Experimental
Fig. 16. The basic free body diagram (FBD) assumption for regular tetrakaidecahedron (left) and re-entrant unit cell (right) proposed by Choi [89].
r
I
I
p tip
r p
2p r
2pr 2r
29
148
K rIc
0:53
K Ic
q
1 sin p2 u
37
1 cos 2u
Fig. 18. Crack propagation observed by Maiti. (a) Is through the bending failure on
the non-vertical cell elements and (b) is through the tensile fracture of the vertical
cell elements [92].
There is a moderately high number of papers discussing computational approaches to the study of auxetic materials, e.g. [50,95
97]. Here, the author limits the review to multi-level ones, because
it is believed that this type of approach will become the major
trend in the near future.
6.2.1. Unit cell
Almost all computational approaches reviewed use the unit cell
concept, directly or indirectly, for calculation. Many of them are in
the form of testing the analytical approaches they developed. Take
Scarpas work for example [97]. Fig. 19 shows the unit cell Scarpa
used. In his research, he combined analytical, numerical, and
experimental analysis on the compressive strength of hexagonal
chiral honeycombs due to elastic buckling of the unit cells under
atwise compressive loading. His analytical elastic collapse for
the hexagonal chiral cell was:
b
Ec
p
4b2
p K b b0:8 K a a
31 m2c 8p 3 3a2
38
r tip
rtip
2
KI
K I r
p p tip r tip dr
2pr
2pr 2r
30
Furthermore, with the thickness of the rib being t, and the rst
order of the Taylor expansion, Eq. (30) is simplied to:
F 2:38
K I
l t
p
p l
31
F 2:12
Fl
:
t3
32
2
l
t
1
F 5:05 K I p
33
K I
p t
2
0:20rf pl
l
34
n
Using the relation of qq / tl , the stress intensity factor is pros
portional to the normalized density:
K I
q
p 0:19
qs
rf pl
6.2.2. Homogenization
Several introductory variations of the homogenization theory
are available, but they are beyond the scope of this review. However, for the sake of the readers convenience, part of the authors
previously published introduction is simplied and used [98], see
the Appendix. Theocaris, Lee, and Choi were among the rst to
use homogenization theory in auxetic materials research. Lee and
Choi applied homogenization using commercial code in their research using regular and re-entrant structures, while Theocaris
used it for star-shaped structures [99,76]. Similar to Eqs. (A-3)
and (A-11), Choi formulated his equation into:
lim
e!0
Ux; ydX
1
jYj
Z
Xx; ydY dX
39
They concluded that the microscale integration could be replaced by an average value integration for a general Y periodic
function U. Recalling the weak form of linear elasticity problem nite element:
Eijkl
@uk @ v i
dX
@xi @xj
bi v i dX
t i v i dC
40
35
They then obtained the homogenized elasticity tensor EH (see
also Appendix for the basic Homogenization method for auxetic
materials):
K Ic
p 0:10
rf pl
q
1 sin p2 u q
1 cos 2u
qs
36
Eijkl
jYj
Z
Y
!
@ vkl
p
dY
Eijkl Eijkl
@yq
41
K Ic
where
is the fracture toughness of re-entrant foams and u is the
rib angle (see Fig. 18).
Experimentally, Choi showed that for his re-entrant foam, the
following was observed:
where vkl
p is the microscale parameter. Conveniently, the effective
elastic modulus, Ee, and Poissons ratio, me, can be obtained from
the plane stress assumption as follows:
149
Fig. 19. Unit cell used by Scarpa. left: based for analytical approach, right: brick element to model the computation [97].
and
E
1
jVj
e dV
43
Periodic boundary condition over the unit-cell leads displacement eld u such as:
u Ex v 8x 2 V
44
with v a periodic uctuation. It takes the same value at two homologous points on opposite faces of V, whereas the traction vector
t = r n takes opposite values, n being the normal vector. By applying either macroscopic strain or stress, one can compute the effective elastic moduli fourth-rank tensor C and compliance tensor S of
materials:
RC:EES:R
Fig. 20. Comparison between FE and analytical non-dimensional collapse stress
used by Scarpa [97].
