Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Geoderma Regional
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geodrs
Department of Plant Production, Federal University of Esprito Santo, 29500-000 Alegre, Esprito Santo, Brazil
Soil Science Department, Federal University of Viosa, Avenida P. H. Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 December 2014
Received in revised form 20 February 2015
Accepted 23 February 2015
Available online 4 March 2015
Keywords:
Soil health
Agroforestry
Land use
Soil carbon
PCA
Ferralsol
Oxisol
a b s t r a c t
Land cover change and implementation of different management practices can greatly affect the global carbon
(C) budget and soil quality. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of different management practices under representative agroforestry and full sun coffee systems on (i) soil organic matter and CO2C emissions
in dry and rainy seasons and (ii) to determine which management system of coffee is the most effective for improving soil quality in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. A plot of 300 m2, divided into three subplots of 100 m2 each,
was established in three sampling sites: an agroforestry coffee system (ACS), a full sun coffee system (FS) and a
native rainforest (NR) (chosen as reference site of soil conservation). Soil sampling was carried out at ve different depths (05, 520, 2040, 4060 and 60100 cm) for soil chemical and organic matter characterization in
each subplot. CO2C emissions, soil temperature, moisture and microbial biomass C were measured four times
in one year. The soil quality index (SQI) was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) to compare
soil quality classes among the selected sites. ACS tended to has the highest soil C content (19.8 g kg1) in the
05 cm soil layer. FS tended to has less C and nitrogen (N) stock values and elevated metabolic quotient. The
CO2C emissions at the ACS site decreased 1.93 Mg CO2C ha1 year1 when compared to the FS system. An
overall trend of lower labile C was recorded up to 40 cm depth in the FS system (36% less). The ACS provided continuous input of labile organic matter fractions to the soil by litterfall contributing to a continued incorporation of
soil C. The results indicated that CO2C emission, soil temperature, metabolic quotient, C/N ratio, labile and soluble C were the most important soil quality indicators, reecting the general biological properties of the soil.
Based on the SQI values, ACS is the most suitable management of coffee, since it preserves soil quality. Management strategies that guarantee a continued and diversied input of organic matter enable the following:
(i) increased C soil storages, (ii) the stabilization of the microbial biomass C, (iii) a reduction in C loss through
CO2C emissions and (iv) the best indices of soil quality. These are crucial targets in order to restore soil quality
in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome.
2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
The coffee plant crop is one of the main agricultural activities in
Brazil, generating income and employments to the Brazilian agriculture.
The crop is mainly produced by family smallholders, who keep the
farmer in the countryside and contribute to regional socio-economic development (Moo et al., 2009; Souza et al., 2010). Conversion from natural to agricultural systems, as coffee crop or other land use, has largely
contributed to the degradation of Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Most of
the smaller numerous remaining forest fragments are poorer in species
richness and have lower soil quality than larger and well-preserved
fragments, characterizing degraded ecosystems (Moo et al., 2009;
Gama-Rodrigues et al., 2010; Souza et al., 2012; Duarte et al., 2013).
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: andre.thz@gmail.com (A. Thomazini), esmjplia@gmail.com
(E.S. Mendona), irene@ufv.br (I.M. Cardoso), mlgarbin@gmail.com (M.L. Garbin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2015.02.003
2352-0094/ 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
16
2014). Surface soils (030 cm depth) store almost half of soil organic C
and up to three times of the above-ground C stored in a vegetation.
Moreover, they are vulnerable to losses as CO2C emissions due to climatic changes and land management practices (Powlson et al., 2011).
The total quantity of organic C in soils is approximately 1500 Pg (Lal,
2004), which is approximately two times the C content present in the
atmosphere (Lal, 2004). Changes in soil organic C will produce obvious
undesirable consequences on the current patterns of climate change.
Thus, the soil C pools may act as a source of atmospheric C (Davidson
and Janssens, 2006). However, with the adoption of sustainable land
management practices, agricultural ecosystems can potentially be a
sink of atmospheric C and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Lal,
2004; Davidson and Janssens, 2006; La Scala et al., 2009; Liebig et al.,
2013; Song et al., 2013). In this context, there has been increasing
concern in recent years about the consequences of tree planting in coffee plantations and the resulting effects on C sequestration and soil
quality.
