Lifting Analysis Report - Template

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM
LIFTING ANALYSIS
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUTION
0
B
A
REV.
ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

20/05/05
ANA
ISSUED FOR CLIENT

COMMENTS
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK
APPR.
APPR.
ENGINEER APPROVAL
APPR.
CONTRACTOR
COMPANY
STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER
DOCUMENT NUMBER
AG-03-002
CLASS
REVISION
STATUS
A
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
PAGE:
2 of 31
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

REVISIONS
PAGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
REMARKS
E
APP
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
EXHI.
ATTACHMENTS
REVISIONS
PAGES
A
B
C
D
8
X
X
22
X
X
2
X
X
2
X
X
16
X
X
10
X
X
2
X
X
PAGES
REVISIONS
B
C
D
REMARKS
E
REMARKS
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
PAGE:
3 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 6
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS................................................................................6
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION............................................................................................7
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY..................................................................................................7
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY..............................................................................................7
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD............................................................................................8
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS.......................................................................9
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS...........................................9
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS................................10
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION...............................................................................................10
3 DESIGN PREMISES..........................................................................................................11
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS....................................................................................11
3.2 MATERIAL................................................................................................................ 11
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM.........................................................................................12
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM......................................................................................................... 12
4 COMPUTER MODEL......................................................................................................... 14
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS..........................................................................................14
4.1.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................... 14
4.1.2 ALLOWABLE STRESS................................................................................................ 14
4.1.3 CONTINGENCY FACTOR........................................................................................... 14
4.1.4 DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR.........................................................................15
4.1.5 CONSEQUENCE FACTOR.......................................................................................... 15
4.1.6 SKEW EFFECT............................................................................................................ 15
4.1.7 RIGGING ARRANGEMENT......................................................................................... 15
4.1.8 COG VARIATION......................................................................................................... 16
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL............................................................................................18

4.2.1 GENERAL VIEW.......................................................................................................... 18
4.2.2 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................. 19
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM...........................................................................................19

4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM.............................................................................................19
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS......................................................................................19
4.5.1 HOOK POINT............................................................................................................... 19
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
PAGE:
4 of 31
4.5.2 SLINGS........................................................................................................................ 19
4.5.3 MODEL GLOBAL STABILITY.....................................................................................19
5 LOADING........................................................................................................................... 21
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION..........................................................................21
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION.......................................................................21
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS.....................................................................................23
5.3.1 PRE-LOADING COMBINATION..................................................................................23
5.3.2 LOADING COMBINATION WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE FACTOR............................24
5.3.3 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER CONNECTING TO PADEYE...................24
5.3.4 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER NOT CONNECTING TO PADEYE..........25
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS......................................................................................................... 26
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY..............................................................................................26
6.1.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD.................................................................................................. 26
6.1.2 PRE-LOADINGS AND LOADING COMBINATION......................................................26
6.1.3 LOADING SUMMARY AND COG................................................................................27
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS..............................................................................................28

