Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property from the Plaintiffs under
color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, Defendants intimidated, punished,
and threatened the Plaintiffs with facially frivolous and deceptive sanctions on the public
record [see Defendants’ idiotic false pretenses of, e.g., ”frivolity”, “vexatiousness”, …],
because the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against said conclusively proven EXTORTION,
CORRUPTION, and FRAUD under color of prima facie fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.
3. Here under color of prima facie fake “law” and/or fictitious “resolution 569/875”,
Government Officials deliberately deprived and defrauded the Plaintiffs. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,
record landowners of their title to private property. Here, the purported “public land
claim”, Doc. # 213, was the facially idiotic fabrication of multiple Defendant Judges in
2
the U.S. Courts who agreed with other Defendants to accept bribes, defraud, and
5. Here, Defendants fraudulently interfered with public officials and bribed Defendant Judges.
Here, Judges unlawfully demanded real property under color of illegal scam “O.R. 569/875”
and non-existent authority to punish and sanction the Plaintiffs for rightfully defending their
and EXTORTION.
lands under facially fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”, “record Lee County
Officials knew that no property or money was legally due, or could have possibly been
7. Expressly, the Defendants stated and again reiterate their absolute objection to and refusal of
8. Under pretense of duty, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged “land parcels” “12-44-
9. Here, requesting “fees” in excess of those allowed, through wrongful use of fear, force,
and/or authority of office, threatening arrest, all with CORRUPT motives, and unlawfully
3
demanding money and property were CRIMES on the public record. Agreeing to obtain
Court proceedings were illegal acts for criminal purposes of defrauding and depriving the
Plaintiffs of their right to own their riparian Gulf-front lands and exclude Governments.
10. Here, Government Officials retaliated because Plaintiffs demanded their rights to own and
exclude Governments.
11. Here Honeywell knew that the law did not recognize Honeywell’s facially “criminal fable”
of a “public land” “claim” of Lot 15A. See Ch. 95, Fla. Stat., ADVERSE POSSESSION;
Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 712, Fla. Stat., Florida’s self-enforcing
12. Here, Honeywell “rambled” “incomprehensibly” and idiotically about a “public land”
13. Even if there had ever been [merely hypothetically] a valid Government “claim”, title could
have never involuntarily transferred to Government in the well-proven record absence of any
judicial proceedings. Any and all involuntary title transfers would have been strictly and
exclusively a judicial function. See also Florida Attorney General Opinion, AGO 78-125.
Here, Honeywell acted criminally and just like a clueless idiot, who perverted the
4
against said Governmental insanity and crimes in U.S. Courts. Here, record idiots like
Defendant Honeywell were objectively partial and incapable of “comprehending” the legal
issues, complaints, and claims for relief presented and mostly un-filed by the Courts.
“lawmaker(s)” of unknown and uncertain non-existent “raid lands”. See different versions of
15. Just because other Judges had concocted said judicial trash of a “law” and/or facially non-
existent “resolution 569/875”, Honeywell had no authority to repeat the same judicial trash
over and over again under illegal pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” and under color
of law, authority, and/or office. Here, Honeywell obstructed de novo review & justice.
16. Unintelligently and corruptly, Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell fraudulently pretended
that Plaintiffs’ real property of record, Lot 15A, as legally described in reference to the 1912
“Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 “was claimed
Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land (“Resolution 569/875")
(Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).”
17. Here, Honeywell’s facially idiotic and fraudulent pretenses of “public land”, Doc. 213, had
no legal and factual basis, but were for the prima facie criminal purposes of obstructing
justice and deliberately depriving the Plaintiff record owners of said Lot 15A, subject Parcel
5
contradicted the public record of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership of said Lot 15A as
also affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. See Prescott, et al., v. State of
Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009): Here, Honeywell
fraudulently concealed the dispositive public record evidence that the Plaintiffs were the
unimpeachable “owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee County, Florida”:
“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action
The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in
Lee County, Florida. On May 5, 2008, the Appellants filed the present pro se
complaint against numerous state and county officials n1 alleging that they had
violated the Appellants' constitutional rights with respect to their Cayo Costa
property. Most of the allegations in the complaint concern the 1969 Lee
County Resolution 569/875, which claimed the undesignated areas on the east
and west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision plat and all accretions thereto as
public land to be used for public purposes. The Appellants' Lot 15A is on the
west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico and is
adjacent to land that was claimed through Resolution 569/875 to create
the Cayo Costa State Park.”
