Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 73

An assessment of business process management in

the mining sector in Ghana; a case study of BPF at

AngloGold Ashanti

1
Chapter 1 Table of Content

TABLE OF CONTENT........................................................................2

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION.............................................................6

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY.......................................................................6

1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT................................................................................. 7

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY..........................................................................8

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS................................................................................9

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY.....................................................................10

1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY...............................................................................10

1.7 OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY....................................................................11

1.8 ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY....................................................................11

- LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................13

1.9 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 13

1.10 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT - DEFINITIONS.........................................13

1.11 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT - ORIGINS..............................................14

1.12 THE MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT....................16

1.13 THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT......................17

1.14 BUSINESS PROCESSES.............................................................................17

1.14.1 Functions versus Processes.........................................................17

1.14.2 Definition of Processes................................................................18

1.14.3 Types of Processes.......................................................................19

1.14.4 The Importance of Business Processes........................................19

1.14.5 Design of Processes.....................................................................20

2
1.15 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN ACTION..............................................21

1.16 BENEFITS OF BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT..........................................22

1.17 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FAILURE................................................23

1.18 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT LIFE CIRCLE...........................................24

1.19 BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURE AND TOOLS.......................25

1.19.1 Business Process Management Systems (BPMS).........................26

1.19.2 Modelling Standards....................................................................26

- METHODOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE........................28

1.20 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 28

1.21 RESEARCH PARADIGMS............................................................................28

1.22 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY..........................................................................29

1.23 SAMPLING PROCEDURES..........................................................................30

1.23.1 Population and Sample Framework.............................................30

1.23.2 Sampling technique.....................................................................31

1.24 DATA COLLECTION METHODS...................................................................31

1.24.1 Sources of Data........................................................................... 31

1.24.2 Data Collection Instrument..........................................................32

1.25 DATA ANALYSIS...................................................................................... 33

1.26 QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH.....................................................................33

1.27 RESEARCH ETHICS AND LIMITATIONS..........................................................34

1.27.1 Research Ethics...........................................................................34

1.27.2 Limitation to the Study................................................................35

1.28 BRIEF PROFILE OF THE CASE STUDY ANGLO GOLD ASHANTI COMPANY LIMITED

35

3
1.28.1 Mission, Vision and Core Values...................................................37

1.28.2 Strategy....................................................................................... 38

1.28.3 Business Process Framework [BPF].............................................39

1.28.4 What Does One Mean..................................................................39

1.28.5 Why BPF...................................................................................... 39

- FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION......................................41

1.29 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 41

1.30 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS..............................................................41

1.30.1 Gender Distribution.....................................................................41

1.30.2 Age Distribution...........................................................................42

1.30.3 Number of years on the job.........................................................42

1.30.4 Educational Qualification.............................................................44

1.31 THE IMPACT OF BUSINESS PROCESS FRAMEWORK, [BPF] ON MINING OPERATIONS

45

1.31.1 Staff Awareness of business process framework as a working

system in the company...........................................................................45

4.3.2 Importance of the Implementation of Business process framework......................46

1.31.2 Level of Satisfaction with the Implementation Process of the

Business Process Framework..................................................................47

1.31.3 The impact of the Implantation of the Business Process

Framework on the operation of the Mine................................................48

1.32 RELEVANCE OF BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT [BPF]..............................49

1.32.1 Relevance of the Implementation of Business Process Framework

to the Operations of the Mines................................................................49

4
1.32.2 Importance of business process framework to certain factors in

the mines................................................................................................ 50

1.33 SUITABLE APPROACH TO ADOPT IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS

FRAMEWORK [BPF]......................................................................................... 53

1.34 EFFECTIVENESS OR OTHERWISE OF THE IMPLEMENTED BUSINESS PROCESS

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...................................................................................... 56

1.35 CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH BUSINESS PROCESS FRAMEWORK...................58

- SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATION AND

CONCLUSION...............................................................................60

1.36 KEY FINDINGS........................................................................................ 60

1.36.1 The impact of Business Process Framework, [BPF] on mining

operations............................................................................................... 60

1.36.2 Relevance of Business Process Management [BPF].....................60

1.36.3 Suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of Business

Process Framework [BPF]........................................................................62

1.36.4 Effectiveness or otherwise of the implemented business process

management system.............................................................................. 64

1.36.5 Challenges associated with Business Process Framework...........65

1.37 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................66

1.38 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................... 66

REFERENCES................................................................................68

5
Chapter 2 Introduction

1.1 Background of the Study

In todays competitive business environment, the expectation of business owners and

shareholders is continuous and improved ways of increasing profit and decrease cost.

This demand means that managers of companies will also have to continuously strategize

and re-strategize to meet the expectations of their superiors and managers.

One medium of such strategy is the process of instituting effective internal operational

restructuring. Such internal operational restructuring cuts across of departments of the

implementing institution, mainly with the aim of reducing wastage in the system and

create effective and efficient process flow in the institution in order to beat competition.

But not all companies are able to effectively implement such operational reforms

successfully and so they are prone to replicating the approach developed by the more

successful implementers. Through operational effectiveness the rivals imitate one another

and for that reason strategies converge and have a result of limited competition, (Porter,

6
1996). It therefore means that very successful and productive companies are those that

are able to continuously evolve in terms of their business process restructuring and

management.

In such competitive and unstable business environment, business process management

(BPM) seems to help enterprises to implement changes by changing their processes

continuously to achieve the needed results, Antunes and Mouro, (2010). Without

continuous and consistent effort at improving business processes, businesses will fall to

the competition; even lose out their market shares to competition and therefore lose out

their profit margins to competition as well. Such an occurrence is not what is expected of

business managers. All measures and actions must be taken to avoid such an avoidable

occurrence and rather grow business in the expected profitable direction.

Business Process Management, (BPM) is the organizations answer towards the

unpredictability of the business processes, (Wang & Wang 2005), meaning that a wide

number of researchers have attempted to establish the relevance of business process

management. The outcome of these researches confirms that necessity for businesses, big

or small, to adopt BPM as a vital and relevant management tool. It is now seen as tool

that cant be ignored by any serious and result oriented business entity.

Business Process Management (BPM) has been identified as the number one business

priority in todays competitive business environment, Gartner (2005). Today the need for

BPM cant be emphasized any further but rather more studies will have to be conducted

to ascertain the approaches being adopted by different companies and the associated

success stories that come along with its implementation.

7
1.2 Problem Statement

In Ghana, the past two decades has seen a lot of improvement in terms of business

operation orientation. Some companies have accepted the presence of competition and

the impact such competition could have on their profitability and efficiency.

All sectors of the Ghanaian business community are now experiencing an increase trend

in business process improvement and management. The acceptance of business process

management (BPM) as a form of creating better operational systems is now very popular

because of the ability to BPM to help reduce cost and increase profitability (Porter,

1996). It helps to orientate the processes in organizations and also chip away irrelevant

portions and processes.

BPM is now receiving a lot of attention and is wide spread among many organizations

across the country. Its acceptance cuts across various departments of companies. From

human resource restructuring and realignment to automation of previously manually

manned processes. For instance, process automation is perceived to save time, reduce

cost and improve or increase quality. The advances made by the broad adoption of

information technology platforms by companies are now providing adequate information

and data available for enhanced operational business process decisions.

There is a clear need for BPM infrastructure for multinational companies operating on

multi level systems in different locations and countries. Mining companies form one of

such multinational companies. Mining companies engage in projects, which needs

effective process management system other than allowing wastages in the system. The

competencies and strengths of BPM are in consonance with the needs for such effective

processes.

8
This study seeks to assess business process management in the mining sector in Ghana

using a system implemented at AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited called

Business Process Framework [BPF] as the case study.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The main objective of the study is to assess business process management in the mining

sector in Ghana using a system implemented at AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company

Limited called Business Process Framework [BPF] as the case study.

The specific objectives of the study are as follows.

1. To assess the impact of Business Process Framework, [BPF], on the operations of

AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited

2. To determine whether Business Process Management at AngloGold Ashanti

Mining Company Limited, specifically BPF, is as relevant to mining operations as

it being branded to be.

3. To determine the most suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of

Business Process Framework [BPF], at AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company

Limited to achieve the expect results

4. To determine the effectiveness or otherwise of the implemented business process

management system, Business Process Framework [BPF], at AngloGold Ashanti

Mining Company Limited

5. To identify the challenges associated with Business Process Framework [BPF], at

AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited

9
1.4 Research Questions

To achieve the set objectives of the study, the following research questions will have to

be answered by the researcher.

1. What is the impact of Business Process Framework, [BPF], on the operations of

AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited?

2. Is Business Process Management at AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company

Limited, specifically BFP, is as relevant to mining operations as it being branded

to be?

3. What is the most suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of Business

Process Framework [BPF], at AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited to

achieve the expect results?

4. How effective or otherwise has the implementation business process management

system, Business Process Framework [BPF], been at AngloGold Ashanti Mining

Company Limited?

5. What are the challenges associated with Business Process Framework [BPF], at

AngloGold Ashanti Mining Company Limited?

