Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys

LANDOLT-BORNSTEIN
Numerical Data and Functional Relationships

in Scienceand Technology
Nau Series
Editor in Chief: 0. Madelung
Group III: Crystal and Solid StatePhysics
Volume 26
Diffusion in Solid Metals
and Alloys
H. Bakker - H.P. Bonzel - C.M. Bruff * M.A. Dayananda
W. Gust - J. Horvath * I. Kaur - G.V. Kidson - A.D. Le Claire
H. Mehrer - G.E. Murch * G. Neumann - N. Stolica - N.A. Stolwijk
Editor: H. Mehrer
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona
ISBN 3-540-50886-4
ISBN o-387-50886-4
Springer-Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Berlin Heidelberg New York

New York Berlin Heidelberg
CIP-Kurztitelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibiiothek

Zohlenwerfe wd Funkfionen our Nofvrwissensrho/en
und Technik/Landolt-BBmstein. - Berlin; Heidelberg: New York;
London: Paris; Tokyo; Hong Kong: Springer. Parallelt.: Numerical data and functional relationships in science and
technology. - N.S. teilw. Gesamthrsg.: K.-H. Hellwege; 0. Madelung. - N.S. Gesamthrsg.: 0. Madelung. Gruppe 3,
Kristall- und Festk6rperphysik.
NE: Landolt, Hans [Begr.]; Hellwege, Karl-Heinz IHrsg.1; Madelung. Otfried [Hrsg.]; PT
Ed. 26. Diffusion in festen Metallen und Legierungen/H. Bakker... Hrsg.: H. Mehrer. - 1990
ISBN 3-540-50886-4(Berlin . . .)
ISBN o-387-50886-4 (New York.. .)
NE: Bakker, H. IMitverf.1; Mehrer, Helmut B-Ins.1
This work is subjectto copyright, All rights are reserved,whether the whole or part of the material is concerned,specifically
the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or other
ways, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is only permitted under the provisions of
the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and a copyright fee must always be paid.
Violations fall under the prosecution act of the German Copyright Law.
0 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990
Printed in Germany
The useof registerednames,trademarks, etc. in this publication doesnot imply, even in the absenceof a specific statement,
that such namesare exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Typesetting: K. Triltsch, Wiirzburg
Printing: Druckhaus Langenscheidt KG, Berlin
Bookbinding: Liiderita & Bauer-GmbH, Berlin
2163/302&543210- Printed on acid-free paper
Editor
H. Mehrer
Institut fur Metallforschung, Universitit Miinster, W-4400 Miinster,

FRG
Contributors
H. Bakker
Natuurkundig Laboratorium der Universiteit van Amsterdam,

1018 XE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
H. P. Bonzel
Institut fur Grenzfllchenforschung und Vakuumphysik, KFA Jiilich,
W-5170 Jiilich, FRG
C. M. Bruff
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University
of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
M. A. Dayananda School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette,
IN 47907, USA
W. Gust
Max-Planck-Institut fur Metallforschung, Institut fur Werkstoffwissenschaften, W-7000 Stuttgart 1, FRG
J. Horveth
W-7000 Stuttgart 1, FRG
I. Kaur
Max-Planck-Institut fur Metallforschung, Institut fur Werkstoffwissenschaften, W-7000 Stuttgart 1, FRG
%. V. Kidson
Deep River, Ontario, KOJ IPO, Canada
A. D. Le Claire
Oxford Research Unit, The Open University, Boars Hill, Oxford
OX1 RDY, United Kingdom
H. Mehrer
Institut fur Metallforschung, Universitat Miinster, W-4400 Miinster,
FRG
G. E. Murch
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University
of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
G. Neumann
Institut fur Physikalische Chemie, FU Berlin, 1000Berlin 33, FRG
N. Stolica
Institut fiir Metallforschung, Universitat Miinster, W-4400 Mtinster,
FRG
N. A. Stolwijk
Institut fur Metallforschung, Universitlt Miinster, W-4400 Mtinster,
FRG
VIII
Preface
high precision became possible. Since then considerable experimental efforts have been
devoted to a systematic study of diffusion in all types of metals and alloys using radioactive tracers. In addition during the recent decades, the scientific development of other
techniques applicable in diffusion studies like electron microprobe analysis, secondary ion
mass spectroscopy, ion beam backscattering profiling, nuclear magnetic relaxation,
MEiBbauer spectroscopy, after effect measurements, etc., has been extraordinary. Because
of the historical development and the strict desire for a critical evaluation of the available
data, the reference lists in the various chapters start in general with references from
the 50s.
The critical compilation of data was done in collaboration with 13 experts from the
diffusion community and has resulted in tables and series of diagrams which present in
12 chapters data for the following properties: self- and impurity-diffusion in metallic
elements, self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys, chemical diffusion in binary and
ternary alloys, diffusion in amorphous alloys, diffusion of interstitial foreign atoms
like hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen in metallic elements, mass and pressure
* dependence of diffusion, diffusion along dislocations, grain and interphase boundary
diffusion, and diffusion on metal surfaces. A general introductory chapter acquaints the
user of this volume of the basic concepts and experimental methods in the field.
The efforts of many people were involved in the preparation of this volume: It was
a great experience for me at the beginning, that most colleagues whom I asked were
indeed ready to make a contribution. The collaboration with coauthors continued to be
excellent. I am also grateful to them for many suggestions to the general introductory
chapter. The collaboration with the editor-in-chief, Professor O.Madelung, and with the
editorial staff of Landolt-Bernstein, in particular with Dr. W. Polzin, Mrs. I. Lenhart and
Mrs. R. Lettmann, was always encouraging. I also have benefited greatly over the years
from discussions with my colleagues in Miinster, Dr. N. A. Stolwijk, Dr. N. Stolica,
Professor Chr. Herzig, em. Professor Th. Heumann, Professor E. Nembach, with many
students who worked for their diploma or doctoral thesis and with the guest scientists
Dr. G. Erdelyi and Dr. J. Cermak. In the preparation of this volume during several years,
I have been helped by my secretary Mrs. Niehues-Korouma, by Dipl. Phys. W. Lerch and
Dip!. Phys. H. G. Hettwer, Mrs. G. Todt and Mr. M. Mevenkamp. I expressmy gratitude
to all these persons.
I am also grateful to Professor W. L. Johnson who invited me to spend several months in
1990 as a visiting professor at California Institute of Technology in Pasadena during a
sabattical leave from Mtinster. The accomplishment of the volume has benelitted from this
visit in many respects.
Last, but not least, I express my deep gratitude to my wife, Karin, and to my children,
Tobias, Julia, Simon and Lisa, for their moral support and their patience during many
weekends over several years.
Miinster, October 1990
Helmut Mehrer
Ref. p. 301
1.1 Ficks laws, flux of particles, isotropic and anisotropic diffusion
1 General introduction
1.1 Ficks laws, flux of particles, isotropic and anisotropic diffusion
The law governing diffusion processesand hence the redistribution of concentrations is Ficks first law,
which for an isotropic medium or a cubic crystal can be written as
J= -D grade.
(1.1)
J is the instantaneous flux of particles of a certain speciesand c is the concentration of the same species.The
negative sign in (1.1) indicates the opposite direction of the flux compared to the concentration gradient. The
factor of proportionality D is denoted as diffusion coeficient or as diffusivity.
Jis expressedin number of particles or moles per unit area and unit time and c in particles or moles per unit
volume. Consequently D has the dimension length2 time- l. In the international system of units (SIU) used in
this volume, diffusion coefficients are expressedin m 2s- . In the cgs-systemwhich is still used in the literature,
too, they are expressedin cm s-I . D depends on temperature, pressure and in general also on concentration.
Many metallic elements and alloys are cubic. Therefore, in many casesD is indeed a scalar quantity.
For anisotropic media and non-cubic crystals Ficks first law generalizes to
J= - BVc,
(I.3
where 9 is a symmetric second rank tensor denoted as the diffusion coefficient tensor. Equation (1.2)meansthat
the diffusion coefficient varies with direction. The diffusion flux is parallel to grade only along the three
orthogonal principal axes of diffusion. If x1, x2, xj denote these principal axes and J1, J, and J3 the pertaining
components of the diffusion flux, (1.2) may still be written as
JI=-D,;
J=-D
2
i
2 ax,
J,=-D,&.
3
D,, D,, D, denote the principal diffusion coefficients. In general the diffusion flux and grad c are not parallel.
However, if yl, yZ, y3 denote the direction cosines of grad c a diffusion coefficient for the direction (rl, yZ, y3)may
be defined as
(1.4)
D(Y,,Yz,Y~)=Y:.D~+Y~Dz+Y~D~.
Therefore, anisotropic diffusion is completely described by the three principal diffusion coefficients.
For crystals with orthorhombic and higher symmetry the principal axes of diffusion coincide with the axes
of crystallographic symmetry.
In uniaxial (tetragonal, hexagonal, trigonal) crystals with the unique axis parallel to the x, axis, we have
D, = D, =l=D,. The diffusion coefficients for both directions perpendicular to the unique axis are the sameand
are usually denoted as D,. The diffusion coefficient parallel to the unique axis is denoted as D,,. For uniaxial
crystals (1.4) reduces to
D(0) = D,, cos2 0 + D, sin2 8,
(I.3
where ~9is the angle between diffusion direction and crystal axis. For cubic crystals we have D, = D, = D, = D
and (1.2) reduces to (1.1).
Equation (1.1) and its three dimensional generalizations provide a formal definition of the diffusion coefhcient as the ratio of the flux and the concentration gradient. The steady state methods for measuring diffusion
are based directly on Ficks first law.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
1.2.1 Sandwich solution and thin layer solution
[Ref. p. 30
In non-steady state situations the diffusion flux and the concentration vary with time t. In such situations
in addition to Ficks first law a balance equation is necessary.For particles which undergo no reactions this is
the equation of continuity
Combining (1.2) and (1.6) yields

8C
ar = div (3 Vc)
(1.7)
which is denoted as Ficks second law. When the concentration varies only along a certain direction denoted
by x (1.7) becomes
If furthermore D is independent of concentration and hence of position x in the sample (1.8) reduces to
(1.9)
For most diffusion experiments either (1.1) or its generalization to the anisotropic case(1.2),and in non-steady
state situations either (1.8) or (1.9), respectively provide appropriate descriptions of the diffusion process.
1.2 Solutions of diffusion equations for constant diffusivity

The diffusion coefficient is independent of concentration and position when diffusion occurs in chemically
homogeneoussystems.Such measurementsare possible e.g.through the use of radioactive tracer elements.Since
these measurementsrequire extremely small amounts of tracers, the system remains essentially homogeneous
during the diffusion. The diffusion of an interstitial solute in a metal or alloy solvent may be also described by
a constant D as long as the concentration differences are small. In section 1.2 some simple analytical solutions
of the equation (1.8) for various initial and boundary conditions are described. For more comprehensive
collections of solutions we refer to several textbooks [55H, 59C, 63S, 645,66A, 7X, 85P, 89Sl].
1.2.1 Sandwich solution and thin layer solution

A very thin layer of the diffusing speciesof total amount M per unit area is deposited at the boundary x = 0
between two identical samples. After diffusion for time t the concentration is described by
M
exp
(1.10)
2&E
provided that the thickness of the deposited layer is much smaller than 2(D t) *2. (1.10)is often also called either
instantaneous sowce solution or Gaussian concentration
profile. A plot of (1.10)in linear scalesis shown in Fig. 1
for 4 different values of 2 fi.
The quantity 2(0 t)12 is a measurefor the penetration depth and occurs in most
diffusion problems. It is often denoted as d@sion length.
Instantaneous source diffusion also occurs when a quantity M per unit area is placed as a source on the
surface of a sample and if the diffusing speciesis consumed only by diffusion into the sample.The concentration
profile is then given by
c(x, t) = ~
-- *
c(x,
t)=-& exp
( 4Xdt
>
(1.11)
The thin layer solution is often used in radiotracer experiments for the determination of D from the concentration profile (seesubsection 1.6.1.2.1).The thin layer solution differs by a factor 2 from the sandwich solution
since in (1.11) diffusion occurs into a half-space.
Casesin which the thin film condition is violated becauseof low solubility of the diffusing speciesare not
uncommon in impurity diffusion. In such casesoften (1.14)can be used instead of(l.11). For a detailed discussion
of solubility-limited diffusion the reader is referred to [63 M].
Mehrer
Land&-B6mstein
New Series 111126
Ref. p. 301
1.2.2 Constant surface concentration and semi-infinite sample
0.6
Fig. 1. Instantaneous source (Gaussian) diffusion profiles.

The concentration normalized to the total amount Mis plotted versus penetration distance x for four different values of
the diffusion length 2 @.
0.5
1.0
1.5
x-
2.0
2.5
1.2.2 Constant surface concentration and semi-infinite sample

If at t = 0 the concentration in a semi-infinite sample was c(x, 0) = c0 and if at t > 0 the surface concentration is maintained at ~(0, t) = c, the appropriate solution is
c - c,
In (1.12)
(1.12)
= erf(x/2 J&)
co - c,
erfz = -?- 5 e-du

(1.13)
fro
denotes the error function. A sample may be considered as semi-infinite as long as (D t)l is very much smaller
than the sample dimension in diffusion direction.
For co = 0 (1.12) leads to
,
(1.14)
cfc, = erfc(x/2 JiYt)
where the complementary error function is defined by
erfcz = 1 - erfz.
(1.15)
Equation (1.14) describes the in-diffusion of a certain speciesfrom a surface concentration maintained at c,. A
plot of (1.14) in linear scales is shown in Fig. 2 for 4 different values of 2(Dt)/2. Figure 3a and 3b show
comparisons between the instantaneous source concentration profile (1.11)and the constant surface concentration profile (1.14) in logarithmic scales either as a function of the penetration distance or as a function of the
penetration distance squared.
For c, = 0 (1.12) leads to
c/co = erf(x@ @) .
(1.16)
(1.16)is the appropriate solution e.g.for the evaporation of a volatile solute element of initial concentration co
from a non-volatile solvent, or for the decarburization of a metal in an oxidizing atmosphere.
The diffusion flux per unit area which penetrates the surface is D cJ~
in the caseof (1.14)and - D co/
,/&% in the case of (1.16).The total amount of diffusing substance M(t) which penetrates into the sample is
&f(t) = 2c, JzJi
(1.17)
in case of (1.14) and the amount escaping from the sample in the case of (1.16) is
M(t) = 2c, JEqi
(1.18)
Equations (1.17)or (1.18)may be used in in- and out-diffusion experiments to determine D either from the total
amount of material taken up by or lost from a sample.
The solutions given in subsections 1.2.1and 1.2.2are applicable as long as (D t)1/2is very much smaller than
the sample dimensions in diffusion direction. Under such conditions the samplesmay be considered as infinite
or semi-infinite.
Land&-Bibstein
New Series III/26
1.2.3 Diffusion in a membrane
[Ref. p. 30
0.8
0.6
I L.7
:
0.4
0.2
2.5
i0
1.5
2.0
xFig. 2. Constant surface concentration (erfc) diffusion proIiles. The concentration normalized to the constant surface
conccntraction r/c, is plotted versusdistance from the surface
for four different values of the diffusion length 2 fi.
0.5
1.0-
1
10
;;I 10-2
II
; 10-s
u
lo-
10.5
0
0
1.5
3.0
k.5
6.0
15
9.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
30
b
a
I= x2/1,Lit z=x/zyzFig. 3. Instantaneous source (Gaussian) and constant surface concentration source (erfc) diffusion profiles in a semilogarithmic plot. The concentration normalized to the surface concentration is plotted in (a) versus the distance from the surface
normalized to the diffusion length z = x/2 ,/% and in (b) versus z*.
1.2.3 Diffusion in a membrane

In this subsection we consider two casesof one dimensional diffusion in a membrane of thickness L bounded
by two parallel planes. If the surfaces of the membrane at x = 0 and x = L are maintained at constant concentrations c, and c2 as illustrated in Fig. 4a, after some delay time of the order of L2/6D(seebelow) a stead~~
sr~te is reached which is described by
c-c,
c,=c,=
(1.19)
According to (1.19)the concentration changeslinearly from c1 to c2 through the membrane.The flux acrossthe
membrane is given by
J = D(c, -Q/L.
(1.20)
Provided that c,, c2 and L are known, D can be determined from (1.20) by measuring .I.
If the region of the membrane - L/2 < x < L/2 is initially at uniform concentration c0 and the surfacesare
kept at constant concentration c, either desorption (c, < c,J or ahsorption (c, > cO)can occur as illustrated in
Fig. 4 b. The ~~ort-srca~~~
srnre solution of (1.9) is described by
c - co
-,1-T!
cs - co
C-1)
n 2=. 2n
cos[(2n + 1)
Mehrer
nx/L] exp[-(2n
+ l)2n2Dt/L2].
(1.21 a)
land&BBmstcin
New Series III,26
Ref. p. 301
1.2.3 Diffusion
in a membrane
Solution (1.21 a) is particularly useful for large timessince then only few terms in the sum contribute significantly.
The appropriate solution for small times is
c - co
F (- 1y erfcW + 1) WI - x + 2 (- 1y erfcIOn + 1) WI + x
cs- co
n=O
n=O
2JDt
(1.21 b)
2JDt
Equations (1.21 a) and (1.21 b) can be written in terms of the dimensionless parameters D t/L and x/L. Graphs
of (c - co)/(c, - co) versus x/(L/2) are shown in Fig. 4c for various values of 4 D tJL2.
The total amount M(t) of the diffusing species which has entered the membrane at time t with respect to the
corresponding quantity M(co) after infinite time obtained by integration of (1.21 a) is
M(t)
M(a)
and by integration
= 1
8 m
1
FO
exp[- 2
(2n + 1)27?
(2n + 1)2x2Dt/LZ]
(1.22a)
of (1.21 b) is
I/&
+ 2 jJ (- I) ierfc nL
n=O
2JDt
where
ierfc z = 7 erfc u du
I
(1.22b)
(1.22c)
denotes the integral of the complementaryerror function.

For c, = 0 the expressions (1.21) and (1.22) can be used to describe the outgassing of a gaseous or volatile
solute from a membrane. The case co = 0 describes the uptake of a gas or a solute by a thin slab of solvent
material.
in.
x-
-L/2
L/2
X-
Fig. 4. Concentration distributions in plane sheet membranes of thickness L.

(a) Steady state distribution with constant surface concentrations c1 and c2 according to (1.19).
(b) Schematic non-steady state distribution according to (1.21a) for the casesof absorption c, > c,, and desorption cs < cO.
(c) Concentration distribution at various times in a membrane -L/2 < x < L/2 with an initial uniform concentration c0 and
surface concentration c, from (1.21) according to [75C]. The numbers on the curves are values of the dimensionless
quantity 4 D t/L'.
Land&-Bhmstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
1.2.4 Diffusion in a cylinder; 1.2.5 Diffusion in a sphere
[Ref. p. 30
1.2.4 Diffusion in a cylinder

We consider a long circular cylinder of radius R in which diffusion occurs everywhere radially. Concentraion is then a function of distance r from the cylinder axis and of time t. If the concentration is initially uniform
and equal to c0 throughout the cylinder and if the surface concentration at r = R is maintained at c, for t 2 0,
:he solution of (1.9)
. , is
c - co
m exp(- D~,2t) JO(cl,r)
-=
(1.23a)
+
n
1
a, Jl 6%RI
.
cs - co
In (1.23)J,(z) and J,(z) are the Besselfunctions of the first kind with orders zero and one, respectively. The
r, are roots of
J,(cc,R) = 0
which are tabulated in tables of Besselfunctions. Solutions for small times can be found in [75C]. The solution
or a cylinder can be written in terms of the dimensionless parameters Dt/R* and r/R. The corresponding
graphical representation is given in Fig. 5.
The quantity M(t) of the diffusing specieswhich has entered or left the cylinder in time t with respect to the
:orresponding quantity M(co) at infinite time is obtained from (1.23) as
-=M(t)
M(a)
(1.24)
$ -$exp(-Daft).
n n
Equations (1.23) and (1.24) can be used for cylindrical samples to describe the outgassing or the uptake of
Ysolute.
/I
1 -f
//n/llrr
Fig. 5. Concentration distribution at various times in a cylinder of radius R with an initial uniform concentration cOand
constant surface concentration c, according to [7X3 The
numbers on curves are values of the dimensionless quantity
DrjR.
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
r/R -
1.2.5 Diffusion in a sphere

We consider a sphere of radius R and restrict ourselves to a case where diffusion is radial. If the surface
concentration for t 2 0 is maintained at c, and if the sphere is initially loaded with a uniform concentration co
the solution is
c - co =,+E
cs - co
2 iI....?
n
xr =I
sin y
exp[- n*rr* Dt/R*]
(1.25)
where r denotes the distance from the centre of the sphere.The total amount of the diffusing speciesM(t) at time
t entering or leaving the sphere obtained by integration of (1.25) is given by
MO)
-=
M(a)
1 - -$ el -$ exp(- n27c2Dt/R2)
(1.26)
where M(m) denotes the total amount at infinite time. Curves showing the solution of (1.25) as a function oi
r/R for different values of the dimensionless parameter Dt/R* are reproduced in Fig. 6. Equation (1.25)and (1.26)
can be used to describe the outgassing or the uptake of a solute from or by a sphere.
Mehrer
laooll-Bomslel
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 301
1.3 Diff. eq. for cont.-dependent diffusivity;
Fig. 6. Concentration distribution at various times in a

sphere of radius R with an initial uniform concentration cO
and constant surfaceconcentration c, according to [75C]. The
numbers on curves are values of the dimensionless quantity
1.4.1 Self-diff. coefficient
0.2
Dt/R2.
0.2
OA
0.6
0.8
'
r/R -
1.3 Diffusion equation for concentration-dependent diffusivity

In general the diffusion coefficient will depend on the concentration of the species,which also means that
the diffusion coefficient changes with position in the sample. In this case according to (1.8) Ficks second law
must be written as
(1.27)
In (1.27) we have used d for the chemical diffusion coef$cient (seesection 1.4). The solution of (1.27) in closed
form is (apart from special casesof b(c)) usually not possible and numeric or graphic integrations of (1.27) are
necessary.The most frequently used method of analysis is the Boltzmann-Matano method which was proposed
by Matano [33M] and is based on a transformation of (1.27)which is due to Boltzmann [1894B]. This method
is described in subsection 1.6.1.2.2.
1.4 The various diffusion coefficients

In this section various experimental situations and the various diffusion coefficients which they entail are
described. In order to permit a clear distinction between the various diffusion coefficients in the present chapter
the symbol "D" is used for the diffusion coefficient in combination with lower and upper indices. However, the
indices are dropped again in the following sections of chapter 1 and in the data chapters of the whole volume
whenever it is clear which diffusion coefficient is considered.
1.4.1 Self-diffusion coefficient

1.4.1.1 Pure elements
If in a solid of element A the diffusion of A atoms is studied, one speaks about self-diffusion. Studies of
self-diffusion usually utilize tracer atoms A* of the same element. In most experiments tracers are marked by
their radioactivity. A typical situation for a radiotracer experiment is shown in Fig. 7a. The isotopic mass or
the nuclear spin is sometimes used as tag for tracer atoms as well. The tracer self-&&ion coefficient DF is in
a microscopic picture according to
DA
=fI
A
62
related to the jump length 1of atomic jumps and to the mean residence time of atoms r on a certain site in a
,crystalline solid. The correlation factor f is in the caseof self-diffusion often only a numeric factor which depends
on the crystal structure and on the diffusion mechanism [7OLl]. Tracer self-diffusion data in pure metallic
elements are listed in chapter 2.
Land&Biimstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
1.4.1 Self-diffusion coefficient
a
Fig.
sion
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
[Ref. p. 30
7. Various situations
for diffusion
experiments
which entail different diffucocflicients:
thin layer of A* on A: tracer self-diffusion
in pure elements
thin layer of B* on A: impurity
diGsion
in pure elements
thin layer of A* or B* on AB alloy: tracer self-diffusion
in homogeneous
alloys
diffusion
couple of metals A and B: interdiffusion
of two metals A and B.
1.4.1.2 Homogeneous alloys

In a homogeneous binary AB alloy two tracer self-diffusion coefficients for both A* and B* tracer atoms can
be measured.They are denoted as Dii and DAB;),respectively. A typical experimental situation is illustrated in
Fig. 7c. Since in a radiotracer experiment the concentration of A* or B* is usually negligible the alloy composition is not modified by the diffusing species.In general the tracer self-diffusion coeflicients depend on the alloy
composition.
Results on self-diffusion in &/tlte binary alloys containing small atomic fractions X, are frequently represented in terms of
(1.29a)
0;; = D,^;(X,) = D,^[l + b,X, + b2X; . ..I.
Then D:rf is denoted as the sol~~t seljrdtj%oa coeffjcient and DIi as the solute diJiusion coeflcienf. Experimenare usually well represented by (1.29a) and b,, b, etc. are denoted as solvent
tal measurements of Dii(X,)
enhnrtcet~lcnrfictors. D,A(O) is the tracer self-diffusion coefficient in the pure solvent. b, is largely determined by
perturbations due to isolated solute atoms, b, by pairs of solute atoms, and so on.
For similar reasons,the soltrt~ dijirsion coejkient DrR at low concentrations, can be representedby a power
seriesdependence
D:f
Dy is then also denoted as impurity
solute enhnncement factors.
= D,;(X,)
Dr[l
+ B, X, + B,X; . ..I.
(1.29b)
diffusion coefficient of speciesB in solvent A. B,, B, etc. are denoted as
Depending on the specific alloy system, the one component is more or less soluble in the other component,
i.e. the primary and terminal phases extend over wider or smaller composition ranges. A primary phase of an
alloy AB is the solution of element B in A and thus has the same crystal structure as element A, whereas the
terminal phase crystallizes in the crystal structure of element B. For higher concentrations these alloys exhibit
usually short-range or even long-range atomic order, which may cause substantial deviations from the behaviour represented by the equations (1.29a, b). Attempts to describe the diffusion coefficients in these concentrared alloys as a function of composition theoretically or even empirically are less successful than for dilute
alloys [84Bl]. For a limited number of alloy systems the primary/terminal phase extends over the whole
composition range, sometimes with a tendency of atomic long-range order at higher concentrations and lower
temperatures. This ordering has a profound influence on the diffusion coefficients of both components. An
example is the Fe-Co system.
In contrast, many alloy systemsexhibit intermediate phases. In the phase diagram these phasesare separated
from the primary or terminal phases or from each other by two-phase regions. They usually crystallize in
ordered structures. These may be completely different from the crystal structures of the pure components.
Therefore the self-diffusion coeilicients in these materials can not be related to those in the pure constituents at
all. A scarcenumber of theseintermediate phasesshow an order-disorder transition at higher temperatures with
a considerable influence on the diffusion characteristics. Ordered intermediate phasesare also called intermetallit compods.
The number of measurementsof self-diffusion coefficients in intermetallic compounds is relatively
small. but it is clear already that the detailed atomic defect structure of these materials is essential to their
self-diffusion behaviour. Tracer self-diffusion data in binary alloys and in intermediate phases are listed in
chapter 4.
Land&BBmstein
New Series III,/26
Ref. p. 301
1.4.2, 3, 4 Impurity, chemical, intrinsic diffusion coefficients
1.4.2 Impurity diffusion coefficient

When the diffusion of a solute B in a solvent A is measured at extremely small concentration of B, which
e.g. radiotracers permit (by diffusion of tracer B* into pure metal A (see Fig. 7 b), the impurity diffusion
coefficient 0: is observed. Apart from their practical importance impurity diffusion coefficients are also of
special theoretical interest becausethey describe the diffusion of an isolated impurity atom in an otherwise pure
solvent. Impurity diffusion of metallic elementsin metals is covered in chapter 3 and the diffusion of C, N, and 0
diffusing in metals in chapter 8.
1.4.3 Chemical diffusion coefficient

A diffusion coefficient which is measured in a chemical concentration gradient is denoted as chemical
coefficient 6 (seealso section 1.3).Any chemical diffusion coefficient describesdiffusion referred to fixed
axes in the sample. d can be deduced from the concentration-depth-profile (see section 1.6) and in general
depends on concentration. Measurements which entail diffusion in a chemical diffusion gradient are:
difision
(1) Diffusion of interstitial solutes (e.g. hydrogen) in metals

(2) Interdiffusion of two metals A and B which form substitutional solid solutions or interdiffusion between two
alloys of the metals. An interdiffusion experiment between two pure metals is schematically illustrated in
Figs. 76 and 17(a). Obviously diffusion is measured in a chemical gradient. In the case of interdiffusion d
is also denoted as interdiffusion coefjcient. For many practical purposes the chemical interdiffusion coefficient is an adequate measure of the diffusion behaviour of an alloy.
Data for chemical diffusion are compiled for binary alloys in chapter 5 and for ternary alloys in chapter 6.
Chapter 6 also contains an introduction to ternary diffusion, which is beyond the scopeof the general introduction. Diffusion of interstitial solutes except hydrogen is covered in chapter 8 and hydrogen diffusion in chapter 9.
1.4.4 Intrinsic diffusion coefficients

The intrinsic diffusion coeficients (or component diffusion coefficients) DA and D, of an AB alloy, which are
primarily of interest for more fundamental physical reasons, describe the diffusion of the two speciesA and B
relative to the lattice planes. The diffusion rates of A and B are usually not equal. Therefore, in an interdiffusion
experiment a net flux of atoms acrossany lattice planeexists. If the number of lattice sites is conserved the lattice
planes in the diffusion zone move with respect to the sample-fixed axes to compensate for the unequal fluxes
across it. At the same time lattice sites are created on the one side of the diffusion zone and annihilated on the
other side. This can be achieved by creation and annihilation of point defects(vacancies,self-interstitials). The
shift of lattice planes with respect to sample-fixed axes is denoted as Kirkendall effect. The Kirkendall effect is
illustrated schematically in Fig. 17(b). Inert markers (e.g. fine insoluble wires, oxide particles, etc.) have been
incorporated at the initial interface between the two interdiffusing metals A and B or between two interdiffusing
AB alloys of different composition. During the diffusion process a shift of the markers takes place. This
Kirkendall shift was for the first time observed in [47S].It can be used to determine the velocity u of the markers.
u is also denoted as Kirkendall velocity.
A more complete description of diffusion in substitutional binary alloys is based on the intrinsic diffusion
coefficients. DA and D, can be determined from the chemical diffusion coefficient d and the marker shift:
It is possible to show [48D, 49D, 63S, 66A, 85P, 89Sl] that the chemical and intrinsic diffusion coefficients
are related by the equation
0 =X,0,
+ X,0,
(1.30)
where X, and X, are the molar fractions of speciesA and B. The velocity u of an inert marker is given by
v = (D, - DB) ax&
(1.31)
with aX,/ax denoting the concentration gradient at the marker position. u is also denoted as Kirkendall
velocity. Using (1.30) and (1.31) DA and D, can be calculated separately when B and 2)have been measured.
An alternative method permits the measurement of the ratio DA/DB instead of v. Such a method which is
based on the marker shift in a sandwich arrangement of alloy samples with two different compositions is
described in [77Hl].
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
10
1.5.1 Direct interstitial mechanism
[Ref. p. 30
Equation (1.30) assumesno net volume change which is only correct for ideal solutions. For non-ideal
mixtures (1.30) must be replaced by [7OL2, 85P]
(1.32)
where t and vBdenote the partial molar volumes of speciesA and B, respectively. c, and cs are the concentrations of speciesA and B.
Equations (1.31)and (1.32)also require complete flux compensation along the diffusion direction. In practice
this is sometimes not the caseas can be seenfor example, from the occurrence of pores [53B] on the side of the
diffusion couple suffering a net loss of atoms and from the occurrence of changes in lateral dimensions [52S, 59R].
These side effects of the Kirkendall effect are also illustrated in Fig. 17(b).
The intrinsic diffusion coefficients DA and D, and the tracer diffusion coefficients Dfi and Dz;, in an AB alloy
differ fundamentally. The latter pertain to a homogeneous alloy whereas the intrinsic diffusion coefficients are
measured in the presenceof a chemical composition gradient. This gradient imposes on the otherwise random
motion of atoms a bias, which makesatoms preferentially jump in one direction along the composition gradient.
It is possible to show [48D, 83B, 85P] that the intrinsic diffusion coefficients and the tracer self-diffusion
coefficients in the alloy are related via
DA=
D;;d,
(1.33)
D,=
D,;$
(1.34)
and
where 4 is denoted as thcrn~od~man~ic factor. The relations (1.30),(1.31),(1.33) and (1.34) were first established
by Darken [48D, 49D]. They are sometimes denoted as Darkens equations.
The thermodynamic factor is given by
+=1+$$
x. ap.
z-L.1
kT
(1.35)
aXi
where yi is the activity coejlicient of the species i in the alloy and pi its chemical potential. Because of the
Gibbs-Duhem relation Q,is the samefor both speciesof binary alloys. The thermodynamic factor is larger than
unity for alloys with negative enthalpy of mixing and smaller than unity in the opposite case.Sometimesit may
be even negative which leads to the phenomenon of uphill-diffusion.
Equations (1.33) and (1.34) are approximate forms of the more elaborate expressions
DA = Dti4rA
(1.36)
D, = Dik+rB
(1.37)
and
where r, and r, denote the so-called vacancy wind factors. For a detailed discussion of these factors the reader
is referred to [68M, 83B, 85P]. Often (1.33) and (1.34) are reasonably well obeyed experimentally.
1.5 Atomistic mechanisms of diffusion

For a given temperature the diffusion coefticients of different atoms in a metal or an alloy may differ by many
orders of magnitude. The diffusivity of an atom depends strongly on the mechanism by which it moves. In this
section we describe briefly the most important atomic mechanisms of diffusion. For further details seee.g.[63S,
66A, 85P, 89Sl].
1.5.1 Direct interstitial mechanism

Foreign atoms that are located exclusively in interstitial sites of an otherwise perfect crystal may diffuse
simply by jumping from interstitial site to interstitial site as indicated in Fig. 8a. This mechanism is denoted as
the interstitial (or even more specifically the direct interstitial) mechanism. The movement of interstitially
dissolved atoms does not involve intrinsic point defects(vacancies,divacancies, self-interstitials . . .) as diffusion
vehicles. Therefore, direct interstitial diffusion is usually much faster than the diffusion of substitutionally
incorporated atoms. The direct interstitial mechanism is responsible e.g.for diffusion of hydrogen (seechapter 9)
and for the diffusion of other small impurity atoms like C, N and 0 (seechapter 8) in metals.
Mehrer
l..andolt-Bornstem
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 301
11
1.5.2,3,4 Direct exchange and ring, vacancy, divacancy mechanisms
Fig. 8. Illustration of various direct diffusion mechanismsin

zrystals according to [84F]:
[a) direct interstitial mechanism (foreign atom [full circle]
jumping from interstice 1 to interstice 2, from 2 to 3, etc.);
[b) direct exchange mechanism of two neighbouring atoms
on regular lattice sites;
cc) ring mechanism of 4 neighbouring atoms.
1.5.2 Direct exchange and ring mechanisms

The direct diffusion of substitutionally incorporated foreign atoms or of host atoms on regular lattice sites
would involve the exchange of two atoms on neighbouring lattice sites (seeFig. 8 b) or of a ring of atoms (see
Fig. SC).So far, no examples of these kinds of direct diffusion have been found presumably because these
mechanismsare energetically unfavourable.
Usually the diffusion of self-atoms or of foreign atoms on substitutional sites requires intrinsic point defects
1sdzfision vehicles (seethe following subsections 1.5.3to 1.5.6).The fact that the Kirkendall-effect (seesubsection 1.4.4)is observed in substitutional alloys is strong evidence in favour of diffusion mechanismswith diffusion
vehicles.
1.5.3 Vacancy mechanism

In the vacancy mechanism vacant lattice sites act as diffusion vehicles. A substitutional foreign atom or a
self-atom diffuses by jumping into a neighbouring vacancy (seeFig. 9).
Self-diffusion in most metals and alloys and diffusion of foreign atoms (impurity diffusion) exclusively
dissolved on substitutional sites occur mainly by the vacancy mechanism.
Attractive or repulsive interactions between the vacancy and substitutionally dissolved foreign atoms may
lead to higher or lower diffusivities of foreign atoms compared with self-diffusion of the solvent.
Fig. 9. Illustration of the vacancy mechanism according to

34F]: the tagged self-atom in tracer self-diffusion or the forAgn atom in substitutional-solute diffusion (full circle)
moves, by jumping into the vacancy on its right-hand side (a),
to the right (b) by one nearest-neighbour distance of the
regular lattice atoms.
1.5.4 Divacancy mechanism

In this casebound pairs of vacancies on neighbouring lattice sites act as diffusion vehicles. A host atom or
a substitutional foreign atom on a regular site diffuses by jumping into one vacancy of the neighbouring pair
(seeFig. 10).The divacancy mechanism has been proposed to contribute to self-diffusion in face-centeredcubic
metals above 2/3 T, (7,,= melting temperature) besidesthe vacancy mechanism [7OS].The temperature dependence of self-diffusion of fee metals has been sometimes analysed in terms of a sum of two Arrhenius terms (see
section 1.8).If this is the casethe term with the lower activation enthalpy is attributed to diffusion via monovacancies and the term with the higher activation enthalpy to diffusion via divacancies.
Fig. 10. Illustration of the divacancy mechanism: The

tagged self-atom in tracer self-diffusion or the foreign atom
in substitutional-solute diffusion (full circle) moves, by exchanging its site with one vacancy of the divacancy on its
right-hand side (a), to the right (b) by one nearest-neighbour
distance of the regular lattice atoms.
Land&Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
12
1S.5 Interstitialcy
mechanism; 1.5.6 Interstitial-substitutional
1.5.5 Interstitialcy
mechanisms
[Ref. p. 30
mechanism
In the intersfitinlcy (or indirect irrrerstitinl) mechanism self-b~terstitials act as diffusion vehicles. A self-interstitial replaces a substitutional atom which then in turn replaces a neighbouring lattice atom (Fig. 11). This
mechanismis the counterpart of the vacancy mechanism since the self-interstitial is the antidefect ofthe vacancy.
In silicon. this mechanism dominates self-diffusion and presumably plays a prominent role in the diffusion of
some substitutional solutes [84F]. In metals it is presumably not of importance under thermal equilibrium
conditions. However, it is important if self-interstitials are created by irradiation of a crystal with energetic
particles. DitTusion in an irradiation
environment
is not treated in this volume.
Fig. 11. Illustration of the interstitialcy mechanism according to [84F]. In (a) a self-interstitial (open circle in the center
of the lattice cell) has approached a tagged self-atom or a
substitutional foreign atom (full circle), rcspcctively; in (b)
the tagged atom has exchanged its original position with the
self-interstitial. In this way the tagged atom has temporarily
become an interstitial, whereas the original self-interstitial
has disappcarcd by occupying a regular lattice site. In (c) the
tagged atom has jumped into a regular site by pushing a
self-atom into an interstitial site.
1.5.6 Interstitial-substitutional
mechanisms
Some foreign atoms A may be dissolved on interstitial (Ai) and also on substitutional sites (A,). Such atoms
may diffuse via the dissociotire n~~rhnnisntor via the kick-out nwchanism. The two mechanismshave in common
that the diffusivity of foreign atoms is much higher when they are located in interstitial sites than when they are
located in substitutional positions. Under such circumstances the incorporation of A atoms can occur by fast
diffusion as Ai interstitials and their subsequent change-over to the substitutional positions [89Sl]. The difference between the two mechanismslies in the type of the intrinsic point defect which mediates this change-over:
In the dissociative mechanism illustrated in Fig. 12a (sometimesalso denoted as the Frank-7imbull
or as
the Longini mechnnism) the interchange involves vacancies (V) according to the reaction
A,+VF-?A,.
(1.38)
The.rapid diffusion of some foreign elements in some polyvalent metals has been attributed to the dissociative
mechanism (seechapter 3). For further details seee.g. [84F, 89Sl].
In the kick-out mechanism illustrated in Fig. 12b the interchange involves self-interstitials (I) according to
the reaction
(1.39)
Ai+AA,+I.
Examples for the kick-out mechanism have been established for some rapidly diffusing foreign atoms in silicon.
So far no examples for kick-out diffusion in metals have been found. For details seee.g. [84F].
Mehrer
Landok-Bkimstein
New Series III:26
Ref. p. 301
13
1.6.1.1 Steady-state methods
AS
Ai
AS
Ai
b
Fig. 12. Illustration of interstitial-substitutional mechanisms:
(a) dissociative mechanism (also known as Frank-Turnbull
mechanism or as Longini mechanism)
(b) kick-out mechanism.
1.6 Methods of measuring diffusion coefficients

The experimental methods of measuring diffusion coefficients can be grouped into two categories: Direct
methods which are directly based on Ficks laws and indirect methods. The latter take advantage of the fact
that many physical phenomena in solids depend on the occurrence of thermally activated motion of atoms.
From suitable measurements of such phenomena it is also possible to determine a diffusion coefficient.
1.6.1 Direct methods

Since in methods based on Ficks laws diffusion always occurs over distances which are large compared to
the interatomic distance direct methods are sometimes also referred to as macroscopic methods. One measures
a diffusion flux, an integral over a diffusion flux, a concentration profiles or an integral over a concentration
profile.
1.6.1.1 Steady-state methods

These methods are based directly on Ficks first law. The usual procedure is to perform a permeation
experiment through a membrane which e.g.can be a thin plane sheet or a cylindrical tube. The concentrations
of the diffusant are maintained at c1 and c2 on the opposite sides of the sample. The diffusion flux J is measured.
After a certain delay time of the order of L2/6 D (seesubsections 1.2.3 or 1.2.4)the steady-state concentration
distribution.is established in the sample. Then the diffusion coefficient can be deduced according to
L
D=Jp
Cl
(1.40)
c2
from measurementsperformed on a plane sheet of thickness L (seeFig. 4a), or according to
D= _
J WW,)
2nR,
c1 -c2
(1.41)
from measurements of e.g. outward diffusion performed on a cylindrical tube with inner and outer radii R,
and R,.
As an alternative to (1.40), the diffusion coefficient can be determined from
D = - J/(&/ax)
(1.42)
if the steady state concentration distribution across the plane sheet is measured.
Permeation measurements are applicable when the diffusing speciesis either a gas (e.g.hydrogen, . . .) or if
it canbe supplied to and removed from the sample through a gas or vapour phase.
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
14
1.6.1.2 Non-steady-state methods
[Ref. p. 30

These methods are based on Ficks second law for concentration-dependent (1.8)or concentration-independent diffusivities (1.9).Most frequently the concentration distribution in a sample is measured and the diffusion
:oeffrcient is deduced from a comparison with the solution of Ficks second law appropriate to the conditions
>f the experiment.
1.6.1.2.1 Thin layer methods
A very thin layer of the diffusant is deposited on a plane surface of the sample (seeFig. 7a, b, c). Vacuum
:vaporation, electrochemical or chemical deposition and ion implantation are used as deposition techniques.
After the diffusion anneal the concentration profile is given by (1.11)provided that the deposited thickness was
very much smaller than (D t) 1. This condition is usually easy to satisfy in radiotracer experiments of self- and
impurity diffusion. Many details about the thin layer methods can be found in [84R, 89S2].Several procedures
are in use to determine the redistribution of the diffusant:
a) Direct profile measurements
After diffusion the profile c(x) is usually determined by sectioning the diffusion zone and measuring the
concentration (activity) in each section. The tracer diffusion coefficient D (in section 1.4 denoted as Dy in the
caseof self-diffusion, as Dr in the caseof impurity diffusion and as 0:; in the caseof self-diffusion of A tracer
in a homogeneous AB alloy) may be determined from a plot of logarithm of concentration in each section
against the penetration distance squared. According to (1.11)in such a plot bulk diffusion leads to a straight line
with slope - l/(4 Dt). Examples for the experimental standard of penetration profiles that can be achieved with
this method are shown in Figs. 13 and 14 [87G, 84H]. The excellent linearity of these profiles permits a
determination of diffusion coefficient within an accuracy of the order of a few percent.
For serial sectioning several techniques are in use: Mechanical sectioning with a precision lathe (10 urn,
5 . lo-r6 m2s-), a microtome (1 urn, 5 * lo-* m* s- ) or a precision grinder (0.5 pm, IO- l8 m2s- ). Available
microsectioning techniques are chemical or electrochemical attack (5 nm, lo-** m*s-) and sputtering by
bombardment with ions (2 nm, 5 . 1O-24 m* s- ). The numbers in parentheses indicate the minimum section
thicknessesand the minimum diffusion coefficients which can be obtained in practice.
The section thicknesses and from these the penetration distance can be measured by weighing. For very thin
sections weighing may be too inaccurate and optical methods (interference microscopy, . . .) or surface profile
methods are to be preferred.
For the determination of concentration activity counting is used in radio-tracer experiments. Becauseof the
high sensitivity of counting facilities for radioactive substancesextremely small quantities of tracer atoms suffice
to study diffusion. Mass spectrometry is sometimes also used for concentration measurements.
Ionic sputtering for sectioning is associatedwith secondary ion massspectrometry (SIMS), secondary neutral
mass spectrometry (SNMS), or Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) in commercial SIMS, SNMS, or AES
analyzers. A schematic illustration of the SIMS technique is shown in Fig. 15. For details seee.g. the review
[84P].
Sputtering for sectioning associated with activity counting has been combined in some laboratory devices
(see,e.g.,[75Gl, 85M]). An example is shown in Fig. 16.
Occasionally electronmicroprobe
analysis (EMPA) has been used to measureimpurity diffusion coeflicients.
A high sensitivity of the microprobe is necessaryto monitor diffusion from deposited layers of diffusants thin
enough to meet the conditions for the use of equation (1.11).
b) Residual activity measurement
The residual activity emanating from each newly exposed sample surface at depth x in a radiotracer-sectioning experiment can be used to calculate the diffusion coefficient. This method is denoted as Gruzin-Seibel or as
residual activity method.
c) Surface activity decreasemeasurement
The diffusion coefficient may be determined from the total activity emanating from the sample surface at
x = 0 after various diffusion anneals. This procedure is denoted as the surface decreasemethod.
Both the residual activity and the surface decreasemethod require an integration of (1.11).They should be
regarded as less reliable than the sectioning method because they necessitate a knowledge of the absorption
characteristics of the radiation concerned and an assumption about the concentration profile. In addition the
surface decreasemethod is particularly susceptible to errors arising from sample oxidation, tracer losses and
short circuiting diffusion.
Mehrer
Land&-B6mst.h
New Series Ill/26
Ref. p. 301
.YZ-
IO9
orb.
units
105
12
16
20.10bnm2
:
arb.
units
1OS
104
I
x
c
.P
z
0 IO3
.u
.z
E
LA
10
10
10
1
0
10
15
20
-Km4cm2 30
x2.
Fig. 13. Examples for penetration profiles obtained with the
radiotracer method and microtome sectioning according to
[87G]. The isotope Te was implanted to a depth of about
30 nm into silver single crystals. Afterwards diffusion anneals
were performed at four different temperatures and times resulting in average diffusion lengths much larger than 30 nm.
Under such conditions the implants may be considered as
thin film sources.The specific activities are plotted as functions of the penetration distances squared. The slopes of
these curves correspond to the quantity - 1/(4Dt).
(secondary ions, neutrals 1
Fig. 15. Schematic illustration of the SIMS technique for

direct measurements of diffusion profiles.
Landolt-Bibstein
New Series III/26
Fig. 14. Examples for profiles obtained with the radiotracer

method using sputter sectioning accordjng to [84H]. The isotope Q5Zrwas electrodeposited on the surface of a-Zr single
crystals. Diffusion anneals were performed at eight temperatures for different times. The specific activities are plotted as
functions of the penetration distances squared. The slopes of
these curves correspond to the quantity - 1/(4Di).
1
,
I
2
3
6
Tungsten filament
Anode
Catcher foil camera
Ar ions (500 to 1500eV)
2
/
3 Sputtered moteriol
(neutral)
I
4 Specimen
5 Specimen holder with
motor for specimen
rototion
Fig. 16. Schematic view of a sputtering device which is used

for radioactive diffusants according to [85M]. The penetration profiles shown in Fig. 14 have been obtained with this
device.
Mehrer
16
[Ref. p. 30
1.6.1.2.2 Diffusion couple methods with profile measurement

Two homogeneous metals or alloys of concentrations c, and c2 are brought into intimate contact across a
plane interface and are then allowed to interdiffuse to provide a concentration profile c(x). If the profile is
determined in some convenient manner (seea) to d)) b(c) is obtained from
b(c*) = -
j xdc (2tac/ax).
(1.43)
( L-1 >I
Equation (1.43) is the basis of the Bo/tz,tlnnr~-Mntnno method which is illustrated in Fig. 17(a). The chemical
Wusion
coeficient
B (seesubsection 1.4.3)can be determined from an integral over a part of the measured
profile and from its slope in P. The origin of the abscissax, which is denoted as the Matano plane, is defined
by the condition
(1.44)
Ixdc=O.
A graphic interpretation of (1.43) and (1.44) is also given in Fig. 17(a). For concentration independent B the
Matano plane coincides with the initial position of the interface. For concentration dependent d this is usually
not the case (SWsubsection 1.4.4).
Shifted position of markers
Cl
lniliol position
of morkers
X-
Fig. 17(a). Illustration of the Boltzmann-Matano

method
for the calculation of d from equation (1.43). The Matano
plane is defined by the equality of the two hatched arcas
FOhl and FOM. Jx-dr is equal to the doubly hatched area
FOHP. a@.~ is the slope of the tangent of the concentration
profile in P.
Fig. 17(b).. Schematic illustration of the Kirkendall-effect

and its side effects: Jn and Ja denote the diffusion fluxes of
species A and B; Jhl is the net flux of matter causing the
Kirkcndall shift I which is indicated by a fat arrow. The
formation of pores on the side of the faster diffusing species
(D,, > 0,) and lateral changes of sample dimensions are frequently observed side effects of the Kirkendall effect.
Sauer and Freise [62S] have deduced an expression which does not require a knowledge of the position of
the Matano plane. Using the expression
7 (1 - Y) dx + (1 - y(x*)) 1 ydx
-m
where
(1.45)
(1.45a)
denotes a normalized concentration, the interdiffusion coefficient can be deduced from two integrals over the
observed concentration profile and from one slope. Expressions (1.43) to (1.45) are applicable if the molar
volume does not change upon interdiffusion.
If the molar volume V, = V,(y) depends on concentration, which is the casefor non-idea! systems,instead
of (1.45) the expression
(1.46)
D(y(x*)) = uY*)
dx + (1 - y(x*)) 1 + dx
2t (aJl/ax),.
m
must bc used.
Mehrer
Land&-BBmstein
New Series 11126
Ref. p. 301
17
If 0 varies little in the concentration range c1 to c2, which is often the caseif the range c1 to c2 is sufficiently
restricted, the appropriate solution for concentration independent D
c-q
c2-Cl
1
X
= - erfc ~
2
2JE
(1.47)
may be used instead of (1.43),(1.45) or (1.46).

It should be pointed out that it is the chemical or interdiffusion coefjcient (see subsection 1.4.3) which is
measured with the diffusion couple method. As already mentioned in 1.4.4markers inserted at the interface can
be used to locate its final position after diffusion. From this the Kirkendall velocity can be determined. If the
chemical diffusion coefficient and the Kirkendall velocity or the ratio DA/DBare known the intrinsic difision
coefficients can be calculated according to subsection 1.4.4.
The determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient by the diffusion couple method usually requires a
measurement of the concentration profile c(x) (seehowever subsection 1.6.1.2.3).Several methods are in use for
this purpose:
a) Sample sectioning
The profile can be obtained by sectioning the diffusion zone and measuring the quantity of the diffusing
speciesin each section with an appropriate method of analysis (seesubsection 1.6.1.2.1).Sample sectioning is of
course a destructive technique. It is often indispensible in thin layer experiments, especially when radiotracers
are used (seea) in subsection 1.6.1.2.1).For thin film diffusion couples nowadays several non-destructive techniques are available which allow the profile determination without sectioning (seec) and d)) below.
b) Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA)
In an electron microprobe analyzer a thin electron beam (diameter about 1 urn) stimulates X-ray emission
of the elements to be studied. The profile can be obtained by analysing the intensity of characteristic radiation
from the sample along the diffusion direction. The sensitivity in concentration is about 10e3 to 10m4depending
on the element. Becauseof the finite thickness of the electron beam and the finite size of the excited volume only
diffusion coefficients d 2 10-l m2 s- can be measured.EMPA is used for interdiffusion studies in macroscopic diffusion samples.An example for an interdiffusion profile obtained by EMPA is shown in Fig. 18. Interdiffusion coefficients determined from such profiles according to equation (1.45)are shown in Fig. 19 [86H, 89Hl].
-I000-800 -600
-400
-200
x-
200
400
600 pm 800
Fig. 18. Example for an interdiffusion profile obtained with

electron microprobe analysis according to [86H, 89Hl]. In
this experiment a diffusion couple consisting of an Ag - Sb
alloy (3.92 at% Sb) and ofpure Ag was formed and annealed
for 35 h at 1048K.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
[Ref. p. 30
18
I
0
I
1
4 ot %
xSb -
Fig. 19. Interdiffusion coefficients in dilute Ag-Sb alloy as a

function of the Sb concentration according to [86H, 89Hl].
c) Rutherford backscattering (RBS)

Rutherford backscattering uses an ion beam (usually 4He ions, typical energies several MeV) from an
accelerator. A schematic illustration of a backscattering device is shown in Fig. 20. The sample is bombarded
along the diffusion direction with monoenergetic ions and one studies the number of elastically backscattered
ions as a function of their energy. From this energy spectrum the profile can be determined. The element
itrformntion
is contained in the kinematic factor of Rutherford scattering which depends on the mass of the
scattering atom. The deptlt injbrmation comesfrom the continuous energy loss of the analyzing ions. The yield
of backscattered ions is proportional to the concentration of backscattering atoms. This is illustrated schematically in Fig. 21(a). An example for an RBS diffusion study is shown in Figs. 21(b) to 21(d).
Becauseof the limited penetration range of the ions (several urn) in a solid sample RBS is applicable when
one species is deposited at t = 0 as a fairly thin film. Diffusion coefficients between lo-r6 mzsV1 and
10mz3m2s- are accessible.RBS is mainly applicable for the analysis of a heavy element in a light matrix. For
details see,e.g., the review [84M3].
m
MeV
Heions
000000..
000000..
000000*a
Sample
Preamplifier
m
M
jr
Energy
Fig. 20. Schematic representation of a Rutherford backscattering device. The ion beam. the sample and the detector are
indicated.
Amplifier
MCA
Fig. 21(a). Schematic illustration of Rutherford backscattering: A sample consisting of two layers of heavy and light
atoms (massesM and m) is shown. Yield and energy of the
backscattered ions are monitored with an appropriate detector and a multichannel analyzer (MCA). The energy spectrum is also shown. The high energy end of the spectrum
(M-signal) corresponds to the ions backscattered from heavy
atoms near the sample surface. The low energy end of the
M-signal corresponds to the ions backscattered from heavy
atoms near the interface. The signals from heavy and light
atoms are separated in the energy spectrum because of the
different kinematic factors.
Mehrer
Landolt-Kmstein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 301
x012
I
0.14 pm
I
4
nt%
1.0
1.2
1x
1.6
E-
1.8
2.0
2.2 MeV 2.1,
Fig. 21 (b). RBS back scattering spectrum resulting from

2.5 MeV 4He ions incident upon Sn implanted Fe according
to [84M3]. The half width of the implanted Sn profile is
25.5 nm. Y,: backscattering yield.
6.0
6.51
0
I
0.5
I
1.0
Y
1.5
I
-Joe2pm2
2.5
Fig. 21 (c). Depth profiles of Sn in Fe measured during a

sequenceof anneals at 823 K with RBS according to [84M3].
The profile at t = 0 corresponds to the as-implanted profile
shown in Fig. 21(b).
lo-l7
m2/s
104'8
IP
~I lo-l9
1o-zo
10-2'
10-2'1
1.05
1.10
1.15
l/T-
1.20
1.25&'
1.2540-3K'
1.30
Fig. 21 (d). Diffusion coefficients of Sn in Fe measured by

RBS according to [84M3].
d) Nuclear reaction analysis (NRA)

In a nuclear reaction analysis experiment a monoenergetic ion beam (protons, 4He, . . .) is used as in RBS.
The sample is bombarded in the diffusion direction and the ions induce with the element to be studied a nuclear
reaction with a narrow resonance. The yield of the out-going particles created by this reaction is measured as
a function of the energy of the incident beam. From the yield versus energy curve the c(x) profile can be
determined. As in the caseof RBS, NRA is also applicable to diffusion couples where one speciesis deposited
as a thin film. Diffusivities between lo-l6 m2 s-l and 10ez3 m2sM1 are accessible. The NRA technique is
convenient for some light nuclei. For details seee.g. the review [84L].
Landolt-BGmstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
20
[Ref. p. 30
1.6.1.2.3 Diffusion couple methods without profile measurement

Methods for the determination of chemical diffusion coefficients without profile measurementbut restricted
to low solute concentrations - i.e. close to the impurity dijiision cocjkient - are the resistometric analysis
developed by Ceresara et al. [66C] and the X-ray dijk-tion analysis developed by Fogelson [68F, 71Fj:
In the resistonwtrir method a thin wire (diameter about 0.1 cm) is plated with a layer (about low4 cm) of the
solute metal. The time dependenceof the resistance R of the wire at constant annealing temperature can be used
to determine the diffusion coeflicient. The measured quantity usually is
R(t) - R(O)
a0 = R(a) - R(0)
(1.48)
where R(f) denotes the resistance of the wire at time t. A theoretical expression for 4 is given in [66c]. This
expression is based on the solution of Ficks second law for diffusion into a cylinder given in subsection 1.2.4
and on the approximation that the resistivity is proportional to the solute concentration. From a comparison
between the experimental values for 4 and the pertaining theoretical expression D-values can be determined.
Accurate D-values are obtained for solute concentration of not more than some 0.1% provided that the
solute is sufficiently soluble, that surface hold-up does not occur and that D is not strongly dependent on the
concentration.
The principle of the X-ray diffr,action annl~~is consists in the measurement of the surface concentration
decreaseof the diffusant. A layer of about 10e5 cm is deposited on a foil of about 2. 10m2cm thickness. In a
surface layer of about 10m3cm the concentration of the diffusant is determined by analyzing the diffraction line
profile. The shift of the line edge is used to find the concentration, which changes upon diffusion by about
1 . ..3%.
This method leads to diffusion coefficients very close to the impurity diffusion coef!icient, if the solubility is
large enough to ensure the validity of the thin-film solution (1.11) and if a surface hold-up of the diffusant can
bc exluded.
It is obvious that both methods should be regarded as lessreliable than diffusion couple methods with profile
measurement.
1.6.1.2.4 In- and out-diffusion methods
Material is allowed to diffuse into, or out of, an initially homogeneous sample of concentration c0 under
condition where the surface concentration is maintained at c,.
The diffusion coefficient may be deduced from a measurement of the concentration distribution within the
sample. For a concentration-dependent b the Boltzmann-Matano method can be used to give a a(c). Concentration-independent diffusion coefficients are determined by comparison with an appropriate analytical solution. For some simple sample geometries(plane sheet,cylinder, sphere) the analytical solutions to Ficks second
law are described in subsections 1.2.3, 1.2.4 and 1.2.5.
The diffusion coefficient may also bc calculated from the total amount of material picked up or lost from
the sample. For constant diffusivities appropriate expressions for the total amount of material have been given
for the above mentioned geometries in subsections 1.2.3, 1.2.4and 1.2.5 as we!!. For concentration-dependent
diffusivities this method gives an average diffusivity over the range c0 to c,.
1.6.1.2.5 Other macroscopic methods
There are a number of phenomena in solids which for their occurrence depend on diffusion over distances
large compared to the interactomic distance. From suitable measurement made on such phenomena it is
possible to deduce with some limited accuracy a diffusion coefficient. The more important methods are:
- Measurements of the growth rate of a new phase [74S]. A prerequisite of this method is that the growth rate
is controlled by diffusion.
- Measurements of the sintering kinetics, which under appropriate conditions can be controlled by bulk
diffusion. For a recent review see,e.g., [89Gl].
- Measurements of the creep rate of a crystal, when it is controlled by bulk diffusion, which is the case in the
so-called Nabarro-Herring creep regime. For a recent review see[8962]. By contrast in the so-called Cable
creep regime the creep rate is dominated by grain boundary diffusion (seechapter 12).
Ref. p. 301
1.6.2.1 Relaxation methods; 1.6.2.2 Nuclear methods
21
1.6.2 Indirect methods

These methods are not based directly on Ficks laws. One studies phenomena which are influenced by the
occurrence of the thermally activated motion of atoms. These methods are often sensitive to only one or to a
few atomic jumps. A relaxation time, a relaxation frequency, a relaxation rate or a line-width is measured.With
the help of a microscopic model of the underlying jump processthe mean residencetime z of the diffusing species
is deduced. According to
D =f d=r/6
(1.49a)
a diffusion coefficient can be determined provided that the jump length d and the correlation factor f are known.
d is usually obvious from the lattice geometry. f depends on the crystal structure and the diffusion mechanism.
The quantity
r= l/2
(1.49b)
is often denoted as the mean jump frequency of the diffusing atoms.
The indirect methods can be grouped into two categories - relaxation methods and nuclear methods:
1.6.2.1 Relaxation methods

In the relaxation methods the atomic motion is induced by external influences like mechanical stresses,
magnetic fields or temperature jumps. Anelastic or magnetic after-effects or internal jiktion are monitored. A
great variety of experimental devices has been used (seee.g. [72N]). The more important relaxation phenomena
related to diffusion are:
a) Snoek effect
In body-centered cubic metals the interstitial (octahedral or tetrahedral) sites have a tetragonal symmetry.
Due to this lower symmetry atoms in interstitial solution like C, N, 0 can give rise to a relaxation phenomenon,
the so-called Snoek effect.The Snoek effect can be studied in anelastic after-effect and internal friction measurements. In addition in ferromagnetic material magnetic after-effect measurementscan be used to study the Snoek
effect.
b) Got-ski effect
Any foreign atom solute in a solvent which produces a lattice dilatation can give rise to an anelastic
relaxation which is due to the diffusion in a macroscopic strain gradient. In practice the Gorski effect is
detectable only if the diffusion coefficient is high enough. Therefore, Gorski effect measurementshave been used
so far only for the study of hydrogen diffusion in metals. For details see e.g., the reviews [72V, 84B2] and
chapter 9 of this volume.
c) Zener effect
In substitutional AB alloys the reorientation of solute-solvent atom pairs under the influence of an applied
stresscan give rise to an anelastic relaxation denoted as Zener effect. From the reorientation kinetics the jump
frequencies can be determined for a given pair model.
1.6.2.2 Nuclear methods

Examples are nuclear magnetic relaxation (NMR), Miissbauer spectroscopy (MBS) and quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS). Like other indirect methods these methods are sensitive to one or a few atomic jumps.
a) Nuclear magnetic relaxation
(NMR)
The width of the resonance line and the spin-lattice relaxation time 7 have contributions which are due to
the thermally activated motion of atoms. Measurements of the diffusional narrowing of the linewidth or of
T1as functions of temperature permit a determination of diffusion coefficients (seee.g.[82K, 84S]).A prerequisite
for NMR measurementsis a non-vanishing nuclear moment of the diffusing species.An example for a NMR
study of diffusion is shown in Fig. 22(a) and (b).
NMR methods are particularly appropriate for self-diffusion measurements of solid or liquid metals. In
favourable cases(Li, Al, . ..) di ffusion coefficients between lo-l8 m*s- and 10-l ms- are accessible(see
Fig. 25). In the case of foreign atom diffusion NMR studies are handicapped by the fact that a signal from a
minority of nuclear spins must be detected.However, in favourable casesNMR studies are possible. For details
seee.g. [88G].
Land&-Bhnstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
22
[Ref. p. 30
1.6.2.2 Nuclear methods

lo-'0
lo-'0 I.
d/S
10-l
10-12
lo-
11
0
0
16
lo-16
0.45 MH;
1.8
4.8
8
x v,=
'
.
.
.
15.5
35
I
Q
10-15
10-16
10-n
I3K-
10-18
IL1
8 *lo-
Fig. 22(a). Nuclear magnetic relaxation times & and T1pinLi as a function
of reciprocal temperature according to (78MJ. The spin-lattice relaxation
time TI has been measured for several Larmor frequencies. In the caseof the
spin-lattice relaxation time T,, the magnetic field is given instead of the
Larmor frequency. The minima in T, and T,, are caused by the diffusional
motion of Li atoms.
10-19
lo-91
2
4
l/T -
5 40JK-
40JK-' 6
Fig. 22 (b). Self-diffusion coeflicient of

Li as a function of reciprocal temperature deduced from the NMR data of
Fig. 22(a) according to [78M].
b) Miissbauer spectroscopy(MBS) and quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS)

The linewidth in Mhshauer spectroscopy and in quasielastic scattering of monoenergetic neutrons both have
a contribution Ar which is due to the diffusional motion of atoms. This diffusional broadening can be observed
only in systemswith fairly high diffusivities (seeFig. 25) since Ar must be comparable to or exceed the natural
linewidth in MBS measurementsand the energy resolution of the neutron spectrometer in QENS experiments.
Appropriate probes for MBS are Fe, 19Sn, Eu and 16Dy. QENS is applicable to a few fast diffusing
elementswith a large enough, quasielastic scattering cross section for neutrons. Examples are Na self-diffusion
and hydrogen diffusion in metals. Further nuclei with large enough quasielastic scattering cross sections for
thermal neutrons are Co, Ni, V, Ti and Cr. Fig. 23(a), (b) shows examples for MBS spectra together with the
deduced diffusion coefficients. Fig. 24 illustrates typical effects of diffusive motion on a QENS spectrum.
Neither MBS nor QENS are routine methods for diffusion measurements.An interesting aspect of both
methods is that they can provide some microscopic information on the elementary jump process. If single
crystals are used in MBS or QENS measurementsAr depends on orientation. This anisotropy can be used to
deduce the jump direction and the jump length (see e.g. [84M2, 842, SSV]) of the diffusing atoms.
Mehrer
Land&BBmslein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 301
1.6.2.2 Nuclear
Fe
T=1767K
23
methods
FWHM=25.1mm/s
96
100
I
c
E
,;
E
6
z
98
96
100
98
96
100
0.56
2 98
c)
2
701
lii2JK
I
-40
,f
I
-20
0.830mm/s 1
I
0
I
20
I
I
mm/s 40
0.60
vFig. 23 (a). Mijssbauer spectra for self-diffusion in y-iron

(bottom) and S-iron in polycrystalline samples according to
[85v]. The Miissbauer source was s7Co in Rh at room temperature. The linewidth increases with increasing temperature due to the diffusional motion of the Fe atoms. For each
temperature the full width of half maximum of the Mossbauer line is given in mm s- r .
-6
-4
-2
Fig. 24. Quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS) spectrum

(number of scattered neutrons N as a function of the energy
transfer ho for a fixed scattering vector Q = 1.3 IO-r0 m-r)
measured at 365.7 K on a sodium single-crystal according to
[80G]. The dashed line represents the resolution function of
the neutron spectrometer. The observed line is broadened
due to the diffusional motion of sodium atoms.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
0.62
0.64
.lO"K
0.68
Fig. 23 (b). Self-diffusion coefficient of iron as a function of

reciprocal temperature deduced from the Miissbauer data of
Fig. 23 (a) according to [85v]. Circles represent Mijssbauer
results. For reasons of comparison tracer data are shown as
solid lines.
96
,!I
0.58
Mehrer
1.6.3 Comparison of diffusivity
24
f
D(l,)
t
t
Lll2/31~1 D(l,)
sputtering
Tracer
SIMS.AES
RBS
----------___--------
\
EMPA
NRA
m\
/W)
2
f
/rj
I I
15
I I
10-7
s
5
I%
-fi
.-e
cl
-___,
IF
I I
KY*
I
O-
I,
I
10-1
E
I
[Ref. p. 30
0 I liquid)
Olfost)
mech.sect.
/
/
ranges accessible to various methods
I I I I
K-lo m2/s 10
Fig. 25. Illustration of the ranges of diffusion coeflicients which arc accessible to various experimental
methods. The following abbreviations have been
used: Tracer = radiotracer method, SIMS = secondary ion mass spectrometry, AES = Auger electron spectroscopy, EMPA = electron microprobe
analysis, RBS = Rutherford backscattering, NRA =
nuclear reaction analysis, AE = mechanical or magnetic after-effect, IF = internal friction, Gorski =
Gorski effect, NMR = nuclear magnetic relaxation,
MBS = Mijssbauer spectroscopy, QENS = quasielastic neutron scattering. On the upper scale some
values of diffusion coeficients have been indicated:
D (liquid) = typical value in a liquid metal,
D (fast) = typical value for very fast diffusors in
solids, D(T,) = typical value for self-diffusion in
metals near the melting temperature, D(2/3 T,) =
typical value for self-diffusion at 2/3 T,, D(7;) =
typical value for diffusion in amorphous alloys near
their crystallisation temperature.
1.6.3 Comparison of diffusivity ranges accessible to various methods

Approximate rangesof diffusion coefficients which can be determined by various direct and indirect methods
discussed in subsections 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 are illustrated in Fig. 25.
Nowadays, the radiotracer method can cover an enormous range of diffusivities provided that microsectioning techniques (e.g.sputtering) and mechanical sectioning techniques (lathe-, microtome- grinder sectioning) are
combined. Up to now it is the standard method for studies of self- and foreign atom diffusion provided that
appropriate radioisotopes are available.
SIMS and AES techniques both utilize depth profiling by sputtering and are therefore appropriate for small
diffusion coefficients. The use of AES dictates that the diffusion of foreign atoms other than the major constituents be studied since AES discriminates between different elements only. In SIMS and in SNMS experiments the composition analysis is performed in mass spectrometers which can discriminate between different
isotopes of the same element as well. Nevertheless, these techniques are mainly appropriate for foreign atom
diffusors. Self-diffusion studies can be performed with enriched natural isotopes. However, they suffer from a
background problem due to the natural abundance of these isotopes.
RBS and NRA methods are restricted to small diffusion coefficients becauseof the limited penetration ranges
of the analyzing ion beams and becauseof the effectsof beam straggling which becomemore serious for larger
penetrations. RBS is particular appropriate for heavy solutes in a light solvent whereas NRA is appropriate for
somelight solutes including hydrogen. A prerequisite for NRA studies of diffusion profiles is a nuclear reaction
with a narrow resonance.
EMPA is restricted to relatively large chemical diffusion coefficients since the depth resolution is limited by
the size of the volume excited by the electron beam.
The number of atomic jumps performed by the diffusing speciesduring anelastic or magnetic after-effect (e.g.
Snoek effect) studies of diffusional processes is typically in the order of one. Internal friction studies are
particular sensitive to diffusion processesin the sample when the jump rate of atoms is comparable to the
vibration frequency of the internal friction device. When applicable the after-effect and the internal friction
methods can monitor very small to small diffusion coefficients mainly for interstitial diffusors.
The Gorski ejj-,ct is an anelastic after-effect in metal-hydrogen systems.Its cause is hydrogen redistribution
by diffusion over distances which are comparable to the sample dimension. This can be monitored for sufliciently large diffusion coeflicients.
Amongst the nuclear methods NRA covers the widest range of diffusivities. The range indicated in Fig. 25
can be observed in materials with large gyromagnetic ratios and small non-diffusive
contributions
to the
relaxation
rates (in metals e.g. the electronic contributions).
MBS and QENS, when applicable, are limited to
fast diffusion processes.
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 301
1.7 Diffusion along dislocations, grain boundaries and on surfaces;

1.8 Temperature dependence of diffusion
25
1.7 Diffusion along dislocations, grain boundaries and on surfaces

Any real crystalline sample usually contains dislocations, often grain boundaries and always free surfaces.
In the context of diffusion these one- or two-dimensional defectsare denoted as diffusion short-circuits or aspaths
of high difisivity. They have in common that the jump frequency of an atom in these regions is usually much
higher than that of the same atom in the lattice [63S, 66A, 85P, 88K1, 89Sl]. The higher diffusivity in these
regions is of interest for two reasons:
In experiments made by any of the methods discussed in section 1.6 to determine the diffusivity in the
volume, the question arises how much high-diffusivity paths contribute to the measured diffusion coefficient.
However, in properly designed experiments these contributions can be reduced to a negligible extent. Effects of
surface diffusion can be eliminated by removing the near surface region after the diffusion anneal and before a
determination of what is intended to be a volume diffusion coefficient is performed. Obviously single crystals
or at least coarse grain polycrystals are to be preferred in accurate measurementsof volume diffusion. Dislocation diffusion can never be completely avoided in metals. However, it can be made negligible by working with
well-annealed samples and at relatively high temperatures. This is due to the fact that short circuiting diffusion
rates increase less rapidly with increasing temperature than volume diffusion rates.
It has been realized that the transport of matter along high-diffusivity paths plays a key role in several
important technologies. This is particular obvious for diffusion along free surfaces and for grain boundary
diffusion in fine-grain materials. Nowadays it is possible in properly designedexperiments to determine diffusion
coefficients in these regions.
The few data available for dislocation difision are collected in chapter 11. The data for grain-boundary
difjitsion and those for surface diffusion are collected in chapters 12 and 13, respectively. In chapters 11 to 13
introductions to the various phenomena and to the pertaining experimental methods will be given as well.

