Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
c
Only the expenses related to provision of services are transactions with outside parties.
The $3,000,000 revenue reported by Suzlon and the $3,000,000 expense reported by
Patni are eliminated.
2.
d
Eliminating entries remove the intercompany asset (loan receivable) and liability (loan
payable) and the interest revenue and interest expense. There is no effect on timing of
income recognition, and therefore no adjustment is made to the investment account or
beginning retained earnings.
3.
a
Downstream sales only affect equity in net income. The effect is [($540,000 - $480,000)
- ($540,000 - $480,000)/1.2] = increase of $10,000.
4.
d
Only the adjustment to 2013 depreciation affects equity in net income and noncontrolling
interest in net income. It is an upstream sale, so the increase of $2,000,000/10 =
$200,000 is shared 80% - 20%.
5.
b
From the consolidated companys perspective, it paid $35,000 for the land and sold it for
$85,000. Therefore the consolidated gain is $50,000.
6.
a
The intercompany gain, recognized by the subsidiary in 2010, is $400,000. In 2013, the
parent sells the land to an outside party for $550,000, reporting a loss of $850,000 (=
$1,400,000 - $550,000). The consolidated loss is $450,000 (= $1,000,000 - $550,000).
The 2013 eliminating entry adjusts the reported $850,000 loss to $450,000, and
reclassifies it from the subsidiarys beginning retained earnings.
7.
a
The consolidation working paper for 2013 is:
Parent
Subsidiary
Inventory
Sales
CGS
8.
$100,000
450,000
400,000
Dr
Cr
-20,000 (I-2)
500,000 (I-1) 500,000
400,000 (I-2) 20,000 500,000 (I-1)
d
Eliminating entries are:
Sales
30,000,000
CGS
Investment in subsidiary
30,000,000
200,000
CGS
CGS
200,000
225,000
Inventory
9.
Consolidate
d
$80,000
450,000
320,000
225,000
b
Eliminating entries are:
Patent
600,000
Investment in subsidiary
600,000
Unconfirmed downstream loss at the beginning of 2013 is [($1,000,000/5) x 3)] =
$600,000.
Amortization expense
200,000
Patent
To correct the amortization expense for 2013.
10.
200,000
c
Eliminating entries are:
Retained earnings, subsidiary
1,700,000
Equipment, net
1,700,000
Unconfirmed upstream gain at the beginning of 2012 is [($2,000,000/20) x 17)] =
$1,700,000.
Equipment, net
Depreciation expense
To correct the depreciation expense for 2013.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2013
2
100,000
100,000
EXERCISES
E6.1
a.
150,000
Land
150,000
To eliminate the unconfirmed gain on the intercompany sale of land and reduce the land
account to original acquisition cost.
2013
Investment in Sunnyvale
150,000
Land
150,000
To add the prior year unconfirmed gain to the investment account to maintain equivalence
with the retained earnings of Sunnyvale and reduce the land account to original
acquisition cost.
b.
2014
Investment in Sunnyvale
150,000
1.
In a prior year, the subsidiary sold land to the parent at a gain of $20,000. The parent still
holds the land.
Current year intercompany sale of land at a loss of $14,000.
In prior year, the parent sold land to its subsidiary at a gain of $30,000. The subsidiary
still holds the land.
In a prior year, the subsidiary sold land to the parent at a gain of $18,000. The parent
sold the land to an outside party this year.
2.
3.
4.
E6.3
(in thousands)
Consolidation Working Paper
Retained earnings, Converse -1/1
15,000
Investment in Converse
27,000
Cost of goods sold
42,000
To eliminate the intercompany profit on upstream intercompany sales, assumed confirmed during
2013, from the beginning inventory. Prior year profits on upstream sales are removed from
Converses beginning retained earnings; $15,000 = $75,000 x 20%. Prior year profits on
downstream sales are added to Nikes Investment in Converse as they had been removed from
the Investment account via the 2013 equity accrual; $27,000 = $117,000 - 117,000/1.3.
