Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The equilibrium current is the current generated by all the IEF was carried out in the PROTEAN IEF cell. The 7 cm
species as they diffuse around their equilibrium position, pH 3–10 strips were subjected to the following IEF program:
including ions close to the electrode and proteins in the IPG 50 V for 15 min, 250 V for 15 min, linear gradient to 4,000 V
as they are converted between their neutral and ionic forms. over 2 hr, and 4,000 V for 2 hr. The longer 17 cm pH 3–10
The equilibrium current is proportional to the concentration of strips were subjected to three different IEF program strategies:
all ionized species in the sample. In contrast to the moving 1) a “direct progressive voltage” (50 V for 15 min, 250 V for
current that decreases with time at constant voltage, the 15 min, linear gradient to 10,000 V over 5 hr, and 10,000 V
equilibrium current is linearly proportional to the voltage. for 5 hr, or, for the protein-containing mixture, for a total of
40 kV-hr ); 2) a “desalting step and progressive voltage” (50 V
The convection current may be driven by electroendosmotic
for 9 hr, 200 V for 1 hr, linear gradient to 1,000 V over 1 hr,
movement, a component of hydrodynamic transport.
linear gradient to 10,000 V over 6 hr, and 10,000 V for a total
For safety from overheating, a limit of 50 µA per 3 mm wide of 40 kV-hr for the entire run) as described in Joubert-Caron et
strip is advised for commercial apparatus. If the current al. (2000); and 3) a “desalting step and rapid voltage” (50 V for
reaches 50 µA when the voltage is set to increase linearly, 9 hr, 10,000 V to 40 kV-hr). The current was limited to 50 µA
the voltage will then be regulated by the current limit, and the per strip, and the running temperature was 20°C. The strips
resulting voltage increase will no longer be linear. Once the were run in duplicate for samples that contained buffers in
current decreases below 50 µA, the voltage will again drive the absence of proteins, and in triplicate for in-gel protein
the linear progression of the gradient. One of the major incorporation. For protein-containing samples, the strips were
problems encountered by novices to 2-D electrophoresis is stored at -20°C until used for the second dimension.
the inability to reach the voltage they want. Connection of a PROTEAN IEF Cell to a Computer
We evaluated the contribution of various compounds to To monitor electrical properties during IEF, a modem cable
the electrical field. We show how recording the electrical was connected from the RS-232 port of the PROTEAN IEF
parameters helps to identify artifacts, allowing adjustment of cell to the serial port of a PC. The HyperTerminal software
the profile and the duration of each IEF step, and adaptation was opened from the Start menu of the Windows 95
of the protocol to the sample and the buffers used. operating system. The setup configuration was 9,600 bits/sec,
8 data bits, no parity, stop bit at 1, material control flow.
Methods The PROTEAN IEF cell exported run data every 5 min to
First-Dimension Electrophoresis
HyperTerminal software. At the end of the run, the data were
All reagents and materials were obtained from Bio-Rad unless
entered into an Excel spreadsheet for plotting.
otherwise indicated. The loading volumes were 125 µl and
300 µl for ReadyStrip™ 7 cm and 17 cm IPG strips, respectively. Second-Dimension Electrophoresis
Passive rehydration was carried out in the PROTEAN® IEF cell Prior to SDS-PAGE, IPG strips were equilibrated as previously
at 20°C. The rehydration step was 2 hr long for test samples described in Joubert-Caron et al. (2000). They were loaded on
that contained buffers in the absence of proteins, and 6 – 9 hr PROTEAN II Ready Gel® 8 –16%T precast gels and run for 1 hr
for in-gel protein incorporation. at 40 V followed by 15 hr at 150 V in a PROTEAN II XL cell.
The gels were silver stained and one gel per condition was
Three different premade reagents were tested: ReadyPrep™ scanned with a GS-700 scanner and quantitated as described
reagent 1, reagent 2, and reagent 3.* For protein in-gel by Joubert-Caron et al. (1999) and Poirier et al. (2001) with
incorporation, the salt-free rehydration solution was 7 M urea, Melanie 3 software (Genebio, Geneva, Switzerland).
