Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Socratic Seminar
Table of Contents
Long Term Plan Overview
Overview
Standards
Habits of Discussion
Habits of Discussion Games and Routines
Long Term Plan Week at a Glance
Socratic Seminar Lesson Plan: Interactive Read Aloud
Works Cited
Page
3
4
5
6
7
8
13
Overview
Socratic seminars are very useful tools for aiding in student discussions because they allow scholars to do the heavy
thinking in a lesson and begin to build self-advocacy as scholars are forced to answer and speak for themselves. In
addition, Socratic Seminars facilitate the construction of new knowledge through connections to prior knowledge,
making these vital tools in helping scholars become college ready (Clayton, 2013). Before Socratic seminars are
possible, certain habits and routines must be present so that scholars are able to adequately facilitate their own
discussion. Without this establishment of ground rules student discussions can fall flat (Clayton, 2013). This Long
Term plan serves as an implementation guide to help scholars master the habits and routines necessary to participate in
a Socratic seminar. While many of these objectives do not need to be independent lessons, they can be incorporated
into a literacy mini lesson, or introduced during morning meeting. However they are introduced, they should be
reinforced throughout the remainder of the day to keep scholars focused on these norms.
Speaking and Listening
This long term plan overview is aligned to habits of discussion and Common Core State Standards by getting scholars
to participate in agreed upon discussion norms. This is essential is forming a culture where scholars are able to facilitate
their own discussion, as required in Socratic seminars. Scholars will practice habits of discussion such as tracking the
speaker, speaking audibly, using a complete sentence, evaluating each others answers and building on to each others
answers (English Language Arts Standards).
Habits of Discussion
Speak audibly: Speaking loud enough so that everyone can hear.
- Symbol- motioning pointer finger up towards the ceiling to let teammates know you they need to speak up.
Use a complete sentence: Responding to questions with a complete sentence.
- Symbol- putting two hands together and pulling them apart to them teammates know they need to stretch out
their answer.
Track the speaker: Eyes are tracking whoever is speaking in a discussion.
- Symbol- point to your eyes and then point to the teammate speaking to let teammates know their eyes should be
tracking the speaker.
Tell your teammates: Scholars tell their teammates their answer rather than the teacher.
Tell me more: Adding more details to your response.
- Symbol- spin pointer finger in a circle to show teammates they are almost there but need to add on more to their
answer.
Evaluate each others answers: Showing support or disagreement for a teammates answer.
- Symbol- scholars evaluate each others answers by giving them a thumbs up if they agree with them or a thumbs
down if they disagree with them.
Build on each others answers: Scholars add on to their teammates thought when answering a question
- Symbol- scholars repeatedly place fists one on top of the other as if they are building something to let teacher
and teammates know that they have something to add to their teammates answer.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.1
Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about grade 1 topics and texts with peers and
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the
Build on others' talk in conversations by responding to the comments of others through multiple exchanges.
Ask and answer questions about key details in a text read aloud or information presented orally or through
other media.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.6
Week 2: Evaluating each others answers and building on to each others answer.
In this week we will work on evaluating others answers during a discussion and building on to others answers.
CCSS
Habits of
Weekly Objectives and Focuses
Discussion Games
and Routines
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.1.A -Track Clap
SWBAT show agreement or disagreement when their peers answer a
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.6
-Two Cents
question.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.1
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.1.B
-Turn
and
Talk
SWBAT build on to each others answers.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.1.1
CCSS.ELCCSS.ELASentence Stems
SWBAT answer questions about key details in a text
LITERACY.SL.1.2ALITERACY.SL.1.1
Pre-Reading
Activate: Activate students prior knowledge by
inviting them to engage with the big ideas, themes,
or features of a text through their own experiences.
(This could entail an opportunity for students to
think quietly, freewrite, turn & talk, respond to a
poll, etc.)
8
During Reading
Teacher Models Habits of Discussion during the Socratic Seminar, as if the teacher
was a student.
What can we learn from Clover and Annie?
Should people be divided or segregated based on the color of their skin?
- Pg. 8: Clover and Annie dont understand the other side of the fence (and why they
cant be friends) , but are told thats the way its always been
- Pg. 19: the girls decide to overcome the fence (and what it stands for), despite what their
parents had warned
10
11
12
Works Cited
Clayton, H. (2013). Socratic Seminars: Making Meaningful Dialogue. Retrieved from:
http://www.justaskpublications.com/just-ask-resource-center/e-newsletters/mccca/socratic-seminars-makingmeaningful-dialogue/.
English Language Arts Standards Speaking & Listening Grade 1. (n.d.). Retrieved March 18, 2016, from
http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/SL/1/
Habits of Discussion Archives - Teach Like a Champion. (n.d.). Retrieved March 18, 2016, from
http://teachlikeachampion.com/tag/habits-of-discussion/
Teach For America. (Executive Producer). (n.d.) Rebecca Snyder - 2011 Sue Lehmann Winner - Teaching Sample
2. Retreived from: https://sites.google.com/a/teachforamerica.org/tfa-teacher-video-archive/jhu
13