6.3 SLINGS LOAD......................................................................................................... 28
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS.......................................................................................29
6.4.1 MEMBER CONNECTED TO PADEYE.........................................................................29
6.4.2 MEMBER NOT CONNECTED TO PADEYE................................................................29
6.5 REACTION............................................................................................................... 29
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS..............................................................................31
ATTACHMENTS
APPENDIX A
PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION
APPENDIX B
STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY
APPENDIX C
JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS
APPENDIX D
UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS
APPENDIX E
SACS INPUT FILE
APPENDIX F
SACS OUTPUT FILE
Appendix F1
Maximum Joint Deflection List
Appendix F2
Member Unity Check Summary
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
APPENDIX G
REFERENCES DRAWING
10/10/10
A
5 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
INTRODUCTION
1.1
OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS
10/10/10
A
6 of 31
The purpose of this calculation is to check the adequacy of DIESEL STORAGE to sustain the loads
that may occur during the lifting conditions, which comprise of :
The dead weight of Diesel Storage Platform
The dynamic amplification due to offshore site.
The lifting sling load distribution accounting for CoG variation and sling length inaccuracy.
The design of lifting padeyes
The calculation is based on the design data and the requirements in the Structural Design Basis ,
General Specification, General Specification for Design of Offshore Topside Structure (Ref. 7),
General Specification for Load-out, Sea-fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore
Structures (Ref. 10) & API RP2A-WSD 21st 2000 Edition (Ref. 11).
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION
2.1
WEIGHT SUMMARY
10/10/10
A
7 of 31
The detail weight summary of DIESEL lifting condition without contingency as well as with
contingency is given in the following table. Definition and detail of the loading condition is given in
chapter 5.1.
Unit : kN
Structure
Loading Condition
Main Structure Self Weight
Structural Appurtenance
Diesel Storage Tanks Opt.
Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump
Piping Dry
Electrical/Instrumentations
DIESEL
STORAGE
Actual Weight
Cont's
Precog: saclst.1000ta , keyword : basic load
2.2
CENTRE OF GRAVITY
The centre of gravity and origin co-ordinates are shown below :
Platform North
8.40 m
PL09
1
PL12
Diesel
Storage
DIESEL STORAGE
Deck Center
(-0.000, 0.000)
11.75 m
X
DIESEL CoG
(-0.90,0.34)
2
PL05
PL06
Actual Weight
with
Contingencies
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
8 of 31
The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

CoG (m)
Structure
DIESEL STORAGE
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads is performed with considering the 1.30 dynamic amplification factor and
shifted of centre of gravity location. The slings angles are measured between slings and the
horizontal plane (degree) see sketch below.
HOOK
POINT
Point
No.
1
2
3
4
Point
Diesel Storage
Vertical Angle (
Member
Degree
The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

Padeye on the DIESEL STORAGE:
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Lifting Point Type
Attached to:
Load Case
10/10/10
Member
9 of 31
Load (kN)
Padeye
Padeye
Padeye
Padaye
From the above member sling load table, the maximum sling load DIESEL STORAGE is 728.75 kN.
Thus, this load will be used for pad-eyes design. The pad-eye design and calculation will be
explained in Appendix A in this report.
File dari pltlst.LPA, keyword : member forces
2.4
API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Maximum stress ratios obtained for members are :
Members connected to padeye :
The maximum interaction ratio below is checked with the consequence factor of 1.35.
Location
Member
Properties
Load
Case
UC
DIESEL
STORAGE
Pstlst.NLP, key word : r than 1

Members not connected to padeye :
These member below are not connected to the lift points. These members are checked with the
consequence factor of 1.15.
Location
Member
Properties
Load
Case
UC
DIESEL
STORAGE
Pstlst.FLP, key word : r than 1

All member have satisfied the API RP2A WSD 21 st Edition / AISC 9th Edition code checking
requirements in lifting condition.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
2.5
10/10/10
A
10 of 31
API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, punching shear check is
not performed in the analysis.
2.6
API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, joint minimum required
strength ratios is not resulted in the analysis.
2.7
JOINT DEFLECTION
The maximum joint deflection occurred on the lifting analysis (included lifting in shifted position) are
shown below :
Displacements given are relative displacements with regard to the extremities of span (mm).
Location
Member
Span
(l)
Properties
Deflection
Relative (d)
Load
Case
d/l
DIESEL
STORAGE
All deflections are acceptable, which are less than 1/360 for main beam and 1/300 for other beam
(for cantilever l design value is twice the cantilever length).
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
DESIGN PREMISES
3.1
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
10/10/10
A
11 of 31
The present analysis is carried out based on the design criteria described in the following documents
1) Document no. Design of Offshore Topside Structure
2) Document no. MTO -Structural
3) Document no. Equipment List
4) Drawings References:
a.
DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
b.
DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
3.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1) Document No. Structural Design Basis
2) Document No. Platforms Weight Control Report
3.1.2 Company General Specification

