Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
This paper examines the process of how the combination of an appearance-oriented ideology and cosmetic surgery technology re-institutionalizes the importance of womens appearances.
Patriarchal ideology, which controls every aspect of life in Korea,
defines womens appearances as an ability that only women can possess. Also, cosmetic surgery technology promises women power, pleasure, and freedom, but within the boundaries set by their appearance.
The willing submission of women to a violent transformation of
their bodies is done with the intention of experiencing an empowerment, pleasure, and freedom from appearance. Furthermore, technology capital admits and even absorbs womens dissatisfaction and resistance to the importance placed on their appearance. As a result,
womens bodies become an object of consumption, not subject to their
own identity. Also, womens desires become dependent on each other,
and their appearances become unified.
In conclusion, womens behavior as reflected by cosmetic surgery
stems from the political conversation among patriarchal, consumptive
capitalism, and medical technology capitalism.
Keywords: cosmetic surgery, technology capital, patriarchal femininity, womens beauty, consumptive capitalism, unequal discipline
Woo Keong Ja (U, Gyeong-ja) is a lecturer of Department of Sociology at Yonsei University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Yonsei University in 2002 with a dissertation entitled Yeoseong-ui oemo juui-wa seonghyeong uiryo saneop (Womens Obsession
with Appearance and the Cosmetic Surgery Industry). E-mail: woo48@hanmir.com.
53
Introduction
Cosmetic surgery, once considered a branch of general medical services in Korea, has recently experienced a sudden expansion in market scale, valued in hundreds and thousands of dollars, and is undergoing a process of industrialization. Specialists note that cosmetic
surgery sales increased by roughly 17 percent from 1999 to 2000,
reaching almost 170 billion won (144 million dollars). If procedures
in non-specialist plastic surgery clinics (such as skin clinics, etc.),
where cosmetic surgery often takes place without being officially
reported, are included in this calculation, the overall scale of surgery
can be estimated at about 2-3 times that number. Taking all these figures into consideration, specialists assess that the cosmetic surgery
market in Korea stands at one trillion won (847 million dollars)
(Chosun Ilbo, 30 July 2001). In parallel, the market for products related to the cosmetic surgery industry has experienced a boom in sales.1
And the main consumers of this increase in the beauty market in
Korea are women.
These statistics raise a number of questions: what are the benefits that women can expect to reap through good looks? And on the
other hand, what are the losses women expect to suffer if they are
not considered good-looking? Furthermore, what are the benefits that
society gains through womens beauty complex? What is the beauty/coarseness standard against which womenas opposed to men
are judged and where does this standard come from? And how can
the phenomenon that women are just as obsessed with their appearance as in the past, or even more so, be explained in light of the
diversification and advancement in womens higher and professional
education that is taking place alongside an overall drive for equality
1. Botox, the wrinkle-eliminating serum, is a case in point; it is sold exclusively by
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Company, and its sales increased from roughly a half
billion won in 1998 to 8 billion won in 2001, and is expected to reach a record of
13-15 billion won in 2002 (Chosun Ilbo, 12 June 2001). In addition, the material
used in breast and nose surgery has also noted a rise in market sales of over 10
billion won.
54
55
them. Even adults who have taken charge of the subjectivity over
their own bodies are often unable to escape from these sociocultural
norms, and in many cases these norms are internalized to the extent
that women are unaware of the motivations behind their actions.
On the surface, it seems that the motivation behind most Korean
womens decision to undergo surgery lies in feelings of inferiority
regarding their appearance. A closer look, however, reveals that several other factors are at play. These include the ideological norms
applied to women, the dictates of a profit-guaranteeing economic
logic, a sphere of consumption that both encompasses and creates
human desire, and the development and commercialization of the
seemingly all-powerful and widely expanding frontiers of medical
technology.
