Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 13 March 2013
Received in revised form 3 June 2013
Accepted 26 June 2013
The research on adsorptive properties of coal y ash was carried out. The results obtained on the
adsorption of copper and nickel were analyzed by the well known models given by Langmuir and
Freundlich. For the sorption isotherms, initial metal ion concentration varied while the pH of solution
and adsorbent weight in each sample held constant. The sorption isotherms were researched with
copper and nickel. The inuence of pH (310), blend time (0.54 h) and the initial concentration of Cu(II)
and Ni(II) ions (5100 mg L1) was researched on adsorption/desorption of analyses elements from/to
the aqueous solutions by using coal y ash. Optimum conditions of adsorption/desorption of Cu(II) and
Ni(II) ions in studied systems were established. The coefcient of adsorption/desorption on the basis of
Freundlich and Langmuir equation was found.
2013 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Coal y ash
Nickel(II)
Copper(II)
Adsorption
Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms
Introduction
Coal y ash is a particulate material produced from the
combustion of coal in thermoelectric power plants. According to
the World Energy Council, as of 2009, China held an estimated
103.8 Gt of recoverable coal reserves, the third-largest in the world
behind the United States and Russia and about 14% of the worlds total
reserves. In recent years, coal made up about 74% of Chinas total
primary energy consumption and about 60% of the chemical
materials derived from coal products [13]. The amount of coal y
ash generated in Poland was 4.2 Gt per year, of which 52% (2.2 Gt)
was recycled while the rest was land-lled [4]. Ash contamination
poses a serious threat to environment. The conrmed presence of
heavy metals in y ash their bioactivity and biotoxicology, rst of all,
their mobility can cause signicant environmental problems.
Contamination during disposal of y ash, as well as interaction of
y ash and heavy metals in the environment is very limited. A lot of
investigations have revealed that leachable coal ash contaminants
[5], particularly arsenate, chromium [68], selenium, boron, strontium, and barium, have different effects on the quality of impacted
environments. Trace elements in coal can provide useful information
from an environmental point of view for possible pollution control of
toxic trace elements during coal combustion and utilization [3]. Some
valuable trace elements (e.g., Au, Ge, Ga, Nb, Zr, U, Re, REE, and PGE)
are enriched in some coals or coal-bearing strata, and, thus are being
or can be potentially recovered from coal ashes [3,9].
582
Nomenclature
A
C0
ads
Caq
Csads
V0
mads
KFads
KLads
n
D
KFdes
KLdes
Csdes
des
Caq
ads
C1
des
C1
VT
tads
tdes
t
LOI
I
FAAS
CRM
RSD
REE
PGE
by metallurgical solid wastes, i.e. bauxite waste red muds and coal
y ashes acting as sorbents [23]. The distribution ratios of metals
between the solid sorbent and aqueous solution have been found
as a function of sorbent type, equilibrium aqueous concentration
of metal and temperature. Wang et al. [24] the removal of copper
and nickel ions on the treated coal y ash have researched. The
pseudo second-order kinetics would be better for tting the
dynamic adsorption of Cu and Ni ions. Similarly Papandreou et al.
[25], the application of y ash porous pellets as adsorbent of
lead(II), zinc(II) and chromium(III) ions from aqueous solution
was studied. Adsorption isotherms of lead, zinc and chromium
were determined for agglomerated material using the Langmuir
equation. Cho et al. [10] the purpose of this study was to
investigate the possibility of the utilization of coal y ash as a
cheap adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals in aqueous
solutions if not strongly acidic. Kinetic experiments were also
performed and the zeta-potentials of the coal y ash particles
were measured at various pHs. Li et al. [26] the experiments to
determine the adsorption of calcium lignosulfonate (CLS) onto
Shand and Boundary Dam (BD) coal y ashes were performed.
