Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 26

CEMENT and CONCRETERESEARCH. Vol. 3, pp. 363-388, 1973.

Pergamon Press, Inc


Printed in the United States.

F R A C T U R E M E C H A N I S M S OF C O N C R E T E U N D E R C O M P R E S S I V E L O A D S

Samuel Diaz S a n t i a g o
Puerto Rico P l a n n i n g Board

H u b e r t K. H i l s d o r f
U n i v e r s i t y of K a r l s r u h e

ABSTRACT
The n a t u r e of p r o g r e s s i v e c r a c k g r o w t h in plain c o n c r e t e
under c o m p r e s s i v e loads was investigated. A c o n c e p t u a l
m o d e l was f o r m u l a t e d to d e s c r i b e c r a c k e x t e n s i o n at a given stress as well as the m a n n e r in w h i c h u l t i m a t e failure of c o n c r e t e takes place. C o m p r e s s i o n tests were perf o r m e d on c o n c r e t e prisms to i n v e s t i g a t e the n a t u r e of
crack g r o w t h at the m a c r o s c o p i c level. In addition, analytical and e x p e r i m e n t a l m o d e l studies were c o n d u c t e d
using fracture m e c h a n i c s c o n c e p t s in w h i c h the b e h a v i o r
of isolated cracks under c o m p r e s s i v e loads was studied.

In d i e s e r Studie w u r d e das W a c h s t u m von R i s s e n in Beton


unter D r u c k b e a n s p r u c h u n g u n t e r s u c h t . Es w u r d e ein M o d e l l
entwickelt, das die R i B e n t w i c k l u n g bei einer g e g e b e n e n
S p a n n u n g und den Vorgang, der zum B r u c h des Betons f~hrt,
beschreibt. Mit Hilfe yon D r u c k v e r s u c h e n an B e t o n p r i s m e n
w u r d e der R i B f o r t s c h r i t t auf m a k r o s k o p i s c h e r Ebene untersucht. F e r n e r w u r d e n a n a l y t i s c h e und e x p e r i m e n t e l l e Mod e l l u n t e r s u c h u n g e n auf der G r u n d l a g e der B r u c h m e c h a n i k
d u r c h g e f ~ h r t , in d e n e n das V e r h a l t e n e i n z e l n e r Risse unter D r u c k b e a n s p r u c h u n g s t u d i e r t wurde.

363

364

Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

Introduction
Considerable

r e s e a r c h w o r k has been d e v o t e d

m i n a t i o n of the b e h a v i o r of p l a i n
loading.

to the d e t e r -

c o n c r e t e under v a r i o u s modes of

Such studies have c o n c e n t r a t e d on the s t r e n g t h - d e f o r m a -

tion c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the m a t e r i a l .
w o r k has been done to d e t e r m i n e
c o n c r e t e on its m a c r o s c o p i c

By c o m p a r i s o n ,

less

the e f f e c t of the s t r u c t u r e of

behavior.

c e r n e d w i t h the i n v e s t i g a t i o n

much

Such studies have been con-

of m a t e r i a l

behavior

and/or w i t h

m o d e l i n g of such behavior.
Investigators

of the m a t e r i a l

w i t h the d e t e r m i n a t i o n
tion u n d e r

load.

even b e f o r e

It is g e n e r a l l y

load is a p p l i e d

cracking

o r d e r of 25-55

acknowledged

(1,2).

significantly

% of the s h o r t - t i m e

One i n v e s t i g a t o r

ce of large a g g r e g a t e s

at s t r e s s e s

to form c o n t i n o u s

although
develop

stress

levels

bilizes,

it has been o b s e r v e d

causes

cracks p r o p a g a t e

into t h r e e g e n e r a l c a t e g o r i e s :

dels

at the interfa-

starts

to occur

(6,3).
(3,7) that for
c r a c k i n g never sta-

Similarly
until

for cyclic

loa-

failure occurs

(3).

b e h a v i o r can be c l a s s i f i e d

lattice m o d e l s

(11,12,13,14),

(2,3,5);

that i n c l i n e d cracks

failure

failure.

to s i m u l a t e the o b s e r v e d

cial b e h a v i o r m o d e l s

load

(1,5). O n c e m i c r o cu
l e n g t h they are o r i e n t e d p r e d o m i -

in the o r d e r of 7o-90 % of fcu,

ding at high stresses,

(1,3).

% of f

loading it has been found

and e v e n t u a l l y

Models

concentrated

l e a d i n g to i m m e d i a t e

For s u s t a i n e d

cu
c r a c k i n g under

close to the d i r e c t i o n of loading

in some tests
suddenly,

strength f

crack p a t t e r n s

in the o r d e r of 70-9o

in a d i r e c t i o n

in the

B r i d g i n g of i s o l a t e d bond cracks

cracks e x c e e d a c e r t a i n m i n i m u m
nantly

Under short-

to 25 from the loading di-

are m o s t l y

(1,3).

setting and

at stresses

has p o i n t e d out that initial

(4). T h e s e cracks

through mortar

during

compressive

is r o u g h l y o r i e n t e d at angles close
rection

changes

can be a t t r i b u t e d

c h a n g e s d u r i n g hydration.

increases

deteriora-

that c o n c r e t e cracks

Such c r a c k i n g

such as v o l u m e

and t e m p e r a t u r e

time loads,

have been c o n c e r n e d

of i n d i c a t o r s of the m a t e r i a l

to a n u m b e r of factors
hardening

behavior

(8,9,1o),

interfa-

and f r a c t u r e m e c h a n i c s

mo-

(16,15).
In the lattice m o d e l s

structural

system.

Although

concrete

is s i m u l a t e d by a lattice

some s o p h i s t i c a t e d

lattice models

Vol. 3, No. 4

365
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

have had success


crete

in m o d e l i n g

(9) their physical

ximate.

resemblance

They do not furnish


Interfacial

the s t r e s s - s t r a i n

ness of the a g g r e g a t e - m o r t a r
basis of such weakness,
In general

terms

depending

In some models
lure, while

that the interfacial

of tensile

the formation of tensile

in others

fail.

Whereas,

ding the p r o g r e s s i v e
terfaces,
governed
fore,

slender

these models

the interface

cracks
cracks

follows

shortly.

is equated to fai-

compression
are helpful

down the

elements which
in understan-

models,

fracture m e c h a n i c s

to concrete.

at crack tips.

lure model w h i c h considers


mechanics

te under c o m p r e s s i v e
Although

(16) has proposed

and Walsh

of

a fai-

factor

in the

and cement pas-

loads.

crack growth

by Bombolakis

McClintock

emphasize

Glucklich's

voids as the significant

not directly related

work on p r o g r e s s i v e

there-

for the a p p l i c a t i o n

of crack growth and failure of concrete

is

crack growth.

on the other hand,

Zaitsev

in-

crack growth

attention must be given to individual

(15) has laid down the foundations

in rock,

After

that subsequent

the effect of stress concentrations

tributed

interface orientation,

by the stress fields at the crack tips and that,

Fracture mechanics

work

comes about.

formation of cracks at aggregate m a t r i x

they fail to recognize

special

on the

bond is broken

it is just one step in breaking

system into a number of weaker,


eventually

deterioration

local stresses.

the formation

the inherent weak-

and try to explain,

level for each particular

on the existing

bond is broken,

recognize

interface

is very appro-

on crack growth.

how progressive

they propose

at a given stress

w i t h concrete

information

behavior models

behavior of con-

to concrete,

in c o m p r e s s i o n

some n o t e w o r t h y

fields was con-

(18) in the field of rock mechanics.


