ores. US. Department of Justice We , Office of the Pardon Attorney z Weaemecoso 8 88 8 January 7, 2014 Dear This is in response to your correspondence of December 20, 2013, received in this office on that same date, requesting pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. {§552, the “clemency warrants,” the “clemency proclamations,” and the “clemency file, including the petition, any correspondence, supporting evidence, and decision-making files” for Ronald Eugene Greenwood and Kimberly Lynn Stout The clemency warrants for both Mr. Greenwood and Ms. Stout are included in the materials that will be described below. I am unfamiliar with the term “clemency proclamation” but [ have attached the press release and statement that were publicly released by the White House on December 19, 2013 regarding the executive clemency grants of that date. And finally, as Ms. McElroy of my office advised you separately on December 30, 2013, absent the written consent of Mr. Greenwood and Ms. Stout, their applications and all correspondence between them and this office has been withheld in full pursuant to exemption six of the FOIA, which limits the release of information that could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of an individual’ personal privacy, Thave attached hereto a total of 107 pages from the clemency case file of Mr. Greenwood, and 15 pages from the clemeney case file of Ms. Stout, that are responsive to your request. You will note redactions of information from eight of the 107 pages released to you from Mr. Greenwood’s clemency case file as a result of the application of the aforementioned exemption six of the FOIA, as well as exemption five of the FOIA, which permits the withholding of information constituting inter- and intra-agency deliberative communications regarding executive clemency matters. A total of approximately 49 pages from the clemency case file of Mr. Greenwood, and 50 from the case file of Ms. Stout, which constitute their executive clemency applications and various communications with this office, have been withheld from production as a result of the application of exemption six of the FOIA. Additionally, a total of 91 pages for Ms. Stout, and 56 pages for Mr. Greenwood, that originated with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have been referred to the FBI, and they will respond to you directly regarding the release of thoserecords, A total of nine pages from the case file of Ms. Stout, consisting of the letter of advice in her case, and the comments of the United States Attorney of the district of conviction, and the sentencing judge, and 17 pages from the case file of Mr. Greenwood, consisting of the letter of advice in his case, and the comments of the United States Attorney of the district of conviction, the sentencing judge, and the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice, have been withheld in their entirety due to the aforementioned exemption five of FOIA. Finally, the release of the presentence investigation reports and statements of reasons, consisting of 12 pages in the case of Ms. Stout, and 29 pages in the case Mr. Greenwood, must be sought from the United States Probation Office that supervised these individuals (the Wester District of Virginia for Ms. Stout and the Western District of Missouri for Mr. Greenwood). The mailing address for the United States Probation Office for the Western District of Missouri is Suite 1300, 222 N. John Q. Hammons Parkway, Springfield, MO 65806-2530; the mailing address for the United States Probation Office for the Wester District of Virginia is P.O. Box 1563, Roanoke, VA 24007. For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA. See $ U.S.C. §552(c) (2006 & Supp. IV 2010). This response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA. This is a standard notification that is given to all of our requesters and should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. Although I have provided you with all of the information that can be released under the FOIA, I must inform you that if you consider my response to be a denial of your request, you may appeal to the Co-Director, Office of Information Policy, Department of Justice, Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20530-0001. Your appeal must be received within 60 days from the date of this letter. Your envelope and letter should be clearly marked “Freedom of Information Act Appeal” or “Information Appeal.” In the event your appeal is ‘unsuccessful, judicial review will thereafter be available to you in the federal district court for the district in which you reside or have your principal place of business, or in the District of Columbia, where the requested records are located. Sincerely, firctd b. badge Ronald L. Rodgers Pardon Attorney EnclosuresPage | of 3 Home « Briefing Room + Statements & Releases ‘The White House Office of the Press Secretary For immediate Release December 19, 2013 President Obama Grants Pardons and Commutation WASHINGTON, DC - Today President Barack Obama granted clemency to twenty-one individuals, consisting of tight commutations and thirteen pardons, “The President granted commutations to the following eight individuals; + Clarence Aaron - Mobile, Ala, Offense: Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base: possession with intent to distnbute cocaine; attempt fo possess cocaine with intent to distribute (Southem District of Alabama) Sentence: Life imprisonment, five years’ supervised release (Dec. 10, 1983) Commutation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 + Stephanie Yvette George - Pensacola, Fla, Offense: Conspiracy to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute (Northern District of Florida) ‘Sentence: Life imprisonment, ten years' supervised release (May 8, 1997) ‘Commutation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 + EzellGilbert-Tampa, Fla Offense: Possession with intent to deliver cocaine base, possession with intent to istribute marijuana (Middle District of Florida) Sentence: 292 months’ imprisonment, five years’ supervised release (Mar. 25, 1997) ‘Commutation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to time already served + Helen R. Alexander Gray -Ty Ty, Ga Offense: Conspiracy to possess with intent to distrioute cocaine base; possession with intent to distribute cocaine base; possession ofa firearm by a convicted felon (Middle District of Georgia) Sentence: 240 months’ imprisonment (Oct. 8, 1996) ‘Commatation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 + Jason Hermandez - Mckinney, Tex. Offense: Conspitacy to possess with intent to distribute and distribute controlled substances; possession with intent to distribute and distribute crack cocaine and methamphetamine; possession with intent to distribute a mixture of methamphetamine and cocaine hydrochloride; cistrbution of a controlled substance within 1,000 http://www. whitehouse. gov/the-press-office/2013/12/19/president-obama-grants-pardons-an.., 1/7/2014Page 2 of 3 feet ofa protected property: establishing @ place for manufacture and disttlbution of controlled substances (Easter District of Texas) ‘Sentence: Life imprisonment; eight years’ supervised release: $5,000 fine (Oct 2, 198) ‘Commutation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to 240 months (20 years) + Ricky Eugene Patterson - Fort Pierce, Fl. ‘Offense: Conspiracy to distrbute cocaine base; possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (Southern District of Florida) ‘Sentence: Life imprisonment, 10 years’ supervised release (Aug. 3, 1995) Commutation Grant: Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 + Billy Ray Wheelock - Betton, Tex. Offense: Conspiracy to distribute mare than 50 grams of crack cocaine; possession with intent to distribute ‘more than 5 grams of crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school; possession with intent to distibute crack cocaine (Western District of Texas) ‘Sentence: Life imprisonment, 10 years’ supervised release, $3,000 fine (Jun. &, 1983) ‘Commutation Grant Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 + Reynolds Allen Wintersmih, Jr. « Rockford, I Offense: Conspiracy fo possess with intent to distribute and distribute cocaine and cocaine base; possession with intent to distribute crack (Northern District of ihinois) Sentence: Life imprisonment, five years’ supervised release, $1,000 fine (Nov. 23, 1994) Commutation Grant Prison sentence commuted to expire on April 17, 2014 ‘The Prosident grant ns to the follow n individual + Willam Ricardo Alvarez - Marietta, Ga Offense: Conspiracy fo possess with intent to distribute heroin ; conspiracy to import heroin (District of Puerto Rico} Sentence: Time served after nine months’ imprisonment, four years’ supervised release (Apr, 30, 1997; ‘amended Jul 31, 1997) + Chatlie Lee Davis, Jr. - Wetumpka, Ala Offense: Possession with intent to distribute cocaine base; use of a minor to distribute cocaine base (Middle District of Alabama) Sentence: 87 months’ imprisonment, five years’ supervised release (Mar. 21, 1995) + Ronald Eugene Greenwood - Crane, Mo. Offense: Conspiracy to violate the Clean Water Act (District of South Dakota) Sentence: Three years’ probation, conditioned on six months’ homne confinement, 100 hours community service, $5,000 restitution, $1,000 fine (Nov. 18, 1986) + Lite Joe Hatch, aka Joe Hatch Sr. - Lake Placid, Fla, Offense: Possession with intent to distribute manjuana (Southern District of Flora) Sentence: 60 months’ imprisonment, four years’ supervised release (May 15, 1990) + Martin Alan Hatcher. - Foley, Ala (Offense: Distnbuton and possession with intent to distibute marjuana (Southern District of Alabama) ‘Sentence: Five years’ probation (Nov. 9, 1982) http:/Avww.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/12/19/president-obama-grants-pardons-an... 1/7/2014Page 3 of 3 + Derek James Laliberte - Auburn, Me. offense: Money laundering (District of Maine) Sentence: 18 months’ imprisonment, 2 years' supervised release (Oct, 2, 1992; amended May 21, 1993) + Alfred J. Mack - Manassas, Va. Offense: Unlaviul distibution of heroin (District of Columbia Superior Court) Sentence: 18 to 54 months! imprisonment (Apr. 5, 1982) + Robert Andrew Schindler - Goshen, Va. Offense: Conspiracy fo commit wire fraud and mal fraud (District of Utah) Sentence: Three years’ probation, four months’ home confinement, $10,000 restitution (May 14, 1996) + Wille Shaw, Jr. - Myrtle Beach, S.C. Offense: Armed bank robbery (Distt of South Carolina) Sentence: Fifteen years’ imprisonment (Aug. 7, 1974) + kimberly Lynn Stout, formerly known as Kimberly Lynn Cooley - Bassett, Va. Offense: Bank embezzlement; false erties in the books of a lending institution (Wester District of Virginia) ‘Sentence: One day imprisonment, three years’ supervised release (including five months home confinement) (Nov. 9, 1993) + Berard Anthony Sulton, Jr. - Norfolk, Va Offense: Theft of personal property (Easter District of Virginia) Sentence: Three years’ probation, $828 restitution, $500 fine (Apr. 4, 1889) + Chris Deann Switzer - Omaha, Neb, Offense: Conspiracy to violate narcotics laws (methamphetamine) (District of Nebraska) ‘Sentence: Four years’ probation, conditioned on six months home confinement, 200 hours’ community service (Jun. 25, 1896) + Miles Thomas Wilson - Williamsburg, Ohio. (Offense: Mai! fraud (Southern District of Ohio) Sentence: Three years’ probation (Jul. 15, 1964) WWW. WHITEHOUSE.GOV Enespatel {Accessibiy | Copytight Ifoonation |Pvacy Poley |Contact USAgor [Developers | Appi fora Job hitp:/Avww.whitehouse. gov/the-press-office/2013/12/19/president-obama-grants-pardons-an... 1/7/2014Page | of 1 Home + Briefing Room « Statements & Releases The White House Office of the Press Secretary For immediate Release December 19, 2013, Statement by the President on Clemency ‘Three years ago, | signed the bipartisan Fair Sentencing Act, which dramatically narrowed the disparity between penalties for crack and powder cocaine offenses, This law began to right a decades-old injustice, but for thousands fof inmates, it came too late. If they had been sentenced under the current law, many of them would have already served their time and paid their debt to society. Instead, because of & disparity in the law that is now recognized as Unjust, they remain in prison, separated from their families and their communities, ata cost of milions of taxpayer 743 1498 Environmental Law 49EXIV Criminal Responsibility 149EK738 Offenses 149BK743 k. Water Pollution. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 199K25.7(24) Health and Environment) To establish required state of mind for offense of knowingly falsifying, tampering with, or rendering inaccurate any monitoring device ormethod required to be maintained by the Clean Water Act (CWA), government did not haveto prove that defendants knew that theit acts were illegal, but only that they knew of their relevant activities. 