Gangoli et al. [27] reported that the surface of silica (SiO2) might
exhibit considerable afnity toward metal ions. The central ion of
silicates (Si4+) has a very strong afnity for electrons; therefore,
the oxygen atoms that are bound to the silicon ions have a low
basicity, making the silica surface act as a weak acid. Visa et al. [28]
proved that the Class F y ash (FA), with oxides composition
SiO2/Al2O3 over 2.4 proved good adsorbent properties. The FA was
used for removing the Pb2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ cations from mixed
solutions. The optimized adsorption parameters were further
used in thermodynamic and kinetic studies of the adsorption
processes. Sarbak and Kramer-Wachowiak [29] described if it is
assumed that adsorption takes place mainly on the surface of
2CaOSiO2, the interaction of the hydrolysis metal forms with the
surface in an idealized manner may occur as follows:
In acid solutions dealumination of coal y ash:
Si
Si
OH
4H
Si O Al O Si
HO Si
Si OH
+ Al
3+
OH
Si
Si
2+
Si OH + M(H2O)n
Si
HO
OH
OH
HO
Si
Si
O
(a)
HO
OH
OO
M
OH
OH
OH
Al
Si
Si
(b)
OO
OO
HO
OH
OH
+
Al H Si
OO
(c)
Table 1
Composition and characteristic of coal y ash.
No.
Determination
Value
1.
2.
3.
4.
pH
Bulk density, kg m3
Moisture content, % (m/m)
Loss on ignition (LOI)
9.1
618.3
1.08
7.50%
5.
3.1
96.9
6.
9.9
7.
5.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
51
20
12.5
4
2
0.8
0.7
141
4
71
73
39
98
956
29
583
8.
9.
ads
Csads KFads Caq
(1)
(2)
ads
C1
ads
KLads Caq
ads
1 KLads Caq
(3)
584
Fig. 2. pH dependence of Cu(II) and Ni(II) adsorption (A) and desorption (D) on/from
coal y ash, C0 = 25 mg L1.
Fig. 3. Mixing time dependence on Cu(II) and Ni(II) adsorption (A) and desorption
(D) on/from coal y ash; C0 = 25 mg L1; pH = 8.
585
correlation coefcients for the former were higher for the adsorption
of nickel ion on the coal y ash. The Freundlich model is valid for a
multilayer sorption model on a surface containing a nite number of
sites with mutual interactions between sorbed metal cations. As seen
Freundlich models are corrected for the simulation of experimental
data. The correlation coefcients for the Freundlich model and the
Langmuir model are not similar for all cases. The plot of log Csads
ads
against Caq
for the adsorption data of nickel shows that the data ts
well to the Freundlich model. The Freundlich equation predicts that
the metal ion concentration on the sorbent will increase as long as
there is an increase in the metal ion concentration while experimental
results showed a plateau indicating a limiting value of the sorption.
The coefcients KF and n can be estimated from the slopes. As shown
in Fig. 5, the Freundlich isotherm equation provided an excellent t to
the equilibrium sorption data, giving correlation coefcients R2 of
0.99 on the coal y ash for nickel. If R2 is a large number, one can
conclude that the independent variables (experimental data)
contribute to the prediction of the dependent variables (modeling
data). Hence, the linear model is well correlated. Detailed analysis of
the variance also showed that the Freundlich model described the
adsorption data better. The P value is the probability of being wrong in
concluding that there is an association between the dependent and
independent variables. Traditionally, the independent variable can be
used to predict the dependent variable when P < 0.05.
The adsorption data of Ni(II) were found to t well with the
Freundlich and 2nd Langmuir equation (Table 2). The linear plots of
ads
ads
Caq
=Csads versus Caq
at constant pH value suggest the applicability
of the 2nd Langmuir isotherm for Ni(II) adsorption by the coal y
ash, showing the formation of monolayer coverage of the
adsorbate at the outer surface of adsorbent.
The model parameters from Langmuir isotherms obtained from
linear regression are presented in Fig. 5. The corresponding
correlation coefcients are, respectively, between the ranges 0.976
ads
and 0.998. C1
and KLads were determined from the slope and
intercept of the Langmuir plot and are presented in Table 2. Ions of
Cu(II) at pH = 8 and tads = 2 h in all range of researched
concentrations from 5 to 100 mg L1 were total adsorbed from
aqueous solution, the maximum degree of metal removal was
100%.
Langmuir type model presupposes homogeneity of the sorbing
surface and no interactions, involving uniform energies of sorption
on the surface and no transmigration of metal cations in the plane
of the surface. The difference in adsorption capacities of two
sorbents is believed to be largely due to the physicalchemical
properties of them or the chemistry of the metal containing
solutions. These studies point at physisorption and monolayer
adsorption. The removal of copper and nickel using coal y ash
586
Table 3
ads
The values of desorption coefcient and C1
for C0 = 5, 10, 25, 40, 70, and
100 mg L1.