(17) analysed

under the assumption

the effect of inclined cracks

that load t r a n s m i s s i o n

across cracks

occurs.
Based upon this background

information

an attempt was made

to describe more closely the nature of crack p r o p a g a t i o n


crete,

and specifically

microcracking

to investigate

leads to actual

Experimental

the m e c h a n i s m s

in c o n -

by which

failure.

Study of the Process of Crack Growth

Five series of plain concrete

prisms,

lo by lo cm cross

366

Vol. 3, No. 4

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION


section,

and

sustained

3o cm high,

compressive

were

tested

under

load h i s t o r i e s

in o r d e r

of p r o g r e s s i v e

crack growth

and

tested

as s p e c i m e n s

from w h i c h

were

as well

removed

surfaces

on two

was

to e x p o s e

US Type

ratio

as d e t e r m i n e d
details

on

The

prisms

were

cracks

using
This

used

technique

fluorescent

particles

Since

the

fluorescent

crack w i d t h

they

are

a line d e l i n a t i o n
violet

light.

to take

pictures

To take
held

constant

Fig.

stages

covered

a picture

30 seconds.
med.

of the

the

out

The o t h e r

growth

were

particle
of

fine

fluid,

surface

being

smaller
of a crack,

by a crack.

larger

than

surface,
seen

with orange

under

of

level,

taken

and the

of a sawed

surfaces.

strain

to set

was

for

loading

surface

used

loading.

the

and a l l o w e d

ultra-

were

of the v e r t i c a l

stress

the

forming

filters

stages

equip-

fluorescent

area o f f e r e d

is r e a d i l y

then

of the

method.

interior

in g e n e r a l ,

ink was a p p l i e d

on two op-

sides

by o b s e r v i n g

to the

third

a water-

and p h o t o g r a p h i c

at v a r i o u s

the center

series.

(19).

at the c r a c k

such p h o t o g r a p h s

resu-

at v a r i o u s

of loading.
Crack p a t t e r n s

ly from
fying

are,

equipped

The p h o t o g r a p h s

1 shows

in

of the

at a p r e d e t e r m i n e d

while

the

of the c o n c r e t e

were measured

absorption

surfaces

sawing

230 k g f / c m 2. F u r t h e r

filtered

crack w h i c h

Two c a m e r a s

The p h o t o g r a p h s

crack

are a t t r a c t e d

filtered

of the

was

strains

as the

particles

were

5 mm thick

with

strength

of a d i s p e r s i o n

as a r e s u l t of the i n c r e a s e d

layers

1:3.9:4.5

28-day

The m o l e c u l e s

crack,

as-cast

of

and

the n a t u r e

for all test

ink p e n e t r a n t

is known

in a fluid.

were

specimens.

ink c o n s i s t s

than a p a r t i c u l a r

used

can be found

to i n v e s t i g a t e

a fluorescent

Specimens

surface

30 cm d y l i n d e r s

of the

to study

The p u r p o s e

was

average

and lateral

sides

cyclic

aggregates.

proportions

15 by

Longitudinal
vertical

The

Cement

of the test p r o g r a m

posite

ment.

the coarse

the m i x

of o.78.

failure.

by sawing.

I Portland

For m o s t mixes
cement

sides

short-time,

the p i c t u r e

lens

For

negatives

(8 x) was u s e d

the t r a c i n g s
at v a r i o u s

were obtained

quantitative

stages

cking was m o s t l y

with

transparent

plastic.
the

of the e x t e n t

direct-

A magni-

cracks.

From

of c r a c k i n g

w e r e made.

sawed

concentrated

the cracks

in i d e n t i f y i n g

evaluations

of l o a d i n g

specimens

onto

to help

by t r a c i n g

surfaces,

at a g g r e g a t e

load

independent

interfaces.

For

craspe-

(d) fc/fcup=O.92
(down)

(b) fC/fcup=o.94

(e) fc/fcup=O.63
(down)

direction
of loading

(c) fC/fcup = o.99

FIG. 1
Surface cracking at different stages of loading; short-time test,
sawed surfaces

(a) fC/fcup=O.O

0
Z

--I

~-~

0..~

~-4

m
C~

C~

W
0%
~4

4~

z
O

.<
o

368

V0]. 3, No. 4

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION


cimens

with

surfaces

and had r a n d o m

orientation.

(fcup = s h o r t - t i m e
small

increase

terfacial.

was

longer

were observed

stages

of

orient

themselves

ned

crack

into

stresses
wide
one

loading,

a tendency

overall

test

stages

cyclic

fcup

(minimum

before

cracking

failure.

was

at late

there was

stages

at o.95

was
cup
cases the

wide
For

Close

cracks

with

related

the e x t e n s i o n
well

For

of the curve,

usually

to failure.

increase

stress

increase

Wide

appeared

of

3o .

at early

at o.85

stages

did

than

a maximum

growth

tests

from

cracks,

immedia-

fcup m o r t a r

sustained

loa-

in the e x t e n t

of

for c y c l i c

tests

similar

to that of c y c l i c

initial

application

some

crack

cracks

increase

tests

of loading

extending
was

on sawed

into

spe-

at o.85
caused

the m o r t a r

significant,

and also

developed.

specimens

load was

a marked

growth

with

to f a i l u r e

at early

strai-

loading.

of crack

In b o t h
cup"
considerable cracking
phase.

of

with

tests,

load

were

A cnsiderable

close

loa-

in o r i e n t a t i o n

crack

short-time

of

curve.

portion

specimens

to

The rate of

load by more

interfacial.

observed

!ate

tendency

orientation

of a p p l i e d

sustained

At these

specimens

varied

level ~ o),

in the

cracking

:cuD'

stress-strain

average

at stages

For

already

The n a t u r e
cimens

cracks

on sawed

was m o s t l y

In addition,

cracking

These

stress

seen

the

in-

interfacia!

stages.

when

a signi-

to the d i r e c t i o n

in the d e s c e n d i n g

was o b s e r v e d

to those

At 0.95

cup
only

was

caused

had a m a r k e d

of the

but their

tests

of c y c l i n g

similar

ding.

found.

caused

previous

closer

largest

portion

fcup,

level

at e a r l i e r

from the d i r e c t i o n

in c r a c k i n g

tely

o.9o

to another,

For
of o.85

not o b s e r v e d

to 0.85

the mortar.

cracks

voids

of w h i c h m o s t

stress

into

around

of prism)

to interfaces;

was

load

of cracking.

in a d i r e c t i o n

were

not d e v i a t e

the

the g r o w i n g

the d e s c e n d i n g

cracks

of

to e x t e n d

increase

below

strength

in the extent

cracks

the

of cracking,

increase

restricted

concentrated

Increasing

compressive

Further

increase

ding,

it was

in the e x t e n t

ficant
no

as-cast,

surfaces

to voids,

of e x i s t i n g

as e x t e n s i o n

as-cast
both with

cracks.

of e x i s t i n g

rection.

Linking

of cracks

limited

to cracks

located

surface

along

was

stages

a nearly

growth

to new cracks

Orientation

cracks

at late

regard

crack

under
and to

of new cracks,

close

to the

of l o a d i n g
common

as

loading

di-

was m o s t l y

straight

line.