1.5 Significance of the Study

The research will enable players and decision makers in the mining sector to have a fair

understanding of the effect of business process management on the output of their

operations. Other stakeholders, such as software developers, mining engineers and

mining IT experts can also utilize the findings to their benefits during their strategic

sessions. The findings of the study can be a good source of information for business

decision makers having a connection with business process management.

10
It will also add up to the stock of data available in the academic world on the subject area

of the research. Both academia and interest person(s) can access the information made

available by this research. the research will be concluded by July 2013.

1.6 Scope of the Study

This research is undertaken at the Obuasi mine site of AngloGold Ashanti Mining

Company Limited. The study covers the mining and engineering departments involved in

the usage of the Business Process Framework [BPF] system. The major respondents are

the staff of mining, engineering and IT departments being the implementing departments.

1.7 Overview of Methodology

The researcher adopts the purposive sampling technique in acquiring responses from the

selected participants for the research. The researcher employs both quantitative and

qualitative approaches coupled with a descriptive method of presenting the finding of the

research.

The questionnaire used for this research is a semi structured questionnaire, designed to

have both open-ended and close-ended questions. The questionnaire is administered in

person by the researcher, which give the researcher the opportunity to have more personal

interaction with the respondents. This helped the researcher in asking probing questions,

which were not captured in the questionnaire.

The researcher deems this approach as the best because it aids in having a personal

understanding of the real issues pertaining in the company, manage cost incurred for the

research, and also effective time management.

11
SPSS and the Microsoft Office Toolkit will be the soft wares of choice for the

compilation and completion of the research.

1.8 Organization of the Study

The chapter 1 of this research will detail all the introductory components of the study.

The main features are background to the study, problems statement, objectives of the

study and research question. Others are significance of the study, scope of the study, brief

overview of methodology and finally the organization of the study. Chapter 2 deals with

reviewing the most relevant existing works that deals with the set objectives and features

of this study whereas Chapter 3 captures the research methodology and approach adapted

for this study. It gives detailed discussion on the methods and framework that will enable

the achievement of the set objectives of this research.

Chapter 4 deals with all the data gathered from the respondents will be processed,

analyzed and presented in this chapter. The chapter presents all interpretation to be drawn

from the analyses process. It also captures all discussion to be done on the set objectives

of the study. Chapter 5 deals with conclusions, recommendation based on the findings,

limitation to the study and suggestion for further research

12
Chapter 3 Literature Review

1.9 Introduction

This chapter reviews relevant literature on Business process Management (BPM). It

closely examines the following key areas: The impact of Business Process Framework

(BPF) on operations, the relevance of Business Process Framework (BPF) to mining

operations, the most suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of Business

Process Framework (BPF) to achieve the expected results, the effectiveness or otherwise

of the implementation of business process management system, the challenges associated

with Business Process Framework [BPF] in the mining sector.

Before examining the concept of Business Process Management (BPM), it is essential to

make a reference on the BPM definitions exactly as given by important reviewers and

BPM researchers.

1.10 Business Process Management - Definitions

Business Process Management is seen as a way of supporting business processes using

methods, techniques and software to design, enact, control and analyze operational

processes involving humans, organizations, applications, documents and other sources of

information (Ko et al., 2009). In the view of Gartner (2007), BPM is a management

13
practice that provides for governance of a process environment toward the goal of

improving agility and operational performance. BPM is a structured approach employing

methods, policies, metrics, management practices and software tools to manage and

continuously optimize an organizations activities and processes, (Fotou, 2011).

Antuanes and Mouro (2010) went a step further to add more of an IT role to the process.

According to them, BPM integrates a collection of technologies capable to translate

business process models into computer-supported activities, relinquishing routine

management and control tasks from the organizational agents.

Verner (2004) shared the importance of IT in BPM expounded by Antuanes and Mouro.

She indicated that, BPM technology provides not only the tools and infrastructure to

define, simulate, and analyze business process models, but also the tools to implement

business processes in such a way that the execution of the resulting software artifacts can

be managed from a business process perspective. Behara (2006) also sees BPM as a

methodology, as well a collection of tools that enables enterprises to specify step by step

business processes. Business process management (BPM) addresses how organizations

can identify, model, develop, deploy, and manage their business processes, including

processes that involve IT systems and human interaction.

In addition, Ramachandran (2004) points out a more analyzed definition of BPM.

According to him, Business Process Management (BPM) refers to the closed loop,

iterative management of business processes over their entire lifecycle. It includes

designing, optimizing, documenting, communicating, deploying, evaluating, updating,

and retiring processes. Well-managed companies have always had robust, but time

consuming, mechanisms for performing all of these functions.

14
1.11 Business Process Management - Origins

In Michael Hammer and James Champys 1983 published work titled Reengineering the

Corporation (Harper Business, 1993) which began an era of looking at the business in a

different light. The publication allowed many experts to think of managing an enterprise

in a similar way to managing processes (Ramachandran, 2004). The roots can be traced to

Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915). His management thinking had an assumption:

every time a process changes, the environment should remain stable so that the improved

processes will have the time to return the required investment. Such stability is difficult in

this age as the business should rather be more adaptive to such changes. It is only with

this behavior that businesses would remain competitive and stakeholders will achieve

their expectations (Ramachandran, 2004).

Over the course of the years, the concept of processes has been developed and been

integrated with Business Process Management (BPM). BPM technology started in the

1980s and has developed significantly, providing enterprises with a series of advantages.

BPM is nowadays the leader of managing processes. Businesses and governments are

paying attention to business processes in order to make a fully description, automation

and management of them (Verner, 2004). As a result, BPM is used in combination with

computing technology in order to model and automate business processes (Verner, 2004).

Thus, BPM is an approach of managing change and specifically managing business

processes (Owen & Raj, 2003).

In the days before BPM, the trend was to produce data-aware information systems

instead of processaware as happens today with the help of BPM (van der Aalst, 2009).

Before BPM, analysts and IT engineers would bring together different processes,

15
methods, isolated systems and manual methodologies in order to work. With BPM no

matter how many different systems and processes an enterprise has, all of them are

treated as an aggregate architected system (Garimella, Lees, & Williams, 2008).

Learners of BPM should always keep in mind that BPM is not a product (Cho & Lee,

2010). It must not be considered as another IT approach, but as an environment where

business processes are created and communicated to the organization (Cho & Lee, 2010).

1.12 The Misunderstandings of Business Process

Management

Ko et al., (2009) found out that there is a confusion in literature review about BPM

terminology and many times beginners can get mystified between terminologies such as

business process reengineering (BPR), workflow management (WFM) and BPM.

Michael Hammer and James Champys 1983 book Reengineering the Corporation

introduced BPR principles (Hill, 2007). However, BPM and BPR are two different

approaches. According to Ko et al., (2009) BPR calls for radical obliteration of

existing business processes whereas BPM is more practical, iterative and incremental

in fine-tuning business processes. Furthermore, confusion is made between BPM and

WFM. Gartner research group makes clear the difference: Business Process

Management (BPM) is a process-oriented management discipline. It is not a technology.

On the other hand WFM is a flow management technology that can be found within

Business Process Management Suites (BPMSs) and other product categories (Ko et al.,

2009). They further stressed that another difference between BPM and WFM is that the

two approaches differ in the final stage, the diagnosis stage. On the other hand some

authors correctly argue that the difference is so slight that some vendors have just

16
changed the names of their products from WFM to BPM and they sell the product for

BPM support (Ko et al., 2009). However, Ramachandran (2004) cautions that people

should be careful in order to avoid confusing BPM with Enterprise Application

Integrations (ERP) and with Six Sigma.

1.13 The Three Dimensions of Business Process

Management

There are essentially three dimensions of BPM. The first is the business dimension for

when using BPM in every enterprise because value is created for all the stakeholders of a

business and productivity is increased. This results in customers satisfaction and loyalty

for the enterprise (Garimella, Lees, & Williams, 2008). The second is the process

dimension which adds value to the enterprise by the creation of well-defined and

structured activities. The more structured the processes are the more successfully the

enterprise creates value (Garimella, Lees, & Williams, 2008). The third dimension of

BPM is the management dimension which uses all the processes and activates them in

order to achieve an enterprises goals.

1.14 Business Processes

Ko (2009) found that people tend to understand better the processes through models.

Models and processes can make people understand the problem or identify them, increase

knowledge of the organizations processes, understand the areas of potential improvement

and define the roles and responsibilities inside the organization. BPM is based on

business processes and this is the main reason that makes BPM so effective.

17
3.1.1 Functions versus Processes

What does the term business process mean? To ensure that the term process is well

defined and understood, it is appropriate to differentiate between functions and processes.

A function is a group of people performing similar tasks. A process encompasses a range

of tasks, and multiple departments participate in the creation of a processs outcome. For

example, product development is a process because it involves marketing, manufacturing

and other functions (Haapaniemi, 1998). Because there are some traditional functional

boundaries, processes are often difficult to see (Haapaniemi, 1998).

3.1.2 Definition of Processes

Peoples lives are virtually governed by processes these days. In the estimation of Ko

(2009), people use processes in everyday life from planning their holidays to

manufacturing a product. Processes can be developed and improved by experience

(everyday processes) or according to scientific investigations (Ko, 2009). Usually the

term business process is used in reference to high-level description of an enterprise.