Measurements of the diffusion coefficients are usually performed at a series of temperatures. In solids often
an Arrhenius equation
D=D exp(-Q/kT)
(1.50)
describeswell the temperature dependencewithin the studied range. Do is denoted as preexponential factor and
Q as activation enthalpy. T denotes the absolute temperature and k Boltzmanns constant.
Typically, for metals and alloys, the pre-exponential factors are in the range
low6 m*s- & Do 5 10e3 rnzsml
and the activation enthalpies in the range
50 kJmol-1 $ Q & 600 kJmol-
depending essentially on the melting point of the material and on the diffusion mechanism (e.g.direct interstitial
or vacancy mechanism) which is operating.
In this volume the experimental data will primarily be reported in terms of Do and Q whenever this is
possible. In addition the data will be often also represented either as data points or as an Arrhenius line in an
Arrhenius diagram - a plot of the logarithm of the diffusion coefficient as a function of reciprocal temperature.
When several measurementsexist for the same system an attempt has been made to select what appear to be
the most recommended ones. Usually the recommended data will be included in the Arrhenius diagram.
Experimentally the Arrhenius diagram is sometimescurved: In such casesthe data may be better represented
by a sum of two Arrhenius terms according to
D=D?exp(--Q,jkT)+Diexp(-Q&T)
(1.51)
where 0: and 0: have the meaning of pre-exponential factors and Q1 and Qz denote activation enthalpies.
In the casesof so-called anomalous metals like B-Ti and B-Zr a representation of curved Arrhenius diagrams
by
D = D exp(- QjkT) exp(A/kT)
(1.52)
is physically even more meaningful [77S, 88K2]. D and Q represent normal activation parameters and A a
curvature parameter.
Land&Bhnstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
26
[Ref. p. 30
If tits of (1.51) or of (1.52) to the data have been performed by the authors either values of @, @, Q, and
Q2 or values of D, Q will also be reported. However, also Arrhenius diagrams are indispensible, whenever the
data deviate substantially from a simple Arrhenius equation.
Only in some relatively simple casescan the Arrhenius parameters of equation (1.50) be interpreted in a
straightfonvard manner in terms of properties of atomistic defects.We mention three such cases:
For the &&ion OJ interstitial solirtes which migrate by the direct interstitial mechanism (see Fig. 8 a) in a
cubic crystal the diffusion coefficient can be written as
D=gavOexpz
exp -g
.
(1.53)
(
>
Here v is an attempt frequency of the order of magnitude of the Debye frequency, a the cubic lattice parameter.
HM is the activation enthalpy that is necessaryto overcome the barrier between two adjacent interstitial sites
and SMthe pertaining entropy. g is a geometric factor which depends on the lattice structure and on the type
of interstitial sites involved. E.g. for octahedral interstitial sites we have g = 1 in the fee structure and g = l/6
in the bee structure.
in a pure cubic metal - provided that diffusion occurs only by the monovacancy
For tracer selfdiffirsion
mechanism (seeFig. 9) - the diffusion coefficient of the tracer atoms is given by
D = a2jvo exp[(SF + S)/k] exp[ - (HF + H")/k
T].
(1.54)
In (1.54) HF and HM denote the enthalpies of formation (superscript F) and migration (superscript M) of a
vacancy. SF and SMare the corresponding entropies. f is the correlation factor which for the monovacancy
mechanism in cubic lattices is a temperature independent constant (fee: 0.781,bee: 0.727,diamond: 0.5).In these
casesthe meaning of the pre-exponential factor and of the activation enthalpy are by comparison of equations
(1.50) and (1.54)
Q=HF+HM
(1.54a)
and
Do = a2fvo exp [(SF+ S)/k].
(1.54b)
For impurity
di$lrsion
in cubic metals
D = a2j2v(:
via the monovacancy
mechanism
exp[(SF + Sy - SB)/k]*exp[-
can be written as
(HF - HB + Hy)/kT].
(1.55)
Here Hy is the enthalpy barrier for an exchange of sites between impurity and vacancy and v: the pertaining
attempt frequency. Sy is the pertaining entropy. HB and SDdenote the binding enthalpy and entropy between
vacancy and impurity. In contrast to self-diffusion the correlation factor f2 for impurity diffusion depends on
temperature (see,e.g., [66A, SSP]).Strictly speaking, according to (1.55) D has no longer the Arrhenius form.
It is however common practice to recast the temperature variation of D into the form of an Arrhenius law
by defining an effective activation enthalpy as
Q=-kg.
(1.56)
If equation (1.56) is applied to (1.55) one obtains

(1.57)
Q=HF-H'+Hy-C
and
Do = u2f2v:
exp[(SF + Sy - SB)/k] . exp( - C/k T).
(1.58)
The quantity C is defined as

(1.59)
and accounts for the temperature dependenceof the correlation factor. If C depends on 7; Q and Do will also
depend on r Often the temperature dependence of f2 can be approximated by an Arrhenius equation
S2(77 =fpOl
expW)F
T),
(1.59a)
where T denotes the average temperature of the temperature range investigated. Then Q and Do are indeed
constant and may be written as
Q= HF-H'+HyDo = a"f~v~
C(T)
exp[(SF + S,M- SB)/k].

Mehrer
(1.58a)
(1.58b)
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 301
1.9 Mass- and pressure dependence of diffusion
21
For slow diffusion C(T) is usually small, whereas for rapid diffusion by substitutional migration C(F) can be
several tens of kJmol-; however, its dependence on F is often negligible.
As already mentioned experimentally observed Arrhenius plots even for self-diffusion are sometimescurved.
The departure from a straight line can be more or less pronounced. In some cases only curvature at high
temperatures is observed. In the caseof the so-called anomalous bee metals a continuous curvature over the
whole temperature range investigated can be present. Sometimes two straight lines with different slopes have
been reported. In general, the activation enthalpy increases with increasing temperature. However, in some
materials (like e.g. a-Fe) which undergo a magnetic order-disorder transition the activation enthalpy may also
increase with decreasing temperature.
Several explanations for deviations fom straight Arrhenius diagrams have been put forward:
(i) The activation parameters depend on temperature: This has originally been proposed for normal metals
[7562]. The idea of temperature dependent activation parameters and their relation with bulk properties
has been extensively discussed in [86V]. It is very likely the reason for the strong curvatures observed for
some anomalous metals [87H, 88K2] and for different reasons in systemswith order-disorder transitions
like a-iron [77H2, 89H2].
The strong curvatures in anomalous metals have been attributed to anomalies in the phonon dispersion
curves [87H, 88K2, 89H3].
(ii) Diffusion occurs by more than one lattice diffusion mechanism. This is the case when several defects
contribute to the total diffusion coefficient.
The slight curvatures of the Arrhenius diagrams of self-diffusion in fee metals which are observed above
about 2/3 of the melting temperature have been attributed to the simultaneous contribution of mono- and
divacancies to the diffusivity [7OS,78P, 78M]. The tracer self-diffusion coefficient is then given by
(1.60)
D=D,v+D,v,
where D,, and D,, denote the mono- and divacancy contributions, respectively. Since the monovacancy
mechanism has a lower activation enthalpy than the divacancy mechanism it will always dominate at lower
temperatures. With increasing temperature the relative contribution of divacancies increasesand may cause
a slight upward curvature of the Arrhenius diagram. If the mono-/divacancy interpretation is adopted, the
activation parameters from a two-exponential fit according to (1.51) can be attributed to the two vacancy
type defects.
(iii) Diffusion occurs by one mechanism but by several types of atomic jumps. For example, interstitially
incorporated foreign atoms may diffuse by jumps between neighbouring octahedral sites as well as by jumps
between octahedral and tetrahedral sites. Double jumps of atoms have been proposed to contribute to
self-diffusion in the close neighbourhood of the melting temperature [845].
1.9 Mass- and pressure dependence of diffusion

Measurements of the diffusion coefficients of self- and foreign atom diffusion are sometimesperformed with
tracer atoms of different isotopic mass. The mass dependence of diffusion is of special interest becauseit can
provide information about atomic mechanisms of diffusion (seesection 1.5).Isotope effect data are collected in
chapter 10, which also contains a brief introduction into the necessaryconcepts.
Diffusion coefficients in solids depend on the hydrostatic pressure p. Often the equation
D(P) = D(O) ev(-
pAl//kT)
(1.61)
describesthe pressure dependencesufficiently well. The quantity AI/ is denoted as activation volume. Activation
volumes for solid state diffusion are typically in the range between a few tenths of the atomic volume and 1.5
atomic volumes. Activation volumes of diffusion are of practical importance and of scientific interest. The
pertaining data are collected in chapter 10 as well.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
28
1.10 Diffusion in amorphous alloys; 1.11 Further readings
[Ref. p. 30
1.10 Diffusion in amorphous alloys

Amorphous metallic alloys are also denoted as metallic glasses or as glassy metals. Diffusion data for
amorphous metallic alloys are collected in chapter 7.
The study of diffusion in amorphous alloys is a difficult topic from an experimental point of view. Progress
was only achieved in the last decade.The difficulties stem entirely from the facts that amorphous alloys are
non-equilibrium structures and that the diffusion temperatures and times are limited by the need to avoid
crystallization. This entails diffusional penetrations of the order of 0.1 urn and never exceeding 1 pm. Only those
methods of section 1.6 for shallow profiles and some indirect methods can be used in diffusion studies of
amorphous materials.
Diffusion in amorphous alloys is of considerable technological and of scientific interest as we!!. It is of vital
concern for the thermal stability of these materials which is determined by the processesof relaxation and
crystallization. Di!fusion in non-equilibrium structures without long range order and its atomistic mechanisms
are still not as well understood as for crystalline materials.
1.11 Further readings

1.11.1 Textbooks on diffusion
Seith. W., Heumann, Th.: DilJlrsion in Metal/err (2nd Edition). Berlin: Springer, 1955.
Shcwmon, P.: DilJlrsion in Solids. New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hi!!, 1963.
Adda, Y, Philibert, J.: La DiJirsion dons les Solides. Paris: PressesUniversitaires de France, 1966.
Manning, J.R.: Dilfirsion Kinetics of Atoms in Crystals. Princeton: van Nostrand, 1968.
Jest, W: Difirsion in Solids, Liquids atin Gases(2nd Edition). New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Flynn, C.P.: Poinf Dejects nnd Dilfirsion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
Shaw, D., (ed.): Atomic Diji~sion in Semiconductors. London, New York: Plenum Press, 1973.
Tuck, B.: Introduction to Diffirsion in Semiconductors. IEE Monograph Series 16, Inst. Electr. Eng., 1974.
Crank, J.: The Mofhemntics oj DiJiaion (2nd Edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
Nowick. A.S., Burton, J.J.,(eds): Diffirsion in Solids - Recent Developments. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Wever, H.: Elektro- und Thermotransport in Metallen. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1975.
Stark, J.P.:Solid Stare Dilfirsion. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Larikov, L.N., Geichenko, V.V., Falchenko, V.M.: Diffusion Processes in Ordered Alloys. Kiev, 1975. Eng!.
Transl. published by Amerind Publ. Comp. New Dehli: 1981.
Murch, G.E., Nowick, A.S.: D~jirsion in Crystalline Solids. New York: Academic Press, 1984.
Philibert, J.: Diffirsion et Transport de MariPre dons les Solides. Les editions de physique, France, 1985.
Borovskii, LB., Gurov, K.P., Marchikova, I.D., Ugaste, Yu, E.: Interdiffusion in Alloys, 1973, Gurov, K.P., (ed.).
Transl. from Russian by the National Bureau of Standards. New Delhi: Amerind. Pub!. Comp., 1986.
Kirkaldy, J.S.,Young, D.J.: Dilfirsion in the Condensed Stare. Brookfield, USA: The Insitute of Metals, 1987.
Borg. R.J.,Dienes, G.J.: An Introduction to Solid Stare Dijjiision. Boston: Academic Press, 1988.
Kaur, I., Gust, W.: Fundnmenrals oj Grain and Interphase Boundary Dijiision. Stuttgart: Ziegler Press, 1988.
Shewmon, P.: Diffirsion in Solids (2nd Edition) Warrendale, Pennsylvania: The Minerals, Metals and Materials
Society, 1989.
1.11.2 Collections of diffusion data and data of related phenomena

Diffusion data and data of diffusion-related phenomena have also been gathered in:
DlQjirsionData. Wiihlbier, EH., (ed.),Vol. 1-7. Cleveland (USA) and Solothurn (Switzerland): Diffusion Informa-
tion Center.
Di@rsion ond Defect Daro (DDD). From 1967, Vol. Sff, Wiihlbier, EH., Fisher, J.D., (eds.).Switzerland: Trans.
Tech. Publicatons; a review appears about three times a year.

Adda, Y, Philibert, J.: Lo Diffirsion dons les Solides. Paris: PressesUniversitaires de France, 1966.
Neumann, G., Neumann, G.M.: Surface SeljlDiffusion of Metals. Diffusion and Defect Monograph Series,No. 1;
Wiihlbier, E, (ed.) 1972.
Pratt, J.N., Sellers, P.G.R.: Hecrrorransporr in Metals and Alloys. Diffusion and Defect Monograph SeriesNo. 2.
Adda, Y, Le Claire, A.D., Slilkin, L.M., Wiihlbier, EH., (eds.) 1973.
Landolt-Btmstein
New Series III/26
1.l 1 Further readings
29
Frischat, G.H.: Ionic Dgfusion in Oxide Glasses. Diffusion and Defect Monograph Series No. 314.Adda, Y,
Le Claire, A.D., Slifkin, L.M., Wiihlbier, EH., (eds.) 1975.
Wever, H.: Elektro- and Thermotransport in Metallen. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1975.
Burton, B.: Dffusion Creep of Polycrystalline Materials. Diffusion and Defect Monograph SeriesNo. 5. Adda,
Y, Le Claire, A.D., Slifkin, L.M., Wbhlbier, EH., (eds.) 1977.
Dariel, M.P.: Diffusion in rare earth metals, in: Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths.
Gschneidner jr., K.A., Eyring, L. (eds.)Amsterdam: North Holland, 1978, p. 847.
Smithells Metals Reference Book (6th Edition). Brandes, E.A., (ed.), Washington: Butterworths, 1983, Chapter 13-1.
Butrymowicz, D.B.: Diffusion rate data and mass transport phenomena in copper systems. Vol. 8, INCRA Series,
New York, 1983.
Kaur, I., Gust, W., Kozma, L.: Handbook of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion Data. Vol. 1 and 2.
Stuttgart: Ziegler Press, 1989.
1.11.3 Proceedings
Some results concerning diffusion and related subjects are contained in proceedings of international conferences or symposia. The more recent ones are listed below:
Cubic Metals. Proc. Int. Conf. held in Gatlinburg, USA, 1964; Wheeler, jr. J.A.,
Winslow, F.R., (eds.).Metals Park, Ohio: American Society for Metals, 1965.
Vacancies and Znterstitials in Metals, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Jiilich, Germany, 1968; Seeger,A., Schumacher, D.,
Schilling, W!, Diehl, J., (eds.).Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970.
Dzffusion in metallischen Werkstoffen, 7. Metalltagung in Dresden, DDR, 1970. Leipzig: VEB Deutscher Verlag
fur Grundstoftindustrie, 1970.
Atomic Transport in Solids and Liquids, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Marstrand, Sweden, 1970; Lodding, A., Lagerwall, T, (eds.).Z. Naturforsch. 26a, 1971.
Diffusion Processes, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Glasgow; Sherwood, J.N., Chadwick, A.V, Muir, WM., Swinton,
FL., (eds.).2 Volumes, London: Gordon and Breach, 1971.
La Diffusion dans les Milieux Condenses: Thkorie et Application, 19 Colloque Metallurgie. Saclay: INSTN,
1976.
Low Temperature Dgfusion and Applications to Thin Films; Gangulee, A., Ho, P.S.,Tu, K.N., (eds.).Thin solid
films 25 (1975) No. 1-2.
Properties of Atomic Defects in Metals, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Argonne, USA, 1976; Peterson,N.L., Siegel,R.W,
(eds.).J. Nucl. Mater. 69-70 (1978).
Point Defects and Defect Interactions in Metals, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Kyoto, Japan, 1981; Takamura, J.I.,
Doyama, M., Kiritani, M., (eds.).University of Tokyo Press, 1982.
Mass Transport in Solids; Benibre, E, Catlow, C.R.A., (eds.),Nato series,Series B, Vol. 97. London, New York:
Plenum Press, 1983.
DZMETA 82 - Dzffusion in Metals and Alloys, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Tihany, Hungary, 1982; Kedves, EJ.,Beke,
D.L., (eds.).Diffusion and Defect Monographs Series No. 7 (1983).
Nontraditional Methods in Diffusion, Proc. Symp. held in Philadelphia, USA, 1983; Murch, G.E., Birnbaum,
H.K., Cost, JR., (eds.).The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1984).
DiJfusion in Solids: Recent Developments. Proc. Symp. held in Detroit, USA 1984; Dayananda, M.A., Murch,
G.E., (eds.).The Metallurgical Society (1985).
Solute-Defect Interactions - Theory and Experiment. Proc. Int. Seminar held in Kingston, Canada, 1985;
Saimoto, S., Purdy, G.R., Kidson, G.V, (eds.).Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1986.
Vacancies and Znterstitials in Metals and Alloys, Proc. Int. Conf. held in West-Berlin, 1986; Abromeit, C.,
Wollenberger, H., (eds.).Materials Science Forum 15-18 (1987).
Diffusion in High-Technology Materials, Proc. ASM Symposium held in Cincinnati, USA, 1987; Gupta, D.,
Romig, A.D., Dayananda, M.A., (eds.),Trans. Tech. Publications, 1988.
DIMETA-Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, Proc. Int. Conf. held in Balatonfiired, Hungary, 1988; Kedves, EJ.,
Beke, D.L., (eds.).Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989).
Diffusion in Body-Centered
Land&-BCmstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
30
1.12 References for 1

1894B
33M
11s
48D
49D
52s
53B
55s
55H
59c
59R
62s
63M
63s
645
66A
66C
68F
68M
7OLl
lOL2
70s
71F
72N
72V
74s
7sc
75Gl
7562
77Hl
77H2
77s
18M
78P
80G
82K
83B
84Bl
84B2
84F
84H
84J
84L
84Ml
84M2
84M3
84P
84R
Boltzmann, L.: Ann. Physik 53 (1894) 960.

Matano, C.: Jpn. Phys. 8 (1933) 109.
Smigelkas, A.D., Kirkendall, E.O.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 171 (1947) 130.
Darken, L.S.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 175 (1948) 184.
Darken, L.S.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 180 (1949) 430.
Seith, W., Kottmann, A.: Z. Angew. Chem. 64 (1952) 379.
Ballufli, R.W.: J. Metals 5 (1953) 726.
Seith, W, Heumann, Th.: Diffusion in Metallen. Berlin: Springer, 1955.
Hauffe, K.: Reaktionen in und an festen Stoffen. Berlin: Springer, 1955.
Carslaw, H.S., Jaeger,J.C.: Conduction of Heat in Solids. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.
Ruth, V.: Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge 20 (1959) 313.
Sauer, E, Freise, V: Z. Elektrochemie 66 (1962) 353.
Malkovitch, R.Sh.:Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 15 (1963)880; Phys. Met. Metallogr. USSR (English Transl.).
Shewmon, P.: Diffusion in Solids. New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill, 1%3.
Jost, W.: Diffusion in Solids, Liquids and Gases.New York: Academic Press,(2d Edition) 1964.
Adda, Y, Philibert, J.: La Diffusion dans les Solides. Paris: PressesUniversitaires de France, 1966.
Ceresara, S., Frederighi, T, Pieragostini, E: Phys. Status. Solidi 16 (1966) 439.
Fogelson, R.L.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 35 (1968) 492.
Manning, J.R.: Diffusion Kinetics for Atoms in Crystals. Princeton: von Norstrand, 1968.
LeClaire, A.D.: Correlation Effects in Diffusion in Solids, in: Physical Chemistry - an Advanced
Treatise, Vol. X, Chapt. 5. New York, London: Academic Press, 1970.
van Loo, EJ.J.:Acta Metall. 18 (1970) 1107.
Seeger,A., Mehrer, H., in: Vacanciesand Interstitials in Metals. Seeger,A., Schumacher, D., Schilling,
W, Diehl, J., (eds.).Amsterdam: North-Holland 1970, p. 1.
Fogelson, R.L.: Fiz. Tverd. Tela 13 (1971) 1028.
Nowick, AS., Berry, B.S.:Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids. New York: Academic press,1972.
Volkl, J.: Ber. Bunsenges.76 (1972) 797.
Schmalzried, H.: Solid State Reactions. New York: Academic press, 1974.
Crank, 1: The Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford: Clarendon Press,(2d Edition) 1975.
Gupta, D.: Thin Solid Films 25 (1975) 231.
Gilder, M., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. 145 (1975) 507.
Heumann, Th.: Z. Naturforsch. 32a (1977) 54.
Hettich, G., Mehrer, H., Maier, K.: Ser. Metall. 11 (1977) 795.
Sanchez,J.M., De Fontaine, D.: J. Phys. (Paris) C7-38 (1977) 444.
Mehrer, H.: J. Nucl. Mater. 69 + 70 (1978) 38.
Peterson, N.L.: J. Nucl. Mater. 69 + 70 (1978) 3.
Goltz, G., Heidemann, A., Mehrer, H., Seeger,A., Wolf, D.: Philos. Mag. A 41 (1980) 723.
Kanert, 0.: Phys. Rep. 91 (1982) 183.
Bocquet, J.L., Brebic, G., Limonge, Y: Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, in: Physical Metallurgy 1983.
Cahn, R.W., Haasen, P., (eds.).Amsterdam: North-Holland Physics Publishers (yd edition), 1983,
p. 385.
Bakker, H., in: Diffusion in Crystalline Solids. Murch, G.E., Nowick, A.S.,(eds.).New York: Academic
Press, 1984, p. 189.
Berry, B.S., Pritchet, W.C.: in [84Ml].
Frank, W, Gosele, U., Mehrer, H., Seeger,A.: Diffusion in Silicon and Germanium, in: Diffusion in
Crystalline Solids. Murch, G.E., Nowick, A.S., (eds.).New York: Academic Press, 1984, p. 62.
Horvath, J., Dyment, E, Mehrer, H.: J. Nucl. Mater. 126 (1984) 206.
Jacucci, G.: in [84Ml].
Lanford, W.A., Beneson, R., Burman, C., Wielunski, L.: in [84Ml].
Murch, G.E., Birnbaum, H.K., Cost, J.R. (eds.):Nontraditional Methods in Diffusion, Proc. Symp.
held in Philadelphia, USA, 1983. The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1984).
Mullen, J.G.: in [84Ml].
Myers, S.M.: in [84Ml].
Petuskey, W.T.: in [84Ml].
Rothman, S.J.:The Measurement of Tracer Diffusion Coefficients in Solids, in: Diffusion in Crystalline
Solids. Murch, G.E., Nowick, A.S. (eds.).New York: Academic Press, 1984, p. 1.
Mehrer
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26

84s
842
85M
85P
85V
86B
86H
86V
87G
87H
88G
88Kl
88K2
89Gl
8962
89Hl
89H2
89H3
89K
89Sl
8982
Stokes, H.T.: in [84Ml].

Zabel, H.: in [84Ml].
Mehrer, H., in: Solute-Defect Interactions - Theory and Experiment. Saimoto, S., Purdy, G.R.,
Kidson, G.V, (eds.).Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1985, p. 162.
Philibert, J.: Diffusion et Transport de Mat&e dans les Solides. Les editions de physique, France,
1985.
Vogl, G., Petry, W: Diffusion in Metals Studied by Mijssbauer Spectroscopy and Quasielastic Neutron Scattering; Festkiirperprobleme XXV (Advances in Solid State Physics), Grosse, P., (ed.).Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1985, p. 655.
Borovskii, LB., Gurov, K.P., Marchukova, I.D., Ugaste, Yu.E.: Interdiffusion in Alloys, 1973, Gurov,
K.P., (ed.). Transl. from Russian by the National Bureau of Standards. New Delhi: Amerind. Publ.
Company, 1986.
Hagenschulte, H.: Diplomarbeit Universitat Miinster, 1986.
Varotsos, P.A., Alexopoulos, K.D.: Thermodynamics of Point Defects and their Relation with Bulk
Properties. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986.
Geise, J., Mehrer, H., Herzig, Chr., Weyer, G.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 443.
Herzig, Chr., Kiihler, U.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 301.
Gunther, B.: Untersuchungen atomarer Bewegungen in Festkorpern mit Methoden der kernmagnetischen Relaxation. Habilitationsschrift, Universitat Dortmund, 1988.
Kaur, I., Gust, W.: Fundamentals of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion. Stuttgart: Ziegler
Press, 1988.
Kiihler, U., Herzig, Chr.: Philos. Mag. A 58 (1988) 769.
Gail, I.: in [89K].
Greenwood, G.W.: in [89K].
Hagenschulte, H., Heumann, Th.: J. Phys. Condensed Matter, 1 (1989) 3601.
Hirano, K.-I., Iijima, Y.: in [89K].
Herzig, Chr.: Ber. Bunsenges.Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 1247.
Kedves, F.J.,Beke, D.L. (eds.):DIMETA 88 - Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, Proc. Int. Conf. held in
Balatonftired, Hungary, 1988. Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989).
Shewmon, P.: Diffusion in Solids, 2nd edition. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: The Minerals, Metals and
Materials Society, 1989.
Slitkin, L.: Metallurgical Transactions 20A (1989) 2577.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Mehrer
32
2.1 Introduction
[Ref. p. 81
2 Self-diffusion in solid metallic elements

2.1 Introduction
Self-diffusion is the most basic diffusion processin solids. In this chapter self-diffusion data are presented for
solid metallic elements.Only data are given for pure metals. Data for tracer self-diffusion of binary alloys are
tabulated in chapter 4 and the relatively few tracer self-diffusion data available for ternary alloys are included
in chapter 6. Data on diffusion in the semiconducting elements Si and Ge have not been tabulated, but can be
found in [89L]. For a description of experimental methods used in self-diffusion studies the reader is referred to
section 1.6 of the General introduction.
2.1.1 Order of elements

In this chapter data are compiled in the tables and figures according to the position of the substancesin the
periodic table in the following order:
alkali metals group,
alkaline earth metals group,
scandium group metals,
rare earth metals,
titanium group metals,
vanadium group metals,
chromium group metals,
manganesegroup metals,
iron group metals,
cobalt group metals,
nickel group metals,
noble metals,
zinc group metals,
aluminum group metals,
group IVB metals,
group VB semimetals,
group VIB semimetals,
actinide group metals.
2.1.2 Use of tables and figures

In the tables all measurementsare reported whenever possible in terms of the preexponerztialfictor Do and
the octiwtion elltknlpy Q introduced in equation (1.50) of the General introduction. In some casesDo and Q
values are not given in the original work. Do and Q values which were calculated from the original data points
by the present authors are indicated as recalculated.
The tempctwtwe range given in the tables is the range over which measurements were made and used to
calculate Do and Q. Long extrapolations beyond this range may in some casesnot give reliable values for the
diffusion coefficient as will be evident from the graphical representation.
For zrnimiol crystals Do and Q values are given for diffusion perpendicular and parallel to the crystal axis,
whenever experiments on oriented single crystals have been performed. The crystal orientation is indicated by
the remarks I c axis and 11c axis in the Do column of the table.
For mctols wifh dotropic rran.yhtarions
Do and Q values for the various crystal structures are reported. The
pertaining crystal structure is indicated by a corresponding remark - e.g.a-Fe or y-Fe -in the Do column
of the table as well.
The column Methon/Rernnrks
usually contains the information (i) to (v):
(i)
The esperinmtol
method is briefly characterized.
- In by far the. most self-diffusion studies the thin layer method has been applied in combination with
radiotracers (seesubsection 1.6.1.2.1of the General introduction). In thesecasesthe radioisotope used
-for example 19Au - will be stated. In some.casesmore than one isotope of the sameelement -e.g. Na
and 24Na - were used and will then be stated as well. In very few cases stable isotopes and mass
spectrometry were used and will be mentioned explicitly.
Mehrer, Stolica, Stolwijk
Land&-B6mstcin
New Series 111~26
Ref. p. 811
2.1 Introduction
33
- If a serial sectioning technique in combination with counting of the section activity was used for the
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
measurement of the concentration depth profile, which is often the case,this will be indicated by one of
the following keywords: mechanical sectioning, sputter sectioning, chemical sectioning, electrochemical sectioning or anodic oxidation. The keyword mechanical sectioning implies either sectioning by a lathe, by a precision grinder, or by microtome cutting or by combinations of these tools.
If a serial sectioning technique was applied and not the section activity but the residual activity of the
sample was measured this feature will be stated as well.
- In some studies indirect methods (see subsection 1.6.2 of the General introduction) like nuclear
magnetic relaxation (NMR), quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) or transmission electron microscope observations (TEM) were used.In such casesthe above mentioned abbreviations plus someadditional
keywords will be stated.
The nominal purity of the samples will be stated whenever this information is available. For a more detailed
specification of the purity, which only in some casesis available in the original work, the reference should
be consulted.
The use of single - or polycrystals will be stated. The grain size of polycrystals will be indicated, whenever
this information is available.
For uniaxial crystals it is indicated whether both crystallographic directions have been investigated or not.
If both diffusion coefficients, D,, and D,, have been measured, a statement which of the two is larger is
included.
For metals which undergo (an) allotropic transformation(s) a statement is included which crystal structure(s) has (have) been investigated in this particular reference.
The column Method/Remarks may also contain some optional information which concerns the following
items:
[vi) Sometimesin the original work the temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient is analyzed not only
in terms of the simple Arrhenius relationship given by equation (1.50) of the General introduction but
also in terms of more sophisticated expressions.
The most common example is a sum of two exponentials as given by equation (1.51) of the General
introduction. If this is the case the pertaining preexponential factors 0: and Di and the activation
enthalpies Q, and Q, will be stated. If the authors adopt a certain interpretation like for example monoand divacancy contributions to the diffusion coefficient (seeequation (1.60)of the General introduction),
this will be also mentioned.
rvii) If in the same paper additional experiments like e.g. isotope effect experiments, or high-pressure diffusion
experiments, or diffusion experiments with other isotopes and/or other matrices were performed this will
be indicated as well.
Central to the present chapter are the tables. From the tables referencesare made to the figures. For all
metals where sufficiently reliable data were available an Arrhenius diagram - a semilogarithmic plot of the
diffusion coefficient as a function of the reciprocal absolute temperature-has been included in the figure section.
For a given metal those data which are strongly recommended have been included in the pertaining figure. Often
data from several different references,which sometimes but not always cover different temperature ranges, are
Included in the Arrhenius diagram. This procedure enables the user of chapter 2 to get an impression about the
quality of the recommended self-diffusion data.
Generally in a figure pertaining to a given metal its melting temperature T, is indicated. Values of T, are
:aken from [83Sl]. Several metals undergo an allotropic transformation which transforms one crystal structure
nto another when the temperature is raised or lowered. Some metals like for example iron even undergo more
:han one allotropic transformation. Usually an allotropic transformation manifests itself by a stepwise change
If the diffusion coefficient in the Arrhenius diagram. For metals with (an) allotropic transformation(s) the
:ransformation temperature(s) is(are) indicated in the figure. The values of the transformation temperatures are
:aken from [73H].
Figures 46 to 48 are the only ones to which no reference is made from the tables. Each of these figures
:ontains a whole series of Arrhenius lines pertaining to metals with the same crystal structure. A homologous
.eciprocal temperature scaleis used in thesecases.The normalization is performed with the melting temperature
If each individual metal. The reader may find these figures useful to get a quick overview over the self-diffusion
,ehaviour of some important metals.
Landolt-Miirnstem
New Series III/26
2.2.1 Self-diffusion in alkali metals
34
[Ref. p. 81
2.2 The self-diffusion tables

DO
10-4mZs-1
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Fr
Lithium
(Li)
I.24
55.3
300..*453
NMR: spin lattice relaxation times Tr

and T2;
Li signal in natural Li;
99.95%;
dispersion of 12 urn particles in an oil;
liquid Li also studied, Na and Rb also
studied
55H
3.39
56.9
343 . . *443
6Li in natural Li as stable tracer;

polycrystals;
99.8%;
mechanical sectioning, mass spectrometry
59N
50.1
190...240
NMR: spin lattice relaxation time in

rotating frame T,,;
dispersion of 15 urn Li-particles in
mineral oil
65Al
3.123
16Li in Li)
D.120
[Li in 6Li)
-
53.1
308 . ..451
7OL
54.0
308 .+.451
6Li in nearly pure Li and Li in nearly pure 6Li as stable tracer;

mechanical sectioning, mass spectrometry
54
x 312...450
NMR: spin lattice relaxation

time T,;
99.98%;
dispersion of 10 urn particles in
paraffin oil;
T, also studied for dilute Li alloys containing 2, 4, 8 at% Mg; 1.5, 3 at%
Cd and 2.75 at% Ag
72T
47.2
223 ... 373
NMR: spin lattice relaxation in rotating frame TIP;

99.8%;
dispersion of 15 urn particles in mineral oil
73w
0.133
(from T, data)
52.75
s 300...455
NMR: spin lattice relaxation times Tl

and T,,;
75M
(continued)
LandolbB6mstein
New Series III,/26
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
35
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Lithium (Li), continued

0.038
(from TIP data)
50.2
x 192...350
various dispersions of small Li-spheres;

purity not specified;
Arrhenius diagram slightly curved,
two-exponential fit:
07 = 0.038 . 10M4mz s-l
Q, = 50.2 kJmol-,
D,O= 9.5. 10m4m2s-r
Qz = 67 kJmol-,
mono-fdivacancy interpretation
75M
195.**450
NMR: spin lattice relaxation times 7

and T,,;
Li in Li;
deviation from Arrhenius behaviour,
0: = 0.06. 10m4m2s-r
Q1 = 50.2 kJmol-,
0: = 28.8 . 10m4m2 s-l
Qz = 69.5 kJmol-,
mono-Jdivacancy interpretation
76M3
0.33
55.0
220...454
P-NMR: spin-lattice relaxation of polarized radioactive sLi nuclei using

asymmetric P-decay;
deviation from Arrhenius behaviour,
0: = 0.19. 10m4rns-
Q, = 53 kJmol-,
Di = 95. 10e4 m2s-1
Q, = 76.2 kJmol-,
mono-/divacancy interpretation
85Hl
Sodium (Na)
0.20
41.9
E 223 ... 370
NMR: spin lattice relaxation times TI

and T,;
23Na signal in natural Na;
99.95%;
dispersion of 12 pm particles in oil;
liquid Na also studied, Li and Rb also
studied
55H
0.242
43.7
273...368
Na;
coarse grain polycrystals;
diffusion couple of 22Na doped and
undoped Na;
mechanical sectioning;
effects of hydrostatic pressure also
studied
52N
(continued)
Landolt-B6irnstein
New Series III/26
36
Q
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 81
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Sodium (Na), continued

0.145
42.2
273 ... 370
ZZNa, 24Na;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
Arrhenius diagram slightly curved presumably due to K impurity;
isotope effect also studied
66M
194.5... 370
22Na;
99.9995% ;
Do and Q values not given, Arrhenius
diagram curved, two-exponential tit:
0: = 0.0057m2se1
Q1 = 35.7 kJmol-,
Dy= 0.72.10m4m2s-
Q2 = 48.1 kJmo!-,
mono-/divacancy interpretation;
effect of pressure also studied, isotope
effect also studied
71Ml
0.12
41.5
349..-370
QENS:
mono- and polycrystals;
dependenceof quasielastic line width
on momentum transfer also studied
79A
323...371
QENS;
single crystal;
99.999% ;
dependenceof quasi-elastic line width
on momentum transfer studied for
various crystallographic directions;
data discussed together with radiotracer data;
80G
zl60...260

and T,p;
23Na signals in natural Na;
99.95%;
dispersion of small particles in
paraffin;
two-exponential tit:
Dy= 0.004~10-4m2sT1
Q, = 35.9 kJmo!-,
Dz=2.6.10m4 m2sm1
Qz = 46.4 kJmo!-,
80B
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
2.2.2 Self-diffusion in alkaline earth metals
DO
10V4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
37
Fig.
Ref.
67M
71M2
55H
66D
Potassium (K)
0.31
40.8
42K.
273...333
polyirystals;
99.95% ;
mechanical sectioning
0.16
39.2
42K.
22l.s.335
99.9; %;
Arrhenius diagram slightly curved,
0: = 0.05 . 10m4m2 s-l
Q, = 37.2 kJmol-,
Di = 1 1IO-4m2s-1
Q, = 47 kJmol-
Rubidium (Rb)
0.23
39.3
E 280 ... 312

and T,;
*Rb and *Rb signals in natural Rb;
dispersion of 50 urn particles in oil;
liquid Rb also studied, Li and Na also
studied
Cesium (Cs)
No data available.
Francium (Fr)
No data available.
2.2.2 Self-diffusion in glkaline earth metals

Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Bs, Ra
Beryllium (Be)
0.52
157.4
836...1342
165
841...1321
160.8
923.s.1473
(I c axis)
D.62
[II c axis)
3.36
Land&Bhstein
New Series III/26
I and 11hexagonal c axis investigated:

Be;
single crystals;
mechanical sectioning and measurement of residual activity;
DII D,
Be;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
mechanical sectioning and residual activity measurement
.
68P2
[Ref. p. 81
2.2.3 Self-diffusion in scandium group and rare earth metals
38
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Magnesium (Mg)
1.5
:l c axis)
tfc axis)
136.1
74l.e.908
134.8
741 as.908
1.75
[I c axis)
1.78
[II c axis)
138.2
775...906
139
775 ..a906
56s
1 and 11hexagonal c axis investigated:

28Mg;
single crystals;
99.9%;
I and II hexagonal c axis investigated:
2*Mg;
single crystals;
99.99%;
mechanical sectioning and section activity as well as residual activity
measurement;
anisotropy carefully investigated and
found to be weak DJD,, x 1.1 3.. 1.2
Calcium (Ca)
161.2
8.3
68Pl
45Ca;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
mechanical sectioning and residual activity measurement;
14C 5gFe, 235U and 63Ni diffusion in
&I also studied
773 ..* 1073
Strontium (Sr)
No data available.
Barium @a)
No data available.
Radium (Ra)
No data available.

2.2.3.1 Scandium group metals
SC,Y, La
Scandium (SC)
No data available
Yttrium (Y)
280.9
tl c axis a-Y)
0.82
(II c axis a-Y)
252.5
1173..*1573
1173...1573
a-Y, 1 and (1hexagonal c axis investi-
70Gl
69D2
gated: lY;
single crystals;
D,, DA
Lanthanum (La)
1.5
(B-W
188.8
923.s.1123
fee B-La investigated: r4La;

polycrystals (0.1 to 0.2 mm grain size);
99.95%; mechanical sectioning
(continued)
Mehrer, Stolicaj Stolwijk
LandobB6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
39
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
102.6
1140...1169
bee r-La investigated: 14La;

strongly twinned samples;
99.95%;
73D
125.2
1151... 1183
bee y-La investigated: 140La;

polycrystals;
99.85%,
(detailed specification of purity);
74L3
fee y- and bee 6-Ce investigated:

141C!e;
99.9%;
71D
1018...1064
bee 6-Ce investigated: 141C!e;

polycrystals;
99.9%;
mechanical sectioning with measurement of section and residual activity;
data from [71D] also listed
73L2
1003,1028
bee 6-Ce investigated: 141Ce;

polycrystals;
99.9%;
pressure dependence at two temperatures studied
74L2
fee y-Ce investigated: 141Ce;

polycrystals;
99.9%;
pressure dependence studied
76M2
10
69Dl
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Lanthanum (La), continued

1.3. 10-Z
(G-4
0.11
W4
2.2.3.2 Rare earth metals

Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu
Cei-ium (Ce)
153.2
801..+ 965
0.012
(&Ce)
90
992... 1044
0.007
(&Ce)
84.7
0.55
We)
930
Praseodymium (Pr)
0.087
(P-W
123.1
1075~~~1150 bee p-Pr investigated: 14Pr;

polycrystals;
99.96%;
p-Pr classified among anomalous
bee metals;
141n, 14La, (j6Ho also studied in
j3-Pr
Neodymium (Nd)
No data available.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
40
DQ
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
11
77F
12
77F
13
72s
hcp a- and bee y-Yb investigated:

16gYb;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
14
74F
bee y-Yb investigated: r6Yb;

polycrystals;
99.9%;
pressure dependencestudied at these
temperatures
Prometheum (Pm)
No data available.
Samarium (Sm)
No data available.
Europium (Eu)
1.0
144.0
771 *.* 1074
bee Eu investigated: ls2Eu;

polycrystals;
99.7%;
Gadolinium (Gd)
0.01
(B-G4
136.9
1549...1581
bee g-Gd investigated: Gd;

polycrystals;
99.5%;
non-Gaussian penetration curves in
the temperature range
1538*..1548 K
Terbium (Tb)
No data available.
Dysprosium (Dy)
No data available.
Holmium (Ho)
No data available.
Erbium (Er)
4.51
(1 c axis)
3.71
(II c axis)
302.6
1475 .+.1685
301.6
1475...1685

169Er.
single cr&tals;
99.9%;
DJD,, = 1.11... 1.16
Thulium (Tm)
No data available.
Ytterbium (Yb)
0.034
(a-Yb)
0.12
(y-W
146.8
813...990
121.0
995 .** 1086
1003,1033,
1073
14
75F
Lutetium (Lu)
No data available.
Landoh-kimstein
New Series Ill/26
Ref. p. 811
2.2.4 Self-diffusion in titanium group metals
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
41
Fig.
Ref.
63L

Ti, Zr, Hf
Titanium (Ti)
6.4. lo-*
(a-Ti)
122.7
963...1123
44Ti.
poly&ystals;
99.9%;
mechanical sectioning and residual
activity measurement
1172... 1813
(P-V
44Ti;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
curved Arrhenius plot, two-exponential
fit:
0: = 3.58. 10m8rns-l
Q1 = 130.6kJmol-,
0: = 1.09. 10e4 m2sm1
Q, = 251.2 kJmol-;
48V in Ti also studied
15
64M2
.
1.9. 10-3
(P-W
152.8
1173:.. 1856
44Ti;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
68Wl
4.54.10-4
(P-V
131.0
1228... 1784
44Ti;
co-diffusion with g4Nb or g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.97% ;
TiNb alloys also studied
79P
6.6. 10-s
(a-Ti)
169..l
1013...1149
15
80D
[P-Ti)
1176...1893
44Ti;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
activity measurement;
great-depth tails observed
44Ti.
poly:rystals;
99.98%;
curved Arrhenius plot: interpreted as
phonon softening effect on monovacancy migration, data including
[64M2] described as
D = 3.5 . 10T4 exp( - 328.0 kJ/RT)
. exp(4.1 T,/T) rns-l, T in K
15
87Kl
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
42
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
Zirconium (Zr)
2.4. 10-4
P-W
126.0
1441... 1776
g5Zr;
polycrystals;
metallic impurity content specified;
influence of a-g transition also studied
16
61K
1174...2020
g5Zr;
polycrystals;
99.94%;
curved Arrhenius plot described by
D = 3. 10-10(T/1136)15~6
_ [82.06+0.1294(7-1136)]kJ
16
63F
&Zr)
RT
g5Nb in Zr also studied
2.1 . lo-
113.0
1013~~~1130 g5Zr;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
Nb in Zr also studied
68Dl
1215...2088
8gZr;
co-diffusion with Zr.
polycrystals (5 .. .7 mm grain size);
detailed specifications of purity;
Do and Q not given;
influence of preannealing examined;
16
70G2
1124
g7Zr;
single crystals;
D = 5.6.10-18 m*s-1
D=42.10-18~*~-1:
26A< 44Ti, 51Cr, 54Mn, 5gke, 6oCo and
l**Sb in Zr also studied
16
74Hl
1189...2000
g5Zr and 88Zr;

polycrystals;
99.985%;
curved Arrhenius plot: data including
[61K, 63F, 70G2] described by
D = 0.3 * 10m4exp( - 301.0 kJ/RT)
* exp(3.39 Tz/T') m*s-, T in K;
16
79H
[or-Zr)
WW
[a-Zr)
ww
(continued)
LandoIl-BBmslein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
43
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Zirconium (Zr), continued

6.8 . 10-4
(P-W
145.0
1218... 1518
g5Zr;
polycrystals;
nuclear grade;
Fe and lC!r in Zr also studied
81P
3.1 . 10-s
(P-W
105.3
1167... 1476
Zr.
poly&ystals;
nuclear grade;
48V in Zr also studied
16
82P
(c+Zr)
779... 1128
Zr. ,
single crystals of the same random
orientation;
99.99% ;
sputter sectioning;
downward curved Arrhenius plot
16
84H
Hafnium (Hf)
1.2. 10-3
W-W
162.0
2068 . . .2268
l8lHf;
polycrystals;
97.9% (Zr 2.1%);
17
65W2
7.3. 10-6
@-HO
174.2
1197... 1756
17Hf and *lHf;

polycrystals;
97.3% (Zr 2.7%);
68Dl
4.8. 1O-3
(P-W
183.4
2058...2431
175Hf and *lHf;

polycrystals;
97.3% (Zr 2.7%);
68Wl
0.86
(II c axis of cl-Hf)
0.28
(1 c axis of a-Ho
370.1
1470... 1883
17
72D
348.3
1538... 1883
a-Hf 1 and 11hexagonal c axis investigated: lHf;

single crystals;
97.9% (Zr 2.1%);
DL DII
1.1 . 10-3
(P-W
159.2
2012...2351
8lHf;
polycrystals;
97.1% (Zr 2.9%);
17
82H
-La*olt-tlornsfe*
..-..
New Series III/26
44
2.2.5 Self-diffusion in vanadium group metals
DO
10-4mZs-
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
65Ll
I8
65P2
18
74P
18
79MI
81T

V, Nb, Ta
Vanadium (V)
0.011
255.4
1275... 1673
49.
singie crystals;
99.7%;
separate Arrhenius term for
1873...2161 K:
Do = 58. 10e4 ms-,
Q = 383.1 kJmo!-
0.36
308.4
1153...1629
49.
singie crystals (99.99%),

polycrystals (99.9%);
mechanical and chemical sectioning;
1629...2106 K:
Do = 214. 10e4 ms-,
Q = 394.1 kJmol-;
grain boundary diffusion observed;
Fe in V also studied
0.288
309.6
997... 1915
48V.
singie crystals;
99.9%;
mechanical sectioning and anodic oxidation;
great-depth tails observed;
1915...2115 K:
Do = 173. 10m4ms-,
Q = 409.3 kJmo!-
0.0208
272.1
1446... 1649
48~.
singie crystals;
99.7%;
1649...2166 K:
Do = 79.9. 10m4m*s-
Q = 385 kJmo!-; two-kxponential
analysis also given
-
308.8
1200~~~1600 NMR: motional narrowing and relaxation time T,;

slV signals in natural V;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
Do not given;
monovacancy interpretation;
oxygen migration also studied, effects
of oxygen-vacancy pairs discussed
(continued)
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
45
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1323... 1823
48v.
18
83A
18
83Gl
Vanadium (V), continued

1.79
331.9
single crystals and polycrystals;

99.97% (s.c.);
mechanical sectioning, residual and
section activity measurement;
1823...2147K:
Do = 26.81 . 10m4rns-l,
Q = 372.4 kJmol-;
enhancement factors due to alloying
with Fe and Ta also determined
0.10
298.1
1333 ... 1840
NMR: relaxation time T,,;

IV signal in natural V;
polycrystals;
99.95% and 99.8%;
mono-vacancy interpretation:
Do includes correlation factor
J;,, = 0.727;
oxygen migration also studied
Niobium (Nb)
12.4
439.6
1858;..2393
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99%;
60R.I
1.3
397.7
1970...2430
g5Nb;
polycrystals (5 mm grains);
autoradiographic method and mechanical sectioning;
6oCo and 55Fe in Nb also studied
62P
1.1
401.9
1224...2668
g5Nb;
polycrystals (99.75%) and single crystals;
mechanical sectioning and anodic
oxidation;
greath-depth-tails observed;
no appreciable effect of oxygen found;
18Ta in Nb also studied
19
65L2
0.61
397.3
1421...2509
g5Nb;
single crystals (99.9%) and polycrystals;
oxidation;
residual and section activity measurement;
5gFe,6oCo and 63Ni in Nb also
studied
19
77Al
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
(continued)
46
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
Niobium (Nb), continued

0.524
395.6
1354...2690
g5Nb;
single crystals;
99.98%;
oxidation;
Do and Q recalculated from given data,
07 = 0.008. 10m4m2sm1
Q, = 349.3kJmol-,
D, = 3.7. 10e4 m2s-
Q, = 438.0 kJmol-,
no influence of oxygen content found
1929...2673
g5Nb, g2Nb;
single crystals;
0: = 0.015. 10e4 m2s-
Q, = 354.1 kJmol-,
0: = 4.6. low4 m2s-
Q2 = 442.9 kJmol-,
2300..2510
g5Nb;
crystal type not specitied;
electromigration study;
Fe, 6oCo, *Ta and lCr in Nb also
investigated
Tantalum
0.124
78El
8332
(Ta)
413.2
1523.s.2576
s2Ta;
99.67%;
oxidation;
g5Nb in Ta also studied;
Do and Q calculated from
DNb/DT"= 1.85
65Pl
423.6
1261...2993
Ta;
single crystals;
99.98%;
mechanical and sputter sectioning;
monovacancy interpretation
83Wl
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
2.2.6 Self-diffusion in chromium group metals
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
47
Fig.
Ref.

Cr, MO, W
Chromium (Cr)
0.28
306.5
1473... 1873
Cr;
large grain polycrystals;
99.99% ;
62Hl
1.6
339.1
1273...2023
51Cr.
mono- and polycrystals (2 ... 3 mm);
99.98%;
great-depth-tails observed;
ICr and 63Ni diffusion in NiCo alloys
also studied
7lA
970
435.4
1369...2093
51Cr;
single crystals;
99.995%;
21
76M4
1280
441.9
1073... 1446
51Cr.
singIL crystals;
99.99% ;
sputter sectioning;
analysis includes data of [76M4]
21
81M
Molybdenum (MO)
4
481.5
2073 . . .2448
ggMo;
polycrystals;
99.3% (0.7% w);
sectioning method not specified,
residual activity measurement;
la5W in MO also studied
22
59B
2.77
464.7
1973...2193
MO*
polycjstals (1 *. .2 mm grain size);
99.97% ;
mechanical and electrochemical sectioning;
only three data measured
22
60B2
0.38
422.0
2173...2353
MO;
polycrystalline wires;
electrochemical sectioning in radial
direction;
effects of grain boundary diffusion and
recrystallization also observed
61D
(continued)
Land&Biimstein
New Series III/26
48
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmo!-
[Ref. p. 81
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Molybdenum (MO), continued

0.1
386.0
2123.3.2618
ggMo;
single crystals;
also measurementson polycrystals
yielding higher diffusion coefficients
63A
488.2
1360...2113
ggMo;
single crystals;
99.99%;
0: = 0.126. 10m4rns-
Q, = 437.1 kJmo!-,
0: = 139. 10e4 m2s-
Q2 = 549.0kJmo!-,
22
79M2
65A2
23
69P
23
llA2
23
78M
Tungsten (W)
42.8
641.0
2939 ... 3501
18SW.
singlecrystals;
99.99%;
le3Re and lB4Re in W also studied
1.88
587.4
2073 ..- 2676
188~.
singlecrystals;
anodic oxidation;
greath-depth tails observed;
g5Nb and **Ta in W also studied
15.3
626.3
2042...2819
187W.
singlecrystals;
purity indicated by residual resistivity
ratio 10;
oxidation;
seealso [84A]
-
1705...3409
s7W and lssW;

single crystals;
99.999% ;
oxidation;
greath-depth tails observed;
0: = 0.04. 10V4 m*s-
Q, = 525.8kJmo!-,
0: = 46. 10T4 m*s-
Q2 = 665.7 kJmo!-,
Landok-B6mstein
New Series III/26
2.2.7, 8 Self-diffusion in manganese, iron group metals
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
49
Fig.
Ref.
69A
64N
2.2.7 Self-diffusion in manganese group metals

Mn, Tc, Re
Manganese (Mn)
-
1390... 1508
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.95% and 99.3%;
preliminary data for bee and fee phase;
Do and Q not given
Technetium (Tc)
No data available.
Rhenium (Re)
-
511.4
1520... 1560
field ion microscopy, time dependence

of needle shape;
Do not determined
2.2.8 Self-diffusion in iron group metals

Fe, Ru, OS
Iron (Fe)
118
(paramagnetic
cl-Fe)
281.5
970... 1167
a-Fe investigated: 55Fe;

high purity material (not specified);
influence of magnetic order-disorder
transition on D observed;
Do and Q values only from D values at
least 50 K above Curie temperature
24
60Bl
239.5
1082...1178
61B
270
1337... 1666
w und y-Fe investigated: 55Fe;

single and polycrystals;
99.97%;
sectioning and residual activity measurements as well as surface decrease
method employed;
transition on D observed;
Do and Q values for a-Fe only from D
values at least 20 K above Curie
temperature
238.6
1686... 1781
&Fe investigated: 59Fe;

polycrystals;
high purity material (not specified);
Co diffusion in &Fe also studied
63B
Land&-Bijmstein
New Series III/26
(continued)
50
2.2.8 Self-diffusion in iron group metals
DO
10-4m2s-1
[Ref. p. 81
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
240.7
1701... 1765
24a
665
240.7
999...1157
CL-and &Fe investigated: 55Fe, Fe;

99.97%;
only data for &Fe included in
Fig. 24 a;
6oCo diffusion in u- and &Fe also
studied
311.1
1223... 1473
y-Fe investigated: 55Fe;

coarse grain polycrystals
(0.1 .*.0.3 mm);
surface decreasemethod
24a
6612
284. 1
1444... 1634
y-Fe investigated: 5gFe, 55Fe;

coarse grain polycrystals (2.. .5 mm);
99.98%;
data taken from Fig. 3 of [68H];
24a
68H
1168,1169
24a
68W2
1641
1683... 1733
a-, y- and &Fe investigated: 52Fe,

5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
Do and Q values not given;
mainly isotope effect in a-, y- and &Fe
studied
CL-,y- and &Fe investigated: 55Fe,
5gFe.
coarse grain polycrystals (3. **4 mm);
99.999% ;
mainly isotope effect in u-, y-, &Fe
studied
24a
69G
Iron (Fe), continued

2.01
:&Fe)
2.01
baramagnetic
u-Fe)
0.49
(Y-Fe)
(a-Fe)
(Y-Fe)
(b-Fe)
(a-Fe)
We)
:6-Fe)
993,1043,
1142
1394,161l
1725
Iferromagnetic
a-Fe)
784...1017
ferromagnetic a-Fe investigated: 5gFe;

single crystals;
samples with different purity studied;
sputter sectioning;
transition on D investigated;
strong deviation from Arrhenius behaviour observed
24a
24b
77H
121
[paramagnetic
a-Fe)
281.6
1067...1168
paramagnetic a-Fe investigated: 5gFe;

polycrystals with 300 urn average grain
size;
99.97%;
48V diffusion in u-Fe also studied
24a
87G
(continued)
LandoltTl6mstein
New Series III/26
51
2.2.9 Self-diffusion in cobalt group metals
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
766... 1148
Fe, Fe;
99.97%;
sputter sectioning;
strong deviation from Arrhenius behaviour observed;
24b
881
754...1163
paramagnetic and ferromagnetic a-Fe

investigated: Fe, 55Fe;
single crystals;
99.98%;
strong deviation from Arrhenius behaviour observed;
dislocation diffusion also studied
24a
24b
89M,
9OL
6Oco.
99:4% ;
6oCo and 63Ni diffusion in Co-Ni
,alloys and in Ni also studied
25
62H2
Iron (Fe), continued

iara- and ferromagnetic a-Fe)
(para- and ferromagnetic a-Fe)
Ruthenium (Ru)
No data available.
Osmium (OS)
No data available.
2.2.9 Self-diffusion in cobalt group metals

Co, Rh, Ir
Cobalt (Co)
274
1045 ... 1321
260.5
1465... 1570
1.66
287.5
1320... 1584
6OCo;
polycrystals with 500 urn average grain
size;
99.5%;
jCo and 63Ni diffusion in Co -Ni
alloys also studied
65Hl
0.55
(ferro- and paramagnetic Co)
288.5
896... 1745
To, -co, 6Oco;

99.99% ;
no significant influence of the ferromagnetic order transition observed;
isotope effect also studied for five temperatures
25
79B
iejrromagnetic
Co)
0.17
[paramagnetic
Co)
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
(continued)
[Ref. p. 81
2.2.10 Self-diffusion in nickel group metals
52
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
944...1743
SCo;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe und sputter sectioning;
Doand Q values from a forced Arrhenius fit, small deviations attributed
to divacancy contributions and magnetic ordering
25
88L
70s
26
86A
Cobalt (Co), continued

2.54
(ferro- and paramagnetic Co)
304
Rhodium (Rh)
-
391
903 ... 2043
high temperature creep;

polycrystals;
99.98%;
requires a model of high temperature
creep caused by diffusion;
Do not obtained
Iridium (Ir)
0.36
438.8
2092 ... 2664
l g21r;
single crystals;
99.9%;
correction for evaporation applied

Ni, Pd, Pt
Nickel (Ni)
1.27
279.7
1384...1521
63Ni;
polycrystals;
56H
3.36
292.2
1423...1673
63Ni.
59M
polycrystals;
evidence of grain boundary diffusion
below 1423 K
1.9
284.7
1315...1677
63Ni;
99.95%;
64Ml
1.9
279.7
748...923
j3Ni;
single crystals;
99.97% ;
surface decreasemethod;
polycrystals also studied for grain
boundary diffusion
65Wl
(continued)
LandolbB6mstein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
, K
53
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1173...1473
63Ni;
99.99%;
6611
Nickel (Ni), continued

2.59 (from single
crystal data)
2.22 (from
polycrystal data)
293.5
1.77
285.1
1253... 1670
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.999%;
slight curvature of Arrhenius diagram
observed, three-exponential fit:
0: = 0.38 . 10e4 m2s-l
Q1 = 271.3 kJmol-,
0: = 3.07 . 10m4m2sm1
Qz = 309.9kJmol-,
0: = 0.017 rnzs-l
Q3 = 377.5kJmol-,
mono-, di-, trivacancy interpretation
27
68Bl
2.2
292.6
1323... 1477
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.7%;
63Ni in Ni,Al also studied
75B
2.6
279.1
1103... 1273
63Ni.
76F
290
single crystals;
D-values below 1073 K influenced by
diffusion short circuits
1.33
280.8
815...1193
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.997%;
sputter sectioning;
two-exponential fit to own data and
those of [68Bl]
07 = 0.92. low4 rns-
Q1 = 278 kJmol-,
0: = 0.037 m2 s-l
Qz = 357 kJmol-,
27
76Ml
1.82
285.2
1323 ... 1673
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.98% to 99.999%;
83V
0.205
266.3
1323... 1773
28
64P
Palladium (Pd)
lo3Pd, Pd;
single crystals;
99.999%;
54
2.2.11 Self-diffusion in noble metals
DO
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
Platinum (Pt)
0.33
285.6
1598...1873
mixture of 193Pt, 195mPtand 19Pt

obtained by neutron activation of
pure Pt;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
29
57K
0.22
278.8
1523... 1998
r=pt;
99.999%;
29
62C
0.05
257.6
850... 1265
19Pt;
single crystals;
99.99%;
sputter sectioning;
those of [57K]:
0: = 0.06. low4 mz s-
Q, = 259.7 kJmol-,
D=06t06~10-4mZs-1
Q: = 365 to 388 kJmol-,
29
78R
68B2

Cu, Ag, Au
0.19
196.4
Copper (Cu)
973 ... 1263
64Cll;
single crystals;
pressure dependencealso studied for
Cu, Au, Al
0.31
200.7
663...833
TEM observation of the annealing of

quenched-in voids;
99.999% ;
requires a model for void annealing
caused by diffusion
69B
II.78
211.3
972...1334
30
69Rl
D.11
[from Wu data)
190.1
64cu, 67cu;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
I
63Cu stable isotope
69E
D.15
193
[from j5Cu data)
1003...1123
65Cu stable isotope;

NMR: relaxation times 7, and 7;
Cu particles < 8 urn;
99.999% ;
liquid Cu also studied
(continued)
landok-BCmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
55
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Copper (Cu), continued

-
614...654
Tu;
single crystals;
99.999%;
sectioning by anodizing and stripping,
only three temperatures studied;
D-values agree with those of [77M], Do
and Q values not given
74Ll
1.05
210.3
845.+.1111
NMR: 63Cu relaxation time in the

rotating frame;
Cu powder 3...3Onm;
99.99%
74w
0.35
203.6
574...905
64cu.
30
single crystals with low dislocation density;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning;
Do and Q values from fit of one Arrhenius
term to own data and those of [69Rl],
0: = 0.1 . 10e4 rn8-l
Qr = 196.8kJmol-,
@ = 2. 10e4m2sv1
Qz = 233.5 kJmol-l,
77M
lOlO... 1352
64Cu;
single crystals;
99.997%;
Do and Q values not given, two-exponential fit to own data and those of [69Rl,
77M]:
0: = 0.13. 10e4 m2se1
Q1 = 198.5kJmol-,
D~=4.6.10-4m2s-1
Qz = 238.6 kJmol-r,
78Bl
0.68
209.4
1078... 1348
64Cu;
99.999% ;
two-exponential fit to own data and those
of [77M]:
07 = 0.15. 10e4 m2sm1
Q, = 198.8kJmol-,
Dt = 4.8 . 10e4 m2 s-l
Q2 = 243.1 kJmol-I,
79K
0.877
211.3
992... 1355
Tu;
99.998% ;
82F
_Landolt-Bornstem
..-..
New Series III/26
30
30
56
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
Silver (Ag)
-
1183
llomk
single crystals;
99.99%;
measurementsat 1183 K only;
pressure dependencealso studied at
1183 K for OrnAg, 141n and 124Sb
in Ag
65B
3.278
181.7
1038...1218
OrnAg.
polycrystals;
68K
0.67
190.1
913...1228
105~~,
31
70R
31
72R
llomAg;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
losAg, ornAg;
single crystals;
99.999%;
isotope effect also studied;
mono-/divacancy interpretation of diffusion and isotope effect data
946.e.1227
0.041
169.8
547...777
lo mAg.
single ciystals;
99.999%;
sectioning by anodizing;
Do and Q are best values for monovacancies taken from two-exponential fit to own data and those of
[70R]:
0: = 0.041 . 10e4 m*s-
Q, = 169.8kJmol-,
D~=4.8.10-4m2s-1
Q2 = 211 to 221 kJmol-,
31
73Ll
0.235
179.5
630..+ 854
11omAg;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
chemical sectioning;
Do and Q values from tit of Arrhenius
equation to own data and those of
[70R, 73Ll], two-exponential tit of
own data together with various sets
of other data [70R, 73Ll] performed,
31
74B
(continued)
Landolt-BBmsIein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 811
DO
1()-4m2S-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
57
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
105Ag,
31
78B2
31
82R
57M
32
63D
65D
65Gl
6562
68B2
Silver (Ag), continued

0.043
0.091
169.8
580...834
ttomAg;
single crystals;
99.9995%;
sputter sectioning;
comparison with other microsectioning
studies performed
1tomA
.
g,
single crystals;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning;
data from [70R, 73L1,74B]:
0: = 0.046 . low4 m2 s-l
Q1 = 169.8kJmol-,
D,O= 3.3 . 10m4m2 s-l
Qz = 218.1 kJmol-,
pressure dependence also studied
594...994
174.6
Gold (Au)
198AU,
1077 ... 1321
polyc&tals;
99.95%;
0.117
176.3
975...1172
1133...1233
0.107
176.6
623...733
0.107
176.9
1123...1323
0.043
167.5
973 ... 1263
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
198AU.
coarsegrain polycrystals;
99.93%;
diffusion of 59Fe,6oCo and j3Ni in Au
also studied
198AU.
single crystals;
99.99%;
mainly pressure dependenceat three
temperatures studied
195A~;
polycrystals;
L-X ray absorption method
i95Au;
single crystals;
99.97%;
198AU,
single crystals;
pressure dependence of self-diffusion
also studied for Au, Cu and Al
(continued)
2.2.12 Self-diffusion in zinc group metals
58
Q
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 81
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
559...685
198AU,
32
69R2
rgAu, rg8Au;
single crystals;
99.999%;
Co diffusion in Au, isotope effect of
self-diffusion and Co diffusion also
studied
32
78Hl
Au;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning;
pressure dependencealso studied
32
83W2
I and (1hexagonal c axis investigated:

65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
D,, D.l
65Zn, 6gZn;
single crystals;
99.999%;
q > D,;
mainly isotope effect studied for Zn
and Cd diffusion
33
53s
33
67B

65Zn, 6gZn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
D,, > D,;
33
67P
Gold (Au), continued

0.026
166.9
single crystals;
99.99% ;
sectioning by anodic oxidation and
residual activity measurement
0.084
0.027
165
603...866

Zn, Cd, Hg
Zinc (Zn)
0.58
(1 c axis)
0.13
(II c axis)
101.7
513.e.683
91.3
513...683
0.18
(1 c axis)
0.13
(II c axis)
655 ... 685
96.3
513...691
91.7
513...691
(continued)
LandolbB6mstein
New Series III/26
59
Ref. p. 811
DO
10m4m2s-l
kJmol-
Zinc (Zn), continued

-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
573...673

65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
mainly pressure effects investigated
72C

Cd;
single crystals;
99.5%;
D,, > D,;
polycrystals also investigated
34
55w
Cadmium (Cd)
0.10
(1 c axis)
0.05
(II c axis)
80
383...588
76.2
383...588
0.05
73.7
350...420
polycrystals investigated;
NMR: spin relaxation times 7 and T,:
l13Cd signal in natural Cd;
15 urn foil
58M
0.68
(II c axis)
86.2
453...573
II hexagonal c axis investigated: Cd;

single crystals;
99.99% ;
polycrystals also investigated, 65Zn
and lo Ag in Cd also studied
34
67H
0.08
78.7
473...553
polycrystals investigated: l15Cd;

fine grain polycrystals;
99.99% ;
67A
0.18
(1 c axis)
0.12
(II c axis)
82
420... 587
34
72M
77.9
420...587
-L and II hexagonal c axis investigated:

rogCd;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
D,, > D,;
Zn-, Ag-, In-, Hg- and Au-diffusion
also studied
523...593
I and II hexagonal c axis investigated:

Cd;
single crystals;
99.999%;
only pressure effects studied
73B
Mercury (Hg)
No data available.
Land&-B6rnstein
New Series III/26
60
2.2.13 Self-diffusion in aluminum group metals
DO
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
[Ref. p. 81
Fig.
Ref.
2.2.13 Self-diffusion in aluminum group metals

AI, Ga, In, Tl
Aluminum (Al)
1.71
142.4
729...916
26AI (radiotracer with low specific activity);

single crystals and coarse grain polycrystals;
99.99% ;
54Mn in AI also studied
35
62L
144.4
673*..883
26A1(radiotracer with low specific activity);

single crystals;
pressure dependence also studied, selfdiffusion and its pressure dependence also studied for Cu and Au
68B2
0.176
126.4
358 . ..482
TEM observation of the annealing of

quenched-in voids;
99.9999%;
requires model of void shrinkage
caused by self-diffusion
35
68V
120.4
512...820

the rotating frame T, p of 100%
abundant stable isotope 27Al
71F
123.5
515...770

rotating frame T,@of 100% abundant stable isotope 27Al;
27 . . .30 urn foils;
99.999%;
data reanalyzed in [87D]
35
74M
722
26AI;
semi-infinite diffusion couple;
D = 1.05. lo-l4 m2s-;
agreeswith previous radiotracer data
[62L, 68B2J
8582
68C
Gallium (Ga)
D in
10-17
5.3
5.3
7.8
9.3
42
m2s-l
283
293.2
298.2
300.7
303
72Ga;
single crystals and coarse grain polycrystals;
99.9999% ;
results are becauseof experimental difficulties only of qualitative interest,
no clear evidence of anisotropy was
observed
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
61
2.2.14 Self-diffusion in group IV B metals
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmol-l
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
36
59D
710
37
55s
37
85C
38
60M
38
64C
Indium (In)
78.5
312...417
;1 c axis)
2.7
(II c axis)
78.5
312...417
392, 406, 422
I and 11tetragonal axis investigated:

41~.
single ciystals;
99.97%;
DA > D,,
I and 11tetragonal axis investigated:
1141111~.
single crystals;
99.999% ;
mainly pressure effects studied at
3 temperatures
Thallium (Tl)
94.6
420...500
hcp ct- and bee P-T1investigated:

204Tl.
;: c axis of hcp
a-Tl)
95.9
420...500
83.7
515...550
80.2
513...573
Il;c axis of hcp LXT1)
single ciystals;
99.9% ;
in c+Tl: D, > D,,
Kc P-Tl)
0.42
(bee P-Tl)
bee P-T1investigated: 04T1;

99.999% ;
interpretation of slightly curved Arrhenius diagram in terms of mono- and
divacancies
2.2.14 Self-diffusion in group IVB metals

Sn, Pb
Self-diffusion data for semiconducting elements Si, Ge can be found in [89L]
Tin (Sn)
97.6
451...495
107.2
451*..495
105.1
433...501
107.2
433...501
t; c axis)
,,i2caxis)
10.7
(I c axis)
iic axis)
I and 11tetragonal c axis investigated:

lt3Sn;
single crystals;
99.998%;
D, DII
lt3Sn;
single crystals;
99.999%;
D, > D,,;
pressure dependence also studied
(continued)
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
[Ref. p. 81
2.2.15 Self-diffusion in group V B semimetals
62
DO
10-4m2s-1
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
108.4
455 ... 500
38
74H2
Tin (Sn), continued

21.0
(1 c axis)
12.8
(II c axis)
l13Sn.
108.9
455~..500
single crystals;
99.999% ;
D1
D!69&
124Sb-,
65~~~
diffusion in Sn
also studied
Lead (Pb)
0.281
0.887
101.4
447 . . * 595
2oPb;
single crystals;
99.999%;
mechanical (microtome) sectioning
39
55N
109.1
480...596
Pb;
99.99%;
diffusion of Tl and Bi in Pb-Tl
tem also studied
39
61R
39
69M
1 and II rhombohedral (trigonal) c axis

investigated: lz4Sb;
single crystals;
99.998%;
D, > D,,;
results influenced by surface defects
and microcracks
64H
I and II rhombohedral (trigonal) c axis

investigated: lz4Sb;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
serial sectioning by chemical polishing;
D.L D,,
40
66C
106.8
470..* 573
sys-
Pb;
single crystals;
99.999%;
mechanical (microtome) sectioning;
lsmCd diffusion in Pb also studied
2.2.15 Self-diffusion in group VB semimetals

P, As, Sb, Bi
Self-diffusion data for P, As are not included.
Antimony (Sb)
185.9
770... 870
197.2
830... 890
149.9
773..*903
201
773 . ..903
;: c axis)
,iic axis)
0.10
(1 c axis)
c axis)
(continued)
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
63
2.2.16 Self-diffusion in group VI B semimetals
Ref. p. 811
!.I0
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
746... 856
lz4Sb;
polycrystals;
99.9% ;
mechanical sectioning and counting of residual activity;
D at T, is 2.9 . IO-l4 m2s-;
penetration profiles with tails presumably
due to grain boundaries
65H2
Antimony (Sb), continued

1.05
165.4
Bismuth (Bi)
Vo reliable data available.
2.2.16 Self-diffusion in group VIB semimetals

S, Se, Te, PO
self-diffusion data for S are not included.
Selenium (Se)
LOO
I c axis)
1.2
11c axis)
135.1
1.0082
11c axis)
115.8
425 . ..488
115.8
350...480
I and 11trigonal c axis investigated: 75Se; 41

single crystals grown from vapour phase;
purity specified by conductivity between
2. 10m5and 10m6R- cm-;
mechanical sectioning and measurement
of residual activity;
D, > D,,;
41
11trigonal axis investigated: NMR: spin
lattice relaxation times q and Tie of
stable isotope 77Sein natural Se;
single crystals;
99.999%;
three-exponential fit performed;
Do and Q refer to dominating term
(dashed line in Fig. 41), data also published in [8362]
Tellurium
3.91 * 104
(I c axis)
130
(II c axis)
195.9
579...663
168.8
600...673
166
496...640
147.6
Land&Biirnstein
New Series III/26
85G
(Te)
I and II trigonal c axis investigated:

127mTe;
single crystals;
99.9%;
D, > D,, ;
influence of I- and Al-doping also studied
42
67G
I and II trigonal c axis investigated:
42
83W3
127rnTe.
(Y c axis)
iic axis)
70B
single cryktals;
99.999%;
sputter sectioning;
D /DA = 1 . ..2.5.
lZ14Sbdiffusion also studied
(continued)
64
2.2.17 Self-diffusion in actinide group metals
DO
10-4m2s-
kJmo!-
[Ref. p. 81
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
485...650
11trigona! c axis investigated: NMR:

spin lattice relaxation times TI and
T,@of stable isotope 125Tein natural
Te;
single crystals;
99.999%;
good agreement with D,, from [83W2],
similar data in [81G]
85G
43
67s
Tellurium (Te),continued
0.12
139.9
(II c axis)
Polonium (PO)
No data available.