Even though full sun is the dominant management system in the
Brazilian coffee agriculture, there has been an increase in the agroforest
and agroecological practices in the country (Souza et al., 2010). A more
diversied agricultural matrix using agroforestry, where native trees are
intercropped with coffee, has been regarded as one of the best options
for conservation, regeneration and reforestation of the Atlantic
Rainforest Biome (Moo et al., 2009; Souza et al., 2010, 2012; Duarte
et al., 2013). The organic material (above-and belowground litter) produced by trees in agroforestry systems protects the soil against erosion,
serves as food for soil organisms, improves soil structure, and contributes to nutrient cycling, thus increasing nutrient availability to plants
(Nair et al., 2009; Matos et al., 2011; Souza et al., 2012). Soil surfaces
covered by plant organisms and without soil disturbance result in a
gradual decomposition of organic material, which is maintained in the
soil for a long time (Pezarico et al., 2013).
The main chemical and biochemical processes related to soil CO2C
emissions are directly or indirectly related to soil temperature and
moisture, which might vary spatially and temporally in several ecosystems (La Scala et al., 2009; Cruvinel et al., 2011; Stockmann et al., 2013).
Therefore, soil CCO2 emissions are regulated by climatic conditions, especially soil temperature and soil moisture (Cruvinel et al., 2011).
Changes in soil management may affect numerous factors that are directly or indirectly related to temperature and moisture, modifying
the dynamics of soil CO2C emission (La Scala et al., 2009). These assessments are variable among tropical systems, once they are highly heterogeneous. These trends lead to changes on moisture, temperature,
nutrient and C cycling, directly affecting CO2C emissions. Analyzing
the changes on moisture and soil temperature and C storing will provide
insights that are necessary for making justiable recommendations
about the implementation of these systems and to assess soil quality
in the tropical zones.
Globally, about 10 million ha is occupied with coffee production systems (FAO, 2011). Therefore, their design and management may have
profound effects over land-based C ux and storage. The increase of
soil organic C pools is a key in order to mitigate and adapt strategies related to climatic changes. Two aspects are imperative in identifying effective strategies for land-based climate change mitigation under
possible future climate change scenarios: rstly, we need to identify
how different agricultural management practices or changes in landuse create soil organic C sinks (accumulating additional C); secondly,
how they act as C sources (emitting C) or maintain stocks at current
levels. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of different
management practices under representative agroforestry coffee system
(ACS) and full sun coffee system (FS) on (i) soil organic matter and CO2
C emissions in dry and rainy seasons and (ii) to determine which coffee
management system is the most effective for improving soil quality in
the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. It is hypothesized that (i) the transition
from FS to ACS reduces CO2C emissions to the atmosphere; (ii) ACS
increases carbon sink potential, leading to improved soil quality and
Fig. 1. Average monthly climatic data of the municipality of Alegre-ES during experiment
periods from January 2012 to January 2013.
Data from Incaper (Esprito Santo Institute for Research, Technical Assistance and Rural
Extension).
this, the farmer began to use chemical and mechanical mowing controls
of unwanted plants. In the last three years, only mechanical mowing has
been used. Coffee culture is spaced 2.5 2 m (between row and plants,
respectively). Fertilizations are made four times a year with the formulation 25-05-20 (NP2O5 and K2O), based on soil analysis, and liming
when it is necessary. The annual production is currently around 4060
bags of 60 kg/ha.
2.2. Soil sampling
Soil was sampled in March 2012. The soil sampling design was systematic using a sampling area divided into three experimental plots of
100 m2 each. All plots were located at elevations between 550 and
750 m. In each plot, disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were
taken at ve different depths (05, 520, 2040, 4060 and 60
100 cm). Five soil sub-samples were obtained per plot, and were then
composed into one sample. The sample areas are located in a western
exposure site and at the same watershed (downstream) for all soil management systems. Each soil sample was divided into two portions. One
part was air-dried on the same day of sampling and the other was stored
at 4 C until analysis. Soil samples were sieved through a 2-mm sieve to
remove larger pieces of root material and the stone fraction. Fresh soil
samples were used to determine moisture, microbial biomass C and soluble C. All soil samples were analyzed in the soil laboratory at the Federal University of Espirito Santo, Agriculture Science Center.
