PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ( PMGSY)

CHECK LIST FOR P.I.U. & S.T.A.

1. Location :-

State:

2. Package No:3. Name of the Road:

4. Total Length (Km) -

( For Indvidual Road Works )

To be filled by PIU.
HIMACHAL PRADESH
District :

HP-11
From

Bagheri
5

Km

In Built up area -

5. Estimated Cost Rs :
Item
Flexible Pavement
Rigid Pavement
Others
Total
New connectivity

6. Type of proposal:-If the proposed road is a New connectivity

- Is the road a part of core network
If Yes Through Route/ Link Route No.
- Name of the unconnected Target Habitation (s) (to be
crosschecked with CN-6)

To

Punali

Km

In Open Area -

Average Cost :
Total Cost in Rs.
12015531
11735462
23750993

T-

or

L-

Bagheri, Tikkari, Bohri, Amb Da Har and Punali

- Population sub served by the proposed road.

- Does the Proposed Road lead up to the Habitation for
which it is supposed to provide connectivity (In other words
are you sure that the road is not being made partially?)
- Does the proposed Road connect the unconnected
Habitation to
-a) Another habitation having All- weather road.
-b) Directly to an All weather road.
If ( b) indicate the nature of road to which the proposed road
- If the proposal is for up gradation
- is the road a part of the core network
- is it associated Through Route or Not
- PCI value
- Age of the road
- Is it certified that there are no other unconnected Eligible
Habitations in the district.
7. a) Whether the Proposed Road has the
desired carriage way width,Roadway width and Road
Land
Width (RLW
b) Indicates
the) actual widths of the following for

1595
YES

(A)
B
RR
NO
YES
NO

YES / NO
YES
In the Built Up Area (m)

the proposed road

a) Carriageway
b) Roadway

c) Road Land Width

Proforma C

PMGSY)
.T.A.

SOLAN

Punali
In Open Area -

ge Cost :
Total Cost in Rs.
12015531

km

Cost per Km.

Lakhs
24.031

11735462
23750993

23.471
47.502

YES
3

Amb Da Har and Punali

1595
YES

(A)

(B)

B
NO
YES
NO

YES / NO
YES
In the Open Area (m)
3.00
5.0/7.0

10.00

CD4

CD15
7/420

4/870

CD14
7/240

CD3
CD13
7/020

4/740

CD2
4/110
H4

CD12
6/820

7/0

CD1
CD11
6/735

4/090

CD10
6/440

4/0
CD9
6/335

3/0

H2
6/190

6/0
H5
9/0

CD8

2/0
CD185/880
8/880

CD7

1/0
CD6
CD175/595
8/700

CD165/240
8/500

8/0

5/0

CD5

0/0

H1

INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : Attached

saperately

H= HABITATION = 5 NO. H1 TO H5
CD = CROSS DRAINAGE WORK = 18 Nos
slab culvert 3.0 m span = 1 no
900 mm dia hpc

= 17 Nos.

Name of Road :
Cross Section details
a) Cross Section of The Existing road showing different component layers.

3.0
5.0/7.00 M

b) Cross Section of The Proposed road showing different component layers

(Should be as per Actual Provisions of DPR)

SURFACE DRESSING
WBM G-III 75 MM
WBM G-II 75 MM
GSB 125 MM
PROPOSED SHOULDER 275

H3
5/0
8/0

SED SHOULDER 275 MM

8. Base year traffic volume

Month & Year of Traffic Volume Count =
Motorised Traffic
Cars,Jeep, Motorised
Light
Trucks
Agricultural Tractors
Three
two
Commercial
Trallers
Wheelers
Wheelers
Vehicle

Days

Day 1
Day 2
Day 3

14
12
10

11
15
15

Average

12

14

9
9
8
8.333

9
9
8

8
8
9

ADT in the year of Traffic Count =

Growth rate adopted (%) =
Design Life =
10 Years
Number of Harvesting Seasons =
No. of Days in Each Harvesting Season (t) =
Value of (n) assumed =

OL

58
6
2
75
1

OL

Feb-16
Buses
L

8
8
9

1
1
0.5

1
1
0.5

Cycles
OL

Base Year Traffic AADT (T) =

Cumulative ESAL =
Traffic Category =

100285
T-4

9 Subgrade CBR ( for Different Sections ) =

Chainage
CBR %

4+200
7.21

5+500
6.30

6+300
8.12

7+450
6.80

8+600
6.30

Chainage
CBR %

10. Cost Details

A.
General Costs
Cost of Preparation of DPR
B. Pavement Components

Cost Rs.

