Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Regulatory pressure
To achieve discharge limits for priority
substances and 120ppm COD in the EU and
50ppm in China
Wastewater discharge cost
Need to consider different wastewater
treatment options including on-site treatment
and water reuse
Corporate Social Responsibility John Loo
Not applicable
Water Management Strategy
Baseline
Minimise
Recycle
Reuse
Treat
Locally for recovery
End of pipe for recovery or disposal
Contaminants in Wastewater
Crop irrigation Product washing and Freshwater as an Drinking and cooling Freshwater as an
Drinking and cooling moving ingredient water for livestock ingredient
water for livestock Cooling water Product washing Cleaning and Product washing
Cleaning and Boiler water Cooling water disinfection Cooling water
disinfection Air conditioning Boiler water Boiler water Boiler water
Air conditioning of Cleaning and Cleaning processing Cleaning and
livestock facilities disinfection equipment disinfection
Air conditioning Air conditioning Air conditioning
Hard to treat waste Hard to treat waste Hard to treat waste Hard to treat waste Hard to treat waste
Fertilizers pesticides Fertilizer pesticides Fertilizers pesticides Manure containing Residual chlorine
pathogenic organisms herbicides pathogenic organisms antibiotics and arsenic Pesticides
organic sugars Pathogenic organisms Cleaning chemicals
Chlorine residue Flavourants
Sucrose
Reference CERES Report May 2015 Feeding Ourselves Thirsty
Typical Treatment Options
High
Trucking End Treatment
Temperature
Waste Plant
Incineration
Discharge
Waste On site
1 Primary 2 Secondary 3 Tertiary
Stream treatment
Water
Reuse
Discharge
Need for On-site Treatment
Regulation
Onsite pre-treatment will improve the quality of wastewater being discharged and
may be required by local authorities through permit restrictions
On-site Treatment
2 Secondary
Aerobic Process
Activated Sludge
Sequential Batch
2 Secondary 3 Tertiary
1 Primary Anaerobic Process Advanced Oxidation
Suspended Anaerobic Sand Filtration
On site
Solids Digestion Micro Strainer
treatment
Dissolved Air UASB Micro Filtration
Flotation GAC/UV
2 Secondary
MF/RO
MBR
2 Secondary
Physical/Chemical
Treatment
Poll Question 2
Do you use any of the following to treat your wastewater?
Ultraviolet (UV)
Biological processes
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC)
Advanced Oxidation
Membranes
Ozonation
Incineration
Discharge to sewer
Not applicable
Tertiary Wastewater Treatment
Ozone
Membrane Processes
By-product Creates by-products, which can would influence the amount of Ozone
formation sometimes be more problematic
dose required
Chemicals No chemicals used Ozone has the benefit of being
used
generated on-site when needed and
Waste streams None
produces less disinfection by-products
OPEX Expensive requires high O3 dose
$$ than chlorination
The cost of implementing and running
Footprint and Requires long retention times and
capital cost addition of GAC to protect against by-
an Ozone treatment can be deer with
product release resulting in large
footprint and capital cost.
special requirements needed for
operation
15
Activated Carbon
16
Membrane Processes
Treatment Issue:
Key Objective:
100
90
80
% Removal
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Carba- Benzo-a- Tributyl Tin
Diclofenac Cipro-floxacin Triclosan
mazepine pyrene Chloride
% Removal 82 92 100 99 86 99
Start Conc. (ppb) 2.5 5 6 80.7 2.9 9.83
Treatment Issue:
Key Objectives:
0.25
Metaldehyde at outlet (ppb)
Inlet conc.
0.2
0.15
Continuously Regenerated Media
Reg
Target effluent conc.
0.1 Non-Regenerated Media
Non Reg
0.05
0
0 10 20 30 40
Treatment time (h)
The Arvia ODC can take wastewater from out-of to within specification (0.1 ppb)