Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Outline
Objectives
Describe a matrix treatment and how they differ
from fracturing.
Describe Matrix Stimulation Engineering.
List 5 applications of matrix treatments.
Explain the differences between Sandstone and
Carbonate acidizing.
State Hawkins equation and describe its
limitations.
Describe skin and the components of total skin.
List the common matrix fluids and additives
3
What do we know?
1895
1896
1928
1928
1931
1932
1932
1933
SOC
1935
1940
Dowell (Schlumberger)
50-60
Service Companies
1965
70
80
90
Service Companies
00
Schlumberger
Candidate Selection
Formation Damage Characterization
Fluid and Additive Selection
Treatment Design
Execution
Evaluation
9
WHY?
MATRIX STIMULATION ENGINEERING
10
Well Stimulation
Wellbore/Perf Wash
Not recommended on sandstones
Acid Frac
Propped Frac
11
Matrix Acidizing
Chemical Treatment
Wellbore/Tubing Cleanup
Tubing cleanup (TubeCLEAN) is a MUST before every Matrix
Treatment.
12
12
13
Propped Fracturing of
Sandstone Reservoir
14
k
SPE 73702
s = [k/ki (ln r i/rw)] + [k/ks (ln rs /ri)] - ln rs/rw
rs
rw
ks
Zone with
improved
permeability
ki ri
16
Damaged Zone
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
(Skin Damage)
16
Darcys Equation
Pseudosteady State
Oil Well :
7.08X 10 3 k h (p p wf )
q=
r
o Bo ln e 0.75 + s
rw
17
Gas Well :
7 .03 X 10 4 k h p 2 p 2wf
q=
r
g T z ln e 0 .75 + s
rw
Hawkins Equation
k
rs
S =
1 ln
d
ks
rw
90% Damage
6 inches Radially
99% Damage
0.3 inches Radially
Damaged
Zone: 6
Damaged
Zone: 0.3
9 = rs
rw
18
kS
3.3 = rs
kS
80
Percent of original productivity
12-in collar
60
rc
rx
40
20
Wellbore
re
0
0
19
1
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
100.0
90.0
80.0
Q = 10,000 BWPD
k = 100 md
h = 200 ft
P inj = 4000 psi
Viscosity = 0.8 cp
r w = 3 1/16 inches
70.0
3 ft
60.0
Critical
Matrix
50.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Treatment Selection
Gas Production vs. Skin
140
100
100 md-ft
md-ft
500
md-ft
500 md-ft
100
md-ft
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-5
22
Skin
10
Sandstones: Clastic
23
24
Carbonates: Non-Clastic
Limestone
Dolomite
25
26
Matrix Fluids
Acid
Emulsions
Brine
Alcoholic based systems
Foam
Viscoelastic surfactant systems
Diversion
27
Acidizing Additives
Inhibitors
Surfactants
Mutual Solvents
Iron Control
Friction Reducers
Clay Control
Specialty Additives
28
Problems
Proper diagnosis of the problem
Treatment design
Quality Control
Tubing contamination
Zone coverage
Precipitation of reaction products
Damage removal
Fines migration
Pumping Time
In general, 2-4 hours pumping time in a vertical well.
Horizontal = 6+ hours.
Depends on
treatment volume (formation size)
pumping rate (equipment limitations, frac gradient)
well temperature (corrosion effectiveness)
fluids rheology/friction pressure
30
Equipment Layout
water
acid
main
CPT
CT
solvent
C
P
T
31
w
a
t
e
r
g
n
i
or ent
t
i
n m
o
M uip
Eq
wind
Safety Area
Eye Wash
exit
Execution/Evaluation
Health, Safety and Environment
Quality Control
Step Rate Test
Real Time Evaluation
32
Nodal Analysis
6000
A1
1
Pressure, psig
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
4
0
1000
33
2000
3000
Not Used
Outflow (A)
Case 2 (B)
Case 3 (C)
Case 4 (D)
Not Used
Not Used
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Inflow
(1) 0.000
(2) 20.000
(3) 100.000
(4) 200.000
Requirements:
Candidate Selection
Formation Damage Characterization
Fluid and Additive Selection
Laboratory Testing
Treatment Design
Execution
Evaluation
Matrix Stimulation Engineering
34
Conclusions:
Matrix stimulation is a tool used for production
enhancement
Applicable in a wide variety of wells
Incorporates a variety of fluids and techniques
Should yield excellent ROI
P.E.
The Value
Value of
of Repeated
Repeated Acid
Acid Treatments.
Treatments, Illinois
Illinois State
State Geological
Geological Survey
Survey (1934).
(1934).
P.E. Fitzerald:
Fitzerald, The
The whole proposition looks very simple but when studied thoroughly, presents many points to be
analyzed. Field work should always be checked by laboratory experiments and tests.
tests.
36