2000
Thickness
in mm

Description of layer
Earth Work - in Excavation/ Cutting
Earthwork- in Filling (Embankment)
Subgrade (if provided seperately)

Quantity

Cost Rs.

cum
Loosening of earth

2762.09

cum

101

sqm

Scarifying

Shoulders (If not considered in the Earthwork)

275

3023.19

cum

1008

Granular Sub base

125

2301.74

cum

2253

Soil + Aggregate Mix

WBM Gr -I

cum

WBM Gr -II

75

1257.37

cum

287749

WBM Gr -III

75

1257.37

cum

284165

C.Bituminous Layers

Prime Coat

16490.10 sqm
Sub Total

71567
981843

Non Motorised Traffic

Cycle
Rickshawa

Animal Drawn Vechicle

SWC

Num. Tyred

36

100285
T-4

Cost Rs.

Cost /km (Rs)

20000.00

Cost Rs.

4000.0000

Cost/ km (Rs)
0

101369

20274
0

1008383

201677

2253867

450773

2877492.00

575498

2841656.00

568331

715670.00
9818437.00

143134
1963687

B/F
Tack Coat

16490.10

B.M.

cum

OGPC

sqm

Seal Coat

9818437.00

sqm

244878.0

0.00

sqm

0.0

16490.10

sqm

1972216.0

MPM/BBM
Surface Dressing

D. Cement Concrete Road

Pavement Quality Concrete (M30 )
E: C D Works
No. of Existing CD Works
0
Do they require any improvement- specify the nature of
No
improvement
proposed
If yes, their Number
and Cost of improvement
Type of CD & their
Location - Chainage ( Similar Type of CD's may be
Nos
grouped together)

Total Cost of Proposed CD works

17

I. Any other Provisions (Please Specify)

Cost in R
2598473.0

90 mtr

F. Protection works
G. Pucca Side Drains (if Provided)
Length
H. Road Logo, other Road Furniture

Total Length of Bridge/

Culvert

3000

mtr

112752
12383

Parapets

1876242.0
Total Cost of the Project (Rs)

23750993.0

Name of the road

J. Five Year Routine Maintenance
Year
I
II
III
IV
V
Total Maintenance Cost

11. Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Mannual RRM /
Circulars of NRRDA.

12.Whether C.D.works / Protection works are provided as per RRM /

Circulars of NRRDA/ Respective Codes.

Cost in lakhs

3.23
3.49
3.77
4.08
4.40
18.97

% Cost
17.03
18.40
19.87
21.51
23.19
100.00

Latest

Latest

13. Whether the Cost etimates are as per standerd data analysis and S.S.R.

9818437.00

###

244878.00

48976

0
0.00

1972216.00

394443

Cost in Rs.

Cost /Km (Rs)

5989388

1197878

Cost in Rs Cost /Km (Rs)

519695
2598473.00

1127526
123833

225505
24767

1876242.00

375248

23750993.00

4750199

% Cost

Cost /km

0.65
0.70
0.75
0.82
0.88
3.79

17.03
18.40
19.87
21.51
23.19
100.00

Yes

Yes

Yes

14. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under

Lead Distance (Km)
Material
Source
Earth
Murrum (Subgrade)
Aggregate
Sand

Namanagar

Namanagar

Hume pipes
Dherowal
Certified that information provided is true

Prepared By
(Name)
Er. R. S. Katwal

0
0
18
18
18

Material
Cement
Emulsion
Bitumen
Steel

Checked By

Source
Nalagrah
Parwanoo
Panipat
Nalagrah

Scrutinized By

(Name)
Er. S. K. Attri

Counter Signatures of
Co-ordinator STA :

tures of

Source

Lead Distance

Nalagrah

31

Parwanoo

81

Panipat

221

Nalagrah

31

Scrutinized By
(Name)
Er. B. K. Sharma

To be filled by State Technical Agency

Name of the STA:
NIT Hamirpur
Bagheri Punali road
15 Is the Proposed Road entered on the OMMS :
(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Propopsal)
16 If the Proposal is for new connectivity
Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is a part of Core Network
Is the unconnected habitation (s) part of list of unconnected Habitations as per CN-6
Does the Proposal ensure full connectivity to Target Habitation
a) If No, the name of Unconected Habitation up to which it is connected
17

b) If such Unconnected Habitation eligble Under PMGSY

Are you satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys
Soil/ Material Investigation

(L section, X section must be verified)

( CBR, Density, LL, PI, Gradation to be verified)

