Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN 0733-4273
George M. Schwab
Erskine Theological Seminary
The Christian community almost never speaks with one voice about any one tenet of the faith. Yet there
are tenets that the majority of Christ followers assert. One of these fundamental beliefs is that God heals
and restores broken people. Doctors may perform extraordinary procedures which save lives or bring
relief, but few Christians will hesitate to thank God for the physical or emotional healing. Similarly, Christian therapists acknowledge that God provides the ultimate power to heal clients. However, many divergent models of healing exist and the Christian psychologist may not feel adequately trained to discern
which models best reflect historic Christian doctrine and biblical interpretation. This article seeks to avoid
atomistic use of bible passages or superficial use of the text by building on an alternative foundationa
thorough Biblically based, theological review of the Bibles overarching message of healingfor clinicians
as they develop their own understanding how God heals broken people.
Definitions
The reader may first wish to define both inner
healing and biblical theology. What is inner healing? From what grid should empirically informed,
Christ-following clinicians view healing language
in the Bible? Should we treat it as a theological
term or something to operationalize and study?
Unfortunately, we often use the language of healing, health, and wholeness casually, without a
satisfactory understanding of their meanings.
Despite hundreds of volumes on healing, it
remains a deep mystery for manya mystery
often entangled in doctrinal controversies over
the gifts of the Holy Spirit. For the purpose of
this essay we define healing or inner healing as a
divine work bringing growth or positive spiritual
change to painful or distorted perceptions, experiences, habits, or emotions of a person. Such a definition does not attempt to ascertain the cause of
the inner turmoil, its location in the person (e.g.,
body, soul, psyche, etc.), nor the person of the
122
GOD
AS
HEALER
MONROE
The New Testament. The verb
(therapeuo , from which therapy is derived) and its
nominal cognate can be found 46 times in the
New Testament (NT). Although it is used (rarely)
to describe deliverance from evil spirits (Luke
8:2), its primary meaning is the healing or curing
of physical ailments (e.g., Matthew 4:23-24:
Jesus healing of epileptics and paralytics; 10:7-8:
instructions to disciples to heal the sick; 12:22:
the healing of a blind and dumb demoniac). In
most cases, (therapeuo ) has a meaning of physical healing.
(iaomai) also carries the sense of healing from sickness (e.g., Mark 5:29: healed of
her disease; Luke 5:17: Jesus given the power to
heal; Luke 6:19: for power came forth from
him and healed them all; James 5:16: healing by
the hands of elders).
- and
- denote
(hygiaino)
(hygies)
the state of being in good health. Jesus asks the
paralytic, Do you want to be healed? (John
5:6). Elsewhere Jesus says, People who are well
do not need a doctor (Luke 5:31).
- o)
- is usually translated save, as in
(soz
Matthew 1:21, He will save his people from
their sins. However, it also can carry the sense
of a cure. The demon-possessed man was
cured or saved of his legion (Luke 8:36). This
- o),
word has some affinity with
(diasoz
which also carries both senses of to save and
to heal. For example, the centurion sent to
- o)
- his slave (Luke 7:3).
Jesus to heal (diasoz
(kathariz
) properly means to
cleanse. This has particular significance in
relation to healing in the account of the ten
lepers in Luke 17:14-15. As they left Jesus they
were cleansed. One of them, when he saw
that he was healed (iaomai), turned back,
praising God. Thus, to be cleansed of leprosy is to be healedthe terms are in this
case synonymous.
- and
(stereoo)
(holokleria)
are glossed made strong and given completeness respectively. They are used synonymously
in Acts 3:16, By faith in Jesus, this manwas
made strong. It is Jesus name and the faith that
comes through him that has given this completeness to him, as you can all see. (holokleria)
indicates a state of wholeness, perfect health of
the body.
These various terms can, at times, be used
interchangeably. For example, in Acts 4:9-15 the
- are used
- o),
- (hygies),
- and (therapeuo)
terms (soz
to signify a single act of healing.
AND
SCHWAB
123
124
GOD
AS
HEALER
individual as bringing spiritual healing to a multitude. 1 Peter 2:24 interprets the verse in the
following way, He himself bore our sins in his
body on the tree, that we might die to sin and
live to righteousness. By his wounds you have
been healed. The wounds of Christ were physicalbut the healing to Christians is manifestly
not of the same order as Christs wounds. In
this sense, all Christians are healed, or are
being healed, regardless of the state of their
physical bodies.
Jesus himself uses physical healing as a
metaphor for other realities. In John 9, he heals
a man born blind. After the man is questioned at
length, Jesus says concerning the inquisitors,
For judgment I have come that the blind may
see and the sighted may become blind (9:39).