Owen and Raj (2003), defined a business process as the business process comprises all

activities carried out in an enterprise, including e.g. staffing, financing, production,

marketing, etc. Business processes can be seen as processes that have inputs and outputs

which usually are the desired outputs for the customer and add value to the enterprise (Ko

et al, 2009).

A business process is uniquely definable; has a defined set of activities that break down

into increasingly more granular steps and an agreed to set of sequences; is enabled and/or

constrained by culture, skills, policies and rules, laws, measurement/reward systems,

workflow design, information systems and facilities; often crosses organizational

18
boundaries; and follows a formal life cycle (Lusk, 2007). In very simple words, a

business process is an organized group of related activities that together create customer

value (Hammer M., 2001). It is simply the way an organization does its work

(Davenport, 2005).

3.1.3 Types of Processes

It has been found that business processes could be categorized to private and public

business processes. Private processes are the processes that take place internally in the

organization, for example employees payment (Ko, 2009). On the other hand, public

business processes are the processes that are related to the external processes of the

organization, for example the shipping management. Ko (2009) continues analyzing

business processes by giving two main perspectives of the area. From a highlevel

analysis there are two perspectives of business processes: The level perspective and the

core competency perspective.

3.1.4 The Importance of Business Processes

What is the common point between IBM, American Standard, Allmerica Financial, and

Duke Power. The common point is that these enterprises have turned into process

enterprises and have gained all the benefits an enterprise can gain through processes

(Hammer & Stanton, 1999).

The authors continue emphasizing the importance of processes inside an organization by

giving the example of e-commerce sites and more specifically Amazon.com. Well-

defined processes are very important in Amazon. If Amazon manages to deliver the

19
product to the customer on time and without conflicts, the customer will become a

reliable customer to the site (Hammer & Stanton, 1999) and the profits will be increased.

On the other hand, processes sometimes appear as the enemy of creativity (Hammer,

2001). Due to the high automation and routinization the processes require, the creativity

and humans free mind is destroyed. Hammer found this to be wrong. Processes are not

the enemy of creativity. Processes are the opposite of chaos. Processes create

organization and discipline so people are more challenged to work with creativity, rather

than having to face a disorganized situation (Hammer, 2001). In order to strength this

opinion Hammer revealed what a senior executive had confided to him about processes

the revolution in thought, leading to changes in business (Hammer, 2001). In the same

spirit Hammer and Stanton (1999), asserted that a process enterprise is the organizational

form for a world in constant change.

3.1.5 Design of Processes

Various authors have shared many views and researchers on ways processes should be

designed. Andersen Consulting (2009) in their handbook Process Excellence

Handbook, state that in a competitive world the process innovation is very important in

an enterprise. The company introduces the Seven Rs: Rethink, Reconfigure, Reassign,

Resequence, Relocate, Reduce, Retool (Haapaniemi, 1998).

When designing the processes the managers and executives should ensure that the

processes is not be fixed (Hammer & Stanton, 1999). They must change their shape

according to the new technology, the competitors and the circumstances. IBM has

successfully redesigned most of the processes, the last years and now the company

20
redesigns them all over again in order to make them competitive towards the Web

(Hammer & Stanton, 1999).

A very important question: Is good design of processes enough in order to have

successful results in the enterprise? The answer according to Hammer is negative. A good

design is a step towards the ultimate but definitely not enough. In addition to a good

design, the people inside the enterprise should show commitment, responsibility and

maturity (Hammer, 2001).

1.15 Business Process Management in Action

Many authors have tried to present the basic concepts of BPM as business processes. But

how does BPM work in practice? A typical example of BPM in action could really help in

understanding BPM approach in real business life.

A retailer has a problem with delivery due to wrong address of the customer. The goods

are returned back to the retailer. A BPM solution would have provided the company with

live monitoring process and before the package is returned to the company, the system

could find all opportunities to re-route the package to another destination. With this

solution the company can save cost and time (returning, restocking), reduce error cycles

and consequently increase customers satisfaction. With this example, it is clear that BPM

solution can provide the company with clear processes, visibility and control over the

enterprise, no matter the number and location of the departments are (Workpoint LLC,

2011).

Ford Motors is another company, which has enjoyed immense benefits from the

application of BPM in its operations. Their purchasing department had to send copies of

the order to many departments with any purchase order. This had not only decreased the

21
time of the order completion but there also eliminated the danger of a loss occurring.

With BPM the business processes were redesigned: the order was inserted in database

without the need to send copies to other departments and the copy was checked by the

system. Ford said that after BPM application, the company had achieved a significantly

improvement in the processes and in some departments there was a reduction of 75% of

the number of its employees (Ko, 2009).

1.16 Benefits of Business Process Management

A Gartner Group survey suggested that BPM solutions can reduce error cycles and can

lead to cost reduction. More specifically can result in the following benefits (Workpoint

LLC, 2011):

Reduce time;

Reduce numbers of steps of a process;

Reduce error cycles; and

Reduce resources.

In general BPM enables efficiency while maintaining effectiveness and complying with

regulations (Larson & Larson, 2011). If the identified processes are aligned with the

companys business strategy, then there are great possibilities to achieve the companys

objectives and increase efficiency.

The stated benefits are some of the reasons enterprises turn to the BPM solution. Apart

the benefits of BPM, the enterprises turn to BPM because of the unstable climate in the

business arena. Ko et al, (2009) agree with this statement. More specifically they believe

that the globalization and the expansion of organizations have led to the need of quick

22
transfer of information, quick decision-making, quick change adaption and demand for

shorter life cycles. The authors consider the above as crucial factors for an organization in

order to survive and increase its profitability.

As companies all over the world encounter a volatile environment, with high competition

and rapidly growing technology, many turn to the solution offered by BPM. Adam and

Doerr (2009) agree by emphasizing that if an enterprise wants to remain competitive then

3 main dimensions should be fulfilled: time, cost, quality. BPM through the process-

based philosophy and the provided techniques can make the company fulfill these 3

dimensions. Gartner argues that BPM wins the Triple Crown of saving money, saving

time, and adding value.

The success of BPMs application is quantified in terms of financial results (Garimella,

Lees, & Williams, 2008). As already mentioned, BPM minimizes cost, time and waste.

1.17 Business Process Management Failure

Although BPM has significant results, there is also the not so good and beneficial side

of the success story. Many reviews report that 6080% of BPM initiatives have not the

most desired results (Trkman, 2010). In fact, misunderstandings of the BPM concepts and

principles cause the failure of a BPM project (Trkman, 2010). Fingar (2011) through his

article What does BPM Actually Mean? states in an ironic way that every technology

vendor or management consultant puts BPM as a lipstick on their products. By this

statement the author emphasizes the popularity of BPM and the fact that some

technologists use BPM just to sell their products and without caring about the real

techniques of BPM (Adam & Doerr, 2009). This brings out the issue of enterprises

investing money in BPM but not having always the desired results.

23
Each organization should always fit with the environment and the circumstances in

order to remain competitive (Trkman, 2010). It is dangerous to assume that copying a

successful BPM project applied to one organization to another is enough. Every

organization is unique and has its characteristics. The author continues advising people

who are involved in BPM oriented projects by claiming that each organization should

study its prospects and characteristics and then decide which BPM application is

appropriate for the enterprise. The enterprise also should pay attention in order to align its

business processes with its environment whereas the executives and consultants should

decide which business processes are key processes and contribute to the competitive

advantage (Trkman, 2010). Finally, adopting a dynamic method which is customized in

concrete circumstances is one of the best practices an enterprise should follow (Trkman,

2010).

Another reason for the BPM failure as discovered by Trkman (2010) is the fit between

business process and IT. The author shows the critical role of IT by stating IT should not

be considered a panacea but rather as a tool to support improved processes.

1.18 Business Process Management Life Circle

Understanding the BPM Life Cycle helps in the understanding of the concept (Ko, 2009;

Ko et al., 2009). In available literature, there is not a standardized view on the number of

phases in the BPM lifecycle. The most popular lifecycle of BPM is by van der Aaslt (Ko

et al., 2009). His defined lifecycle is considered by many authors as the most

succinctness and relevant (Ko et al., 2009). The lifecycle of BPM consists of 4 phases:

The process design stage, the system configuration stage, the process enactment stage and

the diagnosis stage (Lusk, 2007). Wetzstein et al. (2007) also developed a good life cycle

24
for BPM. According to them, the BPM lifecycle consists of 4 phases: modeling,

implementation, execution, analysis.

Modeling: This is the first phase in the BPM lifecycle. In this phase a business analyst

defines and analyzes the processes and the phases of every process with the help of a

modeling analytical tool. BPM provides business analysts with a modeling tool named

Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN). The design in this phase is very high level

and in order to be executed, the implementation phase should start (Wetzstein, et al.,

2007).

Implementation: In this phase IT engineers, transform the model that has been created in

the previous phase. The process model is executed into a process engine. Service

Oriented Architecture (SOA) and web services help in the execution of the processes. The

language that describes the processes in the services above is the Business Process

Execution Language (BPEL) (Wetzstein, et al., 2007).

