Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Sir,
The brief facts of the case are that on 28.11.2007 Sh. Prakash
Delhi about the admission of Varun Malik S/o Sh. Sukesh Malik
vide MLC No. 335/07. Duty officer P.S. Vasant Kunj lodged the
information in daily diary no. 37A and the entry entrusted to S.I.
found MLC No. 335/07 of Varun Malik S/o Sh. Sukesh Malik R/o
MLC and found the remarks of doctor Two wound gun shot Rt
him that Varun sustained bullet injury on the left side of chest.
that Moti S/o Rohtas R/o Village Masood Pur, Delhi fired two
them hit Varun. He further stated that Moti had fired on his
cousin with the intention to kill him. S.I. Mahender Lal from the
during investigation of the case seized one empty case from the
Mobile phone and the key of the car which were recovered by
prepared the pointing out memo of the scene of the crime at the
given voluntarily.
He seized the weapon of offence which was recovered at the
inspected the scene of the crime, prepare a site plan, got the
Cr. P.C. which revealed that on that day Saching and Nitin were
asked him the same after knowing that both were together.
Thereafter Varun was picked up from near the DPS School and
Yoginder. Yoginder who was in Vasant Kunj at that tie met him.
Vasant Kunj. Near Vasant Arcade they saw the car of Sachin.
They both went near the car after parking their car in front of
their car. They found Sachin, Nitin and Varun in the car. As they
Vasant Kunj with them in their car. They all five while roaming in
Moti who was waiting near Vasant Arcade. When they after
Arcade, they saw Moti standing near the Vasant Arcade. After
formal greetings Moti brought out a pistol from his parked car
bearing no. DL9CN3313 and fired first in the air and thereafter
Yusuf was also murdered in Mathura later on. I.O. recorded the
Doctor. Amar @ Amit S/o Master Jagroshan R/o Flat No. D-775,
filed in the court after his arrest. Efforts are also being made to
exhibits deposited in the lab. Same along with the sanction U/s
U/s 173(8) Cr. P.C. against Parvinder @ Moti and Rajat Passi
Moti for the Narco Analysis test of the at F.S.L., Bangalore. The
U/s 173(8) Cr. P.C. There are sufficient evidences against the
accused persons mentioned in column no. 3 for challan. It is,
accordingly.
Submitted please.
Sd/-
Insp/ARC
Crime Branch, Delhi
May go to court pl.
Sd/-27.2.2015
Asstt. Commissioner of Police
Crime Branch, Delhi.
FINAL REPORT FORM
Date: 28.11.07
In Judicial Custody.
In Judicial Custody.
Sir,
Moti and Rajat Passi @ Doctor has also been obtained. I also
deceased Varun Malik u/s 161 Cr. P.C. who stated in her
visited their house and had taken Varun with them. She
(Acknowledgment to be placed)
18. Dispatched on
Sd/-25.11.08
Signature of the IO submitting the
Final Report or Charge Sheet
Name: Satish Sharma
Rank: Insp. No.: D-3017
absconders (show
persons sent
On bail or 4
for trial
recognizance
Property (including weapons) 5 As per memo
Magistrate
Name and addresses of 6 As per list
witnesses
Charge or information-name 7 Sir,
to meet him at
under trials who posses the mobile phones in the Gurgaon Jail.
From the scrunity of the cell I.D. of the mobile phone numbers
lab. Same along with the sanction U/s 39 A. Act will also be
through suppl. challan U/s 173(8) Cr. P.C. NBW against Amar
@ Amit has also been obtained from the court and efforts are
Sd/-
Insp/AAJS
Crime Branch
Forwarded to court pl.
Sd/-
7.4.2008
ACP/ARC
Date: 28.11.07
Nagar, U.P.
on bail.
Sir,
weapon of offence i.e. pistol which was being used for shooting
prepared the pointing out memo. I also got the mobile phone
which was being used for conversation during that period. The
conducted and the location of both during that period was found
(Acknowledgment to be placed)
18. Dispatched on
Sd/-
Signature of the IO submitting the
Final Report or Charge Sheet
Name: Satish Sharma
Rank: Insp. No.: D-3017
Madivala, Bangalore
To,
The Deputy Commissioner of Police
Crime & Railways
Delhi.
in detail.
examination:
@ Moti
and two electrodes (one on the ring finger and one on the
stated.
9. Polygraph Assessment
were as follows:-
Issues Answer
opposite direction?
phone?
Varun?
the air?
fire accidentally?
Varun?
Varun?
Opinion
reference.
Sd/-
Dr. S. Malini
Asst. Director
Forensic Psychology Division
FSL, Bangalore-68
No/FSL/128/318/PLG/2007 29.5.08
Encl: as above
Sd/-
Director
Forensic Science Laboratory
Madiwala, Bangalore-68
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION)
Versus
AFFIDAVIT
correct.
3. That the annexures (page nos.___ to ____) are true
copies of
Deponent
Verification:-
Verified at New Delhi on this _____ day of October, 2015, that
therefrom.
Deponent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL.A. 292/2014
Versus
CORAM:
ORDER
14.01.2015
Crl.M.A. 9374/2014
3).
states that he would only press for taking on record orders dated
orders. Certified copy of the said orders have not been filed with
the
application.
judicial
2009 and 13th December, 2010 placed on record are true copy of
the original.
Let the said file be inspected and relist the application at 2.15
P.M.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
2.15 P.M
The relevant Court file has been seen by the learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State and he submits that the copy of
orders
December, 2010 annexed with the application are the same and
of
orders dated 11th August, 2009, 16th September, 2009 and 13th
Exhibit HC/1. We clarify the legal and factual inference and the
effect of the said orders is a different aspect, which will be
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
11.8.2009
the fact that charge sheet has already been filed, the
3. List on 16.9.2009.
V.K. SHALI, J.
AUGUST 11, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
16.9.2009
also be indicated.
V.K. SHALI, J.
KP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
13.12.2010
(Ajit Bharihoke)
Judge
December 13, 2010
ks