Thus, Jesus used the physical healing to point to
another kind of blindness that he also came to
heal. Throughout Johns gospel, miracles performed by Jesus are called signs which witness
to Jesus identity and mission (e.g., 4:64, 6:14,
12:18, etc.).
We argue that a full-orbed biblical theology
accounts for both the non-metaphorical usage of
the healing of a physical body and the
metaphorical usage pointing to spiritual or inner
healing. However, to depict the healing of the
people or the land as metaphorical does not
imply that a true restoration does not take place.
Brown (1992) argues that the restoration of
Israel would be as literal as her smiting had
been. A metaphorical healing is a true
healingin the sense of a restoration. And yet, it
is important to recognize (contra Brown) the
metaphorical use of the language since the processes involved in restoring the land or a wayward people are unlike those involved in
restoring a diseased body.
At this point, Jesus own ministry of healing
must be examined in greater detail. Why did
Jesus heal and what was his primary focus in his
healing activity?
Jesus Healing Ministry Points to
Something Greater
Out of compassion, Jesus heals (Matthew
14:14). Earlier, Matthew summarizes Jesus early
ministry in the following way,
Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching
the good news of the kingdom, and
healing every disease and sickness
among the people. News about him
MONROE
John the Baptist wondered if Jesus really was
the messiah, Jesus answered,
Are you the one who was to come,
or should we expect someone else?
Jesus replied, Go back and report to
John what you hear and see: The
blind receive sight, the lame walk,
those who have leprosy are cured,
the deaf hear, the dead are raised,
and the good news is preached to
the poor. Blessed is the man who
does not fall away on account of
me. (Matthew 11:3-6)
But some may wonder if Jesus exhortational
work is a genuine healing ministry. Luke 5:29-32
tells the story of Jesus eating with sinners. The
religious leaders demurred and Jesus answered,
Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I have not come to
call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Here Jesus explicitly connects his calling sinners
to repentance with his healing power. Sinners
are afflicted with injurious unbelief and Jesus
teaching is one part of a unified healing ministry.
Joel Green (1997) writes,
Adopting other imagery more at
home in Luke 5, Jesus portrays toll
collectors and sinners as sick, and
himself as physician. Given the categories of illness and health developed in 5:12-26, this signifies the
psychosocial displacement of Jesus
tablemates. Indeed, Jesus thus draws
on traditional conceptualizations of
Yahweh as physician and of divine
redemption as healing. Against this
backdrop, healing is understood as
restoration to relationship with Yahweh and his peoplethat is, forgiveness. (p. 247-248)
Each of these passages make clear that Jesus
healings belong to a new order, bear witness to
his kingship and point both to a serious disease
and a solution at the consummation of all things.
His healing first and foremost illustrates his
authority and power to provide the greatest healingthat of restoring Gods people to himself by
means of forgiveness of sins. His work here connects to that of Gods call to the Israelites to turn
from their apostasy. In Jeremiah 3:22 and Hosea
14:4 God tells Israel he will heal their faithlessness (Hubbard, 1989)to bring them salvation
AND
SCHWAB
125
126
GOD
AS
HEALER
MONROE
accomplish the goal of drawing his children to
himself. We are not privy to Gods sense of timing and so are free from the impossible task of
explaining why he chooses to heal some and not
others. Rather we groan in eager anticipation of
the time when the Kingdom reaches its fullness.
Human Roles in Healing
Throughout the biblical record, God uses
human activity in bringing about both physical
and spiritual healing. The prophets perform miracles. The disciples restore health. Second
Corinthians 5:16f clearly depicts the work of
believers as functioning as Gods ambassadors to
bring reconciliation to those still outside the
Kingdom. Clearly, God uses people to deliver his
healing power to heal, restore, and proclaim the
kingdom of God.
Does Satan Heal?
Though not the direct purview of this study,
this fundamental question should be part of any
theology of healing. If Satan has healing power,
then one would need to be wary of confusing
his healing with Gods. Biblically speaking, there
are a few brief passages that might shed some
light. Pharaohs group of sorcerers and magicians
seemed to be able to perform some miracles.
Simon, the sorcerer (Acts 8) performed magical
events that astonished people. The young fortune-telling girl followed Paul and prophesied. It
seems clear that Satan does have power to do
some miracles but they pale in comparison to
Gods immeasurable power. A more important
question for counselors may be whether Satan
can use desires for healing to distract attention
from the one who can heal? When clients seek
relief at any cost, do they maybe become vulnerable to therapists who counsel, Peace, peace,
when there is no peace (Jeremiah 8:11)?
