Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Office of Energy Projects

Washington, DC 20426

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project

Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Volume III

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC

Dominion Transmission, Inc.
Docket Nos. CP15-554-000, CP15-554-001, and CP15-555-000
FERC/EIS-0274D
Cooperating Agencies:

U.S. Department of U.S. Army Corps of U.S. Environmental U.S. Fish and West Virginia West Virginia
Agriculture Forest Engineers Protection Agency Wildlife Service, Department of Division of Natural
Service Great Dismal Swamp Environmental Resources
National Wildlife Protection
Refuge

December 2016
This environmental impact statement was prepared by the
staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to
assess the potential environmental impacts of the Atlantic
Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project (Docket Nos.
CP15-554-000, CP15-554-001, and CP15-555-000),
proposed for construction in West Virginia, Virginia,
North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. The cooperation and
assistance of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest
Service; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge;
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection;
and West Virginia Division of Natural Resources was
greatly appreciated.
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Table of Contents
VOLUME III LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX J SITE-SPECIFIC PLANS

J1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS
J2 SITE-SPECIFIC CROSSING PLAN FOR THE JAMES RIVER WILDLIFE
MANAGEMENT AREA

APPENDIX K WATERBODIES CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND

SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX L WETLANDS CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY

HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX M ROADS AND RAILROADS CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE

AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX N FOREIGN UTILITIES CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND

SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX O BEDROCK GEOLOGY CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE

AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX P REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION 2 ANALYSIS

APPENDIX Q TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION COMMUNITIES CROSSED BY THE

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX R FOREST SERVICE MANAGEMENT SPECIES TABLES

APPENDIX S STATE-SENSITIVE SPECIES TABLES

APPENDIX T VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX U RACIAL, ETHNIC, AND POVERTY STATISTICS FOR CENSUS TRACTS

WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY
HEADER PROJECT

APPENDIX V SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED

INDIAN TRIBES FOR THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY
HEADER PROJECT

i Table of Contents Volume III

APPENDIX W CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
TABLE W-1 PAST, PRESENT, AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE
FUTURE ACTIONS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF
INFLUENCE FOR THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
FIGURE W-1 POTENTIAL EFFECT ZONE FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

APPENDIX X REFERENCES

APPENDIX Y LIST OF PREPARERS

Table of Contents Volume III ii

 APPENDIX J

SITE-SPECIFIC PLANS

J1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS

J2 SITE-SPECIFIC CROSSING PLAN FOR THE

JAMES RIVER WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA
J1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline

J1-1
 AP-1

J1-2
FERC's Plans will be followed for Residential Construction, for all Residences
located within 50 feet of the construction work area
1. Orange safety fence will be installed at a minimum 15 feet from the
residence, and 100 feet along the construction corridor, each direction
from residence.
2.Will avoid the removal of mature trees and landscaping within the
construction work area, unless necessary for safe operation of
equipment, or as specified in the landowner agreements
3.Restore all lawn areas and landscaping immediately following clean up
operations or as specified in landowner agreement
4.During landowner negotiations, identify location of septic system and
avoid or develop a replacement plan with landowner during construction.

For this project, the following notes will also be applied

a. Where the pipeline centerline is within 25 feet of a residence, the trench
will not be excavated until the pipe is ready for installation.
b. Landowner will be notified one week prior to construction on his/her
property
c. No refueling or storage of hazardous materials will occur within 200 feet
of a private well.
d. Steel plating or other effective means will be provided to allow
landowner access to his/her residence should construction or other
ground disturbance occur. Required at egress points, landowner
driveways, or other private access ways.
e. On public roads, we will follow our traffic management plans that are
filed as part of the permit
f. Construction will be limited to daylight hours.
g. Applicant will:
Ensure piping is welded and installed as quickly as possible to
minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by
construction;
Complete final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent
erosion control devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench,
weather permitting.
During landowner negotiations, will work with landowner on
restoration procedure. These procedures will include seeding mix,
tree/shrub planting and hardscape replacement.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-3
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-4
 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-5
 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-6
 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-7
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-8
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-9
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-10
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-11
J1-12
J1-13
J1-14
J1-15
J1-16
 N

LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-17
J1-18
 N

LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-19
J1-20
J1-21
N

PROPERTY LINE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-22
 N

LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WORKSPACE

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-23
J1-24
 AP-2

J1-25
FERC's Plans will be followed for Residential Construction, for all Residences
located within 50 feet of the construction work area
1. Orange safety fence will be installed at a minimum 15 feet from the
residence, and 100 feet along the construction corridor, each direction
from residence.
2.Will avoid the removal of mature trees and landscaping within the
construction work area, unless necessary for safe operation of
equipment, or as specified in the landowner agreements
3.Restore all lawn areas and landscaping immediately following clean up
operations or as specified in landowner agreement
4.During landowner negotiations, identify location of septic system and
avoid or develop a replacement plan with landowner during construction.

For this project, the following notes will also be applied

a. Where the pipeline centerline is within 25 feet of a residence, the trench
will not be excavated until the pipe is ready for installation.
b. Landowner will be notified one week prior to construction on his/her
property
c. No refueling or storage of hazardous materials will occur within 200 feet
of a private well.
d. Steel plating or other effective means will be provided to allow
landowner access to his/her residence should construction or other
ground disturbance occur. Required at egress points, landowner
driveways, or other private access ways.
e. On public roads, we will follow our traffic management plans that are
filed as part of the permit
f. Construction will be limited to daylight hours.
g. Applicant will:
Ensure piping is welded and installed as quickly as possible to
minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by
construction;
Complete final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent
erosion control devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench,
weather permitting.
During landowner negotiations, will work with landowner on
restoration procedure. These procedures will include seeding mix,
tree/shrub planting and hardscape replacement.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-26
J1-27
J1-28
J1-29
J1-30
J1-31
J1-32
J1-33
J1-34
N

PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-35
J1-36
J1-37
J1-38
J1-39
J1-40
J1-41
J1-42
 AP-3

J1-43
FERC's Plans will be followed for Residential Construction, for all Residences
located within 50 feet of the construction work area
1. Orange safety fence will be installed at a minimum 15 feet from the
residence, and 100 feet along the construction corridor, each direction
from residence.
2.Will avoid the removal of mature trees and landscaping within the
construction work area, unless necessary for safe operation of
equipment, or as specified in the landowner agreements
3.Restore all lawn areas and landscaping immediately following clean up
operations or as specified in landowner agreement
4.During landowner negotiations, identify location of septic system and
avoid or develop a replacement plan with landowner during construction.

For this project, the following notes will also be applied

a. Where the pipeline centerline is within 25 feet of a residence, the trench
will not be excavated until the pipe is ready for installation.
b. Landowner will be notified one week prior to construction on his/her
property
c. No refueling or storage of hazardous materials will occur within 200 feet
of a private well.
d. Steel plating or other effective means will be provided to allow
landowner access to his/her residence should construction or other
ground disturbance occur. Required at egress points, landowner
driveways, or other private access ways.
e. On public roads, we will follow our traffic management plans that are
filed as part of the permit
f. Construction will be limited to daylight hours.
g. Applicant will:
Ensure piping is welded and installed as quickly as possible to
minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by
construction;
Complete final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent
erosion control devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench,
weather permitting.
During landowner negotiations, will work with landowner on
restoration procedure. These procedures will include seeding mix,
tree/shrub planting and hardscape replacement.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-44
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-45
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-46
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-47
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-48
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-49
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-50
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-51
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-52
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-53
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-54
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-55
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-56
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-57
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-58
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-59
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-60
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-61
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-62
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-63
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-64
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-65
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-66
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-67
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-68
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-69
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-70
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-71
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-72
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-73
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-74
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-75
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-76
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-77
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-78
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-79
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-80
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-81
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-82
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

ORANGE SAFETY FENCE

TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA

EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-83
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

J1-84
 TL-636

J1-85
FERC's Plans will be followed for Residential Construction, for all Residences
located within 50 feet of the construction work area
1. Orange safety fence will be installed at a minimum 15 feet from the
residence, and 100 feet along the construction corridor, each direction
from residence.
2.Will avoid the removal of mature trees and landscaping within the
construction work area, unless necessary for safe operation of
equipment, or as specified in the landowner agreements
3.Restore all lawn areas and landscaping immediately following clean up
operations or as specified in landowner agreement
4.During landowner negotiations, identify location of septic system and
avoid or develop a replacement plan with landowner during construction.

For this project, the following notes will also be applied

a. Where the pipeline centerline is within 25 feet of a residence, the trench
will not be excavated until the pipe is ready for installation.
b. Landowner will be notified one week prior to construction on his/her
property
c. No refueling or storage of hazardous materials will occur within 200 feet
of a private well.
d. Steel plating or other effective means will be provided to allow
landowner access to his/her residence should construction or other
ground disturbance occur. Required at egress points, landowner
driveways, or other private access ways.
e. On public roads, we will follow our traffic management plans that are
filed as part of the permit
f. Construction will be limited to daylight hours.
g. Applicant will:
Ensure piping is welded and installed as quickly as possible to
minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by
construction;
Complete final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent
erosion control devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench,
weather permitting.
During landowner negotiations, will work with landowner on
restoration procedure. These procedures will include seeding mix,
tree/shrub planting and hardscape replacement.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-86
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-87
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-88
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-89
TL-635

J1-90
FERC's Plans will be followed for Residential Construction, for all Residences
located within 50 feet of the construction work area
1. Orange safety fence will be installed at a minimum 15 feet from the
residence, and 100 feet along the construction corridor, each direction
from residence.
2.Will avoid the removal of mature trees and landscaping within the
construction work area, unless necessary for safe operation of
equipment, or as specified in the landowner agreements
3.Restore all lawn areas and landscaping immediately following clean up
operations or as specified in landowner agreement
4.During landowner negotiations, identify location of septic system and
avoid or develop a replacement plan with landowner during construction.

For this project, the following notes will also be applied

a. Where the pipeline centerline is within 25 feet of a residence, the trench
will not be excavated until the pipe is ready for installation.
b. Landowner will be notified one week prior to construction on his/her
property
c. No refueling or storage of hazardous materials will occur within 200 feet
of a private well.
d. Steel plating or other effective means will be provided to allow
landowner access to his/her residence should construction or other
ground disturbance occur. Required at egress points, landowner
driveways, or other private access ways.
e. On public roads, we will follow our traffic management plans that are
filed as part of the permit
f. Construction will be limited to daylight hours.
g. Applicant will:
Ensure piping is welded and installed as quickly as possible to
minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by
construction;
Complete final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent
erosion control devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench,
weather permitting.
During landowner negotiations, will work with landowner on
restoration procedure. These procedures will include seeding mix,
tree/shrub planting and hardscape replacement.

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-91
 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

13.0

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-92
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT EXTRA WORK SPACE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
(NO GROUND SURVEY) PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

EXISTING ROADS
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA
WATER WELL

15.61

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J1-93
J2 SITE-SPECIFIC CROSSING PLAN FOR THE
JAMES RIVER WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA
 N

PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J2-1
N

PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J2-2
 N

PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J2-3
 N

PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD

2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.

J2-4
 2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.
J2-5

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

PROPERTY LINE STORM SEWER 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM USED FOR MAPPING AND TOPOGRAPHY - UTM WITH NAD83 DATUM, ZONE 17, US
SURVEY FOOT, CENTRAL MERIDAN 81 W
FENCE WATER LINE 2. CONTOURS AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE DERIVED BY AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY PERFORMED BY
EXTRA WORK SPACE
THE THRASHER GROUP, INC. ON 06-25-2014 THRU 08-26-2014 GPS SUB-METER ACCURACY.
STREAM SANITARY SEWER 3. AERIAL IMAGERY IS TAKEN FROM A SPRING 2015 FLIGHT BY KUCERA INTERNATIONAL INC.
4. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON GIS & TAX ASSEMENT RECORDS (PROVIDED BY OTHERS). GAI &
EXISTING GAS PIPELINE EDGE OF GRAVEL WETLAND THE THRASHER GROUP MAKE NO GUARANTEE EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE
(COLOR SHOWN TO PROVIDE CLARITY ONLY)
RECORDS AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.
5. WETLAND DATA SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WAS PROVIDED BY NRG.
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
6. THESE DRAWINGS ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS FOR COMPLETE REQUIREMENTS AND BMP LOCATIONS.
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE UTILITY POLE
7. ALL STATIONING SHOWN IS SLOPE STATIONING.

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE (NO GROUND SURVEY) AREA OF NO DISTURBANCE

 2016 GAI Consultants, Inc.
J2-6

PROPOSED TEMPORARY R.O.W.

PROPERTY LINE STORM SEWER 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM USED FOR MAPPING AND TOPOGRAPHY - UTM WITH NAD83 DATUM, ZONE 17, US
SURVEY FOOT, CENTRAL MERIDAN 81 W
FENCE WATER LINE 2. CONTOURS AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE DERIVED BY AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY PERFORMED BY
EXTRA WORK SPACE
THE THRASHER GROUP, INC. ON 06-25-2014 THRU 08-26-2014 GPS SUB-METER ACCURACY.
STREAM SANITARY SEWER 3. AERIAL IMAGERY IS TAKEN FROM A SPRING 2015 FLIGHT BY KUCERA INTERNATIONAL INC.
4. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON GIS & TAX ASSEMENT RECORDS (PROVIDED BY OTHERS). GAI &
EXISTING GAS PIPELINE EDGE OF GRAVEL WETLAND THE THRASHER GROUP MAKE NO GUARANTEE EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE
(COLOR SHOWN TO PROVIDE CLARITY ONLY)
RECORDS AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.
5. WETLAND DATA SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WAS PROVIDED BY NRG.
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT
6. THESE DRAWINGS ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION AREA SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS FOR COMPLETE REQUIREMENTS AND BMP LOCATIONS.
PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE UTILITY POLE
7. ALL STATIONING SHOWN IS SLOPE STATIONING.

PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE (NO GROUND SURVEY) AREA OF NO DISTURBANCE

 APPENDIX K

WATERBODIES CROSSED BY THE

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Harrison County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 0 UNT to Tanner Fork Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Harrison County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 0 Tanner Fork Perennial 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Harrison County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 0 UNT to Tanner Fork Perennial 3 Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Harrison County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 0 Tanner Fork Perennial 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Harrison County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 0 UNT to Tanner Fork Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Harrison County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 0.4 Tanner Fork Perennial 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Harrison County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 0.5 UNT to Tanner Fork Intermittent 4 (CL) 4.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Harrison and Lewis Perm ROW, AP-1 / 1.1 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1, HQS Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Counties, WV Temp ROW Flume survey
Harrison County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 1.1 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 14 (AR) 12 Perm AR NA B1, HQS Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
survey
Harrison County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 1.1 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1, HQS Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
survey
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 1.5 Sand Fork Intermittent 12 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1, HQS Conditions Not Allowable April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume (CNA)-Biological
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 2.4 UNT to Kincheloe Creek Intermittent 43 (AR) 21 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp AR, (CL)
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 UNT to Kincheloe Creek Intermittent 5 Temp AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 UNT to Kincheloe Creek Intermittent 5 Temp AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 UNT to Kincheloe Creek Intermittent 5 Temp AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 UNT to Kincheloe Creek Intermittent 12 (AR) 5 Temp AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Harrison County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 2 (AR) 20 Temp AR NA B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-1

survey
Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 2.4 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 22 (AR) 20 Temp AR NA B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
survey
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 2.4 Kincheloe Creek Perennial 21 (AR) 20 Perm AR NA B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
survey Per WVDNR request, southern access road crossing removed.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 3 UNT to Hog Camp Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 3 UNT to Hog Camp Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 3 UNT to Hog Camp Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 3.8 Hog Camp Run Perennial 11 (AR) 7 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 4 UNT to Hog Camp Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 4 Hog Camp Run Perennial 41 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 5 Elk Lick Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 5 UNT to Elk Lick Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 5 Elk Lick Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 5 UNT to Elk Lick Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 5 Elk Lick Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 5.7 Turkeypen Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 5.7 UNT to Turkeypen Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 5.7 UNT to Turkeypen Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 7.2 UNT to Hollick Run Ephemeral 1 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm CS, AP-1 / 7.5 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Temp CS
Lewis County, WV Perm CS, AP-1 / 7.6 UNT to Hollick Run Intermittent 4 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp CS Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Perm CS AP-1 / 7.7 UNT to Hollick Run Intermittent 4 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Perm CS AP-1 / 7.7 UNT to Hollick Run Intermittent 1.5 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Lewis County, WV Perm CS, AP-1 / 7.7 Hollick Run Perennial 9 (CL) 8.5 1) Dam and Pump 2) Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp CS Flume
Lewis County, WV Perm CS AP-1 / 7.8 UNT to Hollick Run Intermittent 1.5 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Perm CS AP-1 / 7.8 Hollick Run Perennial 8.5 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Temp CS AP-1 / 7.8 Hollick Run Perennial 8.5 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Temp CS AP-1 / 7.8 Hollick Run Perennial 8.5 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 8.2 West Fork River Perennial 92 (CL) 65 Cofferdam In-stream; Within 1000 feet A, B1, HQS CNA-Biological, Fecal April 1 to June 30 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Coliform, and Polychlorinated presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Biphenyls (PCB)

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 9.4 Broad Run Perennial 10 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 9.9 UNT to Broad Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 10.2 Broad Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 10.2 Broad Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 10.2 Broad Run Perennial 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 10.2 UNT to Broad Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 10.8 UNT to Sycamore Lick Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 10.9 Broad Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-2

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 11.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 11.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 12.4 UNT to West Run Intermittent 1.25 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 12.5 UNT to West Run Intermittent 1.25 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 12.5 UNT to West Run Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 12.6 West Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 12.6 West Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 12.6 West Run Perennial 14 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 Iron and Fecal Coliform April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 13.6 UNT to West Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 13.6 UNT to West Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 13.7 UNT to Lifes Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 13.8 UNT to Lifes Run Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.2 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 14.3 Lifes Run Perennial 20 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 Fecal Coliform and CNA- April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump Biological
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.3 Lifes Run Perennial 22 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.3 Lifes Run Perennial 22 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.4 UNT to Lifes Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.4 UNT to Lifes Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 14.5 UNT to Lifes Run Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 14.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 4 Temp AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 14.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 4 Temp AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 14.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 14 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 14.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 3 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 14.9 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 6 Temp AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 14.9 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 6 Temp AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 15 UNT to Hackers Creek Ephemeral 1.5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 15 UNT to Hackers Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 1.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 15 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.3 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.4 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.5 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.5 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.5 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.5 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 14 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 15.5 UNT to Hackers Creek Perennial 13 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.6 Hackers Creek Perennial 30 (AR) 30 Perm AR NA A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Endangered Mussels Water / ACP Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.8 UNT to Hackers Creek Ephemeral 1.5 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.9 UNT to Hackers Creek Ephemeral 1.5 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-3

Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 15.9 UNT to Hackers Creek Ephemeral 1.5 Perm AR NA UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 16.3 UNT to Hackers Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 16.4 UNT to Hackers Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 17.2 UNT to Hackers Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Lewis County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 18.1 UNT to Laurel Lick Intermittent 1.5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 18.1 Laurel Lick Intermittent 5 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 CNA-Biological, Iron, and April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump Fecal Coliform
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 19.9 UNT to Buckhannon Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Run
Lewis County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 19.9 UNT to Buckhannon Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 20.3 Buckhannon Run Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 CNA-Biological, Iron, and April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Fecal Coliform
Lewis County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 20.6 UNT to Buckhannon Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Run
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 23.3 Fink Run Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 24 UNT to Fink Run Intermittent 3 (AR) 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp AR,
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 24.6 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 4 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 24.7 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 25.4 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 25.4 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 25.4 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 25.7 Brushy Fork Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 25.7 Brushy Fork Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 25.8 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 25.8 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 3 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact
Upshur County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 25.8 UNT to Brushy Fork Intermittent 3 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 26 Brushy Fork Perennial 16 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 28.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 28.5 Unnamed Pond to Lick Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Run
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 29.2 Cutright Run Perennial 22 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 29.3 UNT to Cutright Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 29.9 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 29.9 UNT to French Creek Perennial 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 30.3 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 30.5 UNT to French Creek Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 30.6 UNT to French Creek Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 30.6 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 30.7 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 30.7 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 30.9 UNT to French Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 31.1 French Creek Perennial 40 (CL) 40 Cofferdam In-stream; Within 1000 feet B2, HQS Iron September 15 to March 31 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW survey
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 31.7 Buckhannon River Perennial 91 (CL) 75 Cofferdam In-stream; Within 1000 feet A, B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW survey
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 32.1 UNT to Trubie Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 33 UNT to Trubie Run Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
K-4

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 33 UNT to Trubie Run Perennial 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 33 Trubie Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 34.1 UNT to Buckhannon Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to A, B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW River
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 34.4 Grassy Run Perennial 25 (CL) 17 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 36.1 Gravel Run Perennial 21 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 36.1 UNT to Gravel Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 36.7 UNT to Laurel Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 36.7 UNT to Laurel Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 36.7 UNT to Laurel Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 36.8 Laurel Run Perennial 21 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 36.8 Laurel Run Perennial 15 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.1 UNT to Tenmile Creek Intermittent 3.5 Temp AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.1 UNT to Tenmile Creek Intermittent 6 (AR) 3.5 Temp AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.5 UNT to Tenmile Creek Intermittent 2.5 Temp AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.5 UNT to Tenmile Creek Intermittent 2.5 Temp AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.7 Tenmile Creek Perennial 10 (AR) 14 Temp AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.7 Tenmile Creek Perennial 14 Temp AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 37.8 Tenmile Creek Perennial 17 (CL) 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.8 Unnamed Pond to Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Tenmile Creek
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 37.8 UNT to Tenmile Creek Perennial 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 37.8 Unnamed Pond to Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Tenmile Creek
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 37.8 UNT to Tenmile Creek Perennial 5 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 37.8 UNT to Tenmile Creek Perennial 5 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 37.9 UNT to Tenmile Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 37.9 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA

Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 39.6 Tenmile Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 40.5 UNT to Leonard Run Intermittent 2 (CL) 1.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 40.7 UNT to Leonard Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Upshur County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 41.3 Right Fork Middle Fork Perennial 45 (CL) 32 1) Flume 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B2, HQS Iron September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW River Cofferdam
Upshur County, WV Temp AR AP-1 / 41.4 UNT to Right Fork Intermittent 2 Temp AR NA UNT to B2, HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Middle Fork River
Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 41.9 UNT to Jackson Fork Ephemeral 17 (AR) 1 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Upshur County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 41.9 Jackson Fork Perennial 15 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 45.4 UNT to Jenks Fork Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 45.4 UNT to Jenks Fork Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 47 UNT to Long Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 47.1 UNT to Long Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 47.4 UNT to Sugar Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.2 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.4 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 50.4 UNT to Dry Run Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Flume
K-5

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 50.5 Dry Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.5 Dry Run Perennial 23 (CL) 16 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 50.6 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.7 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 50.8 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 4 (AR) 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW, Centerline
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.8 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 7 (CL) 7 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 50.8 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 10 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 50.9 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 51.1 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 5 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.4 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 51.6 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.7 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.7 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.7 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.8 UNT to Lick Run Perennial 7 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.8 UNT to Lick Run Perennial 7 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 51.8 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 UNT to Beech Run Perennial 14 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 UNT to Lick Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.1 Beech Run Perennial 24 (AR) 25 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 52.1 Beech Run Perennial 27 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS pH September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.4 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.4 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.4 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.6 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.8 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 32 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.8 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-6

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.8 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.9 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 52.9 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 53 UNT to Beech Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.1 Left Fork Buckhannon Perennial 23 (AR) 18 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.1 UNT to Left Fork Perennial 43 (AR) 25 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Buckhannon River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.1 Left Fork Buckhannon Perennial 20 (AR) 18 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.1 UNT to Left Fork Intermittent 12 (AR) 12 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Buckhannon River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.1 Left Fork Buckhannon Perennial 50 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.2 Left Fork Buckhannon Intermittent 10 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.2 Left Fork Buckhannon Perennial 5 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.3 Philips Camp Run Perennial 22 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.3 Philips Camp Run Perennial 22 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 54.3 Philips Camp Run Perennial 29 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 54.5 UNT to Left Fork Intermittent 10 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Buckhannon River
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 55 Short Run Perennial 9 (CL) 13 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 55.1 Left Fork Buckhannon Perennial 22 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 55.1 Long Run Intermittent 20 (AR) 20 Perm AR NA HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 55.3 Long Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 55.3 Long Run Perennial 14 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 55.3 UNT to Long Run Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 55.3 Long Run Perennial 10 Perm AR NA HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 55.3 UNT to Long Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 56.1 UNT to Left Fork Intermittent 4 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Buckhannon River Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 56.3 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Fork Elk River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 56.3 Unnamed pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 56.3 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Fork Elk River
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 56.5 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Fork Elk River Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 56.7 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Fork Elk River Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 57 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW, Fork Elk River Flume
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.1 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 6 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Fork Elk River
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 57.1 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 14 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Fork Elk River Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 57.3 UNT to Left Fork Back Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Fork Elk River Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 Mitchell Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 Mitchell Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 Mitchell Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 Mitchell Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.3 Mitchell Run Perennial 8 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 26 (AR) 9 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-7

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 9 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 7 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 7 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.6 UNT to Mitchell Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 UNT to Mitchell Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 Mitchell Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 Mitchell Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 Mitchell Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.7 Mitchell Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 57.8 Back Fork Elk River Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 58.2 Back Fork Elk River Perennial 12 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 59.2 Hewett Fork Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 59.4 UNT to Hickorylick Run Intermittent 27 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 59.7 UNT to Hickorylick Run Ephemeral 5 (AR) 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 60.7 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 8 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 60.7 Valley Fork Perennial 51 (CL) 50 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 60.7 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 8 (CL) 7 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 60.7 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 60.7 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 18 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 60.8 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 3 (AR) 7 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 60.8 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 9 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 60.8 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 22 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 60.9 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 26 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 60.9 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 12 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 61 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 61 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 36 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 61 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 61.1 UNT to Valley Fork Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 61.1 UNT to Valley Fork Ephemeral 6 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 61.3 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 61.7 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
K-8

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 62 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 62 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 62.2 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Flume
Randolph County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 62.2 UNT to Elk River Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 62.9 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA

Randolph County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 63 UNT to Ralston Run Intermittent 5 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temporary Impact
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Ephemeral 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 Rough Gap Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 Rough Gap Run Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.2 UNT to Rough Gap Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.3 UNT to Rough Gap Run Ephemeral 9 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.4 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.4 UNT to Elk River Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.6 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 6 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.7 Falling Spring Run Perennial 20 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.7 Falling Spring Run Perennial 61 (AR) 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 31 (AR) 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 Falling Spring Run Perennial 12 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.8 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.9 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.9 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 10 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.9 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.9 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 63.9 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.1 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.1 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 12 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
K-9

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.1 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.1 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.1 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 64.2 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond In-stream; Within 1000 feet NA NA

Randolph County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 64.2 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond In-stream; Within 1000 feet NA NA

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.3 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.3 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.4 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.4 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.4 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 9 (AR) 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 6 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.5 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.6 UNT to Falling Spring Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
K-10

Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.7 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.7 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.7 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.8 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.8 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.8 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 1 (AR) 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 64.9 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 10 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 65 UNT to Tygart Valley Intermittent 10 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 65 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 65 UNT to Tygart Valley Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 65.3 Mingo Run Intermittent 19 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 65.5 UNT to Mingo Run Intermittent 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Randolph County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 65.7 UNT to Mingo Run Intermittent 17 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 66.6 Douglas Fork Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 66.7 Douglas Fork Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 66.7 Douglas Fork Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 67.5 Dry Fork Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 68.9 UNT to Big Spring Fork Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 69.1 Big Spring Fork Perennial 11 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 69.2 Big Spring Fork Perennial 19 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 69.3 Big Spring Fork Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 69.5 Mill Run Intermittent 14 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 69.6 Mill Run Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 69.6 Mill Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 70.3 Mill Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 70.8 UNT to Big Spring Fork Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW AP-1 / 71.8 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Ephemeral 2 (AR) 2 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Ephemeral 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Ephemeral 4 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 71.9 UNT to Slaty Fork Ephemeral 4 Perm AR NA UNT to HQS September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-11

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72 Slaty Fork Intermittent 7 Perm AR NA HQS, Tier 3 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.3 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.4 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.4 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.5 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.7 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 12 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.8 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR, AP-1 / 72.8 UNT to Clover Creek Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Perm ROW Centerline
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 72.8 UNT to Clover Creek Perennial 24 (CL) 18 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 72.8 UNT to Clover Creek Perennial 13 (AR) 18 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 74.6 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 74.6 UNT to Clover Creek Perennial 16 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 74.6 Clover Creek Perennial 25 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 75.2 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 28 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 75.3 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 14 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 75.5 Clover Creek Perennial 56 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 75.5 UNT to Clover Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 76 Glade Run Perennial 19 (CL) 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 76.5 UNT to Glade Run Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 76.6 Greenbrier River Perennial 180 (CL) 170 Cofferdam In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW presence of sensitive species / no
mussels observed during survey

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 76.9 UNT to Greenbrier River Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1, HQS April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 77.3 UNT to Mile Branch Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 77.3 Mile Branch Perennial 13 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 78.1 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 78.1 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 66 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 78.1 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 79.2 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 79.2 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 35 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 79.2 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 24 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 79.2 UNT to Thorny Creek Ephemeral 53 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 79.3 Thomas Creek Perennial 9 (CL) 12 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 79.3 Powder Lick Run Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 79.8 UNT to Thomas Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Temp ROW AP-1 / 80.9 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run Centerline
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 81 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Run Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 81 UNT to Sugar Camp Perennial 73 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run Temporary Impact
Pocahontas County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 81 UNT to Sugar Camp Perennial 73 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run Temporary Impact
Pocahontas County, WV Temp CY AP-1 / 81 UNT to Sugar Camp Perennial 73 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run Temporary Impact
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 81.1 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 8 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B1 April 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Run Flume
K-12

Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 81.2 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B2 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 81.2 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B2 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 81.2 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to B2 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 81.5 UNT to Sugar Camp Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B2 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Run Flume
Pocahontas County, WV Perm AR AP-1 / 81.9 UNT to Sugar Camp Ephemeral 2 (AR) 1 Perm AR NA UNT to B2 September 15 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Run
Pocahontas County, WV Perm ROW, AP-1 / 82 UNT to Shock Run Perennial 12 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to B2 October 1 to June 1 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 85 UNT to Warwick Run Perennial 45 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 / ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW (Townsend Draft) Flume March 15 to June 30 presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target aquatic species
observed during survey

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 85.1 UNT to Warwick Run Perennial 10 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 / ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW (Townsend Draft) Flume March 15 to June 30 presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target aquatic species
observed during survey

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 85.4 UNT to Lick Draft Perennial 10 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 85.4 Warwick Run Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 / ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
(Townsend Draft) March 15 to June 30 presence of sensitive species / no
mussels or target aquatic species
observed during survey

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 85.5 Lick Draft Perennial 8 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target aquatic species
observed during survey

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 87.2 Back Creek Perennial 73 (CL) 70 1) Cofferdam 2) Dam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, V-VIII Temperature March 15 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW and Pump survey / ACP survey or Agency Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
documented presence of sensitive
species

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 87.3 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Temp ROW
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 87.7 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
VIII
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 88.5 UNT to Back Creek Ephemeral 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 88.6 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
VIII
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 88.8 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 13 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
VIII
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 88.8 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 9 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.2 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
VIII
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 13 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Perennial 15 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May
15/March 15 to June 30
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 89.4 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 90 Peak Run Ephemeral 3 (AR) 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life NA
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 90.1 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 10 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 90.4 Peak Run Perennial 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Highland County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 90.7 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
K-13

Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 90.8 UNT to Stony Run Ephemeral 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 90.8 Stony Run Perennial 31 (CL) 16 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31/ Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 91.1 Morris Run Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 91.1 UNT to Morris Run Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 91.4 Morris Run Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Highland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 91.5 Jackson River Perennial 63 (CL) 60 1) Cofferdam 2) Dam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) and October 1 to March ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW and Pump Temperature 31/March 15 to May presence of sensitive species / Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
15/March 15 to June 30 mussel survey pending

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 91.7 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 91.7 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 91.8 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW, 31/March 15 to May 15 construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp TS
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 91.9 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 91.9 UNT to Jackson River Intermittent 13 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to May 15
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 93 Little Valley Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 93 UNT to Little Valley Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 94.1 Laurel Run Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV pH October 1 to March 31 No mussels or target fish observed Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW during survey Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.1 Laurel Run Perennial 5 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.2 Laurel Run Perennial 38 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.2 UNT to Laurel Run Intermittent 7 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.4 Laurel Run Perennial 10 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.4 Laurel Run Perennial 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to June 30
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.4 Laurel Run Perennial 32 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to June 30
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 94.7 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 13 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 94.8 Laurel Run Perennial 12 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/March 15 to June 30
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 95.2 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 95.5 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Perm ROW, construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 95.6 UNT to Dry Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 97.8 UNT to Cowpasture Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW, River
Temp TS
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 97.8 Cowpasture River Perennial 128 (CL) 125 1) Cofferdam 2)Dam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31/March 15 No federal or state mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW and Pump to June 30 observed during survey / ACP Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species /
additional survey anticipated in
2017
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 97.8 Cowpasture River Perennial 150 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31/March 15 No federal or state mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
to June 30 observed during survey / ACP
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species /
additional survey anticipated in
2017
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 97.9 Cowpasture River Perennial 146 (AR) 150 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31/March 15 No federal or state mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
to June 30 observed during survey / ACP
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species /
additional survey anticipated in
2017
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 97.9 UNT to Cowpasture Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 98.1 UNT to Cowpasture Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
River
K-14

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 98.3 UNT to Cowpasture Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA No mussels or target aquatic Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River species observed during survey

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 99 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 99.3 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Bath County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 99.3 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 99.3 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 99.4 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 20 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 99.4 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 27 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 99.4 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 49 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 100.6 White Sulphur Spring Perennial 9 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Branch Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 100.7 Stuart Run Perennial 65 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified March 15 to June 30 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume survey / ACP survey or Agency Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
documented presence of sensitive
species

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 100.8 UNT to Stuart Run Ephemeral 8 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101 UNT to Unnamed Pond Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 101 UNT to Unnamed Pond Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101 UNT to Unnamed Pond Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101.1 UNT to Stuart Run Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 101.1 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Bath County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 101.2 Unnamed Stream Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101.5 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101.5 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101.6 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 101.8 UNT to Stuart Run Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 102 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 102.1 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 102.1 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 102.5 UNT to Stuart Run Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 103.1 Mill Creek Perennial 29 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume VIII Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 103.1 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, V-VIII October 1 to March Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume 31/October 1 to May 31 Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 103.6 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 103.8 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 103.9 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 103.9 Mill Creek Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, V-VIII October 1 to March Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/October 1 to May 31
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 103.9 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
VIII
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.1 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.2 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.4 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.6 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 104.7 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, V-VIII October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/October 1 to May 31
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.8 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
K-15

Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 104.8 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 105 Mill Creek Perennial 11 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, V-VIII October 1 to March Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
31/October 1 to May 31
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 105.7 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Bath County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 105.7 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline VIII
Bath County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 105.7 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline VIII
Bath County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 105.7 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 107.1 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.1 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 8 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 107.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 107.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 2 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.7 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 107.7 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 107.9 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.1 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.4 Hamilton Branch Perennial 45 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Ephemeral 10 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.6 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 108.6 Hamilton Branch Perennial 103 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 108.8 Hughart Run Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW, Flume
Temp TS
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.2 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 9 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.2 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 9 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 109.3 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.5 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 9 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.6 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 109.7 UNT to Hamilton Branch Perennial 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 109.8 UNT to Hamilton Branch Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.1 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 21 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.5 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.7 Tizzle Branch Perennial 9 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.8 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 20 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.8 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 19 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-16

Temp ROW River Flume

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 110.9 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 23 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Temp ATWS AP-1 / 111.1 UNT to Tizzle Branch Perennial 10 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 111.4 Calfpasture River Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 111.4 White Rock Branch Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 111.5 UNT to Calfpasture Ephemeral 69 (CL) 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 111.5 White Rock Branch Ephemeral 23 (CL) 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 112.1 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 112.2 Calfpasture River Perennial 65 (CL) 45 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 112.3 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 112.6 Hodges Draft Perennial 24 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 No mussels observed during Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume survey Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 13 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 8 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 113.1 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 11 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113.1 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 33 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113.1 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 8 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 113.1 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 3 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 113.3 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 14 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 113.4 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 113.5 Wolfpen Draft Intermittent 8 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 113.5 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 31 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume survey
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 113.9 UNT to Calfpasture Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 113.9 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 114.3 UNT to Body Lick Perennial 41 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Branch Flume survey
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 114.5 UNT to Body Lick Perennial 66 (CL) 60 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Branch Flume survey
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 114.7 UNT to Body Lick Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Branch Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 114.7 UNT to Body Lick Ephemeral 4 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Temp ROW Branch Flume
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 115 UNT to Calfpasture Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 115.2 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 115.2 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 10 (CL) 12 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW River Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 115.4 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 30 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 115.4 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 10 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life NA
River
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 115.4 UNT to Calfpasture Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River Pump
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 115.7 UNT to Barn Lick Ephemeral 0.5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Branch Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 115.8 Barn Lick Branch Perennial 8 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 115.8 Barn Lick Branch Perennial 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 116.3 UNT to Calfpasture Perennial 12 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW River
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 116.5 Braley Branch Perennial 15 Perm AR NA Unclassified October 1 to May 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 116.5 Braley Branch Intermittent 20 (AR) 12 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, (CL) Flume
K-17

Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 116.5 Braley Branch Perennial 15 Perm AR NA Unclassified October 1 to May 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 116.5 Braley Branch Perennial 15 Perm AR NA Unclassified October 1 to May 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 116.5 Braley Branch Intermittent 14 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 116.7 Calfpasture River Perennial 30 (CL) 16 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Augusta County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 117.1 Dowells Draft Perennial 10 (AR) 10 16 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA ACP survey or Agency documentedPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, (CL) Pump presence of sensitive species / no
Temp ROW mussels or target fish observed
during survey

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 117.2 UNT to Dowell's Draft Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 117.2 UNT to Dowell's Draft Perennial 8 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 117.2 UNT to Dowell's Draft Perennial 8 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 117.3 East Branch Dowells Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Draft
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 117.7 UNT to Dowell's Draft Intermittent 7 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to White Oak Draft Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 120.2 White Oak Draft Perennial 25 (CL) 20 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target fish observed
during survey

Augusta County, VA Temp AR AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 25 (AR) 10 Temp AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 75 (AR) 20 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 20 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 20 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 120.2 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 290 (AR) 20 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Augusta County, VA Temp AR AP-1 / 120.3 UNT to Jennings Branch Ephemeral 1 (AR) 1 Temp AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 120.4 White Oak Draft Perennial 29 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target fish observed
during survey

Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 120.6 UNT to White Oak Draft Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 120.7 UNT to Stoutameyer Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Branch Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 120.7 UNT to Stoutameyer Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Branch Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 120.9 UNT to Stoutameyer Intermittent 4 (AR) 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, Branch
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 121.1 Stoutameyer Branch Perennial 9 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 121.1 Stoutameyer Branch Perennial 1 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 122.5 UNT to Jennings Branch Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 122.8 UNT to Jennings Branch Perennial 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume presence of sensitive species / no Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
mussels or target fish observed
during survey

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 123 UNT to Jennings Branch Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 123.9 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 8 (AR) 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 124 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 124.1 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 124.2 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
K-18

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 124.2 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 124.4 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 125.1 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 125.8 UNT to Elk Run Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 128.8 UNT to Jennings Branch Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW, construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp TS
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 129.2 Jennings Branch Intermittent 54 (CL) 55 1) Cofferdam 2) Dam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW and Pump Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 130.1 UNT to Middle River Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 130.4 Middle River Perennial 80 (CL) 75 1) Cofferdam 2) Dam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW and Pump
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 134.2 UNT to Eidson Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 134.4 UNT to Eidson Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 137 Lewis Creek Perennial 19 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW, Flume
Temp TS
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 137.9 UNT to Folly Mills Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Temp ROW Centerline VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 138.6 UNT to Folly Mills Creek Intermittent 9 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 139.1 Folly Mills Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ATWS, Flume VIII
Temp ROW

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 139.1 UNT to Folly Mills Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Temp ROW Centerline VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 139.6 UNT to Folly Mills Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 140 UNT to Folly Mills Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 142.3 UNT to Christian's Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 142.5 Christian's Creek Perennial 27 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 142.5 UNT to Christian's Creek Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 143.9 UNT to Barterbrook Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Branch VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 144 Barterbrook Branch Intermittent 2 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, V-VIII NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 145.6 UNT to South River Perennial 8 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 146.2 UNT to South River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 146.2 UNT to South River Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 146.3 UNT to South River Intermittent 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 147.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 21 (CL) Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 148.6 South River Perennial 46 (CL) 35 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump observed during survey
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 150.8 UNT to South River Ephemeral 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 151.5 UNT to South River Intermittent 3 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Augusta County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 152.3 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 152.4 UNT to Mills Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 152.9 Mills Creek Perennial 33 (CL) 16 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-VIII Benthic-Macroinvertebrate October 1 to March Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Pump Bioassessments 31/October 1 to May 31 construction aquatic species relocations.

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 152.9 UNT to Mills Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.1 UNT to Mills Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 153.2 UNT to Mills Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I- October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Flume VIII construction aquatic species relocations.
K-19

Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.4 Orebank Creek Perennial 13 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV pH October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Centerline
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 153.4 Orebank Creek Perennial 10 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV pH October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 153.4 Orebank Creek Perennial 13 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV pH October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.4 Orebank Creek Perennial 13 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV pH October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.6 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 14 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.7 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 153.7 Back Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, V-VIII Benthic-Macroinvertebrate October 1 to May 31 Mussel survey pending Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump Bioassessments and E. coli Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 153.7 UNT to Laurel Springs Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Branch
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 154.2 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 154.4 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 154.5 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 154.8 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 10 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 154.9 UNT to Back Creek Ephemeral 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 155 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Centerline VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.1 UNT to Back Creek Ephemeral 11 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.2 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.3 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.3 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.5 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.6 UNT to Back Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.8 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 155.9 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 25 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Centerline VIII
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.9 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 155.9 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Centerline VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 155.9 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.2 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.4 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.6 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 7 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.6 UNT to Back Creek Perennial 19 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.7 UNT to Back Creek Intermittent 28 (CL) 7 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.7 UNT to Back Creek Ephemeral 10 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 156.9 UNT to South Fork Back Ephemeral 6 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 156.9 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 157 UNT to South Fork Back Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157 UNT to South Fork Back Perennial 6 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157.2 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 37 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Creek VIII
K-20

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157.2 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 157.3 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek Pump VIII
Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157.3 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA
Creek VIII
Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 157.4 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 157.6 UNT to South Fork Back Perennial 17 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ATWS, Creek Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW

Augusta County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 157.6 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 13 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 157.6 UNT to South Fork Back Ephemeral 11 (CL) 9 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ATWS, Creek Pump
Temp ROW

Augusta County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 157.7 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek
Augusta County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 157.8 UNT to South Fork Back Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 158.6 UNT to South Fork Perennial 8 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 158.6 UNT to South Fork Perennial 8 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 158.7 UNT to South Fork Perennial 8 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River Centerline
Nelson County, VA Temp ATWS AP-1 / 158.8 UNT to South Fork Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 158.9 South Fork Rockfish Perennial 20 (CL) 16 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV E. Coli and Fecal Coliform October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW River Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 160.4 Spruce Creek Perennial 16 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 161.1 Spruce Creek Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 161.4 UNT to South Fork Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 161.8 UNT to South Fork Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Rockfish River
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 161.8 South Fork Rockfish Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 162.4 Spruce Creek Perennial 13 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ATWS, Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 163.1 Spruce Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ATWS, Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 163.7 South Fork Rockfish Perennial 72 (CL) 40 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, I-IV E. Coli and Fecal Coliform October 1 to March 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW River Pump construction aquatic species relocations.
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 163.9 UNT to South Fork Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Rockfish River
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 164.4 UNT to South Fork Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Rockfish River
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 165.4 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 165.5 UNT to Rockfish River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 165.5 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 7 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 165.9 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 16 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 166.2 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 5 (CL) 4.5 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 166.3 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 9 (CL) 9 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 166.7 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 99 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 166.7 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 9 (CL) 9 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, Pump
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 166.7 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 9 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 166.7 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 9 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 166.9 UNT to Rockfish river Perennial 11 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 167.8 UNT to Rockfish river Intermittent 12 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
K-21

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 168.8 Davis Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 168.9 UNT to Davis Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 169.3 Muddy Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 169.7 UNT to Rockfish River Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 170 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 16 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 170.2 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 15 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ATWS,
Temp ROW

Nelson County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 171 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 171 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nelson County, VA Perm AR, AP-1 / 171.3 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 8 (AR) 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 171.3 UNT to Wheeler Cove Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 171.3 UNT to Wheeler Cove Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 171.6 UNT to Rockfish River Perennial 9 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 171.7 UNT to Rockfish River Intermittent 3 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 172.8 UNT to Rockfish River Intermittent 10 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 173.2 UNT to Dutch Creek Intermittent 11 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 175.1 UNT to Dutch Creek Perennial 21 (CL) 25 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 175.6 Dutch Creek Perennial 17 (AR) 18 30 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp AR, (CL) survey
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 175.9 UNT to Dutch Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 176.2 UNT to Dutch Creek Perennial 21 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ATWS, Flume
Temp ROW

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 177.4 UNT to Beaver Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 179 UNT to Buffalo Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 180.2 Buffalo Creek Perennial 22 (CL) 12 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 180.5 UNT to Buffalo Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 180.6 UNT to Buffalo Creek Intermittent 7 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 180.9 UNT to Buffalo Creek Intermittent 1 (CL) 1.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 181.5 UNT to Mayo Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 181.9 Mayo Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 182.6 UNT to Mayo Creek Intermittent 10 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 182.9 UNT to Mayo Creek Perennial 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 182.9 UNT to Mayo Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 182.9 UNT to Mayo Creek Perennial 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 183.3 UNT to Mayo Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 183.4 UNT to Mayo Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nelson County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 183.7 UNT to Mayo Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Nelson County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 184.5 UNT to James River Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery
K-22

Nelson County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 184.5 Mayo Creek Perennial 35 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30/April 15 Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning to June 15 and August 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery September 30 sensitive species

Nelson and Buckingham Perm ROW AP-1 / 184.7 James River Perennial 395 (CL) 300 HDD Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory Mercury in Fish and PCB in March 15 to June 30/April 15 Anadromous / Survey not required Mussels presence assumed, HDD crossing.
Counties, VA fish Spawning and Fish to June 15 and August 15 to ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Nursery September 30 presence of sensitive species

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 184.9 UNT to James River Perennial 21 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30/April 15 Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning to June 15 and August 15 to Agency documented presence of
and Nursery September 30 sensitive species

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 184.9 UNT to James River Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 185 UNT to James River Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 185.4 UNT to James River Perennial 14 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30/April 15 Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning to June 15 and August 15 to Agency documented presence of
and Nursery September 30 sensitive species

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 185.4 UNT to James River Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 185.4 UNT to James River Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 186.8 UNT to Sycamore Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 186.8 UNT to Sycamore Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 187.6 Sycamore Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 187.9 UNT to Sycamore Creek Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 189.1 Walton Fork Intermittent 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 189.1 Walton Fork Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 190 UNT to Walton Fork Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 190 UNT to Walton Fork Intermittent 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 190 UNT to Walton Fork Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 190.1 Walton Fork Perennial 11 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 191 UNT to Ripley Creek Perennial 18 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Temp CS AP-1 / 191.5 UNT to Ripley Creek Intermittent 4 Compressor Station - Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temporary Impact

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 191.5 UNT to Ripley Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp CS
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 191.9 UNT to Ripley Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 193.1 UNT to Matthews Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 194.1 North River Perennial 33 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 194.9 UNT to North River Intermittent 18 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 195.1 UNT to North River Perennial 7 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 195.2 North River Perennial 30 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
observed during survey
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 195.3 North River Perennial 30 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
observed during survey
Buckingham County, VA Temp CY AP-1 / 195.5 UNT to North River Ephemeral 3 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temporary Impact
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 195.5 UNT to North River Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 196.1 UNT to North River Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 196.3 UNT to North River Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-23

Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 196.9 UNT to Slate River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 197.1 UNT to Slate River Perennial 4 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 197.4 UNT to Slate River Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 197.4 UNT to Slate River Ephemeral 1 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 197.9 Slate River Perennial 36 (CL) 19 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 198.1 UNT to Slate River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 198.1 UNT to Slate River Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 198.1 UNT to Slate River Ephemeral 1 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 198.3 UNT to Licky Branch Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 198.5 UNT to Licky Branch Intermittent 1.5 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 198.5 Licky Branch Perennial 19 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 199.4 UNT to Licky Branch Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 200.3 UNT to Pitman Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 201.2 Horsepen Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 201.3 UNT to Horsepen Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 201.8 UNT to Horsepen Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 201.8 UNT to Horsepen Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 202.7 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 203.6 UNT to Willis River Perennial 12 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 204.2 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 2 (CL) Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 204.5 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 204.5 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 204.7 UNT to Willis River Perennial 13 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 204.8 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.1 Willis River Perennial 25 (CL) 30 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey
Buckingham County, VA Temp AR AP-1 / 205.1 Willis River Perennial 28 (AR) 25 Temp AR NA Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.2 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 3 (AR) 7 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp AR,
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 205.6 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.7 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.7 UNT to Willis River Perennial 10 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 205.7 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.9 UNT to Willis River Perennial 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 205.9 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 206.1 UNT to Willis River Perennial 6 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 206.5 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 1 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 206.9 UNT to Willis River Perennial 9 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 207.1 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 207.2 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 207.3 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 207.3 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 10 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-24

Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 207.4 UNT to Willis River Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 207.8 Bishop Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 208.2 UNT to Willis River Perennial 34 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 208.6 UNT to Willis River Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 208.9 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 209.1 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 209.1 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 209.1 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 209.2 UNT to Little Willis River Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 209.5 Little Willis River Perennial 15 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 210 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 16 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 210 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 210.2 Gills Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 211 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 211 UNT to Perkins Creek Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 211 UNT to Perkins Creek Ephemeral 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 211.4 Perkins Creek Perennial 25 (CL) 13 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Buckingham County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 211.7 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 212 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 212.2 UNT to Little Willis River Intermittent 9 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 212.4 UNT to Little Willis River Intermittent 14 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 212.9 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 213 UNT to Little Willis River Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 213.7 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 6 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 213.9 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 214 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 214 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214.2 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214.3 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214.5 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 6 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214.6 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 18 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 214.8 UNT to Dry Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 215 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 215.1 UNT to Dry Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 215.1 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 215.2 Dry Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 215.2 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 1 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 215.4 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
K-25

Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 215.9 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 215.9 UNT to Green Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 215.9 UNT to Green Creek Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 216.2 Green Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 216.8 UNT to Green Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 217 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 217.4 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 217.6 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 2.5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 217.6 UNT to Green Creek Perennial 9 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 217.6 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.1 UNT to Green Creek Ephemeral 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.1 UNT to Green Creek Perennial 18 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.2 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.4 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.6 UNT to Green Creek Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 218.7 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Temp AR AP-1 / 218.8 Green Creek Perennial 14 (AR) 14 Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 219.2 UNT to Green Creek Perennial 39 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, VA Temp ROW, AP-1 / 219.4 UNT to Green Creek Ephemeral 1 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp TS Centerline
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 219.4 Green Creek Perennial 43 (CL) 18 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 219.5 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 219.6 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 219.8 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Cumberland County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 219.8 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Cumberland and Prince Perm ROW, AP-1 / 220.8 Appomattox River Perennial 107 (CL) 100 Cofferdam In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 No federal or state mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Edward Counties, VA Temp ROW observed during survey / ACP Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species

Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 221.6 UNT to Appomattox Perennial 9 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
VA Temp ROW River presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Prince Edward County, Perm ROW AP-1 / 221.7 UNT to Appomattox Ephemeral 2 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA
VA River
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 221.8 UNT to Appomattox Perennial 14 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
VA Temp ROW River Flume presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222 UNT to Appomattox Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW River
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222.1 UNT to Appomattox Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW River
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222.2 UNT to Appomattox Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
VA Temp ROW River presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222.4 UNT to Appomattox Perennial 14 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
VA Temp ROW River presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222.5 UNT to Appomattox Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW River
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 222.6 UNT to Appomattox Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW River
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 223.2 Little Saylers Creek Perennial 17 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Mussel survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Flume
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 223.4 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Creek
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW AP-1 / 223.8 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 2 (CL) 1.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-26

VA Creek
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 223.9 UNT to Little Saylers Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Creek
Prince Edward County, Temp ROW AP-1 / 223.9 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
VA Creek Centerline
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 224.1 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Creek
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 225.2 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Creek
Prince Edward County, Perm ROW, AP-1 / 225.5 UNT to Little Saylers Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 226.6 Saylers Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 227.2 UNT to Ellis Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 227.6 UNT to Ellis Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 227.8 UNT to Ellis Creek Ephemeral 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 228.2 Ellis Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 18 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 228.6 UNT to Ellis Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 228.8 UNT to Flat Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 229 UNT to Flat Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 229.2 Flat Creek Perennial 38 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 229.7 UNT to Flat Creek Perennial 3 (AR) 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 229.9 UNT to Flat Creek Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 230.7 UNT to Little Creek Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 230.7 Little Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 230.9 UNT to Little Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 231 UNT to Little Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 231.8 UNT to West Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 231.8 UNT to West Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 231.9 UNT to West Creek Intermittent 7 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 232 UNT to West Creek Perennial 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232 UNT to West Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232.2 UNT to West Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232.4 UNT to West Creek Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232.4 UNT to West Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 232.7 UNT to West Creek Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232.7 West Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 232.8 UNT to West Creek Intermittent 1 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 233 UNT to West Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 233 UNT to West Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 233.1 UNT to West Creek Ephemeral 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 233.1 UNT to West Creek Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 233.4 UNT to Little West Perennial 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 234.2 Little West Creek Perennial 21 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 234.3 UNT to Little West Intermittent 14 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 235.1 UNT to Deep Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 235.2 UNT to Deep Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 235.5 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-27

Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 235.7 UNT to Deep Creek Ephemeral 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 235.7 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 236 Deep Creek Perennial 26 (CL) 35 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 236.1 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 236.2 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 236.5 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 21 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 236.9 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 236.9 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 2 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 237 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 237.4 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 238.2 UNT to Winningham Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 238.6 Winningham Creek Perennial 50 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 238.6 Winningham Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume observed during survey / additional
mussel surveys pending

Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 238.6 Winningham Creek Perennial 10 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 238.6 Winningham Creek Perennial 50 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 238.8 UNT to Winningham Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 239.1 UNT to Winningham Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 239.9 UNT to Woody Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 239.9 UNT to Woody Creek Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 239.9 UNT to Woody Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 240 Unnamed Pond to Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Temp ROW Woody Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 240.6 UNT to Woody Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No mussels observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume survey
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 240.6 UNT to Woody Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 241.5 UNT to Watson Creek Ephemeral 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 241.6 Watson Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 242.6 UNT to Cellar Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 242.9 Cellar Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 15 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW observed during survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 242.9 UNT to Cellar Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No federal or state mussels Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW observed during survey
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 244.2 Lees Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 244.5 UNT to Lees Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 244.7 UNT to Lees Creek Intermittent 10 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 244.9 UNT to Less Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 245.1 UNT to Less Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 245.4 UNT to Bland Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 245.4 UNT to Bland Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 245.5 UNT to Bland Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 245.6 UNT to Bland Creek Perennial 16 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 245.6 UNT to Bland Creek Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 246 UNT to Bland Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
K-28

Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 247 UNT to Bland Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, V- NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump VIII
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 247.2 UNT to Bland Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 247.8 UNT to Tommeheton Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 248.2 UNT to Twin Lakes Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 248.4 UNT to Twin Lakes Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Nottoway County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 248.6 UNT to Twin Lakes Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 249.1 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 249.1 Butterwood Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 249.6 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 249.7 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW, Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp TS
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 249.9 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 8 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 250.2 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 250.2 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 250.2 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 250.5 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 250.7 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 251.2 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 251.5 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 251.6 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 251.7 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 251.8 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 252 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 252.1 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 4 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 252.6 UNT to Butterwood Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 252.7 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 253.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 10 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 254 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 25 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 254.3 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 254.4 UNT to Butterwood Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA
Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 254.5 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Creek Centerline
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 254.9 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 255 UNT to Butterwood Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Creek construction aquatic species relocations.
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 255.9 UNT to Beaver Pond Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 256.2 UNT to Beaver Pond Perennial 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 256.5 UNT to Beaver Pond Perennial 10 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 256.6 UNT to Beaver Pond Perennial 7 (AR) 7 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 256.7 UNT to Beaver Pond Perennial 5 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek Flume
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 256.8 UNT to Beaver Pond Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 257.7 UNT to Beaver Pond Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Creek Centerline
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 259.3 Beaver Pond Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Roanoke logperch survey pending Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
K-29

Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 259.9 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Dinwiddie County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 260.3 UNT to Tommeheton Intermittent 18 (CL) 3.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Dinwiddie and Brunswick Perm ROW, AP-1 / 260.7 Nottoway River Perennial 96 (CL) 55 Cofferdam In-stream pending FWS consult; Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Counties, VA Temp ROW Within 1000 feet fish Spawning and 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species / full survey
October 15/March 15 to pending
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 260.8 UNT to Nottoway River Ephemeral 7 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 261.3 UNT to Nottoway River Ephemeral 1 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 261.5 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 261.8 Miry Run Perennial 7 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No Roanoke logperch observed Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW during survey
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 262.5 Hickory Run Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 262.6 UNT to Hickory Run Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 262.9 UNT to Hickory Run Perennial 3 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 263.8 UNT to Hickory Run Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 264.6 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 264.7 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 264.7 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 13 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Brunswick County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 264.7 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 3 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 265.1 UNT to Great Branch Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.1 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.1 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.4 UNT to Great Branch Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.6 UNT to Great Branch Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.6 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 265.8 UNT to Great Branch Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 266.1 UNT to Waqua Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 266.3 UNT to Waqua Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 266.8 UNT to Waqua Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 266.9 UNT to Waqua Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 267.4 Waqua Creek Perennial 38 (CL) 27 1) Flume 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 No federal or state mussels or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Cofferdam Roanoke logperch observed during Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
survey
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 267.5 UNT to Waqua Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 267.9 Big Branch Perennial 16 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No Roanoke logperch observed Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump during survey
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 268.9 UNT to Waqua Creek Perennial 11 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life March 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume construction aquatic species relocations.
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 270 UNT to Beaver Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 270.5 Beaver Branch Perennial 7 (CL) 7 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 270.8 UNT to Beaver Branch Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 271.6 UNT to Sturgeon Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-30

Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 271.9 UNT to Sturgeon Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 271.9 UNT to Sturgeon Creek Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 272 Sturgeon Creek Perennial 42 (CL) 40 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream pending FWS consult; Aquatic Life May 15 to July 31 ACP survey or Agency documentedWill adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Pump Within 1000 feet presence of sensitive species Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Brunswick County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 272.6 UNT to Spring Branch Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 272.9 UNT to Spring Branch Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 272.9 UNT to Spring Branch Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 273 Spring Branch Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA No Roanoke logperch observed Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume during survey
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 274.3 Spring Branch Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 274.9 Reedy Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 275 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 275 UNT to Reedy Creek Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond Within 1000 feet NA NA

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 276.1 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 276.2 UNT to Brunswick Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 276.3 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
County Pond
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 276.7 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 276.7 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 1 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW County Pond Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 276.8 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 277 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 277.4 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond
Brunswick County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 277.6 UNT to Brunswick Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
County Pond Centerline
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 277.6 UNT to Brunswick Perennial 10 (CL) 12 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW County Pond Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 277.9 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 278.3 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 278.6 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 278.9 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 278.9 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 279.3 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 279.3 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 279.7 UNT to Reedy Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 280.1 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 280.2 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 280.4 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 280.5 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Brunswick County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 281.5 UNT to Reedy Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Brunswick County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 282.5 Greensville Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

Brunswick County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 282.7 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
Creek
Brunswick County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 282.9 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 283 Greensville Creek Perennial 13 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 283.1 Greensville Creek Perennial 19 (CL) 17 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
K-31

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 283.2 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 2 (CL) 1.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 283.3 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 283.4 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 11 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 284.2 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 5 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 285 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 19 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 285.7 UNT to Meadows Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Branch
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 285.9 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 286.2 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 286.2 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 286.3 Meherrin River Perennial 183 (CL) 115 Cofferdam In-stream pending FWS consult; Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / No federal or state Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Within 1000 feet fish Spawning and 15 to July 31/April 15 to mussels observed during survey / Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery June 15 and August 15 to ACP survey or Agency documented
September 30 presence of sensitive species

Greensville County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 286.6 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 286.8 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 27 (CL) 9 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 287 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 288.5 UNT to Falling Run Ephemeral 12 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 288.5 Falling Run Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 288.8 UNT to Falling Run Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 290 UNT to Fontaine Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 290.4 UNT to Fontaine Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW AP-1 / 290.4 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Temp ROW AP-1 / 293.4 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Centerline
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 293.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 6 (CL) Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 295.7 UNT to Camey Swamp Intermittent 6 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 296.9 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 297.4 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 297.6 UNT to Fontaine Creek Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 297.6 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 2 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning
K-32

and Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm AR AP-1 / 298.6 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 299.4 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 19 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut fish Spawning and construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 299.4 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut fish Spawning and construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 299.6 UNT to Fontaine Creek Intermittent 30 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory E. Coli, Dissolved Oxygen, and February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut fish Spawning and Mercury in Fish construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery

Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-1 / 299.6 UNT to Fontaine Creek Perennial 29 (CL) 40 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory E. Coli, Dissolved Oxygen, and February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / No federal or state Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut fish Spawning and Mercury in Fish mussels observed during survey Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Nursery

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 0.4 UNT to Jacks Swamp Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 1.1 UNT to Jacks Swamp Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 1.9 Jacks Swamp Perennial 30 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW Flume
Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 8.3 UNT to Trouble Field Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA C NA
Creek
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 8.5 UNT to Trouble Field Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 8.5 UNT to Trouble Field Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA
Creek
Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 8.5 UNT to Trouble Field Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA
Creek
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 8.8 UNT to Trouble Field Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 9.6 UNT to Roanoke River Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Northampton and Halifax Perm ROW AP-2 / 9.9 Roanoke River Perennial 355 (CL) 360 HDD Within 1000 feet C February 1 to June Anadromous / ACP survey or Mussels and Atlantic sturgeon presence assumed; HDD crossing.
Counties, NC 30/August 15 through Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
November 15 sensitive speciese / survey not
required

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 10.1 UNT to Roanoke River Perennial 11 (CL) 16 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ATWS,
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 10.7 UNT to Roanoke River Perennial 20 (CL) 22 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 11.4 UNT to Mush Island Gut Perennial 26 (CL) 11 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 11.6 Mush Island Gut Perennial 20 (CL) 20 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 11.8 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond In-stream; Within 1000 feet NA NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 11.9 UNT to Mush Island Gut Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 11.9 UNT to Mush Island Gut Intermittent 9 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 12.4 UNT to Mush Island Gut Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 12.4 UNT to Mush Island Gut Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 13.3 UNT to Mush Island Gut Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 13.6 UNT to Roanoke River Perennial 9 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 13.9 UNT to Roanoke River Intermittent 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 14 UNT to Roanoke River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 14.1 UNT to the Roanoke Perennial 13 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW River
Halifax County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 14.1 UNT to the Roanoke Perennial 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
River Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 14.4 UNT to the Roanoke Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW River
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 14.6 UNT to the Roanoke Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW River
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 15.3 UNT to Little Quankey Perennial 17 (CL) 12 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Creek Pump
K-33

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 15.7 Little Quankey Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 16 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA No federal or state mussels or Pre-construction mussel species relocations.
Temp ROW Pump target aquatic species observed
during survey
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 16.9 Quankey Creek Perennial 53 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA No federal or state mussels or Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW target aquatic species observed
during survey
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 17.4 UNT to Quankey Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 18.1 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 18.2 UNT to Marsh Swamp Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 18.2 UNT to Marsh Swamp Ephemeral 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 18.2 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 18.5 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 12 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp CY,
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Temp CY AP-2 / 18.6 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 12 Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet C NA
Temporary Impact
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 20.1 Marsh Swamp Perennial 15 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, Sw, NSW NA No federal or state mussels or
Temp ROW target aquatic species observed
during survey
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 20.5 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 21 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 21.9 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 24 (CL) 16 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ATWS,
Temp ROW

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 22.8 UNT to Beaverdam Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 23.1 Beaverdam Swamp Perennial 63 (CL) 45 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, Sw, NSW NA Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
Temp ROW spiny crayfish survey pending / no
Neuse River waterdogs observed
during survey

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 23.3 UNT to Beaverdam Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp Pump
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 23.6 UNT to Beaverdam Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp Pump
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 24 UNT to Beaverdam Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp Pump
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 24.6 UNT to Burnt Coat Perennial 39 (CL) 20 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 25 UNT to Burnt Coat Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 26.6 Burnt Coat Swamp Perennial 9 (CL) 8 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, Sw, NSW NA No mussel or target aquatic
Temp ROW species observed during survey

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 26.9 UNT to Burnt Coat Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 27.4 Jacket Swamp Perennial 28 (CL) 25 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
Temp ROW spiny crayfish, and Neuse River
waterdog survey pending

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 27.7 UNT to Jacket Swamp Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 28.9 UNT to Breeches Intermittent 33 (CL) 26 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 29.1 UNT to Breeches intermittent 26 (CL) 20 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 29.8 Breeches Swamp Perennial 16 (CL) 15 1) Flume 2) Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, Sw, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 30.6 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 6 Not Crossed by In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 31 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 31.2 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by Within 1000 feet C NA
Centerline
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 31.2 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 32 Rocky Swamp Perennial 22 (CL) 26 Open Cut In-stream; Within 1000 feet WSIV, NSW NA No federal or state mussel species Pre-construction mussel species relocations.
Temp ROW observed during survey / ACP
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species

Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 32.7 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
K-34

Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 32.8 UNT to Rocky Swamp Intermittent 9 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Halifax County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 33.5 UNT to Fishing Creek Perennial 4 Perm AR NA C NA
Halifax County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 33.7 UNT to Fishing Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 HDD Within 1000 feet C NA
Halifax and Nash Perm ROW AP-2 / 33.9 Fishing Creek Perennial 106 (CL) 40 HDD Within 1000 feet WSIV, NSW February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Revised to HDD crossing per agency request.
Counties, NC Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
sensitive species

Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 34.8 UNT to fishing Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 34.8 UNT to fishing Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 35.1 UNT to fishing Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 36.6 UNT to Black Swamp Perennial 43 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, NSW NA
Temp ROW Flume
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 37 Black Swamp Perennial 21 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, NSW NA No live mussels observed, no state
Temp ROW Flume or federal target aquatic species
observed during survey

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 39.7 UNT to Swift Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 39.9 UNT to Swift Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 40.3 UNT to Swift Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 40.6 Swift Creek Perennial 126 (CL) 130 HDD NA C, NSW February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Revised to HDD crossing per agency request.
Temp ROW Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
sensitive species

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 40.9 UNT to Flat Rock Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 41.6 UNT to Flat Rock Perennial 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 41.7 UNT to Flat Rock Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 42 UNT to Flat Rock Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 42.1 UNT to Flat Rock Perennial 68 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C, NSW NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 42.2 UNT to Flat Rock Perennial 9 (CL) 4 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 42.8 UNT to Flat Rock Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 44 UNT to Flat Rock Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Branch Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 44.4 Flat Rock Branch Perennial 6 (CL) 8 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C, NSW NA No state or federal mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW aquatic species observed during
survey
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 44.8 Flat Rock Branch Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C, NSW NA No state or federal mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW aquatic species observed during
survey
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 47.2 UNT to Pig Basket Perennial 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 47.6 Pig Basket Creek Perennial 30 (CL) 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No state or federal mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut aquatic species observed during
survey
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 47.6 UNT to Pig Basket Intermittent 9 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek Open Cut
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 48.3 UNT to Stony Creek Intermittent 18 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 48.7 UNT to Stony Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 48.7 Stony Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA No state or federal mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume aquatic species observed during
survey / ACP survey or Agency
documented presence of sensitive
species

Nash County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 49.2 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 49.5 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 50.2 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 19 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 50.2 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 50.2 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 8 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Nash County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 50.7 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
K-35

Centerline
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 50.8 UNT to Stony Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 51.5 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 17 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, NSW NA ACP survey or Agency documented
Temp ROW Flume presence of sensitive species

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 51.6 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA ACP survey or Agency documented
Temp ROW presence of sensitive species

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 53.3 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 24 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut spiny crayfish, and Neuse River
waterdog survey pending / ACP
survey or Agency documented
presence of sensitive species

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 54 Little Sapony Creek Perennial 33 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, NSW NA Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut spiny crayfish survey pending / no
Neuse River waterdogs observed
during survey

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 54.9 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 56.1 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 14 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 56.3 Sapony Creek Perennial 38 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, NSW NA Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut spiny crayfish survey pending. No
Neuse River waterdogs observed
during survey.

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 56.6 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 24 (CL) 10 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 57 UNT to Sapony Creek Intermittent 10 (CL) 7 1) Flume 2) Open Cut NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 57.1 UNT to Sapony Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 10 Flume NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 58.8 UNT to Tar River Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 59.1 UNT to Tar River Intermittent 8 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 59.1 UNT to Tar River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 59.4 Tar River Perennial 159 (CL) 130 HDD NA WSIV, NSW February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Revised to HDD crossing per agency request.
Agency documented presence of Surveys performed per agency request.
sensitive species Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Nash County, NC Perm GB, AP-2 / 60.4 UNT to Tar River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Perm ROW,
Temp GB,
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 60.8 Little Swamp Perennial 8 (CL) 13 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIII, NSW NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 61.9 UNT to Toisnot Swamp Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 62.7 UNT to Toisnot Swamp Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 62.8 Toisnot Swamp Pond Pond (AR / CL) 40 Pond NA NA NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 62.8 Toisnot Swamp Perennial 31 (CL) 25 Flume NA WSIII, NSW NA No federal or state mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW aquatic species observed during
survey
Nash County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 62.9 Toisnot Swamp Pond Pond (AR / CL) 40 Pond NA NA NA

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 63 UNT to Toisnot Swamp Ephemeral 4 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 63.3 UNT to Beaverdam Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 63.3 UNT to Beaverdam Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 63.5 UNT to Beaverdam Ephemeral 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 64.5 UNT to Bloomery Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Nash County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 64.6 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) 30 Pond NA NA NA

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 65.1 UNT to Bloomery Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 65.2 UNT to Bloomery Perennial 6 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
K-36

Nash County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 65.6 UNT to Bloomery Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 66 Bloomery Swamp Perennial 18 (CL) 17 Flume NA C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 66.1 UNT to Bloomery Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 66.3 UNT to Bloomery Intermittent 8 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 66.9 Millstone Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA ACP survey or Agency documentedPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume presence of sensitive species /
Neuse River waterdog survey
pending

Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 66.9 UNT to Millstone Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 67.7 UNT to Millstone Creek Intermittent 8 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 67.8 UNT to Millstone Creek Perennial 2 (CL) 1.5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 68.3 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 69.1 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 22 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 69.3 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 9 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 69.5 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 69.7 Marsh Swamp Perennial 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA ACP survey or Agency documentedPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW open Cut presence of sensitive species

Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 70.4 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 70.5 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 9 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 70.9 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 20 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 71 UNT to Marsh Swamp Perennial 16 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA No federal or state mussel or targetPre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut aquatic species observed during
survey
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 71 UNT to Marsh Swamp Intermittent 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 71.8 UNT to Contentnea Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 72.2 UNT to Contentnea Ephemeral 10 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 72.3 UNT to Contentnea Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 72.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 11 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 73.1 UNT to Contentnea Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 73.3 UNT to Contentnea Perennial 6 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 73.4 UNT to Contentnea Perennial 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 73.6 Contentnea Creek Perennial 53 (CL) 40 HDD NA WSV, NSW February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Revised to HDD crossing per agency request.
Temp ROW Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
sensitive species

Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 73.9 UNT to Contentnea Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek Flume
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 74.1 UNT to Contentnea Intermittent 7 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 74.6 UNT to Buckhorn Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 74.9 UNT to Buckhorn Ephemeral 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Reservoir Open Cut
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 75.8 UNT to Buckhorn Perennial 5 (CL) 4.5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch
Wilson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 75.8 UNT to Buckhorn Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Branch Centerline
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 78.9 UNT to Little Buffalo Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 78.9 UNT to Little Buffalo Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 79.2 UNT to Little Buffalo Perennial 9 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek Flume
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 79.3 UNT to Little Buffalo Perennial 17 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 79.5 Little Buffalo Creek Perennial 30 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No mussel or target aquatic
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut species observed during survey
K-37

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 81 UNT to Little River Intermittent 3 (CL) 1.5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 82 UNT to Little River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 82.5 UNT to Little River Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 HDD NA C NA
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 82.5 Little River Perennial 58 (CL) 50 HDD NA WSV, NSW February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Revised to HDD crossing per agency request.
Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
sensitive species / Neuse River
waterdog survey pending

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 82.6 UNT to Little River Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 HDD NA C NA
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 83.4 UNT to Buffalo Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 83.5 UNT to Buffalo Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 84.6 Big Branch Intermittent 15 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Temp GB AP-2 / 84.6 UNT to Big Branch Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA C, NSW NA
Centerline
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 85.9 UNT to Little Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 86.5 Little Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA ACP survey or Agency documented
Temp ROW Open Cut presence of sensitive species /
Mussel, Carolina madtom, NC
spiny crayfish, and Neuse River
waterdog survey pending

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 87.3 UNT to Moccasin Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 88.9 UNT to Moccasin Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 89.7 Moccasin Creek Perennial 17 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW Ecological/biological Integrity NA
Temp ROW Flume Benthos
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 91.2 UNT to Bawdy Swamp Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 92.1 Bawdy Swamp Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Conventional Bore NA C, NSW NA
Temp ROW (with US70 Business
crossing)

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 93.6 UNT to Mill Branch Intermittent 14 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 95.1 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 8 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 95.3 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Johnston County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 95.8 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 96.3 UNT to Polecat Branch Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Temp CY AP-2 / 96.4 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 4 Contractor Yard - NA C NA
Temporary Impact
Johnston County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 97.2 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA C NA

Johnston County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 97.2 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 6 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA C NA

Johnston County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 97.5 Polecat Branch Perennial 12 (AR) 9 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA No mussels or target aquatic
Perm ROW, Flume species observed during survey
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 97.7 UNT to Polecat Branch Intermittent 10 (AR) 10 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Perm ROW, (CL) Flume
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 98.1 UNT to Neuse River Perennial 49 (CL) 26 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 98.5 Neuse River Perennial 151 (CL) Open Cut NA WSV, NSW February 1 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
sensitive species

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 98.6 UNT to Neuse River Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 98.7 Unnamed Pond to Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Temp ATWS, Neuse River
Temp ROW

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 98.8 UNT to Neuse River Intermittent 17 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 98.9 UNT to Neuse River Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 99.7 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) Flume NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
K-38

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 100.9 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 101.3 Hannah Creek Perennial 17 (CL) 19 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No mussels or target aquatic
Temp ROW Open Cut species observed during survey

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 102.4 UNT to Hannah Creek Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 102.8 UNT to Hannah Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 102.8 UNT to Hannah Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 103.9 UNT to Hannah Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 104.4 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 105.1 Whiteoak Branch Perennial 11 (CL) 13 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No mussels or target aquatic
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut species observed during survey

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 106.8 Stone Creek Perennial 23 (CL) 17 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No mussels or target aquatic
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut species observed during survey

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 107.6 Johnson Swamp Perennial 13 (CL) 16 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA No federal or state mussels or Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut target aquatic species observed
during survey, additional survey
pending
Johnston County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 108.1 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 110.5 UNT to John K Swamp Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 110.6 John K. Swamp Perennial 21 (CL) 20 Flume NA C, NSW NA Mussels, Carolina madtom, and NC Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW spiny crayfish survey pending / no
Neuse River waterdogs observed
during survey

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 113.1 Mill Branch Intermittent 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump NA C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 114.2 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 114.2 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 114.6 Jumping Run Perennial 33 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, NSW NA
Temp ATWS, Flume 3) Open Cut
Temp ROW

Johnston County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 114.7 UNT to Mill Creek Intermittent 34 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW,
Temp TS
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 115.4 UNT to Big Juniper Run Ephemeral 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 116.9 Little Juniper Run Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 117.2 Big Juniper Run Perennial 17 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 118.9 Beaverdam Swamp Perennial 35 (CL) 9 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 119.3 Beaverdam Swamp Perennial 33 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 119.7 Beaverdam Swamp Perennial Wetland- 25 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Waterbody Flume 3) Open Cut
Complex (CL)

Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 120.9 UNT to Beaverdam Intermittent 12 (CL) 10 Flume NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 121.9 UNT to Starlins Swamp Intermittent 8 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 121.9 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Temp ROW
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 122.2 Starlins Swamp Perennial 25 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 122.3 Starlins Swamp Perennial Wetland- 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Waterbody Open Cut
Complex (CL)

Sampson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 122.5 UNT to Mingo Swamp Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA C NA

Sampson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 122.5 UNT to Mingo Swamp Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA C NA

Sampson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 122.5 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
K-39

Sampson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 122.5 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Sampson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 122.7 Mingo Swamp Perennial 13 (CL) 17 Flume NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 20 (AR) 12 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 8 (AR) 7 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 10 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 123.1 UNT to Mingo Swamp Perennial 67 (CL) 16 Flume NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 124.5 Black River Perennial 33 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 125.2 UNT to Black River Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 125.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 125.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 10 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 126.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 4 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 126.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 126.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 8 (AR) 19 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Perm ROW, Open Cut
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 127.3 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 25 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 129 UNT to Cape Fear Rive Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 129.4 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 7 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 129.6 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 30 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 129.6 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 7 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 129.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 130.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Open Cut
Cumberland County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 131.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 4 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 131.5 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 131.6 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 131.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 3 (CL) 2.5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 131.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 131.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 132.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 9 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 132.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 24 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 132.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 132.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm MR AP-2 / 132.9 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 15 M&R Workspace NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 133.2 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 39 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 133.4 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 133.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 11 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
K-40

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 133.9 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 134.2 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 13 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 135 UNT to Gum Log Canal Intermittent 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 135.8 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 137.1 UNT to Big Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 139.3 Little Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp CY AP-2 / 141.6 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA NA NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 141.8 UNT to Buck Creek Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 142 UNT to Buck Creek Ephemeral 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 142.7 UNT to Sandy Creek Ephemeral 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 142.8 UNT to Sandy Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 142.8 UNT to Sandy Creek Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 142.9 UNT to Sandy Creek Ephemeral 3 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 143.2 Sandy Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 143.3 UNT to Sandy Creek Intermittent 13 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 143.4 UNT to Sandy Creek Intermittent 13 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 144.7 UNT to White Pond Bay Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 146.2 UNT to Cedar Creek Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 146.2 UNT to Cedar Creek Ephemeral 10 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 146.2 UNT to Cedar Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 146.5 UNT to Cedar Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 146.6 UNT to Cedar Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 146.7 UNT to Cedar Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ATWS,
Temp ROW

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 147 UNT to Cedar Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW,
Temp TS
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 147 UNT to Cedar Creek Ephemeral 9 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW,
Temp TS
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 147.1 UNT to Cedar Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 150.3 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 150.4 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 150.4 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 22 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 150.4 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 150.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 151 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 15 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 151.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 10 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 151.6 UNT to Hair Canal Perennial 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 151.7 Hair Canal Perennial 31 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 152.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 28 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 153.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 11 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
K-41

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 153.2 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 153.5 UNT to Cape Fear River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 153.8 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 11 (CL) 12 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ATWS, Flume
Temp ROW

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 154 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ATWS, Flume
Temp ROW

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 154.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 93 (CL) 60 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 154.2 Cape Fear River Perennial 322 (CL) 323 HDD NA WSIV February 15 to June 30 Anadromous / ACP survey or Mussel presence assumed; HDD crossing.
Agency documented presence of Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
sensitive species / survey not
required
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 154.3 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 19 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA C NA

Cumberland County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 154.6 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 10 (AR) 12 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Perm ROW, (CL) Flume
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 154.6 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 154.7 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 155.1 UNT to Cape Fear River Intermittent 21 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW AP-2 / 155.2 UNT to Cape Fear River Perennial 5 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 156.7 Swans Creek Perennial 12 (CL) 10 Flume NA WSIV NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 157.3 UNT to Swans Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 158.3 UNT to Kirks Mill Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 158.3 UNT to Kirks Mill Creek Intermittent 9 (CL) 9 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Cumberland County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 158.9 Kirks Mill Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA WSIV NA
Centerline
Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 159.1 UNT to Kirks Mill Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Creek

Cumberland County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 160.4 Galberry Swamp Perennial 11 (CL) 17 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Robeson County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 161.8 Unnamed Pond to Little Pond Pond (AR / CL) 40 Pond NA NA NA
Marsh
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 161.9 UNT to Little Marsh Intermittent 10 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 162.5 Little Marsh Swamp Perennial 17 (CL) 21 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 164.2 UNT Little Marsh Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 166.2 Mercer Branch Intermittent 16 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume
Robeson County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 166.8 UNT to Black Branch Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 167 Black Branch Intermittent 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 167.9 Big Marsh Swamp Perennial 33 (CL) 41 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 170.2 UNT to Tenmile Swamp Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 170.7 Tenmile Swamp Perennial 18 (CL) 21 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 171.4 UNT to Little Tenmile Intermittent 6 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 171.8 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 172 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA C NA
Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 172 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA C NA
Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 172 UNT to Little Tenmile Intermittent 7 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 172.1 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 5 Perm AR NA C NA
K-42

Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 172.4 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 7 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 172.4 UNT to Saddletree Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp GB, Swamp
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 172.8 Saddletree Swamp Intermittent 35 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 174 Raft Swamp Perennial 40 (CL) 40 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 174.5 Humphrey Branch Perennial 47 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 176.8 Panther Branch Perennial 48 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 177 Richland Swamp Perennial 23 (CL) 27 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA WSIV, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm AR AP-2 / 177.4 UNT to Richland Swamp Ephemeral 3 Perm AR NA C, Sw NA

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 178.5 Burnt Swamp Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 179.2 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW,
Temp TS
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 181.1 Moss Neck Swamp Perennial 21 (CL) 20 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 181.3 UNT to Moss Neck Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW Swamp
Robeson County, NC Temp ROW AP-2 / 181.6 UNT to Bear Swamp Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Centerline
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 181.6 UNT to Bear Swamp Perennial 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 181.7 UNT to Bear Swamp Intermittent 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 181.7 UNT to Bear Swamp Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Temp ROW
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 182.2 UNT to Bear Swamp Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA C NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Robeson County, NC Perm AR, AP-2 / 182.3 UNT to Bear Swamp Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA C NA
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Robeson County, NC Perm ROW, AP-2 / 182.6 Bear Swamp Perennial 38 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA C, Sw NA
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut

Northampton County, NC Temp AR AP-3 / 0.3 UNT to Jacks Swamp Perennial 6 Temp AR NA C, NSW NA

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 1.3 UNT to Jack's Swamp Ephemeral 13 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 1.5 UNT to Jack's Swamp Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 3.6 UNT to Cypress Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 4.2 UNT to Cypress Creek Intermittent 10 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 5.4 Cypress Creek Perennial Wetland- 300 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW Waterbody
Complex (CL)

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 5.9 UNT to Cypress Creek Perennial 8 (CL) 7 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA No Chowanoke crayfish observed
Temp ROW Open Cut during survey
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 5.9 UNT to Cypress Creek Perennial 31 (CL) 9 1) Flume 2) Dam and In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW Pump 3) Open Cut

Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-3 / 6.5 UNT to Cypress Creek Intermittent 4 Perm AR NA C, NSW NA

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 7 UNT to Cypress Creek Perennial 7 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 7.4 Cypress Creek Perennial Wetland- 620 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA No Chowanoke crayfish observed
Temp ROW Waterbody during survey
Complex (CL)

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 7.8 UNT to Cypress Creek Ephemeral 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C, NSW NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 10 UNT to Meherin River Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW Flume
K-43

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW AP-3 / 10.2 UNT to Cypress Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 10.3 UNT to Cypress Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-3 / 10.8 UNT to Meherin River Ephemeral 2.5 Perm AR NA C NA

Northampton County, NC Perm AR AP-3 / 11.2 UNT to Meherin River Intermittent 9 (AR) 8 Perm AR NA C NA

Northampton County, NC Perm ROW, AP-3 / 11.6 UNT to Meherrin River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump In-stream; Within 1000 feet C NA
Temp ROW
Greensville and Perm ROW, AP-3 / 12.4 Meherrin River Perennial 149 (CL) 113 1) Cofferdam 2) Open In-stream; Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / no federal or state Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Southampton Counties, Temp ROW Cut fish Spawning and 15 to July 31/April 15 to mussels observed during survey / Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
VA Nursery June 15 and August 15 to ACP survey or Agency documented
September 30 presence of sensitive species

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 13.3 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 15 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 13.5 UNT to Meherrin River Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/April 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery June 15 and August 15 to sensitive species
September 30

Southampton County, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 13.6 UNT to Meherrin River Perennial 6 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/April 15 to
and Nursery June 15 and August 15 to
September 30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 14.4 UNT to Meherrin River Perennial 10 (CL) 7 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Open Cut Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/April 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery June 15 and August 15 to sensitive species
September 30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 15.4 UNT to Buck horn Intermittent 12 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 15.9 UNT to Buckhorn Perennial 12 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 16.5 Buckhorn Swamp Perennial 7 (CL) 7 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 18.6 UNT to Tarrara Creek Intermittent 1.5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Southampton County, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 18.9 UNT to Tarrara Creek Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 19 UNT to Tarrara Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Wet
Crossing
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 19.2 UNT to Tarrara Creek Perennial 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Open Cut
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 20 UNT to Tarrara Creek Perennial 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 20.1 UNT to Tarrara Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 20.7 UNT to Tarrara Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Open Cut
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 21 UNT to Tarrara Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Open Cut
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 21.3 UNT to Tarrara Creek Intermittent 9 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume 3) Wet Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
Crossing and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 21.7 UNT to Tarrara Creek Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume 3) Wet Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
Crossing and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 22.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm AR, AP-3 / 22.6 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 7 (CL) Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Perm ROW,
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 22.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 23.7 UNT to Darden Pond Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Open Cut
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 23.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm GB, AP-3 / 24.2 UNT to Darden Pond Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp GB Centerline
K-44

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 24.3 UNT to Darden Pond Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 24.5 UNT to Darden Pond Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm AR, AP-3 / 24.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Perm ROW, Flume
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 26 UNT to Mill Swamp Intermittent 1 (CL) 1 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 26.1 UNT to Mill Swamp Intermittent 6 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 27 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 27.4 UNT to Nottoway River Ephemeral 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 28.8 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 28.8 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 4 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 30.7 UNT to Nottoway River Perennial 18 (CL) 22 Flume NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species
October 15/March 15 to
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 31.3 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 31.6 UNT to Nottoway River Perennial 10 (AR) 10 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of
and Nursery May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species
October 15/March 15 to
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 32.6 Nottoway River Perennial 240 (CL) 160 HDD NA Aquatic Life, Migratory Benthic-Macroinvertebrate February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous /ACP survey or Mussel, Roanoke logperch, and Atlantic sturgeon presence assumed; HDD
fish Spawning and Bioassessments and Mercury 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of crossing.
Nursery in Fish May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species / survey not Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
October 15/March 15 to required
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Southampton County, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 33 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.1 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 33.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 10 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 33.1 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 5 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.1 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.3 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 10 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.9 UNT to Nottoway River Perennial 27 (CL) 22 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume 3) Open Cut Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
K-45

and Nursery May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species

October 15/March 15 to
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 33.9 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 12 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Open Cut Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.3 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 10 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.4 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Franklin City, VA Temp CY AP-3 / 34.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Contractor Yard - Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA
Temporary Impact
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.6 UNT to Nottoway River Perennial 22 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / mussel survey Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/March 15 to pending / ACP survey or Agency Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery May 31 and August 15 to documented presence of sensitive
October 15/March 15 to species
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.6 UNT to Nottoway River Perennial 14 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30/May Anadromous / ACP survey or Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning 15 to July 31/March 15 to Agency documented presence of Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery May 31 and August 15 to sensitive species
October 15/March 15 to
June 30/March 15-May 31
and August 15-September
30

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 1 (CL) 1 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 34.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 35.7 UNT to Nottoway River Intermittent 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Open Cut Migratory fish Spawning 30/March 15 to June 30 construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 35.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 35.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 36.3 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 18 (CL) 16 Flume NA UNT to Aquatic Life, Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 36.6 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 14 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

Southampton County, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 36.6 UNT to Blackwater River Intermittent 4 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

Southampton County and Perm ROW AP-3 / 38.6 Blackwater River Perennial 208 (CL) 185 HDD Within 1000 feet Aquatic Life, Migratory Dissolved Oxygen and Mercury February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
City of Suffolk, VA fish Spawning and in Fish
Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 39.4 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 39.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 39.7 UNT to Blackwater River Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
K-46

and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 40.1 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 8 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 40.2 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 7 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 40.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Flume Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 41.4 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 5 (CL) 3 Flume NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 41.6 UNT to Blackwater River Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 41.6 UNT to Blackwater River Ephemeral 3 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 41.6 UNT to Blackwater River Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 41.6 UNT to Blackwater River Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 42.3 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 8 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 42.3 UNT to Blackwater River Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Aquatic Life, Mercury in Fish February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 42.7 UNT to Blackwater River Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody. Pre-
Temp ROW Flume Migratory fish Spawning construction aquatic species relocations.
and Nursery
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 42.7 UNT to Blackwater River Intermittent 4 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Centerline Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 44.5 UNT to Kingsale Swamp Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 44.6 UNT to Kingsale Swamp Perennial 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 44.6 UNT to Kingsale Swamp Perennial 7 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 44.6 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 44.6 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 1.5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 45.1 UNT to Kingsale Swamp Perennial 11 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 45.4 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 11 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 45.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 10 (CL) 4 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 45.7 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 8 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 45.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 6 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 46.1 UNT to Kingsale Swamp Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 46.2 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 48 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 9 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 48.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 48.7 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 26 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
K-47

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 49.2 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 4 (CL) 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 49.9 UNT to Quaker Swamp Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 50.5 UNT to Quaker Swamp Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 51.7 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 8 (CL) Flume NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.1 UNT to Quaker Swamp Intermittent 3 (CL) 4 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.1 UNT to Quaker Swamp Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.2 UNT to Quaker Swamp Intermittent 4.5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.6 UNT to Quaker Swamp Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.6 UNT to Quaker Swamp Intermittent 2 (CL) 3 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 52.7 UNT to Daughtrey Perennial 17 (CL) 16 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Poccoson Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 53.9 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 53.9 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 53.9 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 54.6 UNT to Cohoon Creek Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 55.4 UNT to Cohoon Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 55.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA
Temp ATWS, Flume
Temp ROW

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 56.2 UNT to Cohoon Creek Perennial 15 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 56.3 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 1 (CL) 0.5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 56.3 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 56.4 UNT to Cohoon Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 56.7 UNT to Cohoon Creek Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 56.7 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) 55 Pond NA NA NA
Temp ROW
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 57 UNT to Eley Swamp Intermittent 2 (CL) 2.5 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ATWS,
Temp ROW

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 58 UNT to Eley Swamp Perennial 9 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 58.1 UNT to Eley Swamp Perennial 4 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Suffolk, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 58.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 0.5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 59.3 UNT to Lake Prince Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 59.4 UNT to Lake Prince Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 59.4 UNT to Lake Prince Intermittent 12 (CL) 2 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 60.5 UNT to Lake Prince Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Flume NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 60.9 UNT to Lake Prince Intermittent 2 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Public fishing NA
Centerline Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61 Lake Prince Reservoir 33 (CL) HDD NA Public fishing Lake NA
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61 Prince Lake Reservoir 171 (CL) 135 HDD NA Public fishing Lake NA
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61 Lake Prince Reservoir Reservoir Not Crossed by NA Public fishing Lake NA
Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61.1 Prince Lake Reservoir 49 (CL) 135 HDD NA Public fishing Lake NA
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61.1 Prince Lake Reservoir 116 (CL) HDD NA Public fishing Lake NA
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61.1 UNT to Lake Prince Ephemeral 3 (CL) 1 HDD NA UNT to Public fishing NA
Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 61.6 UNT to Western Branch Intermittent 1 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Public fishing NA
Reservoir Centerline Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 61.7 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 9 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Reservoir Flume Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 61.8 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Reservoir Flume Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 61.8 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 3 Not Crossed by NA UNT to Public fishing NA
K-48

Reservoir Centerline Lake

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 62.4 Western Branch Reservoir 302 (CL) HDD NA Public fishing Lake NA
Reservoir
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 62.7 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Reservoir Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 63 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 2 (CL) 2 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Reservoir Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 63 UNT to Western Branch Perennial 5 (CL) 3 Dam and Pump NA UNT to Public fishing NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Reservoir Lake
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 63.6 Western Branch Perennial 60 (CL) HDD NA Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Nansemond River fish Spawning and
Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 63.6 Western Branch Perennial 143 (CL) 150 HDD NA Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Nansemond River fish Spawning and
Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 64.4 Nansemond River Perennial 460 (CL) 440 HDD NA Aquatic Life, Migratory February 15 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
fish Spawning and
Nursery

City of Suffolk, VA Temp ROW, AP-3 / 65.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp TS Centerline
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 65.9 UNT to Unnamed Intermittent 7 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW, Reservoir
Temp TS
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 66.9 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 67 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 67.6 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 24 (CL) 15 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 68 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 25 (CL) 15 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 68.5 UNT to Great Dismal Intermittent 30 (CL) 5 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 69.6 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 24 (CL) 23 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 70.2 UNT to Great Dismal Intermittent 18 (CL) 5 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 70.9 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 15 (CL) 15 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp Flume 3) Open Cut

City of Suffolk, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 71.3 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 14 (CL) 14 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp Flume
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 71.4 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 12 (CL) 14 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 71.6 UNT to East Ditch Perennial 5 (CL) Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 71.7 UNT to East Ditch Perennial 3 (CL) 3 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 71.8 UNT to East Ditch Perennial 4 (CL) 4 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 73.6 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 13 (CL) 10 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 73.7 UNT to Great Dismal Intermittent 9 (CL) 7 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 73.9 UNT to Great Dismal Perennial 17 (CL) 15 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Swamp
City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (AR) 5 Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 15 (AR) Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.2 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.3 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 74.3 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 15 (CL) 7 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp AR AP-3 / 74.9 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Temp AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm AR, AP-3 / 75 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Temp AR NA Unclassified NA
Temp AR
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 75 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 43 (CL) 15 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 75.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 75.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch Perm AR NA Unclassified NA
K-49

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 76 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 30 (CL) 15 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 76.9 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 77.4 Deep Creek Perennial 32 (CL) 14 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified February 15 to June 30 Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 77.4 UNT to Deep Creek Perennial 6 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 77.4 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 3 (CL) 2 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 77.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 77.8 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 5 (CL) 5 HDD NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm AR AP-3 / 78.3 UNT to Deep Creek Canal/Ditch 5 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 78.3 UNT to Deep Creek Intermittent 42 (CL) 3 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 78.8 UNT to Unnamed Pond Perennial 20 (CL) 6 1) Dam and Pump 2) NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Flume
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 78.8 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 78.9 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 79 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 7 (CL) HDD NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 79 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 79.7 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 81 UNT to South Branch Ephemeral 3 (CL) 3 Flume NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Elizabeth River

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 81.2 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 81.6 Unnamed Pond Pond Pond (AR / CL) Pond NA Unclassified NA

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 81.8 South Branch Elizabeth Perennial 835 (CL) 840 HDD NA Aquatic Life, Migratory February 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
River fish Spawning and
Nursery

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 82.1 UNT to South Branch Intermittent 17 (CL) 6 Part of Elizabeth NA UNT to Aquatic Life, February 1 to June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Temp ROW Elizabeth River River HDD Migratory fish Spawning
and Nursery

City of Chesapeake, VA Temp ROW AP-3 / 82.1 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 4 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
 Appendix K-1

Waterbody Crossings Along the Atlantic Coast Projecta

Access Road
(AR) and State/Commonwealth or
Project Centerline (CL) Survey/ Desktop Federal Time of Year State/Commonwealth and Federal
County/City, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings Estimated OHWM Blasting Planned (in-stream or State/Commonwealth Restriction (TOYR) (work Species Survey Results / Assumed Atlantic Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
Commonwealth Crossed b Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) c Width (feet) c Construction Methodd within 1000 feet) Regulatory Classification Impairment limited between dates listed) Presence based on Agency Datae commitments) f
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 82.3 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 6 (CL) 6 Flume NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 82.4 UNT to South Branch Ephemeral 5 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Elizabeth River Centerline

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 82.4 UNT to South Branch Perennial 5 (CL) 5 Flume NA Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Elizabeth River

City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW, AP-3 / 82.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Temp ROW Centerline
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 82.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
City of Chesapeake, VA Perm ROW AP-3 / 82.5 Unnamed Ditch Canal/Ditch 3 Not Crossed by NA Unclassified NA
Centerline
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-5 / 0.2 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 2 (CL) 2 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Creek
Greensville County, VA Perm AR, AP-5 / 0.4 UNT to Greensville Intermittent 4 (AR) 4 (CL) 3.5 Flume In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Perm ROW, Creek
Temp ROW
Greensville County, VA Perm ROW, AP-5 / 0.8 Greensville Creek Perennial 22 (CL) 10 1) Dam and Pump 2) In-stream; Within 1000 feet Unclassified NA Pre-construction aquatic species relocations.
Temp ROW Flume

a
Shaded rows indicate waterbody crossings on the Monongahela and George Washington National Fores
b
Project facility abbreviations used in the tables include
Perm AR = Permanent Access Road
Perm AR = Permanent Access Road
Temp AR = Temporary Access Road
Perm ROW = Permanent Workspace/Right-of-Way
Temp ROW = Temporary Workspace/Right-of-Way
Temp ATWS = Temporary Additional Workspace
Temp TS = Temporary Topsoil Workspace
Perm CS = Permanent Compressor Station Footprint
Temp CS = Temporary Compressor Station Workspace
Perm GB = Permanent Ground Bed Easement
K-50

Temp GB = Temporary Ground Bed Workspace

Perm MR = Permanent Metering and Regulation Station Footprint
Temp CY = Temporary Contractor Yard
c
Access Road (AR) and Centerline (CL) Crossings" and Survey/Desktop Estimated OHWM Width" represent measures of the width or crossing width of waterbodies. The first two crossing lengths, for access roads and for the pipeline centerline are GIS derived measurements based on waterbody polygons and the distance the respective facilities (access road or pipeline centerline) cross within
the waterbody polygon. The third column of measurement is included for features that are not crossed by either an access road or the pipeline centerline, based on the field survey or desktop estimated ordinary high water mark (OHWM) width of the waterbodies.
d
Construction Method includes trenchline construction methods for waterbodies that have a pipeline centerline crossing length. For waterbodies that are not crossed by the pipeline centerline or other unique facility components this column reads Not Crossed by Centerline. For waterbodies that intersect unique facility components (e.g., compressor stations, contractor yards) the column refers to
the unique facility crossed and identifies the nature of the planned impacts.
e
Based on results of field surveys conducted by ACP, and/or based on historic survey data provided by federal and/or state agencies denoting presence of sensitive species within the waterbody or watershed. The federal and state listed species that were documented during ACP surveys at waterbody crossing locations are not disclosed in this table in order to protect the species from over-
collection, habitat degradation, and/or to respect landowner, land-managing agencies, and/or regulatory agencies request to restrict the release of the location information.
e
Includes Agency Recommended Mitigation measures received to date in consultation with State/Commonwealth and Federal agencies. Agency consultations are on-going; updates to mitigation measures will be provided when av
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Harrison County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 0.2 UNT to Tanner Perennial 2 (CL) 2 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Harrison County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 0.7 UNT to Dry Fork Intermittent NA 2 Not Crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Centerline feet
Harrison County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 0.8 UNT to Dry Fork Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR TL-635 / 0.9 Dry Fork Perennial 6 (AR) 4 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR TL-635 / 0.9 UNT to Dry Fork Perennial 4 (AR) 5 Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 1.3 Dry Fork Perennial 11 (CL) 8 1) Dam and In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 1.4 UNT to Dry Fork Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 2.1 Meathouse Fork Perennial 30 (CL) 25 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1, HQS Fecal Coliform, April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Within 1000 Iron, CNA
Doddridge County, WV
feet Biological
Aquatic Life
Pipeline TL-635 / 2.9 Johnson Fork Perennial 6 (CL) 6 1) Dam and In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 2.9 UNT to Johnson
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 4 UNT to Indian
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
K-51

Fork 18 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.

