You are on page 1of 13

# ENGR 7901 - Heat Transfer II

Internal Flows

Introduction

In this chapter we examine laminar and turbulent internal forced convection flows. We will
consider two fundamental geometries, the plane channel and the circular tube. We will also
give some consideration to non-circular ducts. We begin by reviewing laminar flows and
considering several important types of flow.

## Internal Forced Convection

If we focus our attention to the tube, we may recall from fluid mechanics that there exists
in an internal flow, two distinct flow regions: the developing region and the fully developed
region. In short tubes developing flow prevails over most of the flow length, where as in
a fully developed flow the flow field remains unchanged over most of the duct length. In
laminar flow we may define the extent of the developing region through the definition of the
entrance length:
Lh 0.05DReD

(1)

Eq. (1) is based on finding the point along the duct axis where u 0.99umax . From the
above equation, we see that for laminar flow, the entrance length increases with increasing
Reynolds number, which in turn is affected by duct size, flow speed, and viscosity. Thus
a small diameter duct containing a very viscous fluid will very nearly be fully developed,
whereas a larger diameter duct with low viscosity fluid will have considerable flow development occurring.
In general, we may define a flow according to the value of the entrance length in relation to
its actual length:
L >> Lh , Fully Developed Flow
L << Lh , Developing Flow
It should be clear that a duct of Lh . L, is not simply one of fully developed flow, as most
of the duct will be undergoing flow development and pressure drop will be larger owing to
1

the acceleration of the fluid in the region outside the boundary layers. However, that is not
to say that the above definition of Lh , is not useful. As we shall see it will become important
when considering thermal boundary layers.

2.1

## Mean Velocity and Bulk Temperature

Two important parameters in internal forced convection are the mean flow velocity u and
the bulk or mixed mean fluid temperature Tm (z). The mass flow rate is defined as:
(2)

m
= uAc
where

Z Z
1
udAc
u=
Ac
Ac
while the bulk or mixed mean temperature is defined as:
RR
Tm (z) =

Ac

ucp T dAc
mc
p

1
=
uAc

(3)

Z Z
uT dAc

(4)

Ac

Since temperature is increasing as the fluid flows downstream, we must use alternate approaches to formulate the Nusselt number and heat transfer rate.

2.2

## Thermal Boundary Layers

The thermal boundary grows in relation to the hydrodynamic boundary layer. In practice, the thermal boundary layer scales with the hydrodynamic boundary layer through the
Prandtl number according to:
Lt 0.05DReD P r

(5)

Eq. (5) gives the approximate length of thermal boundary development which is defined on
the basis of N uD,z 1.05N uD,f d , i.e. where the local Nusselt number is five percent greater
than the fully developed flow value.
There are several fundamental problems in laminar internal flow that can be considered.
Unfortunately, the course text does not address all of these adequately, but we shall. The
following problems arise as a result of considering the thermal entrance length in proportion
to the hydrodynamic entrance length:
L >> Lh , L >> Lt , i.e. thermally and hydrodynamically fully developed flow. This
rarely occurs in practice, but it affords many theoretical solutions.
2

## L >> Lh , L << Lt , i.e. hydrodynamically fully developed, but thermally developing

flow, sometimes called the thermal entrance problem. This type of flow is characteristic
of high Prandtl number fluids P r , e.g. oils.
L << Lh , L << Lt , i.e. hydrodynamically and thermally developing flow, sometimes
called the combined entrance problem
L << Lh , L >> Lt , i.e. hydrodynamically developing flow and thermally fully developed. This type of flow occurs with low Prandtl number fluids P r 0, e.g. liquid
metals.
Under the special case of P r 0 we experience a type of flow called plug flow or slug flow,
for which there is no flow field, but merely a uniform velocity at every point in the duct
cross-section. In such cases, the heat transfer coefficient is higher, than more traditional
fully developed flows. Plug flows also occur inside porous ducts.
In general, heat transfer is always higher in developing flows, since the thermal resistance of
the boundary layer is lower. In the thermal entrance region, heat is being transferred from
a warmer wall temperature (in the case of heating) to the lowest temperature which is the
inlet fluid temperature. However, when the thermal boundary layers merge, there ceases to
be a constant sink temperature and the bulk fluid temperature rises quickly. The local heat
transfer rate is:
Qz = hz A(Tw Tm (z))

(6)

## We also often define a Nusselt number as:

N uD =

hz D
=
kf (Tw Tm (z))
kf

(7)

One must now be careful, as mean Nusselt numbers are difficult to obtain from the above
equation. As we shall see shortly, we use an integrated mean temperature difference from
inlet to exit to calculate the heat transfer rate.