Imposed Femininity: The Appearance Obsession as Patriarchal Ideology
What are the origins of womens appearance obsession? According to
Naomi Wolf, the beauty myth has nothing to do with women and
everything to do with the masculine institution and institutional
power (Wolf 1991, 13). Concepts such as motherhood and chastity, which once were of central value, have now been replaced by
good looks. The beauty myth is neither an age-old system of admiration of women, nor was it one adopted by women. It is no more
than a myth, an expression of the power relationships against which
women must struggle while fighting for the resources which men
have taken sole possession of. Beauty is neither universal nor constant (Wolf 1991, 11). Sara Halprin points out that the empowerment
of appearance and the dual nature of women are apparatuses that
limit resistance to the beauty myth. Under the masculine capitalist
system, we can see an inevitable expression of female duality by
women today: paradoxically, while resenting the premiums offered to
those women with superior looks, women secretly envy those looks
and place extreme importance on the body (Halprin 1996, 11, translators preface). Moreover, external appearances have come to be
regarded as the index measuring womens personalities. The concept
56
57
ance, plunging women into a vicious cycle that makes them even
more dependent on their looks. The limitations placed on womens
appearance as a condition of employment, as well as the emphasis
on looks imposed by the service sector, are both major variables that
limit opportunities for women to display their abilities and achieve
economic independence. These factors contribute to the reproduction
of unequal sexual power relations.
The diversification of occupations and occupational positions in
modern society has not contributed to the expansion of the middle
class with a guaranteed stable income. Rather, it has contributed to
workers submission to wage work, and has become the capital strategy that causes many to inevitably accept the discriminatory structure of wages. The discriminatory structure of labor is manifest in the
case of female laborers, who are bestowed with the status of members of the industrial reserve force. At this stage, the most crucial elements are femininity and the norm of feminine beauty. For example,
in 1994, womens associations and the Korean Teachers and Educational Workers Union protested the requests of 44 companies to recommend women graduates of vocational high schools of specific
height and weight for employment (Seo 2000). Following this case,
the regulations regarding appearances as conditions of employment
disappeared, but in practice appearances continued to be counted as
an essential element in the employment process. As a result, teachers
preparing their students for the job market in vocational high schools
have come to focus first and foremost on grooming their students
appearances rather than concentrating on academic directions,
grades, or abilities. The students have found themselves most easily
employed in simpler assistant positions (Yi 1994, 35-37).
The quantitative increase and diversification in the service sector
are closely related to womens obsession with appearance. As the
types of occupation demanding a specific physique as part of official
employment requirements continue to increase, such as doumi and
narrator models,2 women are being evaluated not according to their
2. Doumi and narrator models are women in their twenties who are hired to help sell
58
59
60
61
4. Balsamo calls this the economics of medical diagnoses (Balsamo 1996, 65).
5. See Korean Medical Association (2001).
62
metic industry. They combine the idea that women must be beautiful
with the more modernized version that beautiful appearance is
another kind of competitive power, and arrive at the conclusion that
all means are legitimate in the aspiration towards beauty. From this
perspective, plastic surgery simply becomes modern womens determined approach to self-management. With the commercial introduction of plastic surgery, once normal female bodies become diseased
and are skillfully dismantled such that the ideal feminine beauty can
be quantitatively evaluated. A monopolistic empowerment of surgery
and a technical notion of beauty is established through the incessant
adoption of new techniques. In this way, women actually contribute
to the immense growth of the plastic surgery industry and inevitably
become increasingly dependent on it.
63
The article has thus far covered the power of appearances in its narrow meaning: the power and ability to obtain the desired commodities and resources. For women, the power of appearance as defined
within the social standard of beauty appears in both the workplace
and the marriage market. The power of appearance, a power widely
recognized by women who want to undergo plastic surgery, is
strengthened once women who have surgery experience a real
increase in power. As one 27-year-old company employee attests,
after having surgery on her chin and nose, followed up a year later
with liposuction on her cheeks, she keenly realized that a beautiful
appearance meant a real increase in social power. After her surgery,
she explained, her life completely changed, and she met a man and
got a job. She noted that had she not undergone plastic surgery, she
doubted that she would have had a chance to display her hardearned academic skills. This is exactly the empowerment of appearance felt by women most keenly in the job and marriage market.