Execution: During this phase, the process engine executes the processes. SOA

communicates processes to other systems or clients through web services (Wetzstein, et

al., 2007).

Analysis: In this phase monitoring of the running processes takes place. Monitoring helps

in order to find error flows and instances and in general control the whole process. It is

worth mentioning that some Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) support

business level monitoring, where analysts can check the performance of every process.

Those results can be collected in a form of dashboards and comprise a form of data

storage and statistics for every interested party. As seen data mining is important in BPM

(Wetzstein, et al., 2007).

25
1.19 Business Process Management Architecture and Tools

BPM technology architecture has proved to be very efficient. Its structure helps in the

alignment of IT and business objectives, supports change and maximize productivity

(Garimella, Lees, & Williams, 2008). The architecture consists of six layers: the Unified

Workspace, the execution environment, the simulation Engine, the process Design

Toolbox, the Metadata Repository and the web service adapters and new services

development (Garimella, Lees, & Williams, 2008).

3.1.6 Business Process Management Systems (BPMS)

BPMS is a technology that is used not only for the automation of the business processes

but also for the management of the whole business processes inside an enterprise

(Ravesteyn & Batenburg, 2010). BPM-systems are the result of developments in both

the business and IT-domain (Ravesteyn & Batenburg, 2010). As DBMS is used for

storing and managing data, BPMS is used for storing, processing and managing business

processes (Ravesteyn & Batenburg, 2010).

3.1.7 Modelling Standards

How are the processes modeled from BPM? Is there any tool, any technique? How

processes are modeled by analysts and consultants? The answer is Business Process

Management Notation (BPMN) and it is a new standard for modeling business processes

and web service processes (Owen & Raj, 2003). BPMN includes a diagram, which is

called Business Process Diagram (BPD); it is user friendly and is appropriate for complex

processes (Owen & Raj, 2003). Also the Business Process Management Institute (BPMI)

has introduced Business Process Modeling Language (BPML) and Business Process

26
Query Language (BPQL) (Owen & Raj, 2003). According to the authors all the above

have been developed by BPMI in order to support BPM and use solid mathematical

foundation which enables BPMN to map easily with BPML and BPQL. BPML are XML

based languages used to model processes. Most of the proposed languages use XML and

build on top of Web Service Description Language (WSDL) offered by W3C (Owen &

Raj, 2003). BPMN is easy to use by non-technical people and it is good for designing and

analyzing complex processes. In order to model a business process flow, the start point,

the end point and the middle processes should be defined. Also business decisions are

models by using gateways, which is like business decisions in flowcharts (Owen & Raj,

2003).

27
Chapter 4 Methodology and Organizational Profile

1.20 Introduction

This section of the report gives details about the approaches the researcher employed in

conducting the research. The chapter tries to inspire and clarify the methodological

approach adopted in order to answer the research questions in chapter one.

1.21 Research Paradigms

The research is designed on the mixed method research approach, i.e. the use of both

qualitative and quantitative research method. These two methods are those most

commonly used for social science research studies of the being conducted now. When

both approached are mixed up in the same research, it is commonly termed as the mixed

method.

According to Casebeer and Verhoef, (1997), quantitative research involves the use of

quantifiable parameters and observations for the presentation of findings of the study.

This approach is the preferred choice in situations where the central idea of the research

bothers on relationships, Neuman (2003). The researcher has adopted to partly use this

approach because is very beneficial in providing detailed data gathering and analysis

planning for the study. Another reason for the choice of a quantitative approach is

because of the inherent ability to measure the expected outcomes of the study and plan

the design for the population and samples for the study. Data for quantitative research is

mostly drawn from closed end question in which the respondent(s) react to very strict

structured questions.

28
Contrary to the quantitative research approach, the qualitative research approach is more

liberal and built on unrestricted responses. McDaniel and Gates, (1996) stated that

qualitative research involves non numerical interpretation of findings and observations of

the patterns of the relationship and phenomenon being studied. This approach lays

emphasis on processes that is not easily quantifiable and is predominantly drawn from

open-ended questions, which allow the respondent(s) to freely express their opinions.

The main object of this study is to do assessment of business process management in the

mining sector in Ghana. To realize the objectives of the study, a semi structured

questionnaire is used in gathering the relevant data needed for the study. the semi

structured questionnaire enables the researcher to source for data relevant to meet need of

both qualitative and quantitative requirements for the study.

1.22 Purpose of the study

For this research, the descriptive research method is employed for the realization of the

research objective. The decision to use the descriptive method is hinged on the

explanation by Robson, (1993) that this method is mostly used when the research

objective is mainly to portray an accurate profile of a person, event or situation. The

descriptive research is best used when the researcher knows the problem but not fully

aware of the prevailing situation cause that problem, Zikmund (2000).

The researcher seeks to investigate the nature of a particular phenomenon and as such it

is best if the finding(s) is described to detail all properties and relationship of the

phenomenon. All questions of who, what, where and how of the research is answered by

29
the descriptive research and there is no need to give any further explanation for the

findings of the research, Zikmund (2000).

There is a chosen case study for the research mainly because of the quest to achieve the

objectives of the study. The case for this research is Anglo Gold Ashanti, in the Obuasi

Municipality in the Ashanti region of Ghana. This design type was used because the

researcher wanted to do an intensive assessment of a single situation. This decision is

highly influenced by Bryman (2004), who explained that a case study design enables the

engagement of a theoretical analysis in consonance with the generation of an intensive

assessment of a single case. This is further emphasized by Yin (1994) who also

established that a case study helps in the investigation of real life contemporary

phenomenon to establish a context that previous had not been existent previously.

1.23 Sampling Procedures

4.1.1 Population and Sample Framework

The research has all members of staff of the Anglo Gold Ashanti Company who have a

role to play in the implementation of the business process framework as the target

population. Ideally, it is believed that the activities of all the members of staff will be

impacted directly or indirectly by the implementation of the business process framework.

This target population forms a part of a large mining sector that adopts business process

management tools as a way of ensuring that there is total reduction in the wastage in the

business processes in their day-to-day activities.

For the completion of this research, a total of 80 respondents are targeted from the

mining, engineering and IT departments of the case being studied for the research. The

30
functionality of these departments makes them the main implementers of the business

process management strategy of the company using the business process framework.

Staff in these departments can give a better expression of their views on this strategic

process in the mines.

4.1.2 Sampling technique

The purposive sampling technique is that which the researcher adopts as the sampling

technique for this research. According to Trochim (2006), purposive sampling is a non-

probability sampling, which is used when the researcher has a purpose for sampling those

people for interview.

In the case of this research, the researcher knows exactly which departments and

respondents to contact because of the peculiarity of the case being studied. Purposive

sampling aids the researcher to achieve a fair representation from the respondents whiles

at the same time seeking a very diverse and divergent opinion of the subject being

studied.

1.24 Data Collection Methods

4.1.3 Sources of Data

This research uses two main sources for data acquisition; primary and secondary sources

of data.

Primary data sources are those sources, which the researcher uses to acquire relevant data

basically for the use of completing the research. According to Johannessen et al., (2004),

primary data is new data gathered by the researcher purposely for the research being

undertaken. For this research, the source of primary data was the use of a semi-structured

31
questionnaire administered to a sample selected among a larger population at the case

study.

Secondary data sources are sources that provide the researcher access to a pool of already

establish data relevant to the research but not necessarily gathered for the specific

purpose of this particular research. Johannessen et al., (1999) stated that secondary data is

data material, which already exists. There are numerous advantages of secondary but its

major influence on the research is the key role it plays in the literature review. For this

research, some of the sources for the acquisition of secondary data were journals,

textbooks, websites, academic publications, etc.

4.1.4 Data Collection Instrument

The researcher sort to gather information from the respondents but this information had

to be sort through the use of an acceptable data collection instrument. Saunders et. al.,

2000 outlined three main means of conducting interviews, being structured interview,

semi-structured interview and unstructured interview. Based on the three established

means, the researcher adopted the semi-structured means of interviewing for the

collection of data for this.

Semi structured interviews and questionnaires consist of a list of questions comprising of

both open and closed ended questions, (Saunders et. al., 2000). The choice of a semi-

structured questionnaire gives the respondents to answer both open and closed ended

questions. The questionnaires are administered in a face-to-face manner by the

researcher, this afforded the researcher the opportunity to address any issues from the

respondents and vice versa.

32
1.25 Data Analysis

After the data collection process, the analysis of the gathered data takes the next stage.

The importance of this stage is primarily to summarize and rearrange the gathered data in

the needed interrelated forms and formats, Zikmund (2000). An effective data analysis is

a more favorable strategy to realizing the research objective(s), Yin (1994).

Thefirststageoftheanalysisprocessisthecompilationofthegathereddatabyusing

SPSS.TheSPSShelpedinthecollationoftheentirefielddataintothemostsuitable

formatandthentransferredintoMSExcelformat. AlltheanalysisisdoneusingMS

Excel,whichchurnedoutallthegraphs,tablesandchartsusedinthepresentationofthe

findingsoftheresearch.ThepresentationofthefindingsisdoneusingMSWord.