3) Document No. Weight Monitoring and Weighing Offshore Units, Rev. 02.
4) Document No. Design of Offshore Topsides Structures, Rev. 02.
5) Document No. Material for Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 01.
6) Document No. Fabrication of Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 02.
7) Document No. Load-out, Sea-Fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore Structures,
Rev.01.
3.1.3 Codes and Standards

8) API RP2A-WSD. 21st Edition, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Construction
Fixed Offshore Platforms 2000.
9) AISC 9th Edition/ASD, American Institute of Steel Construction/Allowable Stress Design 1989.
3.2
MATERIAL
All structures will be made of steel, using the following properties:
Steel density
: 7.850 t/m3
Elastic modulus
: 205000 MPa
Poisson's ratio
: 0.3
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
12 of 31
PAGE:
Steel grades are per basic engineering drawings with the following corresponding yield stresses:
for grade S355
for grade S235
Fy = 355 MPa
thk 16 mm
Fy = 345 MPa
16 mm < thk 40 mm
Fy = 335 MPa
40 mm < thk
Fy = 235 MPa
thk 16 mm
Fy = 225 MPa
16 mm < thk 40 mm
Fy = 215 MPa
40 mm < thk
Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

See hereunder the steel category specification and yield stress.
SPECIAL CATEGORY
FIRST CATEGORY
SECOND CATEGORY
Piles
S355
Tubular OD < 12
S235
Deck leg
S355
Tubular OD > 12
S355
Tubular
S235
WPG
S355
(Web height > 600mm) (*)
WPG
S235
(Web height > 600mm) (*)
Padeyes
S355
Rolled section
S235
(Web height < 600mm) (*)
Rolled section
S235
Plates
S355
Plates
Plates
S235
S235
(*) Welded plate girder shall be preferred for web height is superior to 600mm, else rolled section
shall be used.
3.3
COMPUTER PROGRAM
The following software will be used for modelling and designing of structures :
SACS version 5.2.
This software is developed and produced by EDI (Engineering Dynamics Inc.)
The analysis uses the following co-ordinates :
X : Plant east
3.4
Y : Plant north
Z : Vertical up
UNIT SYSTEM
The following unit system shall be adopted in the SACS analysis files and design documents:
-
Great length
: in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)
Small length
: in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)
Forces and moments
: in kN or kNm
Masses
: in kg or metric tons
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Stresses
: in kN/cm2
Angles
: in degree
10/10/10
A
13 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
COMPUTER MODEL
4.1
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
10/10/10
A
14 of 31
4.1.1 General
The lifting analysis to be carried out are classical static linear analysis of a three dimensional space
frame computer model comprising the Diesel Storage main structure.
Each loading case, an equivalent linear stiffness matrix simulating the behaviour of the structure
automatically computed by the software before the structural analysis of the whole frame proceeds.
The lift arrangement is based on a hook position above the deck CoG and such that the minimum
sling angle with the horizontal is 60 (+/-) 5.
In addition to the nominal CoG position, 2 extreme positions of the CoG are investigated in a
variation along X ans 2 other positions in a variation along Y, which are equal to 10% of the Diesel
Storage dimensions, but not less than within a 2.0 m.
Member stress checking and joint check are performed according to API RP2A WSD 21 st edition
4.1.2 Allowable Stress

Code checking is done using basic allowable stresses
4.1.3 Contingency Factor

4.1.3.1 Provisions
Gravity loads :
equipment dry weights,
piping dry weight,
structural dead weight,
Instrumentation & Electrical bulk,
live loads,
are calculated based upon the Loading Diagrams, Equipment List and also taking into account the
latest up-dated equipment weight including the following provision:
10 %
provision on equipment dry weight is accounted for supporting structure accesses &
walkways,
15 %
provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,
5%
provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,
5%
provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
PAGE:
15 of 31
4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

