Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
F R A C T U R E M E C H A N I S M S OF C O N C R E T E U N D E R C O M P R E S S I V E L O A D S
Samuel Diaz S a n t i a g o
Puerto Rico P l a n n i n g Board
H u b e r t K. H i l s d o r f
U n i v e r s i t y of K a r l s r u h e
ABSTRACT
The n a t u r e of p r o g r e s s i v e c r a c k g r o w t h in plain c o n c r e t e
under c o m p r e s s i v e loads was investigated. A c o n c e p t u a l
m o d e l was f o r m u l a t e d to d e s c r i b e c r a c k e x t e n s i o n at a given stress as well as the m a n n e r in w h i c h u l t i m a t e failure of c o n c r e t e takes place. C o m p r e s s i o n tests were perf o r m e d on c o n c r e t e prisms to i n v e s t i g a t e the n a t u r e of
crack g r o w t h at the m a c r o s c o p i c level. In addition, analytical and e x p e r i m e n t a l m o d e l studies were c o n d u c t e d
using fracture m e c h a n i c s c o n c e p t s in w h i c h the b e h a v i o r
of isolated cracks under c o m p r e s s i v e loads was studied.
363
364
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
Introduction
Considerable
r e s e a r c h w o r k has been d e v o t e d
m i n a t i o n of the b e h a v i o r of p l a i n
loading.
to the d e t e r -
c o n c r e t e under v a r i o u s modes of
tion c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the m a t e r i a l .
w o r k has been done to d e t e r m i n e
c o n c r e t e on its m a c r o s c o p i c
By c o m p a r i s o n ,
less
the e f f e c t of the s t r u c t u r e of
behavior.
c e r n e d w i t h the i n v e s t i g a t i o n
much
of m a t e r i a l
behavior
and/or w i t h
m o d e l i n g of such behavior.
Investigators
of the m a t e r i a l
w i t h the d e t e r m i n a t i o n
tion u n d e r
load.
even b e f o r e
It is g e n e r a l l y
load is a p p l i e d
cracking
o r d e r of 25-55
acknowledged
(1,2).
significantly
% of the s h o r t - t i m e
One i n v e s t i g a t o r
ce of large a g g r e g a t e s
at s t r e s s e s
to form c o n t i n o u s
although
develop
stress
levels
bilizes,
it has been o b s e r v e d
causes
cracks p r o p a g a t e
into t h r e e g e n e r a l c a t e g o r i e s :
dels
at the interfa-
starts
to occur
(6,3).
(3,7) that for
c r a c k i n g never sta-
Similarly
until
for cyclic
loa-
failure occurs
(3).
b e h a v i o r can be c l a s s i f i e d
lattice m o d e l s
(11,12,13,14),
(2,3,5);
that i n c l i n e d cracks
failure
failure.
to s i m u l a t e the o b s e r v e d
cial b e h a v i o r m o d e l s
load
(1,5). O n c e m i c r o cu
l e n g t h they are o r i e n t e d p r e d o m i -
(1,3).
% of f
and e v e n t u a l l y
Models
concentrated
l e a d i n g to i m m e d i a t e
For s u s t a i n e d
cu
c r a c k i n g under
in some tests
suddenly,
strength f
crack p a t t e r n s
in the o r d e r of 70-9o
in a d i r e c t i o n
in the
B r i d g i n g of i s o l a t e d bond cracks
cracks e x c e e d a c e r t a i n m i n i m u m
nantly
Under short-
are m o s t l y
(1,3).
setting and
at stresses
(4). T h e s e cracks
through mortar
during
compressive
is r o u g h l y o r i e n t e d at angles close
rection
changes
can be a t t r i b u t e d
c h a n g e s d u r i n g hydration.
increases
deteriora-
that c o n c r e t e cracks
Such c r a c k i n g
such as v o l u m e
and t e m p e r a t u r e
time loads,
have been c o n c e r n e d
of i n d i c a t o r s of the m a t e r i a l
to a n u m b e r of factors
hardening
behavior
(8,9,1o),
interfa-
and f r a c t u r e m e c h a n i c s
mo-
(16,15).
In the lattice m o d e l s
structural
system.
Although
concrete
is s i m u l a t e d by a lattice
some s o p h i s t i c a t e d
lattice models
Vol. 3, No. 4
365
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
in m o d e l i n g
ximate.
resemblance
the s t r e s s - s t r a i n
ness of the a g g r e g a t e - m o r t a r
basis of such weakness,
In general
terms
depending
In some models
lure, while
of tensile
in others
fail.
Whereas,
ding the p r o g r e s s i v e
terfaces,
governed
fore,
slender
these models
the interface
cracks
cracks
follows
shortly.
is equated to fai-
compression
are helpful
down the
elements which
in understan-
models,
fracture m e c h a n i c s
to concrete.
at crack tips.
te under c o m p r e s s i v e
Although
and Walsh
of
a fai-
factor
in the
loads.
crack growth
by Bombolakis
McClintock
emphasize
Glucklich's
work on p r o g r e s s i v e
there-
for the a p p l i c a t i o n
is
crack growth.
Zaitsev
in-
crack growth
in rock,
After
that subsequent
tributed
interface orientation,
Fracture mechanics
work
comes about.
special
on the
bond is broken
deterioration
local stresses.
the formation
on the existing
bond is broken,
recognize
interface
is very appro-
on crack growth.
how progressive
they propose
at a given stress
w i t h concrete
information
behavior models
behavior of con-
to concrete,
in c o m p r e s s i o n
some n o t e w o r t h y
that load t r a n s m i s s i o n
across cracks
occurs.
