Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
His ethics, though always influential, gained renewed interest with the
modern advent of virtue ethics. All aspects of Aristotle's philosophy continue
to be the object of active academic study today. Though Aristotle wrote many
elegant treatises and dialogues Cicero described his literary style as "a
river of gold" it is thought that only around a third of his original output has
survived.
HYLEMORPHISM
Hylomorphism (or hylemorphism) is a philosophical theory developed
by Aristotle, which conceives being (ousia) as a compound
of matter and form.
The word is a 19th-century term formed from the Greek words hyle,
"wood, matter" and , morph, "form."
Hylomorphism, (from Greek hyl, matter; morph, form), in
philosophy, metaphysical view according to which every natural body
consists of two intrinsic principles, one potential, namely, primary matter,
and one actual, namely, substantial form. It was the central doctrine
of Aristotlesphilosophy of nature. Before Aristotle, the Ionian philosophers
had sought the basic constituents of bodies; but Aristotle observed that it
was necessary to distinguish two types of principles. On the one hand, one
must look for the primordial elementsi.e., for bodies that are not derived
from others and of which all other bodies are composed. He found his
solution to this question in Empedocles doctrine of the four elements: earth,
water, air, and fire. On the other hand, one must look for the intrinsic
conditions whereby a body is or comes to be what it is understood to be, and
to answer this question he proposed his hylomorphic doctrine. The primordial
elements correspond in a sense to those of modern physics insofar as the
single elements can have independent existence or activity of their own and
can therefore be known directly by way of experiment. Matter and form,
however, are not bodies or physical entities that can exist or act
independently: they exist and act only within and by the composite. Thus,
they can be known only indirectly, by intellectual analysis, as the
metaphysical principles of bodies.
Aristotles Causes
"Four causes" refers to an influential principle in Aristotelian thought
whereby explanations of change or movement are classified into four
fundamental types of answer to the question "why?" Aristotle wrote that "we
do not have knowledge of a thing until we have grasped its why, that is to
say, its explanation." While there are cases where classifying an explanation
is difficult, or in which classes of explanation might merge, Aristotle was
convinced that his four classes of explanation provided an analytical scheme
of general applicability.
Aitia, from Greek was the word that Aristotle used to refer to the
concept of explanation. Traditionally in academic philosophy it has been
translated as cause, but this tradition uses the word 'cause' in a peculiar way
that is obsolete, or highly specialized and technical in philosophy, not in its
most usual current ordinary language usage. The translation of
Aristotle's that is nearest to current ordinary language is 'explanation'.
Aristotle held that there were four kinds of answers to 'why' questions
(in Physics II, 3, and Metaphysics V, 2): In this article, the peculiar
philosophical usage of the word 'cause' will be exercised, for tradition's sake,
but the reader should not be misled by confusing this peculiar usage with
current ordinary language.
An event's final cause is the end toward which it directs. That for the
sake of which a thing is what it is. For a seed, it might be an adult plant.
For a sailboat, it might be sailing. For a ball at the top of a ramp, it might
be coming to rest at the bottom.