Ni(II)
KFads
KFads
KLads
KLads
KLads
ads
C1
ads
C1
ads
C1
exp. f.
linear f.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
KFdes
KFdes
KLdes
KLdes
KLdes
des
C1
des
C1
des
C1
exp. f.
linear f.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Ni(II)
Cu(II)
Fig. 6. Freundlich isotherm for Cu(II) and Ni(II) from coal y ash at pH 3; logarithmic
form; C0 = 5, 10, 25, 40, 70, and 100 mg L1.
587
Fig. 8. Initial concentrations dependence on Cu(II) and Ni(II) adsorption (A) and
desorption (D) on/from coal y ash.
Reversibility of adsorption
The aim of the experiment was studying the reversibility of
adsorption on coal y ash. This information is important because
desorption process matters on behavior of compound in coal y
ash in eld conditions. Moreover data of desorption can be
Fig. 7. 2nd Langmuir isotherm for Cu(II) and Ni(II) desorption from coal y ash at pH
3; C0 = 5, 10, 25, 40, 70, and 100 mg L1.
2+
OH
OH
OH
OH
M
OH
OH
H
O
M
OH
OH
H
O
M
O
588
the coal y ash and pH of the system largely affect the adsorption of
the ionic species of Ni(II) and Cu(II), which are Ni2+, NiOH+,
Ni(OH)2, Cu2+, Cu(OH)+, Cu(OH)2, present in wastewater.
Conclusions
Coal y ash as a byproduct obtained from the coal-red Heat
and Power Plant is an effective and inexpensive adsorbent for the
removal of copper and nickel from aqueous solutions. This study
investigated the adsorption of nickel(II) and copper(II) ions by coal
y ash. Optimum conditions of adsorption/desorption of Cu(II) and
Ni(II) ions in studied systems were established. Adsorption follows
both Langmuir and Freundlich models. The removal of copper and
nickel using coal y ash takes place by a particle diffusion
mechanism. These studies point at physisorption and monolayer
adsorption. It is evident from the studies that coal y ash has
demonstrated good removal capabilities for Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions.
References
[1] O.E. Manz, Worldwide production of coal ash and utilization in concrete and other
products, Fuel 76 (8) (1997) 691696.
[2] W. Berg, H.J. Feuerborn, Coal combustion products in Europe trends and developments, in: Proceedings of World of Coal Ash Conference, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 2007.
[3] S. Dai, D. Ren, C.-L. Chou, R.B. Finkelman, V.V. Seredin, Y. Zhou, Geochemistry of
trace elements in Chinese coals: a review of abundances, genetic types, impacts
on human health, and industrial utilization, Int. J. Coal Geol. 94 (2012) 321.
[4] Statistical Yearbook 2010, Condition and Environmental Protection, Warsaw,
Poland, 2010.
[5] L. Ruhl, A. Vengosh, G.S. Dwyer, H. Hsu-Kim, A. Deonarine, Environmental impacts
of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee: an 18-month survey, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 44 (2010) 92729278.
[6] F. Jiao, N. Wijaya, L. Zhang, Y. Ninomiya, R. Hocking, Synchrotron-based XANES
speciation of chromium in the oxy-fuel y ash collected from lab-scale drop-tube
furnace, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 66406646. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/
es200545e.
[7] E. Soco, J. Kalembkiewicz, Investigations on Cr mobility from coal y ash, Fuel 88
(8) (2009) 15131519.
[8] E. Soco, J. Kalembkiewicz, Control of Cr(VI) content in waste coal y ash, in: M.J.B.
Murria (Ed.), Minimisation and Waste Management of Hazardous Residues Containing Cr(VI), Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2011, pp. 317340.
[9] V.V. Seredin, R.B. Finkelman, Metalliferous coals: a review of the main genetic and
geochemical types, Int. J. Coal Geol. 76 (2008) 253289.
[10] M. Ahmaruzzaman, Role of y ash in the removal of organic pollutants from
wastewater, Energy Fuels 23 (2009) 14941511.
[11] C. An, G. Huang, Stepwise adsorption of phenanthrene at the y ash-water interface
as affected by solution chemistry: experimental and modeling studies, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 46 (22) (2012) 1274212750. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es3035158.
[12] V.K. Gupta, I. Ali, Utilization of bagasse y ash (a sugar industry waste) for the removal of
cooper and zinc from wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol. 18 (2) (2000) 131140.