Questions for Counselors Interested in
Developing a Practical Theology of Healing
Theological exploration of Gods healing activities should lead to praxis questions for the
Christian therapist. The following questions are
asked to stimulate the clinicians thinking.
Answers are not provided since they go beyond
the scope of this articles exploration of the
frame for a biblical theology.
What is my personal and professional stance
toward Gods healing activities?
If God heals today, how does my clinical activity reflect that reality? Do I emphasize or minimize
AND
SCHWAB
127
128
GOD
AS
HEALER
Conclusion
Despite these many pages, we have only
brushed the surface in attempting to form a tentative but full-orbed biblical theology of inner healing. God and human activity in healing is a
complex issue with many convoluted human
interpretations. In an effort to provide a clearer
picture of Gods healing presence in the world, in
general, and in counseling, in specific, we have
attempted to develop a broader understanding of
the biblical data regarding Gods character and his
activity in healing a broken and fallen creation. If
one believes the Bible reveals God himself then
we can say with confidence that he is a healing
God and that he chooses to break into our lives
despite our lack of faith and knowledge of his
character. Christian counselors participate with
Gods healing activity when they point the broken
to the one who is and will continue to restore his
creation. While therapeutic work often explores
past and present, the Christian counselor pays
attention to the eschatological aspects of Gods
healing activities and the already/not yet features of the kingdomthat God actively heals by
restoring right relationship with his people.
Notes
1. All authors write from a particular point of view.
We freely admit that we both work from a Reformed
theological understanding of Gods sovereignty over all
things. Within the Reformed community of believers
some assert that the charismatic gifts of healing and
prophecy were given to the Apostles but cease to be
gifts available to believers today. Others believe that
these gifts are indeed given to us today. This debate
need not interfere with our consideration of inner healing as both groups of believers believe God does heal
today even if some do not believe we should seek the
extraordinary gifts (e.g., Gaffin, 1996).
2. There is some debate about the meaning of the
text here, whether anointing with oil refers to common
medical practices or a ceremonial rite to invite Gods
healing. If, as many think, that it refers to a medical
practice, then it appears that we are to use medical
technology but place our faith squarely upon God.
References
Alexander, T. D., & Rosner, B. S. (Eds.). (2000). New
Dictionary of Biblical Theology. Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity Press.
Allen, E. A. (1995). Caring for the whole person.
Monrovia, CA: MARC.
Bouma, H., Diekema, D., Langerak, E., Rottman, T.,
& Verhey, A. (1989). Christian faith, health, & medical
practice. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
MONROE
Brown, M. L. (1995). Israels divine healer. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.
Brown, M. L. (1992, April). The whole man wholly
healed: Israels divine healer in the prophetic books.
Paper presented at the Eastern Regional Theological
Society Meeting, Lanham, MD (Microform: Theological
Research Exchange Network, ETS-0532)
Fesko, J. V. (2008). On the antiquity of biblical theology. In L. G. Tipton and J. C. Waddington (Eds.), Resurrection and eschatology: Theology in service of the
church, essays in honor of Richard B. Gaffin, Jr. (pp.
443-477). Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Press.
Gaffin, Jr., R. B. (1996). A cessationist view. In W. A.
Grudem (Ed.), Are miraculous gifts for today? Four
views (pp. 25-64). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.
Green, J. B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke (NICNT).
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Hubbard, D. A. (1989). Hosea (Tyndale O.T. Commentaries). Downers Grove: IVP.
King, I. (1909, June). [Review of the book The Psychological Phenomena of Christianity]. Psychological
Bulletin, 6, 199-200. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from
PsychINFO database.
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B.
(2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1988). Greek-English Lexicon (Vol. 1). New York: United Bible Society.
Mays, J. L. (1969). Hosea (O.T. Library). Philadelphia:
Westminster.
McMinn, M. R. (2008). Sin and grace in Christian
counseling: An integrative paradigm. Downers Grove,
IL: InterVarsity Press.
Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. New
York: Guilford Press.
AND
SCHWAB
129
Authors
Philip G. Monroe, Psy.D. is Associate Professor of Counseling & Psychology and director of the Masters of Counseling program at Biblical Seminary, Hatfield, PA. His
clinical work focuses on individuals with trauma and
addictions issues as well as those in full-time ministry. His
research interests include the use of scripture in clinical
settings, pastor stress responses, and counseling pedagogy.
George M. Schwab, Sr., Ph.D. is Professor of Old Testament at Erskine Theological Seminary, Due West, SC. He
has prior training and practice in pastoral counseling.
His current research interests focus on Old Testament
wisdom literature. Recent commentary publications
include works on the Song of Songs, Proverbs, Daniel
and a forthcoming work on Judges.