Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Qinghua Luan
College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, China
I.
I. INTRODUCTION
PREDICTION METHOD
A. Principle of GM (1,1)
The essence of GM (1,1) [5] is to accumulate the original data in
order to obtain regular data. By setting up the differential
equation model, we obtain the fitted curve in order to predict the
system. Assuming the observed original water quality is as
follows:
{x
(0)
{x
(1)
(1)
717
Where:
interval of
t =1
Mean value of
Where:
is [ x Z
, x + Z
] , where
1
x(t ) = ( x (1) (t ) + x (1) (t 1)) t = 2,3," , n
2
Data Process
dx (1)
+ ax (1) = u
dt
(2)
a
a = = ( BT B) 1 BT YN
u
x (0) (2)
x(2) 1
(0)
x(3) 1
x (3)
where B =
YN =
#
#
#
(0)
x (n)
x(n) 1
(1)
Grey predicting model of x :
(1)
u
u
x (t + 1) = ( x (0) (1) )e at +
a
a
(0)
Grey predicting model of x
(0)
u
x (t + 1) = (1 e a )( x (0) (1) )e at
a
dx (1)
+ ax (1) = b
dt
(3)
b b
x (1) (t ) = e a ( t 1) [ x ( 0) (1) ] +
a a
x ( 0) (t ) + az (1) (t ) = b, t = 2,3,4," n
(4)
(5)
Figure 1.
ek = x
( 0)
1
e=
n
S12 =
1
n
(0)
(k ) x
(k ) k = 1,2, " , n)
(0)
k =1
[ x ( 0) (k ) x] 2
1
n
[ e( k ) e]
} > 0.95
N ( ,
where
level,
) ,and
(x )
(
( Y.-L.Yeh, T.-C.Chen,2004,
nout
nall
(6)
y ( x) = wi (|| x ci ||)
Gd =
k =1
P = {| e k e |< 06745S1
S2
< 0.35
S1
1 n
= x (0) (t )
n t =1
S 22 =
k =1
While c =
confidence
confidence
(7)
i =1
718
APPLICATION
A. Study area
Spring area of small south China sea is located in
linzhou city and anyang county in henan province. River
water system belongs to Wei river water system in haihe
basin, the main river is huan river, and there are a
Xiaonanhai revervior and artificial Tianhe red flag
canal. The vents is in Huan river valley, the exposed
elevation is between 131-135m. Overall look in spring,
western mountains and Lin basin aer recharge are, and
the central low mountains is runoff area, and eastern
Xinan sea is discharge area, whose total area is
934.6Km2. karst groundwater is buried deeply, the
minimum depth is more than 10m, the influence of
evaporation of groundwater on level is very small, and
the type of karst water discharge is mainly water
drainage, mine drainage and artificial mining. The
precipitation and evaporation measured in 2003,
2004 ,2005 at 6# station is shown in figure.5.
Spring is located in transition between taihang
uplift and north China plain settlement, whose west is
Linzhou fault rupture, east to Tangxi fault rupture.
y i (n) = WK [x(n), C K , K ]
(9)
k =1
C K (n + 1) = C K (n) + C
(10)
e(n)WK (n)
K 2 (n)
(11)
K (n + 1) = K (n) +
e(n)WK (n)
K 2 ( n)
(12)
2
...,[x(n), cN (n), N ]
(13)
(14)
719
Start
2500
Evaporation
Rainfall
2000
1500
1000
500
0
J-03
F-03
M-03
A-03 M-03
J-03
J-03
A-03 S-03
O-03
N-03
D-03
Time
Cj
Cj
center
C j = C jk1
C jk1
C j = C jk1 ?
2500
Figure 5.
2003 at 6# Station
Evaporation
Rainfall
2000
1500
1000
500
NO
0
J-04 F-04 M-04 A-04 M-04 J-04 J-04 A-04 S-04 O-04 N-04 D-04
Time
C j = C jk1
Figure 6.
2004 at 6# Station
Determination of width
Determination of weight
Wij
2500
Evaporation
Rainfall
2000
1500
1000
500
0
J-05 F-05 M-05 A-05 M-05 J-05 J-05 A-05 S-05 O-05 N-05 D-05
Time
End
Figure 4.
Figure 7.
2005 at 6# Station
720
maximum
minimum
300
Groundwater level(m)
290
280
270
260
250
240
Ma
yJu 03
l0
Se 3
p03
No
v0
Ja 3
n0
Ma 4
r0
Ma 4
y0
Ju 4
l0
Se 4
p0
No 4
v0
Ja 4
n0
Ma 5
r0
Ma 5
y05
Ju
l0
Se 5
pNo 05
v05
230
Time
Figure 8.
300
295
Groundwater head(m)
290
285
280
275
TABLE II.
270
265
260
255
250
Nov-01
May-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Jan-04
Aug-04
Feb-05
Sep-05
Mar-06
Time
Figure 9.
Month
Jan-04
Feb-04
Mar-04
Apr-04
May-04
Jun-04
Jul-04
Aug-04
Sep-04
Oct-04
Nov-04
Dec-04
Max
251.56
252.15
252.64
252.63
252.34
252.13
252.54
255.04
257.84
259.86
261.44
262.47
Min
249.62
251.93
252.24
252.44
252.19
251.89
251.37
252.44
255.57
258.21
260.32
261.6
Ave
250.6583
252.0333
252.5317
252.5533
252.2433
252.0067
251.79
253.7367
256.755
259.0517
260.9267
262.0783
Var
0.503
0.007
0.022
0.005
0.002
0.008
0.180
0.946
0.728
0.392
0.189
0.111
Confidence
90
80
70
60
Variance
0.1
0.1-0.5
0.5-1.0
1.0
721
ANN
GM
Input layer
H0(t)
H0(t)
.