Sales
1,150,000
1,150,000
41,500
Inventory
41,500
To eliminate unconfirmed intercompany profit from ending inventory; $41,500 = ($80,000 x
20% = $16,000) + [110,500 - (110,500/1.3) = $25,500].
E6.4
Under a direct sale of the land by Sawyer to the developer, Sawyer reports a gain of $3,900,000.
The noncontrolling interest in net income is $780,000 (= .2 x $3,900,000) and the distribution to
the noncontrolling shareholder is $390,000 (= .5 x $780,000).
Under the intercompany sale, even though the gain is larger, it is eliminated in consolidation, and
does not enter into the noncontrolling interest in net income. As long as the parent holds the land
(which it plans to do under a long-term lease), the gain is not reflected in noncontrolling interest
in net income. Moreover, the income from the lease is the parents income, so the noncontrolling
interest is unaffected. Under this approach, the noncontrolling stockholder receives nothing.
Hence, the direct sale of the land by Sawyer to the developer generates the most dividends for
the noncontrolling stockholder.
E6.5
a.
250,000
Equipment
250,000
To eliminate the gain on intercompany sale of equipment; $250,000 = $800,000
($750,000 - $200,000).
Accumulated depreciation
50,000
Depreciation expense
To eliminate the excess depreciation recorded by Sawyer in 2013 ($250,000/5).
50,000
Equipment
200,000
Accumulated depreciation
200,000
To restate the equipment and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original
acquisition cost basis.
b.
200,000
50,000
Equipment
250,000
To eliminate the amount of intercompany gain unconfirmed in prior years, remove the
excess depreciation recorded in prior years and reduce the equipment to its net book
value at date of intercompany sale.
Accumulated depreciation
50,000
Depreciation expense
To eliminate the excess depreciation recorded by Sawyer in 2014.
Equipment
50,000
200,000
Accumulated depreciation
200,000
To restate the equipment and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original
acquisition cost basis.
E6.6
a.
2,500,000
2,500,000
1,400,000
Cost of goods sold
1,400,000
3,200,000
Inventory
3,200,000
800,000
400,000
Equipment
1,200,000
Accumulated depreciation
200,000
Depreciation expense
200,000
Equipment
2,000,000
Accumulated depreciation
b.
2,000,000
2,500,000
Land
2,500,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
3,200,000
Inventory
Investment in Sand Hill
Accumulated depreciation
3,200,000
800,000
400,000
Equipment
Accumulated depreciation
1,200,000
200,000
Depreciation expense
Equipment
2,000,000
Accumulated depreciation
200,000
2,000,000
E6.7
a.
Total
Swaraj reported net income
$7,000,000
Amortization of identifiable intangibles
(1,750,000)
Upstream loss on land
300,000
Unconfirmed profit in end. inventory - upstream
(600,000)
Confirmed profit in beg. inventory - upstream
350,000
Confirmed profit on downstream equipment
sale
100,000
(= $1,000,000/10)
$5,400,000
b.
Equity
Noncontrolling
in NI
Interest in NI
$5,600,000
$1,400,000
(1,400,000)
(350,000)
240,000
60,000
(480,000)
(120,000)
280,000
70,000
100,000
$4,340,000
_______
$1,060,000
300,000
300,000
600,000
Inventory
To eliminate the unconfirmed profit in ending inventory due to upstream sales.
350,000
Cost of goods sold
To recognize the confirmed profit in beginning inventory due to upstream sales
600,000
Investment in Swaraj
Accumulated depreciation
350,000
700,000
300,000
Equipment
1,000,000
To eliminate the unconfirmed profit as of the beginning of the year on downstream
equipment sales (=7/10 x $1,000,000).
Accumulated depreciation
100,000
Depreciation expense
To eliminate intercompany profit from depreciation expense (= $1,000,000/10).
100,000
E6.8
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
E6.9
Decrease in noncontrolling
interest in net income
-$ 60,000
-130,000
$190,000
(in thousands)
a.