Traffic Surveys / Estimation

18
19
20

Hydraulic Studies.
( Catchment for structures with more than 2 Vents to be verified from topo sheet.
Location and requirement of all CD structures to be verified from L section )
In case , Traffic is projected beyond T 4 Category are you satisfied with the reason given
by
PIU sub grade CBR is less than 3; has Soil Stabilisation etc. been proposed
In case,
( If not , specific Reasons given by PIU)
Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Roads Manul / Circulars of NRRDA:
Alignment & Geometrics
Location and type of CD works and

21
22
23

24

Side drains
Integration for Cross and longitudinal Drainage
Protection Works
Is the design of flexible Pavement as per IRC SP: 72- 2015 and design of Rigid
Pavement
as per IRC SP:622004
.
Does the Estimation
Conform
to Standard
Rate Analysis and SSR generated for
the current Phase
Does the proposal have provisions for
PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board
Km/Hm Stones
Guard Stones (where necessary )
Traffic Sign Boards (as necessary)
Secific Remarks, if any, by STA
( Specific remarks of STA about the overall project are necessary on each DPR)

Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work are based on the data and
by PIU Engineers . The Proposal after final Correction is entered on the OMMS.The Propasal may
for clearance.

Co-ordinator STA:

Technical Scrutiny at STA done by:

Signature
Name

Signature
Name

Date

Date

Yes/ No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes/ No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

ased on the data and SSR provided

MMS.The Propasal may be considered

Co-ordinator STA:

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ( PMGSY)

CHECK LIST FOR P.I.U. & S.T.A.

1. Location :-

State:

2. Package No:-

HP-11

3. Name of the Road:

4. Total Length (Km) -

( For Indvidual Road Works )

To be filled by PIU.
HIMACHAL PRADESH
District :

From

To

Punali

Km

In Open Area -

Bagheri

5.200

In Built up area -

5. Estimated Cost Rs :
Item
Flexible Pavement
Rigid Pavement
Others
Total
New connectivity

6. Type of proposal:-If the proposed road is a New connectivity

- Is the road a part of core network
If Yes Through Route/ Link Route No.
- Name of the unconnected Target Habitation (s) (to be
crosschecked with CN-6)

- Population sub served by the proposed road.

- Does the Proposed Road lead up to the Habitation for which
it is supposed to provide connectivity (In other words are you
sure that the road is not being made partially?)
- Does the proposed Road connect the unconnected
Habitation to
-a) Another habitation having All- weather road.
-b) Directly to an All weather road.
If ( b) indicate the nature of road to which the proposed road
- If the proposal is for up gradation
- is the road a part of the core network
- is it associated Through Route or Not
- PCI value
- Age of the road
- Is it certified that there are no other unconnected Eligible
Habitations in the district.
7. a) Whether the Proposed Road has the desired
carriage way width,Roadway width and Road Land
Width
(RLW ) the actual widths of the following for
b) Indicates

Average Cost :
Total Cost in Rs.
18004654
13022967
31027621

T-

or

Bagheri, Tikkari, Bohri, Amb Da Haar, Punali

1278 souls
YES

(A)
B
RR

In the Built Up Area (m)

the proposed road

a) Carriageway
b) Roadway
c) Road Land Width

L-

INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : Attached saperately

H= HABITATION = 5 NOS.
CD = CROSS DRAINAGR WORK

900 MM DIA HPC = 17 NOS.

SLAB CULVERT = 2 NOS

Name of Road :
Cross Section details
a) Cross Section of The Existing road showing different component layers.

3.35 M
5.0/7.00 M

b) Cross Section of The Proposed road showing different component layers

(Should be as per Actual Provisions of DPR)

8. Base year traffic volume

Days

Month & Year of Traffic Volume Count =

Motorise
dCars,Jeep,
Traffic
Motorised
Light
Trucks
Commercial
Vehicle L

Agricultural Tractors
Trallers

Buses

Vans,Three
Wheelers

two
Wheelers

Day 1
Day 2
Day 3

30
35
40

30
25
34

22
25
22

23
26
21

28
21
27

28
22
28

2
2
2

2
2
2

Average

35

29.666667

23

23.3333

25

26

OL

ADT in the year of Traffic Count =

Growth rate adopted (%) =
Design Life =
10 Years
Number of Harvesting Seasons =
No. of Days in Each Harvesting Season (t) =
Value of (n) assumed =

9 Subgrade CBR ( for Different Sections ) =

Chainage
0+300
1+160
CBR %

7.21

10. Cost Details

A.
General Costs
Cost of Preparation of DPR
B. Pavement Components
Description of layer
Earth Work - in Excavation/ Cutting
Earthwork- in Filling (Embankment)
Subgrade (if provided seperately)

Shoulders (If not considered in the Earthwork)

OL

170
6

Cycles

OL

Base Year Traffic AADT (T) =

2
75
1

Cumulative ESAL =
Traffic Category =

318200
T-6

2+060

3+310

8.12

6.80

6.30

Cost Rs.