[13] V.C. Srivastava, I.D. Mall, I.M. Mishra, Equilibrium modelling of single and binary
adsorption of cadmium and nickel onto bagasse y ash, Chem. Eng. J. 117 (1)
(2006) 7991.
[14] H. Cho, D. Oh, K. Kim, A study on removal characteristics of heavy
metals from aqueous solution by y ash, J. Hazard. Mater. B 127 (2005)
187195.
[15] E. Pehlivan, S. Cetin, B.H. Yank, Equilibrium studies for the sorption of zinc and
copper from aqueous solutions using sugar beet pulp and y ash, J. Hazard. Mater.
B 135 (2006) 193199.
[16] M. Nascimento, P.S. Moreira Soares, V.P. de Souza, Adsorption of heavy metal
cations using coal y ash modied by hydrothermal method, Fuel 88 (9) (2009)
17141719.
[17] B. Bayat, Comparative study of adsorption properties of Turkish y ashes: I. The
case of nickel(II), copper(II) and zinc(II), J. Hazard. Mater. B 95 (2002)
251273.
[18] K.K. Panday, G. Prasad, V.N. Singh, Copper(II) removal from aqueous solutions by
y ash, Water Res. 19 (7) (1985) 869873.
[19] T.-C. Hsu, C.-C. Yu, C.-M. Yeh, Adsorption of Cu2+ from water using raw and
modied coal y ashes, Fuel 87 (7) (2008) 13551359.
[20] P. Ricou-Hoeffer, I. Lecuyer, P. Le Cloirec, Experimental design methodology
applied to adsorption of metallic ions onto y ash, Water Res. 35 (4) (2001)
965976.
[21] S. Zhu, H. Hou, Y. Xue, N. Wei, Q. Sun, X. Chen, Modeling adsorption of copper(II)
onto y ash and bentonite complex from aqueous solutions, J. Colloid Interface
Sci. 315 (1) (2007) 812.
[22] S. Kalyani, P.J. Ajitha, R.P. Srinivasa, A. Krishnaiah, Removal of copper and nickel
from aqueous solutions using chitosan coated on perlite as biosorbent, Sep. Sci.
Technol. 40 (2005) 14831495.
[23] R. Apak, E. Tutem, M. Hugul, J. Hizal, Heavy metal cation retention by unconventional sorbents (red muds and y ashes), Water Res. 32 (2) (1998) 430440.
[24] S. Wang, M. Soudi, L. Li, Z.H. Zhu, Coal ash conversion into effective adsorbents for
removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater. B 133 (13)
(2006) 243251.
[25] A.D. Papandreou, C.J. Stournaras, D. Panias, I. Paspaliaris, Adsorption of Pb(II),
Zn(II) and Cr(III) on coal y ash porous pellets, Miner. Eng. 24 (13) (2011)
14951501.
[26] H.-Q. Li, G.-H. Huang, Ch-J. An, W.-X. Zhang, Kinetic and equilibrium studies on
the adsorption of calcium lignosulfonate from aqueous solution by coal y ash,
Chem. Eng. J. 200202 (2012) 275282. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.cej.2012.06.051.
[27] N. Gangoli, D.C. Markey, G. Thodos, in: Proceedings of the Second National
Conference on Complete Water Reuse: Waters Interface with Energy, Air and
Solids, Chicago, IL, AIChE 3, (1975), pp. 270275.
[28] M. Visa, L. Isac, A. Duta, Fly ash adsorbents for multi-cation wastewater treatment,
Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 (2012) 63456352.
[29] Z. Sarbak, M. Kramer-Wachowiak, Chemically modied wasted y ash from the
Konin power plant and its adsorption properties, Polish J. Environ. Stud. 6 (2)
(1997) 5357 (in English).
[30] H.M.F. Freundlich, Over the adsorption in solution, J. Phys. Chem. 57 (1906)
385470.
[31] J. Wang, X. Teng, H. Wang, H. Ban, Characterizing the metal adsorption capability
of a class F coal y ash, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 67106715.
[32] Ch.-H. Wu, Ch-Y. Kuo, Ch-F. Lin, S.-L. Lo, Modeling competitive adsorption of
molybdate, sulfate, selenate, and selenite using a Freundlich-type multi-component isotherm, Chemosphere 47 (2002) 283292.
[33] I. Langmuir, The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (1918) 13611403.