Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
References
Figure 4: Mean + SEM for Q4 students who attended LAHHH before midterm 1
Analysis of the charts in Figure 1 shows that but did not attend after midterm 1.
Midterm 1 (adj) score = Midterm 2avg = 1.03*Midterm 1avg score
LAHHH attendance was similar for students n=7, t-test probability, two-tailed, matched pairs t-value = 3.713, p-value = 0.0099.
from each quartile, and that each GPA quartile 1.Coletta, Vincent P., and Jeffrey A. Phillips. "Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain,
was represented fairly evenly throughout the Investigating the performance of Q4 students further provided some additional insight preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability." American Journal of Physics 73.12
term. into LAHHH effects on student performance. Based on Figure 4, Q4 students who (2005): 1172-1182.
previously attended LAHHH before midterm 1, but stopped attending LAHHH after 2.Otero, Valerie, Steven Pollock, and Noah Finkelstein. "A physics departments role in preparing
midterm 1, showed about an 8-10% drop on average in midterm 2 scores, another physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model." American Journal of Physics 78.11
statistically significant find. These results seem to indicate that continued attendance (2010): 1218-1224.
Figure 1: LAHHH attendance breakdown by aided in providing stability to exam scores from midterm 1 to midterm 2, whereas 3.Van Dusen, Ben, Laurie Langdon, and Valerie Otero. "Learning Assistant Supported Student
quartiles: Q1 represents students who were in decreases in attendance were strongly associated with a significant drop in exam score Outcomes (LASSO) study initial findings." arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.05358 (2015).
the top quartile in terms of cumulative GPA
prior to entering fall term. averages