At

Vol. 3, No. 4

369

FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

1.00

=V)
W
n,"

FIG.

O.L,O .

Crack d e n s i t y on con-

iI
O_

crete surfaces

020

. . . . . . . .

~-

. . . . . . . .

b
0

0.5

1,0

TOTAL CRACK LENGTH / TRACED AREA.


failure,
served.

wide cracks of the type p r e v i o u s l y m e n t i o n e d ,

In Fig.

2 the r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n r e l a t i v e

cmlcm

were ob-

stress and total

crack length of the traced area of a s h o r t - t i m e test is given.


The same figure shows the crack length at failure

for s u s t a i n e d

and cyclic tests at d i f f e r e n t m a x i m u m stress levels.


It was

found that,

in general,

the m a c r o s c o p i c

terns at failure w e r e very similar for cyclic,


short-time

loading.

cracks was o b s e r v e d

crack pat-

sustained,

and

In most cases a c o n s i d e r a b l e n u m b e r of wide


in the v e r t i c a l

surfaces of the prisms.

Most

of these cracks had an average o r i e n t a t i o n close to that of loading.

For the m a j o r i t y of specimens,

w h i c h almost

invariably occurred

long and wide inclined cracks,

in pairs,

were also o b s e r v e d

(Fig. 3). The average o r i e n t a t i o n of such inclined cracks varied


between

2o and 3o with r e s p e c t to the d i r e c t i o n of applied

load.

In some tests the wide cracks c o i n c i d e d with the p h o t o g r a p h e d


surfaces;

this p r o v i d e d an o p p o r t u n i t y to o b s e r v e the f o r m a t i o n

of these cracks.

For specimens w i t h sawed surfaces,

the h i s t o r y

could be t r a c e d back to smaller cracks w h i c h p r o g r e s s i v e l y

linked

to form the large and wide cracks.


These tests a s c e r t a i n e d the e x i s t e n c e of cracks
te b e f o r e loading

(1,5). They d e m o n s t r a t e d

tests the t r a n s i t i o n

in c o n c r e -

that for s h o r t - t i m e

from local i n t e r f a c e c r a c k i n g to the more ex-

tensive m o r t a r c r a c k i n g o c c u r s at stresses
o.85 to o.95 fcup" Also the p r o g r e s s i v e

in the n e i g h b o r h o o d of

a l i g n m e n t of c r a c ~ with the

370

Vol. 3, No. 4

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

FIG.

Concrete
failure

direction

of

with other

with

Although
pairs

of w i d e

servations

inclined

had been

is not

come about.
The f o r m a t i o n

cracks

the

that

existence
platens.
al.

(5) r e i n f o r c e

clined

failure

will

the w r i t e r s "

a consequence

cial

loading

belief

platens,

that

which

that m a j o r

provide

inclined

the

before

Some

least

in-

resis-

in an a z t e m p t

attributed

their

loading

and Richard,

formation
failure

et al

little

fur-

as a con-

by stiff

(21)

Kupfer,

cracks,

of

have

form of

very

3).

approach,

et al

is a f u n d a m e n t a l

of end restraint.

as soon

of p l a n e s

proveded

ob-

but w h a t m a k e s

(see Fig.

(3,6,12,15)

of Kupfer,

Similar

immediately

occur

friction

invariably,

What merizs

exist,

cracks

is formed

Others

the w o r k

surface

only

they o b s e r v e d

failure

to the end r e s t r a i n t

However,

at failure.

they

inclined

internal

behavior.

solely

that

to use t h e o r i e s

as C o u l o m b ' s

almost

(3,5,6,14,15,19).

tried

tance,

this

in

found

surface

have

to e x p l a i n

surfaces

is in a g r e e m e n t

vertical,

crack

vestigators
such

were

were

fact

of w i d e

suggests

inclined

on p a r a l l e l

is i n c r e a s e d

cracks

reported

them

failure

loading

most wide

discussion

tinuous

as

after

(3,5,2).

ther

or'at

specimens

i n c l i n e d cracks

loading,

studies

et

of an inand not

(19) used

spe-

restraint,

yet

at a p p r o x i m a t e l y

30

Vol. 3, No. 4

371

FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

FIG.

Cement paste cylinders after failure

to the applied load, a p p e a r e d at failure


specimens.

Furthermore,

by p r o g r e s s i v e

for u n i a x i a l l y loaded

failure of cement paste c y l i n d e r s o c c u r s

spalling of thin v e r t i c a l

are tested w i t h stiff platens

sheets even when they

(Fig. 4).

Failure Model
On the basis of previous
tions d e s c r i b e d

in the previous

tual model of crack p r o p a g a t i o n


(a) M i c r o c r a c k s

investigations
sections,

and the o b s e r v a -

the f o l l o w i n g c o n c e p -

in c o n c r e t e

is proposed:

form initially at m o r t a r - a g g r e g a t e

interfaces;

most of these cracks are inclined w i t h respect to the d i r e c t i o n


of loading.

Under load,

mortar,

preferentially

cracks,

however,

the interface cracks p r o p a g a t e


in the d i r e c t i o n of the a p p l i e d

into the
load.

The

follow the weakest surfaces of the system.

(b) P r o g r e s s i v e

f o r m a t i o n of m i c r o c r a c k s

leads to a s y s t e m

c o m p o s e d of a large number of small c o n c r e t e elements w h i c h are


s e p a r a t e d by cracks with a p r e d o m i n a n t l y v e r t i c a l o r i e n t a t i o n .
(c) Failure,

however,

does not occur by p r o g r e s s i v e

the small individual elements,


to form one continuous,
This

but by the joining of small cracks

inclined fracture

failure c o n c e p t is d i f f e r e n t

since it c o n c e i v e s

failure of

surface.
from C o u l o m b ' s

approach,

failure as a c o n s e q u e n c e of p r o g r e s s i v e

cking, w h i l e C o u l o m b ' s a p p r o a c h assumes sudden

cra-

failure to occur

372

Vol

No.

'~

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION


along

a given
The

tions

~lane

question

inclined
the

conditions

under

a limiting

to be a n s w e r e d

fracture

Therefore,

major

when

surfaces

interaction
which

small

Study

of

is h o w

form

cracks

and

from
was

individual

the M e c h a n i c s

Failure
An

analytical

to d e t e r m i n e
is the

surfaces
lead

stress

is r e a c h e d .

under

what

individual

studies
cracks

condi-

microcracks.

to d e s c r i b e

join

the

to form one

crack.
Model

tion

of

shear

The

their

of

analytical
infinite
which

surfaces.

is s h o w n

Only

in Fig.

such

study

proposition

the

formation

and

the

was

that
of

undertaken

crack

inclined

conditions

interacfailure

which

may

a surface.

consisted

isotropic,
Here,

transmit

straight

Propagation

Field

model

to d e t e r m i n e

body.

can

the

for

model

in a h o m o g e n e o u s ,

to be c r a c k s

of

and

formation

dimensional

experimental

cause

in c o n c r e t e ,

Crack

in a C o m p r e s s i o n

the v a l i d i t y
primary

to the

cracks

and

of

of

and

inclined
linearly

frictional
forces

cracks

elastic,

cracks

across

were

frictional
are

and p a r a l l e l

considered.

two-

understood
to

The m o d e l

5.

PC ~.
p, "8

q -qo

-...'