2.3

## Energy Balances in Internal Flow

We desire to relate the heat transfer rate, the duct geometry, and the flow for specific
boundary conditions, i.e. isothermal or isoflux. We begin by examining a control volume for
a section of duct which yields the following expressions for heat transfer:
dQconv = mc
p (Tm + dTm Tm ) = mc
p dTm
3

(8)

or
Qconv = mc
p (Tm,o Tm,i )

(9)

dQconv = qw P dz = hz (Tw Tm )P dz

(10)

## We may also write:

which may be combined with the result given earlier to yield:
dTm
qw P
hz P
=
=
(Tw Tm )
dz
mc
p
mc
p

(11)

Now, there exists two possible solution paths, one for isothermal walls, Tw = Constant and
one for isoflux walls, qw = Constant.
2.3.1

dTm
qw P
=
= Constant
dz
mc
p

(12)

which gives:
Tm (z) = Tm,i +

qw P
z
mc
p

(13)

## or a linear variation in bulk temperature.

With constant heat flux, we are most often interested in how the wall temperature varies.
We see from above result that bulk temperature varies linearly. This also implies that wall
temperature must vary linearly in fully developed flow, since the heat transfer coefficient is
constant. In the entry region where a boundary layer exists, the wall to fluid temperature
difference is not constant. In problems involving isoflux boundaries, we are only concerned
with local wall conditions, and hence no mean heat transfer coefficient exists. We may define
a local heat transfer coefficient (or Nusselt number), but in general it is of little use.
2.3.2

dTm
hz P
=
(Tw Tm )
dz
mc
p

(14)

dTm
hz P
=
(Tm Tw )
dz
mc
p

(15)

d(T )
hz P
=
dz
T
mc
p

(16)

or

## Integrating from inlet to exit gives:

Z

To

Ti

d(T )
=
T

hz P
dz
mc
p

(17)

which gives:

ln

To
Ti

PL 1
=
mc
pL

hz dz =
0

hP L
mc
p

(18)

We may now substitute for the T s and take the exponential of each side:


P hL
Tw Tm,o
= exp
Tw Tm,i
mc
p

(19)

The above result illustrates the exponential behaviour of the bulk fluid for constant wall
temperature. It may also be written as:


P hz
Tw T (z)
= exp
(20)
Tw Tm,i
mc
p
to get the local variation in bulk temperature.
We are interested in relating the wall temperature, the inlet and exit temperatures, and the
heat transfer in one single expression. To do this we write:
Qconv = mc
p ((Tw Tm,i ) (Tw Tm,o )) = mc
p (Ti To )
or
mc
p=

Qconv
(Ti To )

(21)
(22)

## Combining with Eq. (18) gives:


ln

To
Ti


=

hP L
(Ti To )
Qconv

or

(23)

Qconv = hA

(To Ti )

 = hATLM T D
To
ln
Ti

(24)

where A = P L and

(To Ti )


To
ln
Ti
which is the Log Mean Temperature Difference.
TLM T D =

(25)

The above expression requires knowledge of the exit temperature, which is only known if
the heat transfer rate is known. An alternate equation can be derived which eliminates the
outlet temperature. Using Eq. (19) we may write:


P hL
(Tw Tm,i + Tm,i Tm,o ) = (Tw Tm,i ) exp
mc
p


(26)



Qconv
P hL
Tw Tm,i +
= (Tw Tm,i ) exp
mc
p
mc
p

(27)

## Finally, after re-arranging:




P hL
Qconv
= (Tw Tm,i ) 1 exp
mc
p
mc
p

(28)