18. Defendant judicial Crook Honeywell affirmed, Doc. # 213, p. 5, that the Plaintiff record
judicial proceeding”, because the Plaintiffs were the record owners of “Lot 15A”. See public
6
19. Here, the Plaintiffs “appeared for” said “proceeding”, because they were the affirmed record
owners of Lot 15A and entitled to appear. Therefore here, crooked Judge Honeywell knew
that the Plaintiffs held unimpeachable marketable record title to said Lot 15A. Here,
Honeywell’s fraudulent pretenses and deprivations were deliberate and premeditated, Doc. #
213, p. 5:
20. In particular, Honeywell knew that the Plaintiff unimpeachable record property owners had
paid real property taxes for said subject Parcel. See attached public records of Lee County
a. The Plaintiffs were the unimpeachable record owners of said “Lot 15A”;
7
b. No “resolution” had ever existed;
property owners and record property tax payers of their riparian Gulf-front Lot
15A.
22. Here, the Plaintiffs appealed from Defendant crooked U.S. District Judge Honeywell’s
“order”, Doc. # 210, “filed 06/22/10”. Here, said judicial Defendant evaded and obstructed
related and/or associated Case 2:2010-cv-00390 on the very same day, 06/22/2010. See
publication:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33659698/PUBLISHED-NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-FROM-
ORDER-Doc-210
23. Here, Honeywell’s fraud, fraud on the Court, and corrupt & criminal acts were an
EMERGENCY. Here, the prima facie criminality, idiocy and irrationality of Honeywell’s
24. While Defendant Honeywell fraudulently pretended Lot 15A to be “public land”, Defendant
Polster Chappell affirmed Plaintiffs’ record ownership just like said U.S. Appellate Court.
See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr.
8
21, 2009). Here, bungling Judges fatally conflicted with each other on the record at
25. Here, Honeywell knew that her co-conspirator and fellow judicial Defendant Sheri Polster
Chappell had fraudulently made an order for the illegal Governmental seizure of said “Lot
15A”. See fraudulent “writ of execution”; fraudulent “lien”; fraudulent Doc. ## 432, 432-3:
9
10
EMERGENCY DEMAND TO ENJOIN PERVERSION OF PUBLIC RECORD
26. The Plaintiff record owners of said riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), who
paid real property taxes, demand EMERGENCY relief from Honeywell’s material
misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment of the truth and public record evidence of
Plaintiffs’ record title and ownership of said Lot 15A, STRAP # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A;
see also Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE, et al., v. LEE COUNTY, et al., Appellate Brief by
27. Here, ‘public records confirmed’ that the Plaintiffs paid property taxes and unimpeachably
owned said riparian Lot 15A as platted and subdivided in 1912, PB 3, PG 25. Here, public
records confirmed that Honeywell was a crooked U.S. Official and liar of record.
28. Here, on Plaintiffs’ Motion and just terms of record, the Court shall relieve the
Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and proceedings of record such as, e.g.,
11
HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO FALSELY PRETEND RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS
29. Idiotically and corruptly, Honeywell fraudulently pretended “ripeness requirements” for,
e.g., claims of record 4th, 1st, 14th, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendment violations, fraud, and
CORRUPTION. See Doc. # 213. Here, Plaintiffs could directly assert, and rightfully
asserted, their claims for relief from, e.g., Government CORRUPTION and fraud in
Federal Court. Honeywell knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed.