At this point, however, it is essential to expand further on the
conception of the power that women acquire through plastic surgery.
The transformation of womens appearances brings with it not only
officially recognized beauty but encourages active and animated
behavior. The power that ensues from this change must include not
only control over people and objects but also control over daily life.
More particularly, the process of restoring initiative, which occurs in
womens encounter with the world through their bodies, provides
64
65
women question whether their behavior might be described as plastic surgery addiction.
This addiction . . . seems to happen to those of us that are well
off . . . once you fix one part successfully, you want to hurry up
and fix another, and then another. And its all up to you. Thats the
way it is for me; once I fix my waist, Im thinking of getting work
done on other parts of my body. But if it doesnt work out, I wont
even think of setting foot [in another clinic] again (company worker, 23).
66
gaze. And yet, most women think that pleasure comes from fulfilling
a general, universal standard of beauty, not the one generated by a
Korean male gaze. And this understanding contributes to yet more
active consent to surgery.
Release from the Pain Caused by Appearance
The process of socializing appearance results in the creations of feelings of inferiority about appearance and an identity crisis. Women
internalize the gaze that compares their bodies to an ideal, unrealistic
standard. They therefore nurture feelings of inferiority about their
own bodies in direct proportion to a subjective distance from this
standard. Women who turn to plastic surgery explain that they are
motivated to undergo the procedure by a desire to overcome feelings
of inferiority and to recover self-esteem. Clearly, appearance is one of
the important factors that constitute womens identity in Korea.
Womens inferiority complex is not limited to appearance, but
extends to doubt about their personality and resentment towards
their environment, and further results in a pessimistic life view that
affects their family and parents. The appearance problem affects
women, their families, and society in general through the sharing of
similar experiences. These individual feelings of inferiority about
their bodies are based on a more general, sociocultural ideology,
which is enforced from the smallest units of society up, and constitutes a much larger, problematic social structure.
Even beyond the inferiority complex, some women view their
bodies in a pathological way. They associate their bodies with feelings of unbearable pain, describing their bodies as faulty, repulsive, awful to look at, and abnormal. When analyzing their bodies on a gendered basis rather than an aesthetic one, women often try
to discriminate between their own surgery and the cosmetic procedures of others. Women explain that they seek to become normal by
fixing their physical faults. Cosmetic surgery, then, is simply a modern convenience, which, by shaping and thus correcting womens
bodies, can guarantee them a normal life.
67
68
Institutionalization of Resistance
The institutionalization of the appearance obsession and dependence
on technology is established not only through the mutual consent
between power, pleasure, and liberation, but through a strategy that
absorbs the elements of dissatisfaction into the establishment existing
order. First, the physical pain and side effects that are the result of
violent mutilation of perfectly healthy bodiespain undergone in
order to obtain the body promised by technologyare synthesized
69
70
women into a framework of uniform mass production while simultaneously individualizing them. In the end, women who vie for increased social status using this homogeneous aesthetic gauge, following the values of the homogeneous look, are not organized into a single group but are isolated, atomized individuals. Under such circumstances, the problems and damage arising from plastic surgery cannot
but be individualized. Nonetheless women who experience failed surgical procedures have no choice but to become even more dependent
on surgery, and continue to resignedly undergo plastic surgery again
and again. These women actually consider themselves lucky to be
able to continuously undergo plastic surgery. Rather than feeling
doubtful about the process, women who have undergone complicated surgical procedures end up appreciating the superiority of medical
technology and their doctors, and become even more wrapped up in
their looks. Through this process, women are synthesized into the
system of appearance obsession and dependence on technology.
Next, let us examine the problem of the time limit of plastic
beauty. Even once women have undergone successful surgery and
have obtained both power and pleasure through their new appearance, their power and pleasure is short-lived. Humans naturally go
through an aging process, and physical power goes hand in hand
with youth. With or without cosmetic surgery, aging is a crucial issue
for women. Many women familiarize themselves with information
regarding the slowing down of the aging process, displaying the
extent to which aging both pushes them to the sidelines and brings
about a significant loss of power.
