Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AFFECTING GREEN
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
Submitted by:
Aniruddha Uike 2015B04
Ankush Dhabarde
2015B05 Jayanth N
2015B18
Mukund Goel 2015A58
Pranav Patwardhan
2015A31
Rahul Chauhan 2015A34
Summet Arora 2015A59
Vinayak Patil 2015A49
1. Abstract
The research aims to explore the parameters which have an influence over
consumers green purchase behavior and examines the work done in the past to
determine their impact in the current scenario. Thus on that grounds of the research
a conceptual model was designed which forms basis of developing the
questionnaire for consumer survey.
Keywords: pro-environmental consumer behavior, sustainability, green consumer
behavior, green purchasing
2. Introduction
The world is up against a number of sustainability issues and environmental
problems demanding to reduce the human consumption pattern. Sustainability is
making an attempt to fulfil demand of the present considering welfare of future
generation. Growing concerns to protect our environment have led to development
of many product and services that are eco-friendly in nature and use. Some types of
products are labelled as Eco-Friendly so that it will be appropriate for the
consumers decisions to buy. It is of utmost importance to educate consumers about
their consumption habits and the alternatives available in the market and shifting
their inclination from conventional products and services to the greener ones.
Although even after knowing these product development philosophies there is still
lot to be explored regarding the consumer behavior and consumption habits to cater
to their needs effectively and in an environment friendly manner.
Green consumer supply is making a strong impression on researchers as well as
professionals in operation and supply chain management. New conceptual and real
studies of eco-friendly products are based on the industry to fulfil the increasing
demand of environmental friendly consumers. Also, buying, utilizing and disposing
green products claims consumers principle of social responsibility and moral
awareness and, hence, it can be predicted that eco-friendly behavior of consumer
connects with ethical behavior.
Research across various countries have explained that moral factors draw
consumption behavior, and this latest green marketing pattern shows the change in
consumer behavior. But, in reality, green consumers who are not finding solution to
ecological problems, have buying intention is the utmost immediate appropriate
predictor of corresponding behavior.
Following table provides the research done by many researchers on different
variables. The table shows name of author on left side and the variables considered
by them in research on right hand side.
3. Literature Review
Theoretical Background
The term green is usually used interchangeably with pro-environmental or ecofriendly. However the term is simply used to indicate concern for the physical
environment (air, water, land). Some authors have made finer distinctions in
classifying different types of greenness (Iyer al.,1994). The behavior that consumers
display in searching for, purchasing, using, evaluating and disposing of products and
services that will satisfy their needs is called Consumer Behavior (Sciffman & Kanuk
2007). Hence, for this study the green consumer is considered as anyone whose
behavior is influenced by environmental concerns and the environmental concern
that consumers display in searching for, purchasing, using, evaluating, and
disposing of products is considered as Green Consumer Behavior.
Author
Gender
Panni (2006)
Schwartz, 1994
Triandis findings (1993)
MacCarty and Shrum (1994)
a. Environmental knowledge:
In a research paper published by Kempton et.al (1995), it suggested that most
people do not have sufficient knowledge about environmental issues, to act in a
responsible way towards environment. Fryxell & Lo (2003) stated Environmental
knowledge as a general knowledge of facts, concepts, and relationships concerning
the environment and its ecosystems. Thus, environmental knowledge involves
knowledge of environment, key aspects or impacts that their actions have, and
most importantly, collective responsibilities necessary for establishing sustainable
environment. Rokicka (2002) in research paper suggested that a high level of
environmental knowledge leads to a better pro-environmental behavior.
Concordantly, Mostafa (2009) in research paper found that there is a significant
impact of environmental knowledge on the consumers buying behavior of green
products.
b. Environmental awareness:
Environmental awareness can be defined as knowing and understanding the
impact of human behavior on the surrounding environment. According to Kollmuss
and Agyeman, (2006), Environmental awareness has both a knowledge-based
(cognitive) component and a perception based (affective) component. In a research
article by Panni (2006), it is found that the more the consumers / buyers are aware
about the societal and environmental issues, the more is their pro-social and proenvironmental behavior.
are
positively
Individuals with a strong selfish and competitive orientation are less likely to
act ecologically
Individuals who have fulfilled their personal needs are more likely to act
ecologically as they possess more resources (including time, money and
energy) so as to care about larger, less personal, social and proenvironmental issues.
