LETTER OF ROGATORY

This writing will be submitted in the style of a letter of Rogatory aflter consultation advisement and

approval Chief Nanya Shabu'el of the At-sik-hata nation of yamassee Moors We as members of the Anyyu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Declare the following United states code 28 usc 13 60 and who land
include {but not limited to} Georgia North Carolina South Carolina Alabama Florida Tennessee We are

the lndigenous peoples of the aforementioned land with geographic coordinates: 33degrees 36feet
36inches N. latitude; -S4degrees 17feet lTinches W. longitude
1715 Yamassee uprising and The

trailof

Tears which include Missouri is a historical

event which

has

been acknowledge by the U.S. congress passing the following resolutions HJR- 3 (HJ3 lH) HJR 194 5 con
Resolution 25 in which the U.S. federal government under the command of U.S. president Andrew
Jackson rounded up our peoples be they: yamassee, Hichiti, Choctow, Cherokee, Moor olmagseminole,

Yuchi,Washitaw and force them to walk west to Oklahoma away from their traditional land which are
illegally and unlawfully usurped by the United States

prior to the passing of the aforementioned U.S. congressional bills and the united nations declarations
on the right of lndigenous peoples our people's have had the most resistance from the United States of
America in exercising our right to self determination this despite the fact that United states of American
have pass presidential executive orders 13107 lmplementation Human Right treaties and presidential
proclamation 75@ guaranteeing our right to exercise our tribal sovereignty and self determination
The 1857 U.S. supreme court decision Sanford vs Scott known as the Dred scofi decision, which has

never been over turn has made it clear that no descents of Africans can be a Citizens of united states of
American this current state of affairs leads those descent of African/Moors who are unfamiliar with
international law united nations 2nd decade of the world's lndigenous people and the fact that they can
now self identify themselves as indigenous or tribal unable to have a nationality or the ability to identify
and clam their lndigenous inheritance in cord with HJR 194
The legal limbo created by the Dred scott decision of 1857 coupled with the Jim crow laws and the

Christian Black codes of 1794 and the South Carolina negro act which are still use to this day has put the
descent of Africans living in American in a state less position this is cause these decent of Africans to rely
on united states courts which have a history of biased judgment and decision against not only Africans

but native American as well.

All over American many African people claim not only their African heritage but lndian ancestry as well.
Many as called African American families have lndian roots in any one of the various tribes in American
such as; Cherokee Choctaw, yamassee, yuchi, Seminole, Yashitaw,Lumbee,Creeks etc.

Hjr 194 110 congress Lst session on February 27 2W7 congress acknowledges that African Americans
were stripped on their names and in heritage
July 8 2003 president George W Bush acknowledge in a trip to Goree lsland, Senegalthat slavery "was
one of the greatest crime of histon/'.

The northwest ordinance enacted by congress in L787, which begins with the phrase "the utmost good

faith shall always be observed toward the lndians"

United States of American have consistently fault and resists, to this day also African Americans claiming
are lndigenous Status we have consult with chief Nanya shaabu from the At-sik-hata nation of yamassee

Moors in cord with the international law have declared proclaim our indigenous rights our
documentation has been legal recognize acknowledge certified authenticated and confirmed as correct
yet we stillface persecution apartheid genocide rape and kidnapping for manifestirtg our lndigenous
rights as we ar in title to by Law it is well know that Africans in American who claim their indigenous
status as native American/lndian are subjected to persecution ridicule discrimination genocide abuse
and scorn as if that is not possible that they could be native Americanllndian yet modern history is now

unearthing and uncovering facts to prove the assumption by American to be contrary archaeological
evidence

Definition of the Unites states of America: UNITED SIATES OF AMERICA INC Non profit Delaware
Corporation lncorporation Date 4llt9l89 File No 2L93946 UNITED STATESOf AMERICA INC Non-profit
Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date

4lt9l89

File No. 2193946 Entity Name UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA INC Entity Kind CORPORATION Entity Type RELIGIOUS NONPROFIT Residenry DOMESTIC State
DE Status VOID TAX INFORMAT|ON Last

