9 views

Uploaded by Saifullah Mohd

experiment test cylinder

- Tutorial Examine 2D
- Rock mass and rippability evaluation thesis.pdf
- Dynamic Poisson's Ratio of Portland Cement
- settlement
- mechanics - chapter 4
- Momentum
- Exp 1 Thin-thick Cylinders Analysis
- AS-and-A-level-Physics-Core-Practical-5---Young-Modulus-(Student -Teacher -.pdf
- IITian Pace Phy1&2
- Mechanics New 1
- Section Properties
- 1350-SD-06 (Chamber Sump Bowl)
- Lecture.6
- Novedoso Método de Elementos Finitos Para Diseñar Losas Para Pisos Industriales Con Cargas en Los Contornos
- Staad Report
- cal 18
- Cross sensitivity.pdf
- cxfdgfh
- artificial tissue engineering design student checklist
- simpalestressandsimplestrain-120606223038-phpapp01

You are on page 1of 10

MEMD221

SEM 2 2016/2017

28/12/2016 WEDNESDAY

SECTION 4

GROUP 2

PN. FARAH ELIDA BINTI SELAMAT

DM94317

DM94427

DM94514

DM94462

DM94605

OBJECTIVE

1. To determine the behaviour of aluminum alloy 6063 in open ends condition and

closed ends condition.

2. To determine the principle planes in open ends and closed ends condition.

TABLE 1:CYLINDER CONDITION : OPEN ENDS

No

Pressure

Direct

Strain

MN/m2

Hoop

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

Stress

MN/m2

1

0.5

7.60

111

-40

-3

37

72

111

1.0

14.53

217

-80

-8

70

139

215

1.5

21.07

311

-115

-10

102

201

313

2.0

27.60

413

-151

-13

136

267

413

2.5

34.53

519

-189

-15

171

337

522

483.04

-159.40

1.21

161.82

328

483.04

Mohrs Circle at 2.5 MN/m2

TABLE 2:-

No

Pressure

Direct

MN/m2

Hoop

Strain

Gauge

Stress

Gauge 2

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

Gauge

MN/m

1

0.13

0.5

7.60

90

12

72

53

69

85

1.0

14.80

179

20

60

103

139

179

1.5

21.60

268

29

87

152

205

268

2.0

28.27

357

34

113

200

272

358

2.5

34.80

441

40

138

245

325

442

403.33

82.19

162.48

323.05

242.76

Mohrs Circle at 2.5 MN/m2

403.33

Thickness = 3mm

Internal Diameter = 80mm

Poissons ratio = 0.33

Youngs Modulus = 69 10^9 N.m^-2

H =pd/2t (1)

H = 2.5x10^6 x 0.08 / 2 x 0.003 = 33.33 MN.m^-2

H 1 = H/E. (3)

H 1 =33.33 x 10^6 / 69 x 10^9 = 483.04 (for 1,6)

L 1 = -VH/E . (4)

L 1 = -0.33 x 33.33 x 10^6 / 69 x 10^9 = -159.40 (for 2)

1 = 483.04, 2 =159.40

n =((-159.40 + 483.04)/2) + (-159.40 - 483.04)/2) cos 2 (30)

= 1.21 (for 3)

m=((-159.40 + 483.04)/2) + (-159.40 - 483.04)/2) cos 2 (45)

= 328 (for 5)

= (-159.40 + 483.04)/2) = 161.82 (for 4)

Thickness = 3mm

Internal Diameter = 80mm

Youngs Modulus = 69 10^9 N.m^-2

H = 33.33 MN.m^-2

L = 16.67 MN.m^-2

H =1/E (H -vL ) . (9)

H = 403.33 (for 1,6)

L =1/E(L -vH ) . (10)

L = 82.19 (for 2)

1 = 403.33 , 2 = 82.19

n = ((2+1)/2 ) + ((2-1)/2 ) cos2 (=30)

n = 162.48 (for 3)

m = ((2+1)/2 ) + ((1-2)/2 ) cos2

m = 323.05 (for 5)

When is equal 45

= ((2+1)/2 ) = 242.76 (for 4)

DISCUSSIONS

A)

1.