Also, Schwartz, Stern, Dietz and Kalof (1993) studied the role social altruism and
pro-environmental altruism play in influencing green purchase behavior. The results
show that the two parameters positively affect consumers green purchase
behavior. Similarly, Mostafa (2009) in research found that altruism has a positive
significant influence on the decision to buy eco-friendly products.
Thus, the hypothesis:
H0: There is no positive relationship between altruism and consumers
green purchasing behavior.
H1: There is a positive relationship between altruism and consumers
green purchasing behavior.
Dependent Variable: Green Purchasing Behavior
Independent Variable: Altruism
f. Perceived Consumer effectiveness (PCE)
Perceived Consumer effectiveness (PCE) in our research study attempts to find out
to extent the consumers feel responsible that their actions affect the environment.
A number of researchers have confirmed the role of PCE as a predictor of green
purchase behavior of consumer. More commonly it explains when consumers
observe that their actions have made a significant environmental impact by using
the green products and services, theyd would be more likely to follow these
practices and influence others too. Thus PCE was found to be critical parameter
aligned with socially responsible behavior.
Thus, the hypothesis:
H0: Perceived Consumer effectiveness has no significant impact on the
buying behavior of the consumers.
H1: Perceived Consumer effectiveness has significant impact and is an
important factor for understanding the buying behaviors of consumers.
Dependent Variable: Green Purchasing Behavior
Independent Variable: Perceived Consumer Effectiveness (PCE)
green products through his/ her family, how much she/he discusses in the field of
environmental products with his/her friends and how much he shares the
information about green products with family (Finisterrado Pao & Raposo , 2004).
Lee (2009) realised that the social impact is a significant stimulus for Hong Kong
youths green purchasing behavior during his investigation to assesinf important
factors influencing Hong Kong youths green purchasing behavior. Social value is
also measured on a profile of choice imagery (Sheth et al., 1991). Indeed, social
values are not just an economic measure but also include several concepts such as
prestige, status and the common sense of belonging.
Thus, the hypothesis:
H0: Social impact is NOT a significant stimulus for green purchasing
behavior
H1: Social impact is a significant stimulus for green purchasing behavior
Dependent Variable: Green Purchasing Behavior
Independent Variable: Social Influence
i. Consumer values
Consumer values are the desirable goals that identify the principles of human
movements in life (Schwartz, 1994). Based on Triandis findings (1993) two of the
core values that influence consumers behavior consists of individualism and
collectivism. Individualism indicates to what extent a person focusses on his own.
But in contrast, collectivism refers to cooperation, sympathy, assistance and
considers the groups goals and preferring them to personal goals. MacCarty and
Shrum (1994) have also examined two other variables from the value variables
class in their researches: recreation or pleasure and personal security. In their
studies they found that the fun is positively associated with the importance of
recycling and recycling behavior but security does not have a significant correlation.
In an other research, based on the theory of consumers values, Lin and Huang
(2011) measured the role of human values in their willingness to purchase green
products. In fact, the difference between this study and previous studies was that
these two researchers tested the problem from more general aspects. According to
the presented contents, in this study the role of consumers values in green
purchasingof products behavior has been measured based on the theory of
consumers values. According to the theory of consumers values, consumer
behavior is influenced by values such as functional, social, emotional, conditional
and cognitive values.
Thus, the hypothesis:
H0: Buying behavior is NOT influenced by consumer values
H1: Buying behavior is influenced by consumer values
Conceptual Model
4. Research Methodology
The following sections describe the methodologies that were used to conduct the
research. A practical research approach was used to study the topic under research.
Quantitative Research was used to quantify the problem, and generate numerical
data on which statistical survey could be conducted.
Participants
Data for the study were collected through a self-administered survey distributed to
friends and family. A total of 147 respondents participated in the study. The
respondents ranged in age from 18 years to 29 years, with a few respondents in the
40-50 years age group. Of the total respondents, 55.5 percent were male and 45.5
percent were female. Approximately 38 percent of the participants majored in MBA,
and almost 55 percent holding an Engineering degree while the rest held other
degrees.
Measures
Each latent construct was measured using multiple items, mostly adapted from
previous literature. The items under each construct are shown in Table 1
Respondents indicated the extent to which they engaged in purchasing green
products on a five-point scale anchored with (1) Strongly disagree, (2) Disagree,
(3) Neutral, (4) Agree, and (5) Strongly Agree.