Based upon this background
information
and specifically
microcracking
to investigate
leads to actual
Experimental
the m e c h a n i s m s
in c o n -
by which
failure.
prisms,
lo by lo cm cross
366
Vol. 3, No. 4
and
sustained
3o cm high,
compressive
were
tested
under
load h i s t o r i e s
in o r d e r
of p r o g r e s s i v e
crack growth
and
tested
as s p e c i m e n s
from w h i c h
were
as well
removed
surfaces
on two
was
to e x p o s e
US Type
ratio
as d e t e r m i n e d
details
on
The
prisms
were
cracks
using
This
used
technique
fluorescent
particles
Since
the
fluorescent
crack w i d t h
they
are
a line d e l i n a t i o n
violet
light.
to take
pictures
To take
held
constant
Fig.
stages
covered
a picture
30 seconds.
med.
of the
the
out
The o t h e r
growth
were
particle
of
fine
fluid,
surface
being
smaller
of a crack,
by a crack.
larger
than
surface,
seen
with orange
under
of
level,
taken
and the
of a sawed
surfaces.
strain
to set
was
for
loading
surface
used
loading.
the
and a l l o w e d
ultra-
were
of the v e r t i c a l
stress
the
forming
filters
stages
equip-
fluorescent
area o f f e r e d
is r e a d i l y
then
of the
method.
interior
in g e n e r a l ,
ink was a p p l i e d
on two op-
sides
by o b s e r v i n g
to the
third
a water-
and p h o t o g r a p h i c
at v a r i o u s
the center
series.
(19).
at the c r a c k
such p h o t o g r a p h s
resu-
at v a r i o u s
of loading.
Crack p a t t e r n s
ly from
fying
are,
equipped
The p h o t o g r a p h s
1 shows
in
of the
at a p r e d e t e r m i n e d
while
the
of the c o n c r e t e
were measured
absorption
surfaces
sawing
230 k g f / c m 2. F u r t h e r
filtered
crack w h i c h
Two c a m e r a s
The p h o t o g r a p h s
crack
are a t t r a c t e d
filtered
of the
was
strains
as the
particles
were
5 mm thick
with
strength
of a d i s p e r s i o n
as a r e s u l t of the i n c r e a s e d
layers
1:3.9:4.5
28-day
The m o l e c u l e s
crack,
as-cast
of
and
the n a t u r e
ink p e n e t r a n t
is known
in a fluid.
were
specimens.
ink c o n s i s t s
than a p a r t i c u l a r
used
can be found
to i n v e s t i g a t e
a fluorescent
Specimens
surface
30 cm d y l i n d e r s
of the
to study
The p u r p o s e
was
average
and lateral
sides
cyclic
aggregates.
proportions
15 by
Longitudinal
vertical
The
Cement
of the test p r o g r a m
posite
ment.
the coarse
the m i x
of o.78.
failure.
by sawing.
I Portland
For m o s t mixes
cement
sides
short-time,
the p i c t u r e
lens
For
negatives
(8 x) was u s e d
the t r a c i n g s
at v a r i o u s
were obtained
quantitative
stages
cking was m o s t l y
with
transparent
plastic.
the
of the e x t e n t
direct-
A magni-
cracks.
From
of c r a c k i n g
w e r e made.
sawed
concentrated
the cracks
in i d e n t i f y i n g
evaluations
of l o a d i n g
specimens
onto
to help
by t r a c i n g
surfaces,
at a g g r e g a t e
load
independent
interfaces.
For
craspe-
(d) fc/fcup=O.92
(down)
(b) fC/fcup=o.94
(e) fc/fcup=O.63
(down)
direction
of loading
FIG. 1
Surface cracking at different stages of loading; short-time test,
sawed surfaces
(a) fC/fcup=O.O
0
Z
--I
~-~
0..~
~-4
m
C~
C~
W
0%
~4
4~
z
O
.<
o
368
V0]. 3, No. 4
with
surfaces
and had r a n d o m
orientation.
(fcup = s h o r t - t i m e
small
increase
terfacial.
was
longer
were observed
stages
of
orient
themselves
ned
crack
into
stresses
wide
one
loading,
a tendency
overall
test
stages
cyclic
fcup
(minimum
before
cracking
failure.
was
at late
there was
stages
at o.95
was
cup
cases the
wide
For
Close
cracks
with
related
the e x t e n s i o n
well
For
of the curve,
usually
to failure.
increase
stress
increase
Wide
appeared
of
3o .
at early
at o.85
stages
did
than
a maximum
growth
tests
from
cracks,
immedia-
fcup m o r t a r
sustained
loa-
in the e x t e n t
of
for c y c l i c
tests
similar
to that of c y c l i c
initial
application
some
crack
cracks
increase
tests
of loading
extending
was
on sawed
into
spe-
at o.85
caused
the m o r t a r
significant,
and also
developed.
specimens
load was
a marked
growth
with
to f a i l u r e
at early
strai-
loading.
of crack
In b o t h
cup"
considerable cracking
phase.
of
with
tests,
load
were
A cnsiderable
close
loa-
in o r i e n t a t i o n
crack
short-time
of
curve.
portion
specimens
to
The rate of
load by more
interfacial.
