Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EMERGENCY MOTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
1. The judicial and Government corruption, fraud, bribery, and extortion on record were
2. The Rules and public policy prohibited the judicial corruption, fraud, bribery, and extortion
on the record as conclusively evidenced in Plaintiffs’ multiple State and Federal law suits
since 2006. Judicial corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion were outside the scope of any
judicial “immunity”.
and Officials were outside the scope of any lawful judicial and/or governmental activity, the
Plaintiffs expressly sued the Defendant corrupt Judges in their individual private capacities.
4. Here, public policy demanded criminal investigation and prosecution of the Defendant
5. Here, U.S. Officials refused to investigate and prosecute the Defendant corrupt Judges and
Officials for the criminal purposes of concealing said record crimes. Here, public policy had
absolutely required equal prosecution. Here, judges were no different from any other citizen.
6. In “Document 29, 06/30/10”, the “United States of America”, “by and through its Defendant
undersigned attorneys”, and including Defendant Matthew Fesak, fraudulently pretended that
Plaintiffs’ proof and allegations of, e.g., corruption, extortion, bribery, and fraud were
7. Said prima facie false pretenses were absurd as easily illustrated and explained by the fact
that judges were and are of course not “immune” from, e.g., murder or other crimes outside
8. Just like, e.g., Nazi Judges in Nazi Germany were not “immune” from prosecution, the
Defendant Nazi-style Officials in these Government corruption Cases had to defend against
their crimes on the public record. Cover-up was not any option. Idiotically blurting out
“frivolity” and “vexatiousness” was not any option under the rule of law.
2
THE PLAINTIFFS WERE ABSOLUTELY ENTITLED TO RELIEF
9. Here of course, the Plaintiffs were entitled to, e.g., equitable relief. Here, said Defendants’
ignorance and arrogance were injurious. Here, the Plaintiffs were entitled to defend against
10. Here, said Defendants extorted and conspired to extort property and fees under fraudulent
pretenses and color of authority, office, and/or fake “resolution” “O.R. 569/875”.
“condemnation” [“O.R. 569/875”] was an idiotic crime. Here, no fit and intelligent judge
could have possibly concocted such judicial trash, because any and all involuntary alienation
of property would have been exclusively a judicial function. Here, no court judgment/order
13. Here, Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired to fraudulently interact,
defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property and fees from the Plaintiffs
under color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, no Government ever had any
official right or authority to “claim” any “lands”. Here, Defendant Officials and Judges
3
fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of said Government scam
“O.R. 569/875”.
1. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending “immunity”, because corruption,
bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous scam “O.R.
569/875” were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity;
2. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials on the record from the absurd pretenses of “immunity”, because of course the
corruption and Government crimes on the record demanded equal prosecution and
investigation of the Defendant Officials and Judges under the Rules and public policy;
3. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials from corruptly concocting “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” for criminal
purposes of extending prima facie fraud and extortion scheme “O.R. 569/875” and
4. An EMERGENCY Order for the removal of prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875” from the
public record;
Honeywell from concealing Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of Lot 15A, Parcel #
4
ownership by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of
Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);
because she disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants,
perverted the facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28
__________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
_______________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;
JRBU@aol.com
5
Defendant Crooked Officials’Real Estate Fraud Scheme
6
7
8
RESOL~JTIOX PERTAZNIdC TO PUBLIC ws
--p--m IN CAS’O COSTA SUSO!V3S3$y-c-
claim all of raid lands and accretions thereto for the use
’ 1
ke~w~y-
q?&bw
&rrr,@w -
#h$ku!H*,, t
c&gy?:$~;~~,,
: ,.,, \ I
. . ..’ : 1
’ .;
I ,.*. .
‘.
*..: .‘
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
ROBERT P. JANES
BRIAN BIGELOW
RAY JUDAH
TAMMARA HALL
FRANK MANN
By:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Clerk
County Attorney
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!
JACK N. PETERSON
IMAGES OF A FRAUDSTER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 8 of 18