33 U.S.CA. § 131904). [3] Statutes 361 2209 361 Statutes ‘361VI Construction and Operation ‘36LVILA) General Rules of Construction 361K204 Starute as a Whole, and Intrinsic Aids to Construction 361K209 k, Same or Different Language ‘Most Cited Cases Term that appears in statute more than once should ordinarily be construed the same way each time, £6] Criminal Law 110 €=388.2 ‘LLOXVI Evidence TOXVEIM Competency in General ‘110k388 Experiments and Tests; Scientific and Survey Evidence 110K388.2 k. Particular Tests or Experiments. Most Cited Cases. Assistant manager's “secret logs” of actual levels of ammonia nitrogen being discharged at hog processing. plant's waste water treatment facility were not cexcludable 5. unreliable from criminal prosecution © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.119 F3d 712 119 F.3d 71 (Cite as: 119 F.3d 712) under Clean Water Act, despite assistant manager's deviations from stendard protocol prescribed for using ammonia nitrate probe, in light of testimony produced by government tending to show that these deviations did not affect reliability of his test results. Fed.Rules Evid Role 702, 28 USCA. [5] Witnesses 410 29765) 410 Witnesses 410111 Examination 4L01NI(D) Privilege of Witness 4104297 Self-Incrimination -410K297(4) Form and Purpose of tnquiry 410k297(5) k. Cross-Examination and Impeachment. Most Cited Cases Witnesses 410 307 410 Witnesses 410111 Examination ALDIIICD) Privilege of Witness 410k307 k. Claim of Privilege. Most Cited Cases District court struck proper balancebetween defendant's and witness’ rights when it allowed witness, after direct, ‘examination, to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege outside presence of jury in licu of granting defendant's ‘motion seeking to limit severely government's ability to cross-examine witness. U.S.C.A. Const, Amends. 5, [6] Environmental Law 1495 ©7743 149E Environmental Law 149EXIV Criminal Responsibility 49EKT38 Offenses 149EK743 Kk, Water Pollution. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 199425.7(24) Health and Environment) Evidence that engineer at hog processing plant encouraged manager at plant's waste water treatment facility to render monitoring methods inaccurate and discouraged him from complaining about itto others at facility supported engineer's conviction of aiding and abetting violation of Clean Water Act(CWA) discharge permits. 33. USCA, § 1319(6)(4), Page 2 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl. L, Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed, R. Evid, Serv. 664 11] Criminal Law 110 =59(5) 119 Criminal Law OVI Parties to Offenses 110459 Principals, Aiders, Abettors, and Accomplices in General 110k59(5) k. Aiding, Abetting, or Other Participation in Offense. Most Cited Cases Encouraging perpetrators of crime in their efforts to effect that crime amounts to aiding and abetting commission of crime. vironmental Law 1498 ©1743 is) 49E Environmental Law 149EXIV Criminal Responsibility ‘L49EK738 Offenses 149EK743 k. Water Pollution, Most Cited Cases (Formerly 199k25.7(24) Health and Environment) Failure to charge jury that defendant had no affirmative legal duty to report violations of Clean Water Act (CWA) permits orto intervene to prevent them was not, abuse of discretion, wherecharge of aiding and abetting, violations of CWA permits was based on proof that defendant actively encouraged misleading monitoring scheme, and not solely on his role as supervisor and his failure to report violations orto intervene. 33 U.S.C. $1390 14), 19] Criminal Law 110 ©2717 110 Criminal Law ‘LIOXX Trial LIOXX(E) Arguments and Conduct of Counsel 110k712 Statements as to Facts, Comments, and Arguments 110K717 k. Arguing or Reading Law to Jury. Most Cited Cases Prosecutor’ statement that defendant had “a duty" or “an obligation” to “protect the river” or “make sure that the plant operated in compliance with the law,” when considered in context of full closing argument, did not improperly suggest to jury that it could convict defendant of Clean Water Act (CWA) violation solely for failure to report permit violations or failure to intervene to stop them. 33 US.C.A, § 1319(}(4 ‘© 2006 Thomson/West, No Claim to Orig. US. Govt. Works.93d 712 Page 3 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl, L, Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Evid, Serv. 664 (Cite as: 119 F.3d 712) [10] Criminal Law 110 2730(5) 110 Criminal Law 110XX Trial LIOXX(E) Arguments and Conduct of Counsel 10730 Action of Court 1L10k730(5) k. Arguing or Reading Law to Jury. Most Cited Cases Prosecutor's erroneous statoment that defendants could be convicted of Clean Water Act (CWA) violations if thoy “knew thatthe selective sampling and the flow game was going on,” made during closing argument, vwas cured by instructions directing jury to follow the Jays asset forth in instructions and defining element of offense and of aiding and abetting liability. 33, USCA. § 1319X8) 4713 Mark D. Hopson, Washington, DC, argued (Mark, ‘V. Meierhenry, Thomas C. Green, Jeffrey T. Green, ‘Michael J. Raphael, Paul J. Zidlicky, on the brief), for appellant Sinskey. Cheryl Krause Zemelman, Washington, DC, argued (Scott W. Muller, Thomas E, Haroldson, on the brief), for appellant Kumm, *714 Ethan G. Shenkman,Department of Justice ‘Washington, DC, argued (Lois J. Schiffer, Karen E. ‘Schreier, Dennis R. Holmes, David M. Uhlmann, Ellen Durkee, on the brief), for appellee United States, Before RICHARD S$, ARNOLD, Chief Judge, and BOWMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ‘MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. ‘The defendants appeal their convictions for criminal violations of the Clean Water Act. We affirm the Judgments of the trial court ENL The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, L In the early 1990s, Timothy Sinskey and Wayne Kumnm wete, respectively, the plant manager and plant engineer at John Morrell & Co, (*Morre’), a large plant in Siow Falls, South Dakota. The process created a large amount of wastewater, some of which Morrell piped to municipal treatment plant and the rest of which it ‘teated at its own wastewater treatment plant CWWTP"), After treating wastewater atthe WWTP, Morrell would discharge it into the Big Sioux River. ‘One ofthe WWTP’ functions was to reduce the amount ‘of ammonia nitrogen in the wastewater discharged into the river, and the Environmental Protection Agency CEPA") required Morrell to limit that amountto levels specified in a permit issued under the Ciean Water Act CWA”), see 33 US.C, §§ 1251-1387, As well as specifying the acceptable levels of ammonia nitrogen, ‘the permit also required Morrell to perform weekly a series of fests to monitor the amounts of ammonia nitrogen in the discharged water and to file monthly with the EPA a set of reports concerning those results, In the spring of 1991, Morrell doubled the number of ‘hogs that it slaughtered and processed atthe Sioux Falls plant, The resulting increase in wastewater caused the level of ammonia nitrate in the discharged water to be above that allowed by the CWA permit. — Ron Greenwood and Barry Milbauer, the manager and assistant manager, respectively, of the WWIP, manipulated the testing process in two ways so that Morrell would appear not to violate its permit. In the first technique, which the parties frequently refer to as “flow manipulation” or the“flow game,” Morrell would discharge extremely low levels of water (and thus low levels of ammonia nitrogen) early inthe week, when Greenwood and Milbauer would perform the required tests. After the tests had been performed, Morrell would discharge an exceedingly high level of water (and high levels of ammonia nitroxen) later inthe week. ‘The tests would therefore not accurately reflect the overall levels of ammonia nitrogen in the discharged wate. In addition to manipulating the flow, Greenwood and Milbauer also engaged in what the parties call “selectivesampling,” thats, they performed more than the number of tests required by the EPA but reported only the tests showing acceptable levels of ammonia nitrogen, When manipulating the flow and selective sampling failed to yield the required number © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S, Govt. Works.19 F.34712 Page 4 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envil. L. Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 664 (Cite as: 119 F.3d 712) oftests showingacceptable levels ofammonianitrogen, ‘the two simply falsified the test results and the monthly EPA reports, which Sinskey then signed and sent to the EPA, Morrell submitted false reports for every month Dut one from August, 1991, to December, 1992, ‘As a result of theie participation in these activities, Sinskey and Kumm were charged with a variety of CWA violations. After athree-weekttrial, a jury found Sinskey guilty of eleven ofthe thirty counts with which hhe was charged, and Kumm guilty of one of the seventeen counts with which he was charged. In Particular, the jury found both Sinskey and Kumm guilty ofknowingly rendering inaccurate a monitoring method required 9 be maintained under the CWA, in violation of 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c\(), and Sinskey guilty of knowingly discharging a pollutant into waters ofthe United States in amounts exceeding CWA. permit limitations, in violation of 33 U.S.C. § 1319(6\2\A); see also 33 USC, § I311(@). Each appeals his conviction +715 IL 1] Sinskey first challenges the jury instructions that the trial court gave with respect to 33 U.S.C. § 1319(62¥A), which, among other things, punishes anyone who" knowingly violates” $1311 or acondition or limitation contained in a permit that implements § BLL. ‘Tharsection ofthe CWA prohibits the discharge of pollutants except in compliance with, among other provisions, § 1342, which establishes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (*NPDES"). ‘The NPDES authorizes the EPA to issue permis that allow the discharge of certain pollutants within specified limitations and with specified reporting and ‘monitoring conditions. As applied in this case, § 1319(c)2\(A) therefore prohibits the discharge of pollutants in amounts exceeding the limitations specified in an NPDES permit, ‘The trial court gave an instruction, which it incorporated into several substantive charges, that in order for the jury to find Sinskey guilty of acting “knowingly,” the proofhad to show that he was “aware ofthe nature ofhis acts, performfed] them intentionally, and [did] not act or fail to act through ignorance, mistake, or accident” The instructions also told the jury thatthe government was not required to prove that Sinskey knew that his acts violated the CWA or permits issued under that act. Sinskey contests these instructions as applied to 33. USC. § 1319(e)2XA), arguing that because the adver “knowingly” immediately precedes the verb “violtes,” the ‘government must prove that he knew that his conduct Violated either the CWA or the NPDES permit. We disagree. Although our court has not yet decided whether 33 U.S.C. § 13190) 2M) requires the government to prove thata defendant knew that he or she was violating vither the CWA or the relevant NPDES permit when he or she acted, we are guided in answering this question by the generally accepted construction of the word “knowingly” in. criminal statutes, by the CWA's legislative history, and by the decisions of the other courts of appeals that have addressed ths issue. In construing other statutes with similar language and structure, thot is, statutes in which one provision punishes the “knowing violation” of another provision that defines the ilegal conduct, wehave repeatedly held that the word “knowingly” modifies the acts constituting the underlyingconduct. See United Staxes v. Farrell, 69 F.3d 891, 893 (8th Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 US. 1181, 116 S.Ct, 1283, 134 LEA.24 228 (1996), and Linited States v. Hern, 926 F.2d 164 766.68 (8th Cir.1991). In Farrell, 69 £.3d_at 892-93, for example, we discussed 18 U.S.C. § 9242), which penalizes ‘anyone who“knowingly violates” § 922(0)(1), which in ‘urn prohibits the transfer or possession of a machine gun, In construing the word “knowingly,” we held that itapplied only othe conduct proscribed in §922(0)(1), that i, the act of transferring or possessing a machine sun, and not to the illegal nature of those actions. conviction under § 924(a\(2) therefore did not require proof thatthe defendant knew that his actions violated the law, We see no reason to depart from that commonly aceepted construction in this case, and we therefore believe that in 33 U.S.C. § 1319(6N2MA), the word ‘© 2006 Thomson/ West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.119 P34 712 Page S 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed, R. Evid, Serv. 664 (Cite as: 119 F.3d 712) “knowingly” applies to the underlying conduct prohibited by the statute. Untangling the staatory provisions discussed above in order to define precisely therelevant underlying conduct, however, isnot litle dificult. At frst lance, the conduct in question might appear to be violating permit imitation, which would imply that §_1319(6)2XA) requires proof that the defendant knew of the permit limitation and knew that he or she was violating it. To violate @ permit limitation, however, one must engage in the conduct prohibited by that limitation, The permits, inessence, nother layer of regulation in the nature of ala, inthis ase, 2 law that applies only to Morrell. We therefore believe thatthe underlying conduct of which Sinskey ‘must have had knowledge is the conduct that is prohibited by the permit, for example, that Morell’ discharges of ammonia nitrates were higher than one pat per million in the summer of 1992. Given this interpretation of the statute, the government was not required to prove that Sinskey knew that his acts violated*716 cither the CWA or the NPDES permit, butmerely that he was aware of the conduct that resulted in the permits violation This interpretation comports not only with our legal systein's general recognition that ignorance of the law isno excuse, see Cheek v, United States, 498 US, 19: 199, 111 S.Ct, 604, 609, 112 L.Ed 2d 617 (1991), bat also with Supreme Court interpretations of statutes containing similar language and structure, In United States International Minerals & Chemical Corp.,402 US. $58, 91 S.Ct. 1697, 29 L.Ed2d 178 (1971), for ‘example, the Court analyzed a statute that punished anyone who “knowingly vilate{d]” certain regulations pertaining to the interstate shipment of hazardous materials. In holding that a conviction under the statute at issue did not require knowledge of the pertinent law, the Court reasoned that the statute's language was merely a shorthand designation for punishing anyone who knowingly committed. the specific acts or omissions contemplated by the regulations at issue, and that the statute therefore required knowledge of the material facts but not the relevant law. dd. at $62-63,91 S.Ct, at 1700-01. ‘The Court also focused on the nature of the regulatory scheme at issue, noting that where “dangerous or ‘obnoxious waste materials” are involved, anyone dealing with such materials “must be presumed!” to be aware of the existence of the regulations. /d_at 565,91 S.Ct at 1701-02, Requiring knowledge only of the underlying actions, and not ofthe law, would therefore raise no substantial due process concerns. Id_at 564-65, 91 S.Ct, at 1701-02. Such reasoning appiies with equal force, we believe, to the CWA, which regulates the discharge into the public's water of such “obnoxious waste materials” as the byproducts of slaughtered animals. The acts legislative history, moreover, supports our view of the mens rea required for conviction under 33 US.C.