A 27-year-old company employee attests to the fact that after
undergoing plastic surgery four years ago, she was able to enjoy
greater social benefits. However, with time she began to feel victimized by the continual influx of new, younger employees, and started
to notice that some of her other female colleagues were making an
effort to improve their skills rather than their looks. This is an interesting revelation, because it signals the introduction of a new concept. Doubt about the belief that a pretty face awards a woman with
success opens the door to the concept that women can also possess
71
highly developed skills. But even the women who go this route find
their way back to the operating table. This is a result of both the
deeply felt power of transformation that surgery is able to grant in
the first place, and a situation of limited choice that does not permit
any other course of action on the other. This is how the private lives
of women who have undergone cosmetic surgery are stymied and
destroyed by the false promise offered by a highly developed cosmetic surgery industry, delivered through the conflicting messages
appearing intermittently but clearly at all levels of society.
Finally, let us examine the effect of structural synthesis, which
brings about an active consumer consciousness in women. Women
today look upon the cosmetic surgery industry from a market perspective and situate themselves as consumers in relation to it. They
approach the industry rationally, and invest time in visiting different
clinics before they make their decision, much as they would when
shopping for other commodities. Their greatest source of information
is the Internet, which facilitates the real-time exchange of opinions,
and obviates the physical limitations of space. Cosmetic surgery sites6
are filled with discussions and information by past and future
patients, who touch upon an array of issues including womens concerns about their appearance, the different types of procedures, the
time they take, their expense, as well as the ensuing pain, fear, and
side effects. Coming not from the supply but from the demand sector,
these women, thirsting for precise information, register in these sites
to exercise their power as consumers. While consumer rights over
medical technology are not guaranteed, they choose one of the three
following choices. First, they acquire quasi-professional knowledge of
operating techniques and surgical materials. Second, they engage in
an active comparison of the degree of skill of different hospital doc-
72
tors, operating styles, preferred methods, price, service, and sideeffect care. Lastly, they make an inventory of the problematic hospitals and exclude them from the market. Women interested in plastic
surgery, or who have undergone surgical procedures in the past, take
these actions as strategies to interfere with the monopoly of cosmetic
surgery and counter the tyranny of cosmetic surgery technology.
They believe that in this way they can disrupt the cosmetic industry
inciting women to undergo surgery. However, these strategies are far
from expressions of doubt regarding the industry itselfindeed, they
serve to deepen womens dependence on plastic surgery. In reality,
the belief that the cosmetic industry will develop in an appropriate
direction under the control and observation of women consumers
actually serves to hide the subordination of women to the industry
and provides a means for its even wider circulation.
73
74
75
7. Neil Postman, formerly the chair of the Department of Culture and Communication at New York Universitys School of Education, defines technopoly as a new
kind of totalitarian society born of the monopoly of technology.
76
body and desire for correction of the body of men, children, and even
the elderly. The popularization of plastic surgery and the remarkable
increase in the cosmetic surgery market attest to the fact that womens
frustration with their bodies has been aggravated and consequently
their dependence on medical technology has been dependened.
Technological capital does not work to specifically maintain the
patriarchal aesthetic standard, but merely takes advantage of it.
Indeed, technological capital is interested mainly in the acquisition
and creation of profit. Its aim to guarantee control over the human
body, beginning with those of women, is backed by the logic of capital concerning the creation and expansion of market interestslike
selling shoes to a monkey by creating a situation such that it cannot
walk without them.
Points of Fissure
Even in the institutionalized paradigm of appearance obsession and
dependence on technology, points of fissure can be detected. First,
one might note the confusion caused by duplicity in the aesthetic
standard. The traditional structure gives power to beautiful women,
thus promoting an obsession with appearance, limiting womens
empowerment. However, the popularization of cosmetic surgery has
brought the a potential to mass-produce artificially manufactured
beauty, and the rise of this beauty threatens to deteriorate into a situation in which women will no longer be divided along the line of a
single beauty ideal.