observed
!ate
tendency
orientation
of a p p l i e d
sustained
At these
specimens
varied
level ~ o),
in the
cracking
:cuD'
stress-strain
average
at stages
For
already
The n a t u r e
cimens
cracks
on sawed
was m o s t l y
In addition,
cracking
These
stress
seen
the
in-
interfacia!
stages.
when
a signi-
to the d i r e c t i o n
in the d e s c e n d i n g
was o b s e r v e d
to those
At 0.95
cup
only
was
caused
had a m a r k e d
of the
but their
tests
of c y c l i n g
similar
ding.
found.
caused
previous
closer
largest
portion
fcup,
level
at e a r l i e r
from the d i r e c t i o n
in c r a c k i n g
tely
o.9o
to another,
For
of o.85
not o b s e r v e d
to 0.85
the mortar.
cracks
voids
of w h i c h m o s t
stress
into
around
of prism)
to interfaces;
was
load
of cracking.
in a d i r e c t i o n
were
not d e v i a t e
the
the g r o w i n g
the d e s c e n d i n g
cracks
of
to e x t e n d
increase
below
strength
in the extent
cracks
the
of cracking,
increase
restricted
concentrated
Increasing
compressive
Further
increase
ding,
it was
in the e x t e n t
ficant
no
as-cast,
surfaces
to voids,
of e x i s t i n g
as e x t e n s i o n
as-cast
both with
cracks.
of e x i s t i n g
rection.
Linking
of cracks
limited
to cracks
located
surface
along
was
stages
a nearly
growth
to new cracks
Orientation
cracks
at late
regard
crack
under
and to
of new cracks,
close
to the
of l o a d i n g
common
as
loading
di-
was m o s t l y
straight
line.
At
Vol. 3, No. 4
369
FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
1.00
=V)
W
n,"
FIG.
O.L,O .
Crack d e n s i t y on con-
iI
O_
crete surfaces
020
. . . . . . . .
~-
. . . . . . . .
b
0
0.5
1,0
In Fig.
2 the r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n r e l a t i v e
cmlcm
were ob-
for s u s t a i n e d
found that,
in general,
the m a c r o s c o p i c
loading.
cracks was o b s e r v e d
crack pat-
sustained,
and
Most
w h i c h almost
invariably occurred
in pairs,
were also o b s e r v e d
load.
this p r o v i d e d an o p p o r t u n i t y to o b s e r v e the f o r m a t i o n
of these cracks.
the h i s t o r y
linked
(1,5). They d e m o n s t r a t e d
tests the t r a n s i t i o n
in c o n c r e -
that for s h o r t - t i m e
tensive m o r t a r c r a c k i n g o c c u r s at stresses
o.85 to o.95 fcup" Also the p r o g r e s s i v e
in the n e i g h b o r h o o d of
a l i g n m e n t of c r a c ~ with the
370
Vol. 3, No. 4
FIG.
Concrete
failure
direction
of
with other
with
Although
pairs
of w i d e
servations
inclined
had been
is not
come about.
The f o r m a t i o n
cracks
the
that
existence
platens.
al.
(5) r e i n f o r c e
clined
failure
will
the w r i t e r s "
a consequence
cial
loading
belief
platens,
that
which
that m a j o r
provide
inclined
the
before
Some
least
in-
resis-
in an a z t e m p t
attributed
their
loading
and Richard,
formation
failure
et al
little
fur-
as a con-
by stiff
(21)
Kupfer,
cracks,
of
have
form of
very
3).
approach,
et al
is a f u n d a m e n t a l
of end restraint.
as soon
of p l a n e s
proveded
ob-
but w h a t m a k e s
(see Fig.
(3,6,12,15)
of Kupfer,
Similar
immediately
occur
friction
invariably,
What merizs
exist,
cracks
is formed
Others
the w o r k
surface
only
they o b s e r v e d
failure
to the end r e s t r a i n t
However,
at failure.
they
inclined
internal
behavior.
solely
that
to use t h e o r i e s
as C o u l o m b ' s
almost
(3,5,6,14,15,19).
tried
tance,
this
in
found
surface
have
to e x p l a i n
surfaces
is in a g r e e m e n t
vertical,
crack
vestigators
such
were
were
fact
of w i d e
suggests
inclined
on p a r a l l e l
is i n c r e a s e d
cracks
reported
them
failure
loading
most wide
discussion
tinuous
as
after
(3,5,2).
ther
or'at
specimens
i n c l i n e d cracks
loading,
studies
et
of an inand not
(19) used
spe-
restraint,
yet
at a p p r o x i m a t e l y
30
Vol. 3, No. 4
371
FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
FIG.
Furthermore,
by p r o g r e s s i v e
for u n i a x i a l l y loaded
spalling of thin v e r t i c a l
(Fig. 4).
Failure Model
On the basis of previous
tions d e s c r i b e d
in the previous
investigations
sections,
and the o b s e r v a -
the f o l l o w i n g c o n c e p -
in c o n c r e t e
is proposed:
form initially at m o r t a r - a g g r e g a t e
interfaces;
Under load,
mortar,
preferentially
cracks,
however,
into the
load.
The
(b) P r o g r e s s i v e
f o r m a t i o n of m i c r o c r a c k s
leads to a s y s t e m
however,
inclined fracture
failure c o n c e p t is d i f f e r e n t
since it c o n c e i v e s
failure of
surface.
from C o u l o m b ' s
approach,
failure as a c o n s e q u e n c e of p r o g r e s s i v e
cra-
failure to occur
372
Vol
No.
