Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REVIEW
TIZO
P. MADONI*
Protozoa in wastewater treatment
Abstract
Biological wastewater treatment is a process of increasing importance in a world with an ever-increasing human population.
Wastewater treatment facilities are designed to maintain the high density and activity levels of those microorganisms that
carry out the various purification processes. Protozoa are one of the most common components in these man-made ecosystems and play an important role in wastewater purification processes. Protozoa are responsible for improving the quality of
the effluent, maintaining the density of dispersed bacterial populations by predation. Studies of the relationships between
protozoa and physicochemical and operational parameters have revealed that the species structure of these communities is
an indicator of plant efficiency. The Sludge Biotic Index (SBI), an index based on the structure and abundance of the
microfauna inhabiting the activated sludge and mixed liquor, has been devised to monitor activated-sludge plant performance. Heavy metals and other pollutants are toxic to most microorganisms at certain concentrations. These toxicants are
common pollutants of sewage, particularly where there is industrial waste input. The protozoa community is a complex
assemblage of interacting organisms, often including species that are sensitive, resistant or intermediate in their tolerance to
pollutants. Many studies conducted on contaminated activated sludge and mixed liquor have revealed changes in the
dynamics of the protozoa community. Tests on the acute toxicity of pollutants on ciliates have revealed that these microorganisms are useful bioindicators for evaluating the toxicity of waters polluted by different concentrations of metals.
Introduction
Biological wastewater treatment processes rely on
the natural self-purification ability of microbial communities. Nevertheless, they differ from aquatic
environments due to certain characteristics, such as
a strong flow of organic load into the system,
accelerated decomposition processes, short biomass
turnover time, and the prevalence of heterotrophic
organisms. Due to these characteristics, biological
wastewater treatment processes can be regarded as
man-made ecosystems subjected to extreme conditions (Antonietti et al. 1981), so that of all the heterotrophic organisms only protozoa and small metazoa
with life cycles shorter than the sludge retention
time are able to compete in these processes.
The presence of protozoa in biological wastewater treatment processes was observed almost as
soon as each process was introduced, but it has only
been in recent years that the significance of these
microorganisms has been underlined. The organisms
most directly involved in wastewater treatment are
the bacteria. They dominate all other groups, in
number and biomass, and affect the process of mineralization and elimination of organic and inorganic
nutrients. In modern systems, where there is a low
load and high sludge retention time, the presence of
protozoa such as ciliates, flagellates, and amoebae,
or even small metazoa, is very common. These
eukaryotic organisms are able to feed on particulates,
such as suspended bacteria. It is generally assumed
that their primary role in wastewater treatment is the
clarification of the effluent.
This paper is dedicated to Maria Umberta Delmonte Corrado for her contribution to the development of Italian Protistology.
*Correspondence: Paolo Madoni, Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Universit di Parma, Via Usberti 11/A, 43100 Parma, Italy. Fax: +39 521 905402.
Email: paolo.madoni@unipr.it
P. Madoni
Activated-sludge process
Since the installation of the first activated-sludge
treatment facilities in 1922, many authors have
noted the presence of free-living protozoa. These
microorganisms are commonly found in the mixed
liquor of activated-sludge plants and numbers of
the order of 320 106 cells l1 are often reported.
It has been estimated that the protozoa biomass
can reach values of 250 mg l1 (dry weight), constituting over 9% of the volatile solids (Madoni
1994a). Lists of the protozoa species found in activated-sludge plants have been reported by a
number of authors (Agersborg & Hatfield 1929;
Ardern & Lockett 1936; Clay 1964; Brown 1965;
Curds & Cockburn 1970a; Morisita 1970). A
complete list of 228 species of protozoa has been
reported by Curds (1975). Since wastewater treatment is a process of increasing importance in a
world with an ever-growing human population, the
presence and action of microbial communities has
received particular attention in recent years. Consequently, revised lists of protozoa have been made
(Madoni & Ghetti 1981; Augustin & Foissner
1992; Madoni et al. 1993; Foissner & Berger 1996;
Martin-Cereceda et al. 1996; Amann et al. 1998;
Ettl 2001; Madoni 2002; Chen et al. 2004). Of the
228 protozoa species listed for the activated-sludge
plants, about 160 belong to the phylum Ciliophora,
but only a limited number of these have been
observed frequently (Table I). Despite the fact that
the ciliate community of the activated sludge is
slightly different from that of the percolating filters,
some species, such as Acineria uncinata, Vorticella
convallaria, Vorticella microstoma, Opercularia
coarctata and Aspidisca cicada, are commonly
observed in both processes. In a well-functioning
activated-sludge plant, the protozoa community is
Species
Frequency
Euglena sp.