Thickness in mm Quantity

Cost Rs.

Loosening of earth

225

1178
cum

Granular Sub base

cum
Soil + Aggregate Mix
WBM Gr -I

100

WBM Gr -I I

150

169.50
cum
803.62
cum

WBM Gr -I I I

75

401.81
cum

C.Bituminous Layers
5033
sqm

Prime Coat
Tack Coat

5033
sqm

OGPC
Seal Coat
MPM/BBM
Surface Dressing

5033
sqm

D. Cement Concrete Road

Pavement Quality Concrete (M30 )
E: C D Works
No. of Existing CD Works
Do they require any improvement- specify the nature of
improvement
proposed
If yes, their Number
and Cost of improvement
Location - Chainage ( Similar Type of CD's may be
grouped together)

Nil

Type of CD & their Total Length of Bridge/

Nos
Culvert

Total Cost of Proposed CD works

Slab culvert =6. mtr

Cost in
F. Protection works
G. Pucca Side Drains (if Provided)
Length

2800 mtr

H. Road Logo, other Road Furniture

I. Any other Provisions (Please Specify)

Parapets

Total Cost of the Project (Rs)

Name of the road

J. Five Year Routine Maintenance
Year
I
II

Cost in lakhs

1.21
1.3

% Cost
17.09
18.36

III
IV
V
Total Maintenance Cost

11. Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Mannual RRM /
Circulars of NRRDA.
12.Whether C.D.works / Protection works are provided as per RRM /
Circulars
of NRRDA/
Codes.
13. Whether
the CostRespective
etimates are
as per standerd data analysis and S.S.R.
14. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under
Lead Distance
Material
Source
(Km)

Earth
Murrum
(Subgrade
Aggregate
)
Sand

Namanagar

0
0
18
18

1.41
1.52
1.64
7.08

21.47
23.16
100.00

Latest
Latest

Material
Cement
Emulsion
Bitumen
Steel

19.92

Source

Lead Distance

Nalagrah

26

Parwanoo

76

Panipat

216

Nalagrah

26

Certified that information provided is true

Prepared By
(Name)
Er. R. S. Katwal

Checked By

Scrutinized By

(Name)
Er. S. K. Attri

(Name)
Er. B. K. Sharma

Counter Signatures of
Co-ordinator STA :

To be filled by State Technical Agency

Name of the STA:
NIT Hamirpur
Name of Road : Bagheri Punali road
15
Is the Proposed Road entered on the OMMS :
(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Propopsal)
16
If the Proposal is for new connectivity
Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is a part of Core Network
Is the unconnected habitation (s) part of list of unconnected Habitations as per CN-6
Does the Proposal ensure full connectivity to Target Habitation
a) If No, the name of Unconected Habitation up to which it is connected
17

b) If such Unconnected Habitation eligble Under PMGSY

Are you satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys
Soil/ Material Investigation

(L section, X section must be verified)

( CBR, Density, LL, PI, Gradation to be verified)

Traffic Surveys / Estimation

18
19
20

Hydraulic Studies.
( Catchment for structures with more than 2 Vents to be verified from topo sheet.
Location and requirement of all CD structures to be verified from L section )
In case , Traffic is projected beyond T 4 Category are you satisfied with the reason given
by
PIU sub grade CBR is less than 3; has Soil Stabilisation etc. been proposed
In case,
( If not , specific Reasons given by PIU)
Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Roads Manul / Circulars of NRRDA:
Alignment & Geometrics
Location and type of CD works and

21
22
23

24

Side drains
Integration for Cross and longitudinal Drainage
Protection Works
Is the design of flexible Pavement as per IRC SP: 72- 2015 and design of Rigid
Pavement
as per IRC SP:622004
.
Does
the Estimation
Conform
to Standard
Rate Analysis and SSR generated for the
current Phase
Does the proposal have provisions for
PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board
Km/Hm Stones
Guard Stones (where necessary )
Traffic Sign Boards (as necessary)
Secific Remarks, if any, by STA
( Specific remarks of STA about the overall project are necessary on each DPR)

Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work are based on the data and SSR
PIU Engineers . The Proposal after final Correction is entered on the OMMS.The Propasal may be con
clearance.

