Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
We offer this issue on the theme African Cultural Studies, both
enthusiastically and with some ambivalence. On the one hand, as two
collaborating Africans, we are enthused about the publication of an issue of
Cultural Studies dedicated to African Cultural Studies. This journal issue adds to
our individual and collaborative efforts to contribute to the mapping and
development of a plurality of African cultural studies and to making a space for
African approaches in the evolving international discourse of cultural studies.
On the other hand, we are uneasy about the dangers (e.g. homogenization,
impreciseness, exclusivity, incompleteness, blinkered nationalism, reproduction of problematic power relations) that exist or constantly threaten to
emerge in nation-based and region-based traditions of cultural studies. We
share this general unease with others such as Stuart Hall (1992) who has
described British cultural studies as a pretty awkward signifier (p. 277) and
Larry Grossberg who observed that the claims of national traditions are
generally wrong headed . . . . (quoted in Wright 2001, p. 155). Our
preference is for a transnational cultural studies (e.g. Ang 1998, Chen
1992, OConnor 1993, Spivak, 1993). The reality, however, is that cultural
studies has evolved and continues to evolve primarily along regional lines and
however uncomfortable that might make some of us, there is no way to put the
genie of say British cultural studies back in the bottle of cultural studies
history. Thus, there are national versions of cultural studies in a few African
Cultural Studies Vol. 22, No. 2 March 2008, pp. 173!186
ISSN 0950-2386 print/ISSN 1466-4348 online 2008 Taylor & Francis
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals DOI: 10.1080/09502380701788986
174
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
countries (e.g. one can discern different kinds of South African cultural
studies) as well as a much looser discursive formation that can be labelled
African cultural studies. We are engaged in two critical and seemingly
contradictory tasks; first to contribute to the development of African cultural
studies and second, to promote and contribute to the development of
transnational cultural studies. Our position is that as it develops and if it is
taken up as an integral aspect of the internationalization of cultural studies,
African cultural studies can contribute to the evolution of transnational cultural
studies.
Despite some of the dangers, there is potential collective strength in
African cultural studies, especially in the international context of cultural
studies. While internationally dominant region-based versions of cultural
studies (read British and American) are readily recognizable and engaged
around the world, marginal versions have been restricted for the most part to
their own locations, save for interesting flashes that momentarily interrupt an
international cultural studies gaze fixed on the centre [e.g. special issue of
Cultural Studies on Nordic Cultural Studies (Eskola and Vainikkala 1994)];
inclusion of essays on the institutionalization of Turkish cultural studies in a
themed journal issue of International Journal of Cultural Studies (Maton and
Wright 2002). The more substantial of these flashes (e.g. a journal special
issue), we believe (or is that hope?), are more likely to be noticed, recognized
and considered (however fleetingly) for their distinctness. It is our hope that
this journal issue will contribute to the evolution of both African cultural
studies as well as transnational cultural studies.
EDITORIAL
appropriated British cultural studies and at best applied it to the South African
context. Our own preference is for a third strand which occupies a middle
ground where African cultural studies draws on aspects of both nativist and
derivative cultural studies and is developed in conversation with international
cultural studies (Kanneh 1998, Wright 2004).
In his brief preface, entitled Establishing an Intellectual Bridgehead,
Masilela appealed for a nativisation of cultural studies in South Africa (cf.
Kerr 1989). This task, he suggested, would occur in the context of
Africanization which he describes as the re-orientation of intellectual and
historical perspectives of cultural studies in terms of African cultural
trajectories and history. Masilela thus forward-thinkingly linked South Africa
to the continent as a whole at a time when the cultural boycott and
international pressure on apartheid was at its peak. Significantly, then, in
compiling this themed issue of Cultural Studies we found ourselves selecting
papers from a predominance of South African authored-submissions. These
authors (not all of whom are included here) tended to be well-located in
dominant Western cultural studies paradigms familiar to readers of this
journal. However, we wanted to also incorporate studies which have grown
more directly from African contexts, as Masilela recommended, ones which
draw on African philosophies and indigenous frames of reference. Cultural
studies, as Wright has argued (1998), has emerged in many different forms on
different continents and conditions, each developing unique characteristics, in
answering often the same questions. We wanted something of this specificity
to shine through this issue.