CRACK

q-rq-V

-i
FIG.

Definition

of

t t-J
FIG.

5
crack

parameters

Extension

6
of

a crack

Vol. 3, No. 4

373
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

Cotterell

(21) proposed

direction w h i c h maximizes
of crack extension.

that a crack will propagate

the strain energy released

For a crack,

(22) that under t h e s e

leased is given by

{~

Ud = (U-uP) =

as a result

such as the one shown in Fig.

further extension were to move along curve


It can be shown

in the

(u+-u~)

n = no from 0 to P.

conditions

+ ~

[an

6,

the energy re-

-)]

(i)

d~

n (u~-u~

%
where

U d = strain energy released

upon extension

from O to P.

U p , U = strain energy of system at P and O, respectively


o

n'
a

= stresses

~n

&s the axial

~n

that exist on OP when crack is at O;


stress normal

is the shear stress along the same curve

: ),
(u+-u

(u~-u~)

= the relative d i s p l a c e m e n t s
surfaces

For the energy released


tive of eq.

to the n curve,

of the crack

on OP when the crack is at P.

to be a m a x i m u m

(i) must be equal to zero,

the first deriva-

and the second derivative

must be negative.
Suppose that there is a single frictional
2c, inclined at an angle ~ as shown in Fig.

crack of length,

5. The body is loa-

ded uniaxially with a stress

a I. When a I is transformed

equivalent

in the planes parallel

boundary

to the crack,

stresses

the following

stresses

into

and normal

are obtained:

a~ = alsin2 ~

a~+~/2

(2)

= alsin2(~/2+~)

x#,~+~/2

= alsin~ cos~

Since it was postulated

earlier

that stresses can be trans-

m i t t e d across and parallel

to the crack surface,

a normal

ua# will be generated

at the crack.

and a frictional

resulting

Using superposition
separated

stress

system of boundary

stresses

principles

The

7.

the system shown in Fig.

into two systems A and B

tem B result

is shown in Fig.

stress

7 can be

(Fig. 8). The stresses of sys-

in a u n i f o r m stress d i s t r i b u t i o n

throughout

the bo-

374

Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

~~,c:. "r[/2

/f%

FIG.

0"~ ,,"1"[/2

Transformed
stresses

boundary

on a system

with a single,
tional

dy

(19). Thus no stress

tips.

Solutions

concentrations

for the stresses

tips of system A are generally


lar coordinates

(23):

r = 2 - ~

~2~

0 = 2 ~ r

~2~

rr0 = 2--~[~m2~

There,

Fig.

to

KI I = r

cos

8). Utilizing

sed as follows:

intensity

factor

for sliding mo-

The terms r and 0 are defined

~, at infinity

crack of length

in
2c

is:

The boundary
(Fig.

shear,

in po-

(3)

(23) KII for a straight

with u n i f o r m boundary

of the crack

cos

KII is the stress

5. A c c o r d i n g

at the crack

sin

(3cos0-1)

vement of the crack surfaces.

in the v i c i n i t y

crack

known and can be expressed

(3cos@-l)

(3sin@)

are g e n e r a t e d

fric-

(4)
shear of system A is T = ~,+~/2-p~
eqs.

2 and 4, KII for system A can be expres-

Vol. 3, No. 4

375

FRACTURE MECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

Ill,.

~.'R/2

- -

T
System A

System B
FIG.

Stresses

KII =

and systems used in analysis.

(sine cos~ - u-sin2~)

The stresses
direction

given in eq.

aI

(5)

3 can be used to d e t e r m i n e

of initial crack extension.

The two most

tions in such a field are the directions


stress,

(ae)max,

likely direc-

of m a x i m u m

tensile

normal to the radial vector r, and the direc-

tions of m a x i m u m shear stress,

Tre.

It was

found

this system the direction of m a x i m u m tensile


occurs

(19) that for

stress,.

(ae)ma x,

at an angle of 8 = 70.5 , which is independent

tial crack orientation,


8 = O , i.e.

in the same direction

orientations
they will.

it was not possible

values

crack.

for the energy relea-

to show c o n c l u s i v e l y

It w o u l d have been necessary


in all directions

is the direction

at

are tested against Cotterell's

lead to local m a x i m u m values

the energy r e l e a s e d
direction

as the original

they both give stationary

sed. A l t h o u g h

of the ini-

4. The m a x i m u m value of rr8 occurs

When these two directions


criterion,

the

it is most

that both

likely that

to obtain expressions

for

in order to d e t e r m i n e w h i c h

of global m a x i m u m energy released.

Such study could best be approached

using techniques

such as the

finite element method.


It is of interest

to determine

the critical

~max' w h i c h is the initial crack o r i e n t a t i o n

orientation,

for w h i c h branching

376

Vol. 3, No. 4

FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
f r o m the m a i n

crack occurs

would

have

tical

crack orientation

first.

to be a m a x i m u m .

In this e v e n t

It has b e e n

found

the v a l u e

(19)

for the case of a s i n g l e

that

crack

of KII

the criis g i v e n

by
~max
where

= @rc' t a n
2

p is the f r i c t i o n a l

crack surfaces.
Walsh

(i/u)

This

(17) u s i n g

result was

= arc tan

When

two or m o r e
in Fig.

from t h o s e d e t e r m i n e d
if the c r a c k s

s e n c e of m o r e

procedure.

by M c C l i n t o c k

It can be s h o w n

and

(19)

at an a n g l e

equal

in t e r m s

straight

(I/u)

(7)

cracks

are p r e s e n t

5, the s t r e s s e s
for a s i n g l e

are c l o s e

of s t r e s s
cracks,

line,

crack.

i.e.

(24) f o u n d

= T(~a)i/2

| K(k)
(b _ a 2) I/

tips

The effect

factors,
which

field,

differ

is p a r t i c u l a r l y

tip s t r e s s e s

two c r a c k s

b2E (k) _ a 2

KII(N)

This

to e a c h o t h e r .

intensity

Wilmore

in a c o m p r e s s i o n

at the c r a c k

than o n e c r a c k on the c r a c k

of two c o l l i n e a r
mon

also obtained

the two a d j a c e n t

not p r o p a g a t e ~ ~ is o r i e n t e d

~min

be s h o w n

between

than

such as s h o w n

true

coefficient

a different

that a c r a c k w i l l
to or h i g h e r

(6)

of the precan best

KII.

Take

fall

along

the case
a com-

that :

(8)

L
for the near

ends of the crack,

K I I ( F ) = r(~b) I/2
for the far ends,

and,
(9)

kK (k

Where,

k =

(l-a2/b2) I/2

K(k)

= complete

elliptic

integral

of the

E(k)

= complete

elliptic

integral

of the s e c o n d

a, b = c r a c k
For an i n f i n i t e
following

parameters

number

result

KII(~ ) = T

of

defined

collinear

has b e e n o b t a i n e d
2(a+c)

tan

in Fig.

cracks

with

first

kind.
kind.

5
equal

spacing

the

(25),

( ~ )

(io)

Vol. 3, No. 4

377

FRACTUREMECHANICS,CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

3.0

30 . . . .

2.0

~...

K I ] ~:,o]
K It [SINGLE)

(0 CRACKS )

K,,I

-~\
_

u.0LE,

1.0

:_1 o;

i". . . . . . . . . , 2 ~

'--h Ku (FJm END)

K i t (SINGLE)
(2 CRACKS)

's"0LE

) 2CRACKS)

K I I (SINGLE)
i

~zl-- o0

RELATIVE

Z.