Technical Scrutiny at STA done by:

Signature
Name

Co-ordinator STA:
Signature

Date

Name

Proforma C

Y)

SOLAN

unali

n Open Area -

5.200

t:
Total Cost in Rs.
18004654

Cost per Km.

Lakhs
34.624

13022967
31027621

25.044
59.669

YES
3

Da Haar, Punali
278 souls
YES

(A)

(B)

B
YES / NO
YES / NO
YES / NO

YES / NO
YES / NO
In the Open Area (m)
3.00
5.0/7.0
10.00

17 NOS.

Non Motorised Traffic

Cycle
Rickshawa

Animal Drawn Vechicle

SWC

Num. Tyred

106

18200
T-6

Cost /km
(Rs)

Cost Rs.
0.20
Cost Rs.

0.06
Cost/ km
(Rs)

1.95

0.65

4.64

1.55

22.62

7.54
0.00

11.16

3.72

2.68

0.89

0.73

0.24

10.16

3.39

Cost /Km
(Rs)

Cost in Rs.

Cost in Rs
8.98

Cost /Km
(Rs)
2.99

12.47

4.16

7.05

2.35

82.63

27.54

% Cost

Cost /km

17.09

0.40
0.43

18.36

0.47
0.51
0.55
2.36

19.92
21.47
23.16
100.00

Yes
Yes
Yes
Lead Distance
26
76
216
26

zed By

B. K. Sharma

Yes/ No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes/ No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No

n the data and SSR provided by

ropasal may be considered for

Community Consultation Checklist Engineering

Question
Yes
1. Are there any flood prone areas on the road?
If yes:
1.1 Are locations specified and inspected?
1.2. Is high flood level specified for each stretch?
1.3 Are locations specified and inspected?
2. Are there any locations on the road where irrigations ducts
need to be provided?
If yes:
2.1 Are locations specified and inspected?
3. Can the road be used as a shortcut by through traffic?
4. Does the road lead to any quarries, mining areas, brick kilns,
logging areas, tourist attractions etc.?
5. Are there plans to build new schools, hospitals, temples etc
6. Is there potential for double connectivity?
If yes on any of 3-6:
6.1 Is information on location, size and nature of additional traffic
generators and specific routes obtained?
7. Is there a need for deviations from existing track?
If yes:
7.1 Were the proposals for deviation shown on site and explained to the
community?
7.2 Is the land availability checked?
7.3 If there is a need for donation, were the owners consulted regarding
their agreement to donate the land?
8. Is there a need for speed breakers?
If yes:
8.1 Is location and rational for speed breakers identified?
8.2 Is rationale verified and checked on site?
8.3 Are alternative or additional locations discussed?
9. Are all existing intersections checked with the community on
site?
9.1 Is the use of intersecting roads identified (e.g. school children, farm
machinery, etc)?
10. Are proposed culvert locations verified with the community?
10.1 Is there a need for additional culverts?
10.2 If yes, are locations identified?
11.1 If yes, are locations identified?

For DPR consultant

For PIU

Fo

ring
No

N/a

For PIC

Road

Sl.
No.
1
2

Bagheri

Description of Items

Punali

Rate

Amount
(Rs.)

ROFD
C/O Retaining wall
Cross drainage work
Earthen shoulder
Loosening of earth

Annexure 1-A

2598473.00

Annexure 2-A

5989388.00

Annexure 3-A

1008383.00

Annexure 4-A

101369.00

Annexure 5-A

2253867.00

P/L GSB
C/O Base course WBM Grade-II

Annexure 6-A

2877492.00

C/O Base course WBM Grade- III

Annexure 7-A

2841656.00

Priming coat

Annexure 8-A

715670.00

Tack coat

Annexure 9-A

244878.00

Surface dressing

Annexure 10-A

1972216.00

Seal coat

10

PCC drain

Annexure 11-A

1127526.00

11

C/O Parapets

Annexure 12-A

1876242.00

12

Road furniture

Annexure 13-A

123833.00

13

Preparation of DPR

3
4
5
6

20000

Total of construction works

1

Cost of Annual Maintenance for five

years (Shall be borne by State Govt.)