Total
SCOs reported net income
Amortization of identifiable intangibles
Unconfirmed profit in end. inv. - downstream
Unconfirmed profit in end. inv. - upstream
b.
$200,000
(36,000)
(50,000)
(40,000)
$ 74,000
Equity
in NI
$ 150,000
(27,000)
(50,000)
(30,000)
$ 43,000
Noncontrolling
Interest in NI
$ 50,000
(9,000)
(10,000)
$ 31,000
$2,800,000
(1,390,000)
(936,000)
$ 474,000
(31,000)
$ 443,000
Total
$ 900,000
(100,000)
(200,000)
110,000
(60,000)
$ 650,000
Equity
Noncontrolling
in NI
Interest in NI
$ 720,000
$ 180,000
(80,000)
(20,000)
(160,000)
(40,000)
88,000
22,000
(60,000)
-$ 508,000
$ 142,000
$ 12,000,000
( 7,450,000)
( 2,900,000)
1,650,000
( 142,000)
$ 1,508,000
1.
2.
ROA = ($9,000+$2,000-$8,000-$1,900)/($10,000+$4,000)
= $1,100/$14,000 = .079
ROS = $1,100/($9,000 +$2,000) = .10
b.
1.
2.
Without consolidation (1) Sponsor recognizes the $3,500 cash but not the liability, but in
consolidation (2) the liability is also counted along with Sponsorees assets and liabilities.
Sponsoree is more leveraged than Sponsor; Sponsorees separate TL/TA = $3,600/$4.000
= .9, while Sponsors separate TL/TA = $6,000/$10,000 = .6. Therefore consolidating
Sponsoree causes consolidated TL/TA to be higher than Sponsors separate TL/TA.
c.
1.
2.
Enron apparently used this technique to recognize gains on its own stock as income,
something not permitted by GAAP. Without consolidation (1), Sponsors income
includes 25% of the gain on its stock recognized in Sponsorees income and booked by
Sponsor via the equity method. With consolidation (2) the stock issuance is voided and
neither entity recognizes income on the appreciation of Sponsors stock.
E6.12 Comprehensive Consolidated Net Income
Schedule to determine consolidated net income (in thousands)
Browns net income from its own operations
Shoes.coms net income from its own operations
Decrease in cost of goods sold from sale of overvalued inventory
Depreciation expense reduction from overvaluation adjustment
Increase in fair value of contingent consideration liability
Amortization of discount on long-term debt (increase in interest expense)
Impairment loss on capitalized in-process R&D
Increase in cost of goods sold due to eliminated upstream ending
inventory profit
Eliminated loss on downstream sale of patent
Increase in patent amortization expense on the patent ($500/5)
Consolidated net income
Less consolidated net income attributed to noncontrolling interest*
Consolidated net income attributed to controlling interest
$ 50,000
20,000
900
300
(200)
(100)
(600)
(400)
500
(100)
70,300
(2,010)
$ 68,290
PROBLEMS
P6.1 Consolidation Working Paper, Noncontrolling Interest, Intercompany Inventory
Transactions
a.
Calculation of goodwill:
Acquisition cost
Fair value of noncontrolling interest
Total fair value
Book value of Seaport
Previously unrecorded intangibles
Goodwill
$ 3,000,000
275,000
3,275,000
$ 2,000,000
__500,000
2,500,000
$ 775,000
$
$
775,000
750,000
25,000
Calculation of 2013 Equity in Net Income and Noncontrolling Interest in Net Income (in
thousands):
Equity in
Noncontrolling
Total
NI
interest in NI
Seaport Company reported net income
($6,000,000 3,170,000 1,930,000)
$ 900,000
$ 810,000
$ 90,000
Upstream markup, beginning inventory
100,000
90,000
10,000
Downstream markup, beg. inventory
60,000
60,000
Upstream markup, ending inventory
(80,000)
(72,000)
(8,000)
Downstream markup, ending inventory
(75,000)
(75,000)
______
$ 905,000
$ 813,000
$ 92,000
c.