AC, Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu etc.
Data are available only for Th, U and Pu.
Thorium (Th)
395
(a-Th)
299.8
998..-1140
fee u-Th investigated: 228Th;

polycrystals;
99.85% (detailed specification of purity
given);
u-spectroscopy method;
231Paand 233U diffusion in u-Th also
studied
Uranium (U)
0.0018
(Y-U)
115.1
1073...1323
bee y-U investigated;

diffusion couple of natural U and U
enriched with 235U;
polycrystals;
mechanical sectioning and measurement of residual u-activity;
y-U diffusion is anomalous
44
59Al
0.0135
WJ)
175.8
973 ... 1028
B-U investigated;
diffusion couple of natural U and U
enriched with 235U;
polycrystals;
mechanical sectioning and measurement of residual u-activity
44
59A2
(continued)
Ref. p. 811
DO
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
65
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Uranium (U), continued

0.00233
(Y-u)
119.3
1075... 1342
bee y-U investigated;

235U (93 % enriched);
polycrystals;
99.998%;
Do and Q values anomalous
44
60R2
0.002
WJ)
167.5
853...923
orthorhombic a-U investigated;

diffusion couples of natural U and U
enriched with 235U;
polycrystals;
mechanical sectioning and measurement of residual a-activity;
small anisotropy of diffusion in agrains
44
62A
0.0028
WJ)
185.1
973 ... 1023
P-U investigated: 235U;

polycrystals;
grain boundary diffusion also studied
68F
Plutonium
(Pu)
4.5. 10-3
(6-Pu)
99.6
623...713
fee 6-Pu investigated: diffusion couples

of two cylinders, one enriched with
238Pu;
polycrystals;
lathe sectioning;
from autoradiographic experiments
concluded that grain boundary diffusion is unlikely
45
64T
0.02
(E-PU)
77.5
773...885
bee E-PUinvestigated;
diffusion couples consisting of Pu with
either 1% or 8% 240Pu;
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning and measurement of
residual activity
45
68D2
0.003
(E-PU)
65.7
788...849
bee E-PUinvestigated;
polycrystals;
99.9% (detailed specification of purity
and isotopic composition is given);
diffusion in E-PUis anomalous;
pressure effects also studied
45
71C2
(continued)
Land&-Bknstein
New Series III/26
[Ref. p. 81
2 Self-diffusion in solid metallic elements (Figures)
66
DO
IOw4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
66.9
765 ... 886
45
78W
730...750
126.4
594...715
118.4
484...546
108
409...454
bee E-Pu, bet-6-Pu, fee &Pu, face-centered orthorhombic y-Pu, body-centered monoclinic p-Pu investigated:
239Pu;
polycrystals;
z 99.9% (detailed specification of purity and isotopic composition given);
grinder sectioning;
short circuiting effects observed for yand p-Pu;
Do and Q values for 6-Pu given in
[78w] are highly questionable
Plutonium (Pu), continued

3.5. 10-3
I&-PU)
:6-Pu)
5.17.10-2
I&-Pu)
3.8. 1O-2
:Y-pu)
1.69. 1O-2
:B-pu)
Figures for 2
-T
KP
300
400 K
200
250
ml/s
10-l
0
10-1s
6.5 X+K- 55
4.0
l/l Fig. 2. Na. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coeflicient vs. reciprocal temperature from *Na and 24Na tracer
measurements[66M] (triangles) and [71Ml] (circles).
2.5
Fig. 1. Li. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefl?cient vs. reciprocal temperature from measurementswith 6Li
and Li as stable tracers (full circles) [7OL] and from P-NMR
measurements(open circles) [UHI].
3.0
3.5
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series Ill/26
Ref. p. 811
!OO
I
lo-"0
m*/s
lO[
m2/s
67
Be
2-.
lo-"
10-l
,o-l:
I
4
I
Q
, o-1:
10-1'3
IO-"4
10-1'4
10-f
i
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
1o-l5
0
5.0.10-3K-'
5.5
1.0
1/T -
I.1
.,0-33K-l
l/T -
Fig. 3. K. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from 42K tracer measurements [67M] (full circles) and [71M2] (open circles).
Fig. 4. Be. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticients vs. reciprocal temperature from 7Be tracer measurements parallel (full circles) and perpendicular (open circles)
to the hexagonal axis [66D].
-7
IO
m2/
1100 K 1000
,=1116K
f 7"
900
I
800
Ca
-T
900 K
4.1012,
m2/s
1"
850
'
800
750
lo-
1o-1
10-1'2
8
I
Q
8
10-l
I
Q4
0
I
l
IO-"3
10-l
o 01
&
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25 .10-3K' 1.35
1o-1"
0.8
l/lFig. 5. Mg. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal absolute temperature from sMg tracer
measurements parallel (full circles) and perpendicular (open
circles) to the hexagonal axis [71Cl].
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
J
0.9
1.0
1.1
l/T -
1.2
I.3 .lcr331c'
1
Fig. 6. Ca. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from 45Ca tracer measurements [68Pl].
68
-1
-1
1600
lom/
[Ref. p. 81
00
I
1100 K
I
10-l'Or
Ip+,=llX
ml/ s
l[
,=lE03K
lo-I1 _
lo-13 _
0
1o-12 _
a1 1014 _
I
a
1013 _
lo-15 _
lo- 1L _
lo-16
I0.55
0.80 -10 - 0.90
10I5
0.81
I
0 ,
0.95
.l 0-3K-l 1.10
1.00
l/T Fig. 7. Y Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion cocfftcients vs. reciprocal tcmpcrature from Y tracer mcasurcments parallel (full circles) and pcrpcndicular (open circles)
to the hesagonal axis of a-Y [70Gl].
Fig. 8. La. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticicnts vs. reciprocal temperature from r4La tracer measurements in fee p-La [69D2] (open triangles) and bee y-La [73D]
(open circles) and [74L3] (full triangles).
-1
-T
10
m/
950
1050 K
I ,
071K
5.10-"
m/sl
850
I
1200 K
Pr I t
1150
1100
'y.b=999K
I,,=1205 K
Ce
r~g=106BK
lo-
lo-
t
a
0
8
10-l
8
0.875 0.900 -10. c-1 0.950
l/l Fig. 10. Pr. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefftcicnt vs. reciprocal temperature from 42Pr tracer measuremcnts in bee S-Pr [69Dl].
0.800 0.825
0
cl
10-l
0.850
10-l
0.90 0.95 1.00
1.05 1.10
l/l-
4 Fig. 9. Ce. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature from 14Ce tracer measure1.15 alO-K- 1.25 ments in feey-Ce 171D] (open circles) and beeS-Ce[71D] (full
circles) and [73L2] (triangles).
- .
Land&BBmstein
New Series 111'26
Ref. p. 811
-T
1000 K
lo-'[
m2/s
9cIO
.&i
m2/s
Eu
-T
1580Kl570
800
69
1560
1550
1540
3.3
IO-"
3.2
e
3.1
0
~I lo"2
I 3.0
Q
2.9
0
2.8
lo-l3
2.7
10-14
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.6
0.625
1 .W3 K-'1.4
0.630
0.635
0.640
l/T-
l/TFig. 11. Eu. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coeflicient vs. reciprocal temperature from rs2Eu tracer measurements [77F].
3.10-13
m2/s
t'
I. = 1795 K
1600
I
Er
0.655
Fig. 12. Gd. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from Gd tracer measurements in bee /3-Gd [77F].
-7
1700 K
1
0.645 -1O-3K-'
1o-1'
1500
m2/s
I'
I
10-l"
,o-l:
I
Q
, o-l:
0
0
10-l'
IO-lb
s
6.10-15
0.54
,o-l:
0.56
0.58
0.60
l/T-
0.62
0.64 .10-3K'
0.68
Fig. 13. Er. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coeficient vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (full circles) and
,erpendicular (open circles) to the hexagonal axis from r6Er
.racer measurement [72S].
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.10
1.05
l/T -
1.15 .10- C 1.25
Fig. 14. Yb. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature from rC9Yb tracer measurements in polycrystals of hcp a-Yb and bee y-Yb [74F].
2 Self-diffusion in solid metallic elements(Figures)
70
[Ref. p. 81
2000K 1500
10-l
t-n/
1000
800
10-l
lo-li
10-n
10-
10-
10-l
I
a
10
10-16
10-1s
10-l
10-n
10
lor
10s
10
1,o-l!o-l9
1017
0.4
10-Z
10-20
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9 .10-3K- 1.1
10a
l/l Fig. 15. Ti. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticients vs. reciprocal temperature from 44Ti tracer measurements in hcp a-Ti polycrystals [80D] (full circles) and bee S-Ti
[64M2] (open circles) and [87Kl] (triangles).
10-2;
10-2:
[
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2.10-3K-1.4
1I200
3.10-l
rn2/f
-I
-11361
10-l
I
a
,o-li
Fig. 16. Zr. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coef- b

kients vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
tn (a) hcp a-Zr single crystals parallel (I) and perpendicular
10-13
[v) to the hexagonal axis [74Hl], hcp a-Zr single crystals of
the same random orientation (+) [84H] and bee S-Zr ac:ording to [61K] (x), [63F] (o), [70G2] (o), [79H] (+) and
4.10-nL
[82P] (A). (b) same as Fig. a) for bee p-Zr on an enlarged
0.4
scale.
b
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
WK-
l/l-
Land&-B6mstein
New series III!26
Ref. p. 811
1Cl-'"
mvs Hf

-1
2000
2500 K
1700
71
4 Fig. 17. Hf. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticients vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
in hcp o-Hf parallel (full triangles) and perpendicular (open
triangles) to the hexagonal axis [72D] and bee 8-Hf [65W2]
(open circles) and [82H] (full circles).
1500
IO-"
10-l'
10.1:
m2/s
I
-T
1500
I
2000 K
I
&2175K
+a,
1000
1200
1
,,
IP
I
b
10-'4
10-'5
10-16
10-171
"I
10-17
lo-'*
0.'
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
l/T-
0.60 .W3 K-' 0.70
*
IO-20
lo-"II
0.4
-1
..
0.5
0.6
0.7
l/F-
0.8
0.9 W3 K'
1.1
Fig. 18. 8. Se&logarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from @V tracer measurements [65P2] (open circles), [74P] (full triangles), [79Ml] (full
circles), [83A] (crosses) and from NMR measurements
[83Gl] (open triangles).
4 Fig. 19. Nb. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from gsNb tracer measurements [65L2] (open circles), [77Al] (full circles), [78El] (full
triangles) and [81B] (open triangles).
0.3
Landolt-Bijmstein
New Series III/26
0.4
0.5
0.6
l/T-
0.7
0.8X+ Kd0.9
[Ref. p. 81
72
C-T
1500
-7
10-l'
lO-'1
3000 K
2000
2000
1500 1300
1500
1300
3.
ml/s
lo-"
ml/s
10-11
10-l"
10-13
1o-l3
10
10-l
10'15
lo-'5
lo-16
I
a
1200 1100
10-16
10-l'
~I 10-l'
2000
I
- 0
I
10-18.
10-18
lo-l9
1019
.
10-m
10-m
.
10-I'
10-n
10-222
lo-"
0.2
0.2
10-4
OA
0.3
0.L
0.5
0.6
0.7
-10.'K-'
0.9
l/l Fig. 20. Ta. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from a2Ta tracer measurements [65Pl] (full circles) and [83Wl] (open circles).
-I
2500 K 2000
10"
0.5
0.6
0.7
l/T-
0.8
t0.9~10-3K-'
1.0
Fig. 21. Cr. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticient vs. reciprocal temperature [76M4] (open circles) and
[81M] (full circles).
1700 1500
m'/s
lOj
10-2'
4 Fig. 22. MO. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coef10"
0.2
ficient vs. reciprocal temperature from ggMo tracer measure0.3
0.1
0.5
l/l-
0.6
0.740~k'O.8
ments[59B](open
circles).
circles),(60B2](triangles)and
[79M2](full
Landoh-BBmstein
New Series III,/26
Ref. p. 811
-1
5000 K
3000
1IF*,
I I '
I .
m*/s
10-13
1. =3673K$
2500
I
2000
I
0.4
0.5
1700
I,
.
8
10-22
0.2
0.3
_ .
0.6 WK-' 0.7
l/l-
Fig. 23. W Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
[69P] (open circles), [77A2] (triangles) and [78M] (full circles).
1o-23
0.50
0.65
0.80
0.95
l/T-
-T
Fig. 24. Fe. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
in (a) bee o-Fe [60Bl] (x), [68W2] (a), [69G] (m), [77H] (+),
[87G] (A), 18811(0) and [89M] (0); fee y-Fe [6612](v), [68H]
(A), [68W2] (0) and [69G] (m) and bee S-Fe [66J] (v), [68W2]
(0) and [69G] (m); (b) same as (a) for bee a-Fe according to
[77H] (+), [881] (0) and [89M, 9OL] (0).
Land&Biirnstein
New Series III/26
l/T-
1.10
.I,,-3K-1
1.40
[Ref. p. 81
-J
2a,o.,32800K 2600 2500 2600 2300 2200 2100

d!Vi:l
I
I
I0.425 0.450 WK 0.500
l/fFig. 26. Ir. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticient vs. reciprocal temperature from Ir tracer measuremcnts [86A].
0.350
l/JFig. 25. Co. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion cocfRcient vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
:62H2] (open circles), [79B] (full circles) and [88L] (triangles).
I
0x00
0.375
-1
,o-,22000 K
d/s
1700
I ,
A!
1.=lrmK
I
FJ
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1 XI5 K-l
1.3
l/J -
Fig. 27. Ni. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from 63Ni tracer measurements [68BI] (open circles) and [76Ml] (full circles).
0.50
) Pd 1
8
,,o-l3lJ_J
Q5
i500
I
1400
I
1300
I
I
0.80
0.65
0.70 W3K-'
l/JFig. 28. Pd. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from ro3Pdand 12Pd tracer measurements[64P].
0.55
0.60
Land&-B6mstein
New Series Ill!26
Ref. p. 811
Fig. 30. Cu. Semilogarithmic plot of self-diffusion coeffi- b

cient vs. reciprocal temperature from %u and 67Cu tracer
measurements [69Rl] (open circles), [77M] (full triangles),
[78Bl] (full circles) and [82F] (open triangles).
,o-,,2500
-T
1800 K 1400 1200
IU -
-T
1200 K 1000 900
800
700
600
m2/s
1o-l3
1000 900
800
m%
10-1'2
.
102'
0.4
1o-231
0.6
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.2.10-3K' 1.4
1.2
l/T-
IX
1.4
l/T-
1.6
1.6Xr3 K-'1
l/T-
Fig. 29. Pt. Semilogarithmicplot of the self-diffusion coefticient vs. reciprocal temperature from tracer measurements
[57K] (open circles), [62C] (triangles) and [78R] (full circles).
Fig. 31. Ag. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from losAg and lromAg
tracer measurements [7OR] (open circles), [72R] (squares),
[73Ll] (full circles), [74B] (open triangles), [78B2] (full triangles) and [82R] (crosses).
0.8
Land&-B6rnst.h
New Series III/26
1.0
1.2
1.8.10~W22.0
[Ref. p. 81
76
-7
lZO0 1200K 1000
18
mr/s
700
800
600
I
lCT2
4 Fig. 32. Au. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from 19Au and 98Au
tracer measurements [63D] (crosses), (65DJ (open circles),
[69R2] (open triangles), [78Hl] (full circles) and [83W2] (full
triangles).
Au
-1
10-n
600
I
00 K 650
&lo-' I
I
I.- 693K
m*/!
10-l
10-l
;
L-
520
1
550
I
0
A
~I 10-l
I
AI
0
I
A
lo-
lo-
147~K-1.8
a
A
2.10
1.7
1.8 .,0-j K- 2.0
l/l Fig. 33. Zn. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients parallel (full symbols) and perpendicular (open symbols) to the hexagonal axis vs. reciprocal temperature from
6SZn and 69Zn tracer measurements [53S] (triangles), [67B]
(squares) and [67R] (circles).
1.5
&lo-
m2/s
600 K 550
500
450
I
A
1.8
2.0
l/l
10-u
1.6
2.2
-
1.6
4 Fig. 34. Cd. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients parallel (full symbols) and perpendicular (open symD
bols) to the hexagonal axis vs. reciprocal temperature from
26 .10-k 2.6 lo9Cd and rr5Cd tracer measurements [55w] (squares),
[67H] (circles) and [72M] (triangles).
I
IA 0
Landok-Bk-nstein
New
Series III/26
Ref. p. 811

--I
1000K 800 700 600
500
400
350
10-1'3
m2/s
420 K 1 I
-1
380
1
3 40
360
320
In
0
lo-l4
00
. .
~I lo-l5
0
.
0
.
1o-l6
1O-l7
2.3
n
A
A
A
A
A
-T
10-22
10-l
0 K
540
!O
T-
m2/r fzi10-23
lo-24
1.0
3.1 .lO"K- 3.3
2.9
Fig. 36. In. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients parallel (full circles) and perpendicular (open circles) to
the tetragonal axis vs. reciprocal temperature from rr41n
tracer measurements [59D].
IO-JO
10-2'
2.7
l/T -
2.5
4EIO
I,
460
,
440
I
42
I
=507 F
TI
1.4
1.8
2.2
2.6 @K-'
10-l
l/T-
Fig. 35. Al. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature from 26A1tracer measurements [62L] (open circles), from the TEM observation ofvoid
shrinkage [68v] (triangles), and from NMR measurements
[74M] (full circles).
pf
,o-l:
I
~ IO"
10.1"
lo-"
Fig. 37. Tl. Semilogarithmicplot of the self-diffusion coefti- b

cients vs. reciprocal temperature from 04T1 tracer measurements in bet a-T1 parallel (full circles) and perpendicular
(open circles) to the tetragonal axis [55S], bee S-T1[55S] (full
triangles) and [85C] (open triangles).
Landolt-Biknstein
New Series III/26
10-l';
!.2
l/T-
.,O-3K- :
78
10-1'3
ow,4
I 540
I K ,I520 II500
060
10-16
480
I,
460
I ,
440
I ,
[Ref. p. 81
600 K 560 550 520 500 480 &60
lTl/S
DL
I
6.10-
1.8
1.9
2.0
23
2.2
2.3WK2.1
l/T Fig. 38. Sn. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticients parallel (full symbols) and perpendicular (open symbols) to the tetragonal axis vs. reciprocal temperature from
%n tracer measurements [60M] (squares), [64C] (circles)
and [7482] (triangles).
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
l/l-
2.1 .lO-K- 2.3
Fig. 39. Pb. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefkicnt vs. reciprocal temperature from rOPb tracer measurements [55N] (full circles), [61R] (triangles) and [69M] (open
circles).
350
I
J++l 1:
1
tt
l-19
11
10-2s
o-52
1
++,
1.05
1.15
1.20
l/1 -
b
i
10-ZI
I
4,
IdI
DL
1.10
(+
10-22
.IO -16
tt
1.25
-10-s
K- 1.35
Fig. 40. Sb. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (full circles) and
perpendicular (open circles) to the trigonal c axis from 124Sb
tracer measurements[66C].
1o-23
2.00
2.15
2.30
2.45
l/7-
2.60
7
++t
~. .
-lO-K- 2.90
Fig. 41. Se. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (full triangles) and
perpendicular (open triangles) to the trigonal taxis from
75Setracer measurements [70B] and values parallel to the
trigonal axis (circles) from NMR measurements[SSG].
Land&-BBmstein
New series III/26
Ref. p. 811

C-T
-T
600
I
'I
,o-,4 700 K 650

AI 1'
550
500
I
1O-15
m2/s
1150 K
1100
1000
1050
10-1'6
I
a
lo-17ai
I
Q
.
0. .
1019
l
Dll
0,
4.10~'81
0.85
0 .
0
10-m
10-2'
1.4
1.00 .10-3K' 1.05
0.95
l/T-
Fig. 43. Th. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficient in fee u-Th vs. reciprocal temperature from *Th
tracer measurements [67S].
-T
2.1
10-g
Fig. 42. Te. Semilogarithmicplot ofthe self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (full symbols) and
perpendicular (open symbols) to the trigonal c axis according
to 127mTetracer measurements [67G] (squares) and [83W3]
(circles).
m2/s
lo-"0
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1/r -
1.9
.@K'
C-T
10-l'
0.90
1400 K
1200 1100
1000
900 800K 700
600
400
500
10-l'
lo-l2
900
m2/s
I 1o-l3
10-12
~ lo-l4
lo-l5
lo-l6
lo-'7
lo-'8
lo-l6
1o-l7
0.6
IO9
0
0
0
0.7
0.8
0.9
l/T-
1.0
.,o-3K'
1.2
Fig. 44. U. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coeffr:ients vs. reciprocal temperature from 234U and 235U tracer
neasurementsin orthorhombic CL-Upolycrystals [62A] (open
:ircles); tetragonal S-U polycrystals [59A2] (full triangles);
act y-U [59Al] (open triangles) and [60R2] (full circles).
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
10-20
0.8
1.1
1.4
1.7
2.0
.,O-3,(-l
l/TFig. 45. Pu. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefficients vs. reciprocal temperature from Pu tracer measurements in monoclinic S-Pu polycrystals [78w] (open circles);
orthorhomic face centered y-Pu polycrystals [78w] (open circles); fee 6-Pu [78w] (open circles), and [64T] (open triangles); bet 6-Pu [78w] (open circles); bee E-PU [68D2] (full
triangles), [71C2] (full circles) and [78w] (open circles).
[Ref. p. 81
80
lo-0
m2/s
lo-
10-u
1o-l3
lo-&
1P
~I 10-15
10-6
I
~ lo-
10-16
lo-8
10-l
lo-9
10-18
10-m
10-19
10-Z
10-20
1.0
lo-l::
I\
1
I\
I c>r*g I
I
I
1 Pb 1
I
I
250
1, /l Fig. 46. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion cocfficients vs. reciprocal temperature normalized to the melting
tempcraturcs T, for several fee metals.
1.2
1.4
1,/r -
1.6
1.8
2.0
Fig. 47. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coeflicicnts vs. reciprocal temperature normalized to the melting
tempcraturcs T, for several bee metals or metals with bee
high-temperature phases [87K2].
Fig. 48. Semilogarithmic plot of the self-diffusion coefticicnts vs. reciprocal temperature normalized to the melting
temperatures T, for some bee high-temperature phases including lanthanides and actinides [87K2].
Landok-BBmstei
Ne\v Series 11112
81

52N
53s
55H
55N
55s
55w
56H
56s
57K
57M
58M
59Al
59A2
59B
59D
59M
59N
60Bl
60B2
60M
60Rl
60R2
61B
61D
61K
61R
62A
62C
62Hl
62H2
62L
62P
63A
63B
63D
63F
63L
64C
64H
64Ml
64M2
64N
64P
64T
65Al
65A2
65B
65D
65Gl
6562
65Hl
65H2
65Ll
65L2
Nachtrieb, N.H., Catalano, E., Weil, J.A.: J. Chem. Phys. 20 (1952) l;85.
Shirn, G.A., Wajda, E.S., Huntington, H.B.: Acta Metall. 1 (1953) 513.
Holcomb, D.E, Norberg, R.E.: Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 1074.
Nachtrieb, N.H., Handler, G.S.: J. Chem. Phys. 23 (1955) 1569.
Shirn, G.A.: Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 87.
Wajda, E.S., Shirn, G.A., Huntington, H.B.: Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 39.
Hoffmann, R.E., Pikus, IX, Ward, R.A.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 206 (1956) 483.
Shewmon, P.G.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 206 (1956) 918.
Kidson, G.E, Ross, R.: Proc. UNESCO Int. Conf. Radioisotopes in Sci. Res., Ist, Paris 1957, p. 185.
Makin, S.M., Rowe, A.D., Le Claire, A.D.: Proc. Phys. Sot. (London) B70 (1957) 545.
Masuda, Y;: J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 13 (1958) 597.
Adda, Y, Kirianenko, A.: J. Nucl. Mater. 1 (1959) 120.
Adda, Y, Kirianenko, A., Mairy, C.: J. Nucl. Mater. 3 (1959) 300.
Borisov, YR, Gruzin, P.L., Pavlinov, L.V, Fedorov, G.B.: Metall. Metalloved. 1 (1959) 213.
Dickey, J.E.: Acta Metall. 7 (1959) 350.
MacEvan, JR., MacEvan, J.U., Yaffe, L.: Can. J. Chem. 37 (1959) 1623.
Naumov, A.N., Ryskin, G.y Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys. 4 (1959) 162.
Borg, R.J., Birchenall, C.E.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 218 (1960) 980.
Bronfin, M.B., Bokshtein, S.Z., Zhukhovitsky, A.A.: Zavod. Lab. 26 (1960) 828; Ind. Lab. (English
Transl.) 26 (1960) 886.
Meakin, J.D., Klokholm, E.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 218 (1960) 463.
Resnick, R., Castleman, L.S.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 218 (1960) 307.
Rothman, S.J.,Lloyd, L.T., Harkness, A.L.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 218 (1960) 605.
Buflington, ES., Hirano, K.I., Cohen, M.: Acta Metall. 9 (1961) 434.
Von Danneberg, W, Krautz, E.: Z. Naturforsch. 16a (1961) 854.
Kidson, G.V, McGurn, .I: Can. J. Phys. 39 (1961) 1146.
Resing, H.A., Nachtrieb, N.H.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 21 (1961) 40.
Adda, Y, Kirianenko, A.: J. Nucl. Mater. 6 (1962) 130.
Cattaneo, F., Germagnoli, E.: Philos. Mag. 7 (1962) 1373.
Hagel, WC.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 224 (1962) 430.
Hirano, K.I., Agarwala, R.P., Averback, B.L., Cohen, M.: J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 3049.
Lundy, TX, Murdock, J.E: J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 1671.
Peart, RI?, Graham, D., Tomlin, D.H.: Acta Metall. 10 (1962) 519.
Askill, J., Tomlin, D.H.: Philos. Mag. 8 (1963) 997.
Borg, R.J., Lai, D.Y.E, Krikorian, 0.: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 867.
Duhl, D., Hirano, K.-I., Cohen, M.: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 1.
Federer, J.I., Lundy, IS.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 227 (1963) 592.
Libatini, C.M., Dyment, I?: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 1263.
Coston, C., Nachtrieb, N.H.: J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) 2219.
Huntington, H.B., Ghate, P.B., Rosolowski, J.H.: J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1964) 3027.
Monma, K., Suto, H., Oikawa, H.: J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 28 (1964) 188.
Murdock, J.E, Lundy, T.S., Stansbury, E.E.: Acta Metall. 12 (1964) 1033.
Noimann, Kh., Kloze, G., Sokolskaya, I.L.: Sov. Phys. Solid State (Engl. Transl.) 6 (1964) 1369.
Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Rev. A 136 (1964) 568.
Tate, R.E., Cramer, E.M.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 230 (1964) 639.
Alion, D.C., Slichter, C.P.: Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) 235.
Andelin, R.L., Knight, J.D., Kahn, M.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 19.
Bonanno, ER., Tomizuka, CT.: Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) 1264.
Dickerson, R.H., Lowell, R.C., Tomizuka, C.T.: Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) 613.
Gainotti, A., Zecchina, L.: Nuovo Cimento 40B (1965) 295.
Gilder, H.M., Lazarus, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 2081.
Hassner, A., Lange, W: Phys. Status Solidi 8 (1965) 77.
Hassner, A., Hassner, R.: Phys. Status Solidi 11 (1965) 575.
Lundy, TS., McHargue, C.J.:Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 243.
Lundy, TS., Winslow, ER., Pawel, R.E., McHargue, C.J.:Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 1533.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
82

1
65Pl
65P2
65Wl
65W2
66C
66D
6611
6612
665
66M
67A
67B
67G
67H
67M
67P
67s
68Bl
68B2
68C
68Dl
68D2
68F
68H
68K
68Pl
68P2
68V
68Wl
68W2
69A
69B
69Dl
69D2
69E
69G
69M
69P
69Rl
69R2
70B
70Gl
70G2
7OL
70R
70s
71A
7lCl
71C2
71D
71F
71Ml
7lM2
710
72C
Pawel, R.E., Lundy, T.S.:J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 937.

Peat-t, RI? J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 1853.
Wazzan, A.R.: J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1965) 3596.
Winslow, ER., Lundy, IS.: Trans. Metal!. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 1790.
Cordes, H., Kim, K.: J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 2181.
Dupouy, J.M., Mathie, J., Adda, Y: Mem. Sci. Rev. Metall. 63 (1966) 481.
Ivantsov, I.G.: Fiz. Metal. Metalloved. 22 (1966) 725, Phys. Met. Metallogr. USSR (English Transl.)
5 (1966) 77.
Ivantsov, I.G., Blinkin, A.M.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 22 (1966) 876.
James,D.W, Leak, G.M.: Philos. Mag. 14 (1966) 701.
Mundy, J.N., Barr, L.W, Smith, EA.: Philos. Mag. 14 (1966) 785.
Apel, K., Hantzsch, S., Preshu, K.E.: Z. Metallkd. 58 (1967) 401.
Batra, A.P.: Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 487.
Ghoshtagore, R.N.: Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 598.
Hirschwald, W., Schroedter, W: Z. Phys. Chem. NE 53 (1967) 392.
Mundy, J.N., Barr, L.W., Smith, EA.: Philos. Mag. 15 (1967) 411.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.:Phys. Rev. 163 (1967) 645.
Schmitz, E, Fock, M.: J. Nucl. Mater. 21 (1967) 317.
Bakker, H.: Phys. Status Solidi 28 (1968) 569.
Beyeler, M., Adda, Y: J. Phys. (Paris) 29 [4] (1968) 345.
Carter, AC., Wilson, C.G.: Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 1 (1968) 515.
Dyment, E, Libatini, C.M.: J. Mater. Sci. 3 (1968) 349.
Dupouy, M., Calais, D.: Trans. Metall. Sot. AIME 242 (1968) 1679.
Fedorov, G.B., Smirnov, E.A., Moiseenko, S.S.:Metall. Metalloved. Chist. Met. 7 (1968) 124.
Heumann, Th., Imm, R.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29 (1968) 1613.
Kaygorodov, XN., Klotsman, S.M., Timofeev, A.N., Trakhtenberg, I.Sh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 25
(1968) 910.
Pavlinov, L.V, Gladyshev, A.M., Bykov, XN.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 26 (1968) 823.
Pavlinov, L.V, Grigorev, G.X, Sevastianov, VG.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 25 (1968) 565.
Volin, TE., Balluffi, R.W: Phys. Status Solidi 25 (1968) 163.
Walsiie de Reca, N.E., Libatini, C.M.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 1297.
Walter, C.M., Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Rev. 178 (1968) 922.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Sohdi 33 (1969) K 105.
Bowden, H.G., Balluffi, R.W.: Philos. Mag. 19 (1969) 1001.
Dariel, M.P., Erez, G., Schmidt, G.M.J.: Philos. Mag. 19 (1969) 1045.
El-Hanany, U., Zamir, D.: Phys. Rev. 183 (1969) 809.
Graham, D.: J. Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 2386.
Miller, J.W: Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 1095.
Pawel, R.E., Lundy, TS.: Acta Metall. 17 (1969) 979.
Rothman, S.J.,Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Status Solidi 35 (1969) 305.
Rupp, W!, Ermert, U., Sizmann, R.: Phys. Status Solidi 33 [2] (1969) 504.
Briitter, P., Gobrecht, H.: Phys. Status Solidi 37 (1970) 869.
Gorny, D.S., Altovskii, R.M.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 30 (1970) 85.
Graham, D., Hanes, E.R.: NASA Technical Note D 5905,NASA, Washington D.C. 1970,unpublished.
Lodding, A., Mundy, J.N., Ott, A.: Phys. Status Solidi 38 (1970) 559.
Rothmann, S.J.,Peterson, N.L., Robinson, J.T.:Phys. Status Solidi 39 (1970) 635.
Shalayev, VI., Tkachenko, LB., Pavlov, VA., Timofeyev, N.I., Gushchina, A.V: Fiz. Metal.
Metalloved. 39 (1970) 1061.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 8 (1971) 587.
Combronde, J., Brebec, G.: Acta Metall. 19 (1971) 1393.
Cornet, J.A.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32 (1971) 1489.
Dariel, M.P., Dayan, D., Languille, A.: Phys. Rev. B4 (1971) 4348.
Fradin, EY: PhD Thesis, University of Illinois;1971.
Mundy, J.N.: Phys. Rev. B3 (1971) 2431.
Mundy, J.N., Miller, T.E., Porte, R.J.: Phys. Rev. B3 (1971) 2445.
Ott, A., Norden-Ott, A.: J. Appl. Phys. 42 (1971) 3745.
Chhabildas, L.C., Gilder, H.M.: Phys. Rev. B5 (1972) 2135.
Landolt-BBmsteil
New Series III/26

72D
72M
72R
72s
72T
73B
73D
73H
73Ll
73L2
73w
74B
74F
74Hl
74H2
74Ll
74L2
74M
74P
74w
75B
75F
74L3
75M
76F
76Ml
76M2
76M3
76M4
77Al
77A2
77F
77H
77M
78Bl
78B2
78El
78Hl
78M
78R
78W
79A
79B
79H
79K
79Ml
79M2
79P
80B
80D
80G
81B
83
Davis, R.E., McMullen, WD.: Acta Metall. 20 (1972) 593.

Mao, C.: Phys. Rev. B5 (1972) 4693.
Reimers, P., Bartdorff, D.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 50 [I] (1972) 305.
Spedding, EH., Shiba, K.: J. Chem. Phys. 57 (1972) 612.
Titman, J.M., Moores, B.M.: J. Phys. F 2 (1972) 592.
Buescher, B.J.,Gilder, H.M., Shea, N.: Phys. Rev. B7 (1973) 2261.
Dariel, M.P.: Philos. Mag. 28 (1973) 915.
Hultgren, R., Desai, ED., Hawkins, D.T, Gleiser, M., Kelley, K.K., Wagman, D.D.: Selected Values
of the Thermodynamic Properties of the Elements. Metals Park, Ohio: American Society for Metals,
1973.
Lam, N.Q., Rothman, S.J.,Mehrer, H., Nowicki, L.J.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 57 (1973) 225.
Languille, A., Dariel, M.P., Calais, D., Coqblin, B.: Mem. Sci. Rev. Metall. 70 (1973) 241.
Weithase, M., Noack, E: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 57 (1973) Klll.
Backus, J.G.E.M., Bakker, H., Mehrer, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 64 (1974) 151.
Fromont, M., Languille, A., Calais, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35 (1974) 1367.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.:Acta Metall. 22 (1974) 459.
Huang, EH., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B9 (1974) 1479.
Lam, N.Q., Rothman, S.J.,Nowicki, L.J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 23 (1974) K35.
Languille, A., Calais, D., Fromont, M.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35 (1974) 1373.
Messer, R., Dais, S., Wolf, D., in: Proc. 18th Ampere Congress, Allen, P.S.,Andrew, E.R., Bates, C.A.
(eds.).Nottingham, England, 1974.
Pelleg, J.: Philos. Mag. 29 (1974) 383.
Weithase, M., Noack, E: Z. Phys. 270 (1974) 319.
Bronfin, M.B., Bulatov, G.S., Drugova, I.A.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 40 [2] (1975) 363.
Fromont, M.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 36 (1975) 1397.
Languille, A., Calais, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35 (1974) 1461.
Messer, R., Noack, E: Appl. Phys. 6 (1975) 79.
Feller-Kniepmeier, M., Griindler, M., Helfmeier, H.: Z. Metallkd. 67 [8] (1976) 533.
Maier, K., Mehrer, H., Lessmann, E., Schiile, W: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 78 (1976) 689.
Marbach, G., Fromont, M., Calais, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 37 (1976) 689.
Messer, R.: Magnetic Resonanceand Related Phenomena, Proc. 19th Congress Ampere, Heidelberg,
Brunner, H. (ed.) (Heidelberg, Groupement Ampere) 1976, p. 269.
Mundy, J.N., Tse, C.W, McFall, WD.: Phys. Rev. B13 (1976) 2349.
Ablitzer, D.: Philos. Mag. 35 (1977) 1239.
Arkhipova, N.K., Klotsman, SM., Rabovskiy, A., Timofeev, A.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 43 (1977)
779; Phys. Met. Metallogr. USSR (English Transl.) 43 (4) (1977) 88.
Fromont, M., Marbach, G.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 38 (1977) 27.
Hettich, G., Mehrer, H., Maier, K.: Ser. Metall. 11 (1977) 795.
Maier, K.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 44 (1977) 567.
Bartdorff, D., Neumann, G., Reimers, P.: Philos Mag. 38 (1978) 157.
Bihr, J., Mehrer, H., Maier, K.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 50 (1978) 17.
Einziger, R.E., Mundy, J.N., Hoff, H.A.: Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 440.
Herzig, Ch., Eckseler, H., Bussmann, W, Cardis, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 69/70 (1978) 61.
Mundy, J.N., Rothman, S.J.,Lam, N.Q., Hoff, H.A., Nowicki, L.J.: Phys. Rev. B18 (1978) 6566.
Rein, G., Mehrer, H., Maier, K.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 45 (1978) 253.
Wade, WZ., Short, D.W, Walden, J.C., Magana, J.W: Metall. Trans. 9A (1978) 965.
Ait-Salam, M., Springer, T, Heidemann, A., Alefeld, B.: Philos. Mag. A39 (1979) 797.
Bussmann, W, Herzig, Ch., Rempp, W, Maier, K., Mehrer, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 56 (1979) 87.
Herzig, Ch., Eckseler, H.: Z. Metallkd. 70 (1979) 215.
Krautheim, G., Neidhardt, A., Reinhold, U., Zehe, A.: Krist. Tech. 14 (1979) 1491.
Macht, M.P., Frohberg, G., Wever, H.: Z. Metallkd. 70 (1979) 209.
Maier, K., Mehrer, H., Rein, G.: Z. Metallkd. 70 (1979) 271.
Pontau, A.E., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. B19 (1979) 4027.
Briinger, G., Kanert, O., Wolf, D.: Phys. Rev. B22 (1980) 4247.
Dyment, E, in: Titanium 80, Kimura, H., Izumi, O., (eds.)Proc. 46th Int. Conf. on Titanium, Kyoto,
Japan, 1980, p. 519.
Giiltz, G., Heidemann, A., Mehrer, H., Seeger,A., Wolf, D.: Philos. Mag. A41 (1980) 723.
Bussmann, W, Herzig, Ch., Hoff, H.A., Mundy, J.N.: Phys. Rev. B 23 (1981) 6216.
.andolt-Biimstein
lew Series III/26
84
31G
31M
91P
81T
52F
82H
B2P
B2R
B3A
B3Gl
B3G2
B3Sl
83S2
63V
83Wl
83W2
83W3
84A
84H
8%
85G
85Hl
85H2
86A
87D
87G
87Kl
87K2
881
88L
89L
89M
9OL
Gunther, B., Kanert, O., Mehring, M., Wolf, D.: Phys. Rev. B24 (1981) 6747.
Mundy, J.N., Hoff, H.A., Pelleg, J., Rothman, S.J.,Nowicki, L.J., Schmidt, EA.: Phys. Rev. B24 (1981)
658.
Patil, R.X, Tiwari, G.P., Sharma, B.D.: Philos. Mag. A 44 (1981) 717.
Tiers, J.E, Chabre, Y: J. Phys. E 11 (1981) 1943.
Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.I., in: Proc. of Yamada Vth Conf. on Point Defects and Defect Interactions
in Metals, Takamura, J.I., Doyama, M., Kiritani, M., (eds.).Univ. of Tokyo Press 1982, p. 554.
Herzig, Ch., Manke, L., Bussman, W, in: Proc. of Yamada Vth Conf. on Point Defects and Defect
Interactions in Metals, Takamura, J.I., Doyama, M., Kiritani, M., (eds.).Univ. of Tokyo Press, 1982,
p. 578.
Pruthi, D.D., Agarwala, R.P.: Philos. Mag. A 46 (1982) 841.
Rein, G., Mehrer, H.: Philos. Mag. A45 [3] (1982) 467.
Ablitzer, D., Haeussler, J.P.,Sathyaraj, K.X: Philos. Mag. A47 (1983) 515.
Gunther, B., Kanert, 0.: Acta Metal!. 31 (1983) 909.
Gfinther, B., Kanert, O., Wolf, D.: Solid State Commun. 47 (1983) 409.
Smithells, L.J.: Smithells Metals Reference Book (6th Edition), Brandes, E.A.J., (ed.). Washington:
Butterworths, 1983.
Serruys, Y, Brebec, G., in: DIMETA 82, Proc. Int. Conf. on Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, Tihany,
1982, Kedves, EJ., Beke, D.L., (eds.).Trans. Tech. Publication, Switzerland, 1983, p. 351.
Vladimirov, A.B., Kaigorodov, VN., Klotsman, SM., Tracktenberg, I.S., in: DIMETA 82, Proc. Int.
Conf. on Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, Tihany, 1982, Kedves, EJ., Beke, D.L., (eds.).Trans. Tech.
Publication, Switzerland, 1983, p. 338.
Weiler, D., Maier, K., Mehrer, H. in: DIMETA 82, Proc. Int. Conf. on Diffusion in Metals and Alloys,
Tihany, 1982, Kedves, EJ., Beke, D.L., (eds.).Trans. Tech. Publication, Switzerland, 1983, p. 342.
Werner, M., Mehrer, H.: in DIMETA 82, Proc. Int. Conf. on Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, Tihany,
1982, Kedves, EJ., Beke, D.L., (eds.).Trans. Tech. Publication, Switzerland, 1983, p. 393.
Werner, M., Mehrer, H., Siethoff, H.: J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 16 (1983) 6185.
Arkhipova, N.K., Klotsman, S.M., Polikarpova, I.P., Tatrinova, G.N., Timofeev, A.N., Veretennikov,
L.M.: Phys. Rev. B30 (1984) 1788.
Horvath, J., Dyment, E, Mehrer, H.: J. Nucl. Mater. 126 (1984) 206.
Chiron, R., Faivre, G.: Philos. Mag. A51 (1985) 865.
Gunther, B., Kanert, 0.: Phys. Rev. B31 (1985) 20.
Heitjans, P., Kiirblein, A., Ackermann, H., Dubbers, D., Fujiwara, E, Stockmann, H.J.: J. Phys. F 15
(1985) 41.
Hood, G., in: Solute-Defect Interaction - Theory and Experiment, Saimoto, S., Purdy, G.R.,
Kidson, G.V, (eds.),Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1985, p. 83.
Arkhipova, N.K., Klotsman, S.M., Polikarpova, I.P, Timofeev, A.N., Shepatkovskii, P.: Fiz. Met.
Metalloved. 62 (1986) 1882 (in Russian).
Dais, S., Messer, R., Seeger,A.: Mat. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 419.
Geise, J., Herzig, C.: Z. Metallkd. 78 (1987) 291.
Kohler, U., Herzig, Ch.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 144 (1987) 243.
Kiihler, U.: PhD Thesis, University of Miinster, 1987.
Iijima, Y, Kimura, K., Hirano, K.: Acta Metall. 36 (1988) 2811.
Lee, Ch.G., Iijiama, Y, Hirano, K.: The Ninth Japan Symposium Thermophysical Properties, i988,
p. 1.
Landolt-Bornstein, NS, Vol. III/22 b: Semiconductors. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer, 1989.
Mehrer, H., Ltibbehusen, M.: Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 591.
Liibbehusen, M., Mehrer, H.: Acta Metall., in press.
3.1 Introduction
85
3 Diffusion of impurities in solid metallic elements

3.1 Introduction
By impurity diffusion is meant the diffusion of a solute element present in such low concentrations in a
solvent (matrix) that the solute atoms may be regarded as diffusing quite independently of one another, i.e. with
Ino mutual interaction. It represents the very simplest type of binary diffusion and so is of particular interest
as being the most likely to be amenable to theoretical understanding. For this reason very considerable
,experimental effort has been devoted over the last thirty or forty years to systematic measurementsof impurity
,diffusion in metals of all types.
Impurity diffusion in metals usually occurs by a vacancy mechanism (see 1.5.3). The same is true for
self-diffusion of the matrix metal. Depending on the interaction between solute atom and vacancy the impurity
,diffusion coefficient will be either larger or smaller than the self-diffusion coefficient (seechapter 2). However,
in a temperature range between 2/3 T, and T, (T, = melting temperature of the matrix metal) the difference
;between impurity and self-diffusion coefficient will usually not exceed one to two orders of magnitude as long
as solute and self-atoms migrate via the same diffusion vehicle.
Some solute atoms show anomalous fast diffusion. For fast diffusors the impurity diffusion coefficient
texceedsthe self-diffusion coefficient by several orders of magnitude. Fast diffusing solutes usually have a low
solubility in the matrix crystal as well. The phenomenon of fast diffusion has been observed mainly for
1polyvalent matrix metals like Pb, Sn, In, Tl, titanium and vanadium group metals and to some extent for alkali
1metals. Many solutes in Si and Ge are also fast diffusors. However, in this chapter diffusion data are compiled
iFormetallic matrices only.
It is commonly agreed that a low ratio between the atomic radii of solute and matrix atoms is favourable
jibr fast diffusion and that this phenomenon is basically due to rapid transport of solute atoms via interstitial
:rites of the matrix crystal. However, the question whether this rapid transport occurs via a pure interstitial
Ivzechanism (see 1.5.1) or a interstitial-substitutional
exchange mechanism (see 1.5.6) has been resolved only for
7very few solute-matrix combinations.
3.1.1 Methods of measurement

The advent of readily available radioactive isotopes just after the war made it possible for the first time to
aork with solute concentrations low enough to satisfy completely the conditions for true impurity diffusion,
;or extremely small concentrations of radioactive isotopes are accurately measurable. For this reason too the
i deal method of measurementwith radioactive isotopes is the thin layer method (see1.6.1.2.1),for the condition
1;hat the thickness h 6 (D t)1/2 is very readily satisfied; extremely thin layers frequently suffice, often only a few
I:ens of atoms thick.
The thin layer method with serial sectioning and measurement of the activity of each section is quite the
(:ommonest method employed, the diffusion coefficient D being calculated from equation (1.I 1). Alternative
I procedures are to use the residual activity (Gruzin-Seibel) method or the surface decreasemethod. For
reasons outlined in 1.6.1.2.1, these two methods are generally regarded as less reliable, although the residual
activity method is capable of comparable accuracy when the emitted radiation is of low energy so that the
integrated activity from below the surface becomes negligible. The surface decreasemethod is rarely used
nowadays.
Methods of sectioning and analysis for the thin layer methods are reviewed in 1.6.1.2.1. Either mechanical
serial sectioning techniques (lathe sectioning, grinder sectioning, microtome sectioning) or microsectioning
techniques (sputter sectioning, anodic stripping, . . .) may be used. Occasionally, penetration profiles follow, and
are then analysed in terms of, equation (1.14) rather than equation (1.11); this is when the diffusant solubility
is so small that the surface concentration remains at its maximum (solubility) value for the whole of the
diffusion anneal. This solubility can then also be determined from the measurements. When the surface
concentration maintains its maximum saturation value for only part of the anneal time, measurementsmay be
analysed by a solution due to Malkovitch (Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 15 (1963) 880).
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
3.1 Introduction
86
Sometimesnon-radioactive diffusants are employed, either with the thin-layer method or, occasionally, with
diffusion couple or in- or out-diffusion methods. Sufficiently sensitive methods of chemical analysis are then
needed becauseof the necessarily very low concentrations; electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), secondary
ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), scanning laser mass spectroscopy (SLMS), spark source mass spectroscopy
(SSMS), Rutherford back scattering (RBS) and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) are among methods that can
be employed. Electrical resistivity measurementsand X-ray diffraction methods (see1.6.1.2.3) provide another
means of monitoring concentration changes and occasionally have been used to determine impurity diffusion
coefficients.
Apart from one or two measurementsby the Mijssbauer effect, indirect methods, (see1.6.2) have found
little or no application to substitutional solute impurity diffusion, with which this chapter is principally
concerned. This is in marked contrast with the diffusion of the interstitial solutes C, N, 0 and H dealt with in
chapters 8 and 9.
3.1.2 Use of tables and figures

In this chapter impurity diffusion data are compiled in tables and figures according to the positions of the
nrorrix metals in the periodic table in the following order:
alkali group metals,
alkaline earth group metals,
scandium group metals,
rare earth metals,
titanium group metals,
vanadium group metals,
chromium group metals,
manganesegroup metals,
iron group metals,
cobalt group metals,
nickel group metals,
noble metals,
zinc group metals,
aluminum group metals,
group IV B metals,
group VB (semi) metals,
actinide group metals
This order of matrix elements is the same as in chapter 2 on self-diffusion. Within the table that refers to
a given matrix metal the data for solute elements are compiled according to the same order of elements.
The matrix metal can be found on top of the pertaining table. The solute element can be found in the column
Sohrte of the table.
Diffusion data are reported whenever possible in terms of thepre-exponenfiulfaclor Do (secondcolumn) and
the nclhafion enfhnby Q (third column) introduced in equation (1SO) of the General introduction. Occasionally, diffusion coefficients have been listed in these two columns. This procedure was chosen whenever the
original data did not justify an analysis in terms of equation (1.50). Possible reasons could be either too few
data points or physically significant deviations from equation (1.50) already discussed in section 1.8. An
example is diffusion in u-iron: When diffusion is studied over a wide enough temperature range the magnetic
transition causes significant deviations from a simple Arrhenius behaviour. Occasionally curved Arrhenius
diagrams were analyzed in terms of a sum of two Arrhenius terms. In these casesblanks occur in the Do and
Q columns and the result of the two-exponential tit is listed in the Method/Remarks column (seebelow).
The temperature range quoted is the range over which measurementswere made and used by the author(s)
to calculate the quoted values of Do and Q. Extrapolation too far outside this range may not in somecasesgive
reliable diffusion coefficients.
For imitlxinl matrix metals Do and Q values are given for diffusion parallel (II) and perpendicular (I) to the
crystal axis whenever experiments on single crystals of different orientation were performed. The orientation
will be indicated in the Do column of the table.
For matrh met& with allotropic transformations Do and Q values are listed for the various crystal structures.
Either diffusion data are collected separately (like e.g. in the case of cr-Ti and I%Ti) or the modification is
indicated by a corresponding remark (e.g. y-Fe or S-Fe) in the Temperature range column.
Le Claire
3.1 Introduction
87
The column Method/Remarks usually contains the following information:

(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
The experimental method is briefly characterized:

- Thin layer methods
If a thin layer method together with a radioactive diffusant was used the diffusant is stated together with
its mass number.
If concentration-depth curves were determined by serial sectioning and counting the sectioning technique is stated.
If the residual activity method or the surface decreasemethod was employed together with radioactive
diffusants this is stated by the remark residual activity or surface decrease.
If a thin layer method is used together with non-radioactive diffusants the diffusing element is stated
without mass number. The technique for the concentration-depth curve measurement (e.g., electron
microprobe analysis, SIMS, . . .) is stated.
- Diffusion couple methods
or in- and out-diffusion methods or indirect methods are specified in tables.
The statement polycrystal or single crystal is employed to indicate the microstructure of the material.
The nominal purity of the material will be stated.
Appropriate additional information on the method, additional information contained in the paper and
remarks about the reliability of the quoted results may be added in the Method/Remarks column.
When a curved Arrhenius plot has been analyzed by the sum of two exponentials according to equation
(l.Sl), the pre-exponential factors 0: and 0; and the activation enthalpies Q, and Q, are tabulated in the
Method/Remarks column.
Very occasionally the various forms in which results are reported in a paper (tabulated, graphical, in text
etc.) may be found to be incompatible with one another. Careful assessmentof the data has usually made
possible identification of what is most likely the most correct result. It is stated explicitly where this has
been necessary.
Central to the present chapter are the tables. From the tables references are made to the figures. Selected
data have been plotted in the figures as indicated in the column Figure (Fig.).
In the figures of sections 3.2.1 to 3.2.9 and 3.2.16 (sections treated by A.D. Le Claire) the temperature ranges
of the D values shown in the figures agreewith those of the temperature range given in the tables. In most figures
of sections 3.2.10 to 3.2.15 (sections treated by G. Neumann) Arrhenius lines are shown over a temperature
range of typically 213 T, to T,. This temperature range is not identical with the temperature range over which
the measurements were performed. The temperature range of measurements can be found in the tables.
In most figures self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison. In most figures melting
temperatures of the matrix metals and, if necessary,allotropic transformation temperatures have been indicated.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
88
3.2.1 Impurity diffusion in alkali metals
[Ref. p. 203
3.2 The impurity diffusion tables

Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-r
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Fr
Matrix:
lithium (Li)
Li
seechapter 2 on self-diffusion
132
Na
0.41
52.80
325...449
67Ml
0.44
52.02*
317..,435
22Na*
polyciystals;
99.8 %;
microtome sectioning
22Na;
polycrystals;
microtome sectioning;
diffusion in 7Li and 6Li studied;
* Do and Q for 7Li estimated
from graphical data by present
authors
22Na, 24Na;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
isotope effect also determined
71Ll
73Ml
6901
73M2
6801
73Ml
6802
,cu
Ag
Au
D = l.16~10-11 m2sV1
423
0.047 *
38.60*
323...394
0.3
41.87
362...420
0.37
53.72
340...434
0.54
53.72
323 . ..423
0.21
46.01
319...426
64Cu;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
* values reassessedby present
authors
64Cu;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
penetration plots curved Malkovitch solution
1om&;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
losAgt lomAgi
polycrystals;
99.98%;
isotope effect also determined
195Au;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
(continued)
Le Claire
Land&-BCmslein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
89
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
95AU.
polyc&tals
7103
Matrix: lithium (Li), continued

0.10
43.47
300...441
0.141
44.93
300**.441
Zn
0.57
54.34
330...446
65Zn.
polycrystals;
99.98%;
69Ml
Cd
0.62
62.80
355...449
115mC4
polycrystals;
99.98% ;
7001
Hg
1.04
59.37
331...447
03Hg;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
7001
Ga
0.21
54.05
389...447
72Ga;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
7001
In
0.39
66.44
348s.. 443
114mIn;
6803
Au
of 95 % 6Li;
lg5Au:
2, 3
polycrystals of 92.5 % Li;
separate Arrhenius terms for
300...359 K:
Do = 8.5. 10m6m2 s-l;
Q = 42.83 kJmol-;
371...441 K:
Do = 0.24. 10m4m2 s-l;
Q = 46.52 kJmol- (seeFig. 3)
polycrystals;
99.95%;
Sn
0.62
66.32*
380...447
Sn (radioisotope not specified);

polycrystals;
99.95%;
authors
6902
Pb
1.6. IO4
105.5*
401 .*. 443
Pb (radioisotope not specified);

polycrystals;
99.95% ;
authors
6902
Land&-Bknstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
90
Solute

Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 20
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: lithium (Li), continued

Sb
1.6. 1012
173.8*
413 . ..449
Sb (radioisotope not specified);

polycrystals;
99.95%;
authors
6902
Bi
5.3 . 104
198.0*
413...450
Bi (radioisotope not specified);

polycrystals;
99.95% ;
authors
6902
Matrix: sodium (Na)

Na
Li
1.8
49.1
291...358
64Nl
297...353
6Li, Li;
polycrystals;
diffusion couple method;
microtome sectioning and mass
spectroscopy
6Li;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
83Bl
0.08
35.29
273...365
42~.
67Bl
poly&ystals;
99.95%;
Rb
0.15
35.55
272..-359
s6Rb;
polycrystals;
99.95%
67Bl
Ag
0.02
21.39
298..-351
1omAg.
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
83Bl
Au
3.34. 10-4
9.25
274...350
=Au;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
solubility determined from the
erfc-profile :
c, = 540 exp (- 47.0 kJ/RT)
69Bl
Le Claire
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Matrix:
3.2.2 Impurity diffusion in alkaline earth metals
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
273...363
%Zd;
polycrystals;
91
Fig.
Ref.
sodium (Na), continued
Cd
0.37
40.86
83Bl
99.95 % ;
In
1.79
48.73
293...363
l141n;
polycrystals;
83Bl
99.95 %;
Tl
0.52
42.62
297...356
204Tl.
83Bl
poly&stals;
99.95 % ;
Sn
0.54
43.92
316 ... 363
l13Sn;
polycrystals;
83Bl
99.95 %;
Matrix:
potassium (IL)
Na
0.058
31.19
273...335
22Na*
polyciystals;
67Bl
99.95 % ;
Rb
0.09
36.76
273...333
(jRb;
polycrystals;
69Sl
99.95 % ;
Au
1.29. lO-3
13.52
279...326
lg8Au;
polycrystals;
7OSl
99.95 %;
(erfc and Malkovitch solutions)
Matrix:
rubidium (Rb) - No impurity diffusion data available (for self-diffusion data seechapter 2)
Matrix:
caesium (Cs) - No data available

Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ra
Matrix:
beryllium (Be)
Be
Ce
3.1 . 102
303.5
1223 ... 1513
141C!e;
76Al
76Al
polycrystals;
99.7%;
residual activity (erfc solution)

V
29
243.0
1173...1423
4av.
pol&rystals;
99.7%;

Land&-BGmstein
New Series III/26
[Ref. p. 203

Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix beryllium (Be), continued

359.6
Nb
2. lo4
1318...1513
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
76Al
Fe
Fe;
polycrystals;
diffusion couple method and
electron microprobe analysis;
solubility limit also determined
Fe.
polydrystals;
62Dl
66Nl
79Gl
70Al
combined data of [65Dl] and

[74Ml] on single crystals:
64Cu;
serial sectioning (for T > 950K);
diffusion following ion implantation studied by Rutherford
backscattering (for T < 950K)
65D1,
74Ml
1om&;
polycrystals;
66Nl
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
1.0
221.9
1073...1373
0.53
216.9*
973...1349
99.75 % ;
residual activity;
authors
co
27
287.2
1253... 1493
5co;
polycrystals;
99.8%;
residual activity
Ni
0.2
243.0
1073 . . 1523
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.7 % ;
residual activity
cu
Ag
11c 0.38
198.6
733 ... 1273
I c 0.42
193.3
693 ... 1273
6.2
193.0*
923...1183
99.75 % ;
11c 0.43
Ic 1.76
164.5*
180.9*
929...1170
929...1170
residual activity;
authors
om&;
single crystals;
99.75 % ;
D,, = 3.1 . lo-l3 m2se1

D
I = 13.
. 10-13m2s-1
1053
1053
residual activity;
authors
single crystals;
75Ml
99.95 %;
in-diffusion studied by Rutherford backscattering analysis
Ik Claire
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series lIlj26
Ref. p. 2031
93
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: beryllium (Be), continued

D = 1.5 * lo-3 m2s-1
Au
D=28.10-6~2~-1
I
.
D,, =4.4.10-15 m2sm1
D I =65.10-5m2s-l
.
938
938
1053
1053
single crystals;
99.95% ;
in-diffusion studied by Rutherford backscattering analysis;
99.95%;
D in polycrystals of 10 urn grainsize about 10 times larger than
in single crystals
75M3
Al
1068 *.+1356
26A1.
polyirystals;
99.91%;
76Gl
Matrix: magnesium (Mg)

Mg
7, 8
Be
8.06
157.0
773...873
Be;
diffusion couple method with
couple of Mg and Mg 0.2 %
Be alloy;
layerwise spectral analysis (erfc
solution)
66Yl
La
2.2. 10-2
102.2
813...868
dissolution of precipitates in
diffusion couple
66Ll
Ce
450
175.8
823...871
dissolution of precipitates in
diffusion couple
66Ll
Fe
4.10-6
88.8
673.e.873
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
residual activity
68Pl
Ni
1.2. 10-5
95.9
673...873
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
68Pl
Ag
0.34
119.3
749...894
67Ll
11c 3.62
J-c 17.9
133.1
148.2
752...913
752...913
lomAgi
polycrystals;
99.875% ;
serial sectioning
lomAgi
single crystals;
99.99%;
lathe and grinder sectioning
72Cl
Zn
0.41
119.7
740...893
65Zn;
polycrystals;
99.875%;
serial sectioning
67Ll
Cd
11c 1.29
I c 0.46
140.7
132.7
733...898
733...898
Cd;
single crystals;
99.99%;
72Cl
Solute
andolt-BBmstein
\Tew Series III/26
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
1.0
168.3
Le Claire
Golute
[Ref. p. 203
94
Da
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Ref.
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
l141n;
polycrystals;
99.875%;
serial sectioning
114mIn;
single crystals;
99.99%;
67Ll
l13Sn.
72Cl
Fig.
Matrix: magnesium(Mg), continued

[n
Sn
5.2. 10-2
118.9
745...883
(Ic 1.75
Ic 1.88
143.4
142.4
747..-906
747.~~906
11c 4.27
149.9
748 ..-903
72Cl
singlecrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe and grinder sectioning;
D,/D,, = 1 at 902.3 K;
D,/D,, = 1.13 at 858.2 K
Sb
11
c 2.57
I c 3.27
137.3
138.2
781...896
781...896
124Sb;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
(erfc solution)
72Cl
1.6. lo-
114.7
773...893
235~.
68Pl
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
residual activity
Matrix: calcium (Ca)
Ca
Fe
3.2. lo-
124.8
823. . - 1073
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
residual activity
68Pl
Ni
l.lo.10-5
121.0
823. . .1073
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
surface decrease
68Pl
1.1 . 10-s
145.7
773*..973
23su;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
residual activity
68Pl
Matrix: strontium (Sr) - No data available

Matrix: barium (Ba)
- No data available
Matrix: radium (Ra) - No data available
Le Claire
Land&-B6msIei
New Series Ill/26
solute
95
3.2.3 Impurity diffusion in SC group and rare earth metals
Ref. p. 2031
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
3.2.3 Impurity diffusion in scandium group and rare earth metals

3.2.3.1 Scandium group metals
SC,Y, La
Matrix: scandium (SC)
SC
no data available
Fe
1.5. 10-3
54.0
1241s.. 1528
(Cl-SC)
1643
1702
1755
1790
(P-W
Fe;
diffusion couple method using
scanning laser mass spectroscopy;
polycrystals;
99.96%;
electro-mobility and effective
valence also determined
10
11
D=4.1.10-gm2s-
2.6 . IO- m2 s-l
3.4. IO- m2 s-l
4.4. IO- m2 s-l
Matrix: yttrium (Y)

Y
86Al
Fe
1.8. lO-2
85.0
1173...1603
(a-Y>
Fe;
99%;
lathe sectioning;
valence also determined;
similar data in [8201]
11
75M2
co
1.4. 10-2
83.3
1290... 1620
(a-Y)
11
co;
couple of pure Y and Y 0.05%
Co alloy;
polycrystals;
99.6%;
laser-ionization mass spectroscopy;
8201
Ni
5.8. 1O-2
96.5
1290...1580
(a-Y)
Ni;
11
couple of pure Y and Y 0.05%
Ni alloy;
polycrystals;
99.6%;
laser-ionization mass spectroscopy;
8201
Ag
5.4. 10-3
77.0
1178... 1453
(f=Y>
llom&;
99%;
lathe sectioning;
11
75M2
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
96
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
Method/Remarks
Fig.
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
12
1139~~~1170
141Ce.
12
76Fl
(-f-W
polycrystals;
serial sectioning
12
69Dl
Do
10-4m2s-
Ref.
Mah-ix: lanthanum (La)

La
Ce
Au
1.8. IO-
2.2 * 10-2
104.7
75.8
873 ... 1073

(P-W
rgOAu;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
lathe sectioning;
self-diffusion also studied
3.2.3.2 Rare earth metals

Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu
Matrix: cerium (Ce)
Ce
13
La
3.8. lo-*
102.6
998 ..- 1048

(&Ce)
i4La;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
lathe sectioning
13
73Dl
Gd
1.2. 10-2
100.5
1003... 1048
(&Ce)
Gd (radioisotope not specified);

polycrystals;
serial sectioning
13
76Ml
Mn
7.2. IO-
37.0*
888...973
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
lathe sectioning;
* evaluated from 3 graphical
data points by present authors
13
75Dl
Fe
D=2.78.10-10m2s-
10!Fe)
(&Ce)
3.3. 10-4
19.3
173.e.923
We)
1.7. 10-2
49.8
2.0. 10-3
32.2
875.e.990
(v-C4
1005... 1046
(6-Ce)
5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.8 % ;
nondestructive/destructive
y-counting;
5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
lathe sectioning
Le Claire
73Cl
13
75Dl
Landolt-BBmslei!
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
97
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
6OCo.
13
73Cl
13
76Ml
13
72Dl
13
73Cl
72Dl
Matrix: cerium (Ce), continued
co
Ag
Au
46.1
1.0. 10-2
1.6. 1O-3
35.6
1.2. 10-3
33.5
2.5. 10-2
88.3
1.2 * 10-l
92.9
1.4
117.2
4.4. 10-3
62.4
9.5. 10-2
85.8
823...923
(r-W
~920~~*1000
(r-C@
1003.*. 1048
(h-Ce)
polycjstals;
99.8%;
y-counting;
6Oco.
polyc;ystals;
serial sectioning (erfc solution)
852...969
We>
996... 1049
(&Ce)
873...973
(r-C4
lomAgi
polycrystals;
99.9 %;
lathe sectioning
llomAg;
polycrystals;
99.8 %;
y-counting;
823...973
We>
999... 1048
(6-Ce)
l98Atl;
polycrystals;
99.9 ?$;
lathe sectioning
13
14
Matrix: praseodymium (Pr)

Pr
La
D = 1.1 .
HO
IO-l3 m2 s-1 *
1.8. 1O-2
107.6
D = 3.35 . IO-
m2 s-1 *
9.5. 10-3
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
110.1
1039
14La;
(a-Pr)
polycrystals;
1080~~~1190 99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
(P-W
* value estimated from published
graph by present authors
1004
(cl-Pr)
1085...1180
(P-W
166~~.
polycjstals
99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
* value estimated from published
Le Claire
14
69D2
14
69D2
98
Solute
Do
10P4m2s-
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
930 ... 1000

(u-Pr)
1111~~*1166
(P-W
54Mn.
po1yc;ysta1s;
99.9 % ;
lathe sectioning;
* evaluated from graphical data
by present authors
14
75Dl
885... 1060
(mPr)
1075.+.1180
(B-W
885...1036
(cc-Pr)
1092
1151
(P-W
926...1059
(u-Pr)
1086.+.1187
@-w
886... 1040
(cc-Pr)
1085...1195
(WV
870...1015
(a-Pr)
1075...1185
1o$-W
59Fe;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
lathe sectioning
14
75Dl
6Oco;
polycrystals;
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
14
69D3
b4cu;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
lathe sectioning
14
71Dl
11omAg.
polycryitals;
99.93% ;
lathe sectioning
14
69D3
19Au;
polycrystals;
99.93% ;
lathe sectioning
19Au;
single crystals;
99.94%
lathe sectioning (erfc solution)
14
69D3
14
81Dl
65Zn;
polycrystals;
99.97% ;
lathe sectioning
14
70Dl
141n;
14
69D2
Matrix: praseodymium (Pr), continued
Fe
co
1.06.10-j
63.2 *
2.6. lo-
25.1*
2.1 * 10-3
39.4
4.10-3
43.5
4.7. 10-Z
68.7
D=4.6-10-9m2s-1
D=5.0~10-9m2s-1
cu
Ag
Au
Zn
8.4. lo-*
75.8
5.7. 10-2
74.5
0.14
106.3
3.2. lo-*
90.0
4.3. 10-2
82.5
3.3. 10-2
84.2
D =4.4.jO-10m2s-1
D=37.10-0m*s-
D1 = 4.6 +lO-o m2sm1
D=4.0.10-10m2s-1
1
0.18
103.8
0.63
113.0
In
9.6. lo-*
121.0
(cl-Pr)
1053
(u-Pr)
876...1040
(a-Pr)
1095...1194
(VW
1039
(u-Pr)
1075...1200
(P-W
polycrystals;
99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
* values estimated from published
3.2.3 Impurity diffusion in SCgroup and rare earth metals
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Matrix:
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
no self-diffusion data available
54Mn;
polycrystals;
15
75Dl
15
75Dl
neodymium (Nd)
Nd
Mn
D = 4.17 . IO- m2 s-1 *

6.02 . 10-l mz s-l
1.12~10-0m2s-1*
1.61 . lo- m2 s-l
Fe
4.6. 1O-3
51.1
1028
1075
(a-Nd)
1148
99.9 %;
lathe sectioning;
1182
(P-W
955...1136*
(a-Nd)
0.01
56.9
1162... 1231*
(P-W
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
lathe sectioning;
Matrix:
prometheum (Pm) - No data available
Matrix:
samarium (Sm)
- No data available
Matrix:
europium (Eu)
- No impurity diffusion data available;

for self-diffusion seechapter 2
Matrix:
gadolinium (Gd)
- No impurity diffusion data available;

Matrix:
terbium (Tb)
- No data available
Matrix:
dysprosium (Dy)
- No data available
Matrix:
hobnium (Ho)
- No data available
Matrix:
erbium (Er)
Er
Au
11c 4.73.10-3 * 64
lc1.95.10-2*
1270..+ 1485
lg8Au;
16
single crystals;
99.91%;
lathe sectioning (erfc solution);
three temperatures only;
99
- No data available
Matrix:
thulium (Tm)
Matrix:
ytterbium (Yb) - No impurity diffusion data available;

Matrix:
99
lutetium (Lu)
andolt-Bhnstein
lew Series III/26
- No data available
Le Claire
16
79Dl
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.4 Impurity diffusion in titanium group metals
100
Do
10-4mZs-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
17
-
79Sl

Ti, Zr, Hf
Matrix:
titanium (Ti)
r-titanium
Ti
259.0
933.e.1133
Be;
polycrystals;
99.5%;
residual activity
1124
1072
s4Mn.
polyc;ystals;
99.998%;
lathe sectioning;
solvent and solute diffusion in
bee Ti-Co and Ti-Mn alloys also
studied
54Mn*
18
singlecrystals;
99.94% ;
lathe sectioning;
D,,/D, = 3.84.e.1.68;
effect of oxygen on Mn diffusion
also studied
75Sl
59Fe;
single crystals;
99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
D,,/D ,, = 5.15 . ..2.01
s9Fe;
polycrystals;
residual activity
18
83Nl
73Kl
6OCo;
polycrystals;
99.998%;
lathe sectioning;
solvent and solute diffusion in
bee Ti - Co and Ti - Mn
alloys also studied
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
similar data in [83N2];
75Sl
18
85N1,
85N2
Be
14.103
Mn
D = 1.42. lo-l3 rns-l

5.21 . lo-l4 m2s-l
Fe
co
1 c 0.6
ii c 4.9 . lo-
189.2
160.5
878...1135
878...1135
lc 6.4. lo-
iic 4.7. 1O-3
144.2
112.3
877...1136
877...1136
1.2. 10-4
110.5
973...1123
D=6.65~10-2m2s-
3.64. lo-l2 m2 s-l
1129
1072
lc 3.2. lO-2
Iic 1.9. 10-Z
875...1135
875...1135
126.1
114.1
Le Claire
88N2
Landok-BBmstei
New Series Ill/21
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
101
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
912
971
1059
1117
1141
63Ni;
polycrystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning;
* value reassessedby present
authors
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.96%;
lathe sectioning
72HI
18
85N2
I7
76Pl
17
85R 1
Matrix: titanium (a-Ti), continued

Ni
D = 6.7. 10-14m2s-i
I.8 . IO-l3 m2 s-l
76.10-3m2s-l*
2.3 . IO-r2 m2 s-l

2.1 . IO-l2 m2 s-l
I c 5.4 .10-2
11c 5.6. IO-
141.8
137.2
877... 1100
877... 1100
9.7. 10-s
115.1
973...1123
7.4. 10-7
156.4
873...1123
Si
4.4. 10-7
105.2
923 ... 1073
Si (ion-implanted);
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
nuclear reaction analysis;
solubility of Si also determined
17
86Rl
l.c 0.155
11
c 4.7
138.2
172.3
973...1123
973...1123
32~.
4.1 . 10-7
114.5
p-titanium
Ti
Be
Al
Al;
polycrystals;
X-ray diffraction method
Al (ion implanted);
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
nulcear reaction analysis
I7
86NI
1020+.. 1124
single crystals;
99.96% ;
lathe sectioning;
for T < 973 K D values are
smaller than calculated from
Do and Q;
P diffusion in Ti 2.35 at% 0 also
studied
-
18
78Fl
17,18
0.8
168.3
1188...1573
7Be;
polycrystals;
99.62%;
residual activity
17
69Pl
SC
4.0. 10-3
135.7
1213... 1843
46sc.
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
lathe sectioning;
similar data in [65Al]
18
7IAl
Zr
4.7. 10-3
148.2
1193...1773
Zr;
polycrystals;
98.94% ;
residual activity
18
67PI
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
102
Solute

Do
10-4mZs-*
kJmo!-
Mafrix: titanium @Ti), continued

v
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1175...1816
49.
18
64Ml
pol$rysta!s;
99.9 % ;
lathe sectioning;
two-exponential tit to the [64Ml]
data: 0: = 7.9. lO-1o m*s-l,
Q, = 101.1 kJmo!-,
0: = 0.21 . 10v4 m* s-l,
Q2 = 209.0 kJ mol- ;
seealso [65Al]
Nb
1273... 1923
2.91 .10-4
129.9
1228... 1784
Ta
Cr
90Nl
Nb;
polycrystals;
99.7%;
lathe sectioning and autoradiowphy;
07 = 5 . IO- m* s-l,
Q, = 164.5 kJmo!-,
0: = 20. low4 m*s-*,
Q2 = 305.6 kJmol-I;
seealso [65Gl]
gNb;
polycrystals;
99.97% ;
lathe sectioning;
only three temperatures;
diffusion of Ti and Nb in
Ti -Nb alloys also studied
18
63Gl
79Pl
1187...1869
*Ta;
polycrystals;
iodide Ti;
lathe sectioning;
0: = 3. 10-8m2s-1,
Q, = 140.3 kJmol-,
0: = 13 * lob4 m*s-,
Q2 = 309.8 kJmo!-
18
66A1
1243... 1923
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.7.**99.9%;
lathe sectioning and autoradiowphy ;
D~=5~10-7m2s-1,
Q, = 147.8 kJmo!-,
0: = 4.9. 10e4 m* s-l,
Q2 = 255.4 kJmo!-;
seealso [65Gl]
18
63Gl
L42Claire
Land&-BBmsteir
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Matrix: titanium (fl-Ti), continued

MO
103
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1173...1923
MO;
polycrystals;
99.7*..99.9%;
lathe sectioning;
0: = 8 . 10d7 m2 s-l,
Q, = 180 kJmol-r,
0: = 20. 10m4m2 s-l,
Q, = 305.6 kJmol-;
seealso [65Gl]
ggMo;
polycrystals;
98.94%;
residual activity;
* Q and Do values from single
exponential tit to given
temperature ranges
18
63Gl
67Pl
185w.
18
67Pl
0.24
2.82. 1O-4
214.8 *
139.0*
1373... 1833
1173*..1373
3.6. 1O-3
183.8
1173...1523
polyciystals;
98.94%;
Mn
?e
Land&-Bihstein
New Series III/26
1203..- 1923
54Mn
polyciystals;
99.7 % ;
lathe sectioning;
0: = 6.1 . 10e7 m2 s-l,
Q, = 141.1 kJmol-,
0: = 4.3 . 10e4 m2 s-l,
Q, = 242.8 kJmol-;
seealso [65Gl]
18
63Gl
1193...1923
55Fe;
polycrystals;
99.7 % ;
lathe sectioning and autoradiographs ;
0: = 7.8. lo- m2 s-l,
Q, = 132.3 kJmol-,
0: = 2.7. 10m4m2 s-l,
Q, = 230.3 kJmol-l;
seealso [65Gl]
5gFe;
polycrystals;
iodide Ti;
lathe sectioning;
Fe;
polycrystals;
residual activity
18
63Gl
67132
73Kl
D = 9.9. 10-3m2sml
1175
5.6. 1O-3
1273... 1473
131.0
Le Claire
104
Solute

Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: titanium (&Ti), continued
co
1183.a.1923
6oco.
polyc~ystals;
99.7 % ;
lathe sectioning;
0: = 1.2 * 10T6 m2s-,
Q, = 128.1 kJmo!-,
0: = 2. 10-4m2s-1,
Q, = 219.8 kJmo!-;
seealso [65Gl]
18
63Gl
Ni
1203.+. 1923
63Ni.
18
63Gl
polyfrystals;
99.7%;
lathe sectioning and autoradiographs ;
0: = 9.2. lo- m2 s-l,
Q, = 123.9 kJmo!-,
0: = 2. 10m4m2s-',
Q2 = 219.8 kJ mol-;
seealso [65Gl]
-
1233... 1733
Cu;
polycrystals;
iodide Ti;
0: = 2.1 . 10e7 m2 s-l,
Q, = 122.3 kJmo!-,
Dg= 11.3.10-4m2s-,
Q, = 252 kJmo!-
17
69Cl
3.0. 10-3
180.0
1213...1863
llom&*
polycry~tals;
99.95%;
lathe sectioning
17
71Al
1226...1868
l13Sn;
polycrystals;
99.7%;
lathe sectioning;
0: = 3.8 . lo-* m2 s-l,
Q, = 132.3 kJmo!-,
0: = 9.5. 10m4m2 s-l,
Q2 = 289.7 kJ mol-;
seealso [65Gl]
17
65A1
113c&.
7751
cu
Sn
D~8.8.1()-~~m~s-*
4.9.10-13m2s-1
8.9. lo-l3 m2s-
1.8. lo-l2 m2s-
1.2.10-l1 m2s-
1245
1388
1481
1581
1798
polyciystals;
99.97%;
lathe sectioning;
isotope effect also studied;
D values agree with [65Al]
Le Claire
Landolt-B6mstci
New Series W/2(
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-l
Matrix: titanium (fi-Ti), continued

P
105
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1218...1873
32p.
17
65A 1
pol&ystals;
99.9%;
lathe sectioning;
two-exponential tit :
07 = 3.62. IO- m2 s-l,
Q, = 100.9 kJmol-,
0: = 5. 10m4 m2 s-l,
Q, = 236.6 kJmol-;
seealso [65Gl]
U
2.10-3
138.1
1188 .-. 1298
U (natural);
polycrystals;
99.34%;
fission fragment radiography
67Dl
5.1 . 10-4
122.7
1173... 1473
23qJ.
7OP2
18
78Fl
7lL2
polycjstals;
99.62% ;
residual activity
-.
0: = 1.6. 10m9 m2 s-l,
Q, = 89.2 kJmol-,
0: = 2. 10m6m2 s-l,
Q, = 192.6 kJmol-
1173**.1773
1.4. 10-6
64.1*
1173~~~1400 Pu;
polycrystals;
electron microprobe analysis and
a-radiography;
authors
18
r-zirconium
Zr
-
19,20
Rb
1.17. 102
255.4
iO33...1136
Rb;
polycrystals;
out-diffusion method;
possible grain-boundary influence
19
68Sl
Be
0.33
133.6
993...1120
Be;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
grinder sectioning and residual
activity
19
76Tl
Ce
3.54.10-7
106.2
923..*1123
141Ce;
polycrystals;
high purity;
residual activity
20
68P2
PU
Matrix: zirconium (Zr)
Land&-Blimstein
New Series III/26
106
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: zirconium (a-Zr), continued

