0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
877 просмотров5 страниц
1. Central ordered typewriters from Borden but received Remington typewriters instead, which are of superior quality. Central informed Ace it would bill only for the Borden price but Ace refused the Remington typewriters.
2. D owes multiple debts to C at different due dates. C assigned the right to collect from D to T without informing D. On the date the largest debt is due, T seeks to collect the full amount from D.
3. D and C owe each other debts of equal amounts for rice but in different locations. Transport costs differ so it is unclear if debts compensate each other fully.
1. Central ordered typewriters from Borden but received Remington typewriters instead, which are of superior quality. Central informed Ace it would bill only for the Borden price but Ace refused the Remington typewriters.
2. D owes multiple debts to C at different due dates. C assigned the right to collect from D to T without informing D. On the date the largest debt is due, T seeks to collect the full amount from D.
3. D and C owe each other debts of equal amounts for rice but in different locations. Transport costs differ so it is unclear if debts compensate each other fully.
1. Central ordered typewriters from Borden but received Remington typewriters instead, which are of superior quality. Central informed Ace it would bill only for the Borden price but Ace refused the Remington typewriters.
2. D owes multiple debts to C at different due dates. C assigned the right to collect from D to T without informing D. On the date the largest debt is due, T seeks to collect the full amount from D.
3. D and C owe each other debts of equal amounts for rice but in different locations. Transport costs differ so it is unclear if debts compensate each other fully.
Choose the best answer. 6. On January 1, 2010, D obtained a
1. D owes C P20, 000.00 due on loan of P100, 000.00 from C. The March 15. C, on the other hand, loan is secured by a chattel owes D the following debts: P8, mortgage on Ds car and is payable 000.00 due on March 1; P3, 000.00 on December 31, 2010. On due on March 8; P5, 000.00 due on September 26, 2010, the car was March 14. On March 12, C assigned taken at gunpoint from D while he his right to T with notice to D but was starting its engine at the with D not giving his consent to the parking lot of a department store. assignment. On March 15, T can a. Ds loan is extinguished. collect from D: However, D must give a a. P20, 000.00 property which C may sell to b. P9, 000.00 satisfy his claim. c. P4, 000.00 b. Ds loan is subsists. However, C d. None, because the assignment may demand its immediate made by C was without the payment unless D gives consent of D. another security. Items 9, 10 and 11 are based on the c. Ds loan obligation subsists. following information: However, C may not demand A and B are indebted to X and Y for immediate payment since the P10, 000.00. A and B share in the loss of the security was without debt in the ratio of 1:3; while X and the fault of D. D, moreover is Y share in the credit in the ratio not required to give a new 2:3. security. 2. How much may X collect from A if d. Ds loan obligation is the debtors are joint debtors while extinguished together with the the creditors are joint creditors? mortgage since the loss of the a. P10, 000.00. car was without the fault of D. b. P2, 500.00. 7. Salas and Bersamin entered into a c. P4, 000.00. contract whereby Salas would d. P1, 000.00. deliver 5 pieces of genuine Rolex 3. How much may X collect from A if wristwatches to Bersamin. Salas there is active solidarity? proposed to Bersamin that should a. P10, 000.00. Salas deliver 5 units of fake pieces b. P2, 500.00. of Rolex wristwatches by reason of c. P4, 000.00. financial difficulties on his part, d. P1, 000.00. Bersamin would not sue him for 4. How much may X collect from A if damages on the ground of fraud. there is passive solidarity? Bersamin accepted the proposal. a. P10, 000.00. On due date, Salas delivered 5 b. P2, 500.00. pieces of fake Rolex wristwatches. c. P4, 000.00. Upon discovery of the fraud, d. P1, 000.00. Bersamin sues Salas for damages. 