'~
a given
The
tions
~lane
question
inclined
the
conditions
under
a limiting
to be a n s w e r e d
fracture
Therefore,
major
when
surfaces
interaction
which
small
Study
of
is h o w
form
cracks
and
from
was
individual
the M e c h a n i c s
Failure
An
analytical
to d e t e r m i n e
is the
surfaces
lead
stress
is r e a c h e d .
under
what
individual
studies
cracks
condi-
microcracks.
to d e s c r i b e
join
the
to form one
crack.
Model
tion
of
shear
The
their
of
analytical
infinite
which
surfaces.
is s h o w n
Only
in Fig.
such
study
proposition
the
formation
and
the
was
that
of
undertaken
crack
inclined
conditions
interacfailure
which
may
a surface.
consisted
isotropic,
Here,
transmit
straight
Propagation
Field
model
to d e t e r m i n e
body.
can
the
for
model
in a h o m o g e n e o u s ,
to be c r a c k s
of
and
formation
dimensional
experimental
cause
in c o n c r e t e ,
Crack
in a C o m p r e s s i o n
the v a l i d i t y
primary
to the
cracks
and
of
of
and
inclined
linearly
frictional
forces
cracks
elastic,
cracks
across
were
frictional
are
and p a r a l l e l
considered.
two-
understood
to
The m o d e l
5.
PC ~.
p, "8
q -qo
-...'
CRACK
q-rq-V
-i
FIG.
Definition
of
t t-J
FIG.
5
crack
parameters
Extension
6
of
a crack
Vol. 3, No. 4
373
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
Cotterell
(21) proposed
direction w h i c h maximizes
of crack extension.
For a crack,
leased is given by
{~
Ud = (U-uP) =
as a result
in the
(u+-u~)
n = no from 0 to P.
conditions
+ ~
[an
6,
-)]
(i)
d~
n (u~-u~
%
where
upon extension
from O to P.
n'
a
= stresses
~n
~n
: ),
(u+-u
(u~-u~)
= the relative d i s p l a c e m e n t s
surfaces
to the n curve,
of the crack
to be a m a x i m u m
must be negative.
Suppose that there is a single frictional
2c, inclined at an angle ~ as shown in Fig.
crack of length,
a I. When a I is transformed
equivalent
boundary
to the crack,
stresses
the following
stresses
into
and normal
are obtained:
a~ = alsin2 ~
a~+~/2
(2)
= alsin2(~/2+~)
x#,~+~/2
= alsin~ cos~
earlier
a normal
at the crack.
and a frictional
resulting
Using superposition
separated
stress
system of boundary
stresses
principles
The
7.
tem B result
is shown in Fig.
stress
7 can be
in a u n i f o r m stress d i s t r i b u t i o n
throughout
the bo-
374
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
~~,c:. "r[/2
/f%
FIG.
0"~ ,,"1"[/2
Transformed
stresses
boundary
on a system
with a single,
tional
dy
tips.
Solutions
concentrations
(23):
r = 2 - ~
~2~
0 = 2 ~ r
~2~
rr0 = 2--~[~m2~
There,
Fig.
to
KI I = r
cos
8). Utilizing
sed as follows:
intensity
factor
~, at infinity
crack of length
in
2c
is:
The boundary
(Fig.
shear,
in po-
(3)
with u n i f o r m boundary
of the crack
cos
5. A c c o r d i n g
at the crack
sin
(3cos0-1)
in the v i c i n i t y
crack
(3cos@-l)
(3sin@)
are g e n e r a t e d
fric-
(4)
shear of system A is T = ~,+~/2-p~
eqs.
Vol. 3, No. 4
375
Ill,.
~.'R/2
- -
T
System A
System B
FIG.
Stresses
KII =
The stresses
direction
given in eq.
aI
(5)
3 can be used to d e t e r m i n e
(ae)max,
likely direc-
of m a x i m u m
tensile
Tre.
It was
found
stress,.
(ae)ma x,
orientations
they will.
values
crack.
to show c o n c l u s i v e l y
is the direction
at
the energy r e l e a s e d
direction
as the original
sed. A l t h o u g h
of the ini-
the
it is most
that both
likely that
to obtain expressions
for
in order to d e t e r m i n e w h i c h
using techniques
such as the
to determine
the critical
orientation,
for w h i c h branching
376
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
f r o m the m a i n
crack occurs
would
have
tical
crack orientation
first.
to be a m a x i m u m .
In this e v e n t
It has b e e n
found
the v a l u e
(19)
that
crack
of KII
the criis g i v e n
by
~max
where
= @rc' t a n
2
p is the f r i c t i o n a l
crack surfaces.
Walsh
(i/u)
This
(17) u s i n g
result was
= arc tan
When
two or m o r e
in Fig.
from t h o s e d e t e r m i n e d
if the c r a c k s
s e n c e of m o r e
procedure.
by M c C l i n t o c k
It can be s h o w n
and
(19)
at an a n g l e
equal
in t e r m s
straight
(I/u)
(7)
cracks
are p r e s e n t
5, the s t r e s s e s
for a s i n g l e
are c l o s e
of s t r e s s
cracks,
line,
crack.
i.e.