Contingencies are covered by applying where appropriate in the load combinations the following
contingency factors.
15 %
on main structural weight,
15 %
on secondary structural weight,
25 %
on mechanical weight,
20 %
on dry piping weight,
25 %
on bulk electrical weight,
25 %
on bulk instrumentation weight,
25 %
on itemised electrical weight,
25 %
on itemised instrumentation weight,
25 %
for safety items,
0%
on environmental loads,
0%
on live loads.
The weight contingency factor as specified above are applied on dry weight plus provision.
4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

The dynamic amplification factor is 1.30 for lifted weight less than 100 tonnes.
4.1.5 Consequence Factor

A consequence factor of 1.35 is applied for the code checking of any member attached to lifting
points, as well as joints to which these members are connected for punching shear verification.
A consequence factor of 1.15 is applied for the other members and joints.
4.1.6 Skew Effect

The skew effect is applied to take into account shortening or stretching of slings. The load is factored
by 1.33 as a skew load factored (SKL) for flexible object (module) as per GS-STR-401 Section
6.2.2.5 skew load distribution for Single Hook Lifts and 1.15 skew load factored for lifting using
spreader bar
4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

Diesel Storage is lifted with 4-off slings from a single hook point to padeyes. The hook point is
managed to locate above the centre of gravity of structure. The slings are modeled by tubular
3ODX1.25WT with a Youngs modulus of 100000 Mpa, in order to take into account slings stiffness
for analysis. The minimum angle for the all slings is 60 (+/-) 5 degree. The slings arrangement is
shown below.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
16 of 31
4.1.8 CoG Variation

The effect of the variation of the position of the centre of gravity is investigated. The 4-off positions
are investigated in a variation along X and Y equal to 10% of the structure dimensions, but not less
than within a 2.0 m. The minimum 2.0 m CoG variations along X and Y to be used for this lifting
analysis.
CoG positions are given in the table :
Diesel Storage
CoG shifts
Longitudinal
Transversal
X (m)
Y (m)
5%
5%
X.XX < 1.00
X.XX < 1.00
Deck dimension
Shift +/- (%)
Shifts +/- (m)
Shifts to be used
1.00
COG THEORITICAL POSITION
CoG Original
1.00
COG SHIFTED POSITIONS

CoG 1 (-,-)
CoG 2 (+,-)
CoG 3 (-,+)
CoG 4 (+,+)
The sketch showing the variation of CoG are shown in figure below :
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
17 of 31
4
Platform
North
CoG
3
1
4
2
2
CoG shifted (4 Location)
2 m x 2 m Box
The shifts of centre of gravity are obtained by applying dummy forces with zero resultant at four
joints. Dummy forces calculations are presented in Section 5.2 CoG Shift Force Calculation.
The loaded joints at Diesel Storage are node 001L, 002L, 003L and 004L. Those loaded joints are
located at pile heads of the structures.
This is illustrated by figure below :
Diesel Storage SHIFT X
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Diesel Storage SHIFT Y
4.2
STRUCTURAL MODEL
The computer structural model plot are shown in the Appendix B.
4.2.1 General View

The following plot shows the general model of the Diesel Storage
10/10/10
A
18 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
4.2.2
10/10/10
A
19 of 31
Description
The different elements included in the structural model are defined here below:
-
Structural part
Primary and secondary structures together with flooring (including the deck plating, grating, handrail,
stringers and joists) are in the structural section. Only the main structure is modelled in this report,
the other structural components will be input as uniform member load or joint load.
4.3
GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM

Nodes of the structural model are described in a global axis system defined as follows:
4.4
The origin of the global axis system is taken at the Chart Datum/LAT and comes up to the centre
of the main deck legs.
Z is vertical from the Chart Datum/LAT
Y is horizontal parallel to the platform north
X is horizontal parallel to the platform east
LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM

Each member of the structural model has its own local axis system in which calculated internal
forces and moments are expressed. It can also be used to introduce loads on the members.
4.5
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
4.5.1 Hook Point

The hook point is modelled using 1-off node, as explained in section 4.1.6 Skew Effect. Basically,
this node is fixed for the 6 degrees of freedom.
4.5.2 Slings
All slings are released in local moment Y and Z at hook end point an in moment X, Y, and Z at the
other end, to present the shear force and moment generation.
4.5.3 Model Global Stability