Annexure B

Total including maintenance cost

23750993.00
1897490

25648483.00

Sl.No.
1
2
3
4
5

Section
4/200
5/500
6/300
7/450
8/600

Average

5
L-135

5.00 km
Bagheri Punali road
Populat

1595

Amount

per km

In lacs
0.00
25.98
59.90
10.08
1.02
22.54
28.78
28.42
7.16
2.44
19.72
0.00
11.28
18.76
1.24
0.20

Shoulder
11.10

0
1039389
1088980
183342
18431
409794
523180
516665
130122
44523
358585
0
205005
341135
22515
3636

cost of pavement
CD work
Habitation
Population
Maintence
Proposed CD

Flexible pavement
others

237.52
18.98

256.50

CBR (%)
7.21
6.30
8.12
6.80
6.30

6.95

(6.12+5.69) = 5.91%

In Rs
17761605.00
5989388.00
Bagheri, Tikkari, Bohri, Amb Da Ha
1278
1897490.0
17

12015531.000
11735462.000

In lacs

In Rs.

177.62
others
59.89
, Tikkari, Bohri, Amb Da Har and Punali
1278.00
1278
18.98
59.90

In lacs

Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Type of Vehicle
Car, Jeep, Van
Auto Rickshaw
Scooters/Motorbikes
Bus / Minibus
Trucks
Tractors with trailer
Tractor without trailer
Cycles
Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart
Horse cart / Bullock Cart
Pedestrian
Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd)
Total motorised vehicle per day
Total non-motorised vehicle per day

Day-1
14
11
1
14
16
56

Day-2
12
15
1
17
15
60

Day-3
10
15
1
16
17
59

Average
12
14
1
16
16
58
58
Nill

Sl. No.

Type of Vehicle

ADT

AADT

1
2

Car, Jeep, Van

Auto Rickshaw

+( 1.20 x

75 )/

Scooters/Motorbikes

+( 1.20 x

75 )/

Bus / Minibus

+( 1.20 x

75 )/

Trucks

+( 1.20 x

75 )/

Tractors with trailers

+( 1.20 x

75 )/

Tractors without trailers

10

Horse cart / Bullock Cart

Total commercial vehicle per day

(cvpd)
Total motorised vehicle per day
Total non-motorised vehicle per day

29

T
365

Growth
Rate
(AADTx1.
82
06

365

10

365

365

10

11

365

10

11

36

41

36

41

Indicative VDF values considered 10% of laden MCV and 10% laden HCV as overloaded & given be

Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application = To x 4811 x L,
To = ESAL application per day. The Cumulative ESAL application for the project road as per paragra
of IRC: SP: 72 2015 is presented in Annexure
Heavy Commercial Vehicles(HCV) =
Laden:Unladen
Medium commercial vehicles =

12
1 +

11 / 2
11 / 2

6x
6x

11
Laden:Unladen

11 / 2
11 / 2

6x
6x

Total
ESAL
Thickness of Pavement as per curve chart

Proposed thickness of pavement

20.85
275

4811 x1

MM

1 Surface Dressing 2 GSB

125 MM
3 G-II
75 MM
4 G-III
75 MM
Proposed
275 MM

( 63 - 45 MM)
(50 -25 MM)

erloaded & given below:

ion = To x 4811 x L, where

road as per paragraph 3.5

2.86
0.31

=
=

17.16
1.705

0.34
0.02

=
=

1.87
0.11
20.85

100285
T-4

( 63 - 45 MM)
(50 -25 MM)

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

PACKAGE SUMMERY
Package Number:- HP-11Sr. No

District:- Solan

Name of
Block

Name of Road

Type of Proposed
Proposal Length

Cost of
Pavement

Total Estimated Cost

Cons. Cost

Maintenance cost

To

N/U

In Km

Rs: In lac

Nos.

Rs: in Lac

Rs: in Lac

Rs: in Lac

10

11

177.62

17

59.90

237.52

18.98

Punali

Total estimated cost of the package without maintenance Rs.

N NEW CONNECTIVITY U UPGRADATION

* Checked by

State
Cost of CD
works

From

Nalagarh Bagheri

* Prepared by

No. of CD
works

237.52 Lacs

Signature
Name
Designation

(Er. R.S. Katwal)

Assistant Engineer

Signature
Name
Designation

(Er. S.K Attri)

Executive Engineer

* Scrutinized by Signature
Name
Designation

and including maintenance is Rs

Technical Scrutiny
Done By

Coordinator
(Er. B. K. Sharma)
Superintending Engineer

256.50 Lacs

STA

: Signature
: Name

PERFORMA-B

State:- Himachal Pradesh

Average cost per Km
Cons. Cost
Rs: in Lac

Maintenance
cost
Rs: in Lac

12

13

47.50

3.80

: Signature
: Name

: Signature

Name of Block

Nalagarh
District : Solan
Type of proposal

Code

HP-11-

Total No. of
Habitaion
5

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

SUMMARY SHEET.
Un connected Habitations
>1000
0

500-999
1

No of Roads Total Length of No. of New C.D.

road (in Kms)
Structures

250-499
Total
2

Estimated cost in lacs

Pavement
CD Structure
from Format from format F-6B
F-2-A
1
New connectivity

2
1 No.