2.3. Soil chemical and physical characterization
In each site, samples were taken at A and B horizons for chemical and
physical characterization (Table 1). The pH was determined on a 1:5
soil:deionized water ratio; the potential acidity (H + Al) was extracted
with Ca(OAc)2 0.5 mol L1 buffered to pH 7.0, and quantied by titration with NaOH 0.0606 mol L1. Exchangeable Ca2+, Mg2+ and Al3+
were extracted with 1 mol L 1 KCl and P, Na and K were extracted
with Melich-1 (Embrapa, 1997). The element levels in the extracts
were determined by atomic absorption (Ca2+, Mg2+ and Al3+), ame
emission (Na+ and K+) and photocolorimetry (P). The effective cation
exchange capacity (CECE) was calculated by sum of cations (Ca2 +,
Mg2+, Na+ and K+) and total cation exchange capacity (CTCT) estimated by the sum of the CECE and potential acidity. The granulometric analysis was performed by the pipette method while bulk density (BD) was
performed by the volumetric ring method (Embrapa, 1997).
2.4. Soil organic matter
The samples collected at the ve different layers were analyzed to
total organic C (Toc), total nitrogen (Ton), labile C (Labc) and recalcitrant C (Rcalc). Total soil organic C was quantied by wet oxidation
with K2Cr2O7 0.167 mol L1 in the presence of sulfuric acid with external heating. Total N was quantied by sulfuric acid digestion followed
by Kjeldahl distillation. The fractions of soil organic C were estimated
17
Table 1
Chemical and physical characterization of the A and B horizons of soils under different management systems in southern Espirito Santo, Brazil.
Systems
pH
H2O
mg dm3
Na
Ca
Mg
Al
H + Al
SB
CECE
A-horizon
NR
ACS
FS
4.34
5.24
5.86
9.44
10.86
6.48
69.33
111.33
101.00
2.33
1.67
2.00
0.40
1.21
0.87
0.35
0.65
0.57
0.90
0.02
0.00
9.05
2.89
2.37
0.95
2.15
1.70
1.85
2.17
1.70
10.00
5.04
4.06
9.86
42.97
46.37
48.55
0.77
0.00
B-horizon
NR
ACS
FS
4.44
4.79
4.97
2.96
2.80
1.64
21.33
42.33
42.67
3.00
2.33
1.67
0.04
0.28
0.43
0.12
0.20
0.27
1.00
0.25
0.23
5.12
2.83
3.00
0.23
0.60
0.82
1.23
0.85
1.05
5.34
3.44
3.82
4.38
18.23
21.48
81.41
29.78
23.44
CECT
cmolc dm3
Sand
Silt
Clay
638.18
638.96
623.53
55.19
73.43
48.23
306.62
287.61
328.24
525.38
433.96
568.64
68.11
98.44
64.29
406.51
467.60
367.07
g kg1
NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system; pH: active acidity; P: phosphorus; K: potassium; Na: sodium; Ca: calcium; Mg: magnesium; Al: aluminum; H + Al: potential acidity; SB: sum of bases; t: effective cation exchange capacity; T: total cation exchange capacity; S: saturation of bases; m: aluminum saturation.
18
Xn
i1
WiSi;
19
Fig. 2. Mean values of total organic C (a), total N (b), C/N ratio (c), labile C (d), recalcitrant C (e) and bulk density (f) in different soil management systems and for different layers. Horizontal bars represent the standard error. NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system.