Ti
D = 9.4. j()-
m2s-
1116
44Ti;
single crystal of unspecified
orientation;
99.93% ;
lathe sectioning
20
74Hl
1.12.10-8
95.9
873...1123
48V.
20
68Al
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
residual activity;
self-diffusion in hcp Ti, Zr, Hf
also studied
20
68Dl
182Ta.
20
58Bl
72Tl
20
83B2
ggMo;
polycrystals;
high purity;
residual activity
20
68P2
893 ... 1083
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.5 and 99.999% ;
residual activity and serial
sectioning
20
73Tl
973
1071
5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.93% ;
lathe sectioning
5gFe;
orientation;
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
72Hl
74Hl
pol&rystals;
99.84%;
residual activity
Nb
6.6. 10-6
131.9
Ta
1 * 102
293.1
973 ... 1073
polyc;ystals;
99.6%;
residual activity
4.9. 10-j
126.0
896...1105
I c 0.2
11
c 0.2
162.7
153.3
1023...1121
1023...1121
MO
6.22. 1O-8
103.7
Mn
2.4. 1O-3
126.4
Fe
D=3.7.10-2m2s-1
3.5.10-l m2s-
Cr
1113
5Cr.
polycrystals;
99.5 and 99.999%;
activity
51Cr;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
serial sectioning;
considerably lower D values
reported in [65A2]
Le Claire
Land&-BBmsteil
New Series 1112h
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
107

Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
D II = 2.22. 10-3m2s-1
765
834
871
934
980.5
983
1032
1093
1131
1133
871
980.5
1032
1131
5gFe.
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
20
88N2
1.75 . IO-l2 m2 s-l

4.70 . IO-l2 m2 s-l
3.70 IO- m2 s-l
5.5...7.1.10-11m2s-1
6.1 . 10-l m2 s-l
1.68 . IO-lo m2 s-l
2.25 . 10-l m2 s-l
2.2~~~3.6~10-0m2s-
2.85 . 1O-1o m2 s-l
D I =1f~.1O-~m~s-~
.
1.2. lo- ms11
3.4. IO- rn2sm1
9.9 .10-l m2 s-l
I c 1.2 .103
Ic 37
11
c 4.104
< 873
> 923
860...990
5sco, 6OCo;
20
81Kl
63Ni;
single crystals of unspecified
orientation;
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
63Ni;
single crystals;
crystal bar Zr;
lathe sectioning;
Ni diffusion in Zr alloys also
studied
20
72Hl
20
87H2
64CU;
single crystals;
99.95%;
lathe sectioning
19
75Hl
74Tl
89Tl
19
89Vl
19
71Hl
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Matrix: zirconium (a-Z+, continued

Fe
co
183.4
145.8
191.2
single crystals;
99.7 and 99.9%;
D = 1.2 - 10-11 m2 s-1

4.10-11 m2s-1
9.10-l m2s-1
8. lo-11 m2s-
971
1023
1074
1103
D = 1.6 . 1O-o m2 s-1

D= 6. 1()-0m2s-
II
1123
1123
cu
I c 0.25
11
c 0.40
154.5
148.7
888...1132
888...1132
Ag
5.1 . 10-3
187.1
1037... 1120
I c 5.9 . 10-4
11
c 6.7 1O-2
173.7
212.3
2.2
6.8. 10-2
245.0
210.0
D = 1.3 . lo-l5
m2 s-l
Ni
Au
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
oAg~
polycrystals;
99.99%;
serial sectioning
1063...1118
11am-k
1063...1118
single crystals;
99.996%;
grinder sectioning
938...1117 (SC) OrnAg;
895 . . .I1 17 (PC) single crystals (99.93%);
polycrystals (99.993% and
99.96%);
microtome and grinder sectioning
1113
rg8Au;
orientation;
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
Le Claire
108
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmo!-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1099
65Zn;
orientation;
19
7lHl
74Hl
19
85R2
19
59Gl
19
74Hl
19
67Vl
Matrix: zirconium (a-Zr), continued

Zn
D=2.8~10-5m2s-
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
Al
D=3.4~10-17m2s-
1108
26Al;
orientation;
99.93%;
17
280.0
873...1073
lathe sectioning
Al (ion-implanted);
polycrystals;
99.8%;
nuclear reaction analysis
Sn
1.0. 10-e
92.1
113c&.
u-phase
polyc;ystals;
99...99.9%;
residual activity
Sb
D= l.4~~~2.6~t0-7m2s-1
1120
r**Sb;
orientation;
99.93%;
lathe sectioning
s
8.9
185.1
870...1080
J5S;
polycrystals;
99.94%;
serial sectioning
g-zirconium
Zr
19
Rb
8.8. 10-4
153.7
1153...1303
Rb;
polycrystals;
out-diffusion method
19
68Sl
Be
8.33.10-2
130.2
1188...1573
Be;
polycrystals;
99.7 and 99.99%;
residual activity
19
69P1,
76Tl
Ce
1153...1873
14Ce;
polycrystals;
high purity;
residual activity;
07 = 3.16. 10m6m*s-,
Q, = 173.3 kJmo!-,
0: = 42.2* 10e4 m*s-r,
Q, = 310.2 kJ mol-
20
68P2
h Claire
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Matrix: zirconium (fi-Zr), continued

Hf
Temperature
range
K
1190... 1943
109
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
81Hf.
20
87H3
polyc&stals;
99.9 and 99.99%;
two-exponential fit to the [87H3]
data: 0: = 2.8 . 10mgm2 s-l
Q, = 107.6 kJmol-
0: = 0.30. 10e4 m2sm1
Q, = 251.3 kJmol-1
V
Nb
7.59. 1o-3
0.32
191.8
239.5
1143...1473
1473... 1673
8.9. 1O-5
116.5
1166... 1480
1155...2031
7.8. 1O-4
153.2
1503 ... 1908
1.23. 1O-4
131.9
1167... 1433
Ta
5.0. 10-5
113.0
1173...1473
Cr
4.17.10-3
134.0
1173...1473
48~.
90Nl
20
68Al
82Pl
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.94% ;
lathe sectioning;
two-exponential tit to the [63Fl]
data: 0: = 2.7 . IO- m2 s-l
Q, = 116.9 kJmol-
0: = 0.26. 10m4m2se1
Q, = 238.4 kJmol-;
self-diffusion in j3-Zr also studied
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
residual activity
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.77%;
serial sectioning
20
63Fl
policrystals;
99.84%;
residual activity
48V;
polycrystals;
99.8%;
lathe sectioning;
V and Zr diffusion in Zr - V
alloys also studied
9ONl
69Fl
73T2
Ta;
polycrystals;
99.6 %;
residual activity
20
58Bl
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.7 %;
residual activity
67Pl
(continued)
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III126
Le Claire
310
Solute

Do
10-4mZs-
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
51Cr.
polydrystals;
99.92..99.999%;
serial sectioning
sCr.
polydrystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning;
20
79Nl
8921
ggMo;
polycrystals;
99.7%;
residual activity
ggMo;
polycrystals;
high purity;
residual activity;
07 = 1.99. lo- ms-,
Q, = 147.4 kJ mol-,
0: = 2.63 . 10e4 mz s-l,
Q2 = 285.9 kJ mol-
67Pl
20
68P2
20
67Pl
20
73Tl
79P2
Matrix: zirconium (BZr), continued

Cr
MO
7.10-3
142.3
1187.+.1513
3.1
219.0
1630...1910
3.63.10-*
1.29
185.9
243.7
1173...1473
1628...1833
1173...1873
0.41
233.6
1173...1523
1SSw.
polyc;ystals;
99.7 % ;
surface decrease
Mn
Fe
5.6. 1O-3
138.2
1225... 1420
5.38. IO-
140.6
1173...1473
9.1 . 10-3
113.0
1173..+1673
7.4. 10-J
108.0
1176...1886
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.5 and 99.999%;
residual activity
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
serial sectioning;
Zr and Mn diffusion in Zr-Mn
alloys also studied
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.7%;
residual activity
5gFe.
20
polycrystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning;
Co and Fe diffusion in Zr-Nb
alloys and isotope effect for Co
in j3-Zr also studied
67Pl
87Hl
(continued)
Le Claire
Landolt-BCmstein
New Series 11126
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Matrix: zirconium @-Zr), continued

Fe
6.2. 10-3110.9
co
Ag
Sn
111
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1557... 1950
5gFe;
polycrystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning;
89Zl
6Oco;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
57co.
polyciystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning
6OCo;
polycrystals;
high purity;
lathe sectioning;
20
69Kl
87HI
89Zl
Ag;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
serial sectioning and residual
activity
llomAg*
polycryitals;
high-purity;
lathe sectioning;
two-exponential Iit:
0: = 4.2. 10m8m2 s-l,
Q, = 132.3 kJmol-,
0: = 190.5 . lop4 m2 s-l,
Q, = 324.4 kJ mol- 1;
74TI
I9
82Ml
I9
59GI
19
7OVl
19
67VI
3.26. 1O-3
91.4
1193 ... 1878
3.3. 10-3
92.0
1193.*. 1741
4.7. 10-3
96.5
1600... 1950
5.7. 10-4
136.9
1224... 1463
1199... 1988
5.0. 10-3
163.3
P-phase
113&.
polycjstals;
99...99.9%;
residual activity
0.33
139.4
1223++.1473
32~.
pol;crystals;
99.94% ;
residual activity
27.6
162.4
1428 ... 1523
35s.
policrystals;
99.94%;
serial sectioning
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.5 Impurity diffusion in vanadium group metals
112
Do
10-4mZs-
kJmo!-
Matrix: zirconium (&Zr), continued

111.4
8.15.10-s
U
Temperature
range
K
1223...1573
1223... 1773
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
23su.
7OPl
20
71Fl
polycrystals;
99.61%;
residual activity
23qJ.
polycjstals;
serial sectioning;
D=30.1()-10mZs-1
Q: = 82.5 kJmol-I,
0: = 3.6 * 10v5 mz s-l,

Q2 = 242.8 kJ mol-
Matrix: hafnium (Hf)
Hf
21
Cr
0.14
213.9
1183+..2173
(CL-and g-Hf)
5Cr.,
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity
21
76Dl
co
5.3. 10-3
95.5
1106...1798
W-W
6Oco;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
residual activity
21
76Dl
AI
170
357.0
1023...1173
AI (ion implanted);
polycrystals;
97% Hf + 3% Zr;
21
85R2

V, Nb, Ta
Matrix: vanadium (V)
v
22
Ti
0.1
34.1
285.0
363.9
1373...1623
1623...2076
4gTi ;
polycrystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning;
V and Ti diffusion in V-Ti
alloys also studied
22
68M1,
78Pl
Zr
81
369.2
1578...1883
g5Zr.
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
lathe sectioning;
V and Zr diffusion in V-Zr
alloys also studied
22
84Pl
Le Claire
Landolt-BCmsIein
New Series III126
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
113
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1371..*2079
82Ta.
22
77Pl
Matrix: vanadium (V), continued

Ta
0.244
301.4
polycljstals;
99.9%;
grinder sectioning
Cr
9.54.10-3
270.5
1173..*1473
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.8%;
residual activity
22
64Wl
Fe
0.6
295.2
1115...1444
22
65P3
0.373
274
297.3
385.9
1233... 1618
1688...2090
Fe;
99.9 and 99.99% ;
lathe and chemical sectioning;
55Fe, Fe;
single crystals;
zone refined;
lathe and chemical sectioning;
two-exponential fit to the [68Cl]
data: 0: = 2.6. 10m6ms1
Q, = 269.9 kJmol-
0: = 0.11 m2se1
Q2 = 411.0 kJmol-i;
Fe, Fe;
detailed specification of purity in
[81Al];
sectioning and electron microprobe analysis
68Cl
2.48
31.7
318.7
356.6
1473... 1823
1823. ..2088
co
1.12
295.0
1298... 2126
Ni
0.18
266.2
Al
8.4. lo-
2.45. lo-
90Nl
22
81Al
6oco*
single crystals;
99.9 % ;
grinder sectioning
22
75Pl
1175... 1948
63Ni;
99.9 % ;
residual activity
22
86Pl
268.2
1273..a 1773
Al;
polycrystals;
X-ray diffraction method
22
85Ml
208.5
1473 .. 1723
32~.
22
7OVl
22
69Vl
po&rystals;
99.8 %;
residual activity
3.1 . 10-Z
142.4
1320... 1520
35s.
po&rystals;
99.8%;
residual activity
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
114
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
235~.
22
71F2
Matrix: vanadium (V), continued

LJ
1.10-4
257.1
1373.e.1773
polycjstals.
residual ac&ity
Matrix: niobium (Nb)
Nb
23
873
Li (implanted);
nuclear reaction analysis (?)
74Bl
76Bl
23
71Gl
23
7OP3
23
70Rl
Zr;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
electron microprobe analysis
g5Zr;
single crystals;
99.97%;
grinder sectioning
23
70Rl
23
78El
48v.
23
68Al
23
70Rl
23
65Ll
Li
D = 1.7. lo-l6 m2s-
Sr
11.7
479.8
x 2040 ..* 2500 out-diffusion of snallation-uroduced *Sr from polycrystalline

foil
1.5. 10-3
232.8
1473...1873
Ti
Zr
Ta
9.9. 10-2
364.0
1267es.1765
0.4
370.5
1898.s.2348
0.47
364.0
1855...2357
0.85
379.4
1923...2523
2.21
355.9
1273..-1673
0.47
377.0
1898...2348
1.0
415.7
1376...2346
91y.
singie crystals;
99.8 and 99.9%;
residual activity
44Ti.
sing;e crystals;
99.98% ;
anodizing and stripping
Ti;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
singie crystals;
99.98%;
residual activity
48V, v.
polycjstals;
99.9%;
surface decreaseand electron
microprobe analysis
182Ta.
singlecrystals;
99.76% ;
lathe, grinder and anodizingstripping sectioning;
Le Claire
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-l
115
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
51Cr.
singlk crystals;
> 99.98%;
anodizing-stripping sectioning
Cr;
polycrystals;
99.96%;
anodizing-stripping sectioning
23
69P2
69P3
MO;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
MO.
polycl;stals .
residual actibity
23
70Rl
23
73Fl
Matrix: niobium (Nb), continued

Cr
MO
0.3
349.6
1226... 1708
0.13
337.5
1220... 1766
92
511.0
1988. ..2455
1.3. 10-z
350.4
1973..+2298
5.10-4
383.9
2073 . . 2473
185~.
23
69F2
polyciystals;
99.8 %;
residual activity
W;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
23
70Rl
23
62Pl
23
77Al
7.104
653.1
2175...2443
1.5
325.3
1663..2373
0.14
294.3
1663...2168
Ru
29.3
460.1*
2026 . . .2342
lo3Ru;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
activity;
* Do and Q values calculated by
present authors from tabulated
D values
79S2
co
0.74
295.2
1834...2325
23
62Pl
4.18 . IO-*
257.2
1347...2173
6OCo;
polycrystals;
99.74%;
residual activity analyzed by
autoradiography
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.98%;
grinder sectioning
23
76P2
Fe
Fe.
polydrystals;
99.74%;
residual activity analyzed by
autoradiography
Fe, Fe;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
lathe and grinder sectioning and
(continued)
Land&Biimstein
New Series III/26
L43Claire
Solute
Matrix:
co
[Ref. p. 203
116
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1580... 1920
co 6oco-
23
77Al
63Ni ;
polycrystals;
99.82%;
residual activity
63Ni, Ni;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
grinder sectioning and electron
microprobe analysis
23
72Al
23
77Al
niobium (Nh), continued
0.11
274.7
single cryLa!s;
99.9%;
microprobe analysis
9.3
336.6
1261 . ..I519
7.7.10-2
264.2
1433...2168
Pd
2.38
399.5 *
1965... 2341
Pd;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
* Do and Q values calculated by
present authors from tabulated
D values
7982
cu
D=3.71~10-14m2s-1
1829
1909
cu;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
23
77Al
Ni
1.02. IO-l3 m2s-
Zn
5.89
411.3
x 2000 .** 2600 out-diffusion of spallation-produced 65Zn from

polycrystalline foil
76Bl
Al
450
430.1
1700...2000
out-diffusion method
78Nl
Sn
0.14
330.3
2123...2663
l13Sn;
polycrystals;
99.85%;
lathe sectioning
23
65A3
5.1 * 10-2
215.6
1573...2073
32~.
23
68Vl
23
68V2
23
65Pl
7lF2
single crystals;
99.9%;
residual activity
2.6. IO
306.0
1370...1770
35s.

99.6%;
serial sectioning
8.9. lO-2
321.5
1773... 2273
235~.
polycrystals;
99.55% ;
residual activity
5.10-6
321.1
1993..+2373
235~;
polycrystals;
details of method not specified
L.e Claire
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
Matrix: tantalum (Ta)
Ta
Rb
2.9. 10-S
117
Method/Remarks
Fig.
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
24
235.0
x 1700. . .3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Rb from polycrystalline

foil
77Bl
i-
Ref.
cs
8.3. 1O-5
237.0
e 1700. . .3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Cs from polycrystalline

foil
77Bl
Ba
0.21
334.0
z 1700. . .3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Ba from polycrystalline

foil
77Bl
Sr
4.3. 10-2
338.0
E 1700 . . .3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Sr from polycrystalline

foil
77Bl
0.12
302.3
1473 .. 1773
24
71Gl
77Bl
91y.
singie crystals;
99.8 to 99.9%;
residual activity
Hf
1.6. 1O-2
352.0
z 1700. . .3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Hf from polycrystalline

foil
Nb
0.23
413.2
1194..*2757
g5Nb;
24
99.7 % ;
lathe, grinder and anodic stripping
sectioning;
two-exponential fit to the [65P2]
data: 0: = 2.6 . 10m6m2 s-l
Q, = 382.7 kJmol-
D!j!= 14 . 10e4 m2 s-l
Q, = 511.4 kJmol-;
65P2
90Nl
MO
1.8. 1O-3
339.1
2023 ... 2493
ggMo;
polycrystals;
residual activity
24
68Bl
Fe
0.505
298.9
$203... 1513
24
55Vl
5.9. 10-2
329.9
2053 ... 2330
method and purity not specified;

polycrystals
Fe.
polydrystals;
lathe sectioning
24
76A2
6OCo.
24
polycjrstals;
lathe sectioning;
* values estimated from graphical
representation of results
76A2
co
D = 1.4 +IO-l3 m2 se1

8.0. lo-l3 m2 s-l
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
2128*
2330*
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.6 Impurity diffusion in chromium group metals
118
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: tantalum (Ta), continued

Ni
D = 1.1 . lo-l3 m2se1

1.14. lo-l2 m2s-
Al
1.5
306.2
As
0.12
346.0
0.01
293.1
24
63Ni;
polycrystals;
residual activity;
* values estimated from graphical
representation of results
1750~~~2050 out-diffusion method
w 1700... 3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced As from polycrystalline
foil
2053*
2330*
1970...2110
35s.
76A2
78Nl
77Bl
24
69Vl
24
71F2
24
77Sl
pol;crystals;
99.0%;
residual activity
7.6 . lo-
353.4
1873.s.2423
1.03.10-6
117.2
2186...2530
235U;
polycrystals;
residual activity
U (nat.);
polycrystals;
99.9997%;
diffusion profiles deduced from
fission fragment radiography

Cr, MO, W
Matrix: chromirml (Cr)
Cr
v
3s1*
419.0*
seechapter 2 on self-diffustion
25
1595...2041
48v.
25
76M2
singie crystals;
99.998% ;
grinder sectioning;
* Do and Q values calculated
from tabulated D values;
isotope effect of Cr self-diffusion
also studied
MO
2.7. 1O-3
242.8
1373...1693
25
ggMo;
polycrystals;
residual activity;
possible grain boundary influence
6362
Fe
0.47
1.1 . lo+*
332.0
169.1*
1518...1686
1256...1518
Fe;
polycrystals;
residual activity;
* possible grain boundary
influence
25
64Wl
Le Claire
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix : molybdenum (MO)

MO
26
Li
0.65
141.0
1193...1243
75Wl
0.01
470.6
1570...1970
permeation through polycrystalline membrane;

Li (nat.);
single crystals;
out-diffusion
26
77Ll
Rb
27.5
555.2
2200 . ..2870
out-diffusion of spallation produced 84Rb from polycrystalline foil
76B3
Sr
75.8
587.2
2200 . . .2870
out-diffusion of spallation-produced %r from polycrystalline foil
76B3
1.8. lO-4
214.8
1473.+. 1873
9ly.
26
71Gl
76B3
singie crystals;
99.8...99.9%;
residual activity
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Y from polycrystalline foil
9.33
432.5
2200 . . .2870
Zr
56.2
503.2
2200 ... 2870
out-diffusion of spallation-produced 88Zr from polycrystalline foil
76B3
2.9
473.1
1803 ... 1998
V;
polycrystals;
26
72Rl
Nb
14
452.6
2123 . . 2623
26
65A4
2.9
569.4
1998. ..2453
26
72Rl
1.7. 10-Z
379.3
1973...2373,
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
Nb;
polycrystals;
Nb;
polycrystals;
residual activity
26
73Fl
3.5. 10-4
347.5
1993..-2423
26
68Bl
1.9
473.1
2098 ... 2449
*Ta;
polycrystals;
residual activity
Ta;
polycrystals;
ls2Ta; polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
26
72Rl
Ta
D = 1.09 . lo-l4 m2 s-l
Land&Biimstein
New Series III/26
2373
Le Claire
79Ml
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
120
Do
30-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
51Cr.
polydrystals.
residual acti;ity
Cr.
singlk crystals;
99.8%;
26
68Bl
26
71Ml
1ssw.
67Al
68Bl
72Rl
26
74El
Matrix: molybdenum (MO), continued

Cr
2.5. 10-4
226.1
1273... 1773
1.88
342.5
1273...1423
1.7
460.5 *
1973... 2533
poly&stals;
serial sectioning;
* Do and Q values from data
of [67Al] and [64Bl]
4.5. 10-4
324.5
1973... 2423
165W.
poly&stals.
residual activity
W;
polycrystals;
four data points
w;
single crystals;
140
569.4
2093 ..+2453
3.6
515.8
2173...2541
Re
9.7 * 10-2
396.5
1973..2373
ls6Re;
polycrystals;
serial sectioning
26
64B2
Fe
0.15
346.2
1273e.a1623
73Nl
3.7 * 10-3
291.8
1200..- 1478
3.0
418.7
2213...2603
18
446.7
2123...2632
324.5
1273+.. 1773
26
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.96%;
residual activity
5gFe.
poly&ystals;
99.96 and 99.99% ;
residual activity;
6OCo;
polycrystals;
autoradiographic analysis
6OCo;
26
99.98%;
serial sectioning and autoradiographic analysis;
rcilso [65A3]
26
polycrystals.
residual act&ity
63Ni;
single crystals;
residual activity
7lM2
co
Ni
D = 2.4~~~3.2~10-16m2s-1 1623
26
74Ll
62Pl
65A4
68Bl
Landok-B6mstein
New Series Ill/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
121
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: molybdenum (MO), continued

Zn
0.55
387.7
2200 ... 2870
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Zn from polycrystalline

foil
76B3
0.19
337.0
2273 ... 2493
32~.
26
68Vl
26
68V3
74Ll
single crystals;
99.97% ;
residual activity
S
32*
422.9 *
2493 ... 2743
35s.
single crystals;
99.97% ;
layerwise radiometric analysis
(erfc solution);
authors
3.4. 10-2
297.3
1238... 1443
35s.
pol&ystals .
residual ac&ity ;
possible grain-boundary influence
Se
2.19. lo3
639.0
2200 ... 2870
out-diffusion of spallation-produced 15Sefrom polycrystalline foil
76B3
7.6. 1O-3
319.9
1773.e.2273
235U;
polycrystals;
99.98%;
residual activity
26
65Pl
1.3.10-6
316.5
2073 ... 2373
235~.
26
71F2
polycjrstals;
Matrix: tungsten (IV)
w
Ba
10.7
619.0
w 2400.9*3100 out-diffusion of spallation-produced Ba from polycrystalline

foil
6.7. 1O-3
285.1
1473... 1873
91y.
singie crystals;
99.8 ... 99.9%;
residual activity
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Y from polycrystalline
foil
27
-
76B2
27
71Gl
76B2
1.8. 1O-3
342.0
2400... 3100
Ce
2.88. 1O-2
426.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Ce from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Pm
6.2. 1O-2
440.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Pm from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
122
Solute

Do
10-4m2s-*
kJmo!-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: tungsten (W), continued

Eu
7.6. 1O-3
390.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Eu from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Gd
0.19
466.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Gd from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Tm
1.5.10-2
406.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Tm from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Yb
5.1 . 10-2
435.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Yb from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Lu
7.8. 1O-3
390.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Lu from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Hf
1.5. 10-Z
440.0
2400...3100
out-diffusion of spallation-produced Hf from polycrystalline

foil
76B2
Nb
3.01
576.1
1578...2640
69P4
Ta
3.05
585.7
1578...2648
6.2
601.6
2102...2906
g5Nb;
27
sectioning by anodic stripping;
182Ta.
27
singleand polycrystals;
sectioning by anodic stripping;
**Ta;
27
single crystals;
residual resistivity ratio 2 ... 5 . I04;
grinder and anodic sectioning
Cr
0.85
545.9
1909.*. 2658
89Kl
MO
0.05
506.6
2273 ... 2673
0.3
423.0
1973.s.2373
0.15
529.7
2281 es.2528
1.4
567.3
1909...2658
Cr;
27
single crystals;
residual resistivity ratio 2 .. .5. 104;
SIMS analysis;
preliminary data in [87Kl];
ggMo;
polycrystals;
MO; polycrystals;
residual activity
MO; single crystals;
three data points only
MO; single crystals;
27
residual resistivity ratio 2 ... 5 . 104;
SIMS analysis;
Le Claire
69P4
84Al
67L2
68Bl
74El
89KI
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
123
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-i
Fig.
Ref.
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
27
ls3Re,84Re.
>
single crystals;
99.99% ;
grinder sectioning
186Re;
27
polycrystals;
*jRe;
27
single crystals;
residual resistivity ratio 2.. .5 . 104;
grinder and anodic sectioning;
similar data in [82Al]
65A5
Matrix: tungsten (W), continued

275
681.6
2939...3501
19.5
590.3
2373 . ..2673
4.0
597.0
2110...2900
Fe
1.4 10-z
276.3
1213...1513
Fe;
polycrystals;
27
55Vl
OS
0.64
538.4
2105...2928
191@.
27
84Al
Re
67L2
84Al
single crystals.
residual resistivity ratio 2 .. .5 . 104;
co
4.3
1.3. 10-6
418.0
210.0
1365... 1533
1673... 2324
S7Co
single crystals;
99.98%;
grinder sectioning
27
89Ll
Ir
0.32
506.2
2007 . . .2960
ig21r;
27
single crystals;
residual resistivity ratio 2 . . .5 . 104;
84Al
Ni
D = fj. lo-l5 mzsel
1913
electron microprobe analysis of

W-Ni layer grown during
liquid phase sintering of
W-Ni
27
79M2
26.8
2153...2453
32p.
27
7811
27
7211
27
68Sl
71F2
77Sl
510.0
single crystals;
99.99%;
in-diffusion
S
2.17. 1O-5
292.2
2153...2453
35s.
single crystals;
residual activity
U
1.8. lo-
389.4
2245 . . .3000
out-diffusion method;
polycrystals;
99.99%
2.10-3
433.3
1973...2473
235u.
3.34.10-4
Land&-Bihstein
New Series III/26
259.2
2407 . . .2608
polycrystals;
U (nat.);
polycrystals;
99.9998%;
fission fragment autoradiographic analysis
Le Claire
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.7, 8 Impurity diffusion in Mn, Fe group metals
124
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
3.2.7 Impurity diffusion in manganese group metals

Mn, Tc, Re
There are no reported measurements of impurity diffusion in the manganesegroup metals.
3.2.8 Impurity diffusion in iron group metals

Fe, Ru, OS
Matrix: iron (Fe)
The various allotropic modifications of Fe are denoted in the following way (Tc: Curie temperature, T,:
melting temperature):
r-f-Fe
r-p-Fe
y-Fe
&Fe
ferromagnetic bee iron

paramagnetic bee iron
fee iron
bee iron
T, = 1043 K)
(T < T,;
(T, v > T > T,; T. = 1183 K)
(T,, > T > 6,;; T,:; = 1663 Kj
Vi, > T> Ty.s; T,= 1809K)
.
.I
Fe
Be
5.34
218.1
6862
0.1
241.2
28
1073... 1773 Be;
(u and &Fe) polycrystals;
99.9%;
residual activity;
u-phase stabilized by x 1 wt% Be
28
1373...1623
Be;
polycrystals;
We)
99.9%;
residual activity
9.104
473.1
1438... 1593
(y-Fe)
29
65Sl
3.6. 10
407.4
1371... 1626
We)
rssHf;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
residual activity
18lHf.
polycjstals;
99.98%;
residual activity
29
70Bl
0.75 *
264.2
1393...1653
We)
V;
polycrystals;
99.98% ;
residual activity;
* value reassessedby present
authors
70Bl
124
274.0
1058...1172
(u-p-Fe)
1210+..1607
(NW
1433-e. 1563
We)
4av.
29
87Gl
65Sl
Hf
Nb
0.62
273.5
530
344.6
30
68Gl
pol&ystals;
99.98%;
9%;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
residual activity
Le Claire
Land&-BBmstcin
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute Do
125
Q
10-4m2s-
Temperature
range
kJmol-
Method/Remarks
1221... 1474
We)
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
serial sectioning
g5Nb;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
Fig.
Ref.
83Kl
85Gl
Matrix: iron (Fe), continued

Nb
0.75
264.0
50.2
252.0
993
1025
(u-f-Fe)
1059..+ 1162
0.83
266.5
I2!)--:$4
...
D = 1.0. lo-l6 m2sm1

5.4. lo-l6 m2 s-l
(y-Fe)
1070... 1150
(a-p-Fe)
1233.a- 1669
We)
1043... 1150
(a-p-Fe)
8.52
250.8
10.8
291.8
90
271.0
37.3
885... 1174
267.4
. (1 + 0.133s2)*
(a-Fe)
MO
0.3
205.1
1023... 1123
(a-Fe)
Mn
1.49
233.6
0.35
219.8
0.16
261.7
0.11*
251.6
973 ... 1033

(a-f-Fe)
1073...1173
(u-p-Fe)
1193... 1553
6-W
1082... 1174
(a-p-Fe)
0.76
224.6
Cr
(a-p-Fe
and &Fe)
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
29
29
51Cr.
polydrystals;
99.98%;
residual activity
51Cr.
poly&ystals;
serial sectioning
51Cr*
poly&ystal (6 mm grain size);
serial sectioning;
*s: ratio of spontaneous
magnetization at T[K] to
that at OK.
MO;
polycrystals;
pure Fe;
residual activity and surface
decrease;
possible grain boundary
influence
54Mn;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
residual activity
70Bl
29
89Hl
9OLl
66Bl
29
70Nl
29
54Mn;
29
single crystals;
99.99.**99.999%;
* D" refers to purest Fe investigated (Do increases with impurity content)
combined data of [73K2] (diffu- 29
sion couple; polycrystals;
1719.a. 1767 K; electron
microprobe analysis; D independent of concentration
for 0.. .4 % Mn) and [70Nl]
7212
73K2
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
126
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
30
63BI
29
63B2
64SI
30
6651

co
118
285.9
5.5
256.2
9.5
260.8
7.19
260.4
6.38
257.1
6.38
257.1
1.0
301.9
2.9. 10-2
247.4
2120. IO-** m* s- l
D=358~10-23m2s-
2.35 . IO-** m* s-l
1.31 . IO-* m* s-l
3.28 . lo-** m* s-l
1.91 f IO-*O m*s-
5.54.1O-*O m* s-
7.46. IO-* m* se1
1.85. IO-l9 m2sP1
2.90. IO-l9 m* s-l
3.82. lo- m* s-l
6.40.10- m* s-
9.04. lo-l9 m*s-l
1.84. 10-8m2s-1
1.83. lo- rn*s-l
9.30. IO-* m* s-l
1.33 . IO- m* s-l
1.80 . IO- m* s-
6Oco;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity;
influence of magnetic transition
on Co diffusion also studied
6OCo;
1669...1775
polycrystals;
(&Fe)
lathe sectioning and residual
activity
1103~~~1161 6OCo;
polycrystals;
(a-p-Fe)
99.97%;
serial sectioning
6OCo;
956...1000
single crystals;
(a-f-Fe)
99.95%;
1081...1157
residual activity
(a-p-Fe)
6OCo;
1702...1794
polycrystals;
(&Fe)
99.95% ;
lathe sectioning
1409... 1633 thin film and diffusion couple
method;
We)
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
1233... 1493 6Oco;
polycrystals;
We)
99.9 % ;
residual activity
single
To, crystals;
6OCo.
785.5
823
1044...1177
(u-p-Fe)
824
857.5
873.5
907
926
934
945
960
963
976
976
991
993
1021
1034
1036
(u-f-Fe)
29
29
69B2,
61SI
29
75H2
29, 30 82M2
99.997% ;
sputter sectioning;
graphical data in [82M2];
numerical D-values tabulated in
[84Kl];
deviations from Arrhenius behaviour due to influence of
magnetic transition studied in
detail (see Fig. 30)
(continued)
Le Claire
Land&BBmstein
New Series III,/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
127
Fig.
Ref.
co
D = 5.30. lo-l7 ms-

8.48 . lo-? m2 s-l
1.01 . IO-l6 m2 s-l
3.68 . lo-l6 m2 s-l
5.60. lo-l6 m2se1
1.68. 10-15m2s-1
-
29, 30
1058.5
1072
1081
1105.5
1122
1163.5
(u-p-Fe)
6Oco;
30
89Hl
29
6lHl
polycrystals;
-(a-f-Fe
and a-p-Fe) sputter sectioning;
graphical data only;
magnetic transition studied in
detail
Ni
1.4
245.8
873 . ..953
(a-f-Fe)
1.3
234.5
1083 ... 1173

(a-p-Fe)
0.77
280.5
1203... 1323
We)
D = 3.75 . lo-
9.96. IO-*
2.32. lo-l7
4.70. IO-l7
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
9.9
259.2
3.0
314.0
972.6
996.7
1013.2
1032.4
(a-f-Fe)
1054... 1173
(a-p-Fe)
1409 ... 1633
(y-Fe)
1.09
296.8
1426... 1560
We)
63Ni.
single crystals;
99.97% ;
residual activity and surface
decrease
63Ni;
99.97%;
residual activity
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.97%;
residual activity
(j3Ni;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity
29
29
29
63Bl
29
Ni;
thin film and diffusion couple
method;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
Do and 0 from combined data
of [69;2] and [59Ml]
63Ni.
9
polycrystals;
residual activity
29
69B2
29
78Hl
(continued)
Land&-Bijmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
128
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
788
788
833.2
833.2
877.8
877.8
922.5
968.5
1013.5
(u-f-Fe)
1048
1088
1123.3
1160
(a-p-Fe)
j3Ni;
polycrystals (3.5 mm grain size);
99.999%;
sputter sectioning;
magnetic transition
29
89Cl
63Ni.
polydrystals (3.5 mm grain size);
99.999% ;
sputter and microtome sectioning
29
lo3Pd;
29
polycrystals;
99.97% ;
residual activity (and grinder sectioning);
self-diffusion in Pd -Fe alloys
also studied

Ni
D=1.85-10-21 mzswl
1.09. 10m2 m2se1
1.84. 10mzom2sb1
8.69 . lo-* m2 s-l
1.20. lo-l9 m2se1
9.59 . 10V20m2 s-l
7.09. lo-l9 m2 s-l
3.86.10-* m2 s-
3.19 .10-l m2 s-l
D= 1.55*10-16m2s-1
5.69 * lo-l6 m2s-
1.96. lo-l5 m2s-
4.82 . lo- m2 s-l
Pd
0.41
280.9
1373..*1573
We)
Pt
2.7
296.0
1233.e.1533
(y-Fe)
Cu
1.8
295.0
1183...1293
(~-Fe)
D = 1.8 . 1O-15 m2 s-l

2.2. lo- m2 s-
5.1 . lo-l5 m2 s-
1127.5
1140
1174.6
(u-p-Fe)
1558...1641
We)
2.86
306.7
D = 4.81 11O-18 m2s01

9.55.10-*
1.78.10-
4.10.10-
8.26.10-l
m2sw1
m2sw1
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
300
283.9
0.19
272.6
4.16
305.0
963
978
993
1008
1024
(a-f-Fe)
1045...1173
(a-p-Fe)
1198...1323
(y-Fe)
1378... 1483
(y-Fe)
193mpt;
77Fl
29
73M3
28
66S1
28
68Rl
polycrystals;
residual activity
Cu;
polycrystals;
64cu.
single or bicrystals;
99.91%;
grinder sectioning
64Cu;
single crystals;
99.91% ;
grinder sectioning
Cu; single crystals;
99.999%
solubility of Cu also determined
28
28
7782
28
Cu; polycrystals;
99.999% ;
64Cu; polycrystals;
99.96%;
residual activity
Le Claire
28
28
78Ml
Landok-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
129
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

1.95 * 103
288.9
1021... 1161
(a-p-Fe)
230
278.0
973 ... 1033

(cl-f-Fe)
38
259.2
1053... 1173
(ct-p-Fe)
D = 9.58 . IO-*
2.69.10-l
5.49.10-l
1.58 . lo-l6
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
Au;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity
31.0
261.2
972.1
997.8
1012.8
1034.4
(a-f-Fe)
1055...1174
(cl-p-Fe)
Zn
60
262.6
1072+*.1169
(u-p-Fe)
Zn;
single crystals;
residual resistivity ratio > 3000;
chemical diffusion below Tc also
measured
28
81R1
Al
1.8
228.2
1003... 1673
Al;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
X-ray diffraction method;
no influence of a-y transition
observed (?)
83Al
Si
1.7
229.1
28
89Bl
0.07
243.0
x 1100... 1173 Si;

(a-p-Fe)
polycrystals;
1273... 1463 electron microprobe analysis on
Fe/Fe 1 . . .3.3 % diffusion
We)
couples;
D values from extrapolation of
chemical diffusion
5.4
232.4
28
72T2
&
Au
Sn
973 ... 1033

(a-f-Fe)
1073.+.1183
(a-p-Fe)
1300... 1510
We)
2.4
221.9
9.10-4
175.8
6.1 . lo4
316.4
896... 1023
(a-f-Fe)
0.845
261.7
1197...1653
(y-Fe)
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Ag;
polycrystals;
serial sectioning
11om&
polycryitals;
99.97 %;
residual activity
28
71Bl
28
73El
28
28
63Bl
28
l13Sn.
polycljstals .
residual actibity
28
13Sn;
polycrystals;
99.8%;
residual activity
l13Sn; single crystals;
99.98%
residual activity
l13Sn; polycrystals;
> 99.97% ;
serial sectioning
Le Claire
28
75M3
28
84Hl
28
86Kl
130
;olute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
3zp.
[Ref. p. 203
Fig.
Ref.

3
4s
Sb
6.3. lo-*
193.4
1223...1573
We)
8.10
314.0
1.38 . 10
332.0
2.87. lo*
271.O
783...923
(cc-f-Fe)
932...1017
(a-f-Fe)
1078...1153
(u-p-Fe)
4.3
219.8
0.58
246.6
4.4. lo*
270.0
1040...1173
(a-p-Fe)
80
269.9
773..-873
(u-f-Fe)
2.7
205.0
0.5
209.3
1.7
221.9
34.6
231.5
2.10
347.6
x 1050.. . 1150 sulfurization and desulfurization

measured by electrical resistance
(u-p-Fe)
1208... 1298
on polycrystalline foils
(y-Fe)
35s.
1223...1523
polycrystals.
(94
residual actibity
35s.
973...1173
polycrystals;
(a-Fe)
99.996% ;
residual activity
surface segregation rate studied
770... 1000
with Auger electron spectros(u-f-Fe)
copy on single crystals
7.10-s
133.2
28
po&rystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity
surface segregation rate studied
28
by Auger electron spectroscopy
32~.
28
pol;crystals*
residual ac&ity
1223.s.1653
(u-stabilized) 0.5 ... 5% As;
u-stabilized;
1323..+1573 diffusion couple method;
0...1.2% As;
(94
1223...1348
We)
124Sb;
residual activity
Sb (ion implanted);
thin layer method and fission

fragment radiography;
polycrystals
64M2
81Ll
83Ml
76B4
28
28
75Bl
28
78M2
7OWl
28
71H2
28
72Gl
28
86A2
67Dl
Matrix: ruthenium (Ru) - No data available

Matrix: osmium (OS)
- No data available
Le Claire
Land&-LGmstein
New Series III!26
Solute
131
3.2.9 Impurity diffusion in cobalt group metals
Ref. p. 2031
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
3.2.9 Impurity diffusion in cobalt group metals

Co, Rh, Ir
Matrix: cobalt (Co)
Diffusion data are available for ferromagnetic fee Co (f-Co) and for paramagnetic fee Co (p-co). The Curie
temperature is Tc = 1393 K.
-
co
D=3.41.10-16m2s-
6.56 . lo-l6 m2 s-l
2.46. lo-l5 m2s-
1273
1328
1388
(f-Co)
D = 9.34. lo-l5
1.65 . lo-l4
2.39. IO-l4
3.92 . lo-l4
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
m2 s-l
3.15.10-2
232.4
1.1 .1o-2
217.7
0.04
239.4
1433
1473
1523
1563
(P-CO)
1133...1378
(f-Co)
1424... 1519
(P-CO)
1139*** 1510
(f and p-Co)
0.11
253.3
1409... 1629
(P-CO)
0.34
259.6
0.16
248.7
1.25
301.9
lOgI... T,
(f-Co)
TC... 1573
@-Co)
1425...1673
(P-CO)
0.34
269.2
Mn
Fe
Ni
31
48v.
31
86K2
policrystals;
99.9985%;
residual activity ;
each D value is the mean of two
results
1045.+. 1321
(f-Co)
31
7711
54Mn*
polycjstals;
99.95%;
residual activity
31
5gFe;
single crystals;
99.97% ;
residual activity
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
Do and Q values from combined
data of [69B2] and [55Ml]
5gFe.
sing16crystals;
residual activity
31
65A7
31
69B2
31
74B2
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.5%;
surface decrease
59Ml
63Ni.
31
62Hl
polycrystals;
99.2%;
residual activity;
63Ni and 6oCo diffusion in
Co - Ni alloys also studied
(continued)
Landolt-B6mstem
New Series III/26
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.10 Impurity diffusion in nickel group metals
132
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: cobalt (Co), continued

Ni
1465... 1570
(P-CO)
1500...1690
@-Co>
0.10
252.0
3.35
297.3
0.40
282.2
1409... 1643
@-Co)
Pt
0.65
219.3
CU
z 1.0
Zn
31
31
65Hl
31
69B2
1354...1481
1g3mpt;
(f- and p-Co) polycrystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity
31
73M3
x 275
1158, 1273
(f-Co)
Cu;
polycrystals;
99.5%;
0..*5% cu;
in-diffusion method;
two temperatures only
31
84A2
0.12
266.7
1081... Tc
(f-Co)
65Zn,
single crystals;
residual activity
31
74B2
0.08
254.5
1.3
226.1
T, ... 1573
@-Co>
1423... 1523
35s.
31
64Pl
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.5%;
residual activity;
63Ni and 6oCo diffusion in
Co-Ni alloys also studied
Ni;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
residual activity
@-Co)
Matrix: rhodium (Rh) - No impurity diffusion data available; for self-diffusion seechapter 2
Matrix: iridium (Ir)
- No impurity diffusion data available; for self-diffusion seechapter 2

Ni, Pd, Pt
Matrix: nickel (Ni)
Ni
Ce
0.66
254.6
973...1370
14Ce;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
grinder sectioning;
non-Gaussian diffusion profiles
Le Claire/Neumann
32, 33
71Pl
Land&BBmstein
New Series Ill:26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-l
133
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: nickel (Ni), continued

Nd
0.44
250.5
973 ... 1373
147Nd;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
grinder sectioning;
71Pl
Hf
1.8*
251.0*
1023.. 1423
Hf;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
electron microprobe analysis (Ni/
Ni 0.5; 3.8% Hf sandwich
samples);
* estimated values
72Bl
0.87
278.4
1073... 1573
497.
68M2
ICr;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
lathe sectioning;
distinct data scattering
64M3
185~.
64M5
32
78V3
pol&rystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning
Cr
1.1
272.6
2.0
299.4
1373...1541
polyc;ystals;
99.95%;
lathe sectioning
2.87
308.1
1346... 1668
181~.
singlecrystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning
,
Fe
1.0
269.4
1478... 1669
Fe;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
grinder sectioning
32
71B2
co
2.77
285.1
1335.., 1696
To;
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
32
78V3
Pt
2.5
286.8
1354... 1481
193Pt;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity
73M3
64cI.I.
polyc;ystals;
99.95% ;
lathe sectioning
64M4
cu
0.57
258.3
1327..: 1632:
(continued)
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
iolute
[Ref. p. 203
134
Do
10-*mzs-
kJmo!-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
64Cu;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
residual activity
Cu;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
sectioning;
atomic absorption analysis
65A8
32
84Tl
76T2
32
78Vl
55Kl
33
81G2
32
78V2
81Gl
33
88N3
32
83M2

0.724
255.4
1123...1323
0.61
255.0
1080...1613
8.25
282.2
1123...1323
8.94
279.4
1297.s. 1693
9U
2.0
272.1
1173..*1373
Al
1.0
260
914...1212
In
6.78
270.5
1274+..1659
3U
4g
1.1
Ge
2.1
250
264
777..*1513
939 ... 1675
OAg;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity
11oAgt 105Ag*
single crystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning
98A,,,
polycjstals;
99.98%;
autoradiography
Al;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
sputter sectioning;
SIMS analysis (27Al+ signal)
l141n.
singlecrystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning
In;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
sputter sectioning;
SIMS analysis (lIn+, 131n+
signals);
two-exponential tit of the [78V2]
and [81Gl] data:
0: = 1.26 * 10v4 m2s-,
Q, = 251 kJmo!-,
0: = 1.9m2s-,
Q2 = 397.8 kJ mol-
68Ge (implanted);
single crystals;
99.99% ;
grinder and sputter sectioning
Neumann
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series III/26
solute
135
Ref. p. 2031
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

3n
4.56
267.2
1242.e. 1642
l13Sn;
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
32
79Vl
!LS
1.39
251.8
1239.~. 1634
73As;
single crystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning
32
79V2
Sb
3.85
264.0
1203... 1674
Sb;
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
32
76Vl
1.4
219.0
1078.e. 1495
35s.
32
75Vl
23Te;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
32
89Nl
235~.
7121
68B2
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
Te
2.6
254.0
1135... 1553
1.0
236.1
1248... 1348
polycrystals;
99.998% ;
autoradiography;
solubility also measured:
c,= 6.2exp(-83.7kJmol-/RT)
Pu
0.17
213.5
1298.a. 1398
239Pu;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
autoradiography;
solubility also measured: c,
increases from 30 ppm at 1300 K
to 80 ppm at 1400 K
Matrix: palladium (Pd)

Pd
34
Fe
0.18
260.0
1373... 1523
5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
grinder sectioning
34
77Fl
1273..a 1673
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
electron microprobe analysis (Pt/Pt
2.06 % Fe sandwich samples)
34
-
78Bl
Matrix: platinum (Pt)

Pt
Fe
0.025
243.4
(continued)
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.11 Impurity diffusion in noble metals
136
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Uatrix: platinum (Pt), continued

:0
19.6
310.7
1023... 1323
To;
polycrystals;
99.9%;
distinctly curved Arrhenius plot
68Kl
4g
0.13
258.1
1473...1873
Ag;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
electron microprobe analysis (Pt/
Pt 2.4% Ag sandwich samples)
78Bl
4u
0.13
252.0
850...1265
199Au;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
sputter sectioning
78Rl
41
1.3.10-3
193.6
1373..+ 1873
Al;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
electron microprobe analysis (Pt/
Pt 1.23% Al sandwich samples)
iolute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
34
78Bl

Cu, Ag, Au
Matrix: copper (Cu)
cu
-
35...38
Be
0.66
195.9
973 ..* 1348
Be;
polycrystals;
X-ray diffraction analysis
36
73F3
Ii
0.693
196
983 .** 1283
Ti;
polycrystals;
99.998% ;
(Cu/Cu 2 ... 3 % Ti sandwich
samples)
7712
2.48
215
995...1342
4av.
77Hl
7OS2
pol&rystals;
99.998%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
anomalous diffusion profiles
Nb
2.04
251.5
1080...1179
95Nb;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
penetration profiles only 15 pm
Neumann
Land&-BBmsfein
New Series III./26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
137
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
51Cr.
polylrystals;
99.995%;
residual activity
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
near-surface effect for x < 15 urn
51Cr.
polycrystals;
99.998%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
Wr;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
long Gaussian profiles;
D(1200 K) = 1.4. lo-l3 m2s-
71B3
71Sl
77Hl
83Rl
Mn;
polycrystals;
54Mn
polyciystals;
99.998%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
54Mn;
single crystals;
99.998% ;
electrochemical sectioning
36
73F2
77Hl
79M3
59Fe;
single crystals;
99.998%;
lathe sectioning
s9Fe*
singlk crystals;
99.998% ;
lathe sectioning
59Fe;
99.995%;
residual activity
35
58Ml
61Ml
71B3
Matrix: copper (Cu), continued

Cr
Mn
Fe
1.02
224.0
1073... 1343
1.6
240.7
IlOO...
0.337
195
999 ... 1358
1195... 1202
0.74
195.5
973...1348
1.02
200
873 ... 1323
1.42
204.3
773...976
1.4
216.9
992... 1347
1.01
213.3
990... 1329
1.36
217.7
923 ... 1343
(continued)
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
138
Do
10W4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Fe;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
electrolytical sectioning
Fe;
polycrystals;
specpure;
resistometric method
73Bl
78Sl

1.3
215.6
1005... 1297
1.13
214.1
1063*.* 1274
Ru
8.5
257.5
1221... 1335
lo3Ru;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
electrolytical sectioning;
erfc-profile: c, = 0.018
* exp(- 100.5 kJ mol-/RT)
35
73Bl
co
1.93
226.5
975 ... 1351
35
58Ml
1.69
225.7
1163...1306
72B2
0.43
214.3
640 . . a848
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.998% ;
lathe sectioning
6OCo;
polycrystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning and SIMS
analysis (sgCo+ signal)
two-exponential tit of the [58Ml]
and [84Dl] data:
Dy= 0.74*10m4ms1r,
Q, = 217.2 kJmol-,
0: = 736 . 10m4m2 s-l,
Q, = 312.8 kJmol-
84Dl
38
88N3
Fe
Rh
3.3
242.8
1023... 1348
Rh;
polycrystals;
35
72F2
Ir
10.6
276.4
1185...1303
1921r.
35
78Kl
35
58Ml
singld crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Ni
2.7
236.6
1016+..1349
63Ni ;
single crystals;
99.998% ;
lathe sectioning
(continued)
Neumann
LandolbB6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-

Ni
3.8
237.8
139
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
968 ... 1334
63Ni.
5911
64M4
71F3
72A2
83M3
38
88N3
1.7
231.5
1172-s. 1340
2.3
235.3
973.e. 1323
1.94
232.8
1128...1328
0.76
225.0
613...950
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
63Ni s
polydrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Ni;
polycrystals;
66Ni;
polycrystals;
99.99% + 99.999%;
lathe sectioning
Ni;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning;
SIMS analysis;
two-exponential tit to the [58Ml,
64M4, 72A2, 8311131
data:
0: = 0.7.10e4 m2se1,
Q, = 225 kJmol-,
0: = 0.025 m2s-,
Q, = 299.3 kJ mol-
Pd
1.71
227.6
1080... 1320
lo3Pd;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
35
63Pl
Pt
0.67
233
1023 ... 1348
72Fl
0.56
233
1149... 1352
Pt;
polycrystals;
isrpt, igspt;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
35
82Nl
0.63
194.7
37
60Nl
0.61
194.7
70B2
0.574
195.0
(1053 ... 1353) Ag*

single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
(823 ... 1273) OAg;
99.99% ;
residual activity
1049... 1352 o&
99.99% ;
activity
7262
Ag
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
140
Do
10-4mZs-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

Au
Zn
Cd
(1053 ... 1353) lg*Au;

single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
195Au.
1085... 1342
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
ig6Au;
993 ..* 1350
single crystals;
99.999%;
Au;
633 . ..982
single crystals;
99.999% ;
sputter sectioning
0.69
210.6
0.897
212.5
0.537
205.6
0.0803
191.2
0.34
190.9
878...1322
0.41
192.8
1168,122O
0.73
198.9
1165...1348
0.24
188.8
1073..*1313
0.28
189.3
993...1193
0.935
191.3
998...1223
0.73
188.8
(1053.s.1353)
I.27
194.6
1032... 1346
1.2
194
983...1309
35, 38 60NI
77Gl
87FI
38
65Zn;
single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning;
two data points only
65Zn*
polyciystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
65Zn;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Zn;
polycrystals;
specpure;
37
57Hl
67P3
69K2
72A2
79D2
Cd;
single crystals;
99.98%;
lathe sectioning
%d;
single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
logCd; single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Cd; polycrystals;
99.998% ;
grinder sectioning
36
58Hl
60Nl
7262
82Hl
Neumann
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series 111126
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
141
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

Hg
0.35
184.2
(1053 ... 1353) 03Hg;

single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
36
60Nl
Al
0.08
181.3
973 ..- 1348
37
73F4
Ga
0.78
196.4
60Nl
0.523
192.7
71Kl
0.58
193.8
37
77F2
1.30
193.6
37
7262
1.87
196.4
78K2
0.219
178
(1053 ... 1353) 72Ga;

single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
1153 ... 1352 67~~.
polycjstals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
973...1323
Ga;
polycrystals;
1051... 1351 1141~.
single and polycrystals ;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
41~.
1071... 1354
polycjrstals;
99.999% ;
602... 1351
In;
single crystals;
99.9998% ;
sputter sectioning;
SIMS analysis (lisIn+ signal)
two-exponential tit to the [7262,
78K2, and 83Gl] data:
07 = 0.29. 10m4m2 s-l,
Q, = 179.6 kJmol-,
0: = 0.311 rns-l,
Q, = 295.4 kJ mol-
83Gl
38
88N3
In
Al;
polycrystals;
Tl
0.71
181.3
1058... 1269
04T1;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
37
63Kl
Si
0.07
171.7
973 ... 1323
Si;
polycrystals;
37
73F3
Ge
0.397
187.4
975 .. 1289
6*Ge.
single crystals;
99.998%;
lathe sectioning
36
70R2
Landolt-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
(continued)
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
142
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
68Ge;
polycrystals;
99.99%;
lathe sectioning
71Kl
36
73Gl
74Fl
79Kl
210Pb;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
36
77Gl
32~.
37
76Sl
37
6ONl
70Kl
124Sb;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
24Sb;
single crystals;
99.99%;
lathe sectioning
124Sb;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
36
6011
73Gl
79Kl
2oBi;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
37
77Gl

Ge
0.315
185.5
1111. ..I326
Sn
0.842
188.2
1011..a 1321
0.82
187.6
973.e. 1348
0.67
184.4
1018...1355
Pb
0.862
182.4
1006...1225
3.05.10-3
136.1
847... 1319
1lQ.
singlecrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Sn;
polycrystals;
%n;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
As
Sb
Bi
0.12
175.8
0.202
176.4
(1053 ... 1353) 76As;

single crystals;
specpure;
lathe sectioning
1086...1348
73As*
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
activity
0.34
175.8
873 ... 1275
0.616
182.7
1011.a. 1321
0.48
179.6
1049...1349
0.766
178.1
1074...1348
Neumann
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
143
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1073... 1273
35s.
36
691112

S
23
206.6
single crystals;
99.999%;
Se
1.0
180.5
878...1150
?Se (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
37
89Rl
Te
0.97
180.5
822... 1214
rTe (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
37
89R.I
Matrix: silver (Ag)

Ag
Ti
198
1051..* 1220
Ti;
polycrystals;
99.999%;
(Ag/Ag 0.23; 0.45 % Ti sandwich samples)
39,40
79M4
1.33
2.72
209
1012..* 1218
49.
19M4
79M4
39
81Nl
79M4
po&rystals;
99.999%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
3.29
210
1023... 1215
1.1
192.6
976 ... 1231
4.29
196
883 ... 1212
Cr
Mn
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Cr.
polyirystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
51Cr*
singlb crystals;
99.9999%;
erfc-profile: c, = 1620
* exp(- 170.0 kJmol-/RT)
s4Mn;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
Neumann
144
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
[Ref. p. 203
Fig.
Ref.
sgFe;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
(1073 .*. 1205) 5gFe;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
1062... 1213 Fe;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning;
near-surface effect
1066...1219
103R
106~~.
single crystals:
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning;
pronounced near-surface effect
39
6lMl
73Bl
77B2
59Pl
Method/Remarks
Matrix: silver (Ag), continued

Fe
242
205.3
992... 1201
2.6
205.2
1.9
206.7
Ru
180
275.5
co
1.9
204.1
(973 ... 1214)
6oCo;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
39
73Bl
Ni
21.9
229.3
1022... 1223
6lH2
15
217.3
904...1199
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning;
76Ll
78Sl
63Ni.
single crystals;
99.999%;
electrolytical sectioning;
.exp(-33.7kJmol-/IV)
Ni;
polycrystals;
specpure;
2.8
230.4
1023..+ 1193
Pd
9.57
237.6
1009~~~1212
lo3Pd;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
39
63Pl
Pt
6.0
238.2
923 +.. 1223
75Fl
1.9
235.7
1094... 1232
Pt;
polycrystals;
lg*Pt, r=pt;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
39
82Nl
Neumann
Land&-BBmslein
New Series HI/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
145
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
64cu;
40
57Sl
80Dl
56Jl
57Ml
63Ml
cu
Au
Zn
Cd
Land&-Bijmstein
New Series III/%
1.23
193.0
990... 1218
0.029
164.1
699...897
0.262
190.5
923 ... 1223
0.41
194.3
929...1178
0.85
202.1
991...1198
0.62
199.0
0.54
174.6
916... 1197
0.532
174.6
970... 1225
0.85
176.3
953...1165
0.44
174.6
866... 1210
0.504
176.8
1042... 1226
0.079
159.5
926... 1221
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
CU;
single crystals;
99.99%;
sputter sectioning;
SIMS analysis (63Cu signal)
198Au.
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Au;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
198Au.
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
best tit to data from [56Jl,
57M1, 63MlJ
65Zn.
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
Zn;
polycrystals;
specpure;
39
55Sl
40
67Rl
79D2
%d;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Cd;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
chemical sectioning and residual
activity
40
54Tl
69K4
03Hg.
singe &ystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
39
57Sl
Neumann
solute
[Ref. p. 203
146
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: silver (As), continued

91
0.13
159.5
873...1223
Al;
polycrystals;
39
75F2
3a
0.42
162.9
873...1213
Ga;
polycrystals;
purity no specified;
40
77F2
h-i
0.41
170.1
886.a. 1209
l141n.
40
54Tl
67Kl
40
84Ml
singlecrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
0.55
175.0
1044...1215
1 141n.
polycjstals;
99.999%;
activity
i141n:
single crystals;
99.999%;
sputter sectioning
0.36
169.0
553.e.838
Tl
0.15
158.7
(918 ..a 1073)
04T1;
polycrystals;
activity
40
58H2
Ge
0.084
152.8
(948...1123)
lGe;
polycrystals;
activity
39
58H2
Sn
0.25
165.0
865.+.1210
40
54Tl
0.472
171.0
1026...1227
113Sn;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
jSn, l19Sn;
polycrystals;
99.999%;
activity
69K3
Pb
0.22
159.5
(973 . . .1073)
210Pb; polycrystals;
lathe sectioning;
three data points only
55Hl
As
0.042
149.6
915...1213
As; polycrystals;
99.999% ;
(vapour deposited film of inactive As)
75H3
Neumann
Landoh-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
147
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
iz4Sb;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
124Sb;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
activity
39
54Sl
67K2
35s.
67B2

Sb
0.169
160.4
742... 1215
0.234
163.6
1053... 1225
1.65
167.5
873+..1173
policrystals;
99.999% ;
grinder sectioning
Se
0.285
157.4
759...1109
75Se(implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
40
89Rl
Te
0.47
162.9
1043... 1213
69K3
0.21
154.7
65O.a.1169
Te;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
chemical sectioning
Te (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
40
8763
Matrix: gold (Au)

Au
41
Fe
0.19
172.5
973 ... 1323
Fe;
polycrystals;
41
77F3
co
0.22
183.4
973 ... 1323
77F3
0.25
185.2
1030.**1335
co;
polycrystals;
57co;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
41
78H2
0.30
192.6
1153 ... 1210
63Ni.
57Rl
973 ... 1323
poly&ystals;
99.96%;
lathe sectioning
Ni;
polycrystals;
41
76F2
Ni
0.25
Land&-B&n&n
New Series III/26
188.4
Neumann
148
Solute

Do
10-4mZs-
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: gold (Au), continued

Pd
0.076
195.1
973...1273
Pd;
polycrystals;
41
78F2
Pt
0.095
201.4
973...1273
Pt;
polycrystals;
41
78F2
cu
0.105
170.2
973...1179
Cu (vapour deposited 1 u layer);

polycrystals;
99.99% ;
41
66Vl
Ag
0.072
168.3
943 ... 1281
63Ml
0.08
169.1
1046.~31312
65Kl
0.086
169.3
1004.~. 1323
Age
single crystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
Ag;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
electrochemical sectioning and
residual activity
Ag, losAg;
single crystals;
41
74H2
99.999 % ;
Zn
0.082
158.1
969.a.1287
65Zn;
99.999%;
41
77Cl
Hg
0.116
156.5
877...1300
203Hg;
single crystals;
99.994% ;
lathe sectioning
41
65Ml
AI
0.052
143.6
773... 1223
Al;
polycrystals;
41
78F3
In
0.075
153.7
(973 ... 1273)
l141n.
41
71D2
41
77Cl
polycjstals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning and electron
microprobe analysis (Au/Au
0.3% In sandwich samples)
Ge
0.073
144.5
lOlO...
68Ge.

99.999%;
Neumann
Iandolt-Bhstein
New Series Ill,/26
Solute
149
3.2.12 Impurity diffusion in zinc group metals
Ref. p. 2031
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Sn;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
(Au/Au 0.3 % Sn sandwich
samples)
72H2
3Sn.
41
Matrix: gold (Au), continued

Sn
0.0412
143.3
970... 1268
0.0399
143.1
962... 1272
polyciystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
Sb
0.0114
129.4
1003 ..+ 1278
Sb;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
(Au/Au 0.15 . ..0.4% Sb sandwich samples)
72H3
Te
0.063
140.9
908...1145
Te (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
41
89Rl

Zn, Cd, Hg
Matrix: zinc (Zn)
Zn
42,43
63Ni.
42
67M2
11
c 8.1
I c 0.43
136.6
121.5
564...664
11c 2.22
I c 2.00
123.6
125.3
611 .*a688
64cLl;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
42
66B2
11c 0.32
I c 0.45
108.9
115.6
544...686
OAg;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
42
61Rl
AU
11
c 0.97
I c 0.29
124.5
124.4
588...688
620...688
198Au;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
42
63G3
Cd
11c 0.114
Ic 0.117
86.0
85.5
498...689
l15Cd;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
43
63G3
Ni
cu
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
single crystals;
99.999%;
autoradiography
Neumann
150
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: zinc (Zn), continued
Hg
11c 0.056
1 c 0.073
82.5
84.5
533.~~686
203Hg;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
43
67B3
Ga
11
c 0.016
lc 0.018
77.0
76.0
513...676
72Ga;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
43
66B2
In
11
c 0.062
lc 0.14
80.0
82.1
444 9. ~689
l141n;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
43
61Rl
Sn
IIC 0.15
lc 0.13
81.2
77.0
571 . ..673
13Sn;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
43
7OW2
11c 2.21
106.3
(453 .** 573)
67Hl
(Ic 1.40
1 c 0.68
103.2
105.0
(478 . . .583)
OAg;
single crystals;
99.99% ;
Ag;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
44
-
44
72Ml
Au
11
c 1.40
lc 3.16
106.6
110.7
(453 . . - 578)
g5Au;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
44
72Ml
Zn
11c 0.13
1 c 0.084
75.5
75.4
(428 . . .588)
65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999;
lathe sectioning
44
72Ml
Hg
11c 0.21
1 c 0.21
78.6
78.6
(423 . . .573)
2o3Hg*
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
44
72Ml
In
11c 0.10
1 c 0.090
73.1
70.9
(433 ... 573)
r141n;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
44
72Ml
Pb
11
c 0.060
1 c 0.071
68.9
65.8
514*..571
210Pb; single crystals;

99.999%;
lathe sectioning
44
81Yl
Matrix: cadmium (Cd)

Cd
A!2
Matrix: mercury (I-&) - No data available
Neumann
Landolt-Kmstein
New Series III/26
3.2.13 Impurity diffusion in aluminum group metals
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10V4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
151
Fig.
Ref.

Al, Ga, In, Tl
Matrix: aluminum (Al)
Al
45,46
126
803.e.923
Li;
polycrystals;
99.993% ;
46
87Ml
24Na.
po1ycrysta1s;
7783
137&.
73T3
Li
0.35
Na
6.7. 1O-4
719...863
cs
0.0104
453...573
polyciystals;
99.997%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
pronounced near-surface effect ;
determination of D from deeper
penetrations
667...928
28Mg;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
46
74Rl
242.0
804..+913
g5Zr.
polyirystals;
99.999%;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning;
73M4
253.0*
859.s.923
51Cr
single crystals;
99.999%;
* recalculated by present authors
45
7OP4
MO
250.0
898...928
MO;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
electron microprobe analysis (Al/
Al 0.2 ... 0.3 % MO sandwich
samples)
83Cl
Mn
211.4
s6Mn, Mn (implanted);
99.999% ;
electrochemical sectioning
45
71H3
1.24
Zr
728
Cr
1.85. IO3*
(continued)
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
152
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmo!-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Mn;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
A! 0.5 ... I % Mn sandwich
samples)
s4Mn ;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
73B3
87F2
Fe;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
sgFe (implanted);
99.99 to 99.999%;
lathe and microtome sectioning
gFe;
polycrystals;
99.995% ;
microtome sectioning (profile
evaluation by taking into account the formation of an
intermetallic compound in the
near-surface range)
5gFe (implanted);
single crystals;
99.9995% ;
mainly pressure dependence
studied;
two data points close to the
results of [70HI]
70A3
70HI
87BI
89B2
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
6OCo;
polycrystals;
99.995%;
activity
co;
polycrystals;
99.995% ;
6oCo (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
45
7OP4
72A3
Matrix: aluminum (Al), continued

Mn
Fe
co
I215
229.0
773 . ..923
317
217
843 . ..927
135
192.6
823...906
9.1 . 105
258.7
792...931
53
183.4
793 . ..922
(220)
855, 896
464
174.8
695...921
250
174.6
673...913
141
169.0
742.e.912
506
175.7
724...930
Neumann
78E2
83Hl
Land&-BCmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
153
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-l
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
45
78E2

Ni
4.4
145.8
742...924
Ni;
polycrystals;
99.995%;
cu
0.647
135.1
706...925
0.654
136.1
594...928
0.13
117.2
615...883
0.16
118.9
665...868
0.118
116.5
644...928
0.077
113.0
696... 882
0.27
121.0
723...873
0.131
116.4
642.a.928
0.259
120.8
630...926
0.30
121.4
(700 . . .920)
7OP4
64cu.
45
single crystals;
99.999% ;
89Fl
67Cu; polycrystals;
99.999%;
(743 .a.928 K);
grinder sectioning and residual activity measurement
(594 . . .743 K)
slight near-surface effect below
743 K
70A3
Ag;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
70B3
o&*
single crystals;
99.995% ;
microprobe analysis (vapour
deposited film of inactive Ag)
7OP4
lAg;
46
single crystals;
99.999%;
70A3
lg8Au;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
70B3
AU;
single crystals;
99.995% ;
grinder sectioning
7OP4
AU;
46
single crystals;
99.999%;
7OP4
65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
65Zn;
7263
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning
(continued)
&
Au
Zn
LandolGB6mstein
New Series III/26
Neumann

Solute
Matrix:
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
[Ref. p. 203
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Zn;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
(AI/Al 1% Zn sandwich
samples)
65Zn;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning
65Zn.
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
grinder sectioning
Zn;
polycrystals;
99.995%;
65Zn.
singld crystals;
99.999% ;
evaluation together with the
results of [7OP4]
65Zn;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
*two sets of measurements;
evaluation together with the
results of [72G3, 77B33
73B3
76F3
77B3
78E2
78P2
aluminum (Al), continued
0.2
120.6
613...913
0.177
118.1
438...918
0.27
117.8
614..-890
0.20
120.7
650...903
0.325
117.9
688 ..*928
0.16
0.26
117.0
119.1
714 ... 893*

674 .. 837*
0.245
119.6
(614 ... 920)
Cd
1.04
124.3
714..-907
Cd;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
Hg
15.3
141.8
718...862
2o3Hg*
polycjstals;
99.999%;
residual activity;
near-surface effect (oxide hold-up);
penetrations
7882
Ga
0.49
123.1
680.~~926
72Ga;
single crystals;
99.999%;
46
7OP4
In
0.123
115.6
(673 .*. 873)
141n;
polycrystals;
residual activity
70A2
Zn
Neumann
83B3
46
46
70A3
Land&-B6mstein
New Series 111126
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
155
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
46
71H4

In
1.16
122.7
715...929
l141n (implanted);
single crystals;
99.999% ;
Tl
116
152.7
737...862
204T1;
polycrystals;
99.999%;
residual activity;
penetrations
78S2
Si
0.35
123.9
618 . ..904
73B2
2.02
136.0
753 ... 893
Si;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
(Al/Al 0.5 % Si sandwich
samples)
Si;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
Al 0.58 .+. 1.15% Si sandwich
samples)
78F4
Ge
0.481
121.3
674...926
71Ge.
single crystals;
99.999%;
46
7OP4
Sn
0.245
119.3
(673 *. ~873)
113&.
70A2
46
90El
polycjstals;
residual activity
113Sn (implanted);
single crystals;
99.9998% ;
0.84
118.6
649...905
Pb
50
145.6
777 ... 876
210Pb;
polycrystals;
99.999%;
residual activity;
penetrations
7882
Sb
0.09
121.7
721...893
124Sb;
polycrystals;
specpure Al;
residual activity;
grinder sectioning
68B3
Land&BBmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
156
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
798.e.898
235U.
polycjstals;
autoradiography
68B4
47
-
74Al
Matrix: aluminum (Al), (continued)

u
0.1
117.2
Matrix: gallium (Ga) - No data available

Matrix: indium (In)
[n
cl0
1.2.10-S
25.1*
383...423
6OCo;
single crystals;
99.997% ;
distinct data scattering;
* diffusion in (111) direction
4g
IIC 0.11
1 c 0.52
48.1
53.6
(298 ... 423)
Ag*
single crystals;
99.99%;
47
66A2
AU
9.10-3
28.1
(198...423)
lgOAu;
single crystals with random
orientation;
99.99%;
47
66A2
l-i
0.049
64.9
323... 429
204T1;
polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
47
52El
Matrix: thallium (Tl)

ri
48
4g
11
c 0.027
1 c 0.038
46.9
49.4
(360, 480)
(a-Tl)
48
68A2
0.042
49.8
(510 ... 570)

(P-TO
Ag;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
bee polycrystals;
same procedure as for single
crystals
IIC 2-10-s
1 c 5.3 * 10-Q
11.7
21.8
(390, 490)
(or-Tl)
48
68A2
5.2. 1O-4
25.1
(510 ..* 570)

(B-V
lgOAu;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
bee polycrystals;
same procedure as for single
crystals
Au
Neumann
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series 111126
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
3.2.14 Impurity diffusion in group IV B metals
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
157
Fig.
Ref.
3.2.14 Impurity diffusion in group IVB metals

Sn, Pb
Diffusion data for semiconducting elements Si, Ge are not included. They can be found in [89L2].
Matrix: tin (Sn)
Sn
49, 50
78S3
Fe
4.8. lO-4
51.2
387...462
co;
polycrystals;
99.9995% ;
MijDbauer spectroscopy (57Fe
signal)
Ni
11
c 1.99 . IO-
Ic 1.87. lo-
18.1
54.2
298...373
393 . ..473
63Ni;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
50
84Yl
cu
Ic 2.4. lO-3
33.1
(413 .** 503)
64Cu;
single crystals;
50
67D2
&
11c 7.1 . 10-3

..Lc 0.18
51.5
77.0
(403 . . .503)
OAg;
single crystals;
50
66D2
Au
11
c 5.8 . lO-3
Ic 0.16
46.1
74.1
(403 . . * 503)
lg8Au;
single crystals;
50
66D2
Zn
11
c 1.1 . 10-Z
I c 8.4
50.2
89.2
(410... 500)
65Zn;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
50
74H3
Cd
11c 220
Ic 130
118.1
115.6
(460 . . .500)
logCd;
single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
49
74H3
Hg
11
c 7.5
Ic 30
105.9
112.2
448 . ..499
03Hg;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
49
72Wl
In
11
c 12.2
Ic 34.1
107.2
108.0
454... 494
141n;
single crystals;
99.998%;
lathe sectioning
49
58Sl
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
158
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: tin (Sn), continued

TI
1.3 * 10-J
61.5
410..+489
04T1;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning and autoradiomphy ;
grain-boundary contributions
69B3
Sb
IIC 71.0
I c 73.0
121.8
123.1
466.s.499
124Sb;
single crystals;
99.999%;
lathe sectioning
49
71H5,
7483
Matrix: lead (Pb)

Pb
Na
6.3
118.5
522...586
22Na;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
51
-
7201
co
9. lo-
46.4
383 ... 573
sgCo (implanted; ny6Co,

activation analysis);
polycrystals;
99.9999%;
78K3
Ni
1.0. 10-z
44.5
(481 . . .593)
63Ni.
51
73C2
singlk crystals;
99.9999% ;
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
8282
51
75D2
1.1 . 10-z
45.4
423.a. 523
Pd
3.4. 10-3
35.4
(470 . *. 590)
rogPd;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
Pt
1.1 . 10-2
42.3
490..*593
cu
7.9. 10-3
33.6
(498 . . .598)
8OVl
Pt;
51
single crystals;
99.9999%;
microtome sectioning (Pt concentration determined by observing
the variation in the melting
curve for each slice);
*exp(- 51.0 kJmol-/RT)
64Cu;
66Dl
(continued)
Solute
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Matrix: lead (Pb), continued

(23.4) *
(8.6 * 10-y
cu
Au
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
491... 803
64cu;
72C2
51
75D3
65Cl
66Dl
74A2
75D2
51
82H2
lQ8Au;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
56Al
195~~.
61Al
198~~.
66A3
single Lystals;
99.999%;
lQ8Au; single crystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
66Kl
single crystals;
99.9999%;
D(p) measured between 0 and
5.6 GPa;
* partly erroneous zero-pressure
results
reanalysis of the results of
[72C2], using an improved
pressure calibration
** Do and Q represent the zeropressure parameters
8.6. 10-3
34.2 **
-*
(470 . . .750)
4.6. lo-
60.5
(398 ... 598)
4.42. 1O-2
60.8
437.e.572
4.8. 1O-2
60.8 **
4.6. 1O-2
60.8
423...573
2.8. 1O-3
37.3
463 ... 569
4.1 * 10-3
39.1
367...598
&
159
Ref. p. 2031
OAg;
single crystals;
99.999%;
3.9 GPa;
* zero-pressure values for Do and
Q not evaluated
Ag.
single crystals;
OAg;
single crystals;
99.998%;
reanalysis of the results of [65Cl]
using an improved pressure
calibration;
** Do and Q represent the zeropressure fitting parameters
OAg;
polycrystals;
99.999% ;
lathe sectioning
single Lystals;
99.999%;
2.5. 1O-3
8.7. 1O-3
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
36.6
41.9
(353 ... 523)
(463 . . .593)
Neumann
(continued)
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
160
Do
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
Fig.
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
(444 . . .693)
ig8Au;
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
D(p) measured between 2.1 and
3.9 GPa;
* Do and Q represent the zeropressure parameters
reanalysis of the results of [71Wl], using an improved pressure
calibration;
ig5Au;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
9Au.
51
single crystals;
99.9999%;
65Zn.
single crystals;
99.9999%;
65Zn.
51
singld crystals;
99.9999% ;
4.7 GPa;
Cd;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
51
Cd;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
4 GPa;
zo3Hg.
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
Ref.