30. Here, the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against Honeywell’s NAZI-style terror and
upon the Court and legally “incomprehensible” bogus contentions of “frivolity” and “public
land”. Here, Honeywell concealed that no condemnation had ever occurred nor could have
possibly occurred. Had there [hypothetically] been any condemnation, title would have
involuntarily transferred to Lee County, which Honeywell knew never happened. Only then
could there have possibly been any “compensation”, because here Plaintiffs rightfully
12
31. Here, the Plaintiffs had rightfully pleaded, e.g., fraud and fraudulent concealment in both
32. Here, Honeywell fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs paid property taxes and held perfected
marketable title to said “Lot 15A”. Here, Honeywell’s “order”, Doc. # 213, constituted prima
facie premeditated & deliberate deprivations under color of office and authority. Here,
Honeywell had no authority to pervert the public record & obstruct justice. Prescott v. State
of Florida, supra. Here, Honeywell knew that the Lee County Attorney had categorically
ruled out any possibility of Lee County ownership of Lot 15A, 12/29/2000 Memorandum:
13
14
HONEYWELL’S COVER-UP FOR FELLOW JUDICIAL GANG MEMBERS
33. Here like a brainless parrot, Honeywell merely repeated the null and void orders by the
named judicial Defendants. Because the Plaintiffs had demanded relief from said null and
void orders by judicial Defendants such as, e.g., Steele, Polster Chappell, Pizzo, Lazzara,
which were based on facially fraudulent and legally impossible “Government ownership”
“claims”, Honeywell was obligated to review de novo and use a brain. However here, she
never reviewed anything, but repeated the same old judicial record trash and continued to
pervert the public record just like said fellow judicial Defendants had. Here more than one
hundred (100) pages of Plaintiffs’ Complaint had never even been filed, Doc. # 1:
could have possibly alienated Plaintiffs’ record property against their will;
embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a “public land claim” [see, e.g.,
perverting the record & concealing Plaintiffs’ record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25.
15
5. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and
proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214. for said well-proven reasons;
6. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their
State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
7. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-
8. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
9. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs’ record ownership by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.
10. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th
11. An Order compelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her “rulings” were not
NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false “frivolity” and
“vexatiousness” pretenses and the concealment of said fake “legal descriptions”, fake “land”
16
12. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she
disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the
facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. § 455;
17
Def. Crooked Honeywell’s Real Estate Fraud:
18
19
20
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell
http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 212 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 212 Filed 06/22/10 Page 3 of 3
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
APPEAL
Plaintiff
Jennifer Franklin Prescott represented by Jennifer Franklin Prescott
P.O. Box 845
Palm Beach, FL 33480
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Jorg Busse represented by Jorg Busse
P.O. Box 11124
Naples, Fl 34101-11124
239/595-7074
PRO SE
V.