Consolidation Working Paper, December 31, 2013 (in millions)
Trial Balances
Taken From Books
Dr (Cr)
Eliminations
Consolidated
Peninsula Seaport
Current assets
Investment in Seaport
Property, plant and equipment, net
Intangibles
Goodwill
Liabilities
Capital stock
Retained earnings, Jan. 1
$ 1,950
4,183
980
--
5,810
4,270
5,120
--
(4,900)
(3,000)
(6,700)
(2,100)
(1,200)
(2,300)
Dr
(I-2) 60
Sales
Equity in net income of Seaport
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Noncontrolling interest in net income
1,000
(15,000)
(813)
9,050
4,150
______
$
0
340
45
52
360
40
3,170
1,930
_____
$
0
(I-1)5,900
(C) 813
(I-3) 155
$ 2,775
-10,930
4,570
475
(7,000)
(3,000)
(6,700)
(E) 1,200
(I-2) 100
(E) 2,200
400
(6,000)
155 (I-3)
453 (C)
3,060 (E)
730 (R)
(R) 300
(R) 475
Noncontrolling interest
Dividends
Balances
Cr
(E)
(R)
(N)
(C)
(N)
160 (I-2)
5,900 (I-1)
(N) 92
______
$ 11,295 $ 11,295
(437)
1,000
(15,100)
-6,315
6,080
92
$
0
Calculation of goodwill:
Acquisition cost
Fair value of noncontrolling interest
Total fair value
Book value of Wholesome
Revaluations:
Plant and equipment, net
Intangibles
Long-term debt
Goodwill
$ 120,000
35,000
$ 155,000
$ 74,000
(15,000)
25,000
(4,000)
80,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
60,000
$ 15,000
b.
Total
$ 5,000
Equity in Noncontrolling
net income interest in net
of
income of
Wholesome
Wholesome
$ 3,750
$ 1,250
1,500
(2,500)
(1,000)
1,125
(1,875)
(800)
375
(625)
(200)
2,400
1,800
600
(3,000)
2,400
(2,250)
$ 1,750
(750)
650
c.
Consolidation Working Paper, December 31, 2013
Trial Balances Taken
From Books
Dr (Cr)
Eliminations
Consolidated
Kelloggs
Wholesome
Current assets
Plant and equipment, net
Investment in Wholesome
$ 35,000
262,650
131,100
$ 20,000
192,000
--
Identifiable intangibles
Goodwill
Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Capital stock
Retained earnings, Jan. 1
100,000
-(30,000)
(350,000)
(80,000)
(60,000)
Noncontrolling interest
Sales revenue
Equity in NI of Wholesome
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Noncontrolling interest in NI
-(400,000)
(1,750)
250,000
143,000
_____-$
0
10,000
-(25,000)
(100,000)
(54,000)
(38,000)
Dr
Cr
(O) 1,500
(R) 12,500
(R) 73,000
(E) 54,000
(I-2) 2,400
(E) 35,600
-(140,000)
-65,000
70,000
_____-$
0
3,000 (I-3)
7,500 (R)
1,750 (C)
67,200 (E)
62,150 (R)
2,500 (O)
1,000 (O)
$ 52,000
448,650
-120,000
72,000
(55,000)
(450,000)
(80,000)
(60,000)
22,400 (E)
15,850 (R)
650 (N)
(I-1) 60,000
(C) 1,750
(I-3) 3,000
Balances
2,400 (I-2)
60,000 (I-1)
(O) 2,000
(N) 650 _______
$ 246,400 $246,400
(38,900)
(480,000)
-255,600
215,000
650
$
0
P6.3
a.
25,00
0
55,00
0
Plant assets
80,000
To eliminate the intercompany gain unconfirmed in prior years, remove the excess
depreciation recorded in prior years and reduce the asset account to its net book value at
date of intercompany sale.