Au
Zn
Cd
Hg
5.6. 1O-3
39.7 *
5.8 . lo- 3
40.3 *
3.62. 1O-3
37.4
411*.*511
5.2. lo-
38.6
(334 ... 563)
1.6. lo-*
47.3
455... 572
1.65.10-*
47.8 *
(453 ... 773)
0.409
88.9
(423 ... 593)
0.92
92.8 *
(523 ... 823)
1.05
95.0
466...573
71Wl
75D2
75W2
79D3
74R2
77Dl
69M3
77Vl
73Wl
(continued)
Neumann
Land&BSmstein
New Series W/26
Solute
161
3.2.15 Impurity diffusion in group V B semimetals
Ref. p. 2031
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
H&?
1.5
96.7 *
(523 ... 823)
03Hg*
single crystals;
99.9999% ;
3.8 GPa;
51
77Vl
In
33
112.2
437.e.493
In;
single crystals;
99.999%;
(5 urn film of inactive In
deposited on the crystal)
69K5
Tl
0.511
101.9
480..+596
04T1;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
51
61R2
Sn
0.41
94.4 *
(523 . . .723)
3Sn.
51
77D2
singlecrystals;
99.9999% ;
3 GPa;
Sb
0.29
92.9
461...588
lz4Sb;
single crystals;
99.9999%;
72Nl
Bi
6.8
112.2
564, 596
loBi;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
only two data points
61R2
3.2.15 Impurity diffusion in group VB semimetals

P, As, Sb, Bi
Matrix: phosphorus (P) - No data available
Matrix: arsenic (As)
- No data available
Matrix: antimony (Sb)

Sb
Ag
67
119.7
603...879
liAg; polycrystals;
99.9 % ;
serial sectioning
Matrix: bismuth (Bi) - No data available

Land&-BGmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
73K3
iolute
[Ref. p. 203
3.2.16 Impurity diffusion in actinide group metals
162
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.

AC, Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, etc.
vlatrix: actinium (AC) - No data available
vlatrix: thorium (Th)
[-thorium
rh
5.10-3
80.8
1238...1558
52
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
diffusion couple method and spark
source mass spectroscopy;
charge also determined
79w 1
5. 1o-4
55.3
1238... 1558
52
co;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
79Wl
Ni
4.10-3
77.9
1238...1558
52
Ni;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
79Wl
Pa
1.26. lo2
312.8
231Pa;
polycrystals;
99.84%;
profile determination via u-emission spectra
52
67Sl
LJ
2.21 . lo4
332.0
233~.
52
67Sl
963...1150
52
polycjstals;
99.84% ;
profile determination via a-emission spectra
g-thorium
Th
Zr
1.73 . lo4
no self-diffusion data for g-Th

available
384.0
1773... 1873
52
Zr;
polycrystals;
99.977%;
diffusion couple method and scanning laser mass spectroscopy;
84Sl
Landolr-B5mslein
New series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
jolute
Do
10m4m2sK1
kJmol-
163
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1693
1963
8iHf.
52
65Rl
Matrix: thorium @Th), continued

Hf
D=1.09.10-12m2s-1
2.09 . IO- m2 s-l
polycjstals;
lathe sectioning
0.019
129.8
1653.'.1939
52
v;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
7834
Nb
0.5
201.8
1643... 1933
52
Nb;
polycrystals;
99.95% ;
7884
Ta
0.57
210.6
1648...1933
52
Ta;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
78S4
MO
15.1
216.0
1698... 1873
52
MO;
polycrystals;
99.977% ;
84Sl
0.103
160.0
1683...1818
52
W;
polycrystals;
99.977% ;
84Sl
Re
4.04.10-3
84.0
1663 ... 1943
52
Re;
polycrystals;
99.977% ;
84Sl
Fe
4.10-3
71.6
1633... 1898
52
Fe;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
source mass spectroscopy
79Wl
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
Solute
[Ref. p. 203
164
Do
10V4mzs-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
co;
52
79Wl
52
Ni;
polycrystals;
99.95%;
79Wl
Matrix: thorium (Th), continued

co
4.10-j
65.3
1633... 1898
polycrystals;
99.95%;
Ni
4 * 10-4
38.1
1633.s.1898
Matrix: protactinium (Pa) - No data available

Matrix: uranium (U)
u-uranium
u
-
918
polycrystals;
D determined from precipitate
dissolution
53
53
D = 1.77. lo-l3 m2s-l
1021.2
53
62R 1
D=3.60~10-14mZs-1
6.45. lo- rns-l
3.41 . lo-l4 m2 s-l *
5.36. lo-l4 m2 s-l
1.61 . lo-l4 m2s-
1.51 . lo-l3 m2sT1*
1.07. lo-l3 m2sT1
943
953
968.8
985.7
993
1002.5
1013
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.993% ;
lathe sectioning
51Cr;
polycrystals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning;
* mean of two values
53
70D2
Fe
D = 8.71 . lo-i3 m2s-*

2.6.10-12m2s-1*
974
1033
5gFe;
polycrystals;
99.993% ;
lathe sectioning;
* mean of two values
53
62Rl
co
1.54.10-2
114.9
964.e. 1036
6OCo.
polycjstals;
99.98% ;
lathe sectioning
53
70D2
53
Fe
Dz3.10-14m2s-1
p-uranium
u
Cr
y-uranium
u
-
72Sl
Nb
4.87. 1O-2
166.0
1063...1376
g5Nb; polycrystals;
99.99%;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
Cr
5.47.10-3
102.4
1070~~~1311 51Cr; polycrystals;

99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
Le Claire
Landolt-BBmsfein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
Solute
165
Do
10-4m2s-
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
Matrix: uranium (y-u), continued

Mn
1.81. 1O-4
58.1
1060..+ 1212
54Mn.
polyciystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
Fe
2.69. 1O-4
50.3
1059... 1263
5gFe*
polydrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
co
3.51 . 10-4
52.6
1056... 1263
6Oco.
polyckystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
Ni
5.36. 1O-4
65.6
1059... 1313
63Ni;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
64P2
cu
1.96. 1O-3
100.7
1059... 1312
53
64P2
Au
4.86. 1O-3
127.3
1057.~. 1280
64Cu;
polycrystals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
95Au.
polycjstals;
99.99% ;
lathe sectioning
53
61R3
Matrix: neptunium (Np) - No data available

Matrix: plutonium (pu)
S-plutonium
Pu
-
54
co
1.2. 10-2
53.2
617...699
6OCo;
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
54
75Cl
Ag
D = 1.08 . lo-l4 m2 s-i
695
OAg;
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
54
76Cl
Au
D=2.37.10-i4m2s-
713
lg8Au;
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
54
76Cl
s-plutonium
Pu
-
54
co
1.4. 10-3
41.4
757...894
6OCo.
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
54
75C2
cu
1.0. 10-3
51.5
773...853
cu;
polycrystals;
diffusion couple method
54
76C1,
7OLl
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
3 Diffusion of impurities in solid metallic elements (Figures)

Solute
Do
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
Temperature
range
K
[Ref. p. 203
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
l*om&;
54
76Cl
lg8Au;
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
54
76Cl
Matrix: plutonium (E-Pu), continued
Ag
4.9. 10-s
40.2
772...884
polycrystals;
grinder sectioning
Au
5.7 * 10-s
43.1
788...844
Figures for 3
c-T
1u
10-Q
I ,
T,=QXK
m2/s
-T
350
400 K
.,-10
Matrices -6Li
. ILie
m7fs
1o-'o
i-13
6
2.1,
2.6
2.8
3.040-k :
4.10-
I
2.1
I/T-
ig. 1. Li. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeficicnts in lithium vs. reciprocal temperature. Na: [67Ml],
31: [73M2]. Ag: [73Ml], Au: [6802], Zn: [69Ml], Cd:
70011, Hg: [7001], Ga: [7001], In: (68031,Sn: [6902],
b: (69021. Sb: [6902], Bi: [6902]. Self-dimusion according
\
2.3
2.5
2.1
l/T-
2.9
I
40K.
3.3
Fig. 2. 6Li and Li. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coeficicnts vs. reciprocaltemperaturein near pure 6Li and Li
matrices.Na: [71Ll], Au: [7101]. The lines for 6Li in 6Li and
for Li in Li areestimatedfrom Li and7Li mutualdiffusion
data 171Ll].
o chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Ik Claire
Ref. p. 2031
-T
2*lP
m*/s T,,=454 K
-1
350
400 K
I
300
I
IO-'0 *
4mg
m*/s
300
350 K
275
10-g
Matrices : Li,7Li
167
IV"
1o-10
I
a
10-l'
IOP
10-11
IO-'3 1
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
l/T-
3.0
.,0-j K-1
Fig. 3. 6Li and Li. Semilogarithmic plot of Au diffusion

coefficients in 6Li (full circles) and 7Li (open circles). The
solid line indicates the analysis of 7Li data in terms of two
separate Arrhenius terms [7101].
-T
4.1og
m*/s
10-13
i
2.8
3.0
3.2
l/T-
3.4
.,o-3K-'
Fig. 4. Na. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in sodium vs. reciprocal temperature. Li: [64Nl],
K: [67Bl], Rb: [67Bl], Ag: [83Bl], Au: [69Bl], Cd: [83Bl],
In: [83Bl], Tl: [83Bl], Sn: [83Bl]. Self-diffusion according to
chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
10-g
10-1'0
I
a
IO'
+i;--I,
-T
lo-"O
m*/s
1400 K 1200
800
1000
IO-"
,o-l;
,0-l>
lo-l3
10-K
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
l/T-
3.4
.10-j K-1
3.8
Fig. 5. K. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefticients in potassium vs. reciprocal temperature. Na: [67Bl],
Rb: [69Sl], Au: [7OSl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2
is shown for comparison.
I
a
IO.14
,0-l:
10-'E
10-l
Fig. 6. Be. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in beryllium vs. reciprocal temperature. Ce: [76Al],
V: [76Al], Nb: [76Al], Fe: [66Nl], Co: [79Gl], Ni: [70Al],
Cu: [65Dl, 74Ml], Ag: [66Nl], Au: [75Ml], Al: [76Gl].
Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Land&-Bihstein
New Series III/26
10-l
10-l
0.60
Le Claire
0.75
0.90
1.05
l/T-
1.20
.lOK-'
1.50
[Ref. p. 203
168
10-l
ml/s
900K
1100K
,, ,
lOO,
-1
1000
I
900
I
800
Matrix : Co
10-2
10.3
lo-j
I lo-
a
I 10-14
Q
10-H
10-n
10-16
10-n
1lil 0
1.125
1.200
1.275
l/T -
1.350 .lO-sK- 1.5f
:ig. 7. Mg. Semilogarithmic plot ofimpurity diffusion coeficients in magnesium vs. reciprocal temperature. Be: (66Yl],
ig: [67Ll], Zn: [67Ll], In: [67Ll], Fe: [68Pl], Ni: [68Pl],
J: [68Pl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for
:omparison
10-l
10-19
0.850
0.925
1.000
1.075
1.150 .lO-sK- 1.300
Fig. 9. Ca. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in calcium vs. reciprocal temperature. Fe, Ni, U
[68Pl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for
comparison.
10-l
ml/s;
900 K
750
I
Matrix : Mg 1
,o-l; 1
I
Q
10-l3-
lo-
1.0:i
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.3540% 1.40
Fig. 8. Mg. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeffkients in magnesium single crystals vs. reciprocal temperature. Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb [72Cl]. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Le Claire
Land&BBmstein
New Series 111.l26
Ref. p. 2031
169
-T
KY7 2000
10-7
2000 K
1750
1500
1500
1750 K
10-e lT
m2/s
1250
m2/s
1250
10-g
lo-8
lo-"O
I
Q
10-g
10-I'
QI 10-12
lo-lo
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65 0.70
l/T-
0.75 .@K-'
10-13
Fig. 10. SC. Semilogarithmic plot of Fe impurity diffusion

coeffkients in scandium vs. reciprocal temperature [86Al].
10-14
-T
IC
m
1100 K
1
I
T, =
1000
900
I
lo-l5
Matrix : Ce
1ln71K
lo-;
IO
0.60
IO1-9
-10
11LOl/OMII 1
1:
I:
A)
[72011\.
Ag oh
1
I ',
CeA
I t
La\!
IO-11
0.70 0.75
1/T-
0.80 .10-3K-' 0.90
coT?3c11/-
1200 K
10-g
m2/s
X-t-M+t-Au
1)
1
1000
1100
900
h+Ag[7iCl1
1
Id,
I
0.65
Fig. 11. Y. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in hcp a-yttrium vs. reciprocal temperature. Ag and
Fe : [75M2], Ni and Co : [8201]. Self-diffusion according to
IO
I
Q
;I
800
m,Ag[72011
1.
lo-"[
10-l'
-1 I
IO-12
yibcc))
0.95
4 IT
1.00
PCfcc)
I ,0-l:
Matrix : La
Stbccl
I\
, o-1:
IO-13
10-l
IO-14
0.90
0.95
1.00 1.05
1.10
l/T-
1.15
1.20 .10-3K-' 1.:

10-l'
Fig. 13. Ce. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefticients in fee y- and bee 6-cerium vs. reciprocal temperature. La: [73Dl], Gd: [76Ml], Mn: [75Dl], Fe: [73Cl,
75Dl], Co: [73Cl, 76Ml], Ag: [72Dl, 73Cl], Au: [72Dl].
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
0.85
0.90
1.05 .lOJK-'
Fig. 12. La. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeffkients in fee- and bee y-lanthanum vs. reciprocal temperature. Au: [69Dl], Ce: [76Fl]. Self-diffusion according to
Le Claire
[Ref. p. 203
170
-T
2 ,o.q
Ed
rn?/s
in-8
1100
1
1, =1205K
I I
1000
la,p =1068K
1200
1100
10-s m2/s n=1289 t,blll,,
900
I
I
Matrix : Pr
Matrix
-5
.I
10-q
10-s
I-
I
cl
1o-l0
: Nd
Pfbcc)
lo-[
]cc(hcp)
oi
1 I
o Mn
I 10-l
10-l
0.80
Pfbcc] 1
0.85
0.90
0.95
l/T-
1.00
:
-1104K- 110
Fig. 15. Nd. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in a- and S-neodymium vs. reciprocal temperature.
Mn: (75Dl], Fe: [75Dl].
orfhcp)
10-n
0 In
0 Lo
10-l
.Ho
-T
10-n
0.80 0.85
0.90
0.95 1.00
l/T-
. .
1.05 .lO-K- ;5
10-g
1700K
1500
1250
m2k
Fig. 14. Pr. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficicnts in hcp u- and bee L%praseodymiumvs. reciprocal
temperature. La: [69D2], Ho: [69D2]. Mn: [75Dl], Fe:
[75Dl], Co: [69D3], Cu: [7lDl], Ag: [69D3], Au: [69D3],
Au in single crystals: [SlDl], Zn: [70Dl], In: [69D2]. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
1o-q
lo-lo
A
10
10-n
0. 5
0.70
0.75 40-3K- I
l/TFig. 16. Er. Semilogarithmic plot of Au impurity diffusion
coeftkicnts for hexagonal erbium single crystals vs. reciprocal temperature [79Dl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2
I.82Claire
0.60
0.65
Land&-BGmstein
New Seriec 111126
Ref. p. 2031

-7
,o-8 2000 K
1500
I
'
m2/s T,=1940K
1250
1000
I
I
/'&=1155K
1o-7
m2/s
-I
1500
2000 K
I
11
I
T,=2125K
1000
II
Tu.p=1136K
I
I,
IF9
s'
173
P(bcc) 1 dhcp)
I
I
II
IO-"O
11 Mairix : Zr
lo-"
,o-l;
1O-l3
~I lo-l4
10-15
Si
10-1'6
IO.17
Y
Agtsc)
lo-"B
IO-'91
0.4
10-19
10-2[
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
l/T-
0.9
1.0
.lO-'K-'
Fig. 17. Ti. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients

for non-transition element impurities in titanium vs. reciprocal temperature. Be: [69Pl], Cu: [69Cl], Ag: [71Al], Al:
[76Pl, 85Rl], Sn: [65Al], Si: [86Rl], Pin a-Ti: [86Nl], Pin
S-Ti: [65Al]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown
for comparison.
, I
0.5
0.7
0.8
l/T-
0.9
1.0 40JK'
1.2
Fig. 19. Zr. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients

for non-transition element impurities in zirconium vs. reciprocal temperature. Matrix u-Zr: Rb: [68Sl], Be: [76Tl],
Cu: [75Hl], Ag single crystals (SC)and polycrystals: [89Vl],
Au: [71Hl], Zn: [71Hl], Al: [85R2], Sn: [59Gl], Sb: [74Hl],
S: [67Vl]. Matrix S-Zr: Rb: [68Sl], Be: [69Pl] and [76Tl],
Ag: [82Ml], Sn: [59Gl], P: [7OVl], S: [67Vl]. Self-diffusion
according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
For Fig. 18 seenext page.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
0.6
Le Claire
172
3 Diffusion of impurities in solid metallic elements(Figures)
[Ref. p. 203
-1
,o.q
Too0
1500
I
d/s
1250
1000
10-q
1P
10-l'
10-'2
~I lo-l3
lo-&
lo-l5
10-16
10"
10-nL
cL5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1.lO-K- 1.2
l/TFig. 18. Ti. Semilogarithmic plot ofdiffusion coefftcients for transition element
impurities in titanium vs. reciprocal temperature. Matrix a-Ti: Mn: [88N2],
Fe: [83Nl], Co: [85Nl, 85N2], Ni: [85N2], U: [78Fl]. Matrix P-Ti: SC:[71Al],
Zr: [67Pl], V: [64Ml], Nb: [63Gl], Ta: [66Al], Cr: [63Gl], MO: [63Gl],
W: [67Pl], Mn: [63Gl], Fe: [63Gl], Co: [63Gl], Ni: [63Gl], U: [78Fl],
Pu: [71L2]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Le Claire
Land&-B6mstein
New series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
1500
I
ZOOOK
I
r, = 2125K
lo-*
d/s
I
T
1000
I
ti,P
! I w&J
800
1
Matrix : Zr
I
1136K
1U9
173
ICP
IO-"
,o-l;
1
Q
IL?
lo-"C
IO"
I I
lo-'C
/3(bccl
I
I iI T3Y1
10-1'1
lo-'1
1o-l!
t#
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
m
0.8
l/T-
0.9
1.0
1.1
-10" K-'
1.3
Fig. 20. Zr. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients for transition element impurities in zirconium vs. reciprocal temperature. Matrix cL-Zr: Ce:
[68P2], Ti: [74Hl], V: [68Al], Nb: [68Dl], Ta: [58Bl], Cr: [83B2], MO: [68P2],
Mn: [73Tl], Fe: [88N2], Co: [81Kl], Ni: [72Hl, 87H2]. Self-diffusion in cL-Zr
according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison. Matrix p-Zr: Ce: [68P2],
Hf: [87H3], V: [68Al], Nb: [63Fl], Ta: [58Bl], Cr: [79Nl], MO: [68P2],
W: [67Pl], Mn: [73Tl], Fe: [87Hl], Co: [69Kl], U: [71Fl].
Land&-Bknstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
174
0.L
05
0.6
0.7
l/T-
-lo5 K-
0.8
[Ref. p. 203
1.0
Fig. 21. Hf. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficicnts in hafnium vs. reciprocal tcmpcraturc. Cr: [76Dl],
Co: [76Dl], Al: [85R2]. Self-diffusion according tochapter 2
-T
10-10
2000K
1
1750
I
I
1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
m%
1250
I
10-l
,o-l;
, 0 -1:
10-n
t
,0-l!
10.
10-l
10-u
,o -1:
0 i
\I
0.80 .W3K- 0.90
Fig. 22. V. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeftkients in vanadium

vs. reciprocal lempcrature. Ti: [68Ml, 78Pl], Zr: [84Pl], Ta: [77Pl], Cr:
[64Wl], Fe: [65P3, 81Al], Co: [7SPl], Ni: [86Pl], Al: [85Ml], P: [7OVl],
S: [69Vl], U: [71F2]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison
Le Claire
Land&-BCmrlein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
175

-T
2500 K 2250
IF9
I
I
m2/s r,=27LOK
I
I
2000
1500
I
1750
I
Matrix : Nb
hNi-l72All
\i
10-l'
1O-'6
10-19
\
A,\
1o-2o
1o-n
0.35
0.10
0.45
0.50
0.55
l/T-
0.60
0.65
0.70
.103 K-'
0.80
Fig. 23. Nb. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in niobium
vs. reciprocal temperature.Y: [71Gl], Ti: [70Rl, 7OP3], Zr: [70Rl, 78El],
V: [70Rl, 68Al], Ta: [65Ll], Cr: [69P2], MO: [70Rl, 73Fl], W: [69F2, 70Rl],
Fe: [62Pl, 77Al], Co: [76P2, 77A1, 62Pl], Ni: [72Al, 77Al], Cu: [77Al],
Sn: [65A3], P: [68Vl], S: [68V2], U: [65Pl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Land&Bihstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
176
[Ref. p. 203

-1
lo-
nn'/s
I-
I,=
2500 K 2250 2000
^^L..
jLWK
II
1750
II
1500
II
I
1250
I
Matrix : la
1U
lo-
1o5
10
Y\\
\
~I 10-l
I
\
lo-8
I I I IW
lo-9
I
I
IIlo-O
1o-23
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75 .lO-K- 0
l/TFig. 24. Ta. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in tantalum

vs. reciprocal temperature. Y: [71Gl], Nb: [65P2], MO: [68Bl], Fe: [55Vl,
76A2], Co: [76A2], Ni: [76A2], S: [69Vl], U: [71F2, 77Sl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
-T
Fig. 25. Cr. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefftcicnts in chromium vs. reciprocal temperature.V: [76M2],
MO: [6362], Fe: [64Wl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter
2 is shown for comparison.
Le Claire
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
l/T-
0.65
0.70 .lOK- 0.80
Iandolt-B6mstein
Nen Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
I".10
177
2500 K
2893
:s I
\[\\
l.\I\
\I
I
Irl71Mll
\ I
lo-'"
10-1'9
10-20
0.35
0.40
045
0.50
0.55
0.60
l/T-
0.65
0.70
0.75
.10-K-
0.85
Fig. 26. MO. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in molybdenum vs. reciprocal temperature. Li: [77Ll], Y: [71Gi], V: [72Rl], Nb: [65A4,
72R1, 73Fl], Ta: [68Bl, 72Rl], Cr: [68Bl, 71Mi], W: [74El], Re: [64B2],
Fe: [73Nl], Co: [65A4, 68Bl], Ni: [71M2], P: [68Vl], S: [68V3], U: [65Pl,
71F2]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Land&-BGmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
178
10-23
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
l/T-
0.55 0.60
[Ref. p. 203
0.65 010-~K-0.75
Fig. 27. W. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in tungsten

vs. reciprocal tcmpcrature. Y:[71Gl],Nb: [69P4],Ta: [69P4,84Al],Cr:[89Kl],
MO: [89Kl], Re: [65AS, 67L2, 84Al], Fe: [55Vl], OS: [84Al], Co: [89Ll],
Ir: [84Al], Ni: (79M2]. P: [7811], S: [7211], U: [68Sl]. Self-diffusion according
to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Fig 28. Fe. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion co- b