EH1111
6 H
4 E2211
EH1122
EH2222
7
0 5
EH1212
E 6
4 me
1 m2e
0
me
1
0
0 7
5
1me
2
R
1
jVj
Z
V
r dV
42
45
150
Fig. 21. Micrograph of the auxetic ultra high molecular weight polyethylene
(UHMWPE) developed by Alderson and Evans [101].
151
Push the pipe down on the loose end plate such that the foam is
compressed evenly at the end. Try not to push too fast; this may
contribute to the uneven distribution of compression along the
length of the specimen.
Gently tighten down the side screws to hold the cut pipe in
place.
Place assembly in centre of furnace or oven. A kitchen oven is
sufcient.
Leave the foam in the oven for a predetermined amount of time.
The gray polyester foams transform better at a slightly lower
temperature for a longer amount of time, about 20 min maximum. The white/cream colored polyether foam seems to be
more sensitive with respect to melting together; 1718 min. is
appropriate.
Remove and cool the specimen completely. Taking the specimen out of the mould before complete cooling may result in
premature release of the pre compression. It may be helpful
to release foam ribs which have stuck together: stretch the
specimen gently in each of three directions. Congratulations!
You have made negative Poissons ratio foam (also called antirubber, dilational material, or auxetic material).
Measure the amount of permanent compression retained by the
specimen by either measuring the new distance between the
marks or by measuring the size of the transformed sample.
Other kinds of moulds are possible and have been used successfully by others.
A.2. Homogenization theory applied for auxetic computation
This subsection is extracted from authors previously published works and some other publications, e.g. [98,99]. In this
theory, the local constitutive structure is thought to have a locally
specied periodic unit cell as shown in Fig. A-1. Hence, every
physical variable eld on this material support can be expressed
by the combination of the averaged part with the local disturbance as depicted in part (b) of the gure. Assuming that the
periodicity, , should be sufciently small, every physical eld
u(x, y) in total can be represented by the following asymptotic
expansion in :
ux; y u0 x u1 x; y
1 2 2
u x; y . . . . . . for y
2
x=
1
2
v x; y v 0 x v 1 x; y 2 v 2 x; y . . . . . .
A-2
ux; y u0 x u1 x; y
lim
x!0
ux; ydV
1
jYj
Z
v x; y v 0 x v 1 x; y
A-4
Eijkl
@uk @ v i
dX
@xl @xj
Z
X
bi v i dX
t i v i dC
C
A-9
v are:
5 ux; y 5x u x 5x u x; y 5y u1 x; y
5 v x; y 5x v 0 x 5x v 1 x; y 5y v 1 x; y
A-10
!
0
@uk @u1k
@ v 0i @ v 1i
dX
@xl
@yl
@xj
@yj
X
"
!
#
Z
@u1k @ v 0i @ v 1i
@u0k @u1k @ v 1i
dX
Eijkl
@xi @xj
@yj
@xl
@yl @xj
X
Z
@u1 @ v 1i
2 Eijkl k
dX
@xl @xj
C
Z
Z
bi v 0i v 1i dX t i v 0i v 1i dC
Eijkl
A-11
? 0, it becomes:
when
!
0
@uk @u1k
@ v 0i @ v 1i
dX
Eijkl
@xl
@yl
@xj
@yj
X
Z
Z
bi v 0i dX t i v 0i dC
Z
A-12
0
@uk @u1k
@v i
dX
x!0
@xl
@yl
@xj
X
Z
Z
bi v 0i dX t i v 0i dC
lim
A-13
and
lim
x!0
Eijkl
@uk @u1k @ v 1i
dX 0
@xi
@yi @yj
A-14
Ux; y dX
Z
X
1
jYj
Z
Ux; ydY dX
A-15
Z
@uk @u1k
@v i
1
dY dX
Eijkl
@xl
@yl
@xj
X jYj Y
Z
Z
bi v 0i dX t i v 0i dC
A-16
and
Z
A-5
Eijkl
x!0
x!0
ux; ydY dV
A-8
and
lim
Z
A-7
or
A-3
and
for y
x=
@
@u 1 @u
ux; y
@xi
@xi @yi
A-6
and
lim
x=
A-1
ux; y u0 x u1 x; y
1 2 2
u x; y . . . . . . for y
2
ux; y u0 x u1 x; y
or,
and, using the homogenization principle, we use x and y in microscale coordinate (see Fig. A-1),
1
jYj
Z
Y
Eijkl
@uk @u1k @ v 1i
dY dX 0
@xi
@yi @yj
A-17
152
Fig. A-1. (a) A frame of multi-scaling in materials using the homogenization theory. (b) Local deviation in the eld variable to be embedded into the rationally smoothed
distribution [98].