Accumulated depreciation
10,000
Depreciation expense
To eliminate the excess annual depreciation expense recorded by Smart in 2012.
10,000
Plant assets
20,000
Accumulated depreciation
20,000
To restate the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original acquisition
cost basis.
Transaction (2)
Retained earnings-Smart
(6 x ($50,000/10))
Accumulated depreciation (4 x
($50,000/10))
30,000
20,000
Plant assets
50,000
To eliminate the intercompany gain unconfirmed in prior years, remove the excess
depreciation recorded in prior years and reduce the asset account to its net book value at
date of intercompany sale.
Accumulated depreciation
5,000
Depreciation expense
To eliminate the excess depreciation recorded by Pert in 2012.
Plant assets
5,000
300,000
Accumulated depreciation
300,000
To restate the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original acquisition
cost basis.
Transaction (3)
Plant assets
40,000
Investment in Smart
(4 x $40,000/5))
32,000
Accumulated depreciation
($40,000/5)
8,000
To eliminate the intercompany loss unconfirmed in prior years, add back the reduced
depreciation recorded in prior years and increase the asset account to its book value at
date of intercompany sale.
Depreciation expense
8,000
Accumulated depreciation
8,000
To add back the reduced depreciation recorded by the purchasing affiliate (Smart) in
2012.
Plant assets
360,000
Accumulated depreciation
360,000
To restate the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original acquisition
cost basis.
b.
30,000
P6.4
a.
Total
$ 800,000
Equity in Noncontrolling
net
interest in net
income
income
$ 760,000
$ 40,000
400,000
380,000
(200,000)
(200,000)
100,000
95,000
(200,000)
(200,000)
60,000
$ 960,000
60,000
$ 895,000
20,000
5,000
______
$ 65,000
P6.5
(in thousands)
a.
Total
$ 200,000
Equity in
net income
$ 160,000
Noncontrolling
interest in net
income
$ 40,000
10,000
10,000
(16,000)
(12,800)
(3,200)
(20,000)
$ 174,000
(16,000)
$ 141,200
(4,000)
$ 32,800
141,200
Dividends - Suro
(.8 x .4 x $200,000)
Investment in Suro
To eliminate the current year equity method entries made by Pohang.
(I-1)
Stockholders equity (RE), 1/1 Suro
64,000
77,200
15,000
Land
15,000
To eliminate the unconfirmed gain from the prior year upstream transfer of land and
reduce the land account to original acquisition cost.
(I-2)
Sales
Cost of goods sold
To eliminate intercompany merchandise sales.
350,000
350,000
(I-3)
Investment in Suro
10,000
Cost of goods sold
10,000
To eliminate unconfirmed intercompany profit on downstream sales from beginning
inventory.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2013
18
(I-4)
Cost of goods sold
16,000
Inventory
16,000
To eliminate unconfirmed intercompany profit on upstream sales from ending inventory.
(I-5)
Gain on sale of machinery
25,000
Machinery
To eliminate the gain on the intercompany sale of machinery.
25,000
(I-6)
Accumulated depreciation
5,000
Depreciation expense
5,000
To eliminate excess depreciation on the machinery acquired from Suro; this is the portion
of the $25,000 gain confirmed to Singular in 2012.
(I-7)
Machinery
40,000
Accumulated depreciation
To restate the machinery and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original
acquisition cost basis.
(I-8)
Computer service revenue
20,000
20,000
3,000
Accounts receivable
To eliminate intercompany receivables and payables.
(E)
Stockholders equity Suro (1)
40,000
3,000
1,575,000
Investment in
Singular
1,260,000
Noncontrolling
interest in Suro
315,000
To eliminate the remaining beginning stockholders= equity of Suro against the
investment and establish the book value of noncontrolling interest as of 1/1/12.
(1)
(R)
Goodwill
50,000
Investment in Suro
To establish goodwill as of the beginning of the year.