Table 1: Variable Descriptions
Variable
Factor
EA1
EA2
EA3
Effect
of
Awareness,
Attitude
environmental
concern
and
EA4
EA5
PI1
PI2
Effect
of
Product
Information availability
and
Question
Factor 1: Effect of environmental Awareness, concern
and Attitude [Having environmental awareness, concern
towards the environment, attitude motivates me to buy
Green Products]
Factor 1: Effect of environmental Awareness, concern
and Attitude [I consider the effect a particular product
has on environment before making a purchase decision]
Factor 1: Effect of environmental Awareness, concern
and Attitude [I think purchasing an eco-friendly product
would eventually lead to sustainable environment in
near future]
Factor 1: Effect of environmental Awareness, concern
and Attitude [The prices of eco-friendly products are
high, but the value they provide in terms of sustainable
environment is even higher]
Factor 1: Effect of environmental Awareness, concern
and Attitude [Its better to buy green product as it is ecofriendly]
Factor 2: Effect of Product and Information availability
[Adequate information about a particular green product
leads to improved awareness & concern about the
environment]
Factor 2: Effect of Product and Information availability
PI3
PI4
PI5
PCE1
PCE2
PCE3
Effect
of
Perceived
Consumer Effectiveness
PCE4
PCE5
TF1
TF2
TF3
Effect of
Fairness
practices
Transparency /
on
business
TF4
TF5
SF1
SF2
SF3
SF4
SF5
CV1
Consumer Values
CV2
CV3
CV4
CV5
DV1
DV2
DV3
DV4
Demographic Circumstances
DV5
DV6
A1
A2
A3
Altruism
A4
A5
A6
GPB1
GPB2
GPB3
GPB4
GPB5
Analysis
Steps followed for analysis:
1. Factor Analysis
2. Reliability Analysis
3. Validity Analysis
I. Factor Analysis
In this research, we conducted a factor analysis, a technique for identifying groups
of variables. Factor analysis can be used to (1) understand the structure of a
set of variables; (2) to construct a questionnaire to measure an underlying
variable and (3) to reduce a data set to a more manageable size while
retaining as much of the original information as possible (Field, 2005).
The first step is to look at the inter-correlation between variables. The questionnaire
questions should measure the same underlying dimension and therefore they
should correlate with each other (because they are measuring the same thing). The
variables that do not correlate with each other should be eliminated. Principal
components analysis with Varimax rotation was used so as to extract maximum
possible variance from the data (Kim and Mueller, 1978).
According to the results that we got from the factor analysis, the questions that are
not correlating and will be eliminated are PI1, PI2, PI3, PI4, PI5, PCE1, PCE2, PCE3,
PCE4, PCE5, TF1, SF4, SF5, DV4, DV5, DV6. The constructs that were deleted are:
Perceived Consumer Effectivness, certain questions from Product and Information
Availability, Demographic Perception, Social Factors and Transperancy. All the other
variables are correlating with each other and are therefore correct to perform a
factor analysis.
KMO & Bartletts Test of Sphericity is a measure of sampling adequacy that is
recommended to check the case to variable ratio for the analysis being conducted.
The Bartletts test compares the observed correlation matrix to the identity
matrix. In other words, it checks if there is a certain redundancy between the
variables that we can summarize with a few number of factors. If the variables are
perfectly correlated, only one factor is sufficient. If they are orthogonal, we need as
many factors as variables.
The null hypothesis is that the inter-correlation matrix comes from a population in
which the variables are non-collinear (i.e. an identity matrix)
In most academic and business studies, KMO & Bartletts test play an important role
for accepting the sample adequacy.
Approx. Chi-Square
.828
2351.639
Df
300
Sig.
.000
As can be seen in Table 2, the KMO of this questionnaire is .828 which can be
classified as meritorious. This is the KMO for multiple variables. The KMO values
for individual variables should be above a minimum of 0.5 and are excellent for this
dataset: All variables are above 0.5. In addition, Bartletts test is highly significant
and based on this finding, it is confident to say that factor analysis is appropriate for
these data.
The next step is to look at the number of the components. Based on appendix 1, ten
components can be made since SPSS only extracts factors with an eigen-value
higher than 1. This is supported by the scree plot which has a point of inflexion after
five factors.
A Scree Plot displays the eigen-values associated with a component or factor in
descending order versus the number of the component or factor. You can use scree
plots in principal components analysis and factor analysis to visually assess which
components or factors explain most of the variability in the data.
The final step is the principal component analysis. Table 4 shows the rotated
component matrix which is a matrix of the factor loadings for each variable onto
each factor. In other words, Table 4 shows which questions relates to which factor.