3
5

4
Nil

Associated through route

Upgradation

Nil

Other gradation

1 No.

Nil

Total

Eligible
2

Total
(5)+(6)

5
177.62

6
59.90

7
237.52

177.62

59.90

237.52

Programme Implementat

(PMGSY) Nalagarh D

Annexure -7-1
FORMAT F-1
(See Para 7.2)

bitations
<250

Total eligible
Habitants

No. of unconnected Habitations

connected / connected
Habitations benefited

8
5

Programme Implementation Unit

Executive Engineer
(PMGSY) Nalagarh Division

District Solan

Assistant Engineer

Nalagarh Sub Division

HP PWD. Nalagarh

FW

--

75 mm 75 mm

14
15
16

20 mm -

Surface
Dressing
17

Executive Engineer

HP PWD. Nalagarh

Nalagarh Division

Parapets

Side Drain

Seal coat

PC

BM

Primer and Tack coat

WBM G-III

WBM G-II

Sub grade preparation

GSB-1 GR -1

Earth Work/Earthen
Shoulders/ loosening of
earth / Protection work

Clearing Grubbing

Detail

Existing surface type

Road length in Km

Block: Nalagarh

18

18.76

175m
m

13

11.28

325m
m
12

0.00

-11

19.72

10

9.60

28.42

28.78

22.54

37.08

5B

Cost Rs in Thickness in
mm
lac

5 5A

Name of
Habitation
connected
To
Benifited
New
construction
N
/ up
gradation
A
(N)/Assosiat
ed through
route
U
(A)/Upgradat
Facilities accessed
used
ion (U)
A/B/C/D
From

Block

Sr. No.

District : Solan

Punali

Bagheri

1
Nalagarh

FORMAT

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

ROAD PROPOSED IN PMGSY FOR RURAL CONNECTIVTY (PAVEMANT LAYERS)

Package N

Detail of Thickness and cost for payment layers

19

21

22

177.62

20

0.20

1.24

Total cost of Pavement

in Lacs

Survey and investigation

&DPR

Road Logo & other road

furniture

FORMAT : F -2A

Package No. HP 11-

ers

23

WORLD BANK)
For Rural Connectivity
EXISTING CROSS SECTION OF ROAD

District : Solan

Package No. HP-11-

Block: Nalagarh

5/7 meter wide i.e. 5.00 mtr in straight and 7.00 mtr on curves

Assistant Engineer
Nalagarh Sub Division
HPPWD Nalagarh

Executive Engineer
Programme Implementation Unit
(PMGSY) Nalagarh Division

District Solan

FORMAT: F-3

ementation Unit

garh Division

rict Solan

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

ROAD PROPOSED IN PMGSY FOR RURAL CONNECTIVTY (PAVEMANT LAYERS)

District : Solan

Package No.HP-11-

Total

No.
7

Length
8

Box/Arch/RC
Culverts

Hume pipe
Culverts

No. Dia

No.
11
Details

10

Dia.

12
-

13
-

Minor Bridge

Structure by type.

Minor Bridge

Box/Arch/RC
Culverts

Hume Pipe

Road length in km

Habitation
connected/benefited

Population

No. Dia

No.

Lengt No
h
14
15
16
-

17 900 mm

900
mm

HP11002

Existing C.D. Structure by type

Bagheri, Tikkari,
Bohri, Amb Da Har
and Punali

1595

Bagheri Punali road

NALAGARH

Name of road

Code of Block

Sr. No.

Name of Block

Details of proposed C.D.

Detail
s

Assistant Engineer
Nalagarh Sub Division
HP PWD. Nalagarh

Total

Cost

In

lacs

Executive Engineer
Nalagarh Division
HP PWD. Nalagarh

length

17

Total cost of Road

(18+19)

re by type.

Total cost of pavement

from Forma t F-2A

proposed C.D.

Total cost of
proposed
C.D. strct.

Minor Bridge

FORMAT : F -2B

18
19
20

59.90
177.62
237.52

59.90
177.62
237.52

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

Detail Of Existing Roads (For Upgradation)
District : Solan
Block: Nalagarh
Sr.
No.