CRACK SPACING

FIG.

2a
2c

RELATIVE

/.

CRACK SPACING. ~'c


FIG.

Io

Effect of crack spacing on

E f f e c t of c r a c k spacing on

KII - c o l l i n e a r cracks.

KII

Fig.

p a r a l l e l cracks.

9 shows the ratios of the KII values

cracks to the KII values

for c o l l i n e a r

for a single c r a c k as a function of 2a/

2c, w h i c h is indicative of the d i s t a n c e b e t w e e n cracks.

It is

evident that as the cracks b e c o m e closer and as the n u m b e r of


cracks increase the stresses at the c r a c k tips increase.
When a similar a p p r o a c h is used for the case of p a r a l l e l
cracks of equal l e n g t h
of various authors
obtained.

~ig.

Io), using the results of the work

(6,7), r e l a t i o n s

Once again the stresses

such as shown in Fig.

io are

increase w i t h i n c r e a s i n g p r o x i -

mity and n u m b e r of cracks.


On the basis of these results
p r e s e n c e of several cracks

it can be c o n c l u d e d that the

in a s y s t e m s u b j e c t e d to c o m p r e s s i v e

stresses causes an increase in the crack tip stresses.


A n u m b e r of q u e s t i o n s

still are unanswered:

In w h i c h way

does crack i n t e r a c t i o n i n f l u e n c e the d i r e c t i o n of crack extension? Will the f o r m a t i o n of an initial b r a n c h crack lead to failure? To p r o v i d e answers to these q u e s t i o n s an e x p e r i m e n t a l m o d e l
study was performed.

378

Vol. 3, No. 4

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

Experimental Model.Study

- Single Cracks

P l a s t e r of Paris s p e c i m e n s
to study crack p r o p a g a t i o n
mulate

23 by 7.5 by 1.3 cm were used

in a c o m p r e s s i v e

stress

f r i c t i o n a l c r a c k s thin m e t a l pieces,

embedded

into the specimens.

thus the crack ~ n g t h ,

o.oi

To si-

cm thick, were

The l e n g t h of the m e t a l pieces and

2c, w e r e varied.

For each p a r a m e t e r under

study at least t h r e e s p e c i m e n s w e r e tested.


w e r e o.4:1 w a t e r to g y p s u m by weight.
s t r e n g t h of e l e v e n c o n t r o l

field.

The mix p r o p o r t i o n s

The a v e r a g e c o m p r e s s i v e

specimens without metal

i n c l u s i o n s was

165 k p f / c m 2. The s p e c i m e n s w e r e cast h o r i z o n t a l l y

in b a t c h e s of

four,

the fourth for

three specimens

c o n t r o l purposes.
b e f o r e testing.

for the crack g r o w t h

A c u r i n g time of four to five hours was a l l o w e d

Further

thods can be found in

i n f o r m a t i o n on the c a s t i n g and curing me-

(19).

In the tests the load was a p p l i e d


of a p p r o x i m a t e l y

40 k g f / c m 2 / m i n .

one of the v e r t i c a l

The v a r i a b l e s
crack inclination,

2c = 1.52;

continuously

for the s i n g l e c r a c k study were the initial

~, and the c r a c k length,

2c. Three crack in-

~ = 45 , 3o , 15 and t h r e e d i f f e r e n t
2.o3 and 2.54 cm were

under

(branching off the m a i n crack)

ably,

the b r a n c h c r a c k d e v i a t e d c o n s i d e r a b l y

of the o r i g i n a l crack by an angle

According

0ie for the d i f f e -

to Table

1 0ie varied

and for ~ = 15 and


in the

For ~ = 15 the a v e r a g e v a l u e s of 0ie were

f o u n d to be c o n s i d e r a b l y

lower than -70.5 This d i f f e r e n c e

in part to s e c o n d a r y

stresses b e c o m e m o r e p r o m i n e n t

ses since the shear s t r e s s e s

can

s t r e s s e s w h i c h are i n t r o d u c e d

b e c a u s e of the finite t h i c k n e s s of the m e t a l


secondary

from the i n c l i n a t i o n

for 0ie are close to 7o.5 as p r e d i c t e d

study.

be a t t r i b u t e d

A l m o s t invari-

0ie.

l i t t l e w i t h r e s p e c t to the c r a c k length,
30 the values

a small b r a n c h

was observed.

1 shows the a v e r a g e v a l u e s of the angle


u n d e r study.

load r e a c h e d a given

study,

crack

rent p a r a m e t e r s

crack lengths,

investigated.

v a l u e d e p e n d e n t on the p a r a m e t e r s

analytical

using the fluores-

earlier.

It was o b s e r v e d that w h e n the a p p l i e d

Table

at a rate

C r a c k e x t e n s i o n was studied on

s u r f a c e s of the s p e c i m e n s

cent ink t e c h n i q u e d e s c r i b e d

clinations,

study,

inclusions.

These

as the angle ~ d e c r e a -

also d e c r e a s e .

Vol. 3, No. 4

379
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION
TABLE 1
Results

from Model Tests w i t h Single C r a c k s

8ie = A v e r a g e O r i e n t a t i o n of Initial B r a n c h E x t e n s i o n

Kiiie

= Stress

Intensity

Factors

fpu = F a i l u r e Stress k g f / c m
Crack Length

(o)

(kpcm - 3 / 2 )

Crack O r i e n t a t i o n

2c
(cm)

= 45

@ = 30

~ = 15
8ie

ie

KIIie fpu

8ie

KIIie fpu

KIIie f8u

1.52

-66

55.6 165

-6o

5o.5

159

2.o4

-64

52.6

159

-64

43.8

152

-52

45.8

157

2.54

-62

48.1

128

-62

45.5

147

-44

48.2 431

The i n i t i a t i o n of b r a n c h c r a c k i n g did not c o i n c i d e w i t h


failure since the b r a n c h cracks c o n t i n u e d to g r o w in a stable
manner with

increasing

progressively

load. As they grew their o r i e n t a t i o n became

aligned w i t h the d i r e c t i o n of a p p l i e d

For the tests w h e r e the initial

inclination,

load.
~, was either

45 or 3o two d i s t i n c t modes of failure were observed.


tests the b r a n c h cracks c o n t i n u e d to e x t e n d
until a g i v e n load was reached,
cracks b e c a m e unstable.

In some

in a stable m a n n e r

at w h i c h e x t e n s i o n of the

The cracks then p r o g r e s s e d

branch

to the

ends of the s p e c i m e n s p l i t t i n g it into two s e p a r a t e c o m p r e s s i o n


elements.

In most

instances these two e l e m e n t s

failed by out of

p l a n e shear or bending,

at a p p r o x i m a t e l y the same load at w h i c h

splitting occurred(Fig,

lla). This mode of failure was r e f e r r e d

to as s p l i t t i n g failure.

In other tests,

a second u n s t a b l e b r a n c h

crack formed and c a u s e d i m m e d i a t e failure.

A l t h o u g h the initial

o r i e n t a t i o n of these s e c o n d a r y b r a n c h cracks was not always exactly in the d i r e c t i o n of the initial cracks,
growth,

they c o n t i n u e d

m o s t cases the cracks


(Fig.

in the later stages of

in the d i r e c t i o n of the initial crack.


s e p a r a t e d the s p e c i m e n

llb and llc). This o c c u r r e d a l m o s t

In

into two blocks

i n s t a n t l y i n d i c a t i n g the

u n s t a b l e g r o w t h of the second b r a n c h crack.