From the Graph, we know that the value of the Youngs Modulus is

((27.60-14.53)/(413-215)) = 66.01 GPa.

(Gradient of graph is 0.066 TPa)

The actual value of Youngs Modulus is 69GPa.

Percentage Error = (69-66.01)/(69) = 4.33%

2.

((-40-(-80))/(111-217)) = 0.3777

(Gradient of the graph is 0.3777)

The actual value of the Poissons ratio given is also 0.33

The Percentage error = (0.33-0.3777)/(0.33) = 14.45%

3.

Sample Calculations for Open Ends (Theoretical values):

Thickness = 3mm

Internal Diameter = 80mm

Poissons ratio = 0.33

Youngs Modulus = 69 109 N.m-2

H =pd/2t (1)

H = 2.5x10^6 x 0.08 / 2 x 0.003 = 33.33 MN.m^-2

H 1 = H/E. (3)

H 1 =33.33 x 10^6 / 69 x 10^9 = 483.04 (for 1,6)

L 1 = -VH/E . (4)

L 1 = -0.33 x 33.33 x 10^6 / 69 x 10^9 = -159.40 (for 2)

1 = 483.04, 2 =159.40

n =((-159.40 + 483.04)/2) + (-159.40 - 483.04)/2) cos 2 (30)

= 1.21 (for 3)

m=((-159.40 + 483.04)/2) + (-159.40 - 483.04)/2) cos 2 (45)

= 328 (for 5)

= (-159.40 + 483.04)/2) = 161.82 (for 4)

B)

1.

2.

Sample Calculations for Closed Ends (Theoretical Values):

Thickness = 3mm

Internal Diameter = 80mm

Poissons ratio = 0.33

Youngs Modulus = 69 10^9 N.m^-2

H = 33.33 MN.m^-2

L = 16.67 MN.m^-2

H =1/E (H -vL ) . (9)

H = 403.33 (for 1,6)

L =1/E(L -vH ) . (10)

L = 82.19 (for 2)

1 = 403.33 , 2 = 82.19

n = ((2+1)/2 ) + ((2-1)/2 ) cos2 (=30)

n = 162.48 (for 3)

m = ((2+1)/2 ) + ((1-2)/2 ) cos2

m = 323.05 (for 5)

When is equal 45

= ((2+1)/2 ) = 242.76 (for 4)

C) State one example of real engineering application using open ends condition and

closed ends condition concept:-

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the purpose of the experiment is successfully achieved. The

Youngs Modulus, E is obtained to be 66.01 GN/m 2. The Poissons Ratio is calculated to

be 0.3777. Meanwhile, for the open ends condition the Principal Strains are calculated

to be H = 483.04 and L = -159.40 . The concept of the circumferential stress and

combined stress is clearly understood.

REFERENCES

1. Book :

a. Author (s). Year. Title. Edition. Place: Publisher. Page number. (example: L.H. van

Vlack. 1989. Elements of Materials Science and Engineering. 6th Ed. Reading

:Addison-Wesely Publ. pp100-105.)

b. Title. Year. Book Title. Edition. Place: Publisher. Page number. (Example:

Materials Science Handbook. 1986. 20th Ed. Ohio: C.R.C. Press. pp. 1986)