(24) f o u n d
= T(~a)i/2
| K(k)
(b _ a 2) I/
tips
The effect
factors,
which
field,
differ
is p a r t i c u l a r l y
tip s t r e s s e s
two c r a c k s
b2E (k) _ a 2
KII(N)
This
to e a c h o t h e r .
intensity
Wilmore
in a c o m p r e s s i o n
at the c r a c k
than o n e c r a c k on the c r a c k
of two c o l l i n e a r
mon
also obtained
the two a d j a c e n t
not p r o p a g a t e ~ ~ is o r i e n t e d
~min
be s h o w n
between
than
such as s h o w n
true
coefficient
a different
that a c r a c k w i l l
to or h i g h e r
(6)
KII.
Take
fall
along
the case
a com-
that :
(8)
L
for the near
K I I ( F ) = r(~b) I/2
for the far ends,
and,
(9)
kK (k
Where,
k =
(l-a2/b2) I/2
K(k)
= complete
elliptic
integral
of the
E(k)
= complete
elliptic
integral
of the s e c o n d
a, b = c r a c k
For an i n f i n i t e
following
parameters
number
result
KII(~ ) = T
of
defined
collinear
has b e e n o b t a i n e d
2(a+c)
tan
in Fig.
cracks
with
first
kind.
kind.
5
equal
spacing
the
(25),
( ~ )
(io)
Vol. 3, No. 4
377
FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
3.0
30 . . . .
2.0
~...
K I ] ~:,o]
K It [SINGLE)
(0 CRACKS )
K,,I
-~\
_
u.0LE,
1.0
:_1 o;
i". . . . . . . . . , 2 ~
K i t (SINGLE)
(2 CRACKS)
's"0LE
) 2CRACKS)
K I I (SINGLE)
i
~zl-- o0
RELATIVE
Z.
CRACK SPACING
FIG.
2a
2c
RELATIVE
/.
Io
E f f e c t of c r a c k spacing on
KII - c o l l i n e a r cracks.
KII
Fig.
p a r a l l e l cracks.
for c o l l i n e a r
It is
~ig.
(6,7), r e l a t i o n s
io are
increase w i t h i n c r e a s i n g p r o x i -
in a s y s t e m s u b j e c t e d to c o m p r e s s i v e
In w h i c h way
does crack i n t e r a c t i o n i n f l u e n c e the d i r e c t i o n of crack extension? Will the f o r m a t i o n of an initial b r a n c h crack lead to failure? To p r o v i d e answers to these q u e s t i o n s an e x p e r i m e n t a l m o d e l
study was performed.
378
Vol. 3, No. 4
Experimental Model.Study
- Single Cracks
P l a s t e r of Paris s p e c i m e n s
to study crack p r o p a g a t i o n
mulate
in a c o m p r e s s i v e
stress
f r i c t i o n a l c r a c k s thin m e t a l pieces,
embedded
o.oi
To si-
cm thick, were
2c, w e r e varied.
field.
The mix p r o p o r t i o n s
The a v e r a g e c o m p r e s s i v e
i n c l u s i o n s was
in b a t c h e s of
four,
three specimens
c o n t r o l purposes.
b e f o r e testing.
Further
(19).
40 k g f / c m 2 / m i n .
one of the v e r t i c a l
The v a r i a b l e s
crack inclination,
2c = 1.52;
continuously
~ = 45 , 3o , 15 and t h r e e d i f f e r e n t
2.o3 and 2.54 cm were
under
ably,
the b r a n c h c r a c k d e v i a t e d c o n s i d e r a b l y
According
to Table
1 0ie varied
f o u n d to be c o n s i d e r a b l y
in part to s e c o n d a r y
stresses b e c o m e m o r e p r o m i n e n t
can
s t r e s s e s w h i c h are i n t r o d u c e d
from the i n c l i n a t i o n
study.
be a t t r i b u t e d
A l m o s t invari-
0ie.
l i t t l e w i t h r e s p e c t to the c r a c k length,
30 the values
a small b r a n c h
was observed.
load r e a c h e d a given
study,
crack
rent p a r a m e t e r s
crack lengths,
investigated.
v a l u e d e p e n d e n t on the p a r a m e t e r s
analytical
earlier.
Table
at a rate
C r a c k e x t e n s i o n was studied on
s u r f a c e s of the s p e c i m e n s
cent ink t e c h n i q u e d e s c r i b e d
clinations,
study,
inclusions.
These
as the angle ~ d e c r e a -
also d e c r e a s e .
Vol. 3, No. 4
379
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
TABLE 1
Results
8ie = A v e r a g e O r i e n t a t i o n of Initial B r a n c h E x t e n s i o n
Kiiie
= Stress
Intensity
Factors
fpu = F a i l u r e Stress k g f / c m
Crack Length
(o)
(kpcm - 3 / 2 )
Crack O r i e n t a t i o n
2c
(cm)
= 45
@ = 30
~ = 15
8ie
ie
KIIie fpu
8ie
KIIie fpu
KIIie f8u
1.52
-66
55.6 165
-6o
5o.5
159
2.o4
-64
52.6
159
-64
43.8
152
-52
45.8
157
2.54
-62
48.1
128
-62
45.5
147
-44
48.2 431
increasing
progressively
aligned w i t h the d i r e c t i o n of a p p l i e d
inclination,
load.
~, was either
In some
in a stable m a n n e r
at w h i c h e x t e n s i o n of the
branch
to the
In most
failed by out of
p l a n e shear or bending,
splitting occurred(Fig,
to as s p l i t t i n g failure.
In other tests,
a second u n s t a b l e b r a n c h
A l t h o u g h the initial
o r i e n t a t i o n of these s e c o n d a r y b r a n c h cracks was not always exactly in the d i r e c t i o n of the initial cracks,
growth,
they c o n t i n u e d
In
i n s t a n t l y i n d i c a t i n g the
Since the d i r e c t i o n
380
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
FIG.