§ 1319(e¥2(A). In 1987, Congress amended ‘the act, in pat io inerease deterrence by strengthening the criminal sanctions for ts violation, See, eg, H.R. Conf, Rep. No. 99-1004 at 138 (1986) and S.Rep. No {99-50 at29-30 1985). To that end, Congress changed the term “willfully” to “knowingly” in that section of the act dealing with intentional violations, See 133 Cong. Rec. HI3i (daily ed. Jan. 7, 1987) (statement of Rep. J. Howard), reprinted in 1987 US.C.C.AN. 5,28, and 33 US.C, § 1319, historical and statutory notes, 1987 amendment, at 197 (West supp.1997). Although Congress did not explicitly discuss this change, it may logically be viewed as an effort to reduce the mens rea necessary for a conviction, as the word “willfully” generally connotes acting withthe knowledgethat one's conduct violates the la, while the word “knowingly normally means acting with an awareness of one's actions. Compare Cheek, 498 U.S. a201, 111$.Ct at $610, with International Minerals, 402 U.S, at $62-63, 91S.Ct, at 1700-0]. See also Babbitt v_ Sweet Home ‘Chapter of Communities, $15 US. 681, 696-97 1.9, 5 7 132 LBd2d $97 ( (Giscussing change in Endangered Species Act from *willfully”to knowingly”), and Hern, 926 F.2dat 767. ‘Our confidence in this interpretation is increased by decisions of the only other appellate courts to analyze the precise issue presented here. See United States v. Hopkins, 53 F.3d 533, $41 (2d Cir. 1995), cert. denied, ‘SIGU.S. 1072, 116S.Ct 773, 133 L.Ed.2d 725 (1996), ‘and, United States v Weitsenhoff, 38 F.3d 1275, 285.86 (Oth Cir.1993), cert denied, 513 US. 1128, 115 S.Ct, 939, 130 L.Bd2d 884 (1995). Both cases held that 33 U'S.C. § 1319(@)QMA) does not require © 2006 Thomson/ West. No Claim to Orig, U.S. Govt. Works.119 F.3d 712 Page 6 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 664 « as: 119 F.3d 712) proof that the defendant knew that his or her acts violated the CWA or the NPDES permits at issue. Contrary to the defendants’ assertions, moreover, United States v. Ahmad_ 101 F.3d 386 (Sth Cir, 1996 is inapposite. In Ahmad 101 F.3d at 388, a convenience store owner pumped out an underground ¢gasolinestoragetank into which some water had leaked, discharging gasoline into city sewer systemsandnearby creeks in violation of 33 U.S.C. § 1319(0\2\(A). At trial, the defendant asserted that he thought that he was discharging water, and thatthe statute’srequirement that he act knowingly required that the government prove not only that he knew that he was discharging something, but also that he *717 knew that he was discharging gasoline, [d at 390. The Fifth Circuit agreed, holding that a defendant does not violate the statute unless he or she acts knowingly with regard to each element of an offense. fd at 391. Ahmad, however, involved a classic mistake-of-fact defense, and is not applicable to a mistake-of-taw defense such as that asserted by Sinskey and Kumm. Indeed, the Fifth, Cireuit noted as much, distinguishing Hopkins, $3 F.3d at 533, and Weitzenhoff 35 F.3d at 1275, on the {rounds that those decisions involved a mistake-of-law dofense, See Ahmad, 101 F.3d at 390-91, [2] Sinskey, joined by Kuram, also challenges the trial court's instructions with respect to 33 USC. § 1319(6)(4), arguing that the government should have ibeen required to prove that they knew that their acts were illegal. This argument has even less force with respect £0 § 1319(c\4}-which penalizes a person who ‘knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or methodrequired‘o ‘be maintained” by the CWA-than it does with respectto S$ 1319(@2MA) — In § 1319(6¥9), the adverb “knowingly” precedes and explicitly modifies the verbs that deseribe the activities that violate the act. [3] We have repeatedly held that, in other statutes with similar language, the word “knowingly” refers only to ‘knowledge of the relevant activities (inthis case, the defendants! knowledge that they were rendering the ‘monitoring methods inaccurate by aiding and abetting in the flow games and selective sampling). See, eg, United States v, Hopkins, 53 F.3d 01541: Linited States 1 Bnochs, 857 F.2d 491, 492-94 (8th Cit 1988), cert denied, 490 US. 1022, 109 S.Ct. 1749, 104 LEA.2d 186 (1989, and Onited States, Udofo, 111 F.2d 831, 837 (ith Cir 1983), cert denied, 464 (LS, 895. 104 S.CL 245, 78 Ld 2d 234 (1983). Based on this well ‘established constructional convention, and the equally well known principle that a term that appears in 3 statute more than once should ordinarily be construed the same way each time, Raralafv. United Sates, 510 4 S.CL 24615 (1994), we see no reason to read a requirement tht a defendant know ofthe illegal nature of his or her acts into 33 USC. § 1319(6\4) Contrary to the defendants’ assertions, moreover, requiring the govemmentto prove only thatthe defendant acted with awareness of his or her conduct does not render § 1319(c)(4) a strict liability offense. {4] Sinskey also contends that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence Milbauer's*secret logs”-that is, notes that Milbauer took in which he recorded the actual levels of ammonia nitrogen being discharged-bocausothe logs constituted expert scientific evidence that did not meet the threshold standards of accuracy and reliability. See Fed R.Evid, 702 and Daubert v, Merrell Dow Pharm, Inc. 5 19, 4, 2797125 1,B.d.2d 469 (1993) Sinskey appears not to contest the fact that, in the abstract, the means of testing ammonianitrogen levels, ‘that Milbauer used, an ammonia nitrate probe, was sufficiently accurate and reliable. Sinskey instead. attacks the manner in which Milbauer used the probe, arguing that certain deviations by Milbaver from the standard protocol prescribed for using the probe rendered his results so unreliable as to negate, in this ease, the probe's generally accepted accuracy and reliability. See, e.g, United States v Johnson, S6E.34 947, 952-53 (8th Cir,1995), and United States », Martings, 3 F.3d 1191, 1198 (8th Cir 1993), cert denied, S1DU.S. 1062, 114 S.Ct. 734, 126 L.Ed.2d 697 1994 ‘After a careful review of the tial cour's two-day hearing on this issue and the relevant testimony at trial, wwe findno error. Although Sinskey identified several practices of Milbauer that deviated from the standard, protocol for use ofthe probe, the government produced. © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.N9F34712 Page 7 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envil, L, Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Bvid. Serv. 664 (Cite as: 119 F.3d 712) testimony tending to show that these deviations did not affect the reliability of Milbauers test results. ‘Therefore, admitting the secret logs and allowing the jury to consider these deviations when deciding what, ‘weight co give the logs was, we believe, well within the trial cour’ discretion, [5] We similarly find no error in the trial court's decision not to grant Sinskey’s motion seeking to limit severely the government's *718 ability to cross-examine tan unindicted co-conspirator. Although a trial court must strike a balance between a witness's fifth amendment privilege and the defendant's sixth amendmentrighttocross-examination, see, e.g, Unied = n ch Cir.1988), there isno indication in the present case that the trial court failed properly to strike such a balance. ‘Although the trial court refused to grant the requested ‘motion, it indicated that it would be willing to consider other restrictions on the cross-examination’s scope. After the defense suggested none, the tial court ruled that it wouldallow the witness, after direct examination, to invoke his fifth amendment privilege outside the presence ofthe jury. We believe that thisruling gave Sinskey everything that he requested, and more. The trial court therefore did not err in balancing the defendant’ and the witness's rights in the manner that it chose. M1. (617) Kumm attacks his conviction for violating 33 USC. § 1319(e¥4) on 2 number of grounds, first among them the sufficiency of the governments evidence. Kum claims that the government's evidence established only that he feiled to stop others from rendering inaccurate Morrell's monitoring ‘methods, not that he affirmatively participated in the deceit either directly or by aiding and abetting those wthodid. As Kummecorrectly argues, to convict him of aiding and abetting the monitoring scheme, the ‘government must prove more than his mere association with, and knowledge of the activities of, Greenwood, Milbauer, and Sinskey. United Stares v_ Nunn, 940 E2d_U128, 1131 (8th_C Instead, the ‘government must show that Kumm associated himself with the misleading monitoring scheme, participated in it“as something [he] wished to bring about,” and acted insuch a way as to ensure its success. United States v Hlernandes, 986 F 2d 234,238 (8th Ci.1993), quoting United States v. Posters ‘WN’ Things, Lid, 969 F.2d 682, ‘aff'd SIMUS.513, 1148.2 1747, 1281.E42d539 (1994). Encouragingthe perpetrators of a crime in their efforts to effect that crime is therefore aiding and abetting the commission of a crime. See Hernandes, 986 F.2d st 238, and Num, 940.24 at 1131. ‘After a careful review of the record in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict, see United States v. Baker, 98 F.3d 330, 338 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 US. 1179, 117 Sct, 1456, 137 LEd2d 56 11997), we believe that the evidence against Kumm, although hardly overwhelming, is not so weak that no reasonable juror could have convicted him. See id. In particular, we believe that the evidence supports a verdict that he aided and abetted the misleading, ‘monitoring scheme by encouraging Greenwood 10 render Morrell’s monitoring methods inaccurate and by discouraging him from complaining about ito others at the WWTP. Kumm once reassured a worried Greenwood, for example, “not to worry about [the violations] because if we di get caught, Morrels had enough layers and lobbyists that it wouldn't be a problem.” Although Kumm knew of Greenwood’s illegal activities, moreover, he praised Greenwood on employee evaluations and even recommended that Greenviood receive a raise, When Greenwood began complaining, about the violations and campaigning for physical improvements at the WWIP to deotease future violations, Kumm silenced him, Ata meeting of the plant's mechanical department, for example, Kummtold Greenwood that “[nJow is not the time or the place to discuss those matters” when Greenwood raised the subject of the violations. Lasty, although Greenwood ‘would “rant and rave” to Kum several times @ week about the permit violations and about getting the WW'P fixed, Kumm responded only by submitting to Morrell headquarters routine requests for future Jmprovements that were similar to previous requests that had already been denied. We believe that these © 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works,13d 712 Page 8 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl, L, Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Evid, Serv. 664 te as: 119 F.3d 712) affirmativeacts constitute sufficientevidence to support Kumm's conviction. {8] Kumm challenges the jury instructions on several ‘grounds. In addition to the issue discussed above, Kummasserts thatthe essence of the goverament’scase ‘was his failure to report the violations and to intervene to stop their continuation, that he had no such duties, and that the trial court