Since the d i r e c t i o n

of g r o w t h tended to c o i n c i d e w i t h the d i r e c t i o n of the initial

380

Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

FIG.
Failure

of P l a s t e r

of P a r i s

Specimens

Element
45

and

this

thus

i.e.

Branch

Failure
;

2,54
crack,

2c

was

taken

as

an

referred

to

as s h e a r

combinations

other

crack

inclinations.

shear

branch

cracks

splitting and
by

local

Failures
common

for

of

the

stress

used

Both

fie'

were

were

cm

extension

modes

of

also

different

branch

manner.

at

Although

failure,
observed.

than

for

and

the

cracks

observed,

were

initial

crack

crack

length.

factor,

Study

growth
The

KII,

KII
the

in r e f e r e n c e

In the p r e v i o u s

tensile

crack

Mixed

above

lengths.

1 suggests

Model

shear

somewhat

failures

to c r a c k

to d e t e r m i n e

Experimental

was

in a s t a b l e

crack

intensity

is g i v e n

of

Crack

2c =

2,o4

cm

failure.

the

Branch

in a few
most

failu-

crushing.

increasing

in T a b l e

procedure
tension

larger

stress,

with

as g i v e n

Cracks

= 300;

mentioned

growth

shear

related

the

compressive
decrease

grew

Shear

2c =

indication

of the m o d e s

~ = 15 , c r a c k

occurred

Crack

2,o4

For

res

single

llc

= 3oO;

cm

was

instances

with

llb

lla

ii

found

values

The

of

at

applied

were

closeness

found

extension

property.

initial

branch

The
ex-

(19).
- Crack

section

it was

Interaction
pointed

out

to

of the v a l u e s

crack

a material

KII v a l u e s

the

extension

at i n i t i a l

to be

to be m o r e

that

initial

Vol. 3, No. 4

381
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

crack

extension

the d i r e c t i o n
sion.

It was

ly f o r m i n
ry b r a n c h
tension
with

predicted
also

crack,

predicted

such

nant mode
portant

of

fashion,
stant

were

crack
For

3o , w e r e
cings,

were

inclined

studied

collinear

arranged

cracks

investigated;

2a = 0 . 7 6 ,

1.52

found

for
and

that

similar

to s i n g l e

ching was

in m o s t

cases

to d e c r e a s e
As

in the

with

growth.

used

crack

failure

to be

stres-

that

to p l a y

an im-

models
step-like

hypothesis.

A con-

tests.
~ = 45 and

each

crack

3.o4

inclination
cm w e r e

cracks.
than

a decrease
single

The

three

spa-

used.
of

initial

stress

for

cracks

FIG.
Failure

near

crabran-

and

it w a s

spacing.

the b r a n c h

ris

branch

at i n i t i a l

single

in c r a c k

cracks,

if

the p r e d o m i -

Therefore,

in all

ex-

associated

c o l l i n e a r or

this

seconda-

thought

have

exten-

two c r a c k o r i e n t a t i o n s

smaller

c a s e of

was

would

the o r i e n t a t i o n

was

found

therefore,

in e i t h e r

1.52 cm w a s

as the

to

occasional

shear

stresses

as h i g h

to t e s t

crack

surfaces

to the

the

interaction

close

of an u n s t a b l e

surfaces

of c r a c k

tensile

failure

It was,

in o r d e r

of

for

Yet,

almost

failure

crack

cracks,

length

It was
cking

analysis.

in the p r o c e s s

two

inclined

specimens.

failure,

part

containing

of

in a d i r e c t i o n

s e e m to be r e l a t e d

modes

control

occurs

to the e x t e n s i o n

in the

failure

formation

that

due

which

cracks

in the a n a l y s i s

found

the m o d e l

ses of the
the

in s i n g l e

cracks

!2

of P l a s t e r

Specimen
Cracks,

2a = 2c =

conti-

with

of PaColli-

~ = 45

o.52

cm.

382

Vol. 3, No. 4

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

nued

to

increase

towards

the

in m o s t

tests

2a,

two

the

Fig.

increasing

direction
in t h a t

cracks

12 s h o w s

Center

with

of

loading.

at

a given

were

a failed

joined

was

more

= 45 . A f t e r

the

two c r a c k s

ting.

were

found

In o t h e r

cracks

instances,

followed,

inclined

failure

the

at w h i c h

load

Table

2 the

were

surface.

The

considerably

failure

center

modes

center

the

exterior

length

almost

took

the

load

was

place.

specimens

lower

than

for

the

resulting

from

crack

and

split-

exterior

always
can

of an

were

to

seen

collinear

crack

shear

close

be

case.

for

branch

formation

As

extension

occurred.

causing

with

single

crack.

tensile

joined,

immediate

on and

spacing

at t i m e s

cracks

observed

branch

joining

joined

the

was

by a s h e a r

closest

failure

for

progressively

depended

the

joining

loads

which

for

after
to an

failure

after

in

leading

to b e n d

A new phenomenon
load,

frequent

to i n c r e a s e

and

abruptly

specimen

joining

cracks

load

from
cracks

Thus

definitely

the
pre-

dominant.
For
crack
ces

the

study

orientation,

between

ted;

for

o.o;

-0.76

cracks

~ = 30 was

cracked

each value
and

of

planes,
of

-1.52

"h"

in s t e p - l i k e
used.

Two

different

h = o.76

and

1.52

three

cm w e r e

different

studied.
TABLE

Results

from Model

Tests

fashion

with

cm,

one

normal
were

overlaps

The overlap

only

investiga-

between

between

Orientation

of

Collinear

Cracks

pu

= Stress

= Failure

Crack

Intensity

Initial

Factors

Branch

Extension

(kpcm

S t r e s s ~ g f / c m 2)
Crack

Spacing

Orientation

2c
= 30

= 45

(cm)
0ie

KII

f pu

i___~e
0

KII

fpu

0.76

-68

46.8

124

-64

49.8

12o

1.52

6o.7

139

-66

45.5

119

52.9

152

50.5

159

3.o4

cracks

(2c = 1.52

-3/2)
KIiie

cracks,

@ie = A v e r a g e

distan-

-71

5o.2

145

-52

-62

53.6

165

-64

(o)

cm)

Vol. 3, No. 4

383
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

is d e f i n e d

here as the h o r i z o n t a l

tips of the two cracks

(Fig.

As in the p r e v i o u s
considerably
continued
under

cracks

tests

cracks

load as the cracks


of a p p l i e d

in the m a j o r i t y

In m o s t

cases
crack

or s p l i t t i n g

shown

re smaller

than

not as m a r k e d

Failure

in Table

3 in m o s t

for single

cracks,

13

of P l a s t e r

of Pa-

ris S p e c i m e n

with

like Cracks,

~ = 30 ,

step-

2c = 1.52 cm, h = 0.76


overlap

of
cracks

This was p a r t i c u l a r between

cracks.

a tensile

and j o i n i n g
tensile

In s o m e

failure
shear

cracks

cases

surface

cracks

it

(Fig.13)
extended

shear

branch

formation

into the d i r e c -

load.

as for c o l l i n e a r

FIG.

of the

joining

for c o l l i n e a r

about w h e n

suddenly

causing

themselves

to the tip of the other

to splitting.

by the d e v i a t i o n

the

cm o v e r l a p

the e x t e r i o r

at the e x t e r i o r

tion of a p p l i e d

-o.76

Moreover,

was o n l y p o s s i b l e

to o r i e n t

of the tests.

deviating

leading

interior

deviated

crack.