(0.17 m3 m3) and ACS (0.15 m3 m3) than in FS (0.12 m3 m3). The annual
microbial biomass C was observed to be higher in NR (232.71 mg kg1)
and ACS (189.22 mg kg1) than in FS (128.69 mg kg1), and similar
trends were also observed in case of soluble carbon. A trend of higher
metabolic quotient indicates that FS has a major level of disturbance
and energy demand (Fig. 5d) compared to the other soil management
systems for all study periods. Relationship between microbial biomass
C and total organic C (microbial quotient) is leaning to be higher in FS
(1.85%) than in ACS (0.95).
Table 2
Mean values of carbon and nitrogen stocks (C and N stocks) in Mg ha1 at 0100 cm layer
and probabilities after randomization tests comparing orthogonal contrasts among different soil management systems.
C stock
N stock
NR
ACS
FS
125.21
12.82
103.93
10.30
78.61
7.26
NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system.
20
Fig. 3. Mean values of CO2C emissions (a) and soil temperature (b) in different soil management systems. Vertical bars represent the standard error. NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system.
Fig. 6 shows the SQI and the specic contribution of each indicator
towards the SQI for the different management systems. Overall, scored
values for all indicators were observed to be higher under NR and ACS
than in FS (SQI values 0.5, 0.48 and 0.31, respectively). Considering
the specic contribution of each score generated, the CO2C emission,
soil temperature and metabolic quotient had a signicant contribution
in the SQI for all selected sites (16, 27 and 32% in average, respectively).
Metabolic quotient had signicant contributions in the SQI (45.6%).
4. Discussion
Land management practices inuence the quantity, quality and distribution of soil organic carbon in agricultural systems (Pezarico et al.,
2013). The trend of total organic C near-surface in NR and ACS when
compared to FS is due to the continuous input of organic material provided by litterfall. The results show that ACS tends to increase C and N
stocks as compared to FS. Aboveground C in ACS ranged from 0.29 to
15.21 Mg ha 1 year 1 and from 30 to 300 Mg C ha 1 up to 1 m
depth in the soil (Nair et al., 2010). Soto-Pinto et al. (2010) reported signicant C accumulation in agroforestry coffee systems (50 Mg C ha1 in
average) in Mexico. The amount of biomass input and species diversity
in ACS is comparable to natural ecosystems, with higher potential to
storage of C and N than FS (Matos et al., 2011).
The results indicate that the dry season, with low moisture (Fig. 5a)
and soil temperature (Fig. 3b), decreases the rates of microbial biomass
activity (Fig. 5b). This pattern is more pronounced in the FS system. The
end of dry season and the beginning of rainy season (in October) promoted increases in soil temperature and moisture, contributing to increased CO2C emissions (Fig. 3a and b) as well as microorganism
activity in the soil (Fig. 5b). Liebig et al. (2013) reported that summer
months were characterized by signicantly higher CO2C emissions
(15.26 Mg CO2C ha1 year1), parallel to higher soil temperatures,
while spring and fall were similar (4.856.93 Mg CO2C ha1 year1).
It was observed that ACS reduced CO2C emissions in 1.93 Mg CO2
Table 3
Parameters of the model between CO2C emissions and soil temperature for and Q10 factor for the different soil management systems.
Management
systems
NR
ACS
FS
Fig. 4. Linear relationship related to log(CO2C) emissions and soil temperature, for native
rainforest (NR); agroforestry coffee system (ACS) and full sun coffee system (FS). n = 72.
R2
Q10
1.946 0.489
1.937 0.601
1.466 0.609
0.124 0.023
0.117 0.027
0.093 0.023
0.546
0.445
0.390
0.381
0.911
0.717
3.456 0.171
3.222 0.194
2.522 0.142
21
Fig. 5. Mean values of soil moisture (a), microbial biomass C (b), soluble C (c), metabolic quotient (d) and microbial quotient (e) in different soil management systems. Vertical bars represent the standard error. NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system.