therefore*719 abused its Aiscretion when it refused to give an instruction to the jury that Kumm had no affirmative legal duty to report violations of the CWA permits or to intervene (0 prevent them. Though such an instruction would certainly have been appropriate, after a careful review of the record we see no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decisionnatto give the requested instruction, for the following reasons. Contrary to Kumm's assertions, the government's ease did not facus solely on Kumm'stale as a supervisor and his failure to report the violations or to intervene. We note at the outset of this discussion that Kumm was neither charged with, nor convicted of, a failure to report CWA permit violations. Instead, he was charged with, and convicted of, “renderfing] inaccurate” the monitoring methods required under Morrell's CWA permit. See 33 ILS.C. § 1319(6\(4) ‘Kumm argues, however, that the testimony of several ‘witnesses and certain portions of the governments closing argument so emphasized his supervisory status ‘andhis inaction, that they led the jury to convicthim for ‘being an innocent bystander who merely failed to report ‘the violations orto intervene, Aftera careful review of the statements at issue, in their full context, we disagree. ‘As we indicated above, the government sufficiently proved that Kumm actively encouraged the flow ‘manipulation and selective sampling, thereby affirmatively participating inthe misleading monitoring scheme. Presenting evidence that Kumm was a supervisor, that is, that he was in & position capable of ssiving rewards and reassurances, was but @ necessary part of showing how he was able to encourage Greenwood, Likewise, testimony that Kum neither reported nor interfered with the permit violations was consistent with the government's claim that Kumm was encouraging illegal activity. Contrary to Kumm's assertions, this evidence did not merely tend to show that Kumm violated some supposed duty to report permit violations; it tended instead to prove acts of concealment on Kumm'spart that allowed the selective sampling scheme effectively to camouflage Morrells violations. [2] Nor do we find reversible error in the prosecutor's closing argument, AsKumm points out, the prosecutor did, at times, argue that Sinskey and Kumm had “a duty” or “an obligation’”to “protect the river” or “make sure that the plant operated in compliance with the Taw.” In the context of the full closing argument, however, we believe that these statements refer not to legal duties, but rather to the duties of his job, And. while the prosecutor did refer to what Kumm did not do, such as not reporting the violations and not interfering with them, these references were always, as ‘rhetorical device, juxtaposed against what Kumm did do. In context, we do not believe that these statements suggested to the jury that it could conviet Kum solely for the failure to report permit violations or the failure to intervene to stop them [10] We do, however, believe that the prosecutor misstated the law when he told the jury, with respect to the violation of 33 U.S.C. § 1319%e)(4), that if “these ‘ovo gentlemenknew thatthe selective sampling and the flow game was going on, they are guilty.” We note, ‘though, not only that this statement was not objected to either during or after the argumentin question, but also that we believe that the jury instructions suicienly cured whatever unfair prejudice this statement may have created. ‘The tril court told the jury that it had to “follow the law as stated in these instructions,” that i had to “follow my instructions on the law, even if you thought the law was different,” and that “[i}twould be ‘violation of yoursworn duty to base your verdict upon any rules of law other than the ones given you in these instructions.” The instructionsrelevantto § 131 9(6)) defined accurately the elements ofa violation of it and the elements of aiding and abetting, including the nocessity that a defendant act knowingly. The aiding and abetting instructions, moreover, correctly told the jy that a defendant's mere presence ata crime scene or his mere association with the perpetrators of @ © 2006 Thomson/ West, No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt, Works.119 F3d.712 Page 9 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R, Evid. Serv, 664 (Cite as: 119 F334 712) violation was insufficient to prove that the defendant aided and abetted the commission of an offense “nov, For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the convictions in all respects. C.A8 (S.D_),1997. US. v. Sinskey 119 F.3d 712, 44 ERC 2081, 27 Envtl,L. Rep. 21,468, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 664 END OF DOCUMENT © 2006 Thomson/West, No Claim to Orig. U.S, Govt, Works.‘Westlaw Attached Printing Summary Report for BOLLWERK,HELEN M 1605914 Your Search: ‘Ti¢Timothy /5 Sinskey) Date/Time of Request: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 09:16:00 Central Client Identifier: Dos Database: ALLFEDS Citation Text: 119 F.3d 712 Lines: 547 Documents: 1 Iinages: 0 ‘The material accompanyingthis summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson, West and their affiliates.Missouri Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan ‘SOS Home :: Business Services :: Business Entity Search Search " Re ny Business Name ‘Search Type: Starting With bade G Utility ‘@By Charter Number By Registered Agent ‘Search Date: 10/3/2012 Search Time: 13:20 ‘For New Corporations Glick on the Business Entity Name or Charter Number to view Verify ‘more information. Verify Cettification Entity Someta Business Entity Charter Creation File Fictitious Name Name Number Type Status Date Registration —_ — File Online RG Utility Contracting, LC1187171 Limited Active 12/5/2011 @Renew Online uc Uability File LLC Registration ‘Company File Ontine ‘Online Orders Records Returned 1 to 1 ‘Register for Online ‘Orders ©0rder Good Standing ‘SOrder Certified Documents Commissions Corporations UCC Office Phone: (573) 751-2783 Phone: (573) 751-4153 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Toll Free: (866) 223-6635 Toll Free: (866) 223-6635, 500 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Main Office: (573) 751-4936 =rMissouri Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan SOS Home :: Business Services :: Business Entity Search Search @By Business Name ‘©By Charter Number ‘@By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verity verity Certification Registration Report File Online File Ficttious Name Registration File Online Renew Online File LLC Registration File Online Online Orders ‘Register for Online Orders, Order Good Standing Order Certiied Documents Filed Documents (Click above to view filed documents that are available.) Business Name History Date: 10/3/2012, Name Name Type RG Utility Contracting, LLC Legal Limited Liability Company - Domestic - Information Charter Number: Lot187171 Status: Active Entity Creation Date: 12/5/2011 11:03:11 AM Expiration Date: Perpetual Registered Agent Agent Name: Greenwood, Ronald Office Address: 1240 State Hwy A Crane MO 65633 Mailing Address: Organizers Name: Ronald Greenwood Address: 1240 State Hwy A Crane MO 65633 Commissions Phono: (573) 751-2783 Toll Froe: (866) 223-6535 Corporations UCC Office Phone: (573) 751.4153 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Toll Free: (868) 223-6535 800 West Wain Streat Jefferson City, MO 65101 Main Office: (573) 751-4996. =Missouri Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan 80S Home :: Business Services Search By Business Name By Charter Number @By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verify Verity Certification Registration Report File Online File Ficttious Name Registration File Online Renew Online File LLC Registration File Onine Online Orders Register for Online Orders 0rder Good Standing S0rder Certified Documents Business Entity Search ‘All Annual Reports fled 1999 forward are available to view 4&/or print as well as all documents filed on or after 5-12-03. Status of fled documents prior to 6-12-03: if the Creation Filing is not available to be viewed, the entire file may be incomplete because it has not been scanned. Therefore, there may be other types of filings associated with this, entity. ‘Once a copy request and appropriate fees have been received on a specific entity the entire fle is completely ‘scanned and available online to view andlor print Date: 10/3/2012 Current Name: RG Utility Contracting, LLC Image Date Document flo 1215/2014, Creation Filing *F View the images on-line! Netscape users, use the IM ution ‘Commissions Phone: (573) 751-2783 Toll Free: (866) 223-653: Corporations UCC Office Phone: (673) 751-4153 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Toll Free: (886) 223-6535 G00 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Main Office: (673) 751-4936File Number: 201133980199 : Letsart74 State of Missouri Date Filed: 1705/2011 Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State Robin Carnahan Secretary of State Articles of Organization 1. ‘The name of the limited liability company is’ RG Utility Contracting, LLC 2, The purpose(s) for which the limited liability company is organized: ‘The transaction of any lawful business for which a limited lial ‘Missouri Limited Liability Company Act, Chapter 347 RSMo. ity company may be organized under the ‘The name and address of the limited liability company's registered agent in Missouri is: Ronald Greenwood. 1240 State Hwy A, Crane MO 65633 Wane Ailes 4. ‘The management of the limited liability company is Manager X]Member 5. The duration (period of existence) for this limited liability company is: Perpetual is 6. The name(s) and street address(es) of each organizer: Ronald Greenwood, 1240 State Hwy A, Crane MO 65633 In Affirmation thereof, the facts stated above are true and correct: (Te unersigned understands that False statements made io this filing are subject othe penalties provided under Section 575.040, RSMo) Ronald Greenwood ‘Organizer Nae)Robin Carnahan Secretary of State CERTIFICATE OF ORGANIZATION RG Utility Contracting, LEC LCH87171 filed its Articles of Organization with this office on the December 5, 2011, and that filing was found to conform to the Missouri Limited Liability Company Act. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN CARNAHAN, Secretary of State of the State of Missouri, do by virtue of the authority vested in me by law, do certify and declare that on the December 5, 2011, the above emtity is a Limited Liability Company, organized in this state and entitled to any rights granted to Limited Liability Companies. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause to be affixed the GREAT SEAL of the State of Missouri. Done at the City of Jefferson, this December 5, 2011Missouri Secretary of State Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan SOS Home «: Business Services :: Business Entity Search Search By Business Name ‘By Charter Number @8y Registered Agent For New Corporations Verity verity Certification Registration Report File Online File Fictitious Name Registration Fie Online Renew Online File LLG Registration File Online Online Orders Register for Oniine Orders Order Good Standing 20rder Cerlfied Documents Search Type: Starting With Search Criteria: Clean Stream Enterprises ‘Search Date: 10/9/2012 Search Time: 13:23 Click on the Business Entity Name or Charter Number to view ‘more information. Entity Business Entity Charter Creation Name Number Type Status Date CLEAN STREAM —LC0025404 Limited Active 1/28/1999 ENTERPRISES, Liability Luc. ‘Company Records Returned 1 to 1 Page 1 of 1 Commissions Phone: (573) 751-2783, Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Corporations UCC Office Phone: (573) 751-4153 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 G00 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Main Office: (573) 751-4936 *Missouri Secretary of State Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan SOS Home :: Business Services Search By Business Name By Charter Number By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verify Verity Certification Registration Report Business Entity Search Filed Documents : (Click above to view Date: 10/8/2072 seg documents that are available.) Business Name History Name Name Type Page 1 of 1 ‘File Online CLEAN STREAM 1 Fie Fictitious Name ENTERPRISES, LLC. aici Registration File Oniine Pee ee Renew Oniine Limited Liability Company - Domestic - Information eri el ane Registration Charter Number: Lc0026404 ile Online : " Online Orders eee pe Register for Online Entity Creation Date: 1128/1899 Orders ca order Good Standing State of Business.: Mo Order Certified Documents Expiration Ds 04/16/2028 Registered Agent Agent Name: William Bert Bond Office Address: 102 East Brown Clever MO 65631 Mailing Address: Organizers Name: RONALD E. GREENWOOD Address: ROUTE 1 BOX 3406 CRANE MO 65633 ‘Commissions Corporations ucc offi Phone: (573) 751-2783 Phone: (573) 751-4153 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 Toll Free: (866) 223-6535 00 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 ‘Main Office: (573) 751-4936 ~~Missouri Secretary of State Page | of 1 Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan ‘SOS Home :: Business Services :: Business Entity Search Search All Annual Reports fled 1999 forward