0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
100 просмотров1 страница
This document discusses the pros and cons of implementing a jury system in the Philippines. It notes that having juries would require renovating courtrooms to accommodate them, and would incur significant costs to house, feed, and care for sequestered jurors. It also argues that the jury system is imperfect and prone to corruption, as evidenced by cases of police officers being acquitted despite killing unarmed individuals. Additionally, most Philippine courtrooms may be too small to hold 12 jurors. The money required for extensive renovations could be better spent improving conditions for judges.
This document discusses the pros and cons of implementing a jury system in the Philippines. It notes that having juries would require renovating courtrooms to accommodate them, and would incur significant costs to house, feed, and care for sequestered jurors. It also argues that the jury system is imperfect and prone to corruption, as evidenced by cases of police officers being acquitted despite killing unarmed individuals. Additionally, most Philippine courtrooms may be too small to hold 12 jurors. The money required for extensive renovations could be better spent improving conditions for judges.
This document discusses the pros and cons of implementing a jury system in the Philippines. It notes that having juries would require renovating courtrooms to accommodate them, and would incur significant costs to house, feed, and care for sequestered jurors. It also argues that the jury system is imperfect and prone to corruption, as evidenced by cases of police officers being acquitted despite killing unarmed individuals. Additionally, most Philippine courtrooms may be too small to hold 12 jurors. The money required for extensive renovations could be better spent improving conditions for judges.
There is also a logistical and financial aspect to having the
jury system. This would mean reconfiguring existing
courtrooms, jurors need to be sequestered somewhere secure. They have to be billeted, fed and cared for. All these will cost a lot of money, something our country may have not enough.
Furthermore, the jury system is not perfect. It can also be
prone to corruption. The movie Runaway Jury, based on John Grishams novel, gives one glimpse on the ugly side of the jury system. Keep in mind Grisgham is practicing lawyer and knows a thing or two about these irregularities that are not often publicized. There are known cases where jurors acquitted police officers who killed unarmed individuals. They show the jury system does not gurantee fairness if the wrong people are chosen and they are already corrupted.
Only two assessors would have done, as in the Pistorius
case. A jury is usually composed of 12 good men and true. I don't know if any courtroom today in the Philippines has space for a jury. Manila courts are shameful and disgraceful. No decent courtroom. Makati is better Paraaque, more so but the courtrooms may be too small for a 12-man jury. It will cost billions to reconfigure courtrooms. The money can be used instead for other purposes, like improving further the working condition of judges to attract and keep the best and the brightest among idealistic young graduates. The system worked in my youth. Among the many CFI Judges in Manila, there was tsismis (gossip) only as to one. RUNAWAY JURY- John Grisham Plot summary[edit] Every jury has a leader, and the verdict belongs to him. Wendall Rohr and a legal team of successful tort lawyers have filed suit on behalf of plaintiff Celeste Wood, whose husband died of lung cancer. The trial is to be held in Biloxi, Mississippi, a state thought to have favorable tort laws and sympathetic juries. The defendant is Pynex, a tobacco company. Even before the jury has been sworn in, a stealth juror, Nicholas Easter, has begun to quietly connive behind the scenes, in concert with a mysterious woman known only as Marlee. Rankin Fitch, a shady "consultant" who has directed eight successful trials for the tobacco industry, has placed a camera in the courtroom in order to observe the proceedings in his office nearby. He has begun to plot many schemes to reach to the jury. He planned to get to Millie Dupree through blackmailing her husband through a tape that has him trying to bribe an official. He reaches to Lonnie Shaver through convincing a company to buy his employer and convince him through orientation. He also tries to reach
Rikki Coleman through a blackmail of revealing
her abortion to her husband. As the case continues, Fitch is approached by Marlee with a proposal to "buy" the verdict. Quite early on, it becomes obvious what Nicholas Easter and his lover/partner Marlee are doing: he is working from the inside to gain control of jury - being warm-hearted, sympathetic and very helpful to jurors who might be won over, and rather ruthless to those who prove impervious to his efforts. Eventually, Easter becomes jury foreman after the previous one falls ill (resulting from Nicholas spiking his coffee). Easter also manages to completely hoodwink and repeatedly manipulate the Presiding Judge - despite his being a veteran judge who is well aware of the vast monetary interests involved, and who (correctly) suspects both sides of resorting to underhand methods. Meanwhile, Marlee acts as Easter's agent on the outside, increasingly convincing Fitch that, indeed, Easter is in control of the jury and in a position to deliver any verdict on demand. Marlee gives the highly experienced and cynical Fitch the impression that the pair's object in doing all this is purely mercenary - to sell the verdict to highest bidder. Still, Fitch makes a great effort to discover Marlee's true name and antecedents. This turns out to be extremely difficult, and the detectives employed by Fitch express their grudging respect for her skill in hiding her tracks. With the court proceedings reaching their climax, Fitch still in the dark about Marlee's past - agrees to her proposal to pay $10 million for a favorable verdict. Only after the money was irrevocably transferred to an offshore banking account do the detectives discover the shattering truth: Marlee's parents have both died due to smoking; far from a cynical mercenary, she is in fact a zealous anti-smoking crusader. Thus, Fitch knows that he lost his principals' $10 million in addition to having lost the trial. Inside the closed jury room, Easter convinces the jury to find for the plaintiff and make a large monetary award $2 million for compensatory damages, and $400 million for punitive measures. While not able to sway the entire jury,Easter gets nine out of twelve jurors to back him which is enough, three quarters of the jury being sufficient for a valid verdict in a civil case. The defense lawyers and their employers are devastated. Meanwhile, at the Cayman Islands, Marlee makes use of her certain knowledge that tobacco companies' stocks are going to take a sharp plunge in order to short-sell them, making an enormous gain on the original $10 million - and Easter, having achieved the goal of the prolonged campaign, quickly disappears from Biloxi and gets altogether out of the US. While Easter and Marlee are now rich and satisfied that they served justice, Fitch realizes that his reputation has been destroyed and that the tobacco companies, once undefeatable, are now vulnerable to lawsuits. The book closes with Marlee returning the initial $10 million bribe to Fitch, having used it to make several times that much, and warning Fitch that she and Nicholas will always be watching. She explains that she had no intention to steal or lie, and that she cheated only because "That was all your client understood."