Pipeline TL-635 / 4 UNT to Indian Perennial 13 (CL) 12 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Fork Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 4.6 UNT to Indian Perennial 9 (CL) 8 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Fork Within 1000
feet
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR TL-635 / 5 Indian Fork Perennial 20 (AR) 15 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 5.1 UNT to Indian Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Fork Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR TL-635 / 5.1 Indian Fork Perennial 6 (AR) 6 Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 5.4
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Buckeye Creek Perennial Perm AR NA B1, HQS April 1 - June 30
21 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 5.4
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Indian Fork Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
12 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 5.5 Buckeye Creek Perennial 31 (CL) 10 1) Dam and In-stream; B1, HQS Fecal Coliform April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 5.5 UNT to Buckeye Intermittent 17 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Creek Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 5.9 UNT to Buckeye Intermittent 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Creek Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 6.7 Greenbriar Creek Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 7.8 Buffalo Calf Fork Perennial 21 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 Fecal Coliform April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 7.8
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Buffalo Calf Fork Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
10 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 7.9 UNT to Buffalo Perennial NA 6 Not Crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV
Workspace Calf Fork Centerline feet
TL-635 / 7.9 UNT to Buffalo
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Calf Fork 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 8.9 UNT to Buffalo Perennial 8 (CL) 8 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Calf Fork Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Pipeline TL-635 / 9.4 Long Run Perennial 26 (CL) 25 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 9.4
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR UNT to Long Run Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
25 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 10.6 Buckeye Run Perennial 17 (CL) 16 Bore Within 1000 B1, HQS Fecal Coliform, April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace feet Iron, CNA
Doddridge County, WV
Biological
Aquatic Life
Pipeline TL-635 / 10.6 UNT to Buckeye Perennial 10 (CL) 10 Bore Within 1000 UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV
Workspace Run feet
TL-635 / 11.7 UNT to Buckeye
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30
Run 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 12.9 Flint Run Perennial 12 (CL) 10 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1, HQS Fecal Coliform April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 13.5
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR UNT to Flint Run Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30
4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 14.1 UNT to Righthand Perennial 7 (CL) 7 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Fork East Run Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 14.1
UNT to Righthand
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork East Run
19 (AR) 7 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 14.1 UNT to Righthand
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
K-52

TL-635 / 14.2
UNT to Righthand
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork East Run
3 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 14.2 UNT to Big Battle
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 6 (AR) 6 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 15.1 UNT to Big Battle Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Pipeline TL-635 / 15.2 UNT to Big Battle Perennial 3 (CL) 2 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 15.5
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Big Battle Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
18 (AR) 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 15.6 UNT to Big Battle Perennial 11 (CL) 5 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Run Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 15.8 UNT to Big Battle
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 3 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 15.8 UNT to Big Battle Perennial 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 15.8 UNT to Big Battle
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 5 (AR) 5 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 16.3
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Big Battle Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
31 (AR) 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 16.5
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Big Battle Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
27 (AR) 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
TL-635 / 16.5 UNT to Big Battle
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 5 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions.
Pipeline TL-635 / 17.8 Little Battle Run Perennial 16 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 17.8
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Little Battle Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
6 (AR) 6 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Ground Bed TL-635 / 17.8 UNT to Little Perennial NA 1 Ground Bed NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV
Battle Run
TL-635 / 17.8
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Little Battle Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
19 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Pipeline TL-635 / 18.5 McElroy Creek Perennial 74 (CL) 55 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Endangered Mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody and
Workspace Within 1000 Water / DTI survey or mussel relocation requirements.
Doddridge County, WV feet Agency documented
presence of sensitive
species
TL-635 / 18.5 Endangered Mussels Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody and
Water / DTI survey or mussel relocation requirements.
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR McElroy Creek Perennial Perm AR NA B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Agency documented
presence of sensitive
37 (AR) 55 species
Pipeline TL-635 / 18.6 UNT to McElroy Perennial 41 (CL) 6 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Creek Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 19
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Franks Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
10 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Pipeline TL-635 / 20.6 Franks Run Perennial 31 (CL) 20 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Doddridge County, WV Workspace Within 1000
feet
TL-635 / 21.9 UNT to Broad
Doddridge County, WV Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 5 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Tyler County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 23.1 UNT to Indian Intermittent NA 5 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Creek centerline feet
Tyler County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 23.1 Indian Creek Perennial 16 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo Perennial 15 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-53

Workspace Run Within 1000

feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 3 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 10 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 11 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 8 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 24.8 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 17 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 25.4 UNT to Buffalo Perennial NA 4 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Run centerline feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.4 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 5 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 25.4 UNT to Buffalo Perennial 13 (CL) 12 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Run Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.4 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 24 (AR) 12 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.4 UNT to Arches
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork 17 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.4
Perm AR Arches Fork Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
27 (AR) 25 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.5 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 10 (AR) 9 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.5 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 4 (AR) 9 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.5 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 4 (AR) 9 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 25.9 UNT to Arches
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Fork 8 (AR) 6 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 22 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 59 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 81 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 9 (AR) 8 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 54 (AR) 2 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 6 (AR) 2 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 4 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 3 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 2 (AR) 2 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 26.2 UNT to Buffalo
Perm AR Intermittent Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 2 (AR) 2 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 26.8 UNT to Carpenter Perennial NA 8 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Run centerline feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 26.9 Carpenter Run Perennial 16 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 28.1 Ashcamp Run Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.4 UNT to South Perennial NA 4 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing centerline feet
Creek
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.4 South Fork Perennial 74 (CL) 70 1) Dam and In-stream; B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 DTI survey or Agency Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody and
K-54

Workspace Fishing Creek Pump 2) Flume Within 1000 documented presence of mussel relocation requirements.
feet sensitive species
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.5 UNT to South Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
Creek feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 29.5 UNT to South
Perm AR Fork Fishing Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30
Creek 4 (AR) 4 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent 10 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
Creek feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent 7 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
Creek feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent 9 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
Creek feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent NA 4 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing centerline feet
Creek
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent NA 4 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing centerline feet
Creek
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 UNT to South Intermittent NA 4 Not crossed by Within 1000 UNT to B1, HQS April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fork Fishing centerline feet
Creek
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 29.7 South Fork Perennial 66 (CL) 50 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1, HQS Fecal Coliform, April 1 - June 30 No mussels obseved Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Fishing Creek Within 1000 Iron, CNA during survey
feet (Conditions not
allowable)
Biological -
Aquatic life
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 30.1 South Fork Perennial 54 (CL) 45 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1, HQS Fecal Coliform, April 1 - June 30 DTI survey or Agency Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody and
Workspace Fishing Creek Within 1000 Iron, CNA documented presence of mussel relocation requirements.
feet (Conditions not sensitive species
allowable)
Biological -
Aquatic life
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 30.9 Richwood Run Perennial 33 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 Fecal Coliform April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Within 1000
feet
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 30.9 Fecal Coliform
Perm AR Richwood Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
24 (AR) 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 30.9 Fecal Coliform
Perm AR Richwood Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
24 (AR) 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 31.8 Upper Run Perennial 29 (CL) 20 Dam and Pump In-stream; B1 Fecal Coliform April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 32.2 UNT to Upper Perennial 18 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Run Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 33.2 Lower Run Perennial 27 (CL) 7 1) Dam and In-stream; B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.2
Perm AR Lower Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
34 (AR) 7 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.4
Perm AR Lower Run Perennial Perm AR NA B1 April 1 - June 30
14 (AR) 14 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Pipeline TL-635 / 33.4 UNT to Lower Perennial 15 (CL) 15 Dam and Pump In-stream; UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Workspace Run Within 1000
feet
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.5 South Fork
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA B1, HQS April 1 - June 30
Fishing Creek 87 (AR) 98 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.5 UNT to Lower
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 11 (AR) 10 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.5 UNT to Lower
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 7 (AR) 6 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
K-55

Wetzel County, WV TL-635 / 33.5 UNT to Lower

Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30
Run 7 (AR) 6 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Wetzel County, WV Compressor Mockingbird UNT to Lower Intermittent NA 10 Compressor NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Station Hill / 33.6 Run Station -
Temporary
Impact
Wetzel County, WV Compressor Mockingbird UNT to Lower Perennial NA 6 Compressor NA UNT to B1 April 1 - June 30 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Station Hill / 33.6 Run Station -
Temporary
Impact
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 0.2 UNT to Turtle Perennial 4 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; TSF Aquatic Life March 1 - June 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
PA Workspace Creek Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, TL-636 / 0.2 UNT to Turtle Aquatic Life
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA TSF March 1 - June 15
PA Creek 13 (AR) 3 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 0.6 UNT to Turtle Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; TSF Aquatic Life March 1 - June 15 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
PA Workspace Creek Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 1.2 UNT to Kemerer Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and In-stream; Unclassified Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Hollow Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, TL-636 / 1.2 UNT to Kemerer Aquatic Life
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA Unclassified
PA Hollow 4 (AR) 4
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 1.3 Kemerer Hollow Perennial 5 (CL) 4 1) Dam and In-stream; Unclassified Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 1.7 UNT to Kemerer Perennial 6 (CL) 1 1) Dam and In-stream; Unclassified Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Hollow Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 1.9 UNT to Kemerer Perennial 5 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; Unclassified Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Hollow Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 2.5 UNT to Steels Perennial 4 (CL) 4 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to HQ-CWF Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 2.6 Steels Run Perennial 7 (CL) 6 1) Dam and In-stream; HQ-CWF Aquatic Life October 1 to December Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
PA Workspace Pump 2) Flume Within 1000 31
feet
Westmoreland County, TL-636 / 2.7 UNT to Steels
Perm AR Perennial Perm AR NA UNT to HQ-CWF
PA Run 2 (AR) 2
 Appendix K-2

Waterbody Crossings Along the Supply Header Project

Access Road Blasting State/Commonwealth or State/Commonwealth

(AR) and Survey/Desktop Planned (in- Federal Time of Year and Federal Species
Project Centerline (CL) Estimated stream or State/Commonwealt Restriction (TOYR) (work Survey Results /
County, State/ Facilities Segment / Waterbody Crossings (feet) OHWM Width Construction within 1000 h Regulatory limited between dates Assumed Presence DTI Commitments to Conservation Measures (TOYR or other
a
Commonwealth Crossed Milepost Feature Name Regime (feet) a Method b feet) Classification Impairment listed) based on Agency Data c
commitments) d
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 2.9 UNT to Steels Perennial 10 (CL) 10 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to HQ-CWF Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 3.2 UNT to Steels Perennial 6 (CL) 4 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to HQ-CWF Aquatic Life NA
PA Workspace Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 3.6 UNT to Perennial 6 (CL) 5 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to HQ-CWF NA
PA Workspace Haymakers Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Pipeline TL-636 / 3.8 UNT to Perennial 3 (CL) 3 1) Dam and In-stream; UNT to HQ-CWF NA
PA Workspace Haymakers Run Pump 2) Flume Within 1000
feet
Westmoreland County, Compressor JB Tonkin / UNT to Perennial NA 8 Compressor NA UNT to HQ-CWF NA
PA Station 3.9 Haymakers Run Station -
Temporary
Impact
Westmoreland County, Compressor JB Tonkin / Haymakers Run Perennial NA 9 Compressor NA HQ-CWF October 1 - December Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
PA Station 3.9 Station - 31
Temporary
Impact
Westmoreland County, TL-636 / 3.9 October 1 - December
Perm AR Haymakers Run Perennial Perm AR NA HQ-CWF
PA 9 (AR) 9 31 Will adhere to time of year restrictions for work within the waterbody.
Westmoreland County, Compressor JB Tonkin / UNT to Perennial NA 3 Compressor NA UNT to HQ-CWF NA
PA Station 3.9 Haymakers Run Station -
Temporary
Impact
K-56

a
Access Road (AR) and Centerline (CL) Crossings" and Survey/Desktop Estimated OHWM Width" represent measures of the width or crossing width of waterbodies. The first two crossing lengths, for access roads and for the pipeline centerline are GIS derived measurements based on waterbody polygons and the distance
the respective facilities (access road or pipeline centerline) cross within the waterbody polygon. The third column of measurement is included for features that are not crossed by either an access road or the pipeline centerline, based on the field survey or desktop estimated ordinary high water mark (OHWM) width of the
waterbodies.
b
Construction Method includes trenchline construction methods for waterbodies that have a pipeline centerline crossing length. For waterbodies that are not crossed by the pipeline centerline or other unique facility components this column reads Not Crossed by Centerline. For waterbodies that intersect unique facility
components (e.g., compressor stations, contractor yards) the column refers to the unique facility crossed and identifies the nature of the planned impacts.
c
Based on results of field surveys conducted by DTI, and/or based on historic survey data provided by federal and/or state agencies denoting presence of sensitive species within the waterbody or watershed. The federal and state listed species that were documented during DTI surveys at waterbody crossing locations are not
disclosed in this table in order to protect the species from over-collection, habitat degradation, and/or to respect landowner, land-managing agencies, and/or regulatory agencies request to restrict the release of the location information.
d
Includes Agency Recommended Mitigation measures received to date in consultation with State/Commonwealth and Federal agencies. Agency consultations are on-going; updates to mitigation measures will be provided when available.
 APPENDIX L

WETLANDS CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE

AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 TABLE L-1

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
AP-1
West Virginia
Harrison County 0.0 05020002 whab001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
0.0 05020002 whab001s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
0.0 05020002 whab001s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
0.0 05020002 whab001e PEM 3 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
0.0 05020002 whab001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
0.5 05020002 whab002e PEM 7 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
1.1 05020002 wleb001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Lewis County 1.1 05020002 wleb001e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
5.7 05020002 wlea003e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
5.7 05020002 wlea002e PEM 53 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
5.8 05020002 wlea004e PEM 44 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.2 05020002 wlea005e PEM 9 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-1

8.2 05020002 wleb003e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

9.2 05020002 wlea006e PEM 6 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
9.2 05020002 wleb004e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
9.6 05020002 wleb201e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
10.3 05020002 wleb006s PSS 24 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
11.8 05020002 wlea007e PEM 26 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
14.5 05020002 wleh006e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
15.0 05020002 wleb106e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
15.3 05020002 wleb107e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
16.4 05020002 wleb108e PEM 16 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
16.4 05020002 wleb108e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
19.9 05020002 wlea011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.7 05020002 wlea012f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Upshur County 24.0 05020001 wupa001e PEM 26 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
24.0 05020001 wupa001e PEM 29 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
24.3 05020001 wupa002e PEM 12 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
24.7 05020001 wupa003e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
24.7 05020001 wupa003e PEM 15 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
25.4 05020001 wupb001e PEM 39 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
25.4 05020001 wupb001e PEM 5 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
25.7 05020001 wupb002e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
25.9 05020001 wupb003e PEM 429 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
26.0 05020001 wupb004e PEM 874 1.5 0.0 Open Cut
26.3 05020002 wupa005e PEM 72 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
26.6 05020002 wupa004e PEM 39 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
26.8 05020002 wupa006e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
29.1 05020001 wupb006e PEM 56 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
29.3 05020001 wupb007e PEM 100 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
30.5 05020001 wupa007e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
30.6 05020001 wupa007e PEM 3 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
30.9 05020001 wupa008e PEM 21 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-2

30.9 05020001 wupa008e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

36.1 05020001 wupb009f PFO 1 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
36.1 05020001 wupa010f PFO 16 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
36.1 05020001 wupa010f PFO 1 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
36.1 05020001 wupa010f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
36.1 05020001 wupb009f PFO 18 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
36.8 05020001 wupb010e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
37.9 05020001 wupb011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
39.4 05020001 wupa012e PEM 141 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
39.6 05020001 wupa015f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
41.3 05020001 wupa011e PEM 23 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
Randolph County 47.3 05020001 wraa104e PEM 22 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
47.4 05020001 wrab103e PEM 22 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
48.4 05020001 wraf002e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
48.8 05020001 wrac099e PEM 62 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
50.2 05020001 wrac100e PEM 58 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
50.2 05020001 wrac100e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
50.3 05020001 wrac101e PEM 22 0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
50.7 05020001 wraa402f PFO 12 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
50.7 05020001 wraa402f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
50.7 05020001 wraa402f PFO 4 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
50.8 05020001 wraa403e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
50.8 05020001 wrae001e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
50.9 05020001 wraa404f PFO 32 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
50.9 05020001 wraa404e PEM 125 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
51.0 05020001 wraa405f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
51.2 05020001 wraa406e PEM 14 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
51.2 05020001 wraa407e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
51.4 05020001 wraa408f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
51.4 05020001 wraa409e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
51.4 05020001 wraa409e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
51.4 05020001 wraa410f PFO 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-3

51.5 05020001 wraa411f PFO 31 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

51.6 05020001 wraa412f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
51.6 05020001 wraa413f PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
51.7 05020001 wraa414e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
51.8 05020001 wraa418e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
51.9 05020001 wraa417e PEM 19 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
52.0 05020001 wraa416e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
52.0 05020001 wraa415f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
52.1 05020001 wraa420f PFO 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
52.2 05020001 wraa423e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
52.3 05020001 wraa422e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
53.3 05020001 wraa421e PEM 71 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
53.7 05020001 wraa424e PEM 29 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
54.3 05020001 wraa429e PEM 71 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
54.4 05020001 wraa430s PSS 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
55.1 05020001 wrap001e PFO 16 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
55.3 05020001 wrap003e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
55.4 05020001 wrap004e PEM 31 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
55.8 05020001 wrap005e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
55.9 05020001 wrap007e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
55.9 05020001 wrap008e PEM 16 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.0 05020001 wrap009e PEM 32 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.0 05020001 wrap011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.1 05020001 wrap012e PEM 135 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
56.1 05020001 wrap012e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.3 05050007 wrap017e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.4 05050007 wrap019e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.4 05050007 wrap020e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.4 05050007 wrap020s PSS 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
56.4 05050007 wrap022e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.5 05050007 wrap024s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.5 05050007 wrap025e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-4

56.7 05050007 wrap026e PEM 14 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

56.7 05050007 wrap027e PEM 10 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.7 05050007 wrap028e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.7 05050007 wrap029e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.8 05050007 wrap030e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
56.8 05050007 wrae200e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
57.3 05050007 wrae201e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
57.4 05050007 wrae202e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
57.4 05050007 wrae203e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
57.4 05050007 wrae205e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
57.4 05050007 wrae204e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
57.4 05050007 wrac104e PEM 76 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
57.9 05050007 wrae240e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
57.9 05050007 wrae239e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
58.2 05050007 wrae237e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
58.3 05050007 wrae236e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
58.3 05050007 wrae235e PEM 99 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
60.3 05050007 wrae207e PEM 15 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
61.2 05050007 wrae209e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
61.7 05050007 wrae225e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.2 05050007 wrae223e PEM 45 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.2 05050007 wrae222e PEM 110 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
62.4 05050007 wrae220s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
62.4 05050007 wrae220e PEM 14 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.4 05050007 wrae219e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.6 05050007 wrae218e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.6 05050007 wrae217e PEM 31 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
62.8 05050007 wrae216e PEM 86 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
63.0 05020001 wrae215f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
63.0 05020001 wrae214e PEM 78 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
63.3 05020001 wrae212e PEM 16 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
63.3 05020001 wrae213f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-5

63.5 05020001 wrae211e PEM 28 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

63.8 05020001 wrae210e PEM 26 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
Pocahontas County 71.0 05050007 wpoe002e PEM 6 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
71.7 05050003 wpoa406e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
71.7 05050003 wpoa404e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
71.7 05050003 wpoa404e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
71.7 05050003 wpoa403e PEM 345 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
72.2 05050003 wpoc105f PFO 181 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
74.6 05050003 wpoc109e PEM 53 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
74.6 05050003 wpoc109e PEM 0 0.0 0.0 NA
75.5 05050003 wpoc100e PEM 70 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
75.6 05050003 wpoc101e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
75.7 05050003 wpoc102e PEM 961 1.7 0.0 Open Cut
76.2 05050003 wpoc103e PEM 38 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
76.3 05050003 wpoc103e PEM 147 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
76.4 05050003 wpoc104e PEM 16 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
76.4 05050003 wpoc106e PEM 27 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
76.5 05050003 wpoc107s PSS 17 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
76.5 05050003 wpoc107s PSS 23 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
81.0 05050003 wpoe011e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
81.0 05050003 wpoe011e PEM 14 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
81.0 05050003 wpoe011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
81.1 g 05050003 wpoe010e PEM 26 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
82.7 g 05050003 wpoa400e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
Virginia
Highland County 85.4 g 02080201 whia407f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
85.4 g
02080201 whia406f PFO 49 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
88.3 02080201 whia403e PEM 29 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
90.6 02080201 whia400e PEM 2 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
91.3 02080201 whic121e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Bath County 94.8 02080201 nwi_va_e_002 PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
95.5 02080201 nwi_va_e_003 PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-6

97.7 02080201 nwi_va_k_003 PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

100.6 02080201 wbaa002e PEM 7 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
101.0 02080201 wbar009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
101.2 02080201 wbaf001f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
101.2 02080201 wbaf001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 nwi_va_k_004 PFO 9 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 nwi_va_k_004 PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 wbar004e PEM 89 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 nwi_va_k_004 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 nwi_va_k_004 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
103.1 02080202 nwi_va_k_004 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
103.1 02080202 wbar003e PEM 64 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
103.2 02080202 wbar003e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
104.2 02080202 wbar001f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
104.8 02080202 nwi_va_k_006 PFO 126 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
104.8 02080202 nwi_va_k_006 PFO 49 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
105.0 02080202 nwi_va_e_014 PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
105.7 02080202 wbar007f PFO 15 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
105.7 02080202 wbar007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Augusta County 108.3 02080202 waur001f PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
108.3 02080202 waur001e PEM 78 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
108.3 02080202 waur001e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
109.6 02080202 wauz007e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 NA
109.6 02080202 wauz006e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
109.7 02080202 wauz005e PEM 9 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
109.8 02080202 wauz004e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
110.2 02080202 wauc112e PEM 35 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
110.3 02080202 wauc113e PEM 216 0.4 0.0 Open Cut
112.0 02080202 wauc110e PEM 19 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
113.1 g 02080202 waua402s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
113.1 g 02080202 waua402s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
113.1 g 02080202 wauz003e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-7

113.5 02080202 waua403e PEM 6 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

114.3 02080202 waua405s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
114.7 02080202 wauc106e PEM 78 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
115.0 02080202 wauc104e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
115.0 02080202 wauc104e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
115.4 02080202 waub100e PEM 9 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
115.8 g 02080202 waub101e PEM 15 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
115.8 g 02080202 waub102e PEM 21 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
116.5 02080202 wauz001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
116.5 02080202 wauz002e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
117.1 02080202 wauc001f PFO 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
120.4 g 02070005 wauc002s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
143.2 02070005 wauc101e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.2 02070005 waub001e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
148.5 02070005 wauc102f PFO 204 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
148.6 02070005 wauc102f PFO 385 0.5 0.3 Open Cut
148.7 02070005 wauc102e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
150.8 02070005 wauc103f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
152.4 02070005 waub103f PFO 283 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
153.4 02070005 waua059f PFO 3 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
154.6 g 02070005 wauc100e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
156.0 02070005 waua053s PSS 13 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
156.0 02070005 waua053s PSS 27 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
156.2 02070005 waua052e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
156.2 02070005 waua052e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
156.2 02070005 waua052e PEM 20 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
156.4 02070005 waua051e PEM 20 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
156.4 02070005 waua051e PEM 23 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
156.9 02070005 waue001s PSS 104 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
157.5 02070005 waua400f PFO 128 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
Nelson County 158.9 02080203 wnea020f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
165.5 02080203 wnec050e PEM 28 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-8

165.5 02080203 wnec050e PEM 0 0.0 0.0 Open Cut

166.2 02080203 wnea051f PFO 24 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
166.2 02080203 wnea051f PFO 33 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
166.3 02080203 wnea051f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
171.0 02080203 wnez004s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
171.8 02080203 wnea402e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
182.9 02080203 wnep001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
184.5 02080203 wnea023f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
184.6 02080203 wnea022f PFO 110 0.2 0.1 HDD
Buckingham County 184.8 02080203 wbuc109f PFO 281 0.8 0.2 Open Cut
185.4 02080203 wbup007e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
186.8 02080203 nwi_va_a_025 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
186.8 02080203 nwi_va_a_025 PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
187.6 02080203 wbup005f PFO 104 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
188.2 02080203 wbup004f PFO 26 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
188.2 02080203 wbup003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
190.1 02080203 wbuc108f PFO 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
190.6 02080203 wbua001f PFO 56 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
190.7 02080203 wbua010f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.0 02080203 wbua002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.0 02080203 wbua002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.0 02080203 wbua002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.0 02080203 wbua002f PFO 15 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
191.0 02080203 wbua002f PFO 36 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
191.5 02080203 wbub050f PFO 93 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
191.9 02080203 wbub051s PSS 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
193.5 02080203 wbuc003f PFO 115 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
194.1 02080203 wbuc004e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
194.1 02080203 wbuc005f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
195.0 02080203 wbuk001e PEM 24 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
196.1 02080203 wbuk005e PEM 124 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
196.1 02080203 wbuk005e PEM 53 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-9

197.5 02080203 wbuk007e PEM 0 0.0 0.0 Open Cut

198.5 02080203 wbua200e PEM 29 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
198.5 02080203 wbua201e PEM 47 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
198.5 02080203 wbua201f PFO 68 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
200.1 02080203 wbul004s PSS 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
200.5 02080203 wbup002e PEM 132 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
201.2 02080203 wbup001s PSS 0 0.0 <0.1 Open Cut
201.2 02080203 wbup001f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
201.2 02080203 wbup001f PFO 121 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
201.2 02080203 wbup001s PSS 0 0.0 0.0 NA
201.8 02080203 wbul005f PFO 51 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
201.8 02080203 wbul005f PFO 78 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
203.6 02080205 wbul002f PFO 171 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
203.6 02080205 wbul002f PFO 53 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
205.2 02080205 wbul003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
206.5 02080205 wbul007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
206.6 02080205 wbul007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
206.9 02080205 wbul006f PFO 35 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
206.9 02080205 wbul006f PFO 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
207.8 02080205 wbua004f PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
207.8 02080205 wbua004f PFO 22 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
208.8 02080205 wbua400f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
209.1 02080205 wbuk013f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
209.2 02080205 wbuk013f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
209.2 02080205 wbuk013f PFO 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
209.4 02080205 wbuk016f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
209.5 02080205 wbuk017e PEM 31 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
209.5 02080205 wbuk018e PEM 157 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
210.1 02080205 wbuc104f2 PFO 210 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
210.2 02080205 wbuc104f2 PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
210.9 02080205 wbuk010f PFO 68 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-10

211.7 02080205 wbua203e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

211.7 02080205 wbua401f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
211.7 02080205 wbua401f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
211.8 02080205 wbua402e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
Cumberland County 213.8 02080207 wcuk001f PFO 19 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
213.9 02080207 wcuk002f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
214.5 02080207 wcuc001f PFO 32 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
214.8 02080207 nwi_va_044 PFO 197 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
214.8 02080207 nwi_va_044 PFO 80 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
215.0 02080207 wcuk014f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
215.4 02080207 wcuk016f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
216.0 02080207 wcuk017e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
218.2 02080207 wcuk012s PSS 41 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
218.7 02080207 wcuk011f PFO 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
218.7 02080207 wcuk011f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
218.7 02080207 wcuk011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
218.7 02080207 wcuk011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
218.7 02080207 wcuk011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
219.5 02080207 wcuk008f PFO 45 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
219.5 02080207 wcuk008f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
220.0 02080207 wcuc100e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
220.4 02080207 wcuk006e PEM 18 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
220.5 02080207 wcuk006e PEM 199 0.4 0.0 Open Cut
220.7 02080207 wcuk005e PEM 70 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
Prince Edward County 221.7 02080207 wpek001e PEM 90 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
222.6 02080207 wpek002e PEM 72 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
223.1 02080207 wpea005f PFO 97 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
223.2 02080207 nwi_va_047 PFO 51 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
223.2 02080207 nwi_va_047 PFO 19 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
223.2 02080207 wpea005f PFO 442 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
223.9 02080207 wpea002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
224.1 02080207 wpea003f PFO 60 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-11

224.3 02080207 wpea004f PFO 42 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

225.2 02080207 wpec001f PFO 53 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
225.5 02080207 wpea006f PFO 41 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
225.5 02080207 wpea006f PFO 17 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
Nottoway County 226.0 02080207 wnok021s PSS 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
226.1 02080207 wnok022f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
226.8 02080207 wnok001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
227.2 02080207 wnok002f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
227.2 02080207 wnok002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
228.3 02080207 wnok003f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
228.3 02080207 wnok003e PEM 155 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
228.8 02080207 wnok005f PFO 44 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
228.8 02080207 wnok005f PFO 0 0.0 0.0 NA
229.2 02080207 wnok006e PEM 153 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
229.3 02080207 wnok007f PFO 3 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
229.9 02080207 wnok008f PFO 7 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
229.9 02080207 wnok008f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
230.0 02080207 wnok009f PFO 47 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
231.8 02080207 wnol001f PFO 61 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
232.4 02080207 wnol003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
232.7 02080207 wnok017f PFO 30 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
232.7 02080207 wnok017e PEM 56 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
232.7 02080207 wnok017f PFO 83 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
232.8 02080207 wnok018s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
232.8 02080207 wnok018s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
233.4 02080207 wnok019f PFO 27 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
233.4 02080207 wnok019f PFO 63 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
233.5 02080207 wnok020s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
233.5 02080207 wnok020f PFO 33 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
235.2 02080207 wnom005e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
235.5 02080207 wnom006f PFO 191 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
235.5 02080207 wnom006f PFO 84 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
L-12

235.6 02080207 nwi_va_c_043 PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA

236.0 02080207 wnok101f PFO 275 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
236.1 02080207 wnok100f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
236.1 02080207 wnok100f PFO 54 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
237.4 02080207 wnop001f PFO 32 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
238.6 02080207 wnok010e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
238.8 02080207 wnok011e PEM 12 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
238.8 02080207 wnok011e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
238.8 02080207 wnok011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
239.1 02080207 wnok012f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
240.0 02080207 wnok013e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
240.6 02080207 wnok016f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
241.4 02080207 wnoc100f PFO 57 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
241.5 02080207 wnoc100f PFO 356 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
241.6 02080207 wnoc100f PFO 53 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
242.8 02080207 wnoc001f PFO 361 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
242.8 02080207 wnoc001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
242.9 02080207 wnoc001e PEM 158 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
242.9 02080207 wnoc001e PEM 333 0.6 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
243.0 02080207 wnoc001f PFO 105 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
244.1 02080207 nwi_va_k_007 PFO 496 1.4 0.3 Open Cut
245.1 02080207 wnol006f PFO 51 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
245.1 02080207 wnol006f PFO 117 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
245.4 02080207 wnoa010f PFO 17 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
245.6 02080207 wnol007f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
246.0 02080207 wnol008f PFO 64 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
246.0 02080207 wnol008f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
247.2 02080207 wnok024f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
247.2 02080207 wnok025f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
247.7 03010201 wnom001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
247.7 03010201 wnom001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
247.8 03010201 wnom001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-13

247.8 03010201 wnom001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

247.8 03010201 wnom001e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
247.8 03010201 wnom001e PEM 42 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
247.8 03010201 wnom001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
248.1 03010201 wnom002e PEM 52 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
248.1 03010201 wnom003f PFO 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
248.2 03010201 wnom003f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
248.4 03010201 wnom003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
248.4 03010201 wnom003f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
248.6 03010201 wnom004f PFO 7 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
248.6 03010201 wnom004f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
Dinwiddie County 249.1 03010201 wdim001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
249.1 03010201 wdim001f PFO 53 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
249.1 03010201 wdim001e PEM 59 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
249.1 03010201 wdim001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
249.2 03010201 wdim002s PSS 60 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
249.5 03010201 wdim003e PEM 9 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
249.6 03010201 wdim003e PEM 135 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
249.8 03010201 wdim004e PEM 37 0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
249.9 03010201 wdim005s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
250.2 03010201 wdim006f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
250.2 03010201 wdim006f PFO 51 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
250.2 03010201 wdim006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
250.2 03010201 wdim006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
250.5 03010201 wdim007f PFO 5 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
250.5 03010201 wdim007f PFO 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
250.6 03010201 wdim011f PFO 166 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
251.2 03010201 wdim010f PFO 11 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
251.2 03010201 wdim010f PFO 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
251.4 03010201 wdim008e PEM 7 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
251.5 03010201 wdim009e PEM 58 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
251.5 03010201 wdim009f PFO 7 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-14

251.5 03010201 wdim012f PFO 82 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

252.0 03010201 wdim015f PFO 54 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
252.0 03010201 wdim015f PFO 20 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.0 03010201 wdim015f PFO 0 0.0 0.0 NA
252.1 03010201 wdim016f PFO 7 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.1 03010201 wdim016f PFO 4 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.6 03010201 wdim018f PFO 61 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.7 03010201 wdim019f PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.7 03010201 wdim019f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
252.7 03010201 wdim019f PFO 19 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
252.9 03010201 wdim020f PFO 30 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
253.1 03010201 wdim021f PFO 24 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
253.6 03010201 wdic013f PFO 907 1.6 0.6 Open Cut
253.8 03010201 wdic013f PFO 516 0.8 0.4 Open Cut
254.0 03010201 wdic011f PFO 494 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
254.3 03010201 wdic010f PFO 29 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
254.5 03010201 wdic008e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
254.6 03010201 wdic007e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
254.6 03010201 wdib006f PFO 75 0.1 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
254.8 03010201 wdia006f PFO 159 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
255.4 03010201 wdib004f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
255.4 03010201 wdib005e PEM 54 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
255.5 03010201 wdib003s PSS 48 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
255.7 03010201 wdib002s PSS 156 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
255.9 03010201 wdib001f PFO 105 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
256.2 03010201 wdic006f PFO 29 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
256.5 03010201 wdic004f PFO 100 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
256.7 03010201 wdio030f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
257.3 03010201 wdio028f PFO 95 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
259.3 03010201 wdic001f PFO 78 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
259.3 03010201 wdic001f PFO 158 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
259.4 03010201 wdia400f PFO 221 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
L-15

259.7 03010201 wdio026f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

260.6 03010201 wdic003f PFO 410 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
Brunswick County 260.7 03010201 wbrc003f PFO 33 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
260.8 03010201 wbrc003f PFO 80 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
260.8 03010201 wbra201f PFO 100 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
261.3 03010201 wbrc001f PFO 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
261.5 03010201 wbra202f PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
261.5 03010201 wbra202f PFO 17 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
261.6 03010201 wbra400f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
262.5 03010201 wbra203f PFO 26 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
262.5 03010201 wbra203f PFO 126 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
262.6 03010201 wbra203f PFO 26 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
262.8 03010201 wbra204f PFO 242 0.3 0.2 Open Cut
262.9 03010201 wbra204f PFO 202 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
264.2 03010201 wbrc050e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
265.1 03010201 wbro003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
265.4 03010201 wbro005f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
265.4 03010201 wbro005f PFO 64 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
265.4 03010201 wbro005f PFO 0 0.0 0.0 NA

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
266.1 03010201 wbrr013f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
266.1 03010201 wbrr013f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
266.3 03010201 wbrr012f PFO 36 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
266.6 03010201 wbrr011s PSS 160 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
266.7 03010201 wbrr010f PFO 142 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
266.8 03010201 wbrr010f PFO 39 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
266.9 03010201 wbrr009e PEM 4 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
266.9 03010201 wbrr014f PFO 63 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
267.4 03010201 wbrr015s PSS 56 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
267.4 03010201 wbrr015f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
267.5 03010201 wbro010f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
267.8 03010201 wbro008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
267.9 03010201 wbro009f PFO 77 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-16

267.9 03010201 wbro009e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

267.9 03010201 wbro009f PFO 37 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
267.9 03010201 wbro009e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
269.4 03010201 nwi_va_b_061 PFO 113 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
269.7 03010201 wbrr006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
270.0 03010201 wbrr001f PFO 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
270.0 03010201 wbrr001f PFO 9 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
270.0 03010201 wbrr001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
270.2 03010201 wbrr002e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
270.2 03010201 wbrr002f PFO 97 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
270.5 03010201 wbrr003e PEM 108 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
270.5 03010201 wbrr003f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
270.5 03010201 wbrr003e PEM 15 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
270.6 03010201 wbrr003f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
271.8 03010201 wbrr005f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
271.8 03010201 wbrr005e PEM 18 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
271.9 03010201 wbrr005e PEM 23 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
271.9 03010201 wbrr005f PFO 352 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
272.0 03010201 wbrr007f PFO 19 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
272.6 03010201 wbrr008e PEM 35 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
272.9 03010201 wbro001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
273.0 03010201 wbro011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
273.0 03010201 nwi_va_b_054 PFO 48 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
273.0 03010201 nwi_va_b_054 PFO 90 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
274.3 03010201 wbrc101e PEM 55 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
274.3 03010201 wbrc101e PEM 23 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
274.4 03010201 wbrc100e PEM 94 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
274.4 03010201 wbrc102e PEM 21 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
274.6 03010204 wbrr016e PEM 1,003 1.9 0.0 Open Cut
274.9 03010204 nwi_va_b_045 PFO 385 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
275.0 03010204 nwi_va_b_045 PFO 14 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
275.5 03010204 wbro015e PEM 71 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-17

275.5 03010204 wbro015f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

275.5 03010204 wbro016e PEM 122 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
275.6 03010204 wbro017e PEM 52 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
275.9 03010204 wbrp002f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
276.1 03010204 wbrp003f PFO 27 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
276.1 03010204 wbrp003e PEM 85 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
276.1 03010204 wbrp003e PEM 46 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
276.1 03010204 wbrp003f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
276.8 03010204 wbro018f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
277.0 03010204 wbro019e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
277.0 03010204 wbro020f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
277.0 03010204 wbro020e PEM 13 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
277.0 03010204 wbro020f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
277.0 03010204 wbro020e PEM 32 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
277.6 03010204 wbrc103e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
277.6 03010204 wbrc103e PEM 104 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
277.7 03010204 wbrc104e PEM 60 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
278.9 03010204 wbro014e PEM 28 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
279.2 03010204 wbrp001e PEM 26 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
279.2 03010204 wbrp001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
280.0 03010204 wbra217s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
280.1 03010204 wbra217s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
280.4 03010204 wbra216f PFO 604 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
280.5 03010204 wbra216f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
280.6 03010204 wbra215f PFO 130 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
281.0 03010201 wbra214f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
281.3 03010201 wbra213s PSS 42 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
281.9 03010204 wbrb003f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
282.0 03010204 wbrb002f PFO 64 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
282.1 03010204 wbrb001f PFO 243 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
282.3 03010204 wbrb004f PFO 124 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
282.8 03010204 wbra002f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
L-18

282.9 03010204 wbra001f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

282.9 03010204 wbra001f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
Greensville County 283.0 03010204 WVA-DDF-002 PFO 24 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
283.0 03010204 WVA-DDF-002 PFO 163 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
283.1 03010204 WVA-DDF-002 PFO 204 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
283.3 03010204 WVA-DDF-010 PFO 61 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
283.5 03010204 WVA-DDF-011 PEM 104 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
283.9 03010204 wgra016f PFO 68 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
284.0 03010204 WVA-RDK-007 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
284.1 03010204 wgra016f PFO 81 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
284.1 03010204 wgra016e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
284.2 03010204 wgra016f PFO 16 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
284.2 03010204 wgra016f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
284.4 03010204 WVA-RDK-002 PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
284.5 03010204 WVA-RDK-001 PSS 1,110 1.9 0.3 Open Cut
285.0 03010204 wgrc108f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
285.0 03010204 wgrc108f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
285.4 03010204 wgra040f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
285.9 03010204 wgra013f PFO 27 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
285.9 03010204 wgra013f PFO 35 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
286.2 03010204 wgra014f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
286.2 03010204 wgra014f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
286.3 03010204 wgra015f PFO 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
286.4 03010204 wgra008f PFO 334 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
286.5 03010204 wgra008e PEM 104 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
286.8 03010204 wgra009f PFO 272 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
287.6 03010204 wgra039f PFO 174 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
287.8 03010204 wgra011f1 PFO 261 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
287.8 03010204 wgra011f2 PFO 377 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
288.2 03010204 wgra001f PFO 119 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
288.5 03010204 wgra002f PFO 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
288.5 03010204 wgra002f PFO 285 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
L-19

288.8 03010204 wgra002f PFO 206 0.3 0.1 Open Cut

289.1 03010204 wgrc109s PSS 19 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
290.1 03010204 wgrc010e PEM 472 0.8 0.0 Open Cut
290.2 03010204 wgrc011f PFO 40 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
290.2 03010204 wgrc011f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
290.4 03010204 wgrc009f PFO 511 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
291.4 03010204 wgra003f PFO 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
292.4 03010204 wgra012s PSS 3,493 6.0 0.8 Open Cut
294.0 03010204 nwi_va_k_010 PFO 153 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
294.0 03010204 nwi_va_k_011 PFO 696 1.9 0.5 Open Cut
295.6 03010204 wgrb003f PFO 369 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
295.7 03010204 wgrb003f PFO 240 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
295.9 03010204 wgrp004f PFO 138 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
296.1 03010204 wgrp003f PFO 78 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
296.8 03010204 wgrb001f PFO 242 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
296.9 03010204 wgrb002f PFO 773 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
297.4 03010204 wgrb002f PFO 159 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
297.5 03010204 wgrc012f PEM 149 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
297.7 03010204 wgra034s PSS 580 0.8 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
297.8 03010204 wgra034e PEM 373 0.9 0.0 Open Cut
297.9 03010204 wgra033f PFO 1,920 3.3 1.3 Open Cut
298.3 03010204 nwi_va_a_011 PFO 105 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
298.3 03010204 wgra032f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
298.4 03010204 nwi_va_a_010 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
298.4 03010204 nwi_va_a_009 PFO 24 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
298.4 03010204 wgra031f PFO 173 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
298.4 03010204 nwi_va_a_008 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
298.4 03010204 wgra030f PFO 153 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
298.5 03010204 nwi_va_a_006 PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
298.6 03010204 wgra029f PFO 101 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
298.7 03010204 wgrp005s PSS 804 1.4 0.2 Open Cut
299.3 03010204 wgrp006s PSS 562 1.0 0.1 Open Cut
L-20

299.4 03010204 wgrp006s PSS 658 1.1 0.1 Open Cut

299.6 03010204 wgrp006f PFO 217 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
299.6 03010204 wgrp006f PFO 1,095 1.9 0.7 Open Cut
AP-1 Subtotal 45,990 84.5 19.9
AP-2
North Carolina
Northampton County 0.3 03010204 wnra002f PFO 204 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
0.4 03010204 wnra002f PFO 75 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
0.7 03010204 wnra001f PFO 96 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
1.0 03010204 wnrh011f PFO 43 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
1.0 03010204 wnrh011f PFO 386 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
1.1 03010204 wnrh011f PFO 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
1.2 03010204 wnrh010f PFO 352 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
1.4 03010204 wnrh009f PFO 1,003 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
1.6 03010204 wnrh008f PFO 161 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
1.8 03010204 wnrh007f PFO 539 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
1.9 03010204 wnrh007f PFO 245 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
3.1 03010204 wnro001f PFO 203 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
3.4 03010204 wnrh012f PFO 155 0.3 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
3.5 03010204 wnrg001e PEM 43 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
3.6 03010204 wnrg002f PFO 428 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
5.1 03010107 wnrp023f PFO 200 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
6.6 03010107 wnrp019f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
8.0 03010107 wnrg005f PFO 77 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
8.5 03010107 wnrg006f PFO 73 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
8.5 03010107 wnrg006f PFO 77 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
9.6 03010107 wnrh005f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
9.6 03010107 wnrh005f PFO 3 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
9.6 03010107 wnrh005f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
9.6 03010107 wnrh005f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Halifax County 10.1 03010107 whlh002f PFO 134 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
10.7 03010107 whlh003f PFO 89 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
L-21

11.4 03010107 whlc002f PFO 20 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

11.4 03010107 whlc002f PFO 2 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
11.4 03010107 whlc002f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
11.6 03010107 whlc003e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
11.7 03010107 whlc003e PEM 8 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
11.7 03010107 whlc004e PEM 47 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
11.8 03010107 whlc005f PFO 11 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
11.9 03010107 whlc006f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
11.9 03010107 whlc006f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
12.8 03010107 whlc001f PFO 127 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
13.2 03010107 whlg001f PFO 1 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
13.2 03010107 whig001f PFO 114 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
13.6 03010107 whlf002s PSS 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
13.6 03010107 whlf003f PFO 157 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
13.9 03010107 whlf004s PSS 24 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
14.4 03010107 whlp001f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
14.4 03010107 whlp001f PFO 53 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
14.6 03010107 whlp001f PFO 60 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
14.6 03010107 whlp001f PFO 39 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
15.3 03010107 whlf007f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
15.4 03010107 whlf007f PFO 66 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
15.5 03010107 whlf008f PEM 229 0.4 0.0 Open Cut
15.7 03010107 whlf009f PFO 153 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
15.8 03010107 whlg005f PFO 746 1.4 0.5 Open Cut
16.2 03010107 nwi_nc_a_005 PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
16.9 03010107 nwi_nc_h_001 PEM 129 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
16.9 03010107 nwi_nc_h_001 PEM 102 0.6 0.0 Open Cut
17.3 03010107 whlg008f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
17.3 03010107 whlg008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
17.4 03010107 whlg008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
17.5 03010107 whlg008f PFO 542 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
17.8 03010107 whlg009f PFO 568 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
L-22

19.2 03020102 whlh010f PFO 283 0.4 0.2 Open Cut

19.7 03020102 whlh009f PFO 1,443 2.6 1.0 Open Cut
20.1 03020102 whlh009f PFO 1,726 3.0 1.2 Open Cut
20.4 03020102 whlh008f PFO 111 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
20.6 03020102 whlg012e PEM 525 0.9 0.0 Open Cut
20.7 03020102 whlg012f PFO 10 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
21.0 03020102 whlh032s PSS 10 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
21.1 03020102 whlh032s PSS 1,971 3.4 0.5 Open Cut
21.5 03020102 whlh032f PFO 268 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
21.6 03020102 whlh031f PFO 523 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
21.9 03020102 whlh030f PFO 124 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
21.9 03020102 whlh030f PFO 5 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
22.0 03020102 whlb103f PFO 166 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
22.2 03020102 whlh027e PEM 338 0.6 0.0 Open Cut
22.3 03020102 whlh027f PFO 172 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
22.7 03020102 whlh028f PFO 172 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
22.8 03020102 whlh028f PFO 40 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
22.8 03020102 whlh028f PFO 29 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
23.0 03020102 whlh029f PFO 448 0.8 0.3 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
23.1 03020102 whlh029f PFO 329 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
23.5 03020102 whlg019f PFO 163 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
23.6 03020102 whlg019f PFO 42 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
23.8 03020102 whlg018f PFO 305 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
24.2 03020102 whlg017s PSS 1,242 2.1 0.3 Open Cut
24.6 03020102 whlg016f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
24.6 03020102 whlg016f PFO 209 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
24.7 03020102 whlg015f PFO 455 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
24.9 03020102 whlb100f2 PFO 444 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
25.0 03020102 whlb100f1 PFO 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
25.0 03020102 whlb100f1 PFO 87 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
25.2 03020102 whlg014f PFO 107 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
25.3 03020102 whlg013f PFO 1,165 2.0 0.8 Open Cut
L-23

25.8 03020102 whlh012f PFO 400 0.7 0.3 Open Cut

26.3 03020102 whlh014f PFO 1,348 2.3 0.9 Open Cut
26.6 03020102 whlh014f PFO 532 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
27.2 03020102 whlh015f PFO 919 1.6 0.6 Open Cut
27.4 03020102 whlh015f PFO 431 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
27.7 03020102 whlh016f PFO 70 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
27.7 03020102 whlh016f PFO 169 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
29.0 03020102 whlh017f PFO 261 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
29.1 03020102 whlh018f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
29.1 03020102 whlh018f PFO 132 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
29.3 03020102 whlh019f PFO 320 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
29.7 03020102 whlh020f PFO 323 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
29.8 03020102 whlh020f PFO 95 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
30.2 03020102 whlh024f PFO 216 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
30.5 03020102 whlh025f PFO 168 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
30.9 03020102 whlh026f PFO 331 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
31.2 03020102 whlo001f PFO 105 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
31.6 03020102 whlh021s PSS 88 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
32.0 03020102 whlh023e PEM 213 0.4 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
32.0 03020102 whlh023e PEM 221 0.4 0.0 Open Cut
33.3 03020102 whlg010f PFO 437 1.0 0.3 Open Cut
33.7 03020102 whlg011f PFO 166 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
Nash County 34.8 03020102 wnag001f PFO 57 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
34.8 03020102 wnag001f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
34.8 03020102 wnag001f PFO 33 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
34.9 03020102 wnag002f PFO 124 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
35.1 03020102 wnag003f PFO 41 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
35.1 03020102 wnag003f PFO 83 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
35.1 03020102 wnah017f PFO 193 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
36.5 03020102 wnah015f PFO 945 1.6 0.7 Open Cut
36.6 03020102 wnah015f PFO 54 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
36.7 03020102 wnah014f PFO 123 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
L-24

37.0 03020102 wnah019f PFO 199 0.3 0.1 Open Cut

37.0 03020102 wnah019e PEM 104 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
37.0 03020102 wnah019e PEM 413 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
37.8 03020102 wnah036f PFO 83 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
37.9 03020102 wnah018s PSS 202 0.4 <0.1 Open Cut
38.1 03020102 wnah006f PFO 194 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
38.3 03020102 wnah005f PFO 282 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
38.4 03020102 wnab102s PSS 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
38.5 03020102 wnah004f PFO 251 0.3 0.2 Open Cut
38.7 03020102 wnab101f PFO 82 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
38.9 03020102 wnah003f PFO 234 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
39.1 03020102 wnah002f PFO 459 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
39.2 03020102 wnah001f PFO 846 1.5 0.6 Open Cut
39.7 03020101 wnab100f PFO 6 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
39.9 03020101 wnah008f PFO 56 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
39.9 03020101 wnah008f PFO 44 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.1 03020101 wnah007f PFO 250 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
40.9 03020101 wnah013f PFO 391 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
41.0 03020101 wnah012f PFO 292 0.5 0.2 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
41.6 03020101 wnah011f PFO 48 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.6 03020101 wnah011f PFO 22 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.7 03020101 wnah010f PFO 64 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.7 03020101 wnah010f PFO 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.8 03020101 wnah009f PFO 93 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
42.0 03020101 wnah034f PFO 498 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
42.1 03020101 wnah034f PFO 74 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
42.2 03020101 wnah034f PFO 73 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
42.8 03020101 wnac002f PFO 16 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
42.8 03020101 wnac002f PFO 36 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
43.0 03020101 wnac001f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
43.6 03020101 wnac003f PFO 322 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
44.0 03020101 wnac004f PFO 354 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
L-25

44.4 03020101 wnac005s PSS 119 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut

44.4 03020101 wnac005f PFO 157 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
44.5 03020101 wnac005f PFO 35 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
44.7 03020101 wnag012f PFO 193 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
44.8 03020101 wnag012f PFO 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
45.4 03020101 wnac006f PFO 264 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
45.6 03020101 wnab103f PFO 533 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
47.2 03020101 wnah021f PFO 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
47.6 03020101 wnah022f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
47.7 03020101 wnah022f PFO 2,450 4.2 1.7 Open Cut
48.1 03020101 wnah022e PEM 165 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
48.2 03020101 wnah022f PFO 708 1.2 0.5 Open Cut
48.3 03020101 wnah022f PFO 386 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
48.4 03020101 wnah023f PFO 1,041 1.9 0.7 Open Cut
48.6 03020101 nwi_nc_k_004 PFO 281 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
48.7 03020101 wnah023e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
48.7 03020101 nwi_nc_k_004 PFO 318 0.8 0.2 Open Cut
48.7 03020101 nwi_nc_k_004 PFO 366 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
48.8 03020101 wnah023f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
48.9 03020101 wnah023f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
48.9 03020101 wnah024f PFO 713 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
50.3 03020101 wnag006f PFO 99 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
50.7 03020101 wnag005f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
50.8 03020101 wnag004f PFO 113 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
51.5 03020101 wnag008f PFO 188 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
51.5 03020101 wnag008f PFO 7 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
51.6 03020101 wnag008f PFO 89 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
51.6 03020101 wnag008f PFO 290 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
52.0 03020101 wnag007f PFO 135 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
53.3 03020101 wnah030e PEM 92 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
53.3 03020101 wnah030e PEM 154 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
53.5 03020101 wnah029f PFO 370 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
L-26

53.7 03020101 wnah028f PFO 1,429 2.5 1.0 Open Cut

54.0 03020101 wnah028f PFO 730 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
54.3 03020101 wnah027f PFO 167 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
54.4 03020101 wnah027f PFO 1,208 1.9 0.8 Open Cut
54.9 03020101 wnah026f PFO 199 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
54.9 03020101 wnah026f PFO 225 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
55.7 03020101 wnah032f PFO 52 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
55.9 03020101 wnah033f PFO 573 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
56.2 03020101 wnah031f PFO 324 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
56.3 03020101 wnah031f PFO 2,419 4.2 1.7 Open Cut
56.6 03020101 wnah031f PFO 210 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
56.8 03020101 wnah025f PFO 1,218 2.1 0.8 Open Cut
57.0 03020101 wnah025f PFO 170 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
57.1 03020101 wnah025f PFO 237 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
57.9 03020101 wnao012f PFO 966 1.6 0.7 Open Cut
58.2 03020101 wnao012f PFO 1,969 3.1 1.4 Open Cut
58.8 03020101 wnap004f PFO 36 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.1 03020101 wnap003f PFO 81 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.1 03020101 wnap003f PFO 98 0.2 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
59.3 03020101 wnap002f PFO 66 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.4 03020101 wnap001f PFO 17 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.8 03020101 wnao011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
60.6 03020203 wnao010f PFO 1,100 2.0 0.8 Open Cut
60.8 03020203 wnao010f PFO 246 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
61.2 03020203 wnao009f PFO 188 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
61.3 03020203 wnap006f PFO 246 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
61.8 03020203 wnao008f PFO 263 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
62.1 03020203 wnao007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
62.3 03020203 wnao006f PFO 846 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
62.6 03020203 wnao005f PFO 493 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
62.8 03020203 wnao004f PFO 139 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
62.8 03020203 wnao004f PFO 329 0.7 0.2 Open Cut
L-27

63.3 03020203 wnao003f PFO 43 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

63.3 03020203 wnao003f PFO 137 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
64.6 03020203 wnao002f PFO 2,150 3.7 1.5 Open Cut
65.3 03020203 wnao001f PFO 408 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
Wilson County 66.0 03020203 wwio021f PFO 100 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
66.0 03020203 wwio021f PFO 165 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
66.5 03020203 wwio018f PFO 173 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
66.6 03020203 wwio017f PFO 552 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
66.9 03020203 nwi_nc_k_005 PFO 52 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
66.9 03020203 nwi_nc_k_005 PFO 195 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
66.9 03020203 nwi_nc_k_005 PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
67.7 03020203 wwio001s PSS 205 0.4 <0.1 Open Cut
67.8 03020203 wwio001f PFO 78 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
67.8 03020203 wwio001f PFO 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
67.8 03020203 wwio001s PSS 155 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
68.0 03020203 wwio002f PFO 136 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
69.1 03020203 wwio004e PEM 100 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
69.1 03020203 wwio004f PFO 96 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
69.3 03020203 wwio005f PFO 106 0.2 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
69.3 03020203 wwio005f PFO 229 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
69.6 03020203 wwio006f PFO 318 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
69.7 03020203 wwio006f PFO 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
69.9 03020203 wwio007f PFO 443 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
70.3 03020203 wwio009f PFO 568 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
70.4 03020203 wwio009f PFO 20 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
70.5 03020203 wwip020f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
70.5 03020203 wwio008f PFO 26 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
70.5 03020203 wwio008f PFO 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
70.9 03020203 wwio012f PFO 458 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
70.9 03020203 wwio012f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
70.9 03020203 wwio012f PFO 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
71.0 03020203 wwio012f PFO 60 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-28

71.0 03020203 wwio012f PFO 342 0.5 0.2 Open Cut

71.3 03020203 wwio013f PFO 668 1.2 0.5 Open Cut
71.6 03020203 wwip001f PFO 151 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
71.7 03020203 wwip002f PFO 51 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
71.9 03020203 wwip003e PEM 145 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
71.9 03020203 wwip003f PFO 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
72.3 03020203 wwic002f PFO 109 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
72.5 03020203 wwic001f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
72.9 03020203 wwic003f PFO 509 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
73.1 03020203 wwib101f PFO 321 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
73.2 03020203 wwib101f PFO 33 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
73.3 03020203 wwib101f PFO 516 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
73.4 03020203 wwib101f PFO 263 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
73.5 03020203 wwib100f PFO 126 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
73.8 03020203 wwip018f PFO 66 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
73.9 03020203 wwip017f PFO 87 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
74.0 03020203 wwip016f PFO 240 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
74.3 03020203 wwip015f PFO 442 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
74.5 03020203 wwip004f PFO 246 0.4 0.2 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
74.8 03020203 wwip006f PFO 317 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
74.9 03020203 wwip006f PFO 313 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
75.1 03020203 wwip007f PFO 268 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
75.2 03020203 wwip008f PFO 121 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
75.2 03020203 wwia001f PFO 276 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
75.6 03020203 wwip019f PFO 443 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
75.8 03020203 wwip019f PFO 66 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
76.0 03020203 wwip013f PFO 4,165 7.1 2.9 Open Cut
76.8 03020203 wwip013e PEM 39 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
76.8 03020203 wwip013f PFO 182 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
76.9 03020203 wwip014f PFO 285 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
77.0 03020203 wwio016f PFO 140 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
77.3 03020203 wwio015f PFO 257 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
L-29

77.4 03020203 wwio014s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

77.5 03020203 wwio014f PFO 1,113 1.9 0.8 Open Cut
Johnston County 77.9 03020203 wjoo003f PFO 1,798 3.1 1.2 Open Cut
78.5 03020201 wjoo002f PFO 966 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
79.1 03020201 wjob109f PFO 178 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
79.2 03020201 wjob109f PFO 73 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
79.3 03020201 wjob110f PFO 125 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
79.4 03020201 wjob111s PSS 386 0.7 0.1 Open Cut
79.5 03020201 wjob111s PSS 77 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
79.7 03020201 wjob106f PFO 99 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
79.8 03020201 wjob105f PFO 517 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
79.9 03020201 wjob105e PEM 41 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
80.1 03020201 wjoo004f PFO 1,102 1.9 0.8 Open Cut
80.4 03020201 wjop022f PFO 587 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
80.6 03020201 wjop020f PFO 1,368 2.3 0.9 Open Cut
81.0 03020201 wjop021f PFO 771 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
81.4 03020201 wjoo009f PFO 92 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
81.5 03020201 wjoo010e PEM 13 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
81.9 03020201 wjop004f PFO 796 1.3 0.5 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
82.5 03020201 wjoe001f PFO 87 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
82.6 03020201 wjoe002f PFO 186 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
83.2 03020201 wjoe004f PFO 346 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
83.7 03020201 wjop017f PFO 36 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
84.5 03020201 wjop002f PFO 331 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
84.6 03020201 wjop002f PFO 47 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
85.0 03020201 wjoo011f PFO 905 1.6 0.6 Open Cut
85.3 03020201 wjop003f PFO 256 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
85.6 03020201 wjoo012f PFO 961 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
85.9 03020201 wjoo013f PFO 131 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
85.9 03020201 wjoo013f PFO 127 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
86.1 03020201 wjoo014s PSS 373 0.6 0.1 Open Cut
86.3 03020201 wjoo015f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-30

86.4 03020201 wjoo016f PFO 170 0.3 0.1 Open Cut

86.5 03020201 wjoo016f PFO 362 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
87.0 03020201 wjoo017f PFO 244 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
87.3 03020201 wjoo019f PFO 82 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
87.3 03020201 wjoo019f PFO 32 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
87.3 03020201 wjoo020f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
87.4 03020201 wjoo020f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
87.6 03020201 wjoo021f PFO 2,702 4.7 1.9 Open Cut
89.6 03020201 wjop005f PFO 432 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
89.7 03020201 wjop006f PFO 115 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
89.8 03020201 wjop007f PFO 431 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
90.0 03020201 wjop027f PFO 745 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
90.3 03020201 wjop026e PEM 242 0.4 0.0 Open Cut
90.4 03020201 wjop008e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
90.6 03020201 wjop009f PFO 421 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
90.9 03020201 wjop028s PSS 400 0.7 0.1 Open Cut
91.0 03020201 wjop011s PSS 300 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
91.0 03020201 wjop011e PEM 101 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
91.1 03020201 wjop011f PFO 228 0.4 0.2 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
91.8 03020201 wjop012f PFO 154 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
92.1 03020201 wjop013f PFO 79 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
92.6 03020201 wjop031f PFO 1,671 2.8 1.1 Open Cut
93.0 03020201 wjop039f PFO 443 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
93.1 03020201 wjop038f PFO 16 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
93.3 03020201 wjop019f PFO 907 1.6 0.6 Open Cut
94.0 03020201 wjoa020f PFO 1,404 2.4 1.0 Open Cut
94.7 03020201 wjoo029f PFO 133 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
95.1 03020201 wjoa019f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
95.1 03020201 wjoa019f PFO 94 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
95.9 03020201 wjob108f PFO 749 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
96.1 03020201 wjob107f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
97.1 03020201 wjoo032f PFO 233 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
L-31

97.1 03020201 wjoo031f PFO 868 1.7 0.6 Open Cut

97.4 03020201 wjoo030f PFO 396 1.1 0.3 Open Cut
97.5 03020201 wjoo030f PFO 461 1.2 0.3 Open Cut
97.6 03020201 wjoo034f PFO 1,037 2.8 0.7 Open Cut
97.7 03020201 wjoo034f PFO 1,136 2.3 0.8 Open Cut
97.9 03020201 wjoo036f PFO 1,317 2.3 0.9 Open Cut
98.2 03020201 wjoo036f PFO 904 1.5 0.6 Open Cut
98.3 03020201 wjoo036f PFO 1 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
98.3 03020201 wjop034f PFO 1 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
98.3 03020201 wjop034f PFO 41 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
98.3 03020201 wjop034f PFO 842 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
98.4 03020201 wjob112s PSS 316 0.6 0.1 Open Cut
98.6 03020201 wjoa013s PSS 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
98.6 03020201 nwi_nc_k_006 PFO 41 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
98.7 03020201 nwi_nc_k_006 PFO 143 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
98.7 03020201 nwi_nc_k_006 PFO 56 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
98.8 03020201 nwi_nc_k_007 PFO 189 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
98.8 03020201 nwi_nc_k_007 PFO 1,496 3.6 1.0 Open Cut
99.8 03020201 wjoa021f PFO 380 0.6 0.3 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
99.9 03020201 wjoa021s PSS 762 1.5 0.2 Open Cut
100.0 03020201 wjoa021f PFO 387 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
100.5 03020201 wjob113e PEM 258 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
100.5 03020201 wjob113f PFO 292 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
101.2 03020201 wjoa012f PFO 245 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
101.3 03020201 wjoa012f PFO 496 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
101.5 03020201 wjoa011f PFO 146 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
101.7 03020201 wjoa010f PFO 517 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
102.2 03020201 wjoa009f PFO 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
102.8 03020201 wjoa008f PFO 282 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
102.8 03020201 wjoa008f PFO 471 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
103.9 03020201 wjoa007f PFO 386 0.5 0.3 Open Cut
103.9 03020201 wjoa007f PFO 109 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
L-32

104.4 03020201 wjoa006f PFO 110 0.2 0.1 Open Cut

105.0 03020201 wjoa005f PFO 190 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
105.1 03020201 wjoa005f PFO 196 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
106.3 03020201 wjoa004e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
106.5 03020201 wjoa003f PFO 281 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
106.6 03020201 wjoa003f PFO 987 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
106.8 03020201 wjoa003f PFO 120 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
107.5 03020201 wjoa002f PFO 459 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
107.6 03020201 wjoa002f PFO 659 1.1 0.5 Open Cut
108.1 03020201 wjob100f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
108.1 03020201 wjob100f PFO 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
108.9 03020201 wjoa001f PFO 51 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
110.1 03020201 wjop024f PFO 915 1.7 0.6 Open Cut
110.5 03020201 wjop029f PFO 276 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
110.6 03020201 wjop029f PFO 451 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
111.4 03020201 wjoo026f PFO 61 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
113.1 03020201 wjoo027f PFO 939 1.7 0.6 Open Cut
113.7 03020201 wjoo024f PFO 1,006 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
114.5 03020201 wjoo023e PEM 14 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
114.5 03020201 wjoo023f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
114.6 03020201 wjoo023f PFO 69 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
114.6 03020201 wjoo022f PFO 375 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
114.7 03020201 wjoo022f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Sampson County 116.7 03030006 wsao002f PFO 634 1.1 0.4 Open Cut
116.9 03030006 wsao001f PFO 184 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
116.9 03030006 wsao001f PFO 117 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
117.2 03030006 wsap002f PFO 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
117.2 03030006 wsap002f PFO 417 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
117.9 03030006 wsap003f PFO 287 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
118.3 03030006 wsao010f PFO 1,818 3.1 1.3 Open Cut
118.7 03030006 wsao011f PFO 609 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
118.8 03030006 wsao007e PEM 439 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
L-33

118.9 03030006 wsao007f PFO 1,119 1.9 0.8 Open Cut

119.3 03030006 wsao007f PFO 294 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
119.6 03030006 wsao009f PFO 298 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
119.7 03030006 wsao009f PFO 658 1.1 0.4 Open Cut
120.4 03030006 wsao003s PSS 34 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
120.9 03030006 wsao004e PEM 17 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
121.1 03030006 wsao005e PEM 5 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
121.8 03030006 wsao006f PFO 226 0.3 0.2 Open Cut
122.0 03030006 wsao006f PFO 3,325 5.7 2.3 Open Cut
122.7 03030006 wsao006f PFO 204 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
Cumberland County 122.7 03030006 wsao006f PFO 4 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
122.7 03030006 wcmo011s PSS 9,309 15.5 2.1 Open Cut
124.5 03030006 wcmo011s PSS 606 1.0 0.1 Open Cut
124.7 03030006 wcmo011f PFO 436 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
125.4 03030006 wcmc006s PSS 288 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
125.6 03030006 wcmc005f PFO 215 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
126.0 03030004 wcmp006f PFO 441 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
126.3 03030004 wcmp007f PFO 105 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
126.8 03030004 wcmp008f PFO 171 0.3 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
126.8 03030004 wcmp008f PFO 51 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
127.2 03030004 wcmp010f PFO 95 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
127.3 03030004 wcmp010f PFO 119 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
127.5 03030004 wcmp011f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
127.7 03030004 wcmp011f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
127.8 03030004 wcmp011f PFO 110 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
128.4 03030004 wcmp017f PFO 24 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
128.8 03030004 wcmp016f PFO 228 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
129.0 03030004 wcmp015f PFO 153 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
129.0 03030004 wcmp015f PFO 45 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
129.4 03030004 wcmc002f PFO 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
129.4 03030004 wcmc002f PFO 9 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
129.6 03030004 wcmc003f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-34

129.6 03030004 nwi_nc_k_009 PFO 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

129.6 03030004 wcmc003f PFO 165 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
129.6 03030004 nwi_nc_k_009 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
129.6 03030004 wcmc003f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
129.6 03030004 nwi_nc_k_009 PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
130.1 03030004 wcmc007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
130.1 03030004 wcmc007f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
131.8 03030004 wcmb103f PFO 1,977 3.4 1.4 Open Cut
132.3 03030004 wcmb102f PFO 126 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
133.1 03030004 wcmo009f PFO 590 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
133.9 03030004 wcmp039e PEM 91 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
134.3 03030004 nwi_nc_f_006 PFO 155 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
135.7 03030004 nwi_nc_f_007 PFO 119 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
136.7 03030006 nwi_nc_f_008 PFO 6,478 10.7 4.3 Open Cut
137.7 03030006 wcmp048e PEM 0 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
138.1 03030006 nwi_nc_f_009 PFO 2,161 3.7 1.5 Open Cut
138.8 03030006 nwi_nc_f_010 PEM 0 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
139.0 03030006 nwi_nc_f_011 PFO 1,507 2.6 1.0 Open Cut
139.3 03030006 nwi_nc_f_011 PFO 1,452 2.5 1.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
139.7 03030006 wcmf002f PFO 289 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
139.7 03030006 wcmf002e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
139.8 03030006 wcmf003e PEM 64 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
139.9 03030006 wcmf003f PFO 786 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
140.2 03030006 wcmf004e PEM 23 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
140.4 03030006 wcmf001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
140.4 03030006 wcmf001e PEM 162 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
140.4 03030006 wcmf001f PFO 1,325 2.2 0.9 Open Cut
140.7 03030006 wcmf005e PEM 106 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
140.7 03030006 wcmf005f1 PFO 1,818 2.9 1.3 Open Cut
141.0 03030006 wcmf005f2 PFO 1,610 2.7 1.1 Open Cut
141.3 03030006 wcmf005f PFO 1,902 4.9 1.3 Open Cut
141.8 03030006 wcmr003f PFO 422 1.0 0.3 Open Cut
L-35

141.8 03030006 wcmr003f PFO 1,161 2.0 0.8 Open Cut

141.9 03030006 wcmr003e PEM 0 0.2 0.0 NA
142.3 03030006 wcmo027f PFO 182 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
142.3 03030006 wcmo027e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
142.4 03030006 wcmo028f PFO 41 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
142.4 03030006 wcmo028e PEM 149 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
142.9 03030006 wcmo029f PFO 764 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
143.0 03030006 wcmo029e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
143.3 03030006 wcmf010e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.3 03030006 wcmf010e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.5 03030006 wcmf011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.6 03030006 wcmf009e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.6 03030006 wcmf009f PFO 473 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
143.7 03030006 wcmf009e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
143.8 03030006 wcmr006f PFO 634 1.2 0.4 Open Cut
143.9 03030006 wcmr006e PEM 0 0.2 0.0 NA
144.0 03030006 wcmf008f PFO 540 1.3 0.4 Open Cut
144.1 03030006 wcmf008f PFO 1,737 3.0 1.2 Open Cut
144.2 03030006 wcmf008e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 NA

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
145.0 03030005 wcmf006f PFO 5,162 8.6 3.5 Open Cut
145.5 03030005 wcmf006e PEM 0 0.3 0.0 NA
146.2 03030005 wcmp040f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
147.5 03030005 wcmr005f PFO 375 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
147.8 03030005 wcmo026f PFO 1,052 1.8 0.7 Open Cut
147.9 03030005 wcmo026e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
148.3 03030005 wcmo031f PFO 65 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
148.7 03030005 wcmo024f PFO 4,252 7.3 2.9 Open Cut
149.5 03030005 wcmo032f PFO 703 1.2 0.5 Open Cut
152.8 03030005 wcmr002f PFO 666 1.1 0.5 Open Cut
153.0 03030005 wcmr001f PFO 118 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
153.0 03030005 wcmr001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
153.1 03030005 wcmr001f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
L-36

153.3 03030005 wcmp045s PSS 70 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

153.4 03030005 wcmp043s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
153.5 03030005 wcmp046f PFO 112 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
154.0 03030005 wcmp042f PFO 30 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
154.0 03030005 wcmp042e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
154.0 03030005 wcmp042f PFO 96 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
154.0 03030005 wcmp042e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
154.3 03030005 wcmo022e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
154.4 03030005 wcmo022f PFO 85 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
154.4 03030005 wcmo023f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
154.8 03030005 wcmo021f PFO 18 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
154.9 03030005 wcmo020e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
154.9 03030005 wcmo020f PFO 23 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
155.1 03030005 nwi_nc_f_037 PFO 221 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
155.1 03030005 nwi_nc_f_037 PFO 333 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
155.2 03030005 wcmo033f PFO 628 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
155.2 03030005 wcmo033f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
155.3 03030005 wcmo033e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
156.4 03030005 wcmo025s PSS 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
156.4 03030005 wcmo025f PFO 721 1.2 0.5 Open Cut
156.7 03030005 nwi_nc_f_039 PFO 253 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
157.3 03030005 wcmp047f PFO 90 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
157.3 03030005 wcmp047s PSS 216 0.4 <0.1 Open Cut
157.3 03030005 wcmp047s PSS 455 0.8 0.1 Open Cut
158.3 03030005 wcmh004f PFO 2,011 3.5 1.4 Open Cut
158.9 03030005 wcmh003f PFO 205 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
159.1 03030005 wcmh002s PSS 137 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
159.1 03030005 wcmh002f PFO 483 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
159.2 03030005 wcmh002s PSS 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
159.6 03040203 wcmh008s PSS 447 0.8 0.1 Open Cut
159.7 03040203 wcmh008f PFO 507 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
159.8 03040203 nwi_nc_k_013 PFO 0 0.3 0.0 NA
L-37

160.3 03040203 nwi_nc_k_014 PFO 587 1.5 0.4 Open Cut

160.4 03040203 nwi_nc_k_014 PFO 24 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
Robeson County 160.5 03040203 nwi_nc_k_014 PFO 1,449 3.6 1.0 Open Cut
161.1 03040203 nwi_nc_k_015 PFO 335 0.9 0.2 Open Cut
162.1 03040203 wroh019f PFO 1,924 3.3 1.3 Open Cut
162.5 03040203 wroh019f PFO 2,341 4.0 1.6 Open Cut
163.7 03040203 wroc100e PEM 141 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
164.2 03040203 wrog008f PFO 22 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
164.2 03040203 wrog008f PFO 36 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
164.9 03040203 wrog007f PFO 1,527 2.6 1.1 Open Cut
165.3 03040203 wrob001f PFO 2,126 3.7 1.5 Open Cut
165.7 03040203 wrob002f PFO 125 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
166.0 03040203 wrof004f PFO 203 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
166.1 03040203 wrof004e PEM 39 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
166.1 03040203 wrof004f PFO 258 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
166.2 03040203 wrof003f PFO 127 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
166.2 03040203 wrof003f PFO 196 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
166.3 03040203 wrof002e PEM 136 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
166.4 03040203 wrof001e PEM 922 1.6 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
166.9 03040203 wrof006f PFO 203 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
167.0 03040203 wroc003f PFO 146 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
167.6 03040203 wroh018f PFO 227 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
167.7 03040203 wroh018s PSS 2,758 4.8 0.6 Open Cut
168.2 03040203 wroh018f PFO 173 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
169.0 03040203 wroh017f PFO 2,962 5.1 2.0 Open Cut
169.6 03040203 wrog006f PFO 1,517 2.7 1.0 Open Cut
170.6 03040203 wrog004f PFO 2,364 4.1 1.6 Open Cut
171.3 03040203 wrog003f PFO 212 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
171.5 03040203 wrog002s PSS 1,389 2.4 0.3 Open Cut
171.8 03040203 wrog002f PFO 220 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
171.9 03040203 wrog001s PSS 22 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
172.0 03040203 wrog001s PSS 472 0.9 0.1 Open Cut
L-38

172.1 03040203 wrog001f PFO 278 0.5 0.2 Open Cut

172.4 03040203 wroh016s PSS 1,763 3.1 0.4 Open Cut
172.8 03040203 wroh016s PSS 619 1.1 0.1 Open Cut
172.9 03040203 wroh015f PFO 2,048 3.5 1.4 Open Cut
173.4 03040203 wroh014f PFO 376 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
173.9 03040203 wroh013f PFO 800 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
174.0 03040203 wroh013s PSS 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
174.0 03040203 wroh013s PSS 522 0.9 0.1 Open Cut
174.1 03040203 wroh013f PFO 1,357 2.4 0.9 Open Cut
174.4 03040203 wroh013s PSS 179 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
174.4 03040203 wroh013f PFO 228 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
174.5 03040203 wroh013f PFO 246 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
175.5 03040203 wroh011f PFO 1,874 3.2 1.3 Open Cut
176.4 03040203 wroh010s PSS 292 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
176.7 03040203 wroh008f PFO 485 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
176.8 03040203 wroh008f PFO 1,963 3.3 1.4 Open Cut
177.5 03040203 wroh007s PSS 682 1.2 0.2 Open Cut
177.7 03040203 wroh007s PSS 646 1.1 0.1 Open Cut
178.5 03040203 nwi_nc_k_016 PFO 279 0.8 0.2 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
180.7 03040203 wroh005s PSS 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
181.5 03040203 wroe001e PEM 144 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
181.6 03040203 wroh004s PSS 272 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
181.7 03040203 wroh003s PSS 270 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
182.5 03040203 wroh002f PFO 261 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
182.6 03040203 wroh002f PFO 267 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
AP-2 Subtotal 240,804 427.5 148.4
AP-3
North Carolina
Northampton County 0.4 03010204 wnra002f PFO 1,120 1.8 0.8 Open Cut
0.7 03010204 wnrc001s PSS 51 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
0.7 03010204 wnrc001e PEM 103 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
1.5 03010204 wnrc003f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-39

1.6 03010204 wnrc002f PFO 40 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

2.2 03010204 wnrc004f PFO 67 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
2.6 03010204 wnrc006f PFO 314 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
3.0 03010204 wnrc007f PFO 41 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
3.6 03010204 wnrp003f PFO 35 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
4.1 03010204 wnrp004f PFO 40 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
4.9 03010204 wnrc008e PEM 115 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
4.9 03010204 wnrc008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
5.1 03010204 wnrc009e PEM 135 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
5.3 03010204 wnrp020f PFO 466 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
5.5 03010204 wnrp020f PFO 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
5.9 03010204 wnrp022f PFO 171 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
5.9 03010204 wnrp022f PFO 79 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
6.3 03010204 wnrp011f PFO 192 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
6.3 03010204 wnrp011e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.0 03010204 wnrp009e PEM 28 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.0 03010204 wnrp009e PEM 24 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.0 03010204 wnrp009f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
7.0 03010204 wnrp009f PFO 30 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
7.1 03010204 wnrp009e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.1 03010204 wnrp008f PFO 32 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
7.1 03010204 wnrp008e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.3 03010204 wnrp006e PEM 215 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.5 03010204 wnrp006f PFO 24 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
7.5 03010204 wnrp006e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.5 03010204 wnrp007e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
7.6 03010204 wnrb107f PFO 258 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
7.6 03010204 wnrb107e PEM 125 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
8.1 03010204 wnrb108e PEM 96 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
8.1 03010204 wnrb108e PEM 261 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
8.2 03010204 wnrb108f PFO 0 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
8.6 03010204 wnrc011e PEM 253 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
L-40

8.6 03010204 wnrc011f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut

8.7 03010204 wnrc012e PEM 751 1.0 0.0 Open Cut
8.8 03010204 wnrc012f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
8.9 03010204 wnrc012e PEM 673 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
9.0 03010204 wnrc012f PFO 4 0.8 0.1 Open Cut
9.2 03010204 wnrp018f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
9.4 03010204 wnrp017f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
9.4 03010204 wnrp017e PEM 5 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
9.4 03010204 wnrp016e PEM 633 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
9.4 03010204 wnrp016f PFO 0 0.4 <0.1 Open Cut
9.7 03010204 wnrb106s PSS 167 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
9.9 03010204 wnro003f PFO 303 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
9.9 03010204 wnro002f PFO 149 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
10.0 03010204 wnrb102f PFO 444 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
10.0 03010204 wnrb102f PFO 958 1.7 0.7 Open Cut
10.3 03010204 wnrb102f PFO 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
10.5 03010204 wnrb101f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
10.7 03010204 wnrb100f PFO 329 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
11.9 03010204 wnrp015f PFO 1,165 1.9 0.8 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
12.1 03010204 wgrp001f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
12.1 03010204 wgrp002f PFO 78 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
Virginia
Greensville County 12.3 03010204 wgrp001f PFO 480 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
Southampton County 12.4 03010204 wsop004f PFO 1,354 2.4 0.9 Open Cut
12.9 03010204 wsop004f PFO 658 1.2 0.5 Open Cut
13.4 03010204 wsop001f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
13.5 03010204 wsop001f PFO 3,446 6.1 2.4 Open Cut
14.3 03010204 wsop006s PSS 263 0.7 0.1 Open Cut
14.3 03010204 wsop006e PEM 437 0.5 0.0 Open Cut
14.4 03010204 wsop006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
14.4 03010204 wsop006e PEM 73 1.7 0.0 Open Cut
14.4 03010204 wsop006f PFO 3,636 4.7 1.7 Open Cut
L-41

14.5 03010204 wsop006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

15.2 03010204 wsop022e PEM 120 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
15.2 03010204 wsop022f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
15.3 03010204 wsop023f PFO 705 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
15.4 03010204 wsop023e PEM 0 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
15.4 03010204 wsop023f PFO 307 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
15.4 03010204 wsop023e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
15.6 03010204 wsor001e PEM 757 1.1 0.0 Open Cut
16.3 03010204 wsoo007f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
16.5 03010204 wsoo001f PFO 83 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
16.5 03010204 wsoo001f PFO 86 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
16.8 03010204 wsop015e PEM 262 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
16.8 03010204 wsop015f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
17.0 03010204 wsop016e PEM 187 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
17.0 03010204 wsop016f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
17.1 03010204 wsop017e PEM 1,183 1.6 0.0 Open Cut
17.2 03010204 wsop017f PFO 0 0.4 0.0 NA
17.3 03010204 wsop017f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
17.7 03010204 wsop018f PFO 1,061 1.8 0.7 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
17.8 03010204 wsop018e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
18.0 03010204 wsop018f PFO 489 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
18.0 03010204 wsop018e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
18.1 03010204 wsoa073e PEM 157 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
18.2 03010204 wsoa073f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
18.3 03010204 wsoa072e PEM 152 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
18.3 03010204 wsoa072f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
18.4 03010204 wsoa071e PEM 759 0.6 0.0 Open Cut
18.4 03010204 wsoa071f PFO 62 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
18.5 03010204 wsoa071f PFO 76 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
19.0 03010204 wsoa070f PFO 46 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
19.0 03010204 wsoa070f PFO 37 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
19.2 03010204 wsoo002e PFO 96 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
L-42

19.2 03010204 wsoo002e PFO 100 0.2 0.1 Open Cut

20.0 03010204 wsop014e PEM 39 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.0 03010204 wsop014e PEM 10 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.4 03010204 wsop013e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.4 03010204 wsop013f PFO 52 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
20.7 03010204 wsop012f PFO 111 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
20.7 03010204 wsop012e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.7 03010204 wsop012f PFO 12 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
20.7 03010204 wsop012e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.8 03010204 wsop011e PEM 67 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
20.8 03010204 wsop011f PFO 205 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
21.0 03010204 wsop011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
21.0 03010204 wsop011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
21.1 03010204 wsop011e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
21.1 03010204 wsop011e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
21.3 03010204 wsoa076e PEM 107 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
21.3 03010204 wsoa076e PEM 37 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
21.3 03010204 wsoa076f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
21.3 03010204 wsoa076e PEM 152 0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
21.3 03010204 wsoa076f PFO 0 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
21.5 03010204 wsoa075e PEM 1,063 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
21.6 03010204 wsoa075f PFO 0 0.9 0.3 Open Cut
21.7 03010204 wsoa075e PEM 227 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
21.8 03010204 wsoa075f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
21.8 03010204 wsoa075f PFO 132 0.4 0.1 Open Cut
22.3 03010204 wsoa074e PEM 20 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
22.8 03010201 wsoa032f PFO 300 0.3 0.2 Open Cut
23.0 03010201 wsoa031f PFO 74 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
23.5 03010201 wsoa005f PFO 31 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
23.7 03010201 wsoo003f PFO 332 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
24.5 03010201 wsoo008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
24.9 03010201 wsoo009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-43

25.1 03010201 wsop021f PFO 77 0.1 0.1 Open Cut

25.3 03010201 wsop020f PFO 275 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
25.4 03010201 wsop019f PFO 68 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
26.6 03010201 wsoo006e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
26.6 03010201 wsoo006f PFO 45 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
27.3 03010201 wsol009f PFO 232 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
27.4 03010201 wsol009f PFO 236 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
27.7 03010201 wsol010f PFO 301 0.6 0.2 Open Cut
27.7 03010201 wsol010e PEM 206 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
27.9 03010201 wsol011e PEM 35 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
28.1 03010201 wsol012f PFO 521 0.9 0.4 Open Cut
28.3 03010201 wsol014f PFO 131 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
28.6 03010201 wsop100f PFO 140 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
28.7 03010201 wsol015f PFO 66 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
29.2 03010201 wsol016f PFO 76 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
29.4 03010201 wsol017s PSS 207 0.5 <0.1 Open Cut
29.5 03010201 wsol018f PFO 208 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
29.7 03010201 wsoc009f PFO 48 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
30.0 03010201 wsol019e PEM 209 0.3 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
30.0 03010201 wsol019f PFO 254 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
30.1 03010201 wsol020f PFO 453 0.7 0.3 Open Cut
30.7 03010201 wsoa017f PFO 155 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
30.7 03010201 wsoa017f PFO 54 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
31.8 03010201 wsoa020f PFO 504 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
32.1 03010201 wsol031f PFO 121 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
32.1 03010201 wsol031f PFO 327 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
32.3 03010201 wsol030f PFO 301 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
32.3 03010201 wsol029f PFO 153 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
32.4 03010201 wsol029s PSS 196 0.3 <0.1 Open Cut
32.5 03010201 wsol028s PSS 47 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
32.5 03010201 wsol027f PFO 149 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
32.5 03010201 wsol027f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-44

32.6 03010201 wsol026f PFO 113 0.1 0.1 Open Cut

32.6 03010201 wsol021f PFO 728 0.8 0.5 HDD
33.0 03010201 wsol022f PFO 52 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
33.5 03010201 wsoa026e PEM 32 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
33.6 03010201 wsoa027s PSS 141 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
33.7 03010201 wsoa028f PFO 254 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
34.6 03010201 wsoo010f PFO 6 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
34.9 03010201 wsol025f2 PFO 1,081 1.8 0.7 Open Cut
35.1 03010201 wsol025f1 PFO 54 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
35.1 03010201 wsol025s PSS 469 0.8 0.1 Open Cut
35.2 03010201 wsol024s PSS 507 0.9 0.1 Open Cut
35.4 03010201 wsol023s PSS 1,232 2.1 0.3 Open Cut
35.6 03010201 wsol023f PFO 292 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
35.7 03010201 wsol023f PFO 754 1.3 0.5 Open Cut
35.8 03010202 wsoa025e PEM 27 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
37.0 03010202 wsol033e PEM 433 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
37.3 03010202 wsol034f PFO 172 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
37.4 03010202 wsoa023f PFO 804 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
37.6 03010202 wsoc008f PFO 105 0.1 0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
37.7 03010202 wsoc017f PFO 111 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
37.8 03010202 wsoa022f PFO 95 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
38.1 03010202 wsoa021f PFO 74 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
38.1 03010202 wsoa021f PFO 563 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
38.4 03010202 wsoa024f PFO 1,093 1.2 0.8 HDD
City of Suffolk 38.6 03010202 wsoa024f PFO 15 <0.1 <0.1 HDD
38.6 03010202 wsua006f PFO 209 0.2 0.1 HDD
39.1 03010202 wsua007s PSS 50 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
39.4 03010202 wsua008f PFO 44 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
39.4 03010202 wsua008f PFO 96 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
39.5 03010202 wsua021f PFO 39 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
39.5 03010202 wsua021f PFO 234 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
39.6 03010202 wsua021f PFO 213 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
L-45

39.7 03010202 wsua020f PFO 25 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

39.7 03010202 wsua020f PFO 12 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
39.7 03010202 wsua019s PSS 111 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
39.9 03010202 wsua018s PSS 33 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.0 03010202 wsua009f PFO 32 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.1 03010202 wsua010f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.1 03010202 wsua010f PFO 31 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.2 03010202 wsua010f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
40.2 03010202 wsua010f PFO 37 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.0 03010202 wsua072f PFO 68 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.1 03010202 wsua070f PFO 83 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
41.2 03010202 wsua071f PFO 490 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
41.4 03010202 wsuo037f PFO 32 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
41.4 03010202 wsuo037f PFO 72 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
42.2 03010202 wsuo013f PFO 89 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
42.3 03010202 wsuo013f PFO 172 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
42.3 03010202 wsuo013f PFO 155 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
42.7 03010202 wsuo012f PFO 107 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
43.1 03010202 wsup030e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
43.7 03010202 wsup014e PEM 26 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
43.7 03010202 wsup014f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
43.8 03010202 wsup013e PEM 490 0.8 0.0 Open Cut
43.9 03010202 wsup013f PFO 0 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
43.9 03010202 wsup013f PFO 94 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
44.0 03010202 wsup013f PFO 202 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
44.0 03010202 wsup013f PFO 184 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
44.2 03010202 wsup026e PEM 483 0.7 0.0 Open Cut
44.2 03010202 wsup026f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
44.3 03010202 wsup026f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
44.5 03010202 wsup025f PFO 335 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
44.6 03010202 wsup025f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
44.6 03010202 wsup025e PEM 31 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
L-46

44.6 03010202 wsup025e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA

44.6 03010202 wsuo017f PFO 287 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
45.1 03010202 wsuo020f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
45.1 03010202 wsuo020f PFO 28 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
45.5 03010202 wsua076f PFO 562 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
45.6 03010202 wsua076e PEM 82 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
46.1 03010202 wsua074e PEM 2 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
46.1 03010202 wsua074e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
46.2 03010202 wsua073f PFO 1,525 2.6 1.0 Open Cut
46.5 03010203 wsuc101f PFO 2,348 4.0 1.6 Open Cut
47.0 03010203 wsuc101e PEM 72 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
47.0 03010203 wsuc101f PFO 118 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
47.0 03010203 wsuc101f PFO 783 1.4 0.5 Open Cut
47.2 03010203 wsuc101s PSS 332 0.6 0.1 Open Cut
47.3 03010203 wsuc100f PFO 235 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
47.3 03010203 wsuc100s PSS 281 0.5 0.1 Open Cut
47.4 03010203 wsuc100f PFO 604 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
47.5 03010203 wsuc005f PFO 801 2.2 0.6 Open Cut
47.6 03010203 wsuc005s PSS 1,556 1.8 0.4 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
48.1 03010203 wsuc006e PEM 293 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
48.1 03010203 wsuc006f PFO 0 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
48.6 03010203 wsuc007e PEM 470 0.8 0.0 Open Cut
49.3 03010203 nwi_va_b_047 PFO 241 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
49.4 03010203 nwi_va_b_048 PFO 800 1.5 0.6 Open Cut
49.6 03010203 wsuo027f PFO 198 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
49.7 03010203 wsuo027e PEM 143 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
49.7 03010203 wsuo027f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
49.7 03010203 wsuo027f PFO 23 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
49.8 03010203 wsuo026f PFO 114 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
49.9 03010203 wsuo026f PFO 74 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
50.0 03010203 wsuo025f PFO 1,167 2.0 0.8 Open Cut
50.4 03010203 wsuo024f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-47

50.5 03010203 wsuo024f PFO 56 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

50.5 03010203 wsuo024f PFO 25 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
50.8 03010203 wsuo022f PFO 2,402 4.1 1.7 Open Cut
51.4 03010203 wsuo023f PFO 866 1.6 0.6 Open Cut
52.1 03010203 wsup037f PFO 142 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
52.3 03010203 wsup021f PFO 420 0.8 0.3 Open Cut
52.6 03010203 wsup024s PSS 59 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
52.6 03010203 wsup024s PSS 112 0.2 <0.1 Open Cut
52.6 03010203 wsup024s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
52.6 03010203 wsup024f PFO 90 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
52.7 03010203 wsup023f PFO 242 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
52.8 03010203 wsup022f PFO 1,350 2.3 0.9 Open Cut
53.0 02080208 wsup022s PSS 2,745 4.7 0.6 Open Cut
53.6 02080208 wsuo039f PFO 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
53.9 02080208 wsup027s PSS 2,051 3.5 0.5 Open Cut
54.4 02080208 wsup028s PSS 353 0.6 0.1 Open Cut
54.5 02080208 wsup028f PFO 88 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
54.6 02080208 wsup029f PFO 203 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
54.6 02080208 wsur007f PFO 60 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
54.7 02080208 wsur008f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
55.0 02080208 nwi_va_c_027 PFO 158 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
55.0 02080208 nwi_va_c_007 PEM 746 1.3 0.0 Open Cut
55.4 02080208 nwi_va_c_028 PFO 86 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
55.4 02080208 nwi_va_c_028 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
56.1 02080208 wsup032f PFO 856 1.4 0.6 Open Cut
56.3 02080208 wsup032f PFO 143 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
56.3 02080208 wsup033f PFO 76 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
56.4 02080208 wsup034e PEM 22 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
56.4 02080208 wsup034e PEM 131 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
56.6 02080208 wsup035f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
56.7 02080208 wsup035f PFO 80 0.1 0.1 Open Cut
57.4 02080208 wsup0038f PFO 135 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
L-48

57.5 02080208 wsuo032f PFO 441 0.8 0.3 Open Cut

57.9 02080208 wsuo033f PFO 465 0.6 0.3 Open Cut
59.3 02080208 wsuo034f PFO 39 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.3 02080208 wsuo034f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
59.4 02080208 wsuo035f PFO 58 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.4 02080208 wsuo035f PFO 62 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
59.4 02080208 wsuo035f PFO 19 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
62.7 02080208 wsuo041f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
62.7 02080208 wsuo041f PFO 4 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
62.7 02080208 wsuo041f PFO 21 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
63.0 02080208 wsuo042f PFO 56 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
63.0 02080208 wsuo042f PFO 29 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
63.6 02080208 wsup015f PFO 50 0.1 0.1 HDD
63.6 02080208 wsup015e PEM 20 <0.1 0.0 HDD
63.6 02080208 nwi_va_c_001 E2E 1,938 2.2 0.0 HDD
64.0 02080208 wsup018e PEM 50 0.1 0.0 HDD
64.3 02080208 wsup016e PEM 37 <0.1 0.0 HDD
64.3 02080208 nwi_va_c_002 E2E 297 0.3 0.0 HDD
64.4 02080208 nwi_va_c_005 E2U 1,864 2.1 0.0 HDD

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
64.8 02080208 wsuc112e PEM 349 0.4 0.0 HDD
65.2 02080208 wsuc113e PEM 25 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
66.2 02080208 nwi_va_c_042 PFO 49 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
66.2 02080208 nwi_va_i_004 PEM 295 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
66.3 02080208 wsuo018e PEM 3,488 2.5 0.0 Open Cut
66.6 02080208 wsuo018s PSS 0 3.3 0.0 Open Cut
67.0 02080208 wsuo019e PEM 2,174 1.8 0.0 Open Cut
67.2 02080208 wsuo019s PSS 1,073 3.7 0.3 Open Cut
67.6 02080208 wsup020f PFO 1,605 6.0 1.7 Open Cut
67.6 02080208 wsup020e PEM 1,623 1.6 0.0 Open Cut
68.1 02080208 wsup020e PEM 6 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
68.1 02080208 wsup020e PEM 2,133 1.7 0.0 Open Cut
68.6 02080208 wsuo009e PEM 895 0.9 0.0 Open Cut
L-49

68.7 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 0 1.6 0.4 Open Cut

68.8 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 159 0.3 0.1 Open Cut
68.8 02080208 wsuo009e PEM 149 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
68.9 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 3,729 6.4 2.6 Open Cut
69.5 02080208 wsuo009e PEM 20 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
69.6 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 1,155 2.0 0.8 Open Cut
69.8 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 2,768 4.8 1.9 Open Cut
70.3 02080208 wsuo009e PEM 20 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
70.3 02080208 wsuo009f PFO 2,761 4.9 1.9 Open Cut
70.9 02080208 wsuo010s PSS 524 0.9 0.1 Open Cut
71.0 02080208 wsur001f PFO 64 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
71.1 02080208 wsuo011f PFO 1,289 2.1 0.9 Open Cut
71.3 02080208 wsuo011e PEM 25 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
City of Chesapeake 71.4 02080208 wchr004f PFO 126 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
71.8 02080208 wchr002f PFO 7,181 10.5 4.9 Open Cut
71.8 02080208 wchr002e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
73.1 02080208 wchr002e PEM 99 2.0 0.0 Open Cut
73.1 02080208 wchr002f PFO 1,682 2.9 1.2 Open Cut
73.5 02080208 wchr002e PEM 240 0.4 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
73.5 02080208 wchr002f PFO 586 1.0 0.4 Open Cut
73.6 02080208 wchr002f PFO 245 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
73.7 02080208 wchr002f PFO 1,431 2.5 1.0 Open Cut
73.9 02080208 wchr002f PFO 1,943 3.4 1.3 Open Cut
74.3 02080208 wchr002f PFO 3,854 6.6 2.7 Open Cut
75.1 02080208 wchr001f PFO 4,846 7.9 3.3 Open Cut
76.0 02080208 nwi_va_i_008 PFO 701 1.0 0.5 Open Cut
76.2 02080208 wcho001f PFO 3,277 3.7 2.2 Open Cut
76.9 02080208 wchc002f PFO 179 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
77.1 02080208 wchc001f PFO 54 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
77.3 02080208 wcho002f PFO 8 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
77.4 02080208 wcho004f PFO 84 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
77.4 02080208 wcho004f PFO 49 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-50

77.9 02080208 wcho011e3 PEM 21 <0.1 0.0 HDD

78.0 02080208 wcho011e3 PEM 34 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
78.0 02080208 wcho011f3 PFO 602 1.1 0.4 Open Cut
78.0 02080208 wcho011f3 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
78.2 02080208 wcho011f PFO 837 1.2 0.6 Open Cut
78.5 02080208 wcho011e PEM 394 1.5 0.0 Open Cut
79.5 02080208 wcho005e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
79.9 02080208 wcho009e PEM 72 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
79.9 02080208 wcho009f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
80.4 02080208 wcho010e PEM 1,594 1.7 0.0 Open Cut
80.4 02080208 wcho010f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
80.4 02080208 wchro001e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
80.7 02080208 wcho010f PFO 443 2.2 0.4 Open Cut
80.8 02080208 wchro002_tidal Tidal 801 1.5 0.0 Open Cut
80.8 02080208 wchro002_tidal Tidal 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
80.8 02080208 wchro002e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
80.9 02080208 wchro002f PFO 351 0.5 0.2 Open Cut
81.0 02080208 wchro002e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
81.0 02080208 wcho012e PEM 6 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
81.4 02080208 wcho014f PFO 0 1.1 <0.1 Open Cut
81.7 02080208 wcho016f PFO 0 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
81.7 02080208 wcho017e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
81.7 02080208 wcho016e PEM 319 0.4 0.0 HDD
82.4 02080208 nwi_va_i_009 PFO 452 0.4 0.2 Open Cut
AP-3 Subtotal 141,011 239.3 70.1
AP-4
Virginia
Brunswick County None 0 0 0 NA
AP-4 Subtotal 0 0 0
AP-5
Virginia
Greenville County None 0 0 0 NA
L-51

AP-5 Subtotal 0 0 0
ACP PIPELINE FACILITIES TOTALS 427,805 751.3 238.3
ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES
Compressor Station
Virginia
Buckingham County 191.5 02080203 wbub050f PFO 0 0.5 0.0 NA
191.5 02080203 wbub050f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.5 02080203 wbub050f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
191.5 02080203 wbub050e PEM 0 0.8 0.0 NA
191.8 02080203 wbub050s PSS 0 1.3 0.0 NA
Long Run M&R Station
West Virginia
Randolph County 47.3 05020001 wrab102e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1 NA
47.3 05020001 wrae227e PEM 0 0.1 0.1 NA
Elizabeth River M&R
Station
Virginia
City of Chesapeake 82.6 02080208 wcha001f PFO 0 0.1 0.1 NA
Marts L&R
West Virginia

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
Harrison County 0.0 05020002 whab001e PEM 0 0.1 0.1 NA
0.0 05020002 Whab001s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1 NA
Contractor Yards/Pipe
Yards
AP-1
West Virginia
Randolph County 44.8 05020001 wrac102e PEM 0 0.3 0.0 NA
44.8 05020001 wrac103e PEM 0 0.3 0.0 NA
44.8 05020001 wrac105e PEM 0 1.7 0.0 NA
53.7 05020001 nwi_wv_k_007 PFO 0 0.2 0.0 NA
59.7 05020001 nwi_wv_k_005 PEM 0 1.3 0.0 NA
Pocahontas County 81.0 05050003 nwi_wv_k_001 PEM 0 0.2 0.0 NA
81.0 05050003 nwi_wv_k_002 PEM 0 0.1 0.0 NA
82.7 05050003 wpoa400e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
L-52

Virginia
Highland County 87.6 02080201 whic100e PEM 0 0.2 0.0 NA
87.6 02080201 whic101e1 PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
87.6 02080201 whic101e2 PEM 0 0.1 0.0 NA
87.6 02080201 whic101s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
109.0 02080201 whie003e PEM 0 0.4 0.0 NA
109.0 02080201 whie005e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
109.0 02080201 whie006e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Augusta County 109.2 02080202 wauf001e PEM 0 0.5 0.0 NA
Brunswick County 274.8 03010204 wgrc106e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
274.9 03010204 wgrc107e PEM 0 0.1 0.0 NA
AP-2
North Carolina
Halifax County 18.3 03020102 whlb050e PEM 0 0.2 0.0 NA
18.4 03020102 whlb050e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0 NA
Johnston County 96.4 03020201 wjob115f PFO 0 0.7 0.0 NA
96.4 03020201 wjob115f PFO 0 0.1 0.0 NA
Cumberland County 141.7 03030004 wcuc051e PEM 0 0.4 0.0 NA
ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES TOTALS 10.1 0.4

 TABLE L-1 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Facility/State or Crossing Temporary
Commonwealth/County or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Length (feet) Construction Impacts Operation Impacts Construction
City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a b
(acres) c (acres) d Method e, f
____________________
a
Wetland types according to Cowardin et al. (1979):
PFO = palustrine forested
PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub
PEM = palustrine emergent
PUB = palustrine unconsolidated bottom
E2E = estuarine intertidal emergent
E2U = estuarine intertidal unconsolidated shore
b
The crossing length is the measure of the distance of the centerline through the wetland. It does not include feet crossed outside the centerline. A value of 0 indicates that the
centerline does not cross the wetland.
c
Temporary wetland impacts associated with the construction right-of-way (includes permanent impacts, temporary impacts, ATWS impacts, ground bed impacts and water
impoundment impacts).
d
Operational impacts are associated with scrub-shrub and forested wetlands. Operational requirements allow a 10-foot-wide corridor centered over the pipeline to be maintained in an
herbaceous state, and for the removal of trees within 15 feet on either side of the pipeline. To determine conversion impacts on scrub-shrub wetlands, a 10-foot-wide corridor centered
over the pipeline was assessed. A 30-foot-wide corridor centered over the pipeline was assessed for forested wetlands. Because the easement will be maintained in an herbaceous
state, there will be no operational impacts on emergent wetlands.
L-53

e
Pending the results of geotechnical investigations and final engineering, Atlantic is evaluating use of the HDD method to cross six waterbodies, a water impoundment area, two
highways, and the Appalachian Trail/Blue Ridge Parkway. Use of the HDD method would avoid these features as well as adjacent wetlands and riparian areas. If successfully
implemented, the HDD method would avoid impacts on the adjacent wetlands, including wetlands identified in this table.
f
NA = wetland occurs within workspace but is not crossed by the centerline, trenching thru the wetland is not expected.
g
Located entirely or partially on NFS land.
Note: The totals shown in this table may not equal the sum of addends due to rounding.

 TABLE L-2

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Supply Header Project
Temporary Operation
Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Impacts Impacts Construction
Commonwealth County Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Width (feet) b (acres) c (acres) d Method e
PIPELINE FACILITIES
TL-635
West Virginia Harrison County
0.0 5020002 whag001e PEM 241 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
0.4 5020002 whag002e PEM 101 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
Doddridge County
0.8 5030201 wdog001e PEM N/A <0.1 0.0 NA
1.3 5030201 wdog005e PEM 94 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
1.4 5030201 wdoh003e PEM N/A <0.1 0.0 NA
2.9 5030201 wdog006f PFO 23 <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
5.1 5030201 wdog008f PFO 37 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
12.2 5030201 wdog010f PFO 50 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
15.1 5030201 wdog003e PEM N/A <0.1 0.0 NA
20.7 5030201 wdog012s PSS 65 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
L-54

Wetzel County
24.8 5030201 wwzg003f PFO 61 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
26.8 5030201 wwzg004f PFO 129 0.2 0.1 Open Cut
TL-635 Totals 801 1.3 0.2
TL-636
Pennsylvania Westmoreland
County
0.2 5020005 wwmh012f PFO 33 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
0.6 5020005 wwmh001f PFO 69 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
1.2 5020005 wwmh002e PEM 85 0.2 0.0 Open Cut
1.3 5020005 wwmh002e PEM 51 0.1 0.0 Open Cut
1.9 5020005 wwmh007e PEM 199 0.3 0.0 Open Cut
2.6 5020005 wwmh003f PFO N/A 0.1 <0.1 NA
2.9 5020005 wwmh008e PEM N/A <0.1 0.0 NA
2.9 5020005 wwmh009e PEM N/A <0.1 0.0 NA
2.9 5020005 wwmh010f PFO N/A <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
3.1 5020005 wwmh010f PFO N/A <0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
3.2 5020005 wwmh010f PFO 55 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut

 TABLE L-2 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Supply Header Project
Temporary Operation
Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Impacts Impacts Construction
Commonwealth County Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Width (feet) b (acres) c (acres) d Method e
3.6 5020005 wwmh011f PFO 42 0.1 <0.1 Open Cut
3.8 5020005 wwmh006e PEM 11 <0.1 0.0 Open Cut
TL-636 Totals 544 1.0 0.1
SUPPLY HEADER PIPELINE TOTALS 1,345 2.4 0.3
ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES
JB Tonkin
Pennsylvania Westmoreland
3.8 5020005 wwmh005e PEM -- <0.1 <0.1 --
Martz Junction
Receiver Site
West Virginia Harrison
0.0 5020002 whag004e PEM -- 0.1 0.1 --
ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES TOTALS 0.1 0.1
ACCESS ROADS
L-55

TL-635
West Virginia Doddridge
14.1 5030201 wdoh006f PFO 71 <0.1 <0.1 --
Wetzel
24.8 5030201 wwzg003f PFO 95 0.1 0.1
25.4 5030201 wwzh021e PEM 172 0.1 0.1 --
25.4 5030201 wwzh022e PEM 74 <0.1 <0.1
26.2 5030201 wwzh020e PEM 102 0.1 0.1 --
TL-636
Pennsylvania Westmoreland
0.0 5020005 wwmc001e PEM 124 0.1 0.1 --
ACCESS ROAD TOTALS 638 0.4 0.4
GROUND BEDS
TL-635
West Virginia Doddridge
17.8 5030201 wdoh004e PEM -- <0.1 <0.1 --

 TABLE L-2 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Supply Header Project
Temporary Operation
Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Impacts Impacts Construction
Commonwealth County Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Width (feet) b (acres) c (acres) d Method e
____________________
a
Wetland types according to Cowardin et al. (1979):
PFO = palustrine forested
PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub
PEM = palustrine emergent
b
N/A for Crossing Width indicates that the proposed route centerline does not cross the wetland.
c
Temporary wetland impacts are associated with a 75-foot-wide construction right-of-way through wetlands plus additional temporary workspace and topsoil segregation space.
d
Wetland vegetation type conversion impacts are associated with scrub-shrub and forested wetlands. Operational requirements (corrosion/leak surveys) allow a 10-foot-wide corridor
centered over the pipeline to be maintained in an herbaceous state, and allow trees within 15 feet on either side of the pipeline with roots that could compromise the integrity of the
pipeline to be selectively cut from the right-of-way. To determine conversion impacts on scrub-shrub wetlands, a 10-foot-wide corridor centered over the pipeline was assessed. A 30-
foot-wide corridor centered over the pipeline was assessed for forested wetlands.
e
NA = wetland occurs within workspace but is not crossed by the centerline, trenching thru the wetland is not expected.
Note: The totals shown in this table may not equal the sum of addends due to rounding

L-56

 TABLE L-3

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
AP-1
West Virginia
Lewis County 2.4 05020002 wleb110e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
2.4 05020002 wleb109e PEM 68 <0.1 0.0
2.4 05020002 wleb109e PEM 97 0.1 0.0
3.0 05020002 wleb111e PEM 282 0.1 0.1
6.8 05020002 wleb105e PEM 13 <0.1 0.0
12.7 05020002 wlea088e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
13.6 05020002 wlec001e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.5 05020002 wlea079e PEM 3 <0.1 <0.1
14.5 05020002 wlea079e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.5 05020002 wlea080e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.5 05020002 wlea080e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.7 05020002 wlea081e PEM 28 <0.1 <0.1
L-57

14.7 05020002 wlea082e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1

14.7 05020002 wlea083e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.8 05020002 wlea084e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
14.8 05020002 wlea084e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
14.8 05020002 wlea085e PEM 198 0.1 <0.1
14.8 05020002 wlea087e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
14.9 05020002 wlea087e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
15.3 05020002 wlea086e PEM 72 <0.1 <0.1
15.3 05020002 wleb107e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
15.5 05020002 wlea076e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
15.5 05020002 wlea076e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
15.5 05020002 wlea076e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
16.5 05020002 wlea077e PEM 287 0.2 0.2
17.3 05020002 wlea075e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
19.0 05020002 wlec005e PEM 38 <0.1 <0.1
19.9 05020002 nwi_wv_h_001 PUB 0 <0.1 <0.1
19.9 05020002 nwi_wv_h_001 PUB 96 0.1 0.1
20.2 05020002 wlec006e PEM 33 <0.1 <0.1

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
20.2 05020002 wlec006e PEM 95 0.1 0.1
Upshur County 24.0 05020001 wupb101e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
24.0 05020001 wupa001e PEM 21 <0.1 0.0
24.0 05020001 wupa001e PEM 25 <0.1 0.0
26.8 05020002 wupc001e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
26.8 05020002 wupc001e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
26.8 05020002 wupc001e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
26.8 05020002 wupc001e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
29.3 05020001 wupb007e PEM 42 <0.1 <0.1
36.1 05020001 wupb009f PFO 68 <0.1 <0.1
37.1 05020001 wupa050e PEM 89 0.1 0.0
37.8 05020001 wupb050e PEM 17 <0.1 <0.1
41.9 05020001 wupb103e PEM 87 <0.1 <0.1
Randolph County 47.1 05020001 wraa059f PFO 67 <0.1 <0.1
L-58

47.3 05020001 wrab102e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1

50.3 05020001 nwi_wv_h_002 PUB 74 <0.1 <0.1
50.9 05020001 wraa404e PEM 411 0.2 0.2
51.4 05020001 wraa431s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
51.8 05020001 wraa432s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
52.2 05020001 wraa434s PSS 19 <0.1 <0.1
52.2 05020001 wraa423e PEM 56 <0.1 <0.1
52.2 05020001 wraa423s PSS 132 0.1 0.1
52.3 05020001 wraa435e PEM 115 0.1 0.1
52.3 05020001 wraa435e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
53.2 05020001 wraa436e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
53.3 05020001 wraa436e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
53.3 05020001 wraa436e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
53.3 05020001 wraa436e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
54.2 05020001 wrac113e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
54.3 05020001 wrac110e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
54.3 05020001 wrac112e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
55.1 05020001 wrac114e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
55.1 05020001 wrac114e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
57.3 05050007 wrac108e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.3 05050007 wrae201e PEM 8 <0.1 <0.1
57.4 05050007 wrae202e PEM 111 <0.1 <0.1
57.4 05050007 wrae203e PEM 29 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae232e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae233e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae233e PEM 124 0.1 0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae241e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae241e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae230e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae230e PEM 3 <0.1 <0.1
57.7 05050007 wrae231e PEM 33 <0.1 <0.1
57.8 05050007 wrae235e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
58.1 05050007 wrae235e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
L-59

58.1 05050007 wrae235e PEM 839 0.6 0.6

58.3 05050007 wrae235e PEM 431 0.3 0.3
58.3 05050007 wrae235e PEM 395 0.2 0.2
58.3 05050007 wrae235e PEM 119 0.1 0.1
58.4 05050007 wrae235e PEM 10 <0.1 <0.1
59.9 05050007 wrac106e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
63.0 05020001 wrae214e PEM 36 <0.1 <0.1
63.1 05050007 wrac115e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
63.3 05020001 wrae212e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
Pocahontas County 71.7 05050003 wpoa404e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
71.7 05050003 wpoa404e PEM 288 0.2 0.2
71.7 05050003 wpoa403e PEM 93 <0.1 <0.1
71.7 05050003 wpoa403e PEM 6 <0.1 <0.1
71.9 05050007 wpoa413e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
71.9 05050007 wpoa414e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
71.9 05050007 wpoa411e PEM 12 <0.1 <0.1
71.9 05050007 wpoa415e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
71.9 05050007 25 <0.1 <0.1
Virginia

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
Highland County 85.4 c 02080201 whia406f PFO 33 <0.1 <0.1
Bath County 103.9 02080202 nwi_va_l_006 PFO 169 0.1 0.1
103.9 02080202 nwi_va_l_006 PFO 91 0.1 0.1
104.0 02080202 wbar002f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
104.0 02080202 nwi_va_l_002 PEM 114 0.1 0.1
104.0 02080202 nwi_va_e_008 PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
104.7 02080202 nwi_va_l_007 PFO 51 <0.1 <0.1
104.7 02080202 nwi_va_l_007 PFO 39 <0.1 <0.1
Augusta County 108.6 02080202 nwi_va_l_001 PSS 206 0.1 0.1
112.3 02080202 nwi_va_h_002 PEM 162 0.1 0.1
112.3 02080202 nwi_va_h_001 PEM 102 0.1 0.1
112.3 02080202 nwi_va_h_001 PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
124.0 02070005 waub107e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
141.0 02070005 waub106e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
L-60

141.0 02070005 waub106e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1

157.0 02070005 waue002e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
157.0 02070005 waue002e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
Nelson County 171.3 02080203 wnez003s PSS 40 <0.1 <0.1
175.5 02080203 nwi_va_c_045 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
184.6 02080203 wnec052e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
184.6 02080203 wnea021e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
Buckingham County 184.8 02080203 wbua009f PFO 39 <0.1 <0.1
184.8 02080203 wbuc109f PFO 175 0.1 0.1
184.8 02080203 wbup006e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
184.9 02080203 wbua008e PEM 20 <0.1 <0.1
185.2 02080203 wbua007e PEM 16 <0.1 <0.1
185.3 02080203 wbua007e PEM 85 0.1 0.1
185.4 02080203 wbua006e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
185.4 02080203 wbua006e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
189.1 02080203 wbuc007s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
189.1 02080203 5 <0.1 <0.1
189.1 02080203 17 <0.1 <0.1
190.0 02080203 wbuc106s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
190.0 02080203 wbuc106s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
195.3 02080203 wbuc105f PFO 399 0.2 0.2
211.4 02080205 wbua003e PEM 17 <0.1 <0.1
Cumberland County 218.9 02080207 wcua002f PFO 32 <0.1 0.0
218.9 02080207 wcua002f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
Brunswick County 260.7 03010201 nwi_va_a_044 PFO 121 0.1 0.1
260.7 03010201 wbrc003f PFO 44 <0.1 <0.1
281.5 03010204 nwi_va_063 PFO 166 0.1 0.1
281.5 03010204 nwi_va_062 PFO 198 0.1 0.1
282.4 03010204 wbra026f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
Greensville County 283.9 03010201 WVA-RDK- PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
006
283.9 03010201 WVA-RDK- PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
006
284.8 03010204 WVA-RDK- PSS 123 0.1 0.0
L-61

001
286.6 03010204 wgrc001f PFO 100 0.1 0.1
298.4 03010204 nwi_va_a_031 PEM 210 0.1 0.1
298.6 03010204 nwi_va_a_034 PFO 492 0.3 0.3
AP-1 Subtotal 8,358 5.8 5.3
AP-2
North Carolina
Halifax County 10.1 03010107 nwi_nc_a_011 PFO 821 0.6 0.6
19.6 03020102 whlg020f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
19.6 03020102 whlg020f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
24.5 03020102 whlg016f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
24.5 03020102 whlg016f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
24.6 03020102 whlh035e PEM 208 0.1 0.1
29.0 03020102 whlg021e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
33.5 03020102 whlh034f PFO 54 <0.1 <0.1
33.5 03020102 whlh034f PFO 116 0.1 0.1
33.5 03020102 whlh034f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
Nash County 53.1 03020101 wnag011f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
54.3 03020101 wnah027f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
54.4 03020101 wnah027f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
61.2 03020203 wnao009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
61.3 03020203 wnap006f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
61.3 03020203 wnao009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
61.3 03020203 wnap006f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
61.3 03020203 wnao009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
Johnston County 97.2 03020201 nwi_nc_l_004 PFO 231 0.2 0.2
97.2 03020201 nwi_nc_l_004 PFO 288 0.2 0.2
97.4 03020201 wjoo030f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
97.4 03020201 wjoo031f PFO 100 0.1 0.1
97.5 03020201 wjoo031f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
97.5 03020201 wjoo030f PFO 27 0.1 0.1
97.5 03020201 wjoo031f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
97.5 03020201 wjoo031f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
L-62

97.6 03020201 wjoo034f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1

97.7 03020201 wjoo034f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
97.7 03020201 wjoo035f PFO 0 0.1 0.1
97.7 03020201 wjoo034f PFO 161 0.2 0.2
97.7 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
97.8 03020201 wjoo035f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
97.8 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 0.1 0.0
97.8 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 0.2 0.0
98.0 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 0.1 0.0
98.0 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
98.0 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
98.0 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 0.1 0.0
98.1 03020201 wjop036f PFO 30 0.1 0.0
98.1 03020201 wjop036f PFO 219 0.2 0.0
98.1 03020201 wjop036f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
98.2 03020201 wjop035f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
98.3 03020201 wjop034f PFO 24 0.2 0.0
98.3 03020201 wjop034f PFO 138 0.3 0.0
98.3 03020201 wjop032f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
98.4 03020201 wjop032f PFO 0 0.1 0.0
98.4 03020201 wjop032e PEM 361 0.1 0.0
98.4 03020201 wjob112f PFO 127 0.1 0.0
98.4 03020201 wjob112f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
98.4 03020201 wjob112f PFO 153 0.1 0.0
98.5 03020201 wjob112f PFO 80 0.1 0.0
98.5 03020201 wjob112f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
99.9 03020201 wjoa021s PSS 0 0.0 0.0
106.3 03020201 wjob104f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
106.3 03020201 wjob104f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
106.3 03020201 wjob103s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
106.3 03020201 wjob103s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
106.3 03020201 wjob103s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
Cumberland County 122.7 03030006 wcmo011s PSS 14 <0.1 <0.1
L-63

123.0 03030006 wcmo015s PSS 797 0.5 0.5

123.1 03030006 wcmo015s PSS 167 0.1 0.1
123.1 03030006 wcmo015e PEM 88 <0.1 <0.1
123.1 03030006 wcmo015s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
126.8 03030004 wcmp008f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
126.8 03030004 wcmp008f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
126.8 03030004 wcmp009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
126.8 03030004 wcmp009f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
136.1 03030006 nwi_nc_l_003 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
136.1 03030006 nwi_nc_l_003 PFO 265 0.2 0.2
136.7 03030006 nwi_nc_l_002 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
136.7 03030006 nwi_nc_f_008 PFO 64 <0.1 <0.1
137.1 03030006 nwi_nc_l_001 PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
137.2 03030006 nwi_nc_l_001 PFO 2,010 1.4 1.4
143.9 03030006 wcmr006e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
Robeson County 182.3 03040203 wroh022f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
AP-2 Subtotal 6,542 6.2 4.3
AP-3
North Carolina

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
Northampton County 0.3 03010204 wnrh014e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
0.3 03010204 wnrh014e PEM 0 <0.1 0.0
7.2 03010204 wnrr007f PFO 9 <0.1 <0.1
Virginia
Southampton County 14.4 03010204 wsop006f PFO 150 0.1 0.0
14.8 03010204 nwi_va_a_035 PFO 1,072 0.7 0.0
14.8 03010204 wsop006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
14.8 03010204 wsop006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
14.8 03010204 wsop006f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
14.8 03010204 wsop005f PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
29.5 03010201 wsol018f PFO 68 0.1 0.0
31.6 03010201 nwi_va_108 PFO 73 <0.1 <0.1
31.6 03010201 nwi_va_108 PFO 38 <0.1 <0.1
31.9 03010201 nwi_va_111 PFO 49 <0.1 <0.1
L-64

31.9 03010201 wsoa020f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1

32.3 03010201 wsoa019s PSS 0 <0.1 0.0
32.4 03010201 wsoa019s PSS 172 0.1 0.0
32.5 03010201 wsol028s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
32.5 03010201 wsol027f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
32.5 03010201 wsol027f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
32.9 03010201 wsol022f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
City of Suffolk 39.1 03010202 wsua007s PSS 0 0.1 0.1
39.1 03010202 wsuc010s PSS 0 <0.1 <0.1
39.1 03010202 wsua007s PSS 0 0.1 0.1
53.0 02080208 wsup022s PSS 1,172 0.8 0.0
53.3 02080208 nwi_va_h_005 PSS 261 0.2 0.0
64.2 02080208 nwi_va_h_006 E2EM 181 0.1 0.1
64.2 02080208 nwi_va_h_007 E2EM 411 0.3 0.3
66.3 02080208 nwi_va_l_005 PFO 864 0.6 0.0
66.6 02080208 wsuo018s PSS 141 0.1 0.0
71.0 02080208 wsuc111f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
City of Chesapeake 73.9 02080208 wchr002f PFO 176 0.2 0.0
74.0 02080208 nwi_va_l_004 PFO 774 0.5 0.0

 TABLE L-3 (contd)

Wetlands Crossed by Access Roads for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Facility/State or Hydrologic Unit Cowardin Crossing Temporary Impacts Permanent
Commonwealth/County or City Milepost Code (HUC8) Unique ID Classification a Length (feet) b (acres) Impacts (acres)
74.1 02080208 wchr002f PFO 19 <0.1 0.0
74.1 02080208 nwi_va_l_004 PFO 0 <0.1 0.0
74.1 02080208 wchr002f PFO 13 <0.1 0.0
74.2 02080208 wchr002f PFO 0 0.2 0.0
74.3 02080208 wchr002f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
75.0 02080208 wchr002f PFO 0 0.2 0.0
75.0 02080208 wchr002f PFO 0 0.1 0.1
75.1 02080208 wchr002f PFO 0 <0.1 <0.1
75.1 02080208 wchc003s PSS 0 0.1 0.1
75.1 02080208 wchr001f PFO 0 0.2 0.2
75.1 02080208 wchr001f PFO 0 0.1 0.1
78.2 02080208 wcho011f PFO 134 <0.1 <0.1
78.4 02080208 wcho011e PEM 1,039 0.6 0.6
78.5 02080208 wcho011f PFO 104 0.2 0.2
L-65

78.5 02080208 wcho011e PEM 419 0.5 0.5

78.6 02080208 wcho011e PEM 0 <0.1 <0.1
AP-3 Subtotal 7,338 6.4 2.6
AP-5
Virginia
Greensville County 0.2 03010204 WVA-RDK- PSS 154 0.1 0.0
001
AP-5 Subtotal 154 0.1 0.0
ACCESS ROAD TOTALS 22,392 18.5 12.2
____________________
a
Wetland types according to Cowardin et al. (1979):
PFO = palustrine forested
PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub
PEM = palustrine emergent
PUB = palustrine unconsolidated bottom
E2EM = estuarine intertidal emergent
b
The crossing length is the measure of the distance of the centerline through the wetland. A value of 0 indicates that the centerline does not cross the wetland.
c
Located entirely or partially on NFS land.

