Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
12 September 2015
The Facts
Per our discussion and the documents you have shown me, the following
are the pertinent facts:
You, Verna and your husband, Albert are married for 30 years and blessed
with five childens. On the thirtieth year of your marriage, your husband, albert
confessed to you that he had a child to another woman, Cindy Velez before your
marriage took place. Cindy Velez was terminally ill with cancer. The name of your
husbands child is Bernard who is sophomore law student. Cindys dying wish
was for your husband to formally adopt Bernard to legitimize his status and to
entitle him to be among Alberts heirs.
The foregoing provision appears that the 32-year old illegitimate child of
your husband is qualified to be adopted.
Applicable Jurisprudence
Since there can be no valid adoption without a court decree granting the
same, a mere agreement of adoption between the adopters and the parents of
the child is not valid adoption. (Santos-Ynigo v. Republic, 95 Rep. 244) Nor The
fact that the child had been adopted de facto (ampon) by the alleged adopting
parents ( Lazatin v. Judge Campos, 92 scra 250) The mere consent of your
children does not automatically constitute adoption.
Recommendation
If you still do not want the adoptee to inherit from you, I suggest that you
should ask your husband not pursue the adoption. The child is already 32 years
old and capable of living on his own. The child may still inherit from your
husband even if there is no adoption.
I appreciate the opportunity to advise you regarding this matter. Please let
me know if you wish to discuss any of these issues further. Thank You
Yours faithfully,
Atty. M. Areglado
(sdg.)