Name of Road

1 Bagheri Punali
road

Road
Road
Facilities
Length connectin accessed
g to
A/B/C/D

Traffic per day

Existing road details

LCV/Trucks/ Land width Road width

Total
Motorised Bus/Agricult
(mt)
(mt)
ure/Tractor/T
railer

Embankment

WBM Layer/Khanja
Soiling

Ht

Width

Width

Thickness

12

13

10

11

VR

58

58

10

5/7 M

*Road connecting to NH/SH/MDR/ODR/VR

** Use A= market, B= Education Facilities, C = Health Centres, D = Combination of previous
*** Where actual figure is not available, Estimated figure may be included
**** Type BM/MMS/DMC

Executive Engineer
Programme Implementation Unit
(PMGSY) Nalagarh Division

FORMAT : F -4

Package No. HP-11Length = 5

km

mentation Unit

Bitumen layer

Type

Width

14

15

Thicknes
s (mm)
16

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

Association of Routes
District : Solan
Package
No

No.
1
HP-11-

Primary Network

Habitation
Served (with
population)
3

code

souls

Associated
Through
route(ATR)

PCI

Age

Whether
Other
Whether
proposed for conforman includes in
Upgradation (U)
ce
package Y/N
or Renewal (R) subsidiary
to the ATR

Programme Implem

(PMGSY) Nalagarh

FORMAT : F -4A

Package No. HP-11Habitation served with

population

Habitation

Population
10

Executive Engineer
Programme Implementation Unit
(PMGSY) Nalagarh Division

District Solan

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (WORLD BANK)

For Rural Connectivity
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION OF ROAD
Block: Nalagarh

District : Solan

Package No. HP-11-

Proposed surface dressing

Proposed75 mm WBM G-III
Proposed 75 mm WBM G-II
Proposed 125 mm GSB

Proposed PCC ushape drain

3.00/5.00

pROPOSEDE/shou

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF ROAD CRUST

Assistant Engineer
Nalagarh sub division
HPPWD Nalagarh

Executive En
Nalagarh Div
HPPWD Nala

FORMAT: F-5

kage No. HP-11-

Proposed Earthen Shoulder

275 MM

pROPOSEDE/shoulder

Executive Engineer
Nalagarh Division
HPPWD Nalagarh

FORMAT : F -6
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)
Cost estimate for road construction
District : Solan
Bagheri Punali road
Block: Nalagarh
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5

5
Description of Items

Protection work
Cross drainage work
Earthen shoulder
Loosening of earth

km
Quantity

Unit
Annexure 1-A
Annexure 2-A
Annexure 3-A
Annexure 4-A
Annexure 5-A

P/L GSB
C/O Base course WBM Grade-II

C/O Base course WBM Grade- III

Annexure 7-A

Priming coat

Annexure 8-A

Tack coat

Annexure 9-A

Surface dressing

Annexure 10-A

PCC drain

Annexure 11-A

C/O Parapets

Annexure 12-A

10

Road furniture

Annexure 13-A

11

Preparation of DPR

Annexure 6-A

Lump-sum

Total of construction works

Cost of Annual Maintenance for five years (Shall be borne by State Govt.)
1

Total including maintenance cost

Annexure B

FORMAT : F -6

exure 1-A
exure 2-A

exure 3-A

exure 4-A

exure 5-A

exure 6-A

exure 7-A

exure 8-A

exure 9-A

xure 10-A

xure 11-A

xure 12-A

xure 13-A

mp-sum

exure B

Rate

Amount
(Rs.)

2598473.00
5989388.00
1008383.00
101369.00
2253867.00
2877492.00
2841656.00
715670.00
244878.00
1972216.00
1127526.00
1876242.00
123833.00
20000.00
23750993.00
1897490.00
25648483.00

FORMAT : F -7
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)
Cost estimate for roads construction of cross drainage works

District : Solan
Block: Nalagarh
Sl. No.

Length = 5
Description of Items

No.

NA

D/H

(m)

(m)

(m)

Quantity

Unit

FORMAT : F -7

km
Rate

Amount
(Rs.)

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY)

RATE ANALYSIS
District: Solan
State: H.P.
Bagheri Punali road
Material

Source

Cement steel
Sand
Aggregate Below 40 mm
Aggregate Above 40 mm
Bitumen
Emulsion

Market at Nalagarh
Namanagar
Namanagar
Namanagar
Pani Pat
Parwanu

Hume Pipe

Dherowal

Assistant Engineer
Nalagarh Sub Division
HPPWD Nalagarh

FORMAT : F -8

GSY)

Package No. HP-11-

Lead (In KM)

31
18
18
18
221
81
41

Executive Engineer
Programme Implementation Unit
(PMGSY) Nalagarh Division
District Solan