Peranema sp.
F
F
Arcella sp.
Euglypha sp.
Centropyxis sp.
F
F
R
Bacterivorous ciliates
Free-swimming
Cinetochilum
margaritaceum
Colpidium colpoda
Cyclidium glaucoma
Dexiostoma campylum
Glaucoma scintillans
Paramecium aurelia
complex
Paramecium caudatum
Pseudocohnilembus
pusillus
Spirostomum teres
Uronema nigricans
Crawling
Acineria uncinata
Aspidisca cicada
Aspidisca lynceus
Chilodonella uncinata
Drepanomonas revoluta
Euplotes aediculatus
Euplotes affinis
Euplotes patella
Trithigmostoma
cucullulus
Trochilia minuta
Stylonychia sp.
Attached
Carchesium polypinum
Epistylis chrysemidis
Epistylis entzii
Epistylis plicatilis
Opercularia articulata
Opercularia coarctata
Opercularia nutans
Stentor coeruleus
Vaginicola ingenita
Vorticella aquadulcis complex
Vorticella convallaria complex
Vorticella infusionum complex
Vorticella microstoma complex
Vorticella octava complex
Zoothamnium arbuscula
Carnivorous ciliates
Acineta tuberosa
Amphileptus claparedei
Coleps hirtus
Litonotus crystallinus
Litonotus cygnus
Litonotus lamella
Plagiocampa rouxi
Podophrya sp.
Prorodon sp.
Spathidium sp.
Tokophrya lemnarum
Tokophrya quadripartita
F
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
F
R
V
V
C
F
F
F
F
R
F
C
R
C
C
F
V
F
F
R
R
F
V
V
R
R
C
F
C
F
F
C
R
F
V
R
C
R
F
C
P. Madoni
Table II. Pearson correlation test between protozoa and plant operational conditions, obtained from 44 activated-sludge plants (from
Madoni 1994b; = negative correlation, * P < 0.01, ** P < 0.001).
Small flagellates
Free-swimming ciliates
Crawling ciliates
Attached ciliates
Vorticella microstoma
and/or V. infusionum
Opercularia spp.
Testate amoebae
Microfauna abundance
Number of species
D.O.
Nitrifying ability
BOD5 removed
Effluent colour
Sludge age
MLSS
0.652**
0.651**
0.616**
0.340
0.596**
0.549**
0.620**
-0.029
0.798**
0.829**
0.784**
0.432*
0.836**
0.725**
0.611**
0.516**
0.583**
0.668**
0.534**
0.171
0.736**
0.753**
0.534**
0.266
0.676**
0.745**
0.727**
0.626**
0.778**
0.504**
0.597**
0.912**
0.429*
0.645**
0.679**
0.763**
0.760**
0.762**
0.923**
0.648**
0.676**
0.583**
0.768**
0.841**
0.638**
0.008
0.464**
0.335
0.487**
0.722**
0.181
0.464**
0.495**
0.591**
P. Madoni
Table III. 24-h LC50 mean values (mg l1) of some protozoa from activated sludges tested with heavy metals.