are available to view By Business Name &/or print as well as all documents filed on or after 5-12-03. ‘By Charter Number ‘@By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verify verify Certification Registration Report File Online File Fictitious Name Registration Status of filed documents prior to 5-12-03: If the Creation Filing is not available to be viewed, the entire fle may be incomplete because it has not been scanned. Therefore, there may be other types of flings associated with this entity Once a copy request and appropriate fees have been received on a specific entity the entire file is completely ‘scanned and available online to view andlor print File Online Renew Online File LLC Registration Date: 10/3/2012 File Online Online Orders fenegee or olne Current Name: CLEAN STREAM ENTERPRISES, L.L.C, Order Good Standing Image Date Document ‘Order Certified Document ieee ee eee eevee 112811999 Creation Filing 112812012 ‘Agent Change/Resign ¥ View the images on-line!! Netscape users, use the IM button. ‘Commissions Corporations UCC Office Phone: (573) 751-2783 Phone: (673) 751-4183 Phone: (573) 751-4628 Toll Free: (886) 223-6535 Toll Free: (868) 223-6535 (866) 223-6535, 600 West Main Strest Jefferson City, MO 65101 Main Office: (673) 751-4936 ~~A : State of Missouri ie | Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State Seated: > | Date Filed: 01/23/2012 Corporations Divison PO Bor 798/600, Main St, Rin 322 Robin Carnahan Sfferson Ci, MO 65102 ear aaa Statement of Change of Registered Agent and/or Registered Office By a Foreign or Domestic For Profit or Nonprofit Corporation or a Limited Liability Company Trstructions ‘This fort is to be used by either a for profit or cenprosit corporation ora limited liability company to change eter or botb the name of its registered agent and/or the addcess of its existing registered agent. ‘There is a $10.00 fee for filing this statement. PO Box may only be used in conjunction with w physical street address. Agent and address must be in the State of Missouti, ‘The corporation may not ect as its own agent. cme LCOS 1. The name of the business entity is Clean Stream Enterprises, L.L.C. 2. The adéress including stret and number, of its present registered ofice (before ches) is 1240 State Hwy A, Crane, MO_65633 “Ades Cipiaaip 3, The address, including street and number, of is registered ofice is hereby changed to: 102A East Brown, Cleveg M0 ose, aren (70 ry ny ve we i conpaton wih 3 pial se dees) Cioaaip 4, The name ofits present registered agent (before chenge) is: Ronald Greenwood 5. The name of the new registered agent is: Witam Bert Bond Authorized signature megs) pear below: (Ma aac porte vigils eecoed writen coms 0 sor Be of age) 6. The address of its registered office and the address ofthe business office of its registered agent, as changed, will be identical 7. The change was duly authorized by the business entity named above, In ABlrmation thereof, the facts stated above are true and correct (The undersigned understands yy falge statpagghs melo inthis filing are subject tothe penalties provided under Section 575.040, RSMo) i Wiliam Bert Bond ‘phar signature aces member, meager or Wappen of be board Fried Name Managing Member Tae Bae ‘Name and address to return filed document: Name: DevidPayne Law LEG ee Address; 1402S. Eliot, Ste F,POBox467 ChangeResianton of Ago 1 Panes) conmanten ce Aces UA "2024 1827State of Missouri Rebecca McDowell Cook, Secretary of State P.O. Box 778, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102 Corporation Division «PILED Articles of Organization (Submit in duplicate with filing fee of $105) JAN 2 8 1999 1. The name of the limited liabiliey company i Kose Mb (Cok BEG CLEAN STREAM ENTERPRISES, LLC ieoah or Gh 2. The puspose(s) for which the limited Hiaility company is crgonized:(A)_to conduct tests for water and waste water treatment systems; to engage or transact any lawful business for which a limited liability company may be organized under the Missouri Limited Liability Company Act; and (b) see attached 8. The name and address of the limited liability company's registered agent in Missouri is: Ronald E. Greenwood, R.R. 1, Box 340C, Crane, MO 65633 Nowe Susctadicw GiviSantip ‘The management of the limited liability company is vested in one or more managers. X01 Yes O No 5. The latest date on which the limited liability company is to dissolve is: April 15, 2025 ‘Monty DayYer 6. Upon the withdrawal of any member, the remaining member(s) have the following right(s) (if any) to continue the business and affairs of the limited liability company: None; company is dissolved per V.A.M.S. 347.137 and applicable law. 7. The name(s) and address(es) of each organizer: Ronald E. Greenwood, Route 1, Box 340C, Crane, MO 65633 8, For tax purposes, is the limited liability company considered a corporation? Yes No A partnership In gffiymatign theregf, she facts stated above are true: ‘onald E. Greenwoo Cia! Organizer Organizer ne 1299)Attachment to Articles of Organization CLEAN STREAM ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. 2. (b) without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to carry on the business of testing, evaluating, surveying, compiling reports, papers, pamphlets and other products and services relating to the ‘testing of water and waste water standards according to generally accepted practices. ‘ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATB OF MISSOURI) dss COUNTY OF LAWRENCE ) On_this day of ., before me personally appeared Ronald Greenwood, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing and acknowledged that they executed the same as his free act and deed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in Aurora, Missouri, the day and year first above written. Notary Public My Commission Expires:No- Lt0025404 Rebecca McDowell Cook Secretary of State CERTIFICATE OF ORGANIZATION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY FILED ITS ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION WITH THIS OFFICE ON THE NI + 1999, AND 28TH DAY oF JANUARY THAT FILING WAS FOUND TO CONFORM TO THE MISSOURI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT; NOW, THEREFORE, 1, REBECCA MCDOWELL COOK, SECRETARY OF STATE, STATE OF MISSOURI, BY VIRTUE OF AUTHORITY VESTED IN ME BY LAW, DO CERTIFY AND DECLARE THAT ON THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999, THE ABOVE ENTITY IS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ORGANIZED IN THIS STATE AND ENTITLED TO ANY RIGHTS GRANTED TO LIMITED ES. N TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HE STATE OF MISSOURI, ON THIS, THE 'BTH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999-MoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Page 1 of 1 Operator Search Results Page W=brinking Water Treatment OS=Drinking Water Distribution wweWastewater (CF =Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) CCick on a heading below to sor the table GeaNo Nami ‘a ‘Contract County Gat Level ExpDate 2i4 Greenwood, Ronald E Crane, Mo No STONE WW A 12012018 214 Greenwood, Ronald E Crane, MO__No ‘STONE DS il _o2aBn015 214 Greenwood, Ronald E Grane, MO No STONE OW D _o2nsnois Missouri 1.800.961.4827 | 573-751-1600 Department of E-mail: opcert@anrmo gov Natural ResourcesMoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Page 1 of 1 Certified Operator Ronald E. Greenwood Crane, MO 65633, CCortfeate Number: 2114 ‘County: STONE. ‘Training Updated: 0510172012 Certificate Renewal Training Cenifications _Expires Earned Needed __Restricted Use At Wawa Taino 760 00 NatRestted ow-D oazez018 no 0 Not Restrictect DS -t 0212812015 a0 Not Restricted lable for Contract Operations Drinking Water Treatment: No Drinking Water Distribution: No Wastewater: No CAFO: No. DW=Drinking Water Treatment DS=Drinking Water Distribution WwweWastowater cF=Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Missouri 4-800-381-4827 1 573-751-1600 Fy Department of Erma: opcert@anrmo.goy Natural ResourcesMoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Page 1 of 1 Certified Operator Ronald E, Greenwood Grane, MO 65633 Cortifcate Number 2114 County: STONE. ‘Training Updated: 0800172012 Cerificate Renewal Training Centifications _Expires__ Earned _Needed _Restricted Use At lw are12014 780 00 NetRestictes Dw-D oz20r2015 110 90 Not Resticted | DSH oner2015 410. 13.0 Not Restricted Available for Contract Operations | Drinking Water Treatment: No Drinking Water Distribution: No ‘Wastowator: No CAFO: No DW=Drinking Water Treatment _DS=Drinking Water Distribution WW-Wastewater (CF=Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Missouri 4-800-961-4827 573-751-1600 Fy Department of E-malt opoet@darmo.gov Natural ResourcesMoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Page 1 of 1 Certified Operator Ronald E. Greenwood Grane, MO 65633 Cortficate Numb County: STONE ai ‘Training Updated: 030112012 Certificate Renewal Training Cottifications _Expires Earned __Neoded _Restricted Use At asa Taisia0%4 780 00 NotResticied Dw-D 022872015, 110 80 Not Restricted Ds-u 22812015 #0. 19,0__NotRestrctes Available for Contract Oper [Drinking Water Treatm Drinking Wator Distibution: No Wastewater: No CAFO: No DWeDrinking Water Treatment _DS=Drinking Wster Distribution wwWastewater (cF=Concentrated Animal Feoding Operation (CAFO) Department of Erma: pcon@ancro cov Natural Resources Missouri 4-800.961-4827 573-751-1600MoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Operator Search Enter search criteria below and press "Search Operators” vOperatera) ©) Page 1 of 2 ‘tise Init: Certification Type: ww Sa Ge Oe ‘Dweorinking ster Yrestmant_DS=Dvihing Water Dstbuton Wlletastewster_CFCAFO aubRAIN parry lparTon Cieates ‘Cieenton CALLAWAY CJ CAMDEN GIRARDEAU [carrou. TlearTeR TlcRAWFORD Soave SJOALLAS: loaves Slounrun COFRANKLIN: GASCONADE Sicentry Cloreene iRunoy CUHARRISON, SUJEFFERSON CJoHNsoN Srevox Sacuepe LAFAvETTE ChuawRence: ews uncoun uN LIVINGSTON. MACON TI Mapison hwaRies CmMaRION imcooNaLp fae aes ae ata “lpemiscor TpeRRY Operns CIPHELPS: Cpe Spare TPouK Craus: Cischuner ‘SCOTLAND GENEVIEVE Elstooparo ClstoNe Clsutuvan ‘TEXAS [vernon Clwarren TADPOIOMoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Page 1 of | Operator Search Results Page [DW=Drinking Water Treatment OS*Drinking Water Distribution vettetowcter roteneentata homal Fewang Operation CAFO) clokon shesdg bocwtosorinetitle Peon i ‘aia Coast Gos a Tol | Seu Geomoel Rena Gane No STONE WAAaozon Si eesust ReaitéGe'MO No sTone 0S “W_eoaszore Frit eeenned Rona Gre -No STONE OW D_eaaacote Missouri snnsestr | 7375-800 m Department of Natural Resources HEEEHH vinaoinMoDNR Water and Wastewater Operator Certification Certified Operator Ronald E. Greenwood Crane, MO 65633 Certificate Number: 2114 County: STONE Training Update: 10142010 lea Covificaie Renewal Training Corteations _Expites Earned __ Needed __ Restricted Uso At ww ® ‘amon «88.0 00 NotResticted = DW-3 conser: «248 Det Rested sin canenow SSSA Rete ‘vailable for Contract Operations: "Drinking Water Treatment: No Drinking Water Distribution: No Wastowater: No DWsDrinking Water Treatment _DS=Drinking Water Distribution wweWastewater (ORR Missouri Fy Department of GRID Natural Resources Page | of 1 (cF=Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) 4-800-361-4827 / 573-751-1600 E:mnai: cent@aer-mo gov nAnaOAissouri Secretary of State Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan ‘SOS Home :: Business Services Search ‘By Business Name ©By Charter Number ‘By Registered Agent For New Corporations Verity verity Certification Registration Report File Online File Fictitious Name Registration File Online ‘Renew Online File LLC Registration File Online Online Orders ©Register for Oniine Orders Order Good Standing 20rder Certified Documents Business Entity Search ‘Search Type: Starting With Search Criteria: Clean Stream Enterprises LLC Search Date: 11/12/2010 Search Time: 17:06 Click on the Business Entity Name or Charter Number to view more information. Entity Businoss Entity Charter Creation Name Number Type Status Date CLEAN STREAM —LC0025404 Limited Active 1/28/1999 ENTERPRISES, Liability LL. Company Records Returned 1 to 1 600 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Page 1 of 1Missouri Secretary of State Page | of I Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan SOS Home :: Business Services = Business Entity Search Search By Business Name ‘By Charter Number By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verity verity Cortfcation Registration Report File Online File Fictitious Name Registration File Online Renew Online File LLC Registration File Online Online Orders Register for Online Orders Order Good Standing ©0rder Certified Documents Filed Documents : (Click above to view Datei ia0 0. filed documents that are available.) Business Name History Fea Name Type CLEAN STREAM ENTERPRISES, LLC Legal Reena ecen ren ses ese ESSEC een Limited Liability Company - Domestic - Information Name Charter Number: Lc0025404 Status: Active Entity Creation Date: 1128/1999 State of Business.: Mo Expiration Date o4ris'2025 Re EE Registered Agent ‘Agent Name: RONALD E. GREENWOOD Office Address: RR.1 BOX 3406 CRANE MO 65633 Mailing Address: ese eee ee Organizers Nam RONALD E, GREENWOOD ROUTE 1 BOX 340¢ CRANE MO 65633 Address: 600 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65104 naanMissouri