50,000
$1,250,000
98,000
(48,000)
1,300,000
141,200
(64,000)
$1,377,200
32,800
DividendsSuro (.2 x .4
x $200,000)
Noncontrolling interest
in Suro
To record the change in the noncontrolling interest during 2012.
$ 120,000
(12,000)
(10,000)
$ 98,000
16,000
16,800
P6.6
(in thousands)
a.
Calculation of goodwill:
Acquisition cost
Fair value of noncontrolling interest
Total fair value
Book value of Selene
Previously unrecorded intangibles
Goodwill
Consideration paid
75% x $14,000
Goodwill to parent
Goodwill to noncontrolling interest
b.
$ 20,100
5,900
26,000
$ 10,000
4,000
$ 20,100
10,500
$ 9,600
$ 2,400
14,000
$ 12,000
80%
20%
Calculation of 2014 Equity in Net Income and Noncontrolling Interest in Net Income (in
thousands):
Equity Noncontrolling
Total
in NI
interest in NI
Selenes reported net income ($50,000 35,000
8,000)
$ 7,000 $ 5,250
$ 1,750
Amortization, developed tech ($4,000/5)
(800)
(600)
(200)
Confirmed downstream gain on equipment (excess
depreciation) ($2,000/10)
200
200
Upstream markup, beg. inv. ($1,800 $1,800/1.2)
300
225
75
Upstream markup, end. inv. ($2,400 $2,400/1.2)
(400)
(300)
(100)
Downstream markup, beg. inv. ($3,000 x 20%)
600
600
Downstream markup, end. inv. ($2,800 x 20%)
(560)
(560)
_____
$ 6,340 $ 4,815
$ 1,525
c.
Consolidation Working Paper, December 31, 2014 (in thousands)
Trial Balances
Eliminations
Taken From Books
Dr (Cr)
Consolidated
Cash
Receivables
Inventories
Plant and equipment, net
Investment in Selene
Intangibles
Goodwill
Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Capital stock
Retained earnings, January 1
Pierre
Selene
$
1,000
5,600
70,000
460,000
25,040
$ 2,500
10,000
30,000
150,000
Dr
(I-2) 200
(I-1) 1,600
(I-4) 600
(R) 1,600
(R) 9,000
(4,000)
(489,82
5)
(5,000)
(90,000)
(2,800)
(163,700
)
(2,000)
(20,000)
Sales revenue
Equity in income of Selene
Cost of sales
Operating expenses
Noncontrolling interest in net income
40,000
960 (I-5)
1,600 (I-1)
2,565 (C)
16,275 (E)
8,400 (R)
800 (O)
(E) 2,000
(I-4) 300
(E) 19,700
Noncontrolling interest
Dividends
Balances
Cr
(150,00
0)
(4,815)
100,000
(C) 4,815
(I-5) 960
42,000
_____
$
-0-
8,000
_____
$ -0-
(O) 800
(N) 1,525
$ 78,100
15,600
99,040
608,600
-800
9,000
(6,800)
(653,525)
(5,000)
(90,000)
5,425
2,200
775
2,250
750
3,000
3,500
(E)
(R)
(N)
(C)
(N)
(8,400)
40,000
(165,000)
--
35,000 (I-3)
900 (I-4)
200 (I-2)
_______
$ 78,100
100,060
50,600
1,525
$
-0-
d.
Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings For the Year 2014
Sales
$ 165,000
Costs of goods sold
(100,060)
Gross margin
64,940
Operating expenses
(50,600)
Consolidated net income
14,340
Noncontrolling interest in income
(1,525)
Consolidated income to controlling interest
12,815
Retained earnings, January 1
90,000
Dividends
(40,000)
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2013
22
62,815
3,500
15,600
99,040
118,140
608,600
800
9,000
$ 736,540
$
6,800
653,525
660,325
5,000
62,815
67,815
8,400
76,215
$ 736,540
(in millions)
a.