The 10 factors are labelled as EA1, EA2, EA3, EA4, EA5, TF2, TF3, TF4, TF5, SF1,
SF2, SF3, DV1, DV2, DV3, A1, A2, A3, A5, A6.
.666
EA2
.646
EA3
.779
EA4
.718
10
11
12
EA5
.803
PI1
.649
PI2
.604
PI3
PI4
.651
PI5
.823
PCE1
PCE2
.544
PCE3
.530
PCE4
PCE5
.618
TF1
.873
TF2
TF3
.646
TF4
.758
TF5
.628
SF1
.740
SF2
.759
SF3
.757
SF4
.736
SF5
.817
CV1
.720
CV2
.550
CV3
CV4
CV5
.671
DV1
.818
DV2
.725
DV3
.719
DV4
.565
DV5
.668
DV6
A1
.594
A2
.676
A3
.687
A4
.655
A5
.606
A6
.639
GPB1
.680
GPB2
.825
GPB3
.757
GPB4
.827
GPB5
.863
A1
.761
A2
.735
A3
.723
A5
.710
A6
.714
EA1
.595
EA2
.638
EA3
.755
EA4
.733
EA5
.807
GPB1
.679
GPB2
.825
GPB3
.767
GPB4
.832
GPB5
.865
TF2
.576
TF3
.751
TF4
.819
TF5
.736
SF1
.813
SF2
.794
SF3
.845
DV1
.830
DV2
.789
DV3
.735
Standardized
Alpha
Items
N of Items
.877
.877
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Squared
Cronbach's
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
EA1
14.86
12.740
.707
.520
.851
EA2
15.19
13.224
.653
.486
.864
EA3
14.65
12.940
.722
.523
.848
EA4
14.71
12.849
.688
.586
.855
EA5
14.63
12.469
.769
.648
.836
A closer look will be taken to the items that measure the above factor. As shown in
Table 5, the Cronbachs Alpha is .877 which is above 0.7 and therefore excellent. In
Table 6, the values in the column labeled Corrected Item-Total Correlation have no
items that are less than .3. Again this is good, since values under .3 indicate that
this item does not correlate well with the scale overall. The column labeled
Cronbachs Alpha if item deleted reflect the change in Cronbachs Alpha that would
be seen if a particular item were deleted. Field (2005) stated that any items that
result in substantially greater values of than the overall may need to be deleted
from the scale to improve its reliability. Since none of the Alphas is higher than .877
there is no need to delete any of the items.
Standardized
Alpha
Items
.846
N of Items
.849
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Squared
Cronbach's
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
TF2
11.22
7.025
.598
.379
.839
TF3
10.97
6.376
.721
.534
.789
TF4
10.95
6.271
.765
.597
.771
TF5
11.25
5.957
.665
.483
.818
c. Effect of Altruism (A 1, 2, 3, 5, 6)
The reliability score for the Altruism is .885 (Table 9). Again, values between .7 and .
8 are good, higher values indicate a high reliability. The Cronbachs Alpha cannot be
improved if one of the five items would be removed.
Table 9: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Cronbach's
Standardized
Alpha
Items
.885
N of Items
.886
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Squared
Cronbach's
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
Total Correlation
A1
15.56
10.165
.714
.513
.863
A2
15.73
10.004
.769
.607
.850
A3
15.86
10.475
.651
.450
.878
A5
15.71
10.233
.725
.561
.860
A6
15.65
10.214
.761
.625
.852
Standardized
Alpha
Items
.866
N of Items
.867
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Squared
Cronbach's
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
Total Correlation
SF1
6.81
3.402
.728
.544
.829
SF2
6.79
3.551
.721
.533
.834
SF3
6.81
3.470
.789
.623
.773
Cronbach's
Alpha
.809
DV1
DV2
DV3
f.
Cronbach's
Alpha
Based
on
Standardize N
of
d Items
Items
.808
3
Cronbach's
Alpha
if
Item
Deleted
.663
.740
.800
The last dimension to look at is the dependent variable GPB. The items that
measure this dimension are GPB (1,2,3,4,5). As shown in Table 15, the Cronbachs
Alpha for the GPB is .865 which is good. It shows that the questionnaire finding
respondents Green Purchase Behavior as reliable. The Cronbachs Alpha cannot be
improved if one of the items would be deleted.