2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.24% (v/v) Triton X-100,
0.2% (w/v) Bio-Lyte 3/10. Rehydration solution (280 µl) was
mixed with 20 µl (100 µg) of soluble proteins extracted from
the lymphoblastoid cell line PRI as previously described in
Joubert-Caron et al. (2000). To evaluate the effect of DTT on
the current, lyophilized reagent 2 was reconstituted with
deionized water and with either 10 mM or 20 mM DTT.
2
02-102 2778 remy tnote.qxd 5/1/02 5:00 PM Page 5
40
and without protein both showed the same equilibrium current
Voltage, kV
32 µA
profile and values. The difference in migration time can be
30 2
attributed to the proteins, which are amphoteric molecules,
29 µA and to the presence of ions in the protein extract. Assuming
20
24 µA an average protein molecular weight of 40 kD, loading 100 µg
1
in 300 µl corresponds to an 8.3 µM concentration. The
10
associated conductivity is insignificant compared to the
contribution of any salts or ionic contaminants. The high current
0 0 contributed by a salt (such as Tris at only 40 mM) versus 100 µg
1 2 3 4 of protein, emphasizes the importance of desalting samples as
Run time, hr
extensively as possible.
Fig. 1. Current and voltage profiles of different solutions loaded on IPG strips Electrical Strategies
(current, thick lines; voltage, thin lines). Solutions (125 µl) were loaded onto
7 cm pH 3 –10 strips. A, lyophilized reagent 2 reconstituted with either Three different voltage regimens were tested. In the experiment
demineralized water (blue) or deionized water (red). B, reagent 2 illustrated in Figure 2A, the molecules were first mobilized at
supplemented with no DTT (blue), 10 mM DTT (red), or 20 mM DTT (black). low voltage for a short time. Then the voltage was increased
The IEF program was 50 V for 15 min, 250 V for 15 min, linear gradient to
4,000 V over 2 hr, and 4,000 V for 2 hr.
linearly to 10,000 V over 5 hr. Complete focusing was
achieved at 10,000 V for 5 hr or a total of 40 kV-hr for the
protein-containing solution. For both the rehydration solution
alone, and the protein-containing sample, it took only 3 hr for
the moving current to reach zero. The remaining current, due
to the equilibrium current, was then determined only by the
voltage according to Ohm’s Law. The graphical representation
3
02-102 2778 remy tnote.qxd 5/1/02 5:00 PM Page 6
10
Voltage, kV
30 This step has also been described as a preliminary desalting
8
19 µA
step (Righetti and Bossi 1997). This second strategy was
6
20 used in the “desalting step and progressive voltage” program
4 described in the Methods section.
10 5 µA
2
As shown in Figure 2B, the global current profile looked very
0 0 different from the previous profile shown in Figure 2A. A
2 4 6 8 10
Run time, hr desalting process was apparent in the first step at 50 V for
B Desalting step and progressive voltage almost 7 hr, after which the current stabilized. This step could
50 14 hence be reduced from 9 hr to 7 hr. After this initial step, all
47 µA
12 tested mixtures except reagent 3 followed the voltage ramp
40
without current limitation. The rehydration solutions, with or
Current, µA/strip
10
without proteins, showed similar profiles, with a return to
Voltage, kV
30 8
equilibrium after 2 hr at the last gradient step. These data
18 µA 6
20 suggest that the duration of the gradient could be reduced
4 from 6 hr to 2 – 3 hr. Reagent 1 (40 mM Tris) reacted to the
10 gradient step with a high but short peak of current, due to
2
8 µA
the previous extended desalting step at 50 V. Even reagent 3
0 0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 (the mixture with Tris) showed a zero moving current before
Run time, hr
the end of the gradient step, which could therefore be
C Desalting step and rapid voltage
45 µA
reduced from 6 hr to 4 hr. It is noteworthy that in both
50 14 electrical strategies, the values of the equilibrium current
12 were the same.