According to Edvardsen et al. (1994) the starting point in developing quality research

findings is analysis and presentation of the findings. The researcher ensured that the

findings of the research were acquired through the most quality process.

1.26 Quality of the Research

To ensure that the study meets the right quality standard, Saunders and Thornhill, (2003)

advises that the researcher should pay enough attention to the level of reliability and

validity of the study.

The reliability of the findings of the research is mainly the consistency and homogeneity

of the findings in terms of taking measures to ensure that errors in the findings are

minimal. As per Easteby-Smith et al., (1991), the researcher took measures to ensure that

similar observations will be made by other researcher(s) on any other occasion. The

process of acquiring and processing data from the fieldwork was done with a high level

33
of transparency to ensure that respondents will be willing to give similar responses when

contacted by another researcher on any occasion.

On the other hand, the validity of the finding was ensured by ensuring that the method

used for data collection and analysis churned out accurate resulting and the findings are

really about is really happening in reality. Saunders and Thornhill, (2003) explains that

validity is the extent to which data collection methods or methods accurately measure

what they were intended to measure.

1.27 Research Ethics and Limitations

4.1.5 Research Ethics

Research ethics are the guiding principles and rules employed in ensuring that the right

actions are taken through out the duration of the research, (Johannessen et al., 2004). The

following key ethical principles were applied throughout the research process.

All communications relating to this research was done in a transparent and honest

manner

The researcher ensured the avoidance of misleading representation of captured

data and/or findings

Anonymity of individuals or organizations involved in the research was kept in

absolute confidentiality

The dignity of respondents was respected and also ensured that consent was

sought from respondents to use their views for the research

34
Therewastotalconfidentialityofdatasourcedfromrespondentsandalsokept

veryprivate

4.1.6 Limitation to the Study

The completion of the research had the following limitations

Contacting respondents was difficult because respondents were very dispersed

Getting adequate information on the subject being researched into was difficult

Time constraint and insufficient financial strength also impeded the smooth execution of

the study

1.28 Brief Profile of the Case Study Anglo Gold Ashanti

Company Limited

Mining in Obuasi started in March 1890 when three men from Cape Coast namely Joseph

E. Ellis, Joseph E. Biney and Joseph P. Brown travelled along the river Pra into Adansi

Kingdom for business. Whilst on their journey, they saw some local mineral prospectors

who were working on the farmlands for the king of Bekwai. The three men upon

realizing the potential of gold mining in the region quickly became interested and so had

to negotiate for some mining concessions of about 25,900 hectors in Obuasi. After the

acquisition of land for gold mining, they decided to abandon the traditional method of

gold prospecting which the locals were used to and rather introduced professional

mining. They first named their property as Ellis Mine and followed up with the sinking of

shafts on reefs and laid out interconnecting tunnels. In their resolve to create a modern

mine in Obuasi, they begun to import some mining equipment from a London firm which

was owned by Smith and Cade. As the mine grew in strength, there was the need to

35
engage the services of a mine manager and so J.P Wilson was employed. As the years

went by, the need for capital injections and some level of expertise became paramount.

Therefore after operating the Ellis Mine for five years, a major decision was taken to sell

the property to foreigners for profit.

As the business relationship between Ellis Mine and the equipment supplier in London

became stronger, the mine decided that Biney should carry along with him some gold

exhibit to London to be shown to the supplier. The main aim of the exhibition was to

examine the possibility of selling the mine to him. The whole idea of selling the mine did

not materialize until Edwin Arthur Cade joined the firm as partner after marrying one of

the daughters of Smith. In August 1895, the sale went through successfully to Cade. Two

years later Cade and his associates registered Ashanti Goldfields Corporation AGC

Limited in the city of London. After several years of mining AGC Ltd in Ghana, it

ventured beyond the shores of Ghana and became an international company with

associates in Guinea, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Again, as the need for further capital

injection, it became inevitable due to the desire to go into deep mining. AGC finally

decided to go into a merger with another company in the mining industry. This dream

became a reality in April 2004, a new company called AngloGold Ashanti was formed.

The new company was the result of the merger of the then Ashanti Goldfields Company

Limited AGC of Ghana and AngloGold of South Africa. AngloGold Ashanti is a global

gold producer with 21 operations in four continents, namely Africa, Australia, South

America and North America. The company is listed on several stock exchanges including

New York, Johannesburg, London and Australia stock exchanges. AGA presently

36
operates two mine sites in Ghana, which are located at Obuasi and Tarkwa in the Ashanti

and Western Regions respectively.

The Obuasi Mines, which is the focus of this research, is predominantly an underground

gold mine with a depth of about 1.5km. It has the richest gold deposit in Ghana and was

discovered in the later part of 1897 by a group of Europeans who later sold their rights to

Edwin Cade, the founder of Ashanti Goldfields Corporation AGC. It is about 56km south

of Ashanti Regional capital called Kumasi. The gold deposit at Obuasi covers a distance

of approximately 300km. there are four active shafts and a ramp at the moment, which

are the means through which the ore from underground extracted, hoisted and transported

to the treatment plants for processing. The shafts are linked by a haulage system serving

the various shaft stations. These stations are then fed by conveyors from ore passes to the

haulage points. The Obuasi Mine has three treatment plants namely

a. Sulphide plant, it treats the ore from underground

b. Tailings plant the material from the reclamation operations

c. Oxide plant batch-treats remnant open pit ore and low-grade stockpiles

Since mining at Obuasi started over 100 years ago, much of the ore bodies have already

been mined. However, with the deep project, which is presently being implemented, it is

expected that the useful life of the companys operations at Obuasi would be extended by

yet another 35 years.

4.1.7 Mission, Vision and Core Values

Our mission is to create value for our shareholders, our employees and our business and

social partners through safety and responsible exploring, mining and marketing our

products. Our primary focus is gold and we will pursue value creating opportunities in

37
other minerals where we can leverage our existing assets, skills and experience to

enhance the delivery of value.

Vision

To be the leading mining company


Values
Safety is our core value

We treat each other with dignity and respect

We value diversity

We are accountable for our actions and undertake to deliver on our commitments

The communities and the societies in which we operate will be better off for
AngloGold Ashanti having been there.

We respect the environment

4.1.8 Strategy

Table 3:1 Corporate Strategy

Strategic Goals Our Future 5year Delivery Target


Safety 0 accidents 70% reduction in accident
rates
People +5% productivity per year 30% improvement in
productivity
Environmental 0 incidents 60% reduction in reportable
incidents
Productivity Global leader 20% increase in productivity
to 6Moz
Cost Industry midpoint 25% decrease in real unit
costs
Financial +50% thru cycle Increase return on capital
invested to +15%

38
With the current trend of competition in the mining industries globally for the past

decades couple with the consistent rising of gold price worldwide, the company

introduced a lot of business strategies to be cost effective as to maximize profits. One of

such strategies was the adaption of Business Process Framework (BPF) under PROJECT

ONE which was enrolled in 2010.

4.1.9 Business Process Framework [BPF]

It is one of the Business Processes that would deliver the business expectations,

established by management. When we say BPF, we mean; doing the right work at the

right time and in the right way will deliver the required performance. If the work is

planned, scheduled and properly resourced ahead of execution the desired outcome will

be achieved more consistently and at lower cost.

4.1.10 What Does One Mean

ONE is about every AngloGold Ashanti employee uniting towards a single outcome.

Every one of us must meet the challenge of this business improvement project to make

AngloGold Ashanti the best business it can be.

ONE will provide a common framework in terms of how all employees operate, seeking

to apply consistency across the company and to encourage sharing of information.

ONE also represents the fact that this business improvement project is a critical

company-wide initiative that will underpin everything we do.

4.1.11 Why BPF

More is expected from assets each year more output, lower costs, longer life

39
Variation in output lowers results below the potential of the asset

Stakeholders demand a high level of confidence that results will be delivered they dont

like variation

Data indicates that most variation results from not doing the right things with the asset,

consistently.

BPF provides practical management standards that will allow us to deliver more from our

assets with greater confidence it is 1 of the 3 key initiatives of the CEO.

40
Chapter 5 Findings, Analysis and Discussion

1.29 Introduction

This chapter deals with the analysis, discussion and presentation of the findings from the

data collected from the fieldwork. The analysis is aimed at establishing valid points in

answering the research questions to be able to achieve the research objectives and

ultimately come out with the relevant conclusions and recommendations.

1.30 Demographic Characteristics

This part of the research discusses some demographic characteristics for both Contractors

and Bankers involved in the study. The demographic characteristics discussed in this

research include gender, age, educational qualification and number of years of work.

5.1.1 Gender Distribution

Table 4.1: Gender distribution of Respondents

Gender Frequency Percentage (%)

Male 71 88.8

Female 9 11.3

Total 80 100

Source: field survey 2013

The number of males involved in this study is far greater than the females as shown by

table 4.1 above. 88.8% of the respondents are males while the remaining 11.2% are

females. This therefore shows the dominance of the mining sector by males.