This loss of control over women again brings about the situation
in which distinctions are made between appearances that are plastic
versus natural. The plastic beauty standard is suppressed, and
womens appearance obsession and desire for plastic surgery are disparaged. The very effort to accommodate the patriarchal standard of
beauty is resolutely punished. Within this discourse, women have
come to feel ashamed and self-accusatory regarding their desire to
undergo plastic surgery, and as a result, are secretive about their
77
operations. So what is the strategic value of openly admitting to having had plastic surgery? Open admission frequently results not in
acquisition of self-respect, but in a depreciation of self-value. However, if the decision to undergo surgery is inevitable, the attempt to
form and circulate a collective discourse among women with similar
experiences can become a strategic attack on the industry. This type
of coming out can call upon the repressed experiences of women
and become the precondition for the creation of such a discourse.
Specifically, experiences such as surgery, failed dieting, the revival of
inferiority complexes with time even after successful surgery, and
other problems arising relating to the appearance obsession (for
example, the anxiety created by worrying about keeping the secret of
having had plastic surgery, or identity crises that arise from their
undiscovered talents) can be taken out of the domain of the individual and be collectivized and organized as a discourse of resistance,
thus offering the first opportunity to form a discourse of resistance.
But while this kind of discourse offers a resistance to the divisiveness
of patriarchy, it is always in danger of falling into the capitalist logic
of the interests of medical technology.
The second point of fissure can be found is the less obvious question of economic inequality. While plastic surgery offers the prospect
of eliminating physical differences and inequalities, it cannot escape
the much-related question of economic inequality and capital. More
specifically, the development and popularization of plastic surgery
technology does not guarantee that the road leading to beauty will be
open to everyone. But the logic of the homogenization of gendered
desire, which serves to eliminate class differences between women,
creates a situation in which women unhesitatingly embrace the standardized logic of medical technology, thus bolstering the popular conviction that technological development goes hand in hand with an
advanced civilization blurs the acute discord between classes. This is
based on the belief that advanced technology brings with it high efficiency, which in turn carries with it high costs, and this again associated with technological progress and superiority.
The development of the cosmetic surgery industry encourages
78
the belief in the aesthetic openness and aesthetic equality that would
ensure that everyone has the right to enjoy the benefits of the industry. Reality, however, does not permit equal access to beauty. The
more the linked issues of appearance obsession and dependence on
technology is institutionalized, the more precise and defined becomes
the logic of capital, thus bringing the more inconspicuous problem of
economic inequality to the fore. Even if the discipline of technological capital is internalized, realistic economic limitations form a
boundary that is impossible to overcome. In this way, the homogeneity created by class desire for plastic surgery deepens class alienation.
The fact is that in order to enjoy the benefits of technological capitalwhether in terms of plastic surgery, genetic engineering, or otherwiseone must possess the economic capability to do so. This
defines the most significant point of fissure in the system of internalization of capitalist logic.
Conclusion
This paper has examined the process in which the combination of the
appearance obsession and the technology of cosmetic surgery reinstitutionalizes the obsession with appearance in a modern sense.
Patriarchal ideology, which permeates not only daily life, but also the
processes of production, labor, and consumption, teaches women
that the single attribute defining their worth is physical appearance.
It then promises women power, pleasure, and liberation through this
domain. Within this paradigm, the development of the technology of
cosmetic surgery promises millions of frustrated women to make
their potential a reality and claims that it can deliver equal beauty to
all. As a result, many women come to believe that, through surgery,
or through the simple existence of the possibility of surgery, they too
can achieve the idealistic standard of beauty at any time they please,
and thus eagerly and actively enter the beauty industry market. At
the same time, however, these women come to helplessly accept the
logic of technological capital that makes women consistently examine
79
80
REFERENCES
An, Hye-ryeon. 2001. Peminijeum-ui geo-ul (The Mirror of Feminism). Seoul:
Ingansarang.