 APPENDIX M

ROADS AND RAILROADS CROSSED BY THE

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 APPENDIX M

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings a
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
AP-1
West Virginia Harrison County County or local road County Hwy 35/3 1.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 2 1.4 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 4/3 3.9 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road 4.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 10/10 4.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 10/11 5.0 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 10/12 5.7 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Hollick Run Rd 7.8 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 1 8.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Elk City Rd 8.4 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Broad Run Rd 9.4 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 8/3 9.6 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County Railroad Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 11.7 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Sycamore Rd 11.8 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road 12.2 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 19 12.7 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road 4WD Road 13.7 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County U.S. or State Hwy I 79 14.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Lifes Run Rd 14.3 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 7/4 15.5 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 13 17.2 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road Laurel Lick Rd 18.1 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road 19.9 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 32/2 20.4 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road County Hwy 32 20.6 Bore
West Virginia Lewis County County or local road 20.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 12 23.2 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 119/33 23.2 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road Fink Run Rd 24.0 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 7/4 24.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Route 7 25.8 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 14 27.1 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 4 29.1 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road Sago Rd 29.3 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 20/9 30.5 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County Railroad Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 31.1 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road Sago Rd 31.6 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County Railroad Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 31.6 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 22 31.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 22 33.8 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 22/3 34.4 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road 34.4 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road Driveway 36.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 24 36.8 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 9/8 37.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road 38.7 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 30/18 40.6 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 30 41.3 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 9 41.3 Bore
West Virginia Upshur County County or local road County Hwy 9/23 43.8 Bore

M-1
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 34 45.3 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 42/1 48.4 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 42 48.4 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 46/2 49.0 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 46/2 49.1 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 46/2 49.7 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 46 50.6 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 45 56.2 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 15 59.5 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road 59.5 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 49 60.7 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Rte 219/14 65.4 Bore
West Virginia Randolph County County or local road County Hwy 51/1 66.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road County Rte 67.5 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County Railroad Western Maryland Railway 68.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 219 69.1 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 70.7 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road Driveway 72.8 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road Beverage Rd 74.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road County Hwy 9/2 75.3 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 75.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road County Hwy 15 75.9 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road County Hwy 1 76.5 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County Railroad C and O Railroad 76.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road County Hwy 1/4 76.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 28 79.2 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 92 81.1 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 82.5 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 82.5 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 82.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 82.6 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 83.0 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 4WD Road 83.1 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 83.2 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 83.7 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 83.8 Bore
West Virginia Pocahontas County County or local road 83.8 Bore
Virginia Highland County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 84 87.2 Bore
Virginia Highland County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 604 88.5 Bore
Virginia Highland County County or local road Bratton McGuffin Trl 89.2 Bore
Virginia Highland County County or local road 89.7 Bore
Virginia Highland County County or local road 91.2 Bore
Virginia Highland County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 220 91.3 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road 92.1 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road 92.1 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road 92.2 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 694 93.0 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road 93.7 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 614 94.7 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 609 95.3 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 678 97.7 Bore
Virginia b Bath County Forest Service road Shenandoah Mt. Trail (FS 98.7 Bore
Trail 447)

M-2
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 627 100.8 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 629 101.4 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road Driveway 102.7 Bore
Virginia Bath County County or local road Route 640 103.1 Bore
Virginia Bath County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 641 105.5 Bore
Virginia b Bath County Forest Service trail Brushy Ridge Trail (FS Trial 105.9 Conventional
718)
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Deerfield Valley Rd 108.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 108.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 108.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 108.8 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 109.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Deerfield Valley Rd 110.0 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Hug Hart Fort Ln 110.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 111.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 111.7 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Pauley Mill Rd 111.9 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Deerfield Valley Rd 112.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Hodges Draft Ln 112.7 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Clay Hill CH Ln 113.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Methodist Church Ln 113.4 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road W Augusta Rd 113.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy U.S. Highway 250 114.8 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 115.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 115.8 Bore
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 348.1 116.5 Bore
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road Braley Pond Rd/FS Road 715 116.7 Bore
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 449 117.0 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road Dowells Draft Trail (FS Trail 117.1 Conventional
650)
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 449A 118.7 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 449B 118.8 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 449B 119.1 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 466A 120.2 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 466/White Oak Draft 120.4 Conventional
Trail (FS Trail 486)
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 728 121.0 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 1755 121.2 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 1755 121.4 Conventional
Virginia b Augusta County Forest Service road FS Road 1757 121.8 Conventional
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Jennings Gap Rd 124.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Dryden Rd 124.9 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 125.0 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 42 125.9 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 126.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Private Dr 126.9 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Hotchkiss Rd 127.4 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Churchville Ave 129.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Vinegar Hill Rd 129.7 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 129.7 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Eagle Rock Ln 130.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Driveway 130.8 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 130.8 Bore

M-3
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Driveway 130.9 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Morris Mill Rd 131.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 133.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Driveway 133.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Parkersburg Tpke 134.2 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Miss Phillips Rd 134.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County Railroad C and O Railroad 135.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Hebron Rd 135.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Middlebrook Rd 137.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Stingy Hollow Rd 137.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Old Greenville Rd 139.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Lee Jackson Hwy 140.0 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Folly Mills Station Rd 140.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Folly Mills Station Rd 140.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy I 64 140.8 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Guthrie Rd 143.0 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 143.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Tinkling Spring Rd 144.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Stuarts Draft Hwy 145.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 146.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Wayne Ave 147.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 147.6 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Cisco Ln 148.1 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Patton Farm Rd 148.8 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Lyndhurst Rd 149.4 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Schages Ln 149.4 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 152.0 Bore
Virginia Augusta County U.S. or State Hwy Howardsville Tpke 152.2 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Clear Meadows Ln 152.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Mt Torrey Rd 153.4 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road 154.5 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Bear Path Ln 155.3 Bore
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Hibernia Cir 156.6 Bore
Virginia b Augusta County Trail Appalachian National Scenic 158.1 HDD
Trail (FT 1)
Virginia Augusta County County or local road Blue Ridge Pkwy 158.2 HDD
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Beech Grove Rd 158.6 HDD
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 158.8 Bore
Virginia Nelson County U.S. or State Hwy Beech Grove Rd 158.9 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 162.5 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 162.8 Bore
Virginia Nelson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 151 163.1 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Glenthorne Loop 163.3 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 165.7 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Gullysville Ln 166.2 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Grape Lawn Dr 168.8 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Thomas Nelson Hwy 169.0 Bore
Virginia Nelson County U.S. or State Hwy Thomas Nelson Hwy 169.0 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Old Ridge Rd 169.5 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Stagebridge Rd 170.4 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Wheelers Cove Rd 171.0 Bore
Virginia Nelson County Railroad Southern Railroad 175.4 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Laurel Rd 176.2 Bore

M-4
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 176.3 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 178.5 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Glade Rd 179.9 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road 181.0 Bore
Virginia Nelson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 646 181.1 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Dillard Ln 183.1 Bore
Virginia Nelson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 626 183.3 Bore
Virginia Nelson County County or local road Midway Mills Ln 184.5 HDD
Virginia Nelson County Railroad Chesapeake and Ohio 184.5 HDD
Railroad
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road 185.2 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road 185.6 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road 185.7 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road 186.1 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 604 186.4 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 737 188.6 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road 188.8 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 660 190.5 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road Union Hill Rd 192.2 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 56 192.6 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 60 196.3 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 644 198.2 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 641 199.9 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 638 200.8 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 640 202.3 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County County or local road Appomattox Buckingham SF 202.4 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 633 204.0 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 609 206.0 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 633 208.8 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 15 209.4 Bore
Virginia Buckingham County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 769 209.9 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road Pleasant Valley Rd 212.0 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road Pleasant Valley Rd 212.7 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road Raines Rd 213.5 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road Plank Rd 214.3 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Cumberland Rd 215.8 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road Ingle Rd 217.3 Bore
Virginia Cumberland County County or local road River Rd 219.9 Bore
Virginia Prince Edward U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 619 222.6 Bore
County
Virginia Prince Edward County or local road Gully Tavern Ln 223.7 Bore
County
Virginia Prince Edward County or local road Gully Tavern Rd 224.7 Bore
County
Virginia Prince Edward U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 617 225.8 Bore
County
Virginia Nottoway County U.S. or State Hwy Holly Farm Rd 226.4 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road S Genito Rd 227.0 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Dutchtown Rd 228.7 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Jennings Ordinary Rd 230.2 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County Railroad Southern Railroad 231.5 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County U.S. or State Hwy E Patrick Henry Hwy 231.6 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Good Hope Rd 232.8 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road W Creek Rd 233.2 Bore

M-5
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Namozine Rd 234.8 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Mountian Hall Rd 235.6 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Winningham Rd 237.2 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Indian Oak Rd 237.8 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Bible Rd 239.6 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Piney Green Rd 241.0 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Cellar Creek Rd 242.2 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Cottage Rd 243.6 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Hawthorne Dr 244.8 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Yellow Bird Rd 245.2 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Green Gable Rd 246.6 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 460 247.1 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 247.3 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Reservation Rd 247.4 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Wellville Rd 247.9 Bore
Virginia Nottoway County County or local road Fort Pickett Military Reserve 248.0 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County County or local road Green Meadows Ln 250.1 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County County or local road Zilles Rd 250.9 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County County or local road White Oak Rd 254.6 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County U.S. or State Hwy Darvills Rd 255.9 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County County or local road Whitmore Rd 257.6 Bore
Virginia Dinwiddie County County or local road Harpers Rd 259.6 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Gills Bridge Rd 260.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Gills Bridge Rd 261.0 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Gills Bridge Rd 261.0 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Gills Bridge Rd 261.0 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Lew Jones Rd 262.3 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Rawlings Rd 263.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 265.4 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Waqua Creek Rd 266.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 1 267.7 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County U.S. or State Hwy I 85 268.1 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County U.S. or State Hwy I 85 268.2 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Pine Ridge Rd 268.4 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Antioch Rd 269.4 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Ebenezer Rd 269.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Great Oak Rd 271.2 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Blackbottom Rd 273.0 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 274.4 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Liberty Rd 274.5 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Old Stage Rd 274.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road County Pond Rd 275.7 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.5 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.5 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.6 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.6 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.8 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 276.8 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 277.3 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 277.8 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County U.S. or State Hwy Governor Harrison Pkwy 279.6 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 279.8 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Walton Rd 279.9 Bore

M-6
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Freemans Cross Rd 280.5 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Markum Rd 281.2 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 281.9 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road 282.7 Bore
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Belfield Rd 283.0 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Radium Rd 284.0 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 284.8 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Rodgers Rd 285.6 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 285.7 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 285.8 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 286.0 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 286.1 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 287.3 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 287.7 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Dry Bread Rd 288.1 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 289.4 Bore
Virginia Greensville County U.S. or State Hwy Brink Rd 290.5 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Collins Rd 291.2 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Rock Bridge Rd 292.2 Bore
Virginia Greensville County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy F 129 293.1 Bore
Virginia Greensville County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 293.1 Bore
Virginia Greensville County U.S. or State Hwy Skippers Rd 293.5 Bore
Virginia Greensville County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 293.6 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Zion Church Rd 294.9 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 295.3 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 295.3 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 296.3 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Taylors Mill Rd 296.4 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 297.5 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 299.2 Bore
Virginia Greensville County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 662 300.1 Bore
AP-2
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 2.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Hickory Tree Rd 2.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Big John Store Rd 3.5 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Old Garysburg Rd 4.2 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 4.3 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 301 4.9 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 5.0 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Stephenson Rd 5.8 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 6.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 301 6.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 186 7.2 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 7.6 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Ellis St 7.6 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Old Highway Rd 8.1 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 158 8.2 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 9.4 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road River Rd 10.4 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 10.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 12.8 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 301 13.5 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road White Hill Rd 13.5 Bore

M-7
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 14.4 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 14.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Reeses Store Rd 15.0 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 15.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy NC Hwy 125 15.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Dog Pound Rd 16.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 903 16.3 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road J S Pope Rd 18.2 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Grapevine Rd 18.7 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 561 20.5 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Justice Branch Rd 20.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Williams Scott Rd 21.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Whitehead Rd 22.5 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Richneck Rd 23.4 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Beaver Dam Rd 24.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road S Brown Rd 25.7 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Bryant Rd 26.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Heathsville Rd 27.2 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 27.8 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 28.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Ringwood Rd 28.2 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 28.8 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 28.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 4WD Road 29.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Sneed Rd 30.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Driveway 30.2 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Driveway 30.2 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Wagon Wheel Rd 30.8 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Wagon Wheel Rd 30.9 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Hope Rd 31.0 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Faith Rd 31.3 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 31.4 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 481 31.5 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 32.6 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 33.0 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 33.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road Bellamy Lake Rd 33.1 Bore
North Carolina Halifax County County or local road 33.4 Bore
North Carolina Nash County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 48 34.7 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Swift Creek School Rd 35.1 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Hickory Rd 36.9 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Straight Gate Rd 38.0 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Watson Seed Farm Rd 39.6 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Massengale Rd 40.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road N Browntown Rd 40.8 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Wollett Mill Rd 41.9 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Deans Rd 43.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Red Oak Battleboro Rd 44.1 Bore
North Carolina Nash County U.S. or State Hwy Red Oak Blvd 45.0 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Turkey Foot Rd 45.5 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Big Jim Rd 45.9 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Lacy Ln 46.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road N Old Carriage Rd 46.5 Bore

M-8
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Lacy Ln 46.5 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Hunter Hill Rd 46.9 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Reges Store Rd 48.4 Bore
North Carolina Nash County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 64 49.3 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Eastern Ave 49.8 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Kamlar Rd 50.1 Bore
North Carolina Nash County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 50.7 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Oak Level Rd 51.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 58 52.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road E Old Spring Hope Rd 52.3 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Bone Ln 52.6 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Lindsay Rd 56.8 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Sandy Cross Rd 57.9 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Bend of the River Rd 58.7 Bore
North Carolina Nash County U.S. or State Hwy E NC Highway 97 60.0 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Old Bailey Hwy 60.4 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Graham Brantley Rd 60.5 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Back 40 Ln 61.4 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Ada Taylor Rd 61.6 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Maudis Rd 62.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Old Smithfield Rd 62.8 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Old Smithfield Rd 63.6 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road W Hornes Church Rd 64.0 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Bull Head Rd 65.2 Bore
North Carolina Nash County County or local road Friday Rd 65.7 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Green Pond Rd 66.0 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Countryside Rd 66.4 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 264 66.4 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Bruce Rd 66.6 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road 67.4 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 264A 67.5 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County Railroad Norfolk Southern Railroad 67.5 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Sims School Rd 68.2 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Rock Ridge Sims Rd 68.2 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Winborne Rd 69.2 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Marsh Swamp Rd 69.4 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Nobles Chapel Rd 69.7 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road 69.8 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Boykin Rd 70.8 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Wilkerson Loop 71.1 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Healthy Plaines Church Rd 71.6 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Rock Ridge School Rd 72.2 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Leonard Rd 72.6 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 581 74.2 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 42 74.7 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Exum Rd 75.9 Bore
North Carolina Wilson County County or local road Shaw Rd 76.9 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 222 W 78.8 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Bay Valley Rd 79.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Beulahtown Rd 79.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Glendale Rd 80.0 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Abednego Rd 80.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Hales Rd 80.9 Bore

M-9
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Moore Rd 81.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Old Beulah Rd 82.1 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Micro Rd W 83.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Old Beulah Rd 83.9 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Davis Homestead Rd 84.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Old Creech Rd 85.5 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Hawkins Rd 86.8 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy US Highway 301 N 87.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 88.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Lizzie Mill Rd 88.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 88.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Campground Rd 89.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Futrell Rd 89.5 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Pine Level Selma Rd 90.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County Railroad Southern Railroad 90.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Firetower Rd 91.0 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy US Highway 70A E 91.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 70 92.1 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road 92.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy US Highway 70 Bus E 93.5 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road 94.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road 94.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road 94.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Casey Rd 94.9 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Brogden Rd 95.7 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Stevens Sausage Rd 96.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Stevens Sausage Rd 97.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Guin Rd 99.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Devils Racetrack Rd 100.7 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy US Highway 701 S 102.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Lees Union Church Rd 102.7 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Coats Rd 103.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Stricklands Crossroads Rd 104.1 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road 105.3 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Oak Forest Rd 106.0 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road W Johnson Rd 107.8 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Enoch Rd 108.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy I 40 108.2 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Meadowbrook Rd 108.5 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Godwin Lake Rd 109.4 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 50 S 109.6 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 96 S 111.0 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Godwin Lake Rd 112.0 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Mamie Rd 112.1 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Holly Grove Rd 112.5 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County County or local road Golda Rd 112.9 Bore
North Carolina Johnston County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 242 S 113.5 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Hay Barn Rd 115.0 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Godwin Lake Rd 115.3 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County U.S. or State Hwy Harnett Dunn Hwy 115.9 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Green Path Rd 116.3 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Larry Ln 116.4 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Timothy Rd 117.6 Bore

M-10
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Green Path Rd 117.7 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County U.S. or State Hwy Plain View Hwy 118.6 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Old US 421 Hwy S 118.8 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road N Spring Branch Rd 120.3 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Green Path Rd 121.0 Bore
North Carolina Sampson County County or local road Ottis Rd 121.3 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Sherrill Baggett Rd 125.0 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 125.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Leitha Ln 125.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Leitha Ln 125.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Godwin Falcon Rd 126.4 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Dunn Rd 128.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 128.3 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Sisk Culbreth Rd 129.9 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 130.8 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road River Rd 131.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 132.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Swamp Rd 132.8 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Jackie Lee Rd 133.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 133.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Dunn Rd 134.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 134.9 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 135.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Goldsboro Rd 136.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 137.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Murphy Rd 138.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 140.2 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 140.4 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Maxwell Rd 140.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Clinton Rd 142.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 142.8 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 144.5 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 210 145.0 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Stedman Cedar Creek Rd 146.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Bogie Island Rd 146.6 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy Cedar Creek Rd 148.2 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Sophia Bill Rd 148.4 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Dudley Rd 150.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road 150.4 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Johnson Rd 151.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Tabor Church Rd 153.0 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Matt Hair Rd 153.7 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Cheraw St 155.0 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Marsh Rd 155.1 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 87 S 156.0 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Yarborough Rd 156.9 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Fire Department Rd 157.8 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Chickenfoot Rd 159.3 Bore
North Carolina Cumberland County County or local road Yarborough Rd 159.4 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Ballance Farm Rd 161.5 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County Railroad Seaboard System Railroad 163.5 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Willow Dr 163.7 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Freedom Dr 164.0 Bore

M-11
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy I 95 164.1 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road W McRainey Rd 164.3 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 301 164.9 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Carolina Church Rd 165.2 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 20 W 167.2 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road W Great Marsh Church Rd 168.6 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Coy Rd 169.6 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road M Strong Rd 169.8 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road M Strong Rd 169.9 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Mary C Rd 170.4 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Waldron Rd 170.5 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Tolar Rd 171.3 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Rennert Rd 172.4 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Shannon Rd 173.7 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Snipes Rd 174.9 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road McQueen Rd 175.2 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 211 W 176.1 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Buies Mill Rd 176.5 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Buie-Philadelphus Rd 177.8 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Evergreen Church Rd 178.6 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Stafford Dr 179.0 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 179.2 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Townsends Chapel Rd 179.4 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 72 179.8 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Philadelphus Rd 180.7 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Frank Rd 181.3 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County County or local road Whistling Rufus Rd 181.3 Bore
North Carolina Robeson County U.S. or State Hwy NC Highway 710 182.9 Bore
AP-3
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 1.1 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Concord Church Rd 2.0 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Dr Parker Rd 2.5 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Big John Store Rd 3.3 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Peanut Market Rd 3.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 4.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 4.5 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 6.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Mount Zion Church Rd 7.5 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road Big John Store Rd 7.9 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 9.4 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 9.5 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 9.6 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 186 9.9 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 10.0 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 10.9 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 186 11.3 Bore
North Carolina Northampton County County or local road 11.8 Bore
Virginia Southampton Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 13.3 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road The Hall Rd 13.4 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 14.2 Bore
County

M-12
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Southampton County or local road 15.1 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Whitehead Rd 16.0 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Old Branchville Rd 16.4 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 17.4 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Powells Hill Rd 19.0 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 35 19.6 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Lassiters Dr 19.8 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Cross Keys Rd 20.8 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Three Bees Rd 22.0 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 22.6 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 22.7 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 23.5 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Grays Shop Rd 23.5 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Blackhead Signpost Rd 24.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Thomaston Rd 25.5 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Thomaston Rd 26.6 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Cypress Bridge Rd 26.9 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Bishop Poquoson Rd 28.8 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton U.S. or State Hwy General Thomas Hwy 29.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 29.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Beale Rd 29.5 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Handsom Rd 30.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Nottoway Farms Dr 31.1 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Nottoway Farms Dr 31.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Nottoway Farms Dr 31.3 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 31.9 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Campbell's Run Rd 32.9 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Delaware Rd 33.2 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Sycamore Church Rd 34.7 Bore
County

M-13
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia Southampton County or local road 34.7 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton U.S. or State Hwy Smiths Ferry Rd 35.8 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 37.1 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 37.4 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road 38.0 Bore
County
Virginia Southampton County or local road Hemlock St 38.2 Bore
County
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Seaboard Systen Railroad 39.1 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy S Quay Rd 39.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road New Rd 40.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road S Quay Rd 41.1 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 58 41.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Holy Neck Rd 41.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Harvest Dr 43.1 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Barnes Rd 44.4 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Elwood Rd 44.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Brentwood Rd 45.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy S Quay Rd 45.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Okelly Dr 46.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Dutch Rd 47.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Longstreet Ln 48.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Quince Rd 48.8 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Pioneer Rd 49.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 50.4 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy Holland Rd 50.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Chappell Dr 51.8 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Seaboard Coast Line Railroad 53.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Deer Path Rd 53.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 54.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Indian Trl 55.5 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Little Creek Rd 56.3 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Norfolk and Western Railroad 56.8 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Archers Mill Rd 57.0 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy Pruden Blvd 59.0 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Lake Prince Dr 60.2 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Labrador Ln 60.6 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Matoaka Rd 61.4 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Mockingbird Ln 61.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk County or local road Waters Ave 62.7 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 10 63.2 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy Nansemond Pkwy 66.1 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Railway 66.3 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk Railroad Railway 66.9 Bore
Virginia City of Suffolk U.S. or State Hwy W Military Hwy 71.3 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake Railroad Seaboard Coast L Railroad 71.4 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Peach Rd 73.6 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake Railroad Norfolk Southern Railway 76.0 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Galberry Rd 77.6 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road 77.6 HDD

M-14
 APPENDIX M (contd)
a
Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
Virginia City of Chesapeake U.S. or State Hwy I 64 77.8 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake U.S. or State Hwy I 64 77.9 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake U.S. or State Hwy George Washington Hwy N 78.7 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Fenway Ave 78.7 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road 79.0 HDD
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Hopewell Dr 79.3 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Baywood Trl 79.6 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Shell Rd 79.9 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Jarvis Rd 79.9 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Richwood Ave 80.0 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Steel St 80.8 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Currie Ave 81.0 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Vepco St 81.1 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake Railroad N P B Railroad 82.2 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake U.S. or State Hwy Bainbridge Blvd 82.4 Bore
Virginia City of Chesapeake County or local road Driveway 82.7 Bore
AP-4
Virginia Brunswick County County or local road Walton Rd 0.3 Bore
AP-5
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 0.3 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road Radium Rd 0.5 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 0.6 Bore
Virginia Greensville County County or local road 0.6 Bore

SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

TL-636
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Borland Farm Rd 0.3 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Wilson St 0.9 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Kemerer Hollow Rd 1.4 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Wiestertown Rd 2.7 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Evans Rd 3.3 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road 3.4 Bore
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland County or local road Hills Church Rd 3.6 Bore
County
TL-635
West Virginia Harrison County County or local road 0.2 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 27 1.4 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 25 2.1 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 46/3 4.0 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 46 4.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 15 5.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 15/11 5.9 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 17 6.7 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 17/1 7.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 42 7.9 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County Railroad Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 9.4 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 38 9.4 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County U.S. or State Hwy US Hwy 50 10.6 Bore

M-15
 APPENDIX M (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Road and Railroad Crossings a
Facility/State or Construction
Commonwealth County/City Road Type Road/Railroad Name Milepost Method
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road Old US 50 10.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 3 13.0 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 20/2 15.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 55/8 17.8 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 23 18.6 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 6 20.7 Bore
West Virginia Doddridge County County or local road County Hwy 4 22.8 Bore
West Virginia Tyler County County or local road County Hwy 13 23.1 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road County Hwy 82 23.8 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road 26.8 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County Railroad Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 29.5 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County U.S. or State Hwy State Hwy 20 29.5 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road County Hwy 20/10 29.7 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road County Hwy 20/10 30.1 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road County Hwy 7/6 30.9 Bore
West Virginia Wetzel County County or local road County Hwy 20/4 31.8 Bore
____________________
a
Road and railroad data obtained from RexTag Strategies, June 2016.
b
Located entirely or partially within NFS land.

M-16
 APPENDIX N

FOREIGN UTILITIES CROSSED BY THE ATLANTIC COAST

PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 APPENDIX N

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
AP-1
West Virginia Harrison County 0.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Harrison County 0.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Harrison County 0.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Harrison County 0.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 1.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 3.3 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Lewis County 5.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 6.0 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Lewis County 6.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 6.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 6.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 7.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 7.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 7.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 7.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 8.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 9.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 9.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 9.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 10.8 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Lewis County 11.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 11.0 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Lewis County 12.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 13.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 13.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 13.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 14.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 14.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 15.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 15.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 16.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 17.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Lewis County 18.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Dominion Transmission, Inc.
West Virginia Lewis County 18.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Lewis County 19.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Lewis County 19.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP

N-1
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
West Virginia Upshur County 22.5 Electric Transmission
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 22.7 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Upshur County 23.1 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Upshur County 25.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 26.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 26.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 27.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 27.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 27.1 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 27.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC
West Virginia Upshur County 27.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC
West Virginia Upshur County 27.5 Electric Transmission
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 30.1 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 30.9 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 31.4 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 33.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 33.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 33.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 33.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC
West Virginia Upshur County 33.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC
West Virginia Upshur County 34.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
LP
West Virginia Upshur County 37.1 Natural Gas Pipeline CONE Midstream Partners, LP
West Virginia Upshur County 37.4 Natural Gas Pipeline CONE Midstream Partners, LP
West Virginia Upshur County 37.7 Electric Transmission
Line
West Virginia Upshur County 38.6 Natural Gas Pipeline CONE Midstream Partners, LP
West Virginia Upshur County 40.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Eastern America Energy Corporation
West Virginia Randolph 45.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 45.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 45.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 45.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 46.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 46.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 47.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP

N-2
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
West Virginia Randolph 47.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Randolph 47.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Randolph 47.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Randolph 47.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 47.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 47.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 47.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 48.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 48.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 48.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 48.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 49.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Midstream Development,
County LP
West Virginia Randolph 50.8 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Randolph 56.7 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Randolph 59.2 Electric Transmission
County Line
West Virginia Randolph 62.6 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Pocahontas 67.7 Electric Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Pocahontas 75.8 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Highland 90.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Augusta County 114.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia Augusta County 124.4 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia Augusta County 136.5 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Augusta County 142.8 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia Augusta County 142.8 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Augusta County 145.3 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Augusta County 147.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Virginia Augusta County 148.1 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Augusta County 153.3 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Nelson County 177.0 Electric Transmission
Line

N-3
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
Virginia Nelson County 179.2 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia Buckingham 191.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
Virginia Buckingham 191.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
Virginia Buckingham 191.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
Virginia Buckingham 191.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
Virginia Buckingham 196.5 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Buckingham 199.9 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Buckingham 200.8 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Buckingham 209.5 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Buckingham 211.3 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Cumberland 213.5 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Cumberland 214.5 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Cumberland 215.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Cumberland 219.9 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Cumberland 220.0 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Prince Edward 225.7 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Nottoway 231.6 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Nottoway 232.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Nottoway 247.4 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Brunswick 267.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 283.5 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 284.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 288.3 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 288.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 291.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
Virginia Greensville 293.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Greensville 293.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
Virginia Greensville 293.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
AP-2

N-4
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
North Carolina Northampton 2.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Transcontinental Gas P.l. Co., LLC
County
North Carolina Northampton 4.9 Electric Transmission
County Line
North Carolina Northampton 5.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
North Carolina Northampton 6.2 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
North Carolina Northampton 6.4 Electric Transmission
County Line
North Carolina Halifax County 12.7 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 15.0 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 16.3 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 20.5 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 22.2 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 22.2 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 22.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
North Carolina Halifax County 24.9 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 28.2 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 28.4 Electric Transmission
Line
North Carolina Halifax County 31.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
North Carolina Nash County 48.1 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
Line
North Carolina Nash County 48.1 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
Line
North Carolina Nash County 52.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
North Carolina Nash County 62.5 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
Line
North Carolina Wilson County 74.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
Line
North Carolina Johnston 91.1 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 91.5 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 92.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Johnston 92.9 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 92.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Johnston 93.5 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 100.8 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 109.6 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Johnston 113.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County

N-5
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
North Carolina Sampson 115.0 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Sampson 115.9 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Sampson 119.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Sampson 119.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Cumberland 125.3 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 129.6 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 129.9 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 130.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Cumberland 131.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Cumberland 131.1 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 132.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Cumberland 133.9 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 134.6 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 140.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 143.3 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 151.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 152.0 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 152.3 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 152.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 152.8 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 153.2 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 154.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 155.8 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 157.3 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 157.6 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 157.7 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 158.2 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Cumberland 159.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Robeson 163.0 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line

N-6
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
North Carolina Robeson 163.0 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Robeson 167.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
North Carolina Robeson 171.8 Electric Transmission Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC
County Line
North Carolina Robeson 182.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Company
County
AP-3
North Carolina Northampton 6.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
North Carolina Northampton 8.6 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
North Carolina Northampton 8.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 14.4 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 16.5 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 16.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 17.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 18.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 18.2 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 19.7 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Southampton 20.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 20.8 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 22.3 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 25.6 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 26.9 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia Southampton 27.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 28.6 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
County Line
Virginia Southampton 35.9 Electric Transmission
County Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 41.9 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 42.8 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 43.9 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 44.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 44.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 44.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line

N-7
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
Virginia City of Suffolk 44.4 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 45.9 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 47.3 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 48.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 49.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 56.5 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 56.5 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 59.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 62.1 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 62.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Virginia City of Suffolk 62.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Virginia City of Suffolk 63.2 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 65.0 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 65.9 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 66.1 Electric Transmission
Line
Virginia City of Suffolk 68.8 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Line
Virginia City of 73.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake
Virginia City of 73.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake
Virginia City of 73.5 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 77.7 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 77.9 Electric Transmission Dominion Virginia Power Company
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 78.7 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 78.7 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 79.5 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 79.8 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 79.8 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 80.7 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 80.7 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 80.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake
Virginia City of 80.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake

N-8
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
Virginia City of 80.8 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 80.8 Electric Transmission
Chesapeake Line
Virginia City of 82.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake
Virginia City of 82.7 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
Chesapeake
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
Tl-636
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 0.0 Electrical Transmission West Penn Power Company
County Line
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 0.4 Natural Gas Pipeline West Penn Power Company
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 0.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 0.7 Products Pipeline Sunoco Pipeline, LP
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 1.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 1.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 1.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 2.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 3.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 3.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
Pennsylvania Westmoreland 3.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Peoples Natural Gas
County
TL-635
West Virginia Doddridge 6.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Eastern America Energy Corporation
County
West Virginia Doddridge 6.3 Natural Gas Pipeline MarkWest Liberty Midstream &
County Resources, LLC
West Virginia Doddridge 6.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Crestwood Marcellus Pipeline
County
West Virginia Doddridge 6.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Mountaineer Midstream Company, LLC
County
West Virginia Doddridge 7.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Doddridge 8.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Doddridge 9.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Doddridge 9.1 Natural Gas Pipeline MarkWest Liberty Midstream &
County Resources, LLC
West Virginia Doddridge 12.0 Natural Gas Pipeline MarkWest Liberty Midstream &
County Resources, LLC
West Virginia Doddridge 12.1 Electrical Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Doddridge 12.3 Natural Gas Pipeline Mountaineer Midstream Company, LLC
County
West Virginia Doddridge 13.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County

N-9
 APPENDIX N (contd)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Crossings of Existing Pipelines and Other Facilities a
Facility/State or
Commonwealth County/City Milepost Type Operator
West Virginia Doddridge 14.0 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
County
West Virginia Doddridge 14.5 Natural Gas Pipeline Mountaineer Midstream Company, LLC
County
West Virginia Doddridge 14.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Chesapeake Energy, Inc.
County
West Virginia Doddridge 14.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Mountaineer Midstream Company, LLC
County
West Virginia Doddridge 15.0 Electrical Transmission Monongahela Power Company
County Line
West Virginia Doddridge 16.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Mountaineer Midstream Company, LLC
County
West Virginia Doddridge 16.3 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
County
West Virginia Doddridge 17.8 Natural Gas Pipeline MarkWest Liberty Midstream &
County Resources, LLC
West Virginia Doddridge 18.9 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
County
West Virginia Doddridge 19.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Doddridge 20.2 Natural Gas Pipeline Columbia Gas Transmission
County
West Virginia Doddridge 20.2 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
County
West Virginia Wetzel County 23.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 23.9 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 24.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 24.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 24.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 24.0 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 24.1 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 25.4 Natural Gas Pipeline Caiman Energy
West Virginia Wetzel County 25.8 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 30.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Caiman Energy
West Virginia Wetzel County 31.2 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Wetzel County 31.4 Electrical Transmission Monongahela Power Company
Line
West Virginia Wetzel County 31.4 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Wetzel County 31.6 Natural Gas Pipeline Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
West Virginia Wetzel County 31.8 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Wetzel County 32.3 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Wetzel County 33.1 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
West Virginia Wetzel County 33.2 Natural Gas Pipeline EQT Midstream Partners (Equitrans)
____________________
a
Utility data obtained from RexTag Strategies, June 2016.

N-10
 APPENDIX O

BEDROCK GEOLOGY CROSSED BY THE

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 APPENDIX O

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
West Virginia
AP-1 0.0 1.2 Permian - Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
1.2 1.3 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
1.3 1.5 Permian - Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
1.5 1.6 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
1.6 2.2 Permian - Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
2.2- 3.1 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
3.1- 3.1 Permian - Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
3.1 4.7 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
4.7 4.8 Permian - Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
4.8 5.7 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
5.7 5.9 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
5.9 7.1 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
7.1- 8.1 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
O-1

8.1 8.3 Quaternary Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium NA

8.3 9.1 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
9.1 9.9 Quaternary Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium NA
9.9 11.7 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
11.7 11.9 Quaternary Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium NA
11.9 15.1 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
15.1 15.3 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
15.3 15.7 Quaternary Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium NA
15.7 15.8 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
15.8 16.2 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
16.2 16.4 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
16.4 16.9 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
16.9 17.3 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
17.3 17.8 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
17.8 18.4 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
18.4 19.7 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
19.7 20.7 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
20.7 21.0 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
21.0 21.9 Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
21.9 22.2 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
22.2 22.3 Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
22.3 23.2 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
23.2 23.3 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
23.3 23.9 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
23.9 24.1 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
24.1 24.6 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
24.6 24.9 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
24.9 25.1 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
25.1 25.2 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
25.2 23.4 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Sandstone Siltstone
25.4 25.7 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
25.7 26.0 Pennsylvanian Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium NA
O-2

26.0 30.0 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone

30.0 30.2 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
30.2 30.3 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
30.3 31.1 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
31.1 31.4 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
31.4 32.5 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
32.5 32.6 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
32.6 33.5 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
33.5 33.8 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
33.8 34.0 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
34.0 34.3 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
34.3 34.5 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
34.5 34.7 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
34.7 34.9 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
34.9 35.0 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
35.0 35.4 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
35.4 35.5 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
35.5 35.6 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
35.6 35.8 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
35.8 35.9 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
35.9 36.0 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
36.0 36.3 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
36.3 36.5 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
36.5 36.7 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
36.7- 36.9 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
36.9 37.2 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
37.2 37.4 Pennsylvanian Conemaugh Group Shale Siltstone
37.4 37.5 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
37.5 38.1 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
38.1 39.5 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
39.5 39.7 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
39.7 41.1 Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation Sandstone Siltstone
41.1 50.4 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
O-3

50.4 50.6 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale

50.6 51.9 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
51.9 52.1 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
52.1 52.2 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
52.2 52.3 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
52.3 54.1 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
54.1 54.5 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
54.5 55.2 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
55.2 55.5 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
55.5 58.0 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
58.0 58.1 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
58.1 58.3 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
58.3 58.7 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
58.7 59.8 Pennsylvanian Kanawha Formation Sandstone Shale
59.8 60.1 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
60.1 60.3 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
60.3 60.4 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
60.4 61.0 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
61.0 61.6 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
61.6 61.9 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
61.9 62.2 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
62.2 62.2 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
62.2 62.7 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
62.7 62.9 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
62.9 63.8 Pennsylvanian New River Formation Sandstone Shale
63.8 64.1 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
64.1 64.6 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
64.6 65.0 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
65.0 65.5 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
65.5 66.5 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
66.5 66.7 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
66.7 67.3 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
67.3 67.7 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
O-4

67.7 67.9 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone

67.9 68.1 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
68.1 68.5 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
68.5 68.6 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
68.6 68.8 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
68.8 69.4 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
69.4 69.6 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
69.6 70.4 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
70.4 70.8 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
70.8 71.1 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
71.1 71.6 Mississippian Bluestone and Princeton Formations Shale Sandstone
71.6 72.4 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
72.4 72.6 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
72.6 73.0 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
73.0 73.5 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
73.5 73.7 Mississippian Hinton Formation Shale Sandstone
73.7 74.2 Mississippian Bluefield Formation Shale Limestone
74.2 74.6 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
74.6 74.7 Mississippian Maccrady Formation Shale Sandstone
74.7 75.1 Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone Limestone Shale
75.1 75.2 Mississippian Maccrady Formation Shale Sandstone
75.2 75.6 Mississippian Pocono Formation Sandstone Siltstone
75.6 78.1 Devonian Hampshire Formation Sandstone Limestone
78.1 78.6 Devonian Chadakoin Formation Siltstone Shale
78.6 79.4 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
79.4 80.0 Devonian Millboro Shale Shale Black Shale
80.0 80.1 Devonian Oriskany Sandstone and Helderberg Group, Sandstone Limestone
undivided
80.1 80.2 Silurian Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations Limestone Shale
80.2 80.3 Silurian McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Shale Sandstone
80.3 80.4 Silurian Tuscarora Formation Quartzite Sandstone
80.4 80.6 Silurian McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Shale Sandstone
80.6 80.7 Silurian Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations Limestone Shale
O-5

80.7 80.8 Devonian Oriskany Sandstone and Helderberg Group, Sandstone Limestone
undivided
80.8 81.2 Devonian Millboro Shale Shale Black Shale
81.2 81.8 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
81.8 82.8 Devonian Chadakoin Formation Siltstone Shale
82.8 83.9 Devonian Hampshire Formation Sandstone Limestone
Virginia
AP-1 83.9 86.9 Devonian Hampshire Formation Sandstone Limestone
86.9 87.1 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
87.1 87.4 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
87.4 87.5 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
87.5 87.7 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
87.7 88.0 Ordovician Juniata, Oswego, Martinsburg (Reedsville and Dolly Shale Mudstone
Ridge), and Eggleston Formations
88.0 88.1 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
88.1 88.5 Ordovician Juniata, Oswego, Martinsburg (Reedsville and Dolly Shale Mudstone
Ridge), and Eggleston Formations
88.5 88.9 Ordovician Moccasin or Bays Formation through Blackford Shale Mudstone
Formation
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
88.9 89.3 Ordovician Juniata, Oswego, Martinsburg (Reedsville and Dolly Shale Mudstone
Ridge), and Eggleston Formations
89.3 90.3 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
90.3 90.9 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
90.9 92.0 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
92.0 92.2 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
92.2 92.8 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
92.8 93.6 Ordovician Juniata, Oswego, Martinsburg (Reedsville and Dolly Shale Mudstone
Ridge), and Eggleston Formations
93.6 94.6 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
94.6 95.8 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
95.8 96.9 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
96.9 97.5 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
O-6

Groups
97.5 97.9 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
97.9 101.8 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
101.8 102.2 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
102.2 102.4 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
102.4 102.5 Silurian Keefer, Rose Hill, and Tuscarora Formations Arenite Shale
102.5 103.7 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
103.7 105.2 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
105.2 108.4 Silurian-Devonian Ridgeley Sandstone, Helderberg and Cayugan Limestone Sandstone
Groups
108.4 108.9 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
108.9 109.1 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
109.1 110.5 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
110.5 114.9 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
114.9 115.0 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
115.0 115.1 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
115.1 115.3 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
115.3 117.2 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
117.2 120.2 Devonian Chadakoin Formation Siltstone Shale
120.2 121.2 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
121.2 122.1 Devonian Chadakoin Formation Siltstone Shale
122.1 122.6 Devonian Brallier Formation Shale Siltstone
122.6 122.8 Devonian Millboro Shale and Needmore Formation Black Shale Shale
122.8 123.4 Silurian-Devonian Lower Devonian and Silurian Formations Undivided Sandstone Limestone
123.4 123.7 Ordovician Juniata, Oswego, Martinsburg (Reedsville and Dolly Shale Mudstone
Ridge), and Eggleston Formations
123.7 123.9 Ordovician Edinburg Formation, Lincolnshire and New Market Limestone Black Shale
Limestones
123.9 125.0 Cambrian Elbrook Formation Dolostone Limestone
(Dolomite)
125.0 128.6 Cambrian-Ordovician Conococheague Formation Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
128.6 131.5 Ordovician Beekmantown Group Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
O-7

131.5 132.3 Cambrian-Ordovician Conococheague Formation Limestone Dolostone

(Dolomite)
132.3 135.0 Ordovician Beekmantown Group Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
135.0 137.0 Cambrian-Ordovician Conococheague Formation Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
137.0 137.7 Ordovician Beekmantown Group Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
137.7 138.7 Cambrian Elbrook Formation Dolostone Limestone
(Dolomite)
138.7 139.2 Cambrian-Ordovician Conococheague Formation Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
139.2 140.6 Ordovician Beekmantown Group Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
140.6 141.0 Ordovician Edinburg Formation, Lincolnshire and New Market Limestone Black Shale
Limestones
141.0 142.1 Ordovician Martinsburg Formation Shale NA
142.1 143.1 Ordovician Edinburg Formation, Lincolnshire and New Market Limestone Black Shale
Limestones
143.1 144.8 Ordovician Beekmantown Group Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
144.8 145.9 Cambrian-Ordovician Conococheague Formation Limestone Dolostone
(Dolomite)
145.9 149.5 Cambrian Elbrook Formation Dolostone Limestone
(Dolomite)
149.5 152.4 Cambrian Waynesboro Formation Dolostone Shale
(Dolomite)
152.4 153.3 Cambrian Shady Dolomite Dolostone Limestone
(Dolomite)
153.3 155.5 Cambrian Chilhowee Group Quartzite Conglomerate
155.5 155.8 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Catoctin Formation - Metabasalt Meta-Basalt NA
155.8 156.6 Cambrian Chilhowee Group Quartzite Conglomerate
156.6 157.0 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Catoctin Formation - Metabasalt Meta-Basalt NA
157.0 157.3 Cambrian Chilhowee Group Quartzite Conglomerate
157.3 158.6 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Catoctin Formation - Metabasalt Meta-Basalt NA
158.6 161.0 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA
161.0 161.8 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Catoctin Formation - Metabasalt Meta-Basalt NA
O-8

161.8 162.2 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA

162.2 162.9 Proterozoic Y Layered Pyroxene Granulite Granulite NA
162.9 163.1 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
163.1 163.6 Proterozoic Y Biotite-Muscovite Leucogranite Gneiss Granitic Gneiss NA
163.6 164.0 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
164.0 164.3 Proterozoic Y Layered Biotite Granulite and Gneiss Gneiss Granulite
164.3 165.3 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
165.3 165.9 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA
165.9 166.6 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
166.6 167.1 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA
167.1 167.2 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
167.2 168.7 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA
168.7 168.8 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
168.8 169.5 Proterozoic Y Charnockite Granitic Gneiss NA
169.5 169.9 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
169.9 170.7 Proterozoic Y Layered Biotite Granulite and Gneiss Gneiss Granulite
170.7 171.2 Proterozoic Y Layered Quartzofeldspathic Augen Gneiss and Flaser Felsic Gneiss Flaser Gneiss
Gneiss
171.2 173.4 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
172.4 172.5 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagabbro Amphibolite Amphibolite
172.5 173.0 Proterozoic Z Rockfish River Pluton Granodiorite NA
173.0 173.7 Proterozoic Y Alkali Feldspar Leucogranite Granite NA
173.7 174.1 Proterozoic Y Porphyoblastic Biotite-Plagioclase Augen Gneiss Augen Gneiss NA
174.1 175.0 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagabbro Amphibolite Amphibolite
175.0 177.1 Late Proterozoic Linville Metadiabase Metamorphic Rock Greenstone
177.1 179.2 Proterozoic Z Ashe Formation - Biotite gneiss Biotite Gneiss NA
179.2 179.7 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Alligator Back Formation - Feldspathic Meta-Argillite Schist
metagraywacke
179.7 180.0 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Mafic Igneous Complex Undivided Mafic NA
Metavolcanic
Rock
180.0 180.9 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Alligator Back Formation - Feldspathic Meta-Argillite Schist
metagraywacke
180.9 181.2 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Catoctin Formation - Metabasalt Meta-Basalt NA
181.2 183.2 Cambrian Candler Formation - Phyllite and schist Phyllite Schist
O-9

183.2 183.4 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
183.4 184.0 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Alligator Back Formation - Feldspathic Meta-Argillite Schist
metagraywacke
184.0 184.2 Cambrian Candler Formation - Phyllite and schist Phyllite Schist
184.2 184.8 Upper Triassic Newark Supergroup; Triassic Sandstone, Siltstone, Sandstone Siltstone
and Shale
184.8 186.9 Cambrian Candler Formation - Phyllite and schist Phyllite Schist
186.9 188.7 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
188.7 189.3 Cambrian Candler Formation - Phyllite and schist Phyllite Schist
189.3 193.4 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
193.4 193.7 Proterozoic Z- Buckingham Complex - Metamorphosed mafic and Metamorphic Rock NA
Pennsylvanian ultramafic rocks
193.7 193.9 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
193.9 196.7 Proterozoic Z- Buckingham Complex - Metamorphosed mafic and Metamorphic Rock NA
Pennsylvanian ultramafic rocks
196.7 196.8 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
196.8 197.1 Proterozoic Z- Buckingham Complex - Metamorphosed mafic and Metamorphic Rock NA
Pennsylvanian ultramafic rocks
197.1 197.6 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
197.6 197.7 Proterozoic Z- Buckingham Complex - Metamorphosed mafic and Metamorphic Rock NA
Pennsylvanian ultramafic rocks
197.7 198.0 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
198.0 198.2 Proterozoic Z- Buckingham Complex - Metamorphosed mafic and Metamorphic Rock NA
Pennsylvanian ultramafic rocks
198.2 200.7 Proterozoic Z-Cambrian Metagraywacke, Quartzose Schist, and Melange Meta-Argillite Schist
200.7 200.8 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
200.8 202.2 Cambrian Chopawamsic Formation - Interlayered felsic and Metavolcanic NA
mafic metavolcanic rocks Rock
202.2 203.5 Ordovician Axemann Formation Limestone NA
203.5 204.3 Cambrian Interlayered Mafic and Felsic Metavolcanic Rocks - Amphibolite Biotite Gneiss
Amphibolite, hornblende-biotite gneiss, and schist.
204.3 204.4 Proterozoic Ultramafic Rocks Ultramafitite NA
(Komatiite)
204.4 210.3 Cambrian Interlayered Mafic and Felsic Metavolcanic Rocks - Amphibolite Biotite Gneiss
Amphibolite, hornblende-biotite gneiss, and schist.
O-10

210.3 211.4 Upper Triassic Newark Supergroup; Breccia, mixed clasts Breccia NA
211.4 214.3 Upper Triassic Newark Supergroup; Triassic Sandstone, Siltstone, Sandstone Siltstone
and Shale
214.3 215.6 Triassic Newark Supergroup, Chatham Group; Sanford Conglomerate Sandstone
Formation
215.6 217.0 Proterozoic Migmatitic Paragneiss Paragneiss NA
217.0 217.1 Proterozoic Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss NA
217.1 220.0 Proterozoic Migmatitic Paragneiss Paragneiss NA
220.0 200.5 Proterozoic Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss NA
220.5 220.7 Proterozoic Biotite Granite Gneiss Granitic Gneiss NA
220.7 221.7 Proterozoic Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss NA
221.7 223.5 Proterozoic Biotite Granite Gneiss Granitic Gneiss NA
223.5 223.8 Proterozoic Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss NA
223.8 224.3 Proterozoic Migmatitic Paragneiss Paragneiss NA
224.3 228.2 Proterozoic Biotite Granite Gneiss Granitic Gneiss NA
228.2 229.4 Proterozoic Migmatitic Paragneiss Paragneiss NA
229.4 234.5 Proterozoic Burkeville Pluton Granodiorite Monzonite
234.5 235.4 Proterozoic Amphibolite and Amphibole-Bearing Gneiss and Amphibolite Gneiss
Schist
235.4 235.5 Proterozoic Burkeville Pluton Granodiorite Monzonite
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
235.5 235.9 Proterozoic Amphibolite and Amphibole-Bearing Gneiss and Amphibolite Gneiss
Schist
235.9 236.2 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Migmatitic Paragneiss
Paragneiss
236.2 236.6 Proterozoic Y- Piedmont Upland Quartzofeldspathic Felsic Gneiss
Pennsylvanian Gneiss
236.6 236.7 Proterozoic Y Piedmont Upland Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss
Garnet-Biotite
Gneiss
236.7 237.1 Proterozoic Y- Piedmont Upland Quartzofeldspathic Felsic Gneiss
Pennsylvanian Gneiss
237.1 239.9 Proterozoic Y Piedmont Upland Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss
Garnet-Biotite
Gneiss
239.9 240.1 Proterozoic Y Piedmont Upland Amphibolite, Schist
Amphibole
Gneiss, And
O-11

Schist
240.1 240.7 Proterozoic Y- Piedmont Upland Granite Gneiss Granitic
Pennsylvanian Gneiss
240.7 241.5 Proterozoic Y Piedmont Upland Porphyroblastic Biotite Gneiss
Garnet-Biotite
Gneiss
241.5 244.7 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Piedmont Upland Mylonite, Mylonite Mylonite
Gneiss, And
Cataclastic Rocks
244.7 245.9 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
245.9 248.4 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
248.4 248.7 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
248.7 250.7 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
250.7 251.2 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
251.2 259.9 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
259.9 260.3 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
260.3 261.2 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
261.2 261.3 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
261.3 262.7 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
262.7 264.1 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Gneissic Granite Granite
And Granodiorite
264.1 270.6 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Biotite Gneiss Biotite Gneiss
270.6 272.4 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Piedmont Upland Mylonite, Mylonite Mylonite
Gneiss, And
Cataclastic Rocks
272.4 276.2 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Porphyroblastic Granite
Biotite Granite
276.2 278.2 Proterozoic Piedmont Upland Mafic And Felsic Metavolcanic
Volcanic Rocks Rock
278.2 280.0 Proterozoic - Paleozoic ? Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
280.0 281.1 Proterozoic Mafic and Felsic Volcanic Rocks Metavolcanic NA
Rock
O-12

281.1 281.5 Proterozoic Granite Granite Granodiorite

281.5 282.1 Tertiary Pliocene Sand and Gravel Gravel Sand
282.1 283.1 Proterozoic Granite Granite Granodiorite
283.1 283.3 Proterozoic Mafic and Felsic Volcanic Rocks Metavolcanic NA
Rock
283.3 284.3 Tertiary Pliocene Sand and Gravel Gravel Sand
284.3 284.6 Proterozoic Mafic and Felsic Volcanic Rocks Metavolcanic NA
Rock
284.6 285.6 Tertiary Pliocene Sand and Gravel Gravel Sand
285.6 287.1 Proterozoic Mafic and Felsic Volcanic Rocks Metavolcanic NA
Rock
287.1 289.6 Tertiary Pliocene Sand and Gravel Gravel Sand
289.6 290.2 Proterozoic Granite Granite Granodiorite
290.2 297.8 Tertiary Bacons Castle Formation Gravel Sand
297.8 298.0 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
298.0 298.7 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
298.7 299.4 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
299.4 300.1 Tertiary Bacons Castle Formation Gravel Sand
300.1 300.1 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
North Carolina
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
AP-2 0.0 9.4 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
9.4 11.3 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
11.3 13.9 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
13.9 14.2 Paleozoic/Late Proterozoic Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite Metamorphic Rock NA
14.2 15.0 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
15.0 15.6 Paleozoic/Late Proterozoic Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite Metamorphic Rock NA
15.6 16.5 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
16.5 16.9 Paleozoic/Late Proterozoic Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite Metamorphic Rock NA
16.9 19.4 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
19.4 20.0 Paleozoic/Late Proterozoic Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite Metamorphic Rock NA
20.0 22.7 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
22.7 23.1 Paleozoic/Late Proterozoic Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite Metamorphic Rock NA
23.1 32.5 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
32.5 32.8 Permian/Pennsylvanian Foliated to Massive Granitic Rock Granite NA
O-13

32.8 33.6 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
33.6 34.1 Permian/Pennsylvanian Foliated to Massive Granitic Rock Granite NA
34.1 39.3 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
39.3 42.9 Permian/Pennsylvanian Foliated to Massive Granitic Rock Granite NA
42.9 43.69 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
43.6 44.9 Permian/Pennsylvanian Foliated to Massive Granitic Rock Granite NA
44.9 46.9 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
46.9 49.4 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
49.4 50.2 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
50.2 50.5 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
50.5 51.7 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
51.7 52.0 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Felsic Metavolcanic Rock Felsic Mafic
Metavolcanic Metavolcanic
Rock Rock
52.0 52.8 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
52.8 57.1 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
57.1 58.2 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
58.2 59.5 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Felsic Metavolcanic Rock Felsic Mafic
Metavolcanic Metavolcanic
Rock Rock
59.5 60.6 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
60.6 60.8 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
60.8 62.4 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
62.4 63.0 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
63.0 65.6 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
65.6 66.2 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
66.2 66.7 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
66.7 67.4 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
67.4 69.0 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
O-14

69.0 69.1 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite

Rock
69.1 69.8 Permian/Pennsylvanian Granitic Rock Granite NA
69.8 69.8 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
69.8 70.3 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
70.3 71.2 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
71.2 72.6 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
72.6 74.1 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite Metasedimentary Meta-Argillite
Rock
74.1 78.5 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
78.5 79.7 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Felsic Metavolcanic Rock Felsic Mafic
Metavolcanic Metavolcanic
Rock Rock
79.7 82.3 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
82.3 83.9 Cambrian/Late Proterozoic Felsic Metavolcanic Rock Felsic Mafic
Metavolcanic Metavolcanic
Rock Rock
83.9 87.2 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
87.2 92.5 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
92.5 92.9 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
92.9 95.3 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
95.3 96.0 Tertiary Terrace Deposits and Upland Sediment Terrace Gravel
96.0 103.1 Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation Sandstone Mudstone
103.1 106.5 Cretaceous Black Creek Formation Clay or Mud Sand
106.5 107.0 Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation Sandstone Mudstone
107.0 116.7 Cretaceous Black Creek Formation Clay or Mud Sand
116.7 117.2 Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation Sandstone Mudstone
117.2 122.9 Cretaceous Black Creek Formation Clay or Mud Sand
122.9 135.3 Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation Sandstone Mudstone
135.3 183.0 Cretaceous Black Creek Formation Clay or Mud Sand
North Carolina
AP-3 0.0 12.1 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
Virginia
O-15

AP-3
12.1 12.2 Tertiary Yorktown Formation and Duplin Formation, Undivided Clay or Mud Sand
12.2 13.5 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
13.5 13.7 Quaternary Shirley Formation Gravel Sand
13.7 13.7 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
13.7 17.4 Quaternary Shirley Formation Gravel Sand
17.4 17.5 Tertiary Moorings Unit of Oaks and Coch (1973) Sand Silt
17.5 17.6 Quaternary Shirley Formation Gravel Sand
17.6 18.3 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
18.3 19.5 Quaternary Shirley Formation Gravel Sand
19.5 28.3 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
28.3 32.1 Quaternary Shirley Formation Gravel Sand
32.1 32.9 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
32.9 34.4 Quaternary Dune Sand Dune Sand NA
34.4 38.0 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
38.0 38.6 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
38.6 39.3 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
39.3 39.6 Quaternary Chuckatuck Formation Gravel Sand
39.6 40.0 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
40.0 41.8 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
41.8 44.0 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
44.0 44.3 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
44.3 44.7 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
44.7 49.1 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
49.1 49.8 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
49.8 49.9 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
49.9 50.4 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
50.4 51.3 Tertiary-Quaternary Windsor Formation Gravel Sand
51.3 55.3 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
55.3 55.5 Tertiary Chesapeake Group Sand Silt
55.5 55.9 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
55.9 56.5 Tertiary Chesapeake Group Sand Silt
56.5 57.5 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
O-16

57.5 58.1 Tertiary Chesapeake Group Sand Silt

58.1 60.6 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
60.6 61.3 Tertiary Chesapeake Group Sand Silt
61.3 62.0 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
62.0 62.7 Tertiary Chesapeake Group Sand Silt
62.7 63.4 Quaternary Charles City Formation Sand Silt
63.4 64.2 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
64.2 64.6 Holocene water Water NA
64.6 65.1 Quaternary Alluvium Alluvium Clay or Mud
65.1 65.2 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
65.2 65.5 Holocene water Water NA
65.5 66.5 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
66.5 68.7 Quaternary Swamp Deposits Peat Clay or Mud
68.7 69.9 Quaternary Artificial Fill Unconsolidated NA
Deposit
69.9 71.5 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
71.5 72.6 Quaternary Swamp Deposits Peat Clay or Mud
72.6 73.4 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Sedgefield Member Sand NA
73.4 76.4 Quaternary Swamp Deposits Peat Clay or Mud
76.4 81.7 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Lynnhaven Member Sand Silt
 APPENDIX O (contd)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Project/State or Commonwealth/ Secondary
Component Milepost Range Unit Age Geologic Unit Primary Lithology Lithology
81.7 81.8 Holocene water Water NA
81.8 82.7 Quaternary Tabb Formation; Lynnhaven Member Sand Silt
Virginia
AP-4 0.0 0.4 Proterozoic - Paleozoic Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks Mylonite Gneiss
Virginia
AP-5 0.0 1.0 Proterozoic Mafic and Felsic Volcanic Rocks Metavolcanic NA
Rock
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
Pennsylvania
TL-636 0.0 1.1 Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group Limestone Shale
1.1 2.5 Pennsylvanian Casselman Formation Shale Siltstone
2.5 3.4 Pennsylvanian Glenshaw Formation Shale Sandstone
3.4 3.5 Pennsylvanian Casselman Formation Shale Siltstone
3.5 3.9 Pennsylvanian Glenshaw Formation Shale Sandstone
O-17

West Virginia
TL-635 0.0 33.6 Permian-Pennsylvanian Dunkard Group Sandstone Siltstone
 APPENDIX P

REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION 2 ANALYSIS

 Appendix P

Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2 Analysis

The RUSLE2 equation is used to evaluate potential erosion rates at specific sites as well as guide
conservation and erosion control planning. RUSLE2 uses factors that represent the effects of climate, soil
erodibility, topography, cover management and support practices to compute soil erosion.

RUSLE2 estimates average annual soil loss from the eroding portion of the overland-flow path,
deposition on the depositional portion of the path, and sediment load along the overland flow path. Sediment
yield (delivery) is the sediment load at the end of the overland flow path, at the outlet of terrace/diversion
channels, or discharged from sediment basins that are considered in the overland flow path (profile)
representation used in a particular RUSLE2 computation. These quantities are expressed in units of mass
per unit area per year.

RUSLE2 computes net detachment each day using the factors: [a = r k l S c p] where: a = net
detachment (mass/unit area), r = erosivity factor, k = soil erodibility factor, l = slope length factor, S = slope
steepness factor, c = cover-management factor, and p = supporting practices factor.

The R factor represents the erosivity of the climate at a particular location. An average annual value
of R is determined from historical weather records using erosivity values determined for individual storms.
The erosivity of an individual storm is computed as the product of the storm's total energy, which is closely
related to storm amount, and the storm's maximum 30-minute intensity. Erosivity range from less than 8
(US customary units) in the western US to about 700 for New Orleans.

The K factor represents a relative quantitative index of the susceptibility of bare soil to particle
detachment and transport by water, and is one of the factors used in the Revised Universal Soil Loss
Equation to calculate soil loss. K factor values range from 0.02 to 0.69. Fine textured soils high in clay
have low K values, about 0.02 to 0.15, because they are resistant to detachment. Coarse texture soils, such
as sandy soils, have low K values, about 0.05 to 0.2, because of low runoff even though these soils are
easily detached. Medium textured soils, such as silt loam soils, have moderate K values, about 0.25 to 0.40,
because they are moderately susceptible to detachment and they produce moderate runoff. Soils having a
high silt content are the most erodible of all soils. They are easily detached and they tend to crust and
produce large amounts and rates of runoff. Values of K for these soils tend to be greater than 0.4.

The l and S factors jointly represent the effect of slope length, steepness, and shape on sediment
production. The c factor accounts for the effects of cover-management and the p factor accounts for
supporting management practices. Support practices include contouring, filter and buffer strips, rotational
strip cropping, terraces and diversions, and small impoundments These practices are referred as support
practices because they are used to support primary cultural erosion control practices based on vegetation,
crop residue, plant litter, and applied mulch (Foster 2004).

Four scenarios were analyzed using two soil map units that would be crossed by the project in
Bath County, Virginia. Outlines of each scenario are below. Additional inputs and RUSLE2 computer
model output values are summarized in table P-1.

1. Preconstruction
a. 100 slope length
b. Slope Steepness = representative slope value as defined in SSURGO for each soil map
unit
c. Crop Management Zone: CMZ 64

P-1
 d. Base management = Permanent pasture, average annual canopy 95%, residue 30%
2. Construction, no cover
a. 100 slope length
b. Slope Steepness = representative slope value as defined in SSURGO for each soil map
unit
c. Crop Management Zone: CMZ 64
d. Base management = Construction site, no vegetative cover
3. Construction, with temporary seed and mulch
a. 100 slope length
b. Slope Steepness = representative slope value as defined in SSURGO for each soil map
unit
c. Crop Management Zone: CMZ 64
d. Base management = Construction site, temporary seed annual ryegrass with mulch
4. Restoration
a. 100 slope length
b. Slope Steepness = representative slope value as defined in SSURGO for each soil map
unit
c. Crop Management Zone: CMZ 64
d. Base management = Permanent pasture, average annual canopy 50%, residue 5%

P-2
 TABLE P-1

Summary of RUSLE2 Computer Model Inputs and Outputs for Selected Soil Map Units in Bath County, VA
Input Values Output Values
Annual
Crop Slope T Conservation Sediment Soil Event
Mgmt R K Slope Slope Value, Plan Soil Delivery, Conditioning Runoff,
Scenario Management Practices Zone a Factor Factor b Length Steepness c t/ac/yr Loss, t/ac/yr t/ac/yr Index (SCI) in/yr
Bath County, VA; 16E, Dekalb-Watahala-McClung complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes
Permanent Pasture, Avg.
CMZ
"Preconstruction" Annual Canopy 95%, 150 0.15 100 45 2 0.015 0.015 1.9 0.57
64
Residue 30%
Construction Site, no CMZ
Construction A 150 0.15 100 45 2 120 120 -9.7 3.6
vegetation 64
Construction Site,
CMZ
Construction B Temporary Seed Annual 150 0.15 100 45 2 69 69 -5.3 3.5
64
Ryegrass with Mulch
Permanent Pasture, Avg.
CMZ
Restoration Annual Canopy 50%, 150 0.15 100 45 2 3.7 3.7 0.42 1.6
64
Residue 5%
Bath County, VA; 50D, Shelocta-Berks complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes
Permanent Pasture, Avg.
CMZ
"Preconstruction" Annual Canopy 95%, 150 0.37 100 25 5 0.022 0.022 1.9 2
P-3

64
Residue 30%
Construction Site, no CMZ
Construction A 150 0.37 100 25 5 180 180 -14 6.1
vegetation 64
Construction Site,
CMZ
Construction B Temporary Seed Annual 150 0.37 100 25 5 97 97 -7.5 6.2
64
Ryegrass with Mulch
Permanent Pasture, Avg.
CMZ
Restoration Annual Canopy 50%, 150 0.37 100 25 5 5 5 0.31 3.8
64
Residue 5%
____________________
a
Crop Management Zone selected based on county; http://fargo.nserl.purdue.edu/rusle2_dataweb/NRCS_Crop_Management_Zone_Maps.htm
b
K Factor inputs obtained from the SSURGO database for each soil map unit
c
Slope Steepness inputs obtained from the representative slope value as defined in SSURGO for each soil map unit
References/Additional Resources

Foster, George R. Revised Universal Soil Loss EquationVersion 2, Draft Users Reference Guide. Prepared
for USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Washington D.C. December 22, 2004.

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Overview or RUSLE2. https://www.ars.usda.gov/southeast-

area/oxford-ms/national-sedimentation-laboratory/watershed-physical-processes-
research/docs/revised-universal-soil-loss-equation-2-overview-of-rusle2/

P-4
 VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/
Details
Detailed printout of RUSLE2 calculation for multiple fields, one or more management alternatives per field

I. Client/Tract ID & Summary

Client/Owner name:
Tract #:
Location: USA\Virginia\Bath County

Printout date: December 8, 2016

Prepared by (name):
USDA Service Center/Location:

Narrative description of plan, fields, and/or management alternatives being compared:

Info: Analysis of runoff potential for individual soil types within the analysis area. Slopes entered
were extracted from SSURGO database, "Slope Gradient - Representative Value" field.

Notes on collection of input data, field visits, etc.:

Summary of RUSLE2 output for each field & management alternative:

Cons. plan.
Soil conditioning STIR
Field name Description soil loss,
index (SCI) value
t/ac/yr
Preconstruction, 100' slope length,
VA017_16E Permanent Pasture, Avg. Annual 0.015 1.9 2.9
Canopy 95%, Residue 30%
Construction Site, 100' slope length, All
VA017_16E 120 -9.7 49
default values used
Construction Site, 100' slope length,
VA017_16E Temporary Seed Annual Ryegrass with 69 -5.3 27
Mulch
Post-Construction, 100' slope length,
VA017_16E Permanent Pasture, Avg. Annual 3.7 0.42 7.3
Canopy 50%, Residue 5%
Preconstruction, 100' slope length,
VA017_50D Permanent Pasture, Avg. Annual 0.022 1.9 2.9
Canopy 95%, Residue 30%
Construction Site, 100' slope length, All
VA017_50D 180 -14 49
default values used
Construction Site, 100' slope length,
VA017_50D Temporary Seed Annual Ryegrass with 97 -7.5 27
Mulch
Post-Construction: 100' slope length,
VA017_50D Permanent Pasture, Avg. Annual 5.0 0.31 7.3
Canopy 50%, Residue 5%

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-5
Recommendations / Comments:

II. RUSLE2 Plan Inputs

1. CLIMATE (R FACTOR)

Climate Location: USA\Virginia\Bath County (R Factor: 150 US)

2 & 3. SOIL & TOPOGRAPHY (K and LS FACTORS)

Field name Soil Slope T Value, Slope length, ft Slope steepness,

t/ac/yr %
VA017_16E soils\Bath 2.0 100 45.0
County,
Virginia\16E
Dekalb-Watahala-
McClung
complex, 35 to 55
percent
slopes\Dekalb
Channery sandy
loam 35%
VA017_16E soils\Bath 2.0 100 45.0
County,
Virginia\16E
Dekalb-Watahala-
McClung
complex, 35 to 55
percent
slopes\Dekalb
Channery sandy
loam 35%
VA017_16E soils\Bath 2.0 100 45.0
County,
Virginia\16E
Dekalb-Watahala-
McClung
complex, 35 to 55
percent
slopes\Dekalb
Channery sandy
loam 35%

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-6
Field name Soil Slope T Value, Slope length, ft Slope steepness,
t/ac/yr %
VA017_16E soils\Bath 2.0 100 45.0
County,
Virginia\16E
Dekalb-Watahala-
McClung
complex, 35 to 55
percent
slopes\Dekalb
Channery sandy
loam 35%
VA017_50D soils\Bath 5.0 100 25.0
County,
Virginia\50D
Shelocta-Berks
complex, 15 to 35
percent
slopes\Shelocta
Silt loam 60%
VA017_50D soils\Bath 5.0 100 25.0
County,
Virginia\50D
Shelocta-Berks
complex, 15 to 35
percent
slopes\Shelocta
Silt loam 60%
VA017_50D soils\Bath 5.0 100 25.0
County,
Virginia\50D
Shelocta-Berks
complex, 15 to 35
percent
slopes\Shelocta
Silt loam 60%
VA017_50D soils\Bath 5.0 100 25.0
County,
Virginia\50D
Shelocta-Berks
complex, 15 to 35
percent
slopes\Shelocta
Silt loam 60%

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-7
4A. CROP MANAGEMENT (C FACTOR) SUMMARY ALL FIELDS/ALTERNATIVES

RUSLE2 crop management file name for each field & management alternative:
Field name Description Management
VA017_16E Preconstruction, 100' slope managements\CMZ 64\a.Single
length, Permanent Pasture, Avg. Year/Single Crop
Annual Canopy 95%, Residue Templates\F01. PERMANENT
30% PASTURE\01. PASTURE,
PERMANENT. Avg annual
canopy 95%, residue 30%
VA017_16E Construction Site, 100' slope managements\CMZ
length, no vegetation 64\d.Construction Site
Templates\Construction site
VA017_16E Construction Site, 100' slope managements\CMZ
length, Temporary Seed Annual 64\d.Construction Site
Ryegrass with Mulch Templates\Temporary Seed
Annual Ryegrass with mulch
VA017_16E Post-Construction, 100' slope managements\CMZ 64\a.Single
length, Permanent Pasture, Avg. Year/Single Crop
Annual Canopy 50%, Residue Templates\F01. PERMANENT
5% PASTURE\06. PASTURE,
PERMANENT. Avg annual
canopy 50%, residue 5%
VA017_50D Preconstruction, 100' slope managements\CMZ 64\a.Single
length, Permanent Pasture, Avg. Year/Single Crop
Annual Canopy 95%, Residue Templates\F01. PERMANENT
30% PASTURE\01. PASTURE,
PERMANENT. Avg annual
canopy 95%, residue 30%
VA017_50D Construction Site, 100' slope managements\CMZ
length, no vegetation 64\d.Construction Site
Templates\Construction site
VA017_50D Construction Site, 100' slope managements\CMZ
length, Temporary Seed Annual 64\d.Construction Site
Ryegrass with Mulch Templates\Temporary Seed
Annual Ryegrass with mulch
VA017_50D Post-Construction: 100' slope managements\CMZ 64\a.Single
length, Permanent Pasture, Avg. Year/Single Crop
Annual Canopy 50%, Residue Templates\F01. PERMANENT
5% PASTURE\06. PASTURE,
PERMANENT. Avg annual
canopy 50%, residue 5%

4B. CROP MANAGEMENT (C FACTOR) DETAILS SELECTED ALTERNATIVES

Key crop management details can be printed for one or more management alternatives in this plan.
Details that can be printed include:
- Rotation duration (years)
- Crops / vegetations in rotation and long-term yield averages (table)
- Key dates and list of field operations (table)
- Details about external residue (manure, compost) additions (table)

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-8
In order to print these details:
- Return to this Plan in RUSLE2.
- Open relevant Worksheet(s) within the Plan, then relevant Profile(s) within the Worksheet(s).
- From the Profile screen(s), print using VA RUSLE2 Profile Printout w Details.2007.
- Copy the desired crop management details from the resulting Word Profile printout(s).
- Paste the crop management details below and clearly identify the alternative(s) to which they apply.
- Delete these instructions.

a. Alternative 1:

b. Alternative 2:

c. Alternative 3:

5. SUPPORT PRACTICES (P FACTOR) SUMMARY

Summary of support practices selected for each field & management alternative:
Field name Description Contouring Support practices Terrace/diversion
system system
VA017_16E Preconstruction, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
Permanent
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
95%, Residue
30%
VA017_16E Construction Site, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
All default values
used
VA017_16E Construction Site, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
Temporary Seed
Annual Ryegrass
with Mulch
VA017_16E Post- contour- -- none -- -- none --
Construction, 100' systems\default
slope length,
Permanent
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
50%, Residue 5%
VA017_50D Preconstruction, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
Permanent
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
95%, Residue
30%

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-9
Field name Description Contouring Support practices Terrace/diversion
system system
VA017_50D Construction Site, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
All default values
used
VA017_50D Construction Site, contour- -- none -- -- none --
100' slope length, systems\default
Temporary Seed
Annual Ryegrass
with Mulch
VA017_50D Post- contour- -- none -- -- none --
Construction: 100' systems\default
slope length,
Permanent
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
50%, Residue 5%

6. RUSLE2 SOFTWARE DETAILS

- Program version: Feb 23 2016

- Database name: BASE_NRCS_MOSES_03302016
- Plan file name: plans\ACP_Analysis_ByMUSYM_16E

III. RUSLE2 Plan Outputs & Definitions

1. SOIL LOSS ESTIMATES & SOIL QUALITY SCORES ALL FIELDS & ALTERNATIVES:

Cons. plan. Soil

Sed. delivery,
Field name Description soil loss, conditioning STIR value
t/ac/yr
t/ac/yr index (SCI)
Preconstruction,
100' slope
length,
Permanent
VA017_16E 0.015 0.015 1.9 2.9
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
95%, Residue
30%
Construction
Site, 100' slope
VA017_16E length, All 120 120 -9.7 49
default values
used

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-10
 Cons. plan. Soil
Sed. delivery,
Field name Description soil loss, conditioning STIR value
t/ac/yr
t/ac/yr index (SCI)
Construction
Site, 100' slope
length,
VA017_16E Temporary 69 69 -5.3 27
Seed Annual
Ryegrass with
Mulch
Post-
Construction,
100' slope
length,
VA017_16E Permanent 3.7 3.7 0.42 7.3
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
50%, Residue
5%
Preconstruction,
100' slope
length,
Permanent
VA017_50D 0.022 0.022 1.9 2.9
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
95%, Residue
30%
Construction
Site, 100' slope
VA017_50D length, All 180 180 -14 49
default values
used
Construction
Site, 100' slope
length,
VA017_50D Temporary 97 97 -7.5 27
Seed Annual
Ryegrass with
Mulch
Post-
Construction:
100' slope
length,
VA017_50D Permanent 5.0 5.0 0.31 7.3
Pasture, Avg.
Annual Canopy
50%, Residue
5%

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-11
Cons. Plan. Soil Loss, t/ac/yr = Soil loss for conservation planning in tons/acre/year
Estimate of average annual rainfall-induced soil loss (detachment of soil particles & transport downhill) over the
length of the modeled slope. It is critical to understand that this value represents a long-term (20- to 30-year)
average, not a prediction of actual soil loss in any single year. This is the number to use for conservation planning
and to compare with the fields T soil loss tolerance value. This number is a measure of the likelihood of
degradation by erosion of the soil resource in upslope (steeper) areas of the field. Very little credit is given for any
sediment deposition that may occur towards the bottom of the modeled slope (for example, due to an end-of-slope
filter strip), because upslope areas are still being degraded.

Sed. Delivery, t/ac/yr = Sediment delivery, tons/acre/year

Estimate of the amount of sediment delivered by runoff to the end of the modeled slope. This is RUSLE2s best
estimate of long-term average edge of field soil loss. Full credit is given for any sediment deposition that occurs
anywhere on the modeled slope due to reductions in slope grade, filter strips, terraces, etc. This number is not used
for conservation planning, but may be used for other environmental applications (e.g., P-Index). In many cases,
RUSLE2 users will model slopes as uniform with no structural practices, vegetative features (filter strips), or breaks
in topography that result in sediment deposition. In this typical situation, results for sediment delivery and soil loss
for conservation planning will be identical.

Soil conditioning index (SCI)

Soil organic matter (SOM) or soil carbon (C) trend score. If SCI is negative (less than zero), SOM and soil
C and soil quality are predicted to decline over time on the modeled slope under the modeled management
system. If SCI is positive (greater than zero), SOM and soil C and soil quality are predicted to stay the
same or to increase over time. SCI scores usually range from -1 to +1 in typical VA situations, although
more extreme values are possible. SCI is an index score (no units) designed solely for comparing the
relative impact of different management alternatives on long-term soil quality trends. When calculating
SCI, RUSLE2 considers three key factors: (1) amount of surface and subsurface biomass returned to the
soil; (2) tillage-induced oxidation of soil carbon; and (3) predicted sheet & rill erosion. Climate and soil
type inputs are also considered due to the influence of these factors on soil C oxidation trends.

STIR = Soil Tillage Intensity Rating (average annual value for the overall crop rotation)
Measure of intensity of tillage or soil disturbance. STIR is an index (no units) designed solely for comparing the
relative impact of different management alternatives on soil disturbance. STIR increases with increasing tillage and
can range from 0 to 200+. Average annual STIR values (shown in this printout) reflect the total amount of soil
disturbance that occurs during the overall rotation, averaged across the number of years in the rotation. STIR values
can also be calculated for individual crops (shown only in the VA Profile Printout w/ Details). The STIR for an
individual crop represents the sum of all soil disturbance associated with establishing and harvesting that crop.
STIR values in the 5 to 20 range are typical of no-till crops and/or continuous no-till or low soil disturbance
cropping systems. In long rotations with a mix of tilled and no-till and/or perennial crops, the average annual STIR
for the overall rotation may be relatively low even if significant tillage occurs in individual years and STIR values
for one or more crops in the rotation are relatively high.

2. FUEL USAGE & COST ESTIMATES (adjusted for soil texture):

STIR Fuel cost,

Field name Description
value US$/ac
Preconstruction, 100' slope length, Permanent Pasture, Avg.
VA017_16E 2.9 0
Annual Canopy 95%, Residue 30%
VA017_16E Construction Site, 100' slope length, All default values used 49 0
Construction Site, 100' slope length, Temporary Seed Annual
VA017_16E 27 0
Ryegrass with Mulch
Post-Construction, 100' slope length, Permanent Pasture,
VA017_16E 7.3 0
Avg. Annual Canopy 50%, Residue 5%
Preconstruction, 100' slope length, Permanent Pasture, Avg.
VA017_50D 2.9 0
Annual Canopy 95%, Residue 30%
VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016
P-12
 STIR Fuel cost,
Field name Description
value US$/ac
VA017_50D Construction Site, 100' slope length, All default values used 49 0
Construction Site, 100' slope length, Temporary Seed Annual
VA017_50D 27 0
Ryegrass with Mulch
Post-Construction: 100' slope length, Permanent Pasture,
VA017_50D 7.3 0
Avg. Annual Canopy 50%, Residue 5%

Fuel cost, US$/ac

Estimate of total cost of fuel consumed by all field operations over the full duration of the modeled crop
rotation. RUSLE2 calculates this value using the Equivalent Diesel Use (gal/ac) output and the user-
selected fuel type and cost ($/gal) (neither can be shown in a Plan printout).

In order to make a valid overall fuel cost comparison between management alternatives, it is especially
important that a fuel type and unit fuel cost should be selected for each alternative under consideration.
Therefore, the user should check RUSLE2 to verify that all fuel related inputs are correct before drawing
conclusions from the fuel cost estimates in this printout.

RUSLE2 fuel usage results are expressed as total fuel used over the full duration of the rotation (i.e.,
gal/ac), not average annual fuel use (i.e., gal/ac/yr). Therefore, be very careful when using these values to
compare relative fuel efficiency of two crop rotations that differ in duration!

Fuel usage results are derived from built-in estimates of typical fuel needs for each field operation in the
RUSLE2 database. When interpreting these results, remember that most RUSLE2 management files were
created with the goal of modeling operations and processes that impact soil loss. Therefore, some fuel-
consuming operations with no impact on soil loss may not be listed in management files (e.g., post-
emergence pesticide applications, hay tedding and raking, etc.). If you wish to improve the accuracy of
fuel usage estimates and comparisons, make sure that all field operations (including those with no soil loss
impact) are included in the relevant RUSLE2 management files.

RUSLE2 fuel usage estimates also reflect an adjustment based on soil type (i.e., finer texture requires more
energy to till). RUSLE2 makes this soil type adjustment to fuel usage for every operation, including
operations that do not disturb soil. Therefore, keeping soil type constant for all management alternatives
under consideration will also help ensure a more accurate fuel usage comparison.

VA RUSLE2 Plan Printout w/ Details, December 8, 2016

P-13
 APPENDIX Q

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION COMMUNITIES CROSSED BY THE

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 TABLE Q-1

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
WEST VIRGINIA
Barren Land Acidic Rock Physiognomy is variable and includes sparsely vegetated rock Acidic Rock Outcrop, Cliff, and Talus habitats occupy a very 2.3 2.1
Outcrops, Cliffs, and faces, lichen and bryophyte dominated communities, sparse small area of the state. Sparsely vegetated to wooded
Talus vertical shrublands, and boulderfield woodlands and forests. lithomorphic habitats, including rock outcrops, cliffs, talus, and
Boulderfield forests and woodlands occur in relatively moist boulderfields on acidic geologic formations across the state at
topographic positions where deep rocky colluvium restricts tree all elevations. These habitats are restricted to certain geologic
growth to a few adapted species, notably Sweet Birch, Yellow formations and are concentrated in certain areas.
Birch, Chestnut Oak, and Mountain Ash. In open habitats tree
growth is limited by drought and/or lack of rooting medium.
Coniferous Red Spruce Forests Upland, mixed evergreen-deciduous forests and woodlands at These habitats are confined to high elevations in the Allegheny 6.3 3.8
(Evergreen) high elevations dominated or codominated by Red Spruce. Mountains Ecoregion, There are five globally rare upland Red
Forest Associated trees may include the evergreen Eastern Hemlock, Spruce associations classified in West Virginia. These forests
and deciduous Yellow Birch, Red Maple, American Beech, occur in small to large patches. Small areas of two forest seep
Mountain Ash, and Black Cherry. Common shrubs include associations are also included in this map class.
Mountain Holly, Great Rhododendron, Striped Maple, Southern
Mountain Cranberry, and Mountain Laurel. The herb layer is
characterized by species adapted to short, cool growing seasons,
including Intermediate Woodfern, Mountain Woodfern, Mountain
Q-1

Wood Sorrel, Canada Mayflower, and Painted Wakerobin.

Mosses and liverworts often have heavy cover over the rocky
ground.
Deciduous Dry Calcareous Natural vegetation of forests is dominated by oak and hickory Dry to dry-mesic calcareous forests, woodlands, and glades 5.1 3.0
Forest Forests, Woodlands, species, including Chinquapin Oak, White Oak, Red Oak, within the range of Chinquapin Oak at low to middle elevations,
and Glades d Bitternut Hickory, and Shagbark Hickory, with codominance by a most abundant in areas with drier climates in the rain shadow
variety of other hardwoods, including Black Maple, Sugar Maple, on the lee side of the Allegheny Mountains. Some of the oldest
and White Ash. Common shrubs and small trees include Paw known living trees in the eastern United States are Eastern
Paw, Muscletree, Redbud, Dogwood, Spicebush, Hop Hornbeam, Red Cedars found in this habitat in West Virginia. The herb
and Black Haw. Herb layers are usually diverse, combining layer is usually diverse and includes several globally and state
species with affinities for other oak-hickory forests in the region rare species.
and more strict calciphiles. Open stand structure of woodland and
glade habitats is maintained by drought stress to trees and in
some cases by avalanches, fire, or grazing. Common woodland
trees include Eastern Red Cedar, Chinquapin Oak, Red Oak, and
White Ash.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
Deciduous Dry-Mesic Oak Most stands have a large component of oaks, including Red Oak,
Forest Forests Chestnut Oak, White Oak, and Black Oak. A subset can be
described as oak hickory forests with a large component of
hickory species including Pignut, Mockernut, and Shagbark.
Other common trees include Red Maple, Sugar Maple, White
Ash, Tuliptree, Black Gum, and American Beech. Common small
trees and shrubs include Sourwood, Witch Hazel. Hop
Hornbeam, Serviceberry,and Dogwood. Heath shrubs may be
present but are not abundant as in the Dry Oak (-Pine) Forest.
Common vines include Virginia Creeper and Greenbrier. The
herb layer ranges from sparse to moderate and is often quite
diverse.
Deciduous Montane Red Oak Forests dominated by Red Oak at high elevations in the Ridge
Forest Forests and Valley Ecoregion and along the border with Virginia on
Allegheny Mountain in the Allegheny Mountains Ecoregion. Other
oaks and hickories are generally excluded and canopy height is
stunted due to severe climate. There is usually abundant coarse
woody debris and an open canopy structure due to tree damage
Q-2
Impacts (Acres)
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Upland, mostly deciduous forests at lower and middle 350.7 216.3
elevations throughout the state. Soils are usually somewhat
less acidic and more fertile compared to the Dry Oak (-Pine)
Forest, but are dryer than the Mixed Mesophytic Forest or
Northern Hardwood Forest. This map class also includes areas
of pine plantations.
Known occurrences of these habitats are restricted to the 15.5 6.2
highest ridges in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion and in the
Allegheny Mountains Ecoregion along the border with Virginia.
In these environments they occur as large or continuous linear
patches, which dominate the ridgetops and upper slopes. The
heath understory type is very rare in the state and known only

from wind and ice storms. Associated trees include Red Maple, in the southernmost counties near the Virginia border.
Sugar Maple, Black Cherry and Sweet Birch. Common
subcanopy trees and shrubs include Striped Maple, Witch Hazel,
and Mountain Holly. Some stands have shrub layers dominated
by heaths. Herb layers are variable, with variants dominated by
combinations of grasses, forbs, and ferns.
Deciduous Northern Hardwood Common deciduous tree species in natural forests include Sugar Upland deciduous and mixed deciduous-evergreen forests at 645.7 421.9
Forest Forests Maple, Red Maple, American Beech, Yellow Birch, Sweet Birch, high elevations in the Allegheny Mountains Ecoregion. This
Black Cherry, Red Oak, Cucumber-tree, and White Ash. Some upland forest ecosystem may include forest seeps which are
stands may include or be dominated by Eastern Hemlock. Red too small to map as a separate wetland habitat. The map class
Spruce is often present but is not abundant in the tree canopy. may also include plantations of Red Pine, Eastern White Pine,
Common shrubs include Striped Maple and Mountain Holly. The Norway Spruce, and Red Spruce.
herb layer is characterized by species adapted to short, cool
growing seasons, including Intermediate Woodfern, New York
Fern, Mountain Wood Sorrel, and Canada Mayflower.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Mixed Forest Dry Oak (-Pine) Dominant trees include Chestnut Oak, Scarlet Oak, Black Oak, Upland deciduous and mixed evergreen-deciduous forests on 389.7 229.0
Forests White Oak, and Red Maple. Sourwood is a common small tree, warm, dry topographic positions and soils throughout the state,
except in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion, where it is absent. In except at the highest elevations, most extensive in the Ridge
the eastern counties there are large areas where Eastern White and Valley Ecoregion.
Pine is codominant with oaks. Other pines are often found
scattered in mostly deciduous stands. Some small patches in the
Western Allegheny Plateau and Cumberland Mountains
ecoregions are dominated or codominated by Virginia Pine or
Short Leaf Pine. Understories are usually dominated by heath
shrubs including Mountain Laurel, Black Huckleberry, and
blueberries. Herb layers are usually sparse and have low
diversity.
Mixed Forest Mixed Mesophytic Common deciduous tree species in natural stands include Sugar These habitats are broadly distributed across the lower and 169.1 107.9
Forests Maple, American Basswood, American Beech, Red Maple, middle elevations of the state but are most abundant in areas
Tuliptree, Red Oak, Sweet Birch, White Ash, and Yellow with more rainfall to the west of the Allegheny Front. They
Buckeye. Some stands may include or be dominated by Eastern occur in large areas on cool aspects of mountain flanks and
Hemlock. Common shrubs include Great Rhododendron, gorge slopes. In the dissected landscapes of the Western
Spicebush, Witch Hazel, and Striped Maple. The herb layers of Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion and low-rainfall areas of the
Q-3

are often lush and diverse, characterized by a flush of spring
ephemerals followed by late season dominance by Wood Nettle
and ferns.
Mixed Forest Pine-Oak Rocky Dominant pines which comprise distinct subtypes include Pitch
Woodlands Pine, Table Mountain Pine, Virginia Pine, and Red Pine. Oaks
are sometimes codominant. Trees are often stunted and stand
physiognomy is sometimes dwarf forest with canopy less than 16
feet tall. The understories are usually dominated by dense heath
shrubs including Mountain Laurel, blueberries, and Black
Huckleberry. The herb layer is typically sparse and has low
diversity. This habitat type also includes sandstone glades with
high exposure of bedrock pavement with scattered, dwarfed
trees, including pines and Eastern Red Cedar
Herbaceous Unknown Wetland e Includes only a few wetlands that did not fall in the floodplain and
Emergent riparian zones. These included some Laurentian-Acadian and
Wetland Piedmont types that were renamed unknown.
Ridge and Valley Ecoregion patches are smaller and are
confined to lower slopes and the coolest aspects.
Upland evergreen and mixed evergreen-deciduous woodlands 1.4 0.7
and forests in hot, very dry topographic positions. This habitat
type is confined to the eastern counties where a dry climate is
produced by the rain shadow on the lee side of the Allegheny
Mountains. Stands are often small patches on rocky summits,
outcrops, and cliffs. Trees are often stunted and stand
physiognomy is sometimes dwarf forest with canopy less than
16 feet tall.
0.2 0.2
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Woody High Allegheny Forested swamps are dominated by Red Spruce, with varying These habitats are confined to higher elevations of the <0.1 0.0
Wetland Wetlands cover by Red Maple, Eastern Hemlock, and Yellow Birch. Where Allegheny Mountains Ecoregion in Preston, Mineral, Tucker,
limestone or calcareous shale influences seepage water, Balsam Grant, Randolph, Pendleton, Pocahantas, Nicholas, and
Fir and Black Ash are typical canopy dominants. Shrub swamps Greenbrier counties. Large concentrations of these habitats
may be dominated by Speckled Alder, Bushy St. Johns wort, are found in Canaan Valley, Cranesville Swamp, Cranberry
Black Chokeberry, Common Winterberry, and/or Velvetleaf Glades, and headwaters of the Greenbrier and Shavers Fork
Blueberry. Herbaceous communities may be dominated by rivers. Wetlands in this system are drained by low-gradient,
species of bulrushes, bur reeds, rushes, sedges, and grasses. meandering, intermittent to small streams that form the
Mosses, especially peat mosses have high ground cover in most headwaters of larger mountain rivers. These habitats form
communities. complex mosaics of small patch communities. Forested
swamps occupy the drier margins or slightly higher islands in
the wetland mosaic. Nutrient-poor fens with bog-like vegetation
such as Cottongrass and Sphagnum mosses form the
characteristic open portion of many of these wetlands.
Ombrotrophic bogs, which receive all their water and nutrients
from precipitation, are rare, but occur in undisturbed portions of
a few of the larger wetlands.
Woody River Floodplains Common trees of forested floodplains at lower elevations include These habitats occupy a very small area of the state. Because 31.4 5.3
Q-4

Wetland Sycamore, Silver Maple, River Birch, White Ash, Green Ash, they are along rivers, they are concentrated in the lower
Sugar Maple, Pin Oak, and Tuliptree. High elevation floodplain elevations, but they also include smaller areas along rivers at
forests are often dominated by Red Spruce, Yellow Birch, and/or higher elevations. Thus they range from the lowest elevations
Eastern Hemlock. Shrub swamps of lower elevation floodplains in the state along the Ohio and Potomac rivers up to 3,600 feet
are often dominated by Smooth Alder or Buttonbrush. Riverscour elevation along the Shavers Fork River.
prairies are usually characterized by warm-season grasses such
as Big Bluestem and Switch Grass, but these are lacking in
riverscour prairies at higher elevations. Herbaceous wetland
floodplain communities may be dominated by species of
bulrushes, burreeds, rushes, sedges, water lilies and/or other
species.
Woody Small Stream These habitats are mostly jurisdictional wetlands, but narrow Natural vegetation of variable physiognomy in the floodplains 45.4 29.2
Wetland Riparian Habitats riparian zones that are not wetlands may also be included. of small streams, primarily at low to middle elevations. These
Habitats include headwater wetlands and seeps, and wetlands habitats occur in linear zones and small patches throughout
and riparian zones along creeks and other small streams. the state, and include specialized marl marshes that occur
Beaver-influenced wetlands are common. Common names for nowhere else in the state and host a high diversity of rare
these habitats include floodplain forests, swamp forests, riparian plants.
forests, riparian zones, forest seeps, shrub swamps, marshes,
wet meadows, Beaver meadows, and Beaver ponds.
Scrub-Shrub Anthropogenic These habitats developed on land that was converted from These habitats occur in small to large patches throughout the 4.1 2.9
Shrubland & natural habitats by humans, and then abandoned. Vegetation is state at all elevations.
Grassland highly variable and often includes a mixture of native and non-
native plant species.
ACP WEST VIRGINIA TOTAL: 1,666.9 1,028.5
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)
Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
NLCD
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
VIRGINIA
Barren Land Acidic Cliff and Talus A sparsely vegetated cliff or talus slope formed on granitic,
sandstone, or other acidic bedrock. The lack of soil, highly acidic
bedrock, and constant erosion, limits the vegetation to mosses,
lichens, and herbs growing on bare rock or crevices, and to
sparse trees and shrubs rooted in deeper soil pockets. Lichen
cover may be extensive. In the Central Appalachians, red-cedar
trees, poison ivy vines and rock polypody ferns are characteristic.
Birch or spruce replaces red cedar in the north, where a
shrubland of heaths and reindeer lichen may develop where cold
air accumulates at the sheltered bottom of slopes. Areas of
concentrated seepage are sometimes present.
Barren Land Circumneutral Cliff A sparsely vegetated cliff or steep talus slope formed on
and Talus calcareous sandstone or shale or other moderately calcareous
bedrock. The vegetation varies from sparse to patchy as the lack
of soil and constant erosion restricts vegetation growth to rock
crevices or soil pockets. Trees are typically present and may form
woodland or even forest vegetation. Basswood, ash, and
Q-5
bladdernut are woody indicators of the enriched setting; northern
white cedar is sometimes present. The herb layer is typically not
extensive but includes at least some species that are indicators of
high nutrient conditions.
Coniferous Southern A conifer forest of slopes and ridges at high elevations in the
(Evergreen) Appalachian Southern Appalachians. Table mountain pine is typical and often
Forest Montane Pine Forest dominant, occurring with pitch pine, Virginia pine, or Carolina
and Woodland hemlock. Chestnut oak, scarlet oak, and scrub oak are usually
present and are sometimes abundant in examples that have not
burned recently. A dense heath shrub layer is typical; herbs are
usually sparse but may be more abundant and shrubs less dense
when fires occurred more frequently. Periodic fire presumably
also maintained a more open woodland canopy structure in these
communities. In some areas pines may be able to maintain
dominance due to edaphic conditions, such as very shallow soil
or extreme exposure, but most sites appear eventually to
succeed to oak in the absence of fire.
Deciduous Central and A high elevation hardwood forest dominated by red oak and white
Forest Southern oak, with the individuals often stunted or wind-flagged. Chestnut
Appalachian oak and xeric hickories are also sometimes present. Chestnut
Montane Oak Forest trees were important in this system historically, but are now found
only as stumps and sprouts. Early azalea and other heath shrubs,
along with mountain holly, are common in understory vegetation,
though graminoid species and ferns dominate in some examples.
Impacts (Acres)
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Landforms in this system are associated with steeper 1.1 1.0
mountains and hills, river bluffs, and gorges. In some cases
this system may take the form of upper-slope boulderfields
without adjacent cliffs, where talus forms from freeze/thaw
action on the bedrock. This system is prone to harsh climatic
conditions; frequent disturbances include drought stress and
wind and storm damage.
Vertical or near-vertical cliffs and steep talus slopes where 1.1 0.6
weathering and/or bedrock lithology produce circumneutral to
calcareous pH and heightened nutrient availability. Substrates
include calcareous sandstone, calcareous shale, or other
sedimentary mixtures containing limestone or dolomite.
This system occurs on the most extreme of convex landforms-- 13.1 7.1
sharp ridges and adjacent upper slopes. At the northern end of
its range in the central Appalachians, it is found from
elevations of about 1,750 to 4,000 feet. Underlying rocks are
acidic and soils are infertile, shallow and droughty. A thick duff
layer and volatile heath shrubs create a strongly fire-prone
habitat. Disturbance from southern pine beetle outbreaks can
be system-changing.
This forest mostly occurs on exposed, inhospitable sites from 54.2 35.0
about 3,000 to 4,500 feet. The weathered soils are thin,
nutrient-poor, low in organic matter, and acidic. High winds and
ice storms are commonplace, which probably explains the
stunted appearance of many of these communities. Lightning-
caused fires may suppress heath shrub development in the
understory.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Deciduous Northeastern Interior An oak-dominated, mostly closed canopy forest that occurs as a Moderate moisture and heat loading are characteristic for this 831.2 462.0
Forest Dry-Mesic Oak matrix (dominant) type through the central part of our region. Oak oaky system. It occurs at low to mid elevations, where the
Forest species characteristic of dry to mesic conditions (e.g., red, white, topography is flat to gently rolling, occasionally steep.
black, and scarlet oak) and hickories are dominant in mature Substrate bedrock and soils are commonly but not always
stands. Chestnut oak may be present but is generally less acidic. Chestnut was formerly a prominent tree in these
important than other oak species. Red maple, black birch, and forests.
yellow birch may be common associates. Heath shrubs are often
present but not well developed. Local areas of limy bedrock, or
colluvial pockets, may support forests that reflect the richer soils.
With a long history of human habitation, many of the forests are
midsuccessional, in which pines (typically Virginia or white) or
tuliptree may be codominant or dominant.
Deciduous Southern Atlantic A hardwood forest of the coastal plain with a significant Found on lower slopes, along streams and rivers, on mesic 135.7 81.0
Forest Coastal Plain Mesic component of mesophytic (moist but non-wetland) species, such flats between drier pine-dominated uplands and floodplains,
Hardwood Forest as American beech or southern sugar maple. Upland and and on local raised areas within bottomland terraces or wet
bottomland oaks at the mid-range of moisture tolerance are flats. Soils are variable in texture and pH, excluding only the
usually also present, particularly white oak, but sometimes also coarsest sands.
southern red oak, cherrybark oak, or Shumard oak. Loblolly pine
Q-6

is sometimes present, but it is unclear if it is a natural component

or has entered only as a result of past cutting. Understories are
usually well developed. Shrub and herb layers may be sparse or
moderately dense.
Deciduous Southern Piedmont A hardwood forest of moist low or north-facing slopes in the Occurring on mesic sites in the Piedmont from Virginia 546.4 290.1
Forest Mesic Forest Piedmont. Vegetation is dominated by trees that favor conditions southward. Most examples occur on lower or north-facing
of moderate moisture (sweetgum, white oak, red oak, tuliptree, slopes where topography creates moister and cooler
basswood), with American beech most prominent. Conifers are conditions.
occasionally abundant. A few places support dense heath shrubs;
otherwise shrubs layers tend to be sparse to moderate. Rock
chemistry is an important determinant of variation, with denser
and more diverse herb layers on richer examples.
Deciduous North Atlantic A hardwood forest largely dominated by oaks, often mixed with These forests occur on sandy to gravelly glacial deposits and 4.6 3.0
Forest Coastal Plain pine. White, red, chestnut, black, and scarlet oaks are typical, outwash from Long Island north, and on deep, acidic, coarse-
Hardwood Forest and American holly is sometimes present. Sassafras, birch, textured soils on the flat to rolling landscapes of the coastal
aspen, and hazelnut are common associates in earlier plain to the south.
successional areas. In the northern half of the range, conditions
can grade to dry-mesic, reflected in the local abundance of
beech. A heath shrub layer is common; the herbaceous layer is
sparse. In southern-more occurrences in Maryland or Virginia,
pines (shortleaf, Virginia, and particularly loblolly) may be
important, even strongly dominant canopy trees.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)
Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
NLCD
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
Grassland / Central Appalachian A mosaic of woodlands and open glades on thin soils over
Herbaceous Alkaline Glade and limestone, dolostone or similar calcareous rock with its core
Woodland distribution in the Central Appalachians. In some cases, the
woodlands grade into closed-canopy forests. Eastern red-cedar is
a common tree, filling in in the absence of fire, and chinquapin
oak is indicative of the limestone substrate. Other locally
occurring trees and shrubs are sugar maple, red and white oak,
pignut hickory, eastern redbud, and hackberry. Prairie grasses
are often dominant in the herb layer, and forb richness is often
high, supporting species such as tall larkspur, American harebell,
columbine, and four-leafed milkweed.
Herbaceous Laurentian-Acadian A freshwater emergent or submergent marsh dominated by
Emergent Freshwater Marsh herbaceous vegetation and associated with isolated basins,
Wetlands edges of streamways, and seepage slopes. Typical plants include
cattails, marsh fern, touch-me-not, pondweeds, water lilies,
pickerelweed, and tall rushes, species that tolerate sustained
inundations and do not persist through the winter. Scattered
shrubs are often present and usually total less than 25% cover.
Q-7
Trees are generally absent and, if present, are scattered.
Zonation within a marsh is associated with water depth and
length of inundation. This is a very broadly defined system, with
many variants distributed widely in the Northeast.
Herbaceous Piedmont-Coastal An herbaceous wetland that occurs in small basins and alluvial
Emergent Plain Freshwater environments in the Piedmont and coastal plain of Virginia.
Wetlands Marsh Vegetation is zoned according to water depth, length of
inundation, and substrate; submergent plants in the deepest
water like pondweeds and water lilies give way to emergents like
cattails and bulrushes, then shallower water species like arrow-
arum and American bur-reed, and finally to species of periodically
flooded shorelines like marsh St. John's-wort and various sedges.
Herbaceous Piedmont-Coastal Dominant overstory species are red maple and blackgum, with
Emergent Plain Shrub Swamp tulip-tree and loblolly pine also locally important. Common small
Wetlands trees and shrubs are sweetbay magnolia, sweet pepperbush,
highbush blueberries, swamp azalea, smooth winterberry, and
southern wild raisin. Compact dodder is often abundantly
attached to the stems of shrubs in these swamps. Common
herbaceous species include cinnamon fern, netted chain fern,
and the sedges.
Impacts (Acres)
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
A moderately dry patch community that forms in shallow soils 56.9 31.1
at high landscape positions (upper slopes, ridgetops), at
elevations up to about 2,500 feet. It is known widely through
the region. Fire is sometimes an important natural disturbance
vector, but open physiognomies may also be maintained by
drought and landslides. Lower elevation examples are often in
highly fragmented agricultural landscapes.
Freshwater marshes are associated with lakes, ponds, 0.1 0.1
headwater basins and slow-moving streams, impoundments,
ditches, or any low lying basin that collects water. Such basins
are often flat-bottomed and shallow, or marsh vegetation forms
a ring around the edge of deeper basins. They typically occur
on muck over mineral soil, and as part of a larger wetland
complex that may include forested or shrubby swamps,
peatlands, and/or open water.
Occurs most commonly in alluvial settings, at margins of 44.2 30.3
streams, but also in headwater basins and in small,
permanently flooded isolated basins and non-alluvial
springheads. Substrates are generally muck over mineral soil;
water chemistry and available nutrients vary.
The habitats occupied by these saturated, deciduous or mixed 18.7 13.6
forests include small headwaters stream bottoms and seeping
toe-slopes with acidic, nutrient-poor soils. Similar seepage
wetlands are known from most coastal states of the mid-
Atlantic region. Characterized by diffuse drainage with braided
channels and Sphagnum-covered hummocks in a sandy or
peaty substrate, these habitats are generally wet and
somewhat protected from fire.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Mixed Forest Appalachian A hardwood forest of sugar maple, American beech, and yellow This habitat type is an ecological generalist in much of its 8.8 6.2
(Hemlock)-Northern birch, sometimes mixed with, and sometimes dominated by, range, occupying low to mid-elevations on a variety of
Hardwood Forest eastern hemlock. Northern red oak and white oak occur landforms and bedrock types. Drier, typic, and moist/cool
commonly, but do not dominate. Black cherry, black birch, white variants occur along a gradient from higher, more exposed
pine, and tulip tree are typical on nutrient rich or historically sites to lower, more protected ones. To the south, the hemlock
disturbed sites. wooly adelgid and a warming climate may push this system to
more closely resemble Southern Appalachian Oak Forests.
Mixed Forest Central Appalachian A mixed forest or woodland of pitch pine and/or Virginia pine This forest occurs as relatively small patches on exposed 24.4 13.1
Pine-Oak Rocky mixed with dry-site oaks (primarily scrub oak, scarlet oak, and ridgetops, hilltops and outcrops, at elevations ranging up to
Woodland chestnut oak). Red pine and shortleaf pine may also occur. Some about 4,000 feet. The substrate rock is granitic or other acidic
areas have a fairly well-developed heath shrub layer; a graminoid lithology, including traprock in New England. Conditions are
herb layer dominated by Pennsylvania sedge, poverty grass, and dry, and soils are thin and nutrient-poor. This system
common hairgrass may be more prominent in others. The experiences moderately intense fires naturally every 5 to 25
vegetation is patchy, with woodland as well as open portions, or years; fire history largely determines the vegetation character
even sparse cover on dry rocky hilltops and outcrops. of individual occurrences.
Mixed Forest Dry Oak-Pine Forest/ An oak or oak-pine forest of dry sites, characterized by a variable A habitat of dry rolling hills, mid- to upper slopes and ridgetops, 870.2 495.0
Central Appalachian mixture of drought tolerant oaks (chestnut oak, white oak, red where soils are often thin, well-drained, and nutrient-poor. This
Southern Piedmont oak, black oak, scarlet oak) and pines (pitch, white, Virginia). It system may occur on any kind of rock type; rock chemistry is
Q-8

occurs broadly in the Central Appalachians and northern an important determinant of variation. Regular low intensity fire
Piedmont ecoregions, most commonly as a large (to very large) helped maintain the oak-pine balance historically.
patch habitat. It has a much more limited range in New England,
where hickories may be present. Community structure ranges
from open woodlands to closed forest. Heath shrubs are common
in the understory; the herb layer is often sparse and lacks
diversity. In the absence of fire this system may tend to succeed
to hemlock and locally common hardwoods.
Mixed Forest Plantation Forest The most common species planted are loblolly, shortleaf and Plantation forests occur throughout the state, but plantation 494.7 284.8
Virginia pines, with white pine sometimes planted in the western pine forests occur mostly in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont
part of the state, yellow-poplar, and mixed hardwoods. regions.
Mixed Forest Southern and A hardwood or mixed forest with a high diversity of mesophytic Found on sheltered coves and concave slopes. Soils are often 39.6 27.0
Central Appalachian (moisture loving but non-wetland) trees. Canopy species rocky and may be coarse or fine-textured, and may be
Cove Forest commonly include yellow buckeye, sugar maple, white ash, residual, alluvial, or colluvial.
basswood, tuliptree, cucumber tree, and American beech,
sometimes in a single stand. Hemlock is sometimes present,
mostly in acidic coves. Shrub and herb layers are similarly rich,
and calcium-bearing and circumneutral bedrock tends to support
the richest examples. This forest is typical of sheltered, shady
places in the Blue Ridge and central Appalachian Mountains,
forming large patches (tens to hundreds of acres) on concave
slopes that accumulate nutrients and moisture.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Palustrine Tidal Salt Marsh, The vegetation is primarily herbaceous marsh, most of it These brackish to salt intertidal marshes of the embayed 3.3 3.2
Emergent Estuarine Marsh dominated by black needlerush. Areas near tidal inlets have salt region of southeastern Virginia and adjacent North Carolina
Wetland marsh dominated by cordgrass. There are also salt flats are distinguished by the extensive brackish water and tidal
(Persistent) dominated by saltgrass and swampfire, as well as salt-tolerant flooding driven by winds that is characteristic of that region.
shrublands and a few treed hammocks that occur on small
elevated areas closely associated with the marshes.
Scrub-Shrub Shrubland / Upland shrubby, grassy, or mixed cover areas created or These shrublands occur primarily in central and southeast 263.8 139.6
grassland; mostly maintained in areas that would naturally revert to forest over time. Virginia along the ACP.
ruderal shrublands,
regenerating
clearcuts
Woody Atlantic Coastal A complex of wetland and upland vegetation on floodplains of Two variants are recognized. "Blackwater" floodplains originate 57.8 36.4
Wetland Plain Blackwater / coastal plain streams south of the James river in southeast in sandy soils; their waters are strongly stained by tannins and
Brownwater Stream Virginia. These are narrow but sometimes long dendritic patches carry little suspended clay sediment. Depositional landforms
Floodplain Forest of wetland forest dominated by bald cypress and tupelo with oaks are limited. Streams in more nutrient rich and diverse
and other bottomland hardwoods found in drier areas. Small "brownwater" floodplains carry substantial amounts of silt and
shrubby sloughs may be present, and shrub and herb layers are clay. Natural levees are often distinctly present. Soils in
generally well developed. blackwater systems tend to be strongly acidic; finer textured
Q-9

brownwater soils are generally more fertile.

Woody Central Atlantic A hardwood or mixed forested swamp on poorly drained soils of Occurs on poorly drained, organic or mineral soil flats. Largest 97.2 61.2
Wetland Coastal Plain Non- the outer the acreage of this system. Today this phase is present examples are on broad interfluvial flats. These areas are
riverine Swamp and only in high-quality examples. A mostly nonriverine, non- saturated by rainfall and seasonal high water tables with only
Wet Hardwood seepage, non-tidal hydrology is a distinguishing factor for secondary influence of river or tidal flooding. Fire is generally
Forest swamps in this system, which is the dominant habitat type in the infrequent but may be important locally. Sea-level rise will have
Great Dismal Swamp in Virginia. system-changing impact on near-coastal examples.
Woody North-Central A conifer or mixed conifer-hardwood swamp of poorly drained Occurs at low to mid elevations (generally <2,000 feet) in 0.4 0.3
Wetland Appalachian Acidic acidic substrates throughout central New England and the poorly drained depressions that may be in proximity to a
Swamp Central Appalachians, encompassing a broad range of basin, stream. The acidic substrate is mineral soil, often with a
seepage, and stream-associated wetland communities. Hemlock component of organic muck; if peat is present, it usually forms
is usually present and may be dominant. It is often mixed with a thin layer over the mineral soil rather than a true peat
deciduous wetland trees such as red maple or black gum. Spruce substrate.
is rarely present. Basin swamps tend to be more nutrient-poor
than seepage swamps; in some settings, the two occur adjacent
to each other with the basin swamp vegetation surrounded by
seepage swamp vegetation on its upland periphery.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
Woody North-Central A complex of wetland and upland vegetation on floodplains of
Wetland Appalachian Large medium to large rivers in Atlantic drainages. They are typical of
River Floodplain larger rivers but they can occur on smaller rivers where the
stream gradient is low and a broad floodplain develops. The
vegetation complex includes floodplain forests in which silver
maple, sycamore, box elder, and cottonwood are characteristic,
as well as herbaceous sloughs, shrub wetlands, ice scours,
riverside prairies, and woodlands. Most areas are underwater
each spring; microtopography determining how long the various
habitats are inundated. Depositional and erosional features may
both be present depending on the particular floodplain.
Woody North-Central Interior A hardwood or occasionally mixed swamp of alkaline wetlands
Wetland and Appalachian associated with limestone or other calcareous substrate in the
Rich Swamp southern portion of the region. Red maple and black ash are the
dominant deciduous trees in most examples. Conifers may
include larch, but typically not northern white cedar, which is
characteristic of more northern wetlands. The canopy can be
variable, as there may be shrubby or herbaceous openings within
Q-10
Impacts (Acres)
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Floodplains form on land adjacent to a stream or river that 2.1 1.5
experiences periodic flooding when the river overflows its
banks. A variety of microtopographic features form as a result
of annual river activity. This broadly-defined system includes
vegetation on deep alluvial deposits, on depositional levees
and bars, in backwater sloughs, and (rarely) on bedrock where
rivers cut through resistant geology.
This forested wetland occurs at low to mid elevations. They are 0.9 0.7
found in poorly drained depressions or at the margins of
stream valley bottoms, where higher pH and/or nutrient levels
are associated with a rich flora. The substrate is primarily
mineral soil, but there may be some peat development. Basin
settings may still be hydrologically connected to nearby
streams.

the swamp. A diverse ground cover is made up of some

combination of herbs indicative of nutrient-rich conditions, ferns,
and bryophytes characteristic of fens.
Woody Piedmont Upland A forested swamp of wetland oaks occurring in small, shallow Occurs on nearly level Piedmont uplands with clay hardpans 2.3 1.7
Wetland Depression Swamp basins in upland settings where water pools due to limited soil and shallow seasonal flooding. Most known examples are on
drainage. Most examples are isolated seasonally flooded mafic bedrock. Flooding depth is typically shallow (< 25 cm).
wetlands dominated by wetland oaks (pin oak, swamp white oak, Soils are typically loamy clays. There is substantial variation
laurel oak, willow oak, overcup oak), but a few are treeless or among the pools, related to substrate, basin morphology, and
open-canopied ponds. Vegetation is zoned with an outer ring of geographic location.
trees, a more interior ring of shrubs (buttonbush, heaths,
greenbrier), vines, and wetland graminoids and ferns, and a
central area with or without standing water year round depending
on precipitation. Sphagnum moss is sometimes extensive in parts
of the pools.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Woody Piedmont-Coastal A complex of wetland and upland vegetation on floodplains along Occurs along large rivers or streams where topography and 47.6 30.4
Wetland Plain Large River larger rivers, where temporary to seasonal flooding affects alluvial processes have resulted in a well-developed floodplain.
Floodplain vegetation composition and dynamics. Vegetation includes both The alluvial soils are variable in texture.
non-forested bar and scour communities and a diverse group of
more extensive forests. Microtopographic heterogeneity is high,
and forests tend to be differentiated by depositional landforms
such as levees, sloughs, terraces, and abandoned channels.
Better drained soils may support wet site oaks, shagbark hickory,
and sweetgum. Wettest swamps are often dominated by green
ash and red maple. Bald cypress may occur, but does not
dominate. Understories are generally open, with sedges and
grasses or moisture-loving forbs in the herb layer.