ACS has higher capacity to decrease soil disturbance (greater aggregate stability), reduce soil temperature and increase water holding
capacity. Stable aggregates provide a physical protection of soil organic
matter and decrease the vulnerability to attack by microorganisms
in reduced tillage systems, consequently decreasing losses of C
(imansk, 2013; Thomazini et al., 2013). Due to organic material inputs
through litterfall and the mild climate provided by their canopies, agroforestry coffee systems create a higher soil moisture availability and
mild temperatures (Nair et al., 2008). The signicant positive correlation between soil CO2C emissions, moisture and temperature indicates
that organic matter decomposition processes are dependent on
water availability and soil temperature (Davidson and Janssens, 2006).
Liebig et al. (2013) reported that soil temperature was correlated with
CO2C emissions during the spring and fall, and with soil moisture
22
Table 4
Outcome of principal component analysis for the rst ve principal components (PC).
Principal components
Eigenvalue
Variability (%)
Cumulative %
Eigenvectors:
Total organic C
Total N
C/N ratio
Labile C
Recalcitrant C
C stock
N stock
CO2C emission
Soil temperature
Moisture
Microbial biomass C
Soluble C
Metabolic quotient
Microbial quotient
PC1
PC2
PC3
PC4
PC5
9.716a
69.401
69.401
2.403
17.166
86.567
1.155
8.248
94.815
0.448
3.197
98.012
0.238
1.701
99.713
0.285b
0.275
0.059
0.230
0.216
0.303
0.299
0.310
0.317
0.267
0.304
0.213
0.319
0.226
0.245
0.210
0.627c
0.299
0.473
0.103
0.141
0.075
0.027
0.108
0.001
0.141
0.010
0.348
0.219
0.367
0.131
0.478
0.009
0.118
0.187
0.044
0.057
0.423
0.023
0.508
0.011
0.283
0.035
0.050
0.056
0.112
0.015
0.365
0.075
0.309
0.166
0.149
0.426
0.646
0.007
0.311
0.198
0.107
0.014
0.023
0.200
0.024
0.364
0.042
0.132
0.494
0.268
0.333
0.163
0.551
Fig. 6. Soil quality index (SQI) and the individual contribution of each indicator towards
the soil quality index under different management systems. CO2C: soil CO2C emission;
Temp: soil temperature; Qmet: metabolic quotient; C/N: C/N ratio; Labc: labile C; Solc: soluble C; NR: native rainforest; ACS: agroforestry coffee system; FS: full sun coffee system.
a
Boldface eigenvalues correspond to the principal components examined for the soil
quality index.
b
Boldface eigenvectors are considered highly weighted.
c
Bold-underlined eigenvectors correspond to the indicators included in the minimum
data set.
Table 5
Correlation matrix for the highly weighted variables under the rst three principal components.
Toc
C/N
Labc
Estc
Estn
CO2C
Temp
Biom
Solc
Qmet
Toc
C/N
Labc
Estc
Estn
CO2C
Temp
Biom
Solc
0.499
0.582
0.743
0.680
0.831
0.852
0.844
0.404
0.897
0.392
0.042
0.014
0.052
0.152
0.187
0.030
0.200
0.662
0.661
0.790
0.687
0.645
0.325
0.700
0.949
0.873
0.976
0.969
0.629
0.935
0.905
0.937
0.882
0.727
0.915
0.935
0.856
0.726
0.960
0.980
0.661
0.989
0.541
0.955
0.678
Qmet
Toc: total organic C; C/N: C/N ratio; Labc: labile C; Estc: C stock; Estn: N stock; CO2C: soil CO2C emission; Temp: soil temperature; Biom: microbial biomass C; Solc: soluble C; Qmet:
metabolic quotient. Values in bold are different from 0 with a signicance level = 0.05 (Pearson correlation).
Regional climate characteristics exert great inuence on Q10 estimated values. Epron et al. (1999) reported that the increase in Q10
values of soil respiration is higher at low temperatures than at high temperatures. Kirschbaum (1995) obtained an even greater range of Q10
from 4.5 at 20 C to 2.5 at 30 C. Since the current study reports soil temperature ranged from 19 to 22 C (NR) and 20 to 24 C (ACS) compared
to 24.5 to 27.5 C (FS), higher Q10 values were recorded in NR and ACS.