Baek, Suk-hui. 1998. Seonghyeong susul jeonhu sinchesang mit jaa jonjunggam-e daehan bigyo yeongu (A Comparison of Physical Conditions
and Self-Esteem before and after Plastic Surgery). Masters thesis, Kyung
Hee University.
Balsamo, Anne. 1996. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg
Women. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Bartky, Sandra L. 1988. Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of
Patriarchal Power. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on Resistance,
edited by Irene Diamond and Lee Quinby. Boston, Mass.: Northeastern
University Press.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1991. Sobi-ui sahoe (The Society of Consumption). Seoul:
Moonye Publishing Co. Originally published as The Consumer Society:
Myths and Structures (London: Sage Publications, 1970).
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Feminism, Foucault, and the Politics of the Body. In
Up against Foucault: Exploration of Some Tensions between Foucault and
Feminism, edited by Caroline Ramazanoglu. New York: Routledge.
Brumberg, Joan. 1997. The Body Project: An Intimate History of American
Girls. New York: Random House.
Davis, Kathy. 1995. Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic
Surgery. London: Routledge.
Featherstone, Mike. 1993. Sobi munhwa sok-ui yukche (The Body in Consumer Culture). Munhwa gwahak (Cultural Science) 4. Translated by
Kim Seong-ho. Originally published as The Body in Consumer Culture. In The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory, edited by Mike
Featherstone, Mike Hepworth, and Bryan S. Turner (London: Sage Publications, 1991).
Gillespie, Rosemary. 1996. Women, the Body Brand Extension in Medicine:
Cosmetic Surgery and the Paradox of Choice. Women and Health 24.
Gilman, Sander L. 1991. Making the Body BeautifulA Cultural History of
Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Goodman, Marcene. 1996. Culture, Cohort, and Cosmetic Surgery. Journal
of Women and Aging 8.
Griffin, Christine. 1985. Typical Girls?: Young Women from School to the Job
Market. London: RKP.
81
Haiken, Elizabeth. 1997. Venus Envy: A History of Cosmetic Surgery. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Halprin, Sara. 1996. Yeppeun eolgul kompeullekseu (The Pretty-Face Complex).
Translated by Choe Sun-hui. Seoul: Munhak Sasangsa. Originally published as Look at My Ugly Face!: Myths and Musings on Beauty and Other
Perilous Obsessions with Womens Appearance (New York: Viking, 1995).
Han, Seol-a. 1993. Yeoseong-ui oemo gwalli-e daehan yeoseongjuuijeok
jeopgeun: dai-eoteu gyeongheom-eul jungsim-euro (A Feminist Study
on Womens Body Shaping and Grooming Practices: With a Focus on
the Dieting Experience). Masters thesis, Ehwa Womans University.
Hong, Seong-hui. 1999. Hanggongsa yeoseungmuwon-ui oemo jungsim-ui
goyong-e gwanhan yeongu (A Study of Appearance-Based Employment
of Flight Attendants). Masters thesis, Sungshin Womens University.
Jeong, Jae-eun. 1993. 20 dae yeoseong-ui siljae chehyeong-gwa isanghyeong-e gwanhan yeongu (A Study of the Real Bodies of Women in
Their Twenties and the Ideal Figure). Masters thesis, Seoul National
University.
Jo, Hye-jeong. 1994. Yongmo jehan-e kkallin munhwajeok jeonje (The Cultural Premises Underlying Appearance-Based Employment Qualifications). Samujik yeoseong (The Office Woman) 16.
Jo, Ok-ra. 2001. Hanguk sahoe-eseo nai-deum, geurigo yeoseong-ui nai
(Aging in Korean Society and Womens Age). Tto hana-ui munhwa
(Another Culture) 16: 21-32.
Jo, Sun-gyeong. 1994. Yongmo jehan, geu gyeongjejeok jeonje-ui heogu
(Appearance-Based Employment Qualifications and the Falsehood of Its
Economic Premises). Samujik yeoseong 16.
Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 1996. Yeoja-ui yukche, namja-ui siseon: topeulliseu
sahoehak (Womens Body, Male Gaze: The Sociology of Toplessness).
Translated by Kim Jeong-eun. Seoul: Hankyung Newspaper Co. Originally published as Corps de femmes, regards dhommes: sociologie des
seins nus (Paris: Nathan, 1995).
Ko, Seok-ju, and Jeong Jin-gyeong. 1992. Oemo-wa eogap: munhwajeok
gwannyeom-ui naemyeonhwa-ga yeoseong-ege michineun yeonghyang
(Appearances and Repression: How Women Are Influenced by the Internalization of Cultural Ideals). Hanguk yeoseonghak (Journal of Korean
Womens Studies) 8.
Korean Medical Association. 2001. Jiyeok mit jeonmun gwamokbyeol uiwon
bunpo hyeonhwang (The Present Distribution of Medical Services
according to District and Medical Specialty). Quoted in Dong-a Ilbo, 17
82
July 2001.
Liggett, John. 1997. Eolgul munhwa, geu yesuljeok wijang (Culture of the
Face and Its Artistic Camouflage). Translated by Yi Yeong-sik. Seoul:
Bogo Sipeun Chaek. Originally published as The Human Face (New
York: Stein and Day, 1974).
Morgan, Kathryn. 1992. Women and the Knife: Cosmetic Surgery and the
Colonization of Womens Bodies. Hypatia 6: 25-53.
Postman, Neil. 2001. Tekeunopolli (Technopoly). Translated by Kim Gyun.
Seoul: Minumsa. Originally published as Technopoly: The Surrender of
Culture to Technology (New York: Vintage Books, 1993).
Seo, Minja. 2000. No Equal Employment Opportunities? http://womenlink.
or.kr/english/news/news01_04.html (accessed December 19, 2003).
Seo, So-yeong, and Yun Yeong-ju. 1996. Tto hana-ui gulle, mi-ui sinhwa
(Yet Another Bridle: The Beauty Myth). Yeoseong-gwa sahoe (Women
and Society) 7.
Seong, Yeong-sin. 1997. Sobi-wa gwanggo sok-ui sinche imiji: areumdaumui damnon (Body Images Created in Consumption and Advertising: The
Discourse of Beauty). Sahoe bipyeong (Social Criticism) 17.
Sullivan, Deborah A. 2001. Cosmetic Surgery: The Cutting Edge of Commercial
Medicine in America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Wajcman, Judy. 2001. Peminijeum-gwa gisul (Feminism and Technology).
Translated by Jo Ju-hyeon. Seoul: Dangdae. Originally published as
Feminism Confronts Technology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).
Wolf, Naomi. 1991. The Beauty Myth. London: Vintage.
Yi, Dong-yeon. 1993. Yukche-ui gwalli-wa munhwa hyogwa (Body Shaping and Its Cultural Effects). Munhwa gwahak (Cultural Science) 4.
Yi, Je-jin. 1994. Sangeopgo yeohaksaeng-ui chwieop gyoyuk hyeonsil (The
Present State of Vocational Education for Girls Attending Commercial
High Schools). Samujik yeoseong 16.
Yi, Seong-uk. 1993. Yeoja-ui nun-gil, bolgeori-ui sungmyeong-e daehayeo
(Womans Gaze and the Fate of the Feast to the Eyes). Munhwa gwahak 4.
Yi, Yeong-ja. 1997. Isanghwadoen mom, areumdaun mom-eul wihan satu
(The Desperate Struggle for the Idealized, Beautiful Body). Sahoe bipyeong 17.
Yun, Yeong-ju. 2000. Ilganji mit yeoseongji-e natanan hanguk yeoseong-ui
daieoteu damnon bunseok (An Analysis of the Diet Discourse in Daily
Newspapers and Womens Magazines). Masters thesis, Seoul National
University.