Secretary of State Missouri Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan SOS Home :: Business Services :: Business Entity Search Search gy Business Name ‘By Charter Number By Registered Agent ‘For New Corporations Verity verity Cerification Registration Report entity File Online File Fictitious Name Registration File Online scanned and available online to view andlor print Renew Online File LUC Registration Date: 11/12/2010 SFile Ontine Online Orders ‘Register for Online Current Name: CLEAN STREAM ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. Orders Order Good Standing Image Date ‘Order Certified Documents *¥ View the images on-line! Netscape users, use the DY button, 600 West Main Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 All Annual Reports filed 1999 forward are available to view jor print as well as all documents filed on or after 5-12-03. Status of filed documents prior to 5-12-03: If the Creation Filing is not available to be viewed, the entire file may be incomplete because it has not been scanned. Therefore, there may be other types of flings associated with this Once a copy request and appropriate fees have been received on a specific entity the entire fle is completely zl sveen99e Creation Fin EN i Page 1 of 1 feces ents mn natelRireinaceRntitu lana h/Bilinne aandSO7E41Evi Grove Wastewater Trimt (Grove Fair Wastewater) - Fair Grove, Missouri (MO) | Co... My small business is not a 9-5 job. ‘Be prodctive siheravar you are. Gonata Apostor business, FREE 90-day tal» ANCA ge 000 Company Profile Repos Fair Grove Wastewater Trtmt, se: ‘ieee Fare Ronde Far Greve, MO 88868 nw Sostas Noten insane casens | seubalrage open ao (MDA BC Raat Bu 20 yrs Dons Die ity Ge Urboab PizasND, DC, YA ‘cranny gs Rone tape Remo! A About Ei Grove Wastewater Trin Far Gove Vert Tmi ‘yu tt of apc He Pak castes | High Speed Internet & Phone Verizon Websites powered by Intuit RSA BON or yee ‘Pnacmacautis Waste Frataracaiea Wass Vensgemen: ie can Fetp yu win ePAcerplarce Tsao Fupe coupon aay ke dong0e ateo%or Mo 8.20 alo pumps {620 yaa rps Dre Hy Sete UnbostteBreae MO. DE, SUA sare) Google racy cam Sana Sane, Nea ots frar Gm i Goretesnste shoe terry te at en 8 a 500000 are Busineee Cotegoriog Grove me Fate Grove Wastemstor Tart Busines Information Locaton Type Sipe Locson ana ee esto $509 000 Eninyess 194 Page | of 2 Google Apps oS. Nae Fale Grove Wastewater Titmt cone artoptos % accom Elo ee hay Advertise fe locally with Googie the men TryGoogle oye wer ne Tags. 3 paiimscrpan eee NEW local advertising solution Gougle Onercanganea sateen Jenin Fr rvs MO D2joe Pane te iy Seve heen Bn oot 2 Vel CgFair Grove Wastewater Trtmt (Grove Fair Wastewater) - Fair Grove, Missouri (MO)| Co... Page 2 of 2 00m Ne Fabia tata Prohartcng eccy fest oases Msp cyapitiica date srynensenad Pry Pe) Mc Ow Tame onianavechargesON¥E Suton sss Ewe me @ Foes heerHurley, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hurley, Missouri From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hurley (formerly, Spring Creek Mill)! is a city in Stone County, Missouri, United States. The population was 178 at the 2010 census. It is part of the Branson, Missouri Micropolitan Statistical Area. Contents = 1 Geography m 2 Demographics m 2.1 2010 census ® 2.2 2000 census m= 3 References Geography Hurley is located at 36°55'56"N 93°29'53"W (36,932333, -93.497979) is ‘According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 0.45 square miles (1.17 kin”), all of it land. Demographics 2010 census As of the census!” of 2010, there were 178 people, 67 houscholds, and 47 families residing in the city. The population density was 395.6 inhabitants per square mile (152.7 /km?). There were 79 housing Page 1 of 3 Coordinates: 3°55'56°N 939293" Hurley, Missouri Location of Hurley, Missouri Coordinates: 36°5S'S6"N 93°29'53"W United States Country State Missouri County Stone Areal! + Total 0.45 sq mi (1.17 km?) + Land 0.45 sq mi (1.17 km?) + Water 0 sq.mi (0 km") Elevation 1,093 R333 m) Population (2010)") + Total 178 + Density 395.6/sq mi {152,7/km?) ‘Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6) +Summer (DST) _ CDT (UTC-5) ZIP coué 65675 Area codes) 417 eeeee FIPS code 29-3392 GNIS feature ID 0735662"! units at an average density of 175.6 per square mile (67.8 /km?). The racial makeup of the city was 98.9% White, 0.6% Native American, and 0.6% from two or more races.Hurley, Missouri - City Information, Fast Facts, Schools, Colleges, and More Page | of 2 |] Hurley, Missouri © ind seo nar you er cate | st sae De: Se nts camou 9 Bot, submt ar au Sn cot mes SH Sra ou (cor cta and 8 ET, ER Tic tar paulo a The People and Familes of Hurley | aes em | Wealth and tavation |x ey tno nen oD | trey Housing | omen hte maby ‘commuting | ney Sette ear | contact Acreited Schools With Online Options i | | ones Core ad alee Rete on Cyonne | tnt one tr i Parra seectnaieeyies aye |= anatase | p eeactcrsmeirte | |: Mena naan ‘daily Cacenr & Rsucation News fom our aoe | Daan, | | aaa retrace mica | | Mammy esas een —_ | tomapmesraraee, | | @ ea, i : + tt. Beran Guten asc ental) i Aas nt aero | 6p errant Sess | ge coemmererazeee me | | | | orb sn ict it EER aaneanase a | erie iantvacitercimote | ms oe © gems mine me || Yt at tren ED seh te Sa tae fen, = | ns © monauiaae mn http://www.citvtowninfo.com/places/missouri/hurley 1126/2012Crane, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Crane, Missouri From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Crane is a city in Stone County, Missouri, United States. The population was 1,462 at the 2010 census. It is part of the Branson, Missouri Micropolitan Statistical Area. Contents a 1 Geography a 2 Demographies w 2.1 2010 census m= 2.2 2000 census a 3 References m= 4 External links Geography Crane is located at 36°54’ 14"N 93°34'16" W (36.903813, -93.571128) is) According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 1.52 square miles (3.94 km?), all of it land! Crane Creek flows through the city, Demographics 2010 census As of the census”! of 2010, there were 1,462 people, 558 households, and 347 families residing Page 1 of 3 Coordinates: 36°S4'14°N 93°34 16°W Crane, Missouri — City — Location of Crane, Missouri Coordinates; 36°54’14°N 93°34'16"W Country United States State Missouri County Stone Areal!) + Total 1,52 sq mi (3.94 ken?) +Land 1,52 sq mi (3.94 km?) + Water 0sq mi (0 km?) Elevation 1,148 ft (350 m) Population (2010)! + Total 1,462 + Density 961.8%5q mi (371.4) ‘Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6) +Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5) ZAP code 65633 ‘Area code(s) 417 FIPS code 29-1707401 GNIS feature 1D 0716460! in the city. The population density was 961.8 inhabitants per square mile (371.4 /km’). There were 663 housing units at an average density of 436.2 per square mile (168.4 /km*). The racial makeup of the city was 97.2% White, 0.1% African American, 0.7% Native American, 0.2% Asian, 0,4% from other races, and 1.4% from two or mote races, Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.2% of the population,Fair Grove, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 6 Fair Grove, Missouri Coors TENN From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Fair Grove is a city in Greene County, Missouri, United States. The population was 1,393 at the Fair Grove, Missouri 2010 census. It is part of the Springfield, Missouri ae ee Nickname(s): "The Old Mill Town" aoc Motto: "Laissez-faire" Contents i m= 1 Geography m= 2 Demographies = 2.1 2010 census & m= 2.2 2000 census = 3 History Location inthe state of Missouri = 4 Fair Grove Today 1299'59""Ni 9320/4" w= 5 Fair Grove R-X Public Schools coeries Megenemueeceace m 6 Fair Grove Heritage Reunion : cede m7 Fair Grove and the Future eee A tose = 8 References a baiaen m 9 External links County Greene i Government + Mayor ‘Tim Smith Geography Areal”! + Total 3.18 sq mi (8.24 km?) Fair Grove is located at + Land 3.18 sq mi (8.24 km?) + Water sq mi (0 km’) 37°22'52"N 93°9'4"W (37.380992, -93.150996))) Fair Grove is located about 14 miles (23 km) north —_ Elevation 1,211 ft G69 m) of Springfield, Missouri on Highway 63. MODOT a a is improving four lane Highway 65 south to Population (2010) Springfield, connecting with 4 lanes south to anor 1393 Branson and Buffalo, MO. + Density 438. 1fsq mi (169.2/km?) Time zone ‘Central (CST) (UTC-6) According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 3.18 square miles +Summer (DST) _ CDT (UTC-5) (8.24 km”), all of it land.) ZIP code 65648 Area code(s) 417 FIPS code 29233387 GNIS feature ID 071772441 ‘Website hitp://fairgrove.org ts Saciaenaees ieee tanec «nn?Fair Grove MO Page 1 of 1 Welcome To Thtt:City Of Fair Grove: Presg-Release Ryblie NoticesSEWER HOMEPAGE, POLICE, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ALDERMAN MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL CODES BUSINESS LEADERSHIP BR courr PLANKING & ZONING biter /ifairornvn are SEWER heat Page I of 1 WASTEWATER PLANT {$100 SEWER DEPOSIT REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL SERVICE, Deposits must be made in person and photo 1D is require. City of Fair Grove ‘81 South Orchard Biva, Fair Grove, MO 65648 APPLICATION DOWNLOAD: Residentiat py Dre 25 eto eae by PUSS ik Lae ae PA rt op/89h 202. FAIRGROVE OFClever, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Clever, Missouri From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Clever is a city in Christian County, Missouri, United States, The population was 2,139 at the 2010 census. It is part of the Springfield, Missouri Metropolitan Statistical Area. They have recently built a new high school and library. For being a small town they have some relatively good businesses and are increasingly growing, Contents 1 Geography 2 History 3 Demographics = 3.1 2010 census 1 3.2 2000 census 4 Notable People from Clever 5 Churches m= 5.1 Funeral Home m 5.2 Cemeteries 6 Businesses 7 References 8 External links Geography Clever is located at arvaen 93°28'12" W (37.028804, -93.470067) 6 According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 1.26 square miles 3.26 km?), all of it land." Clever sits at an clevation of 1398 feet. History Page 1 of 4 Coordinates: STAN 98°28'12°W Clever, Missouri — City Motto: where itjust gets beiter everyday Location of Clever, Missouri Coordinates: 37°1'44"N 93°28'12"W County State County Government + Mayor Areal!) + Total «Land Water Elevation Population (2010) + Total + Density ‘Time zone + Summer (DST) ZAP code Area code(s) FIPS code GNIS feature ID Website United States Missouri Jaredd King 1.26 sq mi (3.26 km’) 1.26 sq mi (3.26 km’) 0'sq mi (0 km?) 1,398 A (426 m) 2,139 1,697.6!5q mi (655.4/km?) Central (CST) (UTC-6) CDT (UTC-5) 65631 4IT 29-14788°1 735973 hiipy//elevermo.com/ On August 2nd 1861 a small American Civil War skirmish broke out at Dug Springs on what's now Old Wire Road just a couple of miles away from present day Clever. Eight days later these same forces fought at Wilson's Creek. Clever was established as a town in 1896. It's name came from all the "clever" people living in the town. Clever did quite well as a town while the railroad ran by it. The town includedSpringfield, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 16 Springfield, Missouri Coordinates: S2N 93°17 10°W From Wikipedia, the fiee encyclopedia Springfield is the third largest city in the U.S. 7 ann Suess andthe county cata Grene Springfield, Missouri County." According to the 2010 census data, the population was 159,498, an increase of 5.2% since ‘the 2000 census." The Springfield Metropolitan, Area, population 436,712, includes the counties of Christian, Dallas, Greene, Polk and Webster. Springficld’s nickname is the Queen City of the Ozarks and is known as the Birthplace of Route 66 as well as the home of several universities including Missouri State University. Contents a I History = 1.1 Name = 1.2 Incorporation m 1.3 Civil War a 1.4 Wild Bill Hickok shootout 1.5 Lynching m= 1.6 Birthplace of Route 66 = 2 Geography Location in the state of Missouri w 2.1 Climate Coordinates: 37°11’42"N 93°1710°W = 3 Demographies cease = 3.1 2010 census Country United States = 3.2 2000 census State Missouri ideas Counties Greene, Christian = 4.1 Top employers m= 5 Government Founded 1838 m= 6 Education eee m 7 Recreation = 8 Spors +Mayor —— JimO'Neal = 9 Culture ‘Areal! 9.1 Country music + City 82.31 sq mi (213.18 km?) 9.2 The Ozark Hillbilly Medallion = 9.3 Museums and other points of ae She seal e3 ea? interest + Water 0,59.sq mi (1.53 kin?) «9.4 National Register of Historic +Metro 3,021 sq mi (7,824 km*) Places : ae eee eho mmussaee Elevation 1,299 G96 m) = 11 Healthcare Population (2010)"" a 12 Living conditions + City 159,498 = 13 Media 3.6/kn” een oD x 3.64 Sy caries density 1,951.8¢sq mi (753.6/Kin?)Aurora, Missouri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aurora, Missouri From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aurora is a city in Lawrence County, Missouri, United States. The population was 7,508 at the 2010 census. Contents 1 History 2. Geography 3 Demographics m 3.1 2010 census m= 3.2 2000 census = 4 Transportation m 5 Notable people . . 