Pentlands retained earnings from its own operations
Equity in net income, 2011 2014:
75 % of Sketchers total net income since acquisition (75% x $140)
Less 75% of amortization on asset revaluation [75% x (($60/5) x 4)]
Less 80% of goodwill impairment loss (80% x $5) (Note 1)
Less 75% of unconfirmed gain on upstream land sale (75% x $30)
Less unconfirmed gain on downstream patent sale [$10 (($10/10) x 3)]
Less 75% of unconfirmed profit on upstream ending inventory (75% x 20)
Less unconfirmed profit on downstream ending inventory
Equity in net income, 2011 2014
Consolidated retained earnings, December 31, 2014
55
105
(36)
(4)
(22.5)
(7)
(15)
(17)
3.5
$ 58.5
$ 180
50
230
$ 20
60
Goodwill
80
$ 150
$ 120
80%
b.
Investment in Sketchers, January 2, 2011
Plus equity in net income, 2011 - 2014
Less 75% of Sketchers dividends, 2011 2014 (12 x 75%)
Investment in Sketchers, December 31, 2014
$ 180
3.5
(9)
$174.5
c.
Fair value of noncontrolling interest, January 2, 2011
Plus noncontrolling interest in net income, 2011 2014:
25 % of Sketchers total net income since acquisition (25% x $140)
Less 25% of amortization on asset revaluation [25% x (($60/5) x 4)]
Less 20% of goodwill impairment loss (20% x $5) (Note 1)
Less 25% of unconfirmed gain on upstream land sale (25% x $30)
Less 25% of unconfirmed profit on upstream ending inventory (25% x 20)
Noncontrolling interest in net income, 2011 2014
Less 25% of Sketchers dividends, 2011 2014 (12 x 25%)
Consolidated noncontrolling interest, December 31, 2014
50
35
(12)
(1)
(7.5)
(5)
9.5
(3)
$ 56.5
P6.8
$150,000
$380,000
x .8
304,000
x .35
(106,400)
60,000
103,600
(41,440)
62,160
x .15
$ 9,324
Bonus
P6.9
a.
Salem reported net income
Confirmed profit in BI-downstream
Unconfirmed profit in EI-upstream
Unconfirmed loss on asset sale-downstream
Confirmed loss on asset sale-downstream
= $360,000/6
Unconfirmed gain on land sale-upstream
Confirmed gain (excess amortization) on
patent sale-upstream = $250,000/5
Unconfirmed gain on prior year patent sale,
as of beg.of year-upstream = $250,000/5 x 2
Total
$6,200,000
650,000
(500,000)
360,000
Equity in
NI
$4,960,000
650,000
(400,000)
360,000
Noncontrolling
Interest in NI
$1,240,000
(60,000)
(190,000)
(60,000)
(152,000)
(38,000)
50,000
40,000
10,000
100,000
$6,610,000
80,000
$5,478,000
20,000
$1,132,000
(100,000)
b.
$61,000,000
7,910,000
68,910,000
38,850,000
12,010,000
1,440,000
52,300,000
16,610,000
1,132,000
$15,478,000
Check: Consolidated net income to the controlling interest must equal Portlands
reported net income, including the equity income accrual. $15,478,000 = $10,000,000 +
$5,478,000.
NOTE ON THE PATENT: The patent acquired internally from Salem had a net book
value of $200,000 [= $500,000 - (3/5) X 500,000] when sold by Portland for $420,000.
The $220,000 (= $420,000 - 200,000) external gain reported in other income is fully
confirmed and does not affect the consolidation. This years $50,000 (= $250,000/5)
excess amortization is eliminatedincreasing incomebecause the patent was held
internally for the entire year. Moreover, the remaining $100,000 upstream intercompany
gain is now fully confirmed by the external sale and is added to this years income. The
$100,000 is the original $250,000 intercompany gain reduced by three years of excess
amortization at $50,000 a year.