Annual report Filed: 1991

htt://www.state.de.us/corp/di rectweb. shtm

We have declared our selves lndigenous in tribal and claim our indigenous rights as we are in title to in
cord with HJ resolutionl94 and HJ resolution 3 we still face an up held battle by the Corporation United
States of America. We who have declared and claim our indigenous rights face skepticism ridicule and
scorn for daring to declare ourselves as lndigenous although the congressional records been apologies

from the U.5. congress allow us to do so, since in American's legal system we are look upon as not
having a legal or lawfully status/citizenship. We as lndigenous Cherokee Moors are not Citizens of the
United States of American (Religious Corporation) And as such we are entitled to protection accord with
the constitutional rights and the lnternational rights as well. Our Statutory Declaration of our
indigenous rights put us in conflict mostly and consistently with U.S courts U.S Government and the local
STATE and U.S Government agencies We are All native American and White we all have a valid

treaty
with the governor who is the Chief Magistrate of the State of Missourivia Statutory Declaration. UNILOS
Article 19 right of safe passage we are seeking clarity and the validity of actions taking by STATE agents
whlch have violated the various treaty UNDRIP civil political economic social culture rights.
Under Missouri SUNSHINE LAW 610 we are submitting to the Judge Anne Marie Clark Judge Robin
Vannoy Ashley Laitmore Chris Brown Kathryn S Herman Terry Carter Dr. Linda Shaw all another Doctors
and agents who participated in the kidnapping Deprivation of rights under color of LAW title 18 section
242 and Genocide A list of lnterrogatories under supreme court rule 33. No question is to go under
answer and allfacts are the uprnost priority in the determination of justice or injustice which would aide
in the prompt and safe return of our children to our care

>.

L.

2.

What is the date that Kathryn S Herman received permission from the parents of Etheryah Haley
now known as Aleshanee Sha ul me elto be little there rights to have a say in the type of
treatment their daughter would receive?
What is time and date thatthe parents of Etheryah Haley now known as Aleshanee Sha ul me el

3.

give up or waive their rights their wave their rights to self determination?
What is the time and date that the children or the parents there of came obtigated or came

4.
5.

6.
7.
8.

within the provision of section 211.031.1{1)RSMO?

What is time and date that any tribal member parents or children where in the city of ST.LOUIS
as it is a corporation with a charter establish in 1914?
Where is the city of ST.LOUIS geographically located?
What is the process of procedure to come into the city of ST.LOUIS?
Are you given a choice to be a CITIZEN SUBJECI CLIENT RESIDENCE or is it by force assimilation?
When was the protective custody hearing requested and were the parents given prior notice

with their consent?

9. Do the parents or children is matter have a valid CONTACT with the state of MISSOUR| or the
city of ST.LOUIS that can be proven for the record?
L0. Who were the witnesses of the alleged neglect and where did this take place?
11. Since this is the 3'd year for the international decade for the people of African descent can a of
persons be given of all members who provide assisted in the following area (a) development (b)
education (c) employment (d) health {e) housing in harmony with theme of tnternational
decade?

12. What assist did Kathryn S Herman Ashley Latimore give to the parents and children in the aide
of the program of activities for the implementation of the international decade for people of
African descent before reporting abuse and neglect?
13. What are the facts which support the diagnosis from Dr. Linda Shaw about the condition of
Etheryah now known as Aleshanee which allegedly cause bye breast feeding and vegan diet?
14. ls Dr. Linda shaw diagnosis facts or opinion and can proof claim be provided?

15. Could Etheryah now known as Aleshanee have been clause by a virus or something of than the
diet?
16. Why was Etheryah mother not test to see if she could give blood to her daughter if the blood
transfusion was necessary as was stated by Doctors?
L7. Why were the parents denied the right to disgust the one year old chemical treatment to be
given to their daughter despite the fact that this information were told to doctors in advance

that she was to treated without the use of chemicals violating their lndigenous rights?
18. What was meant by the Statement from Karan 5 Hermann although the mother appears to be
African American the mother reportedly that she is white and Native American? which give her
SF 181 as a supported document
19. Was the true afiention of Ashley Latimore and Kathryn Herman who racial discriminated profile
the mother to commit kidnapping and Genocide against the family?
20. Why did the Judge approve the order after it was clear that facts would clearly show the
complaint was the result of racial discrimination in violation of the international decade on
people of African descent