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 1/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
Defendant
Roger Alejo represented by Jack Neil Peterson
Lee County Attorney's Office
2115 Second St
PO Box 398
Ft Myers, FL 33902
239/533-2236
Fax: 239/485-2118
Email: peterj@leegov.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Kenneth M. Wilkinson represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Jack N. Peterson represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Roger Desjarlais represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Lee County Florida represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Lee County Value Adjustment Board
Defendant
Lori L. Rutland
Defendant
State of Florida, Board of Trustees of
the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 2/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
Defendant
State of Florida, Department of
Environmental
Protection
Defendant
Chad Lach
Defendant
Reagan Kathleen Russell
Defendant
Karen B. Hawes represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Charlie Green represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Bob Janes represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Brian Bigelow represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Ray Judah represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Tammy Hall represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 3/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Frank Mann represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
United States Attorney(s) represented by Jennifer Waugh Corinis
United States Attorney
400 North Tampa Street
Suite 3200
Tampa, Fl 33602
813/274-6310
Fax: 813/274-6200
Email: jennifer.corinis@usdoj.gov
TERMINATED: 05/12/2010
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven A. Nisbet
US Attorney's Office - FLM
Suite 3200
400 N Tampa St
Tampa, FL 33602
813/274-6333
Fax: 813/274-6198
Email: steven.nisbet@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Sean P. Flynn represented by Jennifer Waugh Corinis
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/12/2010
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven A. Nisbet
US Attorney's Office - FLM*
Suite 3200
400 N Tampa St
Tampa, FL 33602
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 4/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
813/274-6333
Fax: 813/274-6198
Email: steven.nisbet@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
E. Kenneth Stegeby represented by Jennifer Waugh Corinis
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/12/2010
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven A. Nisbet
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
David P. Rhodes represented by Jennifer Waugh Corinis
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/12/2010
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven A. Nisbet
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
A. Brian Albritton represented by Jennifer Waugh Corinis
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/12/2010
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven A. Nisbet
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Cynthia A. Pivacek represented by Gerald D. Siebens
Office of the Attorney General
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 5/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
Suite 1100
501 E Kennedy Blvd
Tampa, FL 33602-5242
813/233-2880
Fax: 813/233-2886
Email: gerald.siebens@myfloridalegal.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Johnson Engineering, Inc. represented by Clifford Gorman
Clifford Gorman, LLC
450 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3270
954/467-9100
Fax: 954/467-9797
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Steven Carta
Defendant
Mike Scott represented by John W. Lewis
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, PA
1715 Monroe St
PO Box 280
Ft Myers, FL 33902-0280
239/344-1120
Fax: 239/344-1200
Email: John.lewis@henlaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Hugh D. Hayes represented by Gerald D. Siebens
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Gerald D. Siebens
Defendant
State of Florida Attorney General
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 6/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
Defendant
William M. Martin
Defendant
Peterson Bernard
Defendant
Skip Quillen
Defendant
Tom Gilbertson
Defendant
Charles Barry Stevens
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 7/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
(Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 205 NOTICE OF APPEAL from fraudulent order as to 186 Order by Jorg Busse, Jennifer
Franklin Prescott. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibits)(drn) (Entered:
06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 206 NOTICE of telephonic appearances at illegal court hearing show of cause, government
corruption and record evidence of judicial concealment of fake land parcels by Jorg
Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott. (drn) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 207 NOTICE of illegal 6/22/10 court hearing by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott.
(drn) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 208 NOTICE of illegal 6/22/10 court hearing by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott.
(drn) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 209 EMERGENCY MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for relief from phony
hearing by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott. (drn) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 210 ORDER denying 193 Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge
Charlene E. Honeywell on 6/22/2010. (BGS) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 211 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Charlene E. Honeywell: Motion Hearing
held on 6/22/2010 re 149 MOTION for sanctions and for pre-filing injunction filed
by E. Kenneth Stegeby, David P. Rhodes, Sean P. Flynn, A. Brian Albritton. This
matter came before the Court on the Motion for sanctions and for pre-filing injuction and
the Order to Show Cause entered on March 31, 2010 [Doc. 126]. The Plaintiffs did not
appear. The Court heard argument of counsel. The Court will enter a global pre-filing
injunction. The Court will enter an Order on the multiple motions to dismiss. The Court
is considering an Order for monetary sanctions. For the reasons stated on the record,
the Court will enter an order denying the Emergency Motion for Recusal of Defendant
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell, 28 U.S.C. § 455, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241,
242 Public Notice & Publications of Judicial Corruption & Conspiracy to Conceal U.S.
Fraud [Doc. 193]. Court Reporter: Martina Reporting Services - Patsy Coleman (LAF)
(Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 212 LETTER received in Chambers from Plaintiffs on 06/22/10 via facsimile - Your Pattern
of Corruption, Concealment, & Fraud on Court. (LAF) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/23/2010 213 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss and Motion for
Injunctive Relief of Defendants Albritton, Flynn, and Rhodes 69 is GRANTED in part.