40
Current, µA per strip
4
02-102 2778 remy tnote.qxd 5/1/02 5:00 PM Page 1
A, Direct progressive voltage, 7 hr run B, Desalting step and progressive voltage, 17.5 hr run C, Desalting step and rapid voltage, 14 hr run
50 10 50 10 50 10
40 8 40 8 40 8
Current, µA/strip
Voltage, kV
30 6 30 6 30 6
20 4 20 4 20 4
10 2 10 2 10 2
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Run time, hr Run time, hr Run time, hr
Analysis of 2-D gels allowed further comparison of the three The third strategy, however, with its sudden voltage increase,
protocols. Each of the 2-D gels of samples subjected to the showed fewer large protein spots and many more small
“direct progressive voltage”, the “desalting and progressive protein spots compared to the two other strategies. One can
voltage”, and the “desalting and rapid voltage” IEF runs hypothesize that the small, more mobile molecules in a
(Figure 3A, B, and C, respectively) appeared similar and complex mixture respond first to the suddenly applied field.
showed almost the same number of spots (1,005, SEM <1%). As the applied voltage increases, the molecules could be
The IEF run durations were 7 hr, 17.5 hr, and 14 hr, respectively. progressively subjected to the field and mobilized, and the
Image analysis of the gels showed that the distribution of movement of the larger ones would be better regulated by
protein spots, however, was not identical. The number of the applied current.
spots was determined in three molecular weight intervals:
small proteins <25 kD; proteins between 25 kD and 100 kD; Table. Number and distribution of protein spots focused using different
electrical strategies by mass intervals. Data from gels in Figure 3.
and large proteins >100 kD (see Table). The sum of the spots
Focusing Strategy
counted in the three intervals slightly differed from the total
Mass Direct Desalting Step Desalting Step
number of spots per gel; some spots could have been Range, kD Progressive and Progressive and Rapid
counted twice because they lie near the boundary between Voltage Voltage Voltage
intervals. The three electrical strategies gave similar numbers >100 119 132 76
of spots for the proteins between 25 kD and 100 kD (739, 25–100 740 745 732
SEM <1%). This corresponds to the mass range that is well 0–25 143 132 191
separated by 2-D electrophoresis. For these common proteins,
intense evaluation of different electrical strategies is not Looking at the distribution of spots in various pH intervals
necessary once the moving current reaches zero. The fastest (Figure 4), proteins with pIs in the ranges of 5 – 6 and 6 –7,
strategy (7 hr in this case) can be chosen. For both large and which are the most abundant in the sample (Joubert-Caron
small proteins, the first two strategies, which have a et al. 2000), were present in the same proportion at all of the
progressive voltage gradient in common, showed similar voltage regimens applied (SEM around 1%). The extremely
numbers of spots. The initial low-voltage step at 50 V did not acidic (pH 3.5 – 4) and alkaline (pH 9 – 9.5) regions also showed
give a significant increase in the number of large protein spots. similar numbers of spots but the small number of spots
5
02-102 2778 remy tnote.qxd 5/1/02 5:00 PM Page 2
Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc.
Life Science Web site www.bio-rad.com USA (800) 4BIORAD Australia 02 9914 2800 Austria (01)-877 89 01 Belgium 09-385 55 11 Brazil 55 21 507 6191
Group Canada (905) 712-2771 China (86-21) 63052255 Denmark 45 44 52-1000 Finland 358 (0)9 804 2200 France 01 47 95 69 65 Germany 089 318 84-177
Hong Kong 852-2789-3300 India (91-124) 6398112/113/114, 6450092/93 Israel 03 951 4127 Italy 39 02 216091 Japan 03-5811-6270
Korea 82-2-3473-4460 Latin America 305-894-5950 Mexico 52 5 534 2552 to 54 The Netherlands 0318-540666 New Zealand 64-9-4152280
Norway 47-23-38-41-30 Portugal 351-21-472-7700 Russia 7 095 721 1404 Singapore 65-2729877 South Africa 00 27 11 4428508 Spain 590 5200
Sweden 46 (0)8-55 51 27 00 Switzerland 061 717-9555 United Kingdom 0800-181134