- Tutorial Examine 2DUploaded byJM SV
- Rock mass and rippability evaluation thesis.pdfUploaded byBrian Conner
- Dynamic Poisson's Ratio of Portland CementUploaded byJelena Marković
- settlementUploaded byKatyayini Nelli
- mechanics - chapter 4Uploaded bysanjivtis
- MomentumUploaded byahmedyashar
- Exp 1 Thin-thick Cylinders AnalysisUploaded byDarshan Shaarma
- AS-and-A-level-Physics-Core-Practical-5---Young-Modulus-(Student -Teacher -.pdfUploaded byAmeerHamzaa
- IITian Pace Phy1&2Uploaded byLokesh Kumar
- Mechanics New 1Uploaded byKanishka_Veedi_3183
- Section PropertiesUploaded bydyelspeed
- 1350-SD-06 (Chamber Sump Bowl)Uploaded byMeena Munim
- Lecture.6Uploaded bypsycho_zahran
- Novedoso Método de Elementos Finitos Para Diseñar Losas Para Pisos Industriales Con Cargas en Los ContornosUploaded byAaron Arango Ayala
- Staad ReportUploaded bySabdar Hussain
- cal 18Uploaded byRahul Moottolikandy
- Cross sensitivity.pdfUploaded bysayyadmannan
- cxfdgfhUploaded byWisnu Slamet Priyanto
- artificial tissue engineering design student checklistUploaded byapi-340842845
- simpalestressandsimplestrain-120606223038-phpapp01Uploaded byPrasanth Kumar
- 17AUploaded byShakil Khan
- OutUploaded byBita Mohajernia
- Modelling Procedure 3D FrameUploaded bysac21m
- SA PengunciUploaded byMuhammad Zaki
- Sway Classification ReportUploaded byKwan Hau Lee
- RM E Getting Started DINUploaded byOrlando Lopes
- Re Boul 2018Uploaded byOktay
- tsurUploaded byapi-3733260
- Surrey SE1M94 2001 PaperUploaded byphilipyap
- IRJET-Seismic Behaviour of Steel Bare Frame Building with Outrigger and Bracing with Outrigger StructuresUploaded byIRJET Journal

- Thyroid GlandUploaded byXandy Jaraba
- Application to Your Classroom _ Piaget in the ClassroomUploaded bybaksi
- Safari - 9 Feb 2019 morningUploaded byRy Bernas
- Pgdm Syllabus NewUploaded bybkpanda20065753
- Finger YogaUploaded byVanja Mihov
- The Lord's Supper Proclaims the Mercy of GodUploaded byGrace Church Modesto
- PGPM 11 - Principles & Practices of ManagementUploaded byHarmeet Singh
- LDS Old Testament Handout 18: Isaiah background & Isaiah in the Book of MormonUploaded byMike Parker
- 1_Teachers Guide Lesson OneUploaded byChris
- Benson Autonomy How to Do It Here (1)Uploaded byAlan
- Detailed SSC CGL Syllabus (Tier I) - Based on New Pattern 2017 - Testbook Blog.pdfUploaded byKabir Sai Prasanna Suryavansh
- Degenesis Rebirth Edition – Interview With Marko DjurdjevicUploaded byfoxtrout
- Algebra 15 Min a DayUploaded bycmegmhi
- Erich Fromm Love Art PDFUploaded byKim
- 7_Bar Exam Questions on Special WritsUploaded byMarife Tubilag Maneja
- Ch12-17Uploaded byChristopherMason
- iso14000Uploaded byroelens
- Genre Remediation Reflection.docxUploaded byJoseph Carter
- Food Protein Analysis - Quantitative Effects on Processing (2002)Uploaded byRhynoHD
- The Dream of the RoodUploaded bynatalia
- Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, And Natural History of Thoracic Aortic AneurysmUploaded byNathaliazuos
- Colonialisam in India.pdfUploaded bymanikrishnaUOH
- Jesus Armando a.r. Tarrosa, Petitioner, Vs. Gabriel c. Singson and Hon. Salvador m. Enriquez,Uploaded byKaye Miranda Laurente
- mahavirUploaded byKailash Kothari
- Lab Report 5-Engineering StaticsUploaded byAndhika Utama
- Cosmic CodesUploaded byheatman_drj
- Friedrich Hielscher wiki.pdfUploaded byjuan
- Inwa.txtUploaded bydfgrtg454g
- BGP Command Line Interface(cli) TreeUploaded byMd. Chhabibur Rahman
- Air Asia MejikUploaded byNunik Fajrinaa Putri