Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
2 FORMULATION
2.1 Cavity Model
q= +U +q rotor ,
(2
)
and
vQ
V=
=( U + qrotor ) n ,
n
s r
dl,
4 (r 2+ 2 )3 /2
K
(4
where K is a filtering parameter, which is of the same
)
order of the size of the panels on the wake. s is the
where n denotes the normal vector on the surface. tangential vector along the vortex loop, and r is the
Applying Greens third identity, Eq. (3) written as a vector from the running point on the vortex loop to the field
boundary intergral form:
point.
2 p= p
SB
where
S B and
G ( p , p ) dS +
w ( y p ' )
dS+ ( qrotor n ) GdS ,
)
n p
np
n p ' as shown
scheme,
in Fig. 1.
S Euler-Explicit
S
SW
'
'
(8
)
S r as
eff = M [1e c Sr ],
)
is the density of water, n is the rotational velocity of the
where M is the original vortex strength shed from the propeller in RPS(revolution per second),
D is the
rotor blade, eff is the effective vorticity strength when diameter of the propeller, and V s is the ship speed.
evaluating the induced velocity from the wake to the stator,
and c is a constant which requires calibration. Eq. (10) In the RANS simulation, 1.8 million hexahedral cells were
used to mesh 1/5 of the domain, as shown in Fig. 3.
is formed analogously to the Lamb-Oseen vortex model.
k SST turbulence model was adopted. In order to
The physical consideration behind Eq. (10) is explained by
model
the cavitation process, the two-phase fluid mixture
He (2010).
model and the Schnerr-Sauer cavitation model were
The model described in Eq. (10) could be an
oversimplification. But further improvement requires more
experimental or numerical investigation in order to
understand the physical process clearer. In this study, the
wake panels are removed if S r is less than 0.02, and the
effects of these panels on the rotor will not be evaluated.
In order to avoid inaccurate stator induced velocity close to
the stator surface, a numerical clearance is set to keep the
wake panels always away from the stator surface.
+
y was controlled below 15. During
Eq. (1) and Eq. (5) both have interaction terms containing
q stator and q rotor . The interaction is handle in a
iterative manner, as shown in Fig. 2.
-Cp
-1
-2
BEM
RANS r/R=0.644
-3
-4
0
0.4
Xd/C
0.6
0.8
-Cp
0.2
-2
BEM
RANS r/R=0.827
-4
-6
0
0.2
0.4
Xd/C
0.6
0.8
The rotor used in this study has similar pitch angles as those
of the ONR AxWJ-2 rotor, the design advance ratio J s
of this rotor is 1.2. The stator and rotor geometry are shown
in Fig. 3. Numerical simulation of this propulsion system at
J s=1.2 is carried out. The time step size for this
simulation is set as 5degree.
-0.02
KT
-0.025
-0.03
-0.035
50
100
150
200
ANGLE
250
300
350
0.01
0.0095
Rotor only
1st Iteration
2nd Iteration
3rd Iteration
0.009
KQ
0.0085
0.0002
Cavity volume
0.008
0.0075
0.007
0
50
100
150
200
250
ANGLE
300
350
0.0001
0
0.008
Stator Only
1st Iteration
2nd Iteration
3rd Iteration
4th Iteration
0.006
0.004
100
150
200
250
300
350
KT
0.002
-0.002
-0.004
50
50
100
150
200
ANGLE
250
300
350
0.01
0.008
KQ
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
-0.002
0
50
100
150
200
ANGLE
250
300
350