Species
Aspidisca cicada
A. cicada
A. cicada
A. cicada
A. cicada
A. cicada
A. lynceus
A. lynceus
A. lynceus
A. lynceus
A. lynceus
Blepharisma americanum
B. americanum
B. americanum
B. americanum
Chilodonella uncinata
C. uncinata
C. uncinata
C. uncinata
C. uncinata
Colpidium colpoda
C. colpoda
C. colpoda
C. colpoda
C. colpoda
Dexiostoma campylum
D. campylum
D. campylum
D. campylum
D. campylum
D. campylum
Drepanomonas revoluta
D. revoluta
Euplotes affinis
E. affinis
E. affinis
E. affinis
E. affinis
E. affinis
E. patella
E. patella
E. patella
E. patella
E. patella
Metal
LC50
Cd
Cu
Hg
Zn
Pb
Cr
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cu
Hg
Zn
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cu
Cr
Ni
Pb
Cd
Cu
Cr
Hg
Ni
Pb
Cr
Pb
Cd
Cu
Cr
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cu
Cr
Hg
Ni
0.31
0.021
0.07
2.4
1.26
2.35
2.21
1.82
14.5
0.004
0.05
1.4
0.001
0.017
1.05
<0.0001
<0.00004
0.011
<0.0015
<0.0002
0.89
0.05
108
1.19
0.23
0.2
0.01
3.29
0.017
1.05
1.1
45.6
0.88
0.4
0.064
2.73
0.19
2.32
3.10
2.65
0.011
9.47
0.13
7.70
Ref.
a
a
a
a
b
b
c
c
c
c
c
a
a
a
a
c
c
c
c
c
d
d
d
d
d
a
a
b
a
e
b
b
b
a
a
b
a
b
a
a
a
b
a
e
Species
Metal
LC50
Ref.
E. patella
E. aediculatus
E. aediculatus
E. aediculatus
E. aediculatus
E. aediculatus
Opercularia coarctata
O. coarctata
O. coarctata
O. coarctata
O. minima
O. minima
O. minima
O. minima
Paramecium caudatum
P. caudatum
P. caudatum
P. caudatum
P. caudatum
P. caudatum
P. caudatum
Spirostomum teres
S. teres
S. teres
Trochilia minuta
T. minuta
T. minuta
T. minuta
Uronema nigricans
U. nigricans
U. nigricans
U. nigricans
U. nigricans
U. nigricans
Vorticella convallaria
V. convallaria
V. convallaria
V. convallaria
V. octava
V. octava
V. octava
V. octava
V. octava
Pb
Cd
Cu
Cr
Ni
Pb
Cd
Cr
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cr
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cu
Cr
Hg
Ni
Pb
Zn
Cr
Ni
Pb
Cd
Cu
Cr
Zn
Cd
Cu
Cr
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cr
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Zn
2.18
0.59
0.01
0.10
0.03
0.50
3.75
211
3.28
10.3
5.55
164
5.0
84.7
0.18
0.011
2.57
0.02
0.49
2.26
2.50
3.23
0.17
1.08
0.27
0.31
9.25
0.20
0.62
0.014
2.18
0.004
1.62
0.003
3.81
101
2.29
3.79
3.24
80
2.05
2.81
0.57
b
d
d
d
d
d
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
a
a
b
a
e
b
a
b
e
e
c
c
c
c
a
a
b
a
b
a
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
The letters in the bibliography columns refer to published references, as follows: a, Madoni et al. (1992); b, Madoni et al. (1994); c,
Madoni et al. (1996); d, Madoni & Romeo (2006); e, Madoni (2000).
Agersborg HPK, Hatfield WD. 1929. The biology of a sewagetreatment plant A preliminary survey. Sewage Works Journal
1:411415.
Al-Shahwani SM, Horan NJ. 1991. The use of protozoa to indicate changes in the performance of activated sludge plants.
Water Research 25:633638.
Amann R, Lemmer H, Wagner M. 1998. Monitoring the
community structure of wastewater treatment plants:
A comparison of old and new techniques. FEMS Microbial
Ecology 25:205215.
Antonietti R, Madoni P, Ghetti PF. 1981. Some notes on the biological self-purification process: Biological water-treatment
10
P. Madoni
11