efficients for non-transition element solutes in iron vs. reciprocal temperature. Be in a- and &Fe: [68G2], Be in y-Fe:
[68Gl], Cu in y-Fe: ]66Sl, 68R1,77S2,78Ml], Cu in a-p-Fe:
[7782, 68Rl], Cu in a-f-Fe: [77S2], Ag in a-p-Fe: [71Bl,
73El], Ag in a-f-Fe: [73El], Au in a-Fe: [63Bl], Zn in a-pFe: [81Rl], Sn in a-f-Fe: [72T2,84Hl], Sn in a-p-Fe: [72T2],
Sn in y-Fe: [75M3, 86Kl], P in a-f-Fe: [81Ll, 83Ml], P in
a-p-Fe: [83Ml], P in y-Fe: [64M2], As in y-Fe: [76B4], Sb in
a-f-Fe: [78M2], Sb in a-p-Fe: [75Bl], S in a-Fe: [72Gl], S in
a-f-Fe: [86A2], S in y-Fe: [71H2].
Ik Claire
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III;26
-T
1750 K
10-g ,,
,
mi/,l~i.=l~09K
1500
I~~~,~=1~63K( I I
I1
I1
1250
I1
,I
~~~,p=11B3K
1000
I
T,= 1043K
I
I;
I
Be
lo-"0
II
I
I
I
Iv-Fe/
I
I
II
II
900
I
800
I
Matrix : Fe
I
I
w-D-Fe
I I
II
Be+\
Ii \
oCuI77S21
Au[63Bll
l/T -
I
I
-.
I
n-f-Fe
180
[Ref. p. 203
9
- Ii!
sss-11
.-zzu.- 0
. a0
---
9
L
Le Claire
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
10-1:
1200 K
1100
1000
800
900
m*/s
IF"
10.1:
10-'f
10.1;
~I
IO"
~~-1"
lo-*(
10-2
10-2;
,o-2:
0.9
1.0
1.1
l/T-
1.2
1.3 .105 K-' 1.4
Fig. 30. Fe. Semilogarithmic plot of Co impurity diffusion coefficients in c1iron vs. reciprocal temperature showing the influence of the magnetic transition
[63Bl, 66J1, 82M2, 89Hl]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for
comparison.
4 Fig. 29. Fe. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients for transition element solutes in iron vs. reciprocal
temperature. Hf in y-Fe: [65Sl, 70Bl], V in y-Fe: [87Gl], V
in u-p-Fe: [87Gl], Nb in a-p-Fe: [85Gl], Nb in y-Fe: [85Gl],
CT in or-p-Fe:[89Hl], Mn in U-p-Fe and &Fe : [73K2], Mn in
a-p-Fe: [7212], Mn in a-f-Fe and y-Fe: [70Nl], Co in u-Fe:
[82M2, 84Kl], Co in y-Fe: [75H2, 69B2], Co in &Fe: [63B2,
66511,Ni in a-Fe: [89Cl, 63B1, 6lHl], Ni in y-Fe: [69B2,
6lH1, 78Hl], Pd in y-Fe: [77Fl], Pt in y-Fe: [73M3].
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire
181
[Ref. p. 203
182
-T
1750K
10 A
lm=1768K
mT/
1500
I
1250
A
1, = 1393K
11cIO
I
MCh X ..
co
lo-
f-Co
10-l
lo-
I
Q
1o-
lo-
10
lo0.60
0.70
0.75
l/l-
0.80
0.85
0.90 -10 K
Fig. 31. Co. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in cobalt

vs. reciprocal temperature. V: [86K2], Mn: [7711], Fe: [65A7, 69B2, 74B2],
Ni: [62Hl, 65H1, 69B2], Pt: [73M3], Cu: [84A2], Zn: [74B2], S: [64Pl]. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Le Claire
Landolt-Btimstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031

-T
1600K
1500
I
1400
I
1300
I
1200
I
Matrix : Ni
2.10-;;5
I
0.60
I
0.65
I
0.70
l/T-
I
0.75
I
0.80
\
1
0.85.lO"K-' 0.90
Fig. 32. Ni. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in nickel vs.
reciprocal temperature. S: [75Vl], Te: [89Nl], Sb: [76Vl], In: [78V2], As: [79V2],
Sn: [79Vl], Ag: [78Vl], Cu: [84Tl], Ge: [83M2], Fe: [71B2], Co: [78V3],
W: [78V3]. For temperature ranges of the measurementssee section 3.2.10. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
183
184
-1
1600K 1LOO
lLO0 1200
I
1
l,= 1728K
lCig
lo-g
d/s
800
I
,o.,o
Matrix : Ni
I
10-l
1000
[Ref. p. 203
2000K 16001400
d/s
\
10-13
10-16
10-M
It
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
a9
l/T-
1.0
1.1 .lO-jK- 1.3
Fig. 33. Ni. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in nickel vs. reciprocal temperature including microsectioning measurements. Al: [81G2]. Two-exponential
fits for In in Ni [88N3] and Ni in Ni [86N2].
lo-LL
0.4
0.6
I !
l/T -
10-73
1.0 .105K- 1.2
Fig. 34. Pd and Pt. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in palladium and platinum vs. reciprocal
temperature. Fe in Pd: [77Fl], Au in Pt: [78Rl]. For temperature ranges of the measurementsseesection 3.2.10.Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison. The
left hand D scalerefers to Pt and the right hand D scale refers
to Pd.
Neumann
htdolbB6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
l/T-
0.95
1.00
.10-j K-1
185
1.10
Fig. 35. Cu. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in copper

vs. reciprocal temperature for various slow diffusing impurities. Au: [60Nl],
Fe: [58Ml], Co: [58Ml], Pd: [63Pl], Ni: [58Ml], Rh: [72F2], Pt: [82Nl],
Ru: [73Bl], Ir: [78Kl]. For temperature ranges of the measurementsseesection
3.2.11. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
186
-10
10
mIS y-&L
10
10
-I
1000
1300K
I
1
F
F
--II
I
[Ref. p. 203
Matrix : Cu
tPb
S
ib
\
1
2
10
10
10
K- 1
l/lFig. 36. Cu. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeffcicnts in copper
vs. reciprocal tempcraturc for various fast diffusing impurities. S: [69M2],
Pb: [77Gl], Sb: [6011], Sn: [73Gl], Cd: (58Hl], Hg: [60Nl], Ge: [70R2],
Mn: [73F2]. Be: [73F3]. For temperature rangesofthcmeasurements seesection
3.2.11. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
I
Neumann
Land&-BBmsfein
New Series Ill!26
Ref. p. 2031
187
2x-"
mVs
IO-"
\
\
lo-li
%Zn
\
\
,o-l:
t
cl
10-14
,0-l'
10-If
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
l/T-
0.95
1.00
.I0 K-'
1.10

vs. reciprocal temperature for various fast diffusing impurities. Bi: [77Gl],
Se: [89Rl], Te: [89Rl], Tl: [63Kl], P: [76Sl], In: [7262],As: [60Nl], Si: [73F3],
Ag: [60Nl], Ga: [77F2], Zn: [57Hl], AI: [73F4]. For temperature ranges of the
measurementsseesection 3.2.11. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown
for comparison.
LandolGB6mstein
New Series III126
Neumann
188
lo-lo
In/:
13001200K1100 1000
-T
900
800
700
[Ref. p. 203
600
10
,o-l;
,o-l!
lo-l4
lo-l5
10-16
QI 10
lo-B
lo-9
l0-m
10-n
10-n
lo-
10-2;
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
l/T-
1.3
1.4
1.5 .lOJK- 1.7

vs. reciprocal temperature including microsectioning measurements.Au: [60Ni,
87Fl]. Two-exponential fits for In, Co, Ni in Cu: [88N3] and Cu in Cu: [86N2].
Neumann
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
1200K
4w'
-T
3
1001
1100
m2h
,o":
900
800
10-l"
1II-l4
\
\
\
\1
aI 10-l'
1
\
IP
lo-l7
lo-'[
24-
!L.Io-3
K-11..
0.
0.85
l/T-
Fig. 39. Ag. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in silver vs.
reciprocal temperature. Ge: [58H2], Sb: [54Sl], Al: [75F2], Hg: [57Sl],
Cr: [SINI], Fe: [61Ml], Co: [73Bl], Au: [63Ml], Pd: [63Pl], Pt: [82Nl].
For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.11. Self-diffusion
according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
LandchB6mstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
189
190
[Ref. p. 203
-1
1200K
1100
1000
900
800
2
10-IS
8
6
4
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00 1.05 l.lO

1.15 .@K- 1.25
l/lFig. 40. Ag. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coeftkicnts in silver vs.
reciprocal temperature. Se: [89Rl], Te: [8762], Ga: [77F2], Tl: [5882], Sn:
[54Tl], In: [54Tl, 84Ml], Zn: [67Rl], Cd: [54Tl], Cu: [57Sl]. For temperature
ranges of the measurementsseesection 3.2.11.Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Neumann
Landoh-Bbmstein
New Series III126
Ref. p. 2031
191
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
l/T-
0.95
1.00
1.05 .W3 K-'
1.15
Fig. 41. Au. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in gold vs.
reciprocal temperature. Te: [89Rl], Ge: [77Cl], Al: [78F3], Sn: [72H2],
Hg:.[65Ml], In: [71D2], Zn: [77Cl], Fe: [77F3], Cu: [66Vi], Ag: [74H2],
Co: [78H2], Ni: [76F2], Pd: [78F2], Pt: [78F2]. For temperature ranges of the
measurements seesection 3.2.11. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown
for comparison.
Land&Bhstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
192
3 Diffusion
of impurities
in solid metallic
elements (Figures)
[Ref. p. 203
l/IFig. 42. Zn. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients for slow diffusing
impurities parallel (II) and perpendicular (I) to the hexagonal c axis in zinc vs.
reciprocal temperature. Ag: [61Rl], Cu: [66B2], Au: [6363], Ni: [67M2]. For
temperature ranges of measurementsseesection 3.2.12.Self-diffusion according
Neumann
Landolt-B6mstein
New series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
193
1
6.1rP
m*/:
I
m=
650 K
,
550
500
c 93K
+z-!T
\
-11
IO
5
\
-Cd Ilc t
nlc
\
In Ilc
\
\
,pi
4
I
Q
Golc
,p
t
Snlc
\
\$7 Ilc
IF"
2.104
1.6
l/T-
Fig. 43. Zn. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients for fast diffusing
impurities parallel (11)and perpendicular (I) to the hexagonal c axis in zinc vs.
reciprocal temperature. Sn: [7OW2], In: [61Rl], Cd: [6363], Ga: [66B2],
Hg: [67B3]. For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.12.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
194
540-1lT?/s
550K
I1
= 59 K
[Ref. p. 203
51 -
lo- \
ih.
10-n -
blc
\
%
$
g IIC g
IC
lo-J-
\n Ilc
h
s
\\
$1
nlc,
\\
~I lo-h-
\u IIC
105---
\
\\
10-K~
10-l -
lo-B1.6
2.1
.l/l-
2.2
2.3
\L
2A *ll (-1 ;
Fig. 44. Cd. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients parallel (]I)
and pcrpcndicular (I) to the hexagonal c axis in cadmium vs. reciprocal temperature. Pb: [81Yl], In: [72Ml], Hg: [72Ml], Zn: [72Ml], Ag: [72Ml], Au:
[72Ml]. For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.12. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Neumann
Landolf-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2031
&.\..,
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
IA
1.5
I.6 W3K4 1.7
l/T-
Fig. 45. Al. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefficients for slow diffusing
impurities in aluminum vs. reciprocal temperature. Co: [7OP4], Cu: [7OP4],
Ni: [78E2], Mn: [71H3], Cr: [7OP4]. For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.13. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for
comparison.
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
195
196
l.,. -,,, , 9;OK ,
8;O
70,D,
[Ref. p. 203
lo-l5
e
6
&lo-6
1.05
1.15
1.25
1.35
l/1 -
1.45
1.55.10-3K-165
Fig. 46. Al. Scmilogarithmic plot of diffusion cocfficicnts for fast diffusing impurities in aluminum vs. reciprocal tcmpcraturc. Sn: [90El], In: [71H4],
Cd: [70A3], Cc: [7OP4], Ga: [7OP4], Zn: [83B3], Au: [7OP4], Ag: [7OP4],
Mg: [74Rl]. Li: [87Ml]. For tcmpcraturc ranges of the mcasurcmcnts set
section 3.2.13. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
Neumann
Landok-Rihstein
New Seric~ Ill.26
Ref. p. 2031

-T
K 400
-9 425
I
I
/s T,,=430K
197
-T
350
I
375
I
325
I
10-g m2/s
550K
FiOCI
-10
400
I 1
450
, )
7K
Matrix : TI
1oo
10.
-11 _
IO'
10-l'
10.
IO-12
,I'
1
-10
~1.lo-l3
-13 _
lo-
10-14
lo--15_
10-15
IO-16 _
lo-l6
lo- 17
2.3[I
2 5
2.60
2.75
2.90
-IO-%
IO7
1.:
l/T-
1.85
2.1
2.15
2.30
40 K- 2.60
l/T -
Fig. 47. In. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients parallel (I]) and perpendicular (I) to the tetragonal c
axis in indium vs. reciprocal temperature. Au: [66A2],
Ag: [66A2], Tl: [52El]. For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.13. Self-diffusion
according to
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Fig. 48. Tl. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in bee S-thallium and hexagonal a-thallium parallel
(I]) and perpendicular (I) to the c axis vs. reciprocal temperature. Au: [68A2], Ag: [68A2]. For temperature ranges of the
measurements see section 3.2.13. Self-diffusion according to
Neumann
198
[Ref. p. 203
-1
500 K
10-l
ml
LOO
i0
-
350
I
Matrix : Sn
VI-
Sn 11
i
10
1
I
lo-
lgIIC
\
$
4 \k
\
nlc
\
t\
I
-10-
lo-
lo-
lo-
lo1.9
2.0
2s
Fig. 49. Sn. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients parallel (]I)
and perpendicular (I) to the tetragonal c axis in tin vs. reciprocal temperature.
In: [SSSl], Cd: [7483], Hg: [72Wl], Sb: [71H5]. For temperature ranges of the
measurementsseesection 3.2.14. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown
for comparison.
Neumann
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031

-1
10-;
m2/!
500K
450
400
350
lo-' I
IV9I-
10-"[I
10-l'I_
pI
2-
10-l': 3-
10-l'
10-l' I_
10-l'I-
,o-l; ,
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5 2.6
2.7 .lOJK- ;
l/T Fig. 50. Sn. Semilogarithmic plot of diffusion coefftcients for fast diffusing
impurities parallel (II) and perpendicular (I) to the tetragonal c axis in tin vs.
reciprocal temperature. Ni: [84Yl], Cu: [67D2], Au: [66D2], Ag: [66D2],
Zn: [74H3]. For temperature ranges of the measurements see section 3.2.14.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Neumann
200
10d1
600K
550
[Ref. p. 203
jO0
10-
\
\
3
?
lfi
1.cu
-&h
10
~t lo-
\
\
16
t
\
\
lo-
\
\
10-l
Sn
\2.2 ;
26
24 .lO K- 2.6
l/T Fig. 51. Pb. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion cocfkients in lead vs.
reciprocal temperature. Cu: [75D3], Pd: [75D2], Au: [79D3], Pt: [8OVl],
Ni: [73C2], Zn: [77Dl], Ag: (82823, Cd: [77Vl], Hg: [77Vl], Sn: [77D2],
Tl: (61R2]. For temperature ranges of the measurements xc section 3.2.14.
10
1.6
1.7
1.6
Neumann
Landoll-BBmslein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2031
201

-T
10
rn;
00 K 1800
1700
I
,=2028d 1
160CI
1500
I I
&=I633 K
I
Matrix : Th
-Ia(fcc)
10
+I-- Fe
0
I
rNi
b:IO-m2/s
I 10
Q
10-1'5
IO
\
1O-18
0.80
0.85
10
0.70
0.65 . I-
0.90
.10-3K- 1.
0.95
0.8040-3KK
0.85
0.75
.I//-
Fig. 52. Th. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in thorium vs. reciprocal temperature. a-Th: Fe:
[79Wl], Co: [79Wl], Ni: [79Wl], Pa: [67Sl], U: [67Sl]. Selfdiffusion according to chapter 2 is also shown for comparison. S-Th: Zr: [84Sl], Hf: [65Rl], Nb: [78S4], Ta: [7834],
MO: [84Sl], W: [84Sl], Fe: [79Wl], Co: [79Wl], Re: [84Sl],
Ni: [79Wl], V: [78S4].
For Fig. 53 seenext page.
Fig. 54. Pu. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in plutonium vs. reciprocal temperature. &Pu:
Co: [75Cl], Ag: [76Cl], Au: [76Cl]. Self-diffusion according
to chapter 2 is shown for comparison. a-Pu: Co: [75C2],
Cu: [76Cl], Ag: [76Cl], Au: [76Cl]. Self-diffusion according
Land&Bhnstein
New Series III/26
10
10
Le Claire
1.2
1.3
l/T-
1.4
1.5
.10-3K-' I:
202
1300K
1Cl-!
1200
1000
1100
[Ref. p. 203
900
m2/:
10-
Matr
10
~t lo-
10
e
,
i
lo-
lo-
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05 -110-3K- 1.15
l/T-
Fig. 53. U. Semilogarithmic plot of impurity diffusion coefficients in uranium

vs.reciprocaltemperature.a-U: Fe: [72Sl]; 0-U: Cr: [70D2,62Rl], Fe: [62Rl],
Co: [70D2]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for comparison.
y-U: Nb: [64PZ], Cr: [64P2], Mn: [64P2], Fe: [64P2], Co: [64P2], Ni: [64P2],
Cu: [64P2], Au: [61R3]. Self-diffusion according to chapter 2 is shown for
Le Claire
Landolt-B&nstein
New Series III/26
203

52El
54Sl
54Tl
55Hl
55Kl
55Ml
55Sl
55Vl
56Al
56Jl
57Hl
57Ml
57Rl
57Sl
58Bl
58Hl
58H2
58Ml
58Sl
59Gl
5911
59Ml
59Pl
6011
60Nl
61Al
61Hl
61H2
61Ml
61Rl
61R2
61R3
61Sl
62Dl
62Hl
62Pl
62Rl
63Bl
63B2
63Fl
63Gl
6362
6303
63Kl
63Ml
63Pl
64Bl
64B2
Eckert, R.E., Drickamer, H.G. : J. Chem. Phys. 20 (1952) 13.

Sonder, E., Slifkin, L.M., Tomizuka, C.T.: Phys. Rev. 93 (1954) 97.
Tomizuka, C.T., Slifkin, L.M.: Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 610.
Hoffman, R.E., Turnbull, D., Hart, E.W: Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 417.
Kurtz, A.D., Averbach, B.L., Cohen, M. : Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 442.
Mead, H.W., Birchenall, C.E.: Trans. AIME 203 (1955) 994.
Sawatzky, A., Jaumot, F.E.: Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 1627.
Vasilev, YP., Kamardin, V.I., Skatskii, S.G., Chermomorchenko, S.G., Schuppe, G.N. : Tr. Stredneaziat Gos. Univ. Lenina 65 (1955) 47.
Ascoli, A., Germagnoli, E., Mongini, L.: Nuovo Cimento 4 (1956) 123.
Jaumot, F.E., Sawatzky, A.: J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956) 1186.
Hino, J., Tomizuka, C.T., Wert, C.A.: Acta Metall. 5 (1957) 41.
Mead, H.W., Birchenall, C.E.: Trans. AIME 209 (1957) 874.
Reynolds, J.E., Averbach, B.L., Cohen, M. : Acta Metall. 5 (1957) 29.
Sawatzky, A., Jaumot, F.E.: Trans. AIME 209 (1957) 1207.
Borisov, E.V., Godin, YuG., Gruzin, P.L., Eustyukhin, A.I., Emelyanov, VS. : Met. Met. Izdatel
Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow 1958; Translation: NP-TR-448 1960,196.
Hirone, T., Kunitomi, N., Sakamoto, M., Yamaki, H.: J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 13 (1958) 838.
Hoffman, R.E.: Acta Metall. 6 (1958) 95.
Mackliet, C.A.: Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1964.
Sawatzky, A.: J. Appl. Phys. 29 (1958) 1305.
Gruzin, P.L., Emelyanov, VS., Ryabova, G.G., Federov, G.B.: 2nd Geneva Conf. Proc. 19 (1959)
187.
Ikushima, A.: J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 14 (1959) 1636.
MacEwan, J.R., MacEwan, J.U., Yaffe, L. : Can J. Chem. 37 (1959) 1629.
Pierce, C.B., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. 114 (1959) 686.
Inman, M.C., Barr, L.W.: Acta Metall. 8 (1960) 112.
Nachtrieb, N.H., Tomizuka, C.T., Schulz, L.G.: Report AFOSR-TR-60-23, The University of Chicago, U.S.A. 1960.
Ascoli, A.: J. Inst. Met. 89 (1961) 218.
Hirano, K.-I., Cohen, M., Averbach, B.L.: Acta Metall. 9 (1961) 440.
Hirone, T., Miura, S., Suzuoka, T.: J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 16 (1961) 2456.
Mullen, J.G.: Phys. Rev. 121 (1961) 1649.
Rosolowski, J.H.: Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 1828.
Resing, H.A., Nachtrieb, N.H. : J. Phys. Chem. Solids 21 (1961) 40.
Rothman, S.J.: J. Nucl. Mater. 3 (1961) 77.
Suzuoka, T.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 2 (1961) 176.
DonzC, G., Le Hazif, R., Maurice, F., Dutilloy, D., Adda, Y: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 254 (1962)
2328.
Hirano, K.-I., Agarwala, R.P., Averbach, B.L., Cohen, M. : J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 3049.
Peart, R.F., Graham, D., Tomlin, D.H.: Acta Metall. 10 (1962) 519.
Rothman, S.J., Peterson, N.L., Moore, S.A.: J. Nucl. Mater. 7 (1962) 212.
Borg, R.J., Lai, D.Y.F.: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 861.
Borg, R.J., Lai, D.Y.F., Krikorian, O.H.: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 867.
Federer, J.I., Lundy, T.S.: Trans. Met. Sot. AIME 227 (1963) 592.
Gibbs, G.B., Graham, D., Tomlin, D.H. : Philos. Mag. 8 (1963) 1269.
Gruzin, P.L., Zemskii, S.V., Rodina, I.B.: Metall. Metalloved. Chist. Met. 4 (1963) 243 (A.E.R.E.
Transl. 1032, 1965).
Ghate, P.B.: Phys. Rev. 131 (1963) 174.
Komura, S., Kunitomi, N.: J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 18 Supp. II (1963) 208.
Mallard, W.C., Gardner, A.B., Bass, R.F., Slifkin, L.M. : Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 617.
Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Rev. 132 (1963) 2471.
Bokshtein, S.Z., Bronfin, M.B., Kishkin, S.T.: Diffusion ProcessesStructure and Property of Metals,
Moscow 1964, p. 16; Translation: New York: Consultants Bureau 1965.
Bronfin, M.B.: Diffusion ProcessesStructure and Properties of Metals, Moscow 1964, p. 24; Translation: New York: Consultants Bureau 1965.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire, Neumann
204
64Ml
64M2
64M3
64M4
64M5
64Nl
64Pl
64P2
64SI
64Wl
65Al
65A2
65A3
65A4
65AS
65A6
65Al
65A8
65C1
65Dl
65Gl
65Hl
65Kl
65L1
65Ml
65Pl
65P2
65P3
65Rl
65Sl
66Al
66A2
66A3
66Bl
66B2
66D1
66D2
66J1
66Kl
66Ll
66Nl
66Sl
66Vl
66Yl
67A1
67Bl
67B2
67B3
67Dl

Murdock, J.F., Lundy, T.S., Stansbury, E.E.: Acta Metall. 12 (1964) 1033.
Mural, V.V., Gruzin, P.L.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 17 (1964) 792; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 17 (5) (1964) 154.
Monma. K., Suto, H., Oikawa, H.: J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 28 (1964) 192.
Naumov, A.N.: Fiz. Tverd. Tela 6 (1964) 2517; Sov. Phys. Solid State (English Transl.) 6 (1964) 1997.
Pavlyuchenko, M.M., Kononyuk, I.F.: Dokl. Akad. Nauk Belorussk. SSR 8 (1964) 157.
Peterson. N.L., Rothman, S.J.: Phys. Rev. A 136 (1964) 842.
Sato, K.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 5 (1964) 91.
Wolfe, R.A., Paxton, H.W.: Trans. Met. Sot. AIME 230 (1964) 1426.
Askill, J., Gibbs, G.B.: Phys. Status Solidi 11 (1965) 557 (Contains recalculated values of Ds and Qs
from the measurementson Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Nb, and MO reported in [63Gl]. However, since these
seem.in some cases,to give a much inferior representation of the original data, none is quoted).
Aganvala, R.P., Murarka. S.P.; Anand, MS.: Trans. Met. Sot. ATME 233 (1965) 986.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi 9 (1965) K 167.
Askill, J., in: Diffusion in Body-Centered CubicMetals, Am. Sot. Met. 1965, p. 247.
Andelin. R.L., Knight, J.D., Kahn, M.: Trans. Met. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 19.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi 9 (1965) K113.
Aucouturier, M., Lacombe, P.: Cobalt No. 28 (1965) 1.
Anand, M.S., Murarka, S.P., Agarwala, R.P.: J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1965) 3860.
Curtin, H.R., Decker, D.L., Vanfleet, H.B. : Phys. Rev. 139 (1965) A 1552.
Dupouy, J.M., Mathie, J., Adda, Y.: Proc. Int. Conf. Metallurgy of Be. Grenoble 1965, p. 159.
Graham. D.,in:DiffusioninBody-CenteredCubicMetals,Cleveland,U.S.A.:Am.Soc.Met.l%S,p.27.
Hassner, A., Lange, W.: Phys. Status Solidi 8 (1965) 77.
Klotsman, S.M., Arkhipova, N.K., Timofeyev, A.N., Trakhtenberg, ISh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 20
(1965) 390; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 20 (3) (1965) 70.
Lundy, T.S., Winslow, F.R., Pawel, R.E., McHargue, C.J.: Trans. Met. Sot. AIME 233 (1965) 1533.
Mortlock, A.J., Rowe, A.H.: Philos. Mag. 11 (1965) 1157.
Pavlinov, L.U., Nakonechnikov, A.I., Bykov, V.N.: Sov. J. At. Energy (English Transl.) 19 (1965)
1495.
Pawel. R.E., Lundy, T.S.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 937.
Peart. R.F.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 1853.
Rothman, S.J., Peterson, N.L., in: Diffusion in Body-Centered Cubic Metals, Am. Sot. Met. 1965,
p. 183.
Sparke, B., James.D.W., Leak, G.M.: J. Iron Steel Inst. 203 (1965) 152.
Askill. J.: Phys. Status Solidi 16 (1966) K63.
Anthony, T.R., Turnbull, D.: Phys. Rev. 151 (1966) 495.
Ascoli, A., Bollani, B., Guardi, C., Kustidic, D.: Phys. Rev. 141 (1966) 732.
Borisov, V.T., Golikov, V.M., Sherbedinskiy, G.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 22 (1966) 159; Phys. Met.
Metallogr. (English Transl.) 22 (1) (1966) 175.
Batra. A.P., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 542.
Dyson, B.F., Anthony, T.R., Turnbull, D.: J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 2370.
Dyson, B.F.: J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 2375.
James,D.W., Leak, G.M.: Philos. Mag. 14 (1966) 701.
Kidson, G.V.: Philos. Mag. 13 (1966) 247.
Lal, K., Levy, V.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 262 (1966) 107.
Naik, M.C., Dupouy, J.M., Adda. Y: Mtm. Sci. Rev. Metal!. 63 (1966) 488.
Speich, G.R., Gula, J.A., Fisher, R.M., in: The Electron Microprobe, New York: Wiley 1966,p. 525.
Vignes. A., Haeussler, J.P.: M&m. Sci. Rev. Metall. 63 (1966) 1091; C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 263
(1966) 1504.
Yerko, V.F., Zelenskiy, V.F., Krasnorutskiy, V.S.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 22 (1966) 112; Phys. Met.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi 23 (1967) K21.
Barr, L.W., Mundy, J.N., Smith, EA.: Philos. Mag. 16 (1967) 1139.
Barbouth, N., Oudar, J., CabanC,J.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 264 (1967) 1029.
Batra, A.P., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. 154 (1967) 569.
De Keroulas, F., Mary, J., QuCrC,J.: J. Nucl. Mater. 22 (1967) 276.
Le Claire, Neumann

67D2
67Hl
67Kl
67K2
67Ll
67L2
67Ml
67M2
67Pl
67P2
67P3
67Rl
67%
67Vl
68Al
68A2
68Bl
68B2
68B3
68B4
68Cl
68Dl
68Gl
6862
68Kl
68Ml
68M2
6801
6802
6803
68Pl
68P2
68Rl
68Sl
68Vl
68V2
68V3
69Bl
69B2
69B3
69Cl
69Dl
69D2
69D3
69Fl
69F2
69Kl
205
Dyson, B.F., Anthony, T.R., Turnbull, D. : J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1967) 3408.

Hirschwald, W., Schrodter, W.: Z. Phys. Chem. N. F. 53 (1967) 392.
Kaygorodov, V.N., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 24 (1967) 117; Phys.
Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 24 (1) (1967) 115.
Kaygorodov, V.N., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 24 (1967) 661; Phys.
Lal, K.: CEA Report R 3136, 1967.
Larikov, L.M., Tyshkevich, V.M., Chorna, L.F. : Ukr. Fiz. Zh. 12 (1967) 983.
Mundy, J.N., Ott, A., LBwenberg, L.: Z. Naturforsch. 22a (1967) 2113.
Mortlock, A.J., Ewens, P.M.: Phys. Rev. 156 (1967) 814.
Pavlinov, L.V. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved 24 (1967) 272; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 24 (2)
(1967) 70.
Peart, R.F.: Phys. Status Solidi (1967) 545.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.: Phys. Rev. 154 (1967) 558.
Rothman, S.J., Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Rev. 154 (1967) 552.
Schmitz, F., Fock, M.: J. Nucl. Mater. 21 (1967) 317.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S., Gruzin, P.L.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 23 (1967) 908; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 23 (5) (1967) 133.
Agarwala, R.P., Murarka, S.P., Anand, M.S.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 61.
Anthony, T.R., Dyson, B.F., Turnbull, D.: J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 1391.
Borisov, E.V., Gruzin, P.L., Zemskii, S.V.: Zashch. Pokryt. Metal. No.2, 1968, p. 104. Translation:
Protective Coatings on Metals, Vol. 2, p. 76, New York: Consultants Bureau 1970.
Blechet, J.J.,van Craeynest, A., Calais, D. : J. Nucl. Mater. 28 (1968) 177.
Badrinarayanan, S., Mathur, H.B.: Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 19 (1968) 353.
Blechet, J.J.,van Craeynest, A., Calais, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 27 (1968) 112.
Coleman, M.G., Wert, C.A., Peart, R.F.: Phys. Rev. 175 (1968) 788.
Dyment, F., Libanati, C.M.: J. Nucl. Mater. 3 (1968) 349.
Grigoriev, G.V., Pavlinov, L.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 25 (1968) 836; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 25 (5) (1968) 79.
Grigoriev, G.V., Pavlinov, L.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 26 (1968) 946; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 26 (5) (1968) 179.
KuEera, J., ZemEik, T.: Can. Met. Quart. 7 (1968) 83.
Murdock, J.F., McHargue, C.J.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 493.
Murarka, S.P., Anand, MS., Agarwala, R.P.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 69.
Ott, A., Nordtn-Ott, A.: Z. Naturforsch. 23a (1968) 473.
Ott, A.: Z. Naturforsch. 23a (1968) 1683.
Pavlinov, L.V., Gladyshev, A.M., Bykov, V.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 26 (1968) 823; Phys. Met.
Paul, A.R., Anand, M.S., Naik, M.C., Agarwala, R.P. : Int. Conf. Vat. Interstitials in Metals. Jiilich,
Sept. 1968, Vol.1, p. 105.
Rothman, S.J., Peterson, N.L., Walter, C.M., Nowicki, L.J.: J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 5041.
Schwegler, E.Ch., White, EA.: Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1 (1968) 191.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 26 (1968) 517; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 26 (3) (1968) 138.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S. : Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No.1 1968, 206.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S. : Fiz. Metal. Metalloved. 25 (1968) 321; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 25 (2) (1968) 130.
Barr, L.W, Mundy, J.N., Smith, EA.: Philos. Mag. 20 (1969) 389.
Badia, M., Vignes, A.: Acta Metall. 17 (1969) 177.
Bartha, L., Szalay, T.: Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 20 (1969) 825.
Caloni, O., Ferrari, A., Strocchi, P.M.: Electrochim. Metall. 4 (1969) 45.
Dariel, M.P., Erez, G., Schmidt, G.M.J.: J. Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 2746.
Federov, G.B., Smirnov, E.A., Novikov, SM.: Metall. Metalloved. Chist. Met. 8 (1969) 41.
Federov, G.B., Zhomov, F.J., Smirnov, E.A.: Metall. Metalloved. Chist. Met. 8 (1969) 145.
Kidson, G.V., Young, G.J. : Philos. Mag. 20 (1969) 1047.
Land&-B&n&n
New Series III/26
Le Claire, Neumann
206
69K2
69K3
69K4
69K5
69MI
69M2
69M3
6901
6902
69Pl
69P2
69P3
69P4
69SI
69Vl
70AI
70A2
70A3
70Bl
70B2
70B3
70Dl
70D2
70Hl
70Kl
7OLI
70NI
7001
7OPl
7OP2
7OP3
7OP4
70RI
70R2
7OSl
7OS2
7OVI
7OWl
7OW2
71AI
71Bl
71B2
71B3
71Dl
71D2
71Fl

Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved 28
Kaygorodov, V.N., Klotsman, S.M., Timofeyev, A.N., Trakhtenberg, J.Sh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
28 (1969) 120; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 28 (1) (1969) 128.
Kaygorodov, V.N., Klotsman, S.M., Timofeyev, A.N., Trakhtenberg, I.Sh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
KuEera, J., St&sky, K.: Can. Met. Quart. 8 (1969) 91.
Mundy, J.N., Ott, A., Lowenberg, L., Lodding, A.: Phys. Status Solidi 35 (1969) 359.
Moya, F., Moya-Goutier, G.E., CabanC-Brouty, F.: Phys. Status Solidi 35 (1969) 893.
Miller, J.W.: Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 1095.
Ott, A.: J. Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 2395.
Ott, A., Lodding, A., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. 188 (1969) 1088 and Corrigendum (private communication).
Pavlinov, L.V., Grigoryev, G.V., Gromyko, G.O.: Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No. 3,1969, 207;
Russ. Metal!. (English Transl.) No.3, 1969, 158.
Pelleg, J.: J. Less-Common Met. 17 (1969) 319.
Pawel, R.E., Lundy, T.S.: Acta Metal!. 17 (1969) 979.
Smith, EA., Barr, L.W.: Philos. Mag. 20 (1969) 205.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S. : Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No. 1, 1%9, 244.
Ananin, V.A., Gladkov, V.P., Zotov, V.S., Skorov, D.M.: Sov. J. At. Energy (English Transl.) 29
(1970) 941.
Anand, M.S., Agarwala, R.P.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 1 (1970) K41.
Alexander, W.B., Slifkin, L.M.: Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 3274.
Bowen, A.W., Leak, G.M.: Metal!. Trans. 1 (1970) 1695.
Barreau, G., Brunel, G., Cizeron, G., Lacombe, P.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 270 (1970) 516.
Beyeler, M., Maurice, F., Seguin, R.: M&m. Sci. Rev. Metal!. 67 (1970) 295.
Dariel, M.P., Blumenfeld, M., Kimmel, G.: J. Appl. Phys. 41 (1970) 1480.
Hood, G.M.: Philos. Mag. 21 (1970) 305.
Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 29
Lataillade, F., Despres,1, Hocheid, B.: Plutonium and Other Actinides, Nucl. Metal!. 17 (1) (1970)144.
Nohara, K., Hirano, K.-I.: Proc. Int. Conf. Sci. Tech. Iron & Steel 7 (1970) 11; seealso: Trans. Iron
& Steel Inst. Jpn., Suppl. 11 (1971) 1267.
Pavlinov, L.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 30 (1970) 367; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 30 (2)
(1970) 149.
Pavlinov, L.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 30 (1970) 800; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 30 (4)
(1970) 129.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.: Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 3264.
Roux, F., Vignes, A.: Rev. Phys. Appl. (France) 5 (1970) 393.
Reinke, ED., Dahlstrom, C.E.: Philos. Mag. 22 (1970) 57.
Smith, EA., Barr, L.W.: Philos. Mag. 21 (1970) 633.
Saxena, M.C., Sharma, B.D.: Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 23 (3) (1970) 16.
Vandyshev, B.A., Panov, A.S. : Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No. 1, 1970, 231.
Wang, S.-J., Grabke, H.J.: Z. Metallkde. 61 (1970) 597.
Warford, J.S., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 1867.
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 43 (1971) K I.
Bondy, A., Levy, V.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 272 (1971) 19.
Bakker, H., Backus, J., Waals, F.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 45 (1971) 633.
Barreu, G., Brunel, G., Cizeron, G.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 272 (1971) 618.
Darie!, M.P.: J. Appl. Phys. 42 (1971) 2251.
Dreyer, K., Herzig, Ch., Heumann, Th., in: Atomic Transport in Solids and Liquids, A.Lodding,
T. Lagervall (eds.), Tubingen: Verlag der Zeitschrift fir Naturforschung 1971, p. 237.
Federov, G.B., Smimov, E.A., Zhomov, F.I., Gusev, F.I., Paraev, S.A.: Metal!. Metalloved. Chist.
Met. 9 (1971) 30.
Le Claire, Neumann
Landolt-Kmstein
New Series W/26

71F2
71F3
71Gl
71Hl
71H2
71H3
71H4
71H.5
71Kl
71Ll
71L2
71Ml
71M2
7101
71Pl
71Sl
71Wl
7121
72Al
72A2
72A3
72Bl
72B2
72Cl
72C2
72Dl
72Fl
72F2
72Gl
7202
72G3
72Hl
72H2
72H3
7211
7212
72Ml
72Nl
7201
72Rl
72Sl
72Tl
72T2
72Wl
73Bl
73B2
Federov, G.B., Smirnov, E.A., Zhomov, F.I., Gusev, V.N., Paraev, S.A. : Sov. J. At. Energy (English
Transl.) 31 (5) (1971) 1280.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoev, A.V., Akimova, I.A.: Fiz. Tverd. Tela 13 (1971) 1028; Soviet
Phys. Solid State (English Transl.) 13 (1971) 856.
Gornyy, D.S., Altovskiy, R.M.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 31(1971) 781; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English
Transl.) 31 (4) (1971) 108.
Hood, G.M.: Diffusion Processes,J.N.Sherwood et al. (eds.), New York: Gordon & Breach 1971,
Vol.1, p. 361.
Hoshino, A., Araki, T.: Trans. Nat. Res. Inst. Met. 13 (1971) 99.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Philos. Mag. 23 (1971) 1479.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Phys. Rev. B 4 (1971) 2339.
Huang, F.H., Huntington, H.B.: Ser. Metall. 5 (1971) 705.
Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 31
Lodding, A., Ott, A. : Z. Naturforsch. 26a (1971) 81.
Languille, A.: M&m. Sci. Rev. Metall. 68 (1971) 435.
Mulyakaev, L.M., Shcherbedinskii, G.U., Dubinin, G.N.: Metallov. Term. Obrab. Met. 8 (1971) 45.
Makhlin, N.A., Ivanov, L.I.: Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No. 1, 1971, 222; Russ. Met. (English
Transl.) No. 1, 1971, 152.
Ott, A.: J. Appl. Phys. 42 (1971) 2999.
Paul, A.R., Agarwala, R.P.: Metall. Trans. 2 (1971) 1691.
Saxena, M.C. : Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 24 (4) (1971) 56.
Weyland, J.A., Decker, D.L., Vanfleet, H.B. : Phys. Rev. B 4 (1971) 4225.
Zanghi, J.P., van Craeynest, A., Calais, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 39 (1971) 133.
Agarwala, R.P., Hirano, K.-I.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 13 (1972) 425.
Anusavice, K.J., de Hoff, R.T.: Metall. Trans. 3 (1972) 1279.
Anand, A., Agarwala, R.P. : Philos. Mag. 26 (1972) 297.
Bergner, D.: Krist. Tech. 7 (1972) 651.
Badrinarayanan, S., Mathur, H.B.: Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 10 (1972) 512.
Combronde, J., Brebec, G.: Acta Metall. 20 (1972) 37.
Candland, C.T., Decker, D.L., Vanfleet, H.B. : Phys. Rev. B 5 (1972) 2085.
Dariel, M.P., Dayan, D., Calais, D.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 10 (1972) 113.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoyev, A.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 33 (1972) 1102; Phys. Met.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoyev, A.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 34 (1972) 1104; Phys. Met.
Gruzin, P.L., Mural, V.V., Fokin, A.P. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 34 (1972) 1326; Phys. Met. Metallogr.
(English Transl.) 34 (6) (1972) 209.
Gorbachev, VA., Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N. : Fiz. Met.
Metalloved. 34 (1972) 879; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 34 (4) (1972) 202.
God&y, I., Beke, D.L., Kedves, F.J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 13 (1972) K 155.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Philos. Mag. 26 (1972) 329.
Herzig, Ch., Heumann, Th.: Z. Naturforsch. 27a (1972) 1109.
Herzig, Ch., Heumann, Th. : Z. Naturforsch. 27 a (1972) 613.
Iovkov, V.P., Panov, A.S., Ryabenko, A.V. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 34 (1972) 1322; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 34 (6) (1972) 203.
Irmer, V., Feller-Kniepmeier, M.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 33 (1972) 2141.
Mao, Ch.: Phys. Rev. B 5 (1972) 4693.
Nishikawa, S., Tsumuraya, K.: Philos. Mag. 26 (1972) 941.
Owens, C.W., Turnbull, D. : J. Appl. Phys. 43 (1972) 3933.
Roux, R. : Thesis, Univ. Nancy, France 1972.
Stelly, M., Servant, J.M.: J. Nucl. Mater. 43 (1972) 269.
Tendler, R., Varotto, C.F.: J. Nucl. Mater. 44 (1972) 99.
Treheux, D., Marchive, D., Delagrange, J., Guiraldenq, P.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 274 (1972)
1260.
Warburton, W.K.: Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972) 2161.
Bernardini, J., CabanC,J.: Acta Metall. 21 (1973) 1561.
Bergner, D., Cyrener, E.: Neue Hiitte 18 (1973) 356.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire, Neumann
208
73B3
73Cl
73C2
73Dl
73El
73Fl
73F2
73F3
73F4
73Gl
73Kl
73K2
73K3
73Ml
73M2
73M3
73M4
73Nl
73Tl
73T2
73T3
73Wl
74Al
74A2
74B 1
74B2
74El
74Fl
74Hl
74H2
74H3
74Ll
74Ml
74R 1
74R2
74Tl
7.5Bl
75Cl
75C2
7SDl
75D2
75D3
75Fl
75F2
75Hl
75H2
75H3
75Ml
75M2

Bergner, D., Cyrener, E.: Neue Hiitte 18 (1973) 9.
Cathey, W.N., Murphy, J.E., Woodyard, J.R.: Metall. Trans. 4 (1973) 1463.
Candland, CT., Vanfleet, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 7 (1973) 575.
Eguchi, T., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I.: Cryst. Lattice Defects 4 (1973) 265.
Federov, G.B., Smirnov, E.A., Gusev, V.N., Zhomov, F.I., Gorbenko, V.L.: Metall. Metalloved.
Chist. Met. No. IO, 1973, 62.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoyev, A.V. : Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Chern. Metall. (9) (1973)
136.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoyev, A.V., Akimova, I.A., Kretinin, V.D.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Pokoyev, A.V. : Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tsvetn. Metall. 16 (1973)
143.
Gorbachev, V.A., Klotsman, SM., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N.: Fiz. Met.
Korneluk, L.G., Mirsky, L.M., Bokshtein, B.S.: Titanium Science and Technology, Vol.11, 1973,
p. 905.
Kirkaldy, J.S., Smith. P.N., Sharma, R.C.: Metall. Trans. A 4 (1973) 624.
Kuzmenko, P.P., Grinevich, G.P.: Metallotiz. 47 (1973) 98.
Mundy, J.N., McFall, W.D.: Phys. Rev. B 7 (1973) 4363.
Mundy, J.N., McFall, WD.: Phys. Rev. B 8 (1973) 5477.
Million. B., K&era, J.: Kovove Mater. 11 (1973) 300.
Marumo, T., Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.-I.: J. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 23 (1973) 17.
Nohara. K., Hirano, K.-I.: Nippon Kinzoku Gakkaishi; (J. Jpn. Inst. Met.) 37 (1973) 731.
Tendler, R., Varotto, C.F.: J. Nucl. Mater. 46 (1973) 107.
Tiwari, G.P., Saxena, M.C., Patil, R.V.: Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 26 (1973) 55.
Tiwari, G.P., Sharma, B.D.: Indian J. Technol. 11 (1973) 560.
Albrecht, W.W., Frohberg, G., Wever, H.: Z. Metallkde. 65 (1974) 279.
Ascoli, A., Filoni, L., Poletti, G., Rossi, S.L.: Phys. Rev. B 10 (1974) 5003.
Biersack, J.B., Fink, D.: Proc. Symp. Fusion Technology, 8th, EUR-5182, 1974, p. 907.
Bristoti, A., Wazzan, A.R.: Rev. Bras. Fis. 4 (1974) 1.
Erley, W., Wagner, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 25 (1974) 463.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Akimova, I.A.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 37 (1974) 1107; Phys. Met.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Acta Metall. 22 (1974) 459.
Herzig. Ch., Wolter, D.: Z. Metallkde. 65 (1974) 273.
Huang. F.H., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 1479.
Lesage, B., Huntz, A.M.: J. Less-Common Met. 38 (1974) 149.
Myers, S.M., Picraux, S.T., Prevender, T.S.: Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 3953.
Rothman, S.J.,Peterson, N.L., Nowicki, L.J., Robinson, L.C.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 63 (1974) K 29.
Ross, R.A., Vanfleet, H.B., Decker, D.L. : Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 4026.
Tendlcr, R., Varotto, C.F.: J. Nucl. Mater. 54 (1974) 212.
Bruggeman, G.A., Roberts jr., J.A.: Metall. Trans. A 6 (1975) 755.
Charissoux, C., Calais. D., Gallet, G.: J, Phys. Chem. Solids 36 (1975) 981.
Charissoux, C., Calais, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 57 (1975) 45.
Dariel. M.P.: Acta Metall. 23 (1975) 473.
Decker, D.L., Candland, C.T., Vanfleet, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 4885.
Decker, D.L.: Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 1770.
Fogelson. R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Akimova, I.A.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 39 (1975) 447; Phys. Met.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Akimova, I.A.: Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tsvetn. Metall. (2) 1975,
142.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 3780.
Henry, G., Barreau, G., Cizcron, G.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 280 (1975) 1007.
Hehenkamp, Th., Wiibbcnhorst, R.: Z. Metallkde. 66 (1975) 275.
Myers, S.M., Langley, R.A.: J. Appl. Phys. 46 (1975) 1034.
Murphy, J.E., Adams, G.H., Cathey, W.N.: Metall. Trans. A 6A (1975) 343.
Le Claire, Neumann
Landoh-BBm&n
New Series 111126

75M3
75Pl
75Sl
75Vl
75Wl
75W2
76Al
76A2
76Bl
76B2
76B3
76B4
76Cl
76Dl
76Fl
76F2
76F3
76Gl
76Ll
76Ml
76M2
76Pl
76P2
76%
76Tl
76T2
76Vl
77Al
77Bl
77B2
77B3
77Cl
77Dl
77D2
77Fl
77F2
77F3
77Gl
77Hl
7711
7712
77Jl
77Ll
77Pl
209
Marchive, D., Due, D., Treheux, D., Guiraldenq, P.: C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) C 280 (1975) 25.
Santos, E., Dyment, F.: Philos. Mag. 31 (1975) 809.
Vladimirov, A.B., Kaygorodov, V.N., Klotsman, S.M., Trakhtenberg, I.Sh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
Wu, C.H.: J. Chem. Phys. 62 (1975) 4589.
Ananin, V.A., Gladkov, V.P., Svetlov, A.V., Skorov, D.M., Tenishev, V.I.: Sov. J. At. Energy (English Transl.) 40 (1976) 304.
Ablitzer, D., Gantois, M.: La Diffusion dans les Milieux Condenses. Theorie et Applications. CEN
Saclay, Vol. 1, 1976, p. 299.
Beyer, G.J., Novgorodov, A.F.: Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 27 (5/6) (1976) 341; seealso: ZfK-311
(Zentralinstitut fiir Kernforschung, Dresden, DDR) 1976.
Beyer, G.J.: ZfK-310 (Zentralinstitut fur Kernforschung, Dresden, DDR) 1976.
Beyer, G.J.: ZfK-317 (Zentralinstitut fur Kernforschung, Dresden, DDR) 1976.
BoiiC, B.I., LuEiC, R.J.: J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 887.
Charissoux, C., Calais, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 61 (1976) 317.
Dyment, F.: J. Nucl. Mater. 61 (1976) 271.
Fromont, M.: J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 37 (1976) L117.
Fogelson, R.L.,Ugay, Ya.A., Akimova, I.A.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 41(1976) 653; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 41 (3) (1976) 180.
Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.-I.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 17 (1976) 809.
Gladkov, V.P., Svetlov, A.V., Skorov, D.M., Tenishev, V.I., Shabalin, A.N. : Sov. J. At. Energy (English Transl.) 40 (1976) 306.
Ladet, J., Bernardini, J., Cabane-Brouty, F.: Ser. Metall. 10 (1976) 195.
Marbach, G., Charrissoux, C., Janot, C.: La Diffusion dans les Milieux Condenses - ThCorie et
Applications. Proc. Colloque de Metallurgic. CEN Saclay, Vol. 1, 1976, p. 119; Report CEA-Conf.3674.
Mundy, J.N., Tse, C.W., McFall, WD. : Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 2349.
Pokoev, A.V., Mironov, V.M., Kudryavtseva, L.K.: Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zadev., Tsvetn. Metall. 19
(2) (1976) 130; Sov. Non-Ferrous Met. Res. (English Transl.) 4 (2) (1976) 81.
Spindler, P., Nachtrieb, K.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 37 (1976) 449.
Tendler, R., Abriata, J., Varotto, C.F.: J. Nucl. Mater. 59 (1976) 215.
Treheux, D., Heurtel, A., Guiraldenq, P.: Acta Metall. 24 (1976) 503.
Vladimirov, A.B., Kaygorodov, V.N., Klotsman, S.M., Trakhtenberg, ISh.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
41 (1976) 429. Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 41 (2) (1976) 181.
Ablitzer, D.: Philos. Mag. 35 (1977) 1239.
Beyer, G.J., Fromm, WD., Novgorodov, A.F.: Nucl. Instr. Methods 146 (1977) 419.
Bharati, S., Badrinarayanan, S., Sinha, A.P.B.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 43 (1977) 653.
Beke, D.L., God&y, I., Kedves, F.J., Groma, G.: Acta Metall. 25 (1977) 539.
Cardis, D. : Doctoral Thesis, Univ. Miinster, FRG 1977.
Decker, D.L., Ross, R.A., Evenson, W.E., Vanfleet, H.B. : Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 507.
Decker, D.L., Weiss,J.D., Vanfleet, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 16 (1977) 2392.
Fillon, J., Calais, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 38 (1977) 81.
Fogelson, R.L., Ugay, Ya.A., Akimova, I.A. : Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tsvetn. Metall. (1) 1977,
172.
Fogelson, R.L., Kazimirov, N.N., Soshnikova, I.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 43 (1977) 1105; Phys.
Gorbachev, V.A., Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N.: Fiz. Met.
Hoshino, K., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I.: Metall. Trans. A 8 (1977) 469.
Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I., Taguchi, 0.: Philos. Mag. 35 (1977) 229.
Iijima, Y, Hoshino, K., Hirano, K.-I.: Metall. Trans. A 8 (1977) 997.
Jackson, M.S., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 4644.
Larikov, L.N., Isaichev, V.I., Maksimenko, E.A., Belkov, B.M.: Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 237 (2)
(1977) 315; Sov. Phys. Dokl. (English Transl.) 22 (1977) 677.
Pelleg, J., Herman, M.: Philos. Mag. 35 (1977) 349.
Landok-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire, Neumann
210
17Sl
r7S2
17s3
17vl
18Bl
18El
18E2
18Fl
18F2
78F3
78F4
78Hl
78H2
7811
78Kl
78K2
78K3
78Ml
78M2
78Nl
78Pl
78P2
78Rl
78Sl
7832
78S3
78S4
78Vl
78V2
78V3
79Dl
79D2
79D3
79Gl
79Kl
79Ml
79M2
79M3
79M4
79Nl
79Pl
79P2
79Sl
79S2
79Vl
19V2
79Wl

Su, C.S.: Nucl. Instr. Methods 145 (1977) 361.
Salje, G., Feller-Kniepmeier, M.: J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) 1833.
Sudir, S., Csikai, J., Buczko, M.: Z. Metallkde. 68 (1977) 740.
Vanfleet, H.B., Jorgenson, J.D., Schmutz, J.D., Decker, D.L.: Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 5545.
Bergner, D., Schwarz, K.: Neue Hiitte 23 (1978) 210.
Einziger, R.E., Mundy, J.N.: Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 449.
ErdClyi, G., Beke, D.L., Kedves, F.J., Godeny, I.: Philos. Mag. B 38 (1978) 445.
Federov, G.B., Smimov, E.A. : Diffuziya v. Reaktornykh Materialakh. Moscow: Atomizdat Publ.
1978. Translation: Diffusion in Reactor Materials. Trans. Tech. Pub!., Switzerland 1984.
Fogelson, R.L., Voronina, I.M., Somova, T.I.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 46 (1978) 190; Phys. Met.
Fogelson, R.L., Trotimova, N.N.: Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tsvetn. Metal!. (4) 1978, 152.
Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.-I., Fukushima, Y: Metall. Trans. A 9 (1978) 1811.
Hanatate, Y., Majima, K., Mitani, H.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 19 (1978) 669.
Herzig, Ch., Eckseler, H., Bussmann, W., Cardis, D.: J. Nucl. Mater. 69/70 (1978) 61.
Iovkov, V.P., Panov, A.S., Ryabenko, A.V.: Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Met. No. 1, 1978, 78; Russ.
Met. (English Transl.) No. 1, 1978, 68.
Klotsman, S.M., Rabovskiy, Ya.A., Talinskiy, V.K., Timofeyev, A.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 45
Krautheim, G., Neidhardt, A., Reinhold, U.: Krist. Techn. 13 (1978) 1335.
Kusunoki, K., Nishikawa, S.: Ser. Metal!. 12 (1978) 615.
Majima, K., Mitani, H.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 19 (1978) 663.
Myers, S.M., Rack, H.J. : J. Appl. Phys. 49 (1978) 3246.
Nikolaev, G.I., Bodrov, N.V.: Zh. Fiz. Khim. 52 (1978) 143.
Pelleg, J.: Rev. High-Temp. Mater. IV (1978) 5.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.: Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 4666.
Rein, G., Mehrer, H., Maier, K.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 45 (1978) 253.
Sen, S.K., Dutt, M.B., Barua, A.K.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 45 (1978) 657.
Sawanayagi, F., Hasiguti, R.R.: J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 42 (1978) 1155.
Shimotomai, M., Hasiguti, R.R., Umeyama, S.: Phys. Rev. B 18 (1978) 2097.
Schmidt, EA., Conzemius, R.J., Carlson, O.N.: J. Less-Common Met. 59 (1978) 53.
Dariel, M.P., Komblit, L., Beaudry, B.J., Gschneidner, K.A.: Phys. Rev. B 20 (1979) 3949.
Dutt, M.B., Sen, S.K.: Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 18 (1979) 1025.
Decker, D.L., Melville, J.G., Vanfleet, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 20 (1979) 3036.
Gladkov, V.P., Svetlov, A.V., Skorov, D.M., Shabalin, A.N.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 48 (1979) 871;
Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 48 (4) (1979) 170.
Krautheim, G., Neidhardt, A., Reinhold, U., Zehe, A.: Phys. Lett. A 72 (1979) 181.
Maier, K., Mehrer, H., Rein, G.: Z. Metallkde. 70 (1979) 271.
Muster, W.J.,Yoon, D.N., Huppmann, W.J.: J. Less-Common Met. 65 (1979) 211.
Maier, K., Kirchheim, R., Tiilg, G.: Mikrochim. Acta Suppl. 8 (1979) 125.
Makuta, F., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 20 (1979) 551.
Nicolai, L.I., de Tendler, R.H.: J. Nucl. Mater. 87 (1979) 401.
Pontau, A.E., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. B 19 (1979) 4027.
Pruthi, D.O., Anand, M.S., Agarwala, R.P.: Philos. Mag. A 39 (1979) 173.
Shabalin, A.N., Gladkov, V.P., Gruzin, P.L., Svetlov, A.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 48 (1979) 663;
Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 48 (3) (1979) 182.
Sathyraj, K.V., Ablitzer, D., Demangeat, C.: Philos. Mag. A 40 (1979) 541.
Vladimirov, A.B., Klotsman, S.M., Trakhtenberg, IS. : Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 48 (1979) 1113; Phys.
Weins, W.N., Carlson, O.N.: J. Less-Common Met. 66 (1979) 99.
L.e Claire, Neumann
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26

80Dl
80Vl
81Al
8lDl
81Gl
81G2
81Kl
81Ll
81Nl
81Rl
8lYl
82Al
82Hl
82H2
82Ml
82M2
82Nl
8201
82Pl
83Al
83Bl
83B2
83B3
83Cl
83Gl
83Hl
83Kl
83Ml
83M2
83M3
83Nl
83N2
83Rl
84Al
84A2
84Dl
84Hl
84Kl
84Ml
84Pl
84Sl
84Tl
84Yl
85Gl
85Ml
85Nl
85N2
211
Dorner, P., Gust, W., Hintz, H.B., Lodding, A., Odelius, H., Predel, B. : Acta Metall. 28 (1980) 291.
Vanfleet, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 21 (1980) 4337.
Ablitzer, D., Haeussler, J.P., Sathyraj, K.V., Vignes, A.: Philos. Mag. A 44 (1981) 589.
Dariel, M.P., McMasters, O.D., Gschneidner, K.A.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 63 (1981) 329.
Gust, W., Hintz, H.B., Lodding, A., Odelius, H.: Philos. Mag. A 43 (1981) 1205.
Gust, W, Hintz, H.B., Lodding, A., Odelius, H., Predel, B.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 64 (1981) 187.
Kidson, G.V.: Philos. Mag. A 44 (1981) 341.
Luckman, G., Didio, R.A., Graham, W.R.: Metall. Trans. A 12 (1981) 253.
Neumann, G., Pfundstein, M., Reimers, P.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 64 (1981) 225.
Richter, I., Feller-Kniepmeier, M.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 68 (1981) 289.
Yeh, D.C., Acuna, L.A., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 23 (1981) 1171.
Arkhipova, N.K., Veretennikov, L.M., Klotsman, S.M., Tatarinova, G.N., Timofeyev, A.N. : Fiz.
Met. Metalloved. 53 (1982) 104; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 53 (1) (1982) 92.
Hoshino, K., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I., in: Point Defects and Defect Interactions in Metals, J.I.Takamura, M.Doyama, M.Kiritani (eds.), University of Tokyo Press 1982, p. 562.
Hu, C.K., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. B 26 (1982) 2782.
Manke, L., Herzig, Ch. : Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 2085.
Mehrer, H:, Hopfel, D., Hettich, G.: DIMETA-82, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves,
D.L.Beke (eds.), Trans. Tech. Publ., Switzerland 1983, p. 360. Seealso [84Kl].
Neumann, G., Pfundstein, M., Reimers, P. : Philos. Mag. A 45 (1982) 499.
Okafor, I.C.I., Carlson, O.N.: J. Less-Common Met. 84 (1982) 65.
Pruthi, D.O., Agarwala, R.P.: Philos. Mag. A 46 (1982) 841.
Akimova, LA., Mironov, V.M., Pokoyev, A.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 56 (1983) 1225; Phys. Met.
Barr, L.W, Smith, EA., in: DIMETA-82, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L.Beke
(eds.), Trans. Tech. Publ., Switzerland 1983, p. 325.
Balart, S.N., Varela, N., Tendler, R.: J. Nucl. Mater. 119 (1983) 59.
Beke, D.L., GbdCny, I., Kedves, F.J.: Philos. Mag. A 47 (1983) 281.
Chi, N.V., Bergner, D., in: DIMETA-82, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke
(eds.), Trans. Tech. Publ., Switzerland 1983, p. 334.
Gust, W., Ostertag, C., Predel, B., Roll, U., Lodding, A., Odelius, H. : Philos. Mag. A 47 (1983) 395.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J., Armstrong, J.: Philos. Mag. A 47 (1983) 775.
Kurokawa, S., Ruzzante, J.E., Hey, A.M., Dyment, F.: Met. Sci. 17 (1983) 433.
Matsuyama, T., Hosokawa, H., Suto, H.: Trans. Jpn. Inst Met. 24 (1983) 589.
Mantl, S., Rothman, S.J., Nowicki, L.J., Lerner, J.L.: J. Phys. F 13 (1983) 1441.
Macht, M.P., Naundorf, V., Dbhl, R., in: DIMETA-82, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J.Kedves,
D.L. Beke (eds.) Trans. Tech. Publ., Switzerland 1983, p. 516.
Nakajima, H., Koiwa, M., Ono, S.: Ser. Metall. 17 (1983) 1431.
Nakajima, H., Koiwa, M., Minonishi, Y, Ono, S.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 24 (1983) 655.
Rockosch, H.J., Herzig, Ch.: Phys. Status Solidi (b) 119 (1983) 199.
Arkhipova, N.K., Klotsman, S.M., Polikarpova, I.P., Tartarinova, G.N:, Timofeev, A.N., Veretennikov, L.M.: Phys. Rev. B 30 (1984) 1788.
Arita, M., Nakamura, M., Goto, K.S., Ichinose, Y: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 25 (1984) 703.
Diihl, R., Macht, M.P., Naundorf, V.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 86 (1984) 603.
Hennesen, K., Keller, H., Viefhaus, H.: Ser. Metall. 18 (1984) 1319.
KuEera, J., Kozak, L., Mehrer, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 81 (1984) 497.
Mehrer, H., Weiler, D.: Z. Metallkde. 75 (1984) 203.
Pruthi, D.D., Agarwala, R.P. : Philos. Mag. A 49 (1984) 263.
Schmidt, EA., Beck, M.S., Rehbein, D.K., Conzemius, R. J., Carlson, O.N. : J. Electrochem. Sot. 131
(1984) 2169.
Taguchi, O., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.-I.: J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 48 (1984) 20.
Yeh, D.C., Huntington, H.B.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 1469.
Geise, J., Herzig, Ch.: Z. Metal&de. 76 (1985) 622.
Maslov, I.A., Mironov, V.M., Pokoyev, A.V.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 60 (1985) 193; Phys. Met.
Nakajima, H., Ishioka, S., Koiwa, M.: Philos. Mag. A 52 (1985) 743.
Nakajima, H., Koiwa, M.: Titanium Science and Technology, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Ti 1985,
p. 1759.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Le Claire, Neumann
212
35Rl
35132
36Al
36A2
36Kl
36K2
36Nl
96N2
56Pl
86Rl
87Bl
B7Fl
B7F2
B7Gl
B7G2
B7Hl
B7H2
B7H3
B7Kl
87K2
87Ml
8701
88Nl
88N2
88N3
89Bl
89B2
89Cl
89Fl
89Hl
89Kl
89Ll
89L2
89Nl
89Rl
89Tl
B9Vl
B9Zl
90El
9OLl
90Nl

RIisiinen, J., Anttila, A., Keinonen, J.: J. Appl. Phys. 57 (1985) 613.
Rais?inen,J., Antilla, A., Keinonen, J.: Appl. Phys. A 36 (1985) 175.
Axtell, S.C., Okafor, I.C.I., Conzemius, R.J., Carlson, O.N.: J. Less-Common Met. 115 (1986) 269.
Arabczyk, W., Militzer, M., Miissig, H.J., Wieting, J.: Ser. Metall. 20 (1986) 1549.
Kimura, K., Iijima, Y., Hirano, K.-I.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 27 (1986) 1.
Ku&era, J., Million, B., RftiiEkovl, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) % (1986) 177.
Nakajima, H., Nakazawa, J., Minonishi, Y., Koiwa, M.: Philos. Mag. A 53 (1986) 427.
Neumann, G., Tolle, V.: Philos. Mag. A 54 (1986) 619.
Pelleg, J.: Philos. Mag. A 54 (1986) L21.
RaisLnen, J., Keinonen, J.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (1986) 773.
Beke, D.L., Godeny, I., Szabo, I.A., ErdClyi, G., Kedves, F.J.: Philos. Mag. A 55 (1987) 425.
Fujikawa, S., Werner, M., Mehrer, H., Seeger,A.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 431.
Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.-I.: Mater. Sci. Forum 13/14 (1987) 539.
Geise, J., Herzig, Ch.: Z. Metallkde. 78 (1987) 291.
Geise, J., Mehrer, H., Herzig, Ch., Weyer, G.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 443.
Herzig, Ch., Neuhaus, J., Vieregge, K., Manke, L.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 481.
Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 475.
Herzig, Ch., Kijhler, U.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 301.
Klotsman, S.M., Tatarinova, G.N., Timofeyev, A.N.: Mater. Sci. Forum 15-18 (1987) 457.
Klotsman, S.M., Osetrov, S.V., Polikarpova, I.P., Tartarinova, G.N., Timofeyev, A.N., Shepatkovskiy, O.P.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 64 (1987) 148; Phys. Met. Metallogr. (English Transl.) 64 (1)
(1987) 133.
Minamino, Y., Yamane, T., Araki, H.: Metall. Trans. A 18 (1987) 1536.
Okafor, I.C.I.: Acta Metall. 35 (1987) 759 (reports results that seem to be identical with those of
[84Sl]!)
Nakamura, Y, Nakajima, H., Ishioka, S., Koiwa, M.: Acta Metall. 36 (1988) 2787.
Nakajima, H., Hood, G.M., Schultz, R.J.: Philos. Mag. B 58 (1988) 319.
Neumann, G., TolIe, V.: Philos. Mag. A 57 (1988) 621.
Bergner, D., Khaddour, Y., LBrx, S.: DIMETA-88, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves,
D.L. Beke (eds.); Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 1407.
Becker, Ch., ErdClyi, G., Hood, G.M., Mehrer, H.: DIMETA-88. Diffusion in Metals and Alloys,
F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke (eds.), Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 409.
Cermlk, J., Liibbehusen, M., Mehrer, M.: Z. Metallkde. 80 (1989) 213.
Fujikawa, S., Hirano, K.: DIMETA-88. Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke
(eds.), Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 453.
Hirano, K.-I., Iijima, Y: DIMETA-88, Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J.Kedves, D.L. Beke (eds.),
Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 1039.
Klotsman, S.M., Koloskov, V.M., Osetrov, S.V., Polikarpova, I.P., Tatarinova, G.N., Timofeyev,
A.N.: DIMETA-88. Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke (eds.), Defect and
Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 439; Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 67 (1989) 767; Phys. Met. Metallogr.
(English Transl.) 67 (4) (1989) 136.
Lee, J.S., Klockgeter, K., Herzig, Ch., in: Proc. Int. Conf. on Intergranular and Interphase
Boundaries in Materials, Paris, 1989, J. Phys. (Paris), in press; and Diploma&it K. Klockgeter,
Univ. Miinster, 1989.
Landolt-Bornstein, NS, Vol. 111/22b: Semiconductors, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Tokyo:
Springer 1989.
Neuhaus, P., Herzig, Ch.: Z. Metallkde. 80 (1989) 220.
Rummel, G., Mehrer, H.: DIMETA-88. Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke
(eds.), Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 453.
Tobar, G., Balart, S.: DIMETA-88. Diffusion in Metals and Alloys, F.J. Kedves, D.L. Beke (eds.),
Defect and Diffusion Forum 66-69 (1989) 381.
Vieregge, K., Herzig, Ch.: J. Nucl. Mater. 165 (1989) 65.
Zee, R.H.: J. Phys. Condensed Matter. 1 (1989) 5631.
ErdClyi, G., Freitag, C., Mehrer, H.: Philos. Mag. Lett., in press.
Lee, C.-G., Iijima, Y, Hiratani, T., Hirano, K.: Materials Trans. JIM 31 (1990) 255.
Neumann, G., Tolle, V.: to be published.
Le Claire, Neumann
LandoIl-Bhstein
New Series III/26
4 Self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys and intermediate phases
213
4 Self-diffusion in homogeneousbinary alloys and intermediate phases

Use of the tables and figures
In this chapter tracer self-diffusion coefficients are presented in binary alloys, i.e. metallic mixtures of two
elements. Results on diffusion in, for example, a semiconducting intermediate phase such as GaAs are not
tabulated.
In this chapter the tables have a central function. From these tables referencesare made to the figures. The
order in which the alloy systemsare arranged is alphabetical, for example Ag - Al is tabulated before Ag - Au
and V,Ga should be transformed to GaV, first and is then found after Ga - Pu. This order is exactly the same
as used in collections of binary phase diagrams. Primary and terminal phasesare indicated by a hyphen between
the element symbols: A - B, whereas intermediate compounds are presented by their stoichiometric formula, for
example A,B. The crystal structure of thesecompounds is also given. In the various columns of the tables, a dash
indicates that no data (or figures) are available (or shown) for a special composition, a blank space should be
understood as a repetition of the information (immerical values, reference key) given in the line above.
The full list of alloys, treated in this chapter, is presented below. In contrast to the tables, the alloys are given
here both in the order A-B and B-A. In this way it is immediately clear which Ni systems,for example, occur
in the tables. In a scarcenumber of casesalso isotope effectshave been measured (seechapter 10 about the mass
dependenceof the diffusion coefficient for an explanation). In the list below, these are indicated by E(A), which
means the isotope effect for diffusion of element A.
List of alloys, their phasesand diffusing elements

System
Phase
Diffusing
element
Page
Ag-Al
Ag-Au
primary and terminal

primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition
range in the temperature range studied
primary
primary
intermediate, y-phase
primary
intermediate, B2 (CsCl) structure
primary
primary
primary
terminal
terminal, bee structure
intermediate, rhombohedral structure
intermediate, rhombic structure
intermediate, monoclinic structure
intermediate, Ll 2 (Cu,Au) structure
primary
Ag
Ag, Au
218
218
Ag, Cd
Ag
Hg
Ag
Ag
Ag
Ag, Sn
Ag
Ag, Zn
Ag, Zn
Ag
co
Al, Fe
Al, Fe
Fe
Al, Fe
Al, Fe
Ni
Ni
Zn
Ag, Au
218
218
219
219
219
219
219
220
220
220
218
220
220
221
221
221
221
221
221f.
222
218
Ag-Cd
Ag-Cu
4z,Hg,
Ag-In
A@fg
Ag-Sb
Ag-Sn
Ag-Zn
Ag,Zn,
Al-Ag
AlCo
Al-Fe
AlFe
A&Fe
AI,Fe,
A&Fe
AlNi
AlNi,
Al-Zn
Au-Ag
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
214
System
Phase
Diffusing
element
Page
4uCd
4u-cu
intermediate, B2 (CsCI) structure

primary
Au, Cd
Au, Cu
222
223
Au-Ta
AuZn
Cu-Sb
Cu,Sb
Cu-Sn
Cu,Sn
Cu,Sn,
Cu-Zn
primary
primary
terminal
terminal
range, fee, bee and ordered B2
primary
terminal
intermediate, Ll 2 (Cu,Au) structure
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
primary
primary
primary
intermediate, p-phase, DO, (BiF,) structure
primary
intermediate, p-phase, DO, (BiF,) structure
intermediate, &phase, y-brass-type structure
primary
CuZn
intermediate, bee, and B2 structure
Fe-Al
FeAl
FeAI,
Fe,AI,
FeA!,
Fe-Co
primary, bee structure

intermediate, rhombohedra! structure
intermediate, rhombic structure
intermediate, monoclinic structure
range, fee, bee and ordered B2
Be-Cu
Be-Ni
Cd-Ag
CdAu
Cd-Pb
CoAl
Co-Fe
CoGa
Co-Mn
Co-Ni
Co-Ti
Co,Ti
co-u
Cr-Fe
Cr-Ni
Cr-Zr
Cu-Ag
Cu-Au
Cu-Be
Cu-Fe
Cu-In
Cu-Ni
Cu-Pt
Fe-Cr
Au
223
Au, Zn
223
EN4 WW
Be
224
Ni
224
Ag, Cd
218
Au, Cd
222
Cd
224
co
220
224f.
Co, Fe
Wo), We)
225f.
Co, Ga
Mn
226
226f.
Co, Ni
Co, Ti
co
U
Cr, Fe
221
228
228
228
Cr
Ni
Cr, Zr
4.z
Au, Cu
228
228f.
229
218
223
Be
cu
cu
Cu, Ni
224
229
229
229
cu, Pt
229f.
cu
cu
cu
Cu, Sn
Cu, Sn
Cu, Zn
Wu), Wn)
Cu, Zn
Wu), Wn)
AI, Fe
Al, Fe
Fe
Al, Fe
Al, Fe
Co, Fe
E(Co), E(Fe)
Cr, Fe
230
230
230
230
230
231
231f.
220
221
221
221
221
224f.
228
Land&-BCmsIein
New Series 111126
215

System
Phase
Fe-Cu
Fe-Ge
Fe-Mn
Fe-MO
Fe-Ni
terminal
primary
*
primary
primary
primary, fee structure
primary
primary
primary
primary
primary
terminal
terminal, E- and &phase
intermediate, Al 5 structure
terminal
range in. the temperature range studied
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
ordered phase, Ll, (Cu,Au) structure
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
intermediate, DO, @-TiCu,) structure
intermediate, L 12 (Cu,Au) structure
terminal
primary
Fe-Pd
Fe-Pt
Fe-Sb
Fe-Si
Fe-Sn
Fe-Ti
Fe-V
Fe-Zr
GaCo
GaNi
Ga-Pu
GaV,
Ge-Fe
Hf-Zr
I-Q%,
Hg-Pb
In-Ag
In-Cu
InPd
M&s
Mn-Co
Mn-Fe
MnPt,
Mn-Ti
Mn-Zr
MO-Fe
Mo-Ni
MO-W
Nb-Ni
NbNi,
Nb-Ti
Nb-W
Nb-Zr
NiAl
N&Al
Ni-Be
Ni-Co
Ni-Cr
Ni-Cu
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
Diffusing
element
Page
cu
Fe
Fe, Mn
Fe
Fe, Ni
229
232
232
232
233
Fe, Pd
233
Fe, Pt
Fe
Fe, E(Fe)
Fe
Fe
Fe, V
Fe, Zr
Co, Ga
Ga, Ni
Pu
Ga, V
Fe
Hf
234
234
234f.
236
236
236
236
225f.
236f.
237
237
232
237
Hg
Nit, Pb
Ag
cu
In, Pd
Ag
Mn
Fe, Mn
Mn
Mn, Ti
Mn, Zr
Fe
MO, Ni
MO, W
219
237
219
229
237f.
219
226
232
238
238
238
232
239
239
Ni
Nb, Ni
Nb, Ti
239
240
240
Nb, W
240
Nb, Zr
241
Ni
Ni
Ni
Co, Ni
221.
221f.
224
226f.
Cr
Ni
Cu, Ni
228
228f.
229
:,,
216
System
Phase
Diffusing
element
Page
Ni-Fe

primary
primary
intermediate, DO, (B-TiCu,) structure
primary
primary
primary
primary
terminal, fee structure
ordered phase, Ll, (Cu,Au) structure
primary, E-phaseand &phase
terminal
terminal
terminal
intermediate, DO, (BiF,) structure
terminal
intermediate, p-phase
terminal
terminal
terminal
terminal
intermediate, DO, (BiF,) structure
intermediate, y-brass-type structure
terminal
intermediate, p-phase
primary
terminal
primary
intermediate, L 12 (Cu,Au) structure
terminal
primary
terminal
primary
terminal
Fe, Ni
232
Ga, Ni
MO, Ni
Ni
Nb, Ni
Ni
Zn
Cd
Hg, Pb
Pb, Ti
Fe, Pd
236
239
239
240
241
241
224
237
241
232
In, Pd
cu, Pt
237f.
229f.
Fe, Pt
Mn
Pu
W
Aiz
cu
cu
Fe
Sn
Zr
232
238
237
242
219
230
230
232
242
242
Fe, E(Fe)
Ni
4s Sn
cu
Cu, Sn
Cu, Sn
Fe
Sn
Sn, Zn
Au
Co, Ti
co
Fe
Mn, Ti
Nb, Ti
232
241
219
230
230
230
234
242
242
223
227
228
234
238
240
Ti, V
242f.
Ti
243
Pb, Tl
U
U, Zr
241
228
243
Fe, V
234
NiGa
Ni-Mo
Ni-Nb
Ni,Nb
Ni-Si
Ni,Zn,
Pb-Cd
Pb-Hg
Pb-Tl
Pd-Fe
PdIn
Pt-Cu
Pt-Fe
Pt,Mn
Pu-Ga
Re-W
Sb-Ag
Sb-Cu
SbCu,
Sb-Fe
Sb,Sn,
SC-Zr
Si-Fe
Si-Ni
Sn-Ag
Sn-Cu
SnCu,
Sn,Cu,
Sn-Fe
Sn,Sb,
Sn-Zn
Ta-Au
Ti-Co
TiCo,
Ti-Fe
Ti-Mn
Ti-Nb
Ti-V
Ti-Zr
Tl-Pb
u-co
U-Zr
V-Fe
Bakker
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series Ill/26
217
System
Phase
Diffusing
element
Page
V,Ga
V-Zr
V-Ti
Ga, V
V, Zr
Ti, V
237
243
MO, w
239
Nb, W
240
Zn,Ag,
Zn-Al
ZnAu
intermediate, Al 5 structure
primary
primary
terminal
terminal
242
220
220
220
222
223
Zn-Cu
terminal
W-MO
W-Nb
W-Re
Zn-Ag
242f.
Ag, Zn
Ag
Ag, Zn
Zn
Au, Zn
EW),
WW
Cu, Zn
231
E(Cu), E(Zn)
ZnCu
intermediate, bee and B2 structure
Zn,Ni,
Zn-Sn
Zr-Cr
Zr-Fe
Zr-Hf
terminal
primary
primary
primary/terminal phase extending over the whole
primary
Zr-Mn
Zr-Nb
Zr-Sc
Zr-Ti
Zr-U
Zr-V
composition
241
242
229
234
237
composition
Mn, Zr
Nb, Zr
238
241
composition
Zr
242
composition
Ti
243
composition
U, Zr
243
V, Zr
243
For figures seepage 244.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
231f.
Cu, Zn
WW, -Vn)
Zn
Sn, Zn
Cr, Zr
Fe, Zr
Hf
218
4 Self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys and intermediate phases (Tables) [Ref. p. 276
Zomposition
It %
Temperature
range [K]
ig-Al;
primary and terminal phase
lomAg diffusion in primary phase
873 ... 1073
AI: 3.8
11.6
17.8
21.7
romAg diffusion in terminal phase
Al: 90.3...99
673...868
DO
10m4ms-
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
185.9
256.6
180.0
114.3
70s
0.39
121.0
68H *)
) Remark: D is concentration independent.
Ag- Au; primary/terminal phaseextending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
*romAg diffusion
63M
927...1218
0.52
187.5
Au: 8
0.32
184.4
17
908...1225
0.23
182.3
908...1229
35
180.5
908...1245
0.19
50
174.7
927... 1244
0.11
66
171.7
923... 1284
0.09
83
168.5
936.e.1234
0.072
94
*Au diffusion
202.2
63M
Au: 8
991... 1213
0.82
991 ..* 1220
0.48
198.0
17
0.35
195.4
991 ... 1269
35
988 ... 1274
0.21
189.5
50
186.3
988 ... 1274
0.17
66
0.12
180.2
985 ... 1274
83
176.1
991 ... 1283
0.09
94
Ag - Cd; primary phase
OrnAgdiffusion
Cd: 30.50...37.70 836,..955
11Cd diffusion
Cd: 31.25...36.25 836...955
For D seeFig. 3
68G
For D see Fig. 3
68G
Ag - Cu; primary phase

lromAg diffusion
cu: 0.17
0.17
0.84
0.84
0.85
1.38
1.68
1.75
2.52
2.55
3.36
4.16
4.43
5.00
6.56
8.15
1053...1179
963 ... 1053
1053..*1179
963...1179
963...1123
883...1113
998...1179
973..*1173
926... 1091
963...1123
963...1123
973... 1173
926... 1091
998...1153
973..*1173
998.s.1103
0.65
1.06
0.68
0.08
0.39
1.04
0.07
0.66
0.63
0.30
0.26
1.84
0.57
0.06
0.51
0.04
189.2
171.6
189.2
163.3
184.2
188.9
170.0
187.5
183.2
180.4
176.6
195.1
181.3
167.0
182.1
160.3
Bakker
57Y, 77B2
5
6
4
7
6
5
5
7
6
4
7
4
64S, 77B2
72P, 77B2
57Y, 77B2
55H, 77B2
72P, 77B2
64S, 77B2
64S, 77B2
55H, 77B2
72P, 77B2
57Y, 77B2
55H, 77B2
57Y, 77B2
Iandolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
219
Ref. p. 2761 4 Self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys and intermediate phases (Tables)
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
Do
10m4ms1l
e
kJ mol-
Fig.
Ref.
77s
85K
Ag,Hg,; intermediate phase, y-phase

203Hg diffusion
Hg: 55
323...375
1.2.10-4
30.3
Ag - In; primary phase

OrnAg diffusion
In: 0.151 . ..0.943 1054
For D see Fig. 9
AgMg; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

OrnAg diffusion
Mg: 41.1.
43.6
43.6, 43.8
45.0
45.8
48.5
48.7
49.8
52
52.8
57.2
773...973
0.095
0.15
0.31
0.686
1.53
0.37
0.39
0.28
0.134
0.33
0.051
139.0
147.8
154.5
165.8
172.9
165.3
166.2
170.0
159.1
153.6
120.1
0.382
0.302
2.75
182.1
178.3
175.8
10
10
10
10
10
64D
64D
61Hl
64D
64D
61Hl
61Hl
64D
64D
Ag - Sb; primary phase

1lomAg diffusion
Sb: 0.53
0.89
1.42
902... 1173
842...1163
841...1164
11
55s
12
13
83H2
85K *)
14
78G
15
78G
Ag - Sn; primary phase

1lomAg diffusion
Sn:
0...8.67
946... 1146
0.218 ... 0.773 1052
For D see Fig. 12

For D see Fig. 13
*) Remark: Single crystals.
Sn: 0.108
0.8
3
4.7
6
893 ...
893 ...
889 ...
893 ...
885...
l1 3Sn diffusion
Sn: 0.11
893 ... 1123
1.7
Land&BBmstein
New Series III/26
1042
1042
1010
1042
980
0.13
0.12
0.085
0.07
0.07
172.9
168.3
160.7
157.0
154.9
No difference with Sn impurity diffusion

in pure silver
0.125
156.8
Bakker
220
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
low4 rns-
Fig.
Ref.
16
67R
17
69s
17
69s
18
67SI,69S
18
67S1,69S
kJ mol-
Ag - Zn; primary and terminal phase

OrnAg diffusion in primary phase
Zn: 0...4.1
1020,1153
For D seeFig. 16
OrnAg diffusion in terminal phase;

diffusion in single crystals parallel to the hexagonal axis
0.42 (5)
Zn: 99.11
594...686
0.35 (7)
99.32
594...690
I 10.0 (6)
109.2 (12)
1omAgdiffusion in terminal phase;

diffusion in single crystals perpendicular to the hexagonal axis
117.2 (8)
0.69 (10)
Zn: 99.11
594...686
115.7 (4)
0.49 (3)
99.65
594...682
65Zn diffusion in terminal phase;
diffusion in single crystals parallel to the hexagonal axis
0.17 (1)
Zn: 98.6
620...690
0.14 (1)
99.43
92.4 (3)
91.9 (4)
65Zn diffusion in terminal phase;

diffusion in single crystals perpendicular to the hexagonal axis
96.8 (2)
0.26 (1)
Zn: 98.6
620 . . .696
96.8 (6)
0.22 (2)
99.43
Ag,Zn,; intermediate phase, y-phase
OrnAg diffusion
Zn: 61
62
65Zn diffusion
Zn: 61
713..*913
4.06
-
122.2 (13)
-
19
71s
680...840
1.55
108.0 (11)
20
71s
21
51N
AICo; intermediate compound, B2 (CsCl) structure

jCo diffusion
co: 49..*57
Al-Fe;
1523
For D see Fig. 21
terminal phase, disordered bee structure
26AI diffusion in paramagnetic phase

100
Fe: 75
1173...1358
267.1
75L
Fe diffusion in paramagnetic phase

32.4
Fe: 75
1173...1413
252.0
22
75L
Fe diffusion in paramagnetic phase

0.01
Fe: 82
973... 1450
0.02
90
1156...1450
0.42
94
1088... 1478
171.7
183.5
197.7
23
81RI
Fe diffusion in ferromagnetic phase

0.01
Fe: 82
816.a.953
0.06
90
765...941
94
953.s.991
197.7
195.9
-
23
81Rl
Landolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
221
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10m4m2sv1
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
AlFe; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

26A1diffusion
Fe: 48.8, 51.5
55Fe diffusion
Fe: 47.8
48.8
51.5
59.5
65.9
1173...1358
8700
339.9
75L
1173.s.1423
60
170
1.82 . lo4
830
230
278.8
252.0
331.9
293.9
278.8
24
75L
180.0
75L
Al,Fe; intermediate phase, rhombohedral structure

5Fe diffusion
Fe: 33.18
0.02
A&Fe,; intermediate phase, rhombic structure

26A1diffusion
Fe: 28.39
1173 ... 1358
1.75.10-5
106.7
75L
Fe diffusion
Fe: 28.39
1173 ..* 1358
0.004
141.1
75L
Al,Fe; intermediate phase, monoclinic structure

26A1diffusion
Fe: 24.83
1173... 1358
0.012
183.3
75L
55Fe diffusion
Fe: 24.83
1173... 1358
0.001
157.8
75L
0.00012
0.00104
0.00053
0.2302
4.461
0.6296
0.1504
177.9 (264)
209.7 (310)
200.5 (448)
275.9 (21)
307.3 (96)
274.2 (314)
250.3 (134)
27,28
71Hl
0.0352
0.096
0.7254
216.4 (71)
253.7 (130)
250.3 (163)
AlNi; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

63Ni diffusion
Ni: 48.3
48.6
49.0
49.2
50.0
53.2
54.5
55.5
58.0
58.5
58.7
AlNi,;
1273.. 1623
26,27
See Figs. 26,27
intermediate phase, Ll, (Cu,Au) structure
63Ni diffusion
Ni: 73.2
74.7
74.8
76.2
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
1193...1553
1193... 1553
1163.~. 1477
1193... 1553
3.11
1.00
1.00
4.41
300.3
303.1
286.8 (42)
306.3
Bakker
28,29
28,29
30
28,29
71H2
71H2
75B
71H2
(continued)
222
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
Q.
DO
IO+ ms-r
kJ mol-
Dab
10e4 m2s-*
Fig.
Qb
Ref.
kJ mol-
AINi,, continued
63Ni diffusion
Analysis in terms of two exponentials: D(T) = Do" exp(- QJR T) + Dabexp(- QJR T)
Ni: 14
965... 1623
105 (90)
344.9(50)
2 (3). 10-n
121.8(117)
75
965... 1623
146 (32)
347.0(29)
1.1 (4). lo-
141.1(33)
16
965... 1623
132 (53)
342.4 (105) 1.0 (6). lo-
134.8(50)
31
87H3
31, 32
31
Remark: In the high-temperature range there is a good agreement with [71H2] and [75B] (seeFig. 31).
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10m4rns-
e
kJ mol-
Fig.
Ref.
0.25 (3)
0.18 (2)
0.22 (4)
0.22 (4)
0.24 (5)
0.23 (4)
0.170 (98)
0.20
0.324 (216)
0.209 (96)
0.22
0.288 (266)
0.229 (137)
0.23
119.0 (9)
116.7 (12)
117.6 (12)
117.1 (13)
117.5 (15)
116.9 (12)
112.5 (32)
112.6 (21)
113.2 (37)
108.3 (25)
105.1 (21)
105.7 (54)
103.5 (34)
100.5 (29)
33, 34
33, 34
33, 34, 35
33, 34
33, 34
33, 34, 35
36
37
36
36
77Bl
0.162 +238
-0.108
0.575 + 1.084
-0.376
0.692 (701)
100.5 (59)
80C
106.6 (59)
108.1 (54)
111.9 (54)
106.8 (25)
111.4
(39)
90.4 (42)
36
75Gl
117.6 (4)
125.6 (21)
38, 39
38, 39
67G
67G
116.8 (13)
109.7 (21)
61H2*)
38, 39
67G
129.8 (4)
130.6 (20)
117.2 (29)
38, 39
38, 39
67G
67G
61H2
113.4 (21)
38, 39
67G
Al - Zn; primary phase

65Zn diffusion
Zn:
1.16
614...890
1.73
2.15
2.80
3.29
3.76
7.06
9.9
15.17
24.25
28.9
31.27
41.51
50.0
598...753
683...836
598...782
598...753
622...745
634...726
634...715
603...683
52.52
616...695
53.28
615...686
55.04
598...686
56.85
585...654
57.28
598...675
1 514 +2.852
-0.989
0.575 (265)
57.50
58.5
585...675
589...663
1.35 (103)
0.036
8OC
75Gl
80C
80C
75Gl
80C
8OC
75Gl
AuCd; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCI) structure

lg5Au diffusion
Cd: 47.5
627...871
49.0
50.0
50.5
714...822
576...877
714...822
0.23
0.61
0.17
0.12
(2)
(6)
(3)
(1)
*) Remark: Diffusion of rg8Au.
logCd/sCd diffusion
Cd: 47.5
646 ... 858
49.0
50.0
50.5
714...822
604 ... 893
714...822
1.36 (2)
1.5 (2)
0.23 (1)
0.22 (2)
Bakker
Landolf-Wmstein
New Series Ill/26
223
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10d4 rnzs-l
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
Au - Cu; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
lg5Au diffusion
cu: 75
823...1173
0.0065 (9)
160.2 (39)
40
70. . 100
1133
For D see Fig. 41
41
65B, 69A,
77B2
78H
64Cu diffusion
cu: 70... 100
1133
For D seeFig. 41
41
78H
143 (10)
42
75G2
Au - Ta; primary phase

lg5Au diffusion
Ta: 1.2
477...669
0.0014
AuZn; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

lg5Au diffusion
Zn: 49.0
50.0
51.0
701 ... 923

701 ... 923
701 ... 923
0.19
0.33
0.016
133.5
138.6
113.0
43,44
71G
65Zn diffusion
Zn: 49.0
50.0
51.0
701...923
701...923
701 ... 923
0.84
1.93
0.047
144.8
148.2
115.1
43,44
71G
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
D
311sl
Fig.
Ref.
1g5/1ggA~diffusion,
Zn: 48.37
48.59
49.10
49.40
49.41
49.47
49.78
49.83
50.27
50.70
50.73
50.92
51.01
isotope effect E
876
876
878
874
878
875
757
874
757
875
875
814
875
1.620 (12). IO-l3

1.880 (13). lo-l3
1.420 (8). IO-l3
1.700 (4). 10-13
1.730 (6). lo-l3
1.650 (20) . lo- l3
1.040 (6). lo-l4
1.530 (22). 10-13
8.950 (44). lo-l5
2.000 (16). IO-l3
1.670 (15). IO-l3
6.330 (15). IO-l4
2.380 (12). IO-l3
0.22 (2)
0.30 (3)
0.41 (4)
0.24 (3)
0.32 (2)
0.21 (6)
0.37 (4)
0.20 (3)
0.23 (2)
0.25 (3)
0.29 (3)
0.35 (3)
0.36 (3)
45
83H3
0.230 (17)
0.190 (13)
0.090 (35)
0.100 (13)
0.050 (10)
46
83H3
Remark: For pressure dependence of the diffusion coefficient see [72J].
65/6gmZndiffusion,
Zn: 49.18
49.35
50.21
50.43
51.85
isotope effect E
916
928
835
837
810
7.280 (64). lo-l3

1.200 (21) . lo-l2
1.330 (15). lo-l3
1.200 (16). lo-l3
3.180 (47). lo-l3
Remark: For pressure dependence of the diffusion coefficient see [725].
Land&-BGmstein
New Series III/26
Ijakker
224
Fig.
Ref.
9.03
195.1
47
73L, 77B2
5.99
198.0
47
73L, 77B2
Be - Ni; primary phase

63Ni diffusion
Ni: 1.7
1173...1373
6.0
0.41 (16)
0.23 (12)
247.0 (109)
188.4 (17)
70A
Cd - Pb; terminal phase

lo9Cd diffusion
Pb: 99.1 . ..99.995 410.1
For D seeFig. 48
48
79Cl
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
Be - Cu; primary phase

Be tracer diffusion
perpendicular to the c axis
Cu: 1.6
770...1120
parallel to the c axis
Cu: 1.6
770...1120
DO
10-4 m2s-
kJ mol-
Co-Fe; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
Co diffusion in the ordered B2 (CsCI) structure
Fe: 50
928...995
557 (42)
70F
49
6oCo diffusion in the disordered bee structure, ferromagnetic phase
Fe: 32.8
903...1153
(6.04:;:;:).
10-3
190.9 (54)
72H
70F )
50.4
50
1023...1123
1068...1218
2.00 (50)
(6.59+;:;;!
71.4
903 ... 1083
93.2
903 ... 1073
+lO-2
251.2
247.0 (84)
(109)
(l.25+$.
lo-
198.0 (96)
(4.69;;:;;).
10-l
187.1 (121)
72H
) 5Co diffusion.
jCo diffusion in the disordered bee structure, paramagnetic phase

Fe: 93.2
1153...1193
(5.72:;:;;).
lo-
146.5 (84)
72H
251.2 (167)
72H
6oCo diffusion in the fee structure, ferromagnetic phase

Fe: 10.4
1073...1283
(6.44+;:;;).
1O-2
6oCo diffusion in the fee structure, paramagnetic phase

Fe: 10.4
1333... 1583
(l.61 ;!;i).
lO-2
234.0 (193)
72H
32.8
1333...1583
(3.15;:;;).
1O-2
265.0 (117)
72H
50
1285...1437
1.33 (50)
290.5 (84)
49
70F )
50.4
1333...1583
(1.54:;:;;).
IO-
349.5 (42)
72H
71.4
1333...1583
(3.36+$
* 1O-2
266.2 (96)
93.2
1283...1583
(1.09$;;).
10-r
326.0 (201)
(continued)
) 5Co diffusion.
Bakker
land&BBmstcin
New Series III,/26
225
Fig.
Ref.
557 (42)
49
70F
59Fe diffusion in the disordered bee structure, ferromagnetic phase

230.2 (42)
1068... 1218
0.25 (10)
Fe: 50
49
70F
59Fe diffusion in the fee structure, ferromagnetic phase

1081... T,
0.58
Fe: 6
10
0.68
273.3
279.2
74B
59Fe diffusion in the fee structure, paramagnetic phase

TC... 1573
0.15
Fe: 6
10
TC... 1573
0.18
50
1285 ... 1473
1.26 (10)
261.6
263.3
286.7 (84)
49
74B
74B
.70F
Temperature
range [K]
Composition
at %
DO
10m4m2sv1
kJ mol-
Co -Fe, continued
59Fe diffusion in the ordered B2 (CsCl) structure
928...995
Fe: 50
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
Fig.
Ref.
70F
49
70F
49
70F
49
70F
m*s-
57/60Codiffusion, isotope effect E in the fee structure, paramagnetic phase

0.773 (100)
1333
2.63 . lo-l6
Fe: 50
55159Fediffusion, isotope effect E in the ordered B2 (CsCl) structure
0.06 (20)
928
1.56. IO-l9
Fe: 50
0.30 (20)
956
8.68 . 10-19
0.16 (20)
975
4.79.10-18
0.30 (15)
994.5
8.70. IO-=
55/59Fediffusion, isotope effect E in the disordered bee structure
0.54 (8)
1068
1.03 . 10-16
Fe: 50
0.46 (8)
1150
1.07.10-15
0.64 (IO)
1175
1.85. 10-l
0.55 (8)
1218
5.12. IO-
55/59Fediffusion, isotope effect E in the fee structure
1285
3.00.10-6
Fe: 50
1335
8.14. IO-l6
1400
2.28. IO-l5
1434
5.34.10-15
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
Doa
10m4ms
Q.
kJ mol-
0.67 (8)
0.71 (8)
0.65 (8)
0.61 (8)
Dab
10m4ms1r
Qb
Fig.
Ref.
80s
kJ mol-
CoGa; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

6oCo diffusion
Analysis in terms of two exponentials: D(T) = Doa exp( - Q,/R T) + Dab exp( - QJRT)
Ga: 40.0
848...1423
0.989+ o49
-0.33
225 (10)
967+ 7oo
-400
294 (21)
50
44.0
898...1423
234 (13)
51
912...1423
948 ... 1423
1450+530
-390
366 (9)
883 (14)
302(12)
50.0
52.0
0846+54
.
-0.33
one exponential
one exponential
292 (2)
302 (1)
52
53
54.8
924... 1373
0.365 (13)
235 (2)
1160;;;
308 (2)
54
Remark: See also [79B].

(continued)
Land&-Bhutein
New Series III/26
226
Composition
at %
Tempcraturc
range [K]
DO
IOe4 m2s1
Q.
kJ mol-
Dab
Fig.
Ref.
383 (29)
50
80s
IO6
410 (29)
IO7
434 (45)
51
. IO4
357(50)
Qb
IOm4m2s11
kJ mol-
CoGa, continued
67Ga diffusion
Analysis in terms of two exponentials: D(T) = Do exp( - Q,/R T) + Dab exp( - QJR T)
53 6+12
. -10
277 (9)
(,.I,-$IO
Ga: 40.0
973 ... 1423
42.0
1123...1373
145+I
-10
290
44.0
1024...1423
518+70
-80
304 (8)
46.0
1024...1373
212+380
-140
302
48.0
1198...1373
249+ 39
-34
302
(7.82;;:).
IO7
441 (49)
50.0
998...1423
292 (I I)
(I.80:;:$.
IO6
398 (18)
52
52.0
1024... 1423
303 (1I)
(4.59+::;).
IO8
462 (46)
53
53.0
1133...1323
309
1.60. IO6
394
54.8
923... I373
66.3+18
-14
326+50
-40
690
9410+1000
- 900
(3.26+;:).
IO-4 163 (IO)
328 (7)
54
Remark: See also [79B].

Composition
Temperature
at %
range [K]
Co -Mn;
DO
10m4m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
268.3 (63)
256.6 (100)
263.3 (34)
55
771
kJ mol-
primary phase
54Mn diffusion
Mn: 5.22
5.22
10.24
1141 ... 1241)
1.38
1329...1473b)
1176... 1421
0.501
1.36
Remark: l ) Ferromagnetic phase, b, Paramagnctic phase.
Co-Ni;
primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
6oCo diffusion [69M]; Co

Ni:
3.7
diffusion [72M]
1 23+1.23
1340...1579
. -06,
7.1
1349.e.1578
1 12+2.55
. -075
280.0 (142)
10.3
1358...1578
o 43 + 0.75
. -028
267.5 (126)
30.0
1362...1577
o lo+o.15
. -oo6
246.6 (113)
49.3
1366...1577
o 18+o:20
. -oo9
252.0 (88)
0.094+ o.50
-0.08
o.40+.60
-0.25
o 98 + 0.73
. -o,41
49.3
69.7
69.7
853... 1353
1365...1574
853... 1353
56
69M
254.1 (163)
72M
258.7 (117)
56
69M
271.7 (50)
72M
283.4 (84)
(continued)
Bakker
Landolt-B6mslein
New Series 111126
Composition
at %
227
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10e4 m2 s-l
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
Ni: 73.7
1355...1570
o.og -oo7
+ 0.26
240.3 (159)
56
69M
73.7
853*..1353
o.37 -021
+0:50
261.6 (75)
72M
80.1
1343...1564
o.22 -o
+ 0.55
16
250.7 (151)
56
69M
o.32+0.24
-o.14
259.5 (50)
72M
8.68 +
-49.44
53
312.3 (88)
71M
7.1
l2 6+7:04
-4.52
316.5 (54)
10.3
13 7+ 17.5
. -7.70
317.3 (100)
30.0
7 45 + 6.06
* -3.34
306.8 (71)
49.3
4 80+4.23
-2.23
300.1 (75)
69.7
5 g6 + 5.63
. -2.90
298.9 (80)
73.7
6 13+4.87
-2.72
299.7 (71)
80.1
3 66+ 1.65
. -1.13
293.9 (46)
Co - Ni, continued
80.1
853... 1353
63Ni diffusion
Ni:
3.7
Composition
at %
1338...1563
Temperature
K
D
rn2se1
Fig.
Ref.
1.92.10-12
1.15.10-2
1.76. IO-
1.60. IO-l2
3.79 * lo-
3.95 * lo-
3.35 * IO-
3.30.10-1
75Sl
Co - Ti; terminal phase

Co diffusion
Ti: 92.6
95.1
96.7
98.4
92.6
95.1
96.7
98.4
Composition
at %
1186
1478
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10e4 m2 s-l
Ti: 92.6
1076... 1484
(2.50+;$.
95.1
1076..+ 1572
96.7
98.4
Fig.
Ref.
lO-2
162.8 (75)
57
75Sl
(I.41 i:;;).
10-Z
160.3 (50)
1166... 1617
(l.58+;$).
lO-3
140.2 (38)
1237 ... 1777
(1.26+;:;;).
lO-3
145.3 (67)
kJ mol-
44Ti diffusion
_Lanaolt-bxlw.eln
.._
New Series III/26
Bakker
228
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10T4 m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
203
188
174
58
88N
59
64D
kJ mol-
Co,Ti; intermediate phase, Ll z (Cu,Au) structure

6oCo diffusion
Ti 21.5
22.8
24.0
Co-U;
1074.0... 1332.2
1074.0... 1322.6
1074.0... 1321.9
4.3. 10-z
1.2. 10-z
3.7. 10-3
terminal phase
235U diffusion
u: X99.5...% 99.77 1095, 1113
For D see Fig. 59
Cr - Fe; primary/terminal phaseextending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
5Cr diffusion in paramagnetic a-phase
o *8+o.05
1073... 1673
. -o.04
Fe: 81
o 19+o.03
. -0.02
0.64 (7)
84
87
218.1 (38)
231.9 (29)
Cr diffusion in paramagnetic y-phase

Fe: 94
1073...1673
, .21 +0.73
-046
70Bl
237.3 (100)
3 21 +0.83
. -0.66
98
70Bl
216.8 (59)
244.5 (50)
s9Fe diffusion in ferromagnetic a-phase

Fe: 80.25
848...919
0.65
84.78
868...950
1.25
90.87
848...999
9.27
217.3
226.5
230.6
68R
s9Fe diffusion in paramagnetic y-phase

Fe: 90.87
1173..*1313
0.12
237.4
70R
s9Fe diffusion in paramagnetic a-phase

Fe: 80.25
963 ... 1098
0.18
84.78
999 ... 1050
0.27
94.95
1073...1173
0.85
96.91
1040...1173
6.7
98.57
1040~~~1173
2.8
99.13
1040...1173
1.2
208.0
215.6
237.3
255.8
249.1
241.1
68R
Cr -Ni;
74K
primary and terminal phase
sCr diffusion in primary phase

Ni: 18
1423.~~1688
SCr diffusion in terminal phase
Ni: 52.3
1223... 1473
61.6
65.6
70.6
76.4
78
1123...1473
85.7
1223... 1473
95.3
1223...1473
63Ni diffusion in terminal phase
Ni: 52.3
1223... 1473
61.6
65.6
71A
0.28
259.5
2.64
2.16
2.42
2.91
6.10
0.61
5.66
6.37
284.2
284.0
288.0
288.5
295.5
264
293.6
292.1
8lR2
1.74
1.43
1.35
288.9
290.4
289.5
8lR2
Bakker
8lR2
79D
8lR2
(continued)
Land&-B6mstein
New Series 11126
Composition
at %
229
DO
10m4m2 s-l
e
kJ mol-
Fig.
Ref.
rangeKl
285.4
293.8
259
289.3
279.5
81R2
1123... 1473
1223... 1473
1223... 1473
1.02
2.95
0.15
2.31
1.32
Temperature
Cr - Ni, continued
Ni: 70.6
76.4
78
85.7
95.3
79D
81R2
Cr - Zr; terminal phase

Cr diffusion
Zr: 97.4
1233... 1371
0.19
191.3
73Tl
g5Zr diffusion
Zr: 92.14
95.92
96.51
97.95
1227...
1218 ...
1196...
1200...
1.59.10-z
1.39.10-z
2.05. IO-
5.16. 1O-3
173.4 (26)
169.2 (45)
169.0 (87)
165.5 (75)
60
81Pl
61
72B
62
82H
1516
1516
1518
1497
Cu -Fe; primary phase

64Cu diffusion
Fe: 0 ... 2.4
1293
For D see Fig. 61
Cu - In; primary phase

64Cu diffusion
In: 0.4
0.8
1.2 .,
1.7
Cu -Ni;
1005... 1145
220
200
200
190
2
0.4
0.6
0.2
64Cu diffusion
Ni: 1
1053...1163
1.86
204.7
67S2
21.5
1146...1385
1.9+2.0
231.5 (80)
63
64M, 77B2
5416
1258... 1483
2.3 -lo
(10,
252.4 (13)
87
1327...1632
7-03
1.5+o.4
.
263.7 (3)
64
64M, 77B2
63Ni diffusion
Ni: 21.5
1187... 1386
.
oo63+o.012
-0.010
208.0 (21)
54.6
1298... 1476
17+11
-7
279.6 (63)
87
1379... 1618
35+17
-11
313.5 (71)
Cu - Pt; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
.,
_
64Cu diffusion
1172...1319
1.l+1.8
-o 7
221.0 (105)
24.6
1220... 1369
. -042
053+1.01
229.0 (163)
49.4
1273 ... 1566
o.027 + 0.022
-0.012
213.5 (71)
74.5
1371...1658
37
o .67 -o
+ 0.83
269.6 (50)
Pt: 9.8
I&dolt-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
65
77B2
(continued:
230
Fig.
Ref.
oo93+.42
.
- 0.076
oo*g+o.041
.
-0.013
220.2 (180)
66
77B2
1307...1560
oo66+0.126
.
- 0.044
249.1 (126)
1413...1655
o.022+~081
-0.017
252.4 (197)
0.4
0.6
0.7
200
200
200
67
82H
8.57. 1O-4
1.99.10-4
1.36. 1O-4
43.8 (56)
30.4 (42)
24.30 (364)
68,69
70H, 84B
0.4
0.07
0.06
0.03
200
180
180
170
70,71
82H
Temperature
range fK1
DO
lop4 m2s-
Pt: 9.8
1179.**1331
24.6
1219..+1367
49.4
74.5
Zomposition
it %
kJ mol-
Zu - Pt, continued
195Ptdiffusion
215.2 (126)
Cu-Sb; primary phase

54Cudiffusion
Sb: 0.3
0.5
0.8
1005~~~1145
Cu,Sb; intermediate phase, p-phase, DO, (BiF,) structure

54Cu diffusion
Sb: 21
25
29
770 . . .900
Cu- Sn; primary phase

64Cu diffusion
Sn: 0.4
0.8
1.1
1.7
1014... 1145
Cu,Sn; intermediate phase, y-phase, DO, (BiF,) structure
64Cu diffusion
Sn: 16.6
18.0
19.8
20.2
811... 1008
873...998
873...998
897...992
0.0083 (17)
0.014
0.0036
0.018 (3)
83.0 (19)
74.5
84.6
82.0 (10)
72,74
73,74
73,74
72,74
80P
68E
68E
80P
1%n diffusion
Sn: 16.6
18.0
19.8
20.2
839...998
873...998
873.e.998
903.s. 1003
0.22 (19)
0.33
0.092
0.035 (16)
117.8 (68)
122.2
113.4
107.1 (29)
72,74
73,74
73,74
72,74
80P
68E
68E
80P
129.3 (4)
75
68E
208.0 (21)
75
68E
Cu,Sn,; intermediate phase, &-phase,y-brass-type structure
64Cu diffusion
Sn: 20.5
710... 850
4.7 (13)
11%n diffusion
Sn: 20.5
770... 840
Bakker
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10e4 m2se1
231
Fig.
Ref.
76
7OP
kJ mol-
Cu - Zn; primary phase

67Cu diffusion
Zn: 0...4
I
1167,122O
For D seeFig. 76
8.6
873 .+. 1074
162.0 (84)
72K2
8.6
873...1074
oo57+o.100
.
-0.036
o t5+0.06
. -oo5
177.0 (25)
72K2
10.1
1022...1252
o 64+o:07
. -oo7
190.9 (8)
680
14.9
783 ... 1084
160.0 (109)
72K2
20.5
1021...1213
176.6 (29)
680
28.8
873 ... 1074
133.5 (134)
72K2
30.2
973...1175
164.5 (25)
680
37.1
907... 1074
o.oo56+ 0.0100
- 0.0037
135.6 (67)
72K2
Fig.
Ref.
65Zn diffusion
Zn:
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
o.075 + b.220
-0.056
o.35+o.12
-oog
0028+~.120
.
- 0.023
o 32+o.10
. -oo8
m2s-l
64Cu/67Cu diffusion, isotope effect E

Zn: 3.6
1169.4
29.8
1166
3.75.10-14
4.31 . 10-13
0.699 (7)
0.632 (9)
7OP
65Zn/6gZn diffusion, isotope effect E

Zn: 4.89
1169.7
30.6
1168.8
1.31 . IO--l3
1.67. lo-l2
0.389 (10)
0.446 (8)
7OP
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
low4 m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
CuZn; intermediate compound, disordered bee structure and ordered B2 (CsCl) structure
64Cu diffusion in the disordered structure
Zn: 45.65 . ..48.00 770... 1090
0.011
92.3
77
56K
65Zn diffusion in the disordered structure

Zn: 45.65 ... 48.00 772 ... 991
0.0035
78.6
77
56K
64Cu diffusion in the ordered B2 structure

Zn: 45.65...48.00 654..715
180
565.~. 654
80
158.6
150.8
77
56K
65Zn diffusion in the ordered B2 structure

Zn : 45.65 . . .48.00 649 . . .723
78000
537...649
163
185.1
152.0
77
56K
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
Fig.
Ref.
64Cu/67Cu diffusion, isotope effect E in the disordered structure

Zn: 46.2
835.6
1.70.10-12
0.325 (9)
7OP
65Zn/6gZn diffusion, isotope effect E in the disordered structure

Zn: 49.0
833.3
4.46. lo-l2
0.24 (1)
67P
(continued)
Landolt-Biimstein
New Series III/26
m2s-l
Bakker
232
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
D
m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
CuZn, continued
64Cu/67Cu diffusion, isotope effect E in the ordered B2 structure
Zn: 46.8
683
1.77.10-4
0.325 (IO)
7OP
65Zn/6gZn diffusion, isotope effect E in the ordered B2 structure

Zn: 47.2
683.6
4.38 . lo-r4
0.20 (I)
67P
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
IOm4m2s-
,Q
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
Fe - Ge; primary phase

5gFediffusion
Ge: 4.8
1173..*1473
4.8
242.8 (42)
67LI
0.090
0.105
0.058
0.066
0.110
0.35
0.64
0.85
0.60
265.4
262.9
255.8
254.9
262.0
275.4
282.1
277.5
276.7
73N
oo55+o.014
.
-0.012
0.020+ 0.09
-0.007
o oo96+ 0.0034
- 0.0007
oo17+o.o11
.
-0.007
oo72+o.031
-0.027
029+o.11
-0.08
0.190
0.120
0.073
249.5 (80)
70N
235.3 (71)
222.3 (71)
229.4 (88)
248.2 (113)
266.6 (138)
261.6
251.6
242.0
73N
263 (11)
77R
257 (19)
266 (20)
264 (20)
Fe - Mn; primary phase

Fe diffusion in primary phase
Mn: 1.04
1263...1513
2.03
2.97
4.90
7.04
10.41
18.15
25.50
33.98
54Mn diffusion in primary phase
Mn:
1.04
983...1573
2.03
2.97
4.90
7.04
10.41
18.15
25.50
33.98
1263...1513
Fe-MO; primary phase

sgFe diffusion in primary, paramagnetic phase
MO: 0.32
0.64
0.90
1.5
953...1173
15.5+32
-10
23.6+16
- 21
28.5+210
- 25
47.7+ 340
- 42
Bakker
Land&-BCmstein
New Series III/26
Ref. p. 2761 4 Self-diffusion

Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
Fe - Ni; primary/terminal
5gFe diffusion
Ni: 14.9
29.7
45.3
60.5
70.0
75.3
79.8
90.0
63Ni diffusion
Ni: 14.9
29.7
45.3
60.5
70.0
75.3
79.8
90.0
lo3Pd diffusion
Pd: 10
20
30
40
50
55
60
70
80
90
binary
alloys and intermediate phases (Tables)
DO
10m4 ms-
Fig.
233
Ref.
kJ mol-
phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
1258 -.+ 1578
2.13
9.98
8.75
28.77
11.99
20.28
12.30
17.99
286.3
305.7
301.8
311.3
302.7
309.9
304.2
307,l
(180)
(105)
(77)
(122)
(94)
(72)
(55)
(174)
78
81M
1258 ... 1578
1.88
2.36
8.04
7.76
13.90
13.31
8.73
7.67
289.4
291.9
303.4
300.5
305.3
307.3
301.5
299.6
(139)
(120)
(152)
(123)
(62)
(138)
(89)
(196)
79
81M
Fe - Pd; primary/terminal
5gFe diffusion
Pd: 10
20
30
40
50
55
60
70
80
90
in homogeneous
phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
1373 ... 1523
1373...1523
0.79
0.93
0.66
0.95
0.95
0.79
0.69
0.60
0.91
0.91
259.5 (130)
269.6 (134)
275.9 (147)
0.70
1.84
1.66
1.05
0.70
0.67
0.79
0.73
0.79
0.37
278.8
284.6
279.2
270.8
264.6
263.7
266.2
266.6
271.3
268.3
277.5
271.7
262.5
264.1
262.5
260.0
258.7
(110)
(163)
(159)
(147)
(130)
(147)
(134)
(172)
(155)
(167)
(147)
(130)
(142)
(142)
(134)
(151)
(151)
80, 84
77F*)
81,84
:
82, 84
77F*)
83,84
) Remark: The values of the pre-exponential factors and activation energies(for s9Feand lo3Pd diffusion) were obtained by
:omputer calculations based on the results given in Fig. 84.
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
234
Temperature
range [K]
Do
10e4 m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
03+0.8
. -o.22
263 (38)
79C2
o.1 +0.2
-0.07
o.1 +0.2
-0.07
o o4 + 0.07
. -0.04
254 (25)
259 (21)
240 (21)
O06+3
. -o,0599
251 (71)
5.69
o o4 + 0.05
-0.02
254 (17)
14.8
0.008+ 02
-0.006
224 (25)
1.1+26
_ 1o
264.1 (343)
20
0.34+ l2
- 0.33
265.0 (327)
25
1.17+130
- 1.16
265.4 (477)
30
0.28+71
-0.27
264.1 (335)
34
o.15+1.2
-0.13
1.3+1.5
-0.5
1*13+o.79
-0.47
2.1 + 3.9
-1.4
o.85 + 0.74
-0.40
264.1 (234)
289.7 (327)
284.2 (59)
292.2 (121)
286.7 (71)
0.34+ 3.5
-0.31
280.9 (222)
0.51
216.8 (84)
67Ll
85
75M2 *)
71D*)
81Rl
Composition
at %
Fe-Pt;
kJ mol-
primary phase (solution in y-phase of Fe)
5gFediffusion
Pt: 2.92
1386...1528
5.69
8.0
8.3
lg7Pt diffusion
Pt: 2.92
15
1406.e. 1569
1173...1693
40
45
50
55
60
79C2
75K
Fe - Sb; primary phase

sgFe diffusion
Sb: 2.5
1169.e.1370
Fe - Si; primary phase

Fe diffusion in ferro- and paramagnetic phase
Si: 7.64
806... 1366
For D see Fig. 85
*) Remark: Single crystal.
Fe diffusion in ferromagnetic phase

Si: 3
980... 1030
0.60 (30)
10
875...957
5.59
224.7 (54)
219.1
l ) Remark: Single crystal
(continued)
Bakker
Iandolt-BGmstein
New Series III/26
235
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DQ
10m4ms11
Fig.
Ref.
276
276
282.5
215.9 (54)
232.3
86, 87
86, 87
-
81T
81T
702
71D*)
68L
250 (11)
86
77M *)
229.8
68L
kJ mol-
Fe - Si, continued
5gFe diffusion in paramagnetic phase
1.03
1063... 1373
Si: 1.48
76.7
1.87
1063... 1373
63.2
3
1173...1523
0.23 (7)
3
1030... 1173
1.63
4.7
1073... 1573
5.5
1013...1373
72+17
. _ 51
6.3
1073... 1573
1.65
6.4
1013...1373
-3,1
3.15+6.8
238 (11)
86
77M *)
6.55
1063... 1373
5.2
242
86,87
81T
7.64
1173... 1373
-028
1.38+o.35
228.1 (25)
85
751112
*)
7.8
1053...1373
86+18
. _ 58
244 (11)
86
77M *)
8.2
8.64
10
1073 ... 1573

1063 ... 1373
1005...1178
0.50
4.93
0.25
213.1
236
209.6
68L
86, 87 81T
81Rl
11.1
1173...1373
063+o.19
.
212.2 (33)
75M2 *)
11.3
1073 ... 1573
1.11-oll .
213.9
68L
11.6
1053...1373
063+18
.
212 (13)
86
77M *)
11.7
12.1
1073...1573
1063... 1373
1.46-047
0.8
216.4
213
68L
86, 87 81T
15.3
1133...1373
21+7.5
. -16
219 (16)
86
77M *)
19.2
1093...1373
-18
3.4+3.7
216 (8)
86
77M *)
*) Remark: Single crystal.
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
Fig.
Ref.
m2sm1
5515gFediffusion in single crystals, isotope effect E in the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phase
71D
0.366 (48)
6.50 (32). lo-l7
980
Si: 3
0.339 (45)
1.04 (5). 10-16
996
0.336 (44)
1.35 (7). 10-16
1008
0.343 (45)
1.91 (IO). 10-16
1016
0.339 (41)
3.06 (15). IO-l6
1023
0.343 (38)
3.23 (16) * IO-l6
1039
0.346 (37)
6.18 (22). 10-16
1062
0.349 (36)
7.70 (28). lo-l6
1076
0.346 (35)
8.94 (32). lo-l6
1083
0.377 (34)
2.42 (9). 10-l
1128
0.397 (40)
5.77 (21) . lo- l5
1175
Remark: The Curie temperature is 1029K.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
236
Composition
3t %
Temperature
range [K]
Do
10m4m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
88
83K
kJ mol-
primary phase
Fe-h;
5gFediffusion
Sn: O... 2.7
Fe-Ti;
1168
For D see Fig. 88
primary phase
5gFediffusion
Ti: 2
2
1173...1473
2.8
242.0 (42)
67Ll
1273... 1673
0.56+14
-0.12
o 27 + 0.04
. -0.03
216.4 (63)
70Bl
204.7 (42)
o.40+.5
-0.2
208.9 (234)
1173...1773
1173...1466
1.4
I.87
236.9 (42)
240.3 (42)
67LI
1273... 1723
3 g2+0.82
. -0.68
3 ()(-)+0.49
-0.42
2 28 + 0.40
. -0.34
2 12+0.25
. -0.22
, 66 + 0.49
-0.38
241.1 (54)
70B2
238.6 (42)
236.1 (46)
236.5 (29)
234.0 (75)
4
6
primary phase
Fe-V;
Fe diffusion
V: I.8
5.3
*V diffusion
v:
2
5
9
14
19
Fe - Zr; terminal phase
5gFe diffusion
Zr: 96.5
98.0
99.5
lOgO... 1600
1120... 1600
1120... 1580
7.4 (3) 10-3
108.1 (19)
same values
same values
1276...1515
1188...1470
1196...1520
1218,..1515
1258...1518
5.26. lO-2
2.9. 10-3
1.62. lO-3
2.08. lO-3
155.5 (132)
140.8 (73)
146.0 (72)
150.9 (I 34)
1.52. lO-3
149.0 (65)
89
87Hl
90
81PI
91,92
76D
g5Zr diffusion
Zr: 93.63
96.46
98.36
98.65
99.02
GaNi;
intermediate phase, B2 (CsCI) structure
67Ga diffusion
Ni: 47.28
48.76
50.01
50.73
51.01
52.40
1085... 1384
0.1230 (2317)
0.7874
0.0010 (19)
0.0122 (329)
0.1087 (2656)
5.1430 (209524)
191.5
209.4
146.5
166.4
189.6
222.0
(continued)
Bakker
Land&BBmstein
New Series 111126
Composition
at %
237
Temperature
range [K]
Do
Fig.
10m4rns-l
kJ mol-
978 ... 1380
0.0029 (38)
0.0126 (117)
0.0130 (192)
0.0936 (1220)
0.1353 (1187)
0.0174 (84)
0.0107 (95)
0.0121 (37)
143.1
154.3
156.0
172.5
175.3
158.2
153.7
153.9
93,94 76D
238Pu diffusion
diffusion in s-phase
Pu: 96.6
847...917
6.98. 1O-4
56.1
71w
diffusion in g-phase
Pu: 96.6
613...781
76.4
152.0
71w
414.1 (87)
95
84V
Ref.
GaNi, continued
63Ni diffusion
Ni: 47.28
48.76
49.33
50.01
50.45
50.73
51.01
52.40
Ga - Pu; terminal phase
GaV,; intermediate phase, Al 5 structure

48V diffusion
V: 75.6
1298 ... 1449
15200
Hf - Zr; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
*Hf diffusion in single crystal
diffusion parallel to the hexagonal axis
Zr: 4.0
1493... 1883
0.86
1347... 1493
7.1. lo-
370.0 (134)
85.0 (268)
96
72D
diffusion perpendicular to the hexagonal axis

Zr: 4.0
1493 ... 1883
0.28
1347... 1493
8.9. IO-lo
348.3 (200)
104.2 (553)
97
72D
Hg - Pb; terminal phase

03Hg diffusion
Pb: 96
Pb
428.s.568
o 7g+o.17
. -0.14
90.0 (8)
98
73w
487...568
o.76 + 0.21
-0.14
105.1 (13)
98
73w
diffusion
Pb: 99
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO"
10e4 ms-
Q.
kJ mol-
Dab
low4 ms-
Qb
Fig.
Ref.
314.7 (251)
318.5 (241)
293.4 (241)
-
99
83Hl
kJ mol-
InPd; intermediate phase, B2 (CsCl) structure

i14In diffusion
Analysis in terms of two exponentials: D(T) = Doa exp( - Q,/RT) +
Pd: 49
1094...1270
0.0084 (44)
192.1(125)
50
996... 1326
0.0050 (27)
181.5(106)
53
996... 1417
0.016 (8)
191.1(116)
56
1039... 1472
0.14 (3)
215.3 (29)
Dabexp(- QJR T)
5.0 (39). IO2
10.6 (62). IO2
20.0 (ill)
-
(continued)
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
238
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DQ
Fig.
Ref.
lop4 m*s-
kJ mol-
1056... 1274
1098... 1326
1122...1424
1056...1379
0.12 (2)
2.30 (55)
0.60 (13)
0.20 (4)
207.5 (29)
243.3 (29)
222.0 (19)
205.6 (19)
99
83Hl
57.0
222.0
53.1
100
101
102
79A
Fig.
Ref.
75Sl
Fig.
Ref.
103
75Sl
InPd, continued
ro9Pd diffusion
Pd: 49
50
53
56
MnPt,; ordered phase, Ll z (Cu,Au) structure

s4Mn diffusion
Pt: 65
75
82
1026... 1284
1026... 1283
1020... 1284
2.3.10-r
3.10-2
2.1 * 10-10
Composition
at %
Temperature
K
Mn -Ti;
m*s-
terminal phase
54Mn diffusion
Ti: 79.4
82.1
86.7
90.3
86.7
90.3
1171
1513
8.83. IO-l4
9.67. IO-l4
1.54.10-13
1.86.10-3
1.44.10-11
5.64. IO-
Temperature
range [K]
DO
Ti: 79.4
1083... 1525
(5.47;;:;).
IO-
208.0 (75)
82.1
1070... 1570
(2.60+;:;;).
lo-*
176.2 (42)
86.7
1076... 1617
(2.06+;:;;).
lo-*
172.0 (54)
90.3
1137...1720
(1.90;:;;).
lo-*
171.2 (96)
Composition
at %
10m4m*s-l
kJ mol-
44Ti diffusion
Mn -Zr;
terminal phase
54Mn diffusion
Zr: 98
98.5
99
99.5
Zr diffusion
Zr: 98
98.5
99
99.5
1173...1473
0.08 (3) +10-j

0.46 (12). IO-
1.38 (41). lO-3
2.92 (73). lO-3
104.6 (27)
120.1 (30)
129.5 (37)
135.7 (27)
104
79P2
1173...1473
3.36 (97).
2.17 (61).
1.20 (30).
0.71 (20).
125.3 (35)
121.8 (28)
116.7 (34)
112.3 (27)
105
79P2
lO-4
lO-4
10-4
10-a
Bakker
land&-Btimsfein
New Series III/26
239
Composition
It %
Temperature
range [K]
Do
10m4rns-l
Fig.
Ref.
207.2
210.6
218.5
228.6
71F
229.8
198.4
kJ mol-
MO- Ni; terminal phase

)gMo diffusion
Ni: 77
80
82
84
92
63Ni diffusion
Ni: 77
80
82
84
0.20
0.25
0.45
1.30
1.31
1373...1573
0.12
0.19
0.34
0.63
2.55
1223...1573
1223 ... 1623
1223 ... 1623
1273 ... 1673
92
MO-W;
studied
1373 ... 1573

1223 ... 1573
1223 '.* 1623
1223 ... 1623
1273 ... 1673
204.3
211.0
218.5
236.1
71F
primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range
-
ggMo diffusion
w: 0.1
15
20
25
35
45
50
56
65
75
80
85
99.9
la5W diffusion
w: 0.1
15
20
25
35
50
65
75
80
85
99.9
2073 .. 2673
1673 . ..2673
1673...2673
1673...2673
1773...2673
2173...2673
1973... 2773
2173 ... 2573
2073 ... 2873
2073 .*. 3073
2073 *.. 3073
2073 . . .3073
2473 +.. 3073
2073..2673
1673...2673
1673 ... 2673
1673 ... 2673
1773 ... 2673
1973...2773
2073 ... 2873
2073 ... 3073
2073 ... 3073
2073 ... 3073
2473 ... 3073
468.8
443.7
427.0
142
265
146
47
28
0.12
12
0.17
1.3
0.2
397.6
385.1
431.2
368.4
447.9
0.11
360.0
353.7
343.3
0.08
0.0025
326.5
69F
69F
68s
67L2
69F
67L2
69F
334.9
297.2
0.0085
1.4
1.7
2.2
305.6
312.3
322.3
355.8
6.9
397.7
14
16
20
22
25
24
427.0
485.6
498.1
510.7
544.2
Nb - Ni; terminal phase

63Ni diffusion
Ni: 90
92
98.8
Land&-Bknstein
New Series 111126
1303 ... 1503
281
260
255
1.80
0.20
0.12
Bakker
240
Zomposition
1t %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10m4m2s-
Fig.
Ref.
kJ mol-
VbNi,; intermediate phase, DO, (P-TiCu,) structure

Nb diffusion in single crystals
Ni: 75
1543.s.1623
240
447.9
75Ml
Ni diffusion in single crystals

Ni: 75
1363.s.1643
0.18
304.7
75Ml
Vb-Ti;
,95Nb diffusion
fi: 10
35
50
2000..2473
1773. ..2273
1473...2073
SeeFig. 106
SeeFig. 106
SeeFig. 106
64.3
1279...1657
70
1373.e.2073
o.29*+o.195
-0.117
SeeFig. 106
80.4
1222... 1565
(1.18+;:;;).
85
90
1150~~*1515
1230...1515
SeeFig. 106
SeeFig. 106
94.6
1222...1784
(l.79+;$.
95
1230...1573
See Fig. 106
1279.e. 1657
(2.51:;:;;).
80.4
1222...1565
94.6
1222... 1784
106,107
106,107
106,107
63G
63G
63G
106,108
79Pl
106,107
63G
106,108
79Pl
106,107
106,107
63G
63G
106,108
79Pl
106,107
63G
247.1 (43)
108
79Pl
(3.15~;:~~)~ 1O-3
175.6 (52)
108
79Pl
(l.27+$.
149.1 (24)
108
79Pl
258.4 (61)
lO-2
1O-3
198.1 (67)
160.0 (33)
4Ti diffusion
Ti: 64.3
10-l
lO-3
Nb- W; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
p5Nb diffusion
w: 5
IO
30
1873... 2273
Composition
at % W
Temperature
K
psNb diffusion
w: 2
5
10
2680 (20)
*W diffusion
w: 2
5
10
2680 (20)
2334
164
0.0257
544.2
489.8
355.8
67L3
Fig.
Ref.
1.277 (7). IO-l2

1.065 (4). lo-l2
0.760 (4) . lo- l2
86M
4.35 (20). lo-3

3.30 (8). IO-l3
2.38 (6). IO-l3
68M
m2s-
Bakker
Landolf-BBmstein
New Series III/26
242
:omposition
1t %
Fig.
Ref.
373.0 (234)
72Kl
344.5 (540)
(.46+5.1
-2.4 > lo-*
469.7 (151)
633.e.673
633...663
613...653
0.871 . 1O-7
0.923.10-*
0.929. lo-
83.7
67.0
46.0
72s
Temperature
DO
Fig.
Ref.
range[Kl
10m4m*s-l
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10v4 m*s-l
kJ mol-
ae- W; terminal phase

W diffusion
ii: 78
2208...2773
89
94
Sb,Sn,; intermediate phase, p-phase
r3Sn diffusion
jn: 41
43
45
Composition
at %
SC-&;
kJ mol-
kJ mol-K-l
)5Zr diffusion
The following measurementsare analyzed by D(T) = Do exp (- Q/R T) exp (A/R T*)
Zr: 86.4
1400... 1900
1.3
341.7
17.18. lo4
111
93.3
1280... 1900
1.0
335.9
16.31 . lo4
Composition
at %
87H2
Temperature
DO
Fig.
Ref.
low4 m*s-l
range[Kl
kJ mol-
Sn- Zn; primary phase

13/23Sn diffusion
Zn: 0.9
420...490
89+7.3
.
-4.0
104.6 (23)
112
66B
65Zn diffusion
Zn: 0.9
350...455
20+1.0
-0.5
71.0 (15)
112
66B
Ti-V;
44Ti diffusion
v: 10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1173...1875
1173.s.1796
1223... 1848
1273... 1848
1273.e.1849
1273...1874
1373... 1918
1373... 1941
1423... 2023
Arrheniusplot is curved
113
68M
48V diffusion
v: 10
20
30
40
1173.s.1823
1173...1848
1223...1846
1223... 1848
114
68M
(continued)
Bakker
Land&-Bknslein
New Series III/26
243
Composition
at %
Temperature
range [K]
DO
10e4 m2 s-l
Fig.
Ref.
114
68M
kJ mol-l
Ti - V, continued
v: 50
60
70
80
90
1323... 1846
1323... 1845
1373... 1875
1423... 1923
1423.. 2020
Ti - Zr; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
44Ti diffusion
Zr: 49
1060... 1920
I15
87H2
U - Zr; primary/terminal phase extending over the whole composition range in the temperature range studied
235U diffusion
Zr: 41
61
73
89
1173 ... 1325

1173 ... 1338
8.96
0.007
0.00365
7.5. 10-4
245.3
168.7
160.7
141.9
68F
1173...1338
7.5. 10-7
3.8 . 1O-6
2.4. IO-
3.9. 10-4
0.028
0.12
83.7
99.2
118.5
146.5
190.5
205.5
68F
1428...2047
064+I.20
-0.42
312.6 (153)
II6
81P2
1578 ... 1888
86 (25)
72 (22)
68 (22)
58 (15)
383.2 (109)
379.4 (110)
376.7 (106)
373.0 (105)
117
84P
48V diffusion in terminal phase

1166... 1480
Zr: 98.0
98.5
99.0
99.5
0.7 (2). 10-5

1.5 (3). 10-5
3.0 (6). IO-5
5.5 (11). 10-5
94.2 (10)
100.6 (18)
106.9 (21)
112.5 (24)
118
82P
g5Zr diffusion in primary phase

1578...1883
Zr: 0.5
1.0
I.5
2.0
115 (38)
153 (52)
195 (64)
242 (80)
373.0 (100)
376.0 (103)
378.6 (107)
380.8 (112)
119
84P
Zr diffusion in terminal phase

1167... 1476
Zr: 98.0
98.5
99.0
99.5
14.0 (40). 10-5

9.3 (25) . IO-
5.9 (15). 10-5
4.5 (13) * 10-5
120.8 (33)
116.8 (31)
112.0 (29)
109.0 (26)
120
82P
g5Zr diffusion
Zr: 15
22
41
61
73
89
V - Zr; primary and terminal phase

48V diffusion in primary phase
Zr: 0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
4 Self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys and intermediate phases (Figures)
[Ref. p. 276
Figures for 4
10
m2
6
4
2
10
-I
10
6
6
4
2
10-15
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
.lOJK- 1.30
Fig. 3. Ag-Cd (30 ... 38 at % Cd). OrnAg diffusion coeflicient (full lines) and Cd diffusion coefficient (dashedlines)
vs. reciprocal temperature [68G].
0
Ag-
8 ot%
-
Fig. 1. Ag-AI (90.3...99 at % Al). romAg diffusion coefficient vs. Ag concentration at various temperatures [68H].
1.6
.10-3
mvs
6
6
1.2
I 4
m
I 0.8
a
0.1
01
0
10-14
I
20
I
40
I
60
I
I
80 at% 100
Au Fig. 2. Ag-Au (8...94 at % Au). OrnAg diffusion coeflicient (open circles) and 198A~diffusion coefficient (full circles) vs. Au concentration at 1148K [63M].
0.85
0.89
0.93
0.97
1.01.10-3K-1.05
l/lFig. 4. Ag-Cu(0.17...8.15at
%Cu). omAgdiffusioncoefkicnt vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2].
Bakker
Landoh-BBmstcin
New Series 111i26
245
Ref. p. 2761 4 Self-diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys and intermediate phases (Figures)
2d3
m2/sI
1ll-'2
m2/5
A-
P..
An
r-t,
lo-l3
8
4
4
~hI lo-"
8
6
4
4\
2
0.85
0.90
\\
1Pl
0.80
0.95
1.00
W3 K-'
1.10
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
l/T-
l/T-
Fig. 5. Ag-Cu (0.85 ... 3.36 at % Cu). omAgdiffusion co-
efficient vs. reciprocaltemperature[77B2].
1.05
.10-3K'
1.15
Fig. 6. Ag-Cu (1.38 ... 4.43 at % Cu). OrnAg diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2].
lo--2
m2/s
m2/s
6
4
3.0
.10-3,(-l
64
Q
2
10-13
B
lo-l3
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
l/T-
3.2
Fig. 8. Ag,Hg, (55 at % Hg). 03Hg diffusion coeffkient vs.

reciprocal temperature [77S].
1.25,
0.95
0
0.2
0.4
10-14
a
$15
0.
0.88
0.91
0.94
l/T -
0.97
.,0-3K-l
1.03
Fig. 7. Ag-Cu (1.75 ... 6.56 at % Cu). llomAg diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2].
Fig. 9. Ag-In (0.151. ..0.943 at % In). OrnAg diffusion

coefficient relative to the silver self-diffusion coefficient vs. In
concentration at 1054 K [85K]. Different symbols correspond to two runs of measurements.
Land&-B6rnstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
0.6
In -
0.8 at%
1.0
4 Self-diffusion in homogeneousbinary alloys and intermediate phases(Figures)
246
[Ref. p. 276
10-12 _
m7/s
.
-13 >
10
1o-l3
I -14 _
a 10
lo-&
10-15 I
Q
10-16
48
45
40
52
56
lo-l5
ot% 60
MgFig. 10. AgMg (41.l ... 57.2at % Mg). OrnAg diffusion co:flkient vs. Mg concentration at various temperatures [64D].
lo-l6
Ag - Sn
10-l
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.0
l/l -
1.2.10-3K-1
Fig. 11. Ag-Sb (0.53...1.42 at % Sb). OrnAg diffusion

coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [55S].
8 at% 10
6
SnFig. 12. Ag-Sn (1 . ..8.67 at % Sn). OrnAg diffusion coefficient relative to the silver self-diffusion coefficient minus 1
vs. Sn concentration at various temperatures [83H2].
2
0.8 at% 1.0

0.6
0.4
Sn Fig. 13. Ag-Sn (0.218...0.773 at % Sn). OrnAg diffusion
coeffkient relative to the silver self-diffusion coeflicient vs.
Sn concentration at 1052K [85K]. Different symbols correspond to two runs of measurements.
Bakker
0.2
Landolf-BBmstein
New Series III!26
247
10-12
m2/S
Ag - Sn
13
10-12
m2/s
14
-13
IO
jot% Sn
I
4.1
3
15 _
0.8 lo-l4
0.108
I6
1.1540JK-' 1.20
1.9:
Fig. 14. Ag-Sn (0.108... 6 at % Sn). rromAg diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [78G].
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
l/T-
1.05
@K-'
1.15
Fig. 15. Ag-Sn (0.11, 1.7 at % Sn). rr3Sn diffusion coefticient vs. reciprocal temperature [78G].
10-12
m2/s
6
Ag -Zn
, 2.8
28.
1o-13
8
6
I
a
2.2
22
I
a
2.0
20
'T
6
1.8
18
1.6
16
14
0
1.1,
1
4 at%
1.65 40-3K-'
Fig. 16. Ag-Zn (1.1...4.1 at % Zn). lomAg diffusion coefficient vs. Zn concentration at various temperatures [67R].
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
1.75
l/T -
Zn -
Fig. 17. Ag-Zn (99.11 ... 99.65at % Zn). romAg diffusion

coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (D,,) and perpendicular (D,) to the c axis [69S].
Bakker
248
[Ref. p. 276
10-[
KS/s
10-12
\
2
\
10-l
I
el
I 6
,o-li
Q6
4
-13
10
1.0
1.1
1.2
l/l-
1.3
1.4.lO-K- 15
Fig. 19. AgxZn, (61,62 at % Zn; y-phase). OrnAg diffusion

coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [71S].
lo-)
l.LO
1.45
1.50
1.55
l/l -
1.60
.10-JK
1.70
Fig. 18. Ag-Zn (98.6,99.43 at % Zn). 6sZn diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (D,,) and perpendicular (D,) to the c axis [69S].
10amk
10-n
2.5
48
54
56 01% 58
co Fig. 21. AlCo (49 ... 57 at % Co). Co diffusion coefficient
vs. Co concentration at 1623 K [51N].
I
Q
50
52
10-u
10-l
m2/s
Al - Fe
10-u
10-n
1.0
14 .1O-3K- 1.5
1.3
l/l Fig. 20. Ag,Zn, (61 at % Zn; y-phase). 6sZn diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [71S].
1
1.2
I
~ 10-u
lo-l4
Fig. 22. AI-Fe (75 at % Fe). Fe diffusion coeflicient vs. b

reciprocal temperature [75L].
lo-l5
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85.10-K- 0.90
l/T-
Bakker
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
10-12_
m21s
10-13
IO"
249
m2/s
AlFe
i
L
82ot%Fe
o 90ot%Fe
,94ot% Fe
Y
10-14 _
?I
10-15 _
I
a
0.85.1O-3
K-I
0.75
0.80
l/T Fig. 24. AlFe (51.5 ... 65.9 at % Fe). 55Fe diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [75L].
0.65
10
0.70
10
10
1o-13
8
6
10-19
0.7
- .
0.9
1.0
1.1 .lO-K- 1.3
l/l Fig. 23. Al-Fe (82 .. .94 at % Fe). Fe diffusion coeffcient vs. reciprocal temperature [81Rl]. Arrows indicate
Curie temperatures.
0.6
0.8
10-l'"
a*
6
4
2
lo-l5
8
6
10-l'"
6
6
4
1o-gIl;
-2
0.80
l/TFig. 26. AlNi (50.0 ... 58.7 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Ni concentrations (in at %): Curve f: 50.0; 2: 53.2; 3: 54.5; 4: 55.5;
5: 58.0; 6: 58.5; 7: 58.7 [71Hl].
11-1,
6
4
6 I
0.64
0.68
l/l-
0.72
/Jo-17
0.60
Landok-BBmstein
New Series III/26
14
Fig. 25. AlNi (48.3 ... 50.0 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Ni concentra0.76.10-3K-
0.80 tions(inat%):Curve1:48.3;2:48.6;3:49.0;4:49.2;5:50.0
[71Hl].
Bakker
250
[Ref. p. 276
Fig. 28. AINi, (73.2...76.2 at % Ni). 3Ni diffusion coeffi- b

cient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Ni concentrations (in at %): Curve I: 76.2; 2: 74.7; 3: 73.2 [71H2].
2.11f2I
m/s
1;-2
AlNi
I
A,
//
10-15
8
6
I
4
1i-6
6
4
4.1o-l*
0.60
1;-5
10'.Dm2,s
0.65
0.70
0.75
I
0.90
0.80
40JK-
AINi3
1557K
A
1
10-6
8
6
4.10-"7
66
,
II
,y
-1
48
50
52
54
Ni -
56
lo- 14 _
I
I
L
1427
58 at % 60
Fig. 27. AlNi (48.3 ... 58.7 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs. Ni concentration (48.3 ... 58.7 at % Ni) at various
temperatures: Curve I: 1623K; 2: 1573K; 3: 1523 K;
4: 1473K; 5: 1423K; 6: 1373 K; 7: 1323K; 8: 1273 K
[71Hl].
oc
1471
L27
-?
394
-v
-v
374
t
I I5 _ 1394
~ lo-
318
9
1290
L-
290
9
lo- 16 _
1190
LFig. 29. AINi, (73.2 ... 76.2 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefli- b
:ient vs. Ni concentration at various temperatures [71H2].
10-lI7
73.1
3
Bakker
73.5
74.tj
Ni -
75.0
75.5 0
251
Ref. p. 2761 4 Self-diffusion in homogeneousbinary alloys and intermediate phases(Figures)

lom2/
IO+
m2/s
i.
Al Ni,
lo-
IO-
I
a
10-18
IO-91
0.6
lo-
P
*
0.7
1.0 .IOK- 1.1
0.9
0.8
1/T-
Fig. 31. AlNi, (74 ... 76 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature for various Ni concentrations (in
at %): Open circles: 74; triangIes: 75; full circles: 76. Solid
line: result from [75B] for 75 at % Ni; dashed line: result
from [71H2] for 75 at % Ni.
10-l
10
[
0.90
l/T-
Fig. 30. AINi, (74.8 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs.

reciprocal temperature [75B].
10-12-
8L2.5
10-L
m2/s
792.2
!,Io-13~
I o-l3
10-l 4
10-14
,
~I lo-!
10-'5
0
4 ot%
Zn -
lo-l6
Fig. 33. Al-Zn (1.16 ... 3.76 at % Zn). 65Zndiffusion coefficient vs. Zn concentration at various temperatures [77Bl].
10-l
10-l1
23.5
Landok-B&stein
New Series III/26
24.0
24.5
25.0
Al -
25.5
at%
;!6.5 4 Fig. 32. AINi, (z 74 ... x 76 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coef-
ficient vs. Al concentration at various temperatures [87H3].
Bakker
[Ref. p. 276
10'
m*/
lo>
4
.l(p
I lo-'
a
ml/s
3
2 I
a
10-l
\
\
11
0
I
1
4 at%
lo-'
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.5
*l[ i-K 1
l/1 __)
ln -
Fig. 34. Al-Zn (1.16...3.76 at % Zn). Linear plot of the

65Zn diffusion coefficient vs. Zn concentration at various
temperatures [77Bl].
Fig. 35. Al -Zn (2.15,3.76 at % Zn). 65Zn diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77Bl].
1P
m2/s
10-
,0-x
I
a
,pI
10-l
10-p
50 at% 60
Zn -
Fig. 36. Al-Zn (lo... 58.5 at % Zn). 5Zn diffusion coeflicient vs. Zn concentration at various temperatures [7X1].
Fig. 37. AI -Zn (24.25 at % Zn). 65Zn diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature [SOC].
Bakker
&lo-"2
m2/s
mVs
6
lo-l2 8
253
AuCd
I
.
I
I
/I
,
821.7K_,A
--&---
_-/
/
10
8
6
4
46
L7
48
49
50 at%
51
Cd -
Fig. 39. AuCd (47.5 ... 50.5 at % Cd). Au diffusion coefficient and Cd diffusion coefficient vs. Cd concentration
at various temperatures [67G]. Full symbols: Au diffusion;
open symbols: Cd diffusion.
, o-l;
m2/s
10-y\
I
1.2
1.3
1.4
1/T -
1.5
1.6~10-3K-'1.7
,o-lZ
Fig. 38. AuCd (47.5 ... 50.5 at % Cd). rg5Au diffusion coefficient, Cd and r5Cd diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal
temperature [67G]. Open triangles: Cd diffusion in the
47.5 at % Cd compound; full triangles: Cd diffusion in the
47.5 at % Cd compound; open circles: Au diffusion in 47.5
at % Cd compound; open squares: Cd diffusion in the
49.0 at % Cd compound; full circles: Au diffusion in the 49.0
at % Cd compound; diamonds: Cd diffusion in the 50.5
at % Cd compound; full squares: Au diffusion in the 50.5 at
% Cd compound.
10-13
m2/s
I 6
TX-j-
Au-Cu
I
1o-l4
1
Q
, o-l!
1
I
lo-"
,i-44
0
IO
15
Au -
20
25 at% 30
Fig. 41. Au-Cu (72.5 ... 97.5 at % Cu). rgsAudiffusion coefficient and Wu diffusion coeftkient vs. Au concentration
at 1133 K [78H]. Full circles: Au diffusion; open circles: Cu
liffusion.
Landolt-Biimstein
New Series III/26
lo-l7
C
0.9
1.c
l/T -
Fig. 40. Au-Cu (75 at % Cu). lg5Au diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2]. Open circles: [65B]; full
circles: [69A].
Bakker
254
10-l
m2/s
ml/s
[Ref. p. 276
lo-11
m21
5
Au -To
1\
10-12
b c\
oI 10.13 -
10
a
lo-3
1.k
10.14 _
2.0 alO-K- 2.2

1.8
l/T Fig. 42. Au-Ta (1.2 at % Ta). lg5Au diffusion coeftkient
vs. reciprocal temperature [75G2].
[X(32].
1.6
10-15
1.05
10
m21
1.15
1.25
l/T-
1.35.lO-K-l 1.
Fig. 43. AuZn (49.0 ... 51.Oat % Zn). Au diffusion coefficient and 65Zn diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [71G]. A: Au diffusion in the 49.0 at % Zn compound;
A: Zn diffusion in the 49.0 at % Zn compound: o: Au diffusion in 50.0 at % Zn compound; l : Zn diffusion in the 50.0
at % Zn compound; V: Au diffusion in the 51.0 at % Zn
compound; V: Zn diffusion in the 51.0 at % Zn compound.
lo-
~I 10
10
OS
10-l
69
50
0
48.0
51 ot%
2nFig. 44. AuZn (49.0 ... 51.8 at % Zn). Au diffusion coefticient and 6SZndiffusion coeflicient vs. Zn concentration at
various temperatures [71G]. Open circles: Au diffusion; full
circles: Zn diffusion.
48.5
49.0
49.5 50.0
Zn -
50.5 at%
51.5
Fig. 45. AuZn (48.37...51.01 at % Zn). 9599Au isotope

effect Efor diffusion vs. Zn concentration at various temperatures [83H3]. Full triangles: 757 K; open triangle: 814 K;
circles: 876 K.
Bakker
Land&-BBmsfein
New Series III!26
Ref. p. 2761 4 Self-diffusion in homogeneousbinary alloys and intermediate phases(Figures)

0.3
1 o-li
mVs
255
Be-Cu \
I 0.2
,o-l:
u 0.1
I
49.0
49.5
50.0
50.5
Zn -
51.0
at%
52.0
?ig. 46. AuZn (49.18...51.85 at % Zn). 65/6gmZnisotope

:ffect E for diffusion at various temperatures (see table) ac:ording to [83H3].
-14
10
Q
, 0 -l!
10-16
1.i
1 1.1
10-17L
0.7
3 I.(
--,
2
0.9
1.0
l/T-
1.1
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.8 at%
1.0
1oq3
m2/s
Cd -
?ig. 48. Cd-Pb (99.1 . ..99.995 at % Pb). Cd diffusion

:oefficient relative to the lead self-diffusion coefficient vs. Cd
:oncentration at 470.7 K [79Cl].
I
f-o-~e
730C
I
9iOC
IO.14
10-15
1o-16
I
Q
10-1'1
10-18
10-19
0.6
Fig. 49. Co -Fe (50 at % Fe). Upper part: Co diffusion

coeffkient (full circles) and s9Fe diffusion coefficient (open
circles) vs. reciprocal temperature [70F]. Full triangle: Co
diffusion [68w]; open triangles: s9Fediffusion [68w]. Lower
part: ss5sFeisotope effect E for diffusion vs. reciprocal temperature [70F].
Land&-B&m&n
New Series III/26
1.240"K-'1.3
Fig. 47. Be-Cu (1.6 at % Cu). Be tracer diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature parallel (I]) and perpendicular (I) to the c axis according to [77B2] based on [73L].
a o.!
0.E
0
0.8
Bakker
-0.2 I
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
l/T-
1.0
256
10
ml/
[Ref. p. 276
10-l
m2/s
10-12
10
lo-
I
a
10
10-l
a
10-
lo-l5
lo-
\ ,
lolo-
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1.lo-)KJ 1.2
0.7
0.8
l/1Fig. 50. CoGa (40.0 at % Ga). 6oCo diffusion coefficient

(full circles) and 67Ga diffusion coeflicient (open circles) vs.
reciprocal temperature [8OS].
0.9
l/l -
1.0
1.1.10-3K-1.2
Fig. 51. CoGa (44 at % Ga). 6oCodiffusion coefficient (full

circles) and 67Gadiffusion coefficient (open circles) vs. reciprocal temperature [SOS].
lo-
m2/s
mVs
lo-j
10-12
10-l
10-l)
10-l'
I lo-l5
a
I
a
10-16
lo-&
lo-5
1.1.1W3K-1.2
1.0
0.9
l/1Fig. 53. CoGa (52.0 at % Ga). 6oCo diffusion coefficient
(full circles) and Ga diffusion coefticient (open circles) vs.
0.7
Fig. 52. CoGa (50.0 at % Ga). 6oCo diffusion coefficient

(full circles) and 67Ga diffusion coefficient (open circles) vs.
Bakker
0.8
257
10.
m2/
10-1'2
10-1'2,
mVs
\:
lo-
IO-l3
lo-l3
IOP
lo-l4
I
-10-
I
a 10-1'5
lo-"6
IO-l7
t
IO-'*
0.7
lo0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1 40" K 1.2
0.
0.75
l/T -
Fig. 54. CoGa (54.8 at % Ga). 6oCo diffusion coefficient

:full circles) and 67Ga diffusion coefficient (open circles) vs.
:eciprocal temperature [8OS].
0.80
l/T -
0.85 *10-3K-'
O.!
Fig. 55. Co-Mn (5.22, 10.24 at % Mn). 54Mn diffusion

coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [771].
10-l'
m2/s
6
\3\
\\
Co-P
I
A 92.6 at% Ti
1o-l2
m2/s '1
1723K
IO
8
Co-Ni
I
Q
6
1o-l3
I
-14
Q
Q IO
IO
8
6
IO-15
-15
IO
I
10-161
lo-'6
0
20
40
I
co-
60
I\d
Fig. 56. Co -Ni (3.7. .. 80.1 at % Ni). 6oCodiffusion coefticient vs. Co concentration at various temperatures [69M].
Land&-Biimstein
New Series 111126
0.5
80 at% 100
0.6
0.7
l/T-
0.8
0.9 .W3K-' 1.0
Fig. 57. Co-Ti (92.6...98.4 at %). 44Ti diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [75Sl].
Bakker

I
I
I
I
I
0.80
0.85
l/l-
msl Co?Ti
[Ref. p. 276
-15
P t
6 I
1 I
I
I
I I I I FH
10-166
0.70
0.75
01
0
0.90 -10-3K- 1.00
Fig. 58. Co,Ti (21.5 ... 24.0 at % Ti). 6oCo diffusion coeflicient vs. reciprocal temperature [88N]
I
0.1
I
0.2
co-
I
0.3
I
I
0.4 ot % 0.5
Fig. 59. Co-U (x 99.5 ... x 99.7 at % U). 235U diffusion

coefficient vs. Co concentration at various temperatures
WPI.
1.00
10
t 0.95
z
0
:a90
0
10
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
l/l-
0.85
0
0.80 alO-K- 0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0 ot% 2.5
Fe -
Fig. 60. Cr-Zr (92.14...97.95 at % Zr). g5Zr diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [81Pl].
Fig. 61. Cu - Fe (0.2 ... 2.4 at % Fe). 64Cu diffusion coefficient relative to the copper self-diffusion coefficient vs. Fe
concentration at 1293K according to [72B].
Bakker
Land&-Bctnmfein
New Series 11126
4s
.10-1
m2/s
3.5
10.
m,2
259
L Cu-Ni
3.0
I 2.5
Q 2.0
1.5
IO'
1.0
0.5
I1005K
1.5
2.0
2.5 at% 3.5
In Fig. 62. Cu - In (0.4 ... 3.1 at % In). @Cu diffusion coefficient vs. In concentration at various temperatures [82H].
0.5
1.0
0.65
0.70
87.0at%Ni 54.60i
IOAl-LLLL
-II
0.60
0.75
0.80 .loK-- 0
l/7Fig. 63. Cu-Ni (21.5 ... 87 at % Ni). 64Cudiffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature according to [77B2], based
,o-l;
-r-l-
m2/s
10-l
m2/I
5
9.8at%Pt
Cu-Ni
,o-l:
I
m
1o-14
Pt
?BSot%Pt 1
,o-l5
0.
l/T-
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80 -lo-3K- 0.90
l/T-
Fig. 64. Cu-Ni (21.5 ... 87 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature according to [77B2], based
on [64M].
Land&-Bijmstein
New Series III/26
0.60
Fig. 65. Cu - Pt (9.8 . .74.5 at % Pt). 64Cudiffusion coeffcient vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2].
Bakker
260
C?
[Ref. p. 276
d/s cu- Pt
10
I
Q
III
0.55
~~~~!
0.60
0.65
0.70
l/l-
0.75
0.80 .10-3K- 0.90
Fig. 66. Cu -Pt (9.8 . ..74.5 at % Pt). gsmPtdiffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77B2].
SbFig. 67. Cu-Sb (0.3 ... 1.7 at % Sb). 64Cu diflusion COGcient vs. Sb concentration at various temperatures [82H].
25ol%Sb
10-11
lo-01
I
!
Zlot% Sb
1.10
1.14
1.22
1.18
l/l
1.26@K- 1.30
Fig. 68. Cu,Sb (21 . ..29 at % Sb). 64Cu diffusion cocfficicnt vs. reciprocal tcmperaturc [7OH].
29 ot%
27
25
Sb Fig. 69. Cu,Sb (21 ...29 at % Sb). 64Cu diffusion coefficient vs. Sb concentration at various temperatures [70H].
Bakker
21
23
Landolt-BCmslein
New Series 11126
261
IO.'3
m2/s
3.0
lo-l4
Q
I
a
1.7ot% Sn
2.0
l.lot% Sn
0.8 at% Sn
,o-l'
2.5
I.5
0.4ot% Sn
10-b'
1.00
403K-'
1.
I/T-
Sn-
Fig. 70. Cu- Sn (0.4 ... 1.7 at % Sn). 64Cu diffusion coeffi:ient vs. reciprocal temperature [82H].
Fig. 71. Cu - Sn (0.4 .. .3.0 at % Sn). 64Cu diffusion coefficient vs. Sn concentration at various temperatures [82H].
10-1tl r
m2
10-l
m2h
I 10-l
a
I
:r16.6at% Sn
I
do
latO/oSn
,o-l;
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
I/T-
1.15
.IO-jK-'
Fig. 72. Cu,Sn (16.6, 20.2 at % Sn). Yu diffusion coefticient (full circles) and l13Sn diffusion coefficient (open circles) vs. reciprocal temperature [8OP].
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
IO'.12
1.000
1.025
1.050
1.075
I/T-
1.100 dK-'
1.150
Fig. 73. Cu,Sn (l&19.8 at % Sn). Wu diffusion coefficient