41
5.1.2 Age Distribution

Figure 4.1: Age distribution of respondents

AgeDistribution Below 25
4(5%)
Above40
8(10%)
41 45
9(11.3%)
25 30
12(15%)

36 40
16(20%) 31 35
31(38.8%)

Source: field survey 2013

It can be seen from figure 4.1 above that a majority of the respondents (38.8%) involved

in the study are between the ages of 31 35. 20% fall between 36 40, 11.3% between

41 -45, 5% below 25 years, 15% between 25 30 while the remaining 10% are above the

ages of 40 years. The data portrayed above gives the indication that the staffs of the

sector are young and energetic and will therefore lead to high productivity in the

researchers view.

5.1.3 Number of years on the job

The selected respondents for the survey were asked to indicate how long they have been

in employment in the mining sector. They were to indicate whether theyve been in the

sector for below a year, 1 - 2 years, 2 3 years, 3 4 years, 4 5 years or 5 years and

42
above. The analysis of the data after the collection of the questionnaires revealed some

results, which are presented in table 4.2 below.

Table 4.2: Years of employment

Years Frequency Percentage (%)

Below 1 year 2 2.5

1 - 2 years 4 5

2 3 years 14 17.5

3 4 years 31 38.8

4 5 years 20 25

5 years and above 9 11.3

Source: field survey 2013

From the table above, it can be observed that just 2.5% of the respondents have been

employed in the sector for periods below a year. A greater number of them have been

employed for periods between 3 - 4 years (38.8%). 25% have also worked for 4 5 years

in the mining sector. It is therefore revealed by the data above that the staffs involved in

the survey do have enough experience in their field and are in a better position to answer

the questions on the questionnaires distributed to them, hence improving the validity of

the survey.

43
5.1.4 Educational Qualification

Figure 4.2: Educational qualification of respondents.

Educational Quali ication

14(17.5%)
23(28.8%)

11(13.8%) SSCE/ MSLC


Professional Certi icate
1st Degree
32(40%)
2nd Degree

Source: field survey 2013

The educational qualifications of the respondents appeared to be quite impressive as a

majority of them (40%) hold a first degree qualification while 28.8% have second degree

qualifications. However, 17.5% and 13.8% hold SSCE/MSLC and Professional

certificates respectively.

44
1.31 The impact of Business Process Framework, [BPF] on

mining operations

5.1.5 Staff Awareness of business process framework as a

working system in the company

On the question, Are you aware of business process framework as a working system in

this company? respondents were to answer by selecting either Yes or No from item 6 of

the questionnaires distributed to them. The findings are presented in figure 4.3 below.

Figure 4.3: Awareness of business process framework

NO, 19

YES, 61

Source: field survey 2013

As seen from figure 4.3 above, a majority of the staffs (61 out of 80) pointed out that they

are aware of business process framework as a working system in their company by

answering yes to item 6 of the questionnaire, which is quite encouraging. 19 of them

however revealed that they are unaware of this concept.

45
5.1.6 4.3.2 Importance of the Implementation of Business process framework

The researcher then went on to find out from the respondents (especially those who

selected yes in item 6), how important the business process framework has been since its

implementation. They were asked to indicate whether it has been very important,

important, moderately important, of little importance or unimportant.

Figure 4.3: Importance of the business process framework been since its

implementation

Source: field survey 2013

The data from figure 4.3 unearths the notion that the business process framework in the

companies has been of much importance since its implementation as 46 out of the 80

selected respondents involved in the survey described it as important with 13 of them also

pointing out that it is very important. 7 of them however see it as unimportant, 5 as

unimportant while the remaining 9 rate the business process framework as moderately

important.

46
5.1.7 Level of Satisfaction with the Implementation Process of

the Business Process Framework

On the question, how satisfied are you with the implementation process of the business

process framework? the respondents gave varied responses which led to the generation

of the results presented below.

Figure 4.4: Staff satisfaction in relation to the implementation of the business

process framework

Source: field survey 2013

It can be seen from figure 4.4 that 23.8% of the selected respondents indicated that they

are very dissatisfied with the implementation of the business process framework while

41.3% are very satisfied. 30% indicated that its implementation is good, 15% are also

satisfied while the remaining 8.8% are very satisfied. From the information above, even

though 30% of the respondents see the implementation of the business process

47
framework as good, a greater percentage (41.3%) are dissatisfied with its implementation

and therefore stands to reason that its implementation is fraught with problems, in the

researchers view.

5.1.8 The impact of the Implantation of the Business Process

Framework on the operation of the Mine.

The researcher sought to find out whether the implementation of the business process

framework has had some impact on the operation of the mine. This was done through the

use of item 9 of the questionnaire, which dwelt on this. The findings after the analysis of

the data from the field survey are presented in figure 4.5 below.

Figure 4.5: The impact of business process framework implementation

Source: field survey 2013

A majority of the respondents (46.3%) as seen in figure 4.5 above asserted that the

implementation of the business process framework has somewhat impacted the operation

48
of the mine. 31.3% were of the view that it has impacted the operation of the mine to a

great extent while 15% and 7.5% indicated that it has impacted the mines operation very

little and not at all respectively. It can therefore be deduced from the foregoing analysis

that the implementation of the business process framework has had some impact on the

operations of the mine.

1.32 Relevance of Business Process Management [BPF]

This aspect of the research was aimed at finding the relevance of the implementation of

business process management at the mines. The results gathered are discussed under the

following headings.

5.1.9 Relevance of the Implementation of Business Process

Framework to the Operations of the Mines

Item 11 of the questionnaires distributed to the staffs sought to elicit their responses in

respect to the relevance of the implementation of business process framework to the

operations of the mines. They were therefore asked to indicate this by choosing yes or

no from the questionnaire. Below are the findings after the analysis of the data.

Figure 4.6: Relevance of business process implantation to the operation of the mines

49
Source: field survey 2013

It can be seen from the diagram above that 33.8% out of the total of 80 respondents

involved in the survey pointed out that the implementation of the business process

framework is of no relevance to the operations of the mines. A majority of them, that is

66.3% asserted otherwise, highlighting the idea that the implementation of business

process framework is of much relevance to the mining companies.

5.1.10 Importance of business process framework to certain

factors in the mines

The researcher proceeded to also look at the importance of the implementation Business

Process Frame work to certain factors in the mines by asking the respondents to give their

views from their experience by indicating whether the factors in the table below are very

important (1), important (2), moderately important (3), of little importance (4) or

unimportant (5). The findings are presented below.

Table 4.3: Importance of business process framework to certain factors in the mines

50
Factors Responses

1 2 3 4 5
Improve understanding 7 17 18 27 11
(8.8%) (21.3%) (22.5%) (33.8%) (13.8%)
Improving operation processes 31 20 15 9 5
(38.8%) (25%) (18.8%) (11.3%) (6.3%)

Improving Communication 16 13 35 7 9
(20%) (16.3%) (43.8%) (8.8%) (11.3%)

Handling complexity 6 15 24 31 14
(7.5%) (18.8%) (30%) (38.8%) (17.5%)

Evaluate change impacts 13 29 17 12 9


(16.3%) (36.3%) (21.3) (15%) (11.3%)

Improving documentation and 37 21 11 7 5


archiving (46.3%) (26.3%) (13.8%) (8.8%) (6.3%)

Improving supply chain and logistics 16 22 18 14 10


management processes (20%) (27.5%) (22.5%) (17.5%) (12.5%)

Source: field survey 2013

It can be observed from table 4.3 above that on the factor of improved understanding, the

analysis of the data revealed that 33.8% which is the majority consider business process

framework as to this factor to be of little importance while 21.3% also consider it as

important. 8.8% see it as very important with 13.8% considering it as unimportant. Also,

a majority of the respondents see it as very important to improving communication while

6.3% on the other hand see it as unimportant with 18.8% maintaining that it is moderately

important.

51
The table also reveals that 38.8% of the respondents view business process framework to

be of little importance to handling complexity while 7.5% see it as very important. 30%

also see it as moderately important and 18.8% see it as important. Also on the factor,

evaluate change impacts, 16.3% selected very important, 36.3%, important, 21.3%,

moderately important, 15%, of little importance and 11.3% unimportant.

A greater percentage of the staffs also indicated that business process framework is very

important to improving documentation and archiving while 6.5% maintained that it is

unimportant. 20% also saw it as very important while 12.5% saw it as unimportant to

improving supply chain and logistics management processes as shown the table 4.3

above.

The respondents cited some of the impact of business process management on the

operations of the company as;

It has made work easier by making working materials close to their user and

increased employees understanding of policies through interaction.

It has improved worker-management discipline

It has helped in planning ahead before the execution time

It has also helped to do right work at the right time and in the right way

Work force included in the planning schedule process

Work load has reduced

Production has improved

52
There has been work flexibility

Time Conscious

Workforce Conscious of work to be done daily

1.33 Suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of

Business Process Framework [BPF]

In the quest to find out the most suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of

business process management, the respondents were asked in an open ended format to

give suggestions on whether the implementation of the business process framework be

done wholly across the operations of the mine or on pilot basis. Some of the suggestions

elicited from the respondents have been given below:

Competent staffing and very good logistic are required in implementation of

business process management.