To avoid the numerical instability, joint 001L of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X and Y-axis
displacement, however, joints 004L of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X-axis displacement.
Hook point is fixed in 6 degree of freedom. See figure below.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
20 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
21 of 31
LOADING
The loading diagram shown in the Appendix A has been used to establish the loading.
5.1
ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION

Elementary loads to be considered are summarised in the table below. Description of each loading
type is detailed thereafter.
Discipline of loads
Structure
Loading
name
Structural
Diesel Storage
Equipment
Balancing Forces (couple)
5.2
Description
Structural Self Weight
Structural Appurtenance
Diesel Storage Tank Operation
Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump
Piping Dry
Electrical/Instrumentations
+X
Enforce loads along X direction
+Y
Enforce loads along Y direction
COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION

Diesel Storage Platform
The CoG shift forces are applied at the joints connecting slings to boat landing. Those forces allow
for enforced shifting of CoG.
The load +X causes the shift of the CoG along X :
2 x F+x x Lx = Fz x x
F+x = (Fz x x) / (2 x Lx)
F+x = (xxx.xx 1.00) / (2 x xx) = xx.xxx kN
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
PAGE:
22 of 31
These load are applied at :

Node 001L
Node 003L
Node 002L
Node 004L
-xx.xxx kN
-xx.xxx kN
xx.xxx kN
xx.xxx kN
The load +Y causes the shift of the CoG along Y:
2 x F+y x Ly = Fz x y
F
+y
= (Fz x y) / (2 x Ly)
F+y = (xx.xxx x 1.00) / (2 x 11.75) = xx.xxx kN
These load are applied at :

Node 001L
Node 003L
Node 002L
Node 004L
-xx.xxx kN
xx.xxx kN
-xx.xxx kN
xx.xxx kN
This is illustrated by figure below :
Load Condition +X Enforce Loads along X Direction
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
23 of 31
Load Condition +Y Enforce Loads along Y Direction

The resultants of these forces are equal to zero in order to keep the same weight of the boat landing.
5.3
LOADING COMBINATIONS
5.3.1 Pre-loading Combination

Prior to make a load combination, the pre-loading combination is required to easier to make load
combination.
The pre-loading combination definition are shown below:
Load Label
WGHT
Description
Lift weight with contingencies
DAF
Lift weight with contingencies and dynamic amplification factor
NLP
Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.35 consequence factor
FLP
Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.15 consequence factor
The pre-loading combination factor are shown in the table below:

Loading
Description
WGHT
Structural Self Weight
1.1500
Structural Appurtunances
1.1500
Loading
DAF
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
WGHT
1.20
Loading
PAD
NPAD
DAF
1.350
1.150
10/10/10
A
24 of 31
The loading combination for CSF (common solution file) module will be explained below:
The loading definition:
Loading Type
Definition
Loading 0
Origin position with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 1
Shift 1 with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 2
Shift 2 with 1.33 skew load factor
The final result will be a combination of all shifted condition and origin position both for 1.15
consequence factor, 1.35 consequence factor and no consequence factor.
5.3.2 Loading Combination without Consequence Factor

The load factors to be used in the load combination are as follows:
Diesel Storage module
Loading
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
1.330
1.330
-1.330
-1.330
+Y
1.330
-1.330
-1.330
1.330
5.3.3 Loading Combination for Member Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor have 1.35 and skew effect
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Loading
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
1.7955
1.7955
-1.7955
-1.7955
+Y
1.7955
-1.7955
-1.7955
1.7955
5.3.4 Loading Combination for Member not Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor of 1.15 and skew effect
Loading
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
1.5295
1.5295
-1.5295
-1.5295
+Y
1.5295
-1.5295
-1.5295
1.5295
10/10/10
A
25 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
ANALYSIS RESULTS
6.1
LOADING SUMMARY
10/10/10
A
26 of 31
6.1.1 Elementary Load

LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
****** SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY ******