21. What facts can a judge and commissioner give proof of to show that they are not complicit in
racial discrirnination Genocide and kidnapping?
22. Can a judge give all the facts as to why the case was allow to be dismissed without prejudice and
then re filed without the evidence showing racial discrimination and me stating that we were
are not CITIZENS?
23. What authority does the judge have or to use to proceed and ignore the challenge of jurisdiction
as the parents and children are not CITIZEN? As was stated via the Dred scott decision 1857
from the supreme court..... I Voided out birth certificate for fraud via

llki",i:i'.y,

-ry;qi!,Jt*

{i.i

l:i-

t:crG!-f :Ll:t3&i

::

i:':"I':ei:,i-r.

24. Where can proof be found to give supporting evidence that the judge followed the mandate for
congressional records pg A32220 may 11 1955 with all decisions made in this matter?
25. When did the parents give permission to have son removed from their care and medically
experimented on?

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples(htlp-:li.,rv.un.org'igsaisocder iunpfii/documents/DRtrPS:eir.pd0 United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 &. 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res. 26 S. 1200, HJR-3

t..

Affirmed to and subscribed before me this

-lll

au, of January

prejudice
t

//

Produce ldentification

a*;a,uA
J

PublicNotary

t/ /'
t

Type and# ID

Tvlu fpiruJio.Q,**
6?/oy'

SlTra

2/ )

My Commission Expires

LtoLf'

Standing At Law White and American lndian VIA https://www.scribd.com/user/306423924/PriyaSiranEL

Sionya Haley now known as Priya Siran El Indigenous autochthonous flesh and blood female of the Aniyu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Michael Fullilove now known as Marshawn Shiloh Wijaya Sha ul me el
tndigenous autochthonous flesh and blood man the of the Ani-yu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors our

Childrenltribal members are Michael Fullilove jr now known as Samon Wijaya Sha ul me el lndigenous
flesh in blood male child of the Ani-yu-wiya of Cherokee moors Etheryah Haley Alshanee Kerensa Sha ul
me el lndigenous Autochthonous flesh and blood female child of the Ani-yu-Wiya Tribe of Cherokee
moors on the lndigenous land of Cahokia Missouria Turtle Geographically location 38.602177 No*h
Latitude -90.206058 West Longitude
-yuUnder the MISSOURt SUNSHINE LAW ....chapter 610 I Priya Siran Sha ul as the matriarch of the Ani
wiya tribe of Cherokee moors in harmony with vienne convention on diplomatic relations of 1961
request the following information to validate your government position your OATH of office and EIN
number and lndemnity Bond? Jennifer M Joyce OATH of Office EIN number and lndemnity Bond? lt is
you to
requested of you to provide the Contracts that say that were are citizens. lt is also requested of

provide proof of any contacts that says I give my children to the state of MISSOURI? List any Facts that I
have given or wave my free prior and informed consent to my rights to self determination Article 1 thru
4 on rights of the Indigenous people which is my guaranteed inalienable unalienable rights under article
1 of the international Covenant on civil and political rights self government, autonomy which would
make any members of our tribe a client citizen or residence or slaves or subject to :ie RSMO statues or
codes ordinance ect... we have voided out Birth Crtificate for fraud see

https:l/www.scribd.com I user l?AM23924lPriyaSiranEL

According to the Dred Scott Case which has never been over turn {Dred Scott V. Sandford 50 us 393
(1857)African descent and those who were free could never be CITIZENS of the UNITED STATES)
Responding to the Unlawful paperwork that Clarie Wilson (lnvestigator) from Jennifer M Joyce Circuit
Attorney Office A court ordered are you speaking of the same court 920 North Vandeventer the court
that cannot prove that they have jurisdiction Administer Robin R Vannoy violated her OATH of office by

the courts RULES lnferior Court is a court with limited jurisdiction I challenge the
Jurisdiction of the court at the court hearing when I made a special appearance she lgnored me several
times she never proved jurisdiction she continue on proceeding without jurisdiction
NOT following

