International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research

Volume 2, Issue 9 September -2016

Comparision Between WiMAX and LTE

Garima Mishra
M.Tech Student, Department of CSE, KMM Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tirupati, India
Abstract - LTE and WiMAX are the two advances ready to overwhelm cutting edge portable systems.
There is a solid rivalry between LTE and WiMAX innovations with WiMAX being ahead because of
accessibility of benchmarks through IEEE 802.16 and is up and running however needs in generous take
off arrangements because of cost. LTE overhauls from 3G Networks are being done generally quicker.
This paper thinks about the specialized similitudes and contrasts amongst WiMAX and LTE. Both
specialized and non-specialized angles have been investigated. We have endeavored to make a near study
between the two advancements to comprehend them better.
I.
INTRODUCTION
WiMAX has developed as a potential contrasting option to cell innovation for wide-zone remote systems.
In light of OFDMA and as of late acknowledged by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU)
as an IMT-2000 (3G innovation) under the name OFDMA TDD WMAN (Wireless Metropolitan Area
Network), WiMAX is attempting to challenge existing remote advances promising more noteworthy
capacities and more prominent efficiencies than option methodologies, for example, HSPA. In any case,
as WiMAX, especially versatile WiMAX, has come nearer to reality, sellers have kept on upgrading
HSPA, and saw WiMAX focal points are no more drawn out clear.
Rather, WiMAX has picked up the best footing in creating nations as a contrasting option to wireline
sending. Best case scenario, the guarantees of versatile WiMAX is engaging however it stays doubtful in
this present reality. WiMAX has built up a biological community bolstered by numerous organizations,
yet it will in any case just speak to a little rate of remote endorsers throughout the following five to ten
years.[1]
WiMAX is not a solitary innovation; it is a group of interoperable advances. The first particular, IEEE
802.16, was finished in 2001 and planned essentially for telecom backhaul applications in indicate point,
viewable pathway arrangements utilizing range above 10 GHz. This unique variant of IEEE 802.16 uses
a radio interface in light of a solitary bearer waveform.
The following real stride in the advancement of IEEE 802.16 happened in 2004, with the arrival of the
IEEE 802.16-2004 standard. It included different radio interfaces, including one in view of OFDM-256
and one in light of OFDMA. IEEE 802.16-2004 additionally bolsters pointto-multipoint interchanges, sub10 GHz operation, and non-viewable pathway correspondences. Like the first form of the standard,
operation is altered, implying that endorser stations are normally immobile.[2]
Potential applications incorporate remote Internet Service Provider (ISP) benefit, nearby communication
sidestep (as an other option to link modem or DSL benefit), and cell backhaul for associations from cell
base stations to administrator base systems. Merchants can outline gear for either authorized or unlicensed
groups.