Woody Riparian Forest, The vegetation includes both non-forested bar and scour This ecological system consists of vegetated communities 42.3 27.0
Wetland Southeast Virginia communities, as well as more extensive forested floodplain along streams and small rivers in the Piedmont of the
communities. The vegetation is often a mosaic of forest, southeastern United States where flooding and flood-related
woodland, shrubland, and herbaceous communities. Common environmental factors affect vegetation composition and
Q-11

trees include River birch and American sycamore. Open, flood- dynamics.
scoured rivershore prairies feature Switchgrass and Big
bluestem, and Twisted sedge is typical of wetter areas near the
channel.
Woody Southern Piedmont The vegetation includes both non-forested bar and scour This ecological system consists of vegetated communities 2.6 1.9
Wetland Lake Floodplain communities and the more extensive forested floodplain along Piedmont rivers, south of the James River in Virginia,
Forest communities. Forests are generally differentiated by depositional where flooding and flood-related environmental factors affect
landforms such as levees, sloughs, ridges, terraces, and vegetation composition and dynamics.
abandoned channel segments.
ACP VIRGINIA TOTAL: 3,665.3 2,084.9
NORTH CAROLINA
Coniferous Atlantic Coastal Vegetation is a set of associations that are most naturally These communities occur on a variety of well- to excessively- 393.5 193.2
(Evergreen) Plain Upland woodlands or savannas dominated by Longleaf pine and having a drained sandy or sandy loam soils. Like other longleaf pine
Forest Longleaf Pine well-developed grassy herb layer. A few associations have communities, this community is maintained by frequent, low-
Woodland sparse herb layers due to excessively drained soils, and a few intensity wildland fire.
are dominated by scrub oaks. Other pine species may sometimes
be present. Scrub oaks (and others) form an understory in most
associations, all but the mesic ones. Low shrubs, most
ericaceous, are often an important component. In most of the
range, Pineland threeawn (wiregrass) is the dominant herb.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Deciduous Southern Atlantic Vegetation consists of forests dominated by combinations of This system occurs in dry-mesic to dry but not xeric sites, 354.8 170.2
Forest Coastal Plain Dry upland oaks, particularly White oak, Southern red oak, and Post generally on upper to midslopes in bluff systems, but
and Dry-Mesic Oak oak. In the northern part of the range, Red oak may be a occasionally it occurs on broader uplands or on the highest
Forest component, while in the southern part, evergreen species such parts of non-flooded river terraces
as Water oak or Darlington oak become more prominent.
Hickories are also prominent, including Mockernut hickory, Pignut
hickory, and Sand hickory.
Deciduous Southern Atlantic Stands of this system include a significant component of This system occurs in a variety of moist non-wetland sites that 33.5 18.9
Forest Coastal Plain Mesic mesophytic species such as American beech or Florida maple. are naturally sheltered from frequent fire. Most common are
Hardwood Forest Upland and bottomland oaks at the mid-range of moisture lower slope and bluff examples along streams and rivers in
tolerance are usually also present, particularly White oak, but dissected terrain, but some examples occur on mesic flats
sometimes also Southern red oak, Swamp chestnut oak, between drier pine-dominated uplands and floodplains or on
Shumard oak, or Water Oak. Some typical smaller trees and local high areas within bottomland terraces or nonriverine wet
shrubs include Flowering Dogwood, Common sweetleaf, flats.
Sourwood tree, Witch hazel, Red mulberry, and Silky camellia.
Some typical herbs include Partridge berry and Arrowleaf ginger.
Grassland / Clearcut Grassland Modified/managed communities are comprised of vegetation Occurs throughout the state along the ACP. 168.7 77.8
Q-12

Herbaceous / Herbaceous resulting from the management or modification of natural/near-

natural vegetation, which produces a structural and floristic
combination not clearly known to have a natural analogue.
Modified vegetation may be easily restorable by either
management, time, or restoration of ecological processes. An
example would be unimproved pastures resulting from removal of
trees.
Mixed Forest Managed Tree Loblolly pine is the most planted species in North Carolina, Occurs throughout the state along the ACP. The coastal plain 122.5 59.5
Plantation followed by longleaf pine, and hardwoods including red and white (north and south) has the largest area of timberland followed
oak, soft maple, sweetgum, ash, and yellow-poplar. by the piedmont and mountains
Mixed Forest Southern Piedmont Vegetation consists of forests dominated by combinations of Occurs on upland ridges and upper to mid slopes, occupying <0.1 <0.1
Dry Oak-(Pine) upland oaks, particularly White oak, Red oak, Black oak, Post most of the uplands where soils are not rocky or otherwise
Forest oak, Scarlet oak, and Southern red oak, along with Pignut extreme. Moisture conditions, determined by topography, are
hickory, Mockernut hickory, and other hickories. Other common dry to dry-mesic. This system may occur on any kind of rock
tree species include Loblolly pine, Shortleaf pine, Virginia pine, type, with rock chemistry being an important determinant of
Red maple, American sweetgum, and Tuliptree. A well-developed variation.
understory and shrub layer is generally present, and the herb
layer is sparse to at most moderate in density.
Scrub-Shrub Successional Scrubshrub habitats are areas where the vegetation is Occurs throughout the state along the ACP. 12.6 5.8
Shrub/Scrub dominated by small woody plants such as shrubs and young
trees. Successional habitats are ephemeral and will have a
limited longevity without repeated disturbance. These habitats
often take place within the forest environment where removal of
mature trees and natural regeneration of adjacent forest species
has occurred.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Scrub-Shrub Successional Scrubshrub habitats are areas where the vegetation is Occurs throughout the state along the ACP. 98.9 55.1
Shrub/Scrub (Clear dominated by small woody plants such as shrubs and young
Cut) trees. Successional habitats are ephemeral and will have a
limited longevity without repeated disturbance. These habitats
often take place within the forest environment where trees have
been removed (clear cut) and natural regeneration of adjacent
forest species has occurred.
Woody Atlantic Coastal Vegetation consists almost entirely of forests of wetland trees. Occurs in floodplains of small streams that carry little mineral 51.7 29.0
Wetland Plain Blackwater Wetter examples are strongly dominated by Baldcypress and sediment (blackwater streams). Flooding is an important
Stream Floodplain Swamp tupelo. Other examples have mixtures of these species ecological factor in this system
Forest with oak and other bottomland hardwoods tolerant of blackwater
conditions. Except in the very wet examples, understory, shrub,
and herb layers are generally well-developed, and woody vines
are also prominent.
Herbaceous Atlantic Coastal Vegetation includes a series of primarily herbaceous and Occurs in Carolina bays with mineral soils and with seasonal to 3.1 1.9
Emergent Plain Clay-Based woodland associations. The wettest sites have open water and permanent standing water. Carolina bays are oriented, oval,
Wetland Carolina Bay floating-leaved aquatic vegetation, or marsh vegetation of tall shallow depressions with nearly flat bottoms
Q-13

Wetland graminoids. Drier sites often have an open canopy of Pond

cypress, with a dense, often fairly species-rich herbaceous layer
beneath. A large number of annual species are present.
Woody Atlantic Coastal A characteristic suite of primarily evergreen shrubs, greenbriars, This system occurs on broad interfluvial flats and in small to 84.4 49.4
Wetland Plain Peatland and Pond pine dominates. Inkberry holly, Fetterbush, large, very gentle basins and swales, largely on the outermost
Pocosin and Staggerbush, Swamp titi, Large gallberry, and Dusty zenobia are terraces of the Outer Coastal Plain. The communities have in
Canebrake characteristic and usually dominant in some combination, along common a dense shrub layer of wetland shrubs tolerant of the
with Laurel greenbrier. Pond pine is the characteristic tree, and it organic soils, low nutrient conditions, and fire.
along with a set of evergreen hardwoods, including Loblolly bay,
Sweetbay magnolia, and Swamp bay, are generally the only trees
present. Herbs are scarce and largely limited to small open
patches.
Woody Atlantic Coastal Vegetation consists largely of forests dominated by wetland trees Occurs in floodplains of medium to small Coastal Plain rivers 81.1 51.9
Wetland Plain Small species. Non-forested vegetation is present only on recently that carry little mineral sediment (blackwater rivers).
Blackwater River deposited bars and in oxbow lakes. The lowest, wettest areas
Floodplain Forest have some combination of Bald cypress, Pond cypress, and
Swamp tupelo. Water tupelo is generally scarce or absent. Higher
portions of the floodplain have forests with combinations of a
small set of wetland oaks and other species, including Laurel oak,
Overcup oak, Water oak, American sweetgum, Loblolly pine,
Sweetbay magnolia, and other species.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Woody Atlantic Coastal The lowest, wettest areas have some combination of Baldcypress Occurs in floodplains of medium to small Coastal Plain rivers 55.6 32.9
Wetland Plain Small and Water tupelo dominating. Natural levees and riverfronts have that carry significant mineral sediment (brownwater or redwater
Brownwater River a diverse mixture of trees that typically includes American rivers).
Floodplain Forest sycamore, Sugarberry, Green ash, Boxelder, and other species
that benefit from the high light levels and heavy alluvial deposition
of these sites. Moderate to high parts of the floodplain away from
the levee are usually dominated by bottomland hardwoods,
various mixtures of wetland oaks, including Laurel oak, Swamp
chestnut oak, Cherrybark oak, and sometimes a number of other
oak species, along with American sweetgum, but other species
are sometimes codominant.
Woody Central Atlantic Vegetation is a set of associations that are naturally woodlands or This system occurs on wet mineral soil sites. Landforms 79.7 44.5
Wetland Coastal Plain Wet savannas dominated by Longleaf pine or, less frequently, by include low areas in relict beach ridge systems and eolian
Longleaf Pine Pond pine, Slash pine or some combination. Hardwoods are sand deposits, and poorly drained clayey, loamy, or sandy
Savanna and present in any abundance only in examples altered by fire flats. They occasionally occur on river terraces above current
Flatwoods suppression. The ground cover is a dense combination of herbs flood levels.
and low shrubs. A variety of ericaceous shrubs and hollies is
common, with density determined by fire history. Grasses
Q-14

naturally dominate the ground cover. Pineland three-awn often

dominates within its range, but Toothache grass, Carolina
dropseed, Wireleaf dropseed, or other grasses may dominate. A
great diversity of other herbs is often present, including
composites, sedges, insectivorous plants, and variety of showy
forbs. Communities in this system are often very high in species
richness.
Woody Southern Atlantic Vegetation is a closed-canopy forest of wetland trees. The wetter This system consists of poorly drained, organic or mineral soil 5.7 3.5
Wetland Coastal Plain sites are dominated by combinations of Baldcypress, Black flats of the outer Atlantic Coastal Plain. These areas are
Nonriverine Swamp tupelo, and occasionally Water tupelo, Loblolly pine, Atlantic saturated by rainfall and seasonal high water tables without
and Wet Hardwood white-cedar, American sweetgum, and Tuliptree. Less wet sites influence of river or tidal flooding. The largest areas are on
Forest have canopies of wetland oaks such as Laurel oak, Swamp broad interfluvial flats, but substantial areas occur on organic
chestnut oak, and Cherrybark oak. Most communities have a deposits in drowned river valleys in the Embayed Region of
well-developed shrub layer that has more floristic affinities with North Carolina and Virginia, beyond the reach of the influence
pocosins or baygalls than with river floodplain communities that of wind tides.
have similar canopies. The shrub layer is usually dominated by
Summersweet, Coast Leucothoe, or species shared with
pocosins. The herb layer is not usually well-developed but may
be dense where shrubs are atypically sparse. Wetland ferns,
such as Royal fern and Netted chain fern, and sedges usually
dominate. The most common subcanopy species are Red maple,
Swamp bay, and Sweetbay. Typical shrubs include
Inkberry, Large gallberry, Sweetbells leucothoe, Virginia
sweetspire, and Fetterbush. Herbs, chiefly ferns and sedges, are
typically sparse, but mosses may be common.
 TABLE Q-1 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Community a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Woody Southern Piedmont Almost all of the extent of the system is naturally forested. The Occurs near streams and small rivers, on floodplains and <0.1 0.0
Wetland Small Floodplain and forest canopy is usually a mix of mesophytic and widespread terraces affected by river flooding and on emergent bars and
Riparian Forest species such as Tuliptree, American sweetgum, and Red maple, banks within channels. Depositional landforms, including
along with characteristic alluvial and bottomland species such as levees, sloughs, ridges, terraces, and abandoned channel
Sycamore, River birch, Boxelder, Sugarberry, Green ash, segments may be present, but are smaller than the scale of
American sweetgum, Swamp chestnut oak, and Cherrybark oak. the communities of the floodplain.
American beech may be present in drier portions, mixed with the
other species. Successional areas are often strongly dominated
by Loblolly pine, Virginia pine, American sweetgum, or Tuliptree.
ACP NORTH CAROLINA TOTAL: 1,545.9 793.6
ACP CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 6,878.1 3,907.0
____________________
a
NLCD data for Virginia, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania: Gawler, 2008.
NLCD data for North Carolina: Schafale, 2012.
b
State Vegetation Community Types for West Virginia: WVDNR, 2015b.
State Vegetation Community Type data for Virginia and Pennsylvania: Nature Conservancy, 2015.
Q-15

State Vegetation Community Type data for North Carolina: NatureServe. 2014.
c
Dominant Vegetation Community descriptions were identified by using the NE Terrestrial Habitat Map Guide (Nature Conservancy, 2015), NatureServe Explorer (NatureServe,
2015) and state SWAPs.
d
Includes previous calcareous, which include Calcareous Glades combined with the new Northeastern Interior Calcareous Oak Forest ecological system, and large areas with
mostly acidic bedrock.
e
Unknown wetlands include a few wetlands that do not fall in the floodplain and riparian zones. These included some Laurentian-Acadian and Piedmont types that were renamed
unknown.
 TABLE Q-2

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Supply Header Project

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Type a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
PENNSYLVANIA
Deciduous Northeastern An oak-dominated, mostly closed canopy forest that occurs as a Moderate moisture and heat loading are characteristic for this 9.0 3.4
Forest Interior Dry-Mesic matrix (dominant) type through the central part of our region. Oak oak system. It occurs at low- to mid-elevations, where the
Oak Forest species characteristic of dry to mesic conditions and hickories are topography is flat to gently rolling, occasionally steep.
dominant in mature stands. With a long history of human Substrate bedrock and soils are commonly, but not always
habitation, many of the forests are mid-successional, in which acidic. Chestnut oak was formerly a prominent tree in these
pines (typically Virginia or eastern white) or tuliptree may be co- forests. A moist-cool subtype of this habitat may occur on
dominant or dominant. north facing slopes with may provide particular habitat
conditions for some wildlife species.
Deciduous South-Central Dominant species include sugar maple, American beech, A high-diversity, predominately hardwood forest that occurs 1.0 0.5
Forest Interior Mesophytic American basswood, red oak, cucumber tree, and black walnut. on deep and enriched lowland soils or in somewhat protected
Forest Eastern may be a component of some stands. Trees may grow landscape positions such as coves or lower slopes.
very large in undisturbed areas. The herb layer is rich, often with
abundant spring ephemerals.
Mixed Forest Appalachian A hardwood forest of sugar maple, American beech, and yellow This is the dominant forest system in Pennsylvania. This 24.5 12.5
(Hemlock)-Northern birch, sometimes mixed with, and sometimes dominated by, habitat type is an ecological generalist in much of its range,
Hardwood Forest eastern hemlock. Northern red oak, and white oak occur occupying low- to mid-elevations on a variety of landforms
Q-16

commonly, but do not dominate. Black cherry, black birch, white
pine, and tuliptree are typical on nutrient rich or historically
disturbed sites.
WEST VIRGINIA
Deciduous Dry-Mesic Oak Red oak, chestnut oak, white oak, black oak, pignut hickory,
Forest Forests mockernut hickory, shagbark hickory, red maple, sugar maple,
white ash, tuliptree, black gum, American beech, sourwood, witch
hazel, hop hornbeam, serviceberry, dogwood, Virginia creeper,
and greenbrier.
Mixed Forest Dry Oak (-Pine) Dominant trees include chestnut oak, scarlet oak, black oak,
Forests white oak, and red maple. Sourwood is a common small tree,
except in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion, where it is absent. In
the eastern counties there are large areas where eastern white
pine is codominant with oaks. Understories are usually dominated
by heath shrubs, including mountain laurel, black huckleberry,
and blueberries.
and bedrock types. Drier, typic, and moist/cool variants occur
along a gradient from higher, more exposed sites to lower,
more protected ones. This habitat can range from dry to
typical to moist/cool sites with minor differences in plant
species composition among them.
SHP PENNSYLVANIA TOTAL 34.5 16.4
Upland, mostly deciduous forests at lower and middle 134.2 62.2
elevations throughout the state. Soils are usually somewhat
less acidic and more fertile compared to the Dry Oak (-Pine)
Forest, but are dryer than the Mixed Mesophytic Forest or
Northern Hardwood Forest.
Upland deciduous and mixed evergreen-deciduous forests on 328.0 158.2
warm, dry topographic positions and soils throughout the
state, except at the highest elevations, most extensive in the
Ridge and Valley Ecoregion.
 TABLE Q-2 (contd)

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities Crossed by the Supply Header Project

NLCD Impacts (Acres)
Vegetation State Vegetation
Type a Community Type b Dominant Vegetation Community c
Site Characteristics Con. Op.
Mixed Forest Mixed Mesophytic Sugar maple, American basswood, American beech, red maple, Upland deciduous and mixed deciduous-evergreen forests in 95.2 52.7
Forests tuliptree, red oak, sweet birch, white ash, yellow buckeye, eastern moist (mesic) habitats at lower to middle elevations
hemlock, great rhododendron, spicebush, witch hazel, striped throughout the state.
maple, wood nettle, ferns, and bryophytes.
Scrub-Shrub Anthropogenic These habitats developed on land that was converted from These habitats occur in small to large patches throughout the 6.3 3.3
Shrubland and natural habitats by humans, and then abandoned. Vegetation is state at all elevations.
Grassland highly variable and often includes a mixture of native and non-
native plant species.
Woody River Floodplains Sycamore, silver maple, river birch, white ash, green ash, sugar These habitats occupy a very small area of the state. 1.9 0.9
Wetland maple, pin oak, tuliptree, red spruce, yellow birch, and/or eastern Because they are along rivers, they are concentrated in the
hemlock, smooth alder, buttonbrush, big bluestem, switch grass, lower elevations, but they also include smaller areas along
bulrushes, burreeds, rushes, sedges, and water lilies. rivers at higher elevations. Thus they range from the lowest
elevations in the state along the Ohio and Potomac rivers up
to 3,600 feet elevation along the Shavers Fork River.
Woody Small Stream Habitats include headwater wetlands and seeps, and wetlands These habitats occur in linear zones and small patches 11.6 7.0
Wetland Riparian Habitats and riparian zones along creeks and other small streams. Beaver- throughout the state.
influenced wetlands are common. Common names for these
Q-17

habitats include floodplain forests, swamp forests, riparian

forests, riparian zones, forest seeps, shrub swamps, marshes,
wet meadows, beaver meadows, and beaver ponds.
SHP WEST VIRGINIA TOTAL: 577.2 284.3
SHP CUMULATIVE TOTAL: 611.7 300.7
____________________
a
The corresponding National Land Cover Database (NLCD) vegetation communities were identified using the Northeast Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Classification crosswalk table
between each states SWAP habitats (found in Appendix D of Gawler 2008).
 APPENDIX R

FOREST SERVICE MANAGEMENT SPECIES TABLES

 TABLE R-1
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
MAMMALS
West Virginia northern G5T2/S2 Red spruce, fir, spruce-hardwood and northern
flying squirrel hardwood forests with well-developed understory.
Glaucomys sabrinus Mostly in moist forests with mature trees and snags
fuscus or cavity trees (NatureServe, 2015). Field surveys
confirmed that AP-1 mainline construction
workspace does not cross suitable habitat;
however, suitable habitat occurs in proximity to a
proposed access road near Gibson Knob.
Southern Rock Vole G4T3/S2 Cool, moist talus slopes and rocky areas above
Microtus chrotorrhinus 915 m in elevation within forested streamside
carolinensis riparian areas dominated by rocks greater than 0.2
m in diameter and with abundant woody debris,
herbaceous vegetation, and moss (Orrock and
Pagels, 2003). Suitable habitat potentially present
within the survey corridor based on general habitat
conditions; desktop analysis is in progress.
Eastern Small-Footed G4/S1 Hibernates in caves and mines; found in
R-1
Myotis mountainous regions in the summer in rocky
Myotis leibii habitat (e.g., rocky outcrops, talus slopes, ledges),
and man-made structures (WVDNR, 2003).
Foraging habitat includes riparian forests, upland
forests, clearings, strip mines, and ridgPageetops
(NatureServe, 2015). Mist-net surveys captured
one individual in 2015 and two suitable roosting
locations were identified during 2016 habitat
surveys.
Little Brown Myotis G3/S2 Roost in cave, buildings, rocks, trees, mines,
Myotis lucifugus tunnels, and other man-made structures and under
bridges. Hibernates in caves, tunnels, and mines
(NatureServe, 2015). Based on MNF surveys of
this area, primary roost trees are present and the
MNF has stated that suitable habitat for this
species occurs throughout most of the MNF based
on past mist-netting surveys. Field surveys
confirmed that nine secondary roost trees occur
within 150 feet of the pipeline centerline; however,
habitat is considered less than ideal. No individuals
were detected.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Proposed access road would require clearing of red spruce Pending consultation with the
trees. Atlantic is currently working with the MNF to finalize the MNF on the proposed access
conservation measures for the access road that would impact road realignment and
suitable habitat for this species. Atlantic would realign the conservation measures.
access road to minimize direct impacts on red spruce trees, and
would relocate red spruce saplings to adjacent NFS forest
areas prior to grading.
Construction equipment may cause physical injury or mortality Pending additional desktop
to individuals. Construction activities would remove and/or analysis and consultation
degrade suitable habitat, and would cause disturbance through with MNF on conservation
noise and vibrations, which may disrupt normal activities. Due measures.
to abundance of suitable habitat in the MNF, impacts would not
be anticipated to be significant.
The two potential roosting locations identified during surveys Pending consultation with
are located 450 feet and 900 feet downslope of the construction MNF on conservation
workspace; therefore, direct impacts are not anticipated. Tree measures.
clearing on rocky slopes may improve summer habitat for this
species by increasing solar radiation on potential summer
maternity habitat, making habitat more suitable for roosting;
although tree removal would also contribute to loss of foraging
habitat (FS et al., 2002). Atlantic intends to conduct tree
clearing outside of the active season, although a portion of
potential forested habitat may be cleared in October during the
active season.
Atlantic would clear forested habitat during the winter season to Pending consultation with
minimize direct effects on roosting bats, although a portion of MNF on conservation
forested habitat may need to be cleared in October. Clearing of measures.
forested vegetation would reduce available roosting and
foraging habitat, and construction through karst features and/or
in proximity to bat hibernacula may render hibernacula
unsuitable. Disturbance to bats roosting adjacent to access
roads or construction activities could also result from noise
and/or vibrations generated by these activities. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and Karst Mitigation
Plan (see appendix I) to minimize impacts on potential bat
hibernacula.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Allegheny Woodrat G3G4/S3 Rocky areas such as caves, deep crevices, and
Neotoma magister large boulder fields in or around hardwood forests
with abundance oaks and other mast-bearing trees.
Also known from northern hardwood and oak-pine
forests. This species is nocturnal (WVDNR, 2003).
Field surveys documented the presence of
Allegheny woodrats along two rock formations
along Buzzard Ridge within the MNF (Outrcrops #1
and #2), and suitable habitat near Cloverlick
Mountain (Outcrop #6); although the habitat is
considered small and marginally suitable.
R-2
Tri-Colored Bat G2G3/S2 Roost in caves, rock crevices, trees/foliage, and
Perimyotis subflavus sometimes buildings in both wooded and cleared
areas. Associated with forested landscapes; most
foraging occurs along riparian areas. Hibernates in
caves, rock crevices, and mines (NatureServe,
2015). The MNF has stated that suitable habitat for
this species occurs throughout most of the MNF
based on past mist-netting surveys. Field surveys
confirmed that nine secondary roost trees occur
within 150 feet of the pipeline centerline. No
individuals were detected.
Long-tailed Shrew G4/S2S3 Deciduous or evergreen forest mountainous areas
Sorex dispar with loose talus; rocky damp areas with deep
crevices covered by leaf mold and root are
preferred. May also occur along small mountain
streams (NatureServe, 2015).
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Use of an access road adjacent to and approximately 25 feet Pending consultation with
from Outcrops #1 and #2 could increase noise levels, disrupting MNF on conservation
normal activities. Vehicle collisions from increased traffic on the measures.
access road would be less likely because woodrats are
nocturnal and most construction would occur between 6AM and
6PM. The proposed access roads are existing forest roads that
would not require improvements; therefore, additional
fragmentation of habitat would not be anticipated.
Sedimentation from stormwater runoff during construction could
fill underground crevices used as habitat, degrading suitable
habitat. The AP-1 mainline construction workspace would cross
Outcrop #6, eliminating this suitable habitat. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) to control sediment
erosion and restore the right-of-way. Based on MNF
correspondence, Allegheny woodrats exhibit a meta-population
structure, and as such, fragmentation of suitable forested
habitat is a major concern for this species. Species-specific
avoidance measures and monitoring during and post-
construction is expected to ensure continued viability of local
populations of this species.
Atlantic would clear forested habitat during the winter season to Pending consultation with
minimize direct effects on roosting bats; although a portion of MNF on conservation
forested habitat may be cleared in October. Clearing of forested measures.
vegetation would reduce available roosting and foraging habitat,
and construction through karst features and/or in proximity to
bat hibernacula may render hibernacula unsuitable.
Disturbance to bats roosting adjacent to access roads or
construction activities could also result from noise and/or
vibrations generated by these activities. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and Karst Mitigation
Plan (see appendix I) to minimize impacts on potential bat
hibernacula.
Potential impacts would include temporary to permanent loss of Pending consultation with
suitable habitat, and potential injury or mortality of individuals if MNF on conservation
present and unable to move from the area during construction. measures.
Construction activities adjacent to suitable habitat would also
increase noise levels, which could disrupt normal activities.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Southern Water Shrew G5T3/S1 Undercut banks of high gradient and high elevation
Sorex palustris (above 900 m) first and second order streams with
punctulatus abundant cover from overhanging rocks, roots,
logs, and crevices (NatureServe, 2015). Desktop
analysis is in progress.
Eastern Spotted Skunk G4/S1 Prefers forested areas or habitats with significant
Spilogale putorius cover. Occupies dens abandoned by other
mammals, under brush piles, in hollow logs or
trees, rock crevices, under buildings, or other
protected sites. This species is nocturnal
(NatureServe, 2015). Suitable habitat potentially
present within survey corridor based on general
habitat conditions. Species-specific surveys were
not conducted; desktop analysis is in progress. The
R-3
outcrops identified during Allegheny woodrat
surveys near Buzzard Ridge is also suitable habitat
for the eastern spotted skunk.
Southern Bog Lemming G5/S3 Prefers boggy habitat, but also common in
Synaptomys cooperi marshes, meadows, and upland forests with thick
humus layer. Occupies burrows 6-12 inches deep
and surface runaways (NatureServe, 2015).
Desktop analysis is in progress.
BIRDS
Northern Goshawk G5/S1B,S1N Typically nest in mature or old-growth forests. In
Accipiter gentilis eastern U.S., prefer hardwood-hemlock forests
where black birch and American birch are preferred
nest trees. Forages in both heavily forested and
relatively open habitat (NatureServe, 2015). Field
surveys confirmed that suitable habitat occurs in
the following locations: MNF Area 2 and MNF Area
3. No northern goshawk activity was detected
during callback surveys conducted in 2016.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Potential impacts would include temporary to permanent loss of Pending results of desktop
suitable habitat, and potential injury or mortality of individuals if analysis.
present and unable to move from the area during construction.
Construction activities adjacent to suitable habitat would also
increase noise levels, which could disrupt normal activities.
Increased sedimentation and turbidity from stormwater run-off
during construction into suitable stream habitat could negatively
impact this species. Atlantic would implement the sediment and
erosion control measures identified in the COM Plan (appendix
G).
Use of access roads adjacent to suitable habitat could increase Pending additional desktop
noise levels, disrupting normal activities. Vehicle collisions analysis and consultation
causing injury or mortality are also possible; however, unlikely with MNF on conservation
because this species is nocturnal and construction activities measures.
would primarily occur between 6AM and 6PM. Sedimentation
from stormwater run-off during construction could fill
underground dens. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan
(see appendix G) to control sediment erosion and restore right-
of-way. Removal of forested vegetation would also remove
foraging habitat for this species.
Potential impacts would include temporary to permanent loss of Pending results of desktop
habitat, and potential injury or mortality of individuals if present analysis.
and unable to move from the area during construction.
Construction activities adjacent to suitable habitat would also
increase noise levels, which could disrupt normal activities.
Sedimentation from stormwater runoff during construction could
fill underground burrows. Atlantic would implement the COM
Plan (appendix G) to control sediment erosion and restore right-
of-way.
Construction would cause loss of potential nesting and foraging Pending consultation with
habitat, and potentially cause disturbance to foraging MNF on conservation
goshawks. Atlantic would adhere to the migratory bird time of measures.
year restriction (TOYR) in the MNF as outlined in the COM Plan
(see appendix G) and Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). If
northern goshawks are identified prior to or during construction,
an appropriate no-activity buffer, determined in consultation with
MNF, would be placed around the active nest. Maintenance of
the permanent right-of-way in an herbaceous / scrub-shrub
state could increase foraging habitat for this species.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Long-Eared Owl G5/S1B,S1N Deciduous and evergreen forests, orchards,
Asio otus wooded parks, farm woodlots, and river woods.
Wooded areas with dense vegetation are used for
roosting and nesting; open areas are used for
hunting (NatureServe, 2015). Present based on
known species range. Suitable habitat potentially
present within the survey corridor based on general
habitat conditions. Species-specific surveys were
not conducted.
American Peregrine G4T4/S2B, Typically nest on ledges of vertical cliffs with a
Falcon S2N sheltering overhang; also use river banks, open
Falco peregrinus bogs, large stick nests of other species, tree
anatum hollows, and man-made structures (NatureServe,
2015). Suitable habitat potentially present within
the survey corridor based on general habitat
conditions. No peregrine falcons were observed
within a 2-mile-wide aerial survey area during eagle
surveys.
R-4
Bald Eagle G5/S3B, Nests usually found in tall trees (usually confiers)
Haliaeetus S3N or on pinnacles or cliffs near water. In winter, bald
leucocephalus eagles may associate with waterfowl
concentrations, areas with abundant dead fish, or
in areas with abundant, readily available upland
resources (e.g., rabbit, deer carrion) (NatureServe,
2015). Field surveys confirmed that potentially
suitable habitat occurs in much of the analysis
area. Three stick nests were identified 4,000 feet
from the pipeline centerline, but were not confirmed
to be bald eagle nests.
Migrant Loggerhead G4T3Q/S1B, Open areas, grasslands (often grazed or
Shirke S1N occasionally mowed), and agricultural landscapes
Lanius ludovicianus interspersed with forbs, scattered shrubs, and/or
migrans small trees. Usually nests in eastern red cedar or
hawthorne (VDGIF, 2015a). Species-specific
surveys were not conducted. Based on a desktop
analysis, there is little open habitat that would
support this species (near Gibson Knob).
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction would cause loss of nesting and roosting habitat Pending consultation with
and potentially cause disturbance to foraging owls. Atlantic MNF on conservation
would adhere to the migratory bird TOYR clearing restriction in measures.
the MNF as outlined in the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). If tree clearing is to take
place during the nesting season, and an active long-eared owl
nest is detected by Biological Monitors, the MNF would be
notified and the nest would be left undisturbed. Maintenance of
the permanent right-of-way in an herbaceous / scrub-shrub
state could increase foraging habitat for this species.
Construction would cause loss of potential nesting and foraging Pending consultation with
habitat, and potentially cause disturbance to foraging falcons. MNF on conservation
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and measures.
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Construction would cause a loss of nesting and roosting habitat Pending consultation with
and potentially cause disturbance to foraging eagles. Atlantic MNF on conservation
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and measures.
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). For any tree clearing
that would occur during the winter roosting season or nesting
season, a qualified biological monitor would walk ahead of
clearing crews and search for roosting and nesting bald eagles
in areas where bald eagles are likely present. If a bald eagle
nest is identified, Atlantic would establish a 1,500-foot-wide no-
activity buffer around the nest or roost consistent with
Forestwide Standards, and would follow the National Bald
Eagle Management Guidelines for identified winter roosts as
stated in the Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). Impacts
and conservation measures related to bald eagles are
described in more detail in in section 4.5.3.
Atlantic would construct outside of the nesting season and Pending consultation with
implement the mitigation measures outlined in the Migratory MNF on conservation
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). Construction activities would measures.
cause temporary habitat loss and disturbance to foraging
shrikes; however, because this species prefers open grassland
habitat (VDGIF, 2015a), clearing the right-of-way could provide
additional suitable habitat for this species. Atlantic would mow
the permanent right-of-way outside of the nesting season.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Red-Headed G5/S3B,S3N Open woodland, especially beech or oak, parks,
Woodpecker cultivated areas, and gardens (NatureServe, 2015).
Melanerpes Species-specific surveys were not conducted.
erythrocephalus
Golden-Winged Warbler G4/S1B Requires brushy early successional habitat.
Vermivora chrysoptera Prefers to nest in areas such as powerline rights-
of-way, shrubby fields, abandoned strip mines,
alder swamps, beaver-created wetlands, and
abandoned orchards (WVDNR, 2003). Field
surveys confirmed that there is no potentially
suitable habitat on the MNF; however, suitable
habitat was found adjacent to the MNF on Gibson
Knob. No golden-winged warbler activity was
detected on MNF lands, but was detected at one
location on private land adjacent to MNF.
R-5
REPTILES
Timber Rattlesnake G4/S3 Hibernates in fissures in rock ledges or talus
Crotalus horridus slopes. Utilizes diverse forests and open habitats
when active (WVDNR, 2006b). Field surveys
confirmed no potentially suitable denning habitat on
the MNF and no individuals were observed;
however, six rattlesnakes were observed 1.5 miles
from the survey corridor in the Seneca State Forest
adjacent to the MNF.
AMPHIBIANS
Green salamander G3G4/S3 Damp crevices in shaded outcrops and ledges,
Aneides aeneus beneath loose bark and in cracks of standing or
fallen trees, sometimes under logs on ground. This
species is nocturnal (NatureServe, 2015). Surveys
conducted in 2016 of potentially suitable habitat
within the MNF identified one area of low-quality
habitat and no individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction would cause a loss of potential nesting and Pending consultation with
foraging habitat and potentially cause disturbance to foraging MNF on conservation
woodpeckers. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see measures.
appendix G) and Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Because this species requires open habitat for foraging
(NatureServe, 2015), the permanently maintained right-of-way
could provide additional suitable foraging habitat for this
species.
Construction would cause a loss of potential foraging habitat. Pending consultation with
Atlantic would adhere to the migratory bird TOYR clearing MNF on conservation
restriction in the MNF as outlined in the COM Plan (see measures.
appendix G) and Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). Based
on this species preference for early successional habitat,
Atlantic may create additional suitable habitat for this species
within the permanently maintained right-of-way. Atlantic would
mow the permanent right-of-way outside of the nesting season.
Construction activities would increase noise and vibrations, Pending consultation with
which disrupt normal activities, displace snakes, or increase MNF on conservation
stress. Construction would remove foraging habitat and measures.
vehicles could cause injury or mortality. Atlantic would maintain
low speed limits on the construction right-of-way and access
roads to minimize collisions with wildlife. In addition, removal of
forested vegetation along the right-of-way could expose rock
outcrops that are currently shaded, potentially providing
sufficient solar radiation for suitable timber rattlesnake denning
or gestating habitat. Atlantic would implement the Snake
Conservation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize disturbance
and impacts on timber rattlesnakes during construction.
If this species is present, use of access roads would increase Pending consultation with
noise levels, disrupting normal activities. Vehicle collisions MNF on conservation
would be less likely because green salamanders are nocturnal measures.
and most construction would occur between 6AM and 6PM.
Sedimentation from stormwater runoff during construction could
fill underground crevices used as habitat, degrading suitable
habitat. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix
G) to control sediment erosion and restore right-of-way.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Eastern Hellbender G3G4T3T4/ Permanent streams under flat rocks in the riverbed.
Cryptobranchus S2 Found in all elevation streams west of the
alleganiensis Allegheny Front. This species has been
documented in the West Fork Greenbrier River
(Pauley, 2004).
FISH
Candy Darter G3/S1 Riffles and runs of small cool and warm streams
Etheostoma osburni and rivers. Adults are typically found in large rubble
to boulder substrates in the swiftest portions of
their fast-flowing habitat. Endemic to the upper
Kanawha River system (WVDNR, 2003). Studies
have documented this species in the New River
drainage in the MNF, and they are known to occur
in the West and East Fork Greenbrier River in the
MNF, both upstream and downstream of the ACP
project area (Chipps et al., 1993; Burns, 2007).
R-6
New River Shiner G4/S2 Pools and slow runs of cool to warm creeks and
Notropis scabriceps small to medium rivers with rocky, gravely, or sand
substrates, occasionally with moderate deposits of
silt (NatureServe, 2015). Studies have documented
this species in the New River drainage in the MNF,
and they are known to occur in the West and East
Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF, both upstream
and downstream of the ACP project area (Chipps
et al., 1993; Burns, 2007).
Appalachia Darter G4/S2 Small to medium rivers in gravel and rubble riffles The potential impacts and conservation measures for this
Percina gymnocephala and raceways. Found in deeper waters in fall and
winter. Known from the New River system above
Kanawha Falls (NatureServe, 2015). A study has
documented this species in the New River drainage
in the MNF, and they are known to occur in the
West and East Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF,
both upstream and downstream of the ACP project
area (Burns, 2007).
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
There is only one crossing of a perennial waterbody on the Pending MNF review of
MNF (unnamed tributary to Shock Run) and Atlantic would use sedimentation analysis and
a dry crossing technique (i.e., dam and pump or flume) to cross conservation measures.
this waterbody. As such, impacts on water quality would be
limited to the time needed to construct the crossing. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G), which
includes sediment and erosion control measures.
There is a potential for this species to occur downstream of the Pending MNF review of
ACP project area. Waterbody crossings and access road sedimentation analysis and
construction/use would temporarily degrade water quality conservation measures.
through increased sedimentation and turbidity during
construction, reduced fish passage, disturbance, changes in
hydrology, and disturbance and injury or mortality from blasting
(see section 4.6 for additional discussion). Removal of riparian
habitat may also contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing shade increase localized
water temperatures. Atlantic would implement the measures in
the COM Plan (see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control sedimentation
and the introduction of hazardous chemicals, and to restore
riparian habitats.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described for the Candy Darter above. sedimentation analysis and
conservation measures.
Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described for the Candy Darter above. sedimentation analysis and
conservation measures.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Kanawha Minnow G3G4/S1 Riffles and runs of gravel, rubble, and boulder in
Phenacobius teretulus cool to warm, small to medium rivers. Known from
the New River drainage (NatureServe, 2015).
Studies have documented this species in the New
River drainage in the MNF, and they are known to
occur in the West and East Fork Greenbrier River
in the MNF, both upstream and downstream of the
ACP project area (Chipps et al., 1993; Burns,
2007).
INVERTEBRATES
Gastropods (Snails)
Organ Cavesnail G2/S2 Inhabits caves under flat rocks in streams with
Fontigens tartarea moderate current. Limestone rocks are preferred
(NatureServe, 2015). This species has been
documented from Dreen Cave in Pocahontas
County (Nature Conservancy, 2001), located less
than one mile from the ACP construction
workspace.
R-7
Bivalves (Freshwater Mussels)
Elktoe G4/S1 Found in small, medium and large streams with
Alasmidonta marginata swift current and gravel, sand, or cobble substrate
(NatureServe, 2015).
Green Floater G3/S2 Canals, rivers, and lakes on gravel, sand, or mud
Lasmigona subviridis substrates (NatureServe, 2015). A study has
documented this species in the New River drainage
in the MNF, and they are known to occur in the
West and East Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF,
both upstream and downstream of the ACP project
area (Nature Conservancy, 2001).
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described for the Candy Darter above sedimentation analysis and
conservation measures.
Although no caves were identified within the survey corridor on Pending consultation with
the MNF, there are potential impacts on adjacent or connected MNF on conservation
cave systems downstream of the construction right-of-way. measures.
Construction activities could alter water flow patterns or
increase sediment and contaminant loads, which could lead to
a reduction or degradation of available habitat. Organ cavesnail
habitat is susceptible to contamination due to the porosity of the
substrate. Blasting, trenching, and digging can cause shifts in
surface and subsurface formations and hydrology, and may
crush snails, or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described for the Candy Darter above. sedimentation analysis and
In addition, Atlantic would implement the West Virginia Mussel conservation measures.
Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon authorization from
the WVDNR if mussels are present.
This species is currently under review by FWS for listing under Pending MNF review of
the ESA (see section 4.7.1.13). The potential impacts and sedimentation analysis and
conservation measures for this species are the same as conservation measures.
described for the Candy Darter above. In addition, Atlantic
would implement the West Virginia Mussel Survey Protocol
(Clayton et al., 2016) upon authorization from the WVDNR if
mussels are present.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Crustaceans (Amphiphods, Isopods, & Decapods)
Cannulate Cave Isopod G2G3/S1 Subterranean streams and pools under flat rocks.
Caecidotea cannula Known from the Cave Hollow System and Red Run
Cave on the MNF (NatureServe, 2015; Nature
Conservancy, 2001). No caves were identified
within the survey corridor on the MNF.
Holsingers Cave Isopod G5/S3 Caves in riffle area of streams, in stream gravel,
Caecidotea holsingeri under rocks, on decaying wood in streams and
occasionally drip pools. Known from 10 caves in
Pocahontas County and 5 caves in Randolph
County (NatureServe, 2015). No caves were
identified within the survey corridor on the MNF.
A cave obligate isopod G1/S1 Subterranean rivers. Known from Flower Pot,
R-8
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Although no caves were identified within the survey corridor on Pending consultation with
the MNF, there are potential impacts on adjacent or connected MNF on conservation
cave systems downstream of the construction right-of-way. measures.
Construction activities could alter water flow patterns or
increase sediment and contaminant loads, which could lead to
a reduction or degradation of available habitat. Isopod habitat is
susceptible to contamination due to the porosity of the
substrate. Blasting, trenching, and digging can cause shifts in
surface and subsurface formations and hydrology, and may
crush isopods or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Isopod above. measures.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with

Caecidotea simonini Stillhouse, Aquaterra and Commander Adama species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Killer Bat caves in Randolph County (NatureServe, Isopod above. measures.
2015). No caves were identified within the survey
corridor on the MNF.
Elk River Crayfish G2/S1 Low gradient, medium-sized rivers with moderate The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Cambarus elkensis gradient. Substrate includes sand, gravel, species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
sandstone boulders, and cobbles. Endemic to the Isopod above. measures.
upper Elk River basin. Freshwater cave species
occurring near entrances to very deep in cave
systems (NatureServe, 2015). This species has
been documented in Slaty Fork and Old Field Fork
in Pocahontas County (Nature Conservancy,
2001).
Greenbrier Cave G2/S1? Subterranean streams, usually in the upper The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Crayfish portions of the cave or dry stream beds. Found in species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Cambarus nerterius one cave in the Elk River Drainage in Pocahontas Isopod above. measures.
County on the MNF (NatureServe, 2015; Nature
Conservancy, 2001).
Culvers Cave G1/S1 Mud-bottom seep and drip pools in caves. Only The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Amphipod known from three caves in Tucker and Randolph species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Stygobromus culveri Counties. Isopod above. measures.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Greenbrier Cave G3/S3 Relatively wide-spread obligate subterranean The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Amphipod amphipod. Predominantly found in small, gravel species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Stygobromus bottom cave streams, or pools fed by ceiling drips Isopod above. measures.
emarginatus or seepage water (NatureServe, 2015).
Pocahontas Cave G1/S1 Only three specimens known from Piddling Pit The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Amphipod Cave in Pocahontas County. Found in mud-bottom species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Stygobromus nanus drip pools and associated seepage (NatureServe, Isopod above. measures.
2015).
Minute Cave Amphipod G2G3/S1 Known from four cave sites. Found in mud- The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Stygobromus parvus bottomed, drip, and seep pools in caves species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
(NatureServe, 2015). Isopod above. measures.
Myriapods (Millipedes)
Greenbrier Valley Cave G3/S3 Subterranean obligate. Reported from 10 caves in The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Millipede Pocahontas County (NatureServe, 2015). species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Pseudotremia fulgida Isopod above. measures.
Grand Caverns Blind G3G4/S2 Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Cave Millipede species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
R-9

Zygonopus weyeriensis Isopod above. measures.

Insects (Springtails)
Gandy Creek Cove G1/S1 Subterranean obligate; habitat is poorly known The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Springtail (NatureServe, 2015). species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Pseudosinella certa Isopod above. measures.
A Springtail G3G4/S3 Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Pseudosinella gisini species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
gisini Isopod above. measures.
A Springtail G3G4/S3 Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Sinella agna species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
Isopod above. measures.
Insects (Cave Beetles)
A Cave Beetle G4/S2 Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Pseudanophthalmus species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
fuscus Isopod above. measures.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
A Cave Beetle G3/S3 Subterranean obligate. Known from 14 caves in The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending consultation with
Pseudanophthalmus Pocahontas County and 2 caves in Randolph species are the same as described for the Cannulate Cave MNF on conservation
hypertrichosis County (NatureServe, 2015). This species has Isopod above. measures.
been documented from Cass Cave and Dreen
Cave in Pocahontas County (Nature Conservancy,
2001), located 3.8 miles and less than one mile,
respectively, from the ACP construction
workspace.
Insects (Dragonflies)
Rapids Clubtail G3G4/S3 Clear streams and brooks with strong current over There is only one crossing of a perennial waterbody on the Pending MNF review of
Dragonfly clean gravel, cobbles, or bedrock (NatureServe, MNF (unnamed tributary to Shock Run). Atlantic would use a sedimentation analysis and
Gomphus quadricolor 2015). dry crossing technique (i.e., dam and pump or flume) to cross conservation measures.
this waterbody. Impacts on water quality would be limited to the
time needed to construct the waterbody crossing. Atlantic
would also remove riparian vegetation that could provide shelter
and foraging habitat. Vehicle collisions could cause injury or
mortality to adult dragonflies. Atlantic would implement the
COM Plan (see appendix G), which includes sediment and
R-10

erosion control measures.

Green-Faced Clubtail G3G4/S3 Clear, rocky rivers and streams. Has also been The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
Dragonfly found in reservoirs and other impoundments species are the same as described for the Rapids Clubtail sedimentation analysis and
Gomphus viridifrons (Olcott, 2011). Dragonfly above. conservation measures.
Brook Snaketail G5/S2 Prefers clear, clean, rocky streams. Has been The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
Dragonfly documented from the Greenbrier River (Olcott, species are the same as described for the Rapids Clubtail sedimentation analysis and
Ophiogomphus carolus 2011). Dragonfly above. conservation measures.
Insects (Butterflies and Moths)
Early Hairstreak GU/S2 Woodland openings and moist, but well-drained Adult butterflies would be able to disperse away from Pending MNF review of
Butterfly mature American beech (Fagus grandifolia) forests. disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or mortality could conservation measures.
Erora laeta Its main larval host plant is American beech; result if the individual is unable to find other suitable habitat.
beaked hazelnut (Coylus cornuta) is a secondary Construction activities could remove suitable larval host plants
larval host plant. Adults are active from late April and foraging plants, and could kill larvae if present. This species
through May and late June through August (VDCR may benefit from the presence of woodland clearings, including
and VDGIF, 2013). Host plant was identified during rights-of-way, by creating additional suitable habitat. Atlantic
botany surveys on the MNF. Individual surveys would minimize use of herbicides and pesticides along the
were not conducted. construction and permanent rights-of-way and would allow tree
species to regenerate outside the permanent right-of-way after
construction is complete.
Milnes Euchlaena Moth G2G4/S2 Hardwood and mountain oak woodlands with acidic Adult moths would be able to disperse away from disturbance; Pending MNF review of
Euchlaena milnei soil. Its larval host plant is unknown. Adults are however, reduced fitness and/or mortality could result if the conservation measures.
active in from early to mid-July (VDCR and VDGIF, individual is unable to find other suitable habitat. Construction
2013). Individual surveys were not conducted. activities could remove suitable larval host plants and foraging
plants; and could kill larvae if present.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Starry Campion Moth G3G4/S1 Wooded areas or openings. Its larval host plant
Hadena ectypa include species of the genera Silene, including
starry campion (Silene stellata) and bladder
campion (Silene vulgaris) (NatureServe, 2015).
Host plant was identified during botany surveys on
the MNF. Individual surveys were not conducted.
Bronze Copper Butterfly G5/S2 Low, wet areas such as bogs, marshes, wet
Lycaena hyllus meadows, and ponds. Its larval host plants are
members of the buckwheat family, including curly
dock (Rumex crispus). Adults are active June-
September in the northern part of their range, and
May-November in southern part of their range
R-11
(Lotts and Naberhaus, 2016). Host plant was
identified during botany surveys on the MNF.
Individual surveys were not conducted.
West Virginia White G3?/S3 Moist deciduous woodlands or mixed woods. Its
Butterfly larval host plants are toothworts (Dentaria diphylla
Pieris virginiensis and D. laciniata). Adults are active from April-May
(Lotts and Naberhaus, 2016). Individual surveys
were not conducted.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Adult moths would be able to disperse away from disturbance; Pending MNF review of
however, reduced fitness and/or mortality could result if the conservation measures.
individual is unable to find other suitable habitat. Construction
activities could remove suitable larval host plants and foraging
plants; and could kill larvae if present. This species may benefit
from the presence of woodland clearings, including rights-of-
way, by creating additional nectaring habitat. In addition, as
outlined in the Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F), Atlantic committed to incorporate regionally-
specific and native forb seeds in its traditionally all-grass seed
mix to create pollination habitat, which may reduce impacts on
this species. Management of the right-of-way that encourages
nectar sources would be beneficial to this species.
ACP would impact a limited amount of emergent wetland Pending MNF review of
habitat in the MNF (<0.1 acre). Adult butterflies would be able to conservation measures.
disperse away from disturbance; however, reduced fitness
and/or mortality could result if the individual is unable to find
other suitable habitat. Construction activities could remove
suitable larval host plants and foraging plants; and could kill
larvae if present. This species may benefit from the clearing of
the right-of-way by encouraging the spread of its larval host
plant, curly dock. Curly dock is an introduced species that
adapts to disturbed areas, such as roadsides, farm fields, and
other weedy habitats (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
This species is a weak flyer and will not fly across open areas Pending MNF review of
including rights-of-way; therefore, if it is present, construction conservation measures.
equipment could cause injury or mortality. Construction
activities could remove suitable larval host plants and foraging
plants; and could kill larvae if present. Tree and shrub species
would be allowed to regenerate outside the permanent right-of-
way after construction is complete. This species is also
sensitive to the spread of invasive species, particularly garlic
mustard. Atlantic would implement the Invasive Plant Species
Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and COM Plan (see
appendix G) to mitigate the spread of invasive and noxious
plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Diana Fritillary Butterfly G3G4/S2S3 Favor wooded areas, particularly in low-lying Adult butterflies would be able to disperse away from Pending MNF review of
Speyeria diana valleys, pine woods, and cove forests, within or disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or mortality could conservation measures.
near mountain ranges. Its larval host plants are result if the individual is unable to find other suitable habitat.
violets (Viola spp.). Adults are active from mid-June Construction activities could remove suitable larval host plants
to early September (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). and foraging plants; and could kill larvae if present. This species
Host plant was identified during botany surveys on is known to benefit from the presence of woodland clearings,
the MNF. Individual surveys were not conducted. including rights-of-way, by creating additional nectaring habitat
(FS et al., 2002). In addition, as outlined in the Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F), Atlantic committed to
incorporate regionally-specific and native forb seeds in its
traditionally all-grass seed mix to create pollination habitat,
which may reduce impacts on this species. Management of the
right-of-way that encourages nectar sources would be beneficial
to this species.
FLATWORMS
Hoffmasters Cave G3G4/S2 Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2015). Although no caves were identified within the survey corridor on Pending consultation with
Flatworm the MNF, there are potential impacts on adjacent or connected MNF on conservation
Macrocotyla hoffmasteri cave systems downstream of the construction right-of-way. measures.
R-12

Construction activities could alter water flow patterns, or

increase sediment and contaminant loads, which could lead to
a reduction or degradation of available habitat. flatworm habitat
is susceptible to contamination due to the porosity of the
substrate. Blasting, trenching, and digging can cause shifts in
surface and subsurface formations and hydrology, and may
crush flatworms, or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
VASCULAR PLANTS
Plant Species Documented during Surveys
Roan Mountain Sedge G2G3/S2 Rich soils of mid- to high-elevation mesic forests in Atlantic would remove 2.9 acres of Roan Mountain Sedge Pending MNF review of
Carex roanensis the southern Appalachians (NatureServe, 2015). populations and suitable habitat, reducing the known conservation measures.
Field surveys identified three populations of sedge populations within the survey corridor by a total of 89 percent. In
on the MNF covering a total of 3.2 acres and 523 addition, 1.4 acres of suitable mesic forest habitat would be
individuals. permanently removed. Degradation of adjacent suitable habitat
(e.g., hydrology, soil compaction, light) would also occur,
reducing plant health and fecundity of individuals near the
forests edge. Atlantic identified a population of invasive plant
species in proximity to the Roan Mountain Sedge populations,
which could spread into the disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. MNF has requested a
site-specific avoidance and minimization strategy for this
R-13

Appalachian Oak Fern G3/S2 Maple-birch-hemlock woods on mountain slopes
Gymnocarpium and summits, in sandstone, talus slopes, or boulder
appalachianum colluvium, typically at elevations above 2,000 feet
(NatureServe, 2015). Field survey identified one
population of approximately 10,000 individuals near
Forest Route 55 adjacent to the ACP project area,
covering 0.4 acre.
species.
Atlantic would remove less than 0.1 acre of Appalachian Oak Pending MNF review of
Fern population and suitable habitat, reducing the known conservation measures.
populations within the survey corridor by a total of 0.2 percent.
Degradation of adjacent suitable habitat (e.g., hydrology, soil
compaction, light) would also occur, reducing plant health and
fecundity of individuals near the forests edge. Atlantic
identified a population of invasive plant species in proximity to
the Appalachian Oak Fern population, which could spread into
the disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic would implement the COM
Plan (see appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. MNF has requested a site-specific avoidance and
minimization strategy for this species.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
White Alumroot G2Q/S2 Acid rock outcrops, sandstone, roadsides, high
Heuchera alba summits, grassy balds, edge of sinkholes, and in
hardwood and dwarf pine forests. Found in
elevations ranging from 2,205 to 4,200 feet
associated with Aquilegia spp., wall-rue,
maidenhair spleenwort, and purple-stem cliffbrake
(NatureServe, 2015). Field surveys identified one
population of 75 individuals covering 0.6 acre on a
ridge within an oak-hickory forest, and another
individual outside of the ACP project area.
Bristly Black Currant G5/S2 Moist woods and streambanks to drier forest
Ribes lacustre slopes at low to moderate elevations (Burke
Museum of Natural History and Culture, 2016).
Field surveys identified one population near an old
R-14
access road; however, fruits were not available at
the time of the field surveys and, therefore,
identification was not confirmed but is assumed.
Plant Species Found in Forested Habitat (Not Documented during Surveys)
Allegheny Onion G3?/S2 Thin soils on high-elevation amphibolite
Allium allegheniense (metamorphic rock) or calcareous rock outcrops
(Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe,
2015). Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present in the ACP project area; however, no
individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Atlantic would remove 0.4 acre of White Alumroot population Pending MNF review of
and suitable habitat, reducing the known populations within the conservation measures.
survey corridor by a total of 77 percent. Degradation of adjacent
suitable habitat (e.g., hydrology, soil compaction, light) would
also occur, reducing plant health and fecundity of individuals
near the forests edge. Atlantic identified a population of
invasive plant species in proximity to the Alumroot population,
which could spread into the disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. MNF has requested a
site-specific avoidance and minimization strategy for this
species.
The individual identified is located about 24 feet upslope from Pending MNF review of
the construction workspace. Although no individuals would be conservation measures.
directly impacted by construction, construction activities could
degrade suitable habitat adjacent to the right-of-way (e.g.,
hydrology, soil compaction, light). Atlantic identified a
population of invasive plant species in proximity to the currant
population, which could spread into the disturbed right-of-way.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. MNF has requested a
site-specific avoidance and minimization strategy for this
species.
Construction activities would remove forested habitat, which Pending MNF review of
would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If conservation measures.
present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Lanceleaf Grapefern G5T4/S1 Mainly found in shady woods; associated with rich
Botrychium lanceolatum maple-yellow birch woods, choke cherry, Crategus
var. angustisegmentum spp., and Botrychium matricarifolium in West
Virginia. High elevation forests, rocky stream
banks, and grassy balds. Documented in
Pocahontas County. (Flora of North America
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe,
2015; Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Bluntlobe Grapefern G4/S3 Found in moist, shady, acidic woods and swamps.
Botrychium oneidense Documented in Randolph and Pocahontas
Counties. (Flora of North America Editorial
Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Roundleaf Dogwood G5/S1 Rocky forests and boulder fields; rare in the
Cornus rugosa mountains. Not documented in counties crossed by
R-15
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove forested habitat, which Pending MNF review of
would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If conservation measures.
present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Because this species is associated with secondary or
tertiary forest regrowth, it could recolonize the cleared right-of-
way; although recolonization would take many years
(NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation
measures for this species are the same as described above for
the Allegheny Onion.
Removal of canopy would make habitat for this species Pending MNF review of
unsuitable and recovery potential along the cleared right-of-way conservation measures.
would be low (NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and
conservation measures for this species are the same as
described above for the Allegheny Onion.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.

ACP (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016; Onion.

Box Huckleberry
Gaylussacia brachycera
Crested Coralroot G5T4T5/S1
Hexalectris spicata var.
spicata
Limestone Adders- G5/S1
tongue
Ophioglossum
engelmannii
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed.
G3/S2 Acidic sandy soils in woodlands and slopes, The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
frequently associated with pine and mountain species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
laurel, or sourwood and black gum. Not Onion.
documented in counties crossed by ACP (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; Flora of North America
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe,
2015). Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Rich mesic forests, dry rocky woodlands over basic The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
and calcareous soils. Not documented in counties species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
crossed by ACP (Virginia Botanical Associates, Onion.
2016; NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys
confirmed suitable habitat present; however, no
individuals were observed.
Dry, rocky limestone and dolomite woodlands and The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
barrens of the Ridge and Valley province. Not species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
documented in counties crossed by ACP (Virginia Onion.
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Rock Skullcap G3/S2 Mesic to dry rocky forests and boulder fields.
Scutellaria saxatilis Documented in Pocahontas and Randolph
Counties. (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016;
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed..
Canada Yew G5/S2S3 Cliffs, bluffs, boulder fields, rocky forests, and
Taxus canadensis seepage swamps, usually on sites underlain by
calcareous or mafic rocks. Documented in
Pocahontas and Randolph Counties (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Bristle-fern G4/S1 Deeply sheltered grottoes on non-calcaerous
Trichomanes rocks. Documented in Pocahontas County (Flora of
boschianum North America Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+;
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
R-16
were observed.
Netted Chainfern G5/S2 Moist to wet, acidic soils of low mesic forests,
Woodwardia areolata floodplains, depressions swamps, bogs, and
pocosins. Documented in Pocahontas County. Not
commin high Appalachians (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016; Flora of North America Editorial
Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Plant Species Found in or Tolerant of Open or Edge Habitat (Not Documented during Surveys)
Lillydale Onion G2/S2 Bare rock, talus, and scree slopes. In West
Allium oxyphilum Virginia, a large population was documented on a
shale barren, south-facing slope within an open
hardwood forest with grass-sedge understory.
Occurs on acidic soils. Endemic to west-central
Virginia and eastern West Virginia. Not
documented in counties crossed by ACP (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Creation of forest gaps and openings expose this species to Pending MNF review of
sunlight, drying out the plants. This species is also sensitive to conservation measures.
invasive plants and encroachment by woody plants
(NatureServe, 2015). The potential impacts and conservation
measures for this species are the same as described above for
the Allegheny Onion.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
Onion.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
Onion.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Allegheny conservation measures.
Onion.
Successful restoration if this species includes minimizing Pending MNF review of
disturbance to shale barren habitat, controlling invasive and conservation measures.
noxious weeds, and limiting encroachment of woody vegetation
(NatureServe, 2015). Construction activities would remove
shale barren habitat, which would degrade or make habitat
unsuitable for this species. If present within the construction
right-of-way, individuals would be killed. Construction activities
could also potentially introduce or encourage the spread of
invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic would implement the
COM Plan (see appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation
Plan (see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Bartram Shadbush G5/S2 Cool woods, mountain slopes, summits, bogs, poor
Amelanchier fens, conifer swamps, acidic soil, sandy lake
bartramiana shores, stream banks, rocky ridges, and roadside
thickets. Documented in Pocahontas and Randolph
Counties (Flora of North America Editorial
Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Purple Clematis G5T5/S2 Calcareous cliffs, rock ledges, talus slopes,
Clematis occidentalis gravelly embankments, rocky woods, and
var. occidentalis clearings. Documented in Pocahontas County
(Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds.,
1993+; NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys
confirmed suitable habitat present; however, no
individuals were observed.
Bentleys Coralroot G2/S1 Found in Appalachian deciduous forest, often at
R-17
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove vegetation, which would Pending MNF review of
degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If present conservation measures.
within the construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities would remove shale barren habitat,
which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this
species. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would implement
the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Bartram conservation measures.
Shadbush.
If present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would Pending MNF review of

Corallorhiza bentleyi
forest edges in somewhat disturbed sites.
Documented in Pocahontas County (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; Flora of North America
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe,
2015). Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
be killed. Construction activities would remove forested habitat, conservation measures.
which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species
however, because this species is also known to occur at forest
edges in somewhat disturbed sites, the permanent right-of-way
could create additional suitable habitat. Because Atlantic would
perform maintenance of the permanent right-of-way, this
species could benefit from creation of additional suitable
habitat. Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Tall Larkspur G3/S2 Rich woods and edges of woods, rocky slopes,
Delphinium exaltatum semi-open woodlands, glades, and prairie
openings. Tolerant of a limited amount of
disturbance. Not documented in counties crossed
by ACP (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016;
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed..
R-18
Shrivers Frilly Orchid G1/S1 Mesic forests, seepage swamps, and forest edges
Platanthera shriveri at elevations of 2,350 to 4,000 feet. Documented in
Pocahontas and Randolph Counties (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Beadles Mountain-mint G2G4/NR Open forests, forest edges, and roadsides (Virginia
Pycnanthemum beadlei Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Mountain Pimpernel G3/S3 Calcareous shale barrens, limestone, rock
Taenidia montana outcrops, narrow ridges, and open woods. Not
documented in counties crossed by ACP (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
If present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would Pending MNF review of
be killed. Construction activities would remove woodland conservation measures.
habitat, which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this
species however, because this species is also known to occur
at woodland edges in somewhat disturbed sites, the permanent
right-of-way could create additional suitable habitat. This
species can be successfully restored through controlled burning
and thinning or clearing of understory woody vegetation.
Mowing and selective thinning of overstory trees and shrubs
has been conducted at a site in North Carolina in early spring
before leaf emergence to benefit this and other rare prairie plant
species (NatureServe, 2015). Because Atlantic would perform
maintenance of the permanent right-of-way outside of the
migratory bird nesting season (April 1-August 31) and only
every 3 years; this species could benefit from creation of
additional suitable habitat. Construction activities could also
potentially introduce or encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would implement
the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Bentleys conservation measures.
Coralroot.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Bentleys conservation measures.
Coralroot.
Construction activities would remove barren habitat, which Pending MNF review of
would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If conservation measures.
present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Appalachian Blue Violet G4/S3 Rich, moist forest communities in partially open to
Viola appalachiensis open sites generated naturally or by human
disturbance, including streambanks, floodplains,
glades, clearings, forest edges, and roadsides.
Found in habitats that are kept open by mowing.
Documented in Pocahontas and Randolph
Counties (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016;
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed.
Plant Species Found in Wetland and Riparian Habitat (Not Documented during Surveys)
Spreading Rockcress G3/S2 Moist rocky woods, limestone outcrops, and shady
Arabis patens riverbanks. Not documented in counties crossed by
ACP (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016;
NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed.
R-19
Showy Ladys-slipper G4/S1 Swampy thickets, bogs, woodland glades, ravines,
Cypripedium reginae stream and lake edges, seepages on limestone or
sandstone bluffs, damp calcareous slopes or
shores, limestone quarries, wet calcareous
meadows, seep springs, forested fens, sandy
shorelines, and talus slopes. Not documented in
counties crossed by ACP (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015). Botanical
sureys confirmed suitable habitat present;
however, no individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Bentleys conservation measures.
Coralroot.
Riparian habitat crossed by ACP within the MNF is limited. Pending MNF review of
Construction activities would remove woodland and riparian conservation measures.
habitat, which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this
species. If present within the construction right-of-way,
individuals would be killed. Construction activities could also
potentially introduce or encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would implement
the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would impact <0.1 acre of wetland habitat within the Pending MNF review of
MNF, and riparian habitat is limited. Construction activities conservation measures.
would remove wetland and riparian habitat, which would
degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If present
within the construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce or
encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Blue Ridge St. Johns- G3/S1 Seepage slopes and spray areas near falls at
wort higher elevations. Also found in grassy balds,
Hypericum grassy openings, and forests. Documented in
mitchellianum Pocahontas and Randolph Counties (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Long-stalk Holly G3/S2 Bogs, seeps, and high-elevation stream banks. In
Ilex collina West Virginia, it has been found in wetland areas,
river edges, high energy and/or scoured
riverbanks, sandstone soils, and northern
hardwoods. Documented in Pocahontas and
Randolph Counties (Virginia Botanical Associates,
R-20
2016; NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys
confirmed suitable habitat present; however, no
individuals were observed.
Butternut G4/S3 Optimal growth occurs on well-drained soils of
Juglans cinerea bottomlands and floodplains. Found in rich
mesophytic forests, lower slopes, ravines, and
various types of bottomland. Documented in
Pocahontas and Randolph Counties (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016; NatureServe, 2015).
Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove <0.1 acre of wetland Pending MNF review of
habitat, and riparian habitat is limited, which would degrade or conservation measures.
make habitat unsuitable for this species. However, because
this species is also known to occur in openings, the permanent
right-of-way could create additional suitable habitat. If present
within the construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce or
encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Showy Ladys- conservation measures.
Slipper.
Atlantic would impact <0.1 acre of wetland habitat within the Pending MNF review of
MNF, and floodplain habitat is limited. Construction activities conservation measures.
would remove forest habitat, which would degrade or make
habitat unsuitable for this species. However, because this
species is known to benefit from the creation of canopy gaps
and some form of disturbance (NatureServe, 2015), the
permanent right-of-way could create additional suitable habitat.
If present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. This species is primarily
threatened by the spread of a canker fungus (NatureServe,
2015).
 TABLE R-1 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Swamp Lousewort G5/S2 Mafic and calcareous fens, wet meadows, and rich
Pedicularis lanceolata open floodplains. Documented in Pocahontas and
Randolph Counties (Virginia Botanical Associates,
2016; NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys
confirmed suitable habitat present; however, no
individuals were observed.
Bog Bluegrass G3/S1 Shaded seeps and seepage swamps, usually over
Poa paludigena calcareous or mafic rocks; rare in the mountains
(Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016). Botanical
sureys confirmed suitable habitat present;
however, no individuals were observed.
Pennsylvania Buttercup G5/S1 Stream banks, bogs, moist clearings, and
R-21
Ranunculus depressions in woodlands. Documented in
pensylvanicus Pocahontas County (Flora of North America
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+; NatureServe,
2015). Botanical sureys confirmed suitable habitat
present; however, no individuals were observed.
NON-VASCULAR PLANTS
Ammons Tortula Moss G1G3/S1 Rock outrcops in mixed hardwood forests
Tortula ammonsiana communities. In West Virginia, it has been
associated with yellow birch, mountain maple, and
striped maple. Documented in Pocahontas County
(NatureServe, 2015). Botanical sureys confirmed
suitable habitat present; however, no individuals
were observed.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Atlantic would impact <0.1 acre of wetland habitat within the Pending MNF review of
MNF, and floodplain habitat is limited. Construction activities conservation measures.
would remove wetland and floodplain habitat, which would
degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. If present
within the construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce or
encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for this Pending MNF review of
species are the same as described above for the Showy Ladys- conservation measures.
Slipper.
Atlantic would impact <0.1 acre of wetland habitat within the Pending MNF review of
MNF, and floodplain habitat is limited. Construction activities conservation measures.
would remove wetland and floodplain habitat, which would
degrade or make habitat unsuitable for this species. However,
because this species is also known to occur in clearings, the
permanent right-of-way could create additional suitable habitat.
If present within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the
spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Creation of forest gaps and openings expose this species to Pending MNF review of
sunlight, drying out the plants. This species is also sensitive to conservation measures.
trampling (NatureServe, 2015). If present within the construction
right-of-way, individuals would be killed. Construction activities
could also potentially introduce or encourage the spread of
invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic would implement the
COM Plan (see appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation
Plan (see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants.
 TABLE R-1 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia
Global Rank/
Species State Rank a Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
____________________
a
Global/State Conservation Rank: Global (G) /State (S) Conservation Rank: G1/S1 = Critically imperiled - At very high risk of extinction due to extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer populations),
very steep declines, or other factors; G2/S2 = Imperiled - At high risk of extinction or elimination due to very restricted range, very few populations, steep declines, or other factors;
G3/S3 = Vulnerable - At moderate risk of extinction or elimination due to a restricted range, relatively few populations, recent and widespread declines, or other factors; G4/S4 =
Apparently Secure - Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors; G5/S5 = Secure - Common; widespread and abundant; GU/NR =
Unranked; Q = Questionable Taxonomy taxonomic distinctiveness of this entity at the current level is questionable; T = Infraspecific Taxon for example, subspecies or variety; ? =
Inexact Numeric Rank. State Rank (Birds): S_B: breeding status; these species typically inhabit the state only during the breeding season, S_B,S_N: breeding and non-breeding status
when they differ. Global Rank is based on NatureServe, 2015 and State Rank is based on WVDNR, 2015a.
R-22
 TABLE R-2
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
MAMMALS
Eastern Small-Footed - 3 G1G3/S2 Generally roost on the ground under
Bat rocks, in crevices, and occasionally in
Myotis leibii buildings and under tree bark.
Hibernates in solution and fissure
caves and mine tunnels near the
entrance (VDGIF, 2015a). No suitable
habitat was found in the survey
corridor and no individuals were
detected.
Southern Water LE 3 G5T3/S1S2 Undercut banks of high gradient and
Shrew high elevation (above 900 m) first and
Sorex palustris second order streams with abundance
punctulatus cover from overhanging rocks, roots,
logs, and crevices (NatureServe,
2015). Field surveys identified
potential habitat at four streams
crossed by the pipeline near the WV-
R-23
VA state line; presence of water shrew
is assumed. 1.0 mile of potentially
suitable habitat on GWNF was not
surveyed due to access issues and
must be surveyed at a later time.
BIRDS
Peregrine Falcon LT 6 G4/S1B,S2N In western Virginia, peregrine falcon
Falco peregrinus nest in natural, open, rocky cliffs in
mountainous areas or river gorges,
usually associated with water. In
eastern Virginia, falcons use man-
made structures such as unfinished
bridge piers, bridges, or skyscrapers
(VDGIF, 2015a). Suitable habitat
potentially present within the survey
corridor based on general habitat
conditions; no, peregrine falcons were
observed within a two-mile wide aerial
survey area for eagles. Pending
review of cliff habitat.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Based on survey results, no direct impacts on eastern Pending GWNF review of
small-footed bat are anticipated. Tree clearing on rocky survey results and
slopes may improve summer habitat for this species by conservation measures
increasing solar radiation on potential summer
maternity habitat, making habitat more suitable for
roosting (FS et al., 2002); however, tree clearing would
also reduce foraging habitat. Construction activities
could also disturb bats in the vicinity, potentially
disrupting normal activities.
In-stream construction activities could displace shrews, Pending GWNF review of
cause stress, and disrupt normal activities. survey results and
Construction equipment could cause injury or mortality conservation measures
to individuals. Increased sedimentation and turbidity
from construction activities and use of access roads
into suitable stream habitat could temporarily degrade
habitat, and impact forage species. Atlantic would
implement the sediment and erosion control measures
identified in the COM Plan (see appendix G).
If present in the vicinity of the ACP project area during Pending GWNF review of
construction, construction activities could disturb desktop analysis and
falcons, displacing individuals and disrupting normal conservation measures
activities. If in proximity to a nest during the nesting
season, prolonged or frequent disturbance could cause
nest abandonment. Construction would also result in
the loss of foraging habitat. Atlantic would implement
the COM Plan (see appendix G) and Migratory Bird
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to mitigate impacts on this
species.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Bald Eagle - 6 G5/S3S4B, Prefers coasts, lakes, and rivers, and
Haliaeetus S3S4N seen along mountain ridges during
leucocephalus migration. The James,
Rappahonnock, and Potomac Rivers
provide some of the most important
eagle habitats in Virginia. Most nests
are found in the midst of large wooded
areas adjacent to marshes or bodies
of water, or in isolated trees located in
marshes, farmland, or in logged areas
where scattered trees remain (VDGIF,
2016b). Field survey confirmed that
potentially suitable habitat occurs in
much of the analysis area, and one
unknown stick nest was identified
approximately 314 feet from the
centerline that had been tended
during the season. No bald eagles
were observed.
R-24
Migrant Loggerhead LT 3 G4/S1B,S2N Open areas, grasslands (often grazed
Shrike or occasionally mowed) and
Lanius ludovicianus agricultural landscapes interspersed
migrans with forbs, scattered shrubs, and/or
small trees. Usually nests in eastern
redcedar or hawthorne (VDGIF,
2015a).
AMPHIBIANS
Cow Knob - 3 G3/S2 Found at high elevations in mixed
Salamander deciduous forest interspersed with
Plethodon punctatus Virginia pine and hemlock and
numerous rock outcrops. Most
abundant in old-growth forests with
many downed logs and abundant
surface rocks, including talus
(NatureServe, 2015; VDGIF, 2016k).
Field survey confirmed that suitable
habitat occurs on Tower Hill Mountain
and on Gum Tree Hill within areas
with high concentrations of rock cover.
No individuals were detected.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
If present in the vicinity of the ACP project area during Pending GWNF review of
construction, construction activities could disturb survey results and
eagles, displacing individuals and disrupting normal conservation measures
activities. If in proximity to a nest during the nesting
season, prolonged or frequent disturbance could cause
nest abandonment. Construction would cause loss of
nesting and foraging habitat. Atlantic would implement
the COM Plan (see appendix G) and Migratory Bird
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). A qualified biological monitor
would walk ahead of clearing crews and search for
roosting bald eagles and nesting bald eagles. If bald
eagle nests or occupied bald eagle winter roosting
habitat are identified ahead of or during construction,
Atlantic would follow the National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines for work within 660 feet of the
active bald eagle nest. Additional information provided
in section 4.5.3.
Atlantic would construct outside of the nesting season Beneficial Effect
and implement the mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1). This species
prefers open grassland habitat (VDGIF, 2015a);
therefore, clearing of the right-of-way during
construction could provide suitable habitat for this
species. Atlantic would mow the right-of-way outside of
the nesting season.
Construction activities would contribute to habitat loss Pending GWNF review of
and degradation of potentially suitable habitat. Atlantic survey results and
would implement the COM Plan (see appendix G), and conservation measures
Rehabilitation and Restoration Plan (see appendix F)
to restore the right-of-way. No direct impacts on
individuals are anticipated.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
FISH
Roughhead Shiner - TBD G2G3/S2S3 Endemic to the headwaters of the
Notropis semperasper James River. Cool to warm streams of
moderate gradient, gravel to boulder
substrate, slight siltation, slow to
moderate currents or in or just below
the head of a pool, or in moderately
calm water adjacent to runs (VDGIF,
2016b). This species has been found
in the upper James watershed above
the town of Buchanan, Botetourt
County (FS, 2014). Based on
correspondence from the GWNF, this
species is known from Back Creek,
Jackson River, and Cowpasture River
in Bath and Allegheny Counties (FS,
2016c). Atlantic assumed presence at
these waterbody crossing locations.
Surveys were conducted in 2016 on
R-25
the GWNF; no roughhead shiner were
observed at crossing locations and
habitat was considered unsuitable.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Waterbody crossings and access road Pending GWNF review of
construction/use would temporarily degrade water survey results,
quality through increased sedimentation and turbidity sedimentation analysis,
during construction, reduced fish passage, potential and conservation
mortality during fish relocation efforts, disturbance, measures
changes in hydrology, and disturbance and injury or
mortality from blasting (see section 4.6 for additional
discussion). Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and sedimentation, and
by decreasing shade increase localized water
temperatures. Atlantic would implement the Virginia
Fish Relocation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to remove all
fish species trapped within areas proposed for
dewatering or in-stream work prior to initiating
construction. Atlantic would also implement the
measures in the COM Plan (see appendix G),
including implementation of the VDEQ Virginia Erosion
and Sediment Control Handbook, and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of hazardous
chemicals, and to restore riparian habitats. Atlantic
also committed to adhering to the VDGIF TOYR
(March 15 to June 30) (VDGIF, 2016a) at the
waterbody crossing locations where this species is
assumed to be present, which includes Back Creek,
Jackson River, Cowpasture River, Warwick Run, and
the unnamed tributaries to Warwick Run and Stuart
Run.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Orangefin Madtom LT TBD G2/S2 The native population of orange
Noturus gilberti madtom occurs in the Roanoke River
drainage, and an introduced
population is found in the James River
drainage (VDGIF, 2016b). This
species has been found in the South
Fork Roanoke River watershed,
Roanoke River above Salem, Craig
Creek, Johns Creek, and Cowpasture
River in Bath County (FS, 2014; FS,
2016c). Surveys were conducted in
2016 on the GWNF; no orangefin
madtom were observed at crossing
locations.
R-26
INVERTEBRATES
Gastropods (Snails)
Round Supercoil Snail - TBD G3/SU Moist environments including damp
Paravitrea reesei areas under rocks, leaf litter, river
bluffs and other slopes near water
(Hotopp et al., 2013). This species
was not identified during surveys on
the GWNF.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Waterbody crossings and access road construction Pending GWNF review of
and use would temporarily degrade water quality survey results,
through increased sedimentation and turbidity during sedimentation analysis
construction, reduced fish passage, potential mortality and conservation
during fish relocation efforts, disturbance, changes in measures
hydrology, and disturbance and injury or mortality from
blasting (see section 4.6 for additional discussion).
Removal of riparian habitat may also contribute to
increased erosion and sedimentation, and by
decreasing shade increase localized water
temperatures. Atlantic would implement the Virginia
Fish Relocation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to remove all
fish species trapped within areas proposed for
dewatering or in-stream work prior to initiating
construction. Atlantic would also implement the
measures in the COM Plan (see appendix G),
including implementation of the VDEQ Virginia Erosion
and Sediment Control Handbook, and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of hazardous
chemicals, and to restore riparian habitats. Because
only the introduced population of orange madtom may
be affected by ACP, the VDGIF TOYR (March 15-May
31) would not apply (VDGIF, 2016a).
Construction activities could cause mortality to Pending GWNF review of
individuals if present in the workspace. This species is survey results and
known to inhabitat leaf litter in forests, a habitat that is conservation measures
common across the GWNF. Construction and
maintenance of the right-of-way would result in
conversion to less desirable habitat in some areas.
Suitable habitat is very common across the GWNF (FS
et al., 2002).
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Bivalves (Freshwater Mussels)
Brook Floater LE TBD G3/S1 Fast-flowing, clean water in substrates
Alasmidonta varicosa that contain relatively firm rubble,
gravel, and substrates swept free from
siltation. Buried in the substrate in
shallow riffle and shoal areas (VDGIF,
2016b). This species was not
identified during mussel surveys on
the GWNF and habitat was
considered unsuitable.
Yellow Lance - TBD G2G3/S2S3 Slow currents with unsilted sandy
Elliptio lanceolata substrates; can tolerate various water
sizes (NatureServe, 2015). This
species has been found in
Cowpasture River in Allegheny
County (FS, 2016c). Surveys were
conducted in 2016 on the GWNF; no
yellow lance were observed at
R-27
crossing locations and habitat was
considered unsuitable. Additional
surveys on the Cowpasture River are
anticipated in 2017.
Atlantic Pigtoe LT TBD G2/S2 Clean, swift-moving waters often
Fusconaia masoni found in gravel of gravel-sand
substrate. Historic data indicates
potential presence of this species in
the Mill Creek and Calfpasture River
drainages (VDGIF, 2016b). This
species was not identified during
mussel surveys on the GWNF and
habitat was considered unsuitable.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Neither this species, nor suitable habitat was identified Pending GWNF review of
during surveys on the GWNF. Historic data does not survey results,
indicate presence of this species in waterbodies sedimentation analysis,
crossed by ACP on the GWNF; therefore, no impacts and conservation
are anticipated on this species. measures
This species is currently under review by FWS for Pending GWNF review of
listing under the ESA (see section 4.7.1.13). Although survey results,
this species was not detected during surveys, Atlantic sedimentation analysis,
assumed presence of this species in the Cowpasture and conservation
River based on agency data. Atlantic would cross measures
Cowpasture River with the mainline pipeline using a
dry technique approximately 0.3 mile upstream and
downstream from the GWNF property boundaries. The
Cowpasture River would also be crossed by two
permanent access roads. The potential impacts and
conservation measures for this species are the same
as described above for the Roughhead Shiner, with the
exception of the TOYR. Atlantic committed to VDGIF
TOYR for short-term brooding mussels of May 15-July
31 (VDGIF, 2016a) (see table S-2 in appendix S).
This species is currently under review by FWS for Pending GWNF review of
listing under the ESA (see section 4.7.1.13). This survey results,
species, nor suitable habitat for this species, was sedimentation analysis,
identified during surveys on the GWNF; however, there and conservation
is a potential for downstream impacts on this species. measures
The potential impacts and conservation measures for
this species are the same as described above for the
Roughhead Shiner, with the exception of the TOYR.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for all in-stream work
from May 15-July 31 for waterbodies known or
assumed to support Atlantic pigtoe mussels.
Consultation with GWNF and FWS is ongoing for this
species.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Green Floater LT TBD G3/S2 Fast-flowing, clean water in firm This species is currently under review by FWS for Pending GWNF review of
Lasmigona subviridis rubble, gravel and sand substrates listing under the ESA (see section 4.7.1.13). This survey results,
swept free from siltation. Found buried species, nor suitable habitat for this species, was sedimentation analysis,
in substrate in shallow riffle and shoal identified during surveys on the GWNF. Historic data and conservation
areas (VDGIF, 2016b). This species does not indicate presence of this species in measures
was not identified during mussel waterbodies crossed by ACP on the GWNF; therefore,
surveys on the GWNF and habitat no impacts are anticipated on this species.
was considered unsuitable.
Crustaceans (Amphipods and Isopods)
Racovitzas Terrestrial - TBD G3G4/S2 Subterrestrial, subterranean obligate ACP would cross these watershed in Bath, Highland, Pending GWNF review of
Cave Isopod species. This species has been and Augusta Counties. It has been potentially conservation measures
Miktoniscus racovitzai documented in the Upper James extirpated from the South Fork Shenandoah watershed
watershed in Bath County, and South (NatureServe, 2015). No caves were identified within
Fork Shenandoah watershed the survey corridor on the GWNF; however, there are
(NatureServe, 2015). potential impacts on adjacent or connected cave
systems downstream of the construction right-of-way.
Construction activities could alter water flow patterns
or increase sediment and contaminant loads, which
R-28

could lead to a reduction or degradation of available

habitat. Isopod habitat is susceptible to contamination
due to the porosity of the substrate. Blasting,
trenching, and digging can cause shifts in surface and
subsurface formations and hydrology, and may crush
isopods or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
Montgomery County - TBD G2G3/S1 Subaquatic, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Cave Amphipod species. Full extent of subterranean this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
Stygobromus habitat is unknown. Although this Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
fergusoni species has not been documented in
counties crossed by ACP, it has been
documented within the Upper James
watershed (NatureServe, 2015)
crossed by ACP in Bath and Highland
Counties.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Shenandoah Valley - TBD G3G4/S3 Subaquatic, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Cave Amphipod species. Specimens have been this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
Stygobromus collected from 11 caves in the Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
fergusoni Potomac River drainage in small
streams and pools. Full extent of
subterranean habitat is unknown.
Although this species has not been
documented in counties crossed by
ACP, it has been documented within
the South Fork Shenandoah
watershed (NatureServe, 2015)
crossed by ACP in Augusta County.
Allegheny County - TBD G2/S2 Subaquatic, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Cave Amphipod species. Full extent of subterranean this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
Stygobromus habitat is unknown. Although this Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
hoffmani species has not been documented in
counties crossed by ACP, it has been
documented within the Upper James
watershed (NatureServe, 2015)
R-29

crossed by ACP in Bath and Highland

Counties.
Bath County Cave - TBD G2G3/S1S2 Subaquatic, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Amphipod species. Has been documented from this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
Stygobromus mundus both cave and surface stream Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
collections. Full extent of
subterranean habitat is unknown. This
species has been documented in the
Upper James watershed in Bath
County (NatureServe, 2015) crossed
by ACP in Bath and Highland
Counties.
Myriapods (Centipedes and Millipedes)
Hoffmans Cleidognid - 5 G3/S2S3 Leaf litter in deciduous forest, which is There is the potential for mortality of individuals during Pending GWNF review of
Millipede common in the GWNF. Mountaintop tree clearing and other construction activities. survey results and
Cleidogona hoffmani species documented from Mt. Rogers, Construction and maintenance of the right-of-way conservation measures
Whitetop Mountain, Elk Garden, and would result in conversion to less desirable habitat in
Helton Creek. This species was some areas. Suitable habitat is very common across
documented at nine sites during the GWNF (FS et al., 2002).
surveys on the GWNF.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Montane Centipede - 3 G2/S2 Endemic to the Blue Ridge Mountains The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Escaryus cryptorobius of Virginia. Found in the upper soil this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
horizons in mixed hardwood forests in Hoffmans Cleidognid Millipede. conservation measures
the summer months (May through
July); burrows deep into the soil matrix
during winter (Pereira and Hoffman,
1993). This species was not
documented during surveys.
A cave centipede - TBD G1G2/S1 Subterrestrial, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Nampabius turbator species. Although this species has not this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
been documented in counties crossed Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
by ACP, it has been documented
within the Upper James watershed
(NatureServe, 2015) crossed by ACP
in Bath and Highland Counties.
Shenandoah - 5 G1/S1 Leaf litter in mixed forests, which is Four of the sites where Nannaria specimens were Pending GWNF review of
Mountain common in the GWNF, between 760 identified would be located within the ACP construction survey results and
Xystodesmid Millipede to 1,000 meters elevation (Hoffman, workspace. The potential impacts and conservation conservation measures
R-30

Nannaria shenandoa 1949). Surveys on the GWNF did not measures for this species are the same as described
document this species; however, the above for the Hoffmans Cleidognid Millipede.
survey documented six sites with
unidentifiable Nannaria specimens,
which may represent suitable habitat
for this species.
Mays Mountain Cave - 3 N/A Leaf litter and detritus in deciduous The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Millipede forests, which is common in the this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Pseudotremia alecto GWNF, at 330 meters elevation; has Hoffmans Cleidognid Millipede. conservation measures
also been found in caves.
Documented in Allegheny and Bath
Counties (Shear, 2011). This species
was not documented during surveys.
Pleasing Xystodesmid - 3 G3/S3 Leaf litter of deciduous forests, which The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Millipede his common in the GWNF, and cove this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Semionellus placidus habitats, usually near water Hoffmans Cleidognid Millipede. conservation measures
(BugGuide, 2016). This species was
not documented during surveys.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Insects (Springtails)
A cave springtail - TBD G4/S3 Subterrestrial, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Pygmarrhopalites species. This species has been this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
carolynae documented in Bath County and in the Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
South Fork Shenandoah and Upper
James River watersheds
(NatureServe, 2015), which would be
crossed by ACP in Bath, Highland,
and Augusta Counties.
A cave springtail - TBD G1/S2 Subterrestrial, subterranean obligate The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Pygmarrhopalites species. Known from two caves in this species are the same as described above for the conservation measures
sacer Bath County. This species has been Racovitzas Terrestrial Cave Isopod.
documented in Bath County and in the
Upper James River watershed
(NatureServe, 2015), which would be
crossed by ACP in Bath and Highland
Counties.
Insects (Beetles)
R-31

Appalachian Tiger - 3 G3/S2 Prefers open sand or a matrix of sand There is the potential for mortality of individuals during Pending GWNF review of
Beetle and cobble along permanent streams clearing and other construction activities. Construction survey results and
Cicindela or medium-sized rivers; usually found and maintenance of the right-of-way would temporarily conservation measures
ancocisconensis along rocky mountain streams and remove suitable habitat; however, based on this
small rivers in partially shaded areas, species preference of open habitat, right-of-way
such as sand banks and sand bars. clearing and maintenance could have a beneficial
Occasionally reported along roads. effect by creating potentially suitable habitat (FS et al.,
This species is active April through 2002).
June and late-July to September, but
not always active in fall (NatureServe,
2015). Suitable habitat for this species
was observed within the GWNF;
however, no individuals were
documented.
Northern Barrens - 3 G3/S2 Specialized to sandy/coarse gravel or The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Tiger Beetle eroding sandstone in pine barrens, this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Cicindela patruela open mixed, or deciduous woodlands Appalachian Tiger Beetle. conservation measures
where open ground exists. This
species is active late April to June and
mid-August into September, but not
always active in fall (NatureServe,
2015). Suitable habitat for this species
was observed within the GWNF;
however, no individuals were
documented.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Maureen's Hydraenan - 5 G2?/S2? Along the edges of smaller, lower
minute Moss Beetle gradient streams in clean, fine shale
Hydraena maureenae gravels, typically gravel bars. This
species is potentially active year-
round (NatureServe, 2015). Surveys
conducted on the GWNF identified
suitable habitat for this species at
eight stream locations and
documented eight inviduals at six of
those stream locations.
Insects (Dragonflies)
Alleghany Snaketail - 3 G3T2T3/S1 Suitable habitat for this species was
Ophiogomphus observed within the GWNF; however,
incurvatus no individuals were documented. This
alleghaniensis species has the potential to occur in
streams within Sulphur Springs Hollow
and Dowells Draft, which are crossed
R-32
or in proximity to ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
This species has been documented along existing FS Pending GWNF review of
roads that have been proposed for use as access survey results and
roads; therefore, construction activities could cause conservation measures
mortality to individuals if present in the workspace.
Filing of the interstitial spaces between gravels with
sediment, which would occur during construction
activities, makes habitat no longer suitable for this
species. Atlantic would implement the erosion control
and sedimentation measures described in the COM
Plan (see appendix G), and would minimize
disturbance to gravel bars along streams.
Increased sedimentation threatens this species. Adult Pending GWNF review of
dragonflies would be able to disperse away from sedimentation analysis,
disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or mortality and conservation
could result if the individual is unable to find other measures
suitable habitat. Dowells Draft and two unnamed
tributaries to Dowells Draft would be crossed using a
dry crossing technique, which would be limited to the
time needed to construct the waterbody crossing.
Atlantic also proposes to use existing roads that cross
Dowells Draft, the East Branch of Dowells Draft, and
an unnamed tributary to Dowells Draft as permanent
access roads. There is the potential that construction
activities could impact nymphs through direct mortality
or temporary reduction in water quality. In addition,
increased sedimentation could result from use of
access roads and stormwater run-off from access
roads and the construction workspace. Atlantic would
implement the sediment and erosion control measures
in the COM Plan (appendix G).
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Insects (Butterfly, Skippers, and Moths)
Herodias Underwing - 6 G3T3/S2S3 Prefer pitch pine (Pinus rigida)-bear
Moth oak (Quercus ilicifolia) barrens, or
Catocala herodias sparse, open woodlands. Food plants
gerhardi plants are bear oak, and blackjack oak
(Quercus marilandica); larvae feed
mostly on bear oak and reared mostly
on blackjack oak. Adults are active
from July to August (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Potential host plants
for this species were observed within
the GWNF; however, individual
surveys were not conducted. Because
individual surveys were not
conducted, presence is assumed
within suitable habitat.
Milne's Euchlaena - 6 G2G4/S2 Hardwood and mountain oak
R-33
Moth woodlands with acidic soil. Its larval
Euchlaena milnei host plant is unknown. Adults are
active in from early to mid-July (VDCR
and VDGIF, 2013). Individual surveys
were not conducted for this species.
Because individual surveys were not
conducted, presence is assumed
within suitable habitat.
Hebards Noctuid - 3 GU/SH Prefers rich, deciduous forests with
Moth abundant larval food plants, such as
Psectrotarsia hebardi stoneroot (Collinsonia canadensis).
Larvae are active into September
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). Individual
surveys were not conducted for this
species. Because individual surveys
were not conducted, presence is
assumed within suitable habitat.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Adult moths would be able to disperse away from Pending GWNF review of
disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or mortality survey results and
could result if the individual is unable to find other conservation measures
suitable habitat. Construction activities could remove
suitable larval host plants and foraging plants, and
could kill larvae if present. This species is known to
benefit from the presence of woodland clearings,
including rights-of-way, by creating additional nectaring
habitat (FS et al., 2002). In addition, as outlined in the
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F),
Atlantic committed to incorporate regionally-specific
and native forb seeds in its traditionally all-grass seed
mix to create pollination habitat, which may reduce
impacts on this species. Management of the right-of-
way that encourages nectar sources would be
beneficial to this species.
Adult moths would be able to disperse away from Pending GWNF review of
disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or mortality survey results and
could result if the individual is unable to find other conservation measures
suitable habitat. Construction activities could remove
suitable larval host plants and foraging plants; and
could kill larvae if present.
This species has not been recently documented in Pending GWNF review of
Virginia (prior to 1950). Adult moths would be able to survey results and
disperse away from disturbance; however, reduced conservation measures
fitness and/or mortality could result if the individual is
unable to find other suitable habitat. Construction
activities could remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if present.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Appalachian Grizzled LT 6 G5T1T2/S1 Dry, open areas with shaley soils such The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Skipper as shale barrens, and artificially this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Pyrgus centaureae opened habitats such as clearcuts and Herodias Underwing Moth. conservation measures
wyandot utility rights-of-way. Its larval host is
dwarf cinquefoil (Potentilla
canadensis). Adults are active from
mid-April to early May (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Field habitat
assessments identified one host plant
for this species within the GWNF;
however, no caterpillars were
observed. Adults could not be
sampled as it was outside of their
activity period; therefore, presence is
assumed in suitable habitat.
Diana Fritillary - 3 G3G4/S3 Favor wooded areas, particularly in The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Butterfly low-lying valleys, pine woods, and this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Speyeria diana cove forests, within or near mountain Herodias Underwing Moth. conservation measures
ranges. Its larval host plants are
R-34

violets (Viola spp.) and nectar plants

include butterfly bush, milkweeds, and
other purple flowers. Adults are active
from mid-June to early September
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). Field
habitat assessments identified host
plants for this species within the
GWNF; however, no individuals were
observed.
Regal Fritillary - 3 G3/S1 Uses violets (Viola spp.), especially The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Butterfly birdfoot violet (V. pedata), as its larval this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Speyeria idalia host plants. Prefers tallgrass areas, Herodias Underwing Moth. conservation measures
such as prairies, fields, grasslands,
and bogs; may have close ties with
undisturbed native grasslands. Adults
feed on nectar from thistle (Cirsium
spp.), milweeks (Aesclepias spp.), and
red clover (Trifolium spp.). Adults are
active mid-June through mid-August
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). Field
habitat assessments identified host
plants for this species within the
GWNF; however, no individuals were
observed.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
VASCULAR PLANTS
Trailing White - 3 G3/S3 Seepage swamps, mafic fens, rocky
Monkshood high-elevation forests, rich cove
Aconitum reclinatum forests, and periodically wet boulder
fields, usually on base-rich substrates
at middle to high elevations (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016). Species
not observed during surveys.
Nodding Onion - 3 G2/S1 Bare rock, talus, and scree slopes. In
Allium oxyphilum West Virginia, a large population was
documented on a shale barren, south-
facing slope within an open hardwood
forest with grass-sedge understory.
R-35
Occurs on acidic soils. Endemic to
west-central Virginia and eastern
West Virginia. Not documented in
counties crossed by ACP (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016;
NatureServe, 2015). Species not
observed during surveys.
Variable Sedge - 3 G3/S2 Dry, usually sandy, open oak/heath
Carex polymorpha forests, pine oak/heath woodlands,
clearings, and wetland ecotones
(Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Species not observed during surveys.
Small Spreading - 3 G4?/S2 Dry, acidic soils of oak/heath forests
Pogonia and pine-oak/heath woodlands
Cleistesiopsis bifaria (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Species not observed during surveys.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove forested habitat, Pending GWNF review of
which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for survey results and
this species. If present within the construction right-of- conservation measures
way, individuals would be killed. Construction activities
could also potentially introduce or encourage the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F)
to restore the right-of-way, and would implement the
Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table
2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants.
Successful restoration if this species includes Pending GWNF review of
minimizing disturbance to shale barren habitat, survey results and
controlling invasive and noxious weeds, and limiting conservation measures
encroachment of woody vegetation (NatureServe,
2015). Construction activities would remove shale
barren habitat, which would degrade or make habitat
unsuitable for this species. If present within the
construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of
invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Virginia White-haired 3 G3/S3 Barrens, cliffs, and open, rocky
Leatherflower woodlands on shale, limestone,
Clematis coactilis dolomite, and calcareous sandstone
(Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Species not observed during surveys.
Bentleys Coralroot LE 3 G2/S2 Dry-mesic to mesic forests, especially
Corallorhiza bentleyi by roadsides. Rare in the mountains
(Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Species not observed during surveys.
R-36
Glade Spurge - 3 G3/S2 Rich cove and floodplain forests,
Euphorbia purpurea boulder fields, montane oak-hickory
forests, seeps, and seepage swamps;
usually in habitats over calcareous or
mafic rocks (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016). Species not
observed during surveys.
White Alumroot 3 G2Q/S1 Moist shale roadside banks, acid rock
Heuchera alba and calcareous outcrops, mossy talus
slopes, and on high summits from
3,250 to 3,920 feet (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016; NatureServe,
2015). Species not observed during
surveys.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove barren habitat, Pending GWNF review of
which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for survey results and
this species; however, because this species is also conservation measures
known to occur in openings, the permanent right-of-
way could create additional suitable habitat. If present
within the construction right-of-way, individuals would
be killed. Construction activities could also potentially
introduce or encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Atlantic would implement the COM
Plan (see appendix G) and Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore the
right-of-way, and would implement the Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
control the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
Construction activities would remove rock outcrop Pending GWNF review of
habitat, which would degrade or make habitat survey results and
unsuitable for this species. If present within the conservation measures
construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of
invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)
RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present?
Butternut - 3 G4/S3? Optimal growth occurs on well-drained
Juglans cinerea soils of bottomlands and floodplains.
Found in rich mesophytic forests,
lower slopes, ravines, and various
types of bottomland (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016; NatureServe,
2015). Species not observed during
surveys.
Hellers Blazing Star - 3 GU/S3 Dry, rocky woodlands, barrens,
outcrops, and clearings, at middle to
R-37
Liatris helleri
high elevations; occur on both acidic
and base-rich substrates (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016). Species
not observed during surveys.
Carolina Saxifrage - 3 G3/S3 Moist or dry, shaded, mostly
Micranthes sedimentary rock outcrops and cliffs,
caroliniana often under overhangs or on faces
with periodic seepage (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016). Species
not observed during surveys.
Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Construction activities would remove floodplain habitat, Pending GWNF review of
which would degrade or make habitat unsuitable for survey results and
this species however, because this species is known to conservation measures
benefit from the creation of canopy gaps and some
form of disturbance (NatureServe, 2015), the
permanent right-of-way could create additional suitable
habitat. If present within the construction right-of-way,
individuals would be killed. Construction activities
could also potentially introduce or encourage the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F)
to restore the right-of-way, and would implement the
Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table
2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. This species is primarily threatened by the
spread of a canker fungus (NatureServe, 2015).
Construction activities would remove woodland and Pending GWNF review of
barren habitat, which would degrade or make habitat survey results and
unsuitable for this species; however, because this conservation measures
species is also known to occur in clearings, the
permanent right-of-way could create additional suitable
habitat. If present within the construction right-of-way,
individuals would be killed. Construction activities
could also potentially introduce or encourage the
spread of invasive and noxious plants. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F)
to restore the right-of-way, and would implement the
Invasive Plant Species Management Plan (see table
2.3.1-1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants.
Construction activities would remove rock outcrop Pending GWNF review of
habitat, which would degrade or make habitat survey results and
unsuitable for this species. If present within the conservation measures
construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of
invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Sweet Pinesap - 3 G3/S3 Mesic to dry upland forests, typically This species is cryptic and very difficult to detect during Pending GWNF review of
Monotropsis odorata in acidic humus under oaks, pines, or surveys. The potential impacts and conservation survey results and
ericaceous shrubs, but occasionally in measures for this species are the same as described conservation measures
base-rich soils (Virginia Botanical above for the Trailing White Monkshood.
Associates, 2016). Species not
observed during surveys.
Sword-leaf Phlox - 3 G2/S2 Dry open forests, woodlands, forest The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Phlox buckleyi edges, clearings, and road banks on this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
shale and metasiltstone (Virginia Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
Botanical Associates, 2016). Species
not observed during surveys.
Bog Bluegrass - 3 G3/S2 Found in shaded seeps and seepage Atlantic would impact 0.1 acre of wetland habitat within Pending GWNF review of
Poa paludigena swamps, usually over calcareous or the GWNF. Construction activities would remove survey results and
mafic rocks (Virginia Botanical wetland habitat, which would degrade or make habitat conservation measures
Associates, 2016). Species not unsuitable for this species. If present within the
observed during surveys. construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
R-38

plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see

appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of
invasive and noxious plants.
Torreys Mountain- - 3 G2/S2 Dry, rocky or sandy woodlands and The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
mint clearings; calcareous fens, occurs in this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
Pycnanthemum both extremely acidic and basic soils Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
torreyi (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2016).
Species not observed during surveys.
Rock Skullcap - 3 G3/S3 Mesic to dry rocky forests and boulder The potential impacts and conservation measures for Pending GWNF review of
Scutellaria saxatilis fields; occasionally in cove forests and this species are the same as described above for the survey results and
on stream banks. Frequent in the Trailing White Monkshood. conservation measures
mountains (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016). Species not
observed during surveys.
 TABLE R-2 (contd)

RFSS with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest, Virginia
VA OAR Global Rank/
Species Status a Rank b State Rank c Suitable Habitat or Species Present? Potential Impacts and Conservation Measures Determination of Effects
Mountain Least - 3 G3T2/S2 Montane populations are on acid Atlantic would impact 0.1 acre of wetland habitat within Pending GWNF review of
Trillium ridgecrests and in mafic fen (Virginia the GWNF. Construction activities would remove survey results and
Trillium pusillum var. Botanical Associates, 2016). wetland habitat, which would degrade or make habitat conservation measures
monticulum unsuitable for this species. If present within the
construction right-of-way, individuals would be killed.
Construction activities could also potentially introduce
or encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G) and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement the Invasive Plant Species Management
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control the spread of
invasive and noxious plants.
____________________
a
LE =State Listed Endangered, LT=State Listed Threatened. VA Status is based on Roble, 2016 and Townsend, 2016.

b
OAR Rank: 1 = Analysis Area is outside a known species range, 2 = Lack of suitable habitat in the Analysis Area, 3 = Habitat present, but species not found in Analysis
Area, 4 = Species occur in Analysis Area, but outside of area where ground disturbance would occur, 5 = Field survey located species in the activity areas, 6 = Species not
R-39

seen during survey, but possibly occur in the activity area based on suitable habitat, 7 = Aquatic species or habitat known downstream of project or activity area, but
outside identified geographic bounds of water resource effects area, 8 = Aquatic species known or assumed to be downstream of project or activity area and within
identified geographic bounds of water resource cumulative effects analysis area, 9 = Federally listed mussel and/or fish species known in the 6th level watershed of the
Analysis Area.
c
Global/State Conservation Rank: Conservation status ranks are based on a one to five scale, ranging from critically imperiled (G1) to demonstrably secure (G5). Status is
assessed and documented at three distinct geographic scales-global (G), national (N), and state/province (S). Global/State Conservation Rank: G1 = Critically imperiled -
At very high risk of extinction due to extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer populations), very steep declines, or other factors; G2 = Imperiled - At high risk of extinction or elimination
due to very restricted range, very few populations, steep declines, or other factors; G3 = Vulnerable - At moderate risk of extinction or elimination due to a restricted range,
relatively few populations, recent and widespread declines, or other factors; G4 = Apparently Secure - Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to
declines or other factors; G5 = Secure - Common; widespread and abundant; GU = Unranked; Q = Questionable Taxonomy taxonomic distinctiveness of this entity at the
current level is questionable; T = Infraspecific Taxon for example, subspecies or variety; ? = Inexact Numeric Rank. State Rank (Birds): S_B: breeding status; these
species typically inhabit the state only during the breeding season, S_B,S_N: breeding and non-breeding status when they differ; SH= Possibly Extirpated from State. Global
Rank is based on NatureServe, 2015 and State Rank is based on Roble, 2016 and Townsend, 2016.

Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat
Name) Description
MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST AND GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST
Eastern Wild Turkey MNF: High-interest game species.
Meleagris gallopavo GWNF: High-interest game species. Indicative of
effective management of this species in meeting
public demand for harvest.
Inhabits forest and open woodland, scrub oak,
deciduous or mixed-deciduous-coniferous areas,
especially in mountainous regions. Feeds on
seeds, nuts, fruits, grains, buds, young grass
blades, insects, and small vertebrates
(NatureServe, 2015).
Wild Brook Trout MNF: High-interest game fish, and top level
Salvelinus fontinalis predator. Population effects reflect an integration
of effects to water quality and stream conditions in
aquatic habitats influenced by the management
on National Forest System Lands.
R-40
GWNF: High-interest game fish, and top level
predator. Indicative of successful management in
mitigating the acidication of streams and meeting
public demand for harvest of this species.
Found in clear, cool, well-oxygenated creeks,
small to medium rivers, and lakes (NatureServe,
2015).
TABLE R-3
Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
and/or Operation
Temporary modification of habitat and habitat
loss, reduction in food availability; potential
direct mortality associated with collisions with
construction vehicles or equipment; disturbance
during construction. This species may benefit
from openings and clearings; forest thinning,
prescribed burning, and grazing have shown an
increase in suitable habitat (NatureServe,
2015). After restoration is complete, the
permanent right-of-way may provide additional
habitat for this species.
Waterbody crossings and access road
construction and improvements would
temporarily degrade water quality through
increased sedimentation and turbidity during
construction, reduced fish passage, potential
mortality during fish relocation efforts,
disturbance, changes in hydrology, and
disturbance and injury from blasting (see
section 4.6 for additional discussion).
Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing shade
increase localized water temperatures.
Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Atlantic would conduct restoration as outlined
in the COM Plan (see appendix G) and
construction and restoration plans (see table
2.3.1-1). Impacts on this species would be
temporary; once construction is complete
additional habitat would be available. With the
implementation of these conservation
measures, ACP is not anticipated to have
significant long-term, adverse effects on this
species or its habitat.
Atlantic would cross the unnamed tributary to
Slaty Fork on the MNF, which is a CWF HQS
supporting trout species. On the GWNF, Atlantic
would cross 26 trout streams that are known or
have potential to contain wild brook trout. Atlantic
would adhere to the WVDNR TOYR of
September 15 to March 31 for HQS on the MNF,
and the VDGIF TOYR for brown and brook trout
in the GWNF of October 1 to March 31, or
coordinate with the appropriate agencies if
Atlantic cannot adhere to this TOYR. Atlantic
would also implement the measures in the COM
Plan (see appendix G) and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of hazardous
chemicals, and to restore riparian habitats. The
GWNF has expressed concern about the
proposed crossings of these waterbodies, in
particular the numerous crossings of Laurel Run
and the proposed access road that runs parallel
to Laurel Run within its riparian corridor. This
alignment is inconsistent with Forest Plan
standards and BMPs related to soil and water
(FS, 2016d). Atlantic committed to eliminate the
access road along Laurel Run, and is in the
process of re-evaluating proposed stream
crossings in the GWNF relative to Forest Plan
standards and BMPs. Conclusion pending
updated route through the GWNF and
sedimentation analysis.
 TABLE R-3 (contd)
Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat
Name) Description
MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST
West Virginia Northern High interest endangered species. Associated
Flying Squirrel with certain late successional characteristics in
Glaucomys sabrinus mature spruce forest. Forest Standards require
fuscus that suitable habitat for this species be identified
and considered occupied. Objective WF11 is to
maintain at least 20,000 acres of mid-late and late
successional (>80 years old) spruce forest to
provide optimum habitat for West Virginia
northern flying squirrel. The long-term objective is
to increase mid-late and late successional spruce
forest to at least 40,000 acres.
Cerulean Warbler High-interest non-game species. Associated with
Setophaga cerulean large trees, gaps, and complex canopy layering
characteristic of old-growth forests. Forest interior
species sensitive to fragmentation. Forest Plan
Objective WF09 is to maintain at 50,000 acres of
R-41
mid-late and late successional (>80 years old)
mixed mesophytic and cove forest to meet habitat
needs for cerulean warbler. Current >80 year-old
mixed mesophytic and cove forest is estimated at
around 320,000 acres.
GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST
Beaver Indicative of successful wetland restoration
Castor canadensis efforts.
Inhabit permanent sources of water of almost any
type; prefer low gradient streams, ponds, and
small mud-bottomed lakes with dimmable outlets
(NatureServe, 2015).
Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
and/or Operation
The ACP mainline construction workspace
does not cross suitable habitat for the West
Virginia northern flying squirrel; however, a
proposed access road on NFS lands near
Gibson Knob would require clearing of red
spruce trees.
Construction of the ACP would remove 90.6
acres of mixed forest habitat within the MNF;
a smaller percentage of this habitat would
likely be old growth. Removal of this habitat
would also contribute to habitat fragmentation
and degradation. Construction would cause
disturbance and potential mortality due to
collision with construction vehicles or
equipment.
Removal and degradation of habitat,
fragmentation of wildlife corridors, and
disturbance to beaver, potential injury or
mortality associated with collision with
construction vehicles or equipment. The ACP
would not occur at the sites where this
species is currently being monitored by the
GWNF.
Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Atlantic is currently working with the MNF to
finalize the conservation measures for the
proposed access road that would impact
suitable habitat for this species. Atlantic would
realign the access road to minimize direct
impacts on red spruce trees, and would
relocate red spruce saplings that would be to
adjacent NFS areas prior to grading.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the MNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and COM Plan
(see appendix G). Pending updated vegetation
impacts based on field survey data and
according to the MNF vegetation classification,
and analysis of impacts on old growth
component.
Altantic would impact 0.1 acre of wetlands
within the GWNF, and would implement
measures in the COM Plan (appendix G), and
construction and restoration plans (see table
2.3.1-1) when crossing wetlands and restoring
the right-of-way. Atlantic committed to low
speed limits on all ACP access roads to
minimize wildlife collisions. Based on the
limited amount of wetlands and natural pond
habitats that would be removed within the
GWNF, ACP is not anticipated to have
significant long-term, adverse effects on this
species or its habitat.
 TABLE R-3 (contd)
Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat
Name) Description
White-tailed Deer High-interest game species. Indicative of
Odocoileus virginianus effective management of this species in meeting
public demand for harvest.
Occupy many types of habitat in mountains and in
lowlands, including various forests, woodlands,
forest edges, shrublands, grasslands with shrubs,
and residential areas (NatureServe, 2015).
Black Bear High-interest game species. Indicative of
Ursus americanus effective management of this species in meeting
public demand for harvest.
In habitat forests and nearby openings, including
forested wetlands. Prefer mixed forests with a
thick understory. The occupy dens under fallen
R-42
trees, tree cavities, hollow logs, underground
caves, or dense cover when they are inactive
(NatureServe, 2015).
Pileated Woodpecker Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Dryocopus pileatus habitat conditions relative to abundance of snags
within mature, old growth forest types.
Prefers dense deciduous forests in the southeast,
but also found in coniferous or mixed forests.
Prefers woods with a tall closed canopy and a
high basal area. Nests in cavities and feeds on
insects, especially carpenter ants and beetle
larvae, fruits, and seeds (NatureServe, 2015).
Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
and/or Operation
Removal and degradation of habitat,
fragmentation of wildlife corridors, and
disturbance to foraging deer, potential injury
or mortality associated with collision with
construction vehicles or equipment. Based on
this species preference for early successional
habitat, Atlantic may create additional suitable
habitat for this species within the permanently
maintained right-of-way.
Removal and degradation of habitat,
fragmentation of wildlife corridors, and
disturbance to foraging bears, potential injury
or mortality associated with collision with
construction vehicles or equipment.
Construction would cause permanent loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting woodpeckers.
Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Altantic would implement the measures in the
COM Plan (see appendix G) and construction
and restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to
restore the right-of-way. Atlantic committed to
maintaining low speed limits on all ACP access
roads to minimize wildlife collisions. Based on
the short-term nature of impacts on deer
habitat, and potential to create additional
foraging habitat following construction, the ACP
is not anticipated to have significant long-term,
adverse effects on this species or its habitat.
Altantic would implement the measures in the
COM Plan (see appendix G) and construction
and restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to
restore the right-of-way. Atlantic committed to
maintaining low speed limits on all ACP access
roads to minimize wildlife collisions. Impacts
associated with construction activities are
anticipated to be temporary, and based on the
limited amount of habitat removal relative to the
available habitat in the surrounding area, the
ACP is not anticipated to have significant long-
term, adverse effects on this species or its
habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of mature forest and snags
that would be removed within the GWNF (see
table 4.8.9-5), the ACP is not anticipated to
have significant long-term, adverse effects on
this species or its habitat.
 TABLE R-3 (contd)
Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat
Name) Description
Acadian Flycatcher Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Empidonax virescens conditions within mature riparian habitats.
Moist deciduouds forests with moderate
understory, generally near a stream. Prefers large
forests tracts (NatureServe, 2015).
Eastern Towhee Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Pipilo erythrophthalmus conditions within early successional habitats.
Inhabits forest and swamp edges, regenerating
clearcuts, open-canopied forests, mid-late
successional fields, riparian thickets, overgrown
fencerows, shrub/small-tree thickets, and other
brushy habitat (NatureServe, 2015).
R-43
Scarlet Tanager Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Piranga olivacea conditions within drier mid- and late-successional
oak and oak-pine forest habitats.
Breeds in deciduous forest and mature deciduous
woodland, including deciduous and mixed swamp
and floodplain forests and rich moist upland
forests, typically where oak is dominant. Common
in relatively closed canopy with high diversity of
shrubs, and sparse ground cover. They are able
to successfully breed in small forest patches
(NatureServe, 2015).
Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
and/or Operation
Construction would cause permanent loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting flycatchers. Because this
is a forest interior species, habitat
fragmentation would also contribute to loss of
habitat loss and increased risk of parasitism
and predation.
Construction would cause temporary loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting towhees. Based on this
species preference for early successional
habitat, Atlantic may create additional suitable
habitat for this species within the permanently
maintained right-of-way.
Construction would cause permanent loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting tanagers.
Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of mature riparian forest that
would be removed within the GWNF, the ACP
is not anticipated to have significant long-term,
adverse effects on this species or its habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). In
addition, Atlantic committed to conducting
maintenance mowing outside of the nesting
season during operations. Based on the short-
term nature of impacts on towhee habitat, and
potential to create additional habitat following
construction, the ACP is not anticipated to have
significant long-term, adverse effects on this
species or its habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of oak and oak-pine forest
that would be removed within the GWNF, the
ACP is not anticipated to have significant long-
term, adverse effects on this species or its
habitat.
 TABLE R-3 (contd)
Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat
Name) Description
Ovenbird Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Seiurus aurocapilla conditions relative to interior forest habitat within
mature mesic deciduous forests. This species is
sensitive to forest fragmentation.
Breeds in mid- to late-successional closed-
canopied deciduous or mixed forests with deep
leaf litter and limited understory. Ground-nesting
bird; generally found absent in regenerating
clearcuts (NatureServe, 2015).
Hooded Warbler Indicative of successful maintenance of providing
Setophaga citrina dense understory and mid-story structure within
mature mesic deciduous forests.
Nests in the understory of deciduous forests,
especially along streams and ravine edges, and
thickets in riverine forests. Inhabits yound and
mature forest, but is more abundant in mature
R-44
forests (NatureServe, 2015).
Chestnut-sided Warbler Indicative of successful maintenance of desired
Setophaga pensylvanica conditions within high elevation early successional
habitats.
Inhabits second-growth thickets of deciduous
trees and shrubs, orchards, pasturelands, forest
edges, cut-over forests, roadsides, open
deciduous woodlands, and powerline corridors
(NatureServe, 2015).
Pine Warbler Indicative of successful maintenance of mature
Setophaga pinus pine forests.
Strongly associated with pine and pine-hardwood
forests during breeding and winter seasons.
Adapts well to pine plantations (NatureServe,
2015).
Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
and/or Operation
Construction would cause permanent loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting ovenbirds. Because this is
a forest interior species, habitat fragmentation
would also contribute to loss of habitat loss
and increased risk of parasitism and
predation.
Construction would cause permanent loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting warblers. Because this is
a forest interior species, habitat fragmentation
would also contribute to loss of habitat loss
and increased risk of parasitism and
predation.
Construction would cause temporary loss of
nesting and foraging habitat, and if present,
disturbance, removal of the nest, and potential
mortality of nesting warblers. Based on this
species preference for early successional
habitat, Atlantic may create additional suitable
habitat for this species within the permanently
maintained right-of-way.
Construction would cause loss of nesting and
foraging habitat, and if present, disturbance,
removal of the nest, and potential mortality of
nesting warblers.
Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of mature mesic deciduous
forest that would be removed within the GWNF,
the ACP is not anticipated to have significant
long-term, adverse effects on this species or its
habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of mature mesic deciduous
forest that would be removed within the GWNF,
the ACP is not have significant long-term,
adverse effects on this species or its habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). In
addition, Atlantic committed to conducting
maintenance mowing outside of the nesting
season during operations. Based on the short-
term nature of impacts on warbler habitat, and
potential to create additional habitat following
construction, the ACP is not anticipated to have
significant long-term, adverse effects on this
species or its habitat.
Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory
birds in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory
Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan
(see appendix G), and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Based on
the limited amount of pine forest that would be
removed within the GWNF, the ACP is not
anticipated to have significant long-term,
adverse effects on this species or its habitat.
 TABLE R-3 (contd)

Management Indicator Species in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area with Potential Habitat or Populations
within the Monongahela National Forest and George Washington National Forest
Forest/Species (Scientific MIS / Forest Plan Objectives and Habitat Potential Impacts from ACP Construction
Name) Description and/or Operation Conservation Measures and Conclusion
Cow Knob Salamander Indicative of successful management activities Construction activities would contribute to Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
Plethodon punctatus designed specifically to meet conservation habitat loss and degradation of potentially appendix G), and Rehabilitation and
objectives for this species. Standards and suitable habitat. Restoration Plan (see appendix F) to restore
desired conditions for this species limit the right-of-way. No direct impacts on
development within cow knob salamander individuals. Conclusion pending GWNF review
suitable habitat, and limit activies that could cause of survey results and conservation measures.
fragmentation, isolation, edge effects, and
invasion of non-native species.
Found at high elevations in mixed deciduous
forest interspersed with Virginia pine and hemlock
and numerous rock outcrops. Most abundant in
old-growth forests with many downed logs and
abundant surface rocks, including talus
(NatureServe, 2015; VDGIF, 2016k). Field survey
confirmed that suitable habitat occurs on Tower
Hill Mountain and on Gum Tree Hill within areas
with high concentrations of rock cover. No
individuals were detected.
R-45

____________________
Sources: USDA 2011 and 2014
 TABLE R-4

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
MAMMALS
Northern River Otter All Counties Semi-aquatic species that There are 45 pipeline and access road Impacts on water quality would be limited to the
Lontra canadensis Crossed occurs in riparian areas; also waterbody crossings on the GWNF (some time needed to construct the waterbody crossing.
lataxina require some heavy cover waterbodies may be crossed more than Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
(VDGIF, 2016b). once), including 29 perennial waterbody appendix G), which includes sediment and erosion
crossings. All mainline waterbody control measures for both the waterbody crossings
crossings would be dry crossings (i.e., and access roads. Impacts on forested riparian
dam and pump or flume). Potential habitat would be long term to permanent; however,
impacts would include short- to long-term these impacts would be localized and adjacent
removal of riparian habitat, short-term habitat would be available. Impacts on herbaceous
increase in sedimentation and changes to and shrub-scrub riparian habitat would be short- to
hydrology, and potential short-term long-term depending on the species. Atlantic
disturbance to foraging habitat and would adhere to the GWNF waterbody buffer
species. Potential mortality or injury from requirements, which vary in extent depending upon
construction equipment could occur; the waterbody classification and slope, to mitigate
however, it is anticipated that river otters potential effects from ground-disturbing activities
would move out of the construction area. (see section 4.3).
Fisher Highland, Bath, Originally occurred in both red Impacts include habitat loss and If present, construction and operation of ACP
R-46

Martes pennanti Augusta spruce and mixed hardwood
pennanti forests in Virginia; survives
best in extensive forest and
wilderness areas. Found in
high closed canopy spruce-fir,
cedar, spruce-aspen, alder,
pine, and oak-hickory forests.
This species avoids open
areas with no overhead cover
(VDGIF, 2016b).
Least Weasel Highland, Bath, Edge of marshes, grasslands,
Mustela nivalis Augusta, Nelson, open forests and woodlands,
allegheniensis Buckingham open grasslands, pastures,
forest edges, and residential
and urban environments
(VDGIF, 2016b).
fragmentation, and introduction of barriers
to wildlife corridors. The construction and
permanent right-of-way would create an
open area, which this species would likely
avoid. By fragmenting continuously
forested habitat, it may also reduce
available foraging habitat. There is
potential for mortality or injury during
construction; however, it is anticipated that
fishers would move out of the construction
area.
Impacts would include short term removal
of habitat and disturbance. There is
potential for mortality or injury during
construction; however, it is anticipated that
fishers would move out of the construction
area.
would result in permanent habitat loss and
fragmentation of forested habitat. Although woody
species would be allowed to regenerate within the
construction right-of-way, the permanent right-of-
way would be maintained clear of tree and shrub
species.
This species is found in a variety of habitats,
including grasslands and forest edges. After
completion of construction, the construction right-
of-way would be restored as outlined in the COM
Plan (see appendix G), and least weasels could
occupy this habitat.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Allegheny Woodrat Highland, Bath, Blue Ridge to the wet in Direct loss of habitat and habitat Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
Neotoma magister Augusta wooded bottomlands, banks, fragmentation. Fragmentation isolates appendix G) to control sediment erosion and
caves, and cliffs (VDGIF, populations and eliminates access to food restore the right-of-way. Atlantic is currently
2016l). Field surveys sources. Loss of foraging plants consulting with the GWNF regarding this species.
documented four rock outcrops (American chestnut [Quercus prinus]).
that are potentially suitable for Sedimentation during construction could
woodrat; and a woodrat latrine fill underground crevices used as habitat.
was documented where
Allegheny woodrat presence is
assumed.
BIRDS
Coopers Hawk All Counties Nests in a wide variety of Impacts would include long term to Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory birds
Accipter cooperii Crossed / forest types, including riverine permanent removal of nesting habitat. in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
uncommon woodlands. Forages in areas Construction could disturb nesting hawks (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan (see
permanent mixed with forests and if it occurs during the nesting season, and appendix G), and construction and restoration
resident openings. Winters in mostly potentially result in loss of nest and eggs. plans (see table 2.3.1-1). In areas where clearining
mixed forests or pine woods; Following construction, the permanent outside of the nesting season is not possible,
nests in trees and feeds on right-of-way could be used as foraging Atlantic committed to implementing activity buffers
R-47

birds. (VDGIF, 2016b).
Sharp-Shinned Hawk All Counties Prefers open woodland, edges
Accipter striatus Crossed / of woods, clearings,
velox uncommon and hedgerows, bushy pastures,
permanent and shorelines. More
resident; common frequently found in conifers in
during spring and low elevations and in
fall migration deciduous trees at high
elevations. Prefers matures
forests and stream habitats for
nesting; nests in trees and
feeds on birds (VDGIF,
2016b).
habitat. around active nests, where possible (locations
pending). Impacts on forested habitat would be
long term to permanent; however, these impacts
would be localized and adjacent habitat would be
available. Atlantic could create additional foraging
habitat within the permanent right-of-way following
construction.
Impacts would include short- to long-term The conservation measures for this species are the
impacts on foraging habitat, and long-term same as described above for the Coopers Hawk.
to permanent removal of nesting habitat.
Construction could disturb nesting hawks
if it occurs during the nesting season, and
potentially result in loss of nest and eggs.
Following construction, the permanent
right-of-way could be used as foraging
habitat.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Northern Saw-Whet Highland, Bath, Blue Ridge and mountains Call surveys were conducted on GWNF The conservation measures for this species are the
Owl Augusta, west of Shenandoah River. and no northern saw-whet owls were same as described above for the Coopers Hawk.
Aegolius acadicus Cumberland / High elevation, mature, audibly or visually detected. Impacts
probable breeder coniferous forests, sometimes would include long term to permanent
at high elevations mixed or deciduous forest, with removal of nesting, foraging, and wintering
in western open understory, and riverside habitat. Construction could disturb nesting
Virginia; rare habitat nearby. Wooded hawks if it occurs during the nesting
transient and habitat includes coniferous season, and potentially result in loss of
winter visitor swamps, disturbed deciduous nest and eggs. Following construction,
statewide; rare woods, savannas, riverside the permanent right-of-way could be used
and local summer forest, and shrub-steppe as foraging habitat.
resident at higher habitat; nests in tree cavities
elevations. and feeds on small mammals
(CLO, 2016b).
Golden Eagle Highland, Build nests on cliffs or in the Although golden eagles were not Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory birds
Aquila chrysaetos Augusta, Nelson / largest trees of forested observed along the route during the in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
sub-population of stands. Avoid nesting near nesting season within the GWNF, they (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan (see
200-1,000 urban habitat or densely were observed outside the GWNF and appendix G), and construction and restoration
R-48

individuals winter forested habitat; feeds
in Virginia. primarily on small mammals,
but is capable of taking large
prey such as cranes, wild
ungulates, and domestic
livestock (FWS, 2011j).
Golden eagle surveys were
conducted in the GWNF
between March 5-8, 2016 and
no eagles were observed.
there is a potential for wintering golden
eagles to occur in the ACP project area
along the Allegheny and Blue Ridge
Mountains. Telemetry data collected from
2006-2015 identified 54,382 telemetry
locations concentrated on high ridges
throughout the GWNF. Construction
activities could disturb golden eagles in
their winter habitat. Disturbances near
areas that are important for roosting or
foraging can stress eagles to a degree
that leads to reproductive failure or
mortality elsewhere (FWS, 2011j).
plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Atlantic committed to
having a qualified biological monitor walk ahead of
clearing crews and search for golden eagles. If
golden eagle nests or occupied golden eagle winter
roosting habitat are identified ahead of or during
construction, Atlantic would stop work and notify
the FWS within 24 hours. Impacts and
conservation measures related to golden eagles
are described in more detail in in section 4.5.3.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Hermit Thrush All Counties Breeds in lowlands, wooded Impacts would include long term to Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory birds
Catharus guttatus Crossed / swamps, and damp forests, permanent removal of nesting, foraging, in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
common transient and uplands in dry brushy and wintering habitat. Construction could (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan (see
and uncommon clearings in coniferous or disturb nesting thrush if it occurs during appendix G), and construction and restoration
winter resident; mixed forests. Winters in the nesting season, and potentially result plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Impacts on forested
rare and local borders of winter swamps in in loss of nest and eggs. habitat would be long term to permanent; however,
summer resident thick hummocks where there these impacts would be localized and adjacent
at higher are plentiful fruits; ground- habitat would be available. Atlantic committed to
elevations. nesting and forages on insects, conducting maintenance of the permanent right-of-
Breeding occurs small amphibians and reptiles, way outside of the migratory bird nesting season.
in Highland and fruits (VDGIF, 2016b). Atlantic also committed to incorporate regionally-
County. specific and native forb seeds based on GWNF
consultation in its traditionally all-grass seed mix
during restoration.
Brown Creeper All Counties Breeds in dense coniferous, Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Certhia americana Crossed / deciduous, or mixed permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
uncommon to woodlands, wooded swamps and wintering habitat. Construction could
common transient with standing dead trees and disturb nesting creepers if it occurs during
R-49

and winter visitor; loose bark; nests and forages the nesting season, and potentially result
rare summer insects on trees, also forages in loss of nest and eggs.
resident at higher on seeds and other plant
elevations. material (VDGIF, 2016b).
Sedge Wren Augusta, Bath / Breeds in sedge meadows, ACP would have limited impacts on Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory birds
Cistothorus platenis rare transient; and shallow sedge marshes wetlands (0.1 acre). Impacts would include in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
rare and irregular with scattered shrubs and little short term removal of nesting, foraging, (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan (see
summer to no standing water. Winters and wintering habitat. Construction could appendix G), and construction and restoration
visitor/resident; in drier portions of fresh disturb nesting wrens if it occurs during plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Impacts on herbaceous
nomadic breeder; marshes; nests in shrubs and the nesting season, and potentially result habitat would be short term and localized. Atlantic
breeding occurs in tall sedges or grasses and is in loss of nest and eggs. may potentially create additional breeding habitat
Augusta and Bath an insectivore. Very limited in within the permanent right-of-way following
Counties. available habitat in Virginia construction. Atlantic also committed to conducting
(VDGIF, 2016b). maintenance of the permanent right-of-way outside
of the migratory bird nesting season. Atlantic also
committed to incorporate regionally-specific and
native forb seeds based on GWNF consultation in
its traditionally all-grass seed mix during
restoration.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Olive-Sided Highland / rare Breeds in coniferous (spruce) Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Flycatcher transient forests near edges and permanent removal of nesting and same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
Contopus cooperi statewide, clearings, often along wooded foraging habitat. Construction could
possible breeder streams and borders of disturb nesting flycatchers if it occurs
in extreme northern bogs and muskegs, during the nesting season, and potentially
northern Virginia burned over areas with a few result in loss of nest and eggs.
along border with dead trees for perches. Prefers
West Virginia, to be near water. Mainly found
mostly above in spruce-fir forest areas with
5,000 feet. dead trees and openings;
nests in trees and is an
insectivore (especially bees)
(VDGIF, 2016b).
Mourning Warbler Highland, Bath, Breeds in dense underbrush of Impacts would include short term to long Atlantic would adhere to TOYR for migratory birds
Geothlypis Augusta / rare the edge of lowland swamp or term removal of nesting and foraging in the GWNF as outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
philadelphia transient; rare bog, bushy hillsides, forest habitat. Construction could disturb nesting (see table 2.3.1-1) and the COM Plan (see
summer resident clearings grown to brambles, warblers if it occurs during the nesting appendix G), and construction and restoration
in Highland, Bath, and shrubs and saplings. season, and potentially result in loss of plans (see table 2.3.1-1). Impacts on shrub-scrub
R-50

and western Prefers blackberry thickets; nest and eggs. habitat would be short- to long-term depending on
Augusta Counties. ground nesting bird and the species. These impacts would be localized and
forages on insects and fruits adjacent habitat would be available. This species
(VDGIF, 2016b). occupies forest clearings grown to brambles;
therefore, the ACP has the potential to create
suitable habitat for this species through
regeneration of the cleared right-of-way.
Red Crossbill Highland, Bath, Breeds and winters in Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Loxia curvirostra Augusta / rare coniferous forests; permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
and irregular occasionally winters in and wintering habitat. Construction could
transient and hardwood forests; tree nesting disturb nesting crossbill if it occurs during
winter visitor; rare bird that forages on conifer the nesting season, and potentially result
and irregular seeds (VDGIF, 2016b). in loss of nest and eggs.
summer resident
at high elevations
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Swamp Sparrow All Counties Breeds in marshes, swamps, ACP would have limited impacts on The conservation measures for this species are the
Melospiza georgiana Crossed / bogs, sloughs with bushes, wetlands (0.1 acre). Impacts would include same as described above for the Sedge Wren.
uncommon to rank grasses, sedges or reeds, short term removal of nesting, foraging,
locally common low swampy shores of lakes and wintering habitat. Construction could
transient and and streambanks, usually near disturb nesting sparrows if it occurs during
uncommon to rare fresh water. Prefer high the nesting season, and potentially result
winter resident; elevation bogs for breeding; in loss of nest and eggs.
rare summer winter in fresh waters with
resident in herbaceous cover; nests in
Highland County. shrubs and tall grasses and
forages on seeds, fruits, and
aquatic vegetation (VDGIF,
2016b).
Nashville Warbler All Counties Breeds in moist open Impacts would include short term, long- The conservation measures for this species are the
Oreothlypis Crossed / rare to deciduous woods, overgrown term to permanent removal of nesting, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
ruficapilla uncommon pastures and fields, swampy foraging, and wintering habitat. Atlantic may potentially create additional breeding
transient; rare and areas, edges of woodlands, Construction could disturb nesting habitat within the permanent right-of-way following
local summer and clearings with young warblers if it occurs during the nesting construction. Atlantic also committed to conducting
R-51

resident in Bath, secondary growth, especially season, and potentially result in loss of maintenance of the permanent right-of-way outside
Augusta, and young trees 10-12 feet in nest and eggs. of the migratory bird nesting season.
Highland Counties height. Found mainly in small-
to medium sized spruce or fir
trees along edges of high
elevation bogs and edges of
spruce-fir forests. Prefers
forest openings above 4,000
feet; ground-nesting bird that
forages on insects and insect
larvae (VDGIF, 2016b).
Nothern Waterthrush All Counties Breeds in wooded swamps ACP would have limited impacts on The conservation measures for this species are the
Parkesia Crossed / and bogs and less frequently wetlands (0.1 acre). Impacts would include same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
noveborarcensis uncommon occurs along woodland brooks long term to permanent removal of
transient; rare and or streams and swampy nesting, foraging, and wintering habitat.
local summer wooded shores of pond or Construction could disturb nesting
resident at higher lakes; ground-nesting bird that waterthrush if it occurs during the nesting
elevations; forages on insects, snails, and season, and potentially result in loss of
summer residency occasionally small fish (VDGIF, nest and eggs.
recorded in 2016b).
Highland County.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Cerulean Warbler All Counties Favors open stands of tall Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Setophaga cerulea Crossed / trees along riverbanks or permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit
uncommon to dense deciduous forests with and wintering habitat. Construction could Thrush.This species may respond well to
locally common little undergrowth. Always disturb nesting warblers if it occurs during disturbances that can contribute to gaps in the
transient and found in mature hardwoods; the nesting season, and potentially result canopy; therefore, ACP has the potential to create
summer resident; nests in trees and forages on in loss of nest and eggs. suitable habitat for this species through regular
rare local summer insects and plant material maintenance of the right-of-way.
resident near Blue (VDGIF, 2016b).
Ridge and
mountains farther
west.
Blackburnian Highland, Bath, Breeds in mature conifer Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Warbler Augusta, Nelson / forests (spruce-fir, hemlock) in permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
Setophaga fusca rare to uncommon northern areas; prefers and wintering habitat. Construction could
transient; ridgetop oak forests with disturb nesting warblers if it occurs during
uncommon closed canopies mixed with the nesting season, and potentially result
summer resident conifers in Southern in loss of nest and eggs.
above 1,600 feet Appalachians. Most prevalent
R-52

elevation. above 3,500 feet and occurs

less frequently down to 1,600
feet elevation; nests in trees
and forages on insects and
spiders (VDGIF, 2016b).
Magnolia Warbler All Counties Nests in low conifers, hemlock, Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Setophaga magnolia Crossed / larch, spurce, and fir. Favors permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
uncommon spring spruce or fir forests of both and wintering habitat. Construction could
and common fall mature and fairly young disturb nesting warblers if it occurs during
transient east of stands. Also found around the nesting season, and potentially result
the Blue Ridge; bogs with spruce and fir in loss of nest and eggs.
common transient present. May occur in mixed
and common forests; rarely occurs in
resident and hemlocks and avoids pure
breeder in hardwood forests; nests in
northwest trees and forages on insect
Highland County. larvae, adult insects, and
Rare to spiders (VDGIF, 2016b).
uncommon at
other high
elevations.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Yellow-Bellied All Counties Breeds in mixed hardwood- Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Sapsucker Crossed / conifer forests, especially near permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
Sphyrapicus varius common to fresh water and openings. and wintering habitat. Construction could
uncommon Also found in woodlots, and disturb nesting sapsuckers if it occurs
transient and orchards. Winters in floodplain during the nesting season, and potentially
winter resident; forests and mature ornamental result in loss of nest and eggs.
rare and local conifers. Typically not found in
summer resident deep, dense woods; nests in
over 3,500 feet in tree cavities and forages on
the mountains. tree sap, insects, and fruit
(VDGIF, 2016b).
Winter Wren All Counties Breeds in or near dense Impacts would include long term to The conservation measures for this species are the
Troglodytes Crossed / undergrowth of damp permanent removal of nesting, foraging, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
troglodytes uncommon coniferous forests, in thickets and wintering habitat. Construction could
transient and near woodland streams, banks disturb nesting sapsuckers if it occurs
winter resident. of marshy ditches, piles of during the nesting season, and potentially
Uncommon to slash, boreal bogs, usually with result in loss of nest and eggs.
locally common a dead log from which to sing.
R-53

summer resident Winter in dense undergrowth,

in spruce- especially in moist areas.
dominated forest Mainly breed in spruce-fir
in Mt. Rogers forests that have tangles,
area; uncommon uprooted trees, and other
to rare in summer cover. Also use dark ravines,
in Shenandoah under hermlocks or beneath
National Park and hardwoods; nests in tree
scattered cavities and forages on
locations insects, insect larvae,
elsewhere, mostly millipedes, and spiders
at high elevations, (VDGIF, 2016b).
through present in
summer at lower
elevations in
extreme
southwest.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Golden-Winged Bath, Highland, Prefer shrubby areas with Impacts would include short term, long- The conservation measures for this species are the
Warbler Augusta, Nelson / scattered trees, generally near term to permanent removal of nesting, same as described above for the Hermit Thrush.
Vermivora rare to uncommon edges of mature forests. Breed foraging, and wintering habitat. Because this species prefers early-successional
chrysoptera transient; very in a variety of early- Construction could disturb nesting habitats, ACP has the potential to create suitable
local summer successional or disturbed warblers if it occurs during the nesting habitat for this species through maintenance of the
resident in the habitats including shrubby season, and potentially result in loss of right-of-way outside of the nesting season.
mountains and fields, abandoned farmlands, nest and eggs.
valleys. shrubby swamps, successional
forest, utility rights-of-ways,
clearings within forests, brushy
clearcuts, or shelterwood cuts
in deciduous woods. Once a
disturbed area becomes too
old, this species disappears;
ground-nesting bird that
forages on catepillars, moths,
and other insects and spiders
(VDGIF, 2015a).
R-54

REPTILES
Spotted Turtle Augusta, Nelson, Shallow fresh water wetlands Atlantic would cross limited wetland Impacts on water quality would be limited to the
Clemmys guttata Buckingham, including vernal pools, sinkhole habitat within the GWNF (0.1 acre). time needed to construct through the wetland or
Cumberland, ponds, ponds, ditches, flooded Potential impacts would include short- to waterbody. Atlantic would implement the COM
Prince Edward, fields, streams, floodplains, long-term removal of wetland habitat, Plan (see appendix G), which includes sediment
Dinwiddie, bogs, marshy pastures, and short-term increase in sedimentation and and erosion control measures for both the wetland
Brunswick, forested wetlands (VDGIF, changes to hydrology; potential short-term and waterbody crossings. Impacts on forested
Greensville, 2016b). disturbance to foraging habitat and habitat would be long term to permanent; however,
Southampton, species. Potential mortality or injury from these impacts would be localized and adjacent
Suffolk, construction equipment; however, it is habitat would be available. Atlantic would adhere
Chesapeake anticipated that turtles would move out of to the the GWNF waterbody buffer requirements,
the construction area. which vary in extent depending upon the waterbody
classification and slope, to mitigate potential effects
from ground-disturbing activities (see section 4.3).
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Timber Rattlesnake Highland, Bath, Hibernates in fissures in rock Potential impacts on timber rattlesnake Atlantic would implement Atlantics Snake
Crotalus horridus Augusta, Nelson, ledges or talus slopes. Utilizes suitable denning habitat located within the Conservation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize
(Not currently Buckingham diverse forests and open construction workspace would be impacts on this species and its habitat.
included on GWNF habitats when active (VDGIF, permanent, as construction would require
locally rare list; 2015a). GWNF has reported the removal of rocky outcrops and boulder
however, GWNF an occurrence of the timber slabs. However, removal of forested
plans to add this rattlesnake within the ACP vegetation along the right-of-way could
species) project area. increase solar radiation of adjacent rocky
outcrops, potentially creating more
favorable habitat. Based on 2016 surveys
on GWNF, no timber rattlesnakes or signs
of rattlesnakes were observed; therefore,
no direct impacts are anticipated.
Smooth Greensnake Highland, Bath, Found in upper elevations in Potential impacts would include short-to Impacts on herbaceous habitat would be short
Opheodrys vernalis Augusta, Nelson the Blue Ridge Mountains. long-term removal of habitat. Potential term. After completion of construction, the
Grassy fields, balds, bogs, mortality or injury from construction construction right-of-way would be restored as
open woods, and bramble vehicles and equipment; however, it is outlined in the COM Plan (see appendix G), and
patches. Will take cover under anticipated that greensnakes would move smooth greensnake could occupy this habitat.
R-55

rock piles and logs; sometimes
found as road kills. May
aggregate in winter months in
ant mounds (VDGIF, 2016b).
Northern Coal Skink Highland, Bath, Rarely encountered in Virginia.
Plestiodon Augusta, Nelson Primary habitat are moist or
anthrancinus humid wooded hillsides.
anthracinus Found under cover of leaves
and rocks (VDGIF, 2016b).
out of the construction area.
Impacts include long term to permanent
habitat loss, degradation of habitat quality
(potential change in microclimate habitat),
and fragmentation, and potential
introduction of barriers to wildlife corridors.
There is potential for mortality or injury
during construction; however, it is
anticipated that skinks would move out of
the construction area.
Atlantic committed to maintaining low speed limits
on the construction right-of-way and access roads
to minimize collisions with wildlife.
If present, construction and operation of ACP
would result in permanent habitat loss and
fragmentation of woodland habitat; however, these
impacts would be localized and adjacent habitat
would be available. Although woody species would
be allowed to regenerate within the construction
right-of-way, the permanent right-of-way would be
maintained clear of tree and shrub species.
Atlantic committed to maintaining low speed limits
on the construction right-of-way and access roads
to minimize collisions with wildlife.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)
Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
AMPHIBIANS
Eastern Tiger Augusta, Nelson Breeding habitat includes
Salamander limestone sinkhole ponds
Ambystoma tigrinum associated with wetlands.
tigrinum Terrestrial habitat includes
mature forests (VDGIF,
2016m). 2016 surveys
completed at 59 wetland
features; four sites were
identified as moderate habitat
and one as high; one larval
tiger salamander was
observed on private land / no
adults were observed.
FISH
Potomac Sculpin Highland, Bath, Rocky runs and pools of
Cottus girardi Augusta creeks and small to medium
rivers, often near vegetation
R-56
(Page and Burr, 1991).
Surveys were conducted in
2016 on the GWNF; no
Potomac sculpin were
observed at crossing locations.
Per correspondence with the
GWNF, this species is known
in the Cowpasture River (FS,
2016c).
Potential Project Impacts
The greatest threat to this species is the
loss of breeding ponds and adjacent
woodlands. Direct impacts on breeding
habitat include temporary sedimentation
and potentially long-term alteration of
hydrology associated with the sinkhole
pond. Removal of adjacent mature forests
would reduce terrestrial habitat available
to adults. Construction activities could
also fragment or isolate salamanders from
their breeding or terrestrial habitat.
Atlantic would cross 29 perennial
waterbodies in the GWNF. Altantic would
also cross the Cowpasture River, where
this species has been documented,
approximately 0.3 miles upstream and
downstream from the GWNF property
boundaries. Potential impacts would
include short- to long-term removal of
riparian habitat, short-term increase in
sedimentation and changes to hydrology;
potential short-term disturbance to
foraging habitat and species. Potential
mortality or injury from construction
equipment; however, it is anticipated that
sculpin would move out of the construction
area.
Conservation Measures
GWNF recommended additional surveys of
sinkhole ponds within the GWNF, and a 1,000-foot
buffer of all sinkhole ponds regardless of presence
as they may serve as breeding habitat. Atlantic
continues to consult with the GWNF with regard to
the conservation measures for this species.
Although the crossing of the Cowpasture River is
not located within the GWNF, there is potential for
downstream effects. The Cowpasture River would
be crossed by the mainline pipeline utilizing a dry
crossing technique. Atlantic would implement the
Virginia Fish Relocation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
remove all fish species trapped within areas
proposed for dewatering or in-stream work prior to
initiating construction. Atlantic would also install
two permanent access roads across the
Cowpasture River, which could result in increased
sedimentation during construction and use.
General project mitigation measures would apply,
including implementation of the VDEQ Virginia
Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook and the
COM Plan (see appendix G). Pending GWNF
review of sedimentation analysis.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
BIVALVES (Freshwater Mussels)
Notched Rainbow Bath, Augusta, Fast-flowing, clean water in There are 45 pipeline and access road Atlantic would implement the FWS and VDGIF
Villosa constricta Buckingham, substrates that contain waterbody crossings in the GWNF (some Freshwater Mussel Guidelines for Virginia (FWS
Cumberland, relatively firm rubble, gravel, waterbodies may be crossed more than and VDGIF, 2008) if mussels found; surveys
Nottoway, and sand substrates swept once), including 29 perennial waterbody conducted through 2016 have not identified this
Dinwiddie, free from silt. Bury in the crossings. All mainline waterbody species in waterbodies crossed on the GWNF.
Brunswick, substrate in shallow riffle and crossings would be dry crossings (i.e., Impacts on water quality would be limited to the
Greensville, shoal areas. Known or likely dam and pump or flume). Potential time needed to construct the waterbody crossing.
Southampton from the Cowpasture, impacts would include mortality to mussels Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
Calfpasture, Stuart Run, Lick located at the waterbody crossing location, appendix G), which includes implementation of the
Run, and Mill Creek drainages and short-term increase in sedimentation VDEQ Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
(VDGIF, 2016b). and changes to hydrology. Handbook. Pending GWNF review of
sedimentation analysis.
CRUSTACEANS (Amphipods and Isopods)
Sherando Spinosoid Augusta Cave and springs Although no caves were identified within Atlantic would implement sediment and erosion
Amphipod (NatureServe, 2015). the survey corridor on the GWNF, there control measures and the SPCC Plan (see table
Stygobromus sp. 7 are potential impacts on adjacent or 2.3.1-1) to minimize contamination of surface or
connected cave systems downstream of groundwater systems. Atlantic would also
R-57

the construction right-of-way. implement the Karst Mitigation Plan (see appendix
Construction activities could alter water I) to minimize potential impacts on this species and
flow patterns or increase sediment and its habitat. Consultation with GWNF is ongoing
contaminant loads, which could lead to a with regard to impacts on karst and potential
reduction or degradation of available impacts on this species.
habitat. Amphipod habitat is susceptible to
contamination due to the porosity of the
substrate. Blasting, trenching, and digging
can cause shifts in surface and subsurface
formations and hydrology, and may crush
amphipods, or alter travel corridors (FWS,
2011i).
Big Levels Springs N/A Cave and springs. The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Amphipod species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Stygobromus sp. 18 for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
Greenbrier Valley Bath / Butler Inhabits caves in riffle area of The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Cave Isopod Sinking Creek streams, in stream gravel, species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Caecidotea Cave System under rocks, on decaying wood for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
holsingeri in streams and occasionally
drip pools (NatureServe,
2015).
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
MYRIAPODS (Centipedes and Millipedes)
Faithful Millipede Augusta / Mt. Leaf litter within mixed Construction activities would result in the This species is known to inhabitat leaf litter in
Cleidogona fidelitor Torry near hardwoods (NatureServe, permanent removal of forested habitat and deciduous forests, a habitat that is common across
Sherando Lake 2015). potential mortality of individuals by the GWNF. Construction and maintenance of the
construction vehicles or equipment. right-of-way would result in conversion to less
desirable habitat in some areas. Suitable habitat is
very common across the GWNF (FS et al., 2002).
Grand Caverns Blind Highland, Bath, Cave and springs The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Cave Millipede Augusta / Butler (NatureServe, 2015). species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Zygonopus Sinking Creek for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
weyeriensis Cave System
INSECTS
Springtails
A springtail Bath / Warm Oak forests with predominately Construction activities would result in the Atlantic committed to avoidance of potential habitat
Cliforga alleganiensis Springs Mountain rhododendron understory permanent removal of forested habitat and for this species where occurrences have been
and James River (NatureServe, 2015). potential mortality of individuals by documented. Atlantic would cross the James River
construction vehicles or equipment. utilizing the HDD method, therefore, impacts would
R-58

not be anticipated.
Beetles
A cave beetle No documented Damp mud banks and caves The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Pseudanophthalmus occurrences of (NatureServe, 2015). species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
hypertrichosis this species from for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
counties crossed
by the ACP.
Crossroads Cave Bath / 2 cave This species has no means of The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Beetle locations dispersal from caves. Occur in species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Pseudanophthalmus the twilight zone or deeper in for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
intersectus or on moist soil, near streams
or drip areas. Found under
rocks or debris (NatureServe,
2015).
Maddens Cave No documented This species has no means of The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Beetle occurrences of dispersal from caves. Occur in species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Pseudanophthalmus this species from the twilight zone or deeper in for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
limicola counties crossed or on moist soil, near streams
by the ACP. or drip areas. Found under
rocks or debris (NatureServe,
2015).
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Nelsons Cave No documented This species has no means of The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Beetle occurrences of dispersal from caves. Occur in species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Pseudanophthalmus this species from the twilight zone or deeper in for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
nelsoni counties crossed or on moist soil, near streams
by the ACP. or drip areas. Found under
rocks or debris (NatureServe,
2015).
Petrunkevitchs Cave No documented This species has no means of The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Beetle occurrences of dispersal from caves. Occur in species are the same as described above same as described above for the Sherando
Pseudanophthalmus this species from the twilight zone or deeper in for the Sherando Spinosoid Amphipod. Spinosoid Amphipod.
petrunkevitchi counties crossed or on moist soil, near streams
by the ACP. or drip areas. Found under
rocks or debris (NatureServe,
2015).
Dragonflies
Comet Darner Augusta, GWNF Shallow, fishless ponds with Adult dragonflies would be able to Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
Dragonfly correspondence emergent vegetation, or semi- disperse away from disturbance; however, appendix G), which includes implementation of the
Anax longipes indicates this permanent flooded woodlands. reduced fitness and/or mortality could VDEQ Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
R-59

species has been Adults are active May to early
documented in June. Desktop habitat
sinkhole ponds in assessment of the proposed
Augusta County. route within the GWNF
identified no potential habitat
for these species (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013).
Marthas Penant GWNF Vegetated ponds and lakes
Dragonfly correspondence with sand bottoms and
Celithemis martha indicates this unmowed shoreline vegetation
species has been and emergent aquatic
documented in vegetation; obligate pond
sinkhole ponds in breeder. Adults are active late
Augusta County. May through September.
Desktop habitat assessment of
the proposed route within the
GWNF identified no potential
habitat for these species
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
result if the individual is unable to find Handbook. GWNF has requested that Atlantic
other suitable habitat. There is the conduct surveys for sinkhole ponds; consultation is
potential that construction activities could ongoing for this species.
impact nymphs through direct mortality or
temporary reduction in water quality.
Atlantic would also remove suitable
sinkhole pond habitat, including emergent
vegetation that could provide shelter and
foraging habitat; habitat assessment
results are pending. Vehicle collisions
could cause injury or mortality to adult
dragonflies.
The potential project impacts on this GWNF has requested that Atlantic conduct surveys
species are the same as described above for sinkhole ponds; consultation is ongoing for this
for the Comet Darner Dragonfly. species.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Mustached Clubtail Bath, Augusta Occurs in and around clean, Adult dragonflies would be able to There are 45 pipeline and access road waterbody
Dragonfly fast-flowing rivers. Adults are disperse away from disturbance; however, crossings in the GWNF (some waterbodies may be
Gomphus adelphus active from May 30-June 28 reduced fitness and/or mortality could crossed more than once), including 29 perennial
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). result if the individual is unable to find waterbody crossings. All mainline waterbody
other suitable habitat. There is the crossings would be dry crossings (i.e., dam and
potential that construction activities could pump or flume). Impacts on water quality would be
impact nymphs through direct mortality or limited to the time needed to construct the
temporary reduction in water quality. waterbody crossing. Atlantic would implement the
Atlantic would also remove suitable COM Plan (see appendix G), which includes
riparian habitat that could provide shelter implementation of the VDEQ Virginia Erosion and
and foraging habitat. Vehicle collisions Sediment Control Handbook.
could cause injury or mortality to adult
dragonflies.
Harpoon Clubtail Highland / U.S. Clean, sandy and rocky rivers The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Dragonfly 250 near Head with strong current. Adults are species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Gomphus descriptus Waters active late May to late June for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
Midland Clubtail No documented Mud-bottomed lakes and The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
R-60

Dragonfly occurrences of rivers. Adults are active late species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Gomphus fraternus this species from May to mid-July (VDCR and for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
counties crossed VDGIF, 2013).
by the ACP.
Rapids Clubtail Bath, GWNF Inhabits pools of rapid streams The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Dragonfly correspondence and rivers. Adults are active species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Gomphus indicates this early May to mid-July (VDCR for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
quadricolor species has been and VDGIF, 2013).
documented in
Cowpasture
River.
Chalk-fronted Highland, Augusta Mud-bottomed lakes and The potential project impacts on this ACP does not cross mud-bottomed lakes or ponds
Corporal Skimmer / Buck Run Ponds ponds. Adults are active early species are the same as described above on the GWNF; therefore, impacts on this species
Dragonfly June to early August (VDCR for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. are not anticipated.
Ladona julia and VDGIF, 2013).
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat Potential Project Impacts Conservation Measures
Northern Pygmy Highland Running waters with strong The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Clubtail Dragonfly currents over clean gravel that species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Lanthus parvulus contains sand and silt for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
deposits. Adults are active May
through July (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Desktop habitat
assessment of the proposed
route within the GWNF
identified no potential habitat
for these species.
Southern sprite Augusta, Occur near grassy lakes and The potential project impacts on this GWNF has requested that Atlantic conduct surveys
Dragonfly Dinwiddie, boggy ponds, usually within species are the same as described above for sinkhole ponds; consultation is ongoing for this
Nahalennia Greensville, dense vegetation. Adults are for the Comet Darner Dragonfly. species.
intergricollis Brunswick, GWNF active June through
correspondence September (VDCR and
indicates this VDGIF, 2013). Desktop habitat
species has been assessment of the proposed
documented in route within the GWNF
R-61

sinkhole ponds in identified no potential habitat

Augusta County. for these species.
Stygian No documented Medium to large mountain The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Shadowdragon occurrences of rivers. Adults are active early species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Dragonfly this species from May to late June (VDCR and for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
Neurocordulia counties crossed VDGIF, 2013).
yamaskanensis by the ACP.
Spatterdock darner Highland, Marshes and shallow lakes or The potential project impacts on this GWNF has requested that Atlantic conduct surveys
Dragonfly Augusta, GWNF ponds with waterlilies and species are the same as described above for sinkhole ponds; consultation is ongoing for this
Rhionaeschna correspondence spatterdock near wooded for the Comet Darner Dragonfly. species.
mutata indicates this areas. Adults are active late
species has been May to early July (VDCR and
documented in VDGIF, 2013). Desktop habitat
sinkhole ponds in assessment of the proposed
Augusta County. route within the GWNF
identified no potential habitat
for these species.
Williamons Emerald Highland Slower forest streams or clear- The potential project impacts on this The conservation measures for this species are the
Dragonfly sand or wave washed lake species are the same as described above same as described above for the Mustached
Somatochlora shores. Adults are active May for the Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly. Clubtail Dragonfly.
williamsoni through July (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013).
 TABLE R-4 (contd)
Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
Red Saddlebags Augusta, GWNF Ponds and quiet and still
Dragonfly correspondence waters. Adults are active mid-
Tramea onusta indicates this May through early October
species has been (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
documented in Desktop habitat assessment of
sinkhole ponds in the proposed route within the
Augusta County. GWNF identified no potential
habitat for these species.
Butterflies and Moths
Silver-Bordered Bath, Highland, Lives in wet meadows and
Fritillary Butterfly Nelson marshes, often at sites with
Boloria selene taller vegetation. Larval hosts
on various violet species (Viola
spp.) found in wetlands. Adults
are active from June through
September (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Potential host
plants for this species were
R-62
observed within the GWNF;
however, no individuals were
documented.
Precious Underwing N/A; this species Restricted to mature swamp
Moth is presumed to be forests, forest edges, bog
Catocala prettiosa extirpated in edges, and other habitats with
prettiosa Virginia. thickets or very large bushes of
food plants exceeding 1.5
meters in height. Its larval host
plants include serviceberry
(Amelanchier spp.), and
crabapple (Malus angustifolia)
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). A
limited number of potential
host plants for this species was
observed within the GWNF.
Potential Project Impacts
The potential project impacts on this
species are the same as described above
for the Comet Darner Dragonfly.
Adult butterflies would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
fitness and/or mortality could result if the
individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
present. Altantic would remove 0.1 acre of
suitable wetland habitat for this species.
Adult moths would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
fitness and/or mortality could result if the
individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
present. Altantic would remove 0.1 acre of
suitable wetland habitat for this
species.This species has demonstrated
sensitivity to herbicide and pesticide use
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
Conservation Measures
GWNF has requested that Atlantic conduct surveys
for sinkhole ponds; consultation is ongoing for this
species.
Although suitable habitat for this species was
observed during surveys on the GWNF, no
individuals were observed, therefore, impacts are
not anticipated. As outlined in the COM Plan (see
appendix G), and Restoration and Rehabilitation
Plan (see appendix F), Atlantic committed to
incorporate regionally-specific and native forb
seeds in its traditionally all-grass seed mix to
create pollination habitat, which may reduce
impacts on this species.
Limited suitable habitat for this species was
observed during surveys on the GWNF and no
individuals were observed; therefore, impacts are
not anticipated. Atlantic would minimize use of
herbicides and pesticides along the construction
and permanent rights-of-way, and would allow tree
species to regenerate outside the permanent right-
of-way after construction is complete.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
Early Hairstreak Augusta, Bath, Woodland openings and moist,
Butterfly Highland but well-drained mature
Erora laeta American beech (Fagus
grandifolia) forests. Its main
larval host plant is American
beech, and beaked hazelnut
(Coylus cornuta) is a
secondary larval host plant.
Adults are active from late April
through May and late June
through August (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Field habitat
assessments identified one
host plant for this species
within the GWNF; however, no
individuals were observed.
Tawny Crescent No documented Dry habitats, mainly clearings,
Butterfly occurrences of open woods, and roadsides.
R-63
Potential Project Impacts
Adult butterflies would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
fitness and/or mortality could result if the
individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
present.
Adult butterflies would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
Conservation Measures
Limited suitable habitat for this species was
observed during surveys on the GWNF, and no
individuals were observed; therefore, impacts are
not anticipated. This species may benefit from the
presence of woodland clearings, including rights-of-
way, by creating additional suitable habitat. In
addition, Atlantic would minimize use of herbicides
and pesticides along the construction and
permanent rights-of-way, and would allow tree
species to regenerate outside the permanent right-
of-way after construction is complete.
This species may benefit from the presence of
woodland clearings, including rights-of-way, by

Phycoides batesii this species from Its larval host plants are wavy- fitness and/or mortality could result if the creating additional nectaring habitat. In addition, as
batesii counties crossed leaved asters (Aster undulatus) individual is unable to find other suitable outlined in the Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
by the ACP. and related species. Adults are habitat. Construction activities could (see appendix F), Atlantic committed to incorporate
active May through early June remove suitable larval host plants and regionally-specific and native forb seeds in its
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). foraging plants; and could kill larvae if traditionally all-grass seed mix to create pollination
Suitable habitat for this species present. habitat, which may reduce impacts on this species.
was observed during surveys Aster species would be incorporated into some
on the GWNF, however, seed mixes. Management of the right-of-way that
individuals were not surveyed encourages nectar sources would be beneficial to
and therefore are assumed to this species.
be present.
Northern Crescent Augusta, Bath Prefers barren habitats, but The potential project impacts on this The potential project impacts on this species are
Butterfly also associated with streams; species are the same as described above the same as described above for the Northern
Phycoides cocyta more woodland-based than for the Northern Crescent Butterfly. Crescent Butterfly.
similar species. Its larval host
plants are in the genus Aster
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
Adults are active from June
through July. Field habitat
assessments identified larval
host plants for this species
within the GWNF; however, no
individuals were observed.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)
Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
Atlantis Fritillary Open habitats including open
Butterfly meadows, bogs, roadside
Speyeria atlantis woods, and woodland
openings. Its larval host plant
are violets (Viola spp.). Adults
are active mid-June through
mid-September (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013). Field habitat
assessments identified host
plants for this species within
the GWNF; however, no
individuals were observed.
Chestnut Clearwing N/A; this species Its host plant is the American
Moth has not been chestnut (Castanea dentata)
Synanthedon recently and possibly the chinquapin
castaneae documented in (Castanea pumila) (VDCR and
R-64
Virginia; the only VDGIF, 2013). Potential host
record is from plants for this species were
Falls Church. observed within the GWNF;
however, individual surveys
were not conducted. Because
individual surveys were not
conducted, presence is
assumed in suitable habitat.
VASCULAR PLANTS
American Willow- Highland, Bath, Bogs, seeps, wet meadows,
herb Augusta and wet clearings; usually at
Epilobium ciliatum higher elevations (Virginia
ssp. ciliatum Botanical Associates, 2016).
Surveys completed in 2015
identified this species within
the GWNF.
Potential Project Impacts
Adult butterflies would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
fitness and/or mortality could result if the
individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
present.
Adult butterflies would be able to disperse
away from disturbance; however, reduced
fitness and/or mortality could result if the
individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
present.
Although construction activities would not
directly remove individuals, they may
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Regular maintenance of
the construction right-of-way would also
cause regular disturbance and potential
mortality of this species located adjacent
to the construction workspace.
Conservation Measures
Although suitable habitat for this species was
observed during surveys on the GWNF, no
individuals were observed; therefore, impacts are
not anticipated. This species may benefit from the
presence of woodland clearings, including rights-of-
way, by creating additional nectaring habitat. In
addition, as outlined in the Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F), Atlantic
committed to incorporate regionally-specific and
native forb seeds in its traditionally all-grass seed
mix to create pollination habitat, which may reduce
impacts on this species. Management of the right-
of-way that encourages nectar sources would be
beneficial to this species.
Surveys indicate that American chestnut trees were
uncommon along the survey corridor in the GWNF.
Atlantic would minimize use of herbicides and
pesticides along the construction and permanent
rights-of-way, and would allow tree species to
regenerate outside the permanent right-of-way
after construction is complete.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species.

Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
Frasers Marsh St. Bath, Highland Bog, mafic fens, seeps,
Johns-wort seepage swamps, depression
Hypericum fraseri ponds, and swamps, usually in
peaty, nutrient-poor soils
(Virginia Botanical Associates,
2016). Surveys identified three
populations with a total of
approximately 3,815
individuals of this species
1,000 feet downslope from a
proposed access road
associated with Browns Pond
Conservation Site.
American Ginseng Highland, Bath, Cove forests, and mesic to dry
Panax quinquefolius Augusta, Nelson, slope forests in base-rich soils
(Not a GWNF locally Buckingham, (Virginia Botanical Associates,
rare species; state- Cumberland, 2016). Identified 20
threatened species) Prince Edward populations of this species in
R-65
Highland County within GWNF.
Yellow Nodding Highland, Bath Open forests, clearings, and
Ladies-tresses meadows often at higher
Spiranthes elevations (Virginia Botanical
ochroleuca Associates, 2016). Surveys
identified 1 individual of this
species along a proposed
access road.
TABLE R-4 (contd)
Potential Project Impacts
Although construction activities would not
directly remove individuals, access road
use could contribute to increased dust
cover on plants, erosion and
sedimentation issues, and may also
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants.
Construction activities would directly
remove individuals located within the
construction right-of-way, remove or
degrade suitable habitat for this species
within and adjacent to the construction
right-of-way, and disturb the seed bed.
Construction activities may also
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Regular maintenance of
the construction right-of-way would also
cause regular disturbance and potential
mortality of this species.
Construction activities would directly
remove individuals located within the
access road, remove or degrade suitable
habitat for this species within and adjacent
to the access road, and disturb the seed
bed. Access road use could contribute to
increased dust cover on plants, erosion
and sedimentation issues, and may also
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants.
Conservation Measures
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species. GWNF has recommended
transplanting if plants cannot be avoided; relocation
plan required.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species.
 TABLE R-4 (contd)
Locally Rare Species with Potential Habitat or Populations within the George Washington National Forest
Species County /
Scientific Name Occurrence Habitat
Three Birds Orchid Bath, Augusta Mesic slope forests, montane
Triphora alluvial forests, and large-river
trianthophora ssp. floodplain forest. Most often
tranthophora found under hemlocks or in
moist soils and moss of old
logging roads (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016).
Surveys identified 26
individuals of this species
1,000 feet downslope of a
proposed access road
associated with Browns Pond
Conservation Site.
American Vetch Nelson Dry, shaley or rocky
Vicia americana ssp. woodlands, forest edges and
americana clearings, riverside prairies and
outcrops (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016). Surveys
R-66
completed in 2015 identified
this species within the GWNF;
however, it was not found
during re-surveys in 2016.
Potential Project Impacts
Although construction activities would not
directly remove individuals, access road
use could contribute to increased dust
cover on plants, erosion and
sedimentation issues, and may also
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants.
Construction activities would directly
remove individuals located within the
construction right-of-way, remove or
degrade suitable habitat for this species
within and adjacent to the construction
right-of-way, and disturb the seed bed.
Construction activities may also
encourage the spread of invasive and
noxious plants. Regular maintenance of
the construction right-of-way would also
cause regular disturbance and potential
mortality of this species.
Conservation Measures
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species.
Atlantic would implement the COM Plan (see
appendix G), which includes measures to control the
spread of invasive and noxious weeds, and to
control erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic would
implement dust control as described in the Fugitive
Dust Control and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Atlantic is in ongoing consultation with GWNF
regarding this species.
 APPENDIX S

STATE-SENSITIVE SPECIES TABLES

 TABLE S-1

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
MAMMALS
West Virginia Priority 1 / Pocahontas, Red spruce, fir, spruce-hardwood and Field surveys confirmed Atlantic would realign the access road to minimize
northern flying S2b Randolph northern hardwood forests with well- that suitable habitat occurs direct impacts on red spruce trees, and would
squirrel developed understory. Mostly in moist in proximity to a proposed relocate red spruce saplings to adjacent NFS
Glaucomys sabrinus forests with widely spaced mature trees access road near Gibson forest areas prior to grading. Atlantic is currently
fuscus and an abundance of snags Knob on the MNF. working with the MNF to finalize the conservation
(NatureServe, 2015). measures for the proposed access road that
would impact suitable habitat for this species (see
table R-1 in appendix R).
Eastern red bat Priority 1/ S4 Pocahontas, Wide range of forested and semi- Eight individuals of this Clearing of forested vegetation would reduce
Lasiurus borealis Randolph forested habitats, including developed species were captured available roosting and foraging habitat. Because
areas with large trees and intensively during mist-net surveys this species is active year round, there is potential
managed forests. Roost trees are along the ACP and 19 were for injury or mortality of this species during tree
usually large hardwood trees in foliage. captured during mist-net clearing. Disturbance to bats roosting adjacent to
Active throughout the year when surveys along the SHP. access roads or construction activities could also
conditions are suitable (NatureServe, result from noise and/or vibrations generated by
2015). these activities.
Hoary bat Priority 1 / S3 All Counties Deciduous and coniferous forests and Three individuals of this Clearing of forested vegetation would reduce
S-1

Lasiurus cinereus Crossed woodlands, including areas altered by species were captured available foraging and roosting habitat, although
humans. Forages in open areas, during mist-net surveys this species is not as common in the southeastern
including spaces over water and along along the SHP. U.S. during the summer months (NatureServe,
riparian corridors. Roosts in foliage of 2015). Because this species uses trees to
large deciduous or coniferous trees, hibernate and may be found in the southeastern
sometimes in rock crevices, rarely in U.S. during the winter months, there is also
caves. Have been found hibernating in potential for injury or mortality of this species
tree trunks, tree cavities, and squirrels during tree clearing.
nests. May be found in the southeastern
U.S. during the winter months
(NatureServe, 2015).
Snowshoe hare S3 Pocahontas, Prefers the dense cover of coniferous Surveys were not Atlantic has rerouted the ACP to avoid the Cheat
Lepus americanus Randolph and mixed forests with abundance conducted for this species. Mountain and Back Allegheny Mountain, thus no
understory. Also uses coniferous impacts are anticipated to this species or its
swamps and second-growth areas habitat.
adjacent to mature forests, alder fens,
and conifer bogs (NatureServe, 2015).
The WVDNR indicates that this species
has the potential to occur in Cheat
Mountain and Back Allegheny
Mountain.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Southern rock vole Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas, Cool, moist talus slopes and rocky Surveys were not Potential impacts include temporary to permanent
Microtus Randolph areas above 915 m elevation within conducted for this species; loss or degradation of habitat; potential injury or
chrotorrhinus forested streamside riparian areas desktop analysis for mortality of individuals if present and unable to
carolinensis dominated by rocks greater than 0.2 m suitable habitat on the MNF move from the area during construction; and
diameter and with abundant woody is in progress (see table R- increased noise levels that could disrupt normal
debris, herbaceous vegetation, and 1 in appendix R). Suitable activities. Atlantic would implement the FERC
moss (Orrock and Pagels, 2003). habitat potentially present Plan and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) at
for this species within the waterbody crossings to minimize impacts to this
project area. species.
Eastern small-footed Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas, Hibernates in caves and mines. Also Mist-net surveys captured The two potential roosting locations identified
bat Randolph found in mountainous regions in the one individual in 2015, and during surveys on the MNF are not located within
Myotis leibii summer in rocky habitats (e.g., rocky two suitable roosting the ACP construction workspace, and Atlantic
outcrops, talus slopes, ledges) and locations were identified intends to construct outside of the active season
man-made structures (WVDNR, 2003). during 2016 habitat surveys in most locations; therefore, direct impacts are not
Foraging habitat includes riparian along the ACP survey anticipated (see table R-1 in appendix R). Some
forests, upland forests, clearings, strip corridor within the MNF. tree clearing may occur in October. Tree clearing
mines, and ridgetops (NatureServe, on rocky slopes may improve summer habitat for
2015). this species by increasing solar radiation on
S-2

potential summer maternity habitat, making

habitat more suitable for roosting; however, tree
removal would contribute to loss of foraging
habitat (FS et al., 2002).
Little brown bat Priority 1/S2b All Counties Roost in cave, buildings, rocks, mines, No bats observed during Atlantic and DTI would clear forested habitat
Myotis lucifugus Crossed tunnels, and other man-made the 2015 or 2016 surveys during winter season to minimize direct effects on
structures, and under bridges. on the MNF; however, nine roosting bats in most locations; however, clearing
Hibernates in caves, tunnels, and mines secondary roost trees were of forested vegetation reduces available foraging
(NatureServe, 2015). identified as potential and roosting habitat, and construction through
habitat on the MNF (see karst features and/or in proximity to bat
table R-1 in appendix R). hibernacula may render hibernacula unsuitable.
Additionally, seven Disturbance to bats roosting adjacent to access
individuals were captured roads or construction activities could also result
during mist-net surveys from noise and/or vibrations generated by these
along the SHP survey activities. Atlantic would implement the FERC
corridor. Plan and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) and
Karst Mitigation Plan (see appendix I) to minimize
impacts on potential bat hibernacula.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Allegheny woodrat Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Rocky areas such as caves, deep Surveys conducted in 2016 Because suitable habitat was identified outside
Neotoma magister Randolph crevices, and large boulder fields in or on the Lewis Wetzel WMA SHP project area at Lewis Wetzel WMA, impacts
around hardwood forests with resulted in no observations on individuals or suitable habitat are not
abundance oaks and other mast- of individuals and identified anticipated at that location. However, suitable
bearing trees. Also known from northern one low quality potentially habitat for Allegheny woodrats were found within
hardwood and oak-pine forests suitable habitat location the ACP project area within the MNF. MNF has
(WVDNR, 2003). outside of the survey recommended species-specific conservation
corridor. Surveys measures (see table R-1 in appendix R).
conducted in 2016 on the Additional suitable habitat for this species may
MNF documented occur outside the MNF and Lewis Wetzel WMA.
Allegheny woodrats along Construction activities would cause a direct loss
two rock formations along of habitat and contribute to habitat fragmentation.
Buzzard Ridge,and suitable Construction activities may also reduce available
habitat near Cloverlick foraging habitat for this species. Sedimentation
Mountain, although the during construction could also fill underground
habitat was considered crevices used as habitat. Atlantic and DTI would
small and marginally implement the FERC Plan and Procedures (see
suitable. table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts on this species.
S-3

Tri-colored bat Priority 1/S2b All Counties Roost in caves, rock crevices, No bats observed during Atlantic and DTI would clear forested habitat
Perimyotis subflavus Crossed trees/foliage, and sometimes in surveys along the ACP; during winter season to minimize direct effects on
buildings in both wooded and cleared however, nine secondary roosting bats in most locations; however, clearing
areas. Associated with forested roost trees were identified of forested vegetation reduces available foraging
landscapes; most foraging occurs along as potential habitat on the and roosting habitat, and construction through
riparian areas. Hibernates in caves, MNF along the ACP (see karst features and/or in proximity to bat
rock crevices, and mines (NatureServe, table R-1 in appendix R). hibernacula may render hibernacula unsuitable.
2015). Additionally, two individuals Atlantic and DTI would implement the FERC Plan
were captured during mist- and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) and Karst
net surveys along the SHP. Mitigation Plan (see appendix I) to minimize
impacts on potential bat hibernacula.
Long-tailed shrew S2S3b Pocahontas, Deciduous or evergreen forest Surveys were not Potential impacts would include temporary to
Sorex dispar Randolph, mountainous areas with loose talus; conducted for this species. permanent loss of habitat, and potential injury or
Upshur rocky damp areas with deep crevices However, suitable habitat mortality of individuals if present and unable to
covered by leaf mold and root are potentially present for this move from the area during construction.
preferred. May also occur along small species within the ACP Construction activities adjacent to suitable habitat
mountain streams (NatureServe, 2015). project area. would also increase noise levels, which could
disrupt normal activities. Atlantic would implement
the FERC Plan and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-
1) to minimize impacts to this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Southern Water Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas, Undercut banks of high gradient and Surveys were not Potential impacts would include temporary to
Shrew Randolph high elevation (above 900 m) first and conducted for this species; permanent loss of suitable habitat, and potential
Sorex palustris second order streams with abundance desktop analysis for this injury or mortality of individuals if present and
punctulatus cover from overhanging rocks, roots, species is in progress on unable to move from the area during construction.
logs, and crevices (NatureServe, 2015). the MNF (see table R-1 in Construction activities adjacent to suitable habitat
appendix R). would also increase noise levels, which could
disrupt normal activities. Increased sedimentation
and turbidity from stormwater run-off during
construction into suitable stream habitat could
negatively impact this species. Atlantic would
implement the sediment and erosion control
measures identified in the FERC Plan and
Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1).
Eastern spotted Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas Prefers forested areas or habitats with Surveys were not Suitable habitat potentially present for this
skunk significant cover. Occupies den in conducted for this species; species within the ACP project area. Use of
Spilogale putorius burrow abandoned by other mammals, desktop analysis for this access road adjacent to suitable habitat could
under brush piles, in hollow logs or species is in progress on increase noise levels. Fragmentation isolates
trees, rock crevices, under buildings or the MNF (see table R-1 in populations and eliminates access to food
S-4

other protected sites (NatureServe, appendix R). sources. Potential injury or mortality if struck by
2015). vehicles or equipment using access roads.
Sedimentation during construction could fill
underground crevices used as habitat. Atlantic
would implement the FERC Plan and Procedures
(see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to this
species.
Southern bog S3b Pocahontas, Prefers boggy habitat, but also common Surveys were not Suitable habitat potentially present for this
lemming Randolph, in marshes, meadows, and upland conducted for this species; species within the ACP project area. Potential
Synaptomys cooperi Upshur forests with thick humus layer. Occupies desktop analysis for this impacts would include temporary to permanent
burrows 6-12 inches deep and surface species is in progress on loss of habitat, and potential injury or mortality of
runaways (NatureServe, 2015). the MNF (see table R-1 in individuals if present and unable to move from the
appendix R). area during construction. Construction activities
adjacent to suitable habitat would also increase
noise levels, which could disrupt normal activities.
Sedimentation from stormwater runoff during
construction could fill underground burrows.
Atlantic would implement the FERC Plan and
Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize
impacts to this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
BIRDS
Northern Goshawk Priority Randolph, Typically nest in mature or old-growth Potentially suitable habitat Construction would remove suitable nesting and
Accipiter gentilis 1/S1B/S1Nb Pocahontas forests. In the eastern U.S., prefer identified within the MNF foraging habitat, and potentially cause
hardwood-hemlock forests where black and the Seneca State disturbance to foraging goshawks. Atlantic would
birch and American birch are preferred Forest during 2016 construct outside of the nesting season and
nest trees. Forages in both heavily surveys; however, no implement the mitigation measures outlined in the
forested and relatively open habitats northern goshawks were Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
(NatureServe, 2015). Per WVDNR observed. minimize impacts to this species. Maintenance of
correspondence, this species has been the permanent right-of-way in an herbaceous /
observed at Cheat Mountain and Back scrub-shrub state could increase foraging habitat
Allegheny Mountain, and Rocky Run for this species.
adjacent to Kumbrabow State Forest,
Gauley Mountain, and Middle Fork
Williams River.
Northern Saw-Whet S2B/S2N Randolph Dense coniferous or mixed forests, Surveys were not Construction would remove suitable nesting
Owl cedar groves, alder thickets, swamps conducted for this species. habitat, and potentially cause disturbance to
Aegolius acadicus and tamarack bogs. Often roost in foraging owls. Atlantic would construct outside of
dense evergreens in winter. Forages in the nesting season and implement the mitigation
S-5

heavy shrub habitat (NatureServe,
2015). Per WVDNR correspondence,
this species has been observed at
Cheat Mountain and Back Allegheny
Mountain.
Great Blue Heron S3B/S4N Lewis Nests in colonies in swamps or edges of
Ardea herodias bodies of waters in the tops of the tallest
trees, usually in remote areas. Mature
oak-gum-cypress forests are optimal
breeding habitat (VDGIF, 2016b).
Long-Eared Owl Priority N/A Deciduous and evergreen forests,
Asio otus 1/S1B/S1Nb orchards, wooded parks, farm woodlots,
and river woods. Wooded areas with
dense vegetation are used for roosting
and nesting; open areas are used for
hunting (NatureServe, 2015).
An active great blue heron
rookery was documented
with the ACP survey
corridor in Lewis County
during 2016 bald and
golden eagle surveys. The
rookery is located 800 feet
(0.15 miles) from the ACP
centerline.
Surveys were not
conducted for this species.
measures outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to this species.
WVDNR recommends a time of year restriction
(TOYR) from February 15 to July 31 for activities
within 0.5 mile of a rookery and undisturbed
naturally vegetated buffer of at least 500 feet
around the rookery be maintained. Atlantic is
currently consulting with WVDNR on appropriate
mitigation for the rookery located within the 0.5
mile buffer.
Construction would remove suitable nesting and
roosting habitat, and potentially cause
disturbance to foraging owls. Atlantic and DTI
would construct outside of the nesting season
and implement the mitigation measures outlined
in the Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Maintenance of the permanent right-of-way in an
herbaceous / scrub-shrub state could increase
foraging habitat for this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Ruffed Grouse Priority N/A Dense forest with some deciduous trees Surveys were not Suitable habitat for this species is likely to occur
Bonasa umbellus 1/S3B/S3N in both wet and dry conditions. Young conducted for this species. in the ACP and SHP project areas. Removal of
forests provide best conditions. Nests forested habitat would be long term to permanent,
on the ground (NatureServe, 2015). Per and would also contribute to habitat
WVDNR correspondence, this species fragmentation. Construction activities would
has been observed at Cheat Mountain create noise and vibrations, which could also
and Back Allegheny Mountain. disrupt normal activities. Atlantic and DTI would
construct outside of the nesting season and
implement the mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
minimize impacts to this species.
Broad-Winged Hawk Priority 1/S3B N/A Breeds in broadleaf and mixed forests, This species was Potential impacts on this species and the
Buteo platypterus often near wet areas and forest incidentally observed proposed mitigation are the same as described
openings, edges, and woodlands. during 2016 northern above for the Ruffed Grouse.
Migrates along ridges, river valleys, and goshawk surveys near the
shorelines (NatureServe, 2015). Kumbrabow State Forest
survey corridor and within
the MNF.
S-6

Canada Warbler Priority 1/S3B N/A Breeding habitat consists of moist
Cardellina thickets of woodland undergrowth,
canadensis bogs, tall shrubbery along streams or
near swamps, and deciduous second
growth. Nests are on or near the ground
(NatureServe, 2015).
Olive-sided Priority 1/S1B Pocahontas Breeding occurs in forest or woodland
Flycatcher areas, especially burned-over areas
Contopus cooperi with standing dead trees. Forage from a
variety of forest, woodland, and open
habitats with scattered trees
(NatureServe, 2015). Per WVDNR
correspondence, this species is known
from Cheat Mountain and Back
Allegheny Mountain.
Alder Flycatcher S3B No Brush and shrubby growth, thickets,
Empidonax alnorum Occurrences deciduous forest edge, open second
in Counties growth, and swamps (NatureServe,
Crossed by 2015). Per WVDNR correspondence,
SHP or ACP this species is known from Cheat
Mountain and Back Allegheny
Mountain.
Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
above for the Ruffed Grouse.
Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
above for the Ruffed Grouse.
Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
above for the Ruffed Grouse. Due to this species
preference for forest edge and secondary growth,
the creation of additional forest edge, and
secondary regrowth outside of the permanent
right-of-way after restoration could provide
additional suitable habitat for this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Peregrine Falcon Priority Pocahontas Typically nest on ledges of vertical cliffs No peregrine falcons were Suitable habitat for this species is likely to occur
Falco peregrinus 1/S2BS2Nb with a sheltering overhang; will also use observed during 2016 bald in the ACP project area. Atlantic would construct
river banks, open bogs, large stick nests and golden eagle aerial outside of the nesting season and implement the
of other species, tree hollows, and man- surveys. mitigation measures outlined in the Migratory Bird
made structures (NatureServe, 2015). Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to
this species.
Migrant Loggerhead Priority Pocahontas Open areas, grasslands (often grazed Surveys were not Suitable habitat for this species is likely to occur
Shrike 1/S1B/S1Nb or occasionally mowed) and agricultural conducted for this species. in the ACP project area. Construction activities
Lanius ludovicianus landscapes interspersed with forbs, would cause temporary loss of suitable habitat,
migrans scattered shrubs, and/or small trees. and could disrupt normal activities. Atlantic would
Usually nests in eastern red cedar or construct outside of the nesting season and
hawthorne (VDGIF, 2015a). implement the mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
minimize impact to this species. Due to this
species preference for open herbaceous and
occasionally mowed habitats, ACP has the
potential to create suitable habitat for this species
through maintenance of the right-of-way outside
S-7

of the nesting season.

Swainsons Warbler Priority 1/S3B No Breeding habitat consists of rich, damp, Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
Limnothlypis Occurrences deciduous floodplain and swamp conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
swainsonii in Counties forests. In the mountains, moist lower above for the Ruffed Grouse.
Crossed by slopes of mountain ravines at elevations
SHP or ACP up to 900 meters are preferred
(NatureServe, 2015). Per WVDNR
correspondence, this species is known
from Cheat Mountain and Back
Allegheny Mountain.
Red Crossbill S2B/S2N N/A Coniferous and mixed coniferous- Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
Loxia curvirostra deciduous forests, pine savanna and conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
pine-oak habitat. Migrate and winter in above for the Ruffed Grouse.
deciduous forest and more open
scrubby areas (NatureServe, 2015). Per
WVDNR correspondence, this species
is known from Cheat Mountain and
Back Allegheny Mountain.
Red-Headed S3B/S3Nb Pocahontas Open woodland, especially beech or Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
Woodpecker oak, parks, cultivated areas, and conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
Melanerpes gardens (NatureServe, 2015). above for the Ruffed Grouse.
erythrocephalus
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Vesper Sparrow Priority No Ground nesting bird. Found in plains, Surveys were not Suitable habitat for this species is likely to occur
Pooecetes 1/S2B/S2Nb Occurrences dry shrubland, savannas, weedy conducted for this species. in the ACP project area. Construction activities
gramineus in Counties pastures, fields, and woodland clearings would cause temporary to long term loss of
Crossed by (NatureServe, 2015). suitable habitat, and could disrupt normal
SHP or ACP activities. Atlantic would construct outside of the
nesting season and implement the mitigation
measures outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impact to this species.
Due to this species preference for open
herbaceous habitats, the ACP and SHP have the
potential to create suitable habitat for this species
through maintenance of the right-of-way outside
of the nesting season.
American woodcock Priority 1/S3B N/A Associated with young, second-growth Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
Scolopax minor hardwoods and other early successional conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
habitats that are a result of periodic above for the Ruffed Grouse. Due to this species
forest disturbance. Ideal habitat preference for early successional, secondary
consists of young forests and growth, and edge habitat, the secondary regrowth
S-8

abandoned farmland mixed with outside of the permanent right-of-way after

forested land. Generally considered an
edge species (NatureServe, 2015). Per
WVDNR correspondence, this species
is known from Cheat Mountain and
Back Allegheny Mountain.
Northern waterthrush Priority 1/S2B N/A Prefers damp woodlands with standing
Seiurus water, thick cover along streams, in
noveboracensis marshes, and by stagnant pools, but is
also found on lawns and in hedgerows
and thickets (NatureServe, 2015).
Golden-winged Priority Pocahontas, Requires brushy early successional
warbler 1/S1Bb, PF Randolph habitat. Prefers to nest in areas such
Vermivora as powerline rights-of-way, shrubby
chrysoptera fields, abandoned strip mines, alder
swamps, beaver-created wetlands, and during 2016 surveys, and
abandoned orchards (WVDNR, 2003).
Per WVDNR correspondence, this
species is known from the vicinity of
Gibson Knob and Buzzard Ridge.
restoration, and maintenance of the permanent
right-of-way outside of the nesting season could
provide additional suitable habitat for this species.
Surveys were not Potential impacts on this species and the
conducted for this species. proposed mitigation are the same as described
above for the Ruffed Grouse.
Potentially suitable habitat Suitable habitat for this species is likely to occur
identified within the in the ACP project area. Construction activities
Kumbrabow State Forest would cause temporary loss of suitable habitat,
and adjacent to the MNF and could disrupt normal activities. Atlantic would
construct outside of the nesting season and
one individual was implement the mitigation measures outlined in the
observed on private land Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
adjacent to the MNF (see minimize impact to this species. Because this
table R-1 in appendix R). species prefers early-successional habitats, the
ACP has the potential to create suitable habitat
for this species through maintenance of the right-
of-way. Atlantic has committed to conducting
maintenance mowing outside of the nesting
season during operations.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
REPTILES
Timber rattlesnake Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Hibernates in fissures in rock ledges or Surveys conducted in 2016 No individuals nor suitable habitat were observed
Crotalus horridus Randolph talus slopes. Uses diverse forests and on the Lewis Wetzel WMA in the area of direct impact for either the SHP or
open habitats when active (WVDNR, along the SHP resulted in ACP within the Lewis Wetzel WMA or MNF,
2006b). no observations of respectively. However, construction activities
individuals and identified would increase noise and vibrations, which may
five low quality potentially disrupt normal activities, displace snakes, or
suitable habitat locations. increase stress for rattlesnakes adjacent to the
There is a reported construction workspace. Suitable habitat for this
observation from May 2016 species is likely to occur outside of the Lewis
within the study corridor in Wetzel WMA and MNF. Construction would
the Lewis Wetzel WMA. Six remove foraging habitat, and vehicles could
timber rattlesnakes and cause injury or mortality. Construction activities
suitable habitat were could expose rock outcrops that are currently
observed within the Seneca shaded, potentially providing sufficient solar
State Forest adjoining the radiation for suitable timber rattlesnake denning
MNF about 1.5 miles from or gestating habitat. Atlantic would implement the
the survey corridor for the Snake Conservation Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
S-9

ACP. No suitable habitat or provide guidance to construction crews on ways

individuals were observed to minimize disturbance and impacts on timber
within the survey corridor in rattlesnake during construction.
the MNF.
Northern ring-necked S5 All Counties Can be found in many habitat types, but This species was Impacts would include temporary habitat loss,
snake Crossed seem to prefer wooded areas. Found in incidentally observed disturbance during construction activities, and
Diadophis punctatus rotting logs, piles of dead leaves or during 2016 green potential injury or mortality of snakes that are
edwardsii under rocks (WVDNR, 2006b). salamander surveys in the unable to move away from construction
MNF; surveys were not equipment or vehicles. Atlantic and DTI would
conducted for this species. implement the measures in the FERC Plan and
Procedures, and construction and restoration
plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to
this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
AMPHIBIANS
Green salamander Priority 1/S3b, All Counties Damp crevices in shaded outcrops and Surveys conducted in 2016 Based on lack of suitable habitat for green
Aneides aeneus PF Crossed ledges, beneath loose bark and in along the ACP survey salamander within the ACP project area within the
cracks of standing or fallen trees, corridor within the MNF; MNF, no impacts on this species are anticipated
sometimes under logs on ground three areas of low quality within the MNF. However, there is potentially
(NatureServe, 2015). habitat were identified and suitable habitat for this species outside of the
no individuals were MNF. Impacts would include removal of suitable
observed (refer to appendix habitat, creation of canopy gaps that could make
R). Surveys outside of the otherwise shaded habitat unsuitable, injury or
MNF were not conducted. mortality resulting from collisions with
construction equipment, and noise and vibrations
from construction activities could disrupt normal
activities. Atlantic and DTI would implement the
measures in the FERC Plan and Procedures, and
construction and restoration plans (see table
2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to this species.
Eastern hellbender Priority 1/S2b All Counties Found in permanent streams under flat Surveys were not There are 112 pipeline and access road perennial
Cryptobranchus Crossed rocks in the riverbed. Found in all conducted for this species. stream crossings on ACP, and 95 crossings on
S-10

alleganiensis elevation streams west of the Allegheny This species has been SHP (some waterbodies would be crossed more
Front. documented in the West than once) in West Virginia. Waterbody crossings
Fork Greenbrier River and access road construction/use would
(Pauley, 2004). temporarily degrade water quality through
increased sedimentation and turbidity during
construction, disturbance, changes in hydrology,
and disturbance and injury or mortality from
blasting (see section 4.6 for additional
discussion). Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing shade increase
localized water temperatures. Atlantic and DTI
would implement the measures in the FERC Plan
and Procedures, and construction and restoration
plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control sedimentation
and the introduction of hazardous chemicals, and
to restore riparian habitats.
Seal salamander S5 All Counties Burrows in banks or under rocks, logs, This species was Impacts to this species would include temporary
Desmognathus Crossed and leaves in and near small streams incidentally observed habitat loss, potential disruption of normal
monticola (Pauley, 2004). during 2016 green activities during construction, and potential injury
salamander surveys in the or mortality from construction equipment or
MNF; surveys were not vehicles. Atlantic and DTI would implement the
conducted for this species. measures in the FERC Plan and Procedures, and
construction and restoration plans (see table
2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Allegheny Mountain S4 Upshur, Found under leaf litter, bark, stones, in This species was The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
dusky salamander Randolph, crevices of cliffs and rock outcrops. incidentally observed species are the same as those described above
Desmognathus Pocahontas Breeding habitat occurs beneath logs or during 2016 green for the Seal Salamander.
ochrophaeus rocks along small streams or in salamander surveys in the
seepages in stream banks. Found MNF; surveys were not
throughout the mountainous areas of conducted for this species.
West Virginia (Pauley, 2004).
Mudpuppy Priority 1/S4 Wetzel, Streams and impoundments under This species was Waterbody crossings and access road
Necturus maculosus Harrison, rocks and debris or under bank incidentally observed construction/use would temporarily degrade water
Tyler, overhangs. Found throughout the during 2015 mussel quality through increased sedimentation and
Doddridge, Allegheny Plateau (Pauley, 2004). surveys at one waterbody turbidity during construction, disturbance,
Lewis, Upshur crossing location along the changes in hydrology, and disturbance and injury
ACP. or mortality from blasting (see section 4.6 for
additional discussion). Removal of riparian
habitat may also contribute to increased erosion
and sedimentation, and by decreasing shade
increase localized water temperatures. Atlantic
and DTI would implement the measures in the
S-11

FERC Plan and Procedures, and construction

and restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of hazardous
chemicals, and to restore riparian habitats.
Slimy salamander S5 All Counties Wooded slopes, ravines, floodplains, This species was observed Impacts to this species would include temporary
Plethodon glutinosus Crossed shalebanks, and cave entrances during 2016 green to permanent habitat loss, potential disruption of
typically within hardwood forests, salamander surveys in the normal activities during construction, and
sometimes pinelands (NatureServe, MNF. potential injury or mortality from construction
2015). equipment or vehicles. Atlantic and DTI would
implement the measures in the FERC Plan and
Procedures, and construction and restoration
plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to
this species.
Valley and ridge S4 All Counties Mature hardwood forests with well- This species was observed Impacts to this species would include long term to
salamander Crossed drained soils (NatureServe, 2015). during 2016 green permanent habitat loss, potential disruption of
Plethodon hoffmani salamander surveys in the normal activities during construction, and
MNF. potential injury or mortality from construction
equipment or vehicles. Atlantic and DTI would
implement the measures in the FERC Plan and
Procedures, and construction and restoration
plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impacts to
this species.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Wehrles salamander S4 All Counties Upland forests and woodlands; found in This species was observed The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
Plethodon wehrlei Crossed rock crevices, under rocks, logs, and during 2016 green species are the same as those described above
leaves, and in the twilight zone of caves salamander surveys in the for the Seal Salamander.
(NatureServe, 2015). MNF.
FISH
Redside dace Priority All Counties Small to medium, cool, clear, rubble and Surveys were not There is a potential for this species to occur within
Clinostomus 1/S1S2 Crossed gravel-bottomed streams. Typically conducted for this species. the ACP and SHP project areas. Waterbody
elongatus occurs in pools with moderate current crossings and access road construction/use
and overhanging vegetation. Known would temporarily degrade water quality through
from the Blackwater River system increased sedimentation and turbidity during
(NatureServe, 2015). construction, reduced fish passage, disturbance,
changes in hydrology, and disturbance and injury
or mortality from blasting (see section 4.6 for
additional discussion). Removal of riparian
habitat may also contribute to increased erosion
and sedimentation, and by decreasing shade
increase localized water temperatures. Atlantic
would implement the measures in the FERC Plan
S-12

and Procedures, and construction and restoration

plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control sedimentation
and the introduction of hazardous chemicals, and
to restore riparian habitats.
Candy darter Priority 1/S1b, Pocahontas Riffles and runs of small cool and warm Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Etheostoma osburni PF streams and rivers. Adults are typically conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
found in large rubble to boulder the Redside Dace.
substrates in the swiftest portions of
their fast-flowing habitat. Only found in
the upper Kanawha River System
(WVDNR, 2003). Studies have
documented this species in the New
River drainage in the MNF, and they are
known to occur in the West and East
Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF
(Chipps et al., 1993; Burns, 2007).
Allegheny pearl dace Priority N/A Found in pools of upland creeks and Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Margariscus 1/S2S3b small rivers, ponds, and lakes over sand conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
margarita or gravel substrate (NatureServe, the Redside Dace.
2015).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
New River shiner S2b Pocahontas Pools and slow runs of cool to warm Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Notropis scabriceps creeks and small to medium rivers with conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
rocky, gravely, or sand substrates, the Redside Dace.
occasionally with moderate deposits of
silt (NatureServe, 2015). Studies have
documented this species in the New
River drainage in the MNF, and they are
known to occur in the West and East
Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF
(Chipps et al., 1993; Burns, 2007).
Cheat minnow S1S2b Pocahontas, Runs and pools of small to medium, un- Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Pararhinichthys Randolph, acidified mountain rivers with moderate conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
bowersi Upshur current and gravel or cobble substrate Right Fork Middle Fork the Redside Dace. In addition, Atlantic would
(NatureServe, 2015). This species River is identified within the cross the Right Fork Middle Fork River using a
occurs primarily in the Monongahela extant cheat minnow range. dry crossing technique, and because it is also a
River Basin, which includes the Cheat trout water, would adhere to the TOYR of
River system (Chipps et al., 1993). September 15-March 31.
Appalachia darter S2b Pocahontas Small to medium rivers in gravel and Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
S-13

Percina rubble riffles and raceways; found in conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
gymnocephala deeper waters in fall and winter. Known the Redside Dace.
from the New River system above
Kanawha Falls (NatureServe, 2015). A
study has documented this species in
the New River drainage in the MNF, and
they are known to occur in the West and
East Fork Greenbrier River in the MNF
(Burns, 2007).
Kanawha minnow S1b Pocahontas Riffles and runs of gravel, rubble, and Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Phenacobius boulder in cool to warm, small to conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
teretulus medium rivers. Known from the New the Redside Dace.
River drainage (NatureServe, 2015).
Studies have documented this species
in the New River drainage in the MNF,
and they are known to occur in the West
and East Fork Greenbrier River in the
MNF, both upstream and downstream
of the ACP project area (Chipps et al.,
1993; Burns, 2007).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Brook trout Priority 1/S5 Upshur, Clear, cool, well-oxygenated creeks, Buckhannon River, French The ACP would cross Buckhannon River, French
Salvelinus fontinalis Pocahontas, small to medium rivers, and lakes Creek, and Right Fork Creek, Right Fork Middle River, and the unnamed
Randolph (NatureServe, 2015). Per WVDNR Middle River are tributaries to these waterbodies using dry
correspondence, this species is known designated brook trout crossing techniques or by access roads. Atlantic
from the Cheat Mountain and Back waters. has committed to adhering to the TOYR of
Allegheny Mountain area. September 15-March 31 for trout waters and
adjacent tributaries. SHP does not cross any
trout waters. Additional information is provided in
section 4.6.
GASTROPODS (Snails)
Organ cavesnail S2b Pocahontas, Inhabits caves under flat rocks in 2016 karst surveys Construction activities could alter water flow
Fontigens tartarea Randolph streams with moderate current. identified 64 karst features patterns or increase sediment and contaminant
Limestone rocks are preferred that were located within, loads, which could lead to a reduction or
(NatureServe, 2015). This species has adjacent to, would receive degradation of available habitat. Organ cavesnail
been documented from Dreen Cave in drainage from the proposed habitat is susceptible to contamination due to the
Pocahontas County (Nature ACP right-of-way (15 in porosity of the substrate. Blasting, trenching, and
Conservancy, 2001), located less than Randolph County and 49 in digging can cause shifts in surface and
one mile from the ACP construction Pocahontas County) (see subsurface formations and hydrology, and may
S-14

workspace. section 4.1.2.3). crush snails or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
Atlantic would implement the Karst Mitigation
Plan (see appendix I) to minimize potential
impacts on this species. Consultations are
ongoing with the WVDNR with regard to impacts
on karst and species habitat.
BIVALVES (Freshwater Mussels)
Elktoe Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas Found in small, medium and large None identified during No impacts anticipated on this species. Atlantic
Alasmidonta streams with swift current and gravel, surveys. would implement the West Virginia Mussel
marginata sand, or cobble substrate (NatureServe, Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
2015). authorization from the WVDNR if mussels are
present.
Threeridge S3 All Counties Habitat varies from small to large rivers, None identified during No impacts anticipated on this species. Atlantic
Amblema plicata Crossed and lakes with little to no current to surveys. would implement the West Virginia Mussel
areas of swift current. Also found in a Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
variety of substrates including clay, authorization from the WVDNR if mussels are
mud, sand, sand-gravel, and gravel present.
(NatureServe, 2015).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Spike S3 All Counties Medium to large rivers and streams This species was identified The waterbody where this species was identified
Elliptio dilatata Crossed primarily in shoal habitat of at one waterbody crossing would be crossed using the cofferdam technique.
unimpounded streams and rivers; also location along the ACP. The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
occasionally found in tailwaters of dams this species are the same as described above for
or lakes (NatureServe, 2015). the Redside Dace. Atlantic would implement the
West Virginia Mussel Survey Protocol (Clayton et
al., 2016) upon authorization from the WVDNR to
relocate non-federally protected mussel species
prior to construction.
Wabash pigtoe S1 Doddridge Medium to large rivers at depths up to Species was observed The waterbody where this species was identified
Fusconaia flava 15 feet; favored substrate consists of during 2015 SHP mussel would be crossing using the dam and pump
coarse sand and gravel (NatureServe, surveys at one waterbody technique for the mainline pipeline, and would
2015). crossing location. also be crossed with a permanent access road.
Atlantic has also proposed to withdraw water
where this species was found. The potential
impacts and mitigation measures for this species
are the same as described above for the Redside
Dace. Atlantic would implement the West Virginia
S-15

Mussel Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016)

upon authorization from the WVDNR prior to
construction.
Plain pocketbook S3 All Counties Found in medium to large rivers and None identified during No impacts anticipated on this species. Atlantic
Lampsilis cardium Crossed shallow water lake habitats (Nature surveys. would implement the West Virginia Mussel
Serve 2015). Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
authorization from the WVDNR if mussels
present.
Fatmucket clam NR All Counties Medium to large low gradient streams Species was observed The waterbodies where this species was
Lampsilis siliquoidea Crossed and rivers, and shallow water lake during 2015 SHP mussel identified along the SHP and ACP would be
habitat. Found in variety of substrates, surveys at two waterbody crossed using dry crossing techniques. One
but prefers quiet or slow-moving water crossing locations; and at waterbody would also be crossed by a permanent
with mud bottom (NatureServe, 2015). one waterbody location access road. Atlantic has also proposed to
along the ACP. withdraw water from both crossing locations
where found. The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the same as
described above for the Redside Dace. Atlantic
would implement the West Virginia Mussel
Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
authorization from the WVDNR to relocate mussel
species prior to construction.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Fluted-shell S3 All Counties Canals, rivers, and lakes on gravel, None identified during No impacts anticipated on this species. Atlantic
Lasmigona costata Crossed sand, or mud substrates (NatureServe, surveys. would implement the West Virginia Mussel
2015). Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
authorization from the WVDNR if mussels
present.
Green floater Priority Pocahontas Fast-flowing, clean water in firm rubble, None identified during This species is currently under review by USFWS
Lasmigona subviridis 1/S2a,b gravel and sand substrates swept free surveys. for listing under the ESA (refer to section
from siltation. Found buried in substrate 4.7.1.13). No impacts anticipated on this species.
in shallow riffle and shoal areas. Known Atlantic would implement the West Virginia
from the Greenbrier watershed Mussel Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016)
(Cummings and Cordeiro, 2012). upon authorization from the FWS and WVDNR if
mussels present.
Round hickorynut Priority 1/S3 All Counties Medium to large rivers and streams in None identified during No impacts anticipated on this species. Atlantic
Obovaria subrotunda Crossed sand and gravel substrates with surveys. would implement the West Virginia Mussel
moderate flow and depths up to 2 Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016) upon
meters (NatureServe, 2015). authorization from the WVDNR if mussels
present.
Creeper (squawfoot) S3 All Counties Habitat generalist found in streams and Species was observed The waterbodies where this species was
S-16

Strophitus undulatus Crossed rivers in a variety of flow conditions, and during 2015 SHP mussel identified along the SHP would be crossed using
in lakes and ponds (NatureServe, surveys at two waterbody dry crossing techniques. Atlantic has also
2015). crossing locations. proposed to withdraw water from one crossing
location where found. The potential impacts and
mitigation measures for this species are the same
as described above for the Redside Dace.
Atlantic would implement the West Virginia
Mussel Survey Protocol (Clayton et al., 2016)
upon authorization from the WVDNR to relocate
mussel species prior to construction.

CRUSTACEANS (Amphipods, Isopods, and Decapods)

Cannulate cave Priority 1/S1b Randolph Inhabits subterranean streams and 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
isopod pools under flat rocks. Known from identified 15 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Caecidotea cannula Alpena Cave No. 1, Glady Cave, that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
Bowden Cave, and Harper Cave in adjacent to, would receive
Randolph County (NatureServe, 2015). drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Randolph County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Greenbrier Valley S3b Pocahontas, Inhabits caves in riffle area of streams, 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
cave isopod Randolph in stream gravel, under rocks, on identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Caecidotea decaying wood in streams and that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
holsingeri occasionally drip pools. Known from 10 adjacent to, would receive
caves in Pocahontas County and 5 drainage from the proposed
caves in Randolph County ACP right-of-way (15 in
(NatureServe, 2015). This species has Randolph County and 49 in
been documented from Dreen Cave in Pocahontas County) (see
Pocahontas County (Nature section 4.1.2.3).
Conservancy, 2001), located less than
one mile from the ACP construction
workspace.
A cave obligate Priority 1/S1b Randolph Found in subterranean rivers. Known 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
isopod from Flower Pot, Stillhouse, Aquaterra identified 15 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Caecidotea simonini and Commander Adama Killer Bat that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
caves in Randolph County adjacent to, would receive
(NatureServe, 2015). drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
S-17

Randolph County (see

section 4.1.2.3).
Elk River crayfish G2/S1b Pocahontas Low gradient, medium-sized rivers with 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Camburus elkensis moderate gradient. Substrate includes identified 49 karst features this species are the same as described above for
sand, gravel, sandstone boulders, and that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
cobbles. Endemic to the upper Elk River adjacent to, would receive
basin. Freshwater cave species drainage from the proposed
occurring near entrances to very deep ACP right-of-way in
in cave systems (NatureServe, 2015). Pocahontas County (see
This species has been documented in section 4.1.2.3).
Slaty Fork and Old Field Fork in
Pocahontas County (Nature
Conservancy, 2001).
Greenbrier Cave Priority Pocahontas Subterranean streams, usually in the 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
crayfish 1/S1?b, PF upper portions of the cave or dry stream identified 49 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Cambarus nerterius beds. Found in one cave in the Elk that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
River Drainage in Pocahontas County adjacent to, would receive
(NatureServe, 2015). drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Pocahontas County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Culvers Cave Priority 1/S1b Randolph Subterranean obligate species found in 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
amphipod mud-bottom seep and drip pools in identified 15 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Stygobromus culveri caves. Only known from three caves in that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
Tucker and Randolph Counties. adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Randolph County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
Greenbrier cave Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Relatively wide spread obligate 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
amphipod Randolph subterranean amphipod. Predominantly identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Stygobromus found in small, gravel bottom cave that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
emarginatus streams, or pools fed by ceiling drips or adjacent to, would receive
seepage water (NatureServe, 2015). drainage from the proposed
This species has been documented ACP right-of-way (15 in
from Dreen Cave in Pocahontas County Randolph County and 49 in
(Nature Conservancy, 2001), located Pocahontas County) (see
less than one mile from the ACP section 4.1.2.3).
construction workspace.
S-18

Pocahontas cave Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas Only three specimens known from 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
amphipod Piddling Pit Cave in Pocahontas identified 49 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Stygobromus nanus County. Found in mud-bottom drip that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
pools and associated seepage adjacent to, would receive
(NatureServe, 2015). drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Pocahontas County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
Minute cave Priority 1/S1b, Pocahontas, Known from 4 cave sites. Found in 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
amphipod PF Randolph mud-bottomed, drip, and seep pools in identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Stygobromus parvus caves (NatureServe, 2015). that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way (15 in
Randolph County and 49 in
Pocahontas County) (see
section 4.1.2.3).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
MYRIAPODS (Millipedes)
Greenbrier Valley S3b Pocahontas Subterranean obligate. Reported from 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
cave millipede 10 caves in Pocahontas County identified 49 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Pseudotremia fulgida (NatureServe, 2015). that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Pocahontas County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
Grand Caverns blind Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas, Subterranean obligate. This species has 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
cave millipede Randolph been documented from Cass Cave and identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Zygonopus Dreen Cave in Pocahontas County that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
weyeriensis (Nature Conservancy, 2011), located adjacent to, would receive
3.8 miles and less than one mile from drainage from the proposed
the ACP construction workspace, ACP right-of-way (15 in
respectively. Randolph County and 49 in
Pocahontas County) (see
section 4.1.2.3).
S-19

INSECTS
Cave Beetles
A cave beetle S2b Pocahontas Subterranean obligate. Documented 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Pseudanophthalmus from the Piddling Pit Cave in identified 49 karst features this species are the same as described above for
fuscus Pocahontas County (Nature that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
Conservancy, 2011). adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Pocahontas County (see
section 4.1.2.3).
A cave beetle S3b Pocahontas, Subterranean obligate. Known from 14 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Pseudanophthalmus Randolph caves in Pocahontas County and 2 identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
hypertrichosis caves in Randolph County that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
(NatureServe, 2015). This species has adjacent to, would receive
been documented from Cass Cave and drainage from the proposed
Dreen Cave in Pocahontas County, and ACP right-of-way (15 in
Simmons-Mingo Cave System in Randolph County and 49 in
Pocahontas and Randolph Counties Pocahontas County) (see
(Nature Conservancy, 2001), located section 4.1.2.3).
3.8 miles, 0.7 mile, and 0.4 mile,
respectively from the ACP construction
workspace.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Tiger Beetles
Appalachian tiger Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Inhabits dry sandy banks and islands Surveys were not Construction activities could cause injury or
beetle Randolph along major rivers east of the Allegheny conducted for this species. mortality to individuals located in the right-of-way
Cicindela Mountains; found in dry, sandy during construction, and would temporarily
ancocisconensis openings among sparse vegetation remove suitable habitat and disrupt normal
above the river shoreline (Allen and activities. Based on this species preference of
Acciavatti, 2002). open habitat, right-of-way clearing and
maintenance could have a beneficial effect by
creating potentially suitable habitat (FS et al.,
2002).
Springtails
Gandy Creek Cove Priority 1/S1b Randolph Subterranean obligate; habitat is poorly 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
springtail known (NatureServe, 2015). identified 15 karst features this species are the same as described above for
Pseudosinella certa that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way in
Randolph County (see
S-20

section 4.1.2.3).
A springtail Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Pseudosinella gisini Randolph 2015). identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
gisini that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way (15 in
Randolph County and 49 in
Pocahontas County) (see
section 4.1.2.3).
A springtail Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2016 karst surveys The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Sinella agna Randolph 2015). identified 64 karst features this species are the same as described above for
that were located within, the Organ Cave Snail.
adjacent to, would receive
drainage from the proposed
ACP right-of-way (15 in
Randolph County and 49 in
Pocahontas County) (see
section 4.1.2.3).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Dragonflies and Damselflies
Rapids clubtail Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Clear streams and brooks with strong Surveys were not Adult dragonflies would be able to disperse away
dragonfly Randolph current over clean gravel, cobbles, or conducted for this species. from disturbance; however, reduced fitness
Gomphus quadricolor bedrock (NatureServe, 2015). and/or mortality could result if the individual is
unable to find other suitable habitat. There is the
potential that construction activities could impact
nymphs through direct mortality or temporary
reduction in water quality. Atlantic would also
remove suitable riparian habitat that could provide
shelter and foraging habitat; habitat assessment
results are pending. Vehicle collisions could
cause injury or mortality to adult dragonflies.
Atlantic and DTI would implement the FERC Plan
and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1), which
includes sedimentation and erosion control
measures and waterbody crossing measures to
minimize impacts to this species.
Green-faced clubtail Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas, Clear, rocky rivers and streams; has Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
S-21

Gomphus viridifrons Randolph, also been found in reservoirs and other conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
Marshall impoundments (Olcott, 2011). the Rapids Clubtail Dragonfly.
Riffle snaketail Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas Prefers clear, clean, rocky streams. Has Surveys were not Atlantic would cross the Greenbrier River using a
Ophiogomphus been documented from the Greenbrier conducted for this species. cofferdam, and has proposed in-stream blasting
carolus River (Olcott, 2011). and water withdraw at this location. The potential
impacts and mitigation measures for this species
are the same as described above for the Rapids
Clubtail Dragonfly.
Butterflies, Moths, & Skippers
Early hairstreak S2b Randolph Woodland openings and moist, but well- Surveys were not Adult butterflies would be able to disperse away
butterfly drained mature American beech (Fagus conducted for this species. from disturbance; however, reduced fitness
Erora laeta grandifolia) forests. Its main larval host and/or mortality could result if the individual is
plant is American beech, and beaked unable to find other suitable habitat. Construction
hazelnut (Coylus cornuta) is a activities could remove suitable larval host plants
secondary larval host plant. Adults are and foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
active from late April through May and present. This species may benefit from the
late June through August (VDCR and presence of woodland clearings, including rights-
VDGIF, 2013). of-way, by creating additional suitable habitat. In
addition, Atlantic would minimize use of
herbicides and pesticides along the construction
and permanent rights-of-way, and would allow
tree species to regenerate outside the permanent
right-of-way after construction is complete.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Milnes euchlaena Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas Hardwood and mountain oak woodlands Surveys were not Adult moths would be able to disperse away from
moth with acidic soil. Its larval host plant is conducted for this species. disturbance; however, reduced fitness and/or
Euchlaena milnei unknown. Adults are active in from early mortality could result if the individual is unable to
to mid-July (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). find other suitable habitat. Construction activities
could remove suitable larval host plants and
foraging plants; and could kill larvae if present.
Starry campion moth Priority 1/S1b Pocahontas Wooded areas or openings. Its larval Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Hadena ectypa host plant include species of the genera conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
Silene, including starry campion (Silene the Early Hairstreak Butterfly.
stellata) and bladder campion (Silene
vulgaris) (NatureServe, 2015).
Bronze copper Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas Low, wet areas such as bogs, marshes, Surveys were not Adult butterflies would be able to disperse away
butterfly wet meadows, and ponds. Its larval host conducted for this species. from disturbance; however, reduced fitness
Lycaena hyllus plants are members of the buckwheat and/or mortality could result if the individual is
family, including curly dock (Rumex unable to find other suitable habitat. Construction
crispus). Adults are active June- activities could remove suitable larval host plants
September in the northern part of their and foraging plants; and could kill larvae if
range, and May-November in southern present. This species may benefit from the
S-22

part of their range (Lotts and
Naberhaus, 2016).
West Virginia white Priority 1/S3b Pocahontas Moist deciduous woodlands or mixed
butterfly woods. Its larval host plants are
Pieris virginiensis toothworts (Dentaria diphylla and D.
laciniata). Adults are active from April-
May (Lotts and Naberhaus, 2016).
clearing of the right-of-way by encouraging the
spread of its larval host plant, curly dock. Curly
dock is an introduced species that adapts to
disturbed areas, such as roadsides, farm fields,
and other weedy habitats (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016).
Surveys were not This species is a weak flyer and will not fly across
conducted for this species. open areas including rights-of-way; therefore, if it
is present, construction equipment could cause
injury or mortality. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants and foraging
plants; and could kill larvae if present. Tree and
shrub species would be allowed to regenerate
outside the permanent right-of-way after
construction is complete.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Diana fritillary Priority Lewis, Favor wooded areas, particularly in low- Surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Speyeria diana 1/S2S3b Pocahontas, lying valleys, pine woods, and cove conducted for this species. this species are the same as described above for
Randolph, forests, within or near mountain ranges. the Early Hairstreak Butterfly. In addition, as
Upshur Its larval host plants are violets (Viola outlined in its Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
spp.). Adults are active from mid-June (see appendix F), Atlantic has committed to
to early September (VDCR and VDGIF, incorporate regionally-specific and native forb
2013). seeds in its traditionally all-grass seed mix to
create pollination habitat, which may reduce
impacts on this species. Impacts on this species
are anticipated to be localized and minimal;
management of the right-of-way that encourages
nectar sources would be beneficial to this
species.
FLATWORMS
Hoffmasters Cave Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas, Subterranean obligate (NatureServe, 2016 karst surveys Construction activities could alter water flow
flatworm Randolph 2015). identified 64 karst features patterns, or increase sediment and contaminant
Macrocotyla that were located within, loads, which could lead to a reduction or
hoffmasteri adjacent to, would receive degradation of available habitat. Flatworm habitat
S-23

drainage from the proposed is susceptible to contamination due to the porosity

ACP right-of-way (15 in of the substrate. Blasting, trenching, and digging
Randolph County and 49 in can cause shifts in surface and subsurface
Pocahontas County) (see formations and hydrology, and may crush
section 4.1.2.3). flatworms, or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011).
Atlantic would implement the Karst Mitigation
Plan (see appendix I) to minimize potential
impacts on this species. Consultations are
ongoing with the WVDNR with regard to impacts
on karst and species habitat.
VASCULAR PLANTS
Summer sedge S3 Pocahontas, Dry to mesic forests, seepage slopes, Identified during surveys on Construction activities would result in direct loss
Carex aestivalis Randolph and meadows in the mountains to 1,600 private land along ACP. of individuals and degradation of suitable habitat.
meters (Flora of North America Editorial Construction activities could also introduce or
Committee, eds., 1993+). encourage the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Atlantic would implement the FERC Plan
and Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) and
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement its Invasive Plant Species
Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Brome-like sedge S3 Pocahontas, Forested floodplains, wet hardwood Identified during surveys on The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Carex bromoides Randolph, forests, hardwood swamps, private land along ACP. this species are the same as described above for
ssp. bromoides Upshur occasionally wet meadows, marsh the Summer Sedge.
edges (Flora of North America Editorial
Committee, eds., 1993+).
Troublesome sedge S3 Tyler Fields, roadsides, bottomlands, open Last record collected prior The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Carex molesta woods, on dry to wet, often heavy, to 1977 in Tyler County. this species are the same as described above for
calcareous soils from 100 to 700 meters This species was observed the Summer Sedge.
elevation (Flora of North America during 2015 plant surveys
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+). along the SHP survey
corridor.
Necklace sedge S3 Harrison, Stream banks, moist depressions in This species was observed The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Carex projecta Pocahontas mixed and deciduous forests, moist to during 2015 SHP plant this species are the same as described above for
wet grasslands, meadows, thickets, surveys. the Summer Sedge.
shores, ditches from 10 to 400 meters
elevation (Flora of North America
Editorial Committee, eds., 1993+).
Roan Mountain Priority 1/S2b Randolph, Rich soils of mid- to high-elevation Field surveys identified 4 On the MNF, Atlantic would remove 2.9 acres of
S-24

sedge Pocahontas mesic forests in the southern populations of sedge on Roan Mountain sedge populations and suitable
Carex roanensis Appalachians (NatureServe, 2015). private land and 3 habitat; reducing the known populations within the
populations on the MNF. survey corridor by a total of 89 percent. In
addition, 1.4 acres of suitable mesic forest habitat
would be permanently removed. Construction
activities would degrade adjacent suitable habitat
(e.g., hydrology, soil compaction, light), reducing
plant health and fecundity of individuals near the
forests edge. Atlantic has identified a population
of invasive plant species in proximity to the Roan
Mountain sedge populations, which could spread
into the disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic would
implement the COM Plan on NFS lands (see
appendix G), and Restoration and Rehabilitation
Plan (see appendix F) to restore the right-of-way,
and would implement its Invasive Plant Species
Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
the spread of invasive and noxious plants. MNF
has requested a site-specific avoidance and
minimization strategy for this species (see table
R-1 of appendix R).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Appalachian oak fern Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas Maple-birch-hemlock woods on Field survey identified a On the MNF, Atlantic would remove less than 0.1
Gymnocarpium mountain slopes and summits, in population of approximately acre of Appalachian oak fern population and
appalachianum sandstone, talus slopes, or boulder 10,000 individuals near suitable habitat; reducing the known populations
colluvium, typically at elevations above Forest Route 55 adjacent within the survey corridor by a total of 0.2 percent.
2,000 feet (NatureServe, 2015) to the ACP project area in Construction activities would degrade adjacent
the MNF, covering 0.4 suitable habitat (e.g., hydrology, soil compaction,
acre. light), reducing plant health and fecundity of
individuals near the forests edge. Atlantic has
identified a population of invasive plant species in
proximity to the Appalachian oak fern population,
which could spread into the disturbed right-of-
way. Atlantic would implement the COM Plan on
NFS lands (see appendix G) and Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement its Invasive
Plant Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Pending conservation measures in
S-25

coordination with WVDNR and MNF. MNF has

requested as site-specific avoidance and
minimization strategy for this species (see table
R-1 in appendix R).
False Indian-plantain S3b Randolph, Rich woods, shaded, wet areas This species was observed The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Hasteola suaveolens Tyler bordering streams (Flora of North during 2015 SHP plant this species are the same as described above for
America Editorial Committee, eds., surveys. the Summer Sedge.
1993+).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
White alumroot Priority 1/S2b Pocahontas, In West Virginia, this species has been Field survey identified 1 On the MNF, Atlantic would remove 0.4 acre of
Heuchera alba Randolph found on acid rock outcrops, sandstone, population of 75 individuals White Alumroot population and suitable habitat;
roadsides, high summits, grassy balds, covering 0.6 acre on the reducing the known populations within the survey
edge of sinkhole, and in hardwood and MNF, and another corridor by a total of 77 percent. Construction
dwarf pine forests. Found in elevations individual outside of the activities would degrade adjacent suitable habitat
ranging from 2,205 to 4,200 feet ACP project area. (e.g., hydrology, soil compaction, light), reducing
associated with Aquilegia spp., wall-rue, plant health and fecundity of individuals near the
maidenhair spleenwort, and purple-stem forests edge. Atlantic has identified a population
cliffbrake (NatureServe, 2015). of invasive plant species in proximity to the
Alumroot population, which could spread into the
disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic would implement
the COM Plan on NFS lands (see appendix G)
and Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan (see
appendix F) to restore the right-of-way, and would
implement its Invasive Plant Species
Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
the spread of invasive and noxious plants.
Pending conservation measures in coordination
S-26

with MNF and WVDNR. MNF has requested as

site-specific avoidance and minimization strategy
for this species (see table R-1 in appendix R).
Butternut S3b Marshall, Rich mesophytic forests, lower slopes, This species was observed The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Juglans cinerea Wetzel, Tyler, ravines, and various types of during surveys on private this species are the same as described above for
Doddridge, bottomland, including banks and land along the ACP. the Summer Sedge.
Upshur, terraces of creeks and streams, and
Randolph, floodplain forests (NatureServe, 2015).
Pocahontas
Four-flowered S1 Marshall, Moist prairies, meadows, roadsides, This species was observed The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
loosestrife Tyler, springs, swamps, bogs, and other during 2015 SHP plant this species are the same as described above for
Lysimachia Doddridge, wetlands up to 600 meter elevation surveys. the Summer Sedge.
quadriflora Harrison, (Flora of North America Editorial
Upshur, Committee, eds., 1993+).
Randolph,
Pocahontas
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Bristly black currant S2b Pocahontas Moist woods and streambanks to drier Last record collected prior The individual identified would be located
Ribes lacustre forest slopes at low to moderate to 1977 in Pocahontas approximately 24 feet upslope from the
elevations (Burke Museum of Natural County. Field surveys construction workspace. Although no individuals
History and Culture, 2016). identified one population would be directly impacted by construction;
near an old access road on construction activities could degrade suitable
the MNF; however, fruits habitat adjacent to the right-of-way (e.g.,
were not available at the hydrology, soil compaction, light). Atlantic has
time of the field surveys, identified a population of invasive plant species in
and therefore identification proximity to the currant population, which could
was not confirmed, but spread into the disturbed right-of-way. Atlantic
assumed. would implement the COM Plan on NFS lands
(see table appendix G) and Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F) to restore
the right-of-way, and would implement its Invasive
Plant Species Management Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to control the spread of invasive and noxious
plants. Pending conservation measures in
coordination with WVDNR and MNF. MNF has
S-27

requested as site-specific avoidance and

minimization strategy for this species (see table
R-1 in appendix R).
Smooth hedge-nettle S3 Marshall, Moist and low woodland, ravines, Last record collected prior The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Stachys tenuifolia Wetzel, Tyler, streambanks, pond margins, swamps, to 1977 in these counties. this species are the same as described above for
Randolph and wet meadows (Missouri Plants, This species was observed the Summer Sedge.
2007). during surveys on private
land along ACP and SHP.
Bashful bulrush Priority 1/S1 Pocahontas Dry fields, clearings, open woods, and This species was identified The potential impacts and mitigation measures for
Trichophorum basic ledges. Primary habitat consists of during surveys on the MNF. this species are the same as described above for
planifolium dry, rocky woods; typically hardwoods the Summer Sedge.
(NatureServe, 2015).
 TABLE S-1 (contd)

West Virginia Species of Greatest Concern With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project Area
SGCN Counties with
Species/Scientific Priority/State Documented
Name Statusc Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
____________________
a
Species under review for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act.
b
Species is identified as a Regional Foresters Sensitive Species or Management Indicator Species in the Monongahela National Forest, see section 4.7.3 and appendix R.
c
Based on the WVDNR Species by Taxa and Priority updated Tuesday, July 14, 2015 (http://www.wvdnr.gov/Revised%20Appendix%201.pdf).
d
County Occurrence data for animals is based on sources cited in the Habitat Description column, and information from federal and state agencies. County Occurrence
information for vascular plants is based on the Atlas of West Virginia Vascular Flora (Harmon et al., 2006).
State Rank: S1 = Critically Imperiled, S2 = Imperiled, S3 = Vulnerable, S4 = Apparently Secure, S5 = Secure, SH= Possibly Extirpated, ? = Inexact Number Rank
State Rank (Birds): S_B: breeding status; these species typically inhabit the state only during the breeding season, S_B/S_N: breeding and non-breeding status when they differ.
Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Prioritization: Priority 1 Priority for conservation work in the next decade; species that are not identified as Priority 1 species are
Priority 2 species.
PF federally petitioned species
DL federally delisted species
NR not ranked
S-28
 TABLE S-2

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
MAMMALS
Eastern S2/E (Tier Ia) Greensville, Mature hardwood floodplain 2016 surveys potentially This species is very sensitive to
(Rafinesques) big- Southampton, forests. Roosts in hollow trees, detected this species at one disturbance, which may play a role in
eared bat Suffolk, Chesapeake under loose bark, houses, acoustic site in Suffolk County, roost abandonment. Removal of
Corynorhinus unoccupied buildings, and culverts and four bats were captured suitable habitat (mature forests) and
rafinesquii macrotis (VDGIF, 2015a). during mist-net surveys in insecticides have also played a role
Southampton County. A bridge in decline. Atlantic and DTI would
roost was identified within the clear forested habitat during winter
construction workspace with an season to minimize direct effects on
emergence count of 82 bats. roosting bats in most locations;
This species has been however, clearing of forested
documented at Meherrin River; vegetation reduces available foraging
Nottoway River and Sycamore and roosting habitat, and
Bend swamps; and Quaker construction through karst features
Swamp, which are crossed by and/or in proximity to bat hibernacula
or in the vicinity of ACP (VDCR, may render hibernacula unsuitable.
2016b). Disturbance to bats roosting adjacent
S-29

to access roads or construction

activities could also result from noise
and/or vibrations generated by these
activities. Atlantic would implement
the FERC Plan and Procedures (see
table 2.3.1-1) and Karst Mitigation
Plan (see appendix I) to minimize
impacts on potential bat hibernacula.
VA SWAP recommended
conservation actions include creation
of alternative roost sites, protect and
increase bottomland habitat, and
long-term management to allow
forest to mature to size necessary for
roost sites (VDGIF, 2015a). Pending
VDGIF review of survey results and
recommended conservation
measures.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Virginia northern S1/E (Tier Ia) Highland High-altitude, old growth forest Desktop habitat assessment Suitable habitat for this species
flying squirrel with a significant spruce-fir completed and no suitable located within the GWNF has been
Glaucomys sabrinus component. Most common nest habitat has been identified avoided by reroutes; however, ACP
fuscus trees include Norway spruce within the ACP project area. would impact an additional 6.3 acres
(Picea abies), American beech of red spruce habitat between AP-1
(Fagus grandifolia), yellow birch MPs 63.6 and 71.7 outside the
(Betula alleghaniensis), and black GWNF. Clearing of this forested
birch (B. lenta) (VDGIF, 2015a). vegetation would remove potentially
suitable habitat for the Virginia
northern flying squirrel and would be
a permanent impact.
Southern rock vole S1/Eb (Tier Highland, Bath Cool, moist talus slopes and rocky No suitable habitat has been No suitable habitat for this species
Microtus IIa) areas above 915 m elevation identified within the ACP project has been identified at this time;
chrotorrhinus within forested streamside riparian area. Additional surveys will be therefore no impacts are anticipated
carolinensis areas dominated by rocks greater completed in 2017. to this species. Pending 2017 survey
than 0.2 m diameter and with data.
abundant woody debris,
S-30

herbaceous vegetation, and moss

(Orrock and Pagels, 2003).
Southeastern myotis S2 (Tier IVa) Suffolk, Chesapeake, In the summer, roosts in caves; in
Myotis austroriparius Southampton the winter prefers hollow trees,
mines, caves, and buildings.
Roosting sites are always near
permanent waterbodies (VDGIF,
2015a).
No individuals were detected
during 2015 or 2016 surveys;
however, suitable habitat for this and wooded wetland habitats. The
species is available in the ACP
project area. This species has
been documented at the
Meherrin River; Nottoway River
and Sycamore Bend swamps;
and Quaker Swamp, which are
crossed by or in the vicinity of
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Primary threats to this species
appear to be the loss of roost sites
potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Eastern (Rafinesques) Big-Eared
Bat.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Eastern small-footed S2b (Tier Ia) Highland, Bath, Generally roost on the ground 2016 surveys detected eastern Atlantic intends to construct outside
myotis Augusta under rocks, in crevices, and small-footed bats at one of the active season in most
Myotis leibii occasionally in buildings and acoustic site. This species has locations; therefore, direct impacts
under tree bark. Hibernates in been documented at the Big are not anticipated, although some
solution and fissure caves and Levels-Maple Flats tree clearing may occur in October.
mine tunnels near the entrance Conservation Site, which is in Tree clearing on rocky slopes may
(VDGIF, 2015a). proximity of ACP (VDCR, improve summer habitat for this
2016b). species by increasing solar radiation
on potential summer maternity
habitat, making habitat more suitable
for roosting (FS et al., 2002);
however tree clearing would also
reduce foraging habitat. Construction
activities could also disturb bats in
the vicinity, potentially disrupting
normal activities. Pending VDGIF
review of survey results and
S-31

recommended conservation
measures.
Little brown bat S1S3/PE All Counties Crossed Roost in cave, buildings, rocks, One brown bat was captured The potential impacts and mitigation
Myotis lucifugus (Tier Ia) and trees, under bridges, in during 2016 mist-net surveys in measures for this species are the
lucifugus mines, in tunnels, and other man- Suffolk County. This species same as described above for the
made structures (VDGIF, 2015a). has been documented at the Eastern (Rafinesques) Big-Eared
Burnsville Cove Conservation Bat.
Site, which is in proximity of
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Allegheny woodrat S3b (Tier IVa) Highland, Bath, Blue Ridge to the west in wooded Field surveys documented four Construction activities would result in
Neotoma magister Augusta, Nelson bottomlands, banks, caves, and rock outcrops that are direct loss of habitat and habitat
cliffs (VDGIF, 2016l). potentially suitable for woodrat; fragmentation. Fragmentation
and a woodrat latrine was isolates populations and eliminates
documented on AP-1 where access to food sources. Loss of
Allegheny woodrat presence is foraging plants (American chestnut
assumed on the GWNF. [Quercus prinus]). Sedimentation
Surveys pending at 9.6 miles during construction could fill
and are anticipated to be underground crevices used as
complete in June 2017. habitat. Pending VDGIF review of
survey results and recommended
conservation measures.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Tri-colored bat S1S3/PE/PF All Counties Crossed Roost in caves, rock crevices, Two tri-colored bats were The potential impacts and mitigation
(eastern pipistrelle) (Tier Ia) trees/foliage, and sometimes captured during mist-net measures for this species are the
Perimyotis subflavus buildings in both wooded and surveys in Nelson and same as described above for the
cleared areas (VDGIF, 2016n). Southampton counties during Eastern (Rafinesques) Big-Eared
2016 surveys. This species has Bat.
been documented at Jewel Box
Cave; and the Burnsville Cove
Conservation Site, which are in
proximity to ACP (VDCR
2016b).
Southern water shrew S1S2/Eb Bath, Highland Undercut banks of high gradient Four streams crossed by the In-stream construction activities
Sorex palustris (Tier IIa) and high elevation (above 900 m) pipeline near the Virginia-West could displace shrews, cause stress,
punctulatus first and second order streams Virginia state line on the GWNF and disrupt normal activities.
with abundance cover from were identified as suitable Construction equipment could cause
overhanging rocks, roots, logs, habitat for water shrew. injury or mortality to individuals.
and crevices (NatureServe, 2015). Increased sedimentation and
turbidity from construction activities
S-32

and use of access roads into suitable

stream habitat could temporarily
degrade habitat, and impact forage
species. Atlantic would implement
the sediment and erosion control
measures identified in the FERC
Plan and Procedures (table 2.3.1-1).
Pending VDGIF review of survey
results and recommended
conservation measures.
American water Eb (Tier IIa) Bath, Highland Small, cold streams with thick Four streams crossed by the The potential impacts and mitigation
shrew overhanging riparian vegetation; pipeline near the Virginia-West measures for this species are the
Sorex palustris also around lakes, ponds, Virginia state line on the GWNF same as described above for the
marshes, bogs, and other lentic were identified as suitable Southern Water Shrew.
habitats (VDGIF, 2016o). habitat for water shrew.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
BIRDS
Northern Saw-Whet S1B/S2Nb Bath, Highland, Blue Ridge and mountains west of Call surveys conducted on Potentially suitable habitat for this
Owl (Tier Ic) Augusta, Shenandoah River. High GWNF; no northern saw-whet species occurs within the ACP
Aegolius acadicus Cumberland, elevation, mature, coniferous owls were audibly or visually Project area (see appendix Q).
Nottoway forests, sometimes mixed or detected; surveys were not Construction would remove suitable
deciduous forest, with open required for this species outside nesting and roosting habitat, and
understory, and riverside habitat of the GWNF. potentially cause disturbance to
nearby. Wooded habitat includes foraging owls. Atlantic would
coniferous swamps, disturbed construct outside of the nesting
deciduous woods, savannas, season and implement the mitigation
riverside forest, and shrub-steppe measures outlined in the Migratory
habitat (CLO, 2016b). Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1).
Henslows Sparrow S1B/T (Tier N/A Dry to wet fields with dense No NHI occurrences within the Due to the rarity of this species, no
Ammodramus Ia) vegetation and no woody plants Project area. direct impacts are anticipated;
henslowii (e.g., early successional fields), however, suitable habitat for this
and high marsh, such as black species is likely to occur in the ACP
needlerush (Juncus roemerianus)- project area. Construction activities
S-33

saltmeadow hay (Spartina would cause temporary loss of

patens)-salt grass (Distichlis suitable habitat, and could disrupt
spicata) communities (VDGIF, normal activities of birds in the
2015a). vicinity of the project area. Atlantic
would construct outside of the
nesting season and implement the
mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to minimize impact to this species.
Because of this species preference
for herbaceous communities without
woody plants, clearing of the ROW
during construction could provide
suitable habitat for this species.
Atlantic would mow the ROW outside
of the nesting season.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Seaside Sparrow NR (Tier IVa) Suffolk Breeds in short grass tidal No surveys were conducted for ACP would permanently impact
Ammodramus marshes and meadows with this species. approximately 3.2 acres of salt or
maritimus shrubs and mixed vegetation. brackish marshes in Virginia (see
Strictly found in salt or brackish appendix Q) where this species has
marshes (VDGIF, 2016b). the potential to occur. Construction
activities would cause temporary loss
of suitable habitat, and could disrupt
normal activities of birds in the
vicinity of the project area. Atlantic
would construct outside of the
nesting season and implement the
mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1) to minimize impact to this species.
Grasshopper NR (Tier IVa) All Counties Crossed Breeds in hayfields, weedy fallow No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
Sparrow fields, prairies. Favors grass fields this species. measures for this species are the
Ammodramus for breeding; during winter same as described above for the
S-34

savannarum broomsedge fields are preferred. Henslows Sparrow.