Failure
of P l a s t e r
of P a r i s
Specimens
Element
45
and
this
thus
i.e.
Branch
Failure
;
2,54
crack,
2c
was
taken
as
an
referred
to
as s h e a r
combinations
other
crack
inclinations.
shear
branch
cracks
splitting and
by
local
Failures
common
for
of
the
stress
used
Both
fie'
were
were
cm
extension
modes
of
also
different
branch
manner.
at
Although
failure,
observed.
than
for
and
the
cracks
observed,
were
initial
crack
crack
length.
factor,
Study
growth
The
KII,
KII
the
in r e f e r e n c e
In the p r e v i o u s
tensile
crack
Mixed
above
lengths.
1 suggests
Model
shear
somewhat
failures
to c r a c k
to d e t e r m i n e
Experimental
was
in a s t a b l e
crack
intensity
is g i v e n
of
Crack
2c =
2,o4
cm
failure.
the
Branch
in a few
most
failu-
crushing.
increasing
in T a b l e
procedure
tension
larger
stress,
with
as g i v e n
Cracks
= 300;
mentioned
growth
shear
related
the
compressive
decrease
grew
Shear
2c =
indication
of the m o d e s
~ = 15 , c r a c k
occurred
Crack
2,o4
For
res
single
llc
= 3oO;
cm
was
instances
with
llb
lla
ii
found
values
The
of
at
applied
were
closeness
found
extension
property.
initial
branch
The
ex-
(19).
- Crack
section
it was
Interaction
pointed
out
to
of the v a l u e s
crack
a material
KII v a l u e s
the
extension
at i n i t i a l
to be
to be m o r e
that
initial
Vol. 3, No. 4
381
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
crack
extension
the d i r e c t i o n
sion.
It was
ly f o r m i n
ry b r a n c h
tension
with
predicted
also
crack,
predicted
such
nant mode
portant
of
fashion,
stant
were
crack
For
3o , w e r e
cings,
were
inclined
studied
collinear
arranged
cracks
investigated;
2a = 0 . 7 6 ,
1.52
found
for
and
that
similar
to s i n g l e
ching was
in m o s t
cases
to d e c r e a s e
As
in the
with
growth.
used
crack
failure
to be
stres-
that
to p l a y
an im-
models
step-like
hypothesis.
A con-
tests.
~ = 45 and
each
crack
3.o4
inclination
cm w e r e
cracks.
than
a decrease
single
The
three
spa-
used.
of
initial
stress
for
cracks
FIG.
Failure
near
crabran-
and
it w a s
spacing.
the b r a n c h
ris
branch
at i n i t i a l
single
in c r a c k
cracks,
if
the p r e d o m i -
Therefore,
in all
ex-
associated
c o l l i n e a r or
this
seconda-
thought
have
exten-
two c r a c k o r i e n t a t i o n s
smaller
c a s e of
was
would
the o r i e n t a t i o n
was
found
therefore,
in e i t h e r
1.52 cm w a s
as the
to
occasional
shear
stresses
as h i g h
to t e s t
crack
surfaces
to the
the
interaction
close
of an u n s t a b l e
surfaces
of c r a c k
tensile
failure
It was,
in o r d e r
of
for
Yet,
almost
failure
crack
cracks,
length
It was
cking
analysis.
in the p r o c e s s
two
inclined
specimens.
failure,
part
containing
of
in a d i r e c t i o n
s e e m to be r e l a t e d
modes
control
occurs
to the e x t e n s i o n
in the
failure
formation
that
due
which
cracks
in the a n a l y s i s
found
the m o d e l
ses of the
the
in s i n g l e
cracks
!2
of P l a s t e r
Specimen
Cracks,
2a = 2c =
conti-
with
of PaColli-
~ = 45
o.52
cm.
382
Vol. 3, No. 4
nued
to
increase
towards
the
in m o s t
tests
2a,
two
the
Fig.
increasing
direction
in t h a t
cracks
12 s h o w s
Center
with
of
loading.
at
a given
were
a failed
joined
was
more
= 45 . A f t e r
the
two c r a c k s
ting.
were
found
In o t h e r
cracks
instances,
followed,
inclined
failure
the
at w h i c h
load
Table
2 the
were
surface.
The
considerably
failure
center
modes
center
the
exterior
length
almost
took
the
load
was
place.
specimens
lower
than
for
the
resulting
from
crack
and
split-
exterior
always
can
of an
were
to
seen
collinear
crack
shear
close
be
case.
for
branch
formation
As
extension
occurred.
causing
with
single
crack.
tensile
joined,
immediate
on and
spacing
at t i m e s
cracks
observed
branch
joining
joined
the
was
by a s h e a r
closest
failure
for
progressively
depended
the
joining
loads
which
for
after
to an
failure
after
in
leading
to b e n d
A new phenomenon
load,
frequent
to i n c r e a s e
and
abruptly
specimen
joining
cracks
load
from
cracks
Thus
definitely
the
pre-
dominant.
For
crack
ces
the
study
orientation,
between
ted;
for
o.o;
-0.76
cracks
~ = 30 was
cracked
each value
and
of
planes,
of
-1.52
"h"
in s t e p - l i k e
used.
Two
different
h = o.76
and
1.52
three
cm w e r e
different
studied.