BPM should be tailored to suite the need of the department concern

There should be material delivery crew set up to send material directly to the

working ends.

The mining Planning Department should come out with realistic and reliable

plans/schedules to be executed that will ensure the company production targets

are achieved.

There is a need for the modification of error free system and the work

management system

53
Smooth implementation and management of the process must be part of each

managers KPL.(key performance indicators)

Monthly status reports and actions to mitigate deviations and non-compliance

must be presented by each Head of department (HOD) to the Managing Director (

MD)

One respondent concluded by indicating that, the processes are okay and less time is

used to access the current process. Hence, it is too early to rush and make amendments.

The current trends should therefore continue and be tested well before deciding on any

amendments or whatsoever.

Following from the suggestions of the respondents, it remains imperative that the current

business process management of Ashanti Goldfields be strengthened and assessed for

some period before management decides on the next line of action.

In addition to the above, the researcher sought the views of the respondents on what they

think should be the best approach [team or department based] in the alignment of

business process framework for Anglo Gold Ashanti. Common to the responses given by

the respondents have been illustrated in Figure 4.6 below.

54
Figure 4.6: what should be the best approach [team or department based] in the

alignment of business process framework for Anglo Gold Ashanti

As can be seen from Figure 4.6, majority of the respondents (47.5%) suggested that cost

reduction should be the best approach [team or department based] in the alignment of

business process framework for Anglo Gold Ashanti while 30% think its motivation. Also

32.5% cited improvement in communication, 23.8 cited involvement of workers in the

planning process while 11.3% cited increase in flow of materials for work execution as

the best approach [team or department based] in the alignment of business process

framework for Anglo Gold Ashanti.

Some of the respondents also cited the need for:

Increased productivity

Ensuring that right work is being done at a right time and in the right way.

55
Jobs should be planned, schedule, resourced before execution

Reduction in the work load

Reduction in the cost of maintenance

More time should be available to FLM to Concentrate on the Core business where

resources for the job is the accountability of a coordinator

More time for front line managers as Planning, Scheduling and Resourcing has

been re- assigned

Achievement of safety through job cards

1.34 Effectiveness or otherwise of the implemented

business process management system

On this objective, the respondents were asked to indicate whether there has been a true-

value-added of business process framework to total process cost of the company. In

answers given by the respondents to the question, made it difficult to ascertain if indeed

the implementation of business process management have had any true-value-added

impact on the process cost of the company. To quote some of the respondents in their own

words, some indicated for instance that:

It can be linked if it is planned well and merged together


At times the supplies give us problems by not having adequate resource materials.
We wait want for imported materials before executing jobs, so it makes us

reschedule our jobs most often.

56
These indicate real challenges in the business process management system which hinders

value addition prospects of the system.

The respondents were again asked the question what do you think are some of the

required modifications needed to enable the realization of the full potential of the

business process framework. Their responses include:

Improvement in coordinator

Logistic and competent staffing

Increase in managerial support from the top as expected

There should be clear publicized decision as to its continuation or otherwise

There should be commitment from management at all the operational functions to

ensure harmony

The researcher further sought the views of the respondents on some of the success stories

of the business process framework since its implementation in the company. Some of the

success stories cited by the respondents include:

It has improved Efficiency/Effectiveness in work execution.

It has eased access to materials/equipment

It has in some way reduced the cost and has change the culture of the employees

that is making us work as a team (ONE TEAM)

It has helped us treat each other with dignity and respect

57
It has helped to reduce total cost totally

Schedules are executed promptly by the required dates and it is systematic

approach to work executive. It ensures sustenance and continuous improvement.

There is reduction of cost due to the fact that breakdowns here seemed, reduced.

The respondents however could not give figures or other evidence to support their claims

as indicated above. Some even doubted whether the implementation of business process

management have actually led to cost reduction. They argued that the operational cost of

the company is the same like before. The only difference is that, in business process

framework, the work is planned, scheduled and resourced adequately before execution so

that workers will not be stuck in the process of executing their work due to lack of

materials.

1.35 Challenges associated with Business Process

Framework

Part of the questionnaire also touched on the challenges associated with the business

process management framework of the company. Among the challenges cited by the

respondents include:

People resistance to change

Illiteracy on the part of some of the workers

Inadequate computers

Lack of motivation and supports on the part of some team members

58
Poor management and frontline managers commitment

Late supply of material leading to rescheduling of work schedules

As part of the challenges of business process management of the company, the study

found that, some researchers believe that BPM does not help in aligning business process

and other operational functions mainly due to the lack of proper coordination.

Consequently the views of the respondents were sought with respect to this assertion.

Some of the responses of the respondents on the notion that BPM does not help in

aligning business process and other operational functions mainly due to the lack of proper

coordination have been quoted below.

Yes we experienced this gap immediately we start developing the work package

but it got better when we started developing the work package.


What I know is it is already in IT and integrating it is not going create any big

problem.

In the view of some of the respondents, this gap was identified before implementation.

Management of the company therefore identified the gap by way of computer literacy,

system knowledge, computer availability, work stations etc. And then, computer literacy

training, system training and know were organized before implementation.

59
Chapter 6 Summary Of Key Findings,

Recommendation And Conclusion

1.1 Key Findings

6.1.1 The impact of Business Process Framework, [BPF] on

mining operations

The study found 76.3% of the respondents were aware of business process framework as

a working system in their company while 57.5% described it as important with 16.3% of

them also pointing out that it is very important. Also, 41.3% of the respondents indicated

that they were very satisfied, 30% said its implementation is good, 15% were also

satisfied while the remaining 8.8% are very satisfied. A majority of the respondents

(46.3%) asserted that the implementation of the business process framework has

somewhat impacted the operation of the mine. 31.3% were of the view that it has

impacted the operation of the mine to a great extent.

6.1.2 Relevance of Business Process Management [BPF]

The data analysis revealed that, 66.3% of the respondents were of the view that, the

implementation of business process framework is of much relevance to the mining

companies and 36.3% also see it as very important and important to improving

communication while 43.8 see it as moderately important to improving communication.

The study reveals that 38.8% of the respondents view business process framework to be

60
of little importance to handling complexity while 30% also see it as moderately important

and 18.8% see it as important. However, 47.6% of the respondents were of the view that,

business process management is of little importance and unimportant in terms of

improving understanding. A greater percentage (72.6%) of the staffs also indicated that

business process framework is very important to improving documentation and archiving

47.5 saw it as unimportant to improving supply chain and logistics management

processes.

The respondents cited some of the impact of business process management on the

operations of the company as;

It has make work easier by making working materials close to their user and

increase employees understanding of policies through interaction.

It has improve worker-management discipline

It has helped in planning ahead before the execution time

It has also helped to do right work at the right time and in the right way

Work force included in the planning schedule process

Work hard has reduced

Production has improved

There has been work flexibility

Time Conscious

61
Workforce Conscious of work to be done daily

6.1.3 Suitable approach to adopt in the implementation of

Business Process Framework [BPF]

Some of the suggestions of the respondents with regards to the most suitable approach to

adopt in the implementation of business process management include:

Competent staffing and very good logistic are required in implementation of

business process management.

BPM should be tailored to suite the need of the department concern

There should be material delivery crew set up to send material directly to the

working ends.

The mining Planning Department should come out with realistic and reliable

plans/schedules to be executed that will ensure the company production targets

are achieved.

There is a need for the modification of error free system and the work

management system

Smooth implementation and management of the process must be part of each

manager KPI, (key performance indicators).

Monthly status reports and actions to mitigate deviations and non-compliance

must be presented by each Head of department (HOD) to the Managing Director

(MD)

62
The respondents again suggested that the best approach [team or department based] in the

alignment of business process framework for Anglo Gold Ashanti include:

Cost reduction
Motivation
Improvement in communication
Involvement of workers in the planning and decision making process
Increase in flow of materials for work execution

Increased productivity

Ensuring that right work is been done at a right time and in the right way.

Jobs should be planned, schedule, resourced before execution

Reduction in the word load

Reduction in the cost of maintenance

More time should be available to FLM to Concentrate on the Core business where

resources for the job is the accountability of a coordinator

More time for front line managers as Planning, Scheduling and Resourcing has

been re- assigned

Achievement of safety through job cards

63
6.1.4 Effectiveness or otherwise of the implemented business

process management system

The respondents doubted any true-value-added of business process framework to total

process cost of the company. Some of their comments include:

It can be linked if it is planned well and merged together


At times the supplies give us problems by not having adequate resource

materials.
We right want for imported materials before executing on jobs, so it makes us

reschedules our jobs most often

The respondents were of the view that some of the required modifications needed to

enable the realization of the full potential of the business process framework include:

Improvement in coordinator

Logistic and competent staffing

Increase in managerial support from the top as expected

There should be clear publicized decision as to its continuation or otherwise

There should be committed from management at all the operational functions to

ensure harmony

Some of the success stories in term of the implementation of business process

management cited by the respondents include:

It has improved Efficiency/Effectiveness in work execution.