In some problems involving a single fluid, it is more convenient to consider thermal resistance.
We can define a thermal resistance from the above equation as:
Rt =

2.4

Tw Tm,i
1
h

i
=
hL
Qconv
mc
p 1 exp Pmc
p

(29)

## Film Temperature and Bulk Temperature

In external flows we used the concept of the film temperature to evaluate the fluid properties.
Recall that the film temperature was the average of the wall temperature and the stream
temperature. We have already seen that the bulk fluid (or stream) temperature varies with
axial position. Therefore, we cannot define a constant film temperature. We can however,
define a mean bulk temperature which is the average of the inlet and exit temperatures:
T bulk =

Tm,i + Tm,o
2
6

(30)

In many problems we do not initially know the exit temperature, but we most often know the
wall temperature and the inlet temperature. In these instances, we can estimate the mean
bulk temperature by assuming that the exit temperature is close to the wall temperature.
If required, we can resolve the problem after the exit temperature is obtained from the heat
transfer rate and the enthalpy balance, i.e. Eq. (9), if the mean bulk temperature changes
appreciably.

## Some Fundamental Results in Laminar Flow

In this section we review many useful models for predicting the heat transfer coefficient
for the isothermal wall condition. We will begin with the simplest and most conservative
estimates of the heat transfer coefficient, thermally fully developed flow and proceed to
the most general case, the combined thermal entrance problem, for which we expect the
highest heat transfer coefficients. Further, in this section laminar flow is assumed, that is
ReD < 2300.

3.1

## Hydrodynamic and Thermally Fully Developed Flows

In a thermally fully developed flow, the temperature profile does not change its relative
shape and hence the heat transfer rate at the wall remains constant. This generally occurs
in long tubes. The results for a tube and channel lend easily themselves to analysis, but the
solution procedures are still cumbersome, thus we will only summarize the solutions.
In a circular duct, the solutions for the heat transfer coefficient for constant wall temperature
is:

N uD =

hD
(Q/A)D
=
= 3.66
kf TLM T D
kf

(31)

## In the case of the constant flux condition, we obtain:

Tm (z) = Tw (z)

11 qw D
48 kf

(32)

We may use Newtons law of cooling to express the above equation as a Nusselt number
which gives:

N uD =

qw D
hD
=
= 4.36
kf (Tw (z) Tm (z))
kf

(33)

However, caution is advised when using the Nusselt form of the equation, as we must now
know the correct mean temperature difference, which in this case is the constant wall to fluid
temperature difference. It is important that the student understand the differences between
Eqs. (31) and Eqs.(33). The above equation in practice is of little use as we usually know
the heat flux and desire the local wall temperature, and thus Eq. (32) is more direct.
In general, most engineering thermal systems are not designed to allow fully developed flow
to occur, as it is not efficient use of surface area. In practice, under the constraints of
constant pressure drop (or pumping power) or fixed volume, the optimal flow length that is
achieved in practice is of the order of the thermal entrance length.

In a plane channels of spacing b, the solutions for the heat transfer coefficient for constant
wall temperature is:

N u2b =

(Q/A)(2b)
h(2b)
=
= 7.54
kf TLM T D
kf

(34)

## In the case of the constant flux condition, we obtain:

N u2b =

h(2b)
qw (2b)
=
= 8.23
kf (Tw (z) Tm (z))
kf

(35)

For other shapes we use the hydraulic diameter Dh = 4Ac /P in the definition of the Nusselt
number. Results are also constants for fully developed flows, see the Table given above.

3.2

## Combined Hydrodynamic and Thermally Developing Flows

For simultaneous development of boundary layers in the entrance region of tubes and channels expressions for 0.1 < P r < can be found in handbooks. These models are general
and will predict the fully developed flow limit if the duct is long. These are recommended
for use in most analyses which fall under laminar flow.
3.2.1

Circular Duct

For laminar developing flow in circular tubes with constant wall temperature, one may use the
following model due to Stephan. This correlation is valid for all values of the dimensionless
duct length L = L/(DReD ) and for 0.1 < P r < :
N uD =

N u(P r )
tanh(2.432P r1/6 (L )1/6 )

(36)

where
N u(P r ) =

3.657
0.0499
+
tanh(L )

