Baisa has a debt to Regis amounting to 1,000.

00, their agreement provides that Baisa will pay

500.00 to Regis on January 18, 2017 and the remaining 500 will be paid on January 20, 2017.
On January 17, 2017 Baisa won in a Jueteng. Hence, she decided to pay the entire amount on
that the same day.
However, Regis was in Zimbabwe attending the Sinulog Festival and since he is out of the
country and is schedule to return on January 18, 2017 he refused to accept the payment. This
prompted Baisa to have the 1,000.00 consigned before the RTC of Quezon City. Regis returned
to the Philippines on January 18, 2017 he ask Baisa for the payment of the debt. But the latter
refused.
On January 19, 2017, Regis to filed a suit for collection of sum of money before the RTC of
Quezon City. Baisa raised an argument that she has already consigned the payment to the
Court and as a matter of fact she have already paid the entire debt. Hence, she shouldnt be
held liable for the principal amount and interest.

Questions (5 points each)

1. Is there a valid tender of payment?
2. Is there a valid Consignation?
3. Is the argument of Baisa correct?
4. Is Regis has the right to file the suit against Baisa?
Support your answer with any of the following:
1. by citing any related cases that you have read
2. by applying the requisites of the valid tender of payment or consignation in the case.
3. By applying any related provision of the Civil Code in the case