AKLAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

KALIBO, AKLAN
Course Subject: SEAM SL 4
EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE ITEM ANALYSIS REFERENCE SHEET
Examination Period: PRELIM EXAMINATION
Course and Year/Sec: ESLPMD 2-D SEAM SL 4
Number of Examinees: 40

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Date: NOVEMBER 23, 20

Instructor:C/M MANUEL

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

(PH - PL)

(PH + PL)

DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

2
#C/n

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
3
10
2
1
3
10
4
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
8
10
8
1
5
10
9
10
8
10
8
10
4
10
9
6
6
1
1
9
8
5
9
9
10
5
7
4
10
10
4
5
8
10
9
3
8
10
8
7
4
2
1
8
8

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

7
7
1
5
2
6
7
8
5
10
5
7
10
7
10
5
10
10
10
6

Legend:
H High Group
L Low Group
PH Proportion in High Group
PL Proportion in Low Group

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

DI Discrimination Index (DI)

P average mean of two groups
FI - Facility Index (P)
Submitted to:

CLARK B. LLAMERA, M
Testing Coordina

AKLAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

KALIBO, AKLAN
Course Subject: SEAM B
EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE ITEM ANALYSIS REFERENCE SHEET
Examination Period: PRELIM EXAMINATION
Course and Year/Sec: ENGINE-2A SHIPKNOWLEDGE
Number of Examinees:40

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

10
1
10
1
10
1
10
10
10
1
10
1
10
2
10
10
10
2
10
2
10
1
10
1
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
10

(PH - PL)

(PH + PL)

DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

2
#C/n

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

Date: NOVEMBER 23, 20

Instructor:C/M MANUEL

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
1
10
1
10
1
10
2
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
10

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
7
10
6
10
7
10
8
10
7
10
3
10
2
10
2
10
2
10
1

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Legend:
H High Group
L Low Group
PH Proportion in High Group
PL Proportion in Low Group

DI Discrimination Index (DI)

P average mean of two groups
FI - Facility Index (P)
Submitted to:

CLARK B. LLAMERA, M
Testing Coordina

AKLAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

KALIBO, AKLAN
Course Subject: SEAM SL 4
EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE ITEM ANALYSIS REFERENCE SHEET
Examination Period: PRELIM EXAMINATION
Course and Year/Sec:DECK 2-A
Number of Examinees:40

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Date: NOVEMBER 23
Instructor: C/M MANU

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

(PH - PL)

(PH + PL)

DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

2
#C/n

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H

10
10
10
3
10
3
10
10
10
2
10
4
10
1
10
1
10
1
10
1
3
7
10
7
1
5
4
3
10

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

7
1
9
10
4
10
7
10
7
10
7
10
7
10
5
10
3
10
4
10
1
1
7
10
3
10
10
10
1
10
4

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
2
10
2
1
2
10
3
4
7
10
8
1
5
1
7
10
5
10
6

Legend:
H High Group
L Low Group
PH Proportion in High Group
PL Proportion in Low Group

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

DI Discrimination Index (DI)

P average mean of two groups
FI - Facility Index (P)
Submitted to:

CLARK B. LLAMERA, M
Testing Coordina

AKLAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

KALIBO, AKLAN
Course Subject: SEAM SL 4
EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE ITEM ANALYSIS REFERENCE SHEET
Examination Period: PRELIM EXAMINATION
Course and Year/Sec:DECK 2-B
Number of Examinees:40

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Date: NOVEMBER 23
Instructor: C/M MANU

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

(PH - PL)

(PH + PL)

DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

2
#C/n

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H

1
1
1
10
2
4
10
10
10
3
10
1
10
2
10

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

2
10
3
10
1
3
8
2
7
3
10
2
8
9
5
3
9
10
9
1
10
2
10
8
6
2
6
2
10
1
5
3
5
1
6
3
6
1
8
10
10
10
8
1
6

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

4
7
1
6
1
5
2
8
10
10
1
9
10
4
1
6
10
5
10
6

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Legend:
H High Group

DI Discrimination Index (DI)

L Low Group
PH Proportion in High Group
PL Proportion in Low Group

P average mean of two groups

FI - Facility Index (P)
Submitted to:

CLARK B. LLAMERA, M
Testing Coordina

AKLAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

KALIBO, AKLAN
Course Subject: SEAM SL 4
EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE ITEM ANALYSIS REFERENCE SHEET
Examination Period: PRELIM EXAMINATION
Course and Year/Sec:DECK 2-C
Number of Examinees:40

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Date: NOVEMBER 23
Instructor: C/M MANU

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

P
DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

Item No

Group

No of Samples
(n)

Correct
Answer
(n=19)

Proportion of
Correct
Responses

(PH - PL)

(PH + PL)

DI

ANALYSIS

FI(%)

2
#C/n

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34

H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
1
10
2
10
2
10
10
10
1
10
10
10
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
10
8
10
10
10
4
10
10
10
10
10
2
10
7
10
9
10
10
9
10
10
9
10
4
9
5
10
3
10
9
10
9
10
10
10
7
5
10

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

H
L
H
L
H
L
H

1
4
10
7
10
8
10

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

34
35
36
37
38
39
40

L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L
H
L

10
10
10
9
5
10
6
10
5
10
1
10
5

Legend:
H High Group
L Low Group
PH Proportion in High Group
PL Proportion in Low Group

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

Not at All

DI Discrimination Index (DI)

P average mean of two groups
FI - Facility Index (P)
Submitted to:

CLARK B. LLAMERA, M
Testing Coordina

HEET

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

tor:C/M MANUEL URBANO

ANALYSIS

DECISION

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

RK B. LLAMERA, MANc, RN
Testing Coordinator

HEET

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

tor:C/M MANUEL URBANO

ANALYSIS

DECISION

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

RK B. LLAMERA, MANc, RN
Testing Coordinator

HEET

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

uctor: C/M MANUEL URBANO

ANALYSIS

DECISION

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

RK B. LLAMERA, MANc, RN
Testing Coordinator

HEET

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

uctor: C/M MANUEL URBANO

ANALYSIS

DECISION

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

RK B. LLAMERA, MANc, RN
Testing Coordinator

HEET

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

uctor: C/M MANUEL URBANO

ANALYSIS

DECISION

ANALYSIS

DECISION

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

Very Difficult

Discard

RK B. LLAMERA, MANc, RN
Testing Coordinator