Table 15: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
Based
on
Cronbach's Alpha
Standardized Items N of Items
.865
.866
5
Cronbach's
Alpha
if
Item
Deleted
.864
.833
.831
GPB4 13.65
GPB5 13.81
12.735
11.237
.684
.789
.780
.726
.837
.810
The results of the factor analysis can be summarized in the following table:
Reliability
EA
0.877
TF
0.846
SF
DV
A
0.866
0.809
0.885
Reliable
Variables
EA1, EA2, EA3,
EA4, EA5
TF2, TF3, TF4,
TF5
SF1, SF2, SF3
DV1, DV2, DV3
A1, A2, A3, A5,
A6
Deleted
Variables
TF1
SF4, SF5
DV4, DV5, DV6
A4
The reliability for all the factors is between >0.7 which indicates that this research
is reliable.
Construct 1
factor
loading
1factor^
2
Scale Composite
reliability
sqr of
factor
AVE
A1
0.421
0.761
0.850
0.579
A2
0.735
0.460
0.540
A3
0.723
0.477
0.523
A5
0.710
0.496
0.504
A6
0.714
0.490
0.510
SUM
3.643
2.343
2.657
Construct 2
factor
loading
GPB1
1factor^
2
Scale Composite
reliability
sqr of
factor
0.540
0.679
0.896
0.460
GPB2
0.825
0.320
0.680
GPB3
0.767
0.412
0.588
GPB4
0.832
0.308
0.692
GPB5
0.865
0.252
0.748
SUM
3.967
1.832
3.168
Construct 3
factor
loading
EA1
1factor^
2
Scale Composite
reliability
sqr of
factor
0.645
0.595
0.834
0.355
EA2
0.638
0.594
0.406
EA3
0.755
0.431
0.569
EA4
0.733
0.462
0.538
EA5
0.807
0.348
0.652
SUM
3.528
2.480
2.520
Construct 4
factor
loading
1factor^
Scale Composite
sqr of
0.53
1
AVE
0.63
4
AVE
0.50
4
AVE
reliability
factor
0.668
TF2
0.576
TF3
0.751
0.436
0.564
TF4
0.819
0.329
0.671
TF5
0.736
0.458
0.542
SUM
2.883
1.890
2.110
Construct 5
factor
loading
SF1
0.815
1factor^
2
Scale Composite
reliability
0.332
sqr of
factor
0.338
0.813
0.858
0.662
SF2
0.794
0.370
0.630
SF3
0.845
0.285
0.715
SUM
2.453
0.994
2.006
0.52
7
AVE
0.66
9
A
GPB
EA
TF
SF
DV
A
GPB
EA
TF
SF
DV
0.729
0.188
0.796
0.561
0.283
0.710
0.545
0.167
0.666
0.726
0.461
0.250
0.455
0.422 0.818
0.560
0.109
0.346
0.311 0.332
0.786
V. Regression
From the last table, estimated regression coefficients are: o = 2.212, 1 = 0.257
Based on the estimated regression equation Y= 2.212+0.257*X, we expect that
the sales (Y) will increase by 0.257 units if we increase advertising frequency (X) by
one unit.
R-square = 0.102 (10.2%) in the second table indicates that the 10.2% of total
variance of sales(Y) is explained by the estimated regression equation, by the
Effect of Product and Information availability and Effect of environmental
Awareness, concern and Attitude (X)
Model
R Square
.319a
Adjusted R
Square
Estimate
.102
.070
.86164
Sum of Squares
Regression
df
Mean Square
11.854
2.371
Residual
104.683
141
.742
Total
116.536
146
F
3.193
Sig.
.009b
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model
1
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
2.212
.412
.028
.130
TF
-.083
SF
Coefficients
Beta
Sig.
5.366
.000
.025
.217
.829
.122
-.077
-.684
.495
.161
.093
.163
1.725
.087
DV
-.022
.095
-.023
-.233
.816
EA
.257
.116
.254
2.213
.028
5. Discussion
As public concern for the environment increases, green marketing, which appeals to
consumers with products that are green or environmentally friendly, emerged
as a new strategy. Ecologically themed product claims, such as safe for the
environment and biodegradable became common in the 1980s. However, there
is skepticism about how committed consumers are to environmentally friendly
products in the real marketplace. Not all people who consider themselves
environmentally concerned purchase and consume products environmentally
positioned. Past studies of environmental or ecological concern have examined this
environmental concern as an attitude towards the environment and as reflected in
past behaviors. Few studies have attempted to model the psychological
determinants of ecological consumption (see Ellen, Wiener, and Cobb-Walgren 1991
for a notable example) and no empirical research has tested a theoretical model for
integrating consumer values and environmental concern and assessing their
influence on green purchase decisions. The study presented in this paper provides a
deeper understanding of green buying behavior by focusing on how collectivism,
environmental concern, PCE etc. drive ecological consumptions as well as how they
relate to each other.