pratensis Also uses grasses, weed fields,
and herbs under open pinewoods
(VDGIF, 2016b).
Great Blue Heron S3B/S5N All Counties Crossed Nests in colonies in swamps or
Ardea herodias edges of bodies of waters in the
tops of the tallest trees, usually in the ACP survey corridor in
remote areas. Mature oak-gum-
cypress forests are optimal
breeding habitat (VDGIF, 2016b).
An active great blue heron
rookery was documented within
Suffolk (ROOK-ACT-02) during
2016 bald and golden eagle
surveys. In addition, three
rookeries previously
documented by NHI and the
Center for Conservation Biology
(CCB) in Southampton County
are located within 0.5-buffer of
the workspace; however, no
activity in any of these rookeries FWS and VDGIF to identify
was observed during 2016
surveys.
VDGIF recommends a TOYR from
February 15-July 31 for activities
within 0.5-mile of a rookery; maintain
undisturbed naturally vegetated
buffer of at least 500 feet around the
rookery. ROOK-ACT-02 is located
1,974 feet (0.37 miles) from the ACP
workspace. The NHI and CCB
rookeries are located between 860
(0.16 miles) and 1,050 feet (0.20
miles) from the ACP workspace.
Atlantic is currently coordinating with
appropriate conservation measures
to work within the recommended
buffer for ROOK-ACT-02, and to
confirm that no additional
conservation measures are
necessary at the NHI and CCB
rookeries.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Black-Billed Cuckoo NR (Tier IIb) Highland, Bath, Breeds in brushy pastures, No surveys were conducted for Potentially suitable habitat for this
Coccyzus Augusta, Nelson, shrubby hedgerows at edges of this species. species occurs in the ACP project
erythropthalmus Buckingham, fields, dry, open upland woods, area (see appendix Q). Construction
Dinwiddie, Nottoway, and groves. Found primarily in activities would cause temporary to
Suffolk, Chesapeake mature and usually extensive long term loss of suitable habitat, and
deciduous forests where tangles could disrupt normal activities of
are present; mainly in mountain birds in the vicinity of the project
country (VDGIF, 2016b). area. Atlantic would construct
outside of the nesting season and
implement the mitigation measures
outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan
(see table 2.3.1-1) to minimize
impact to this species. Based on this
species preference for edge and
open habitats, the permanent right-
of-way could provide additional
suitable habitat for this species, once
S-35

restored.
Peregrine Falcon S1B/S2N/Tb Highland, Augusta, In western Virginia, peregrine Suitable habitat potentially VDGIF recommends maintaining a
Falco peregrinus (Tier Ia) Nelson, Suffolk, falcons nest in natural, open, present within the survey 0.5-mile buffer around peregrine
Chesapeake rocky cliffs in mountainous areas corridor; however aerial surveys falcon choice habitat during nesting
or river gorges, usually associated within a 2-mile wide area for season (February 15-July 15);
with water. In eastern Virginia, eagles did not observe any Atlantic would consult with VDGIF if
falcons use man-made structures peregrine falcons. Pending suitable habitat would be impacted
such as unfinished bridge piers, review of cliff habitat. by blasting prior to initiation of
bridges, or skyscrapers (VDGIF, blasting activities. Pending review of
2015a). cliff habitat data in the western part
of the ACP project area.
Least Bittern S3B/S3N Augusta, Dinwiddie, Prefers marshes with fresh or No surveys were conducted for ACP would permanently impact
Ixobrychus exilis (Tier IIIa) Suffolk, Chesapeake brackish waters with tall this species. approximately 3.6 acres of emergent
exilis vegetation. Often in cattails or freshwater or brackish marshes in
areas where vegetation is at least Virginia (see appendix Q) where this
three feet tall (VDGIF, 2016b). species has the potential to occur.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Seaside Sparrow.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Loggerhead Shrike S1B/S2N/Tb All Counties Crossed Open areas, grasslands (often Surveys were conducted on a The potential impacts and mitigation
Lanius ludovicianus (Tier Ia) grazed or occasionally mowed) portion of the ACP survey measures for this species are the
and agricultural landscapes corridor; no loggerhead shrike same as described above for the
interspersed with forbs, scattered were observed. Henslows Sparrow.
shrubs, and/or small trees.
Usually nests in eastern redcedar
or hawthorne (VDGIF, 2015a).
Swainsons Warbler S2B (Tier IIc) Augusta, Suffolk, In Appalachian Mountain areas No surveys were conducted for Potentially suitable habitat for this
Limnothlypis Chesapeake, found in rhododendron and this species. This species has species occurs in the ACP project
swainsonii Southampton mountain laurel communities been documented in the Great area (see appendix Q). Construction
(VDGIF, 2016b). Dismal Swamp: Northwest activities would cause long term to
Section Conservation Site, and permanent loss of suitable forested
Tarrara/SR 35 Conservation habitat, and could disrupt normal
Site, which are crossed by or in activities of birds in the vicinity of the
proximity to ACP (VDCR, project area. Atlantic would
2016b). construct outside of the nesting
season and implement the mitigation
S-36

measures outlined in the Migratory

Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
minimize impact to this species.
Black-and-White NR (Tier IVa) All Counties Crossed Breeds in mature or second- No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
Warbler growth deciduous or mixed this species. measures for this species are the
Mniotilta varia woodlands from sea level to same as described above for the
mountain peaks. They prefer Swainsons Warbler.
sapling stage (age 20) of central
hardwood forest clearcuts with
high stem densities and closed
canopies. Nest in the roots of
fallen trees (VDGIF, 2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Bachmans Sparrow S1B/T (Tier Dinwiddie, Nottoway, Dry, open-canopy pine woods with NHI Occurrences within 2-miles Based on VDGIF assessment, there
Peucaea aestivalis Ia) Southampton, little woody understory, and dense of Project area in mid- to late- is not a high level of concern along
Greensville grass/forb layer such as pine 1990s. This species has been the pipeline route for this species.
savanna. Also uses old fields and documented at the Rt. 63 The potential impacts and mitigation
pine clearcuts. Associated with Uplands Conservation Site and measures for this species are the
broomsedge (Andropogon Fort Pickett Impact Area same as described above for the
virginicus). This species has been Conservation Site, which is are Henslows Sparrow. Thinning of
confirmed within the Fort Pickett in proximity to ACP (VDCR, forests and frequent burns to
Military Reservation (VDGIF, 2016b). suppress underbrush and encourage
2015a). grasses promote suitable habitat for
this species (VDGIF, 2015a);
therefore clearing of the ROW during
construction could provide suitable
habitat for this species. Atlantic
would mow the ROW outside of the
nesting season.
Clapper Rail NR (Tier IVa) Suffolk, Chesapeake Prefers non-timbered wetland with No surveys were conducted for ACP would permanently impact
S-37

Rallus crepitans shallow and deep marshes; rarely this species. approximately 3.6 acres of emergent
reported far from salt water freshwater or brackish marshes in
marshes (VDGIF, 2016b). Virginia (see appendix Q) where this
species has the potential to occur.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Seaside Sparrow.
King Rail S2B/S3N Nelson, Buckingham, Occurs in freshwater or brackish No surveys were conducted for ACP would permanently impact
Rallus elegans (Tier IIb) Cumberland, Prince marshes in emergent vegetation this species. approximately 3.6 acres of emergent
Edward, Nottoway, or extensive marshes along freshwater or brackish marshes in
Dinwiddie, streams, ponds, and rivers. Virginia (see appendix Q) where this
Brunswick, Occasionally use rice fields and species has the potential to occur.
Greensville, wet meadows (VDGIF, 2016b). The potential impacts and mitigation
Southampton, measures for this species are the
Suffolk, Chesapeake same as described above for the
Seaside Sparrow.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Virginia Rail S2B/S3N Chesapeake Prefers dense marsh areas with No surveys were conducted for ACP would permanently impact
Rallus limicola (Tier IVa) cattails as dominant cover type. this species. approximately 3.6 acres of emergent
Found in fresh or brackish freshwater or brackish marshes in
marshes, and sometimes salt Virginia (see appendix Q) where this
marshes, year-round (VDGIF, species has the potential to occur.
2016b). The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Seaside Sparrow.
Golden-Crowned S2B/S5N All Counties Crossed Breeds mainly in dense northern No surveys were conducted for Potentially suitable habitat for this
Kinglet coniferous forests of spruce, but this species. species occurs in the ACP project
Regulus satrapa also nests in pine, fir, hemlock area (see appendix Q). Atlantic
woods and cedar bogs. Winter in would construct outside of the
coniferous mixed or deciduous nesting season, and implement the
forests, thickets, and low tangles mitigation measures outlined in the
of weedy growth (VDGIF, 2016b). Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1).
S-38

American Woodcock NR (Tier IIa) All Counties Crossed In the summer, this species uses
Scolopax minor permanent wet areas with alder,
dogwood, crab apple, and
hawthorne. Nesting occurs in
areas of mixed hardwood growth
of birch, aspen, conifer, and alder.
They forage in fields for insects
(VDGIF, 2016b)
Cerulean Warbler S3S4B (Tier All Counties Crossed Breeds in swamps and
Setophaga cerulea IIa) bottomlands (coastal plain); favors this species.
open stands of tall trees along
riverbanks or dense deciduous
forests with little undergrowth
(mountains). Always found in
mature hardwoods (VDGIF,
2016b).
Magnolia Warbler S2B All Counties Crossed Nests in low conifers, hemlock,
Setophaga magnolia larch, spruce, and fir; avoids pure this species.
hardwood forests (VDGIF, 2015a).
No surveys were conducted for Potentially suitable habitat for this
this species. species occurs in the ACP project
area (see appendix Q). Atlantic
would construct outside of the
nesting season, and implement the
mitigation measures outlined in the
Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1).
No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Swainsons Warbler.
No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Swainsons Warbler.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Black-Throated green S1B? (Tier Chesapeake, Suffolk Coastal cypress and white-cedar No surveys were conducted for A limited about of potentially suitable
Warbler (Waynes Ic) swamps of southeastern Virginia. this species. habitat for this species occurs in the
Warbler) Also inhabits swamps containing ACP project area in an area where
Setophaga virens high percentage of red maple. this species has been known to
waynei Locally common summer resident occur (see appendix Q).
in the Great Dismal Swamp Conservation of the Atlantic white
National Wildlife Refuge, which is cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) is
crossed by ACP (VDGIF, 2015a). important to conserve this species
(VDGIF, 2015a). Atlantic would
permanent remove approximately 1.3
acres of forested vegetation
communities that may contain
Atlantic white cedar. The potential
impacts and mitigation measures for
this species are the same as
described above for the Swainsons
Warbler.
S-39

Northern Rough- NR (Tier IVc) All Counties Crossed Open areas with adequate nest No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
Winged Swallow sites and a water supply, usually a this species. measures for this species are the
Stelgidopteryx stream. Nests are built in burrows same as described above for the
serripennis in sandy banks, often along a Henslows Sparrow.
stream, irrigation ditch, and less
commonly in rock ledges, crevices
in bridges and buildings, or
drainage pipes under bridges
(VDGIF, 2016b).
Eastern Meadowlark NR (Tier IVa) All Counties Crossed Breeds in open farmlands, No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
Sturnella magna especially pastures, hayfields, and this species. measures for this species are the
grassy meadows. May use areas same as described above for the
with scattered shrubs and may Henslows Sparrow.
favor moist lowlands; although
fairly dense grasslands with low
density of shrubs are preferred.
Larger (over five hectares) of
contiguous fields are also
preferred (VDGIF, 2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Appalachian Bewicks SHBb/E Highland, Bath, High elevations in farmyards or This species is very rare and Based VDGIF correspondence, due
Wren Augusta overgrown fields with tree cavities may be extirpated. No suitable to its rarity, this species is unlikely to
Thryomanes bewickii or abandoned buildings (VDGIF, habitat was identified within the occur in the ACP project area.
altus 2015a). GWNF during surveys. Surveys found a lack of suitable
habitat in the GWNF. Therefore,
impacts are unlikely and therefore
have not been assessed further.
Winter Wren S2B/S4N All Counties Crossed Breed in spruce-fir forests with No surveys were conducted for The potential impacts and mitigation
Trogoldytes hiemalis tangles, uprooted trees, and other this species. measures for this species are the
cover, or dark ravines, under same as described above for the
hemlocks or beneath hardwoods. Swainsons Warbler.
Winter in tangles, fallen logs,
uprooted trees, or stream banks
that provide cover (VDGIF,
2016b).
Golden-Winged S3B/SWa Bath, Highland, Prefer shrubby areas with No surveys were conducted for Potentially suitable habitat for this
Warbler (Tier Ia) Augusta, Nelson scattered trees, generally near this species. species occurs in the ACP project
S-40

Vermivora forest edge. Breed in a variety of area (see appendix Q). Construction
chrysoptera early-successional or disturbed activities would cause long term to
habitats including shrubby fields, permanent loss of suitable forested
abandoned farmlands, shrubby habitat, and could disrupt normal
swamps, successional forest, activities of birds in the vicinity of the
utility ROWs, clearings within project area. Atlantic would
forests, brushy clearcuts, or construct outside of the nesting
shelterwood cuts in deciduous season and implement the mitigation
woods. Once a disturbed area measures outlined in the Migratory
becomes too old, this species Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
disappears (VDGIF, 2016b). minimize impact to this species.
Because this species prefers early-
successional habitats (VDGIF,
2015a), the permanent right-of-way
and secondary growth outside of the
permanent right-of-way have the
potential to create additional suitable
habitat for this species once
restored.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
REPTILES
Canebrake S1/E (Tier II) Suffolk, Chesapeake Mature hardwood and mixed pine- There are numerous Construction would remove foraging
rattlesnake (Coastal hardwood forests, forested cane observations of this species in habitat, and vehicles could cause
Plain population) thickets, and ridges adjacent to Chesapeake and Suffolk. This injury or mortality. Construction
Crotalus horridus swampy areas (VDGIF, 2011b). species has been documented activities would increase noise and
in the Great Dismal Swamp vibrations, which may disrupt normal
Conservation Site; and Great activities, displace snakes, or
Dismal Swamp: Northwest increase stress. Atlantic would
Section Conservation Site, implement the Snake Conservation
which are crossed by ACP Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to provide
(VDCR, 2016b). guidance to construction crews on
ways to minimize disturbance and
impacts on snakes during
construction. Atlantic would
implement the Snake Conservation
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to provide
guidance to construction crews on
S-41

ways to minimize disturbance and

Timber rattlesnake S4b (Tier IV)
Crotalus horridus
Scarlet kingsnake S2S4 (Tier
Lampropeltis
elapsoides
Highland, Bath, Hibernates in fissures in rock
Augusta, Nelson, ledges or talus slopes. Utilizes
Buckingham diverse forests and open habitats
when active (VDGIF, 2015a).
Nelson Prefer pine forests or mixed pine-
IIIc) hardwood forests; hide beneath
loose bark of dead pine trees
(Roble et al., 2007).
GWNF has reported an
occurrence of the timber
rattlesnake within the ACP
project area.
One occurrence noted near
Project area.
impacts on timber rattlesnake during
construction.
Construction activities would
increase noise and vibrations, which
may disrupt normal activities,
displace snakes, or increase stress.
Construction would remove foraging
habitat, and vehicles could cause
injury or mortality. Construction
activities could expose rock outcrops
that are currently shaded, potentially
providing sufficient solar radiation for
suitable timber rattlesnake denning
or gestating habitat. Atlantic would
implement the Snake Conservation
Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to provide
guidance to construction crews on
ways to minimize disturbance and
impacts on timber rattlesnake during
construction.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Canebrake rattlesnake.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
AMPHIBIANS
Barking treefrog S2/T (Tier Greensville, Breeds in graminoid-dominated Reports for this species in Potentially suitable habitat for this
Hyla gratiosa IIa) Southampton cypress ponds and bays, and in Greensville and Southampton species occurs in the ACP project
pine barren ponds. Generally pine counties are unconfirmed. DCR- area. ACP would impact
savanna or low wet woods and DNH has documented approximately 757 acres of
swamps surrounding breeding occurrences in Greensville and freshwater wetland in Virginia during
ponds (VDGIF, 2016p). Southampton Counties. This construction, of which approximately
species has the potential to 248 acres would be maintained in an
occur within the survey corridor herbaceous state within the
between U.S. Route 58 and permanent right-of-way. The loss of
County Route 644 (VDCR, suitable wetland habitat is the
2016b). greatest threat to this species. VA
SWAP recommended conservation
actions include maintaining or
restoring forested buffers
surrounding occupied wetlands
(VDGIF, 2015a). Atlantic would
S-42

implement the FERC Plan and

Mabees salamander S1S2/T (Tier Suffolk, Chesapeake Fish-free vernal ponds or
Ambystoma mabeei IIa) ephemeral coastal plain sinkholes
up to 1.5 meters deep, with
surrounding forests generally
composed of hardwoods mixed
with pine. Also found in low areas
adjacent to coastal rivers and pine
savannas, and in bogs, ponds,
low wet woods, and swamps
(VDGIF, 2016q).
2016 surveys completed at 118
wetland features; two sites were
identified as moderate habitat
and none as high; no individuals
were observed. Additional
surveys are pending at 3.1 miles
and are anticipated to be
completed in June 2017.
Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1) to
construct across wetland features,
and its Restoration and
Rehabilitation Plan (see appendix F)
to minimize impacts to this species.
Atlantic has avoided suitable habitat
for this species via reroutes;
therefore no impacts are anticipated.
Pending concurrence from GWNF
and VDGIF.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Eastern tiger E (Tier IIa) Augusta, Nelson Breeding habitat includes 2016 surveys completed at 59 The greatest threat to this species is
salamander limestone sinkhole ponds wetland features; four sites were the loss of breeding ponds and
Ambystoma tigrinum associated with wetlands. identified as moderate habitat adjacent woodlands. VDGIF has
Terrestrial habitat includes mature and one as high; one larval tiger recommended avoidance of
forests (VDGIF, 2016m). salamander observed / no occupied wetlands with 300-meter
adults observed. Additional buffer. Pending VDGIF review of
surveys are pending at 1.4 miles survey results and recommended
and are anticipated to be conservation measures. The GWNF
completed in June 2017. has recommended additional surveys
Associated with the Big Levels- of sinkhole ponds on the GWNF (see
Maple Flats Conservation Site table R-4 in appendix R).
and at isolated wetlands in
Sherando Quad, which are in
proximity to ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
Dwarf waterdog S2S3 (Tier Dinwiddie, Slow-moving areas of low gradient No surveys for this species were Potentially suitable habitat occurs in
Necturus punctatus IIIa) Greensville, streams with mud or sand conducted. This species has waterbodies that are crossed by
S-43

Southampton, substrates (VDGIF, 2016r). been documented at the
Brunswick Nottoway River-Fort Pickett
SCU; and has the potential to
occur at the Meherrin River and
swamp forest near the Virginia-
North Carolina border; and
Fontaine Creek, which are
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
ACP. Waterbody crossings and
access road construction/use would
temporarily degrade water quality
through increased sedimentation and
turbidity during construction,
disturbance, changes in hydrology,
and disturbance and injury or
mortality from blasting (see section
4.6 for additional discussion).
Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing
shade increase localized water
temperatures. Atlantic would
implement the measures in the
FERC Plan and Procedures, and
construction and restoration plans
(see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of
hazardous chemicals, and to restore
riparian habitats, including
implementation of the VDEQ Virginia
Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Cow Knob S2a,b (Tier Ic) Augusta, Bath Lives under rocks, logs, and other 2016 surveys completed in Bath Impacts to this species would include
salamander surface debris where it is moist County within the GWNF. long term to permanent habitat loss.
Plethodon punctatus and cool. Occurs in mixed Potentially suitable habitat was If present during construction, noise
hardwood stands, hardwood identified at two locations; and vibrations generated from
mixed with eastern hemlock however no individuals were construction activities could disrupt
(Tsuga canadensis) and hemlock observed. normal activities, and could cause
stands. Found at elevations injury or mortality from collisions with
greater than 2,400 feet (VDGIF, construction equipment or vehicles.
2016k). Atlantic and DTI would implement the
measures in the FERC Plan and
Procedures, and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1)
to minimize impacts to this species.
FISH
Roughhead shiner S2S3b (Tier Highland, Bath, Endemic to the headwaters of the Surveys for this species were All waterbodies in the upper James
Notropis Ib) Augusta James River. Cool to warm conducted on the GWNF only River watershed would be crossed
semperasper streams of moderate gradient, (refer to table R-2 in appendix utilizing a dry technique. The
S-44

gravel to boulder substrate, slight R). This species has been found potential impacts and mitigation
siltation, slow to moderate
currents or in or just below the
head of a pool, or in moderately
calm water adjacent to runs
(VDGIF, 2016b).
in upper James River drainage
above Buchanan (FS, 2014).
Based on correspondence from
the GWNF, this species is
known specifically from the
Back Creek, Jackson River, and
Cowpasture River in Bath and
Allegheny counties (FS, 2016c)
and Atlantic has assumed
presence at these waterbody
crossing locations.
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Slimy Sculpin. Atlantic would also
commit to the VDGIF TOYR (March
15-June 30) at waterbody crossings
where presence of this species is
assumed.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Slimy sculpin S2 (Tier IV) Highland, Augusta Small rocky brooks, silted No surveys for this species were Potentially suitable habitat occurs in
Cottus cognatus vegetated spring runs to large conducted. This species has the Middle River crossed by ACP. Middle
rivers and shallow to deep potential to occur in the Middle River would be crossed using a dry
portions of oligotrophic lakes River, which would be crossed technique. Atlantic would implement
(VDGIF, 2016b). by ACP (VDCR, 2016b). the Virginia Fish Relocation Plan
(see table 2.3.1-1) to remove all fish
species trapped within areas
proposed for dewatering or in-stream
work prior to initiating construction;
mortality may occur during fish
relocation. Waterbody crossings and
access road construction/use would
temporarily degrade water quality
through increased sedimentation and
turbidity during construction, reduced
fish passage, disturbance, changes
in hydrology, and disturbance and
S-45

injury or mortality from blasting (see

section 4.6 for additional discussion).
Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing
shade increase localized water
temperatures. Atlantic would
implement the measures in the
FERC Plan and Procedures, and
construction and restoration plans
(see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of
hazardous chemicals, and to restore
riparian habitats.
Orangefin madtom S2b/T (Tier Bath Found beneath shelter or larger Surveys were conducted in The potential impacts and mitigation
Noturus gilberti IIb) gravel, rubble, or boulders in 2016 on the GWNF; no measures for this species are the
medium to large, cool to warm orangefin madtom were same as described above for the
streams of moderate gradient and observed at crossing locations. Slimy Sculpin. Because only the
with swifter sections with little to This species has been found in introduced population of orange
no silt (VDGIF, 2016b). the South Fork Roanoke River madtom may be affected by ACP,
watershed, Roanoke River the VDGIF TOYR (March 15-May 31)
above Salem, Craig Creek, would not apply.
Johns Creek, and Cowpasture
River in Bath County (FS, 2014;
FS, 2016c).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
GASTROPODS (Snails)
Virginia springsnail S2/E (Tier Ia) Bath, Highland Endemic only to the Upper James 2016 karst surveys identified Construction activities could alter
Fontigens morrisoni River basin. Confirmed at two two cave entrances and 28 karst water flow patterns, or increase
springs and two caves in Bath and features within the study area in sediment and contaminant loads,
Highland counties (VDGIF, Highland County; and 40 karst which could lead to a reduction or
2015a). features in Bath County (see degradation of available habitat.
section 4.1.2.3). Snail habitat is susceptible to
contamination due to the porosity of
the substrate. Blasting, trenching,
and digging can cause shifts in
surface and subsurface formations
and hydrology, and may crush snails,
or alter travel corridors (FWS, 2011i).
Atlantic would implement the Karst
Mitigation Plan (see appendix I) to
minimize potential impacts on this
species. Consultations are ongoing
S-46

with the VDGIF with regard to

impacts on karst and species habitat.
Round supercoil SUb (Tier IIc) N/A Moist environments including Surveys for this species on the Construction activities could cause
Paravitrea reesei damp areas under rocks, leaf GWNF did not document any mortality to individuals if present in
litter, river bluffs and other slopes occurrences; No surveys for this the workspace. This species is
near water (Hotopp et al., 2013). species were conducted outside known to inhabit leaf litter in forests,
the GWNF. a habitat that is common across the
ACP Project area. Construction and
maintenance of the right-of-way
would result in conversion to less
desirable habitat in some areas.
Because suitable habitat is very
common across the ACP Project
area, the loss of habitat would be
localized and minimal.
BIVALVES (Freshwater Mussels)
Brook floater S1b/E (Tier Augusta, Fast-flowing, clean water in None identified during surveys. No impacts anticipated to this
Alasmidonta varicosa Ib) Buckingham, substrates that contain relatively species; Atlantic would implement
Nottoway firm rubble, gravel, and substrates the Freshwater Mussel Guidelines for
swept free from siltation. Buried in Virginia (FWS and VDGIF, 2008)
the substrate in shallow riffle and where mussels are documented.
shoal areas (VDGIF, 2016b).
Yellow lance S2S3a,b (Tier Nelson, Buckingham, Slow currents with unsilted sandy None identified during surveys. This species is currently under
Elliptio lanceolata IIa) Cumberland, substrates; can tolerate various This species has been review by FWS for listing under the
Dinwiddie, Nottoway, water sizes (NatureServe, 2015). documented in the Nottoway ESA (refer to section 4.7.1.13).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data
Southampton, River-Fort Pickett SCU, and
Brunswick, James River at Wingina; and
Greensville has the potential to occur in the present in the Nottoway and James
Meherrin River and swamp
forest at the Virginia-North
Carolina border; Nottoway
River-Monroe Bridge SCU;
downstream of County Pond;
and Nottoway River-Sturgeon
Creek-Hardwood Creek SCU
(VDCR, 2016b). Per GWNF
correspondence, this species
has also been found in
Cowpasture River in Allegheny
County (FS, 2016c).
S-47
Potential Project Impacts and
Mitigation
Although not detected during
surveys, this species is assumed
Rivers, and their perennial
tributaries. The Nottoway (MP 32.6)
and James rivers would be crossed
utilizing an HDD. Mussels occurring
in waterbodies crossed by HDD may
be affected if there is an inadvertent
release of drilling fluid in or near the
waterbody. Atlantic would implement
the measures outlined in its HDD
Plan (see appendix H), and would
maintain riparian vegetation at HDD
crossings to minimize off road vehicle
use and additional sedimentation.
Where located in waterbodies

crossed by dry crossing technique,

individuals would be relocated to
suitable habitat per the Freshwater
Mussel Guidelines for Virginia (FWS
and VDGIF, 2008). Waterbody
crossings and access road
construction/use would temporarily
degrade water quality through
increased sedimentation and turbidity
during construction, reduced fish
passage, disturbance, changes in
hydrology, and disturbance and
injury or mortality from blasting (see
section 4.6 for additional discussion).
Removal of riparian habitat may also
contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing
shade increase localized water
temperatures. Atlantic would
implement the measures in the
FERC Plan and Procedures, and
construction and restoration plans
(see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of
hazardous chemicals, and to restore
riparian habitats. Atlantic is also
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
proposing to withdraw water from
several of these waterbodies. Atlantic
has committed to TOYR for short-
term brooding mussels of May 15-
July 31 for all in-stream activities,
including water withdrawal.
Additional consultation with the FWS
and VDGIF is pending to determine
the appropriate conservation
measures for water withdrawal.
Atlantic pigtoe S2/Ta,b (Tier Bath, Prince Edward, Clean, swift-moving waters often This species was observed at This species is currently under
Fusconaia masoni II) Nottoway, Dinwiddie, found in gravel of gravel-sand two waterbody crossings. This review by FWS for listing under the
Buckingham, substrate (VDGIF, 2016b). species has been documented ESA (refer to section 4.7.1.13). This
Greensville, Nelson, in the Nottoway River (VCDR, species was detected at one
Brunswick, 2016b; VDGIF, 2016d), waterbody, and is assumed present
Greensville Appomattox River, Sturgeon Nottoway, Appomattox, and Meherrin
Creek, and Meherrin River rivers, Sturgeon Creek, and their
S-48

(VDGIF, 2016d). However, only perennial tributaries. The Nottoway

one stable population is River (MP 32.6) would be crossed
currently known and it is utilizing an HDD. The potential
believed to be almost extirpated impacts and mitigation measures for
form the Nottoway River. this species are the same as
Historic data indicates also described above for the Yellow
indicates potential presence of Lance. Atlantic would also adhere to
this species in the Mill Creek TOYR for all in-stream work from
and Calfpasture River drainages May 15-July 31 for waterbodies
(VDGIF, 2016b). known or assumed to support
Atlantic pigtoe mussels.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Yellow lampmussel S2 (Tier IIa) Dinwiddie, Large streams and rivers with low This species was observed at This species was detected at one
Lampsilis cariosa Southampton, gradient and sand and gravel one waterbody crossing waterbody, and is assumed present
Brunswick, substrates (VDGIF, 2015a). location. Per VDCR in the Nottoway River and Sturgeon
Greensville correspondence, this species Creek, and their perennial tributaries.
has been documented in the The Nottoway River (MP 32.6) would
Nottoway River-Fort Pickett be crossed utilizing an HDD. The
SCU, Nottoway River-Monroe potential impacts and mitigation
Bridge SCU, and Nottoway measures for this species are the
River-Sturgeon Creek- same as described above for the
Hardwood Creek SCU; and has Yellow Lance.
the potential to occur in the
Meherrin River and swamp
forest at the Virginia-North
Carolina border; and Nottoway
River and Sycamore Bend
swamps, which are crossed or
in proximity to ACP (VDCR,
S-49

2016b). However, this species is

considered uncommon in the
Nottoway and Meherrin rivers.
Eastern lampussel S2 (Tier IVa) Nottoway, Dinwiddie, Small streams, large rivers, This species was observed at This species was detected at one
Lampsilis radiata Southampton, ponds, and lakes in a wide variety one waterbody crossing waterbody, and is assumed present
Brunswick of substrates, but prefers sand or location. This species has been in the Nottoway River and Sturgeon
gravel (VDGIF, 2015). documented at the Nottoway Creek, and their perennial tributaries.
River-Monroe Bridge SCU; The Nottoway River (MP 32.6) would
Nottoway River-Sturgeon be crossed utilizing an HDD. The
Creek-Hardwood Creek SCU potential impacts and mitigation
(VDCR, 2016b). Large measures for this species are the
populations are known to exist same as described above for the
in the main stem of the Yellow Lance.
Nottoway and Meherrin rivers,
and may be present in the
James and Roanoke rivers
(VDGIF, 2015a).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Green floater S2/Ta,b (Tier Nelson, Buckingham, Fast-flowing, clean water in firm None identified during surveys. This species is currently under
Lasmigona subviridis IIa) Greensville, rubble, gravel and sand review by FWS for listing under the
Southampton, Prince substrates swept free from ESA (refer to section 4.7.1.13).
Edward, Greensville, siltation. Found buried in substrate Although not detected during
Brunswick in shallow riffle and shoal areas surveys, this species is assumed
(VDGIF, 2016b). This species has present in the Nottoway, James, and
been documented in the Nottoway Meherrin rivers, and their perennial
River-Fort Pickett SCU (VDCR, tributaries. The Nottoway (MP 32.6)
2016b), James River, (VDCR, and James rivers would be crossed
2016b; VDGIF, 2016d), and utilizing an HDD. The potential
Meherrin River (VDGIF, 2016d). It impacts and mitigation measures for
has the potential to occur at the this species are the same as
Appomattox River crossing south described above for the Yellow
of Stoddert; downstream of Lance. Atlantic would adhere to
County Pond; and swamp forest TOYR for all in-stream work from
at the Virginia-North Carolina April 15-June 15 and August 15-
border, which are crossed or in September 30 for waterbodies known
S-50

proximity to ACP (VDCR, 2016b). or assumed to support green floater

Paper pondshell
Utterbackia imbecillis
mussels.
S2S3 Nelson, Nottoway, Occurs in mud and mud sand This species was observed at The waterbody where this species
Dinwiddie, substrates of slackwater areas of one waterbody crossing was documented would be crossed
Greensville, ponds, creeks, or near the banks location. by a dry crossing technique. The
Southampton of large rivers, and reservoirs potential impacts and mitigation
(NatureServe, 2015). measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Yellow Lance.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
CRUSTACEANS (Amphipods, Isopods, and Decapods)
Racovitzas S2 (Tier IIIc)b Bath Subaquatic, subterranean obligate 2016 karst surveys identified ACP would be cross the Upper
terrestrical cave species. Full extent of two cave entrances and 28 karst James and South Fork Shenandoah
isopod subterranean habitat is unknown. features within the study area in watersheds in Bath, Highland, and
Miktoniscus racovitzai Documented in the Upper James Highland County; and 40 karst Augusta Counties. The potential
watershed in Bath County, and in features in Bath County. 78 impacts and mitigation measures for
the South Fork Shenandoah karst features were identified this species are the same as
watershed. It has been potentially within the study area in Augusta described above for the Virginia
extirpated from the South Fork County. Additionally, the Springsnail.
Shenandoah watershed surveys identified two notable
(NatureServe, 2015). areas of concentrations of karst
development: the Cochran
Cave area southwest of
Staunton, and area southeast of
Stuarts Draft that extends
southward towards Sherando
Camp (see section 4.1.2.3).
S-51

Chowanoke crayfish S2S3a (Tier Dinwiddie, Sluggish streams and swamps No surveys were conducted for This species is currently under
Orconectes IIIa) Greensville, with abundance of dead wood on this species in Virginia. This review by FWS for listing under the
virginiensis Nottoway, Brunswick the bottom (VDGIF, 2015a). species has been documented ESA (refer to section 4.7.1.12). The
in the Nottoway River-Fort Nottoway River (MP 260.7) and
Pickett SCU; and has the Waqua Creek would be crossed
potential to occur in Waqua utilizing dry crossing techniques.
Creek, which are crossed or in Atlantic is also proposing in-stream
proximity to ACP (VDCR, blasting at both locations, and water
2016b). withdrawal from the Nottoway River
for hydrotesting. The potential
impacts and mitigation measures for
this species are the same as
described above for the Slimy
Sculpin. Additional consultation with
the FWS and VDGIF is pending to
determine the appropriate
conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
Montgomery County S1 (Tier IIc)b Not Documented in Subaquatic, subterranean obligate 2016 karst surveys identified ACP would cross the Upper James
cave amphipod Counties Crossed by species. Full extent of two cave entrances and 28 watershed in Bath and Highland
Stygobromus ACP subterranean habitat is unknown. additional karst features within Counties. The potential impacts and
fergusoni Documented in the Upper James the study area in Highland mitigation measures for this species
watershed (NatureServe, 2015). County; and 40 karst features in are the same as described above for
Bath County. the Virginia Springsnail.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Shenandoah Valley S3b Not Documented in Subaquatic, subterranean obligate 2016 karst surveys identified 78 ACP would cross the South Fork
cave amphipod Counties Crossed by species. Specimens have been karst features within the study Shenandoah watershed in Augusta
Stygobromus ACP collected from 11 caves in the area in Augusta County. County. The potential impacts and
gracilipes Potomac River drainage in small Additionally, the surveys mitigation measures for this species
streams and pools. Full extent of identified two notable areas of are the same as described above for
subterranean habitat is unknown. concentrations of karst the Virginia Springsnail.
Documented in the South Fork development: the Cochran
Shenandoah watershed Cave area southwest of
(NatureServe, 2015). Staunton, and area southeast of
Stuarts Draft that extends
southward towards Sherando
Camp (see section 4.1.2.3).
Allegheny County S2 (Tier IIc)b Not Documented in Subaquatic, subterranean obligate 2016 karst surveys identified ACP would cross the Upper James
cave amphipod Counties Crossed by species. Full extent of two cave entrances and 28 watershed in Bath and Highland
Stygobromus ACP subterranean habitat is unknown. additional karst features within Counties. The potential impacts and
hoffmani Documented in the Upper James the study area in Highland mitigation measures for this species
watershed (NatureServe, 2015). County; and 40 karst features in are the same as described above for
S-52

Bath County. the Virginia Springsnail.

Bath County cave S1S2 (Tier Bath Subaquatic, subterranean obligate 2016 karst surveys identified ACP would cross the Upper James
amphipod IIc)b species. Has been documented two cave entrances and 28 watershed in Bath and Highland
Stygobromus mundus from both cave and surface additional karst features within Counties. The potential impacts and
stream collections. Full extent of the study area in Highland mitigation measures for this species
subterranean habitat is unknown. County; and 40 karst features in are the same as described above for
Documented in the Upper James Bath County. the Virginia Springsnail.
River watershed in Bath County
(NatureServe, 2015).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Madison cave S1/T (Tier Ib) Augusta Known and endemic to two cave 2016 karst surveys identified 78 The potential impacts and mitigation
amphipod lakes in Augusta County. Caves karst features within the study measures for this species are the
Stygobromus with clean abundant water flowing area in Augusta County. same as described above for the
stegerorum through the system (VDGIF, Additionally, the surveys Virginia Springsnail.
2015a). identified two notable areas of
concentrations of karst
development: the Cochran
Cave area southwest of
Staunton, and area southeast of
Stuarts Draft that extends
southward towards Sherando
Camp (see section 4.1.2.3).
This species has been
documented in the Barterbrook
Blue Conservation Site, and has
the potential to occur at
Churchville Cave, Spring Cave
S-53

#3, and Shortwave Cave, which

are crossed or in proximity to
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
MYRIAPODS (Centipedes and Millipedes)
Hoffmans Cleidognid S2S3 (Tier Not Documented in Leaf litter in deciduous forest. This species was documented Based on survey results, this species
millipede IIc)b Counties Crossed by Mountaintop species documented at nine sites during surveys on is within the ACP project area;
Cleidogona hoffmani ACP from Mt. Rogers, Whitetop the GWNF (see table R-2 in therefore there is the potential for
Mountain, Elk Garden, and Helton appendix R). mortality of individuals during tree
Creek. clearing and other construction
activities. This species is known to
inhabit leaf litter in deciduous forests,
a habitat that is common across the
ACP project area. Construction and
maintenance of the right-of-way
would result in conversion to less
desirable habitat in some areas.
Because suitable habitat is very
common across the ACP project
area, the loss of habitat would be
localized and minimal (FS et al.,
2002).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Montane centipede S2b (Tier IIc) Nelson Endemic to the Blue Ridge This species was not This species is known to inhabit leaf
Escaryus Mountains of Virginia. Found in documented during surveys on litter in mixed forests, a habitat that is
cryptorobius the upper soil horizons in mixed the GWNF; surveys for this common across the ACP Project
hardwood forests in the summer species were not required area. Construction and maintenance
months (May through July); outside the GWNF. of the right-of-way would result in
burrows deep into the soil matrix conversion to less desirable habitat
during winter (Pereira and in some areas. Because suitable
Hoffman, 1993). habitat is very common across the
ACP Project area, the loss of habitat
would be localized and minimal.
A cave centipede S1 (Tier IIIc)b Not Documented in Subterrestrial, subterranean 2016 karst surveys identified ACP would cross the Upper James
Nampabius turbator Counties Crossed by obligate species. Documented two cave entrances and 28 watershed in Bath and Highland
ACP within the Upper James additional karst features within Counties. The potential impacts and
watershed (NatureServe, 2015) the study area in Highland mitigation measures for this species
County; and 40 karst features in are the same as described above for
Bath County. the Virginia Springsnail.
Shenandoah S1b (Tier IIc) Augusta Found in leaf litter in mixed forests Surveys on the GWNF did not Four of the sites where Nannaria
S-54

Mountain between 760 to 1,000 meters document this species; however specimens were identified would be
Xystodesmid elevation (Hoffman, 1949). the survey documented six sites located within the ACP construction
millipede with unidentifiable Nannaria workspace. The potential impacts
Nannaria specimens, which may and mitigation measures for this
shenandoah represent suitable habitat for species are the same as described
this species. Surveys outside above for the Montane Centipede.
the GWNF were not required for
this species.
Mays Mountain Cave NRb (Tier IIc) Bath Found in leaf litter and detritus in This species was not The potential impacts and mitigation
Millipede deciduous forests at 330 meters documented during surveys on measures for this species are the
Pseudotremia alecto elevation; has also been found in the GWNF; surveys outside the same as described above for the
caves. Documented in Allegheny GWNF were not required for this Montane Centipede
and Bath counties (Shear, 2011). species.
Pleasing S3b (Tier IIIc) Augusta Leaf litter of deciduous forests and This species was not The potential impacts and mitigation
Xystodesmid cove habitats, usually near water documented during surveys on measures for this species are the
Millipede (BugGuide, 2016). the GWNF; surveys outside the same as described above for the
Semionellus placidus GWNF were not required for this Montane Centipede
species.
INSECTS
Springtails
A cave springtail S3b Bath Subterrestrial, subterranean 2016 karst surveys identified 40 The potential impacts and mitigation
Pygmarrhopalites obligate species (NatureServe, karst features in Bath County. measures for this species are the
carolynae 2015). same as described above for the
Virginia Springsnail.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
A cave springtail S2b Bath Subterrestrial, subterranean 2016 karst surveys identified 40 The potential impacts and mitigation
Pygmarrhopalites obligate species. Found in caves; karst features in Bath County. measures for this species are the
sacer known from two caves in Bath same as described above for the
County, Virginia (NatureServe, Virginia Springsnail.
2015).
Beetles
Appalachian tiger S2b (Tier IIIc) Augusta, Bath, Prefers open sand or a matrix of This species was not There is the potential for mortality of
beetle Highland sand and cobble along permanent documented during surveys on individuals during clearing and other
Cicindela streams or medium-sized rivers; the GWNF; however suitable construction activities. Construction
ancocisconensis usually found along rocky habitat was observed. Surveys and maintenance of the right-of-way
mountain streams and small rivers outside the GWNF were not would temporarily remove suitable
in partially shaded areas, such as required for this species. habitat; however, based on this
sand banks and sand bars. species preference of open habitat,
Occasionally reported along right-of-way clearing and
roads. This species is active April maintenance could have a beneficial
through June and late-July to effect by creating potentially suitable
September, but not always active habitat (FS et al., 2002).
S-55

in fall (NatureServe, 2015).

Northern Barrens S2b (Tier IIIc) Augusta Specialized to sandy/coarse
tiger beetle gravel or eroding sandstone in
Cicindela partruela pine barrens, open mixed, or
deciduous woodlands where open
ground exists. This species is
active late April to June and mid-
August into September, but not
always active in fall (NatureServe,
2015).
This species was not
documented during surveys on
the GWNF; however suitable
habitat was observed. Surveys
outside the GWNF were not
required for this species.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Appalachian Tiger Beetle.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Maureens S2?b (Tier IIc) Bath Along the edges of smaller, lower Surveys conducted on the This species has been documented
Hydraenan Minute gradient streams in clean, fine GWNF identified suitable habitat within the ACP Project area along
moss beetle shale gravels, typically gravel for this species at eight stream existing FS roads that have been
Hydraena maureenae bars. This species is potentially locations, and documented eight proposed for use as access roads;
active year-round (NatureServe, individuals at six of those therefore construction activities could
2015). stream locations. No surveys cause mortality to individuals if
for this species were conducted present in the workspace. Filing of
outside the GWNF. the interstitial spaces between
gravels with sediment, which would
occur during construction activities,
makes habitat no longer suitable for
this species. Atlantic would
implement the erosion control and
sedimentation measures described in
the FERC Plan and Procedures
(table 2.3.1-1), and would minimize
disturbance to gravel bars along
S-56

streams.
Burnsville Cove Cave S1 Bath, Highland Cave species known only from 2016 karst surveys identified The potential impacts and mitigation
beetle Bath County, Virginia two cave entrances and 28 measures for this species are the
Pseudanophthalmus (NatureServe, 2015). additional karst features within same as described above for the
sp. 8 the study area in Highland Virginia Springsnail.
County; and 40 karst features in
Bath County.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Dragonflies
Comet darner S3b Augusta, GWNF Shallow, fishless ponds with No surveys for this species were Adult dragonflies would be able to
dragonfly correspondence emergent vegetation, or semi- conducted. GWNF has disperse away from disturbance;
Anax longipes indicates this species permanent flooded woodlands. requested that Atlantic conduct however, reduced fitness and/or
has been Adults are active May to early surveys for sinkhole ponds; mortality could result if the individual
documented in June (NatureServe, 2015). consultation is ongoing for this is unable to find other suitable
sinkhole ponds in species. habitat. There is the potential that
Augusta County. construction activities could impact
nymphs through direct mortality or
temporary reduction in water quality.
Atlantic would also remove emergent
vegetation that could provide shelter
and foraging habitat; habitat
assessment results are pending.
Vehicle collisions could cause injury
or mortality to adult dragonflies.
Atlantic would implement the FERC
S-57

Plan and Procedures (see table

2.3.1-1), which includes
implementation of the VDEQ Virginia
Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook.
Marthas penant S2b (Tier IVc) GWNF Vegetated ponds and lakes with No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly correspondence sand bottoms and unmowed conducted. measures for this species are the
Celithemis martha indicates this species shoreline vegetation and same as described above for the
has been emergent aquatic vegetation; Comet Darner Dragonfly.
documented in obligate pond breeder. Adults are
sinkhole ponds in active late May through
Augusta County. September (VDCR and VDGIF,
2013).
Regal darner S1 (Tier IVc) Southampton Found in ponds, lakes, and The last observation of this The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly ditches with aquatic vegetation. species was in 1975. No measures for this species are the
Coryphaeschna Adults are active from June 11- surveys for this species were same as described above for the
ingens July 26 (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). conducted. This species has the Comet Darner Dragonfly.
potential to occur at the
Meherrin River and swamp
forest near Virginia-North
Carolina border; and Nottoway
River and Sycamore Bend
swamps, which are crossed by
or in proximity to ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Robust baskettail S3 (Tier IVc) Southampton, Suffolk Found in lakes and ponds. Adults Observations of this species The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly are active from March 30-May 1 have occurred in both counties measures for this species are the
Epitheca spinosa (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). after 1990. No surveys for this same as described above for the
species were conducted. This Comet Darner Dragonfly.
species has the potential to
occur within the survey corridor
at the Nottoway River and
Sycamore Bend swamps;
Quaker Swamp; Chuckatuck,
Lake Drummond NW, Bowers
Hill, and Suffolk Quads, which
are crossed by or in proximity to
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Mustached clubtail S1 (Tier IVc) Bath, Augusta Occurs in and around clean, fast- Observations of this species Atlantic would conduct three dry
dragonfly flowing rivers. Adults are active occurred in both counties crossings of the Calfpasture River.
Gomphus adelphus from May 30-June 28 (VDCR and between 1950 and 1990. No Adult dragonflies would be able to
VDGIF, 2013). surveys for this species were disperse away from disturbance;
S-58

conducted. This species has the however, reduced fitness and/or

potential to occur at Calfpasture mortality could result if the individual
River, which is crossed by ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
is unable to find other suitable
habitat. There is the potential that
construction activities could impact
nymphs through direct mortality or
temporary reduction in water quality.
Atlantic would also remove riparian
vegetation that could provide shelter
and foraging habitat; habitat
assessment results are pending.
Vehicle collisions could cause injury
or mortality to adult dragonflies.
Atlantic would implement the FERC
Plan and Procedures (see table
2.3.1-1), which includes
implementation of the VDEQ Virginia
Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Banner clubtail SH (Tier IVc) Brunswick, Clean, slow-flowing sandy rivers Observations of this species The Meherrin River would be crossed
dragonfly Greensville in Piedmont and Coastal Plains. have not occurred since prior to at two locations using the dry
Gomphus apomyius Adults are active late-March to 1950 and it is possible that it is crossing technique. The potential
late-May (VDCR and VDGIF, extirpated. No surveys for this impacts and mitigation measures for
2013). species were conducted. This this species are the same as
species has the potential to described above for the Mustached
occur at Meherrin River, which Clubtail Dragonfly.
would be crossed in two
locations by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
Piedmont clubtail S1 (Tier IVc) N/A Small sandy streams of moderate No observations of this species The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly gradient. Adults are active May in counties crossed by the measures for this species are the
Gomphus parvidens 23-June 10 (VDCR and VDGIF, Project; observations within same as described above for the
2013). Virginia occurred between 1950 Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
and 1990. No surveys for this
species were conducted. This
species has the potential to
S-59

occur at the Appomattox River

crossing south of Stoddert,
which is in the vicinity of ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
Chalk-fronted S2S3 (Tier Highland, Augusta Mud-bottomed lakes and ponds. This species has been observed The potential impacts and mitigation
corporal skimmer IVc) Adults are active June 4-August 8 in both counties more recently measures for this species are the
dragonfly (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). than 1990. No surveys for this same as described above for the
Ladona julia species were conducted. This Comet Darner Dragonfly.
species has been documented
at the Braley Pond Conservation
Site, which is in proximity to
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Northern pygmy S2b (Tier IVc) Highland Running waters with strong This species has been observed The potential impacts and mitigation
clubtail dragonfly currents over clean gravel that more recently than 1990. No measures for this species are the
Lanthus parvulus contains sand and silt deposits. surveys for this species were same as described above for the
Adults are active May through July conducted. Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Southern sprite S3b (Tier IVc) Augusta, Dinwiddie, Occur near grassy lakes and No recent records from Virginia. The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly Greensville, boggy ponds, usually within dense No surveys for this species were measures for this species are the
Nahalennia Brunswick, GWNF vegetation. Adults are active June conducted. same as described above for the
intergricollis correspondence through September (VDCR and Comet Darner Dragonfly.
indicates this species VDGIF, 2013).
has been
documented in
sinkhole ponds in
Augusta County
Cinnamon S2 (Tier IVc) Buckingham Medium to large rivers. Adults are This species has not been James River would be crossed using
shadowdragon active April 28-June 21 (VDCR observed since before 1950. No an HDD; therefore impacts to
dragonfly and VDGIF, 2013). surveys for this species were nymphs would also not be
Neurocordulia conducted. This species has anticipated at this location. The
virginiensis been historically documented at potential impacts and mitigation
James River at Wingina, which measures for this species are the
is in proximity to ACP (VDCR, same as described above for the
2016b). Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
S-60

Riffle snaketail S1 (Tier IVc) Highland, Augusta Fast-flowing streams and small This species has been observed The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly rivers. Adults are active June 4- in both counties between 1950 measures for this species are the
Ophiogomphus June 23 (VDCR and VDGIF, and 1990. No surveys for this same as described above for the
carolus 2013). species were conducted. This Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
species has the potential to
occur at Calfpasture River,
which is crossed by ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
Appalachian S1b (Tier IIc) Augusta Breeds in riffle areas of spring-fed This species has been observed Dowells Draft and two unnamed
(Allegheny) snaketail Piedmont streams. Prefer areas between 1950 and 1990. No tributaries to Dowells Draft would be
dragonfly where gravel overlies soft mud in surveys for this species were crossed using a dry crossing
Ophiogomphus shallow water. Adults are active conducted. This species has the technique. Atlantic also proposes to
incurvatus April through June (VDCR and potential to occur in streams use existing roads that crosses
alleghaniensis VDGIF, 2013). within Sulphur Springs Hollow Dowells Draft, the East Branch of
and Dowells Draft, which are Dowells Draft, and an unnamed
crossed or in proximity to ACP tributary to Dowells Draft as
(VDCR, 2016b). permanent access roads. The
potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
St. Croix snaketail S1S2 Nelson, Buckingham, Restricted to large, relatively clean This species has been observed James River would be crossed using
dragonfly Cumberland to pristine swift rivers with gravel in all three counties since 1990. an HDD; therefore impacts to
Ophiogomphus and mud substrates. Adults are No surveys for this species were nymphs would also not be
susbehcha active March to May (VDCR and conducted. This species has anticipated at that crossing. The
VDGIF, 2013). been documented at James potential impacts and mitigation
River at Wingina (VDCR, measures for this species are the
2016b). same as described above for the
Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
Spatterdock darner S2b (Tier IIIc) Highland, Augusta, Marshes and shallow lakes or No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
dragonfly GWNF ponds with waterlilies and conducted. measures for this species are the
Rhionaeshna mutata correspondence spatterdock near wooded areas. same as described above for the
indicates this species Adults are active late May to early Comet Darner Dragonfly.
has been July (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
documented in
sinkhole ponds in
Augusta County.
Fine-lined emerald S2 (Tier IVc) Southampton, Suffolk Small, sandy forest streams and This species has been observed Both Meherrin River and Nottoway
S-61

dragonfly seeps or boggy forest trickles or
Somatochlora filosa sheet flows. Adults are active
June into September (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013).
Coppery emerald SH (Tier IIIc) N/A Small, sandy streams and slow-
dragonfly moving creeks, often with acidic
Somatochlora waters, in forested area. Adults
georgiana are active from June to August
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
in both counties since 1990. No River would be crossed using a dry
surveys for this species were crossing technique. The potential
conducted. This species has the impacts and mitigation measures for
potential to occur at Meherrin this species are the same as
River and swamp along Virginia- described above for the Mustached
North Carolina border; Nottoway Clubtail Dragonfly.
River and Sycamore Bend
swamps; and Quaker Swamp,
which are crossed or in
proximity to ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
No observations of this species Both Winningham Creek and Watson
in counties crossed by the Creek would be crossed using a dry
Project and it is possible that crossing technique. The potential
this species is extirpated. No impacts and mitigation measures for
surveys for this species were this species are the same as
conducted. This species has the described above for the Mustached
potential to occur at Clubtail Dragonfly.
Winningham Creek and
adjacent swamp; and Watson
Creek, which are crossed by
ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Riverine clubtail S1 (Tier IVc) Nelson Medium to large rivers with This species has not been James River would be crossed using
dragonfly varying flow and substrate, in and observed in this county since an HDD; therefore impacts to
Stylurus amnicola out of forested areas. Adults are before 1950. No surveys for this nymphs would also not be
active May through September species were conducted. This anticipated at this crossing. The
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). species has been documented potential impacts and mitigation
at James River at Wingina, measures for this species are the
which is in proximity to ACP same as described above for the
(VDCR, 2016b). Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
Lauras clubtail S2 (Tier IVc) Nelson, Nottoway, Clear, shallow streams with rocky This species has been observed The Nottoway River at the Nottoway
dragonfly Dinwiddie riffles and a sand or mud bottom in Nottoway County more River-Fort Pickett SCU would be
Stylurus laurae (VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). recently than 1990; however it crossed using an HDD; therefore
has not been observed in impacts to nymphs would also not be
Nelson County since before anticipated at this crossing. The
1950. No surveys for this potential impacts and mitigation
species were conducted. This measures for this species are the
species has been documented same as described above for the
at Nottoway River-Fort Pickett Mustached Clubtail Dragonfly.
S-62

SCU, which is crossed by ACP

(VDCR, 2016b).
Red saddlebags S1b Augusta, GWNF Ponds and quiet and still waters. No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
Tramea onusta correspondence Adults are active mid-May through conducted. measures for this species are the
indicates this species early October (NatureServe, same as described above for the
has been 2015). Comet Darner Dragonfly.
documented in
sinkhole ponds in
Augusta County.

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Species/Scientific
Name
Butterflies
Silver-bordered
fritillary butterfly
Boloria selene
S-63
Frosted elfin butterfly
Callophrys irus
Hoary elfin butterfly
Callophrys polios
TABLE S-2 (contd)
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
(SGCN Tier Documented
Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description
S2b Bath, Highland, Lives in wet meadows and
Nelson marshes, often at sites with taller
vegetation. Larval hosts on
various violet species (Viola spp.)
found in wetlands. Adults are
active from June through
September (VDCR and VDGIF,
2013).
S2?b (Tier Highland, Augusta, Most often found in dry areas,
IVc) Nelson, Suffolk especially oak woods, shale
barrens, pine forests, sandhills,
and coastal shrub. Larval host
plants are wild lupine (Lupinus
perennis) and wild indigo (Baptisia
tinctoria). Adults active from May
to June (VDCR and VDGIF,
2013).
S1S3b (Tier Highland, Augusta Bogs, dunes, pine barrens, ridges,
IVc) rocky slopes, and woodland
edges. Its larval host plants are
bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-
ursi) and trailing arbutus (Epigaea
repens). Adults are active mid-
May through June (VDCR and
VDGIF, 2013).
Potential Project Impacts and
Survey / Agency Data
This species has not been
observed in Bath or Nelson
counties since before 1950; but
has been observed in Highland
County more recently than
1990. Potential host plants for
this species were observed
within the GWNF; however, no
individuals were documented
(see table R-4 of appendix R).
No surveys for this species were
conducted outside the GWNF.
This species been historically
documented at the junction of
Route 84 and Route 600; and
has the potential to occur within
wet meadows along Back Creek
(VDCR, 2016b).
This species has been observed
more recently than 1990.
Surveys on the GWNF did not
identify suitable habitat or
individuals of this species. No
surveys for this species were
conducted.
No surveys for this species were
conducted.
Mitigation
Adult butterflies would be able to
disperse away from disturbance;
however, reduced fitness and/or
mortality could result if the individual
is unable to find other suitable
habitat. Construction activities could
remove suitable larval host plants
and foraging plants; and could kill
larvae if present. As outlined in its
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F), Atlantic has
committed to incorporate regionally-
specific and endemic forb seeds in
its traditionally all-grass seed mix to
create pollination habitat, which may
reduce impacts to this species.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Lupine species would be
incorporated into some seed mixes.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Herbaceous and low shrub species
would be allowed to regenerate
within the construction and
permanent ROW after construction is
complete.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Pink-edged sulphur S1S2b (Tier Highland Clearings, woodlands, areas that No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly IVc) have been managed with fire conducted. measures for this species are the
Colias interior clearing, bogs, pine barrens, same as described above for the
managed ROWs, and alpine Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
forests, often in high elevations. Herbaceous and low shrub species
Its larval host plants include would be allowed to regenerate
blueberry and billberry (Vaccinium within the construction and
spp) and members of the heath permanent ROW after construction is
family (Ericacea). Adults are complete.
active mid-June to early
September (VDCR and VDGIF,
2013).
Early hairstreak S2b (Tier IVc) Augusta, Bath, Woodland openings and moist, Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly Highland but well-drained mature American identified one host plant for this measures for this species are the
Erora laeta beech (Fagus grandifolia) forests. species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
Its main larval host plant is however no individuals were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
American beech, and beaked observed (see table R-4 of Tree species would be allowed to
S-64

hazelnut (Coylus cornuta) is a appendix R). No surveys for this regenerate outside the permanent
secondary larval host plant. Adults species were conducted outside ROW after construction is complete.
are active from late April through the GWNF.
May and late June through August
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
Olymbia marble S2b Augusta, Highland Shale and limestone barrens. Its No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly larval host plant is rock cress conducted. measures for this species are the
Euchloe olympia (Cardamine spp.). Adults are same as described above for the
active from April to May (VDCR Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
and VDGIF, 2013). Herbaceous and low shrub species
would be allowed to regenerate
within the construction and
permanent ROW after construction is
complete.
Northern crescent S1S3b Augusta, Bath Prefers barren habitats, but also Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly associated with streams; more identified larval host plants for measures for this species are the
Phycoides cocyta woodland-based than similar this species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
species. Its larval host plants are however no individuals were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
in the genus Aster. Adults are observed. No surveys for this Aster species would be incorporated
active from June through July species were conducted outside into some seed mixes.
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). the GWNF.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Helicta Satyr S2 Dinwiddie, Usually found in grassy wetlands, In all counties except Suffolk, The potential impacts and mitigation
Neonympha helicta Greensville, especially bogs and savannas, but this species has not been measures for this species are the
Nottoway, also in grassy pine forests. Likely observed since prior to 1950. same as described above for the
Southampton, Suffolk hosts on various sedges (VDCR This species has been observed Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
and VDGIF, 2013). This species more recently than 1990 in Carex species would be incorporated
has the potential to occur along Suffolk. into some seed mixes.
the powerline ROW east of Route
674 (VDCR, 2016b).
Atlantic fritillary S2b Augusta, Highland Open habitats including open Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly meadows, bogs, roadside woods, identified host plants for this measures for this species are the
Speyeria atlantis and woodland openings. Its larval species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
host plant are violets (Viola spp.). however no individuals were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Adults are active mid-June observed. No surveys for this
through mid-September (VDCR species were conducted outside
and VDGIF, 2013). the GWNF.
Diana fritillary S3b (Tier IVc) Augusta, Bath, Favor wooded areas, particularly Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
butterfly Highland, Suffolk in low-lying valleys, pine woods, identified host plants for this measures for this species are the
S-65

Speyeria diana and cove forests, within or near
mountain ranges. Its larval host
plants are violets (Viola spp.), and observed. No surveys for this
nectar plants include butterfly
bush, milkweeds, and other purple the GWNF.
flowers. Adults are active from
mid-June to early September
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
Regal fritillary S1b, PF (Tier Augusta, Highland, Uses violets (Viola spp.),
butterfly Ia) Nelson especially birdfoot violet (V.
Speyeria idalia pedata) as its larval host plants.
Prefers tallgrass areas, such as
prairies, fields, grasslands, and
bogs; may have close ties with
undisturbed native grasslands.
Adults feed on nectar from thistle
(Cirsium spp.), milweeks
(Aesclepias spp.) and red clover
(Trifolium spp.). Adults are active
mid-June through mid-August
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
however no individuals were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
This species is known to benefit from
species were conducted outside the presence of woodland clearings,
including rights-of-way, by creating
additional nectaring habitat (FS et al.,
2002). Management of the right-of-
way that encourages nectar sources
would be beneficial to this species.
Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
identified host plants for this measures for this species are the
species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
however no individuals were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
observed. No surveys for this This species is known to benefit from
species were conducted outside the presence of woodland clearings,
the GWNF. including rights-of-way, by creating
additional nectaring habitat (FS et al.,
2002). Management of the right-of-
way that encourages nectar sources
would be beneficial to this species.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Skippers
Mottled duskywing S1S3b (Tier Bath, Augusta, Favors open woods, barrens, No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
skipper IIIc) Highland, Prince sandhills, and brushy fields. Its conducted. measures for this species are the
Erynnis martialis Edward, Greensville, larval host plant is New Jersey tea same as described above for the
Chesapeake (Ceanothus americana). Adults Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
are active from April through Herbaceous and low shrub species
September (VDCR and VDGIF, would be allowed to regenerate
2013). within the construction and
permanent ROW after construction is
complete.
Persius duskywing S1b (Tier IIc) Bath, Highland Found in dry pine-oak forests. Surveys on the GWNF did not The potential impacts and mitigation
skipper Larval host plants include a wide identify suitable habitat or measures for this species are the
Erynnis persius range of legumes, primarily wild individuals of this species. No same as described above for the
persius lupine (Lupinus perennis) or wild surveys for this species were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
indigo (Baptisia tinctoria). Adults conducted outside the GWNF. Lupine species would be
are active from April to June incorporated into some seed mixes.
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
S-66

Two-spotted skipper S2b (Tier IVc) Augusta, Highland, Prefers open bogs, marshes,
Euphyes bimacula Suffolk swamps, and other damp areas.
Its larval host plants are sedges,
primarily tussock sedge (Carex
stricta) and hairy fruit sedge
(Carex trichocarpa). Adults are
active from June to July in the
south and from April to August in
the south (VDCR and VDGIF,
2013).
Dukes skipper S2 (Tier IIIc) Chesapeake, Suffolk Wet, marshy areas such as
Euphyes dukesi swamps, open marshes, and wet
roadside ditches. Prefer
expansive estuarine or coastal
marshes. Prefer broad-leaved
sedges such as shoreline sedge
(Carex hyalinolepis).
No surveys for this species were
conducted.
This species has been observed
more recently than 1990. No
surveys for this species were
conducted. This species has
been documented at the Great
Dismal Swamp Conservation
Site, which is crossed by ACP
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Carex species would be incorporated
into some seed mixes.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Herbaceous species would be
allowed to regenerate within the
construction and permanent ROW
after construction is complete.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Appalachian grizzled S1b (Tier Ia) Augusta, Bath, Dry, open areas with shaley soils Field habitat assessments The potential impacts and mitigation
skipper Highland such as shale barrens, and identified one host plant for this measures for this species are the
Pyrgus centaureae artificially opened habitats such as species within the GWNF; same as described above for the
wyandot clearcuts and utility ROWs. Its however no caterpillars were Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
larval host is dwarf cinquefoil observed. Adults could not be This species is known to benefit from
(Potentilla canadensis). Adults are sampled as it was outside of the presence of woodland clearings,
active from mid-April to early May their activity period; therefore including rights-of-way. Herbaceous
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013). presence is assumed in suitable and low shrub species would be
habitat on the GWNF. No allowed to regenerate within the
surveys for this species were construction and permanent ROW
conducted outside the GWNF. after construction is complete.
Management of the right-of-way that
creates suitable habitat would be
beneficial to this species.
Moths
Cane-boring moth S2S3 Chesapeake, Suffolk Only found in patches of cane, or This species has been observed Based on state vegetation data (see
Acrapex relicta occasionally exotic bamboo more recently than 1990. No section 4.4), ACP would not cross
S-67

stands. This species has been surveys for this species were vegetation communities consisting of
documented at the Great Dismal conducted. cane in Virginia; therefore, no
Swamp Conservation Site, which impacts to this species are
is crossed by ACP (VDCR and anticipated.
VDGIF, 2013).
Herodias underwing S2S3b (Tier Augusta, Bath, Prefer pitch pine (Pinus rigida)- Potential host plants for this The potential impacts and mitigation
moth IIIc) Highland bear oak (Quercus ilicifolia) species were observed within measures for this species are the
Catocala herodias barrens, or sparse woodlands. the GWNF; however, individual same as described above for the
gerhardi Food plants are bear oak, and surveys were not conducted. Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
blackjack oak (Quercus Because individual surveys This species is known to benefit from
marilandica); larvae feed mostly were not conducted, presence is the presence of woodland clearings,
on bear oak and are reared mostly assumed within suitable habitat including rights-of-way, by creating
on blackjack oak. Adults are on the GWNF (see table R-2 in additional nectaring habitat (FS et al.,
active from July to August (VDCR appendix R). No surveys for this 2002). Management of the right-of-
and VDGIF, 2013). species were conducted outside way that encourages nectar sources
the GWNF. would be beneficial to this species.
Precious underwing SHb (Tier IIc) N/A Restricted to mature swamp Presumed to extirpated in The potential impacts and mitigation
moth forests, forest edges, bog edges, Virginia. A limited number of measures for this species are the
Catocala pretiosa and other habitats with thickets or potential host plants for this same as described above for the
pretiosa very large bushes of food plants species was observed within the Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
exceeding 1.5 meters in height. Its GWNF (see table R-4 of Tree species would be allowed to
larval host plants include appendix R). No surveys for this regenerate outside the permanent
serviceberry (Amelanchier spp.), species were conducted outside ROW after construction is complete.
and crabapple (Malus angustifolia) the GWNF.
(VDCR and VDGIF, 2013).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Unexpected Cycnia S1S3 Dinwiddie, Nottoway Coastal sand scrub, barrens, and Surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
moth savanna. Feed on milkweed and not required. This species has measures for this species are the
Cycnia inopinatus overwinter in the duff of fallen been documented at the Fort same as described above for the
milkweed leaves (FS, 2005). Pickett Impact Area Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Conservation Site, which is in Milkweed species would be
the vicinity of ACP (VDCR, incorporated into some seed mixes.
2016b).
Milnes Euchlaena S2b (Tier IVc) Augusta, Bath Hardwood and mountain oak Individual surveys were not The potential impacts and mitigation
moth woodlands with acidic soil. Its conducted for this species. measures for this species are the
Euchlaena milnei larval host plant is unknown. Because individual surveys same as described above for the
Adults are active in from early to were not conducted, presence is Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
mid-July (VDCR and VDGIF, assumed within suitable habitat
2013). on the GWNF (see table R-2 In
appendix R). No surveys for this
species were conducted outside
the GWNF.
A bird dropping S1S2 Chesapeake N/A No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
S-68

(noctuid) moth conducted. This species has measures for this species are the
Protodeltote sp. 1 been documented at the Great same as described above for the
Dismal Swamp Conservation Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Site, which is crossed by ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
Hebards noctuid SHb (Tier IIIc) Bath Prefers rich, deciduous forests This species has not been Because there are no recent
moth with abundant larval food plants, recently documented in Virginia occurrences of this species in
Psectrotarsia hebardi such as stoneroot (Collinsonia (prior to 1950). Individual Virginia, it is unlikely that ACP would
canadensis). Larvae are active surveys were not conducted for impact this species.
into September (VDCR and this species. Because individual
VDGIF, 2013). surveys were not conducted,
presence is assumed within
suitable habitat on the GWNF
(see table R-2 In appendix R).
No surveys for this species were
conducted outside the GWNF.
Aureolaria seed borer S1S3 Bath, Nottoway Associated with false foxglove No surveys for this species were The potential impacts and mitigation
moth species (Aureolaria spp.) (VDCR conducted. This species has measures for this species are the
Pyrrhia aurantiago and VDGIF, 2013). been documented at Fort same as described above for the
Pickett Impact Area Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
Conservation Site, which is in Herbaceous and low shrub species
the vicinity of ACP (VDCR, would be allowed to regenerate
2016b). within the construction and
permanent ROW after construction is
complete.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Chestnut clearwing SHb (Tier IVc) N/A Its host plant is the American This species has not been The potential impacts and mitigation
moth chestnut (Castanea dentata) and recently documented in Virginia; measures for this species are the
Synanthedon possibly the chinquapin (Castanea the only record is from Falls same as described above for the
castaneae pumila) (VDCR and VDGIF, Church. Potential host plants for Silver-bordered Fritillary Butterfly.
2013). this species were observed Tree species would be allowed to
within the GWNF; however, regenerate outside the permanent
individual surveys were not ROW after construction is complete.
conducted. Because individual
surveys were not conducted,
presence is assumed in suitable
habitat. No surveys for this
species were conducted outside
the GWNF.
S-69
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
VASCULAR PLANTS
Red milkweed S2 Dinwiddie, Bogs, wetlands, or marshy areas, Surveys identified 26 individuals Construction activities would directly
Asclepias rubra Greensville, or in moist woodland soil (Virginia of this species at the Handsom- remove individuals located within the
Southampton, Suffolk Botanical Associates, 2016). Gum Powerline Bog construction right-of-way, remove or
Conservation Site. degrade suitable habitat for this
species within and adjacent to the
construction right-of-way, and disturb
the seed bed. Construction activities
may also encourage the spread of
invasive and noxious plants. Regular
maintenance of the construction
right-of-way would also cause regular
disturbance and potential mortality of
this species. Atlantic would
implement the FERC Plan and
Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1),
which includes measures to control
S-70

erosion and sedimentation. Atlantic

would control the spread of invasive
and noxious weeds through the
implementation of its Invasive Plant
Species Management Plan, and
would implement dust control as
described in its Fugitive Dust Control
and Mitigation Plan (see table 2.3.1-
1). Restoration of the right-of-way
would proceed according to the
Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan
(see appendix F). Atlantic is
currently working with VDCR on
potential reroute of the Handsom-
Gum Powerline Bog Conservation
Site pending hydrologic study
anticipated in January 2017.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Valley dolls-daisy S1/E Augusta Sinkhole pond habitats and Potential habitat for this species Atlantic has adopted a reroute to
Boltonia montana associated river and stream sides identified within the survey avoid the population of this species
(NatureServe, 2015). corridor. Surveys completed in at the Lyndhurst Conservation Site.
2015 identified thousands of
individuals of this species at the
Lyndhurst Conservation Site in
Augusta County. This species
has been documented at the
Campbells and Grove Farm
Ponds Conservation Site, which
is crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
Pine barren sandreed S1 Dinwiddie, Bogs (Virginia Botanical Surveys identified 14 individuals The potential impacts and mitigation
Calamovilfa brevipilis Greensville, Suffolk Associates, 2016). of this species in the Emporia measures for this species are the
Powerline Bog Conservation same as described above for the
Site. Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
working with VDCR on potential
S-71

reroute of the Emporia Bog

Powerline Conservation Site pending
hydrologic study anticipated in
January 2017.
Large spreading S1 Greensville, Sphagnous bogs and pocosin Surveys completed in 2015 The potential impacts and mitigation
pogonia Southampton, openings (Virginia Botanical identified this species at the measures for this species are the
Cleistesiopsis Suffolk, Chesapeake Associates, 2016). Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog same as described above for the
divaricata Conservation Site. This species Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
has been documented at the working with VDCR on potential
Handsom-Gum Powerline reroute pending hydrologic study
Conservation Site, and the anticipated in January 2017.
Great Dismal Swamp
Conservation Site, which are
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
American willow-herb SHb Highland, Bath, Bogs, seeps, wet meadows, and Surveys completed in 2015 The potential impacts and mitigation
Epilobium ciliatum Augusta wet clearings; usually at higher identified this species within the measures for this species are the
ssp. ciliatum elevations (Virginia Botanical GWNF. same as described above for the
Associates, 2016). Red Milkweed. Pending GWNF and
VDCR review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Ten-angled pipewort S2 Dinwiddie, Bogs, boggy sphagnous clearings, Surveys identified 100-500 The potential impacts and mitigation
Eriocaulon Southampton, sea-level fens, and mafic fens and individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
decangulare var. Chesapeake seeps (Virginia Botanical Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog same as described above for the
decangulare Associates, 2016). Conservation Site. Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
working with VDCR on potential
reroute pending hydrologic study
anticipated in January 2017.
Branched hedge- S1 Greensville Ruts and pools in powerline ROW; Surveys identified this species The potential impacts and mitigation
hyssop inner edge of Coastal Plain. Only at the Emporia Powerline Bog measures for this species are the
Gratiola ramosa known from Greensville County Conservation Site. same as described above for the
(Virginia Botanical Associates, Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
2016). working with VDCR on potential
reroute of the Emporia Bog
Powerline Conservation Site pending
hydrologic study anticipated in
January 2017.
Frasers Marsh St. S2 Bath, Highland Bog, mafic fens, seeps, seepage Surveys identified a population The potential impacts and mitigation
S-72

Johns-wort swamps, depression ponds, and of 1,500+ individuals of this
Hypericum fraseri swamps, usually in peaty, species in Bath County, and an
nutrient-poor soils (Virginia additional 3,800+ individuals
Botanical Associates, 2016). 1,000 feet downslope from a
proposed access roads
associated with Browns Pond
Conservation Site on the
GWNF.
Hairy St. Johns-wort S1S2 Dinwiddie, Wet flatwoods, power-line swales, Surveys identified 93 individuals
Hypericum setosum Greensville, boggy clearings, and ditches of this species at the Handsom-
Southampton, Suffolk (Virginia Botanical Associates, Gum Powerline Bog
2016). Conservation Site. This species
has been documented at the
Radium Flatwoods East
Conservation Site; Handsom-
Gum Powerline Conservation
Site, which is in the vicinity of or
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Red Milkweed. Pending GWNF and
VDCR review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
The potential impacts and mitigation
measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
working with VDCR on potential
reroute pending hydrologic study
anticipated in January 2017.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Big gallberry S1 Suffolk, Chesapeake Peaty swamps, flatwoods, and Species observed within the The potential impacts and mitigation
Ilex coriacea pocosins; usually associated with construction workspace in measures for this species are the
Atlantic white cedar Suffolk. This species has been same as described above for the
(Chamaecyparis thyoides) or pond documented at the Izaak Walton Red Milkweed.
pine (Pinus serotina). Rare in League Preserve Conservation
southeast Coastal Plain, but found Site, which is in the vicinity of
frequently within the Great Dismal ACP (VDCR, 2016b).
Swamp (Virginia Botanical
Associates, 2016).
Rafinesques S2 Nottoway, Dinwiddie, Bogs, boggy clearings, power-line Surveys identified 10 individuals The potential impacts and mitigation
seedbox Brunswick, swales, and sphagnous ditches of this species in the Emporia measures for this species are the
Ludwigia hirtella Greensville, Suffolk (Virginia Botanical Associates, Powerline Bog Conservation same as described above for the
2016). Site. Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
working with VDCR on potential
reroute of the Emporia Bog
Powerline Conservation Site pending
hydrologic study anticipated in
S-73

Hairy seedbox
Ludwigia pilosa
Ravens seedbox
Ludwigia ravenii
Slender rattlesnake-
root
Nabalus autumnalis
January 2017.
S1 Suffolk Ditches, and boggy clearings Surveys identified 5,735 The potential impacts and mitigation
(Virginia Botanical Associates, individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
2016). Great Dismal Swamp same as described above for the
(Northwest Section) Red Milkweed.
Conservation Site. This species
has been previously
documented in the Great Dismal
Swamp Conservation Site and
Great Dismal Swamp:
Northwest Section Conservation
Site (VDCR, 2016b).
S1 Suffolk Boggy clearings and ditches in Species was identified along The potential impacts and mitigation
wet flatwoods (Virginia Botanical proposed access roads. This measures for this species are the
Associates, 2016). species has been documented same as described above for the
at the Lummis Flatwoods Red Milkweed.
Conservation Site (VDCR,
2016b).
S1 Dinwiddie, Boggy powerline clearcuts, and Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
Greensville, roadside clearings (Virginia 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Southampton, Suffolk Botanical Associates, 2016). species has been documented Emporia Bog Powerline
at the Emporia Powerline Bog Conservation Site pending hydrologic
Conservation Site, which is study anticipated in January 2017.
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
American ginseng S3S4/T Highland, Bath, Cove forests, and mesic to dry 20 populations identified within The potential impacts and mitigation
Panax quinquefolius Augusta, Nelson, slope forests in base-rich soils the GWNF (see table R-4 in measures for this species are the
Buckingham, (Virginia Botanical Associates, appendix R); and 1 population in same as described above for the
Cumberland, Prince 2016). Augusta County. Red Milkweed. The GWNF has
Edward recommended transplanting if plants
cannot be avoided; relocation plan
required. Discussing avoidance and
mitigation for this species with GWNF
(see table R-4 in appendix R).
Pending GWNF and VDCR review of
survey reports and mitigation
measures.
Walters paspalum S2 Augusta, Greensville, Seasonally exposed sandy or Surveys identified 15,000+ The potential impacts and mitigation
Paspalum dissectum Southampton Suffolk, gravelly river shores and bars, individuals of this species in the measures for this species are the
Chesapeake interdune swales and ponds, Great Dismal Swamp same as described above for the
impoundment edges, depressions Conservation Site, and 186 Red Milkweed.
and ruts in bottomland or upland individuals at the Great Dismal
S-74

clearings (Virginia Botanical Swamp (Northwest Section)

Associates, 2016). Conservation Site. This species
has been documented at the
South Meherrin Powerline
Conservation Site; Great Dismal
Swamp Conservation Site; and
South River Meadow
Conservation Site, which is in
the vicinity of or crossed by ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
Small white fringed S2 Dinwiddie, Bogs and sphagnous seeps Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
orchid Greensville, Suffolk (Virginia Botanical Associates, 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Platanthera 2016). species has been documented Emporia Bog Powerline
blephariglottis at the Emporia Powerline Bog Conservation Site pending hydrologic
Conservation Site, which is study anticipated in January 2017.
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
Purple fringeless S1 Highland, Bath, Fens, wet meadows, clearings, Species observed 0.5 mile Because the individual observed is
orchid Augusta, Greensville and ditches, usually in base-rich outside of the environmental more than 0.5 mile outside of the
Platanthera soils (Virginia Botanical survey corridor. environmental survey corridor, no
peramoena Associates, 2016). impacts are anticipated.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Water-plantain S1 Bath, Augusta Freshwater and tidal marshes, Surveys identified 200 individual The potential impacts and mitigation
crowfoot beaver ponds, sluggish streams, plants near the South River Wet measures for this species are the
Ranunculus and montane depression ponds. Meadow Conservation Site in same as described above for the
ambigens Known from fewer than 20 sites Augusta County. Red Milkweed.
(Virginia Botanical Associates,
2016).
Fringed meadow S1 Southampton, Bogs, wet flatwoods, and boggy Surveys identified 150 The potential impacts and mitigation
beauty Greensville, Suffolk powerline clearings (Virginia individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
Rhexia petiolata Botanical Associates, 2016). Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog same as described above for the
Conservation Site. This species Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
has been documented at the working with VDCR on potential
Emporia Powerline Bog reroute of Handsom-Gum and
Conservation Site, and Emporia Bog Powerline
Handsom-Gum Powerline Conservation Sites pending
Conservation Site, which are hydrologic study anticipated in
crossed by ACP (VDCR, January 2017.
2016b).
S-75

Small bunched S1 Southampton, Bogs, sphagnous seeps, and Surveys identified 2,000+ The potential impacts and mitigation
beaksedge Greensville boggy clearings (Virginia individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
Rhynchospora Botanical Associates, 2016). Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog same as described above for the
cephalantha var. Conservation Site. This species Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
attenuata has been documented at the working with VDCR on potential
Emporia Powerline Bog reroute of Handsom-Gum and
Conservation Site, and Emporia Bog Powerline
Handsom-Gum Powerline Conservation Sites pending
Conservation Site, which is hydrologic study anticipated in
crossed by ACP (VDCR, January 2017.
2016b).
Coastal bog S1 Southampton Seeping, sphagnous slopes in Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
beaksedge powerline ROW (Virginia 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Rhynchospora Botanical Associates, 2016). species has been documented Handsom-Gum Powerline
stenophylla at the Handsom-Gum Powerline Conservation Site pending hydrologic
Conservation Site, which is study anticipated in January 2017.
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
Lance-leaved rose- S1 Southampton Powerline clearings in wet Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
gentian flatwoods (Virginia Botanical 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Sabatia difformis Associates, 2016). species has been documented Handsom-Gum Powerline
at the Handsom-Gum Powerline Conservation Site pending hydrologic
Conservation Site, which is study anticipated in January 2017.
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Northern pitcher plant S2 Dinwiddie, Open acidic seepage swamps, Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
Sarracenia purpurea Greensville, streamhead pocosins, boggy 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Southampton, Suffolk depressions in pine flatwoods, species has been documented Handsom-Gum Powerline
sphagnous powerline seeps and at the Dahlia Swamps Conservation Site pending hydrologic
other boggy clearings (Virginia Conservation Site, and study anticipated in January 2017.
Botanical Associates, 2016). Handsom-Gum Powerline
Conservation Site, which is the
vicinity of or crossed by ACP
(VDCR, 2016b).
Slender nutrush S2 Dinwiddie, Bogs and boggy clearings, usually Species not observed during Atlantic is currently working with
Scleria minor Greensville, Suffolk, sphagnous, and saturated 2015 or 2016 surveys. This VDCR on potential reroute of the
Southampton powerline ROW swales (Virginia species has been documented Handsom-Gum and Emporia Bog
Botanical Associates, 2016). at the Emporia Powerline Bog Powerline Conservation Sites
Conservation Site, and pending hydrologic study anticipated
Handsom-Gum Powerline in January 2017.
Conservation Site, which are
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
S-76

2016b).
Southern bog S2 Southampton Wet pinelands and deciduous Surveys completed in 2015 The potential impacts and mitigation
goldenrod flatwoods, swampy woods, and identified 24 individuals of this measures for this species are the
Solidago stricta clearing (Virginia Botanical species at the Branchville same as described above for the
Associates, 2016). Powerline Conservation Site. Red Milkweed. Pending VDCR
review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
Yellow nodding S2 Highland, Bath Open forests, clearings, and Surveys identified 1 individual of The potential impacts and mitigation
ladies-tresses meadows often at higher this species along a proposed measures for this species are the
Spiranthes elevations (Virginia Botanical access road in the GWNF. same as described above for the
ochroleuca Associates, 2016). Red Milkweed. Pending GWNF and
VDCR review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
Gaping panic grass S1 Greensville, Floodplain forests, alluvial Surveys completed in 2015 The potential impacts and mitigation
Steinchisma hians Southampton, Suffolk swamps, and wet clearings and identified this 1,000+ individuals measures for this species are the
fields (Virginia Botanical of this species at the Branchville same as described above for the
Associates, 2016). Powerline Conservation Site. Red Milkweed. Pending VDCR
review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Dense-flowered S1 Southampton, Sphagnous bogs and bog Surveys identified 25-50 The potential impacts and mitigation
camas Greensville clearings (Virginia Botanical individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
Stenanthium densum Associates, 2016). Emporia Powerline Bog same as described above for the
Conservation Site and 600-700 Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
individuals at the Handsom- working with VDCR on potential
Gum Powerline Bog reroute of the Handsom-Gum and
Conservation Site. This species Emporia Bog Powerline
has been documented at both Conservation Sites pending
the Emporia Powerline Bog hydrologic study anticipated in
Conservation Site, and January 2017.
Handsom-Gum Powerline
Conservation Site; and has the
potential to occur at the
Branchville Powerline
Conservation Site, which are all
crossed by ACP (VDCR,
2016b).
S-77

Three birds orchid
Triphora
trianthophora ssp.
trianthophora
Southern bladderwort
Utricularia juncea
American vetch S1b
Vicia americana ssp.
americana
S1 Bath, Augusta Mesic slope forests, montane
alluvial forests, and large-river
floodplain forest. Most often found downslope of a proposed
under hemlocks or in moist soils
and moss of old logging roads
(Virginia Botanical Associates,
2016).
S1 Dinwiddie, Bog, sea-level fens, pond shores,
Southampton, Suffolk and wet, disturbed sands (Virginia
Botanical Associates, 2016).
Nelson Dry, shaley or rocky woodlands,
forest edges and clearings,
riverside prairies and outcrops
(Virginia Botanical Associates,
2016).
Surveys identified 26 individuals The potential impacts and mitigation
of this species 1,000 feet measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
access road associated with Red Milkweed. Pending GWNF and
Browns Pond Conservation Site VDCR review of survey reports and
on the GWNF. mitigation measures.
Surveys identified 350 The potential impacts and mitigation
individuals of this species at the measures for this species are the
Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog same as described above for the
Conservation Site. Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
working with VDCR on potential
reroute of the Handsom-Gum
Powerline Conservation Site pending
hydrologic study anticipated in
January 2017.
Surveys identified this species The potential impacts and mitigation
within the GWNF. measures for this species are the
same as described above for the
Red Milkweed. Pending GWNF and
VDCR review of survey reports and
mitigation measures.
 TABLE S-2 (contd)

Virginia Listed and Species of Greatest Conservation Need With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
State Rank /
Statusc Counties with
Species/Scientific (SGCN Tier Documented Potential Project Impacts and
Name Rank)c Occurrencesd Habitat Description Survey / Agency Data Mitigation
Fringed yellow-eyed S1 Southampton, Boggy and peaty clearings in wet Surveys identified 1 individual of The potential impacts and mitigation
grass Suffolk, Chesapeake flatwoods, pocosins, and Atlantic this species in the Great Dismal measures for this species are the
Xyris fimbriata white cedar swamps. All records Swamp Conservation Site, and same as described above for the
are from the Great Dismal Swamp 13 individuals at the Great Red Milkweed.
(Virginia Botanical Associates, Dismal Swamp (Northwest
2016). Section) Conservation Site.
Tall yellow-eyed S2 Greensville, Suffolk Bogs, powerline swales, Surveys identified 14 individuals The potential impacts and mitigation
grass sphagnous ditches, and sandhill of this species at the Great measures for this species are the
Xyris platylepis seeps (Virginia Botanical Dismal Swamp Conservation same as described above for the
Associates, 2016). Site, and individuals at the Red Milkweed. Atlantic is currently
Handsom-Gum Powerline Bog working with VDCR on potential
Conservation Site. reroute of the Handsom-Gum
Powerline Conservation Site pending
hydrologic study anticipated in
January 2017.
____________________
a
Species under review for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act.
S-78

b
Species is identified as Regional Foresters Sensitive Species, Management Indicator Species, or Locally Rare Species in the George Washington National Forest, see
Section 4.7.3 and appendix R.
c
State Rank and Status is based on Roble, 2016 and Townsend, 2016.
d
County Occurrence information is based on the sources cited in the Habitat Descriptions column, and information provided by federal and state agencies.
State Rank: S1 = Critically Imperiled, S2 = Imperiled, S3 = Vulnerable, S4 = Apparently Secure, S5 = Secure, SH= Possibly Extirpated, SU = Possibly rare, but status uncertain
and more data needed, ? = Inexact Numeric Rank.
State Rank (Birds): S_B: breeding status; these species typically inhabit Virginia only during the breeding season, S_B/S_N: breeding and non-breeding status in Virginia when
they differ
State Status: E Endangered, P Proposed, T Threatened
Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Tier Rank: Tier I Critical Conservation Need; Tier II Very High Conservation Need; Tier III High Conservation Need; Tier IV
Moderate Conservation Need
Conservation Opportunity Ranking (included with SGCN Tier Rank, e.g. Tier Ia, Tier IIIc): a VDGIF has identified species or habitat management strategies, some of which will be
implemented; b VDGIF has identified species or habitat management strategies; but cannot implement; c VDGIF has not identified species or habitat management strategies
for this species
PF federally petitioned species
NR not ranked
 TABLE S-3

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
MAMMALS
Rafinesques big- SC Northampton, Roosts in hollow NHI Observation within One-Mile of Project One of the roost trees and the two building roosts are
eared bat (Coastal Johnston, trees, old buildings, Area (Pre-2006); A total of 16 individuals located greater than 0.25 mile from the construction
Plain subspecies) Sampson, and beneath were captured during mist-net surveys in workspace; however the distance of the other roost
Corynorhinus Robeson bridges usually Halifax and Northampton Counties. In tree was unable to be determined due to denied land
rafinesquii near water addition, telemetry surveys identified three access. The third roost tree is located along a
macrotis (NCDEQ, 2014d). roost trees, and two building roosts. Bat proposed existing access road; therefore use of the
surveys are pending on 2.9 miles in North road could cause disturb roosting bats. Atlantic would
Carolina, which are anticipated to be avoid and implement a 0.25-mile buffer around
completed in August 2017. positively identified roost trees and only clear suitable
habitat during the non-active season (November 16-
March 31). Atlantic is currently coordinating with
NCWRC to determine appropriate conservation
measures for the roost tree located along a proposed
existing access road.
Southeastern SC Halifax, Roosts in buildings, A total of 15 individuals were captured during One of the roost trees and bridge roost are located
myotis Johnston, hollow trees; mist-net surveys in Halifax, Nash, Wilson, greater than 0.25 mile from the construction
Myotis Robeson forages near water and Northampton counties. In addition, workspace; however the other two roost trees are
S-79

austroriparius mainly in the telemetry surveys identified three roost trees, located 0.1 mile from the construction workspace.
Coastal Plain and one bridge roost. Bat surveys are Atlantic would avoid and implement a 0.25-mile buffer
(NCDEQ, 2014d). pending on 2.9 miles in North Carolina, which around positively identified roost trees and only clear
are anticipated to be completed in August suitable habitat during the non-active season
2017. (November 16-March 31). Project would remove
suitable habitat. Atlantic is currently coordinating with
NCWRC to determine appropriate conservation
measures for the two roost trees located within 0.5
mile of the construction workspace.
BIRDS
Bachmans SC Halifax, Open longleaf pine NHI Observation within Project Area (1983). Based on desktop analysis, potentially suitable habitat
sparrow Cumberland, forests, old fields Based on a desktop assessment, Atlantic for this species occurs with the ACP Project area.
Peucaea aestivalis Sampson, (NCDEQ, 2014d). identified potentially suitable habitat for this Construction activities would cause temporary to long
Robeson species in Halifax, Sampson, and term loss of suitable habitat, and could disrupt normal
Cumberland counties. activities. Atlantic would construct outside of the
nesting season and implement the mitigation
measures outlined in the Migratory Bird Plan (see
table 2.3.1-1) to minimize impact to this species.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Cerulean warbler SC Northampton, Mature hardwood forests; steep NHI Observation within One-Mile of Construction activities would cause long term
Setophaga Halifax, Johnston slopes and coves in mountains, Project Area (2007). Based on a to permanent loss of suitable habitat, and could
cerulea natural levees in Coastal Plain desktop assessment, Atlantic identified disrupt normal activities. Atlantic would
(NCDEQ, 2014d). potentially suitable habitat for this construct outside of the nesting season and
species in Northampton and Halifax implement the mitigation measures outlined in
counties. the Migratory Bird Plan (see table 2.3.1-1) to
minimize impact to this species.
Little blue heron SC Cumberland, Forests or thickets on maritime NHI Observation within One-Mile of Atlantic has committed to maintaining a
Egretta caerulea Robeson islands, rarely in swamps or at Project Area (2000). One active disturbance buffer distance of 0.5-mile around
ponds (NCDEQ, 2014d). rookery (WBC-14) with little blue heron of rookeries from February 15-July 31, and
was documented during surveys maintaining an undisturbed, naturally
conducted in 2015 surveys in Robeson vegetated buffer of at least 500 feet around
County. rookeries at all times. The rookery is located
6,375 feet (1.2 miles) from the ACP 300-foot
survey corridor; therefore impacts are not
anticipated.
Snowy egret SC Robeson Forests or thickets on maritime NHI Observation within One-Mile of Atlantic has committed to maintaining a
Egretta thula islands, rarely in swamps or at Project Area (2000). One active disturbance buffer distance of 0.5-mile around
S-80

ponds (NCDEQ, 2014d). rookery with snowy egret was of rookeries from February 15-July 31, and
documented during surveys conducted maintaining an undisturbed, naturally
in 2015 surveys in Robeson County. vegetated buffer of at least 500 feet around
rookeries at all times. The rookery is located
6,375 feet (1.2 miles) from the ACP 300-foot
survey corridor; therefore impacts are not
anticipated.
REPTILES
American T Cumberland, Fresh to slightly brackish lakes, NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
alligator Sampson, ponds, rivers, and marshes Project Area (1990) area (last NHI observance in 1990). Based on
Alligator Robeson (NCDEQ, 2014d). consultation with NCWRC, there is no suitable
mississippiensis habitat for this species within the Project area.
Eastern E Cumberland, Pine flatwoods, savannas, pine- NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
diamondback Sampson, oak sandhills (NCDEQ, 2014d). Project Area (1934) area (last NHI observance in 1934). Based on
rattlesnake Robeson consultation with NCWRC, there is no suitable
Crotalus habitat for this species within the Project area.
adamanteus
Southern SC Cumberland, Sandy woods, particularly pine- NHI Observations within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
hognose snake Sampson, oak sandhills (NCDEQ, 2014d). Project Area (1988) area (last NHI observance in 1988). Based on
Heterodon simus Robeson consultation with NCWRC, there is no suitable
habitat for this species within the Project area.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Coachwhip SR Cumberland, Dry and sandy woods, mainly in NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
Masticophis Sampson pine/oak sandhills (NCDEQ, Project Area (pre-1877) area (last NHI observance prior to 1877).
flagellum 2014d). Based on consultation with NCWRC, there is
no suitable habitat for this species within the
Project area.
AMPHIBIANS
Dwarf SC Robeson Pocosins, Carolina bays, pine Not available. Based on consultation with NCWRC, there is
salamander flatwoods, savannas, and other no suitable habitat for this species within the
Eurycea wetland habitats (NCDEQ, Project area.
quadridigitata 2014d).
Pine barrens SR Johnston, Pocosins, bay forests, boggy NHI Observations within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
treefrog Cumberland, areas (NCDEQ, 2014d). Project Area (1974) area (last NHI observance prior to 1974).
Hyla andersonii Sampson Based on consultation with NCWRC, there is
no suitable habitat for this species within the
Project area.
River frog SC Cumberland, River floodplains, such as pools NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
Lithobates Sampson, or borrow pit ponds (NCDEQ, Project Area (1958) area (last NHI observance prior to 1958).
S-81

heckscheri Robeson 2014d). Based on consultation with NCWRC, there is

no suitable habitat for this species within the
Project area.
Neuse river SC* Halifax, Nash, Neuse and Tar-Pamlico basins. NHI Observations within Project Area This species is currently under review by
waterdog Johnston, Wilson Clean, moderate to swift-flowing (2015). 2016 surveys documented 42 USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
Necturus lewisi streams, common in streams adults at four waterbodies crossed by section 4.7.1.7). Waterbodies where Neuse
greater than 15 m wide and 1 m ACP. Surveys are at one waterbody river waterdogs were documented during 2016
deep. Require relatively high and are anticipated to be completed in surveys would be crossed using the HDD
oxygen levels and water quality February 2017. technique to minimize impacts to this species.
(NCDEQ, 2014d). Waterdogs occurring in waterbodies crossed
by HDD may be affected if there is an
inadvertent release of drilling fluid in or near
the waterbody. Atlantic would implement the
measures outlined in its HDD Plan (see
appendix H), and would maintain riparian
vegetation at HDD crossings to minimize off
road vehicle use and additional sedimentation.
Atlantic is also proposing to withdraw water
from these waterbodies. Atlantic would monitor
water withdrawals during appropriation to
ensure water would not exceed 25 percent of
the waterbodys discharge (as measured at the
nearest USGS gauging station.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Southern chorus SR Johnston, Ditches, Carolina bays, and other NHI Observations within One-Mile of Based on consultation with NCWRC, there is
frog Sampson, temporary shallow ponds Project Area (2014) no suitable habitat for this species within the
Pseudacris Cumberland, (NCDEQ, 2014d). Project area.
nigrita Robeson
FISH
Roanoke bass SR Halifax, Johnston, Found primarily in the Tar and NHI Observations within Project Area This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
Ambloplites Nash, Wilson Neuse river drainages, but also & within One-Mile of Project Area area (last NHI observance in 1997). Where
cavifrons found in Chowan, Roanoke, and (1997) located in waterbodies crossed by dry crossing
Cape Fear river drainages technique, individuals would be relocated to
(introduced to Cape Fear). Rocky suitable habitat per the North Carolina Aquatics
and sandy pools of creeks and Relocation Plan (in development); mortality
small to medium rivers. Most could occur during relocation efforts.
common in clearer, firmer Waterbody crossings and access road
bottomed streams (NatureServe, construction/use would temporarily degrade
2015). water quality through increased sedimentation
and turbidity during construction, reduced fish
passage, disturbance, changes in hydrology,
and disturbance and injury or mortality from
S-82

blasting (see section 4.6 for additional

discussion). Removal of riparian habitat may
also contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing shade
increase localized water temperatures. Atlantic
would implement the measures in the FERC
Plan and Procedures, and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of
hazardous chemicals, and to restore riparian
habitats. Atlantic is also proposing to withdraw
water from several of these waterbodies.
Quillback SR Northampton, Roanoke river drainages. Pools, NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
Carpiodes Halifax backwaters and main channels Project Area (2007) area (last NHI observance in 2007). The
cyprinus of creeks and small to large potential impacts on and mitigation for this
rivers. Also occurs in lakes species are the same as those described
(NatureServe, 2015). above for the Roanoke Bass.
Thinlip chub SC Cumberland, Lumber and Cape Fear rivers NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
Cyprinella sp. 1 Sampson, and their tributaries. Sandy and Project Area (1962) area (last NHI observance in 1962). The
Robeson rocky runs and flowing pools of potential impacts on and mitigation for this
creeks and small rivers with clear species are the same as those described
to turbid warm waters above for the Roanoke Bass.
(NatureServe, 2015).
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Blackbanded SR Johnston, Nash, Many river drainages, especially NHI Observations within Project Area The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
sunfish Sampson, the Lumber drainage. Vegetated (1961) & within One-Mile of Project species are the same as those described
Enneacanthus Cumberland, lakes, ponds, sand and mud- Area (2012) above for the Roanoke Bass.
chaetodon Robeson bottomed pools and backwaters
of creeks, and small to medium
rivers (NatureServe, 2015).
Banded sunfish SR Northampton, Found in most Atlantic NHI Observations within Project Area The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
Enneacanthus Johnston, drainages. Small ponds and (2006) & within One-Mile of Project species are the same as those described
obesus Sampson, backwaters of creeks to small Area (2012); this species was above for the Roanoke Bass.
Cumberland, and large rivers and boggy incidentally observed during aquatic
Robeson brooks over sand or mud in species surveys at the Tar River and
sluggish, acidic, heavily Little Buffalo Creek.
vegetated waters (NatureServe,
2015).
Mimic shiner SR Halifax, Nash, Tar and Neuse river drainages. NHI Observation within One-Mile of The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
Notropis Johnston Clear streams from medium- Project Area (1966) species are the same as those described
volucellus sized creeks to small rivers. Also above for the Roanoke Bass.
found in moderately weedy lakes
S-83

(NatureServe, 2015).
Carolina madtom T* Halifax, Nash, Endemic to the Neuse and Tar NHI Observations within Project Area This species is currently under review by
Noturus furiosus Johnston, Wilson river drainages. Free-flowing (2014); this species was identified at USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
streams with clean sand or three waterbody crossing locations. section 4.7.1.10). The potential impacts on and
gravel bottoms (NatureServe, Based on historic data, this species is mitigation for this species are the same as
2015). known from the Tar River, Fishing those described above for the Neuse River
Creek, Little River, and Contentnea Waterdog. Atlantic would use wet and dry
Creek (FWS, 2015a). Surveys are crossing techniques to cross waterbodies with
pending at five waterbodies and are suitable habitat, but where madtoms were not
anticipated to be completed in June documented. Atlantic would implement the
2017. North Carolina Aquatic Relocation Plan (in
development) at those waterbodies.
Consultations regarding conservation
measures to mitigate the potential impacts of
water withdrawal on this species is ongoing
with the FWS and NCWRC.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
MOLLUSKS: FRESHWATER BIVALVES
Triangle floater T Northampton, Roanoke, Chowan, Tar, Neuse, NHI Observations within Project Area One of the streams where this species has
Alasmidonta Halifax, Nash, and Cape Fear river drainages. (2011); this species was observed at been identified would be crossed using the
undulata Johnston, Wilson Habitat generalist; has been two waterbody crossing locations. HDD technique. Atlantic would implement its
found in silt/sand in slower HDD Plan (appendix H) in the event of an
moving waters, gravel/sand in inadvertent return. The other stream would be
riffles and runs, and from crossed utilizing the open-cut method. Atlantic
crevices in bedrock (NCWRC, would remove and relocate all mussel species
2016a). (regardless of status) to suitable habitat
upstream, pending approval from NCWRC
according to the North Carolina Aquatics
Relocation Plan (in development) prior to
construction. Waterbody crossings and access
road construction/use would temporarily
degrade water quality through increased
sedimentation and turbidity during construction,
disturbance, changes in hydrology, and
disturbance and injury or mortality from
S-84

blasting (see section 4.6 for additional

discussion). Removal of riparian habitat may
also contribute to increased erosion and
sedimentation, and by decreasing shade
increase localized water temperatures. Atlantic
would implement the measures in the FERC
Plan and Procedures, and construction and
restoration plans (see table 2.3.1-1) to control
sedimentation and the introduction of
hazardous chemicals, and to restore riparian
habitats. Atlantic is also proposing to withdraw
water from both of these waterbodies.
Additional consultation with the NCWRC is
pending to determine the appropriate
conservation measures for water withdrawal.
Alewife floater T Halifax, Chowan, Roanoke, and Cape NHI Observations within Project Area This species was not observed at any
Anodonta Northampton, Fear drainages. Clean (2004); this species was not observed waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
implicata Sampson sand/gravel substrates in during surveys. impacts are not anticipated. However,
relatively fast flowing water downstream impacts are possible. The
(NCWRC, 2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Pod lance SC Sampson, Cape Fear and Lumber NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species was not observed at any
Elliptio folliculata Cumberland drainages. Sand and clay Project Area (1998); this species was waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
substrates in small creeks to not observed during surveys. impacts are not anticipated. However,
large rivers, including canals downstream impacts are possible. The
(NCWRC, 2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater..
Yellow lance E* Halifax, Nash, Tar and Neuse river drainages. NHI Observations within Project Area This species is currently under review by
Elliptio lanceolata Johnston Clean, coarse to medium-sized (2010); this species was not observed USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
sands; occasionally found in during surveys. section 4.7.1.13). This species was not
gravel substrates. Main channels observed at any waterbody crossing locations,
to small streams (NCWRC, therefore direct impacts are not anticipated.
2016a). However, downstream impacts are possible.
The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
Cape Fear spike SC Johnston, Cape Fear and Neuse drainages This species was not observed during This species was not observed at any
Elliptio Sampson, (endemic to North Carolina). Has surveys. waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
S-85

marsupiobesa Cumberland, been found in both muddy / loose impacts are not anticipated. However,
Robeson sandy, and firm sandy substrates downstream impacts are possible. The
(NCWRC, 2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
Roanoke T Cumberland, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Cape NHI Observations within Project Area One of the streams where this species has
slabshell Johnston, Nash, Fear, and Lumber drainages. (2009); this species was observed at been identified would be crossed using the
Elliptio Halifax, Deeper channels near shore in two waterbody crossing locations. HDD technique. The other stream would be
roanokensis Northampton relatively fast flowing water. crossed utilizing the open-cut method. The
Coarse to medium sized sands potential impacts on and mitigation for this
and small gravel (NCWRC, species are the same as those described
2016a). above for the Triangle Floater.
Atlantic pigtoe E* Northampton, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, and Cape NHI Observations within Project Area This species is currently under review by
Fusconaia Halifax, Nash, Fear river drainages. Medium to (2012); this species was observed at USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
masoni Wilson, Johnston, large streams; clean, swift waters four waterbody crossing locations. section 4.7.1.13). All waterbodies where this
Sampson, with stable gravel, or sand and species has been documented during surveys
Cumberland gravel substrate. Downstream would be crossed utilizing the HDD technique.
edge of riffle areas (NCWRC, The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
2016a). species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also
proposing to withdraw water from all of these
waterbodies. Additional consultation with the
FWS and NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Yellow E Northampton, Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, NHI Observations within Project Area Both waterbodies where this species has been
lampmussel Halifax, Nash, and Cape Fear river drainages. (2012); this species was observed at documented during surveys would be crossed
Lampsilis cariosa Johnston, Habitat generalist; appears to two waterbody crossing locations. utilizing the HDD technique The potential
Sampson, prefer shifting sands downstream impacts on and mitigation for this species are
Cumberland from large boulders in relatively the same as those described above for the
fast flowing, medium sized rivers Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also proposing to
/ creeks to large creeks withdraw water from both of these waterbodies.
(NCWRC, 2016a). Additional consultation with the FWS and
NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
Carolina T Johnston Neuse River basin. Prefers This species was observed at one The waterbody where this species was
fatmucket gravel, cobble, or boulder waterbody crossing location. identified would be crossed utilizing the open-
Lampsilis radiata substrates, as well as impounded cut method. The potential impacts on and
conspicua habitats (NCWRC, 2016a) mitigation for this species are the same as
those described above for the Triangle Floater.
Atlantic is also proposing to withdraw water
from the waterbody where this species was
S-86

observed. Additional consultation with the

FWS and NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
Eastern T Northampton, Tar River, Swift, and Fishing NHI Observations within Project Area One of the streams where this species has
lampmussel Halifax, Johnston, creek subbasins. Medium to (2012); this species was observed at been identified would be crossed using the
Lampsilis radiata Nash, Sampson coarse sand substrates two waterbody crossing locations. HDD technique. The other stream would be
radiata (NCWRC, 2016a). crossed utilizing the open-cut method. The
potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also
proposing to withdraw water from both of these
waterbodies. Additional consultation with the
FWS and NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Green floater E* Northampton, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse river NHI Observations within Project Area This species is currently under review by
Lasmigona Halifax, Nash, drainages. Small to medium (2010); this species was not observed USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
subviridis Johnston sized streams in quite pools and during surveys; however, per FWS section 4.7.1.13). This species was not
eddies with gravel and sand correspondence this species has been observed at any waterbody crossing locations,
substrate. Generally associated documented in Swift Creek, Tar River, therefore direct impacts are not anticipated.
with good to excellent water and Little River (FWS, 2015a). However, downstream impacts are possible.
quality (NCWRC, 2016a). The potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also
proposing to withdraw water from Swift Creek,
Tar River, and Little River. Additional
consultation with the FWS and NCWRC is
pending to determine the appropriate
conservation measures for water withdrawal.
Tidewater T Northampton, Chowan, Roanoke, and Tar This species was not observed during This species was not observed at any
mucket Halifax River drainages. Habitat surveys. waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
Leptodea generalist; most often found in impacts are not anticipated. However,
ochracea sand/silt substrates (NCWRC, downstream impacts are possible. The
S-87

2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this

species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
Eastern T Northampton, Chowan, Roanoke, Neuse, Tar, This species was not observed during This species was not observed at any
pondmussel Halifax, Nash and Cape Fear river drainages. surveys. waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
Ligumia nasuta Silt and sandy substrates with impacts are not anticipated. However,
limited currents (NCWRC, downstream impacts are possible. The
2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
Creeper / T Halifax, Nash, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, and Cape NHI Observations within Project Area One of the streams where this species has
Squawfoot Johnston, Wilson Fear river drainages. Habitat (2011); this species was observed at been identified would be crossed using the
Strophitus generalist; found in variety of two waterbody crossing locations. HDD technique. The other stream would be
undulatus substrates and waterbodies crossed utilizing the open-cut method. The
(NCWRC, 2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also
proposing to withdraw water from both of these
waterbodies. Additional consultation with the
FWS and NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Notched rainbow SC Halifax, Nash, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse river NHI Observations within Project Area This species was not observed at any
Villosa constricta Johnston, Wilson drainages. Sand/gravel (2012); this species was not observed waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
substrates; often in stable banks during surveys. impacts are not anticipated. However,
among tree root mats (NCWRC, downstream impacts are possible. The
2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
Eastern SR Cumberland, Cape Fear and Lumber NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species was not observed at any
creekshell Sampson drainages. Mud or soft sand Project Area (1990); this species was waterbody crossing locations, therefore direct
Villosa delumbis substrates in small rivers and not observed during surveys. impacts are not anticipated. However,
creeks rich in vegetable detritus downstream impacts are possible. The
(NCWRC, 2016a). potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Triangle Floater.
CRUSTACEANS
North Carolina SC Halifax, Nash, Chowan, Roanoke, Neuse and NHI Observations within Project Area All waterbodies where this species has been
spiny crayfish Wilson, Johnston Tar river drainages. Small to (2010); this species was observed at documented during surveys would be crossed
Orconectes large streams with rock five waterbody crossing locations. utilizing the HDD technique. The potential
S-88

carolinensis substrates (NCWRC, 2016a). impacts on and mitigation for this species are
the same as those described above for the
Triangle Floater. Atlantic is also proposing to
withdraw water from all of these waterbodies.
Additional consultation with the NCWRC is
pending to determine the appropriate
conservation measures for water withdrawal.
Chowanoke SC* Halifax, Chowan and Roanoke river No observations of this species was This species is currently under review by
crayfish Northampton drainages. Slow flowing streams recorded during surveys. Per FWS USFWS for listing under the ESA (refer to
Orconectes or swamps within woodland correspondence this species is known section 4.7.1.12). The Roanoke River would be
(Crockerinus) habitats with sand or gravel from the Roanoke River (FWS, crossed using the HDD method. This species
virginiensis substrates (NCWRC, 2016a). 2015a). was not observed at any waterbody crossing
locations, therefore direct impacts are not
anticipated. However, downstream impacts are
possible. The potential impacts on and
mitigation for this species are the same as
those described above for the Triangle Floater.
In addition, Atlantic is also proposing to
withdraw water from the Roanoke River.
Additional consultation with the FWS and
NCWRC is pending to determine the
appropriate conservation measures for water
withdrawal.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
INSECTS
Mayflies
Mayfly SR Halifax, Nash Swift Creek and Fishing Creek. NHI Observation within One-Mile of Impacts to this species would not be
Baetisca becki Swift, clear, sand-bottomed Project Area (1996) anticipated because both Swift and Fishing
streams and adjacent creeks would be crossed using the HDD
mesophytic forests technique, which would minimize impacts to
(NatureServe, 2015). the waterbody and stream banks where this
species could be encountered.
Mayfly SR Nash Swift Creek. Swift, deep areas of NHI Observation within One-Mile of Impacts to this species would not be
Macdunnoa streams and adjacent mesic Project Area (1990) anticipated because Swift Creek would be
brunnea forests (NatureServe, 2015). crossed using the HDD technique, which would
minimize impacts to the waterbody and stream
banks where this species could be
encountered.
Dragonflies and Damselflies
Septimas clubtail SR Cumberland Small to medium rivers with rapid NHI Observations within Project Area Adult dragonflies would be able to disperse
dragonfly current and gravel bottom & within One-Mile of Project Area away from disturbance; however, reduced
S-89

Gomphus (NatureServe, 2015). (2012) fitness and/or mortality could result if the
septima individual is unable to find other suitable
habitat. There is the potential that construction
activities could impact nymphs through direct
mortality or temporary reduction in water
quality. Atlantic would also remove suitable
riparian habitat that could provide shelter and
foraging habitat; habitat assessment results
are pending. Vehicle collisions could cause
injury or mortality to adult dragonflies. Atlantic
and DTI would implement the FERC Plan and
Procedures (see table 2.3.1-1), which includes
sedimentation and erosion control measures
and waterbody crossing measures to minimize
impacts to this species.
Carolina SR Sampson Temporary or permanent ponds NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the Project
spreadwing and pools with emergent grasses Project Area (pre-2004) area (last NHI observance prior to 2004). All
damselfly (BugGuide, 2016). recorded occurrences in Sampson County for
Lestes vidua this species are either extirpated, have not
been found in recent surveys, or have not been
surveyed recently enough to be confident if this
species is still present. No impacts anticipated.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
Coppery emerald SR Northampton, Creeks and other slow-moving NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the ACP
dragonfly Halifax, Nash, acidic streams in forested areas Project Area (pre-2004) project area (last NHI observance prior to
Somatochlora Johnston, (NCDEQ, 2014d). 2004). All recorded occurrences in
georgiana Sampson, Northampton, Halifax, Johnston, Sampson,
Cumberland, Cumberland, and Robeson counties for this
Robeson species are either extirpated, have not been
found in recent surveys, or have not been
surveyed recently enough to be confident if this
species is still present. No impacts anticipated
in these counties. For Nash County, the
potential impacts on and mitigation for this
species are the same as those described
above for the Septimas Clubtail Dragonfly.
Shining clubtail SR Cumberland, Sandy creeks or small rivers, NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the ACP
dragonfly Sampson, where waters are clean Project Area (pre-2004) project area (last NHI observance prior to
Stylurus ivae Robeson (NCDEQ, 2014d). 2004). All recorded occurrences in Sampson
and Cumberland counties for this species are
either extirpated, have not been found in recent
S-90

surveys, or have not been surveyed recently

enough to be confident if this species is still
present. No impacts anticipated in these
counties. For Robeson County, the potential
impacts on and mitigation for this species are
the same as those described above for the
Septimas Clubtail Dragonfly.
Phantom darner SR Robeson Slow-flowing streams (NCDEQ, NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the ACP
dragonfly 2014d). Project Area (pre-2004) project area (last NHI observance prior to
Triacanthagyna 2004). All recorded occurrences in Robeson
trifida County for this species are either extirpated,
have not been found in recent surveys, or have
not been surveyed recently enough to be
confident if this species is still present. No
impacts anticipated.
Grasshoppers
Weldon short- SR Halifax Open woodlands (endemic to NHI Observation within One-Mile of This species is unlikely to occur in the ACP
wing North Carolina) (NCDEQ, Project Area (1913) project area (last NHI observance in 1913). All
grasshopper 2014d). recorded occurrences in Halifax County for this
Melanoplus mirus species are either extirpated, have not been
found in recent surveys, or have not been
surveyed recently enough to be confident if this
species is still present. No impacts anticipated.
 TABLE S-3 (contd)

North Carolina Listed and Special Concern Species With Potential to Occur in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Area
Counties with
Species/Scientific State Documented
Name Status Occurrences a Habitat Description Survey Data / Agency Data Potential Project Impacts and Mitigation
PLANTS
Running oak SR-P Robeson Mesic pine flatwoods and dry, NHI Observation within Project Area Atlantic is currently discussing rerouting and/or
Quercus elliottii silty sites (NCDEQ, 2014e). (2008); One occurrence documented minimization options with NCEDNR.
during 2015 field surveys.
____________________
a
County Occurrence data is based on sources cited in the Habitat Description column, and information from federal and state agencies.
North Carolina Status: E Endangered, T Threatened, SC special concern, SC-V special concern-vulnerable, SR significantly rare, SR-O significantly rare other, SR-P
significantly rare peripheral, SR-T significantly rare throughout,
Federal Status: *species under review for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act, PF federally petitioned species
NHI = Natural Heritage Information
S-91
 APPENDIX T

VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PIPELINE SEGMENTS

IN MONONGAHELA AND GEORGE WASHINGTON
NATIONAL FORESTS
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Visual Impact Assessment for Pipeline Segments in

Monongahela and George Washington National Forests

Updated

Prepared by:

August 2016

T-1
 ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PIPELINE SEGMENTS IN
MONONGAHELA AND GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FORESTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5
1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 5
1.2 U.S. Forest Service Scenery Management System ................................................. 7
1.3 National Park Service Visual IMpact Framework ................................................ 11
2.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 15
2.1 Seen Area Analysis and Identification of Key Observation Points ...................... 15
2.2 Field Surveys ........................................................................................................ 20
2.3 Visual Analysis Types .......................................................................................... 21
3.0 RESULTS OF VISUAL ANALYSES ........................................................................... 23
3.1 Indicative Simulations .......................................................................................... 23
3.2 Full Visual Simulations (Proposed Action) .......................................................... 23
3.3 Contingency Plan Simulations .............................................................................. 39
4.0 DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................................................... 50
4.1 George Washington National Forest and Blue Ridge Parkway ............................ 50
4.2 Monongahela National Forest ............................................................................... 53
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 56

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Key Observation Points .................................................. 19

Table 2-2 Visual Analyses Conducted for KOPs Selected for Further Study....................... 21
Table 4-1 Summary of Scenic Integrity Objectives for KOPs in GWNF ............................. 50
Table 4-2 Scenic Integrity Objectives crossed by ACP in GWNF ....................................... 51
Table 4-3 Summary of Scenic Classes crossed by ACP in MNF ......................................... 54

2
T-2
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1: VIA Study Area for the ACP ....................................................................................... 6

Figure 1-2: Contingency Route ....................................................................................................... 8
Figure 1-3: Contingency Route Entry/Exit Areas ........................................................................... 9
Figure 1-4: Scenic Integrity Objectives, GWNF .......................................................................... 12
Figure 1-3: Scenic Integrity Objectives, GWNF .......................................................................... 13
Figure 1-5: Scenic Classes, MNF ................................................................................................. 13
Figure 2-1: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, GWNF (East) .......................................................... 16
Figure 2-2: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, GWNF (West) ......................................................... 17
Figure 2-3: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, MNF ........................................................................ 18
Figure 3-1: Baseline photography and Indicative Simulation, KOP 15 ....................................... 24
Figure 3-2: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth Following Construction ................................... 25
Figure 3-3: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction............................... 26
Figure 3-4: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction ....................... 27
Figure 3-5: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth Following Construction ................................... 29
Figure 3-6: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction............................... 30
Figure 3-7: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction ....................... 31
Figure 3-8: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth Following Construction ................................... 32
Figure 3-9: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction............................... 33
Figure 3-10: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction ..................... 34
Figure 3-11: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth Following Construction ................................. 35
Figure 3-12: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction............................. 36
Figure 3-13: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction ..................... 37
Figure 3-14: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction with Vegetative
Restoration ............................................................................................................ 38
Figure 3-15: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth Following Construction ................................. 40
Figure 3-16: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction............................. 41
Figure 3-17: Full Simulation, KOP 40, , Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction ................... 42
Figure 3-18: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction, Permanent
ROW Outlined ...................................................................................................... 43
Figure 3-19: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Contingency Plan ........................................................... 44
Figure 3-20: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined ............... 45
Figure 3-21: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Contingency Plan ........................................................... 46
Figure 3-22: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined ............... 47
Figure 3-23: Full Simulation, KOP 65, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined............... 49

APPENDICES

Appendix A Field Survey Photo Pages

Appendix B High-Resolution, Large-Format Full Visual Simulations

3
T-3
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
ACRONYMS

ACP Atlantic Coast Pipeline

ANST Appalachian National Scenic Trail
Atlantic Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
BRP Blue Ridge Parkway
DEM Digital Elevation Model
EIS environmental impact statement
GIS Geographic Information Systems
GWNF George Washington National Forest
HDD Hydraulic Directional Drill
KOP Key Observation Point
MNF Monongahela National Forest
MP milepost
NPS National Park Service
SIO Scenic Integrity Objective
SMS USFS Scenery Management System
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
USFS U.S. Forest Service
USGS United States Geological Survey
VIA Visual Impact Analysis

4
T-4
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (Atlantic), conducted a visual impact assessment (VIA) to
describe conditions and potential visual impacts for the segments of the proposed Atlantic Coast
Pipeline (ACP) that cross the Monongahela National Forest (MNF) in West Virginia and George
Washington National Forest (GWNF) in Virginia. This VIA also describes conditions and
potential impacts to the Appalachian National Scenic Trail (ANST), which is located on the
GWNF at the ACP crossing location, as well as the Blue Ridge Parkway (BRP), which is
administered by the National Park Service (NPS). This VIA was completed by staff from ERM
(Atlantics contractor), as well as staff from Truescape, LTD, ERMs subcontractor responsible
for preparing visual simulations to support the visual assessment. This report presents findings of
field studies and desktop analysis.