1/3

2/3
tanh(2.264(L ) + 1.7(L ) )
L

and
L =

L
DReD P r

A simpler model due to Hausen given in the text for the P r case is:

(37)

N uD = 3.66 +

0.0668/L
1 + 0.04/(L )2/3

(38)

## The above results are shown graphically in the figure below.

3.2.2

Plane Channel

For laminar developing flow in plane channels with constant wall temperature, one may use
the following model, also due to Stephan, which is valid for all L = L/(2bRe2b ) and for
0.1 < P r < 1000:

N u2b = 7.54 +

0.024(L )1.14
1 + 0.0358P r0.17 (L )0.64

(39)

## A simpler model for the special case when P r is:

N u2b = 7.54 +

3.2.3

0.03/L
1 + 0.0016/(L )2/3

(40)

## The Sieder-Tate Model

Sieder and Tate developed a very simple model for supposed combined entry length problems.
Their model is based on experimental data and takes the form:

N uD = 1.86

1
L
10

1/3 

0.14
(41)

for
L =

L
. 0.05
DReD P r

 
The above model is valid for laminar flows, 0.6 < P r < 16, 700 and 0.0044 < w < 9.75.
The figure above shows this model is only approximately valid in the Prandtl number range,
as it represents a best fit. There has been much historical debate in the many heat transfer
texts regarding this model and its range of application. The concensus is that it is not
strictly applicable to the combined entrance region problem, despite what your text says.
Clearly from the above figure, it is at best, only an approximation. Further, in light of the
fact that it was developed in the late thirties, it is wiser to use newer models that are strictly
applicable to the combined entrance problem such as thos given abaove.

## Turbulent Flows in Tubes, Channels and Ducts

Turbulent flows are much easier to predict, owing to shorter entrance lengths, so short, as
to not being important in most applications. Recall from fluids, that the turbulent entrance
length is:
1/6

Lh 4.4DReD

(42)

We can also reasonable expect that the thermal entrance length will scale with Prandtl
11

number, such that Lt Lh P r. For a tube of similar diameter, we see that the ratio of
turbulent to laminar entrance length is:
Lh,tur
5/6
88DReD
Lh,lam

(43)

Thus at ReD = 4000, we see that it is only 8.7 percent of the laminar entrance length.
Further, as the the Reynolds number increases, this reduces to 4.1 percent at ReD = 10, 000,
and 0.6 percent at ReD = 100, 000.
The simplest model for predicting the heat transfer coefficient in a tube is the Dittus-Boelter
equation:
4/5

N uD = 0.023ReD P rn

(44)

where n = 0.4 for heating of the fluid and n = 0.3 for cooling of the fluid. The well known
Colburn equation uses n = 1/3 and does not consider the heating/cooling effect. The above
equation is valid for ReD > 10, 000, 0.7 < P r < 160 and for tubes of length greater than ten
diameters, i.e. L/D > 10.
More refined models include the Petukov and Gnielinski correlations. Both models require
a friction factor to be calculated as a secondary parameter.
The Petukov model takes the form:

N uD =

(f /8)ReD P r
1.07 + 12.7(f /8)1/2 (P r2/3 1)

(45)

where
f = (1.82 log10 ReD 1.64)2

(46)

## f = (0.79 ln ReD 1.64)2

(47)

or

The above model is valid for 0.5 < P r < 2000 and 104 < ReD < 5 106 .
To obtain agreement at lower Reynolds numbers, Gnielinski modified the above correlation
and proposes:

N uD =

(f /8)(ReD 1000)P r
1.0 + 12.7(f /8)1/2 (P r2/3 1)

The above model is valid for 0.5 < P r < 2000 and 2300 < ReD < 5 106 .

12

(48)

The Dittus-Boelter, Petukov, and Gnielinski models all apply to the case of isothermal
or isoflux conditions, as there is little difference in boundary condition in turbulent flows.
Further, the thermal properties for each should be evaluated at the mean bulk temperature.
Finally, for non-circular ducts, all of the equations are valid provided the hydraulic diameter
is used, D Dh = 4Ac /P as a length scale.

13