One Challenged iurisdiction cannot be assumed

94 ca 2d 7s12tl p2d :189

it must be proved to exist stuck v medical examiners

The court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks Jurisdiction the court has no
authority to reach merit but should dismiss the action Melo V. us 505 F2b

Not every action by any iudge is in exercise of his iudicial function it is not a iudicial function for a
judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse when a iudge act
a trespasser of the law when a judge does not follow the law the iudge loses subject matter

as

jurisdiction and the judge orders are VOID of no legal force or effect Yates vs village of Hoffman
Estates I llinois, 209 F Supp.757 (N.D. lll, 1962)
Any judge or Attorney who does not report the above Judge for treason as required by law may

themselves be guilty of misprision of treason 18 usc section 2382

Adminster Robin Vannoy has committed

Genocide Title 18 section 1091 18 u.s. code 5
1091 - Genocide
r
r

Current through Pub" L. 114-38" (See Public Laws for the current Conaress.)
US Code

Nctes

(alBlsrc Orrexsr.-Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the
specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or
religious group as such-

{1}
kills members of that group;

(2)
causes serious bodily injury to mernbers sf that group;

(3)
causes the permanent impairment of the rnental faculties of members of the group through
drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(4)
subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destructian of
the group in whole or in part;

ts)
irnposes rneasures intended to prevnt births within the group; or

t6)
transfers by force children of the gr$up to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection {b}"
(blPurursxuExT FoR BAsrc Orrrxsr.-The punishment for an offense under subsection (a)

is-

{u
in the case of an effense under subsection (aX1), where death results, by death or
imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and

{2}
a fine of not rnore than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or
both, in any other case.

{c}Ixcrreu=xr Orrensr.Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not
more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(dlArreuer axp

Co*sprRAcY.

Any person who attempts o,r conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be
punished in the same rnanner as a person who completes the offense.

(ellu*rsorcnoN,-There
and (d)

is junisdiction over

the offenses described in subsections (a), (c),

if-

(u
the offense is committed in whcle or in part within the United States; ol'
{2}regardless cf where the offense is committed, the alleged offender

is-

{A}
a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (B U.S.C. 11O1));

(B)
an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that tenm is
defined in section 1O1 of the Immigration and NationalityAct (B U.S.C. 1101));

(c)
a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or

tD)
present in the United States.
deprivations of rights under color of law Title 18 section 242
Clarie Wilson it clearly that you don't care for my children because you are rnaking threats about
sanctioning Medicaid you are Violating my right I have the Right to participate with the state if I choose

to that does not make me a CITIZEN Article 5 Rights of the lndigenous Peoples lndigenous people have

the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct politicat legal economic
socialand cultural institutions
while retaining their right to participate fully if they so choose in the political
economic social and
cultural life of the state
Claire Wilson your asking

for
information on who I had sexual intercourse with I have a right to
a private Life you are violating my rights lnternational covenant
on civil and political rights Article 17 No
one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with
his privacy family
personal

home or

correspondence nor to unlawful afiack on his honor and reputation

Everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference or attacks
clarie wilson(lnvestigator) now you are aware of the situation pursuant
to Title 42 usc 19g6 you have 10
days to response no response is tacit consent and agree to the
above chargers This information will be
made available for public knowledge via lnternet..... ln the great sprits
of my ancestors

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous peoples_
United Nations Convention on
Economic. Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Cd;;; Article
55 & 5d. presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res.26 S. 1200, HJR_3

Affirmed to and subs*ibed before me this

ff-

out

of lanuary z0l7

\/

P?oduce Identification

Type and #

ID

fri f:

ln r*''

ay,

-3 08

without prejudice

t{ion fc'*'i

My Coqgrission Expires
.. j

rtttOfUV J lJ\lWfiY
Notaiv Prb lc NctarV Scal
s rn rr or Mlssouql

Commissioned icr

St l ouls

CountY

Mv Commiss:rrn ExPires: APr., ts

Com'niss,on

#'

. ._/

5t3-illJB

20'1

lt oboz{