TABLE
Results
from Model
Tests
fashion
with
cm,
one
normal
were
overlaps
The overlap
only
investiga-
between
between
Orientation
of
Collinear
Cracks
pu
= Stress
= Failure
Crack
Intensity
Initial
Factors
Branch
Extension
(kpcm
S t r e s s ~ g f / c m 2)
Crack
Spacing
Orientation
2c
= 30
= 45
(cm)
0ie
KII
f pu
i___~e
0
KII
fpu
0.76
-68
46.8
124
-64
49.8
12o
1.52
6o.7
139
-66
45.5
119
52.9
152
50.5
159
3.o4
cracks
(2c = 1.52
-3/2)
KIiie
cracks,
@ie = A v e r a g e
distan-
-71
5o.2
145
-52
-62
53.6
165
-64
(o)
cm)
Vol. 3, No. 4
383
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
is d e f i n e d
here as the h o r i z o n t a l
(Fig.
As in the p r e v i o u s
considerably
continued
under
cracks
tests
cracks
in the m a j o r i t y
In m o s t
cases
crack
or s p l i t t i n g
shown
re smaller
than
not as m a r k e d
Failure
in Table
3 in m o s t
for single
cracks,
13
of P l a s t e r
of Pa-
ris S p e c i m e n
with
like Cracks,
~ = 30 ,
step-
of
cracks
cracks.
a tensile
and j o i n i n g
tensile
In s o m e
failure
shear
cracks
cases
surface
cracks
it
(Fig.13)
extended
shear
branch
formation
into the d i r e c -
load.
as for c o l l i n e a r
FIG.
of the
joining
for c o l l i n e a r
about w h e n
suddenly
causing
themselves
to splitting.
by the d e v i a t i o n
the
cm o v e r l a p
the e x t e r i o r
at the e x t e r i o r
tion of a p p l i e d
-o.76
Moreover,
was o n l y p o s s i b l e
to o r i e n t
of the tests.
deviating
leading
interior
deviated
crack.
Although
came c l o s e
joining o c c u r r e d
formed
load.
joining was b r o u g h t
thereby
sometimes
As
and
crack,
center
cracks
center
tended
was not as f r e q u e n t a s
rapidly
cracking
branch
ly true
Once
branch
g r o w t h of the t e n s i l e
in the i n t e r i o r
original
initial
initial
the d i r e c t i o n
the
5).
of the
it was o b s e r v e d
branch
between
from the d i r e c t i o n
increasing
towards
distance
= -o.76
cm.
cm,
cases
the failure
however,
cracks.
stresses
the d i f f e r e n c e s
we-
were
384
Vol
3, ;~o. ~
TABLE
Results
from Model
Tests
with
Step-Like
(~ = 30 ', 2c = 1.52
Overlap
ween
bet-
Average
h = 0
cm
h = 1.52
16o
134
15o
14o
1.52
152
162
14o
159
158
195
crack
the
that
basis
extension
at h i g h
from
crack
crack
of
inclined
curs
the
from
single
these
inclined
crack
extension
failure
patterns
case,
been
it has
suggested
by
The model
cracks
form
an
shown,
that
the
tests
frequently
leads
However,
of
in a c o n c r e t e
between
the
It is,
nations
for
te s u c h
as
"How
is the m e a n i n g
random
of
questions
can
on
ultimate
the
observed
of
the
bas~
of
the
unloading
of
that
crack
of
portion
reduced
as c o n c r e t e ,
by s h e a r
arranged
!at=er
overlap,
failure
spacings
a direct
compari-
of
concrete.
reasonable
model?
the
incli-
and
propagation
in all
of
between
inclined
concrete
fracture
not
pattern
of C o n c r e = e
sizes
permit
and
strength
in s o m e b u t
of
to p r o v i d e
regarding
the
positive
interaction
not
possible
oc-
result
In the
Failure
formation
the m o d e l
of
branch
necessary.
to the
does
also
cracks
surface.
distribution
system
behavior
some
only
to the
nevertheless,
be d e f i n e d
surfaces
the
of
be c o n -
failure
are
such
requirements
that
may
either
coalescense
shown
cases,
stresses
cracks
is not
shear
to a f f e c t
be c a u s e d
Studies
have
shown
cm
it can
from
surfaces
inclined
(18),
of M o d e l
surfaces.
cracks
may
to
Application
in s u c h
multiple
surfaces
Bombolakis
but
study,
result
failure
by p r o g r e s s i v e
in s t e p - l i k e
may
been
the
with
model
failure
has
case
systems
or
cracks,
which
In this
For
surfaces
Inclined
interaction
growth.
experimental
failure
stresses.
considerably.
te~
h = o.76
142
cluded
son
pu
119
On
ned
Single
as
at F a i l u r e ,
- o.76
-
of
cm)
(kgf/cm 2 )
Cracks
(cm)
crack
Stress
Crack~
expla-
in c o n c r e -
in a s h o t - - t i m e
Why
are
short-time
failure
tes%s?
stress-strain
cur-
ve?"
It has
been
noted
in S e c t i o n
2 that
in c o n c r e t e
What
interface
Vol. 3, No. 4
385
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
cracks
cracks w i t h i n c l i n a t i o n s c l o s e to the
c r i E i c a l c r a c k o r i e n t a t i o n w i l l start to p r o p a g a t e
tar.
i n c r e a s e d further.
given crack e x t e n d s
seness of o t h e r cracks.