6 References 7 External links History The Frisco Railroad (now Burlington Northem- Santa Fe) and the Missouri Pacific (now Union Pacific) previously had depots in Aurora Between 1911 and 1920, the virulently Anti- Catholic newspaper The Menace was published in Aurora by W. F Phelps and Earl MeClure. It achieved a national circulation of over one million, according to the March 1932 issue of American Mercury. The local newspaper is The Aurora Advertiser. In the 1950's, the elementary school on the North Side (of the railroad tracks) was Lowell School (the building has since been torn down). The teachers there were Miss Gardner, Ist Grade; Mrs. Page 1 of 4 Coordinates: 36°59'12"N 93°43 14"W Aurora, Missouri — City — Location of Aurora, Missouri Coordinates: 36°58'12"N 93°43'14"W Country United States State Missouri County Lawrence Areal! + Total 5.98 sq mi (15.49 km?) + Land 5.95 sq mi (15.41 km?) + Water 0.03 sq mi (0.08 km?) Elevation 1,401 ft (427 m) Population (2010) * Total 7,508 + Density 1,261.8/sq mi (487.2/km?) Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6) +Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5) ZAP code 65605 Area code(s) 417 FIPS code 290254801 GNIS feature ID 07134867 Website aurora-cityhall.org, (¢hitp://www.aurora-cityhall.org) Laman (sp?) and Mrs. Holder, 2nd Grade; Miss Thompson, 34 Grade; Mrs. Baton, 4th Grade; Mrs. Williams, 5th Grade; and Mr. Ray, 6th Grade, Some of the students at Lowell Elementary School during that time were Charles Bowling, Dennis Baldwin, Freddie Bares, Bobby and Johnny Beatty, Ray Brown, Ronnie Cantrell, Steven Conn, LaNetta Faye Coker, Larry Dean, Mary Jean Dobbins, Elsie htto//en.wikivedia ore/wiki/Aurora, Missouri 11/26/2012‘The City of Aurora Missouri Page | of 1 pene eT ie Aurora Missouri, An Ozarks Original Welcome to the City of Aurora, Missouri. Located in the heart of Southwest Missouri ‘Aurora is just miles away from Branson, Springfield, Joplin, beautiful area lakes such as Table Rock and Stackton and the Mark Twain National Forest. Aurora is guided by the following vision: The City of Aurora Missouri, through measured bag growth and development of new economic ‘2pportunities and the enhancement of current community events and recreational offerings, will provide the best quality of life for its citizens. With that, Aurora works under the following Mission statement: The City of Aurora's primary mission is to provide an outstanding quality of life for everyone who lives ‘and/or works in the city. This is to be accomplished by creating a safe, secure, healthy, and visually pleasing environment coupled with a strong economy. To that end, the city will encourage measured, steady growth; will provide for sound economic development; will ensure the revitalization and stabilization of downtown Aurora; will create and maintain opportunities for industria! and residential development; will ensure no substandard housing or commercial structures exist in the city that create a health or | safety hazard for the occupants; and will ensure all city services are delivered at the | highest level possible. Again, welcome to the City of Aurora. EMOMIENT EVENTS GUY EcoNOME SESUSTUNETIES TALL DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC PUBLIC PARKS. © CITY COUNEIL. USE sug 10 WORKS RECREATION —~BOADS&” TINK: ie OMNIS A contents © 2008-09 The cit of uinca Missout except were indieated thera se. Al ight ‘woranide. Dupkeaton ar reine only we express perresion fr The City oF Autre ss Mi redrark re property Ur rapave owners, Wels re‘The City of Aurora Missouri Page 1 of 2 Aurora Street Department Steve Woods ube Wores Superintendent Pubic Works Employees: Brian Cook: Maint It Operator: Derek Bayne: Mant If Operator; Terry Ash: Cemetery Sexton Dar! Jones: Maint II Operator Steve Weods: Public Works ‘Superintendent, Jason Jordan: Maint It Operator, Kendall Hate: Mant i Operateermechane The Aurora Street Department The Street Department maintains over 80 miles of streets and alleys in the City of Aurora. Cemetery The cemetery division is part of the Aurora Street Street Department Department, and is operated under the direction of 301 N. Highway 39 Terry Ash, sexton since 1994. ‘Aurora, MO 65605 ‘417-678-4460 Maple Park Cemetery was founded in 1900 with Hours of Operation: 7:00 am S€* burials beginning in 1901-1902. Over 8,400 former 4:00 pm Monday - Friday residents of Aurora are resting in peace at Maple Park. In fact, the town's first Mayor, Carr McNatt, Wastewater Department is buried at Maple Park. Although the cemetery was founded in 1900, the oldest grave dates back to 1892 and was transported from the " Aurora cemetery" to the new "Maple Park cemetery”. To contact the cemetery, please call 678-2308, For more information en city fees and policies regarding burial, please click here. Wastewater Department ‘The wastewater department consists of four employees and they are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the City's treatment facilities, collection system - including lift stations, yard waste area, and the recycling site. ‘The treatment facility is an activated sludge process consisting of a six influent pumps, a fine step bar screen, ram press, four clarifiers, two sand-filters, and uv-disinfectant. It has a design capacity of 2.0 MGD with a hydraulic capacity of 7.0 MGD.Westlaw. VAMS. $61,021 Page 1 c Vernon's Annotated Missouri Statutes Currentness ‘Title XXXVI. Crimes and Punishment; Peace Officers and Public Defenders "g Chapter 561. Collateral Consequences of Conviction (Refs & Annos) 4 561.021, Forfeiture of public office--disqualificatio 1. A person holding any public office, elective or appointive, under the government of this state or any agency or political subdivision thereof, who is convicted of a crime shall, upon sentencing, forfeit such office if (1) eis convicted under the laws ofthis state ofa felony or under the laws of another jurisdiction of a erime which, if committed within this state, would be a felony, or he pleads guilty or nolo contendere of such 8 rime; or (2) He is convicted of or pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a crime involving misconduct in office, or dishon- esty; oF @) The constitution or a statute other than the code so provides. 2. Except as provided in subsection 3 of this section, a person who pleads guilty or nolo contendere or is con- vcted under the laws of this state ofa felony or under the laws of another jurisdiction of a crime which, if com- mitted within this state, would be a felony, shall be ineligible to hold any public office, elective or appointive, ‘under the government of this state or any agency or politial subdivision thereof, until the completion of his sen- tence or period of probation 3. A person who pleads guilty or nolo contendere or is convicted under the laws of this state or under the laws of another jurisdiction of a felony connected with the exercise ofthe right of suffrage shall be forever disqualified from holding any public office, elective or appointive, under the govertiment ofthis state or any agency or poli ical subdivision thereof. CREDIT(S) (1.1977, 8.B, No. 60, p. 662, § 1, eff. Jan, 1, 1979. Amended by L.1991, $.B. No. 262, § A.) COMMENT TO 1973 PROPOSED CODE Based primarily on Model Penal Code § 306.2 this section mandates forfeiture of any public office, (© 2012 Thomson Rewers, No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.Federal Bureau of Prisons Page 1 of L Inmate Locator - Locate Federal inmates from 1982 to present Release Date 7 Name Rogister# Age-Race-Sex Release Date ocatio 1. TIMOTHY JSINSKEY 0787-073 69-White-M 10-02-1998 RELEASED. Results 1-1 of 1 NewSearch FAs Privacy httniamanar han aavlilne’ InmataRindarGarvlat7TrancastinnNamaCaarh SnsadingMare 1192017IPE) STATES DISTRICT COURT at meee mig ask DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ove, acy te 1k {OBATION OFFICE, 29) FES 13. AM 10: 28ebruary 5, 2007 Reply to:_Springfield Helen M. Bollwerk Office of the Pardon Attorney 1425 New York Avenue NW, Ste. 11000 Washington, D.C, 20530 RE: — Greenwood, Ronald Eugene Application for Pardon ‘Dear Ms. Bollwerk: Enclosed are copies of the Presentence Investigation Report and Judgement in a Criminal Case as requested in your letter directed to the U, S. Probation Office for the District of South Dakota on November 30, 2006. Your letter was forwarded to the Wester District of Missouri for a response because Mr. Greenwood’s term of supervision was completed in this district. Mr. Greenwood was sentenced in U. S. District Court for the District of South Dakota toa three-year erm of probation on November 18, 1996, for Conspiracy to Violate tie Clean Water Act, in violation of 18 US.C. 371, Mr. Greenwood was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine, a $50 special assessment, and $5,000 restitution. As special conditions of probation, Mr. Greenwood was ordered to serve a period of six months in home confinement, complete 100 hours of community service work, provide the probation office with any requested financial information, and not incur any new credit charges or open additional lines of credit without the approval of the probation office unless he was in compliance with his payment schedule, Mr. Greenwood reported to the U. S. Probation Office in Springfield, Missouri, on November 22, 1996, to begin his term of supervision. He paid his fine, special assessment, and restitution, and he satisfied his home confinement and community service conditions, Sincerely, bare, 0 0. ihn Gregor? D. Biekson Supervising U. S, Probation Officer GDD:gdd Enclosures‘AO 248 6 (7/93 Shoot 1 - Judgment in a Criminal Case FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of South Dakota HOV 24 95 Southern Division COU Nene UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE Wor Offenses Committed On or Attar November ¥, 1987) v. Case Number: 4:95CR40001-001 RONALD E. GREENWOOD Bryan Morgan Name of Defendant Defendant's Attornay ‘THE DEFENDANT: Dd Pleaded guilty to count(s) 7 Ll pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which (was) (were) accepted by the court. U was found guilty on countis} after a plea of not guilty. Date Offense Title & Section Nature of Offense Concluded Count Numbers 18 USC §371 Conspiracy to Violate the Clean Water Act 12/10/1992 1 ‘The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 5 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The defendant has been found not guilty on countis) LB ——Count{s) (is){are) dismissed on the motion of the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. Defendant Information: 11/18/1996 Soc. Sec. No.: 503-70-2304 oma af igen of Sones Date of Birth: 6/13/1955 USM No. 07620-073 Malling Address, RR 1 Box 340C Crane, MO 65633 Resi rose FR 1 Box 340 C Crane, MO 65633Defendant Case Number: RONALD E. GREENWOOD. Judgment-Page 2 of 5 4:95CR40001-001 PROBATION ‘The defendant is hereby placed on probation for a term of three (3) years. While on probation, the defendant shall not commit another federal, state, of local crime. While on probation, the defendant shall not illegally possess a controlled substance. For offenses committed on or after September 13, 1994: ‘The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as directed by the probation officer. [XI The above drug testing condition is suspended based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse. (Check, if applicable.) (X1 White on probation, the defendant shall not possess a firearm as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921. If this judgment imposes a fine or a restitution obligation, it shall be a condition of probation that the defendant pay any such fine or restitution in accordance with the Schedule of Payments set forth in the Criminal Monetary Penalties sheet of this judgment, ‘The defendant shall comply ‘the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court [sot forth below). The defendant shall also comply with the following additional conditions: » a 3 a 5) a n 8 Py 10) m 1a, 13) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION the defendant shall not leave the judicial strict without permission of the court or probation officer; the defendant shall report tothe probation afficar and shall submit a truthful and complete writen repart within the fst five days ofeach mont; the defendant shall anewor truthfully al ingutigs by the probation office and follow tho instructions of the probation officer: ‘the defendant shal support his or Rer dapendents and mest other family recponsibitie ‘he defendant shal work eogulaly at 9 lawful cccupstion unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, taining, or other acceptable ‘the defendant shall natty the probation officer within 72 hours of any change in residence or employment: the defendant shall ofan from excossive use of alochot and shall nat purchase, porsees, use, disvibute, or aiminster any narcotic or other ‘controlled eubetance, or any paraphernalia related to euch subetonces, except as prescribed by a physician; the defendant chall not frequent places where contvolled substances as ilagaly sol, used, distributed, 0° administered; the defendant shall not aseociate with any petcons engaged in criminal acthity, and shal not associate with any person convicted of a felony unless granted pormiscion te do so by the probation offices the defendant shell permit» probation officer to vsit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere and shall prmit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation offer ‘the defendant chal ntiy the probation officer wthin sovanty:

Вам также может понравиться

• The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  

  От Everand

  The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  Mark Manson

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (5794)
• The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  

  От Everand

  The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  Brené Brown

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1090)
• Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  

  От Everand

  Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  Chris Voss

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (838)
• • Журналы
  • Подкасты
  • Нотное издание
• Principles: Life and Work

  

  От Everand

  Principles: Life and Work

  Ray Dalio

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (599)
• The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  

  От Everand

  The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  Jeannette Walls

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (1712)
• Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  Jesmyn Ward

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1103)
• Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  

  От Everand

  Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  Margot Lee Shetterly

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (895)
• Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  

  От Everand

  Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  Angela Duckworth

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (588)
• Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  

  От Everand

  Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  Phil Knight

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (537)
• The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  

  От Everand

  The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  Stephen Chbosky

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (2102)
• The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  

  От Everand

  The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  Ben Horowitz

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (344)
• Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  

  От Everand

  Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  Ashlee Vance

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (474)
• Bad Feminist: Essays

  

  От Everand

  Bad Feminist: Essays

  Roxane Gay

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1015)
• The Outsider: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Outsider: A Novel

  Stephen King

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1839)
• Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  

  От Everand

  Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  Carmen Maria Machado

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (821)
• The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  

  От Everand

  The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  Viet Thanh Nguyen

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (121)
• The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  

  От Everand

  The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  Siddhartha Mukherjee

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (271)
• Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  

  От Everand

  Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  Frank McCourt

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (440)
• The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  

  От Everand

  The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  Meik Wiking

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (400)
• The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  

  От Everand

  The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  Thomas L. Friedman

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (2259)
• Brooklyn: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Brooklyn: A Novel

  Colm Toibin

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (1937)
• A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  Fredrik Backman

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (4609)
• The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  Garth Stein

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (4200)
• A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  

  От Everand

  A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  Betty Smith

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (1929)
• The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  

  От Everand

  The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  Sarah M. Broom

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (98)
• Steve Jobs

  

  От Everand

  Steve Jobs

  Walter Isaacson

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (806)
• Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  

  От Everand

  Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  Gilbert King

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (266)
• The Woman in Cabin 10

  

  От Everand

  The Woman in Cabin 10

  Ruth Ware

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (2322)
• Yes Please

  

  От Everand

  Yes Please

  Amy Poehler

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1891)
• A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  

  От Everand

  A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  Dave Eggers

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (231)
• Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  

  От Everand

  Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  Doris Kearns Goodwin

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (234)
• Fear: Trump in the White House

  

  От Everand

  Fear: Trump in the White House

  Bob Woodward

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (738)
• Wolf Hall: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Wolf Hall: A Novel

  Hilary Mantel

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (3811)
• John Adams

  

  От Everand

  John Adams

  David McCullough

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (2409)
• On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  

  От Everand

  On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  Naomi Klein

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (73)
• The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  M.L. Stedman

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (789)
• The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  

  От Everand

  The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  George Packer

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (45)
• Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  Jennifer Egan

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (792)
• The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  John le Carré

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (104)
• Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  

  От Everand

  Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  Jay Sekulow

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (137)
• Little Women

  

  От Everand

  Little Women

  Louisa May Alcott

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (104)
• Army FY14 FOIA Log

  

  Документ4 страницы

  Army FY14 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DOD OSD FY13 FOIA Log

  

  Документ106 страниц

  DOD OSD FY13 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DOD OSD FY15 FOIA Log

  

  Документ189 страниц

  DOD OSD FY15 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Army FY12 FOIA Log

  

  Документ5 страниц

  Army FY12 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DODIG FY13 FOIA Log

  

  Документ35 страниц

  DODIG FY13 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DOD OSD FY12 FOIA Log

  

  Документ73 страницы

  DOD OSD FY12 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DOD OSD FY14 FOIA Log

  

  Документ143 страницы

  DOD OSD FY14 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DODIG FY14 FOIA Log

  

  Документ39 страниц

  DODIG FY14 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Index To Documents

  

  Документ2 страницы

  Index To Documents

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Army FY13 FOIA Log

  

  Документ5 страниц

  Army FY13 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• DOD OSD FY16 FOIA Log

  

  Документ566 страниц

  DOD OSD FY16 FOIA Log

  Record Releaser

  0% (1)
• Nhtsa Es16-004326

  

  Документ40 страниц

  Nhtsa Es16-004326

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Usaid F-00327-16

  

  Документ10 страниц

  Usaid F-00327-16

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Hashtag #FOIA Analysis, 1/3/17

  

  Документ6 страниц

  Hashtag #FOIA Analysis, 1/3/17

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Commerce OIG 2015-000228

  

  Документ8 страниц

  Commerce OIG 2015-000228

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Dodig 2014-00215

  

  Документ39 страниц

  Dodig 2014-00215

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Treasury OFAC 2014-01-101

  

  Документ9 страниц

  Treasury OFAC 2014-01-101

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Opm Oig 2015-04826

  

  Документ312 страниц

  Opm Oig 2015-04826

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Dodig 2014-00113

  

  Документ12 страниц

  Dodig 2014-00113

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет
• Eeoc 820-2016-000323

  

  Документ8 страниц

  Eeoc 820-2016-000323

  Record Releaser

  Оценок пока нет