Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Finance
Cemex Enter Indonesia
Group 4 :
Fransisca Arini
Muhammad Prasetio
Tony Ferdyantara
(Kelas Eksekutif B 30 A - C)
Lecturer : Erni Ekawati Phd
Page 0
3 reasons :
1. Entering new market in Southeast Asia.
2. Good long term prospect of Asian infrastructure
development and growth.
3. Indonesia has positive prospective to act as a producefor-export due to the depreciation of Rupiah in 1997
Key Issues
1.
Capital Budgeting Analysis
- Construct pro forma financial statements of SI in Rp
- Create 2 capital budgets (the project view point and parent
view point)
- PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) holds for the Rp/US$ exchange
rate for the life of SI project (This is standard assumptions for
CEMEXs foreign investments.)
- Assume the initial spot rate is Rp 10,000/US$, projected
inflation rates; Indonesia 30% p.a and USA 3% p.a., thus the
forecasted exchange rate for year 1 of the project follow the
PPP calculation is Rp 12,621/US$
- Financial assumptions :
o Capital Investment
Cost of installed capacity, $/tonne : $110
Installed capacity : 20 million mmt/y, thus
Investment (US$) : $ 2,200,000 or
Investment (Rp) : Rp 22 trillion
o Financing
50% equity (all from CEMEX), 50% debt (75% CEMEX,
25% bank consortium arranged by Indonesian Gov).
CEMEX US Dollar based WACC : 11.98%. Indonesian
WACC : 33.275%
o Revenues and costs
Cemex Enter Indonesia Group 4
Page 1
The result of the capital budget from the project view point indicate
a negative NPV of Rp 9.4 trillion and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of
only 15.4 % compared to 33.257% CoC. The project from this view
point is not acceptable.
3.
Page 2
The result of the capital budget from the project view point indicate
a negative NPV of Rp US$925.6 million and Internal Rate of Return
(IRR) of 1.84 % co. The project from this view point is not
acceptable.
4.
5.
-
Page 3
6.
-
Recommendations
1. The investment plan was analyzed within the traditional
capital budgeting framework; they should include other
foreign complications including foreign exchange and political
risk in the analysis. Sensitivity and real option analysis could
also use as a reference to the result.
2. Parent cash flows must be distinguished from project cash
flows since each contributes to a different view of value.
3. Remittance of funds to the parents must be explicitly
recognized because of differing tax systems, legal and
political constraints on the movement of funds and local
business and capital market norms.
4. Differing rates of national inflation must be anticipated
because of their importance in causing changes in cash flows.
5. Foreign projects capital budgeting analysis should be
adjusted for potential foreign exchange and political risks.
6. Alternative methods are used for adjusting for risk, including
adding an additional risk premium to the discount factor used;
decreasing expected cash flows and conducting detailed
sensitivity analysis.
Page 4