If cracks are i n i t i a l l y
will e x t e n d in a m a n n e r
model,
far apart,
d i r e c t i o n of the a p p l i e d
load.
a crack
in the
towards the
if, as a r e s u l t of b r a n c h extension,
Since
i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h another
The f o r m a t i o n of larger,
load is increa-
r e c t i o n of the a p p l i e d load, s h o r t l y a f t e r w a r d s ,
of m a x i m u m radial
shear.
this n a t u r e forms c o r r e s p o n d s
te, f
cu"
An i n c l i n e d
stress,
in the d i r e c t i o n
to the u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h of concre-
fcu' w e r e m a i n t a i n e d
long enough.
If the load is r e d u c e d
been reached,
s l o w d o w n crack
i m m e d i a t e l y after u l t i m a t e
load has
as is n o r m a l l y done in m o s t c o n c r e t e testing,
speed of s p o n t a n e o u s
the
In o r d e r
Normally,
however,
t h e r e b y c a u s i n g a slower, but c o n t i n u e d e x t e n s i o n of b r a n c h
cracks and, c o n s e q u e n t l y ,
increased deformation.
This explains
386
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
why,
tests,
Such crack g r o w t h o f t e n
an i n c l i n e d
form w h i c h
Failure
surface for-
sing a c c e l e r a t e d c r a c k extension,
b r a n c h e x t e n s i o n of the o r i g i n a l
In summary,
in the s y s t e m cau-
or by i n d e p e n d e n t
c r i t i c a l crack.
in a s h o r t - t i m e test an i n c l i n e d
is prevented.
accelerated
Thus,
failure
strength.
sur-
It may
unstable extension
to a c o n t i n u o u s
s e q u e n c e of li-
formation
for a g i v e n e x t e n t of
the
crack growth.
Conclusions
(i) C r a c k i n g w h i c h o c c u r s at s t r e s s e s of less than
cent of the u l t i m a t e
faces and voids.
is c o n c e n t r a t e d
Their o r i e n t a t i o n
inter-
interface
approaches
the
A similar b e h a v i o r was o b s e r v e d on m o d e l s of
Plaster of Paris, w h e r e
directions
at a g g r e g a t e - m o r t a r
85 per-
initially
i n c l i n e d cracks e x t e n d e d
into
invariably
specimens
form in the d e s c e n d i n g p o r t i o n of
load tests.
The m o d e l
studies
in cyclic
stress.
and w h i c h t r a v e r s e the e n t i r e or a
Therefore,
it was p r o p o s e d
that fai-
Vol. 3, No. 4
387
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
lure of concrete
failure
There,
with various
relative positions
to one another,
in most cases,
is formed.
from progressive
large enough
crack systems
failure surface
te results
of crack interaction.
inclined
of an inclined
specimen
Similarly,
failure of concre-
so that an
crack exfailure
surface.
(4) The formation of an inclined
short-time
failure
load,
This reduction
of the load,
the aggregates,
restrains
and, consequently,
in a
by a continuous
thereby permitting
surface
the straining
of the
diagram.
action of
failure
reduc-
crack
surface formation.
References
G.M.
Hansen,
SP2o, ACI,
4. M.A.
43
Conference
ACI,
Proc.
on the Structure
of
(1968).
61, 939
(1964).
5. F.E. Richart, A. Brandtzaeg and R.L. Brown, University of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin No. 185 (1928)
6. G.S. Robinson, International
Dams, Southhampton (1964).
7. B. Meyers,
8. E. Reinius,
Mag.
Concr.
Res., 9,
ACI,
157
Res.,
II, 119
Proc.
66, 6o
(1969).
(1956).
268, Dept. of Civ.
Eng.,
(1959).
ii. A. Brandtzaeg, "Failure of a Material Composed of N o n - I s o t r o pic Elements", Det. Kgl. Norske. V i d e n s k a b e r s Selskabs Skriften No. 12, Grandheim (1927).
12. M.A. Taylor,
ment Pastes,
"A Theory for the Deformation and Failure of CeMortars, and Concretes under General States of
388
Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
Stress", ACI, Proc.
13. S.P.
Shah, Ph.D.
68, 756
Thesis,
(1971).
Cornell University
(1965).
14. O. Buyukozturk, "Stress-Strain Response and Fracture of a Model of Concrete in Biaxial Loading", Report No. 337, Dept. of
Structural Engineering, Cornell University (197o).
15. J. Glucklich, "On the Compression Failure of Concrete",
Report No. 215, University of Illinois, March 1962.
16. T.V.
Zaitsev, Cem.
Concr.
Res.,
i, 1
TAM
(1971).
17. F.A. McClintock and J.B. Walsh, Proc., Fourth U.S. National
Congress of Applied Mechanics, II, lo15 (1962).
18. E.G. Bombalakis,
nology (1963).
Ph.D.
Thesis,
Massachusetts
21. B. Cotterell,
22. H.F. Bueckner,
Intern.
Trans.
Fracture Mech.,
ASME,
Institute of Tech-
8__oo, iii
~, 96
(1965).
(1958).
Irwin, Trans.
ASME, Appl.
Mech.
656
SP 381,
(1949).
(1957).
26. T. Yokobori and M. Ichiwaka, Res. Inst. for Strength and Fracture of Materials, Tohoku University, 3, 1 (1957).
27. M. Ichiwaka, M. Ohashi and T. Yokoborie, Res. Inst. for Strength
and Fracture of Materials, Tohoku University, ~, 1 (1967).