5. D owes C the following debts: P3, Salas contends that he cannot be 000.00 due on August 10; P3, held liable for damages because 000.00 due on August 15; P3, Bersamin waived his right to hold 000.00 due on August 20; and him (Salas) liable on the ground of P3,000.00 due on August 25 which fraud if the reason thereof is the is secured by a pledge of Ds ring. financial difficulties of Salas If today is August 22, and D pays C a. Bersamin cannot sue Salas for P3,000.00 with neither D nor C damages because the reason designating the debt to which the for the waiver is valid, i.e., payment shall apply, the payment financial difficulties of Salas, shall be applied: which is a valid reason for the a. To the debt due on August 10, waiver. following the first-due, first- b. Bersamin can sue Salas for the pay basis. annulment of the contract since b. To the debts due on August 10, it is voidable. August 15, and August 20, c. Bersamin can sue Salas for proportionately at P1, 000.00 damages because the waiver each. he made is void. Nonetheless, c. To the debt due on August 25, the contract is valid. since it is the most onerous to d. Bersamin can sue Salas for the D. rescission of the contract since d. To all the debts proportionately it is rescissible. at P750.00 each. 8. The following are obligations with a informed Ace that will bill the latter term or period, except for the Remington typewriters at a. D to give C P50, 000.00 on P8, 000.00 only. Ace refused to December 1, 2011. accept the Remington b. D to give C P50, 000.00 on typewriters. Christmas day next year. a. Central can compel Ace to c. D to give C P50, 000.00 upon accept the Remington the death of Cs father. typewriters since they are of d. D to give C P50, 000.00 if Cs superior quality. father dies within 2 years. b. Central cannot compel Ace to 9. A, B and C are liable in solidum to X accept the Remington for P12, 000.00. X renounced the typewriters although they are of share of A who accepted it. Later, B superior quality. becomes insolvent. c. Central can compel Ace to a. X can collect from C P8, 000.00. accept the Remington b. X can collect from C P4, 000.00. typewriters since Ace is c. X can collect from C P12, required to pay only the price of 000.00. Borden typewriters. d. X can collect nothing from C. d. Central can compel Ace to 10. On May 31, 2009, D promised to accept the Remington give a specific horse and lot to C if typewriters since all that is C passes the Bar Examination. On required of Central is to deliver September 24, 2009, C took the a typewriter that can perform Bar Examination. The result of the the same function as the one Bar Examination which C took was ordered. released on March 26, 2010 and C 13. D owes C P20, 000.00 due on passed it. C shall be entitled to the March 25. C, on the other hand, house and lot: owes D the following debts: P8, a. on May 31, 2009 000.00 due on March 1; P3, 000.00 b. on September 24, 2009 due on March 8; P5, 000.00 due on c. on March 26, 2010 March 14; and P2, 000.00 due on d. when he receives his rating March 24. On March 18, C assigned 11. D has a grains in Davao, while C his credit right to T without has a grains warehouse in Cebu. D informing D who learned of the borrowed 10 sacks of rice worth assignment on March 20. On March P10, 000.00 from C for Ds 25, T may collect from D: customer in Cebu. Later, C a. P20, 000.00 borrowed 10 sacks of rice which b. P2, 000.00 was also worth P10, 000.00 from D c. P4, 000.00 for Cs customer in Davao. Both the d. None, because the assignment obligations are already due. made by C was without the Transport costs to Davao amount to knowledge of D. P1, 000.00, while those for Cebu 14. D owes C the following debts: P5, amount to P800.00. 000.00 due on January 1; P7, a. D and C need not pay each 000.00 on January 5; P8, 000.00 other since their debts due on January 10; P10, 000.00 compensated each other. due on January 15; and P5, 000.00 b. D and C need not pay each due on January 20. By agreement other since their debts of the parties, D was given the compensated each other, benefit of the period. As of January except for the delivery charges 17, D has not paid any of the which C must pay to D in the debts. He has P5, 000.00 which he amount of P200.00 (P1, 000.00 wants to remit to C. less P800.00). a. D may apply the payment to c. Compensation cannot take any of the five debts. place because the debts are b. D may apply the payment to payable at different places. any of the four debts that have d. D must pay C P10, 800.00 while become due as of January 17. C must pay D P11, 000.00. c. D may apply the payment 12. Ace Realty Company (Ace) ordered either to the debt due on 6 units of Borden typewriters from January 1 or January 20. Central Office Machines (Central) at d. D may apply the payment only the price of P8, 000.00 per unit. to the debt due on January 1. However, Central delivered to Ace 15. Refer to the preceding number. 