We have mentioned one primary framework for conceptualizing African
cultural studies, namely its relationship with African intellectual work on the
one hand and outer-continental work on the other hand (the results of which
are derivative/appropriated cultural studies in Africa, nativized African
cultural studies and a version of cultural studies which draws on both and is
articulated in conversation with international cultural studies). Another
framework involves the location of Africans: the discourse of African cultural
studies is being developed primarily by Africans on the continent as well as
African emigres in the diaspora. In writing the preface for Tomasellis edited
collection, Masilela, a South African writing from exile in the US, made one of
the first outer-continental interventions in the development of African cultural
studies. Our own collaboration reflects and continues this dual source of
development of African cultural studies. One of us, Handel Kashope Wright, is
a Sierra Leonean who was introduced to cultural studies while undertaking
graduate studies in Canada, has taught in the US and now teaches cultural
studies and education in Canada. The other, Keyan Tomaselli, is a South
African who teaches media and cultural studies in South Africa, and has been
instrumental in the development of South African and African media studies
and an indigenized cultural studies. We have also selected essays to reflect both
175
176
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
continental African voices (Lize van Robbroeck and Natasha Distiller from
South Africa, Fibian Kavulani Lukalo from Kenya, Sunday Enessi Ododo from
Nigeria) and voices of Africans living in the diaspora (Boulou de BberiCameroonian in Canada, Awad Ibrahim- Sudanese in the US, Ali AbdiSomalian in Canada). In addition to these two principal sets of contributors,
there are also diasporic Africans (used here in the albeit problematic loose
sense that references black people outside the continent) and Africanists who
are contributing to the development of African cultural studies and the former
of this last two categories is represented by Glenn Jordan (an African American
who is a long time resident in Wales) and his contribution to this themed issue
(Jordan 1973).
With the caveat that these are the selections of two individuals rather than a
definitive, authoritative statement about the status quo of African cultural
studies, we identify these as some of the issues and trends in African cultural
studies. The articles included in this themed issue were selected to cross all of
the earlier themes, with the concept of identity being the cement binding the
papers into an overarching narrative. For example, in Surviving the Future !
Towards a South African Cultural Studies, Natasha Distiller articulates the
general outlines of and an argument to make a space for South African cultural
studies, and issues of identity (especially race, class and language) central in her
discussion. Fibian Kavulani Lukalo in Outliving Generations: Youth Traver-
EDITORIAL
sing Borders through Popular Music in Everyday Urban Life in East Africa
sheds light on what is clearly a vibrant, emerging urban youth culture in East
Africa. The Bongo Flava music described provides an excellent opportunity to
examine a dynamic space where multiple forms of identity (national, regional,
generational, gendered, linguistic, etc.) intersect in complex ways.
All the studies published in this volume engage the notion of Africanness
in interrogating issues of identity and the notion of culture. This is a
recurring theme to which the journal Critical Arts has devoted several special
issues (e.g. Wright 2002, 2003a, Williams 2000). Wright, (2003b) has argued
that black people in predominantly black countries in Africa do not self
identify as black but rather become black or are assigned blackness as an
identity marker in the West [for a parallel argument, see Michelle Wright
(2004) on how African Americans became black]. There is a welcome
conceptual continuity reflected in the fact that Awad Ibrahim and Glenn Jordan
make similar points in their contributions to this themed issue. For and in the
West, race is a crucial, definitive marker (e.g. Webster 1992). For the vast
majority of Africans, however, it is questions of ethnicity and relationship to
the ancestors that are the most crucial markers of identity (Kasoma 1996,
Ododo in this issue, Jordan, in this issue). The importance of the ancestors and
the assumption of overlapping social/ancestral dimensions is evident in Sunday
Enessi Ododos Facekuerade: The Transformational Duality in Ebira-Ekuechi
Festival Performance. Few cultural and media studies scholars admit the
perceptively real dimensions of religion in the everyday life of people in most
societies and communities around the world. This lack of scholarly discussion
of religion is a blind spot in much analysis deriving from cultural and media
studies scholars living in industrial and post-industrial societies. Ododos paper
begins to address this lack in Western-derived (non-anthropological/theological) scholarship. Too often the blight of apartheid has been seen as operating
purely as a form of racial oppression for blacks in South Africa. However, in
Beyond the Traditional/Modernity Dialectic: African Nationalist Subjectivities
in South Africa Print and Visual Culture of the Early Twentieth Century, Lize
van Robbroeck illustrates how race and class intersected in the production of
the virtually untenable position of black middle-class subjects during South
Africas apartheid era. Beyond adding nuance to accounts of the apartheid era,
her essay is something of a reminder to the field of cultural studies that class
matters.
Shepperson and Tomaselli (1992) in Semiotics in an African Context:
Science vs Priest-craft, suggest a way of understanding African
ontologies from the perspectives of African philosophers, linguists and a
mathematician. Some of the papers in this issue appear to be operating in a
similar vein. For example, Ali A. Abdis article Europe and African Thought
Systems and Philosophies of Education: Re-culturing the Trans-temporal
Discourses draws on similar African philosophical sources. A review of
177
178
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
EDITORIAL
179
180
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
EDITORIAL
To the papers
Boulou E. de Bberis, Africanicity in Black Cinema: A Conjunctural Ground
for New Practices of Identity examines the interaction between black cultural
and political identity in order to determine new conjunctural practices of
identity, found in selected black films. He includes two specific paradigms of
communication through which black people can articulate their identity and
challenges the notions that they assert. In addition, he interrogates the
concepts of hybridity and authenticity in identity-creation. His search for a
sense of Africanicity is articulated through films such as Malcolm X and Beloved,
as well as through major role players in the contemporary film industry.