RELATIVE TO MUDLINE ELEVATION
FZ
MX
MY
FX
FY
(KN)
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
(KN-M)
-250.760
-121.691
-403.081
-9.808
-29.200
-45.112
0.000
0.000
-61.036
-109.679
-143.094
46.833
0.000
-21.204
0.000
-1021.310
(KN-M)
-161.756
-212.862
-322.465
-25.501
-11.538
-33.256
1021.305
0.000
MZ
DEAD LOAD
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Didapar dari saclst cog 1, keyword : basic load
6.1.2 Pre-Loadings and Loading Combination

G0 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP0
NLP0
LPA0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
***** SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *****

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-2200.494
-1629.996
(KN-M)
-343.823
-412.588
-556.994
-474.476
-631.053
-740.802
-548.742
(KN-M)
MZ
(KN-M)
-914.429
-1097.315
-1481.375
-1261.912
-1678.343
-1970.229
-1459.429
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Dari saclst.cog0 , keyword : combined load
G1 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL

FY
FZ
MX
MY
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP1
LPA1
NLP1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-1629.996
-2200.494
(KN-M)
677.486
812.984
1097.528
934.931
1243.458
1081.268
1459.712
(KN-M)
-1935.734
-2322.881
-3135.890
-2671.313
-3552.847
-3089.432
-4170.733
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Keyword : relative
G2 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP2
LPA2
NLP2
G3 Position
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-1629.996
-2200.494
(KN-M)
677.486
812.984
1097.528
934.931
1243.458
1081.268
1459.712
(KN-M)
106.876
128.251
173.139
147.489
196.160
170.574
230.275
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
250.760
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
BUOYANCY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
27 of 31
PAGE:
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL

FY
FZ
MX
MY
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP3
LPA3
NLP3
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-1629.996
-2200.494
(KN-M)
(KN-M)
-1365.133
-1638.160
-2211.516
-1883.884
-2505.565
-2178.752
-2941.316
-1935.734
-2322.881
-3135.890
-2671.313
-3552.847
-3089.432
-4170.733
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
G4 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP4
LPA4
NLP4
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN-M)
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-1629.996
-2200.494
-1365.133
-1638.160
-2211.516
-1883.884
-2505.565
-2178.752
-2941.316
(KN-M)
106.876
128.251
173.139
147.489
196.160
170.574
230.275
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.1.3 Loading Summary and CoG

G0 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP0
NLP0
LPA0
************* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *************

RELATIVE TO STRUCTURAL ORIGIN
********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-250.76
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
-1021.30
-1225.56
-1654.51
-1409.39
-1874.49
-2200.49
-1630.00
-0.65
-1.75
-0.80
-2.60
-0.40
-0.74
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
0.24
0.90
0.35
-4.78
0.00
0.47
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
7.36
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
Pada saclst cogota, keyword relative
G1 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP1
LPA1
NLP1

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pada saclst cog1, keyword relative

Harga x y z harus sama dengan xyz rencana
G2 Position
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-250.76
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1021.30
-1225.56
-1654.51
-1409.39
-1874.49
-1630.00
-2200.49
-0.65
-1.75
-0.80
-2.60
-0.40
-0.74
0.00
0.00
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
0.24
0.90
0.35
-4.78
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
7.36
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
28 of 31
PAGE:
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
LOAD
LABEL
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP2
LPA2
NLP2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-250.76
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1021.30
-1225.56
-1654.51
-1409.39
-1874.49
-1630.00
-2200.49
-0.65
-1.75
-0.80
-2.60
-0.40
-0.74
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.24
0.90
0.35
-4.78
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
-0.66
7.36
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
G3 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP3
LPA3
NLP3

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-250.76
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1021.30
-1225.56
-1654.51
-1409.39
-1874.49
-1630.00
-2200.49
-0.65
-1.75
-0.80
-2.60
-0.40
-0.74
0.00
0.00
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
-1.90
0.24
0.90
0.35
-4.78
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
7.36
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
G4 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP4
LPA4
NLP4