In agricultural systems with stable organic matter, mainly due chemical
protection by electrostatic surfaces and physical by aggregation, temperature sensitivity is lower (Chen and Tian, 2005). In this context, increases in soil temperature will not affect the mineralization and C
release to the atmosphere (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). We observed
that ACS also reduces soil temperature through shading by canopies and
litter. This effect should be taken into account to take full advantage of
this system in policies and programs for climate change mitigation
and adaptation.
According to the principal component loading matrix (Table 4), the
rst highly weighted variable group implies that PC1 is mainly associated with soil C pools and its dynamics (i.e., soil temperature acting as a
regulatory factor and metabolic quotient as a C storing indicator). In
the PC2, highly weighted variable suggests that this component is mainly related with soil mineralization process. The highly weighted
variables in the third component imply that it is mainly associated
with labile forms of organic C. In the present study, soil indicators
selected by PCA (soil CO2C emission, soil temperature, metabolic quotient, C/N ratio, labile and soluble C) are considered the most critical indicators for expressing the overall health of the soil and the subsequent
response to the management. In addition, soil CO2C emission, soil temperature, and metabolic quotient are the most important indicators for
soil quality in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome, since they gave the highest
average contribution towards the SQI. The SQI of 0.48 for ACS indicates
that while some effects of this system on soil quality are not ideal, they
are overall better than the FS, which had SQI of 0.31. Thus, through soil
quality assessment, results clearly show that management developed in
the ACS provides the soil to fulll some important functions, as reducing
soil disturbance and increasing C storage. Although the soil quality
index presented in this study used information from a narrow
timeframe, it could easily be used to more fully assess soil-quality dynamics in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome.
5. Conclusions
Soil management in the agroforestry coffee system improves soil
quality, according to the soil quality index calculated. Management
practices in the agroforestry coffee system provide a more efcient metabolism of C indicated by low metabolic quotient values. Thus, more C
is incorporated into the soil by microbial biomass C and the system is
less vulnerable to loss as CO2C emissions, unlike full sun coffee system,
which tended to have greater soil organic matter losses. The lack of vegetation residues on the soil surface in the full sun coffee system resulted
in increases in soil temperature, accelerated mineralization and reduction of total C and N stocks, contributing to higher CO2C emissions.
Considering the future climate change scenarios, there is a tendency
of incrementing on soil temperature and microorganism activity, which
contribute to an increase in soil respiration and C storing in labile C fractions in agroforestry coffee system in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. This
further emphasizes the importance of the conservation of tree biomass
in established forest and agroforestry systems, and the avoidance of
practices that reduce the stocks of soil organic matter.
Based on the soil quality index calculated, soil CO2C emission, soil
temperature and metabolic quotient would be the most effective tools
for assessing the effect of management on soil quality. Also, the soil
quality index obtained was able to synthesize the complex information
contained in large multivariate data-sets. Therefore, it would be useful
for application at regional and national scales in programs of assessing
23
24
Liebig, M.A., Kronberg, S.L., Hendrickson, J.R., Dong, X., Gross, J.R., 2013. Carbon dioxide efux from long-term grazing management systems in a semiarid region. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 137144.
Lu, X., Toda, H., Ding, F., Fang, S., Yang, W., Xu, H., 2014. Effect of vegetation types on
chemical and biological properties of soils of karst ecosystems. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 61,
4957.
Makumba, W., Akinnifesi, F.K., Janssen, B., Oenema, O., 2007. Long-term impact of a
gliricidia maize intercropping system on carbon sequestration in southern Malawi.
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 11, 237243.
Matos, E.S., Mendona, E.S., Cardoso, I.M., Lima, P.C., Freese, D., 2011. Decomposition and
nutrient release of leguminous plants in coffee agroforestry systems. Rev. Bras. Cinc.
Solo 35, 141149.
Moo, M.K.S., Gama-Rodrigues, E.F., Gama-Rodrigues, A.C., Machado, R.C.R., Baligar, V.C.,
2009. Soil and litter fauna of cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Agrofor.
Syst. 76, 127138.