Beyond the Traditional/Modernity Dialectic: African Nationalist Subjectivities in South Africa Print and Visual Culture of the Early Twentieth
Century by Lize van Robbroeck, introduces another realm of African identity,
that of the double consciousness involved in being black and European. She
explores the ambivalent subject positions manifest in the South African black
middle class, by providing an analysis of the visual culture of the early
twentieth century. She displays the differences between the public discourse of
the black press and that of individual black artists. She gives specific reference
to artist Milwa Pembas work, as well as to certain black publications which
substantiate her claims.
Awad Ibrahim in The New Flaneur: Subaltern Cultural Studies, African
Youth in Canada and the Semiology of In-betweenness contributes a
grounding of identity theory through an ethnography of a specific group of
181
182
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
EDITORIAL
Conclusion
In an article commissioned for the inaugural issue of the International Journal of
Cultural Studies, Tomaselli (1998) wrote, It is up to us in Africa and those
concerned about the continent to ensure that our voices are heard, our ideas
debated, and our theories engaged. It is important that we stir the rich
diversity and heritage of African scholarship into the international debates and
183
184
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
directly address the continents fringe status. This theme issue of Cultural
Studies is dedicated to this objective, adding to the growing body of work that
includes journals, books, conferences, presentations, academic programmes
and centres and empirical and conceptual research on African cultural studies.
However, in terms of the project of transnational cultural studies, establishing
and putting forward African cultural studies is only one part of the equation.
The other side has to do with the reception of African cultural studies as it is
being put forward. African cultural studies needs to be taken up both as a
component of regional versions of cultural studies internationally and perhaps
more importantly as contributory to the evolution of transnational cultural
studies. Of course, there is always the issue of how this is done, with all the
attendant possibilities and problems that readings and misreadings entail. As
Ang (1998) once pointed out, at play at the cultural studies borderland is a
politics of (mis)communication where the transfer of meaning cannot be taken
for granted (p. 20). Wrights (1998) caveat to the field is probably still
pertinent: as Africans we can only be at home in international/transnational
cultural studies when we can say African cultural studies without nonAfricans raising an eyebrow and us feeling like biting our tongue. Better yet,
we can only be at home in cultural studies when non-Africans engage African
cultural studies without us raising an eyebrow and wishing they would bite
their tongue.
References
Ang, I. (1998) Doing cultural studies at the crossroads: Local/global negotiations, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13!31.
Barber, K. (1997) Readings in African Popular Culture, London, James Curry.
Bennett, T. (1992) Putting policy into cultural studies, in Cultural Studies, eds
L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler, New York, Routledge.
Cabral, A. (1971) Revolution in Guinea: An African Peoples Struggle: Selected
Texts, ed. R. Handyside, London, Stage 1
Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS). (1986) The Empire Strikes Back.
Race and Racism in the 70s Britain, London, Hutchinson.
Chen, K. H. (1992) Voices from the outside: toward a new internationalist
localism, Cultural Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 476!484.
Eskola, K. & Vainikkala, E. (1994) Nordic culture studies ! an introduction,
Cultural Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 191!197.
Fanon, F. (1965) A Dying Colonialism, New York, Grove Press.
Gray, A. (2003) Research Practice for Cultural Studies, London, Sage Press.
Gilroy, P. (1993) The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness, Cambridge,
MA, Harvard University Press.
Hall, S. (1992) Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies, in Cultural Studies, eds
L. Grossberg, C. Nelson & P. Treichler, New York, Routledge.
EDITORIAL
185
186
C U LT U R A L S T U D I E S
Cultural Studies after 9/11, eds N. Denzin & M. Giardina, Boulder, CO,
Paradigm Publishers, pp. 192!205.
Traber, M. (1989) Communication for justice and peace, in Christian
Communication reconsidered, ed. J. Bluck, Geneva, WACC.
Webster, Y. O. (1992) The Racialization of America, New York, St Martins Press.
Williams, J. (2000) Ethnicity and identity, Critical Arts, vol. 14, no. 1, pp.
73!95.
Wright, H. K. (2004) A Prescience of African Cultural Studies: The Future of Literature
in Africa is Not What It Was, New York, Peter Lang.
Wright, H. K. (ed.) (2003a) Critical Arts, vol. 17, nos 1/2.
Wright, H. K. (2003b) Editorial: whose diaspora is this, anyway? Continental
Africans trying on and troubling the diaspora, Critical Arts, vol. 17, nos. 1/
2, pp. 1!16.
Wright, H. K. (2003c) Cultural studies as praxis: (making) an autobiographical
case, Cultural Studies, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 805!822.
Wright, H. K. (ed.) (2002) Critical Arts, vol. 16, no. 12.
Wright, H. K. (2001) Whats Going On? Larry Grossberg on the status quo of
cultural studies: an interview, Cultural Values, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133!162.
Wright, H. K. (1998) Dare we de-centre Birmingham? Troubling the origin and
trajectories of cultural studies, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 1,
no. 1, pp. 33!56.
Wright, M. (2004) Becoming Black: Creating Identity in the African Diaspor, London,
Duke University Press.