11

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research

Volume 2, Issue 9 September -2016

3GPP is dealing with a venture called Long Term Evolution as a component of Release 8. LTE will permit
administrators to accomplish much higher pinnacle throughputs in higher range data transmission. Take a
shot at LTE started in 2004 with an official work thing began in 2006 and a finished particular expected
in mid 2009. Beginning conceivable organization is focused for 2010.[2] LTE utilizes OFDMA on the
downlink, which is appropriate to accomplish high pinnacle information rates in high-range data transfer
capacity. WCDMA radio innovation is fundamentally as effective as OFDM for conveying crest
information rates of around 10 Mbps in 5 MHz of transmission capacity. Accomplishing top rates in the
100 Mbps go with more extensive radio channels, be that as it may, would bring about very perplexing
terminals, and it is not down to earth with current innovation.
This is the place OFDM gives a useful execution advantage. Booking approaches in the recurrence space
can likewise minimize obstruction, subsequently boosting ghostly proficiency. The OFDMA approach is
additionally very adaptable in channelization, and LTE will work in different radio channel sizes
extending from 1.25 to 20 MHz. On the uplink, notwithstanding, an unadulterated OFDMA approach
brings about high Peak to Average Ratio(PAR) of the flag, which bargains control proficiency and,
eventually, battery life. Subsequently, LTE utilizes an approach called SC-FDMA, which is to some
degree like OFDMA, yet has a 2 to 6 dB PAR advantage over the OFDMA technique utilized by different
innovations, for example, IEEE 802.16e.[3]
LTE is proficient for information as well as, as a result of a very productive uplink, is greatly effective for
VoIP movement. In 10 MHz of range, LTE VoIP limit will achieve just about 500 clients. LTE actualizes
OFDM in the downlink. The fundamental guideline of OFDM is to part a high-rate information stream
into various parallel low-rate information streams, each a narrowband flag conveyed by a subcarrier.
The diverse narrowband streams are produced in the recurrence space, and afterward joined to shape the
broadband stream utilizing scientific calculation called an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) that is
executed in advanced flag processors. In LTE, the subcarriers have 15 kHz dividing from each other. LTE
keeps up this dispersing paying little respect to the general channel transmission capacity, which
rearranges radio plan, particularly in supporting radio channels of various widths. The quantity of
subcarriers reaches from 72 in a 1.4 MHz divert to 1,200 in a 20 MHz channel. The composite flag is
gotten after the IFFT is reached out by rehashing the underlying part of the flag (called the Cyclic Prefix
[CP]). This augmented flag speaks to an OFDM image.
The CP is fundamentally a protect time amid which reflected signs will achieve the beneficiary. [3] It
brings about a practically finish disposal of multipath initiated Inter image Interference (ISI), which
generally makes to a great degree high information rate transmissions hazardous. The framework is called
orthogonal, on the grounds that the subcarriers are produced in the recurrence area (making them naturally
orthogonal), and the IFFT saves that trademark. OFDM frameworks may lose their orthogonal nature as
a consequence of the Doppler move instigated by the speed of the transmitter or the recipient. 3GPP
particularly chose the subcarrier dispersing of 15 kHz to dodge any execution corruption in rapid
conditions.

12

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research

Volume 2, Issue 9 September -2016

II.

COMPARISON OF WiMAX AND LTE FEATURES

The table shows a summary of comparison between economic differences between WiMAX and LTE
III.

CONCLUSION

We reason that both WiMAX and LTE are actually comparative measures. Notwithstanding, there are a
few contrasts in the operation and working of both advances.
The fundamental innovations for WiMAX and LTE are fundamentally the same as and consequently the
key execution parameters, specifically pinnacle and normal throughput execution are tantamount when
considered for similar base station and versatile station radio wire configurations.LTE is the most recent
innovation that is being actualized by numerous media transmission organizations particularly in the
United States. As a result of a few favorable circumstances over WiMAX, LTE will be sent at a quicker
rate and improvements in its innovation will be speedier than WiMAX. WiMAX will keep on coexisting
with LTE as it has a more grounded base of clients around the world. However its development is generally
slower than LTE.
13

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research

Volume 2, Issue 9 September -2016

REFERENCES
[1] "WiMAX and the IEEE 802.16m Air Interface Standard". WiMax Forum. 4 April 2010.
[2] WiMAX Forum, Requirements for WiMAX Coexistence with LTE Networks, WMF-T31-132-v02, December 2012.
[3] WiMAX, HSPA+, and LTE: A Comparative Analysis. WiMAX Forum. (2009)
[4] L. Yi, K. Miao and A. Liu, A Comparative Study of WiMAX and LTE as the Next Generation Mobile Enterprise
Network, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Gangwondo, South Korea, 13-16 February 2011
[5]LTE and WiMAX: Comparison and Future Perspective Ismat Aldmour. Communications and Network, 2013, 5, 360368 Published Online November 2013
[6] K. Etemad, Overview of Mobile WiMAX Technology and Evolution, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 46, No.
10, 2008
[7] . Long Term Evolution (LTE): A Technical Overview, TECHNICAL WHITE PAPER.
[8] Sandeep Singh Sengar, Neeraj Tyagi, Cell Range and Capability Analysis of WiMAX and LTE Network

14