1.1.1 Seen Area Analysis and VIA Study Area

At the initiation of the VIA project, Atlantic met with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to
understand the content and analyses that the USFS required for their decision-making process
regarding consideration of visual impacts resulting from the proposed action.

A USFS memorandum dated September 14, 2015, states that a seen area analysis
should be completed, including all land up to 5 miles from the ACP centerline up to 5 miles
beyond the National Forest proclamation boundary (USFS, 2015). The seen area analysis is a
required first step in evaluating visual impacts for the USFS (see Section 2). This analysis
requires the use of topographic data in a Geographic Information System (GIS) to determine
areas that would be visible from a given feature (in this case the ACP proposed route). The seen
area analysis assumes clear weather and absolutely no intervening vegetation or structures (i.e., a
cleared ground surface analysis. In this sense, the seen area analysis represents a worst-case
scenario that requires verification through on-the-ground observations of actual views with
existing vegetation and other features not included in the seen area topographic mapping.

Consistent with the USFS memo, the study area for this VIA consists of a 5-mile buffer
around the ACPs proposed centerline, as shown in Figure 1-1. Unless otherwise specified, the
analyses in this VIA reflect the proposed route filed with FERC on July 18, 2016. The seen area
analysis is discussed in more detail in Section 2.1.

5
T-5
Figure 1-1: VIA Study Area for the ACP

T-6
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
1.1.2 Proposed Action

The ACP would cross approximately 5.5 miles of USFS-owned land within the MNF, as
well as 14.6 miles of USFS-owned land within the GWNF. The landscape within the study area
is generally characterized by mountainous terrain, largely covered by dense deciduous and
evergreen forests. West of the Greenbrier River (within the MNF), the ACP corridor crosses the
Appalachian Plateau physiographic region, an area characterized by relatively flat ridgetops at
approximately 4,400 to 4,800 feet above sea level, incised by stream and river valleys as low as
2,300 feet. East of the Greenbrier River (the eastern MNF and western GWNF), the corridor is
within the Valley and Ridge region. This area is characterized by narrow ridges running
northeast-southwest, with maximum elevations between 3,200 and 3,800 feet, interspersed with
broad stream and river valleys, often with elevations below 2,000 feet. East of the City of
Staunton (in the GWNF Glenwood-Pedlar Ranger District), the corridor crosses through the Blue
Ridge Mountain region, which reaches heights of approximately 3,500 feet along the BRP and
ANST. River and stream valleys are often cleared and used for agriculture or livestock grazing,
and also serve as north-south transportation routes.

1.1.3 Contingency Analysis

Under the Proposed Action, the ACP corridor would cross underneath the Blue Ridge
Mountains (including the BRP and ANST) using the Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD)
process, from approximately milepost (MP) 157.8 to 158.7. Although Atlantic expects the HDD
to be successful, the Project has also developed a contingency plan for crossing the BRP and
ANST. Under the contingency plan, the ACP corridor would cross the BRP and ANST, the
surrounding USFS and NPS lands, and a small amount of surrounding private land using the
Direct Pipeline Drill directional bore process. Under the contingency plan, the remainder of the
ACP corridor on private lands beyond the Direct Pipeline Drill would consist of typical trenched
pipeline construction on both sides of the Blue Ridge. Figure 1-2 shows the contingency route
relative to the proposed route, while Figure 1-3 shows a detail of the location of the entry and
exit points for the contingency route bore.

1.2 U.S. FOREST SERVICE SCENERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The information in this VIA, and particularly the evaluation of visual impacts in
Section 4.0, is intended to be consistent with the USFS Scenery Management System (SMS).
The SMS, which is a system for the inventory and analysis of the aesthetic values of National
Forest lands (U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1995), is described in Agriculture
Handbook 701, Landscape Aesthetics - A Handbook for Scenery Management. The SMS
establishes a method for measuring the scenic value of lands in National Forests, according to the
opinions of various types of viewers and USFS professionals and forest managers. It takes into
account a wide variety of existing and desired landscape characteristics, such as (but not limited
to) slope; vegetative cover type, pattern, height and distribution; soils; geology; and the edge
effect where different landscape elements meet. This section describes the major concepts of the
SMS relevant to the VIA, and also provides the SMS ratings for the portions of the MNF and
GWNF potentially affected by the ACP.

7
T-7
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 1-2: Contingency Route
T-8

8
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 1-3: Contingency Route Entry/Exit Areas
T-9

9
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
1.2.1 Distance Zones

Distance zones are the generalized groupings used to describe how viewers see the
landscape. The SMS identifies four distance zones:

x immediate foreground (0 to 300 feet);

x foreground (300 feet to 0.5 mile);
x middleground (0.5 mile to 4 miles); and
x background (4 miles to the horizon).

Immediate foreground and foreground views tend to highlight details ranging from
individual leaves to individual trees. The middleground is usually the predominant distance
zone at which National Forest landscapes are seen, except for regions oftall, dense
vegetation. In the background, texture has disappeared and color has flattened, but large
patterns of vegetation or rock are still distinguishable (USDA, 1995).

1.2.2 Scenic Classes

Scenic classes recognize the idea that all National Forests have value as scenery. The
classes, which range from 1 (most valuable scenery) to 7 (least valuable scenery) are a
measurement that can be used to consistently evaluate the scenic value and relative scenic
importance of a particular area. They are used in forest planning to compare values of scenery
with other types of resources. The higher the scenic value (i.e., Scenic Classes 1 and 2), the more
important it is to maintain.

1.2.3 Scenic Integrity Objectives

Whereas distance zones, scenic classes, and sensitivity levels express existing conditions
within a forest, Scenic Integrity Objectives (SIOs) express the desired future aesthetic condition
of a forest. Scenic integrity is a continuum ranging over five levels of integrity from very high
to very low (USDA, 1995). SIO descriptions, as defined below, generally express a comparison
to existing or preferred conditions (USDA, 1995):

x Very High: landscapes where the valued landscape character is intact with only
minute if any deviations.

x High: landscapes where the valued landscape character appears intact. Deviations
may be present but must repeat the form, line, color, texture, and pattern common to
the landscape character so completely and at such scale that they are not evident.

x Moderate: landscapes where the valued landscape character appears slightly

altered. Noticeable deviations must remain visually subordinate to the landscape
character being viewed.

x Low: landscapes where the valued landscape character appears moderately altered
Deviations begin to dominate the valued landscape character being viewed but they
borrow valued attributes such as size, shape, edge effect and pattern of natural

10
T-10
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
openings, vegetative type changes or architectural styles outside the landscape being
viewed.

x Very Low: landscapes where the valued landscape character appears heavily
altered. Deviations may strongly dominate the valued landscape character.

Based on discussions with USFS personnel, Atlantic understands that SIO designations
do not exist for the MNF. At a March 4, 2016 meeting with Atlantic, the USFS agreed that
Scenic Class (which is available for MNF) would be an acceptable proxy for SIO. Atlantic
understands that these two sets of designations are not the same. Scenic Classes are descriptive,
while SIOs are prescriptive. For example, heavily altered landscapes can be reclaimed [i.e., a
higher SIO can be achieved] through future management activities and natural regeneration of
vegetation (USDA, 1995). Given the absence of SIO designations, scenic classes are the best
available way to understand the ACPs potential visual impacts on the MNF. Figure 1-4 shows
the SIO designations for the portions of GWNF within the VIA study area. Figure 1-5 shows the
Scenic Classes for the portions of MNF within the VIA study area.

1.3 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE VISUAL IMPACT FRAMEWORK

The information in this VIA, and particularly the evaluation of visual impacts in Section
4.0, is intended to be consistent with NPS management designations and visual impact
assessment techniques for the BRP.

The segment of the BRP crossed by the ACP is within the Scenic Character
management zone, as defined in the 2013 General Management Plan and environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the BRP. The Scenic Character zone identifies areas of the parkway that
would emphasize protection and sightseeing opportunities of the scenic landscapes and natural
and cultural settings of the central and southern Appalachian highlands (NPS, 2013). The
general intent of the Scenic Character zone is to maintain the visual variety of the parkway
roads forested and pastoral/rural landscape settings consistent with early parkway design
(NPS, 2013).

While the Scenic Character management zone emphasizes high-quality visual

experiences for BRP visitors, it does not require that views be absent of evidence of human
activity. As such, the intent of the Scenic Character management zone is generally comparable
to that of Medium or High SIO designations in GWNF.

11
T-11
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

T-12
Figure 1-4: Scenic Integrity Objectives, GWNF

12
 Figure 1-3: Scenic
1-5:Integrity Objectives,
MNFGWNF

Atlantic Coast Pipeline

National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure Scenic Classes,

13

T-13
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
The NPS does not have an agency-wide equivalent of the USFS SMS. Instead, NPS
manages visual resources and evaluates the visual impacts of proposed activities on a unit-by-
unit basis. For the BRP, NPS uses a Scenery Conservation System to

provide direction for inventory, analysis, and protection planning for desired conditions. This
system is designed to maintain or improve the scenic landscape character and level of scenic
quality of landscape areas viewed from parkway overlooks, vistas, and agricultural openings
(NPS, 2013).

The basis for the NPS Scenery Conservation System is The Blue Ridge Parkway Scenery
Conservation System Guidebook, a publication that is not readily available to Atlantic. Based on
the information in the General Management Plan and EIS for the BRP, Atlantic understands that
the Scenery Conservation System includes components that are similar to the USFS SMS,
including a detailed inventory of existing scenic views, determinations of the sensitivity of those
views to change, and identification of desired visual conditions (NPS, 2013).

Because of the linear nature of the BRP, NPS owns a relatively small amount of the land
within the BRP viewshed. As a result,

scenery conservation works with the idea of a Borrowed Landscape. Maintaining scenery
viewed from overlooks and along the parkway road involves working with 29 county
governments, private landowners, developers, and other agencies. Because the scenery is
borrowed from adjacent lands that are not administered by the National Park Service, the
parkways scenery system is not a direct control management system (NPS, 2013).

14
T-14
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
2.0 METHODS
Visual impacts are defined as the change in aesthetic value resulting from the
introduction of modifications to the landscape. Atlantic initiated consultation with the USFS to
identify and evaluate these impacts for the VIA. Impact assessment involved four primary steps:
x seen area analysis and identification of Key Observation Points (KOPs);
x field survey;
x simulation or other form of visual analysis to understand post-ACP visual conditions;
and
x preparation of this report, summarizing visual conditions and impacts.
This section describes the methods used to complete each of the first three steps.
2.1 SEEN AREA ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION OF KEY OBSERVATION
POINTS
As described in Section 1.1.1., Atlantic prepared a seen area analysis as the initial step in
evaluating visual impacts. The seen area analysis is based on the ACP preferred route (as
mapped by Atlantic) and topography from 10-meter Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data
provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The analysis was performed using the
Viewshed Analysis tool in ArcGIS, the industry standard for GIS mapping and analysis.
In addition to requesting the seen area analysis, the USFS provided lists of potential
KOPs (along with latitude/longitude coordinates) to be evaluated in this study. Figures 2-1
through 2-3 show the seen area for the GWNF and MNF, as well as all originally-suggested
KOPs. The USFS selected these KOPs to represent locations where the ACP crosses or could
potentially be seen from roads, trails and floatable rivers, and other recreational or publicly used
areas within National Forest lands (USFS 2015). Table 2-1 includes the list of suggested KOPs,
as well as a determination, based on field work (see Section 2.2), of whether existing vegetation
or other conditions permitted actual views of the ACP. Atlantic assigned unique ID numbers to
each of these points for ease of identification.1
As requested by the USFS in its September communication, Atlantic met with the USFS
on October 1, 2015 at Dominion Virginia Powers Staunton, VA offices to review the seen area
analysis and list of KOPs, particularly the potential (or lack thereof) for actual views of the ACP,
in light of existing vegetation at each KOP. As a result of this review, several KOPs were
removed from further evaluation due to the absence of actual views of the proposed pipeline
corridor. The discussion at the October 1 meeting also touched on concerns about potential views
of the pipeline right-of-way from the ANST within the Three Ridges Wilderness area, including
Bee Mountain. As a result of the October 1 meeting, Atlantic added four KOPs (numbers 38
through 41 in Table 2-1) to the list of KOPs provided by USFS.

1
The seen area analysis and KOP identification process were performed twice: once in October 2015, and again in
March 2016. The second analysis was necessitated by a major ACP reroute in early 2016. That reroute resulted in the
elimination of several KOPs from analysis, and the addition of others. As a result, there are gaps in the KOP numbering
sequence.

15
T-15
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

T-16
Figure 2-1: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, GWNF (East)

16
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

T-17
Figure 2-2: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, GWNF (West)

17
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

T-18
Figure 2-3: Seen Area Analysis and KOPs, MNF

18
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
TABLE 2-1

Atlantic Coast Pipeline Key Observation Points

ID1 Location/Description Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) In Seen Observations and recommendations
Area?
Monongahela National Forest
6 Highlands Scenic Hwy: SR 150 near White Low Place 38.325861 -80.149833 Yes No further analysis: Intervening topography and vegetation make views of corridor unlikely.
42 Highlands Scenic Hwy, Red Lick Scenic Overlook 38.340653 -80.164013 Yes No further analysis: Intervening topography and vegetation make views of corridor unlikely.
43 Highlands Scenic Hwy, Little Laurel Scenic Overlook 38.309747 -80.137148 Yes No further analysis: Intervening topography and vegetation make views of corridor unlikely.
44 WV 28 @ ACP Crossing 38.420182 -80.049290 Yes No further analysis: KOP is not on USFS-owned land.
45 Allegheny Trail @ ACP Crossing 38.325259 -79.934017 Yes No further analysis: KOP is not on or visible from USFS-owned land.
2
46 Greenbrier River Trail @ ACP Crossing 38.334449 -79.969086 Yes No further analysis: Greenbrier River crossing location would not be on or visible from USFS-owned land
47 Forest Road #1012 38.295338 -79.861307 Yes No further analysis: KOP is entirely forested, at similar elevation, and looking perpendicular to the corridor.
3
49 Forest Road #1026 38.375442 -80.076633 Yes No further analysis: No clear view of corridor from this location. Open pasture at top of mountain, but views toward corridor are screened by trees.
50 Forest Road #24 38.432544 -80.161221 Yes No further analysis: FR 24 runs along Gauley Mountain, which is heavily forested. While sporadic views through trees could exist, the corridor is
51 Forest Road #24 38.590442 -79.823805 Yes nearly 6 miles away, with intervening topography and vegetation.
George Washington National Forest
15 Shenandoah Mtn. Trail 4: Forest Service Trail (FST) 447 at FST 112 38.283878 -79.406025 Yes New analysis recommended to reflect current ACP alignment.
34 Torry Ridge Trail 1: Torry Ridge Trail (FST 507) at FST 507B 4 37.929205 -79.008426 Yes New analysis recommended to reflect current ACP alignment and/or contingency route.
5
35 Torry Ridge Trail 2: Torry Ridge Trail (FST 507) west of FST 518 37.946467 -78.973737 Yes NA: Analysis already completed.
6
38 Blue Ridge Parkway: Ravens Roost Overlook 37.933781 -78.953122 Yes NA: Analysis already completed.
6
39 Blue Ridge Parkway: Three Ridges Overlook 37.907171 -78.979086 Yes NA: Analysis already completed.
40 Bee Mountain, Appalachian National Scenic Trail (near Three Ridges 37.898960 -78.991512 Yes Further analysis recommended.
Wilderness)
41 Three Ridges ridge top, Three Ridges Wilderness Area 37.864571 -78.987966 Yes No further analysis: Corridor is at top of ridge, well above viewer, and through dense forest. View is unlikely.
52 Brushy Ridge Trail (FST 718) at ACP crossing 38.151542 -79.470442 Yes No further analysis: Corridor is at top of ridge, well above viewer, and through dense forest. View is unlikely.
T-19

53 FST 717, Short Ridge Trail, Brushy Ridge Trail 38.157792 -79.473510 Yes No further analysis: Trail and overall mountainside are heavily forested. No obvious outcroppings or clearings where a clear view is likely.
54 FST 718, Brushy Ridge Trail 38.151175 -79.468091 Yes No further analysis: Corridor is not on USFS land for most of Deerfield Valley, and parallels VA 629, making views unlikely.
55 Walker Mountain (FST 546 Back Draft Trail) 38.135072 -79.457438 Yes No further analysis: Trail and overall mountainside are heavily forested. No obvious outcroppings or clearings where a clear view is likely.
56 SR 629, Deerfield Road and Deerfield Valley 38.157551 -79.473170 Yes No further analysis: View from publicly accessible area at base of fire tower is screened by vegetation.
57 SR 641, Bright Hollow Road 38.144371 -79.475055 Yes No further analysis: Trail and overall mountainside are heavily forested. No obvious outcroppings or clearings where a clear view is likely.
58 Duncan Knob Lookout 38.164775 -79.704961 Yes No further analysis: The ACP crossing of VA 614 is not on USFS land; nearby USFS land is moderate to low SIO.
59 FS Trail 622, Laurel Run Trail to Duncan Knob (trailhead shown in coordinates) 38.161151 -79.670111 Yes No further analysis: Trail and overall mountainside are heavily forested. No obvious outcroppings or clearings where a clear view is likely.
60 SR 614, northbound 38.170135 -79.662638 Yes No further analysis: Topography of this location makes views of corridor unlikely; corridor here would also be under pasture, not forest.
61 Fort Lewis community 38.115896 -79.606576 Yes No further analysis: KOPs 60, 61, and 62 do not provide potential views of the ACP.
62 SR 625 at SR 678 38.126913 -79.619436 Yes
63 Cowpasture River Crossing (general location in the vicinity of KOPs 61 and 62) NA NA Yes
64 Shenandoah Mountain Trail (FST 447) Southern Terminus 38.122953 -79.598759 Yes The ACP route has changed since this KOP was identified; no simulation is available, but conditions and impacts are discussed qualitatively.
3
65 Devils Knob Overlook, Wintergreen Resort 37.915545 -78.958294 Yes Further analysis recommended to reflect contingency route.
____________________
Notes
1
The ACP alignment has changed since the initial set of KOPs was identified. KOPs 1-5, 7-14, and 15-33 had potential views of the previous alignment, but no longer have a potential view of the current alignment. As a result, these ID numbers no longer appear in this table.
2
Subsequent to USFS identification of this KOP, the Greenbrier River crossing location was shifted approximately 1,200 feet north.
3
Modified location to approximately 3,000 feet east (crow-fly) of location provided by USFS.
4
Modified location to 3,555 feet southwest (crow-fly) of location provided by USFS.
5
Modified location to 2,165 feet northeast (crow-fly) from location provided by USFS.
6
KOP added by Atlantic to original list provided by USFS.

19
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
After announcement of the revised ACP route in February 2016, Atlantic re-initiated the
KOP selection process with the USFS, provided a revised list of potential KOPs to the USFS,
and discussed that list (and the visual impact assessment process in general) at a March 4, 2016
meeting with the USFS at the North River Ranger District in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The USFS
provided a list of additional recommended KOPs via email on March 11. The resulting list of
KOPs comprises numbers 42 through 65 in Table 2-1.

As a result of consultation with the USFS, Atlantic further revised the ACP route in July
2016. The current proposed route runs north of Fort Lewis. As a result, KOPs 61 through 64 no
longer provide a potential view of the ACP corridor. The current route would cross the
Shenandoah Mountain Trail at approximately MP 98.7. While field surveys did not include this
location, and no KOP was identified to address this crossing, Section 3.2.6 describes this
location, and Section 4.1.3 discusses visual impacts at this location.

2.2 FIELD SURVEYS

Atlantic conducted field surveys in October and November of 2015 and March 2016. The
primary purpose of these field surveys was to gain a better understanding of actual conditions
(terrain, vegetation, accessibility, etc.) at and near the KOPs provided by the USFS. Field
surveys included driving along many of the state and USFS roads near the KOPs and throughout
the pipeline corridor, to obtain a broad understanding of how the ACP corridor might (or might
not) be visible within the region as a whole. Where feasible, conditions at each KOP were
documented with photography.

The field surveys served as input into whether actual views of the ACP corridor existed
(considering vegetation and site-specific conditions), as well as the type of analysis that could
best characterize the ACPs potential visual impacts to USFS and NPS lands, as viewed from
these locations.

2.2.1 2015 Field Surveys

Field work in 2015 (for the initial ACP route) consisted of direct visits to KOPs in late
October 2015 (with the majority of leaves still on deciduous trees) and early November 2015
(primarily leaf-off conditions). During the October survey, Atlantic was able to visit most USFS-
designated KOPs within the seen area (except for KOPs 34 and 35 in Table 2-1). The October
survey also included observation of the general terrain, scenery, and visibility along the public
and Forest Roads listed in Table 2-1. In general, the potential for views along those roads was
similar to the potential for views at the nearest KOP. During the early November field survey,
KOPs 38-41 were visited, and alternative locations (locations with clearer views of the ACP
corridor) were identified for KOPs 34 and 35, as noted in Table 2-1.

Atlantic personnel discussed the results of the field surveys with the USFS at a meeting
held in Roanoke, VA on November 19, 2015. At that meeting, Atlantic and the USFS agreed on
the KOPs that required visual analysis, as well as the KOPs that did not require further analysis,
based on field survey photography, topographic maps, and publicly available satellite maps and
photos.

20
T-20
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
2.2.2 2016 Field Surveys

The February 2016 major route alteration for the ACP resulted in approximately 95 miles
of new pipeline corridor that had not been discussed during previous consultation with the USFS.
As described above, Atlantic and the USFS identified additional KOPs for this route alteration.
The new KOPs were visited in mid-March 2016. The purpose and outcomes of the March 2016
field survey was similar in scope to the October and November 2015 surveys.

2.3 VISUAL ANALYSIS TYPES

Table 2-2 summarizes the recommended types of analysis for each of the KOPs for which
actual views of the ACP corridor potentially exist. Section 2.3 describes these techniques. KOPs
not included in Table 2-2 did not offer potential views of the ACP corridor, primarily due to the
presence of vegetation between the viewer and the corridor.2

TABLE 2-2

Visual Analyses Conducted for KOPs Selected for Further Study

ID Location Type of Analysis
Monongahela National Forest
No KOPs on or within view USFS land, with views of the ACP corridor. NA
George Washington National Forest
15 Shenandoah Mtn. Trail 4: Forest Service Trail 447 near Tims Knob Indicative Simulation
34 Torry Ridge Trail 1 (revised location, per Table 2-1) Full simulation (Proposed Action)
Full simulation (Contingency Plan)
35 Torry Ridge Trail 2 (revised location, per Table 2-1) Full simulation
38 Blue Ridge Parkway: Ravens Roost Overlook Full simulation
39 Blue Ridge Parkway: Three Ridges Overlook Full simulation showing no trees at overlook
40 Appalachian National Scenic Trail: Bee Mountain, near Three Ridges Full simulation (Proposed Action)
Wilderness Full simulation (Contingency Plan)
65 Wintergreen Resort, Devils Knob Overlook Full simulation (Contingency Plan)

2.3.1 Indicative Simulation

In an indicative simulation, Truescape overlays aerial photography onto a digital terrain

model, and then adds simple graphics (in this case, a red line) to indicate the approximate
location of the ACP corridor. This technique is intentionally generalized and does not simulate
the location and height of vegetation or other aboveground structures such as transmission lines.
It is primarily intended to determine whether the ACP right-of-way could be seen from the KOP,
and whether a more detailed simulation would be warranted.

2.3.2 Full Visual Simulations

As part of this project, Truescape developed a series of TrueView 3 photo simulations.

TrueView is a high resolution photo simulation that accurately represents the human field of

2
While KOP 45 (Allegheny Trail) and KOP 46 provided a view of the pipeline corridor, those views were not on and/or
near USFS-owned land, and were thus excluded from this analysis.
3
A registered trademark of Truescape, Ltd.

21
T-21
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
view that would be seen if standing at the actual KOP. Specifically, TrueView simulates a 124
degree horizontal field of view and a 55 degree vertical field of view.

The photographic base of each TrueView simulation consists of a series of nine

overlapping photographs (from a 16 megapixel digital camera) that are digitally color-adjusted
and stitched together to create a single, seamless image. Truescape then develops a 3D model
of the terrain in the photograph, using detailed topographic mapping (including Lidar, where
available). The terrain model is matched to the photograph using known surveyed locations
within the field of view. Project components and right-of-way locations, based on information
provided by Atlantic, are then included in the terrain model, which is incorporated into the base
photography. Project information includes not only location, but also color and texture of
aboveground facilities (if any). The result is an image that accurately displays the location of
proposed ACP facilities and rights-of-way as they would appear to a viewer at each KOP.

22
T-22
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
3.0 RESULTS OF VISUAL ANALYSES

This section presents the results of the field surveys and visual analyses described in
Section 2.0. Appendix A contains the photographs taken during the field surveys. Unless
otherwise specified, the discussions in this section and the remainder of this VIA refer to
conditions along the ACPs permanent right-of-way that would be present several years after
completion of construction on the affected pipeline segment.

3.1 INDICATIVE SIMULATIONS

Atlantic conducted indicative simulations for one KOP, as listed in Table 2-2, using the
methodology described in Section 2.3.1.

3.1.1 KOP 15: Shenandoah Mountain Trail 4

Figure 3-1 shows the raw baseline photography (prior to the digital stitching described
in Section 2.3.2) and the indicative simulation image at KOP 15. The red line in this simulation
shows the location of the corridor from the perspective of a view at this KOP. Based on these
images, the ACP corridor would not actually be visible due to intervening vegetation. This KOP
was not evaluated further.

3.2 FULL VISUAL SIMULATIONS (PROPOSED ACTION)

Atlantic conducted full visual simulations of six KOPs, as listed in Table 2-2, using the
TrueView methodology described in Section 2.3.2. The subsections below present the
simulations, showing the ACP corridor as it would be seen from each of these KOPs. This
includes imagery of existing conditions, as well as separate simulations of views approximately
one growing season, 5 years, and 15 to 20 years following construction. High-resolution, large-
format versions of these simulations are provided in Appendix B.

3.2.1 KOP 34: Torry Ridge Trail 1

Figures 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4 show the full simulation images for KOP 34. Figure 3-4 shows
this simulation with the visible and non-visible portions of the permanent right-of-way outlined
in yellow, for viewer clarity due to the relatively dark atmospheric conditions during baseline
photography and presence of shade at the KOP. From this KOP, the ACP corridor at
approximately MP 157 would be visible as a narrow vegetated (but not forested) band on the far
side of the Back Creek valley, approximately 1.2 miles to the southeast. Figures 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4
also show the ACP corridor up to approximately MP 157.7 as it starts to climb toward the
BRP/ANST corridor, approximately 2.0 miles to the southeast. The visible portion of the right-
of-way ends where Atlantics proposed HDD would be located. Both of these views are in the
middleground, as defined by USFS.

23
T-23
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-1: Baseline photography and Indicative Simulation, KOP 15
T-24

24
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-2: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth Following Construction
T-25

25
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-3: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction
T-26

26
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-4: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction
T-27

27
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
3.2.2 KOP 35: Torry Ridge Trail 2

Figures 3-5, 3-6, and 3-7 show the full simulation images for KOP 35. From this KOP,
the ACP corridor at approximately MP 155.5 would be visible as a narrow vegetated (but not
forested) band on the far side of the Back Creek valley, approximately 0.7 mile to the southeast.
This is in the middleground, as defined by the USFS. As shown in the simulation image, the
view of the ACP corridor would be through mixed coniferous and deciduous vegetation. The
corridor may thus be less visible during leaf-on conditions in spring, summer, and fall

3.2.3 KOP 38: Blue Ridge Parkway at Ravens Roost

Figure 3-8, 3-9, and 3-10 show the full simulation images for KOP 38. From this KOP,
the ACP corridor would be clearly visible as a narrow band of vegetated open land wrapping
around Torry Ridge (the mountain feature in the approximate center of the image),
approximately from MPs 152 to 156 (from right to left). The corridor is approximately 0.75 mile
from KOP 38 at its closest point (left of the bottom-center of the image, corresponding
approximately to MP 156), with MP 152 approximately 2.5 miles away (right-center of the
images, in shadow). These distances are in the middleground, as defined by the USFS. The
appearance of the corridor would be similar to the cleared areas along Back Creek and Mount
Torry Road, closer to the base of Torry Ridge.

3.2.4 KOP 39: Blue Ridge Parkway at Three Ridges Overlook

Figures 3-11, 3-12, 3-13, and 3-14 show the full simulation images for KOP 39. When
baseline photography was taken in November 2015, the existing view from this KOP, a scenic
overlook managed by the NPS, was obscured by trees. At the suggestion of the USFS, the
simulation from this KOP was modified to reflect views of the ACP that would be present if the
NPS chose to remove this vegetation, which would be consistent with the Preferred Alternative
of the General Management Plan for the Parkway (NPS, 2013).

Subsequent to baseline photography and simulation development, NPS did, in fact,

remove the screening vegetation in March 2016. As shown in the figures, viewers would have an
axial view (facing southeast) of the ACP corridor at approximately MP 159 as it climbs over
Piney Mountain, just south of Atlantics proposed HDD. This segment of the corridor would be
approximately 0.75 to 1.0 mile from the viewer, in the middleground, as defined by the USFS.
The simulation in Figures 3-11, 3-12, and 3-13 show the likely conditions after construction,
with no visual mitigation incorporated. Figure 3-14 shows the right-of-way at this location,
approximately 15-20 years after construction, with the incorporation of shallow-rooted perennial
shrubs within the right-of-way, planted as visual mitigation to break up the linear nature of the
gap in forest.

28
T-28
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-5: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth Following Construction
T-29

29
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-6: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction
T-30

30
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-7: Full Simulation, KOP 35, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction
T-31

31
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-8: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth Following Construction
T-32

32
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-9: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction
T-33

33
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-10: Full Simulation, KOP 38, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction
T-34

34
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-11: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth Following Construction
T-35

35
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-12: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction
T-36

36
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-13: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction
T-37

37
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-14: Full Simulation, KOP 39, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction with Vegetative Restoration
T-38

38
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
3.2.5 KOP 40: Appalachian National Scenic Trail (Bee Mountain)

Figures 3-15, 3-16, and 3-17 show the full simulation images for KOP 40. Figure 3-18 shows
this simulation with the permanent right-of-way outlined in yellow, for viewer clarity. From this
KOP, the segment of the ACP corridor within the seen area (see Section 2.1) is approximately MP
160 along Piney Mountain, approximately 2.25 miles from the KOP (within the middleground, as
defined by the USFS). The yellow lines in Figure 3-18 show the location of the right-of-way if it
could be seen through the existing dense vegetation on Piney Mountain. As shown in the Figures,
Project-related changes in color, line, texture, and other characteristics considered in the SMS would
be imperceptible from this KOP, even in leaf-off conditions (i.e., November, when the baseline
imagery was captured).

3.2.6 KOP 64: Shenandoah Mountain Trail Southern Terminus

As discussed in Section 2.1, the route of the ACP has changed since KOP 64 was identified;
as a result, no baseline or simulation images of this location exist. The ACP corridor would cross the
trail at approximately MP 98.7. From this location, the right-of-way would extend approximately
200 feet in either direction before turning, effectively ending the view corridor. At the trails
intersection with the right-of-way, the ACP corridor would be a dominant visual feature, although
views of the ACP corridor from the trail would only be present within a few hundred feet of the
crossing, due to the presence of screening vegetation.

3.3 CONTINGENCY PLAN SIMULATIONS

To evaluate the potential visual impacts of the contingency plan for the HDD crossing of the
BRP and ANST, Atlantic conducted indicative and full simulations from KOPs on the eastern and
western side of the crossing area. The results of those simulations are discussed below.

3.3.1 KOP 34: Torry Ridge Trail 1

KOP 34 presents potential views of the BRP HDD contingency corridor from the west.
Figure 3-19 shows the full simulation image of the BRP HDD contingency corridor at KOP 34.
Figure 3-20 shows this simulation with the permanent right-of-way outlined in yellow, for viewer
clarity due to the relatively dark atmospheric conditions during baseline photography and presence
of shade at the KOP. From this KOP, the ACP contingency corridor from approximately MP 157 to
MP 158 would be visible as a narrow vegetated (but not forested) band on the far side of the Back
Creek valley, approximately 1.2 to 2.0 miles to the southeast. Both of these views are in the
middleground, as defined by USFS.

3.3.2 KOP 40: Appalachian National Scenic Trail (Bee Mountain)

Figure 3-21 shows the simulated views of the BRP HDD contingency corridor from KOP 40,
while Figure 3-22 shows this simulation with the permanent right-of-way outlined in yellow, for
viewer clarity. From this KOP, actual views of the BRP HDD contingency corridor would be
minimal to nonexistent, due to the presence of dense vegetation, even in leaf-off conditions.

39
T-39
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-15: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth Following Construction
T-40

40
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-16: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth 5 Years after Construction
T-41

41
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-17: Full Simulation, KOP 40, , Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction
T-42

42
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-18: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Regrowth 15-20 Years after Construction, Permanent ROW Outlined
T-43

43
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-19: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Contingency Plan
T-44

44
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-20: Full Simulation, KOP 34, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined
T-45

45
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-21: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Contingency Plan
T-46

46
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-22: Full Simulation, KOP 40, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined
T-47

47
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
3.3.3 KOP 65: Devils Knob Overlook

Figure 3-23 shows the full simulation image of the ACP contingency corridor at KOP 65 (the
fencing shown here has since been replaced), with the permanent right-of-way outlined in yellow,
for viewer clarity. From this KOP, the corridor, approximately 1.0 mile away, would be blocked by
vegetation at the edge of the Devils Knob Overlook. Individual viewers could potentially obtain a
view of the contingency corridor by standing at the extreme edge of the overlook (i.e., at the edge of
the vegetation, where the slope begins to drop off); however, the typical viewer, standing in the
designated overlook area, would not be able to see the contingency corridor as it exits the potential
directional bore crossing (if used) of the BRP on the east side of the Blue Ridge Mountains.

48
T-48
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
Figure 3-23: Full Simulation, KOP 65, Contingency Plan, Permanent ROW Outlined
T-49

49
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
4.0 DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS

This section discusses the potential visual impacts of the ACP on the MNF and GWNF,
as well as on the NPS-managed BRP, based on the visual analyses presented in Section 3.0.

4.1 GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST AND BLUE RIDGE

PARKWAY

4.1.1 USFS Scenic Integrity Objectives

Table 4-1 lists the KOPs in GWNF for which visual analyses were conducted (see
Section 3.0), as well as the SIO present both at the KOP itself and generally within the viewshed
(the area visible to an observer at the KOP). Figure 1-2 shows SIOs in the study area within the
GWNF. Table 4-2 shows the length of ACP corridor centerline within the GWNF by SIO.
Approximately 13.9 miles of the ACP corridors 14.3 mile crossing of GWNF-owned land
would be through areas with medium SIO. The remaining 0.4 mile would be through areas with
High SIO (including approximately 0.1 mile where there would be no aboveground evidence of
the corridor, due to the HDD crossing of the BRP and ANST).

TABLE 4-1

Summary of Scenic Integrity Objectives for KOPs in GWNF

Scenic Integrity Objective
ID Location At KOP In Viewshed
34 Torry Ridge Trail 1 (revised location, per Table 2-1) High High
35 Torry Ridge Trail 2 (revised location, per Table 2-1) High High
38 Blue Ridge Parkway: Ravens Roost Overlook NA2 Moderate
39 Blue Ridge Parkway: Three Ridges Overlook NA2 NA3
40 ANST: Bee Mountain, near Three Ridges Wilderness Very High Very High
644 Shenandoah Mountain Trail near MP Moderate Moderate
65 Devils Knob (Wintergreen Resort)Contingency only NA2 Low
___________________
1
Existing transmission ROW in this viewshed has a Low SIO. The ACP corridor itself is not on USFS-owned land, and has no SIO.
2
KOP is not on USFS-owned land, and thus has no assigned SIO.
3
Scenic Integrity Objectives have not been defined by USFS and/or a Scenic Integrity Objective definition has not been provided.
4
Scenic Integrity Objectives have not been defined by USFS and/or a Scenic Integrity Objective definition has not been provided.

4.1.2 NPS Scenery Conservation System Considerations

As described in Section 1.3, the ACP would cross a segment of the BRP (approximately
at MP 158.2) that is within the Scenic Character management zone. Based on available
information, Atlantic understands that the objectives of the Scenic Character management zone
are generally consistent with High to Medium SIO, as defined for the USFS SMS.

50
T-50
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
TABLE 4-2

Scenic Integrity Objectives crossed by ACP in GWNF

Begin End Miles Scenic Integrity Begin Miles Scenic Integrity

Milepost Milepost Crossed Objective Milepost End Milepost Crossed Objective
83.9 86.7 3.9 Moderate 115.8 116.2 0.4 Moderate
86.8 86.9 0.1 Moderate 116.4 116.5 0.1 Moderate
93.7 94.3 0.7 Moderate 116.8 120.6 3.8 Moderate
96.1 96.3 0.4 Moderate 121.1 122.4 1.3 Moderate
96.5 96.6 0.2 Moderate 122.4 122.7 0.3 High
96.9 97.5 0.8 Moderate 122.7 123.2 0.5 Moderate
99.3 99.7 0.5 Moderate 154.0 155.1 1.1 Moderate
105.9 106.0 0.1 Moderate 158.0 158.1 0.1 High1
_____________________
1
The ACP corridor would cross this portion of the GWNF underground, as part of the HDD crossing of the Blue Ridge Parkway and
ANST; as a result, there would be no aboveground evidence of the corridor in this location.

4.1.3 Visual Impacts of the ACP in the GWNF and from the BRP

4.1.3.1 Discussion

The 21 KOPs for GWNF presented in Table 2-1 were intended to be representative of a
wide variety of publicly accessible views from USFS-owned land within the GWNF. As
described in Section 2.3, only 7 of these 21 KOPs provided potential views of the ACP corridor.
Views of the corridor may be available from other locations within GWNF boundaries (although
not on USFS-owned land), such as public roads; however, topography and the screening effect of
existing forests would greatly limit the number of such views (see Appendix A).

As shown in Figures 3-3 through 3-13, middleground and background views of the ACP
corridor would be most likely to occur from the two BRP overlooks and gaps in vegetation along
the Torry Ridge Trail. Potential views from the ANST as it crosses the summit of Bee Mountain
(KOP 40) would be through existing vegetation. As demonstrated by Figures 3-11 through 3-13,
the ACP corridor would be imperceptible from this location. No potential views of the ACP
corridor would be available from this location during leaf-on conditions. No views are available
from the summit of Three Ridges Mountain (KOP 41) due to dense mature tree vegetation,
particularly along the ANST.

Viewers at most of the modeled KOPs would be able to perceive the contrast in color and
line, but the ACP would not dominate the landscape, due primarily to the viewing distance. The
ACP corridor would be visible only from areas with open views of the potential right-of-way
where it crosses forested areas. From the Torry Ridge Trail and BRP overlooks, these changes
would take the form of a thin linear strip of open land in an otherwise forested area. Depending
on the time of year a viewer would see this as a light green, tan, or brown stripe amid darker
green (leaf-on) or gray-brown (leaf-off) forest, or a white stripe if snow cover were present.

From the BRP Ravens Roost overlook (KOP 38), while the corridor would be visible
within the forested area at the base of Torry Ridge (the ridge in the middle of Figure 3-6), it
would be one of several visible human-made features, including roads and buildings. As such,

51
T-51
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
the ACP corridor at KOP 38 would not be inconsistent with NPS management objectives for
visual resources.

The corridor would be visible from the BRP Three Ridges overlook (KOP 39)
approximately 0.75 to 1.0 mile from the viewer, in the middleground, as defined by USFS. With
no additional vegetative plantings, the ACP corridor would be clearly visible from this location,
to a greater degree than from the Ravens Roost overlook (KOP 38) or other KOPs - although it
would not dominate the viewshed, due to its distance from the viewer. With no mitigation, the
ACP corridor at KOP 39 would likely be inconsistent with NPS management objectives for
visual resources. If Atlantic were to commit to planting additional shrubs along the right-of-way,
these plantings would help to reduce the contrast between the right-of-way and surrounding
areas, and would reduce the inconsistency with NPS management objectives.

Hikers along the southern end of the Shenandoah Mountain Trail would see the ACP
corridor crossing in the immediate foreground and foreground, where the ACP crosses the trail.
In this location, alteration of the landscape would include permanent replacement of existing
forest with open land (typically grasses and low shrubs). This change in vegetation type would
dominate the view, and would thus be inconsistent with SMS objectives in this location. The
viewing area for these changes would be relatively smalllimited to the area immediately near
each intersection of the corridor with an existing road or trail. Outside of this immediate viewing
location, trees and terrain (as visible on publicly available aerial photography and topographic
maps) would likely minimize or eliminate the ability to see the remainder of the ACP corridor,
particularly during leaf-on conditions.

The Shenandoah Mountain Trail crossing is the only known case in the GWNF where the
ACP corridor would be visible from USFS-owned land in the immediate foreground or
foreground. To the degree that other similar crossings exist, the views and visual effects at such
locations would be similar to those described for the Shenandoah Mountain Trail crossing.
Middleground and background views and visual effects from other USFS-owned land would be
similar in nature to those described above. The ACP pipeline route would have no aboveground
facilities within the GWNF except for small, widely-spaced mainline valves.

4.1.3.2 Summary

Based on the discussion above, the relationship between the ACP and SIOs in the GWNF
would be as follows:

x Views from Torry Ridge (KOPs 34 and 35) would be somewhat inconsistent with
the High SIO assigned to the area of the Blue Ridge Mountains visible from the
Torry Ridge KOPs. The changes in form, line, color, texture, and pattern
associated with the ACP right-of-way would be somewhat evident (although by
no means dominant) on the landscape.

x Views of the ACP corridor from the Ravens Roost overlook (KOP 38) would not
be inconsistent with NPS management objectives for visual resources, since the
corridor would be one amongst many human-made features on the landscape.

52
T-52
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
x Views of the ACP corridor from the Three Ridges overlook (KOP 39) would
likely be inconsistent with NPS management objectives, given the proximity to
the viewer, the axial nature of the view, and the corridors contrast with
surrounding forest. To mitigate this effect, Atlantic has committed to planting
shrubs and other low vegetation in the right-of-way, to reduce visual contrast (see
Figure 3-13).

x Views of the ACP corridor from Bee Mountain on the ANST (KOP 40) would be
imperceptible. As a result, the Project would be consistent with SIO designations
from this location.

x Views from KOP 64, the Shenandoah Mountain Trail near MP 98.7, would be
inconsistent with the Moderate SIO designation, because views of the right-of-
way where it intersects the trail would not be visually subordinate to the
surrounding landscape character. The extent of such inconsistency would be
limited to within a few hundred feet of the intersection location, due to the
presence of dense forest.

As discussed in Section 4.1.1, only approximately 0.3 mile of the ACP corridor would
disturb the land surface in portions of the GWNF with a High SIO. In these areas, changes in
landscape character associated with the ACP or other human activities are intended to be
imperceptible. While land disturbance associated with the ACP would be inconsistent with High
SIO designations, the ability to view the corridor where it crosses High SIO land would be
extremely limited. The segment itself (between MPs 122.4 122.7) is very short (0.3 mile), 4 and
there are no views of this corridor segment from nearby public roads or trails on USFS property.5

The remainder of GWNF-owned land crossed by the ACP has a medium SIO, a
designation where human activities may be visible but where natural landscapes should be
dominant. The ACP would be consistent with this designation: the corridor would be visible, but
would not dominate the view, except in the area immediately surrounding any ACP crossings of
public roads or trails.

4.2 MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST

4.2.1 USFS Scenic Classes

The ten KOPs for MNF in Table 2-1 were intended to be representative of a wide variety
of publicly accessible views within the forest; however, field surveys (see Section 2.2)
determined that none of these KOPs offered potential views of the ACP corridor, due to existing
vegetation. Figure 1-3 shows Scenic Classes in the study area within the MNF,6 while Table 4-3
shows the length of ACP corridor centerline within USFS-owned portions of the MNF by Scenic
Class. Of the approximately 6.9 miles of USFS-owned land crossed by the ACP in MNF,

4
Due to ACP route revisions, mileposts cited here are for reference only, and are not used to calculate distance.
5
Field observations in October 2015 confirmed that topography and vegetation prevented views from the Wild Oak
National Recreation Trail Forest Service Trail 716approximately 2 miles from the High SIO segment of the ACP.
6
Mapping provided by USFS includes Scenic Class designations for the entire MNF, including USFS-owned land and
private land not owned or managed by USFS.

53
T-53
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
approximately 5.8 miles would be through areas with very high or high scenic value, another
1.1 miles would be through areas with high scenic value, and less than 0.1 mile would be through
an area with medium to high scenic value.

TABLE 4-3

Summary of Scenic Classes crossed by ACP in MNF

Begin Milepost End Milepost Miles Crossed Scenic Class1
71.2 71.5 0.6 2
73.1 73.6 0.9 2
80.4 80.6 0.3 2
80.6 80.6 0.1 3
80.7 80.9 0.3 2
81.2 81.3 0.1 2
81.3 81.4 0.1 3
81.4 81.4 0.1 2
81.4 81.8 0.6 3
81.8 83.2 2.6 2
83.2 83.3 0.2 3
83.3 83.6 0.5 2
83.6 83.7 0.1 3
83.7 83.9 0.4 2
83.9 83.9 <0.1 4
___________________
1
Scenic classes correspond to the following general definitions:
2 high scenic value.
3 medium-high scenic value.
4 medium scenic value

4.2.2 Visual Impacts of the ACP in MNF

Views of the ACP corridor may be available from USFS-owned land within MNF, aside
from the KOPs identified in Table 2-1. Middleground and background views of the ACP corridor
would be particularly sporadic in the MNF due to screening from existing forest. To the degree
that such views exist, visual effects in such locations would be similar in nature to those
described for the KOPs in GWNF.

Views of the ACP corridor within the MNF would be most likely to occur where the
corridor crosses or is collocated with a public road or trail in forested areas (although few such
instances appear to exist on USFS-owned land). In such cases, alteration of the landscape would
occur in the immediate foreground and foreground, where existing forest would be permanently
replaced with open land (typically grasses and low shrubs). The change in vegetation type would
dominate the view, particularly where viewers are able to look down the axis of the ACP
corridor. The viewing area for these changes would be relatively smalllimited to the area
immediately near each intersection of the corridor with an existing road or trail. Outside of this
immediate viewing location, trees and terrain would likely minimize or eliminate the ability to
see the ACP corridor, particularly during leaf-on conditions. The ACP pipeline route would have
no aboveground facilities within the MNF except for small, widely-spaced mainline valves.

54
T-54
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
As discussed in Section 4.2.1, a portion of the ACP corridor would cross areas of the
MNF with very high or high Scenic Class designations. For purposes of analysis, this VIA
assumes that a high or very high Scenic Class designation carries the same management intent as
a High SIO designation: changes in landscape character associated with the ACP or other human
activities are intended to be imperceptible.

In locations where the ACP crosses high or very high Scenic Class designations on MNF
lands, the ACP would be inconsistent with MNF scenery management goals. In such locations,
the removal of forest along the corridor would be clearly visible for an observer at that location.
That finding notwithstanding, public opportunities to view the ACP corridor from or on USFS-
owned land within the MNF would be limited. No such locations were identified through this
process.

4.2.3 Visual Impacts of the ACP Contingency Plan

Under the HDD Contingency Plan, the ACP corridor would cross the BRP and ANST via
a shorter, shallower tunnel. The right-of-way on the ground surface above this tunnel, including
the crossing of the BRP and ANST would not be disturbed or affected. Views of the corridor
from other segments of the BRP and ANST would be similar to those under the Proposed
Action, except that the extent of the cleared corridor on either side of the Blue Ridge would
appear to be slightly longer.

As shown in the simulations in Figures 3-14 through 3-18, the contingency crossing area
corridor would be visible from KOPs to the west of the crossing (i.e., Torry Ridge), but not from
KOPs to the east of the crossing. Comparing Proposed Action and contingency plan simulations
from KOP 34 (Torrey Ridge) and KOP 40 (Bee Mountain) shows that the incremental difference
in disturbed area during operations between Proposed Action and contingency plan is minimal.
As with the proposed action, views of the ACP contingency corridor from KOP 40 would be
minimal and only available during leaf-off conditions. Viewers on the ANST and BRP would not
experience any changes in scenery conditions at the ACP crossing under either scenario. As a
result, the visual impacts of the contingency plan would be essentially the same as the visual
impacts of the proposed action.

55
T-55
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
5.0 REFERENCES

National Park Service. 2013. Final Blue Ridge Parkway General Management
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement. January 2013. Accessed on November 20, 2015.
Available online at: http://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=355&projectID
=10419&documentID=51305.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1995. Agriculture Handbook 701, Landscape Aesthetics-A

Handbook for Scenery Management.

U.S. Forest Service. 2015. Recommended Key Observation Points for Proposed Atlantic Coast
Pipeline On the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests and the
Monongahela National Forest. E-mail from Ted Coffman, received on September 14,
2015.

-------. 2016. ACP Visuals KOP route 6. Email from Ted Coffman, received on March 11,
2016.

56
T-56
$7/$17,&&2$673,3(/,1((19,5210(17$/6859(<

1DWLRQDO)RUHVW9LVXDO,PSDFW$VVHVVPHQW5HSRUW

$33(1',;$

)LHOG6XUYH\3KRWR3DJHV

T-57
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
)LHOG6XUYH\3KRWRV0RQRQJDKHOD1DWLRQDO)RUHVW

Unless otherwise specified, all images are in the general direction of the nearest proposed
portions of the ACP corridor.

.23+LJKODQGV6FHQLF+LJKZD\QHDU:KLWH/RZ3ODFH

.23+LJKODQGV6FHQLF+LJKZD\DW5HG/LFN6FHQLF2YHUORRN

.23+LJKODQGV6FHQLF+LJKZD\DW/LWWOH/DXUHO6FHQLF2YHUORRN

A-1
T-58
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23:9DW$&3&URVVLQJ/RRNLQJ(DVWOHIWDQG1RUWKZHVWULJKW

A-2
T-59
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23*UHHQEULHU5LYHU7UDLOQHDU$&3&RUULGRU&URVVLQJORRNLQJ(DVWOHIWDQG:HVWULJKW

1RWH&URVVLQJORFDWLRQKDVVKLIWHGVRXWKRIWKLVSRVLWLRQVLQFHSKRWRVZHUHWDNHQ

A-3
T-60
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23$OOHJKHQ\7UDLO&URVVLQJORRNLQJ(DVWWRSDQG:HVWERWWRP

A-4
T-61
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23 .23)5
(QWUDQFHWR)5YLHZRI$&3&RUULGRUQRWDFFHVVLEOH

A-5
T-62
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

6ODW\)RUN:9ORRNLQJLQWKHGLUHFWLRQRI.23
$FWXDO.23)5QRWDFFHVVLEOH

 

A-6
T-63
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report
)LHOG6XUYH\3KRWRV*HRUJH:DVKLQJWRQ1DWLRQDO)RUHVW

Unless otherwise specified, all images are in the general direction of the nearest proposed
portions of the ACP corridor.

.236KHQDQGRDK0RXQWDLQ7UDLO/RRNLQJ:HVW$&3FRUULGRUQRORQJHULQWKLVYLHZ

.23%HH0RXQWDLQ$SSDODFKLDQ7UDLO

A-7
T-64
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.237KUHH5LGJHVULGJHWRS7KUHH5LGJHV:LOGHUQHVV$UHD

A-8
T-65
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23$&3FURVVLQJDW)67%UXVK\5LGJH7UDLO%DFN'UDIW7UDLOORRNLQJ1RUWKOHIWDQG6RXWKWRS

A-9
T-66
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.237UDLOKHDGRI)676KRUW5LGJH7UDLO

.237UDLOKHDGRI)67%UXVK\5LGJH7UDLO%DFN'UDIW7UDLO

A-10
T-67
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.23'XQFDQ.QRE/RRNRXW

.235RXWHDW5RXWH)RUW/HZLV$UHD

A-11
T-68
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.235RXWHDW5RXWH)RUW/HZLV$UHD

.23$&3FRUULGRULQYLFLQLW\RI&RZSDVWXUH5LYHUFURVVLQJORRNLQJZHVW

A-12
T-69
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

.231HDU6RXWKHUQ7HUPLQXVRI6KHQDQGRDK0RXQWDLQ7UDLO

.23'HYLOV.QRE2YHUORRN:LQWHUJUHHQ5HVRUW

A-13
T-70
 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
National Forest Visual Impact Assessment Report

$7/$17,&&2$673,3(/,1((19,5210(17$/6859(<

1DWLRQDO)RUHVW9LVXDO,PSDFW$VVHVVPHQW5HSRUW

$33(1',;%

+LJK5HVROXWLRQ/DUJH)RUPDW)XOO9LVXDO6LPXODWLRQ,PDJHV

T-71
 ERM - ACP Pipeline ROW
Additional Forestry

Viewpoint KOP34

Torry Ridge Trail 1

with Contingency Right of Way (ROW) shown

Viewpoint Location Project Area

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2214670.3

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13778971.8
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2644.2
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6-Nov-15 at 04.04 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-72

NOTES:

Viewpoint location has been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83

No part of this photo simulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size

TrueView only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
21 April 2016 3
 KOP34

Torry Ridge Trail 1

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2214670.3

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13778971.8
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2655.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 10:58 AM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-73

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 3
 KOP34

Torry Ridge Trail 1

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2214670.3

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13778971.8
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2655.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 10:58 AM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-74

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP34 - Torry Ridge Trail 1, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 4
 Viewpoint 03

Torry Ridge Trail 2

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2224536.8

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13785472.0
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2456.0
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 01:35 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

.23 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-75

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

.23 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
26 February 2016 9
 KOP35

Torry Ridge Trail 2

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2224536.8

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13785472.0
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2456.0
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 12:35 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP35 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-76

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP35 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 5
 KOP35

Torry Ridge Trail 2

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2224536.8

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13785472.0
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2456.0
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 12:35 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP35 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - Existing View

T-77

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP35 - Torry Ridge Trail 2, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 6
 Viewpoint 05

Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2230689.4

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13780972.7
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3188.8
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 03:55 PM
Orientation of View: NW
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

.23 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - Existing View
T-78

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

.23 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
26 February 2016 11
 KOP38

Ravens Roost,
Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2230689.4

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13780972.7
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3188.8
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 02:55 PM
Orientation of View: NW
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP38 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - Existing View
T-79

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP38 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 7
 KOP38

Ravens Roost,
Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2230689.4

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13780972.7
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3188.8
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 02:55 PM
Orientation of View: NW
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP38 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - Existing View
T-80

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP38 - Ravens Roost, Blue Ridge Parkway Overlook, Looking Northwest - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 8
 Viewpoint KOP39
Blue Ridge Parkway, Three Ridges Overlook
125 Permanent (75) and Temporary (50)
Right of Way (ROW) shown with
indicative restoration planting

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2223312.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13771099.9
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2696.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 03:27 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP39 - Blue Ridge Parkway, Three Ridges Overlook, Looking Southeast - ([LVWLQJ9LHZ
T-81

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
P.O. Box 1808, Blueeld, WV 24701

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

This image shows future conditions if the National Park Service

were to remove vegetation at this site, an action that would
be consistent with the General Management Plan for the Blue
Ridge Parkway.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP39 - Blue Ridge Parkway, Three Ridges Overlook, Looking Southeast - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
21 April 2016 3
 KOP39

Three Ridges Overlook,

Blue Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2223312.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13771099.9
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2696.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 02:27 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Existing View
T-82

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 9
 KOP39

Three Ridges Overlook,

Blue Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2223312.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13771099.9
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2696.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 02:27 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Existing View
T-83

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 10
 KOP39

Three Ridges Overlook,

Blue Parkway Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2223312.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13771099.9
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 2696.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 6 November 2015 at 02:27 PM
Orientation of View: SE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Existing View
T-84

NOTES:
Viewpoint locations have been surveyed by:

i3 Engineering Sciences
43&S\&PYIIPH;:

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83
No part of this photosimulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size TrueView

only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP39 - Three Ridges Overlook, Blue Parkway Overlook, Looking Southeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW with Indicative Restoration For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 11
 ERM - ACP Pipeline ROW
Additional Forestry

Viewpoint KOP40

Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail

with Contingency Right of Way (ROW) shown

Viewpoint Location Project Area

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2219906.9

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13760771.3
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3068.4
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5-Nov-15 at 2:04 p.m.
Orientation of View: NE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - Existing View

T-85

NOTES:

Viewpoint location has been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83

No part of this photo simulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size

TrueView only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
21 April 2016 5
 KOP40

Bee Mountain,
Appalachian Trail

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2219906.9

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13760771.3
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3011.0
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5 November 2015 at 09:59 AM
Orientation of View: NE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - Existing View

T-86

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 12
 KOP40

Bee Mountain,
Appalachian Trail

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2219906.9

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 13760771.3
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3011.0
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5 November 2015 at 09:59 AM
Orientation of View: NE
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - Existing View

T-87

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP40 - Bee Mountain, Appalachian Trail, Looking Northeast - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 13
 ERM - ACP Pipeline ROW
Additional Forestry

Viewpoint KOP65

Devils Knob
with Contingency Right of Way (ROW) shown

Viewpoint Location Project Area

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2229251.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 113774276.5
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3729.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5-Nov-15 at 2:50 p.m.
Orientation of View: S
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP65 - Devils Knob, Looking South - Existing View

T-88

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been precision surveyed by:

Rick Casteel & Adam Bosley

I3 Engineering
LLC

Heights are above mean sea level.

Projection/Zone/Datum:
UTM ZONE 17, NAD83

No part of this photo simulation shall be altered in any way.

Visual assessments should be made from the full size

TrueView only.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP65 - Devils Knob, Looking South - )ROORZLQJ&RQVWUXFWLRQ For on-screen display:

Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
21 April 2016 7
 KOP65

Devils Knob Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2229251.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 113774276.5
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3729.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5 November 2015 at 02:50 PM
Orientation of View: S
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP65 - Devils Knob Overlook, Looking South - Existing View

T-89

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP65 - Devils Knob Overlook, Looking South - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (5 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 14
 KOP65

Devils Knob Overlook

Viewpoint Location Pipeline Right-of-Way

NOTE: The above pipeline ROW alignment has been exaggerated in

width for visual purposes only and does not represent the actual width
of the pipeline ROW.

Easting Position (UTM - Zone 17): 2229251.1

Northing Position (UTM - Zone 17): 113774276.5
Elevation of Photopoint Position (NAVD88): 3729.1
Height of Camera Above Ground (ft): 5.4
Date of Photography: 5 November 2015 at 02:50 PM
Orientation of View: S
Horizontal Field of View: 124
Vertical Field of View: 55

KOP65 - Devils Knob Overlook, Looking South - Existing View

T-90

NOTES:

Viewpoint locations have been terrain-aligned using 1/9 and

1/3 arc degrees terrain, sourced from USGS and with a camera
mounted gps unit.

Photo Simulation Created Using

TrueViewTM Technology
(Patent No.: US 8,184,906 B2)

Provided by

www.truescape.com

DATE SHEET

KOP65 - Devils Knob Overlook, Looking South - Proposed View 75 Permanent ROW (15/20 Year Tree Growth) For on-screen display:
Scale bar to be 4 inches (101.6mm wide)
Viewing distance is 19.7 inches (50 cm)
19 July 2016 15
 APPENDIX U

RACIAL, ETHNIC, AND POVERTY STATISTICS FOR CENSUS

TRACTS WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 TABLE U-1

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
United States 314,107,084 73.8 12.6 0.8 5 0.2 4.7 2.9 16.9 26.2 $26,714 15.6
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
West Virginia 1,853,881 93.6 3.2 0.2 0.7 0 0.3 2 1.3 6.4 $22,148 18.1
Harrison 69,069 95.8 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.3 1.4 4.2 N/A N/A
CT 313 2,595 98.3 0.7 0 0 0 0.2 0.8 1 1.7 $25,184 12.5
CT 314 c 2,860 94.7 0 0 1.5 0 0.3 3.5 0.3 5.3 $20,998 15.5
Lewis 16,412 97.2 0.9 0 0.2 0.1 0 1.7 0.2 2.9 N/A N/A
CT 9672 c 3,549 95.5 0 0 0.3 0 0 4.2 0 4.5 $19,656 22
CT 9673 3,818 98.7 0.1 0 0 0.5 0 0.7 0 1.3 $24,754 9.8
CT 9674 2,596 99.2 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.4 0.8 0.7 $20,677 19.5
Pocahontas f 8,710 96.7 1.5 0.1 0 0 0 1.7 0.4 3.3 N/A N/A
CT 9601.01 d 1,186 99.9 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.8 0.1 $23,185 13
CT 9601.02 1,172 93.1 5.5 0 0 0 0 1.4 0 6.9 $20,815 15.1
U-1

CT 9602 d 3,800 95.8 1 0 0 0 0 3.2 0.4 4.2 $17,764 23

Randolph 29,446 97 1.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.7 3 N/A N/A
CT 9659 c 4,087 97.2 1.8 1 0 0 0 0 1 2.8 $18,578 16.1
CT 9664 d 5,579 98.8 0.3 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.2 1.2 $23,344 12.4
CT 9665 d 4,541 96.9 2.8 0.1 0 0 0 0.2 0.1 3.1 $15,620 21.7
Upshur 24,487 97.6 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.9 1.1 2.4 N/A N/A
CT 9666 d 4,690 97.8 0 0.3 0 0 0 1.9 0 2.2 $20,761 20.9
CT 9668 3,673 99.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0.5 $17,829 27.1
CT 9669 3,347 98.6 0 0 1.4 0 0 0 0 1.4 $26,125 17.1
CT 9670 4,870 96.4 2.1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 3.6 $20,640 17.4
CT 9671 4,361 98.9 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 1.1 $20,290 16.7
Virginia 8,185,131 69.3 19.3 0.3 5.8 0.1 2.2 3.1 8.4 30.8 $31,329 11.5
Amelia e 12,764 72.5 24.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.4 0.9 27.5 N/A N/A
CT 9301 6,697 71.3 26.1 0.2 0.2 0 0.7 1.4 1.4 28.6 $30,589 10.8
Augusta f 73,707 93 4.1 0.3 0.6 0 1 1 2.3 7 N/A N/A
CT 701 d 5,477 74.5 22.6 0 0.6 0 1.5 0.8 2.8 25.5 $15,487 13.2
CT 702 3,666 90.9 0.8 0 0.3 0.1 7 0.8 9.4 9 $28,977 12.4
CT 708 5,868 96.2 2.6 0 0.3 0 0 0.9 0.3 3.8 $28,306 8.1
CT 709 4,822 94.9 3.4 0 0 0 0 1.7 1.5 5.1 $27,757 9.9
 TABLE U-1 (contd)

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
CT 711.01 4,163 93.7 3.2 0 0 0 1.1 2 1.5 6.3 $26,220 18.7
CT 711.02 5,934 97.5 2.1 0.5 0 0 0 0 2 2.6 $26,604 3.8
CT 712 5,876 93.6 3.8 0.1 1.2 0 0.3 1 0.4 6.4 $27,698 7.3
Bath f 4,644 91.7 5.9 0 0 0 0 2.3 1.8 8.2 N/A N/A
CT 9201 c, d 4,644 91.7 5.9 0 0 0 0 2.3 1.8 8.2 $26,429 9.3
Brunswick 16,961 41.7 56.4 0.3 0 0 0.5 1.1 1.9 58.3 N/A N/A
CT 9301 3,511 43.7 52.3 1.5 0 0 0 2.5 0 56.3 $22,048 16.9
CT 9302.01 2,301 24 75.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.3 0.8 75.9 $14,922 20.8
CT 9302.03 c, d 4,321 34.9 63.2 0 0 0 1.1 0.8 5.4 65.1 $18,389 28.9
CT 9303 5,231 60.1 39.3 0 0 0 0.1 0.5 0.4 39.9 $19,258 24.6
Buckingham 17,072 62.2 34.7 0 0.2 0 0.7 2.1 2 37.7 N/A N/A
CT 9301.01 c 4,200 68.3 27.9 0 0 0 2.1 1.8 5.6 31.8 $22,752 26.6
CT 9302.01 5,954 54.4 42.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 2 1.2 45.6 $16,396 20.7
U-2

CT 9302.02 d 4,239 71.7 23.7 0 0.6 0 0.3 3.7 0.6 28.3 $23,583 22.5
Cumberland 9,916 63.1 34.4 0.7 0 0 0 1.8 0.1 36.9 N/A N/A
CT 9301 6,375 64.3 33.4 1.1 0 0 0 1.1 0 35.6 $22,036 15.5
CT 9302 3,541 60.8 36.3 0 0 0 0 2.9 0.3 39.2 $26,778 24
Dinwiddie 27,993 64.8 32.7 0.1 0.3 0 0.4 1.6 2.7 35.1 N/A N/A
CT 8401 5,446 71.7 27.1 0 0.4 0 0 0.7 0.3 28.2 $25,418 17.6
CT 9801 - - - - - - - - - 0 - -
Greensville 11,911 38.2 59.7 0.4 0.4 0 0.4 1 2 61.9 N/A N/A
CT 8801.01 c 4,253 41.8 57 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.4 1.3 58.2 $20,532 18.4
CT 8802 c 4,391 37.6 60.9 0.1 1.1 0 0 0.3 0 62.4 $20,473 21.5
Highland f 2,258 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 N/A N/A
CT 9701 d 2,258 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 $23,482 12.5
Isle of Wight e 35,518 71.4 23.4 0.1 1.1 0 1 3 2.3 28.6 N/A N/A
CT 2804 3,773 84.2 15.6 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.5 15.8 $24,411 13.2
Nelson f 14,892 83.6 13.6 0.2 0.4 0 1.6 0.5 3.3 16.3 N/A N/A
CT 9501 5,588 79.7 18.7 0.3 0.7 0 0.1 0.5 1.3 20.3 $25,272 19.8
CT 9502 4,965 90.2 7.2 0 0.6 0 1 1 2.8 9.8 $30,657 6.9
CT 9503 4,339 81.1 14.5 0.2 0 0 4.1 0 6.5 18.8 $23,182 15
Nottoway 15,756 56.4 39.4 0.3 0.3 0 2.1 1.6 3.9 43.7 N/A N/A
CT 1 6,395 50.3 43.5 0.6 0.5 0 3.6 1.5 5.9 49.7 $19,181 20.8
 TABLE U-1 (contd)

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
CT 2 2,731 71.6 26.3 0 0 0 1 1.2 1 28.5 $26,161 20.3
CT 3 6,620 56 40.6 0.2 0.2 0 1.2 1.8 3.3 44 $20,084 21.3
CT 9801 10 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 - 0
Prince Edward 23,140 63.7 33.6 0.1 1.2 0 0.5 1 2.4 36.4 N/A N/A
CT 9301 7,241 53.3 42.6 0 3.4 0 0.3 0.3 1 46.6 $16,842 36
Rockbridge f 22,367 93.9 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.7 1.6 1.5 6.2 N/A N/A
CT 9301 d 8,117 94.1 2.7 0 1.2 0.2 0 1.7 0.9 5.8 $24,280 14.5
CT 9302 4,087 96.7 0.5 0 0.6 0 1.3 0.9 1.8 3.3 $20,586 15.2
Southampton 18,364 61 36.3 0.3 0.1 0 0.3 2.1 1.3 39.1 N/A N/A
CT 2004 6,298 61.4 36.2 0.3 0 0 0.7 1.4 1 38.6 $27,520 16.4
CT 2005 3,516 53.1 42.7 0 0.5 0 0.1 3.7 0.3 47 $22,512 13.3
Chesapeake, City of 228,168 62.5 29.8 0.3 3.2 0.1 1.1 2.9 4.9 37.4 N/A N/A
CT 205 1,381 47.7 28.2 0 2.4 0 21.4 0.3 29.5 52.3 $21,671 7.1
U-3

CT 206 4,240 82 15 0 0.3 0 0 2.7 7.1 18 $29,805 7.3

CT 207 5,305 22.3 75.1 0 0 0 0 2.5 5.7 77.6 $22,972 15.5
CT 209.03 c 2,588 26 70.5 0.2 1.8 0 0 1.5 4.7 74 $32,525 9.9
CT 209.04 8,616 59.9 31.7 0 4.3 0 0.2 3.9 2.9 40.1 $41,867 10.2
CT 209.05 2,753 78.7 17.1 0 3.9 0 0 0.3 12.5 21.3 $34,107 7.7
CT 213.01 5,401 68.1 27.8 0.2 1.4 0.2 1.1 1.4 3.5 32.1 $36,708 7.8
CT 213.02 9,740 59.1 33 0 2.1 0 1.2 4.5 5.8 40.8 $42,722 6.5
CT 214.01 1,884 65.9 28.3 0.5 0 0 2.3 3 2.3 34.1 $39,132 8.3
CT 214.02 6,534 75.2 19.7 0 1.8 0 0.2 3.2 0.9 24.9 $34,986 10
CT 214.03 4,586 59.2 30.6 0.8 0 0 6.6 2.7 8.3 40.7 $23,675 12.8
CT 214.04 7,620 22 75 0 1.5 0 1.4 0.2 6.7 78.1 $26,045 14.9
CT 215.01 10,725 51.1 38.6 0.5 3.9 0 1.9 4.1 6.8 49 $36,667 10.5
Franklin, City of 8,534 38.8 58 0 0.9 0 0.2 2.2 0.6 61.3 N/A N/A
CT 901 d 4,830 60.4 35 0 1.4 0 0.3 3 1 39.7 $26,535 7.7
CT 902 3,704 10.7 87.9 0 0.2 0 0 1.2 0 89.3 $12,684 48.9
Suffolk, City of 85,477 52.3 41.9 0.1 1.4 0 0.6 3.8 3.3 47.8 N/A N/A
CT 753.02 2,271 71.8 20.4 0.4 1 0 1.1 5.3 1.7 28.2 $34,259 19.2
CT 754.02 4,117 53.7 40 0 0.8 0 1.6 4 6.8 46.4 $44,191 5.2
CT 754.03 4,314 46 46 0 1.2 0 3.1 3.8 4.4 54.1 $41,023 5.8
CT 754.04 971 90.7 9.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 $41,773 1.3
 TABLE U-1 (contd)

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
CT 754.05 2,192 92.5 6.9 0 0 0.4 0 0.2 0.5 7.5 $36,129 1.7
CT 755.01 4,735 46.2 48.2 0 0.7 0 0.1 4.8 1.2 53.8 $26,866 20.4
CT 755.02 4,370 51.8 40.5 0 5 0 0.7 2 2.3 48.2 $36,964 7
CT 757.02 3,555 74.6 22.4 0 0 0 0 3 2.4 25.4 $37,386 7.6
CT 757.03 1,344 70.3 29.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 $26,313 4.9
CT 758.01 2,872 80.2 17.2 0.9 0.3 0 0.2 1.2 0.6 19.8 $26,891 4.7
CT 758.02 1,677 53.5 44.1 0 1 0 0 1.4 0 46.5 $24,979 7.9
CT 758.03 1,343 75.9 20.5 0 0 0 0 3.6 2.6 24.1 $33,772 15.3
North Carolina 9,750,405 69.6 21.5 1.2 2.4 0.1 3 2.3 8.7 30.5 $24,957 17.6
Cumberland 324,002 52 36.2 1.2 2.3 0.3 2.5 5.4 10.4 47.9 N/A N/A
CT 14 d 6,038 47.7 45.4 3.1 0 0 0.3 3.5 5.4 52.3 $20,906 23.6
CT 26 c 4,041 69 25.7 1.5 1.2 0 0.1 2.5 0.4 31 $27,145 17.2
CT 27 8,742 69.8 20.7 0 2.3 0.4 2.5 4.3 6.3 30.2 $28,/829 8.2
U-4

CT 28 6,538 80.2 12.1 1.7 0.2 0.7 0.8 4.3 2.3 19.8 $26,374 12.2
CT 29 4,639 67.3 24 1.3 1.8 0 0 5.7 5.6 32.8 $26,484 17.1
CT 30.01 11,543 65 19.3 5.5 1.2 0 3.7 5.3 10.5 35 $31,878 8.9
CT 30.02 2,789 69.2 24.1 3.4 0 0 1 2.3 9.5 30.8 $25,432 13.4
CT 37 7,035 72.4 22.2 1.1 0.2 0 0 4.2 6.3 27.7 $29,625 13.1
Halifax 53,803 40 51.6 3.3 0.8 0 0.9 3.4 2.4 60 N/A N/A
CT 9306 4,085 36.4 57 0.7 1.2 0 1.2 3.5 2 63.6 $17,943 26.6
CT 9308 5,667 8.3 51 29.3 1.2 0.1 1.6 8.5 3.4 91.7 $15,304 29.7
CT 9309 5,026 9.1 88.6 0.1 1.6 0 0 0.7 0 91 $13,533 34
CT 9310 d 3,285 25.4 67.1 1.3 0.2 0 0 6 1.1 74.6 $18,516 17.3
CT 9301 3,272 24.4 73.8 0.1 0 0 0 1.7 0.3 75.6 $14,967 40.2
Johnston 175,343 78.5 15.1 0.4 0.7 0 3.1 2.2 13.1 21.5 N/A N/A
CT 401 6,263 85.5 13.2 0 0 0 0.9 0.4 8.8 14.5 $22,975 22.8
CT 403.01 3,535 53.7 20.7 1.8 0 0 22.6 1.2 40 46.3 $15,600 41.2
CT 404 4,335 82.6 10.5 0 0.1 0 6 0.7 16.7 17.3 $22,165 20.3
CT 406 d 3,354 59.1 27.6 0 0.6 0 11.6 1.1 15.5 40.9 $17,420 23.6
CT 407 c 3,399 60.9 27 0.2 7.1 0 2.5 2.2 6.4 39 $18,182 18.3
CT 412.02 5,413 87.4 7.5 0.5 0.1 0 4.4 0 31.2 12.5 $17,267 35.7
CT 413 5,686 76.8 14.7 0.4 0 0 3.9 4.2 9.4 23.2 $20,622 23.1
CT 414 6,768 71 14.5 0 1 0 11.5 2.1 17.3 29.1 $20,698 26.8
 TABLE U-1 (contd)

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
Nash 95,174 55.1 37.8 0.7 0.8 0 3.4 2.3 6.4 45 N/A N/A
CT 107 2,538 39.1 55.1 0 1.3 0 0 4.4 1.8 60.8 $22,102 11.4
CT 108 7,087 79.1 20.2 0.3 0.1 0 0.2 0.2 0.8 21 $30,743 9.9
CT 111.01 5,582 49.5 43.7 0 0 0 3 3.9 7.7 50.6 $26,202 11.7
CT 111.02 7,647 65.8 29 3.2 0 0 0.9 0.9 1.6 34 $22,013 19.1
CT 113 5,163 72.9 9.4 0 0 0 15.4 2.2 23.6 27 $22,208 13.4
CT 114 4,748 52 27.9 0.5 0.4 0 18.1 1.1 24.6 48 $23,612 18.1
Northampton 21,310 40.1 56.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.9 1.7 59.9 N/A N/A
CT 9201 5,141 65.1 32.6 0 0 0 0 2.4 1.8 35 $24,813 16.4
CT 9203 c 6,180 19.1 75.6 0.2 0.1 0 0 5.1 0.4 81 $17,625 32.3
Robeson 134,913 30.8 24.1 37.6 0.8 0.1 3.8 2.9 8.1 69.3 N/A N/A
CT 9601.01 4,057 54 34.4 5.3 0 0 4.1 2.1 22.1 45.9 $17,859 43
CT 9601.02 4,970 54.9 21.5 16.7 0.5 0 2.5 3.8 9.3 45 $17,449 23.3
U-5

CT 9602.01 5,879 46.4 30.7 16 0 0 2.9 4 5 53.6 $19,557 22.5

CT 9602.02 4,446 22.5 9.8 58.5 0.9 0 4.4 3.9 19.6 77.5 $18,844 33.1
CT 9603 7,167 36.6 35.9 22.1 0.3 0.5 2.2 2.3 20.7 63.3 $16,283 43.8
CT 9604.01 7,782 9.1 2 82.4 0.7 0 0.6 5.2 0.7 90.9 $17,623 36.3
CT 9604.02 3,654 11.2 7.3 73.9 1.3 0 4.3 2 5.8 88.8 $19,864 29.4
CT 9605.01 c 3,612 4.5 9.3 81.3 0 0 0.2 4.7 0.7 95.5 $17,737 32.3
CT 9606 6,920 16 10.9 67.3 1.1 0 4.1 0.7 6.5 84.1 $17,718 29.8
CT 9607.01 6,253 22.4 6.1 54.2 1 0 12.7 3.5 20.2 77.5 $19,694 36.3
Sampson 63,842 58.5 26 1.7 0.3 0 10.8 2.7 17.5 41.5 N/A N/A
CT 9703.01 5,932 75.2 15.2 0.1 0.3 0 5.2 4.1 13.4 24.9 $25,698 18.7
Wilson 81,499 51.1 38.6 0.4 0.9 0.1 6.9 2.1 9.8 49 N/A N/A
CT 15 5,668 69.6 15.2 0 0.1 0 12.4 2.6 17 30.3 $26,142 13.1
CT 16 3,179 69.2 20.4 1.1 0.4 0 8.8 0 8.8 30.7 $26,047 17.6
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
Pennsylvania 12,758,729 81.9 10.9 0.2 3 0 2 2 6.1 18.1 $26,729 13.5
Greene 38,171 92.3 5.4 0.5 0.2 0 0.3 1.3 1.3 7.7 N/A N/A
CT 9702 3,204 93.2 6.5 0 0.1 0 0 0.3 0.9 6.9 $23,707 10.4
CT 9703 d 4,520 98.9 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.1 $26,172 12.4
CT 9705.01 5,130 57.3 33.3 2.8 0.3 0.1 2.1 4.2 7.2 42.8 $15,159 4.2
 TABLE U-1 (contd)

Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian Hispanic or
Black or American and Other Some Two or Latino Percent
African Indian and Pacific other more origin (of Total Minority Median Below
Total population White (%) a, American Alaska Asian Islander race (%) races any race) Population income Poverty
Project/Location a b
(%) a Native (%) a (%) a (%) a a
(%) a (%) a (%) a (dollars) a Level (%) a
Westmoreland 362,587 95.1 2.3 0.1 0.9 0 0.2 1.3 1 4.8 N/A N/A
CT 8017.02 4,607 99.9 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.1 $32,063 4.2
CT 8017.03 2,750 99.8 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.2 $24,167 4.3
CT 8019 d 6,605 95.6 1 0 1.1 0 0 2.2 0.3 4.3 $25,504 4.7
CT 8020.01 c 2,562 96.1 1 0 2.5 0 0.1 0.4 0.8 4 $29,909 3.1
CT 8020.02 7,673 94.8 0.7 0.2 3.3 0 0.1 1 1.2 5.3 $31,727 6.6
CT 8021.02 c 6,048 96.5 0 0 1.8 0 0 1.6 3.2 3.4 $37,182 5.7
West Virginia 1,853,881 93.6 3.2 0.2 0.7 0 0.3 2 1.3 6.4 $22,148 18.1
Doddridge 8,282 97.2 0.9 0.1 0 0 0 1.8 1 2.8 N/A N/A
CT 9650 d 3,906 97.8 0.4 0.3 0 0 0 1.6 0.7 2.3 $19,244 11
Harrison 69,069 95.8 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.3 1.4 4.2 N/A N/A
CT 314 c 2,860 94.7 0 0 1.5 0 0.3 3.5 0.3 5.3 $20,998 15.5
Lewis 16,412 97.2 0.9 0 0.2 0.1 0 1.7 0.2 2.9 N/A N/A
U-6

CT 9672 c 3,549 95.5 0 0 0.3 0 0 4.2 0 4.5 $19,656 22

Marshall 32,716 97.8 0.9 0.3 0.4 0 0.2 0.5 0.9 2.3 N/A N/A
CT 209 4,435 98.1 1.1 0.1 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 1.8 $22,830 11.4
Ritchie 10,221 98.3 0.4 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.6 1.7 N/A N/A
CT 9623 d 4,333 98.5 0.3 0 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 1.5 $19,398 21
Tyler 9,084 98.8 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0.8 0.6 1.1 N/A 18
CT 9620 2,161 99.4 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.7 $18,830 16.8
Wetzel 16,314 98.6 0.1 0 0.5 0.1 0 0.7 0.6 1.4 N/A N/A
CT 304 2,936 99.5 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 0.5 $18,190 24.6
CT 305 c, d 4,251 98.6 0 0 0.6 0.3 0 0.5 0 1.4 $19,390 23.6
____________________
Sources:
a
U.S. Census Bureau 2014.
b
White Alone, Not Hispanic or Latino
c
Census tract contains permanent aboveground facility.
d
Census tract contains contractor yard.
e
Includes census tracts within one mile of the proposed pipeline facilities and major aboveground facilities, but does not contain any project facilities.
f
Counties with federal lands crossed by the projects.
Grey highlighted values indicate percentage exceeds thresholds defined in text, and is an environmental justice population.
 APPENDIX V

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH FEDERALLY

RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBES FOR THE ATLANTIC COAST
PIPELINE AND SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 TABLE 1-1

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2015
12/4/2014 Follow-up telephone phone call (message) from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe requesting 9/18/2015
comments on the ACP and SHP.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
V-1

requests for comments for the ACP and SHP.

Catawba Indian Nation 10/17/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
11/12/2014 Letter from the Tribe to Atlantic requesting a cultural resources survey for the ACP. 9/18/2015
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
6/22/2016 Email from the Tribe to FERC requesting additional information on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/8/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe (sent at FERCs request) providing updated project 8/15/2016
descriptions and maps for the ACP and SHP.
8/25/2016 Letter from the Tribe to Atlantic/DTI in which the Tribe states there are no concerns regarding 9/1/2016
cultural resource sites in the ACP and SHP project areas. The Tribe additionally asked to be
notified in the event of an unanticipated find.
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Cherokee Nation 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
12/4/2014 Follow-up telephone call (message) from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the 9/18/2015
ACP.
12/19/2014 Voicemail message from the Tribe regarding the ACP. 9/18/2015
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
12/19/2014 Email from Atlantic to the Tribe transmitting copies of Atlantics 7/29/14 and 10/17/14 letters 9/18/2015
requesting comments on the ACP.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Delaware Nation 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
V-2

10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2014
12/1/2014 Letter from the Tribe to FERC in which the Tribe states that no sites of interest to the Tribe 9/18/2015
will be affected by the ACP. The Tribe additionally asked to be notified in the event of an
unanticipated find.
2/11/2015 Letter from the Tribe to DTI in which the Tribe states that no sites of interest to the Tribe will 9/18/2015
be affected by the SHP. The Tribe additionally asked to be notified in the event of an
unanticipated find.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
1/8/2016 Email from the Tribe to Atlantic concurring with the unanticipated discoveries plan for the 1/29/2016
MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
Delaware Tribe of Indians 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2014
12/4/2014 Follow-up telephone phone call (message) from Atlantic/DTI to the Tribe requesting 9/18/2015
comments on the ACP and SHP.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
6/21/2016 Email from the Tribe to FERC in which the Tribe states that its land interests in Virginia are in 9/15/2016
Accomack and Northampton Counties and its land interests in West Virginia are in Brooke,
Hancock, Marshall, and Ohio Counties. (Note: the ACP and SHP do not cross these
Counties.)
8/10/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe (sent at FERCs request) providing updated project 8/15/2016
descriptions and maps for the ACP and SHP.
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
V-3

unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
11/5/2014 Email from the Tribe to FERC in which the Tribe states that the ACP is outside the aboriginal 9/18/2015
territory of the Cherokee people.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
9/7/2016 Letter from the Tribe to FERC in which the Tribe states that the ACP and SHP are within the 9/22/2016
aboriginal territory of the Cherokee. The Tribe additionally requested updated project
information and copies of archaeological survey reports.
10/5/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe providing updated information on the ACP and SHP and 10/17/2016
transmitting copies of archaeological survey reports for the projects.
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
9/7/2016 Letter from the Tribe to FERC requesting topographic maps and survey reports. 9/22/16
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/5/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting Phase I archaeological survey reports 10/31/2016
and updated, revised route maps and renewing requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2014
12/4/2014 Follow-up telephone phone call (message) from Atlantic/DTI to the Tribe requesting 9/18/2015
comments on the ACP and SHP.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/15
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
V-4

survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/1/2016 Email from the Tribe to FERC requesting a follow-up telephone call. 9/15/2016
8/4/2016 Follow-up telephone call from FERC to the Tribe in which the Tribe requested additional 9/15/2016
information on the ACP.
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Pamunkey Tribe 4/24/2015 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Commonwealth recognized Tribe requesting comments on 9/18/2015
the ACP.
8/5/2015 Initial letter from Atlantic to the federally recognized Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
Seneca-Cayuga Nation 10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from NRG to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2015
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Seneca Nation of Indians 10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP.
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
V-5

12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from NRG to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
7/5/2016 Email from the Tribe to FERC expressing interest in the ACP and SHP and requesting an 9/15/2016
archaeological survey in undisturbed areas.
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
The Shawnee Tribe 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP.
12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP.
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Stockbridge Munsee Community 3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
4/24/2015 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
4/30/2015 Letter from the Tribe to Atlantic deferring consultation on the ACP. 9/18/2015
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
Tonawanda Band of Seneca 10/28/2014 Initial letter from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP. 9/18/2015
12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from DTI to the Tribe requesting comments on the SHP.
V-6

10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
6/23/2016 Telephone call from FERC to the Tribe in which the Tribe requested additional information on
the ACP and SHP.
8/8/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe (sent at FERCs request) providing updated project 8/15/2016
descriptions and maps for the ACP and SHP.
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
Tuscarora Nation of New York 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
12/4/2014 Follow-up phone call from NRG to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
 TABLE 1-1 (continued)

Summary of Communications with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Tribe Date Summary Filed to the Docket
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
6/23/2016 Telephone call from FERC to the Tribe in which the Tribe requested additional information on 9/15/2016
the ACP and SHP.
8/8/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe (sent at FERCs request) providing updated project 8/15/2016
descriptions and maps for the ACP and SHP.
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
10/18/2016 Letter from Atlantic and DTI to the Tribe transmitting updated route maps and renewing 10/31/2016
requests for comments on the ACP and SHP.
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians 7/29/2014 Initial letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/17/2014 Follow-up letter from Atlantic to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP. 9/18/2015
10/29/2014 Email from the Tribe to Atlantic deferring consultation on the ACP. 9/18/2015
V-7

3/25/2015 Consultation letter from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/18/2015
10/28/2015 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting a draft archaeological 10/30/2015
survey report and draft unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF.
6/21/2016 Email from FERC to the Tribe requesting comments on the ACP and SHP. 9/15/2016
8/29/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated draft 9/15/2016
archaeological survey report for the MNF. (Note: this letter also references an updated
unanticipated discoveries plan for the MNF; however, a copy of the plan inadvertently was
omitted from this submittal.)
10/4/2016 Letter from Atlantic to the Tribe, a MNF Tribal Partner, transmitting an updated unanticipated 10/31/2016
discoveries plan for the MNF. (Note: the updated plan inadvertently was omitted from a
submittal on 8/29/2016.)
____________________
a
In addition to the communications listed above, Atlantic provided copies of draft survey reports and unanticipated finds plans for the MNF (by letters dated 10/28/2015, 8/29/2016, and
10/4/2016) to the Oneida Indian Nation and Onondaga Nation, both of whom are MNF Tribal Partners.
 APPENDIX W

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

TABLE W-1 PAST, PRESENT, AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE

FUTURE ACTIONS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF
INFLUENCE FOR THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT

FIGURE W-1 POTENTIAL EFFECT ZONE FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

TABLE W-1 PAST, PRESENT, AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE
FUTURE ACTIONS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF
INFLUENCE FOR THE ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE AND
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
 TABLE W-1

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
FERC-Jurisdictional Projects
AP-1 Mountain Valley Pipeline EQT Midstream Harrison, Lewis See section 4.13.2.2 0.0 0.7 mile Anticipated in-service Present
Project Partners, LP northwest December 2018
AP-1 Virginia Southside Transcontinental Gas Brunswick See section 4.13.2.2 0.6 0.3 mile west Completed September Past
Expansion Project Pipe Line Company, 2015
LLC
AP-1 Virginia Southside Transcontinental Gas Brunswick See section 4.13.2.2 0.6 0.3 mile west Anticipated completion Present
Expansion Project II Pipe Line Company, Winter 2017
LLC
AP-1 WB Xpress Project Columbia Gas Randolph See section 4.13.2.2 55-56 <0.25 mile Anticipated to start in Present
Transmission, LLC January 2017; in-service
June and October 2018
Nonjurisdictional Projects
W-1

AP-1 Brunswick Power Station Dominion Virginia Power Brunswick 1.358-megawatt, natural gas- 0.6 Brunswick M&R Estimated completion by Past
fired power station Station Summer 2016
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Brunswick Utility services for the 0.6 Brunswick M&R To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Brunswick M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Brunswick Microwave tower at the 0.6 Brunswick M&R To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Brunswick M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Lewis Utility services for Compressor 7.5 Compressor To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Station 1 Station 1 construction of
Compressor Station 1
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Lewis Relocate existing gathering 7.5 Compressor To coincide with Present
Pipeline Relocation and LLC and storage pipelines and Station 1 construction of
Road Upgrade upgrade an existing road Compressor Station 1
within/near Compressor
Station 1
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Lewis Microwave tower at 7.5 Compressor To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Compressor Station 1 Station 1 construction of
Compressor Station 1

 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Randolph Microwave tower at the Long 47.3 Long Run M&R To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Run M&R Station Station construction of the Long
Run M&R Station
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Buckingham Utility services for Compressor 191.5 Compressor To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Station 2 Station 2 construction of
Compressor Station 2
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Buckingham Microwave tower at 191.5 Compressor To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Compressor Station 2 Station 2 construction of
Compressor Station 2
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Prince Edward Microwave tower at or 225.8 Valve Site 12 To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC adjacent to Valve Site 12 construction of MLV 12
AP-1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Nottoway Microwave tower at or 245.2 Valve Site 13 To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC adjacent to Valve Site 13 construction of MLV 13
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Northampton A new office building for 0.0 Compressor To coincide with Present
Office Building LLC pipeline operations to be built Station 3 construction of
W-2

on the same site as Compressor Station 3

Compressor Station 2
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Northampton Utility services for Compressor 0.0 Compressor To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Station 3 and office building Station 3 construction of
Compressor Station 3
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Northampton Microwave tower at 0.0 Compressor To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Compressor Station 3 Station 3 construction of
Compressor Station 3
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Johnston A new office building for 92.7 Smithfield M&R To coincide with Present
Office Building LLC pipeline operations to be built Station construction of the M&R
on the same site as the station
Smithfield M&R Station
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Johnston Utility services for the 92.7 Smithfield M&R To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Smithfield M&R Station and Station construction of the M&R
office Station
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Johnston Microwave tower at the 92.7 Smithfield M&R To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Smithfield M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-2 Piedmont Facility Piedmont Natural Gas Johnston Piping modifications and 92.7 Smithfield M&R Construction in Winter Present
Modifications additions for interconnect at Station 2018
the Smithfield M&R Station
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-2 Piedmont Facility Piedmont Natural Gas Cumberland Piping modifications and 132.9 Fayetteville Construction in Winter Present
Modifications additions for the interconnect M&R Station 2018
at the Fayetteville M&R Station
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Cumberland Utility services for the 132.9 Fayetteville To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Fayetteville M&R Station M&R Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Cumberland Microwave tower at the 132.9 Fayetteville To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Fayetteville M&R Station M&R Station construction of ACP
aboveground facilities
AP-2 Piedmont Pipeline Piedmont Natural Gas Robeson 26 miles of 20-inch natural gas 182.9 Crosses; Anticipated Winter 2018 Present
pipeline Pembroke M&R
Station
AP-2 Piedmont Aboveground Piedmont Natural Gas Robeson Piping modifications and 182.9 Pembroke M&R Construction in Winter Present
Facilities additions for the interconnect Station 2018
at the Pembroke M&R Station
W-3

AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Robeson Utility services for the 182.9 Pembroke M&R To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Pembroke M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-2 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Robeson Microwave tower at the 182.9 Pembroke M&R To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Pembroke M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-3 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Chesapeake Utility services for the 82.6 Elizabeth River To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Elizabeth River M&R Station M&R Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-3 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Chesapeake Microwave tower at the 82.6 Elizabeth River To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Elizabeth River M&R Station M&R Station construction of the M&R
Station
AP-3 Virginia Natural Gas Virginia Natural Gas Chesapeake Approximately 5 miles of 20- Unknown Unknown Anticipated in 2017 Present
pipeline inch-diameter natural gas
pipeline
AP-5 Greensville Power Station Dominion Virginia Power Greensville 1,600-megawatt natural gas- 1.0 Greensville M&R Anticipated construction Present
fueled power station Station mid-2016 and completion
by 2019
AP-5 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Greensville Utility services for the 1.0 Greensville M&R To coincide with Present
Utility Services LLC Greensville M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-5 Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Greensville Microwave tower at the 1.0 Greensville M&R To coincide with Present
Communications Network LLC Greensville M&R Station Station construction of the M&R
Station
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Municipal
Developments
AP-1 Northwest Lewis Water Lewis County Lewis Extension of water service to 4.0 0.9 mile south Construction schedule RFFA
Extension Commission homes located in areas served unknown
by individual wells
AP-1 Upshur County Upshur County Upshur Improvements to the industrial 26.2 4.6 miles In progress Past
Development Authority Development Authority park including water, sewer, northeast
Industrial Park and gas service
AP-1 Linwood-Snowshoe Pocahontas Public Pocahontas Construction of a new 69.4 0.6 mile east Construction schedule RFFA
Wastewater Project Service District wastewater treatment system unknown
AP-1 Stone Valley Planned Unknown Augusta Remaining portion of a mixed- 145.9 Crossed Completed Past
Unit Development use planned unit development,
W-4

including 247 townhouse lots

and 128 single family
residential lots
AP-1 Wintergreen Resort Wintergreen Pacific LLC Nelson Luxury hotel 159.0 <0.25 mile east 2016 with a projected RFFA
and Pacific Group opening in 2017
Resorts
AP-1 Spruce Creek Resort and Nelson Hilltop, LLC and Nelson Approximately 100-acre resort 162.5 - 162.7 Crosses Construction schedule RFFA
Market Rockfish Valley and market development unknown
Investments, LLC straddling Spruce Creek
AP-1 Water Treatment Plant Water and Sewer Buckingham Construction of a new water 198.0 3.8 miles In progress Past
Project Committee treatment facility northwest
AP-1 Foreign Affairs Security U.S. Department of Dinwiddie Training center for diplomatic 250.0 5.1 miles south- Construction schedule Past
Training Center State security personnel within Fort southwest unknown
Pickett
AP-1 Greensville Power Station County Greensville Road improvements and 284.0 Crossed Construction schedule RFFA
utilities unknown
AP-2 Halifax Solar Power Duke Energy Halifax 20-megawatt (alternating 12.0 7.4 miles In progress RFFA
Project Renewables current) solar project northwest
AP-2 Bone Development, Inc. Bone Development, Inc. Nash Residential development 50.8 Crossed Construction schedule RFFA
unknown
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-2 Elm City Solar Facility Duke Energy Wilson Expansion of existing solar 60.0 9.5 miles Estimated in-service date Past
facility southeast of 4th quarter; 2015; status
unknown; may be
complete
AP-2 TR Lamm Subdivision TR Lamm Subdivision Wilson 10 to 11 planned platted lots 67.8 Crossed Construction schedule RFFA
unknown
AP-2 McClauren Subdivision McClauren Subdivision Cumberland 36-lot residential development 131.6 Crossed Construction schedule RFFA
unknown
AP-2 St. Pauls Johnson Johnson Brothers Utility Robeson New asphalt plant 166.6 2.2 miles In progress Phase I Past
Brothers Facility and Paving Company southeast completed in July 2014
AP-2 Chemtex Cellulosic Chemtex Sampson New biofuel plant facility Unknown Unknown Planned; Construction RFFA
Biofuel Plant schedule unknown
AP-2 Enviva Project Enviva Sampson New wood pellet production Unknown Unknown Anticipated completion in Present
facilities 2017
W-5

AP-3 Market Street SAVE Virginia Natural Gas Suffolk Replacement of 20,000 feet of 60.7 4.4 miles south Construction schedule RFFA
Project main and service lines unknown
AP-3 Planters Station Planters Station LLC City of Suffolk Planned residential 63.1 0.4 mile south Construction began early Past
development, +200 homes 2016

AP-3 Bridlewood Estates Bridlewood Estates City of Suffolk Recently constructed 65.8 0.1 mile south Completed Past
residential development
AP-3 Red Top Raw Water Main City of Chesapeake City of Water main 68.9 Adjacent Construction schedule RFFA
Chesapeake unknown
AP-3 Future connection City of Chesapeake City of Stormwater line 76.0 0.1 mile north Construction schedule RFFA
between Colony Manor Chesapeake unknown
and future regional
stormwater facility
AP-3 Co-Part Auto Auction Copart City of Lot expansion 76.6 0.1 mile north Construction schedule RFFA
Expansion Chesapeake unknown
AP-3 W.L. Black & Associates W.L. Black & Associates City of Conditional Use Permit 78.6 0.1 mile north Construction schedule RFFA
Waste Transfer Chesapeake unknown
AP-3 Copart Auto Auction Copart Auto Auction Suffolk Southward extension of auto 68.8 1.2 miles Planned; Construction RFFA
Expansion auction yard southwest schedule unknown
AP-3 WL Black and Associates WL Black and Chesapeake Waste water transfer facility 78.5 0.1 mile north Construction schedule RFFA
Waste Transfer Facility Associates unknown
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-3 City of Chesapeake City of Chesapeake Chesapeake Stormwater outfall 79.9 <0.25 mile north Phased construction Past
Future Stormwater Outfall improvements and associated starting in 2015
and Related Facilities activities
AP-3 Chesapeake Energy Dominion Virginia Power Chesapeake Decommissioning of four coal- 81.5 0.1 mile south Construction schedule RFFA
Center Decommissioning/ fired generating units and unknown
Fly Ash Removal removal of fly ash stored at the
site
AP-3 Military Highway 36-inch- City of Chesapeake Chesapeake Construction of water main 81.5 <0.2 mile north Construction schedule RFFA
diameter water main unknown
AP-3 Battlefield Boulevard Virginia Natural Gas Chesapeake Install new 6-inch-diameter 82.6 2.1 miles Anticipated in Winter and Past
Pressure Improvement pipeline southeast Spring of 2015; status
unknown; may be
complete
AP-3 Red Top Raw Water City of Chesapeake Suffolk Installation of a raw water tank 63.9 - 66.8 Adjacent, <0.25 Anticipated phased Present
Transmission Main and pump station, a 1-million mile construction between 2015
W-6

gallon concrete ground storage and 2017

tank, site piping, and other site
improvements.
AP-3 Suffolk Gate 1 Heater Virginia Natural Gas Suffolk Installation of water bath for Unknown Unknown Construction schedule RFFA
Installation heating gas unknown
AP-5 Dominion Power Plant Dominion Virginia Power Greensville Installation of road and sewer 1.0 Adjacent (south) Proposed; activities will Present
road and sewer lines lines likely coincide with
(nonjurisdictional construction of the ACP
activities)
Transportation Projects
AP-1 Route 633 (Virso Road) Virginia Department of Prince Edward Bridge replacement 22.7 15.1 miles In progress; completion Past
Bridge Replacement over Transportation southwest date unknown
Bush River
AP-1 Route 687(Jackson River Virginia Department of Bath Bridge replacement 94.1 14.0 miles Completed in November Past
Turnpike) Cowardin Transportation southwest 2014
Run Bridge Replacement
AP-1 Route 250 (Highland Virginia Department of Highland Widening of existing bridge 114.0 9.7 miles west Completed in November Past
Turnpike) Crab Run Transportation 2012
Bridge Replacement
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Bridge replacement 115.0 1.5 miles Completed in Spring 2015 Past
250 (Shenandoah Transportation northwest
Mountain Road)
Ramseys Draft Bridge
Replacement
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Bridge replacement 116.3 0.5 mile south Completed in Spring 2015 Past
250 (Hankey Mountain Transportation
Highway) Calfpasture
River Bridge
Replacement
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Bridge replacement 120.2 0.5 mile south- Completed in Spring 2016 Past
250 (Hankey Mountain Transportation southeast
Highway) White Oak
Draft Bridge
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Two-mile-long road widening 128.9 10.5 miles east Anticipated in Summer Present
616 (Dam Tower Road) Transportation 2018
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Replacement of truss bridge 129.2 0.5 mile east Completed in 2015 Past
801 (Hangers Mill Road) Transportation with new structure
Jennings Branch Bridge
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Replacement of two-lane 129.2 0.5 mile west Under construction Past
W-7

250 (Churchville Avenue) Transportation bridge

Bridge Replacement
Over Whiskey Creek
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Improve intersection 131.0 8.2 miles west- Anticipated in Spring 2016: Past
612 and Route 792 Transportation alignments northwest status unknown
Intersection
Improvements
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Intersection improvement 131.1 4.8 miles east Construction pending RFFA
262 (Woodrow Wilson Transportation project funding
Parkway) and Route 613
(Spring Hill Road)
AP-1 Augusta County Virginia Department of Augusta Repaving of 1.5 miles of 140.9 Crosses Completed in Summer Past
Interstate 81 Southbound Transportation Interstate 81 2015
Pavement Rehabilitation
AP-1 Augusta County Virginia Department of Augusta Improvements to entrance/exit 144.0 3.2 miles Completed in Fall 2015 Past
Interstate 64, Exit 91 Transportation ramps, expanding lanes near northeast
Improvements and Route intersection, bridge widening
285 (Tinkling Spring
Road)
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Intersection improvement 144.0 2.5 miles Completed in December Past
608 (Tinkling Springs Transportation project northeast 2015
Road)
AP-1 Augusta County Route Virginia Department of Augusta Half-mile-long road widening 146.5 0.5 mile Anticipated in 2017 and Present
610 Improvements Transportation southeast 2018
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Route 29 Shoulder Virginia Department of Nelson Shoulder widening at various 169.0 0.7 mile Anticipated April to Past
Widening, Nelson County Transportation locations from intersection with southwest December 2015; status
Highway 6 (River Road) to the unknown
north at the Albemarle County
border.
AP-1 Route 623 (Stagebridge Virginia Department of Nelson Bridge replacement 170.7 1.1 miles Completed in September Past
Road) Bridge Transportation northeast 2014
Superstructure
Replacement over
Rockfish River
AP-1 Route 20 (Constitution Virginia Department of Buckingham Intersection improvement 198.1 5.6 miles In progress; status Past
Route) Transportation northeast unknown
AP-1 Route 20 over Slate River Virginia Department of Buckingham Bridge replacement 198.1 8.7 miles In progress; anticipated Present
Transportation northeast completion in 2017
AP-1 Route 460 Bridge Virginia Department of Nottoway Bridge replacement 245.2 1.7 miles south In progress; anticipated Present
W-8

Replacement Transportation completion in Summer

2017
AP-1 Route 708 (Namozine Virginia Department of Dinwiddie Bridge replacement 251.5 14.4 miles east Anticipated in Fall 2017 Present
Road) Bridge Transportation
Replacement
AP-1 Route 600/226 Virginia Department of Dinwiddie Two existing intersections will 255.7 22.5 miles In progress; estimated Past
Roundabout and Route Transportation be replaced with roundabouts northeast completion in Winter 2016
1/226 Improvements
AP-1 Route 633 Improvements Virginia Department of Greensville Pavement replacement along 291.0 2.2 miles Completed in August 2012 Past
Transportation 1.5 miles southwest
AP-2 U.S. 158 Widening North Carolina Halifax Widening of U.S. 158 from the 8.2 Crosses In development RFFA
Project Department of Interstate-95/North Carolina 46
Transportation interchange west of Garysburg
to the Murfreesboro Bypass
AP-2 U.S. 70 Corridor North Carolina Johnston Raleigh to Morehead City 92.2 Crosses In development RFFA
Department of major road expansion from
Transportation U.S. Highway to Interstate
Highway
AP-2 Fayetteville Outer Loop North Carolina Cumberland New road construction and 133.0 6.3 miles west In progress 2016 through Present
Department of existing road improvements 2020
Transportation
AP-2 I-95 Diverging Diamond North Carolina Robeson Intersection improvement 178.0 9.2 miles south- In progress anticipated Past
Interchange in Lumberton Department of project southeast completion in Spring 2016;
Transportation status unknown
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-2 Complete 540 North Carolina Johnston Completion of Highway 540 toll Unknown Unknown Anticipated Spring 2018 to Present
Department of road Spring 2022
Transportation
AP-3 Route 659 Bridge Over Virginia Department of Southampton Bridge replacement 17.0 1.0 mile north In progress; anticipated Past
Flat Swamp Creek Transportation completion in Winter 2016
AP-3 Route 35 Bridge Virginia Department of Southampton Bridge replacement 19.0 0.9 mile Anticipated in July 2016 Past
Replacement over Transportation southeast
Tarrara Creek
AP-3 Route 671 over Nottoway Virginia Department of Southampton Replacement of two major 33.0 1.4 miles Anticipated Summer 2019 Present
River Transportation bridges northwest to Summer 2021
AP-3 Route 671 Widening Virginia Department of Southampton Widening from two to five 33.0 1.3 miles north- Completed in September Past
Transportation lanes between Delaware and northwest 2013
Shady Brooke Roads
AP-3 General Thomas Virginia Department of Southampton Road widening to 34.0 0.5 mile north In progress through 2017 Present
Highway and Rose Valley Transportation accommodate increased truck or 2018
W-9

Road widening traffic

AP-3 Route 58/Holland Road Virginia Department of Suffolk Widening two-lane road to five 57.3 4.1 miles south Anticipated in Summer RFFA
Improvements Transportation lanes, with bike lanes 2021
AP-3 Route 460 Project in Virginia Department of Suffolk Widening two-lane road to four 59.0 Crosses Anticipated; schedule RFFA
Southeast Virginia Transportation lanes unknown
AP-3 I-64 High Rise Bridge Virginia Department of Chesapeake Bridge repair and deck 80.7 0.9 mile Anticipated Summer 2016 Past
Waterproof and Repair Transportation replacement southeast
Deck
AP-3 Gilmerton Bridge Virginia Department of Chesapeake Bridge replacement 81.9 <0.1 mile north Completed in 2015 Past
Replacement Transportation
AP-3 Dominion Boulevard Virginia Department of Chesapeake Widening two-lane highway to 82.6 1.4 miles In progress; estimated Present
Improvements Transportation four lanes southeast completion in April 2017
Electric Generation and Transmission Projects
AP-1 Oak Mound Waldo Run Trans-Allegheny Harrison A new 18-mile-long 138 kV 8.6 9.7 miles Anticipated completion in Past
138 kV Transmission Interstate Line Company transmission line northeast December 2015; status
Project (TrAILCo), a FirstEnergy unknown
Company
AP-1 Buckhannon Glen Falls Trans-Allegheny Harrison, Lewis New 138 kV transmission line 8.6 5.1 miles Anticipated completion in Past
138kV Transmission Interstate Line Company northeast December 2015; status
Project (TrAILCo), a FirstEnergy unknown
Company
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Dooms Lexington Dominion Augusta Replacement of original 500 142.8 Crosses Completed in December Past
Transmission Line kV lattice-style transmission 2015
Rebuild Project towers with new, galvanized
steel towers between
Lexington and Dooms
AP-1 Brunswick Power Line Dominion Virginia Power Brunswick 13.5 miles of 500 kV electric 267.1 - 279.1 Adjacent In progress; estimated Past
transmission line completion by Summer
2016
AP-2 Rocky Mount Wilson Duke Energy Nash Construction of electric 60.0 10.0 miles east In progress Fall 2014 Past
Transmission Line Elm transmission tap through Spring 2016
City Solar Facility
AP-2 Wilson Zebulon 230 kV Duke Energy Wilson Line rebuild 65.0 12.4 miles west Completed in Summer Past
Line 2015
AP-2 Greenville Zebulon Duke Energy Wilson Line relocation 70.0 11.7 miles east Completed in Spring 2015 Past
230 kV Line Relocation
W-10

AP-2 Black Creek-Wilson Line Duke Energy Wilson Install new line switch 70.0 8.8 miles east Anticipated Winter 2016 Present
Switch through Summer 2017
AP-2 Lee-Selma 115 kV Line Duke Energy Johnston Line relocation 95.0 4.3 miles east Anticipated Spring 2016 Present
through Summer 2017
AP-2 Erwin-Selma 230 kV Line Duke Energy Johnston Line replacement 103.0 9.5 miles west Anticipated Summer 2015 Past
through Winter 2016
AP-2 Clinton-Erwin 230 kV Line Duke Energy Sampson Line replacement 117.0 3.9 miles In progress Summer Past
northwest 2014 through Spring 2016;
status unknown
AP-2 Fort Bragg Woodruff Duke Energy Cumberland Install reconductor line 134.0 12.8 miles west In progress Fall 2014 Present
Manchester through Spring 2017
AP-2 Erwin-Fayetteville 115 kV Duke Energy Cumberland Relocate structures for North 142.0 7.7 miles Completed in Spring 2015 Past
Change and Relocate Carolina Department of northwest
Transportation project
AP-2 Fayetteville Vander 115 Duke Energy Cumberland Install new tap line 142.0 2.7 miles west In progress Summer Past
kV Line Tap to Vander 2014 through Spring 2016;
status unknown
AP-2 Fayetteville Dupont 115 Duke Energy Cumberland Install new tap line 142.0 6.8 miles west In progress Winter 2014 Past
kV Line Cumberland through Spring 2016;
Solar status unknown
AP-2 Fayetteville Dupont 115 Duke Energy Cumberland Install new tap line 142.0 6.8 miles west Completed in Summer Past
kV Line Grays Creek 2015
Tap
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-2 Fayetteville Dupont 115 Duke Energy Cumberland Install line switches 142.0 6.8 miles west In progress Winter 2014 Past
kV Line Line Switches through Winter 2016
AP-2 Weatherspoon Plant Duke Energy Robeson Install tap for solar facility 167.0 2.8 miles In progress Fall 2014 Past
Fayetteville Solar Farm southeast through Spring 2016;
Tap status unknown
AP-2 Weatherspoon Plant Duke Energy Robeson Install tap for solar facility 167.0 2.3 miles In progress Fall 2014 Past
Solar Tap southeast through Summer 2016
AP-2 Weatherspoon Plant Duke Energy Robeson Replace existing structures 170.0 10.6 miles south Anticipated Winter 2016 Present
LOF 115 kV Structure through Spring 2017
Replace
AP-2 Weatherspoon- Raeford Duke Energy Robeson Line relocation 170.0 11.6 miles In progress Summer Present
230 kV Line Relocate northwest 2015 through Fall 2018
AP-2 Weatherspoon- Raeford Duke Energy Robeson Line replacement 170.0 Crosses In progress Summer Present
230 kV Line Replacement 2015 through Spring 2017
W-11

AP-2 Weatherspoon LOF 115 Duke Energy Robeson Convert to remote control 180.0 3.2 miles south Complete Spring 2014 Past
kV through Fall 2015
U.S. Forest Service Projects b
AP-1 Upper Greenbrier North U.S. Forest Pocahontas Timber stand improvement 85.8 11.4 miles north Decision Notice/Finding of Past
Project Service/Monongahela (including mechanical and No Significant Impact No. 4
National Forest (MNF) chemical methods), timber issued in May 2015;
harvest and prescribed fire components of this project
areas, road decommissioning, currently in various stages
riparian restoration, and of implementation
recreational trail
improvements/expansions at
various locations throughout
the Upper Greenbrier River
Watershed
AP-1 Re-issuance of Forest- U.S. Forest Pocahontas Authorization for a new 10- Forestwide; see Forestwide; see Scoping Start RFFA
wide Outfitter and Guide Service/MNF year permit for commercial table 4.8.9-1 table 4.8.9-1 10/2016; Decision
Permit for Snowshoe guiding for backpacking, Expected: 12/2016;
Resort Management hiking, mountain biking, Implementation Expected:
Categorical Exclusion snowshoeing, Nordic skiing, 01/2017
(CE) and fishing on various parts of
the MNF.
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Wildlife Openings U.S. Forest Pocahontas Maintenance of wildlife Forestwide; see Forestwide; see On hold RFFA
Environmental Service/MNF openings across the Forest table 4.8.9-1 table 4.8.9-1
Assessment (EA) through mowing, prescribed
fire, herbicide, and other
treatments, and will include
long-term strategies for
determining, prioritizing, and
treating existing and new
areas.
AP-1 Columbia Gas Road U.S. Forest Pocahontas Columbia Gas Transmission, 73 - 83 Varies b In Progress. Scoping Start Past
Right-of-Way Special Use Service/MNF LLC has applied for an 09/14/2016; Decision
Permit (Amendment 1) amendment (#1) to an existing Expected: 10/2016;
CE permit for an access road not Implementation Expected:
currently authorized. This 10/2016
access road already exists on
the ground and needs
W-12

maintenance, which would be

addressed if appropriate.
AP-1 West Fork of Greenbrier U.S. Forest Pocahontas Grant the West Virginia State 73 - 83 Varies b On hold RFFA
Rail With Trail Service/MNF Rail Authority a long-term
Development EA easement and authorization to
return 27.2 miles of railroad
right-of-way to active railroad
status, and construct a parallel
21-mile trail segment.
AP-1 Forestwide Maintenance U.S. Forest Highland, Bath, Open maintenance of 14,000 Forestwide; see Forestwide; see In Progress. Comment RFFA
of Open and Semi Open Service/George Augusta acres of permanent grass and table 4.8.9-1 table 4.8.9-1 Period 10/03/2016;
Lands, Roadside Washington National shrublands, 59,000 acres of Decision Expected:
Corridors, and Utility Forest (GWNF) road corridors, and 6,500 02/2017; Implementation
Rights-of-Way EA acres of existing gas and Expected: 02/2017
power line utility rights-of-way
across the entire Forest
AP-1 Campground Concession U.S. Forest Bath The Lake Moomaw Recreation 93 106 Varies b Developing Proposal. Est. RFFA
Special Use Authorization Service/GWNF Areas concessionaire special Scoping Start: 06/2016;
(Re-Issue) CE use authorization will expire Decision Expected:
12/31/16. A prospectus for 10/2016; Implementation
concession-operated Expected 01/2017
campgrounds, day use areas,
and marina areas will be
issued for reissuance of these
special use permits.
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Loves Run Yellow Pine U.S. Forest Augusta Use prescribed fire and 112 123; 155 Varies b Developing Proposal. Est. RFFA
Restoration Project CE Service/GWNF mechanical treatments to Scoping Start: 10/2016;
promote the restoration of Decision Expected:
Short Leaf and Pitch Pine 03/2017; Implementation
species within a 266 acre Expected: 05/2017
(approximate) project area.
AP-1 Elkhorn Rx CE U.S. Forest Bath Prescribed burn on the 1,100 93 106 Varies b On hold RFFA
Service/GWNF acre Elkhorn burn unit.
AP-1 Hearthstone Dam U.S. Forest Augusta Rehabilitation to bring the dam 112 123; 155 Varies b Developing Proposal. Est. RFFA
Rehabilitation EA Service/GWNF into State of Virginia Comment Period: 10/2016;
compliance standards Decision Expected:
02/2017; Implementation
Expected: 02/2017
AP-1 South Archer Project EA U.S. Forest Augusta Several hundred acres of 112 123; 155 Varies b In Progress. Scoping RFFA
Service/GWNF thinning and regeneration Start: 08/03/2015; Est.
W-13

treatments to improve wildlife Comment Period: 01/2016;

habitat. Decision Expected:
12/2016; Implementation
Expected: 01/2017
AP-1 Verizon Virginia Fiber U.S. Forest Augusta Installation of Fiber Optic Line 112 123; 155 Varies b Developing Proposal. Est. Past
Optic Line CE Service/GWNF in existing utility corridor. Scoping Start: 10/2016;
Decision Expected:
10/2016; Implementation
Expected: 10/2016
AP-1 Wallace and Marshall U.S. Forest Bath Rx burn about 276 acres on 93 106 Varies b In Progress. Scoping Past
Tracts Prescribed Burns Service/GWNF the Wallace Tract and 56 Start: 01/12/2015; Decision
CE acres on the Marshall Tract for Expected: 10/2015;
wildlife habitat improvement Implementation Expected:
and convert areas from cool 01/2016
season grasses to warm
season grasses.
AP-1 Border Restoration U.S. Forest Bath Prescribe burn 31,475 acres 93 106 Varies b On hold RFAA
Project CE Service/GWNF within 23 areas on National
Forest and VDGIF property as
part of the Appalachian Fire
Learning Network.
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
AP-1 Fiber Optic Line on Warm U.S. Forest Bath Bury approximately 12,000 93 106 Varies b Developing Proposal. Est. Past
Spring Mountain CE Service/GWNF feet of fiber optic cable in an Scoping Start: 07/2016;
existing utility corridor. Decision Expected:
09/2016; Implementation
Expected: 09/2016
AP-1 Hidden Valley U.S. Forest Bath Upgrade Hidden Valley 93 106 Varies b On hold RFAA
Campground Host Site Service/GWNF Campground host with an
Improvements CE electrical hookup.
AP-1 Lockridge Cross Region U.S. Forest Bath Prescribe fire is proposed for 93 106 Varies b In Progress. Scoping RFFA
Collaborative Prescribe Service/GWNF multiple burn units totaling an Start: 10/13/2016; Decision
Burn Project CE estimated 12 acres in Expected: 12/2016;
conjunction with a 1,239 acres Implementation Expected:
prescribe burn on the 04/2017
Marlinton RD of the MNF in
Region 9. This will be part of
W-14

the Fire Learning Network.

