Capitalism Is the Problem http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/39011-capitalism-is-the-problem?tm...

Capitalism Is the Problem

Saturday, January 07, 2017
By Richard D. Wolff (/author/itemlist/user/44661), Truthout | News Analysis

Employees assemble synthesizers at Moog Music's production facility in downtown Asheville, North
Carolina, June 9, 2015. Moog's new employee-ownership arrangement is more than just happy news for
workers; it's a victory for the small company, whose financial success has not always matched its vast
cultural impact. (Photo: Susannah Kay / The New York Times)

Over the last century, capitalism has repeatedly revealed its worst tendencies:
instability and inequality. Instances of instability include the Great Depression
(1929-1941) and the Great Recession since 2008, plus eleven "downturns" in the US
between those two global collapses. Each time, millions lost jobs, misery soared,
poverty worsened and massive resources were wasted. Leaders promised that their
"reforms" would prevent such instability from recurring. Those promises were not
kept. Reforms did not work or did not endure. The system was, and remains, the
problem.
Inequality likewise proved to be an inherent trend of capitalism. Only occasionally
and temporarily did opposition from its victims stop or reverse it. Income and wealth
inequalities have worsened in almost every capitalist country since at least the 1970s.
Today we have returned to the huge 19th-century-sized gaps between the richest 1
percent and everyone else. Rescuing the "disappearing middle class" has become
every aspiring politician's slogan. Extreme inequality infects all of society as
corporations and the rich, to protect their positions, buy the politicians, mass media
and other cultural forms that are for sale.

1 de 5 19-01-2017 12:39
Capitalism Is the Problem http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/39011-capitalism-is-the-problem?tm...
Recent Crises in the History of Capitalism
Capitalism in Western Europe, North America and Japan -- its original centers -- has
boosted profits in four basic ways since the 1970s. First, it computerized and
robotized, not to lessen everyone's work time, but instead to raise profits by reducing
payrolls. Second, it exploited low-wage immigrant labor to offset wage increases won
by years of labor struggles. Third, it moved production to lower-wage countries such
as China, India, Brazil and others. Fourth, it divided and weakened the labor unions,
political party groups and other organizations that pursued labor's interests. As a
result, inside nearly every country of the global capitalist system, the rich-poor divide
deepened.
The Great Depression provoked economic "reforms," such as FDR's New Deal. These
included regulations restricting risky bank and other market practices. Reforming
governments also established public pensions, unemployment insurance, public
employment systems, minimum wages, monetary and fiscal policies, and so on.
Advocates believed that such reforms would end the 1930s depression and prevent
future depressions. They dismissed critics who diagnosed depressions as systemic
and prescribed system change (or "revolution") as the necessary solution. "Reform
versus revolution" was then a hot debate.
In the US, the reformers defeated the revolutionaries as preparation for war -- and
then war itself -- finally ended the Great Depression. As capitalism rebounded after
1945, capitalists increasingly evaded the Depression-era reforms, using their growing
wealth to buy the political influence needed to gut many reforms. Later, Reagan led
the frontal assault, repackaged as "globalization" and "neoliberalism" to undo the
New Deal. When that rollback of reforms culminated in the 2008 crash, it exposed
capitalism's instability and inequality yet again.
The continuing post-2008 economic crisis has reproduced both the kinds of
suffering that happened after 1929 and the reform-versus-revolution debates. The
difference this time is that we know what happened last time. While the reformers
then defeated the revolutionaries, their reforms failed to prevent the continuation of
capitalism's instability and inequality, and their harmful social effects. Reformism
today advocates the same (or a slightly varied) set of reforms as last time. It thus
represents a refusal to learn from our history. The revolutionary alternative now
makes more sense. "Revolutionary," however, need not evoke romantic notions of
storming barricades: Today, revolutionary refers to the recognition that system
change, not another reform, is our primary task.
What System Change Requires
What differentiates system change from reforms? Reforms refer to government
interventions that still leave employers in the exclusive position to make the basic
enterprise decisions: what, how and where to produce and what to do with profits.
Reforms include minimum wage laws, redistributive tax structures, and enterprises
2 de 5 19-01-2017 12:39
Capitalism Is the Problem http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/39011-capitalism-is-the-problem?tm...
owned and operated by the government. They range from the mildly Keynesian (the
New Deal) to the democratic socialist (what we see in Scandinavian countries) to the
state socialist (the model of the USSR and People's Republic of China). All such
reforms retain the core relationship inside enterprises as that of employer-employee,
with private or public directors controlling the mass of workers and making the basic
enterprise decisions.
In contrast, system change means reorganizing the core human relationship inside
the factories, offices and stores of an economy. That relationship connects all who
participate in production and distribution of goods and services. It shapes (1) who
produces what, how and where; (2) how much surplus or profits are available; and
(3) the disposition of the surplus or profits.
Truly moving beyond capitalism means breaking from the employer-employee core
relationship. It means no longer assigning a relatively tiny number of people inside
each enterprise to the employer position of exclusively making the sorts of decisions
outlined above. In private corporations the employers are the boards of directors
selected by the major shareholders. In state or public enterprises of the traditional
socialist economies, the employers are state officials. Instead of either kind of
employer-employee relationship, system change installs a different core relationship
inside enterprises. A different group of people -- all workers in the factory, office or
store -- democratically makes those same decisions. The rule is "one worker, one
vote," and in general, the majority decides. The difference between employer and
employee dissolves.
Such system change beyond capitalism means something quite different from
shifting to public directors from private directors, which is a reform. System change
entails the democratization of the workplace. The logic governing the economic
system, then, would no longer be capital-centric (making decisions (1) through (3) in
such a particular way that the capitalist employer-employee relationship in
production is reproduced). The particular connecting relationship at the core of
capitalism will have been superseded: rather like what happened earlier to the slave-
centric core relationship (master-slave) and the feudal-centric core relationship
(lord-serf). Instead, the post-capitalist core relationship will be democratically
worker-centric, with the central type of workplace being the worker cooperative.
Among the goals driving an economy based on democratic worker coops, job
security, quality of workers' lives and reproduction of the worker coop core
relationship in production will weigh more heavily than enterprise profits. Because
different people will be making the key enterprise decisions and because those
people will be driven by different goals, the post-capitalist society will develop very
differently from the capitalist. Democratic worker coops will likely (1) not relocate
themselves overseas, (2) distribute incomes far less unequally than capitalist
enterprise, (3) not install ecologically damaging technologies near where their
families and neighbors reside, and so on.
3 de 5 19-01-2017 12:39
Capitalism Is the Problem http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/39011-capitalism-is-the-problem?tm...
Responding to reductions in demands for their outputs, worker coops will more
likely stress sharing any reduced work hours among all workers rather than forcing a
few into unemployment. The needless social irrationality of capitalist downturns --
when unemployed workers coexist with unutilized means of production to leave
social needs unmet -- will be much more apparent and thus widely unacceptable.
In an economy built on worker coops, children, retired people, people living with
disabilities or illness and others outside the labor force would be sustained from the
worker coops' "surplus." The latter comprises what the coop labor force produces
above and beyond what it consumes and requires to replace used-up means of
production. Adults in and out of the coop labor force would together and
democratically determine the sizes and recipients of all the distributions of the
surplus. They would decide how much of the surplus would go to expanding
production, to provisions for future contingencies, to providing for children, for
those in other social institutions, and so on. In place of capitalists (a social minority)
distributing the surpluses produced by and appropriated from their employees, a
genuine democracy would govern that distribution, much as it governs other worker
coop decisions.