The Court dismisses this action without prejudice. Additionally, the Court will reserve
ruling on the Motion for Injunctive Relief until after the Show Cause Hearing scheduled
in this case for June 22, 2010. The Motion for Injunctive Relief of Defendants Albritton,
U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, Rhodes, Flynn, Stegeby, and Assistant
U.S. Attorneys for the Middle District of Florida 97 is DENIED as moot. The Motion
to Dismiss and Motion for Injunctive Relief of Defendants Wilkinson, Alejo, Desjarlais,
Peterson, Lee County, Florida, Hawes, Green, Janes, Bigelow, Judah, Hall, and Mann
115 is GRANTED in part. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
Additionally, the Court will reserve ruling on the Motion for Injunctive Relief until after
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 8/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
the Show Cause Hearing scheduled in this case for June 22, 2010. The Motion to
Dismiss of Defendants Hayes and Pivacek 148 is GRANTED in part. The Court
dismisses this action without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Scott 158
is GRANTED in part. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice. The Motion to
Dismiss of Defendant Johnson Engineering 179 is GRANTED. Of Plaintiffs' pending
motions, fifteen (15) are labeled "Emergency Motion" (Dkt. 5, 118, 143, 152, 160,
161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 184, 191, 192, 194 and 209). None of these motions present
an emergency. They are repetitious, rambling, incomprehensible and frivolous. In its
March 31, 2010 126 Order to Show Cause, the Court cautioned Plaintiffs about the
unwarranted designation of a motion as an emergency motion. The Court retains
jurisdiction to impose sanctions. Plaintiffs' pending Motions 5 , 118 , 119 , 121 , 123 ,
124 , 134 , 135 , 143 , 146 , 152 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 182 , 183
, 184 , 191 , 192 , 194 , 195 , 196 , and 209 are DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs'
Complaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to terminate all
pending motions, except the Motion for Pre-filing Injunction and Sanctions 149 , enter
judgment accordingly and CLOSE this case. The Court retains jurisdiction to impose
sanctions. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 6/23/2010. (BGS) (Entered:
06/23/2010)
06/24/2010 214 JUDGMENT in favor of Johnson Engineering, Inc., Lee County Florida, Lee County
Value Adjustment Board, State of Florida Attorney General, State of Florida, Board of
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, State of Florida, Department of
Environmental, United States Attorney(s), A. Brian Albritton, Bob Janes, Brian Bigelow,
Chad Lach, Charles Barry Stevens, Charlie Green, Cynthia A. Pivacek, David P.
Rhodes, E. Kenneth Stegeby, Frank Mann, Gerald D. Siebens, Hugh D. Hayes, Jack
N. Peterson, Karen B. Hawes, Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Lori L. Rutland, Mike Scott,
Peterson Bernard, Ray Judah, Reagan Kathleen Russell, Roger Alejo, Roger Desjarlais,
Sean P. Flynn, Skip Quillen, Steven Carta, Tammy Hall, Tom Gilbertson, William M.
Martin against Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Jorg Busse (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SLU)
(Entered: 06/24/2010)
06/28/2010 215 EMERGENCY MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to enjoin judicial
corruption & fraud (see pleading for complete title) by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin
Prescott. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(SLU) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
06/28/2010 216 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 210 Order on motion for recusal, 213 Order dismissing
case by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit)(SLU) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
06/28/2010 217 EMERGENCY MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for relief from record
judicial corruption & fraud (see pleading for complete title) by Jorg Busse, Jennifer
Franklin Prescott. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(SLU) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
06/28/2010 218 EMERGENCY MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to enjoin judicial
corruption & fraud (see pleading for complete title) by Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin
Prescott. (SLU) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
07/01/2010 219 EMERGENCY MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to enjoin record
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 9/10
7/1/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
extortion, corruption & fraud (see pleading for complete title) by Jorg Busse, Jennifer
Franklin Prescott. (SLU) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 10/10