Although

came c l o s e

joining o c c u r r e d

formed

load.

joining was b r o u g h t

thereby

sometimes

As

and

from one crack

crack,

center

cracks

center

tended

was not as f r e q u e n t a s

for tests w i t h o.o,

rapidly

cracking

branch

ly true

Once

branch

g r o w t h of the t e n s i l e

in the i n t e r i o r

original

initial

initial

the d i r e c t i o n

the

5).

of the

it was o b s e r v e d

branch

between

from the d i r e c t i o n

increasing

towards

distance

= -o.76

cm.

cm,

cases

the failure

however,

cracks.

stresses

the d i f f e r e n c e s

we-

were

384

Vol

3, ;~o. ~

FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACK PROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

TABLE
Results

from Model

Tests

with

Step-Like

(~ = 30 ', 2c = 1.52
Overlap
ween

bet-

Average

h = 0

cm

h = 1.52

16o

134

15o

14o

1.52

152

162

14o

159

158

195

crack
the

that

basis

extension
at h i g h

from

crack

crack

of

inclined

curs

the

from

single

these

inclined

crack

extension

failure

patterns

case,

been

it has

suggested

by

The model
cracks

form

an

shown,

that

the

tests

frequently

leads

However,

of

in a c o n c r e t e

between

the

It is,
nations

for

te s u c h

as

"How

is the m e a n i n g

random

of

questions
can
on

ultimate
the

observed
of

the

bas~

of

the

unloading

of

that

crack
of

portion

reduced

as c o n c r e t e ,
by s h e a r
arranged
!at=er
overlap,

failure
spacings

a direct

compari-

of

concrete.

reasonable

model?

the

incli-

and

propagation

in all
of

between

inclined

concrete

fracture
not

pattern

of C o n c r e = e

sizes

permit

and

strength

in s o m e b u t

of

to p r o v i d e

regarding

the

positive

interaction

not

possible

oc-

result

In the

Failure

formation

the m o d e l

of

branch

necessary.

to the

does

also

cracks

surface.

distribution

system

behavior

some

only

to the

nevertheless,

be d e f i n e d

surfaces

the

of

be c o n -

failure

are

such

requirements

that

may

either

coalescense

shown

cases,

stresses

cracks

is not

shear

to a f f e c t

be c a u s e d

Studies

have

shown

cm

it can

from

surfaces

inclined

(18),

of M o d e l

surfaces.
cracks

may

to

Application

in s u c h

multiple

surfaces

Bombolakis

but

study,

result

failure

by p r o g r e s s i v e

in s t e p - l i k e

may

been

the

with

model

failure

has

case

systems

or

cracks,

which

In this

For

surfaces

Inclined

interaction

growth.

experimental

failure

stresses.

considerably.

te~

h = o.76

142

cluded

son

pu

119

On

ned

Single

as

at F a i l u r e ,

- o.76
-

of

cm)

(kgf/cm 2 )

Cracks

(cm)

crack

Stress

Crack~

expla-

in c o n c r e -

in a s h o t - - t i m e
Why

are

short-time

failure

tes%s?

stress-strain

cur-

ve?"
It has

been

noted

in S e c t i o n

2 that

in c o n c r e t e

What

interface

Vol. 3, No. 4

385
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

cracks

form p r o g r e s s i v e l y under i n c r e a s i n g load. W h e n a g i v e n

stress level is reached,

cracks w i t h i n c l i n a t i o n s c l o s e to the

c r i E i c a l c r a c k o r i e n t a t i o n w i l l start to p r o p a g a t e
tar.

into the mor-

C r a c k s w i t h o t h e r i n c l i n a t i o n s will f o l l o w w h e n the load is

i n c r e a s e d further.

The stress at w h i c h and the m o d e by w h i c h a

given crack e x t e n d s

into the m o r t a r will be d e t e r m i n e d by the clo-

seness of o t h e r cracks.

If cracks are i n i t i a l l y

will e x t e n d in a m a n n e r

similar to that of s i n g l e cracks

model,

far apart,

i.e., a b r a n c h will form w h i c h will p r o g r e s s

d i r e c t i o n of the a p p l i e d

load.

a crack

in the

towards the

If cracks are i n i t i a l l y close or

if, as a r e s u l t of b r a n c h extension,

they come close together,

they will m o s t likely c o a l e s c e as a r e s u l t of the e f f e c t of crack


interaction

leading to t e m p o r a r y u n s t a b l e crack growth.

cracks are i n i t i a l l y small,

Since

the j o i n i n g of cracks will give rise

to a larger crack w h i c h is stable u n l e s s


crack c l o s e b y causes a s u b s t a n t i a l

i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h another

i n c r e a s e in the crack tip stres-

ses so as to favour further crack joining.

The f o r m a t i o n of larger,

s u b c r i t i c a l c r a c k s as a result of crack i n t e r a c t i o n and s u b s e q u e n t


joining will b e c o m e m o r e p r o n o u n c e d as the a p p l i e d
sed. E v e n t u a l l y ,

load is increa-

the joining of two cracks causes the f o r m a t i o n

of a c r i t i c a l crack, w h i c h may give rise to s p o n t a n i o u s b r a n c h ext e n s i o n from its tips.

Such e x t e n s i o n may o c c u r first in the di-

r e c t i o n of the a p p l i e d load, s h o r t l y a f t e r w a r d s ,
of m a x i m u m radial

shear.

The stress at w h i c h a c r i t i c a l crack of

this n a t u r e forms c o r r e s p o n d s
te, f

cu"
An i n c l i n e d

stress,

in the d i r e c t i o n

to the u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h of concre-

failure surface w o u l d always r e s u l t if the

fcu' w e r e m a i n t a i n e d

long enough.

The r e a s o n that some

time under constant, m a x i m u m load is r e q u i r e d b e f o r e a failure


surface is f o r m e d may be found in the c r a c k a r r e s t i n g a c t i o n of
a g g r e g a t e s w h i c h m a y be s u f f i c i e n t to m o m e n t a r i l y
growth.

If the load is r e d u c e d

been reached,

s l o w d o w n crack

i m m e d i a t e l y after u l t i m a t e

load has

as is n o r m a l l y done in m o s t c o n c r e t e testing,

speed of s p o n t a n e o u s

crack e x t e n s i o n m a y be slowed down.

the

In o r d e r

to c h e c k crack g r o w t h c o m p l e t e l y the load w o u l d have to be removed instantly.


rate,

Normally,

however,

the load is r e d u c e d at a slower

t h e r e b y c a u s i n g a slower, but c o n t i n u e d e x t e n s i o n of b r a n c h

cracks and, c o n s e q u e n t l y ,

increased deformation.

This explains

386

Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION

why,

in the studies of surface crack g r o w t h for s h o r t - t i m e

tests,

an i n c r e a s e in the total crack length in the d e s c e n d i n g p o r t i o n


of the s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve was observed.