Worker coops mark a qualitative and quantitative advance beyond capitalism. They
represent a system change adequate to key problems capitalism has shown it cannot
overcome, even after centuries of failed efforts to do so.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission
(mailto:editor@truthout.org).

RICHARD D. WOLFF (/AUTHOR/ITEMLIST/USER/44661)

Richard D. Wolff is professor of economics emeritus at the University of Massachusetts,

Amherst, where he taught economics from 1973 to 2008. He is currently a visiting professor
in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University, New York
City. He also teaches classes regularly at the Brecht Forum in Manhattan. Earlier he taught
economics at Yale University (1967-1969) and at the City College of the City University of
New York (1969-1973). In 1994, he was a visiting professor of economics at the University
of Paris (France), I (Sorbonne). His work is available at rdwolff.com (http://rdwolff.com/)
and at democracyatwork.info (http://democracyatwork.info/).
RELATED STORIES

Cooperatives Over Corporations (/opinion/item/6862-cooperatives-over-corporations)

By Jim Hightower, Truthout (http://truth-out.org) | Op-Ed
Workers' Comp Industrial Complex: The Middlemen Silencing Injured Workers (/news
/item/34263-workers-comp-industrial-complex-the-middlemen-silencing-injured-
workers)
By Michael Grabell, ProPublica (https://www.propublica.org/article/workers-comp-conferences-expos-and-middlemen) |
Report
Workers' Control in the Crisis of Capitalism (/news/item/37442-workers-control-in-the-
4 de 5 19-01-2017 12:39
Capitalism Is the Problem http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/39011-capitalism-is-the-problem?tm...
crisis-of-capitalism)
By Dario Azzellini, ROAR Magazine (https://roarmag.org/magazine/workers-control-in-the-crisis-of-capitalism/) | News
Analysis

Show Comments

5 de 5 19-01-2017 12:39