H0(t)
R(t)
E(t)
Data process
GM prediction
H01(t) H0n(t)
Figure 10.
H1(t)
H2(t)
.
.
.
Hn(t)
GREY DEGREE OF GROUNDWATER LEVEL UNDER DIFFERENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL IN ANYANG STATION
TABLE III.
Confidence
level
J-04
F-04
M-04
A-04
M-04
J-04
J-04
A-04
S-04
O-04
N-04
D-04
0.95
0.17
0.33
0.17
0.17
0.33
0.33
0.50
0.33
0.17
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.9
0.33
0.33
0.67
0.33
0.33
0.67
0.50
0.50
0.17
0.33
0.67
0.50
0.8
0.50
0.67
0.83
0.67
0.50
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.33
0.50
0.67
0.67
0.7
0.67
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.67
0.83
0.67
0.67
0.50
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.6
0.83
0.83
0.83
1.00
0.67
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.67
0.83
0.67
0.67
0.5
0.83
0.83
0.83
1.00
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.4
0.83
1.00
0.83
1.00
0.83
1.00
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.3
0.83
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.83
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.2
0.83
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.83
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.1
0.83
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
350
0.80
348
0.70
346
Groundwater level(m)
0.90
0.60
Grey degree
Hidden Layer
h1
h2
.
.
.
hm
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
342
340
338
336
332
Jan-04
Mar-04
Apr-04
Jun-04
Aug-04
Sep-04
Nov-04
Dec-04
Month
Figure 11.
344
334
0.10
0.00
Nov-03
Minimum
Maximum
330
Nov-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 Jun-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 Dec-04
Month
Figure 12.
722
348
346
Groundwater level(m)
Minimum
Maximum
REFERENCES
344
342
340
338
336
334
332
Nov-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 Jun-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 Dec-04
Month
Figure 13.
264.00
263.00
Groundwater level
262.00
261.00
260.00
259.00
258.00
257.00
256.00
Nov-04 Dec-04
Feb-05 Apr-05
May-05
Jul-05 Sep-05
Oct-05
Dec-05
Time
Figure 14.
station in 2005
CONCLUSIONS
Application of combined grey neural network to
forecasting of groundwater level is a novel research area.
Based on the modeling results obtained in this study, the
following conclusions can be drawn:
(1) The model of combined grey neural network is
proposed by virtue of the dynamic characteristics of
groundwater level, which increased the forecast
precision. Therefore, the method is reliable and effective.
(2) The combined grey neural network is the
improvement of other groundwater level prediction
methods. This method can be used to deal with the
nonlinear and periodical issues to improve the precision
of the groundwater level prediction.
(3) This method is not only suitable for the dynamic
prediction of the groundwater level, but also suitable for
other respects (such as surface water quality, prediction
of quality in the atmospheric environment, and so on) .
IV.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by the National Basic Research
Program of China (2010CB951101) , the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
40830639, 50879016, 50979022 and 50679018) , the
program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research
Team in University (IRT0717) and the Special Fund of
[18] Ju, Q., Z. Yu, Z. Hao, et al, 2009, Division-based RainfallRunoff Simulations with BP Neural Networks and
Xinanjiang models [J]. Neurocomputing, 72, 2873-2883.
[19] Parkin, G., S. J., Birkinshaw, P. L., Younger, et al, 2007,
A numerical modelling and neural network approach to
estimate the impact of groundwater abstractions on river
flows, Journal of Hydrology, 339, 15-28.
[20] Birkinshaw, S. J., G. Parkin and Z. Rao, 2008, A hybrid
neural networks and numerical models approach for
predicting groundwater abstraction impacts, Journal of
Hydroinformatics, 10(2) :127-137.
[21] Demissie, Y., K., A. J. Valocchi, B. S. Minsker, et al,
Integrating a calibrated groundwater flow model with
error-correcting data-driven models to improve predictions,
Journal of Hydrology, 364 , 257271.
[22] Garcia, L., A., A. Shigidi, 2006, Using neural networks for
parameter estimation in ground water, Journal of
Hydrology , 318, 215231.
[23] McDonaldM, C., and A.W. Harbaugh, 1988. A modular
three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow
model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water
Resources Investigations[R]. Book 6, Chapter A1, 586.
[24] Douglas P. Dufresne, and Charles W. Drake, 1999.
Regional groundwater flow model construction and
wellfield site selection in a karst area, Lake City, Florida
[J]. Engineering Geology, 52(1) :129-139.
[25] Chen X., and X. Chen, 2003. Stream Water Infiltration,
Bank Storage, and Storage Zone due to Flood Storages in
Channels[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 280, 246-264.
[26] CHEN Xi, CHEN Xun-hong. Numerical modeling of
groundwater flow and analysis of water budget in
Nebraska Sand Hills, USA[J]. Advances in Water Science,
2004, 15:94 -99.
[27] Qin Ju, Zhongbo Yu, Zhenchun Hao, et al, 2007.
Hydrologic Simulations with Artificial Neural Networks
[A]. Angela Burgess. Third International Conference on
Natural Computation [C]. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer
Society Publications, 2:22-27
723