It has ease access to materials/equipment

64
It has in some way reduced the cost has and change the culture of the employees

that is making us work as a team (ONE TEAM)

It has help us treat each other with dignity and respect

It has helped to reduce total cost totally

Schedules are executed promptly by the required dates and it is systematic

approach to work executive. It ensures sustenance and continuous improvement.

There is reduction of cost due to the fact that breakdowns here seemed, reduced.

6.1.5 Challenges associated with Business Process Framework

Among the challenges of bothering on the implementation of business process

management cited by the respondents include:

People resistance to change

Illiteracy s on the part of some of the workers

Inadequate computers

Lack of motivation and supports on the part of some team members

Poor management and frontline managers commitment


Late supply of material leading to rescheduling of work schedules

The study however found that, prior to the implementation of business process

management of the company, the management o the company had identified that, some

researchers believe that BPM does not help in aligning business process and other

65
operational functions mainly due to the lack of proper coordination. Consequently the

managers of the company identified the gap by way of computer literacy, system

knowledge, computer availability, workstations etc. And then, computer literacy training,

system training and know were organized before implementation.

1.36 Recommendations

The researcher recommends the following based on the findings of the study

1. Much effort must be put into ensuring that the business management process in

the mines assumes its fullest operation considering the extent of its importance to

the various mines.


2. Much importance must also be attached to the implementation of business

management process as this goes a long way to improve upon the operations of

the mines.
3. Staffs of the mines must be given adequate education on the business process

management so as to enhance their knowledge in the field as well as increase their

efficiency and productivity.

1.37 Conclusions

Business process management is of great importance to the mines and also has impacted

their operations to a great extent through the reduction of costs and increased

productivity. However there is high levels of dissatisfaction among the staffs of the mines

in relation to the implementation of the business management framework.

Business process management is also of much importance in application to various

factors at the mines including improved understanding, improved communication,

66
evaluating change impacts and improving documentation and archiving and this enhances

the operations of the mines to a great extent.

Tailoring business process management to suit the needs of the departments concerned,

implementation of realistic and reliable plans, provision of a material delivery crew as

well as availability of competent staffing and very good logistic are some of the suitable

approaches to be adopted by the mines in the implementation of the Business process

management in their operations

The implementation of business process management in the mines is fraught with various

challenges including high levels of illiteracy in relation to the process on the part of some

workers, inadequate computers, lack of motivation and support on the part of some team

members, poor management as well as the late supply of materials leading to

rescheduling of work schedules which militate against the smooth operation of the

process in the mines.

67
Chapter 7 References

Adam, S., & Doerr, J. (2009), How to better align BPM & SOA Ideas on improving the

transition between process design and deployment.

Alby, F. (2010). Methods of collecting data: interviews and questionnaires in practice.

European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project

Antunes, P., & Mouro, H. (2010), Resilient Business Process Management: Framework

and services. Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier

Behara, G. K. (2006, May). BPM and SOA: A Strategic Alliance BP Trends

Bryman, A. (2004). Quantityandqualityinsocialresearch(2nd ed.). London:Routledge.

Burney, M. P. (2008). Inductive & Deductive Research Approach, Department of

Computer Science, University of Karachi

Casebeer, A. L., and M. J. Verhoef. (1997). Combining qualitative and quantitative

research methods: Considering the possibilities for enhancing the study of chronic

diseases. Chronic Diseases in Canada 18:130-5.

Cho, C., & Lee, S. (2010). A study on process evaluation and selection model for

business process management, Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier

Davenport, T. H. (2005, June). The Coming Commoditization of Processes, Harvard

Business Review

Easterby-Smith, M, Thorpe, R and Lowe, A (1991), Management Research: An

Introduction, Sage Publications, London

Edvardsen, B., Tomasson,B. & Ovretveit, J. (1994). Ouality of Service: Making it Really

Work. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

68
Edvardsen, B., Tomasson,B. & Ovretveit, J. (1994). Ouality of Service: Making it Really

Work. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Garimella, K., Lees, M., & Williams, B. (2008), BPM Basics for Dummies, Wiley

Publishing, Inc

Gartner (2010), "Leading in Times of Transition: The 2010 CIO Agenda", available at:

http://drishtikone.com/files/2010CIOAgenda_ExecSummary.pdf (accessed 2010-

06-04).

Haapaniemi. (1998). Process Excellence Handbook, Andersen Consulting

Hammer, M. (2001, June). The Process enterprise: An executive perspective. Hammer

And Company

Hammer, M. & Stanton. (1999, November), How Process Enterprises Really Work,

Harvard Business Review

Havey, M. (2005). Prescription For A Good BPM Architecture.

Hiemstra, A., Ravesteyn, P., & Versendaal, J. (2010). An alignment model for business

process management and service oriented architecture. HU University of Applied

Science, Utrecht University

Hiemstra, A., Ravesteyn, P., & Versendaal, J. (2011), An alignment model for business

process management and service oriented architecture. From BPM and SOA

Alignment Maturity Model: http://www.slideshare.net/ahiemstr/bpm-and-

soa-alignment model

Hill, J. B. (2007, February 9). BPM Institute.org, Retrieved March 4 2011 from BPM

Institute.org: http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/bpm-is-not--

the-same-as-bpr.html

69
Huang, Z.,W.M.P.,v.d.,Lu,X.,& Duan, H. (2010). Reinforcement learning based resource

allocation in business process management. Data & Knowledge Engineering,

Elsevier

Johannessen, A., Kristoffersen, L., and Tufte, R. A., (2004), Forskningsmetode for

nd
konomiskadministrativefag,2 edition, Abstrakt forlag as.

Johannessen, A., Olaisen, J. and Olsen, B., (1999), How can Europe compete in the 21st

century? InternationalJournalofInformationManagement, Vol. 19, pp. 263-275.

Ko, R. (2009). A Computer Scientists Introductory Guide to Business Process

Management (BPM). Crossroads, Vol 12, No. 4

Ko, R. K., Lee, S. S., & Lee, E. W. (2009). Business Process Management (BPM)

Standards: A survey Business Process Management Emerald, pp 744-791

Larson, E., & Larson, R. (2011). BPM.com- The Resource for Business Process

Management. From BPM: An Analytical Perspective.

Lusk, S. (2007). BPM Institute.org. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from BPM Institute.org:

http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/the--process--life--cycle--

and--project--life--cycle--partnership.html

McDaniel, C. & Gates, R. (1996). ContemporaryMarketingResearch. West Publishing.

Merrifield, R., Calhoun, J., & Stevens, D. (2008, June). The Next Revolution in

Productivity, Harvard Business Review

Miers, D. (2006). Best Practice: BPM, Workflow Systems

70
Muehlen, M., & Recker, J. (2011). Business Process Management, From Process

Discovery on a Rainy Day: http://www.bpm.com/asking--the--wrong--

questions--process--discovery--on--a--rainy--day.html

Neubauer, T., & Stummer, C. (2007). Extending Business Process Management to

Determine Efficient IT Investments

Neuman, W.L.(2003). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative

Approaches. Boston. Pearson Education Inc.

Noel, J. (2005). BPM and SOA: Better Together. IBM Corporation

Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in

Qualitative Research.

Owen, M., & Raj, J. (2003). BPMN and Business Process Management: Introduction to

the New Business Process Modeling Standard. Popkin Software.

Porter, M. (1996). What is Strategy? Business Harvard Review

Pritchard, J.P., & Armistead, C. (1999). Business Process Management Lessons from

European business. Business Process Management Journal

Pulier, E., & Taylor, H. (2006). Understanding Enterprise SOA. Manning Publications

Co.

Ramachandran, R. (2004). Business Process Management: A Balance Between Process

Efficiency & Business Agility

Ravesteyn, P.,& Batenburg, R.(2010). Surveying the Critical Success Factors of BPM

Systems Implementation. Business Process Management Journal

Robson, C. (1993) Real World research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner

researcher, Oxford: Blackwell

71
Rosa, E. (2010). BPM and SOA: Taking Care of the Perfect Match to Work in Real Life.

Rosemann, M., & Bruin, T. D. (2009). Towards a Business Process Management

Maturity Model. Queensland University of Technology

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2000) Research Methods for business students

nd
(2 ed.), Essex: Pearson Educations.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., (2000) ResearchMethodsforBusinessStudents

SecondEdition,UK, Financial Times, Prentice Hall

Saunders, M., Thornhill, A. (2003) Organizational justice, trust and the management of

change an exploration, Personnel Review Vol.32,No.3, pp.360-375

Trochim, W. M. K (2006): Non probability sampling, web center for social research

methods URL: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/sampnon.php [accessed

th
17 May 2009]

Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2005). From Process Logic to Business Logic A Cognitive

Approach to Business Process Management, Elsevier

nd
Yin, R.K. (1994) Case study Research-Design and Methods (2 ed.), Thousand Oaks,

CA: sage publications.

Zikmund, W.G., (2000), Business research methods, sixth edition, Harcourt, Inc. 6277

Sea Harbor Drive, Olando, FL.

th
Zikmund,W.G.(2000) Business research Methods (3 ed.),fort worth: Harcourt College

Publishers.

72
[osmanvgm @yahoo.com]

73

Вам также может понравиться