AP-1 Paddy Knob Early U.S. Forest Bath Create early successional 93 106 Varies b On hold RFAA
Successional Habitat CE Service/GWNF habitat in the vicinity of Paddy
Knob.
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
FERC-Jurisdictional Projects
TL-635 Mountain Valley Pipeline EQT Midstream Harrison, See section 4.13.2.2 0.7 Crosses Anticipated in-service Present
Project Partners, LP Doddridge, December 2018
Wetzel, Tyler,
TL-635 Rover Pipeline Project Rover Pipeline LLC Doddridge, See section 4.13.2.2 11.7 - 11.9 Adjacent Anticipated in-service date Present
Tyler in 2017
TL-635 Clarington Project Dominion Transmission, Marshall See section 4.13.2.2 Burch Ridge Burch Ridge Anticipated completion in Past
Inc. Compressor Compressor December 2016
Station Station
TL-635 Monroe to Cornwell Dominion Transmission, Doddridge, See section 4.13.2.2 Mockingbird Hill Mockingbird Hill Anticipated in-service late Past
Project Inc. Wetzel Compressor Compressor 2016
Station Station
TL-636 Texas Eastern Texas Eastern Westmoreland See section 4.13.2.2 0.0 3.5 miles Completed in 2014 Past
Appalachia Market 2014 Transmission, LP southeast of TL-
Project 636; 7.6 miles
southeast of the
JB Tonkin
Compressor
Station
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
TL-635 Mountaineer Xpress Columbia Gas Doddridge, See section 4.13.2.2 10.0 1 mile west Anticipated to start in Present
Project Transmission, LLC Wetzel November 2017; in-service
November 2018
TL-636 Natrium to Market Project Dominion Transmission, Greene, See section 4.13.2.2 Crayne Crayne Completed 2014 Past
Inc. Westmoreland Compressor Compressor
Station; JB Station; JB
Tonkin Tonkin
Compressor Compressor
Station Station
TL-635 Leach Xpress Project and Columbia Gas Greene, See section 4.13.2.2 33.5 15 miles Anticipated November
Rayne Xpress Expansion Transmission, LLC and Marshall northeast 2016 through November
Project Columbia Gulf 2017
Transmission, LLC
Nonjurisdictional Projects
TL-635 Hastings Compressor Dominion Transmission, Wetzel Replace existing gathering Mockingbird Hill 1.0 mile west of Proposed RFFA
W-15

Station Inc. compressor units Compressor Mockingbird Hill

Station Compressor
Station
Commercial, Industrial, and Municipal Developments
TL-635 Hundred Littleton Public Wetzel County Wetzel Extension of water service to 32.5 13.0 miles Construction schedule RFFA
Service District Extension Commission areas in the Hundred Littleton northeast unknown
Public Service District that
currently rely on private wells
and cisterns
TL-635 Pine Grove Sewage Town of Pine Grove Wetzel Improvements to the Town of Mockingbird Hill 1.2 miles north- Construction schedule RFFA
Collector Project Pine Grove sewage collection Compressor northwest unknown
system Station
Transportation Projects
TL-636 Jeannette to Amos K. Pennsylvania Westmoreland Road expansion project 3.8 6.7 miles Completed in 2013 or 2014 Past
Bypass Department of northeast
Transportation
TL-636 PA 66 Beaver Run to 356 Pennsylvania Westmoreland Road resurfacing and widening JB Tonkin 5.3 miles Completed in 2014 Past
Department of Compressor northeast
Transportation Station
Electric Generation and Transmission Projects
 TABLE W-1 (contd)

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions within the Geographic Scope of Influence for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Approx.
Nearest Approx. Distance and Past,
Project/ Common Milepost or Direction from Present, or
Facility Project Name Proponent Counties/Cities Description Facility Project Status RFFA a
TL-635 Buckhannon Glen Falls Trans-Allegheny Harrison New 138 kV transmission line 0.0 8.5 miles east Anticipated completion in Past
138kV Transmission Interstate Line Company from West Milford Substation December 2015; status
Project (TrAILCo), a FirstEnergy to existing Buckhannon to unknown
Company Glen Falls 138 KV
transmission line
TL-635 Oak Mound Waldo Run Trans-Allegheny Harrison, An 18-mile-long 138 kV 11.8 Crosses Anticipated completion in Past
138 kV Transmission Interstate Line Company Doddridge transmission line from the December 2015; status
Project (TrAILCo), a FirstEnergy existing Oak Mound unknown
company Substation, located in the
Clark District of Harrison
County and the Waldo Run
Substation
________________________
a
Past, Present, or Reasonably Foreseeable Future Action (RFFA) classification is based on the projects construction schedule in relation to Atlantics and DTIs currently proposed
schedules.
W-16

b
Additional information about each project can be found at: http://www.fs.fed.us/sopa/forest-level.php?110921 for the MNF and at http://www.fs.fed.us/sopa/forest-level.php?110808
for the GWNF.
FIGURE W-1 POTENTIAL EFFECT ZONE FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

 Penn sylvania

West
Virg inia

Virg inia
Kiskiminetas
North Carolina
"
) "
) River

JB Tonkin

,
%
0
(
!
Turtle Creek
"
)

AQCR: 197

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
Crayne
South Fork
Tenmile Creek ,
%
"
)

4
(
! Milep ost Nearby Project Type SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4 Figure W-1 0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" FE RC-Ju risdictio nal ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project

AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty
Contro l Regi on
)
" Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)

Map 1 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-17
 Penn sylvania South Fork
Tenmile Creek

West AQCR: 181

Virg inia AQCR: 197
Virg inia

Burch Ridge
North Carolina

"
) )
"
,
%
)
"

French
Creek-Ohio
River

AQCR: 179
"
)
Fishing Creek
" )
) ",
%
Mockingbird
Hill
Outlet Middle
Island Creek 25
(
!

McElroy Creek

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
"
)
North )
"
Fork Hughes
River
Headwaters
Middle Island
Creek
Kincheloe Compressor
M&R Station Station 1
0" 0
")
)
"
)
(
!
")
"
)
)"
Middle
#
0
,
%
"
) West Fork
River
"
)

CNX M&R Site

AQCR: 232
"
)
Buckhannon
25 River
"
)
Upper
West Fork (
!
River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
)
" %
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 2 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-18
 "
)

Penn sylvania

"
) AQCR: 232 West
Virg inia
Upper
West Fork Middle Virg inia

River Tygart
Valley River North Carolina

Middle
Buckhannon Fork River
River

#
0
)
"
Long Run
50 M&R Site
(
!

)
"
Upper Tygart
Valley River

Upper Elk
River

"
)

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
75
(
!

Sitlington
Creek-Greenbrier "
)
River Upper
Upper Cowpasture
Back Jackson River
Creek-Middle River
Jackson River

Knapp Creek

100
(
!
"
) Middle
Cowpasture
River

Calfpasture
River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 3 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-19
Upper
Jackson
River Penn sylvania

West
Upper Virg inia
Cowpasture
River Virg inia
)
" )
" 125
)
" (
! North Carolina

)
" )
"
Lower
)
"
))
" " Middle
Upper River
Middle )
"
Middle River
Cowpasture
River Calfpasture
River

Christians South River

(
! Creek )
"
)
" )
"
)
"
)
"

"
) )
"
)
"
150)
" (
!

"
) Upper
"
) Rockfish
River

)
" )
"

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
175 Lower
(
!
Rockfish
River

Lower
Tye
River

David
Creek-James
River
%
,
)
"

Upper
Compressor Slate
"
)
Station 2 River

AQCR: 222 200

(
!

Upper
Vaughans Willis
Creek-Appomattox River
River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 4 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-20
 Penn sylvania

)
" West

,
% Virg inia

Upper Virg inia

Slate
)
"
River North Carolina

AQCR: 222

(
! Upper
Willis
River

Big Guinea
Creek-Appomattox
River
Flat Creek
Vaughans
Creek-Appomattox
River

225
()
! "

Deep Creek

"
) 250
(
! Butterwood "
)
)
" Creek-Stony
Creek

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
"
)

Tommeheton
Creek-Nottoway
River

Sturgeon
Creek-Nottoway
River

)
"
275
(
!
Brunswick
M&R Site
0 Three Creek

Reedy
#
0 (
!
Creek-Meherrin 0"
River
)
(
!
Greensville
#
0
"
) "
)

Fontaine
M&R Site Creek

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 5 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-21
 Sturgeon
Creek-Nottoway Penn sylvania

River
)
"
West
275 Virg inia
(
!
Virg inia
Brunswick
M&R Site North CarolinaKingsale
Swamp-Blackwater
0 Three Creek
River
#
0!(
0)
"
(
!
Greensville
#
0
"
)"
)

Reedy Mill
M&R Site Creek-Meherrin Creek-Nottoway
River River ")
)" )
"
25
(
!
)
"
)
"
Fontaine )
"
Creek
Somerton
0 Tarrara Creek
%
,
(
!
"
) Creek-Meherrin
River
Compressor
Station 3

)
"
Quankey
AQCR: 166
"
)
Creek-Roanoke
River

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
Beech Swamp

25
(
!

Middle
Fishing
Creek

Swift Creek

Stony
Creek Tar River
Reservoir-Tar River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 6 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-22
 Middle Fishing
Creek
Penn sylvania
Swift Creek

West
Virg inia
Stony Creek
Virg inia

North Carolina

50
)!
" (

Tar River
Reservoir-Tar
River

"
)

Buckhorn
Upper Reservoir "
)
Little
River )
"
Wiggins Mill
"
)
"
)
Reservoir-Contentnea "
) "
)
Creek

Toisnot Swamp
75
(
!

Lower
Smithfield

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
Little
M&R Site River

#
0)")"
)
"

Moccasin
100 Creek-Neuse
(
!
River

"
)

Mill Creek

Upper
South
River
"
)

Cross (
!
Creek-Cape
Fear River

"
)
#
0)"
4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 7 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-23
 )
"
Penn sylvania

West
Virg inia
Mill Creek

Virg inia )
"
North Carolina

125
(
! Upper
Fayetteville South
River
M&R Site
"
)
"
) Cross
Creek-Cape
#
0)"
Fear River

)
"

)
" )
"

150
(
! Lower
South
Harrison River
Creek-Cape
Gallberry Fear River
Swamp

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
Raft Swamp )
"
)
"
"
) )
"
)
"
Pembroke 175
M&R Site (
!
Upper
#
0
"
) Big Swamp

Bear )"
Swamp-Lumber
River
)
"
Saddletree
Swamp-Lumber
"
) River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 8 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-24
 Penn sylvania

West
Virg inia

Virg inia

North Carolina

Elizabeth
River
M&R Site
Elizabeth
Nansemond River
River )
"
)
"
75 ")
) " )
"
")
)
"
" )
) #
0
"")
)
" (
! )
")" )
"
)
"

)
"
Kingsale )
"
Swamp-Blackwater
River 50
(
!

")
)" )
"
Dismal Swamp
Canal-Lake

Source: Z:\Clients\A_D\Dominion\Atlantic_Coast\ArcGIS\2016\08\PADEIS\Figures\MXDs\Figure_W-1_AQCR.mxd
Somerton
Drummond
Creek

Mill
Creek-Nottoway
River

Tarrara
Creek-Meherrin
River

4
Nearby Project Type
(
! Milep ost SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 5)

Figure W-1
)
" Comm/Ind/Mu n SHP P rop osed Ro ute (TL -63 6)
%
, Compr essor S ta tion
"
) Ele ctri c Tran sm issi on ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 1)

0 2 4
0
# M a nd R Sta tio n
)
" ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 2)

Potential Effect Zone for Cumulative Impacts

FE RC-Ju risdictio nal
Date: (12/6/2016)

Wa te rshe d Bo un dar y ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 3)

Miles (HUC 10) "
) Nonj urisd icti ona l
ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 4)

Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project )

"
AQ CR = A ir Qu ali ty Reside ntial ACP P rop osed Ro ute (A P- 5)
Contro l Regi on

Map 9 of 9
)
" Tra nspo rtation

For Environmental Review Purposes Only

)
" USFS

W-25
APPENDIX X

REFERENCES
 Appendix X

References

Allen, T.J. and R.E. Acciavatti. 2002. Tiger Beetles of West Virginia. WVDNR, Wildlife Resources
Section, Elkins, WV. Available online at:
http://www.wvdnr.gov/Publications/PDFFiles/tigerbeetlebrochure.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Allen, Williford & Seale, Inc. 2014. Pipeline Impact Study: Study of a Williams Natural Gas Pipeline on
Residential Real Estate: Saddle Ridge Subdivision, Dallas Township, Luzerne County,
Pennsylvania.

American Discovery Trail. 2016. ADT Background. Available online at

http://www.discoverytrail.org/about/background.html. Accessed December 2016.

Anderson, M.G., M. Clark, C.E. Ferree, A. Jospe, A. Olivero Sheldon, and K.J. Weaver. 2013. Northeast
Habitat Guides: A companion to the terrestrial and aquatic habitat maps. Nature Conservancy,
Eastern Conservation Science, Eastern Regional Office. Boston, MA. Available online at:
http://easterndivision.s3.amazonaws.com/NortheastHabitatGuides.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Askins, R.A. 2000. Restoring North Americas Birds. Lessons from Landscape Ecology. Yale University
Press. 336 pages.

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2016. Atlantic Sturgeon. Available online at:
www.asmfc.org/species/atlantic-sturgeon. Accessed December 2016.

Appalachian Trail Conservancy. 2009. Appalachian Trail Conservancys Local Management Planning
Guide. April 2009. Available online at: http://www.appalachiantrail.org/docs/local-management-
planning-guide/2009-local-management-planning-guide.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Appalachian Trail Conservancy. 2014. Appalachian Trail Conservancy Strategic Plan. August 2014.
Available online at: https://www.appalachiantrail.org/docs/default-document-library/strategic-
plan---final-august-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed December 2016.

Appalachian Trail Conservancy. 2015. Policy on Pipeline Crossings of the Appalachian Trail. Available
online at: https://www.appalachiantrail.org/docs/default-source/trail-management-
policies/pipeline-crossings-2015.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed December 2016.

Appalachian Trail Conservancy. 2016. Local Management Planning. Available online at

http://www.appalachiantrail.org/home/volunteer/toolkit-for-trail-clubs/local-management-
planning. Accessed December 2016.

Bailey, C.M. 2000. Major Faults and High-strain Zones in Virginia The Geology of Virginia. College of
William and Mary.

Barber, J.R., K.R. Crooks, and K.M. Fristrup. 2009. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial
organisms. Cell Press. 15 September 2009. Available online at:
http://www.soundandlightecologyteam.colostate.edu/pdf/trendsecologyevolution2010.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Bath County. 2014. Bath County, Virginia Comprehensive Plan. Adopted December 9, 2014. Available
online at: http://www.bathcountyva.org/assets/Bath_County_Comp_Plan_2014-
2019_ADOPTED_1.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-1
Berg, T.M., Geyer, W.E., and others, compilers. 1980. Geologic Map of Pennsylvania (2nd Edition):
Pennsylvania Geological Survey. 4th Series. Map 1. 3 sheets. Scale 1:250,000. Available online:
http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/publications/pgspub/map/map1/index.htm. Accessed
December 2016.

Birchard, W. Jr., and R.D. Proudman. 2000. Appalachian Trail Design, Construction, and Maintenance.
2nd ed. Harpers Ferry, WV: Appalachian Trail Conference: ISBN 1-917953-72-X. 237p.

Blickley, J.L., D. Blackwood, and G.L. Patricelli. 2012. Experimental Evidence for the Effects of Chronic
Anthropogenic Noise on Abundance of Greater Sage-Grouse at Leks. Conservation Biology 26,
461-471.

Brack, V. Jr. and LaVal, R.K. 2006. Diet of the Gray Myotis (Myotis grisescens): variability and
consistency, opportunism, and selectivity. Journal of Mammalogy. 87 (1): 718.

Braswell, A., Hammerson.G. 2004. Necturus lewisi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004:
e.T59432A11940982. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T59432A11940982.en.
Accessed December 2016.

Brooks, S., and A. J. Boulton. 1991. Recolonization dynamics of benthic invertebrates after artificial and
natural disturbances in an Australian temporary stream. Australian Journal of Marine and
Freshwater Research 42:295308. Available online at www.ephemeroptera-
galactica.com/pubs/pub_b/pubbrookss1991p295.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Blue Ridge Parkway. 2003. Blue Ridge Parkway Environmental Assessment Information Guide for
Right-of-Ways. August 2003.

Blue Ridge Parkway. 2016. About Blue Ridge Parkway. Available online at
http://www.blueridgeparkway.org/v.php?pg=8. Accessed December 2016.

BugGuide. 2016. Identification, Images, & Information for Insects, Spiders, & Their Kin for the United
States & Canada. Hosted by the University of Iowa, Department of Entomology. Available online
at: http://bugguide.net/node/view/15740. Accessed December 2016.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014a. Unemployment Rates for States, Annual Average Rankings, 2014.
U.S. Department of Labor. Available online at http://www.bls.gov/lau/lastrk14.htm. Accessed
December 2016.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014b. Labor Force Data by County, 2014 Annual Averages. U.S. Department
of Labor. Available online at http://www.bls.gov/lau/laucnty14.txt. Accessed December 2016.

Bureau of Labor and Statistics. 2016. CPI Inflation Calculator. U.S. Department of Labor. Available
at: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed December 2016.

Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture. 2016. University of Washington Herbarium (WTU)
Image Collection: Plants and Lichens of Washington. Database available online at:
http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php. Accessed December 2016.

Burns, A. 2007. Comparison of two electrofishing gears (backpack and parallel wires) and abundances of
fishes of the upper Greenbrier River drainage. Masters Thesis. West Virginia University,

X-2
 Morgantown, WV. Available online at:
http://www.wvuforestry.com/sWelsh/Burns_Angela_thesis.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Byers, E.A. 2010. Natural communities of the central Appalachian red spruce ecosystem and their
conservation significance. In: Rentch, J. S.; Thomas M. Schuler, eds. 2010. Proceedings from the
conference on the ecology and management of high-elevation forests in the central and southern
Appalachian Mountains. 2009 May 14-15; Slatyfork, WV. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-64. Newtown
Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 206.
Available online at: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/land-conservation/tools02c. Accessed December
2016.

Carduner, J. 2016. Telephone communication on June 27, 2016, between T. Brunner (ERM) and J.
Carduner (NOAA Office of Protected Resources).

Cardwell, D.H., Erwin, R.B., and Woodward, H.P. 1968. Geologic Map of West Virginia. West Virginia
Geological and Economic Survey. MAP-1. 3 sheets. Scale 1:250,000.

Carlson, T., G. Johnson, C. Woodley, J. Skalski, and A. Seaburg. 2011. Compliance monitoring of
underwater blasting for rock removal at Warrior Point, Columbia River Channel Improvement
Project 2009/2010. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Completion Report (PNNL-20388).
Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

CarolinaFirePage.com. 2015. North Carolina Fire Station Lists by County. Available online at
http://www.carolinasfirepage.com/members/nc_ctys.html. Accessed December 2016.

Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). 2010. Petition To List 404 Aquatic, Riparian and Wetland Species
From the Southeastern United States as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species
Act. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/candidateconservation/pdf/Petition_404Aquatic.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. 2016. Invasive Plants of the Thirteen Southern States.
Available online at: http://www.invasive.org/south/seweeds.cfm. Accessed December 2016.

Council on Environmental Quality. 1980. Procedures for Interagency Consultation to Avoid or Mitigate
Adverse Effects on Rivers in the Nationwide Inventory. Available online at
http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/procedures-interagency-consultation-avoid-or-mitigate-
adverse-effects-rivers. Accessed December 2016.

Council on Environmental Quality. 1997a. Environmental Justice Guidance Under the National
Environmental Policy Act. December 10, 1997. Accessed online at:
http://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/G-CEQ-
EJGuidance.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Council on Environmental Quality. 1997b. Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National
Environmental Policy Act. January 1997. Available online at:
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/G-CEQ-
ConsidCumulEffects.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Council on Environmental Quality. 2005. Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in the
Cumulative Effects Analysis. Available online at:

X-3
 http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/G-CEQ-
PastActsCumulEffects.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Chipps, S.R., Perry, W.B. and Perry, S.A. 1993. Status and distribution of Phenacobius teretulus,
Etheostoma osburni, and Rhinichthys bowersi in the Monongahela National Forest, West
Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science 44(1): 47-58. Available online at:
http://www.vacadsci.org/vjsArchives/V44/44-1/44-47.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Chmura Economics & Analytics. 2014. The Economic Impact of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in West
Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina.

Civil War Trust. 2016. Averasborough. Available online at

http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/averasborough.html. Accessed December 2016.

Clark, G.M. 1987. Debris slide and debris flow historical events in the Appalachians south of the glacial
border in J.E. Costa and G.F. Wieczorek, (eds), Debris Flows/Avalanches: Process, Recognition
and Mitigation: Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, Vol. VII, p.
125-138.

Clayton, J.L., B. Douglas, and P. Morrison. 2016. West Virginia Mussel Survey Protocols. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. April 2016. Available
online at:
http://www.wvdnr.gov/Mussels/West%20Virginia%20Mussel%20Survey%20Protocols%20APR
2016.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2016a. Bird Guide: Red-cockaded woodpecker. Available online at:
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Red-cockaded_Woodpecker/id. Accessed December 2016.

Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2016b. Northern Saw-whet Owl. Available online at:
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Northern_Saw-whet_Owl/lifehistory. Accessed December
2016.

Collins, T. K. (2008). Debris flows caused by failure of fill slopes: Early detection, warning, and loss
prevention. Landslides, 5, 107119. Available online at:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10346-007-0107-y. Accessed December 2016.

Commonwealth of Virginia. 1999. Report of the Joint Subcommittee Studying Agricultural /Forestal
Districts to the Governor and General Assembly of Virginia; House Document No. 3.

Cormier, S.A. 1989. The Siege of Suffolk: The Forgotten Campaign, April 11May 4, 1863. H. E.
Howard.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 79/31.
Washington DC.

Crabtree, A.F. 1984. Resolving Conflicts between two Natural Resource User Groups: Pipeline Rights-
of-Way and Off-Road Vehicles. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on
Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management. Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, Mississippi: 472-487.

X-4
Crone, A.J., and Wheeler, R.I. 2000. Data for Quaternary faults, liquefaction features, and possible
tectonic features in the Central and Eastern United States, east of the Rocky Mountain Front.
U.G. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-260. Accessed online:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/ofr-00-0260/ofr-00-0260.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Cummings, K. and J. Cordeiro. 2012. Lasmigona subvirdis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2012: e.T11361A502725. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS.T11361A502725.en.
Accessed December 2016.

Dean Runyan and Associates. 2012. Economic Impact of Travel on West Virginia. Available online at
http://www.wvcommerce.org/App_Media/assets/doc/travelandrec/industry/marketing/2012_Econ
omic_Impact.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Diskin, Barry A, Jack P. Friedman, Sepero C. Peppas, and Stephanie R. Peppas. 2011. The Effect of
Natural Gas Pipelines on Residential Value. Available at:
http://pstrust.org/docs/web_jan_NaturalGas-1.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Eaton, L.S., Morgan, B. A., Kochel, R.C. and Howard A. D., 2003, Role of debris flows in long-term
landscape denudation in the central Appalachians of Virginia, Geology 2003;31;339-342.
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/31/4/339.short. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2016a. Natural Gas Summary for Virginia. Available online
at http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_SVA_a.htm. Accessed October 2016.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2016b. Natural Gas Summary for North Carolina. Available
online at http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_SNC_a.htm. Accessed October
2016.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2016c. Market Trends; Natural Gas. Available online at
http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/mt_naturalgas.cfm. Accessed October 2016.

Environmental Law Institute. 2008. State Wetland Protection: Status, Trends & Model Approaches.
https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/docs/core_states/North_Carolina.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Final Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice
Concerns in EPA's NEPA Compliance Analysis. April 1998. Available online at:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/ej-guidance-nepa-compliance-
analyses.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of
NEPA Documents. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-
08/documents/cumulative.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Environmental Justice Frequently Asked Questions.
Available at: https://compliancegov.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/sections/202370188. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Office of Environmental Information Facility Registry
System (EPA). EPA Facility Registry Public Map Service. Available online at http://geodata.epa.
gov/arcgis/rest/services/OEI/FRS_INTERESTS/MapServer. Accessed December 2016.

X-5
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Green Book: Access to Non-attainment Data. Available
online at https://www.epa.gov/green-book/green-book-national-area-and-county-level-multi-
pollutant-information. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016a. Sole Source Aquifers for Drinking Water. Available
online at: https://www.epa.gov/dwssa. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016b. National Ambient Air Quality Standards Table. Last
Updated September 2016. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-
table. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016c. National Land Cover Database. https://www.epa.gov/eco-
research/multiresolution-land-characteristics-mrlc-consortium. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016d. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:
1990-2014. April 15, 2016. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-
04/documents/us-ghg-inventory-2016-main-text.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016e. The Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing
Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, available online at
http://www2.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan/clean-power-plan-existing-power-plants#CPP-final
(pre-publication version). Accessed August 2016.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2006. Risk Management Series Designing for Earthquakes
A Manual for Architects. FEMA Document 454. December 2006. 394 p. Accessed at:
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1556-20490-5679/fema454_complete.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2016. National Flood Hazard Layer. Available online at
https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-hazard-layer-nfhl. Accessed December 2016.

Fenneman, N.M., and Johnson, D.W. 1946. Physiographic Divisions of the Conterminous United States.
U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA.

Fenneman, N.M. 1938. Physiography of Eastern United States. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 714
pp.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 2008. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
Midcontinent Express Pipeline Project. Docket CP 08-6-000. May 2008.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 2014. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
Constitution Pipeline and Wright Interconnect Projects. Docket CP13-499-000; CP13-502-000;
PF12-9-000. October 2014.

Federal Highway Administration. 2011. Construction Noise Handbook. FHWA-HEP-06-015/DOT-

VNTSC-FHWA-06-02/NTIS No. PB200-109102. Chapter 9: Construction Equipment Noise
Levels and Ranges, Updated November 30, 2015. Washington, D.C. Available online at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook09.cfm.
Accessed December 2016.

X-6
Federal Highway Administration. 2014. Guidance on Utilization of Highway Right-of-Way, Longitudinal
Accommodation of Utilities in the Interstate System Right-of-Way. U.S. Department of
Transportation. Available at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/right-of-
way/policy_and_guidance/guidutil_a.cfm. Accessed December 2016.

Federal Highway Administration. 2016a. About Americas Byways. U.S. Department of Transportation.
Available online at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/byways/about. Accessed December 2016.

Federal Highway Administration. 2016b. Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike. U.S. Department of

Transportation. Available online at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/byways/byways/10351. Accessed
December 2016.

Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico. 19+
vols. New York and Oxford. Database available online at: http://www.efloras.org/. Accessed
December 2016.

Francis, C.D., J. Paritsis, C.P. Ortega, and A. Cruz. 2011a. Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and
nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise. Landscape Ecol (2011) 26: 1269.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9690-z.

Francis, C.D., C.P. Ortega, and A. Cruz. 2011b. Noise Pollution Filters Bird Communities Based on
Vocal Frequency. November 9, 2011. Available online at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027052.

Francis, C.D., N.J. Kleist, C.P. Ortega, A. Cruz. 2012. Noise pollution alters ecological services:
enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2727-2735.

Friends of Wintergreen. 2016. The Pipeline Economic Impact. Available online at

http://www.friendsofwintergreen.com/the-pipeline/economic-impact/. Accessed December 2016.

Fruits, E. 2008. Natural Gas Pipelines and Residential Property Values: Evidence from Clackamas and
Washington Counties. Available at: http://pstrust.org/docs/NGPipesPropertyValues.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

Forest Service, National Park Service, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. AEP 765kV
Transmission Line American Electric Power Transmission Line Construction: Jacksons Ferry,
Virginia to Oceana, West Virginia. George Washington National Forest & Jefferson National
Forest, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
April 2002.

Forest Service. 1995. Landscape Aesthetics, A Handbook for Scenery Management. U.S. Department of
Agriculture.

Forest Service. 2005. Eastern Region. Conservation Assessment for the unexpected tiger moth (Cycnia
inopinatus). U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available online at:
http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsm91_054246.pdf. Accessed August 2016.

Forest Service. 2006. Monongahela National Forest, Final Environmental Impact Statement for Forest
Plan Revision. U.S. Department of Agriculture. September 2006.

X-7
Forest Service. 2011. Monongahela National Forest, Land and Resource Management Plan. U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Updated 2011.

Forest Service. 2013. FS-1017. Forest Service National Strategic Framework for Invasive Species
Management, FS-1017. Available online at:
http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/Framework_for_Invasive_Species_FS-1017.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2014. George Washington National Forest Final Environmental Impact Statement and
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan. Available online at:
http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/gwj/landmanagement/?cid=stelprd3799959. Accessed December
2016.

Forest Service. 2015. Monongahela National Forest. Summary of Fish Distribution by 6th HUC for the
ACP Project. Provided March 09, 2015.

Forest Service. 2016a. Monongahela National Forest, Non-native Invasive Plants Known to Occur on
Forest. Available online at:
http://www.fs.usda.gov/resources/mnf/landmanagement/resourcemanagement. Accessed
December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016b. Wildflowers. Pollinators. Available online at:

http://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pollinators. Accessed April 2016.

Forest Service. 2016c. Letter to FERC regarding Forest Service Comment on the Summary Report of
Habitat Assessments and Surveys of Forest Sensitive Fishes and Freshwater Mussels on the
George Washington National Forest OEP/DG2E/Gas 4 Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC. Docket
Nos. CP15-554-000 and CP15-554-001. U.S. Department of Agriculture. August 28, 2016.
Federal Ascension Number: 20160829-5095.

Forest Service. 2016d. Letter to FERC regarding Forest Service Preliminary Comments Concerning
Crossings of Proposed Streams and Recommendation for Continued Consultation,
OEP/DG2E/Gas 4 Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC. Docket Nos. CP15-554-000 and CP15-554-001.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. September 1, 2016. Federal Ascension Number: 20160901-5150.

Forest Service. 2016e. Monongahela National Forest, Order No. 09-21-13-13 Cave Closure Order. U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Available online at
http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/mnf/notices/?cid=STELPRDB5426017. Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016f. About the Agency. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available online at
http://www.fs.fed.us/about-agency. Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016g. Monongahela National Forest, Recreation. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/recmain/mnf/recreation. Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016h. Monongahela National Forest, Hunting. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/activity/mnf/recreation/hunting. Accessed December
2016.

Forest Service. 2016i. What are the definitions of inventoried roadless areas, potential wilderness areas,
recommended wilderness areas and designated Wilderness? U.S. Department of Agriculture.

X-8
 Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3_000250.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016j. 2001 Roadless Rule. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available online at
http://www.fs.usda.gov/roadmain/roadless/2001roadlessrule. Accessed December 2016.

Forest Service. 2016k. George Washington & Jefferson National Forests, About Us. U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/gwj/learning. Accessed December
2016.

Farm Service Agency. 2016a. Conservation Programs. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available online
at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/index. Accessed
December 2016.

Farm Service Agency. 2016b. Conservation Reserve Program. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available
online at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/conservation-
reserve-program/index. Accessed December 2016.

Farm Service Agency. 2016c. Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Available online at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-
programs/conservation-reserve-enhancement/index. Accessed December 2016.

Farm Service Agency. 2016d. Landowners & Conservationists. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Available online at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=lown&topic=cep.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2008. Draft
Freshwater Mussel Guidelines for Virginia. Last Updated March 7, 2008. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/endangeredspecies/MusselGuidelinesMar08Wat
Finaldraft.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of
Threatened Status for the Cheat Mountain Salamander and Endangered Status for the
Shenandoah Salamander. Final Rule. 54 Federal Register 34464 (August 18, 1989).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. James Spinymussel (Pleurobema collina) Recovery Plan. FWS
Annapolis Field Office, Annapolis, MD. Available online at:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/900924b.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991a. Shale Barren Rock Cress (Arabis serotina) Recovery Plan. FWS,
Region 5 Regional Office, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. Availabe online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/910815.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991b. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed
Endangered Status for the Schwalbea Americana (American chaffseed). Final Rule. 56 Federal
Register 46277 (September 11, 1991).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Northeastern Bulrush (Scirpus ancistrochaetus) Recovery Plan.
Hadley, Massachusetts. 68 pp. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/northeast/pafo/pdf/NB_Recovery_Plan.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-9
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Clubshell (Pleurobema clava) and Northern Riffleshell (Epioblasma
torulosa rangiana) Recovery Plan. FWS, Region 5, Hadley, MA. 67 pp. Available online at:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/940921.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. American Chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) Recovery Plan. FWS,
Region 5, Hadley, Massachusetts. 57 pp. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/950929c.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) Recovery
Plan. Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 62 pp. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/pdf/epfoplan.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Prairie Fringed Orchids Factsheet. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/pdf/prairiefringedorchids.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005b. Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea)
Factsheet. Available online at: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/epfo.html.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc787.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006b. Northeastern bulrush (Scirpus ancistrochaetus). Available online
at: http://www.fws.gov/northeast/pdf/bulrush.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007a. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) Draft Recovery Plan: First Revision.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN. 258 pp. Available online at:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/070416.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007b. Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. Available online at: http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc1113.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007c. Running Buffalo Clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) Recovery Plan:
First Revision. June 2007. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/070627.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008a. Birds of Conservation Concern 2008a. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management. 87 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008b. Virginia Big-Eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus) 5-
Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc1963.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008c. Clubshell (Pleurobema clava) 5-year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. Pennsylvania Field Office, State College, PA. Available online at:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2580.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-10
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008d. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) 5-year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. FWS, New England Field Office, Concord, New Hampshire. Available
online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2002.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008e. Northeastern Bulrush (Scirpus ancistrochaetus) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. FWS, Pennsylvania Field Office, State College, Pennsylvania.
Available online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2618.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008f. Great Dismal Swamp Natural Wildlife Refuge. Available online at
https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_5/NWRS/South_Zone/Great_Dismal_Swamp_Comp
lex/Great_Dismal_Swamp/GDSNWRgeneral.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009a. Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. Available online at: http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2625.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009b. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. Available online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2627.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009c. Cheat Mountain Salamander (Plethodon nettingi) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc3267.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010a. Madison Cave Isopod (Antrolana lira). Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/pdf/MadisonCaveIsopod.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010b. Virginia Sneezeweed (Helenium virginicum) Fact Sheet. Virginia
Field Office, Gloucester, Virginia. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/pdf/VAsneezeweed.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010c. Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) 5-Year
Review: Summary and Evaluation. FWS, Chicago Field Office, Barrington, Illinois. Available
online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc3273.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011a. James spinymussel (Pleurobema collina). Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_james_spinymussel.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011b. Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata) Fact Sheet. Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Website:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_swamp_pink.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011c. Rough-leaf Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). Available
online at: http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_rough-leaf_loosestrife.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011d. Pondberry (Lindera melissifolia). Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_pondberry.html. Accessed December 2016.

X-11
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011e. Michauxs Sumac (Rhus michauxii) Fact Sheet. Raleigh
Ecological Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_michauxs_sumac.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011f. American Chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) Fact Sheet. Raleigh
Ecological Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_american_chaffseed.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011g. Running Buffalo Clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. FWS, Columbus Ohio Field Office, Columbus, Ohio. Available online
at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc3646.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011h. Virginia Spirea (Spiraea virginiana) Fact Sheet. Raleigh
Ecological Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Website:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_virginia_spiraea.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011i. Biological Opinion, Warren County Power Station Low Effect
Habitat Conservation Plan for Madison Cave Isopod (Antrolana lira). FWS Ecological Services,
Gloucester, Virginia. November 21, 2011. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/plan_documents/bobs/bobs_903.pdf. Accesssed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011j. Golden Eagles Status Fact Sheet. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/golden-eagle-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012a. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing
Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser
oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) in the Southeast. Final Rule. 77 Federal Register 5914 (February 26,
2012).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012b. Virginia Ecological Services Strategic Plan. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/20140317_VAES%20Strategic%20Plan.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. New England Field Office, Concord, New Hampshire. Website:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4647.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014a. Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. FWS, Raleigh Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online
at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4468.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014b. Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. FWS, New Jersey Field Office, Pleasantville, New Jersey. Available online at:
http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4474.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014c. Rough-leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) 5-Year
Review: Summary and Evaluation. FWS, Raleigh Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Available online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4450.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

X-12
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014d. Pondberry (Lindera melissifolia) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. FWS, Mississippi Field Office, Jackson, Mississippi. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4358.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014e. Michauxs Sumac (Rhus michauxii) 5-Year Review: Summary
and Evaluation. FWS, Raleigh Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4440.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015a. Letter to Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Regarding Atlantic
Coast Pipeline, North Carolina Segments. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office,
North Carolina. March 25, 2015.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015b. Virginia big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus)
species profile. Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A080. Accessed December
2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015c. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened
Species Status for the Northern Long-Eared Bat With 4(d) Rule; Final Rule and Interim Rule. 80
Federal Register 17974 (April 2, 2015).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015d. Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) Fact Sheet. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_roanoke_logperch.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015e. Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon). Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Website:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_dwarf_wedgemussel.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015f. Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office, Raleigh, North Carolina. Website:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_tar_spinymussel.html. Accessed: 12 April 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015g. Snuffbox (Epioblasma triquetra) Fact Sheet. FWS, Midwest
Regional Office, Bloomington, MN. Website:
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/clams/snuffbox/SnuffboxFactSheet.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015h. Running Buffalo Clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) Fact Sheet.
Website: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/runningb.html. Accessed December
2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016a. Gray bat (Myotis grisescens) Fact Sheet. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/grbat_fc.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016b. Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) fact sheet.
Available online at: http://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/nlebFactSheet.html.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016c. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 4(d) Rule for the
Northern Long-Eared Bat; Final Rule. 81 Federal Register 1900 (Janurary 14, 2016).

X-13
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016d. Red-cockaded Woodpecker Recovery. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/rcwrecovery/rcw.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016e. Chesapeake Bay Field Office Species Page: Atlantic sturgeon
(Acipenser oxyrinchus). Available online at: http://www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/sturgeon.html.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016f. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered
Species Status for Rusty Patched Bumble Bee; Proposed Rule. 81 Fed. Reg. 65324 (September
22, 2016).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016g. Listing a Species as a Threatened or Endangered Species: Section
4 of the Endangered Species Act. Fact Sheet. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/listing.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016h. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis) Species Status
Assessment. Final Report, Version 1. June 2016. Available online at:
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/pdf/SSAReportRPBB.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016i. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis). Fact Sheet.
Available online at: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/factsheetrpbb.html.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016j. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Fact Sheet. Website:
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/smallwhorledpogoniafs.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016k. Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, About the
Refuge. Available online at https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Great_Dismal_Swamp/about.html.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016l. National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper. Available online
at https://www.fws.gov/wetlands /. Accessed December 2016.

Gawler, S. 2008. Northeastern Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Classification (NETHCS), The Northeast
Habitat Classification and Mapping Project, a report to the Virginia Department of Game and
Inland Fisheries on behalf of the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and the
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Available online at:
http://rcngrants.org/content/northeastern-terrestrial-wildlife-habitat-classification. Accessed
December 2016.

Karst Survey Report, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Augusta, Bath, and Highland Counties, VA, & Pocahontas
and Randolph Counties, WV. August 1, 2016. 20 p.

Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 2016. Geohazard Analysis Program Phase 2 Report Atlantic Coast Pipeline
and Supply Header Project. August 2016.

Godard, D.R., L. Peters, R. Evans, K. Wautier, P.A. Cott, B. Hanna, and V. Palace. 2008.
Histopathological assessment of the sub-lethal effects of instantaneous pressure changes (IPCs)

X-14
 on rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) early life stages following exposure to detonation
under ice cover. Environmental Studies Research Funds Report No. 164, Winnipeg. 93 p.

Goldstein, H. 2016. Telephone communication on January 7, 2016, between T. Brunner (ERM) and H.
Goldstein (NOAA Office of Protected Resources).

Goulson, D., E. Nicholls, C. Botias, and E.L. Rotheray. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress
from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science, 347(6229), 1255957.

Governors Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission. 2011. Report. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Office of Lieutenant Governor, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Available at:
http://files.dep.state.pa.us/PublicParticipation/MarcellusShaleAdvisoryCommission/MarcellusSha
leAdvisoryPortalFiles/MSAC_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Grand Caverns.com. 2016. Welcome to Grand Caverns, Americas Oldest Show Cave. Available online
at http://www.grandcaverns.com/v.php?pg=15. Accessed December 2016.

Green, R.A., Lasley, S., Carter, M.W., Munsey, J.W., Maurer, B.W., and Tuttle, M.P. 2015. Geotechnical
aspects in the epicentral region of the 2011 Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake. Geological
Society of America Special Paper 509, p. 151-172.

Green, R.A. 2012. Implications of Observed Liquefaction During the 2011 Central Virginia Earthquake
on Regional Paleoliquefaction Studies. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs,
Vol. 44, p. 382.

Habib, L., E.M. Bayne, and S. Boutin. 2006. Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age
structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:1. Available online at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01234.x. Accessed December 2016.

Hack J.T., and Goodlett, J.C., 1960, Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain Region in the
central Appalachians: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 347, 66 p. Plate 1. Available
online at: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp347. Accessed December 2016.

Hammarstrom, J.M., Brady, K., Cravotta III, C.A. 2004. Acid-rock drainage at Skytop, Centre County,
Pennsylvania, 2004. USGS Open-File Report 2005-1148.

Hansen, E., and F. Boettner. 2008. State of the Watershed: Elk Headwaters, West Virginia. Submitted to
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. Downstream Strategies. Available online
at:
http://www.downstreamstrategies.com/documents/reports_publication/State_of_the_Watershed_
Elk_headwaters_Oct2008.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Hansen, J.L. and D.A. 2006. Environmental Hazards and Residential Property Values: Evidence from a
Major Pipeline Event. November 2006. 82(4): 529-541.

Hansen, E., S.J. Zegre, A. Hereford. 2011. Elk Headwaters Watershed Protection Plan. Prepared by
Downstream Strategies, Morgantown, WV on behalf of Elk Headwaters Watershed Association,
Slatyfork, WV. Submitted to West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Charleston
WV. August 30, 2011. Available online at:
http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/nonptsource/Documents/WBPs/ElkHeadwatersWPP.pdf
. Accessed December 2016.

X-15
Hansen, E., D. Mulvaney, and M. Betcher. 2013. Water Resource Reporting and Water Footprint from
Marcellus Shale Development in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Available online at:
http://www.downstreamstrategies.com/documents/reports_publication/marcellus_wv_pa.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Harmon, P.J., D. Ford-Werntz, and W. Grafton. 2006. Checklist and Atlas of the Vascular Flora of West
Virginia. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Section, Elkins, WV.
381 p.

Hastings, M.C. and A.N. Popper. 2005. Effects of sound on fish. Prepared for the California Dept. of
Transportation. Subconsultant to Jones & Stokes; California Department of Transportation
Contract No. 43A0139, Task Order 1. January 28, 2005.

Heller, M. 2015. Atlantic/DTI Email communication with Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and
Energy. Communication on March 30, 2015.

Hoffman, R.L. 1949. Three new species of Diplopoda from Virginia. Proceedings of the Biological
Socieity of Washington, Vol. 62, pp. 81-88. Available online at:
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35878793#page/96/mode/1up. Accessed December
2016.

Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N.D.,
Wickham, J.D., and Megown, K., 2015, Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database
for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information.
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 81, no. 5, p. 345-354. Available online at:
http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php. Accessed December 2016.

Horizons Village. 2016. Spruce Creek Resort. Posted February 7, 2016. Available online at
https://horizonsvillage.org/blog/page/2/. Accessed December 2016.

Horton, J. W, Jr. and Zullo, V. A., editors. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas: Carolina Geological
Society 50th Anniversary Volume. University of Tennessee Press Knoxville. 424 p.

Horton, J. W., A.K. Shah, D. E., McNamara, S. L. Snyder, and A. M. Carter. 2015b. Aftershocks
illuminate the 2011 Mineral, Virginia earthquake causative fault zone and nearby active faults, in
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern
North America. The Geological Society of America Special Paper 509. Edited by J. W. Horton,
Jr., M. C. Chapman, and R. A. Green. P. 253-272. Available online at:
https://profile.usgs.gov/myscience/upload_folder/ci2014Dec0213292844121Horton-
2015.2509_14.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Horton, J.W., Jr., Chapman, M.C., and Green, R.A. 2015. The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake, and its
significance for seismic hazards in eastern North America Overview and synthesis. Geological
Society of America Special Paper 509, p. 1-25.

Hospitals Center. 2014. Available online at http://www.hospitalscenter.com/county-hospitals.html.

Accessed December 2016.

Hotopp, K.P., T.A. Pearce, J.C. Nekola, J. Slapcinsky, D.C. Dourson, M. Winslow, G. Kimber, and B.
Watson. 2013. Land Snails and Slugs of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States.

X-16
 Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Available online at:
http://www.carnegiemnh.org/science/mollusks/index.html. Accessed December 2016.

Hove, M. 1990. Distribution and life history of the endangered James spinymussel, Pleurobema collina
(Bivalvia: Unionidae). M.S. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, Virginia. 113 pp.

Huisman, W.H.T. and K. Attenborough. 1991. Reverberation and attenuation in a pine forest. Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America 90(5): 2664-2677.

ICF International. 2015. The Economic Impacts of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America. 2013. Building Interstate Natural Gas Transmission
Pipelines: A Primer. Available online at http://www.ingaa.org/file.aspx?id=19618. Accessed
December 2016.

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America. 2016. Mitigation of Land Movement in Steep and Rugged
Terrain for Pipeline Projects: Lessons Learned from Constructing Pipelines in West Virginia. The
INGA Foundation, Inc. Final Report No. 2015-03. April 2016.

International Code Council. 2006. International Building Code. Accessed at:

https://law.resource.org/pub/us/code/ibr/icc.ibc.2006.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Integra Realty Resources. 2016. Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability.

Jacobson, R.B., McGeehin, J.P., Cron, E.D., Carr, C.E., Harper, J.M., and Howard, A.D., 1993,
Landslides triggered by the storm of November 3-5, 1985, Wills Mountain Anticline, West
Virginia and Virginia: in, Jacobson, R.B., editor, 1993, Geomorphic studies of the storm and
flood of November 3-5, 1985, in the upper Potomac and Cheat River Basins in West Virginia and
Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1981, Chapter C, p. C1-C33.

Johnson, G. 2015. Phone Communication with North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Communication on April 7, 2015.

Jones, D.J., G.S. Kramer, D.N. Gideon, and R.J. Eiber. 1986. An Analysis of Reportable Incidents for
Natural Gas Transportation and Gathering Lines 1970 through June 1984. American Gas
Association. NG-18 Report No. 158, Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas
Association.

Jones, W.K. 1997. Karst Hydrology Atlas of West Virginia. 1997. Karst Waters Institute Special
Publication 4. 11 p.

Kentucky Bat Working Group. 2016. Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens). Available online at:
http://biology.eku.edu/bats/graybat.htm. Accessed December 2016.

Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR). 2016. Virginia big-eared bat
(Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus) species page. Available online at:
http://fw.ky.gov/Wildlife/Pages/Virginia-Big-Eared-Bat.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Kempf, N. and O. Huppop. 1997. The Effects of Aircraft Noise on Wildlife; a Review and Comment.
Vogel and Luftverkehr, Bd. 1/97: 58-70.

X-17
Key-Log Economics. 2016. Economic Costs of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Effects on Property Value,
Ecosystem Services, and Economic Development in Western and Central Virginia. Available
online at: http://www.abralliance.org/wp-
content/uploads/2016/02/Economic_Costs_Of_The_Atlantic_Coast_Pipeline-KeyLogic_2-16-
16.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Kielisch, K. 2015. Study on the Impact of Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines. Forensic Appraisal
Group, Ltd. Neenah, WI.

King, L. 2016a. Email Communication with the West Virginia Department of Health and Human
Resources, Bureau for Public Health. Communication on March 11, 2016.

King, L. 2016b. Letter response from West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau
for Public Health. Communication on March 11, 2016.

Kochanov, W. 2015. Atlantic/DTI Email communication with Pennsylvania Department of Conservation

and Natural Resources. Communication on March 26, 2015.

Lai, C. 2011. "Necturus lewisi". Animal Diversity Web. Available online at:
http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Necturus_lewisi/. Accessed December 2016.

Latham, R. S., Wooten, R. M., Cattanach, B. L., Merschat, C. E., & Bozdog, G. N. (2009). Rockslope
stability analysis along the North Carolina section of the Blue Ridge Parkway: Using a
geographic information system (GIS) to integrate site data and digital geologic maps. 43rd US
rock mechanics symposium and 4th US-Canadian rock mechanics symposium (p. 12).
AmericanRock Mechanics Association, 28 June1 July 2009, 171.

LeGrand, H.E., J.A. Ratcliffe, and J.T. Finnegan. 2015. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina 2014. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Land and
Water Stewardship, North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, NC. Revised May 14, 2015. Available online at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=537d88dd-5168-4374-aaba-
a159785bbfbe&groupId=61587. Accessed December 2016.

Lotts, K. and T. Naberhaus, coordinators. 2016. Butterflies and Moths of North America.
http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/. Accessed December 2016.

Land and Water Conservation Fund State Assistance Program. 2008. Federal Financial Assistance
Manual (Volume 69), October 1, 2008.

Martinez, J.J., J.R. Myers, T. J. Carlson, Z.D. Deng, J.S. Rohrer, K.A. Caviggia, M.A. Weiland. 2011.
Design and implementation of an underwater sound recording device. Sensors 11:8519-8535.

Matthaei, C.D. and C.R. Townsend. 2000. Long-term effects of local disturbance history on mobile
stream invertebrates. Oecologia 125:119-126.

Maupin, M.A., and Barber, N.L. 2005. Estimated withdrawals from principal aquifers in the United
States, 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1279, 46 p. Available online at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2005/1279/pdf/circ1279.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-18
McDowell, R. 2015. Atlantic/DTI Email communication with West Virginia Geological and Economic
Survey. Communication on March 23, 2015.

Missouri Plants. 2007. Photographs and Descriptions of the flowering and non-flowering plants of
Missouri, USA. Available online at: http://www.missouriplants.com/index.html. Accessed
December 2016.

Morgan, B.A., Iovine, G., Chirico, P., and Wieczorek, G.F. 1999. Inventory of debris flows and floods in
the Lovingston and Horseshoe Mountain, VA, 7.5 quadrangles, from the August 19/20, 1969,
storm in Nelson County, Virginia. USGS Open-File Report 99-518. Available online at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/ofr-99-0518/ofr-99-0518.html. Accessed December 2016.

Moulds, S., H. Milliken, J. Sidleck, and B. Winn. 2005. The Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay and the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Restoring Virginias Wetlands: A Citizens
Toolkit.
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/WetlandsStreams/restoringvawetlandstoolkit.p
df. Accessed December 2016.

Munday, D.R., G.L. Ennis, D.G. Wright, D.C. Jeffries, E.R. McGreer, and J.S. Mathers. 1986.
Development and evaluation of a model to predict effects of buried underwater blasting charges
on fish populations in shallow water areas. Canada Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences. No. 1418, Vancouver, BC, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Habitat Management
Division.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1996. Sustainable Development Indicator Group.
Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/iwgsdi/Intertidal_Estuarine.html. Accessed
December 2016.

National Audubon Society. 2016. Important Bird Areas. Available online at:
http://netapp.audubon.org/iba. Accessed December 2016.

National Caves Association. 2016. All Showcaves. Available online at https://cavern.com/Directory/.

Accessed December 2016.

National Speleological Society. 2016. A Guide3 to Responsible Caving. Available online at:
http://caves.org/brochure/Guide_to_Resp_Caving_2016.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

National Weather Service. 2016. 2015 Flash Flood/River Fatalities; Lightning Fatalities; and Tornado
Fatalities. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at:
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/hazstats.shtml. Accessed December 2016.

National Wild and Scenic River System. 2016. About the WSR Act. Available online at
https://www.rivers.gov/wsr-act.php. Accessed December 2016.

Nature Conservancy. 2001. Central Appalachian Forest Ecoregional Plan. Report Appendices: CAP
Occurrences (table) February 2001. Available online at:
https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationByGeography/NorthAmerica/UnitedStates/ed
c/reportsdata/terrestrial/ecoregional/cap/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Nature Conservancy. 2015. Terrestrial Habitat Map for the Northeast U.S. and Atlantic Canada. Eastern
Conservation Science. Available online at http://northatlanticlcc.org/spatial-

X-19
 data/terrestrial/terrestrial-habitat-map-for-the-northeast-us-and-atlantic-canada. Accessed
December 2016.

NatureServe. 2014. U.S. National Map Conterminous United States. Available online at
http://www.natureserve.org/conservation-tools/terrestrial-ecological-systems-united-states.
Accessed December 2016.

NatureServe. 2015. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available online at: http://explorer.natureserve.org. Accessed
September 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014a. NC OneMap Geospatial Portal. Available
online at: http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/main/home.page. Accessed December
2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014b. Division of Waste Management Map.
Available online at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/gis/maps/dwmmap. Accessed December
2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014c. Underground Storage Tank Program
Databases. Available online at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/ust/database. Accessed
December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014d. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare
Animal Species of North Carolina. Compiled by H.E. LeGrand, Jr., J. A. Ratcliffe, and J.T.
Finnegan. Revised May 14, 2015. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Land and
Water Stewardship. Available online at: http://dncr-nhp.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/documents/files/2014-NHP-List-of-Rare-Animals-of-NC.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014e. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare
Plants of North Carolina. Eds. Robinson, L.G. and J. Finnegan. Revised October 29, 2014. North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Land and Water Stewardship. Available online at:
http://dncr-nhp.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/documents/files/2014-NHP-List-of-Rare-Plants-
of-NC-revised-29-Oct-2014.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2015. Public Water Supply Water Sources,
including Ground Water and Surface Water Sources (GIS data). July 2015. Division of Water
Resources, Public Water Supply Section, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available online at:
http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B6D1FD333-
DDC0-48B8-8B35-9FF4620276EB%7D. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2016a. Mitigation Services. Available online at
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2016b. Land and Water Stewardship; Wetland
Habitat. Available online at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cpca/wetlands. Accessed December
2016.

North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2014. County Area AADT Maps by Year. Available
online at http://www.ncdot.gov/travel/statemapping/trafficvolumemaps/. Accessed December
2016.

X-20
North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2016. NC Scenic Byways. Available online at
https://www.ncdot.gov/download/travel/scenic_byways.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Geological Survey. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina: North Carolina Geological
Survey. Scale 1:500,000.

North Carolina Geological Survey. 1998. Fossil Collecting in North Carolina. Bulletin 89. Raleigh, North
Carolina.

North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2015. Summary of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Methods for Rating Natural Areas January 2015. Available online at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=34e07911-ef52-4836-b21c-
be94f99186c1&groupId=61587. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2005. North Carolina State Wildlife Action Plan.
Available online at:
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Conserving/documents/ActionPlan/WAP_complete.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2014. Letter to Natural Resources Group Regarding
Scoping comments for Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project from Northampton County through
Robeson County. November 21, 2014.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2015. Letter to Natural Resources Group Regarding
Comments for Species' Surveys for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project from Northampton County
through Robeson County, North Carolina. April 10, 2015.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2016a. North Carolina Species Database. Available
online at: http://www.ncwildlife.org/Learning/Species. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2016b. North Carolina Wildlife Profiles: Carolina
madtom. Available online at: http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/CarolinaMadtom.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2016c. Fishing in North Carolina. Available online at
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Fishing/SeasonsLimits.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2016f. Hunting in North Carolina. Available online at:
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Hunting.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Nelson County Department of Planning and Zoning. 2016. Summary of Application(s) dated January 5.
Available online at https://horizonsvillage.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/spruce-creek-resort-
roads-info.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Newcombe, C.P., and J.O.T. Jensen. 1996. Channel Suspended Sediment and Fisheries: A Synthesis for
Quantitative Assessment of Risk and Impact. North American Journal of Fisheries Management
16(4):693727.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2003. Final Amendment 1 to the Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic
Tunas, Swordfish, and Sharks. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA Fisheries
Highly Migratory Species Management Division, Silver Spring, MD. Available online at:

X-21
 http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/documents/fmp/tss_am1/am1_tunswoshk_fmp_total.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2010. Anadromous Fisheries in North Carolina. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. Available online at: https://www.fws.gov/nc-
es/fish/anadromous.html. Accessed November 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2014a. E-mail to Sara Throndson (NRG) from David O-Brien (NMFS
Biologist Virginia Field Office) dated September 2014. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2014b. Final Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(AHMS) Fishery Management Plan and Amendments. NOAA Fisheries, Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Management Division. Available online at:
http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/documents/fmp/index.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2014c. Summary of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Designations for the
10x10 Square Coordinates: 37o 00.0 N, 76o 20.0 W, 36o 50.0 N, and 76o 30.0 W. National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available online at:
http://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/hcd/STATES4/virginia/virginia/36507620.html.
Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2015a. Call dated December 15, 2015, from T. Brunner (NRG) to D.
OBrien (NMFS). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2015b. Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) species page.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available online at:
http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/atlantic-sturgeon.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2015c. Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. Available online at:
http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/dolphins/bottlenose-dolphin.html. Accessed
December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2015d. Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina). National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. Available online at:
http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/seals/harbor-seal.html. Accessed December
2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016a. What is Essential Fish Habitat? National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. Available online at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/.
Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016b. Consultations to Protect Essential Fish Habitat. National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Habitat Conservation. Available online at:
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/consultations.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016c. Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus truncatus):
Northern North Carolina Estuarine System Stock. May 2016. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. Available online at:

X-22
 http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/stocks/atlantic/2015/f2015_bodonnces.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016d. Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus truncatus):
Western North Atlantic Southern Migratory Coastal Stock. May 2016. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. Available online at:
http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/stocks/atlantic/2015/f2015_bodosmig.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016e. Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina concolor): Western North Atlantic
Stock. May 2016. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Availabe online at:
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/stocks/atlantic/2015/f2015_harborseal.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016f. Call to Tracy Brunner (NRG) from Howard Goldstein (NOAA
Fisheries Office of Protected Resources) dated January 7, 2016. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016g. Email to Tracy Brunner (NRG) from Jordan Carduner (NOAA
Fisheries Office of Protected Resources) dated July 1, 2016. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1978. National Ocean Survey (NOS) National
Geodetic Survey (NOS) 1 Geodetic Benchmarks. Accessed July 2016. U.S. Department of
Commerce. Available online: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/GeodeticBMs/#figure13.
Accessed December 2016.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2012. State Coastal Boundaries, February 9, 2012.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Available online at
https://coast.noaa.gov/czm/media/StateCZBoundaries.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2013a. Regional Climate Trends and Scenarios for
the U.S. National Climate Assessment, Part 3. Climate of the Midwest U.S. NOAA Technical
Report NESDIS 142-3. U.S. Department of Commerce. Available at:
https://scenarios.globalchange.gov/sites/default/files/NOAA_NESDIS_Tech_Report_142-3-
Climate_of_the_Midwest_U.S_0.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2013b. Regional Climate Trends and Scenarios for
the U.S. National Climate Assessment, Part 2. Climate of the Southeast U.S. NOAA Technical
Report NESDIS 142-2. U.S. Department of Commerce. Available at:
https://www.sercc.com/NOAA_NESDIS_Tech_Report_Climate_of_the_Southeast_U.S.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

North American Bird Conservation Initiative. 2013. Bird Conservation Region Map. Available online at:
http://iwjv.org/sites/default/files/nabci_map.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 2016. Frequently Asked Legal
Questions Regarding CREP Conservation Easements. Available online at
http://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/easementprograms/CREP/documents/CREPLegalFAQs.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

X-23
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. 2015. Hospitals by County. Available Online
at http://www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/data/hllistco.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina Historic Sites. 2016. Bentonville Battlefield. Available online at

http://www.nchistoricsites.org/bentonvi/. Accessed December 2016.

North Carolina State University. 2016. Going Native; Habitat Loss.

https://www.ncsu.edu/goingnative/whygo/habloss.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 1981. Comprehensive Plan for the Protection, Management, Development and Use
of the Appalachian National Scenic Trail. September 1981; abridged version 1987.

National Park Service. 2008. Appalachian National Scenic Trail Resource Management Plan. September
2008.

National Park Service. 2011. Nationwide Rivers Inventory. Available online at:
https://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/nri/index.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2012. Application Procedure for Right-of-Way Permits. Blue Ridge Parkway.
Revised September 4, 2012. U.S. Department of the Interior. Available online at:
https://www.nps.gov/blri/planyourvisit/upload/Application-procedure-for-ROWs-new-fees-with-
SF-299-and-BLRI-Veg-Man-Plan.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2013. Blue Ridge Parkway Virginia and North Carolina Final General
Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement. January 2013. Available online at:
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=355&projectID=10419&documentID=5130
5. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016a. National Wild and Scenic Rivers Program. Available online at
https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1912/index.htm. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016b. McDowell. Available online at

https://www.nps.gov/abpp/shenandoah/svs3-2.html. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016c. Cumberland Church. Available online at

https://www.nps.gov/abpp/battles/va094.htm. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016d. Sailors Creek. Available online at

https://www.nps.gov/abpp/battles/va093.htm. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016e. Averasborough. Available online at

https://www.nps.gov/abpp/battles/nc019.htm. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016f. Suffolk. Available online at https://www.nps.gov/abpp/battles/va031.htm.

Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016g. Appalachian National Scenic Trail. Available online at
https://www.nps.gov/appa/index.htm. Accessed December 2016.

X-24
National Park Service. 2016h. Appalachian National Scenic Trail, 2015 Business Plan. Available online
at https://www.nps.gov/appa/getinvolved/upload/APPA_2015_Business_Plan_page_version.pdf.
Accessed October 2015 to December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016i. Frequently Asked Questions. Available online at

https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/faqs.htm. Accessed October 2015 to December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016j. Blue Ridge Parkway, Plan Your Visit. Available online at
https://www.nps.gov/blri/planyourvisit/index.htm. Accessed December 2016.

National Park Service. 2016k. Blue Ridge Parkway, Learn About the Park. Available online at
https://www.nps.gov/blri/learn/index.htm. Accessed December 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Conservation Practice Standard Code 527, Karst Sinkhole
Treatment. Available online at:
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrcs.usda.gov%2FIn
ternet%2FFSE_DOCUMENTS%2Fnrcs143_026190.docx. Accessed December 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2016a. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242. Accessed
December 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2016b. Technical Soil Services Handbook. U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Available online:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_053399. Accessed
December 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2016c. Easements. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available
online at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/easements. Accessed
December 2016.

Obermeier, S.F. and McNulty, W.E. 1998. Paleoliquefaction Evidence for Seismic Quiescence in Central
Virginia During Late and Middle Holocene Time. Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical
Union 79 (17):S342.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1999. OSHA Technical Manual - Noise. Directive
Number 13-03 (TED 01). Effective Date August 15, 2013. Available online at:
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/new_noise/index.html. Accessed December 2016.

Olcott, S. 2011. Final Report for the West Virginia Dragonfly and Damselfly Atlas. WVDNR, Wildlife
Resources Section. Available online at:
http://www.wvdnr.gov/Publications/PDFFiles/OdenateAtlasReportweb.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

Onlyinyourstate.com. 2016a. 12 Places in West Virginia Thatll Make You Wish You Lived
Underground. Available online at http://www.onlyinyourstate.com/west-virginia/wv-
underground/. Accessed December 2016.

X-25
Onlyinyourstate.com. 2016b. 6 Caves in North Carolina That Are Like Entering Another World.
Available online at http://www.onlyinyourstate.com/north-carolina/6-caves-in-nc/. Accessed
December 2016.

Orndorff, Z.W. and W.L. Daniels. 2004. Evaluation of acid-producing sulfidic materials in Virginia
highway corridors. Environmental Geology 46:209-216.

ORourke, T.D. and M.C. Palmer. 1994. The Northbridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994:
Performance of Gas Transmission Pipelines. National Center for Earthquake Engineering
Research. Technical Report NCEER-94-0011. Buffalo, New York.

ORourke, T.D. and M.C. Palmer. 1996. Earthquake Performance of Gas Transmission Pipelines.
Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 12, No. 3, 493-527.

Orrock, J.L., and J.F. Pagels. 2003. Tree communities, microhabitat characteristics, and small mammals
associated with the endangered rock vole, Microtus chrotorrhinus, in Virginia. Southeastern
Naturalist 2(4): 547-558.

Osmond, D.L., D.E. Line, J.A. Gale, R.W. Gannon, C.B. Knott, K.A. Bartenhagen, M.H. Turner, S.W.
Coffey, J. Spooner, J. Wells, J.C. Walker, L.L. Hargrove, M.A. Foster, P.D. Robillard, and D.W.
Lehning. 1995. WATERSHEDSS: Water, Soil and Hydro-Environmental Decision Support
System: Major Causes of Wetland Loss and Degradation. Available online at:
http://www.water.ncsu.edu/watershedss/info/wetlands/wetloss.html. Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. 2015. PaGWIS Download. May 2015.
Available online at:
http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/groundwater/pagwis/downloads/index.htm. Accessed
December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2010. Technical Guide to Mine Subsidence.

Available online: http://www.dep.state.pa.us/msi/technicalguidetoms.html. Accessed December
2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2013. Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use.

August 2013. GIS layer available at:
http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter93/s93.9.html. Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2014. Municipal Waste Landfills and Resource
Recovery Facilities. Available online at:
http://www.dep.pa.gov/Business/Land/Waste/SolidWaste/MunicipalWaste/MunicipalWastePermi
tting/Pages/MW-Landfills-and-Resource-Recovery-Facilities.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2015a. Pennsylvania Mining History. Available

online: http://www.dep.state.pa.us/msi/mininghistory.html. Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2015b. Integrated List Non Attaining GIS layer.
Available online at: http://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/DataSummary.aspx?dataset=888. Accessed
December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2016. Surface Water Withdrawal Data. Available
online at: http://www.depgis.state.pa.us/wave/. Accessed November 2016.

X-26
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2016b. Technologically Enhanced Naturally
Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) Study Report. Prepared by Perma-Fix
Environmental Services, Inc. http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/Get/Document-
112658/Pennsylvania%20Department%20of%20Environmental%20Protection%20TENORM%2
0Study%20Report%20Rev%201.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Page, L.M. and B.M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico.
Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 432 p. In: R. and D. Pauly (Eds). 2016. FishBase. Available
online at: www.fishbase.org. Accessed June 2016.

Paucer, J. 2015. Phone Communication with West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection,
Division of Water and Waste Management. Communication on March 10, 2015.

Pauley, T.K. 2004. Salamanders of West Virginia. WVDNR, Wildlife Resources Section, Elkins, WV.
Available online at: http://www.wvdnr.gov/Publications/PDFFiles/salamanderbrochure.pdf.
Accessed on August 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Health. 1999. Directory of Pennsylvania Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery
Centers. Available online at http://www.health.state.pa.us/pdf/hpa/stats/hospdir98/hospdir98.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. 2016. 2014 Traffic Volume Map (Westmoreland and Greene
Counties). Published January 2016. Bureau of Planning and Research, Transportation Planning
Division. Available online at
http://www.penndot.gov/ProjectAndPrograms/Planning/Maps/Pages/Traffic-Volume.aspx.
Accessed December 2016.

Pennsylvania Geologic Survey. 2005. Geologic Units Containing Potentially Significant Acid-Producing
Sulfide Minerals. Open-File Report OFMI 0501.1.

Pereira, L.A. and R.L. Hoffman. 1993. The Aerican Species of Escaryus, a genus of holarctic centipeds
(Geophilomorpha: Schendylidae). Jeffersoniana 3:1-72.

Petersen, M.D., Moschetti, M.P., Powers, P.M., Mueller, C.S., Haller, K.M., Frankel, A.D., Zeng,
Yuehua, Rezaeian, Sanaz, Harmsen, S.C., Boyd, O.S., Field, E.H., Chen, Rui, Luco, Nicolas,
Wheeler, R.L., Williams, R.A., Olsen, A.H., and Rukstales, K.S. 2015. Seismic-hazard maps for
the Conterminous United States, 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map
3325, 6 sheets, scale 1: 7,000,000. Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3325/. Accessed
December 2016.

Petersen, M.D., Mueller, C.S., Moschetti, M.P., Hoover, S.M., Llenos, A.L., Ellsworth, W.L., Michael,
A.J., Rubinstein, J.L., McGarr, A.F., and Rukstales, K.S. 2016. 2016 One-year seismic hazard
forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from induced and natural earthquakes: U.S.
Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016-1035, 52 p. Available online:
https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20161035. Accessed December 2016.

PGP Valuation, Inc. 2008. Updated Market Analysis The Impact of Natural Gas Pipelines on Property
Values. February 21, 2008. Available at:
http://pstrust.org/docs/Pipeline_Impact_on_Property_Values.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-27
Phillips, S., S. Wang, C. Bottorff. May 2016. Economic Costs of the Mountain Valley Pipeline: Effects
on Property Value, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Development in Virginia and West
Virginia. KeyLog Economics LLC, Charlettesville, VA.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. 2015a. Pipeline Incident 20 Year Trends.
Available online at: http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data-stats/pipelineincidenttrends.
Accessed August 2015.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. 2015b. State Pipeline Performance Metrics.
Available online at: http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data-stats/state-pipeline-
performance-metrics. Accessed August 2015.

Pipeline Research Council International. 2004. Guidelines for the Seismic Design and Assessment of
Natural Gas and Liquid Hydrocarbon Pipelines. Prepared by D. G. Honegger and D. J. Nyman.

Plath, O.E. 1922. Notes on the nesting habits of several North American bumblebees. Pysche 29 (5-
6):189-202.

Radbruch-Hall, D.H., R.B. Colton, W.E. Davies, Ivo Lucchitta, B.A. Skipp, and D.J. Varnes. 1982.
Landslide Overview Map of the Conterminous United States. Geological Survey Professional
Paper 1183. Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1183/pp1183.html. Accessed December
2016.

Reid, S.M., and P.G. Anderson. 1999. Effects of Sediment Released During Open-cut Pipeline Water
Crossings. Canadian Water Resources Journal 24:23-39.

Reisch, C. 2015. Phone Communication with Pennsylvania Department Environmental Protection,

Bureau of Safe Drinking Water. Communication on March 3, 2015.

Roanoke River Partners. 2016a. Go Wild! Roanoke River Paddle Trail. Available online at
http://www.roanokeriverpartners.org/pdfs/GoWild.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Roanoke River Partners. 2016b. About RRP. Available online at

http://www.roanokeriverpartners.org/about-rrp.aspx. Accessed May to December 2016.

Robbins, C.S., D.K. Dawson, B.A. Dowell. 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of
the middle Atlantic states. Wildlife Monographs 103:1-34.

Roble, S.M., G.N Woodie, and M.D. Kinsler. 2007. Discovery of a Population of Scarlet Kingsnakes
(Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides) in the Virginia Piedmont. Catesbeiana 27: 84-94 (2007).

Roble, S.M. 2016. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Animals. VDCR-DNR, Richmond, VA.
Natural Heritage Technical Report 16-07. February 2016. Available online at:
http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/document/anlist2016.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Rockfish Valley Foundation. 2016a. Rockfish Valley Trails. Available online at

http://www.rockfishvalley.org/blog/rockfish-valley-trails/. Accessed December 2016.

Rockfish Valley Foundation. 2016b. Press Release dated June 7, 2016. Available online at
http://www.rockfishvalley.org/blog/wp-

X-28
 content/uploads/PRESSRELEASE_RVF_FERC_CommentsJune8.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

Salmon, J.S. 2001. The Official Virginia Civil War Battlefield Guide. Stackpole Books.

Sas, R.J. Jr. and Eaton, L.S., 2008, Quartzite terrains, geologic controls, and basin denudation by debris
flows: their role in long-term landscape evolution in the central Appalachians. Landslides.
Springer-Verlag. 5:97106. Available online at:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10346-007-0108-x. Accessed December 2016.

Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth Approximation. North
Carolina DENR, Natural Heritage Program (cited as 4th Approximation Guide). Available online
at: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/pubs/4thApproximationGuideFinalMarch2012.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

Shaver, R. 2015. Phone Communication with West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services,
Source Water Assessment and Wellhead Protection Program. Communication on March 11,
2015.

Shear, W.A. 2011. Cave millipedes of the United States. X. New species and records of the genus
Pseudotremia Cope. 2. Species from Virginia, USA (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida, Cleidogonidae).
Zootaxa 3109: 1-38.

Shenandoah Valley Battlefields. 2016. About the Area. Available online at

http://www.shenandoahatwar.org/about-the-area/. Accessed December 2016.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 2016. Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Available online at:
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed December 2016.

Soller, D.R., M.C. Reheis, C.P. Garrity, and D.R. Van Sistine. 2009. Map database for surficial materials
in the conterminous United States: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 425; scale 1:500,000.
Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/425/. Accessed December 2016.

Soto, R. 2015. Email Communication with the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water.
Communication on March 24, 2015.

Steil, J.C., C.R. Blinn, and R. Kolka. 2009. Foresters' Perceptions of Windthrow Dynamics in Northern
Minnesota Riparian Management Zones. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 26(2): 76-82.

Stihler, C. 2014. West Virginia State Update. 2014 Annual Meeting. Northeast Bat Working Group.

Taylor, K.B. 2015. Email communication with the North Carolina Geological Survey. Communication
on July 24, 2015.

The Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike. 2016. Welcome to the Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike. Available

online at http://www.spturnpike.org/. Accessed December 2016.

Thomas, H.R. and Turkle, K. 2013. Field survey and damage assessment of the Mineral, Virginia,
earthquake of August 23, 2011: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1198, 20 p.
Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1198/of2012-1198.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-29
Tiner, R. June 1987. Mid-Atlantic Wetlands: a Disappearing Natural Treasure. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Newton Corner, MA.

Tourism Economics. 2015. The Economic Impact of Travel in Pennsylvania. Available online at
http://www.visitpa.com/sites/default/master/files/pa-visitor-economic-impact-2013-final.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Townsend, J.F. 2016. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. VDCR-DNH, Richmond, VA.
Unpublished report. February 2016. 60 pp. + appendices. Available online at:
http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/document/anlist2016.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Trombulak, S.C. and C.A. Frissell. 2000. Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and
Aquatic Communities. Conservation Biology 14(1): 18-30.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Census 2010 Summary File 1. Population, Housing Units, Area, and Density:
2010 County County Subdivision and Place (GCT-PH1). Retrieved from:
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2013. 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Demographic
and Housing Estimates. Retrieved from: http://factfinder2.census.gov

U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. Estimates of Resident Population Change and Rankings: July 1, 2013 to July
1, 2014. 2014 Population Estimates. Available online at http://www.census.gov/.

U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2014. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Third National
Climate Assessment. Available online at: http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Travel Association. 2014a. The Economic Impact of Domestic Travel on Virginia Counties 2013.
Available online at
https://www.vatc.org/uploadedFiles/Research/2013EconomicImpactofDomesticTravelonVirginia
andLocalities.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Travel Association. 2014b. The Economics Impact of Travel on North Carolina Counties 2013.
Available online at
http://www.nccommerce.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2vuxET_5uHA%3d&tabid=1586&mid=
4665. Accessed December 2016.

USA Fire & Rescue. 2014. Available online at http://www.usafireandrescue.com. Accessed December
2016.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg Massachusetts.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2015. Meeting notes dated December 11, between Atlantic Coast Pipeline
(K. Beatty) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (J. Manning).

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2016. About Easements. Available online at

http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Navigation/Easements.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

USACOPS. 2013. Available online at http://www.usacops.com. Accessed December 2016.

X-30
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2016a. What is a Specialty Crop? Available online at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/scbgp/specialty-crop. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2016b. Organic Agriculture. Available online at

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=organic-
agriculture.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2016c. FAQ: Becoming a Certified Operation. Available online at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/organic-certification/faq-becoming-certified. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1994. Hydrological Units Maps: United States Geological Survey Water-Supply
Paper 2294. Available online at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/wsp2294/pdf/wsp_2294_a.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey, 1996, Debris-Flow Hazards in the Blue Ridge of Virginia, U.S. Geological
Survey Fact Sheet-159-96.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1997a. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Segment 11: Delaware, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, HA 730-L. Appalachian Plateaus
Aquifers. Available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_l/L-text1.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1997b. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Segment 11: Delaware, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, HA 730-L. Valley and Ridge
Aquifers. Available online at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_l/L-text5.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1997c. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Segment 11: Delaware, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, HA 730-L. Piedmont and Blue
Ridge Aquifers. Available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_l/L-text4.html. Accessed
December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1997d. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Segment 11: Delaware, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, HA 730-L. Northern Atlantic
Coastal Plain Aquifer System. Available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_l/L-
text3.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1997e. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Segment 11: Delaware, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, HA 730-L. Regional Summary by
Henry Trapp, JR and Marilee A. Horn. Available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_l/L-
text1.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1999a. Ground Water Atlas of U.S. Introduction and National Summary.
Sandstone Aquifers. Written by James Miller. Available online at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_a/A-text4.html. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 1999b. Ground Water Atlas of U.S.Introduction and National Summary.
Carbonate-rock Aquifers. Written by James Miller. Available online at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/ch_a/A-text5.html. Accessed December 2016.

X-31
U.S. Geological Survey. 2003. Principal Aquifers of 48 Conterminous United States, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands. Digital Data Version 1.0. Reston, Virginia. Available
at: https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/aquifers_us.xml. Accessed December
2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2006. Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States. Available online
at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2008. U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program. Online:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2013. 2011 Minerals Yearbook: Statistical Summary. July 2013 (Revised
December 2015). Available online:
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/statistical_summary/myb1-2011-stati.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2013b. LANDFIRE Existing Vegetation Type layer. (2013, June last update).
Available online at: http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer. Accessed December 2016.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2014. Mineral Resources On-Line Spatial Data. Geology by state. Available
online: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/map.html. Accessed September 2015.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2015. Mineral Resource Data System. Available at:
http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mrds/. Accessed January 2015.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2016. Map of the Principal Aquifers of the United States. Available online at:
http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/aquifer/map.html. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 2016. Century Farms. Available online at
http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/conservation-and-environmental-virginia-century-farms.shtml.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation and Virginia Department of Game and Inland
Fisheries. 2013. Atlas of Rare Butterflies, Skippers, Moths, Dragonflies, and Damselflies of
Virginia. Available online at: www.vararespecies.org. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. 2016. Natural Heritage Conservation Sites.
Available at: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/land-conservation/tools02c. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. 2016b. Letter from VDCR to NRG regarding DCR-
DNH review of natural heritage resources within the ACP Rev 10 Alignment and Associated
Infrastructure. Dated March 31, 2016.

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. 2016c. Virginia Byways. Available online at
http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/recreational-planning/sr-ivb. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. 2016d. What Scenic River Designation Does.
Available online at
http://townhall.virginia.gov/l/GetFile.cfm?File=C:%5CTownHall%5Cdocroot%5CGuidanceDocs
%5C199%5CGDoc_DCR_2691_v8.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

X-32
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 1992. Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook
(Third edition). Available online at:
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/StormwaterManagement/Publications/ESCHandbo
ok.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2014a. Commonwealth of Virginia Groundwater

Management Areas (GWMA). Available online at: http://www.deq.
virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/GroundwaterPermitting/Virginia%20GWMA%20Map_effecti
ve_10114.jpg. Accessed February 2015.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2014b. Virginia Environmental GIS (VEGIS). Available
online at: http://www.deq.virginia.gov/ConnectWithDEQ/VEGIS/VEGISDatasets.aspx. Accessed
December 2016.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2015. Final 2012 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality
Assessment Integrated Report; GIS Data. Available online at: http://www.deq.virginia.
gov/Programs/Water/WaterQualityInformationTMDLs/WaterQualityAssessments/2012305(b)30
3(d)IntegratedReport.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2015. A Report to The Honorable Terence R. McAuliffe,
Governor and The General Assembly of Virginia. Status of Virginias Water Resources.
Available online at
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/WaterSupplyPlanning/AWRR_092915.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2016a. What is the Virginia Coastal Zone Management
Program? Available online at
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/CoastalZoneManagement/DescriptionBoundary.aspx.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2016b. Telephone communication dated October 31 and
November 1 between D. Grimes (VDEQ Volutary Remediation Program [VRP] Project
Manager), M. Anderson (Brownfield and VDEQ VRP Program Manager), and M. Tyler (Atlantic
representative).

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2011a. Cold Water Stream Survey (CWSS) - trout
streams (GIS data). Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, VA.
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/gis/data/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2011b. Canebrake Rattlesnake Conservation Plan.
Bureau of Wildlife Resources. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond,
VA. 25 pp. Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wp-content/uploads/canebrake-
rattlesnake-conservation-plan.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2015a. Virginias 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.
Prepared by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, 7870 Villa Park Dr., Ste.
400, Henrico, VA 23228. August 20, 2015. Available online at: http://bewildvirginia.org/wildlife-
action-plan/. Accessed December 2016.

X-33
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2015b. Meeting notes dated November 9, between
representatives of Atlantic Coast Pipeline and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland
Fisheries. FERC Accession 20151215-5252.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016a. VDGIF Time of Year Restrictions (TOYR)
Table. Updated April 1, 2016. Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wp-
content/uploads/VDGIF-Time-of-Year-Restrictions-Table.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016b. Fish and Wildlife information Service.
Available online at: www.vafwis.org/fwis/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016c. Virginia big-eared bat (Corynorhinus
townsendii virginianus). Available online at
https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/virginia-big-eared-bat/. Accessed December
2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016d. Letter to Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Regarding Atlantic Coast Pipeline Rev 10a Corridor Review ESS Log#34825. June 1, 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016e. Wildlife Management Areas. Available online
at http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wma/?pid=28. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016f. Freshwater Fish Regulations. Available online
at https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/fishing/regulations/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016g. Hunting and Trapping in Virginia: July 2016-
June 2017. Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016-2017-
virginia-hunting-and-trapping-regulations-digest.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016h. White-Nose Syndrome in Virginia, DGIF
Revision to the Closed Cave Policy on Agency Lands. Available online at
https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/bats/white-nose-syndrome/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016i. James River WMA. Available online at
http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wma/james-river/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016j. Horsepen Lake WMA. Available online at
http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wma/horsepen-lake/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016k. Cow Knob Salamander (Plethodon punctatus).
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/cow-knob-salamander/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016l. Allegheny woodrat (Neotoma magister).
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/allegheny-woodrat/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016m. Eastern Tiger Salamander (Amybstoma
tigrinum tigrinum). Available online at:
https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/eastern-tiger-salamander/. Accessed
December 2016.

X-34
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016n. Eastern pipistrelle (Pipistrellus subflavus
subflavus). Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/eastern-
pipistrelle/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016o. American water shrew (Sorex palustris).
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/american-water-shrew/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016p. Barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa). Available
online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/barking-treefrog/. Accessed
December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016q. Mabees Salamander (Amybstoma mabeei).
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/mabees-salamander/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 2016r. Dwarf waterdog (Necturus punctatus).
Available online at: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/information/dwarf-waterdog/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 2016. Board meeting minutes accessed September 12, 2016.
Available online at: http://dhr.virginia.gov/registers/SRB_Minutes_05-04-16_FINAL.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy. 2015. Mineral Mining Interactive GIS Map.
Available online: http://dmme.virginia.gov/webmaps/DMM/. Accessed March 2016.

Virginia Department of Forestry. 2011. Virginias Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality
(4th edition). Available online at: http://dof.virginia.gov/infopubs/BMP-Technical-
Guide_pub.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Forestry. 2016. Virginia Forest Facts. Available online at

http://www.dof.virginia.gov/stateforest/facts/forest-facts.htm. Accessed June 2016.

Virginia Department of Transportation. 2011. Utility Manual of Instructions, Utility Relocation Policies
& Procedures. 10th Edition. January. Available at:
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/right_of_way/utility_manual02132012_techrev.pd
f. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Transportation, 2014. Average Daily Traffic Volumes with Vehicle Classification
Data on Interstate, Arterial and Primary Routes. Available online at
http://www.virginiadot.org/info/2014_traffic_data.asp. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Transportation. 2016a. Printable Map. Available online at

http://www.virginiadot.org/programs/prog-byways-map-printable.asp. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Transportation. 2016b. Welcome to Bicycling in Virginia brochure. Available

online at http://www.virginiadot.org/programs/resources/vdotbikebase.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

X-35
Virginia Botanical Associates. 2016. Digital Atlas of the Virginia Flora. http://vaplantatlas.org/.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Cave Board. 2015. Karst Assessment Standard Practice. 9 p. Available at:
http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/document/karst-assessment-guidelines.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Department of Fire Programs. 2014. Active Primary/Fire Administration Fire Departments By
Locality, Virginia. Available online at
http://www.vafire.com/fire_data_statistics/fire_departments/Active%20Primary%20Fire%20Adm
in%20Fire%20Departments%20By%20Locality%20Final%20Report%20Updated%2004-22-
15.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources. 1993. Geologic Map of Virginia. Scale 1:500,000.

Virginia National Guard. 2015. Army Compatible Use Buffer. Available online at
http://vko.va.ngb.army.mil/VirginiaGuard/environmental/ACUB.html. Accessed December
2016.

Virginia National Guard. 2016. The Official Page of Fort Pickett Maneuver Training Center. Available at:
http://vko.va.ngb.army.mil/fortpickett/. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Speleological Survey. 2016a. Virginia Cave Statistics. Available online at

http://www.virginiacaves.org/va-cave-stats. Accessed May 2016.

Virginia Speleological Survey. 2016b. VSS Project Areas. Available online at

http://www.virginiacaves.org/project-areas. Accessed December 2016.

Virginia Outdoors Foundation. 2015. Letter dated February 10, from M. Little (VOF) to W. Scarpinato,
Jr. (Dominion Resources Services, Inc.).

Virginia Outdoors Foundation. 2016. Mission and History; Land Stewardship; How We Work; and
Changes That Affect Your Easement. Available online at
http://www.virginiaoutdoorsfoundation.org/. Accessed December 2016.

Wallace, J.B. 1990. Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance. Environmental
Management 14: 605-620.

Washington and Jefferson College. 2014. Navigating Shale Gas Development, A Workbook for Local
Government Offices in Pennsylvania.

Ward Burton Wildlife Foundation, Hawthorne & Hawthorne, and ACP. 2016. Meeting notes dated
January 27, between Atlantic Coast Pipeline representatives, Ward Burton Wildlife Foundation,
and Hawthorne & Hawthorne, P.C.

The Ward Burton Wildlife Foundation. 2016. Army Compatible Use Buffer. Available online at
http://www.twbwf.org/acub?ActionID=8&ProgramID=1. December 2016.

Weary, D.J. and D.H. Doctor. 2014. Karst in the United States: A Digital Map Compilation and
Database, USGS Open-File Report 2014-1156, 23 p. Accessed at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1156/. Accessed December 2016.

X-36
West Virginia Department of Military Affairs & Public Safety. 2015. WV Hospitals by Region & County.
Available online at
http://www.dmaps.wv.gov/exercises/Documents/WV%20Hospitals%20by%20County-
Region.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Fire & EMS Department Directory. 2015. Available online at
http://www.wvfirefighters.com/directory.htm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Natural Heritage Program. 2015. Geographic Information System (GIS) data. West
Virginia Department of Natural Resources, Elkins, West Virginia. Data use agreement between
ERM (NRG) and WVDNR dated March 11, 2015.

West Virginia Scenic Trails Association, Inc. 2016. Home Page. Available online at
http://wvscenictrails.org/. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia, Wild and Wonderful. 2016. Fall Foliage Driving Tours, Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike.
Available online at http://www.wvbyways.com/default.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia State Parks and Forests. 2016. Seneca State Forest brochure. Available online at
http://www.wvstateparks.com/Brochures/SenecaStateForestBrochure.pdf. Accessed December
2016.

West Virginia State Parks and Forests. 2016a. Seneca State Forest. Available online at
http://www.senecastateforest.com/. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia State Parks and Forests. 2016b. Seneca State Forest Map, Forest Map and Trails. Available
online at http://www.senecastateforest.com/senecamap.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia State Parks. 2016b. Kumbrarow State Forest. Available online at:
http://www.kumbrabow.com/. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia State Parks. 2016c. Greenbrier River Trail. Available online at
http://www.greenbrierrailtrailstatepark.com/. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia State Parks. 2016d. North Bend Rail Trail. Available online at
http://www.northbendrailtrailstatepark.com/. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 1996. Mining - Abandoned Mine Lands (GIS
data). Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation. Available online at:
http://wvgis.wvu.edu/data/dataset.php?ID=150. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2005. Groundwater Protection Program,

Sinkhole Mitigation Guidance. Division of Water and Waste Management. August 8, 2005.
Available online at:
http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/gw/Documents/9026_Sinkhole_Mitigation_Guidance_
Document_A2005.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2006. Erosion and Sediment Control Best
Management Practice Manual. Division of Water and Waste Management. Revised August 29,
2016. Available online at:

X-37
 http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/stormwater/csw/Documents/E%20and%20S_BMP_200
6.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2012 West Virginia Integrated Water Quality
Monitoring and Assessment Report. US EPA approved. Available online at:
http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/IR/Pages/303d_305b.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2013. Solid Waste Facilities Permitting:
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Available online at http://www.dep.wv.
gov/wwe/permit/solidwaste/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2014a. Well Location Data as of 6/4/2014.
Available online: http://www.dep.wv.gov/oil-and-gas/databaseinfo/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed
September 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2014b. Leaking Tank Program: Database of all
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites. Available online at
http://www.dep.wv.gov/dlr/oer/lustmain/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed November 2014.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2014c. Reporting Services: Bureau of

Environmental Cleanup and Brownfields Regulated Storage Tank Cleanup Incidents. Available
at: http://www.depreportingservices.state.pa.us/ReportServer/Pages/
ReportViewer.aspx?/Cleanup/Tank_Cleanup_Incidents. Accessed November 2014.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2014d. 2012 GIS Shapefiles

(WV2012_ImpairedStreams_24KNHD_20140131.sph). Available online at:
http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/watershed/IR/Pages/303d_305b.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2015. Annual Progress Report to the WV Joint
Legislative Oversight Commission on State Water Resources. Water Use Section. October 18,
2015. Available online at
http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/wateruse/Documents/2015%20Annual%20Report.pdf. Accessed
December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. Undated(a). Mining - Permit Boundaries (GIS
data). Division of Mining and Reclamation. Available online at:
http://wvgis.wvu.edu/data/dataset.php?ID=149. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. Undated(b). Mining - Underground Mining

Limits (GIS data). Division of Mining and Reclamation. Available online at:
http://wvgis.wvu.edu/data/dataset.php?ID=142. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2003a. Source Water Assessment and
Protection Program, Source Water Assessment Report, Buckhannon Water Board, Upshur
County. PWSID: WV3304902. Available online at: http://www.wvdhhr
.org/oehs/eed/swap/search.cfm. Accessed February 2015.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2003b. Source Water Assessment and
Protection Program, Source Water Assessment Report, Grand Badger Community Hawthorne,
Upshur County. PWSID: WV3304910. Available online at: http://www.
wvdhhr.org/oehs/eed/swap/search.cfm. Accessed February 2015.

X-38
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2003c. Source Water Assessment and
Protection Program, Source Water Assessment Report, Huttonsville Medium Security Prison,
Randolph County. PWSID: WV3304205. Available online at:
http://www.wvdhhr.org/oehs/eed/swap/search.cfm. Accessed February 2015.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2003d. Source Water Assessment and
Protection Program, Source Water Assessment Report, Mill Creek Water Department, Randolph
County. PWSID: WV3304209. Available online at:
http://www.wvdhhr.org/oehs/eed/swap/search.cfm. Accessed February 2015.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2003e. Source Water Assessment and
Protection Program, Source Water Assessment Report, Pine Grove Water Works, Wetzel County.
PWSID: WV3305205. Available online at: http://www.wvdhhr.org/oehs/eed/swap/search.cfm.
Accessed February 2015.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2015a. Correspondence letter from the
Bureau for Public Health, Office of Environmental Health Services in response to an
informational request dated November 11, 2014 concerning source water data. Letter dated
January 21, 2015.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2015b. Email dated August 21, 2015 from B.
Woods (WVDHHR) to H. Berman (NRG) containing shapefiles summarizing Source Water
Protection Areas, Source Water Intakes, water protection areas, and Wellhead Protection Areas
within 3 miles of the SHP and ACP.

West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2016. Data for active Wellhead Protection
Areas received by Merjent, Inc. from WVDHHR on October 24, 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2003. Rare, Threatened And Endangered Species [web
application]. WVDNR, Wildlife Diversity Program and Natural Heritage Program. Available
http://www.wvdnr.gov/Wildlife/Endangered.shtm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2005. Wildlife Diversity Notebook: Cheat Mountain
Salamander. Available online at:
http://www.wvdnr.gov/wildlife/magazine/archive/05Summer/wildlife_diversity_salamander.shtm.
Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2006a. Wildlife Diversity Notebook: Virginia big-eared
bat. Available online at: http://www.wvdnr.gov/wildlife/magazine/Archive/06fall/VaBEB.pdf.
Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2006b. Snakes of West Virginia. WVDNR, Wildlife
Resources Section, Wildlife Diversity Program. Available online at:
http://www.wvdnr.gov/Publications/PDFFiles/SnakesofWV05.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2012. Memo dated March 20, WV Cave Closures to Protect
Bats.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2015a. 2015 West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan.
Raleigh, NC. Available online at:

X-39
 http://www.wvdnr.gov/2015%20West%20Virginia%20State%20Wildlife%20Action%20Plan%2
0Submittal.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2015c. West Virginia Terrestrial Habitat Map. Elkins, WV.
Available online at: http://wvgis.wvu.edu/data/dataset.php?ID=465. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2016a. WVDNR, Fishing Home. Available online at
http://www.wvdnr.gov/fishing/Fishing_regs.shtm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2016b. Hunting in West Virginia. Available online at
http://www.wvdnr.gov/hunting/hunting.shtm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. 2016c. District 1, Wildlife Management Areas. Available
online at http://www.wvdnr.gov/hunting/D1WMAareas.shtm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Forestry. 2010. Strategic Plan for the Sustainability of West Virginia Forests
on 12 Major Topics Relevant to the Sustainable Management of West Virginia Forests. Prepared
at the Request of the West Virginia Forest Management Review Commission from 67 Land
Management Professionals & Specialists throughout West Virginia. Available online at
http://www.wvforestry.com/10DOF_112_FMRC_report_lores.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Forestry. 2013. Guidelines for Managing West Virginias Seven State Forests.
Available online at http://www.wvforestry.com/guideline.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Division of Forestry. 2016. About Seneca State Forest. Available online at
http://www.wvforestry.com/senecastateforest.cfm. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Transportation. 2007. Accommodation of Utilities on Highway Right of

Way and Adjustment and Relocation of Utility Facilities on Highway Projects. Railroads and
Utilities Unit, Division of Highways, June. Available at:
http://www.transportation.wv.gov/highways/engineering/files/ACCOMMODATION_OF_UTILI
TIES.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Department of Transportation. 2013. I-79 Charleston to Pennsylvania State Line. Available
online at
http://www.transportation.wv.gov/highways/programplanning/preliminary_engineering/traffic_an
alysis/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed December 2016.

West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey. 2015. Coal Bed Mapping Project. Available online at
http://www.wvgs.wvnet.edu/www/coal/cbmp/coalims.html. Accessed December 2016.

Wheeler, R.I. 2005. Known or Suggested Quaternary Tectonic Faulting, Central and Eastern United
States New and Updated Assessments for 2005, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
2005-1336, 37 pages.

Wieczorek, G.F., Marrison, R.W., Morgan, B., Weems, R.E., and Obermeier, S.F. 2004. Detection of
faults and fault traces in the Shenandoah Valley, Virginia using LiDAR imagery: Geological
Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 36, n. 2, p.120.

Wooten, R.M., Gillon, K.A., Douglas, T.J., Witt, A.C., Bauer, J.B., & Fuemmeler, S.J. 2009. Report on
the Bear Trail debris fl ow of January 7, 2009. North Carolina Geological Survey Report of

X-40
 investigation to Haywood County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Officer.Raleigh: North
Carolina Geological Survey.

Wooten, R.M., Cattanach, B.L., Bozdog, G.N., & Bullard, A.R. 2014. The North Carolina Geological
Surveys response to landslide events in 2012 and 2013 in the Blue Ridge Mountains of western
North Carolina: Using a geodatabase, LiDAR and ortho-imagery in a geographic information
system to augment field investigations and map production. In Abstract with programs (p. 23):
Geological Society of America Southeast Sect 46, Blacksburg. Boulder: Geological Society of
America.

Wooten, R.M., Witt, A.C., Miniat, C.F., Hales, T.C., Aldred, J.A. 2015. Frequency and Magnitude of
Selected Historical Landslide Events in the Southern Appalachian Highlands of North Carolina
and Virginia: Relationships to Rainfall, Geological and Ecohydrological Controls, and Effects, In:
Natural Disturbances and Historic Range of Variation: Type, Frequency, Severity, and Post-
disturbance Structure in Central Hardwood Forests USA (Greenberg, C.H. and Collins, B.S. eds),
pp 203-262.

Xu, J., S.L. Murphy, K.D., Kochanek, and B.A. Bastian. 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume
64, Number 2 (Table 10: Number of deaths from 113 selected causes). U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for
Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. Available online at:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf. Accessed December 2016.

Yellowbook. 2016. Online search by county/city conducted at http://www.yp.com.

Yelverton, J.T., D.R. Richmond, W. Hicks, H. Saunders, and E.R. Fletcher. 1975. The relationship
between fish size and their response to underwater blast. Lovelace Foundation for Medical
Education and Research Topical Report, DNA 3677T, Albuquerque, NM. Prepared for the
Defense Nuclear Agency.

X-41
 APPENDIX Y

LIST OF PREPARERS
 Appendix Y

List of Preparers

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Bowman, Kevin Environmental Project Manager

B.S., Chemistry, McDaniel College, 2010
B.S., Environmental Policy and Science, McDaniel College, 2009

Fernandez Johnson, Gertrude Deputy Project Manager

B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2003

Armbruster, Ellen Cultural Resources

M.A., Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, 1986
B.A., Anthropology, Bryn Mawr College, 1979

Fox-Fernandez, Nancy Vegetation; Wildlife; Aquatic Resources; Special Status Species

M.S., Natural Resources: Wildlife, Humboldt State University, 2006
B.A., Psychology, Skidmore College, 1993

Glaze, James Geology; Soils

B.S., Geology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, 1975

Kopka, Robert Soils

M.S., Soil Science, Cornell University, 1990
B.S., Agronomy, Delaware Valley College of Science and Agriculture, 1987

Rana, Anthony Geology; Groundwater

M.S., International Development, Tulane University, 2012
Graduate Studies, Hydrogeology and Geochemistry, Oklahoma State University, 1988
B.S., Geology, New Jersey City University, 1984

Merjent, Inc.

Mackenthun, Jeff Project Manager, Project Description; Alternatives

B.S., Environmental Studies, Bemidji State University, 1997

Lenz, Kristin Deputy Project Manager, Vegetation; Wildlife; Aquatic Resources; Special Status
Species
B.A., Environmental Studies, Biology emphasis, Alaska Pacific University, 2003

Rice, Zeke Deputy Project Manager, Introduction; Reliability and Safety

B.A., Anthropology/Archaeology and Sociology, Hamline University, 1992

Anderson, Chad Wetlands

M.S., Water Resources Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 2008

Beard, Scott Reliability and Safety

B.S., Chemical Engineering, University of Minnesota-Duluth, 2010

Y-1
Boden, Dr. Peggy J. Cultural Resources
Ph.D., Near Eastern Studies, John Hopkins University, 1999
M.S., Near Eastern Studies, John Hopkins University, 1999
B.A., Anthropology/Near Eastern Studies, University of Minnesota, 1987

Dozier, Jessica Air Quality and Noise

M.S. Candidate, Energy Policy and Climate, Johns Hopkins University, 2015
B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Clark Atlanta University, 2006

Galer, Bruce Geology

B.A., Geology, University of Minnesota, Morris, 1991

Getty, Allison Visual Resources

M.A., Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Ball State University, 2004
B.S., Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Ball State University, 2001

Hansen, Shannon Vegetation; Wildlife; Aquatic Resources

B.S., Natural Resources & Environmental Studies, Forest Resources and Recreation, College of
Natural Resources, University of Minnesota, 1999
Graduate Studies in GIS, St. Marys University of Minnesota, 2007-2013

Hartzheim, Paul Surface Waters

M.S., Water Resources Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 2012
B.S., Environmental Science (Hydrology Emphasis), University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 2003

Jessen, Kim Land Use, Special Interest Areas, and Visual Resources; Cumulative Impacts
B.A., Anthropology/Archaeology, Moorhead State University, 1994

Mize, Kate Soils

B.S., Environmental Science, Land Use Management and Soils Areas of Emphasis, University of
Minnesota, 2004

Richards, Diana Technical Editor

B.A., English, Saint Olaf College, 2005

Sampson, Andrea Special Status Species (Federal)

M.S., Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2013
B.A., Environmental Studies, University of St. Thomas, 1996

Seaberg, John Karst; Groundwater

M.S., Geology (hydrogeology emphasis, Civil Engineering minor), University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, 1985
B.S., Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1980

Sherry, Nicole GIS Support

B.S., Geography (Professional), History, Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2012

Shields, Mitch Water Resources

Master of Civil Engineering, Environmental Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1989
B.S., Biology, Winona State University, 1985

Y-2
Solberg, Kyle GIS Support
B.S., Geography (Resource Management), University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, 2004

Tewinkel, Leslie Special Status Species (Federal)

Ph.D., Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1998
M.S., Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 1991
B.S., Biology, Calvin College, 1989

Warner, Casey Socioeconomics

Masters of Urban and Regional Planning, Virginia Tech 2005
B.A., Urban and Community Studies, University of Connecticut 2003

Merjent, Inc. is a third party contractor assisting the Commission staff in reviewing the
environmental aspects of the project application and preparing the environmental documents
required by NEPA. Third party contractors are selected by Commission staff and funded by
project applicants. Per the procedures in 40 CFR 1506.5(c), third party contractors execute a
disclosure statement specifying that they have no financial or other conflicting interest in the
outcome of the project. Third party contractors are required to self-report any changes in
financial situation and to refresh their disclosure statements annually. The Commission staff
solely directs the scope, content, quality, and schedule of the contractor's work. The
Commission staff independently evaluates the results of the third-party contractors work and
the Commission, through its staff, bears ultimate responsibility for full compliance with the
requirements of NEPA.

Y-3
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Routing Code PJ 11.4
Washington, DC 20426

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use