ISYS2101- Software Engineering Project Management

MIET2407 Engineering Management

Presentation and Document Rating Form
Assessment of students projects is divided in individual and group grade. Each student will receive corresponding points based on the
weighted value seen in the table. Each criterion should have a result of 100 as computed average from the panel.

Project Title

PART A. GROUP PRESENTATION

Weight
Criteria Points
(%)
1. The sequence of topics discussed was logically organized. 25
2. The group has equally distributed the presentation tasks among the
10
members of the team.
3. The transition between speakers was smooth and orderly. 10
4. The group used the right amount of audio-visual materials. 10
5. The font and graphics used were large enough to be seen by the entire
15
audience.
6. The materials discussed were consistent with the contents of the project
15
documentation and the user manual. Good referencing.
7. Responses to questions. 15
TOTAL 100

PART B: INDIVIDUAL GRADE

Weight PROPONENTS
CRITERIA
(%) 1 2 3 4 5
1. The presenter is knowledgeable of the
materials/matter he/she discussed: Introduction 25
(clear Aim Stated) & Conclusion.
2. The presenter maintained the proper posture in
10
delivering his/her presentation.
3. The presenter maintained a comfortable and
10
reasonable pace during his/her delivery.
4. The presenters voice was well-modulated and
10
can be heard throughout the room.
5. The presenter is enthusiastic. 10
6. The presenter is neatly groomed and properly
10
attired.
7. The presenter avoided unnecessary activity/action
10
that may catch the audiences attention.
8. The presenter answered questions directly and did
15
not digress from the focus of the query.
TOTAL 100

TOTAL GRADE GAINED BY THE GROUP (PRESENTATION) (15%)

GRADES AVERAGE
PART A PART B (PART A + PART B) / 2
PART C: DOCUMENTATION
Weight POINT
Criteria
(%) S
The project proposal convince the reader that the group have competence to
10
complete the work
Statement of the problem
a. The introduction provide a general overview of the issues
5
surrounding the study
b. The review based on current and demonstrate of work in the area 5
c. Used evidence to demonstrate the significance of the problem 5
d. The problem under investigation clearly stated 5
Objectives
a. The objectives develop a specific focus for the study 5
b. The objectives support the problem statement and background
5
sections
Project Implementation and Management
a. Clearly describe the overall results that the project expected to
10
accomplish
b. Clearly describe how the project will be carried out in the planned
10
activities
c. Clearly describe who are expected to benefit from the project 10
d. Clearly describe the key elements involved in the implementation
10
process. (e.g. equipment, materials, resources)
e. Clearly describe the procedure or process to be applied in obtaining
10
the expected outcome.
f. Clearly describe the estimated project cost to develop 10
TOTAL 100

PART D: RESUME
Highlight the qualification for the team project 50
Demonstrate professional formatting 50
TOTAL 100

TOTAL GRADE GAINED BY THE GROUP (Documentation) (15%)

GRADES AVERAGE
PART C PART D (PART C (10%) + PART D (5%))

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________
Panel