u1i x; y
v
@u0p
pq
i y
@xq
A-18
where vkl
p is the microscale parameter. This can be obtained by combining Eqs. (A-18) and (A-17):
Z
X
1
jYj
Eijkl Eijpq
!
@ vpq
@u0
@ v 1i
i
dY k 0
@yj @yj
@xl
A-19
Z
X
EHijkl
@u0k
@xl
Z
Z
@v i
dX
bi v 0i dX t i v 0i dC
@xj
X
C
A-20
EHijkl
1
jYj
Eijkl Eijkl
!
@ vkl
p
dY
@yq
A-21
EH1111
6 H
4 E2211
0
EH1122
EH2222
0
2
1
E
7
6m
4 e
0 5
1 m2e
0
EH1212
0
me
1
0
0 7
5
1me
2
References
[1] A. Love, A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Dover
Publications, New York, 1944.
[2] L. Gibson, M. Ashby, G. Schajer, C. Robertson, J. Proc. Lond. Roy. Soc. 382
(1982) 2542.
[3] L. Gibson, M. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Pergamon Press,
London, 1988.
[4] R. Lakes, Science 235 (1987) 10381040.
[5] R. Lakes, Science 238 (1987) 551.
[6] K. Alderson, K. Evans, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22 (1989) 18771882.
[7] K. Evans, B. Caddock, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22 (1989) 18831887.
[8] K. Evans, M. Nkansah, I. Hutchinson, S. Rogers, Nature 353 (1991) 124128.
[9] W. Yang, Z. Li, W. Shi, B. Xie, M. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. 39 (2004) 32693279.
[10] K. Evans, K. Alderson, Eng. Sci. Educ. J. 9 (2000) 148154.
[11] A. Alderson, K. Alderson, J. Aerospace Eng. 221 (2007) 565575.
[12] G. Greaves, A. Greer, R. Lakes, T. Rouxel, Nat. Mater. 10 (2011) 823837.
[13] A. Alderson, Chem. Ind. (Lond.) (1999) X391.
[14] F. Arago, Oeuvres Compltes, Number v. 2 in Oeuvres Compltes, 1854.
[15] W. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, seventh ed.,
Wiley, 2006.
[16] M. Jiang, L. Dai, Philos. Mag. Lett. 90 (2010) 269277.
[17] A. Fukumoto, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 74627469.
[18] C. Perottoni, J. DaJornada, Philos. Mag. Lett. B65 (2002) 224208.
[19] J. Poirier, Introduction to the Physics of the Earths Interior, Cambridge
University Press, 2000.
[20] M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 79887991.
[21] I. Sokolnikoff, E. Stafford, Higher Mathematics for Engineers and Physicists,
McGraw-Hill Book, New York, London, 1934.
[22] H. Kolsky, Stress Waves in Solids, Dover Publications, New York, 1963.
[23] H. Gercek, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 44
(2007) 113.
[24] M. Sadd, Elasticity-Theory, Applications, and Numerics, Elsevier, Burlington,
MA, 2005.
[25] W. Wittke, Rock Mechanics-Theory and Applications with Case Histories
(Translator: R Sykes), Springer, Berlin, 1990.
[26] T. Ting, J. Elasticity 77 (2005) 163176.
[27] T. Ting, T. Chen, Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 58 (2005) 7382.
[28] R. Lakes, Adv. Mater. 5 (1993) 293296.
153