(no symbols) and l13Sn diffusion coefficient (open circles) vs.
reciprocal temperature [68E].
Bakker
262
Cu3Sn
[Ref. p. 276
I
10.11
m2/s
i
lo-
10-l
8
j.lO-l
T-l
I 10
Q
lo-
10-1
15
I
17
I
19
21
10
I
I
23 ot% 25
1 i
1.20
1.30
Fig. 74. Cu,Sn (16.6...20.2 at % Sn). 64Cudiffusion coefli:ient (full circles) and 13Sn diffusion coefficient (open cir:les) vs. Sn concentration at various temperatures [68E, 8OP].
6.0t
3.7
JO-4
1.35
.@K-
1)
l/l -
Sn -
Fig. 75. &Cu,Sn, (20.5 at % Sn). 64Cu diffusion coefficient

(open circles) and l13Sn diffusion coefficient (full circles) bS.
reciprocal temperature [68E].
I
1.0
1.2
d/s
I 3.3
Q 2.9
2.5
0
3
4 01% 5
ln Fig. 76. Cu-Zn (0.6...4.2 at % Zn). 67Cu diffusion coeficient vs. Zn concentration at various temperatures [7OP].
0.8
1.4
1.6
1.8 .10-3K- 2.2
l/T Fig. 77. CuZn (45.46... 48 at % Zn). 64Cu diffusion coefficient (full circles) and 65Zndiffusion coeffkient (open circles)
vs. reciprocal temperature [56K].
I
Bakker
Landok-ESmstein
New Series III!26
263
Fig. 79. Fe-Ni (z 0 ... 90 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefticient vs. Ni concentration at various temperatures [81M].
Open circles: [81M]; open squares: [76Z]; full circles: [7532];
full squares: [63F]; open triangles: [67D], full triangles: mean
values.
1o-l5
lo-"1
I
a
10-15
1
4 1o-14
1Cl-l3
m2/s
lo-l5
mVs
lo-6
IP
10-"5
I
a
aI 10-16
10-17 I
20
40
60
Fe
0
lo-l5
m2/s
NI-
80 at% 100
Ni
lo-l6
1o-l6
lo-l7
10-181
0
Fe
20
40
60
NI-
80 at% 100
Ni
Fig. 78. Fe-Ni (5 ... 90 at % Ni). 5gFediffusion coefficient

vs. Ni concentration at various temperatures [81M]. Open
circles: [81M]; open squares: 16601;full circles: [55N]; full
squares: [63F]; open triangles: [72K3], full triangles: mean
values.
10
6
Fig. 80. Fe-Pd (lo...50 at % Pd). Fe diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77F]. The Arrhenius curves
were obtained by computer calculations based on the results
given in Fig. 84.
Land&-Biirnstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
0.600
0.625 0.650
0.675
l/T-
0.700 .lOJK
0.7:
264
2*10ml/
[Ref. p. 276
4 Fig. 81. Fe-Pd (55...90 at % Pd). 59Fe diffusion coeficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77FJ.The Arrhenius curves
given in Fig. 84.
Fe- Pd
10
8
6
4
I
el
1tY
8
6
4
10-l
0.
2*10-n,
625
0.650
0.675)
l/1-
m2slFe-Pd 1
0.700 .lO-K- 0.750
10-15
0.600
0.625
0.650
0.675
0.700 W3K
0.750
Fig. 82. Fe-Pd (lo...50 at % Pd). lo3Pd diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [77F]. The Arrhenius curves
given in Fig. 84.
For Fig. 83 see next page.
Pd-
4 Fig. 84. Fe-Pd (lo...90 at % Pd). 59Fe diffusion coefftcient (full lines) and ro3Pddiffusion coefticient (dashed lines)
vs. Pd concentration at various temperatures [77F].
Bakker
Land&BBmstein
New Series Ill/26
265
4 Fig. 83. Fe-Pd (55 ... 90 at % Pd). lo3Pd diffusion coeff,

cient vs. reciprocal temperature [77F]. The Arrhenius curve>
were obtained by computer calculations based on the result5
given in Fig. 84.
10-l'
m2/s
IO-l2
0.600
0.625
0.650
10
m2
0.675
0.700
.103K-' 0.750
Fe-S
10
0.7
b
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
l/T -
1.2
I.3 40-3lc'
1.5
Fig. 85. Fe-Si (7.64 at % Si). Fe diffusion coeffkient vs.

reciprocal temperature [75M2]. Full circles: mechanical sectioning; open circles: chemical sectioning; open triangles:
Zener relaxation; full triangles: magnetic Zener relaxation.
The dashed line is the high-temperature extrapolation.
I 10
a
10
lo0.75
Landolt-tlknstein
New Series III/26
0.80
0.85
0.90
1/T-
0.95 *lo-
4 Fig. 86. Fe-Si (1.87 ... 19.2 at % Si). 59Fediffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Si concentrations
(in at %): Curve 1: 0; 2: 1.87; 3: 6.55; 4: 8.64; 5: 12.1; curve
a: 5.5; b: 6.5; c: 7.8; d: 11.6; e: 15.3;f: 19.2. Curves I...5
1.05
from [81T], curves a.. .f from [77M].
Bakker
266
[Ref. p. 276
10
m>/s
1173 K
I
1ll23K
10
11073K
*
I
Q
10-5
20
.,p
mVs
15
I 10
Q
2.5
5.0
7.5
Si -
10.0
12.5of% 15.0
.
Sn -
Fig. 87. Fe-Si (1.4... 12.1 at % Si). Fe diffusion coeflicient vs. Si concentration at various temperatures [81T].
Fig. 88. Fe-Sn (0.2...2.7 at % Sn). Fe diffusion coefficient vs. Sn concentration at 1168 K (83K].
lo-l0
I
Q
L
A
10-l
T-
Ao.
----SC
l- ..
*
10
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
l/T-
0.9 .lO-K 1.0
Fig. 89. Fe - Zr (96.5 ... 99.5 at % Zr). Fe diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [87Hl]. Full triangles: 96.5
at % Zr; open triangles: 98 at % Zr; open circles: 99.5 at %
Zr; full circles: 100 at % Zr.
98.65
I
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
l/T -
0.80
.10-3K-
Fig. 90. Fe-Zr

(93.63...99.02 at % Zr). gsZr diffusion
coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [81Pl].
Landolt-BCmstein
New Series III!26
267
=-l--l-
1-11
IO-
2/s
m2/s
GaNi
3-12
o-13
IO"
mvs
. .a
I
a
VI-'
o-l"1
10
p5
47
I
a
48
49
50
51
52 at%
NIFig. 92. GaNi (47.28. .. 52.40at % Ni). 67Gadiffusion toe

ficient vs. Ni concentration at various temperatures [76D]
o-16
10-l
IO"'
m2fs
,p
GaNi
1380K
I
lo-"
0.7
0.8
la-l2
IT
1285
0.9
l/l -
Fig. 91. GaNi (47.28. 52.40 at % Ni). 67Gadiffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [76D].
For Fig. 93 see next page.
1o-l5
Fig. 94. GaNi (47.28*.. 52.40 at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coef- b

ficient vs. Ni concentration at various temperatures [76D].
Landolt-Bbmstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
47
48
49
N50w51
[Ref. p. 276
268
10 r
m2k
IV3
GC
0
10-l
I=2
I
Q
1
n
0
\
lo-
lo0.68
1
0.70
0.72
l/l-
0.74
0.7640K' 0.78
Fig. 95. GaV, (75.6 at % V). 48V diffusion coefficient vs.

reciprocal temperature [84v].
10
\\
lo-"
l/l
0.9
-
1.0 JO-jK-' 1.1

l/l-
Fig. 93. GaNi (47.28... 52.40at % Ni). 63Ni diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [76D].
Fig. 96. Hf-Zr (2.1 at % Zr). lsHf diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature in single crystals, parallel to the
c axis [72D].
Bakker
Landok-B6mstein
New Series III!26
IV"
m2/s
T0
IO-13
m2/S
Hf- Zr
K-r
10-14
IO!
269
I
m
IO-15 _
I IO-'"
m
--
10-16 a
10-12 m2/S
,o-l;
-13 _
IO
\
4
1-c
I:
li+
0.50
0.55
0.60
l/T-
0.65
0.7040" K 0.75
Fig. 97. Hf-Zr (2.1 at % Zr). isiHf diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature in single crystals, perpendicular to
the c axis [72D].
I 10-14 _
m
IO-15 _
IO-16 c
0.65
10-1'2
m2/s
0.85
.I0
0.
l/T-
I-
d
I5 0.65 0.75 0.85 ~10.
l/T-
Fig. 99. InPd (49 ... 56 at % Pd). 4mIn diffusion coefficient (open circles) and iosPd diffusion coefficient (full circles) vs. reciprocal temperature [83Hl]. Fig. (a): 49 at % Pd,
(b): 50 at % Pd, (c): 53 at % Pd, (d): 56 at % Pd.
1o-l3
10'5
mVs
I
-IO-l4
\
~I lo-l6
MnPt,
=-
10-1'5
lo-l6
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.20
l/T-
0.21
l-.-2
..
.10-JK-'
Fig. 98. Hg-Pb (96 and 99 at % Pb). 203Hgdiffusion coeficient (open circles) and iPb diffusion coefficient (full cirdes) vs. reciprocal temperature in Hg-Pb with 96 at % Pb
md 99 at % Pb, respectively [73w].
Land&-Bhstein
New Series III/26
lo-l7
0.75
0.23
0.80
0.85
O!
Fig. 100. MnPt, (65 at % Pt). 54Mn diffusion coeflicient vs.

reciprocal temperature [79A].
Bakker
270
10-l
m/s
[Ref. p. 276
lo-l5
ml/s
MnPt3
,p!
~I lo-l6
I
a
lo-l1
0.75
10-
0.90
0.95 .,oK- 1.05
l/T Fig. 102. MnPt, (82 at % Pt). 54Mn diffusion coefficient vs.
\_
,(p;
0
0.80 0
0.80
0.85
.95
Fig. 101. MnPt, (75 at % Pt). S4Mndiffusion coefficient vs.

lomZI
Mn-Ti
10
tr
10
I
Q
10-l
0.66
0.70
0.74
l/T-
0.78
0.8240 K-0.86
Fig. 104. Mn-Zr (98...99.5 at % Zr). 54Mn diffusion

coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [79P2].
10-l
,o-l!
0.f
A
0.i
l/l-
0.l
4 Fig. 103. Mn -Ti (79.4 ... 90.3 at % Ti). Ti diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Ti concentrations (in at %): full triangles: 79.4; open triangles: 82.1; full
circles: 86.7; open circles: 90.3 [75Sl].
Bakker
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
271
IO-
8
6
I 4
Q
250
CI
20
40
\I.
IO-
8
6
4.1o-1
0.66
0.70
0.74
l/T-
0.78
0.82.10-dKI1.86
Fig. 105. Mn-Zr (98 ... 99.5 at % Zr). g5Zr diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [79P2].
60
80 at% 100
Ti Fig. 106. Nb-Ti (lo...95 at % Ti). Activation energy and
pre-exponential factor for g4/g5Nbdiffusion vs. Ti concentration. Open circles: [63G]; full circles: [79Pl].
0
10-l
m2/1
10-l
10-l
k0
I
Q
10-l
10-l
0.8.10-jK-
l/T-
Fig. 107. Nb-Ti (10 1..95 at % Ti). 95Nb diffusion coefti:ient vs. reciprocal temperature [63G].
Fig. 108. Nb-Ti (64.3...94.6 at % Ti). g4/g5Nb and 44Ti p
liffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature [79Pl].
Land&-Blirnstein
New Series III/26
Bakker
10-l
0
I
0.60
0.65
0.70
l/T-
0.75 -lOJK-
272
10-10
10.
rnzfs
m2k
[Ref. p. 276
Pb-T1
10
1o-l4
lo-
~I lo-l5
I
~I lo-l3
I
lo-6
lo-
10-17.
0
60
80 ot% II
TLFig. 110. Pb-TI (5...87 at % Tl). zlPb diffusion coeflicient (circles) and 204TIdiffusion coefficient (triangles) vs. TI
concentration at various temperatures [61R].
lo-l5
10-16
0.5
10-l
0.8
0.9 .10-K- 1.1
l/lFig. 109. Nb-Zr (71.9...94.5 at % Zr). g5Zr diffusion
coeficicnt vs. reciprocal tempcraturc for various Zr conccntrations (in at %): open circles: 71.9; full circles: 83.7; triangles: 94.5 [8782].
a6
0.7
2.10.
m2/5
40
Sn-;n
10-l
-r
m2/:
10-l
10-l
I
Q
0
10-l
,o-l"
10-l
2.6
2.4
2.8.lOK- 3.0
l/TFig. 112. Sn-Zn (0.9 at % Zn). 13*3Sn diffusion coeflicicnt (lower curve) and 65Zn diffusion cocflicient (upper curve) vs. reciprocal temperature [66B].
2.2
I
0.7
l/l-
0.8
0.9 *lOK-1.0 4 Fig. 111. SC- Zr (86.4,93.3 at % Zr). Zr diffusion coeflicient vs. reciprocal temperature [87H2].
Bakker
land&B6mstein
New Series 11126
4.10-11m21s
4.10.11
II12/s
Ti-V
IO--11 _
IO-
12-
II
]-11 _
II
)42 _
-13 _
10.
II
]-l3-
\\
$
I
Q
I
Q
14 _
lo-
273
1C,-14
-30
10
-20
'40
I5 _
lo-
IO-15
lo-' 16
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.6
IC,-16
0.8 .10-3K-'I
0.4
l/T-
Fig. 113. Ti-V (10 ... 90 at % Ti). 44Ti diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature [68M].
10-l'I
m2/5
0.b
u.7
0.8 WK-'
l/T-
Fig. 114. Ti - V (10 . . .90 at % Ti). 48V diffusion coefficient

vs. reciprocal temperature [68M].
Ti -Zr
;r
lo-"
10-l
I
a
lo-':
IO-'4
1oP5
1.7
Land&-BBmstein
New Series III/26
Fig. 115. Ti - Zr (49 at % Zr). 44Ti diffusion coefficient vs.

reciprocal temperature [87H2].
Bakker
274
[Ref. p. 276
10
10
10
10
0.8+lOK-0.9
0.6
0.7
l/T Fig. 116. V-Zr (0.5 at % Zr). 48V diffusion coefficient vs.
reciprocal temperature[81P2].
0.1
0.5
lom2/
6
0.58
0.60 40-3K- 0.6L
l/7Fig. 117. V-Zr (0.5...2 at % Zr). 48V diffusion coeflicient
vs. reciprocal temperature for various Zr concentrations (in
at X): open circles: 0.5; open triangles: 1.0; full triangles:
1.5; full circles: 2.0 [84P].
0.52
0.68
0.71
0.76
l/l-
0.77
0.54
0.56
0.80 .lOK- 0.86
Fig. 118. V-Zr(98.0...99.5 at % Zr). 48Vdiffusion cocfficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Zr concentrations (in at %): full triangles: 98.0; open triangles: 98.5; full
circles: 99.0; open circles: 99.5 [82P].
Bakker
Land&-BGmstein
New Series Ill!26
10-l
275
m2/5
- V-Zr
\I -7r
10-l13_
9
8
1
6
4.10-51
0.52
5100.54
0.56
0.58
l/T-
0.60
~10-~K- O.Ei$
Fig. 119. V-B (0.5 ... 2.0 at % Zr). g5Zr diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Zr concentrations (in at %): open circles: 0.5; open triangles: 1.0; full
triangles: 1.5; full circles: 2.0 [84P].
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
14
I3.67
0.71
0.75
l/T-
0.79
3W3K- 0.8i
0.8:
Fig. 120. V-Zr (98.0...99.5 % Zr). Zr diffusion coefficient vs. reciprocal temperature for various Zr concentrations (in at %): Curve I: 98.0; 2: 98.5; 3: 99.0; 4: 99.5 [82P].
Bakker
276
References for 4
References for 4
51N
55H
55N
55s
56K
57Y
61Hl
61H2
61R
63F
63G
63M
64D
64M
64P
64s
65B
66B
660
67D
67G
67Ll
67L2
67L3
67P
67R
67Sl
6782
68E
68F
68G
68H
68L
68M
680
68R
68s
68W
69A
69F
69M
69s
70A
70B 1
70B2
70F
70H
70N
7OP
70R
70s
702
Nix, EC., Jaumot, FE.: Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 1275.

Hoffman, R.E., Turnbull, D., Hart, E.W.: Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 417.
Neiman, M.B., Shinyaev, A.Ya.: Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 102 (1955) 969.
Sonder, E.: Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 1662.
Kuper, A.B., Lazarus, D., Manning, J.R., Tomizuka, C.T: Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1536.
Yanitskaya, M.E., Zhukovitskii, A.A., Bokshtein, S.Z.: Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 112 (1957) 720.
Hagel, W.C., Westbrook, J.H.: Trans. AIME 221 (1961) 951.
Huntington, H.B., Miller, N.C., Nerses, V: Acta Metall. 9 (1961) 749.
Resing. H.A., Nachtrieb, N.H.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 21 (1961) 40.
Fraden, E: B.S. Thesis, Massachusetts: Inst. of Technology, 1963.
Gibbs, G.B., Graham, D., Tomlin, D.H.: Philos. Mag. 8 (1963) 1269.
Mallard, WC., Gardner, A.B., Bass, RX, Slifkin, L.M.: Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 617.
Domian, H.A., Aaronson, HI.: Trans. AIME 230 (1964) 44.
Monma, K., Suto, H., Oikawa, H.: Nippon Kinzoku Gakkaishi 28 (1964) 192.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.:Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) A 842.
Sato, K.: Sci. Rep. Fat. Lit. Sci., Hirosaki Univ. 11 (1964) 9.
Benci, S., Gasparrini, G., Germagnoli, E., Schianchi, G.: J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 26 (1965) 687.
Bergner, D., Lange, W: Phys. Status Solidi 18 (1966) 67.
Okada, T: Radioisotopes 15 (1966) 169.
De Reca, E.W, Pampillo, G.: Acta Metall. 15 (1967) 1263.
Gupta, D., Lazarus, D., Lieberman, D.S.: Phys. Rev. 153 (1967) 863.
Lai, D.A.E, Borg, R.J.: US A.E.C. Report: UCRL-50314 (1967).
Larikov, L.N., Tyshkevich, VM., Chorna, LX: Ukr. Fiz. Zh. 12 (1967) 983.
Lyubimov, VD., Geld, P.V, Shveikin, G.P., Sutina, Yu.A.: Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR,Met. (1967) 84.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.:Phys. Rev. 154 (1967) 558.
Rothman, S.J.,Peterson, N.L.: Phys. Rev. 154 (1967) 552.
Santoro, C.J.: Bull. Am. Phys. Sot. 12 (1967) 104.
Smirnov, O.A., Ivanov, L.I., Abramyan, E.A.: Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR,Met. (1967) 168.
Ebcling, R., Wcver, H.: Z. Metallkd. 59 (1968) 222.
Fedorov, G.B., Smirnov, E.A., Zhomov, EL: Metall. Metalloved. Chist. Met. 7 (1968) 124.
Gardner, A.B., Sanders, R.L., Slitkin, R.L.: Phys. Status Solidi 30 (1968) 93.
Heumann, Th., Biihmer, H.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29 (1968) 237.
Lai, D.YE, Borg. R.J.: UCRL Report No. 50 516 (1968).
Murdock, JE, McHargue, C.J.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 493.
Oikawa, H., Anusavice, K.J., DeHoff, R.T, Guy, A.G.: ASM Trans. Q. 61 (1968) 354.
Ray, S.P.,Sharma, B.D.: Acta Metall. 16 (1968) 981.
Shinyaev, A.Ya.: Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR,Met. (1968) 109.
Wanin, M., Kohn, A.: C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. C 267 (1968) 1558.
Alexander, WB.: Studies on Atomic Diffusion in Metals, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of NC., USA (1969),
cited in [77B].
Frantsevich, I.N., Kalinovich, DE, Kovenskii, I.I., Smolin, M.D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30 (1969)
947.
Million, B., Kucera, J.: Acta Metall. 17 (1969) 339.
Santoro, C.J.: Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 593.
Ananin, VM., Gladkov, VP., Zotov, VS., Skorov, D.M.: At. Energ. 29 (1970) 220.
Bowen, A.W, Leak, G.M.: Metall. Trans. 1 (1970) 2705.
Bowen, A.W., Leak, G.M.: Metall. Trans. l(l970) 2767.
Fishman. S.G., Gupta, D., Lieberman, D.S.: Phys. Rev. B2 (1970) 1451.
Heumann, Th., Meincrs, H., Stiier, H.: Z. Naturforsch. 25a (1970) 1883.
Nohara, K., Hirano, K.: Proc. Int. Conf. Sci. and Technol. Iron and Steel, Tokyo, Sept. 1970,Section
6 (1970) 1267.
Peterson, N.L., Rothman, S.J.:Phys. Rev. B2 (1970) 1540.
Ray, S.P.,Sharma, B.D.: Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 23 (1970) 77.
Spasov, A., Ivanov, G.: God. Solii. Univ. Khim. Fak. 65 (1970/1971) 39.
Zemskii, S.V.,Grigorkin, VI., Moskaleva, L.N.: Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved., Chern. Metall. 13 (1970)
106.
References for 4
71A
71D
71F
71G
71Hl
71H2
71M
71s
71w
72B
72D
72H
72J
72Kl
72K2
72K3
72M
72P
72s
73L
73N
73Tl
73T2
73w
74A
74B
74K
75B
75Gl
75G2
75K
75L
75Ml
75M2
75Sl
7582
7533
76D
762
77Bl
77B2
77F
771
77M
77R
77s
78G
78H
79A
79B
79Cl
79c2
79D
Landolt-Bihstein
New Series III/26
277
Askill, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 8 (1971) 587.

DeCormales, C.O., DeReca, N.E.W: .I Phys. Chem. Solids 32 (1971) 1067.
Frantsevich, I.N., Kalinovich, DX, Kovenskii, II., Smolin, M.D.: Proc. Europhysics Conf., Lodding,
A., Agarwall, I: (eds.),Verlag Z. Naturforsch., 1971, p 100.
Gupta, D., Lieberman, D.S.: Phys. Rev. B 4 (1971) 1070.
Hancock, G.E, McDonell, B.R.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 4 (1971) 143.
Hancock, G.E, McDonell, B.R.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 7 (1971) 535.
Million, B., Kucera, J.: Czech. J. Phys. B 21 (1971) 161.
Seith, W, Heumann, Yh., Wever, H.: Z. Metallkd. 62 (1971) 294.
Wade, WZ.: J. Nucl. Mater. 38 (1971) 292.
Bocquet, J.L.: Acta Metall. 20 (1972) 1347.
Davis, B.E., McMullen, WD.: Acta Metall. 20 (1972) 593.
Hirano, K. and Cohen, M.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 13 (1972) 96.
Jeffery, R.N., Gupta, D.: Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972) 4432.
Korolev, A.A., Pavlinov, L.V, Gavrilguk, M.I.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 33 (1972) 295.
Kucera, J., Million, B., Peskova, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 11 (1972) 361.
Kutnetsov, E.V: Uch. Zap. Gork. Gos. Univ. 148 (1972) 38.
Million, B.: Z. Metallkd. 63 (1972) 484.
Patil, R.V., Sharma, B.D.: Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 25 (1972) 1.
Shcherbedinskii, G.V, Ipatova, VM., Grechnyi, Ya.V, Yakovlev, S.G.:Dopov. Akad. Nauk. Ukr. RSR.
Ser. A 34 (1972) 759.
LeHazif, R., Edelin, C., Dupouy, J.M.: Metall. Trans. 4 (1973) 1275.
Nohara, K., Hirano, K.: J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 37 (1973) 51.
Tiwari, G.P., Saxena, M.C., Patil, R.R: Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 26 (1973) 55.
Tiwari, G.P., Sharma, B.D., Raghunathan, VS., Patil, R.R: J. Nucl. Mater. 46 (1973) 35.
Warburton, WK.: Phys. Rev. B 7 (1973) 1330.
Assassa,W, Guiraldenq, P.: C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. C 279 (1974) 59.
Bristotti, A., Wazzan, A.R.: Rev. Bras. Fiz. 4 (1974) 1.
Kucera, J., Million, B., Ruzickova, J., Foldyna, V, Jakobova, A.: Acta Metall. 22 (1974) 135.
Bronfin, M.B., Bulatov, G.S., Drugova, LA.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 40 (1975) 363.
Gbdeny, I., Beke, D., Kedves, EJ., Groma, G.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 32 (1975) 195.
Gupta, D., Rosenberg, R.: Thin Solid Films 25 (1975) 171.
Kucera, J., Million, B.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 31 (1975) 275.
Larikov, L.N., Geichenko, VV, Falchenko, VM.: Diffusion Processesin Ordered Alloys, Naukova
Dumka Publ., Kiev 1975, Nat. Bur. Stand. New Delhi: Amerind. Publ. Co., 1981.
Maramatsu, EI: Trans. Nat. Res. Inst. Met. 17 (1975) 21.
Mirani, H.VM., Harthoorn, R., Zuurendonk, TJ., Helmerhorst, S.J.,De Vries, G.: Phys. Status Solidi
(a) 29 (1975) 115.
Santos, E., Dyment, E: Philos. Mag. 31 (1975) 809.
Shinyaev, A.Ya.: Diffuzionnye Processy v Splavach, Nauka, Moscow, 1975, p. 100.
Shinyaev, A.Ya.: Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Met. (1975) 162.
Donaldson, A.T., Rawlings, R.D.: Acta Metall. 24 (1976) 285.
Zemskii, S.V, Lvov, VS., Makashova, L.S.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 41 (1976) 775.
Beke, D.L., Godeny, I., Kedves, EJ., Groma, G.: Acta Metall. 25 (1977) 539.
Butrymowicz, D.B., Manning, J.R.,Read, M.E.: Diffusion Rate Data and Mass Transport Phenomena
for Copper Systems,INCRA Monograph V, Washington: Nat. Bur. Stand., 1977.
Fillon, J., Calais, D.: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 38 (1977) 81.
Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.: Philos. Mag. 35 (1977) 229.
Million, B.: Czech. J. Phys. B 27 (1977) 928.
Ruzickova, J., Million, B.: Kovove Mater. 15 (1977) 140.
Shires, P.J.,Hines, A.L., Okabe, T: J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) 1734.
Gas, P., Bernardini, J.: Ser. Metall. 12 (1978) 367.
Heumann, Th., Rottwinkel, T: J. Nucl. Mater. 69-70 (1978) 567.
Ansel, D., Barre, J., Meziere, C., Debuigne, J.: J. Less Common Met. 65 (1979) Pl.
Bose, A., Frohberg, G., Wever, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 52 (1979) 509.
Carlson, P.T, Padgett jr., R.A.: Ser. Metall. 13 (1979) 355.
Cermak, J., Kucera, J.: Kovove Mater. 17 (1979) 3.
Dehaunay, D., Huntz, A.M., Lacombe, P.: Ser. Metall. 13 (1979) 419.
Bakker
References for 4
278
79Pl
79P2
8OC
8OP
80s
81M
81Pl
81P2
81Rl
81R2
81T
82H
82P
83Hl
8382
83H3
83K
84B
Pontau, A.E., Lazarus, D.: Phys. Rev. B 19 (1979) 4027.

Pruthi, D.D., Anand, MS., Agarwala, R.P.: Philos. Mag. A 39 (1979) 173.
Cermak, J., Ciha, K., Kucera, J.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 62 (1980) 467.
Prinz, N., Wever, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 61 (1980) 505.
Stolwijk, N.A., Van Gend, M., Bakker, H.: Philos. Mag. A 42 (1980) 783.
Million, B., Ruzickova, J., Velisek, J., Vrestal, J.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 50 (1981) 43.
Patil, R.V, Tiwari, G.P., Sharma, B.D.: Philos. Mag. A 44 (1981) 717.
Pelleg. J.: Philos. Mag. A 43 (1981) 273.
Raghunathan, VS., Sharma, B.D.: Philos. Mag. A 43 (1981) 427.
Ruzickova, J., Million, B.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 50 (1981) 59.
Treheux, D., Vincent, L., Guiraldenq, P.: Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 931.
Hishino, K., Iijima, Y,Hirano, K.: Acta Metal!. 30 (1982) 265.
Hahn, H., Frohberg, G., Wever, H.: Phys. Status Solidi (a) 79 (1983) 559.
Hehenkamp, T, Faupel, E: Acta Metall. 31 (1983) 691.
Hilgedieck, R., Herzig, C.: Z. Metallkd. 74 (1983) 38.
Kumagai, A., Iijima, Y, Hirano, K.: DIMETA 82, Kedves, EJ., Beke, D.L. (eds.),Trans. Tech. Publ.,
Switzerland, 1983, p. 389.
Bakker, H.: Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, Murch, G.E., Nowick, AS. (eds.),Academic Press, 1984,
p. 250.
84P
84V
85K
86M
87Hl
87H2
87H3
88N

Van Winkel, A., Lemmens, M.P.H., Weeber,A.W, Bakker, H.: J. Less Common. Metals 99 (1984)257.
Kiihler, U., Neuhaus, P., Herzig, C.: Z. Metallkd. 76 (1985) 170.
Mundy, J.N., Ockers, S.T, Smedskjaer,L.C.: Phys. Rev. B 33 (1986) 847.
Herzig, C., Neuhaus, J., Vieregge, K., Manke, L.: Mat. Science Forum 15-18 (1987) 481.
Herzig. C., Kiihler, U.: Mat. Science Forum 15-18 (1987) 301.
Hoshino, K., Rothman, S.J.,Averback, R.S.:Symp. Diffusion Processesin High Technology Materials,
Cincinnati, Ohio, Oct. 12-14, 1987.
Nakajima, H., Nakamura, Y., Koiwa, M., Tagasuki, T, Izumi, 0.: Scri. Metall. 22 (1988) 507.
Land&-B6mstein
New series III,/26
Ref. p. 3661
5.1 Introduction
279
5 Chemical diffusion in inhomogeneousbinary alloys

5.1 Introduction
In this chapter are listed data on chemical diffusion processesin inhomogeneous binary alloys. Only data
for essentially bulk samples (5 2um) are given, thus thin-film data are not presented.
Use of tables
For a given metal pair, the metal having the chemical symbol earlier in the alphabet always comes first.
All alloy concentrations are expressedin atomic percentagesunless specifically given as otherwise e.g. weight
percent.
The tables give data for the interdiffusion coefficient d, sometimes also called the chemical diffusion coeficient or mutual diffusion coefficient, see section 1.4.3. In many casesthe interdiffusion coefficient 0 is conveniently expressed by an Arrhenius equation:
6=D exp(- Q/RT)
(5-l)
where Do is the pre-exponential, Q is the activation enthalpy, R is the gasconstant (R = 8.3145J mol- K- ) and
Tis the absolute temperature. Long extrapolations beyond the temperature range given are not generally
recommended.
In some cases,intrinsic, sometimes known as partial, diffusion coefficients are also given in the tables. These
are denoted by, for example D,, and D,,. The intrinsic diffusion coefficients are related to b, see Eq. 1.30 in
1.4.4.The intrinsic diffusion coefficients can also be conveniently expressedby an Arrhenius equation, e.g.
D,,=Dk ew(- Q&T)
(5.2)
At the limit of the concentration of one metal component approaching zero, the interdiffusion coefficient
approaches the impurity diffusion coefficient, see Chapter 3. Ideally, in an impurity diffusion experiment, the
impurity is present at very low concentration, so low that it does not chemically affect the host. When these
conditions are obviously not met, the experiment is strictly a chemical diffusion experiment and the data are
presented in the tables here.
The following methods for measuring interdiffusion coefficients are used in the tables.
Method A Use of the Boltzmann-Matano analysis gives the concentration dependence of the interdiffusion
coefficient 8, see section 1.6.1.2.2.(The Hall analysis [53H2] is sometimes used near terminal
concentrations). Method A is by far the most common and reliable method. Early work used
sectioning and chemical analysis but since about 1965 most concentration profiles have been
obtained with the electron microprobe.
Method B When it is evident or assumedthat the interdiffusion coefficient d is not a function of concentration
an analytical solution is used, the usual one is Eq. 1.47 in 1.6.1.2.2.
Method C The interdiffusion coefficient is calculated by using measurements on rates of migration of phase
boundaries, typically using the Wagner equation of parabolic growth kinetics [69W2].
Method D The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by an electrochemical method. There are several variations of such a method, all of them indirect and relaxational in nature.
Method E The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by in-diffusion and out-diffusion followed by determination of concentration profile, and use of the Boltzmann-Matano analysis or Eq. 1.47 of the General
Introduction, see also section 1.6.1.2.4.
Method F The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by total gain or loss of material or rate thereof, this is
really an indirect form of Method E.
Method G The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by ferromagnetic relaxation, seesection 1.6.2.1.a.
Method H The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by X-ray diffraction analysis, see section 1.6.1.2.3.
Method I The interdiffusion coefficient is determined by a resistometric method, see section 1.6.1.2.3.
Landolt-B6mstein
New Series III/26
Murch, Bruff
280
5.1 Introduction
The full list of alloys, treated in chapter 5, is presented below. In contrast to the tables in section 5.2, the alloys
are given here in the order A - B and B-A. In this way it is immediately clear which Ni systems,for example,
occur in the tables.
List of alloys
System
Page
System
Page
System
Page
System
Page
Ag-AI
Ag-Au
Ag-Cd
Ag-Cu
Ag-Ga
Ag-Hg
Ag-Mn
Ag-Pb
Ag-Pd
Ag-Zn
282f.
283
283
283f.
284
284
284
284
285
285
Ce-Mg
Ce-Pu
Ce-U
294
294
294
284
288
297
302f.
31Of.
321
321
282 f.
285
285
286f.
287
287
287f.
288
288
288
288 f.
289
289
290
290 f.
291
285
291
295
295
295 ff.
297
297
297
298
298
298
298
298
301
31Of.
311
312f.
314
314
315
315f.
316
316f.
317
317
317
317f.
Mn-Ag
Mn-AI
Mn-Co
Mn-Cu
Mn-Fe
Mn-Ni
Mn-Ti
AI-Ag
Al-Be
Al-Co
AI-Cu
Al-Fe
AI-Li
Al-Mg
Al-Mn
AI-Na
AI-Nb
AI-Ni
AI-Pu
AI-Si
AI-Ti
Al-Zn
Al-Zr
Co-Al
Co-Au
Co-Cr
co-cu
Co-Fe
Co-Mn
CO-MO
Co-Ni
Co-Pd
Co-Pt
Co-Ti
co-v
co-w
Fe-Cu
Fe-Mn
Fe-MO
Fe-Ni
Fe-Pd
Fe-Sb
Fe-Si
Fe-Sn
Fe-Th
Fe-Ti
Fe-U
Fe-V
Fe-W
Fe-Zn
Cr-Co
Cr-Fe
Cr-Mo
Cr-Ni
Cr-Ti
Cr-U
295
299f.
300
300
301
301
Ga-Ag
Ga-Cu
Ga-Pu
Ga-Ti
284
301f.
318
319
Ge-Nb
319
Hf-Ti
Hf-W
Hf- Zr
319
319
319
MO-CO
Mo-Cr
MO-Cu
MO-Fe
Mo-Nb
Mo-Ni
MO-OS
Mo-Pd
Mo-Pt
Mo-Re
Mo-Ta
Mo-Ti
MO-U
MO-W
Mo-Zr
297
300
302f.
311
107f.
322
322
322f.
323
323
323
323
324
324
325
Na-AI
288
284
291
Au-Ag
Au-Co
Au-Cu
Au-Fe
Au-In
Au-Ni
Au-Pd
Au-Pt
Au-Sn
283
291
291
292
292
292
293
293
293
In-Au
In-Cu
In-Ni
In-Pb
292
302
319
320
La-Mg
La-U
320
320
Be-AI
Be-cu
Be-Fe
285
293
294
287
294
294
320
320
320
320
288
319
321f.
325
325
325
325f.
326f.
327
328
328
329
293
Li-AI
Li-Bi
Li-Cd
Li-Mg
Li-Sb
Li-Si
Li-W
Nb-Al
Nb-Ge
Nb-Mo
Nb-Ni
Nb-Pd
Nb-Sn
Nb-Ta
Nb-Ti
Nb-U
Nb-V
Nb-W
Nb-Zr
Ba-U
283 f.
286f.
291
293
294
295
301
301f.
302
302f.
303
303f.
304
304
305
305
305ff.
307
307ff.
Hg-Ag
As-Fe
Cu-Ag
Cu-AI
Cu-Au
Cu-Be
Cu-Cd
cu-co
Cu-Fe
Cu-Ga
Cu-In
Cu-Mn
Cu-MO
Cu-Ni
Cu-Pd
Cu-Pt
Cu-Sb
Cu-Si
Cu-Sn
Cu-Ti
Cu-Zn
Fe-Al
Fe-As
Fe-Au
Fe-Be
Fe-Co
Fe-Cr
287
291
292
294
295 ff.
299 f.
Mg-AI
Mg-Ce
Mg-La
Mg-Li
Mg-Ni
Mg-Pu
Mg-U
287 f.
294
320
320
320
321
321
Ni-AI
Ni-Au
Ni-Co
Ni-Cr
Ni-Cu
Ni-Fe
Ni-In
Ni-Mg
Ni-Mn
Ni-Mo
Ni-Nb
Ni-Pd
288f.
292
297
300
303f.
312f.
319
320
321
322
325
329f.
Bi-Li
294
Cd-Ag
Cd-Cu
Cd-Li
283
294
294
Murch, Bruff
Landok-Bhstein
New Series III/26
5.1 Introduction
281
System
Page
System
Page
System
Page
System
Page
Ni-Pt
Ni-Si
Ni-Sn
Ni-Ta
Ni-Th
Ni-Ti
Ni-U
Ni-V
Ni-W
Ni-Zn
330
330
33Of.
331
331
331
331
332
332
333
Pu-Ga
Pu-Mg
Pu-Ti
Pu-u
Pu-Zr
318
321
334
334
335
Ta-Ti
Ta-W
336
337
Th-Fe
Th-Ni
316
331
U-Sm
U-Sr
U-Ti
u-w
U-Zr
336
336
337
339
339
Re-Mo
Re-Pt
Re-W
323
334
335
Rh-W
336
298
328
332
334
337f.
322
Pb-Ag
Pb-In
Pb-Sn
Pb-Tl
284
320
333
334
Sb-Cu
Sb-Fe
Sb-Li
305
314
320
Pd-Ag
Pd-Au
Pd-Co
Pd-Cu
Pd-Fe
Pd-Mo
Pd-Nb
Pd-Ni
Pd-Ti
Pd-V
285
293
298
304
314
322f.
325
329f.
334
334
Si-Al
Si-Cu
Si-Fe
Si-Li
Si-Ni
Si-U
289
305
315
320
330
336
Sm-U
336
290
298
301
307
316f.
319
319
321
323
326f.
331
334
334
336
336
337
337f.
339
v-co
V-Nb
V-Ni
V-Pd
V-Ti
OS-MO
Ti-Al
Ti-Co
Ti-Cr
Ti-Cu
Ti-Fe
Ti-Ga
Ti-Hf
Ti-Mn
Ti-Mo
Ti-Nb
Ti-Ni
Ti-Pd
Ti-Pu
Ti-Sn
Ti-Ta
Ti-U
Ti-V
Ti-Zr
w-co
W-Fe
W-Hf
W-Li
W-MO
W-Nb
W-Ni
W-Re
W-Rh
W-Ta
w-u
298
317
319
320
324
328
332
335
336
337
339
334
336
Pu-Al
Pu-Ce
289
294
Ta-Mo
Ta-Nb
Ta-Ni
323
325f.
331
293
294
301
317
320
321
324
327
331
334
336
285
290f.
307ff.
317ff.
333
Sr-U
U-Ba
U-Ce
U-Cr
U-Fe
U-La
U-Mg
U-MO
U-Nb
U-Ni
u-Pu
U-Si
Zn-Ag
Zn-Al
Zn-Cu
Zn-Fe
Zn-Ni
293
298
304
323
330
334
293
305ff.
315f.
325
330f.
333
336
336
Tl-Pb
Pt-Au
Pt-Co
Pt-Cu
Pt-Mo
Pt-Ni
Pt-Re
Sn-Au
Sn-Cu
Sn-Fe
Sn-Nb
Sn-Ni
Sn-Pb
Sn-Ti
Sn-Zr
Zr-Al
Zr-Hf
Zr-Mo
Zr-Nb
Zr-Pu
Zr-Sn
Zr-Ti
Zr-U
291
319
325
329
335
336
339
339
Landolt-Biimstein
New Series III/26
Murch, Bruff
5.2 Chemical diffusion tables

Composition
at.%
A&!
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
6.5
8.5
1.76
3.98
0.869
1.76
4.0
0.518
1.84
0.86
1.85
4
7
64
g:,
61.90
DO
Dl
D2
10S4 m*s-r
kJmol-
rn*s-l
m*s-
m*s-
0.21
0.30
0.33
0.55
0.78
1.5
3.0
11.0
16.0
0.21
0.21
121
124
125
129
131
136
141
155
159
113
113
7.3.10-14
1.8. lo-l3
3.8 . IO- l4
1.16.10-13
1.73.10-2
9.2 . IO- l2
-
1.22.10-13
7.87. lo-l4
3.20 . lo- l3
2.75 - lo- l3
1.85 . IO- l3
7.78 . IO- l3
6.61 . 10-13
11.22. 10-13
9.94.10-13
1.22.10-12
5.01 - 10-12
-
773 ..a 868
;0.10-4
4.9. 10-14
1.6. lo- l3
1.6. lo-l3
1.2. 10-13
3.9 * 10-13
4.1 * 10-13
5.3 * 10-13
5.0.10-13
-
773
1.3
121
Temperature
range
K
AI
;02.10-2
1.141 . lo-
-
DL =
D;, =
2.2 * 10-s
QA, = 113
2.4. 1O-4
QA, = 124
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
l=Ag,2=Al
Method A
57H
Method A
70K2
Method C
75Y
Method A
Further data at pressures up to 3 GPa given
in reference.
84M
808
845
868
770
808
770
808
770
808
633...713
753.a.833
731... 828
1.63
1.53
648...793
0.14
2.42. IO-
-
175
155
-
See Fig. 1.
1036... 1238
1079e.. 1290
1173
See Fig. 2.
3.8. lo-l3
7.3.10-13
1.7.10-13
1213
1213
4.7. 10-3
131
923... 1168
0...25
5.5
8.0
9.8
14.8
18.9
24.8
27.7
32.7
33.8
See Fig. 3.
3.4. lo-
5.2. IO-
7.4.10-11
1.2.10-0
1.7 * lo-0
7.3 . 10-10
8.04. 10-I
4.7. 10-g
2.14. IO-
2.72. IO-
3.29. IO-
5.62.10-l
9.12.10-I
1.91 . lo-I0
2.78. IO-
5.53 . 10-10
6.61 * 10-10
2.9. IO-
3.97. IO-
5.07.10-I
1.04. 10-10
1.89~10-10
4.61 . IO-
7.31 . 10-10
1.66.10-g
2.09. lo-
900..* 1053
873
CL
6...30
=O... 6
zo...17
zO...24
See Fig.
See Fig.
See Fig.
See Fig.
&
CU
1.2. 10-z
0.52
149.0
183.8
0...20
Ag
Au
50.8
0 . . .8.77
xO...lOO
5O.e.85
63.5
Ag
Cd
o... 5
0...2
4.
5a.
5 b.
5c.
883...933
1179
1087
1073
990... 1140
1023 .... 1073
87C
425
50E
52S,
53Hl
54B
50K
3
-
59Ml
731
4
5a
5b
5c
73U2
78B
50K
67C2
Method D
Data listed are for
15at.% Al.
Slight dependence on concentration, see reference.
l=Ag,2=Au
Method A
Method A
Method A
Method A
l=Ag,2=Cd
Reanalysis of earlier data
Method B
Method A
Method A
0 determined from
intrinsic diffusion
coefficients.
Method A
Method A
Many intrinsic diffusion
coefficients given in
reference.
1 =Ag,2=Cu
Method B
Method B
(continued)
Composition
at.%
AlZ
0.**2
DO
10m4ms-
kJmol-
Cu (continued)
1.2
0.1
1.7
1
2
2.5
3.1
4
6.8
6
98.5
6.8
99
3.1
99.5
1.6
99.9
0.88
0.21
1.1
xo...3
go--- loo
m2s-
192
196
200
203
210
216
208
201
195
184.5 143c*,
G,: atomic
fraction Ag)
SeeFig. 6.
See Fig. 6.
Method/Remarks
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
818.e. 1043
Method A
b available at higher
concentrations, e.g. up
to 18 at.% Cu at
1043 K and down to
95 at.% Cu,
see reference.
974*** 1273
Method A
0.28 . lo- l3
-
1174
1023
1193
D,
D2
m2s-
-
1.56. lo-t3
-
Fig.
Ref.
71B
7302
Methods A. H
6
Concentration profiles
determined from microprobe and X-ray intensity
bands. See figure for
effect on b(C).
76U
Ag
Ga
1.9..- 3.5
0.42
163
873 --. 1213
Method B
77B2
Ag
Hg
56
3.181 . IO-
32.5
313.e.388
Method A
86L
Ag
Mn
0 . . a8.5
0.18
180
849... 1206
Method A
69B1
63
-
1.5 - 10-12
3.13 * 10-12
5.43 * 10-12
9.14 * 10-12
493 ... 558

493
538
518
493
Method B
Do not reported.
32s
Pb
Ag
0.**0.12
Pd
In solid
solution
50
6.36. 1O-4
85
7ooe.e 1000
Method B
335
1.5. 10-6
103
898... 1198
Method A
7ON2
1.64. lo-
-
69
-
See Fig. 7.
2.45 . IO-l3
8.75. IO-l3
1.7.10-13
1.7. IO-
See Fig. 8.
673..*883
l=Ag,2=Zn
Method A
55Hl
923
973
873
Method E
59G
Method A
70Hl
8.1 . IO-
-
2.3. IO-
-
823 ... 1023
Method A
73U2
See Fig. 9.
See Fig. 9.
583...673
78Sl
See Fig. IOa.
Method A
Do and Q depend on
couple used, see figure.
Method C
IOa
81W
See Fig. lob.
lob
See Fig. 10~.
IOC
See Fig. 11.
See Fig. 11. -
52
126
163
169
550
180
10.5
295
Zll
50
40 . . .55
26.5
26.5
u
P
CL
40
4.e. 30
CL
74 to sfq
phase
boundary
31..*39
wt. %(P)
46...51
wt. %(y)
55...81
wt. %(&)
0.e. 18
Al
Al
0...5
Be
0.005 wt.%
0.0075
wt. %
0.91 wt.%
673
823 ... 1023
Method A
11
86S2
773...908
Methods B
and C
51B
1273 -.. 1473
Method A
85G
co
Composition
at.%
Al
D,
D2
10s4 ms-
kJmol-
m*s-l
m*s-*
rn*s-l
0.29
0.19
0.131
0.231
0.287
0.364
0.588
1.033
1.293
0.85
2.1
1.6. IO6
2.2
0.56
0.18
0.432
0.306
0.425
0.393
0.424
0.556
0.13
130
115
185
188
188
187
189
194
191
136
138
231
149
128
126
194
187
187
183
181
179
113
SeeFig. 12.
0.65
SeeFig. 12. 177

-
D'&=
D& =
0.13.10-4
Q,,, = 163
2.2.10-4
Qc. = 182
cu
0..*0.215
z25
DO
P
2.5 *** 5.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Y2
L2
Jl2
0
0 . . . x2
X0
2
4
6
8
10
74 . . +80
6.0. lo-l4
1.31 .10-9
-
Temperature
range
K
778...908
923 ... 1023
782
814
985 -.a 1270
Method/Remarks
1 =Al,2=Cu
Method B
Method C
Method B
Fig.
Ref.
61Ml
64A
70H2
Method A
Empirical equations for
Do and Q given in
in reference.
700
673 ... 808
Method C
71F
977-e. 1277
Method A
72C
75M2
823.a.1113
Method A
Slight dependence of
B on concentration.
Method A
Method A
853-e. 1273
1073 a.. 1223
75Pl
12
-
75P2
83R
I I I$
I I IZ
5.2 Chemical diffusion in inhomogeneous binary alloys (Tables)
I I I I I I I
Ref. p. 3661
I I I I I I
%a
1ddd
Murch, Bruff
$1
.Y
F4
I I I I I I I
I I I I IIS
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
Land&-B6mstein
New Series III/26
287
Composition
at.%
Al
Y
Al
Method/Remarks
690...818
Method A
Further data at pressures
up to 3.3 GPa given in
reference.
83M
873.e.923
Method A
15
43B
Dl
D2
10m4rns-
kJmol-
m2s-l
m2s-
m2s-
125
124
127
122
122
See Fig. 15.
Mg (continued)
ZO
0.42
1.0
0.49
2.0
0.61
3.0
0.32
4.0
0.45
Mn
0.02~~~0.15 Al
Temperature
range
K
DO
Na
Fig.
Ref.
0.*.0.002
1.1
134
823.0.923
Method F
50R
33
25
Nb
Nb,AI
Nb,AI
2.0. 10-3
2.5
230
366
1473-e. 1773
Method C
75A
Al
Ni
1.87
1.5
4
10
-
268
197
172
50
201
230
268
272
-
1372+..1553
701... 883
928..- 1273
928..- 1273
928 ..a 1273
1533
Method B
Method C
16
56s
675
Method A
72W
1273 ... 1573
Methods A, C
735
1143
1203
1273
1143
1203
1273
Method C
75H
Al
0..*0.7
Y
6
;
2
4
6
8
NiAl
N&Al
62
86
See Fig. 16.