Such crack g r o w t h o f t e n

leads to the f o r m a t i o n of large, w i d e cracks w h i c h o c c a s i o n a l l y


break t h r o u g h aggregates.
ciently fast rate,

If the load is not reduced at a suffi-

an i n c l i n e d

failure surface will

causes the i m m e d i a t e c o l l a p s e of the system.

form w h i c h

Failure

surface for-

m a t i o n will o c c u r either by c o a l e s c e n c e of the b r a n c h e x t e n s i o n s


of the first c r i t i c a l

crack w i t h other cracks

sing a c c e l e r a t e d c r a c k extension,
b r a n c h e x t e n s i o n of the o r i g i n a l
In summary,

in the s y s t e m cau-

or by i n d e p e n d e n t
c r i t i c a l crack.

in a s h o r t - t i m e test an i n c l i n e d

face can form at any stage b e y o n d the u l t i m a t e


be a v o i d e d if by c o n t r o l l i n g the s t r a i n rate,
of b r a n c h cracks

is prevented.

accelerated

Thus,

stress-strain diagram corresponds

failure

strength.

sur-

It may

unstable extension

the d e s c e n d i n g part of the

to a c o n t i n u o u s

s e q u e n c e of li-

mit states and gives the stress w h i c h w o u l d cause u n s t a b l e b r a n c h


e x t e n s i o n and failure surface
cracking.

formation

for a g i v e n e x t e n t of

The larger the strain or the extent of cracking,

lower the stress w h i c h can cause u n s t a b l e

the

crack growth.

Conclusions
(i) C r a c k i n g w h i c h o c c u r s at s t r e s s e s of less than
cent of the u l t i m a t e
faces and voids.

is c o n c e n t r a t e d

As the load is i n c r e a s e d further,

cracks e x t e n d into the mortar.


loading direction.

Their o r i e n t a t i o n

inter-

interface

approaches

the

A similar b e h a v i o r was o b s e r v e d on m o d e l s of

Plaster of Paris, w h e r e
directions

at a g g r e g a t e - m o r t a r

85 per-

initially

i n c l i n e d cracks e x t e n d e d

into

close to the loading direction.

(2) In tests on plain c o n c r e t e


large, wide cracks
s h o r t - t i m e tests,
or s u s t a i n e d

invariably

specimens

it was noted that

form in the d e s c e n d i n g p o r t i o n of

as well as at stages close to f a i l u r e

load tests.

The m o d e l

studies

in cyclic

indicate that such

cracks are the r e s u l t of further e x t e n s i o n of cracks of c r i t i c a l


size, w h i c h will g r o w s p o n t a n e o u s l y u n d e r a g i v e n c o m p r e s s i v e
(3) M o s t failed s p e c i m e n s
failure w h i c h are c o n t i n u o u s
m a j o r part of the specimen.

stress.

showed large i n c l i n e d cracks at

and w h i c h t r a v e r s e the e n t i r e or a
Therefore,

it was p r o p o s e d

that fai-

Vol. 3, No. 4

387
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION,COMPRESSION

lure of concrete
failure

is the result of the formation

surface which forms as a c o n s e q u e n c e

Studies on models with simplified


position.

There,

with various

relative positions

action and eventually

support this proclose cracks

to one another,

in most cases,

stress as a result of crack inter-

is formed.

from progressive

large enough

crack systems

pass through the entire

failure surface

te results

of crack interaction.

it was found that sufficiently

coalesce at a certain critical

inclined

of an inclined

specimen

Similarly,

failure of concre-

joining of small cracks until a crack

is formed, which will lead to spontaneous

tension and eventually,

so that an

to the formation of an inclined

crack exfailure

surface.
(4) The formation of an inclined
short-time

test may be delayed or prevented

tion of the applied


specimen

failure

load,

This reduction

of the load,

the aggregates,

restrains

and, consequently,

in a

by a continuous

thereby permitting

into the descending

surface

the straining

portion of the stress-strain


along with the arresting

of the
diagram.

action of

unstable growth of the critical

failure

reduc-

crack

surface formation.
References

I. T.C. Hsu, F.O. Slate,


6o, 2o9 (1963).

G.M.

Sturman and G. Winter,

2. G.S. Robinson, International


Concrete, London (1965).
3. T.C.

Hansen,

SP2o, ACI,

4. M.A.

Taylor and B.B.

43

Conference

ACI,

Proc.

on the Structure

of

(1968).

Broms, ACI, Proc.

61, 939

(1964).

5. F.E. Richart, A. Brandtzaeg and R.L. Brown, University of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin No. 185 (1928)
6. G.S. Robinson, International
Dams, Southhampton (1964).
7. B. Meyers,

Symposium on the Theory of Arch

F. Slate and G. Winter,

8. E. Reinius,

Mag.

Concr.

Res., 9,

ACI,

157

9. H.E. Roy, M.A. Sozen, SRS Report No.


University of Illinois (1963).
io. A. Baker, Mag. Concr.

Res.,

II, 119

Proc.

66, 6o

(1969).

(1956).
268, Dept. of Civ.

Eng.,

(1959).

ii. A. Brandtzaeg, "Failure of a Material Composed of N o n - I s o t r o pic Elements", Det. Kgl. Norske. V i d e n s k a b e r s Selskabs Skriften No. 12, Grandheim (1927).
12. M.A. Taylor,
ment Pastes,

"A Theory for the Deformation and Failure of CeMortars, and Concretes under General States of

388

Vol. 3, No. 4
FRACTURE MECHANICS, CRACKPROPAGATION, COMPRESSION
Stress", ACI, Proc.

13. S.P.

Shah, Ph.D.

68, 756

Thesis,

(1971).

Cornell University

(1965).

14. O. Buyukozturk, "Stress-Strain Response and Fracture of a Model of Concrete in Biaxial Loading", Report No. 337, Dept. of
Structural Engineering, Cornell University (197o).
15. J. Glucklich, "On the Compression Failure of Concrete",
Report No. 215, University of Illinois, March 1962.
16. T.V.

Zaitsev, Cem.

Concr.

Res.,

i, 1

TAM

(1971).

17. F.A. McClintock and J.B. Walsh, Proc., Fourth U.S. National
Congress of Applied Mechanics, II, lo15 (1962).
18. E.G. Bombalakis,
nology (1963).

Ph.D.

Thesis,

Massachusetts

19. S.I. Diaz and H.K. Hilsdorf, SRS Report No.


Eng., University of Illinois (1971).
2o. H. Kupfer,
(1969).

268, Dept. of Civ.

H.K. Hilsdorf and H. R~sch, ACI, Proc. 66,

21. B. Cotterell,
22. H.F. Bueckner,

Intern.
Trans.

Fracture Mech.,
ASME,

23. P.C. Paris and G.C.Sih,


ASTM (1965).
24. T.J. Willmore,
25. G.R.

Institute of Tech-

8__oo, iii

~, 96

(1965).

(1958).

Fracture Toughness Testing,

Quart. Appl. Math., 2, 53

Irwin, Trans.

ASME, Appl.

Mech.

656

SP 381,

(1949).

(1957).

26. T. Yokobori and M. Ichiwaka, Res. Inst. for Strength and Fracture of Materials, Tohoku University, 3, 1 (1957).
27. M. Ichiwaka, M. Ohashi and T. Yokoborie, Res. Inst. for Strength
and Fracture of Materials, Tohoku University, ~, 1 (1967).

Вам также может понравиться