As the starting point for the model presented in this paper, collectivism, defined as
an individual-level value orientation, appeared to positively influence individuals
tendency to buy green products, but only through their positive beliefs about selfefficacy. Collectivistic individuals who value group goals and cooperation might be
highly motivated to make pro-environmental choices by having stronger beliefs that
their behavior would make a difference in mitigating environmental problems.
Greater perceived self-efficacy directly influences the likelihood that consumers
actually engage in green purchase behavior. These findings seem to reflect the
unique nature of pro-environmental behavior. Unlike general product purchase
decisions, ecological consumption choices are future and group oriented. That is,
instead of instant gratification for the buyer, using green products often provides
benefits for the entire society in the long term. Continuous reinforcement of selfefficacy should be provided for further promoting consumer commitment to green
purchase. Environmental concerns also had a direct, positive influence on green
purchase, suggesting that consumers who possess strong environmental concern
may be interested in consumption of products that reflect that concern. However,
environmental attitudes or concerns that reflect an individuals orientation or belief
toward the environment specifically appear to be not related to their collectivistic
tendencies at a more general level. Theoretically, the approach used in this study
resembles the conceptual framework of several previous studies on proenvironmental behaviors that emphasize the role of intervening
Findings of this study also highlight the importance of consumer attitudes towards
issues closely related to the behavior of interest in understanding the relationship
between values and behavior. Fundamental values that individuals hold at an
abstract level can motivate and drive behavior, but attitudes and beliefs measured
with regards to a particular object or topic may intervene between the abstract
values and the specific behavior. Therefore, a better predictor of target behavior can
be obtained by considering the level of specificity of attitudes and behavior or
motivational factors such as personal efficacy and behavioral intentions. In practical
terms, findings of this study offer implications for marketers and public policy
makers who promote green products or programs for pro-environmental behavior.
Taken together, the results suggest that it is important to increase consumer
awareness of the environmental issues and enhance the perceived efficacy of their
contribution to improving them. Applied to the segmentation and targeting
strategies, promotional messages can be tailored to collectivistic people with an
appeal that emphasizes the importance of their role in improving the environment
as an achievement of group goals such as the societys well-being. For example, the
portrayal of an individuals green behavior contributing to the welfare of the
community they belong to might effectively encourage people to act proenvironmentally. For those who are already environmentally concerned, an
emphasis on success they can yield by taking environmentally conscious actions
might be effective for promoting their ecological purchase and consumption.
6. Conclusion
Based on a comprehensive literature review, this paper, innovatively, provides an
integrated and comprehensive set of hypothesized explanatory variables of Green
Consumer Behavior. It is regarded as the basis for a consensus among the partners
of the value chain for Green products on consumer Behavior in this sensitive field.
Hence, this information is an invaluable source which should inform marketing
strategies and tactics of companies operating in the green product business.
As with any other studies using a student sample, the findings of this study might
not represent consumers at large. A replication of this study with more general
References
APPENDIX
Appendix 1
Loadings
Loadings
Initial Eigenvalues
% of
Cumulative
Variance
Total
% of
Cumulative
Variance
Total
% of
Cumulative
Variance
Component
Total
8.865
35.459
35.459
8.865
35.459
35.459
3.431
13.726
13.726
3.070
12.278
47.738
3.070
12.278
47.738
3.332
13.330
27.056
2.169
8.676
56.413
2.169
8.676
56.413
3.299
13.197
40.253
1.649
6.596
63.010
1.649
6.596
63.010
2.847
11.387
51.639
1.178
4.712
67.721
1.178
4.712
67.721
2.712
10.847
62.486
1.084
4.337
72.059
1.084
4.337
72.059
2.393
9.573
72.059
.775
3.099
75.157
.667
2.668
77.826
.645
2.579
80.404
10
.587
2.347
82.751
11
.507
2.028
84.779
12
.469
1.875
86.654
13
.452
1.809
88.464
14
.404
1.617
90.081
15
.364
1.456
91.536
16
.350
1.399
92.935
17
.292
1.168
94.103
18
.285
1.138
95.242
19
.228
.913
96.155
20
.206
.822
96.977
21
.185
.741
97.718
22
.178
.710
98.428
23
.166
.664
99.092
24
.155
.619
99.711
25
.072
.289
100.000