Nair, P.K.R., Gordon, A.M., Mosquera-Losada, M.-R., 2008. Agroforestry. In: Jorgensen, S.E.,
Fath, B.D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ecology vol. 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 101110.
Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M., Nair, V.D., 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 172, 1023.
Nair, P.K.R., Nair, V.D., Kumar, B.M., Showalter, J.M., 2010. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv. Agron. 108, 237307.
Noponen, M.R.A., Healey, J.R., Soto, G., Haggar, J.P., 2013. Sink or sourcethe potential of
coffee agroforestry systems to sequester atmospheric CO2 into soil organic carbon.
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 175, 6068.
Pezarico, C.R., Vitorino, A.C.T., Mercante, F.M., Daniel, O., 2013. Indicadores de qualidade
do solo em sistemas agroorestais. Amaz. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 56, 4047.
Powlson, D.S., Gregory, P.J., Whalley, W.R., Quinton, J.N., Hopkins, D.W., Whitmore, A.P.,
Hirsch, P.R., Goulding, K.W.T., 2011. Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services. Food Policy 36, S72S87.
Saha, S.K., Stein, T.V., Nair, P.K.R., Andreu, M., 2011. The socioeconomic context of carbon
sequestration in agroforestry: a case study from homegardens of Kerala, India. In:
Kumar, B.M., Nair, P.K.R. (Eds.), Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Springer Science, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-94-0071629-2, pp. 281298.
Sales, E.F., Mndez, V.E., Caporal, F.R., Faria, J.C., 2013. Conilon coffee (Coffea canephora)
agroforestry systems in the state of Esprito Santo, Brazil. Agroecol. Sustain. Food
Syst. 37, 405429.
imansk, V., 2013. Soil organic matter in water-stable aggregates under different soil
management practices in a productive vineyard. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59, 12071214.
Soil Survey Staff of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1999. Soil taxonomy:
a basic system of soil classication for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture Handbook No. 436 (Washington, DC, USA).
Song, X., Yuan, H., Kimberley, M.O., Jiang, H., Zhou, G., Wang, H., 2013. Soil CO2 ux dynamics in the two main plantation forest types in subtropical China. Sci. Total Environ. 444, 363368.
Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Ferrer, G., de Jong, B., 2010. Carbon sequestration
through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor. Syst.
78, 3951.
Souza, H.N., Cardoso, I.M., Fernandes, J.M., Garcia, F.C.P., Bonm, V.R., Santos, A.C.,
Mendona, E.S., 2010. Selection of native trees for intercropping with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agrofor. Syst. 80, 116.
Souza, H.N., Goede, R.G.M., Brussaard, L., Cardoso, I.M., Duarte, E.M.G., Fernandes, R.B.A.,
Gomes, L.C., Pulleman, M.M., 2012. Protective shade, tree diversity and soil properties
in coffee agroforestry system in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
146, 179196.
Stockmann, U., Adams, M.A., Crawford, J.W., Field, D.J., Henakaarchchi, N., Jenkins, M.,
Minasny, B., Mcbratney, A.B., Courcelles, V.D.R., Singh, K., Wheeler, I., Abbott, L.,
Angers, D.A., Baldock, J., Bird, M., Brookes, P.C., Chenu, C., Jastrow, J.D., Lal, R.,
Lehmann, J., O'Donnell, A.G., Parton, W.J., Whitehead, D., Zimmermann, M., 2013.
The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic
carbon. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 8099.
Thomazini, A., Azevedo, H.C.A., Pinheiro, P.L., Mendona, E.S., 2013. Physical soil attributes
in different coffee management systems in the southern region of Espirito Santo.
Coffee Sci. 8, 450459.
Thomazini, A., Mendona, E.S., Souza, J.L., Cardoso, I.M., Garbin, M.L., 2015. Impact of organic no-till vegetables systems on soil organic matter in the Atlantic Forest biome.
Sci. Hortic. 182, 145155.
Wymore, A.W., 1993. Model-Based Systems Engineering: An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Discrete Systems and to the Tricotyledon Theory of System Design.
CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.