6 units of Remington typewriters, Assume that D did not designate a superior brand, which was priced the debt to which the payment at P8, 500.00 per unit. Central shall apply. In this case: a. C may apply the payment to monetary obligation to pay the any of the five debts. value of the horse plus b. C may apply the payment to damages. any of the four debts that have d. If the debtors default in their become due as of January 17. obligation because C is c. C may apply the payment insolvent, A and B will be liable either to the debt due on for Cs share of the obligation. January 1 or January 20 only 19. S, a supplier of fresh fish from since the amount of the Lucena City, hired T, the owner of a payment is the same as the trucking company, for a fee of P3, amount of each debt. 000.00 to bring the fish catch of S d. C may apply the payment to to the Dampa Market in Paraaque the debt due on January 1 only. City which ordered the fish for a 16. Refer to No. 16. Assume the price of P20, 000.00. In so far as S creditor did not also designate the is concerned, his prestation in his debt to which the payment shall contract with T is: apply. In such a case: a. The sale of the fish. a. Payment shall be applied b. The transport of the fish. proportionately to the five c. The payment of P3, 000.00. debts. d. The payment of P20, 000.00. b. Payments shall be applied 20. Refer to the preceding number. In proportionately to the four the contract between S and T: debts that have become due as a. S is the obligor and T is the of January 17. obligee. c. Payment shall be applied only b. S is the obligee and T is the to the debt due on January 1 obligor. since it is the first that has c. Both S and T are obligors and become due. obligees of each other. d. Payment shall be applied d. The Dampa Market is the proportionately to the debt due obligee of both S and T. on January 1 and January 20 21. Which of the following is a since the amount of each debt characteristic of expromision but is of the same amount as the not of delegacion? payment. a. It is made with or without the consent of the debtor. 17. A, B and C are solidary debtors of X b. The third person who makes in the amount of P3, 000.00. X the payment to the creditor renounces the share of A and A is always entitled to accepts the renunciation. subrogation. Thereafter, B becomes insolvent. c. In case of insolvency of the Ultimately: new debtor, the creditor a. C alone will shoulder the may still be recover from balance of P2, 000.00. the original under certain b. A will shoulder P500.00 while C circumstances. will shoulder P1, 500.00. d. It is initiated by the debtor c. C will shoulder only his share of himself. P1, 000.00. A will no longer 22. D borrowed P50,000 from C. on due shoulder any amount since his date, D did not have any money to share was already renounced pay the debt so he proposed to C by X. that the latter accept a d. A will shoulder P1, 000.00, Technomarine watch to settle the while C will shoulder P1, debt. C accepted the proposal and 000.00, for the remaining received the watch. Immediately balance of P2, 000.00. after receiving the watch, C sold it 18. A, B and C are obliged to deliver a to B. Ds obligation to give P50,000 specific horse to X, Y, and Z. to C is extinguished by: a. A demand made by X against A, a. Payment by cession. B and C is a valid demand b. Barter against all the debtors. c. Dacion en pago b. A demand made by X, Y and Z d. Sale against A is a valid demand 23. Evaluate the following statements: against all the debtors. I. One peso, P5 and P10 coins c. If a valid demand is made are legal tender up to P100. against all the debtors but II. One centavo, P.05, P.10 and debtor C cannot comply with P.25 centavo coins are valid his part of the obligation, the tender up to P1,000. obligation is converted into a a. Only statement I is correct. b. Only statement II is correct. a. The original obligation of D is c. Both statements are correct. an obligation with a period. d. Neither statement is b. The original obligation of D is correct. extinguished by novation. 24. A, an agent of P, owes B P20,000. c. The right to choose the item to B, on the other hand, owes P, be given belongs to C. P20,000. Both debts are due. d. The new obligation is an a. P may claim legal alternative obligation. compensation. 29. D borrowed P50 000 from C. The b. A may claim legal debt, which is payable within one compensation. year, is secured by a mortgage that c. B may claim legal D constituted on his lot. The compensation. mortgage is recorded in the d. Neither P, A nor B may Registry of Property. C dies before claim legal compensation. the due date of the debt and was 25. I. a stipulation that an obligation not able to collect any amount of shall be paid in a currency other his loan receivable from D. he was than the Philippine legal tender is survived by S, his only son and void. heir. D, taking advantage of the II. A cashiers check is as good as situation, sold the lot to T who was cash, hence, it is legal tender. not aware of the mortgage a. Only statement I is correct. constituted thereon. b. Only statement II is correct. a. The mortgage is not binding on c. Both statements are correct. T since he was not aware of it d. Neither statement is at the time he bought the lot. correct. b. S, the son of C, has the right to 26. A, B, and C are solidary debtors of