7,000,000
Investment in MC Shops
(I)
Sales
7,000,000
60,000,000
60,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,600,000
2,600,000
8,000,000
8,000,000
4,000,000
Interest expense
Liabilities
43,000,000
All other assets
4,000,000
43,000,000
Current assets
Equity investments
Other noncurrent assets
Goodwill
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Shareholders equity, beg
Noncontrolling interest
570,300
(1,779,100)
(924,500)
(2,734,000)
(260,600)
(70,500)
(603,416)
Dividends
Revenues
Equity method income
Cost of sales and other
operating expenses
Other expenses, net
Noncontrolling int. in NI
Eliminations
Consolidated
Dr
Balances
Cr
(C) 43,200
31,400 (I-2)
307,742 (E)
43,558 (R)
(R) 85,408
(I-2) 31,400
(E) 603,416
179,216
(10,707,400)
(108,600)
(2,128,000)
(I-1) 125,700
(a) 60,400
(C) 48,200
9,396,600
471,100
________
$
-0-
1,882,700
40,200
________
$
-0-
(a) 65,300
(N) 100,499
$ 1,163,523
295,674
41,850
12,683
91,400
87,816
125,700
(E)
(R)
(N)
(C)
(N)
(a)
125,700 (I-1)
________
$1,163,523
$ 3,115,100
-3,891,700
85,408
(2,008,300)
(995,000)
(2,734,000)
(350,207)
-(12,835,400)
-11,218,900
511,300
100,499
$
-0-
Eliminating entries:
(a)
Removes equity investeesintercompany revenues and cost of sales from the equity
method income account and assigns them to revenues and cost of sales.
(C)
Removes the remaining equity method income balance, 51% of investee dividends, and
adjusts the investment by the difference.
(I-1) Removes intercompany revenues generated from investees.
(I-2) Removes intercompany receivables and payables.
(E)
Eliminates investee beginning equity against the investment (51%) and noncontrolling
interest (49%).
(R)
Recognizes the beginning-of-year goodwill balance. The remaining balance in the
investment ($43,558) represents 51% of the total goodwill balance of $85,408 (=
$43,558/.51). The remainder is credited to noncontrolling interest.
(N)
Recognizes $100,499 noncontrolling interest in investee income (= 49% x $205,100),
eliminates the noncontrolling interests dividends and updates the noncontrolling interest
for the current year.
b.
Consolidated amount
Starbucks reported
Increase
Total Assets
$ 7,092,208
6,385,900
$ 706,308
Revenues
$ 12,835,400
10,707,400
$ 2,128,000
11.06%
19.87%
Percentage increase
P6.12 Evaluation of Eliminations Disclosures
a.
Machinery & Engines is the parent company. Its records show an Investment in
Financial Products account. We also observe that the income and stockholders equity
of Machinery & Engines equal the consolidated amounts, a characteristic that is true of
parent companies of wholly-owned subsidiaries that use the complete equity method on
their own books.
b.
The fact that no goodwill arises in the consolidation of Machinery & Engines with
Financial Products suggests that Financial Products was formed as a subsidiary company
by Machinery & Engines, rather than acquired in a business combination. Goodwill arises
when the acquisition cost exceeds the fair value of the subsidiarys identifiable net assets.
When a parent company forms a subsidiary, there is no goodwill.
Another possible explanation is that the excess of acquisition cost over the acquisitiondate fair value of identifiable net assets acquired is fully explained by revaluations of
identifiable net assets.
A third explanation is that the acquired goodwill has been completely written off as
impairment loss (or amortization prior to 2002) in previous years.
c.
The goodwill on the books of Machinery & Engines suggests that Machinery & Engines
acquired other companies in the past, and merged them into the parent. Because the other
companies are no longer separate legal entities, Machinery & Engines reports their assets
and liabilities directly on its own books, as discussed in Chapter 2 of this text.
d.
Financial Products earned $400 million in revenue from Machinery & Engines; there was
no intercompany revenue in the other direction.
e.
860
2,566
522
Investment in Financial
Products
f.
3,94
8