Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Law
6 February 2017 Atty. Timoteo
B. Aquino
1 Philippine National Bank v. Aznar, G.R. No. 171805, 30 May 2011, citing
Magsaysay-Labrador v. Court of Appeals, 259 Phil. 748 (1989).
2 Stronghold Insurance v. Cuenca, G.R. No. 173297, 6 March 2013.
3 SME Bank, Inc. v. De Guzman, G.R. Nos. 18457 & 186641, 8 October
2013.
4 Heirs of Fausto Ignacio v. Home Bankers Savings and Trust Company,
G.R. No. 177783, 23 January 2013, citing Manila Metal Container
Corporation v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 166862, 20 December
2006, citing Firme v. Bukal Enterprises and Development Corporation, G.R.
No. 146608, 23 October 2003.
On the other hand, there are laws governing jurisdiction as
regards individual suits, class suits, and derivative suits. 5
.
Also discussed, and equally applicable to Philippine jurisdiction,
is the converse characteristic of entity shielding limited
liability, which protects the assets of the owners through asset-
partitioning, thereby increasing the value of both corporate and
privately-owned assets of the owners. As adopted in Philippine
jurisdiction, the Trust Fund Doctrine limits the liability of the
stockholders to unpaid subscriptions and properties regarded in
equity as a trust fund for the payment of corporate debts. 6
7 Filipinas Port Services, Inc v. Go, G.R. No. 161886, 16 March 2007.
8 Board of Liquidators v. Heirs of Kalaw, G.R. No. L-18805, 14 August 1967.
earning, both rights generally being proportionate to the capital
contributed.