See Fig. 16.
See Fig. 16.
See Fig. 16.
1.2 * 10-13
1.5.10-3
1.5.10-13
1.1 . 10-13
2.1 . 10-12
6.0. IO-l2
1.1 . 10-11
1.5 . lo- l4
6.3. IO-l4
3.5. lo-
NiAI(G)
(36 . . .54)
N&AI(s)
3.7. 10-z
See Fig. 17 See Figs.

18a...d.
5.0.10-l5
6.3. IO-
2.95 . IO- l4
3.6 . lo- I4
1.16. lo-l3
266
24 . IO-l5
3.8.10-l
11.5.10-15
24.0. IO-l5
55.0.10-5
234
1.5. 10-15
3.0.10-15
7.9.10-15
16.0. IO-l5
37.0.10-5
234
See Fig. 19.
123
1.3
257
2.25. 1O-4
107
1 ... 19
Ni,AI,
w
0...5
Al
Pu
3...9.1
Al
Si
wO...O.48
See Fig. 20.
~0~~~0.5
0.346
124
xo...o.5
2.02
136
wo.31 ...
0.51
-----------
D;, =
D$ =
5.07.10-4
QA, = 143
3.95.10-4
Qsi = 140
1223 ... 1423
Method A
17,
18
7835
1223
1273
1323
1373
1423
1273 ...
1223
1273
1323
1373
1423
1223 ...
1223
1273
1323
1373
1423
1223 ...
1323...
1423
1573
Method A
SOY2
1073 ... 1273
Method C
19
-
1323 ... 1473
Method A
85G
623...790
Method B
69T
743...853
1 = Al, 2 = Si
Method B
43B
79F
1423
1423
617...904
Method B
20
-
753 ... 893
Method A
82s
73Bl
Composition
at.%
Al
2
12.0
10.0
3.8
TiAl,
Al
DO
iJ
Dl
D2
lob4 m2s-
kJmol-
m2s-
m2s-
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
1.4. 10-5
9.0. 10-5
1.6. 1O-5
92
107
99
1256.e. 1523
1 = Al, 2 = Ti
Method A
60G
8.10-
95
1.411~10-*
-
4.61.10-
-
1107...1173
1523
789.e.915
Method C
73v
128
1.84 . IO- l5
3.98 . IO- l5
12.7 . IO- I5
4.92. IO-l4
1.49 * 10-13
6.1 . IO-r3
1.95.10-1s
4.85 . IO- l5
19.3.10-15
6.96 . IO- l4
1.74 * 10-13
6.1 - lo- l3
3.64 . lo- *s
6.12. lo-l5
21.6. lo-l5
6.92. lo-l4
2.12.10-13
3.64.10-15
6.12 . IO- l5
2.0.10-4
7.48. IO-l4
2.2. 10-15
6.66.10-1s
7.08 - lo-l4
1.10. to-15
5.1 * to-14
-
Method A
59H
Ti
i
u
B
Zn
x0
9.1
18.1
18.2
37.6
x0*** x 3.1
1.33
603
633
673
713
758
1086
603
633
673
713
758
1086
603
633
673
713
758
603
633
673
713
758
633
713
633
713
673.e.868
Method/Remarks
Method I
Fig.
Ref.
80M
X0
Al
AU
1373*.. 1573
Method A
78G
4.3
0.58
220
247
1223 a.. 1653
Method A
0.22
183
973 ..* 1323
Method H
5.7. 10-4
-
115
-
700 ... 1000
Method B
1006+.. 1130
Method A
50
50
2.36 +1O-6
7.94 * 10-E
-
57
45
-
823.e.973
573...723
323 ... 1023
Method A
Method A
0.5
4.2
7.2
11.2
14.6
21.8
28.3
38.6
55.3
63.9
79.0
8.99 . IO- 3
12.4. 1O-3
15.6. 1O-3
21.7. 1O-3
29.9f10-3
53.6. 1O-3
89.1 . 1O-3
0.214
0.828
1.69
6.092
133
136
138
141
144
149
154
161
173
179
191
659..-827
Method D
Fe
cf.
Y
co
X0
CU
In solid solution
lo.*.90
AuCu
(disorordered)
(ordered)
IO...90
wt.%
82M
169
179
189
192
192
283
272
382
A1,Zr 3
Al,Zr,
AU
Method A
Data at pressures up to
3GPa given in reference.
9.2.10-3
2.3. 1O-2
5.2. IO-
7.6. IO-
8.0. IO-
9.2
3.4
1.6. lo5
Zr
M3Zr5
0.6 . . .4.6
757...881
124
121
8
10
12
14
16
As
0.406
0.28
3.5
See Fig. 21.
See Fig. 22.
1473 **. 1573

1373 ... 1573
1273 ... 1573
1273 ... 1573
-
76B2
77F
335
21
69B3,69B4
70Kl
22
-
71P
81L
Composition
at.%
Fe
0.~.15.6
X0
5***40
AU
3
In
33
AuIn,
50
AuIn
69
Au,In,
80
Au.&
91
Ni
2
IO
20
30
40
50
55
60
65
70
75
98
0-e. 100
DO
Dl
D2
10m4 ms-
kJmol-
ms-
m2s-
m2s-
See Fig. 23.
4.7 * 10-l
9.9 * 10-l
7.0 * 10-16
1.8 - IO-
2.6. IO-l6
3.6. IO-l6
5.8. IO-l6
5.8. IO-
4.9 * 10-l
7.8. IO-
2.4 1 10-l
6.2. IO-
2.4. 10-l
5.0.10-15
2.9. IO-l5
7.4.10-1s
6.6.10-16
9.1 . 10-16
9.8. IO-l6
9.8. IO-l6
6.8 * 10-l
1.1 . 10-16
2.8.10-
7.1 . 10-l
415
424
415
424
415
424
415
424
415
424
415
424
1123...1198
1198
l.157.10-4
102
0.19
-
172
4.3. 10-2
3.9. 10-2
9.5. 10-2
7.8. IO-*
2.2. 10-2
1.3. 10-2
5.9. 10-3
6.8. 10-2
1.4. 103
2.0 . IO
6.1 . 10s
1.8. lo4
-
173.3
173.8
183
183.8
175.9
177.5
174.6
204.3
305.6
402.8
439.6
356.7
-
See Fig. 24.
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1026... 1276
Method B
44K
973 .a. 1323
Method H
77F
973 ... 1273
Method A
23
831
l=Au,2=In
Method A
64P
Method A
57R
Method A
24
67L5
D,, calculated assuming
Au
Pd
In solid
solution
1.11.10-3
157
3.2. 1O-4
153
1.23. 1O-3
163
98 .
96 ..
94
92
90
~
88
.86
84 -.
82
80
2...8
0.62
1.0
0.73 0.67
0.60
0.58
0.53
0.52
0.47
0.43
0.37
229
234
232
232
231
231
231
231
231..
230.
262
94.9
D;,=O32
QAu= I&
D;t=9.0.1d-2
Sn
0 ... 1.75
o... 1.4
See Fig. 25.

See Fig. 25.
Ba
o...solubility
limit
U
Y
0.112
171
Be
o...x15
x33
~48
75
CU
u
P
174
115
130
138
1.9.
8.4.
5.4.
1.2.
D;, =
50
Au
Pt
In solid
solution
Au
33
IOOO... 1250
Method B
335
899 ... 1313
Method A
70N2
1000... 1250
l=Au,2=Pt
Method B
1198..+ 1328
--
Method A
Data for 0 resulting from
rolled Pt used in couples
are also given in reference.
61B
335
QR = 226
:
10-l
1O-2
10-z
10-3
3.5.10-6
QBe = 121
Method A
1090
1129
25
72H2
1123 ... 1313
Method C
64T
823...1113
923...1113
823.e.1113
823...1113
63R
D& =4.5. IO-

Qcu = 105
l=Be,2=Cu
Method A
Composition
at.%
Be
Bi
Ref.
1073 .** 1373
Method A
64L
See Fig. 26.
653-a-873
Method D
Seereference for 6(T)
details.
26
77W2
27
38R
6;
D,
10s4 m2s-r
kJmol-
m2s-*
m2s-
Fe
0 . . .0.2
1.0
226
Li
Li,Bi
Cll
Cd
Li
35 **e47.5
Mg
Pu
Ce
3.74 ***
7.17wt.%
Ce
O.**solubility
limit
Fig.
Cd
0.075 . . .
0.525
0.5
Ce
In solid
solution
Method/Remarks
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
DO
U
y
See Fig. 27.
773.0.853
Method A
3.5 * 10-3
122
773...1123
Method B
Data from A. Klein
presented by 0. Kubaschewski [50K]
See.Fig. 28.
774-e. 802
Method D
450
176
823...871
Method C
1.31 .10-t
124
676.e. 801
Method B
3.92
278
1073 ..a 1273
Method C
50K
28
84L
co
co
0.1
C-3
0...40
0...15.2wt.%
0...28.3wt.%
0...25
CU
2
1.12
1.75
2.02
2.20
0.98
1.35
1.63
3.21
4.12
4.92
co
o..* 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Fe
0.443
266
1273... 1633
8.4. 1O-2
8.0 IO-
0.14
254
250
253
1273... 1573
Method A
(0 reported to be a function of concentration but
dependence is very slight)
Method B
1273 ... 1573
Method A
0.6
5.7
214
243
1073.** 1346
see remarks
seeremarks 6.8 . 10-l

1.5.10-l
2.2.10-l
9.0.10-18
5.1 . 10-16
6.4. IO-l6
3.8 . lo-l6
4.5.10-16
9.6. lo-l6
3.6 . lo- l6
1158
1273
Method A
Data for intermediate
compositions are also
given in reference.
Method B
Do = 1.0 * 10m4m2sm1
and Q = 275 kJmol-
calculated from 2 points
only.
See Fig. 29.
1409..+ 1629
1.5. 10-3
2.9 * 10-3
4.4. 10-3
5.8. 1O-3
7.0. 10-3
8.8. 10-3
11.5.10-3
12.0.10-3
13.1 .10-3
219
215
212
216
215
217
218
218
219
1273... 1673
52W
63D1,63D2
73Gl
73B2
84A
l=Co,2=Fe
Method A
29
Method A
69B3,
69B4
73Ul
(continued)
Composition
at.%
co
3
5
15
20
25
30
3.5
40
45
50
55
60
65
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
80
85
90
95
45
52
Fe
CL
DO
D,
10S4 m2s-
kJmol-
m*s-*
m*s-
m*s-
3.01 .10-5
1.76.10-
1.33 * 10-14
4.18.10-
(continued)
3.02 . 10
4.13 * lo4
1.15. 10s
1.52. 10
3.02 - 10
5.89. IO
1.4 * 10s
1.54 * 104
4.34 * 103
1.02. 103
3.67 . lo*
84.4
30
45.2
21.6
10.5
5.33
2.54
1.01
4.21
5.67
2.5
2.7
1.53
5.75
0.871
0.783
1.37
2.11
5.01
5.72
-
318
343
361
366
373
378
363
339
323
306
292
274
261
329
319
319
303
293
276
270
273
276
277
281
294
276
273
281
291
306
318
-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1123...1168
Method A
77H
1073***1168
1073+.. 1228
993... 1228
993 *a* 1141

1323-e. 1573
1273 .a. 1573
1228
1168
56
i7
io
ZO
Mn
5
5
10
20
30
40
7.79
0.78
3.07
0.70
0.721
0.627
296.
273
284
257
248
241
33
:0
:0
MO
o..* 15 wt.%
0.23
263
2.48
295
See Fig. 30.
xo*..go
szo... 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
zo-..
1.76
1.61
1.89
1.50
0.48
0.166
0.140
0.725
1.94
-
299
295
295
290
273
258
254
273
285
-
Ni
10 . . .90
IO...90
100
See Fig. 31.

See Fig. 32.
See Fig. 33.

See Fig. 34.
9.0.10-6
5.5.10-16
8.2. 10-l
2.09 * 10-15
1.45. 10-lS
5.29.10-16
1141
1123
1073
1133 ... T, (ferro)

T,.-. 1150 (para)
1133...1423
1273 .-. 1573
Method B
63Dl
1273 ... 1573
Method A
74H
1428... 1673
Method A
30
53H
1423 ... 1578
Method A
31
67B2
1409 ... 1629
Method A
32
67B3,
69B4
1153...1573
Method A
711
7711
D& =
Do
2.2 * 10-s
Q, = 263
9.8. 1O-s
QMn = 229
l=Co,2=Mn
Method A
Mn
1373
Method A
33
73H
1373... 1673
Method A
34
73Ul
Composition
at.%
co
Pd
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
IO***90
co
co
Co,Ti
Co,Ti
CoTi
DO
Dl
10-4mZs-1
kJmol-
m2se1
m2s-*
mzs-*
Pt
0.e. 100
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0.872
1.27
0.887
0.746
0.667
0.639
0.536
0.447
0.465
0.516
286
288
279
275
274
274
272
272
274
277
21
Ti
4.s.8
21
30 . . a32
46.e. 50
90***95(L3)
15.0
5.3 * 10-z
0.28
4.4 * 10-4
67
281
167
218
173
207
13.7 * 10-15
25.6. IO-
55.0 * 10-15
12.0 * 10-14
14.5 * 10-14
12.0 - 10-14
70.7.10-14
28.2. lo-l4
13.9.10-14
See Fig. 35.
See Fig. 36.

-
Ok=
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1423
Method A
66B
1153*.. 1466
Method A
35
721
1398..*1573
1271... 1673
1 =co,2=Pt
Method A
Method A
36
-
67B2
801
Method C
76V
D;=
2.25. 1O-4
8.09. 1O-4 1473 e-e1673
Qc, = 278
QR = 291
-
1173***1413
973 .a. 1123
co
co
Cr
IO...20
o..-11
11
15
5.4
37
42
52
62
72
81
91
0...7.1
13.7
15.5
16.8
18.2
19.3
20.7
12.1
13.9
15.3
16.8
18.0
19.1
O.e.28.3
V
0...14.8wt.%
2.1 . IO-
222
W
0...14.6wt.%
8. 1O-3
238
1.48
7.1 . 10-5
1.2. 10-3
230
170
219
240
252
Fe
u
y
u
u
u
u
u
y
See remarks
u
Y
2.4
6.27
1373 **. 1573
Method B
1373 ... 1573
Method B
I =Cr,2=Fe
Method A
1.7. IO-
1.42. IO-
1.22 * lo-
1.53 * 10-7
0.8. IO-
o.95.1o-g
0.9.10-7
l.o~Io-
-
1096... 1713
1223 ... 1423
1096
1323
1688
1713
1523
Method A
6OPl
1173...1473
Method B
63D1,63D2
1473
Method A
Fe samples are actually
steels with 0.014 % C,
0.18 % Mn, and
O.l6%Si.
70s
948-e. 1758
Method B
74A
8.0. IO-
5.6. 10-l
2.78.10-l
1.17.10-I
7.1.10-0
4.9.10-10
4.64. 10-l
1.1 . 10-12
1.16. 10-l
1.30.10-2
1.23. IO-
1.20 * 10-12
1.14 * 10-12
3.5.10-12
3.76. IO- I2
3.76. IO-
3.68. IO-
3.68. IO-l2
3.56. IO-l2
-
63DI,63D2
63D1, 63D2
(continued)
Composition
at.%
Cr
I7
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
47.8
X0
5
10
I5
20
25
MO
Cr
Ni
o*** 10.3
wt. %
s-.-45
5 ... 20
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1453
Method A
74c
1044... 1124
1049... 1124
1039... 1124
984-e. 1124
974-e. 1124
974.e. I124
Method A
85B
1323 ... 1473
Method B
71HI
1373 *** 1573
Method B
SeeFig. 37. SeeFig. 38. -
1268 ... 1573

1268-e. 1573
Method A
D,
D2
IOm4m2s-t
kJmol-
m2s-l
m2s-*
m2s-
299
292
279
280
269
269
7.5 . IO- 1X
7.5 . IO- 1X
7.0.10-*3
6.4. IO-l3
5.8. IO-l3
5.2 . IO- l3
4.8 . IO- l3
4.3 * 10-13
4.1 . 10-13
3.8 . IO- l3
3.4 . IO- l3
2.8 . IO- l3
2.3 . IO- l3
2.0.10-13
1.7.10-3
1.5.10-3
-
2.27. lo-
-
0.66 * lo-
-
2.9. 1O-3
257
0.6
257
SeeFig. 37.
SeeFig. 38.
Fe (continued)
CL
1.69. IO3
8.24 . IO2
2.21 . 102
2.56. IO2
60
15
Cr
SoIid
solution
range
Temperature
range
K
DO
37
38
63D1,
63D2
67U
Cr
9
Ti
P
3.6. IO-
Cr
0. . . solubility
limit
U
y
0.7
142
3.7. 10-g
2.8. IO-
1258
Method A
62P
1173...1273
Method C
60M
l=Cu,2=Fe
Fe
xO...6
See Fig. 39.
See Fig. 39.
D&=
6.1 . 1O-4
Qn, = 268
21.0
1.3.103
300.0
0.19
0.091
251
301
284
273
193
0.504
208
1073 ... 1323
Ga
CuGa,
1.34.1o-2
43
2.5
4.9
7.6
10.3
13.1
15.9
3.0. 10-4
1.8. 1O-3
1.6. IO-
1.8. IO-
1.3. 10-l
8. IO-
134
142
153
167
157
146
DoGa =
11.1 .10-5
QGa = 155
0.5
1
CL
k-
cu
0;. =
2.7. 1O-4
QFe = 266
97 *-. 99.5(E)
0.**7.4wt.%
O...2wt.%
0;. =
8.9 +1O-4
QFe = 314
0; =
3.6 1 1O-4
Qc, = 274
2.6
wt. %
12.5
D& =
6.5. IO-
Qcu = 140
1173 ... 1323
Method A
39
71K
1133 ... 1283
Method A
74Tl
1045 **. 1153

1198 ... 1323
923 ... 1073
Metliod
77s
Method B.
7883
313 . ..433
1 =Cu,2=Ga
Method C
70T2
773...973
Method A
74Wl
(continued)
Composition
at.%
DO
10m4m2sS1 kJmol-
cu
cu
cu
Ga (continued)
16.3
Dl
D2
m2s-
m2s-i
m2s-r
D& = 1.2. 1O-6
0;. = 8.6. 1O-6
18.4
X0...
0.3
In
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.58
194
0.93
1.2
1.8
5.8
9.8
11.0
18.0
188
188
189
195
198
196
198
Mn
O.e.28
3.3
6.0
6.85
9.0
10
20
30
40
50
72
76
80
0.52
5.66
17.5
4.62
9.22
2.11 * 102
1.4 * 106
2.42 . 10
2.78 . 10
177
207
211
198
209
241
366
400
408
0.54.10-3
0.61 . lo- l3
0.71 . 10-13
1.18. lo-l3
-
Qcu = 135
D& = 6.3. IO+
Qcu = 136
-
QGa= 135
-
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
74Wl
Method A
Qo.= 14
D& = 4.7. 1O-6
Temperature
range
K
973... 1323
Method B
77B2
949***1119
Method A
81H2
913.e. 1093
1123
l=Cu,2=Mn
Method B
Method A
67C2
7ow
1021... 1203
Method A
7714,
7712
949.a. 1089
Much data on intrinsic

diffusion coefficients are
given in reference from
0.6 at.% In to 4.6 at.% In
and at temperatures
x lOOOK.
408
397
397
29
D& = 12.0.10-4
Q, = 210
0; = 1.7.10-4
QMn = 190
1043 ... 1118
77
Dk = 1.3. IO7
Q, = 490
0; = 1.4. 10
1171... 1203
0.37
0.56
0.51
0.53
0.66
1.17
1.33
2.34
10.7
93.6
41.0
2.1
0.14
7.0. 10-z
0.16
187
187
183
181
181
186
189
197
216
241
239
218
198
195
204
0.6. IO-l3
0.8.10-13
0.88 . IO- l3
1.04.10-3
-
Qm = 40
-
2.82. 1O-6
146
82
84
86
3
5
6.0
6.85
9.0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
CU
MO
0.016.. .5.45
CU
70*.* 100
2.11 . 107
7.12. IO6
6.06 * IO6
85A
1173...1548
Method B
55B
52T
1196..* 1322
See Fig. 40.

-
3.7.10-14
1.7.10-14
1333
Method A
40
-
See Fig. 41.
See Fig. 41.
See Fig. 41.
1273
Method A
41
o... 100
Method A
1 =Cu,2=Ni
Method A
Ni
83
850
750-s. 850
850
850
850
750s.. 850
54B
67L3
(continued)
Composition
at.%
CU
Ni
O***loo
o... loo
o*** loo
DO
Dl
D2
10m4m*s-l
kJmol-
m*s-r
m*s-
See Fig. 42.

See Fig. 43.
See Fig. 43.
See Fig. 44.

See Fig. 44.
6.09. IO-l4
2.3 . IO- l3
.exp(-5.94X,,)
.exp(-6.13X,3
Xni is mole fraction Ni
See Fig. 44.
See Fig. 44.
(continued)
.
-
0..- loo
o-.. 5
-
o*** 100
CU
IO*..90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
O.--l00
Pd
50
6 a.. 95
0.48
-
224
-
See Fig. 47.
4.2. lo3
0.67
233
233
Pt
0..*13.9
1.5 ... 2.5
See Fig. 45.

2.7. lo-l5
4.9.10-15
8.5 . IO- Is
1.53.10-14
4.01 . 10-14
8.88 . lo- I4
1.54. 10-13
1.65 . IO- l3
1.28 . lo- l3
See Fig. 46.
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
m*s-i
Temperature
range
K
983-s. 1339
1273
1193
Method A
Method A
b(c) near 100% Cu
depends on calculational method used,
see figure.
42
43
69B2
71M2
See Fig. 44.

6.11 . lo-l4
=exp(-9.08X,3
1273
1273
Method A
Method A
44
-
72Hl
78H
See Fig. 44.
1273
Method A
44
8212
1151... 131
1292
Method A
Method A
45
-
52T
66B
1204.e. 1334
46
69B3,
69B4
.-
1048...1313
1173
Method A
See figure for d(C)
at 1204 and 1334K.
Method A
Method A
70N2
74T2
1314...1674
1023... 1348
Method B
Method B
47
-
44K
72F2
Sb
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
CU
0.32
9.4. 10-Z
3.0. 10-2
-
1.7
.-
0.6
Si
~0~~~10
a/a+K
boundary
11.4
CU
6
Sn
w37wt.%
Y
&
rl
28 ... 33 wt.% -
Cu,Sn
(4
o... 33 wt.%
C!u,,Sn,
.I74
160
147
-
1.3. IO-
6.9. lo-*
-
663
1 =Cu,2=Sb
Method A
56H
,
949 -:1040
Method A
81Hl
2.9 . IO- l4
6.1 . lo-l4
2.15. IO-l4
4.05.10-14
7.8. IO-l4
2.5. lo-l4
1005
1040
970
1005
1040
1005
Method A
Method C
48
-
38R
68A
l=Cu,2=Sn
Method C
d values in 6 phase
are averaged.
64s
49,
50a,b
1.8. IO-l4
3.7.10-14
0.5.10-14
1.85 . IO- l4
3.7.10-14
1.3.10-14
See Fig. 48.

L
973 ... 1075

938 ... 1048
7.7.10-14
3.6 . IO-l3
1.0.10-l*
1.1 . lo-
1.65. lo-1
1.3. 10-l
See Fig. 50a.
4.3.10-16
3.7.10-15
2.7. lo-l6
2.2.10-15
See Fig. 51.
See Fig. 49.

See Fig. 50b.
-
See Fig. 49.

See Fig. 50 b.
-
701
714
731
780
818
845
979
453
483
453
483
523...623
199
78
2.4. lo-
1.0.10-14
2.2 10-14
1.6. IO-l4
3.0 . lo- l4
2.9. IO-*
473
573
673
723
673
723
Method C
Do not given.
Method A
Activation energies
for interdiffusion of
Cu,Sn and Cu,Sn,
given in reference.
51
70F
75L
(continued)
i ,
Composition
at.%
DO
10s4 m2sw1 kJmol-

CU
Sn (continued)
34***38wt.%
Cu,Sn
Cu,Sn,
62~~~lOOwt.% 00.07
2.10-2
40.--bowt.%
90
87
156
Dl
D2
m2s-
m2sv1
m2s-*
2.4. lo-
1.0 * lo-t4
2.4. IO-l4
5.1 * lo- l4
9.0 * lo- l6
3.5 * lo- *s
1.2 * lo- *z
3.8. lo-l2
3.0 * 10-l
7.5 * 10-15
3.0.10-1s
4.0.10-5
3.1 . 10-1s
3.0.10-13
2.0 * 10-12
5.2. IO-*
2.0. IO-
3.4.10-1s
4.0.10-5
-
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
473
573
673
723
473
573
673
723
473.0.723
473
573
673
723
473
573
673
473... 673
473
573
673
723
lOOO*.*1100
Method A
Method A
7501
7502
Fig.
Ref.
75L
. 1013.3Ns.
(IV,,: atomic
fraction Sn)
1.43 * 10-4
70
1.55. 1O-4
65
E
rl
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.6
0.295
0.240
0.313
0.265
0.666
1.02
-
177
173
173
169
174
175
-
463e.0493
Method C
9.3 * 10-14
973...1101
Method A
6.1 . lo-l4
973 ... 1057

1089
80H
0.9
14.5(P)
9.11
134
1.25 . lo- I4
3.7 * 10-14
4.1 .10-4
1.35.10-14
4.9.10-14
6.5 . IO- l4
1.5. 10-14
5.2. IO-I4
5.5 . lo- I4
2.1 . 10-14
Docu =
2.58. 1O-4
tmQcu = 103
See Fig. 52.
1.10-5
3.10-15
0.693
0.934
1.41
1.92
196
199
204
208
7.1 . 10-14
3.7.10-12
9.1 . 10-13
See Fig. 53.
See Figs.
54a... c.
4.7.10-12
1.2.10-12
See Figs.
54a...c.
1.0.10-13
6.3 +IO-I2
See Figs.
54a...c.
2.6
3.1
4.9
Cu,Sn
(E)
Cu,Sn
6-l)
Ti
ZO
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cu
Zn
P
Y
E
cf.
1.4
1.7
Cu
84
2...28
28
1
5
10
16
20
25
28
5.6. IO-
6.2. IO-
8.3 . lo-
9.5. 10-2
9.0. 10-2
3.1 . 10-2
1.6. 1O-2
167
167
165
158
152
136
124
2.4 . IO- I4
1.0~10-13
1.1 . lo-3
2.9 . lo-l4
1.2.10-13
1.5. 10-13
4.3 . lo- I4
1.8. IO-I3
2.0.10-13
6.5 . IO-I4
Dzn =
3.05. 1O-3
Qsn = 144
-
1014
1089
1014
1089
1014
1089
1101
1014
874. . . 993
Method A
52
8OYl
493
Method C
Non-parabolic growth,
possible grain
boundary diffusion
dominated.
84C
Method A
7713
668
1 =Cu,2=Zn
Method C
53Hl
1163
Method A
53
54B
1053 ... 1188
Method A
54a
. ..c
55H2
973 ... 1283
997... 1188
(continued)
Composition
at.%
CU
u
g (disordered)
Y
S (disordered)
P (ordered)
Zn
10
15
20
DO
Dl
D2
10m4m2s-
kJmol-
m2s-
m2s-
m2s-
170
170
170
D!?"= 0.81
D& = 2.1
Qcu = 178
-
Q& = 178
1.4.10-12
1.5. lo-
6.7 . lo- l2
1.1 * lo-0
4.6 . IO- lo
1.8 . IO- lo
-
648
753.e.983
SeeFig. 58.
(continued)
0.13
0.21
0.36
28
1.7
172
4.4..-48
1.8.e.
1.3. 10-2
2.45. lO-2
2.44.10-2
1.71 * 10-2
2.45. lO-2
l.14.10-2
0.99.10-2
0.62. lO-2
0.19.10-2
0.28. lO-2
-
83 . . .76
98
95
91
91
84
80
74
65
64
-
See Fig. 55a.
1.4.10-13
1.6. IO-l2
7.2 . lo- l3
9.5.10-12
8.1 . IO- *
2.1 . lo-
-
800.. 85(~) 48
6.9. 1O-2
78
See Fig. 55 b.
-
48
1.4. IO3
150
M...
47.5 (p)
SeeFig. 59. SeeFig. 57.
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
65.5
66.5
65.3
65.7
65.7
67.2
68.2
68.2
62*.*66(y)
SeeFig. 58.
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
973...1183
Method E
55R
773.e. 1073
Method A
56L
648 . . .923
Methods A and C
6lM2
698.0. 923
798-e. 923
648
748
698
798
923
848
648
Method A
55
ab
69U
56
71Ul
591 .*a720
Method A
Seefigure for b
dependence at 877 K.
734-e. 924
Method A
57.e. 75F
59
41.5...
See Fig. 59. See Fig. 57.
See Fig. 58.
See Fig. 58.
602...718
523...673
Method A
60
76F
748.e.827
Method C
61,
76s
48.5 (P)
79 ... 86(E)
45 . ..49(P)
55...
66.5 (Y)
6
0.9
See Fig. 60.

See Fig. 61.
See Fig. 62.
2.5. IO-
3.0.10-12
4.6. 10-l
x1.0~10-0
9.7 . lo- l4
1.1 . 10-13
1.2. lo-3
1.2.10-13
1.4.10-13
1.4.10-13
-
4.10-14
9.10-14
2.3
3.2
3.5
4.6
4.7
5
9
15
0.412
0.285
0.614
196
182
184
X0
0.966
201
1.10
200
1.14
198
1.15
196
1.13
194
10
1.02
191
;: : :;I::
; : g:::
-
9.6. IO-l4
1.1 . 10-13
1.2.10-13
1.2.10-1:
1.4.10-13
1.4.10-13
-
0;" =
62
748
768
827
842
1168
1105... 1213
966... 1183
82H
Method A
Data at pressures up to
3 GPa also given in reference.
Method A
84T
Method A
0 = 8.9. IO-l4
* exp(8.9AJz,)m2s-
@L : mole fraction Zn)
87s
11.3.10-5
Qz,, = 203
DoZn =
15.3.10-S
Qz,, = 203
Do
Zn=
19.0.10-5
I c+ I 203
Z
20.2. 1o-5
i Qz,, = 201
DoZn =
22.1 * 1o-5
i Qz,, = 200
D;, =
21.8. 1O-5
Qz,, = 198
(continued)
Composition
at.%
CU
Fe
Y
Y
CL
CL
Zn
DO
D,
D2
10e4 m2s-
kJmol-
m2s-
m2s-r
(continued)
Method/Remarks
m2s-l
Temperature
range
K
D,o,=
966.a. 1183
Method A
12
0.957
188
14
0.920
186
16
0.671
181
12.6. lO-5
i Qzm= 185
18
0.518
176
20
0.346
170
22
24
26
28
30
0.228
0.14
0.0796
0.0366
0.0128
164
157
150
140
128
4 + 0.02
wt. %C
14 + 0.02
wt. %C
0.57
276
0.54
273
xo***o.59
1.9.e. 3.6
In solid
solution
5
10
15
20
6.8 * 10-2
3.467
IO
246
241
250
1423 ..a 1533

1203...1533
1063 a.*1458
5.95
3.04
3.37
2.89
314
303
305
301
1363.v.1523
Mn
Fig.
Ref.
87s
17.3 * 10-s
Qzn = 193
0;" =
14.0~10-~
I Qzn = 189
0;. =
0;. =
10.1.10-S
1323 ..a 1723
1 =Fe,2=Mn
Method A
An empirical eqn. for d
is given in reference.
Further d data at 1.25wt.% C
and also at 1473K are given.
Method B
4lWl
45H
Method C
69P
Method A
70Tl
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
38
41.2
38.0
36.4
5
10
15
20
25
30
24
2.83
2.53
3.12
2.44
2.17
1.96
2.04
7.2.10-
1.75.10-Z
0.3
0.163
7.2. 1O-2
0.12
-
297
295
299
294
291
286
289
-
251
264
270
262
249
251
-
9.07. lo-5
3.36. lo-l5
5.29.10-16
3.48. IO-l6
-
D;, = 0.27
QFe= 269
Fe
CL
MO
0 **. 5.05
;0
95
95...97
2.5 (u)
4.1
5.0
5.7
7.5
8.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
&
R
CF
0.785
3.6
2.29
2.19
18.1
3.6
4.2
4.0
4.8
3.8
4.0
73.2
62.3
2.35 . lo2
226
240
238
236
256
257
260
262
263
268
270
336
346
380
6.03. IO-l5
3.52 +IO- l4
1.68 * 10-13
-
2.42 . IO- l4
8.04. IO-l5
1.55. lo-5
6.22. lo-l6
Do =
?.26. 1O-2
QMn = 241
1.78. lo-l4
9.24.10-14
3.87. lo-l3
1523
1443
1363
1283
1123 ... 1573
Method A
73N
948 ... 1758
l=Fe,2=Mo
Method B
74A
1373 ... 1573
Method A
74H
1073 *.. 1573
Methods A and C
B values extend to
15 at.% at 1300C in
ref. d for y phase
(estimated from growth
rate of E) given in
reference.
77N2
1273 ... 1473
1373
1473
1573
1265e.. 1635
1515.e. 1673
1515 ... 1673
DO
Dl
D2
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-
m*s-
rn*s-l
m*s-
Temperature
range
K
Ni
o*** loo
1423-e. 1583
10
5.3
8.9
15.0
24.5
41.5
58.5
38.5
44.5
49.5
-
See Fig. 65. See Figs. 63,

64.
2.9. lo-*
2.75 . lo- l6
318
317
316
316
316
316
306
308
312
-
973
1073
1273-a. 1561
1.1 .10-5
2.5.10-l
4.6. lo-l5
-
0.25. lo-l5
1.2 * 10-15
6.7. IO-
-
1373
DFe=
Dii =
QNL=
Composition
at.%
Fe
u
Y
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
12
37
76
O***lOO
See Fig. 66.
1409...1629
Fig.
Ref.
53H
Method A
63...
65
-
Method A
66
67B1,
6984
Method/Remarks
1 = Fe, 2 = Ni
Method A
65G
1.6. 1O-4
304
5*.*95
See Fig. 67.
3.6. 1O-4
QFc = 274
-
1373.e. 1578
Method A
67
67B2
O.-e loo
See Fig. 68.
See Fig. 68.
See Fig. 68.
1473
Method A
5.0 * 10-15
7.8. IO-l5
1.2 * 10-14
1.8 . lo- l4
2.6 - lo- l4
3.6 - lo- l4
4.6 + lo- l4
4.8. lo-l4
4.2. lo-l4
1.0. 10-14
1.9. 10-14
2.8 . lo- l4
3.8. IO-l4
4.8. IO-l4
5.6. IO-l4
6.2. lo-l4
5.6. lo- l4
4.4.10-14
3.0 * 10-15
3.6. 10-l
4.2.10-
5.2. 10-l
6.2.10-
8.0.10-
9.6 . IO- l5
1.2 * lo- l4
1.6. IO-l4
1473
Method A
68
-
67L4
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0.32
70K3
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 ... 100
0.2
0.15
0.26
0.30
0.38
0.41
0.56
0.71
0.63
See Fig. 69.
264
263
262
258
256
254
254
255
254
923 ... 1223
Method A
69
74B3
IO...90
wt. %
7.5 wt.%
7.5 wt.%
12.5 wt.%
12.5 wt.%
See Fig. 70.
1223 ... 1373
Method A
70
84G
2.7. 10-l
4.4.10-19
3.6. 10-l
2.3. IO-
86D
1184
1124
1075
1030
Method B
83N
1.6. IO-
1.2.10-21
4.0.10-22
9.0.10-16
1.5.10-16
1.1 . 10-18
3.3 . 10-20
6.8.10-21
1.1 . 10-21
Method B
(Reference [83N] is closely
related to [86D])
Method B
978
923
883
1126
paramagnetic
1078 >
978
927
ferromagnetic
877
827
17.5 wt.%
22.5 wt.%
27.5 wt.%
0.5 wt.%
0.5 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
1.0 wt.%
978 .-. 1699
Method A
908 ... 1699
86D
5.2 Chemical diffusion in inhomogeneous binary alloys (Tables)
Murch, Bruff
[Ref. p. 366
Iandolt-Btimsrcin
New Series III./26
Fe
Y
Si
O...lwt.%
3 wt.%
5 wt.%
8.5 wt.%
4
5
8
18
17
17
35
249
247
249
4.10-0
1.7.10-g
2.67 .
;;I::
7.87 .
2.66 . 10-12
-
1.8
209
7 ... 21
See Fig. 71. -
18
u
CL
Fe
0 . . .4.7
+ 1.8%
V to stabilize u
phase
8.35
8.69
9.04
9.38
9.73
10.07
10.41
SIR
xl wt.%
3 wt. % . . .
solubility limit
- e.g.
17 wt.%
at 1123K
_
-
0;. =
Dzi = 2.2
5.6. 1O-4
QFe = 226
-
Qsi = 209
-
0;. =
D,91
=
2.2. 10-4
Qsi = 209
-
I
-
l=Fe,2=Si
Method B
52B
Method C
53F
1073 ... 1673
Method A
67V
1423 ... 1473
Method C
67M
1403 ... 1493
Method A
71
680
1173...1673
Method A
70B
1479
1566
1423
0.735.(1 +
12.4X,,)
(Xsi: atom
fraction Si)
219
5.6. 1O-4
QFe = 226
-
1403 ... 1493
1.82
1.87
1.77
1.62
1.52
1.55
1.66
215
214
213
212
211
211
211
1173 ... 1373
Method A
72M
12.9. 10
3.16. IO6
1.59. 106
345
356
356
1003...1173
1003~~-1113
1113...1173
Method A
73T
(continued)
Composition
at.%
Fe
CL
Y
c?
Fe
ci
Y
Y
CL
Dl
D2
10-4m2s-1
kJmol-*
m2s-
.
m2s-
Sn (continued)
0...80
wt. % Sn
FeSn,
81...100
wt. % Sn
0...9
-
0.3 ..+ 1.6

wt. %
Y
Fe
DO
-Ill
Th,Fe,
Ti
0.7 * ** 3.0
o.e.o.7
2
85
90
95
0 *. .0.4
wt. %
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
3.0 * lo-l9
473
Method A
75L
1.0 * 10-16
9.3 * 10-16
1.2 * 10-16
2.1 * 10-16
1.9 * 10-14
9.1 * 10-14
2.4. 10-l
2.0 * 10-l
573
673
723
473
573
673
723
473
Method A
81Y
Method E
72
-
Method B
86Sl
0.931
5.04.10-5
0.8
221
136
160
4.4*10-7
6.2 . lo- l6
3.6 . lo- *
See Fig. 72.
-
2.32
185
1235-e. 1473
1.34.102
207
823 ... 1073
Method C
7834
3.15
0.15
68
3.6
0.77
0.6
8.5. IO
247
250
260
213
192
188
377
1348-a. 1498
Method A
59M2
973.e.1573
973-e. 1323
973-e-1573
1173.e. 1573
1423 a.. 1573
Method A
68H3
Method B
6882
2.89 . IO2
274
1123...1323
Method C
79
-
573
673
723
473e.o 723
1073*** 1373
1183... 1680
1273-e. 1580
1033... 1235
81A
76T
222
252
217
4.41 .10-Z
2.08
3.23
Fe
O**.solubility
limit
U
y
1.3
133
1063 ... 1273
Method C
60M
Fe
u
V
0.7
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
In solid
solution
0.61
3.9
1.1
0.7
0.71
0.63
0.59
3.4
266
237
223
219
220
220
221
221
1223 ... 1523
Method A
Atmospheric pressure
data only.
Reference contains data
up to 40 k bar pressure
for the y phase.
65Hl
973 ... 1273
Method C
7886
11.52
592
2473 ... 3073
Method F
45v
1.6
0.13
244
268
948 ... 1758
Method B
74A
5.2. IO-l6
6.1 . IO- l6
1.14.10-5
1.44.10-15
6.78. IO-
6.0 . IO- l6
7.9 . lo- l6
1.41 .10-5
1.75.10-15
8.39. IO-
-
1273
1289
1322
1333
1425
1273... 1425
1273
1289
1322
1333
1425
1273 ... 1425
Method A
Fe,Ti
FeTi
Fe
0...0.026
wt. %
ct
Y
Fe
Y
Zll
0...2.9
1
2
257
-
260
73B3
(continued)
L
Composition
at.%
Fe
CL
6.8.e.9.9
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
II.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
21.5...22.5
31 ... 32
Ga
3.o.s.7.9
0.48 . . 2.6
0.73 - *.
1.97wt. %
Zn
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
1223
1282
1333
1368
1424
1223.m.1425
513...593
513***595
741 .a. 798
Method A
623 .+. 790
DO
Dl
D2
IOm4rn*s-l
kJmol-t
m*s-
m*s-*
m*s-
226
75
75
64
72
80
79
80
78
74
75
75
78
80
92
5.7 . IO- l4
1.4. 10-13
3.82 . IO-
5.81 . lo-*
1.37 * lo-*
-
156
55
138
(continued)
4.25 . IO-
3.99 * 10-3
2.97 * 10-3
7.88. 1O-3
1.39. lo-*
5.53.10-3
2.82. IO-
1.02. 1O-3
5.81 . 1O-4
6.98. 1O-4
1.26. 1O-3
8.21 . 1O-3
2.04. 1O-4
1.05.10-J
I.3
5.3 * 10-4
9.8. lo-*
833.e.913
673 ..a 807
Fig.
Ref.
73B3
Method C
Method C
Method A
7303
7301
77WI
Method B
Method A
Method A
68E
7lH2
67R
Ref. p. 3661
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
8
29
r.k
8
VI
5.2 Chemical diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys (Tables)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
G8:
l I lItihlc.4
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IIIIIIIIIl
Murch, Bruff
319
Composition
at.%
In
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
m2s-*
Temperature
range
K
388.e.446
Method A
76
76Cl
388.e.446
DO
D,
D2
low4 m*s-
kJmol-
m2s-*
m2s-
2.9. 1O-3
57
Pb
Dp. =
41
x20*.*50
1.1.10-6
t Q,. = 61
SeeFig. 76.
-
2.2. 10-2
102
813.e.871
Method C
66L
La
In solid
solution
Mg
La
In solid
solution
O*..solubility
limit
U
y
117
233
1123.a.1363
Method C
59A
118
233
1123...1363
Method C
64T
Li
34*** 50
Mg
SeeFig. 77.
768...800
Method D
77
84L
Li
Li,Sb
Sb
-
x 19 **a29 SeeFig. 78.
633...900
Method D
78
77W2
Li
X0
Si
2.5. 10-s
63.2
1073 ... 1623
Method F
6OP2
Li
!ZO
W
5.0
174
1365 a.. 1500
Method B
Li concentration not
given but probably small.
63L
Mg
O...l
Ni
0.44
234
1323s.. 1573
Method B
57s
Mg
PU
0.01
0.562
1.124
1.686
Mg
Mn
0 ... 4
U
0.025
2.45. IO-
1.05.10-2
3.6. 1O-4
119
118
94
6.1 . 10-l
2.5. lo-l4
1.3~10-13
-
1.2.10-1s
3.3 . 10-15
7.5
281
693
748
807
693...807
Method A
63C, 65C
673
773
Method A
63C
1376... 1570
l=Mn,2=Ni
Method B
56s
1073 ... 1323

1173
1223
1273
1323
Method A
79
79Yl
Method A
60G
65H2
Ni
See Fig. 79. -
4.62 . IO- l5
10.4.10-5
32.4.10-l
66.3. IO-
1.4 . 10-15
4.83. lo-l5
12.2 * 10-15
27.5. IO-
1 .10-3
147
1103...1463
1 . IO3
1 . IO3
1 .I03
553
573
578
2073 ... 2436
X0
DoMO=
9.2. 10-z
QMo= 549
19.9
5...25
19.7
Mn
8
Ti
P
MO
WO
50
~100
Nb
16.2
~100
DoMO=
1.4. 10-l
1 QMo= 571
DoMa=
1.1 . 10-l
i QMo= 563
D;, =
4.0 . 10-4
QM,,= 481
l=Mo,2=Nb
Method A
Values of Do and Q
taken from smoothed
curves given in reference.
Dib = 1.3
QNb = 586
DR = 1.9 . 10-l
QNb = 548
D&, = 1.0 . 10-l
QN,, = 582
(continued)
Composition
at.%
MO
20
40
60
80
20 . . .80
10
Nb
DO
D,
low4 rns-
kJmol-
m2sTt
m2s-
m2s-
429
413
411
345
399
-
8.75. IO-r6
1.67. lo-l6
SeeFig. 80.
SeeFig. 81.
SeeFig. 82.
(continued)
13.5
3.8
2.1
5.2 * 10-2
1.5
-
90
IO...80
x10***90
See remarks
x10..*90
MO
0 . . .0.93
0-m.13.5
wt. %
5
15
Ni
MO
OS
lo... 100 vol. %
MO
Pd
61
66
71
75
80
85
3.0
0.853
288
270
1.56
0.97
283
278
SeeFig. 83.
5.5 * 10-s
4.0 - 10-s
5.0 * 10-s
2.4. 1O-4
1.6. 1O-3
1.6. 1O-2
188
165
178
201
219
253
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1673-a-2648
Method A
66W
1573
Average of data given.

Method A
67P1,
67P2
1253
1373-e. 1773
1473...2173
Method A
Method A
Method A
Curved Arrhenius plots,
see reference.
80
81
82
69s
7ov
73B4
1423 ... 1673

1373...1573
Method B
Method B
1273 ... 1568
Method A
57s
63D1,
63D2
74H
2147...2450
Method A
83
73E
1273 ... 1873
1 =Mo,2=Pd
Method A
722
90
95
0.9
0.14
293
283
85
MO
MO
MO
MO
O...lO
solid
solution
range
0
10
20
30
40
DL = 1.5. 1O-6 Dgd = 1.2 . 1O-7

QMo= 260
QPd = 193
Pt
u
P
E
rl
Y
8.0. lo-l6
1.63. IO-
3.59.10-15
6.27. IO-l5
1.05.10-4
1773
Method C
77M
Re
0 ... 100
See Fig. 84.
1773
Method A
84
77M
Ta
Ta rich
MO rich
4.68. IO-
4.16. IO-
251
234
2173...2573
Method A
701
Ti
p
CL
1.23. 1O-4
3.42. IO-*
139
119
1173 ... 1973

873 ..+ 1073
l=Mo,2=Ti
Method B
62E
w2.10-2
x2.10-2
z2.10-2
w9.10-2
z 10-2
197
209
218
264
255
1483 ... 1873
Method A
Further data for Do
and Q are given in
reference but the scatter
is large.
65H2
1173
1773
1623
1373 ... 1673
Method A
85
86
87
-
69F
tzlO0
11.1
X0
20...50
30...50
30...50
1.64. 1O-4
0 ... x 40
D;,=40
QMo= 481
Dii =6.3. 1O-3

QTi = 211
Die = 1.0. 1O-2 D$ = 1.8 . 1O-3

QMo= 204
QTi = 161
205
See Fig. 85.

See Fig. 86.
See Fig. 87.
-
D;, = 2.5.10-2
QMo= 197
- -
Method B
73s
Composition
at.%
MO
2
4
6
U
Y
8
IO
I2
I6
20
24
26
MO
DO
10m4m2s-
kJmol-
2.2
0.58
20
I6
28
3.2
9.6. IO-2
3-10-3
4.5.10-4
2.1 . Io-4
IO wt.%
20 wt.%
30 wt.%
40 wt.%
50 wt.%
60 wt.%
70 wt.%
80 wt.%
90 wt.%
IO wt.%
20 wt.%
30 wt.%
40 wt.%
50 wt.%
60 wt.%
70 wt.%
80 wt.%
90 wt.%
4.48
2.41
0.64
0.48
0.30
0.17
0.14
8.0. IO-2
5.0.10-2
0.52
0.24
5.6. IO-2
1.1 * 10-3
3.8 . 1O-3
7.5 * 10-3
4.0 * to-3
1.7 * 10-4
4.6. IO-4
3.4. lo-l3
1.4.10-'2
1.6. IO-l2
3.4.10-12
-
1123...1323
Method A
2273...2773
Method A
71N
1973.e.2673
Method A
Polycrystalline data given
here.
Single crystal data also given
in reference.
76KI
m2s-
m2s-
m2s-
199
192
222
230
238
219
191
165
162
142
5.2. lo-l4
2.1 . 10-13
491
481
459
458
451
441
438
430
422
448
425
405
394
382
372
386
355
344
Ref.
Method/Remarks
02
Fig.
Temperature
range
K
D,
58Al
1123
1223
1123...1323
1273
1123...1323
1323
1123...1323
MO
Zr
O...lO
Mo,Zr
Nb
449
233
3.3. 10-8
3.0. 10-5
71
163
Pd
Nb
2.2. 10-z
Ta
10
90
x10...90
10
20
25
35
40
45
55
60
65
70
75
90
!O wt. %
65H2
1173...1303
Method C
75Ml
See Fig. 88.

See Fig. 88.
See Fig. 88.
88
71U2
1473
1473
1473
Method A
232
1573 ... 1623
Method C
71Rl
1.58. IO-l7
2.76 .+,-Is
1573
Method A
67P1,
67P2
See Fig. 89.

-
1573...2073
Method A
2273 ... 2653
Method A
89
-
7ov
1673
1773
1873
1973
2073
2173
1673...2173
Method A
Values of d and Q extrapolated to 0 and
100 wt.% Nb are given
in reference.
74W2
Sn
Nb,Sn
Xb
1923...2108
1098... 1718
Method B and C
;d,Nb
P
1.1 . 10-z
1.34.1o-2
1.0. 10-z
9.3. 10-3
1.0. 10-2
1.56. lo-
1.26. 1O-2
2.0. 10-z
3.16. IO-
4.4. 10-z
5.6. lo-
1.24. IO-
Ni
NbNi,
NbNi
Nb
1.6
1 .10-3
343
352
343
347
352
360
364
373
385
394
398
414
293
6.0. lo-l6
1.77.10-15
1.6 . IO-l4
4.3.10-14
7.7.10-14
1.8. IO-l3
-
74s
(continued)
Composition
at.%
Nb
40 wt.%
60 wt.%
80 wt. %
Nb
DO
Dl
D2
10T4 m2sm1
kJmol-
m2sS1
m2s-
7.6. lo-l6
2.3.10-"
2.3. IO-l4
6.1 . IO-l4
1.12 * lo-3
2.8. IO-l3
9.4*10-'6
3.1 . 10-15
3.1 . 10-14
8.7. lo-l4
1.63 . IO- l3
4.2. IO-l3
313
1
-
322
l.18~IO-15
4.1*10-'5
4.4.10-14
I.25 -10-13
2.4. IO-l3
6.2.10-13
-
Ta (continued)
-
308
1
-
Method/Remarks
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
1673
1773
1873
1973
2073
2173
1673...2173
1673
1773
1873
1973
2073
2173
1673...2173
1673
1773
1873
1973
2073
2173
1673...2173
Method A
Ti
Ref.
74W2
74W2
1 =Nb,2=Ti
D;, =
X0
2.5 -10-j
293
20
40
60
80
2.5.10-3
3.2. lo-
3.8. lo-
3.8. 1O-3
263
239
209
184
Xl00
Fig.
3.8. lo-
167
3.8. IO-
QNb = 164
-
Dsf = 5.0. IO-'

Qr,= 259
1273.a.1863
Method A
Values here taken from
smoothed plots given
in reference.
65H2
DoNb =
81.1
-
3.48 . 10-15
3.9.10-14
See Fig.
See Fig.
See Fig.
See Fig.
~0~~~100
See Fig. 92.
IO...90
See Fig. 93. -
10
90
lo...60
IO..*70
40..*90
x10...90
Nb
U(Y)
2
12
18
22
28
38
46
54
62
68
74
78
82
93
2.8 . IO
2.3 . IO
9.6. lo6
9.1 . 10-z
0.113
0.149
6.4. lo-
0.45
0.84
1.94
0.82
1.16
1.19 * 10-4
1.63. 1O-4
623
604
586
308
305
305
285
293
287
292
253
252
140
126
97
2.31 . 1O-4
125
85.
90.
87.
91.
2.2. 10-7
QN,, = 177
-
-!
Dii = 1.7. IO-
( QTi = 164
D;, =
7.1 . 10-7
Qm= 39
0; =
3.82. lo-
Qu = 30
1573
Method A
1173
1273
1623
1373 ... 1573
Method A
Method A
85
90
87
91
1273 ... 1473
Method B
92
71P
1273 ... 1673
Method A
93
75u
63P
1773 ... 1923
1673 ... 1873

1573 ...
1423 ...
1423 ...
1348 ...
1773
1673
1663
1573
1223 ... 1448

1165s.. 1398
966... 1298
l=Nb,2=U
Method A
Further data are available in the reference.
67P1,
67P2
69F
7ov
Composition
at.%
Nh
DO
D,
D2
10v4 ms-
kJmol-
m2s-
m2sS1
m2s-
--
X0
1.6. IO-*
410
20
40
60
1.95 * 10-2
2.3. 1O-2
2.8. IO-
343
293
268
80
3.3 * 10-2
264
85
DE, =
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1 =Nb,2=V
D;=
2.9. 1O-4
( Qv = 405
-
1678.a.2023
Method A
Values have been taken
from smoothed plots
given in references.
65R,
65H2
67P1,
67P2
D;=
I
4.9 * 10-6
QNb = 278
4.2 - IO+
QV = 253
D;=
2.6. 10-j
QV = 247
DE, =
100
1573
Method A
10
90
1.4.10-15
2.3. IO-l4
xlO***90
See Fig. 94.
1573 a** 1773
Method A
94
7ov
See Fig. 95.
1473
Method A
95
7lU2
1.39 * 10-1s
1573
Method A
3.74 . lo- l9
See Fig. 96.

-
1573e.02073
Method A
2273 ... 2673
Method A
o*.-90
Nb
8.6. 10-6
QNb = 275
-
W
10
90
xlo*~*90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
81.45
22.2
1.97
1.4. 10-2
7.4. 10-J
3.0. to-3
1.8. IO-
1.0 * 10-3
6.0. lO-4
440
419
376
280
272
255
247
236
228
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
wt.%
---
67P1,
67P2
96
-
7ov
71N
Nb
X0
197
4.0. 10-z
209
23
40
60
80
0.1
0.3
2.0
255
301
347
10.0
10
90
~10~~~90
x5...85
Ni
20
30
40
50
1.74.10-15
2.5. lo-l4
10
See Fig. 97.

0.68 .10-15
1.30.10-5
1.79.10-15
1.86.10-14
1.03~10-15
2.01 . 10-15
3.37.10-15
3.0. 10-14
1.52. IO-l5
3.54.10-15
7.39.10-15
7.04 . lo- l4
1.72. IO-l5
5.37.10-15
1.17.10-14
9.82. lo--l4
1.97.10-15
6.61 * 10-15
1.61 . IO-l4
1.58. IO-l3
1718.+.1963
Method A
1573
Method A
1373 ... 1573
Method A
97
7ov
1173...1973
Method A
98
73R
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
Method A
66B
65H2
D;, =
3.8 1O-7
Qzr = 185
-
389
See Fig. 98 b. See Fig. 98a.
Pd
l=Nb,2=Zr
DO
Nb =
1.1 . 10-6
QNb = 191
D;, =
2.2. 10-4
Qzr = 415
-
67P1,
67P2
(continued)
Composition
at.%
Ni
Pd
60
70
80
90
O...lOO
Ni
o-.- 14.9
Ni
Dl
D2
low4 m*s-*
kJmol-
m2s-
m2s-
1.40 * 10-15
5.42 . IO- I5
1.56 1IO-l4
1.31 * 10-13
0.84. IO-l5
3.06 . IO- l5
1.13.10-5
1.04.10-3
0.56 . IO- l5
1.90.10-s
5.58 . IO-
5.87 . IO- l4
o.s.lo-s
1.25.10-1s
2.30. IO- l5
3.50. lo-l4
SeeFig. 99.
68
-
180
-
SeeFig. 100.
1.5
258
4.5.10-14
4.8. IO-l4
5.0. lo-4
5.5 * lo-4
5.8. IO-l4
6.0. lo-l4
6.5 3IO- l4
7.0.10-4
(continued)
-
Pt
0.e. loo
Ni
DO
Si
o*** < 1
Sll
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Method/Remarks
m2sv1
Temperature
range
K
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1132
1223
1292
1423
1385
Method A
Method A
1316... 1674
1223 ... 1573
1393 .-. 1573

1373
Fig.
Ref.
66B
99
69B4
Method A
Method A
100
44K
67B2
Method B
57s
8211
1 =Ni,2=Sn
Method A
Data determined from
figure in reference.
Some intrinsic data also
given at 1373 K.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.8
1.5
2.2
4.5
259
257
255
251
253
251
250
-
1.9.10-14
2.2.10-14
1.8 . lo- l4
3.0 . IO- l4
2.6 . lo- 3
2.1
0.1
1.7. 10-5
0.9 . 10-z
231
307
250
134
334
2.5
2.3
2.3
1.9
2.5
2.4
2.3
Method A
841
1423 ... 1573
Method C
77P
823 ... 1073
Method C
7884
1377... 1555
Method B
56s
773 **. 1173
Method C
Phase growth data for TiN,
and Ti,Ni given in reference.
Method C
68H4
1223 ... 1423
;4.10-14
3.7. 10-14
4.2 . lo-l4
6.0. IO-l4
1373
1223 ... 1473
Ni
Ta,Ni
TaNi
TaNi,
TaNi,
TaNi,
Ta
Ni
Th
ThNi
1.6. IO-
74
Ti
0 . . .0.9
0.68
61
5.48. IO-
103
141
142
137
138
193
1123 ... 1273
Method C
180
222
130
803 ... 1003

803 ... 1003
803 ... 1003
Method C
Do is multiplied by 6,,
where 6, is the range of
solubility in the phase.
Ni
TiNi
6
50
51
52
P
TiNi
Ni
0 . . . solubility
limit
UY
U,Ni
U,Ni,
mi5
2.5 . lo2
s:e
marks
8.5 . IO2
7.4.10-3
1073 ... 1213

923 ... 1213
74B4
Composition
at.%
Ni
V
0.~. 14.8
wt. %
5*..95
25
33
60
65
In solid
solution
Ni
w
0.v. 1.5
O.-e14.6
wt. %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
m2s-
Temperature
range
K
1273...1573
Method B
1083 ... 1448

1343 ... 1448
1083 ... 1293
1223... 1448
1083...1163
1253 ..- 1448
1083 ... 1223
1253 ... 1448
1083 ... 1223
773 ... 1273
Method A
Method A
101
63D1,
63D2
78Kl
78K2
Method C
Limited data on d for
other VfNi phases given
in reference.
7836
1426-v. 1562
1273 ... 1573
Method B
Method B
1273-e. 1589
Method A
56s
63D1,
63D2
69Wl
DO
D,
D2
10v4 m2s-r
kJmol-
m2s-
m2s-
0.287
248
36
4.2. 1O-6
1.2 * 10-3
2.0 - 10-s
0.2
7.0 * 10-4
6.8 * 10-2
6.0. 1O-4
1.6. 1O-4
301
87
165
117
234
167
227
172
132
SeeFig. 101.
-
11.1
0.862
322
295
2.24
2.16
2.11
2.07
2.04
2.01
1.98
1.95
1.94
1.92
1.90
1.89
303
303
304
304
304
305
305
306
306
306
307
307
Ni
Zll
Is...95
1.05. IO3
180
.exp(-14.24X,,)
(XNi: mole fraction)
15
255
20
255
6
75
u
79
:6-.90(y) 243
P
55 . ..6O(B) 6
7.1 . 10-z
85
1.2. 10-l
91
Y,,,
3.0. 10-z
97
Y
l.e.40
Pb
Sn
1.82.10-
2.63. 10-l
1.35.10-14
2.29.10-14
1.0. 10-13
3.31 . 10-15
4.68. IO-l5
2.45 . lo- I4
4.16. lo-l4
1.86. IO-l3
I
SeeFig. 102a. SeeFig. 102b. SeeFig. 102~. SeeFig. 103.
1
-
In solid
solution (PI
u solid
7.0
solution
99
101
3.12. lo-l5
6.9. IO-l5
1.96. IO-l4
O...lO
SeeFig. 104.
882... 1281
Method A
69A
1169
1203
1266
1293
1373
1169... 1373
1169
1203
1266
1293
1373
1169...1373
700..*758
1203
790... 1073
883
1173...1273
1203
483...873
Method A
74B5
Method A and C
Do values not given.
77B3
102a
Method C
102c
7882
1073 -.. 1323
Method A
103
518...558
518
538
558
443...454
Method B
Do not reported.
32s
Method A
B increases with concentration. Equation for
Do(C) given in reference.
Method A
104
60C
523
102b
79Y2
87M2
DO
D,
D2
10s4 ms-
kJmol-
m2s-
m2sW1
m2s-
87
-
2.7. IO-
1.5. to-14
3.13.10-4
1.26 alo-
1.6.10-*
3.6. lO-4
1.6. 1O-6
6.4. 1O-4
132
45
129
84
145
Temperature
range
K
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
493.a.558
493
Method B
Do not reported.
32s
973 ... 1273

973...1173
Method A
Several intrinsic diffusion
coefficients given in
reference.
73L
SeeFig. 105.
1473
Method A
105
7lU2
SeeFig. 106.
1773
Method A
106
77M
9.4. 10-4
2.3. 1O-3
124
128
1173.0.1373
Method B
71L
Pu
U
0.35 wt.%
0.17.10-7
57
683.e.813
Method A
1.75wt.%
3.50wt.%
5.25wt.%
7.0 wt.%
8.75wt.%
10.50wt.%
12.25wt.%
14.0wt.%
15.75wt.%
17.15wt.%
0.14. IO-
0.15.10-7
0.18. IO-
0.28 . IO-
0.44.10-7
0.88.10-7
1.18. IO-
2.0. IO-
2.57. IO-
1.83. lo-
56
57
59
64
68
75
79
84
86
84
65D,
65C,
67D
Composition
at.%
Pb
TI
In solid
solution
(Iv
Pd
Ti
B
Y
6
E
rl
Pd
2..-98
Pt
Re
0-a. loo
Pll
2
15
Ti
B
538
558
Ref. p. 3661
I I I I I
Murch, Bruff
5.2 Chemical diffusion in homogeneous binary alloys (Tables)
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
Land&-Biimstein
New Series III/26
335
Composition
at.%
Rh
3
6o
Method/Remarks
Fig.
Ref.
1573+..2073
Method A
64R
1123...1323
Method C
60M
1073 *** 1313
Method C
64T
64
125
-
9.18 . IO- *
2.65 - 10-l
1277... 1523
1363-v. 1523
1523
1 =Sm,2=Ti
Method A
Between 1.0 and
8.0 at.% Sn,
d increases linearly.
60G
3.0. 10-4
92
873...1123
Method B
53R
6.9. 1O-4
153
1373 ... 1573
2.38
197
1073 ... 1273
Method C
59A,
64T
8.62. IO-
202
SeeFig. 85.
SeeFig. 90.
-
1173
1273
1373 ... 1673
Method A
85
90
-
69F
I3
Dl
10s4 ms-
kJmol-
ms-
m2s-
m*s-l
1.3. 10-6
1.5 * to-6
2.5.
3.1 . 10-6
243
175
182
174
20
188
4.08 . IO
229
8.4. IO-
2.7. 1O-4
-
CL
Zi( 1) E
Si
Gzo...
Temperature
range
K
DO
U
y
solubility limit
Sm
U
0 .. .
Y
solubility limit
Sn
1.0
8.0
2.0
Ti
B
Zr
Sn
In solid
CL
solution
0...3.9
p
Sr
U
y
zo*..
solubility limit
Ta
IO*** 35
IO.-* 55
Ti
0 ... z30
Method B
73s
Ta
W
10 wt.%
20 wt. %
30 wt. %
40 wt. %
50 wt. %
60 wt. %
70 wt. %
80 wt. %
90 wt. %
10
20...80
90
30
Ti
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
95
16.5
18.0
U
Y
Ti
V
2.0
3.5
Solid solution range
o... 10
7.0. 10-4
1.0. 10-4
1.22.10-5
6.08.10-6
3.34.10-6
1.66.10-6
1.5. 10-6
1.23. lO-j
2.2. 10-7
1.0
1.0
1.0
309
302
262
254
245
231
232
229
198
544
553
502
1.1 . 10-Z
1.4. 10-3
1.6. 1O-3
4.0. 10-3
9.5. 10-3
2.6. 1O-3
2.6. 1O-3
2.2. 10-3
1.1 . 10-3
4.6. 1O-4
-
153
138
146
161
176
165
165
157
142
126
-
6.0. 1O-3
-
166
1.25. IO-
173
2273 . . .2673
1 = Ta, 2 = W
Method A
71N
1573...2373
Method A
85R
6OAl
D;a =
1.8. 1O-4
QTa = 554
D;=
1.7. 10-S
Q, = 511
1223 ... 1348
5.8. IO-l3
1.2.10-13
2.9. IO-l3
4.1 . 10-13
2.2.10-12
4.7. lo-3
9.

Язык

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Описание:

Дата загрузки

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Описание:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys

Загружено:

Описание:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Похожие издания

LANDOLT-BORNSTEIN

Numerical Data and Functional Relationships

Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

Berlin Heidelberg New York

CIP-Kurztitelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibiiothek

Institut fur Metallforschung, Universitit Miinster, W-4400 Miinster,

Natuurkundig Laboratorium der Universiteit van Amsterdam,

1.1 Ficks laws, flux of particles, isotropic and anisotropic diffusion

1.2.1 Sandwich solution and thin layer solution

Combining (1.2) and (1.6) yields

1.2 Solutions of diffusion equations for constant diffusivity

1.2.1 Sandwich solution and thin layer solution

1.2.2 Constant surface concentration and semi-infinite sample

Fig. 1. Instantaneous source (Gaussian) diffusion profiles.

1.2.2 Constant surface concentration and semi-infinite sample

erfz = -?- 5 e-du

1.2.3 Diffusion in a membrane

1.2.3 Diffusion in a membrane

denotes the integral of the complementaryerror function.

Fig. 4. Concentration distributions in plane sheet membranes of thickness L.

1.2.4 Diffusion in a cylinder; 1.2.5 Diffusion in a sphere

1.2.4 Diffusion in a cylinder

1.2.5 Diffusion in a sphere

exp[- n*rr* Dt/R*]

1.3 Diff. eq. for cont.-dependent diffusivity;

Fig. 6. Concentration distribution at various times in a

1.4.1 Self-diff. coefficient

1.3 Diffusion equation for concentration-dependent diffusivity

1.4 The various diffusion coefficients

1.4.1 Self-diffusion coefficient

1.4.1 Self-diffusion coefficient

1.4.1.2 Homogeneous alloys

diffusion coefficient of speciesB in solvent A. B,, B, etc. are denoted as

1.4.2, 3, 4 Impurity, chemical, intrinsic diffusion coefficients

1.4.2 Impurity diffusion coefficient

1.4.3 Chemical diffusion coefficient

(1) Diffusion of interstitial solutes (e.g. hydrogen) in metals

1.4.4 Intrinsic diffusion coefficients

1.5.1 Direct interstitial mechanism

1.5 Atomistic mechanisms of diffusion

1.5.1 Direct interstitial mechanism

1.5.2,3,4 Direct exchange and ring, vacancy, divacancy mechanisms

Fig. 8. Illustration of various direct diffusion mechanismsin

1.5.2 Direct exchange and ring mechanisms

1.5.3 Vacancy mechanism

Fig. 9. Illustration of the vacancy mechanism according to

1.5.4 Divacancy mechanism

Fig. 10. Illustration of the divacancy mechanism: The

mechanism; 1.5.6 Interstitial-substitutional

1.6.1.1 Steady-state methods

1.6 Methods of measuring diffusion coefficients

1.6.1 Direct methods

1.6.1.1 Steady-state methods

from measurementsperformed on a plane sheet of thickness L (seeFig. 4a), or according to

1.6.1.2 Non-steady-state methods

1.6.1.2 Non-steady-state methods

1.6.1.2 Non-steady-state methods

exp[- nrr Dt/R*]