collect the amount of the note X in the amount of P30 000. C was from D and foreclose the insane at the time the obligation mortgage if the D cannot pay. was constituted. c. The mortgage is not binding on a. X may possibly collect from A T since D was in bad faith the amount of P30 000. when he sold the lot to T. b. X may possibly collect from A d. The rights to collect the loan the amount of P20 000. and foreclose the mortgage c. X may possibly collect from A were extinguished upon the the amount of P10 000. death of C. d. X may not be able to collect 30. On January 1, 2010, D and C anything from A since the agreed that D would deliver to C a insanity of C at the time the specific agricultural land on July 1, obligation was constituted 2010. From January 1 to June 30, rendered the whole obligation 2010, D harvested palay from the voidable. land worth P20 000.00. D actually 27. The following statements delivered the land to C on concerning payment by cession are September 30, 2010. At the time, true, except: crops valued at P15 000.00 that a. The creditors become the grew beginning on July 1, 2010 owners of the properties of the remained unharvested. C had a debtor that were ceded to personal right against D for the them. delivery of the thing and its fruits b. Payment by cession beginning on: extinguishes the obligations a. January 1, 2010 only to the extent covered by b. June 30, 2010 the proceeds of the sale of the c. July 1, 2010 debtors properties d. September 30, 2010 c. The debtor must be insolvent 31. C acquired a real right over the d. It affects all the properties of thing and its fruits on: the debtor except those a. January 1, 2010 exempt from execution b. June 30, 20120 28. D obtained a loan of P50 000 from c. July 1, 2010 C. The same is payable after 60 d. September 30, 2010 days. On due date, D, not having 32. D appointed C as his agent to sufficient cash, offered to give purchase a parcel of land belonging either his ring or his bracelet to C. to X. D promised to give a C accepted the offer. Based on the commission of P10 000.00 to C if C foregoing facts, which of the can present to D the deed of following statements is incorrect? absolute sale signed by X in favor of D on or before December 31, 2010. The condition of the c. Obligation under the note is obligation is: extinguished only up to P20, 000. a. Negative d. No part of the obligation is b. Positive extinguished. c. Impossible 35. D owes C P6000 which is due on d. No condition exists January 10, and another debt of 33. Refer to No. 32. Which of the P12000 which is due on January 20. following statements is incorrect? Both debts are unsecured and non- a. Ds obligation is extinguished if interest bearing and are already it is already January 1, 2011 due. D, however, has only P3000 and c has not yet presented to which he gives to C without D the deed of absolute sale informing C as to which debt the signed by X. payment shall apply. C also did not b. Ds obligation is extinguished indicate on the receipt he issued to on December 5, 2010 if X dies D to which of the two debts the on such date without his having payment shall apply. In this case, signed the deed of absolute a. The payment of P3000 shall be sale. applied to the debt due on January c. Ds obligation is demandable if 10 because it was the first to C presents to D on or before become due. December 31, 2010 the deed of b. The payment of P3000 shall be absolute sale duly signed by X. applied to the debt due on January d. Ds obligation is demandable if 20 because it is of greater amount. it is already January 1, 2011 c. Payment cannot be applied to and C has not yet presented to either of the two debts because it D the deed of absolute sale is incomplete. duly signed by X. d. The payment of P3000 shall be 34. A, B, and C are liable to X in the applied proportionately in the amount P30, 000.00. The debt is amount of P1000 to the debt due evidenced by a promissory note on January 10 and P2000 to the which reads I promise to pay X or debt due on January 20. order P30, 000.00. The note is signed by A, B, and C. X indorsed the note to Y, Y to Z to A for merchandise Z bought from A. a. Obligation under the note is totally extinguished. b. Obligation under the note is extinguished only up to P10, 000.
Ward A. Thompson v. City of Lawrence, Kansas Ron Olin, Chief of Police Jerry Wells, District Attorney Frank Diehl, David Davis, Kevin Harmon, Mike Hall, Ray Urbanek, Jim Miller, Bob Williams, Craig Shanks, John Lewis, Jack Cross, Catherine Kelley, Dan Ward, James Haller, Dave Hubbell and Matilda Woody, Frances S. Wisdom v. City of Lawrence, Kansas Ron Olin, Chief of Police David Davis, Mike Hall, Jim Miller, Bob Williams, Craig Shanks, John L. Lewis, Jack Cross, Kevin Harmon, Catherine Kelley, Dan Ward and James Haller, Jr., 58 F.3d 1511, 10th Cir. (1995)