Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Individual students will be expected to make presentations and lead group discussion in
seminars during the first part of the course. Students will complete two short assignments
one during each term related to exercises applying material discussed in class. There
will be a three-hour test during the December exam period.
Students will prepare a Placement Agreement and Ethical Review Form in the first term
in preparation for their placement in the second term. In pairs or groups of no more than
three, students will do an evaluation of a project implemented by a local organization. It
will thus be a joint effort in which students will negotiate with the clients the terms of
reference for the assessment, design the research, conduct the data gathering, prepare the
results and write the final report. The report is to be no longer than 35 pages at 1.5
spacing (excluding references and appendices), beyond which I will not mark.
The design, implementation and report of the evaluation must be carried out within the
terms that apply to the guidelines for research on human subjects; each design must
receive approval by the IDS Program Ethics Committee. The completed Application for
Research on Human Subjects should be submitted to the Instructor by the last week
of the first term, and any revisions must be completed by first week of the Winter
Term at the latest.
Presentation ...10%
Participation ...10%
Exercises (2) ......5%, 5%
Test 25%
Placement agreement, ethical review ....5%
Evaluation Assignment ......40%
-Mark is to approximately broken down as follows:
Design .5%
Data Collection and Analysis..20%
Final Report and Reporting to Clients
and Community...15%
Please see the Trent University academic calendar for University Diary dates, Academic
Information and Regulations, and University and departmental degree requirements.
Last date to withdraw from Fall-Winter term full courses without academic penalty in
2012-13 is February 7, 2012.
Required and recommended readings not available through the librarys electronic
resources will be available to students through the Bata Library reserve system.
Begin reading Patton, M., 1990, Chapter 6, Fieldwork Strategies and Observation
Methods (especially 199-213, 224-238, 250-274), in Qualitative Evaluation and
Research Methods, 2nd Ed., Sage.
B. L. Berg, 2001. Focus Group Interviewing, in Qualitative Research Methods for the
Social Sciences. Allyn and Bacon, pp. 111-130
Paul Nichols, 2002, Choosing the sample, in Social Survey Methods: A Fieldguide for
Development Workers, Oxfam, pp. 50-72
Geoffrey Cameron and Rachel Yordy, 2006, Making Progress? A Case Study of the
WUSC Plantation Communities Project in Sri Lanka.
CIDA, 2004, CIDA Evaluation Guide
Morris, Lynn Lyons et al. 1987. How to Communicate Evaluation Findings, Newbury
Park: Sage, pp. 7-45, 77-89.
Boulmetis, John and Phyllis Dutwin, 2005, Evaluation as a Business in The ABCs of
Evaluation: Timeless Techniques for Program and Project Managers, Jossey-
Bass, 167-185
B. TOPICS AND READINGS (continued) - WINTER TERM
(Dates subject to change upon majority class decision)
We plan to leave from the Sadlier House at 5 pm on Wednesday afternoon, and return to
Peterborough Friday night at around 9 pm. See above for details.
PLACEMENTS:
We will reconvene as a class for three hours, in order to take the opportunity to discuss
your respective placements as a group. Each pair will conduct a 10 to 15 minute
presentation on the progress made in the placement relative to your placement agreement,
after which we will have a general discussion in order to troubleshoot any problems and
highlight common issues. The focus on this session will be on methodological decisions
in your placements in order to complete your projects most effectively.
This will be our last class, and will run an hour longer than the normally scheduled time.
Each pair will present the key findings and recommendations for of their evaluation. You
may see this both as an opportunity to receive any feedback before you submit your
report, as well as a practice run of your final oral presentation to your host organization.
I will determine the final grade for the report based on this draft. I will also provide
detailed commentary, suggestions, and corrections, which you will need to consider and
incorporate in preparing the final version of the report that will be presented to host
organization. You will need to make three copies of this final, revised report for each of
the three stakeholders the host organization, TCCBE, and myself.
Although I will have determined your final grade for the course, I will not submit
these grades to the Registrars Office until I receive the final, revised version of your
report.
University Undergraduate Degree Learning Expectations
The course
1. Building upon the broad conceptual and empirical foundations of earlier core courses,
IDST 4220Y engenders a focused and critical understanding of the normative bases and
methodological implications of different approaches to assessment and evaluation. This is
the heart of the course. The approach taken is that methods are not merely instruments to
be randomly deployed, but tools for producing very specific kinds of raw data required to
address a conceptual research question, tools that thus need to be custom designed to this
purpose. Students are presented with different research strategies, and the kinds of
epistemologies that underpin them. Challenges arising in the course of a particular
research project are viewed as methodological problems to be dealt with in a principled
way, according to ones starting assumptions about how to best to conduct research.
2. Provides students with a strong foundation in the techniques and methods required in
assessments or evaluations. Students are instructed in practical topics such as: negotiating
terms of reference and ethical standards with evaluation stakeholders and independent
regulatory bodies; data-gathering techniques such as interviews, questionnaires, focus
groups; forms of qualitative and quantitative data collation and synthesis; and how best to
present results.
3. Provides students with opportunities and exposure to actual evaluation studies by: a)
studying evaluation programs implemented by governmental and non-governmental
organizations; b) hosting or visiting development consultants and agencies, and c)
undertaking to conduct an exercise in the evaluation of an organization. This final
component consists of a evaluation placement throughout the second term, and is the
culmination of the course. It enables students to apply what was learned during the first
term in a real world setting.
b. Knowledge of methodologies
Students are presented with a range of advanced methodologies through lectures and
required and recommended readings. Methodology is defined not only as the application
of methods, but as a normative rationale for their use in a sustained research strategy.
Students are required to team up to develop a viable research question on a topic of their
choice, and to develop research instruments consisting of interviews and questionnaires
to address this question. This in turn prepares them for their evaluation placement in the
second term.
c. Application of knowledge
During their 12 week field placement in the second term, students apply the methods
learned in the first term by carrying out an evaluation of a project or program within an
organization in Peterborough, Haliburton, or City of the Kawartha Lakes. This requires
completing a Placement Agreement with their host organization, in which they negotiate
a research plan and terms of reference for their placement. They also go through an
Ethical Review process at Trent.
d. Communication skills
By conducting presentations on assigned reading material and on their research progress
and results (including to the host organization and at the Community Innovation Forum:
Knowledge in Action event), students are able to develop their oral communications
skills. Students prepare a lengthy final report that presents their findings, analyses, and
recommendations in a manner sensitive to the needs of the host organization, and to the
context within which the report will be put to use.