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS

See Appendix C Deflection Output Plots
6.3
SLINGS LOAD
Ambil di pstlst.lpa, keyword : member forces
-250.76
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1021.30
-1225.56
-1654.51
-1409.39
-1874.49
-1630.00
-2200.49
-0.65
-1.75
-0.80
-2.60
-0.40
-0.74
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.24
0.90
0.35
-4.78
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
1.34
7.36
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
7.36
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
10/10/10
REVISION:
29 of 31
PAGE:
SACS-IV SYSTEM
MEMBER
NUMBER
6.4
MEMBER
END
MEMBER FORCES AND MOMENTS
******************** KN *********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
GROUP LOAD
ID
CASE
******************* KN-M ********************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
PL05-
HD
PL05
SLG
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
530.06
692.79
495.41
567.24
358.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PL06-
HD
PL06
SLG
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
340.81
306.77
510.94
158.54
375.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PL09-
HD
PL09
SLG
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
568.27
605.02
400.40
728.75
534.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PL12-
HD
PL12
SLG
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
393.31
215.47
427.47
359.91
560.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MEMBER CODE CHECKS
6.4.1 Member Connected to Padeye

Di pstlst.nlp
* * *
M E M B E R
G R O U P
S U M M A R Y
* * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD

ID
MEMBER
COND
MAX.
DIST
UNITY
FROM
CHECK
END
EFFECTIVE
* APPLIED STRESSES *
AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z
N/MM2
N/MM2
*** ALLOWABLE STRESSES ***
CRIT
AXIAL
COND
N/MM2
EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z
N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
CM
LENGTHS
* VALUES *
KLY
KLZ
B01 D005-PL05 NLP3
0.33
0.2
-0.04 -41.60 -32.73
174.151774.56 234.30 266.25
C<.15
5.3
0.2
0.85
0.85
B02 D072-D073 NLP3
0.61
0.8
-1.30 -36.49
63.75
133.431914.79 155.10 176.25
C<.15
2.1
0.8
0.85
0.85
G01 D030-D044 NLP3
0.56
0.0
-8.49
98.22
13.99
175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25
C<.15
7.6
4.6
0.85
0.85
G02 D050-D051 NLP3
0.27
0.2
-0.49
54.81
-8.31
149.795116.35 234.30 266.25
C<.15
3.4
0.9
0.85
0.85
P02 004L-PL12 NLP1
0.03
0.0
-4.82
0.00
0.00
184.86 954.13 258.75 258.75
C<.15
7.0
1.5
0.85
0.85
6.4.2 Member Not Connected to Padeye

Di pstlst.flp
* * *
M E M B E R
G R O U P
S U M M A R Y
* * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD

ID
MEMBER
COND
MAX.
DIST
UNITY
FROM
CHECK
END
M
EFFECTIVE
* APPLIED STRESSES *
AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z
N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
*** ALLOWABLE STRESSES ***
CRIT
AXIAL
COND
N/MM2
EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z

N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
LENGTHS
KLY
KLZ
CM
* VALUES *
Y
B01 D005-PL05 FLP3
0.28
0.2
-0.04 -35.43 -27.88
174.151774.56 234.30 266.25
C<.15
5.3
0.2
0.85
0.85
B02 D072-D073 FLP3
0.52
0.8
-1.11 -31.08
54.31
133.431914.79 155.10 176.25
C<.15
2.1
0.8
0.85
0.85
G01 D030-D044 FLP3
0.48
0.0
-7.23
83.67
11.91
175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25
C<.15
7.6
4.6
0.85
0.85
G02 D050-D051 FLP3
0.23
0.2
-0.42
46.69
-7.08
149.795116.35 234.30 266.25
C<.15
3.4
0.9
0.85
0.85
P02 004L-PL12 FLP1
0.02
0.0
-4.10
0.00
0.00
184.86 954.13 258.75 258.75
C<.15
7.0
1.5
0.85
0.85
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
6.5 REACTION
Reaction force without consequence factor
Dari pstlst.LPA
SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS

********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
HD
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
-0.490
-0.490
-0.489
-0.490
-0.489
0.351
0.350
0.351
0.353
0.351
1629.991
1629.984
1629.984
1629.984
1629.984
-0.027
-0.039
-0.029
-0.010
-0.034
-0.002
-0.002
0.002
-0.006
0.000
0.000
-0.003
-0.001
0.004
-0.002
001L
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
0.132
0.204
0.144
0.120
0.060
-0.351
-0.350
-0.351
-0.353
-0.351
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
004L
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
0.358
0.286
0.345
0.370
0.428
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
SACS-IV SYSTEM
REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS SUMMARY
*** MOMENTS SUMMED ABOUT ORIGIN ***
LOAD
CASE
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1629.991
1629.984
1629.984
1629.984
1629.984
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
548.747
548.753
548.753
548.741
548.741
1459.433
1459.423
1459.444
1459.423
1459.444
0.000
0.840
0.138
-0.137
-0.840
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.15

Dari pstlst.flp
SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
HD
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
-0.564
-0.567
-0.559
-0.566
-0.559
0.404
0.397
0.398
0.410
0.408
1874.515
1874.502
1874.502
1874.502
1874.502
-0.032
-0.045
-0.033
-0.012
-0.039
-0.002
-0.003
0.003
-0.007
0.000
0.000
-0.004
-0.001
0.005
-0.002
001L
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
0.152
0.238
0.165
0.138
0.067
-0.404
-0.397
-0.398
-0.410
-0.408
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
004L
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
0.411
0.329
0.394
0.428
0.492
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
ACS-IV SYSTEM
LOAD
CASE
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1874.515
1874.502
1874.502
1874.502
1874.502
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.35
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
631.075
631.154
631.153
630.997
630.997
1678.364
1678.302
1678.426
1678.302
1678.426
0.000
0.964
0.161
-0.157
-0.967
10/10/10
A
30 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
10/10/10
A
31 of 31
Dari pstlst.nlp
SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
HD
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
-0.660
-0.662
-0.657
-0.662
-0.657
0.474
0.470
0.471
0.477
0.475
2200.502
2200.490
2200.490
2200.490
2200.490
-0.037
-0.053
-0.038
-0.014
-0.046
-0.002
-0.003
0.003
-0.008
0.001
-0.001
-0.005
-0.001
0.006
-0.002
001L
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
0.178
0.277
0.193
0.162
0.080
-0.474
-0.470
-0.471
-0.477
-0.475
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
004L
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
0.482
0.386
0.464
0.500
0.577
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
SACS-IV SYSTEM
LOAD
CASE
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2200.502
2200.490
2200.490
2200.490
2200.490
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
740.823
740.858
740.858
740.788
740.788
1970.257
1970.216
1970.297
1970.217
1970.297
0.000
1.132
0.186
-0.185
-1.132
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS

Since no tubular intersection is found during lifting analysis, joint can analysis is not
performed in this calculation.

Lifting Analysis Report - Template

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Lifting Analysis Report - Template

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

ISSUED FOR CLIENT

STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL............................................................................................18

4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM...........................................................................................19

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS..............................................................................................28

PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION

JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS

UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS

SACS INPUT FILE

SACS OUTPUT FILE

Maximum Joint Deflection List

Member Unity Check Summary

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

Precog: saclst.1000ta , keyword : basic load

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

Lifting Point Type

API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Pstlst.NLP, key word : r than 1

Pstlst.FLP, key word : r than 1

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1

DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1

3.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

3.1.2 Company General Specification

3.1.3 Codes and Standards

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

for grade S235

Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

: in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)

: in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)

Forces and moments

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.1.2 Allowable Stress

4.1.3 Contingency Factor

provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,

provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,

provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

on main structural weight,

on secondary structural weight,

on dry piping weight,

on bulk electrical weight,

on bulk instrumentation weight,

on itemised electrical weight,

on itemised instrumentation weight,

SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *

* X - DIRECTION *